ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewSupplementary figure S4: (A) Western blot analysis was performed to...
Transcript of ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewSupplementary figure S4: (A) Western blot analysis was performed to...
Supplementary material and methodsDrugs and reagents
Bortezomib, Selleck Chemicals, Houston TX 77230 USA;
MPS, Synpeptide Co, Shanghai, China
MPS peptide sequences:
MPS peptide: KKKKKRFSFKKSFKLSGFSFKKNKK
Mutated MPS peptide: KKKKKRFDFKKDFKLDGFDFKKNKK
Antibodies for IP and Western blotting:
Anti-Marcks, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA
Anti-pMarcks, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA
Anti-bacline 1, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA
Anti-PUMA, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA
Anti-LC3B, Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Danvers, MA
Anti-GAPDH (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.
Danvers, MA
Anti-β-Actin, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, Missouri 63103 USA
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
Cells used for immunoprecipitation were re-suspended in pre-cooled modified Triton lysis buffer
(1% Triton X-100, 20mM Tris-HCl with pH 7.4, 2.5mM EDTA, 2.5mM ethylene glycol
tetraacetic acid, 140mM NaCl, 2 µM β-Me, 1 mM PMSF and cocktail inhibitors tablets (Roche))
and then incubated 30 min on ice. Protein extracts were harvest by centrifuging the cell lysate in
a refrigerated centrifuge and then incubated overnight at 4°C with indicated antibodies or
negative control IgG. Antibody-bonded target proteins were immunoprecipitated with protein G
beads and analyzed on 10-15% SDS-PAGE. The membranes were probed with indicated
antibodies and the bands were visualized using HRP-conjugated secondary antibody and ECL
substrate (Thermo).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA including miRNA was extracted using miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). cDNA was
synthesized by miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen), and applied to miRNA real time PCR using miScript
SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The expression of
mature miRNAs was calculated relative to SNORD72 and fold changes in miRNA treatments
relative to scrambled treatments were calculated by using the 2ΔΔCt algorithm. The mRNA
expression of target genes was determined by RT-qPCR for MM cell lines. Briefly, total RNA
was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA synthesis and quantitative RT-PCR
(qRT-PCR) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Biorad). Ct values
were extracted and after normalization to GAPDH and other housekeeping genes, fold changes
in gene expression were determined using the 2-ΔΔCt algorithm.
Gene silencing with transfection and transduction
MM cells were transiently transfected with either siMARCKS or a scrambled siRNA (Ambion)
using Lipo3000 Transfection Reagent (life) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Assays
were performed after 48 hrs incubation at 37℃ and 5% CO2. Transduction of MARCKS
silencing was accomplished using Lentiviral shRNA particles. 1.0×106/mL HEK 293T cells
were seeded in complete medium and were incubated 24hrs at 37℃ and 5% CO2. Then cells
were transfected with packaging plasmids (pMDlg/pRSV/pMD2) and either shMARCKS or
scrambled shRNAs coded plasmids by using Lipo3000 Transfection Reagent according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were continuously incubated for 48 hours and the medium
containing virus particles was harvested and filtrated with 0.45 µm filters (Millipore) if the
florescence signals of the cell are visible. To transduction the MM cells, 5.0×106 MM cells were
re-suspended in 3 mL lentivirus particles containing medium with 8 μg/mL PolyBrene®, and
then centrifuged for 2hrs at 3200 rpm. Re-suspended the cells carefully with fresh RPMI 1640
medium and further incubated 48 hrs to check the florescence signals. Cells constantly
expressing the shRNA-coding genes were screened with RPMI 1640 medium containing 2.0
μg/mL puromycin and maintained in culture with selection media until use.
Cell viability and apoptosis assay
Cell viability was assessed by MTS colorimetric assay. MM cell lines or PBMCs obtained from
healthy donors were seeded in 96-well plates in 100-μL complete medium at a density of 2.0 ×
104 cells per well. MM cells were incubated at 37℃ and 5% CO2 with various concentrations of
indicated compounds or peptides for indicated periods. After the incubation, 10 µl of MTS (0.5
mg/mL) was added, and the cells were further incubated for an additional 3 hours away from
light at 37℃, followed by adding acidified isopropanol to each well. The absorbance was read
with a microplate reader set at a test wave length of 570 nm and a reference wavelength of 630
nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the mean value and SD were calculated.
Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the mean value and SD were calculated. To
examine apoptotic cell death, MM cells were treated with various concentrations of BTZ in
combination with miR-34a for 48 h followed by annexin V-FITC/PI staining for apoptosis
analysis in a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). Captured events were analyzed
using CellQuest software. The extent of apoptosis was quantified as percentage of annexin-V
positive cells, and the extent of drug-specific apoptosis was assessed by the formula: percentage
of annexin-V positive cells = (test - control) × 100/ (100 - control).
Acridine orange staining
Cells used for AO staining were seeded in 12-well plates and stained with 5 µg/mL acridine
orange for 15 min. Surplus acridine orange was washed by PBS and cells were observed under
fluorescence microscope following re-suspended in fresh complete medium.
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary figure S1: Targetscan analysis for MARCKS-3’UTR. (A) Schema of the
candidate miRNAs by different TargetScan algorithms. Each labelled circle represents one target
prediction algorithm with the number of its predicted miRNAs. The number of miRNAs,
predicted by two, is listed in overlapping area of circles. The 9 common miRNAs in two
different targetscan Algorithms with the highest target score presented in the figure. (B)
Correlation analysis of endogenous 8 miRNAs (other than miR-34a with high score for targeting
prediction Algorithms) with MARCKS expression in patient dataset (GSE70319) presented as
scatter plots. (C) The box whisker plot showing miR-34a and 8 miRNAs expression in
GSE17498 dataset (stage I (durie-salmon): n=9, stage II (durie-salmon): n=9 and stage III (durie-
salmon): n=12). (D) GSEA analysis of an enrichment the miR-34a target genes in MM patients
who display a high level of MARCKS expression in two MM datasets (GSE2658 and
GSE17306). (E) The 8226R5 and MM.1R transduced cells with miR-34a or scramble control
lenti vectors were treated with 10 nM BTZ or vehicle for 48h. Then the cells were stained with
annexin-V/propidium iodide and analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of
apoptotic cells. The percentage of double positive cells indicated in each dot plot as a
representation of apoptosis. (F) The western blot analysis represents the MARCKS protein level
in RPMI-8226R5 and MM.1R transduced cell lines with shMARCKS or scramble control. (G)
The miR-34a level was assessed in the shMARCKS-transduced RPMI-8226R5 and MM.1R cells
with shMARCKS or scramble control by qPCR. The expression level was normalized to
SNORD72 gene. Results shown are mean±SEM.*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; and ***, P < 0.001 (n)
Supplementary figure S2: (A) whole cell lysate was prepared from pair MM cells and subjected
to WB. P-MARCKS expression was determined by western blot analysis in RPMI-8226 vs.
RPMI-8226R5 and MM.1S vs MM.1R cells, respectively. (B) The RPMI-8226R5 and MM.1R
shMARCKS -transduced cell lines were treated for 48 hrs with indicated concentrations of BTZ
and the cell viability was measured by MTT. (C) Median-effect plot of 48hrs MPS-bortezomib
co-treatment. Median effect was calculated by CompuSyn software. (D) The RPMI-8226R5 and
MM.1S cell lines were treated for 48 hrs with indicated concentrations of MPS and BTZ
following by measuring the cell viability by MTT.
Supplementary figure S3: (A) Tumors treated as above were analyzed by immunoblotting for
p-MARCKS, LC3B and GAPDH. (B) Representative Images of tumor tissues slides from five
treated mice groups.
Supplementary figure S4: (A) Western blot analysis was performed to determine the expression
levels MARCKS and p62 in multiple myeloma cell lines MM.1R treated with 40µM MPS or
Mut-MPS (left). Quantification of protein levels of MARCKS and p62 measured by Image J
(right). Data are means±Standard Error of Mean. *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, ***P≤0.001. (B)
Representative confocal images showing LC3B-positive vesicles in 8226R5 multiple myeloma
cells treated as indicated. LC3B expression is shown on the left panel. Middle panel is the
overlay of LC3B expression and DAPI staining (nuclear staining). Right panel shows the 3D
representations after deconvolution of the 488nm signal, which represents the LC3B expression.
(C) Quantification of the number of LC3B-positive vesicles in Fig. S4B after 3D deconvolution
of images (upper panel), and quantification of the number of LC3B-positive vesicles multiplied
by the volume of these vesicles after 3D deconvolution of images (lower panel). (D)
Representative images of acridine orange staining of shMARCKS -transduced RPMI-8226R5
and MM1R cell lines or control cells. (E) Western blot analysis was performed to determine the
phosphorylation level (T198) in MARCKS silenced MM cells. (F) Western blot analysis was
performed to check the LC3B and PUMA level in MM1.S and MM1.R cells after 24 hours MPS
or Mut-MPS treatment with indicated concentrations.
Supplementary figure S5: shMARCKS-transduced RPMI-8226R5 and MM1R cell lines or
control cells were treated with BTZ (5nM) and different indicated concentrations of CQ and the
cell viability was measured with MTT assay.
Supplementary figure S6: (A) The MM.1R and 8226R5 cells were treated with different
concentration of MPS or mut-MPS as a negative control for 24hrs and the level of PUMA was
assessed by western blot. (B, C) The protein lysate was prepared from shMARCKS -transduced
MM1R/RPMI-8226R5 cell lines or control cells and immunoprecipitated with either baclin-1 or
PUMA antibodies. The Input and IP samples were subjected to western blot by indicated
antibodies. Possessions of Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 by PUMA are dampened in 8226R5/MM1R cells
transfected with shRNA targeting MARCKS. Beclin-1 is released from Bcl-xL in MARCKS
silenced 8226R5 cells.
Table S1. Synergistic effects of CQ and BTZ co-treatment are more significant in MARCKS
silenced MM1R and 8226R5 resistant MM cell lines
CI Data for Non-Constant Combo on 8226R5 sc: C&B (CQ+BTZ)
CI Data for Non-Constant Combo on MM1.R sc: C&B (CQ+BTZ)
Dose BTZ (nM)
Dose CQ (µM)
Cell Viability %
CI Dose BTZ (nM)
Dose CQ (μM)
Cell Viability %
CI
5.0 40.0 43.61 0.7 7.5 40.0 19.36 0.71
5.0 60.0 41.9 0.72 7.5 60.0 16.92 0.81
5.0 80.0 37.19 0.65 7.5 80.0 16.26 0.95
CI Data for Non-Constant Combo on 8226R5 shMARCKS: C&B (CQ+BTZ)
CI Data for Non-Constant Combo on MM1.R shMARCKS: C&B (CQ+BTZ)
Dose BTZ (μM)
Dose CQ (μM )
Cell Viability %
CI Dose BTZ (μM)
Dose CQ (nM)
Cell Viability %
CI
5.0 40.0 37.57 0.57 7.5 40.0 19.36 0.64
5.0 60.0 29.11 0.38 7.5 60.0 16.92 0.72
5.0 80.0 25.92 0.33 7.5 80.0 16.26 0.85