ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the...

9
Supplementary information Fig. S 1. CAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all dimensions are in mm. Fig. S2. Schematic of the cross-flow filtration rig. 1 (a) (c) (b) Magnetic stirrer Feed tank Gear pump Pressure gauge Feed input Membrane module Retentate Valve Rotameter Permeate Volumetric flask Balance Computer 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 9 4 8 5 6 7 1 0

Transcript of ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the...

Page 1: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

Supplementary information

Fig. S 1. CAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the

distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all dimensions are in mm.

Fig. S2. Schematic of the cross-flow filtration rig.

1

(b)

(c)

(a)

10

7

6

5

8

4

9

3

12

11132

1

1. Magnetic stirrer 2. Feed tank3. Gear pump4. Pressure gauge5. Feed input6. Membrane

module7. Retentate 8. Valve 9. Rotameter 10. Permeate 11. Volumetric flask12. Balance 13. Computer

Page 2: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

Fig. S3. Calibration curve of oil in water emulsions measured using Turbidity meter (EUTECH TN-100, Thermo-Scientific).

Fig. S4. Flow streamlines, Re = 1000, (a) flat, (b) peak height = 0.125 µm, (c) peak height = 0.25 µm, (d) peak height = 0.5 µm. Eddies region was expanded with the increase of the peak height at constant velocity.

2

a b

c d

Page 3: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

Fig. S5. Oil in water emulsion (a) the permeate, (b) the feed before ultrafiltration process

3

Page 4: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

Table S1. Differences between literature review and this study Modification process Casting conditions Compaction Operating

conditionsOil in water

emulsionMembrane performance Ref.

rel. humidity

(%)

temp.

(ͦ C)

pressure

(bar)

time (min)

pressure (bar)

flowrate

(L/min)

oil con. (mg/L)

Type of oil

permeance

(LMH bar-1) FRR (%)

Oil rejection

(%)

pure water o/w emulsion

NMP Mixing with Hydrous manganese dioxide

(nanoparticles)

--- --- 1 30 1 --- 1000 Crude 573.2 ⁓ 100 75.4/ washing with pure

water

100 [44]

NMP Mixing with Cellulose acetate / polyethylene glycol

--- --- 4 --- 4 0.2 500 Kerosene 20.25 6.75 ----- 88 [45]

DMF Mixing with PEGMA and TFOA

--- --- 1.5 30 1 Dead end cell

900 Vacuum --- --- 99.8 / washing with pure

water

99.5 [38]

DMAc Mixing with SiO2-g-(PDMAEMA-co-PDMAPS)

nanoparticles

--- --- 1.6 60 1 Dead end cell

900 Engine 172.30 79.83 84.26/ washing with pure

water

100 [46]

DMAc zwitterionic polymers from a reactive amphiphilic copolymer additive

--- --- 2.5 30 2 Dead end cell

1500 --- 74.5 --- 99/ washing with pure

water

⁓ 100 [47]

DMAc Surface modification / corona air plasma

--- --- --- --- 1.5 --- 3000 Gas 108.46 37.86 --- 98.2 [34]

DMF Surface modification / corona plasma – assisted coating

TiO2 nanoparticles

--- --- --- --- 1.5 --- 3000 Gas 12.97 10.96 --- 99 [48]

Blending and surface coating by NaX zeolite and TiO2

nanoparticles

--- --- --- --- 1.5 3000 Gas --- 6.3 82.6/ washing with pure

water

99.1 [49]

DMF Mixing with Pluronic F127 --- --- 1.5 30 1 Dead end cell

900 Soybean --- 82.98 93.33 / after chemical washing

100 [11]

DMAc Wavy surface 30 19 – 21 1.5 90 - 120

1 1.4 2490 Sunflower 16 ± 0.46 3 ± 0.8 89 ± 2.7/ washing with

pure water

96 ± 3 this study

where: NMP: N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone and DMF: Dimethylformamide

4

Page 5: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

[1] D.S. Sholl, R.P. Lively, Seven chemical separations to change the world, in: Nature, 2016, pp. 435-437.[2] Y. Wei, H. Qi, X. Gong, S. Zhao, Specially Wettable Membranes for Oil–Water Separation, Advanced Materials Interfaces, 0 1800576.[3] H.J. Tanudjaja, V.V. Tarabara, A.G. Fane, J.W. Chew, Effect of cross-flow velocity, oil concentration and salinity on the critical flux of an oil-in-water emulsion in microfiltration, Journal of Membrane Science, 530 (2017) 11-19.[4] R. Moosai, R.A. Dawe, Gas attachment of oil droplets for gas flotation for oily wastewater cleanup, Separation and purification technology, 33 (2003) 303-314.[5] R. Mohammed, A. Bailey, P. Luckham, S. Taylor, Dewatering of crude oil emulsions 3. Emulsion resolution by chemical means, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 83 (1994) 261-271.[6] S. Maiti, I. Mishra, S. Bhattacharya, J. Joshi, Removal of oil from oil-in-water emulsion using a packed bed of commercial resin, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 389 (2011) 291-298.[7] M.-J. Um, S.-H. Yoon, C.-H. Lee, K.-Y. Chung, J.-J. Kim, Flux enhancement with gas injection in crossflow ultrafiltration of oily wastewater, Water research, 35 (2001) 4095-4101.[8] M. Padaki, R. Surya Murali, M.S. Abdullah, N. Misdan, A. Moslehyani, M.A. Kassim, N. Hilal, A.F. Ismail, Membrane technology enhancement in oil–water separation. A review, Desalination, 357 (2015) 197-207.[9] S. Kasemset, A. Lee, D.J. Miller, B.D. Freeman, M.M. Sharma, Effect of polydopamine deposition conditions on fouling resistance, physical properties, and permeation properties of reverse osmosis membranes in oil/water separation, Journal of Membrane Science, 425-426 (2013) 208-216.[10] I.W. Cumming, R.G. Holdich, I.D. Smith, The rejection of oil by microfiltration of a stabilised kerosene/water emulsion, Journal of Membrane Science, 169 (2000) 147-155.[11] W. Chen, J. Peng, Y. Su, L. Zheng, L. Wang, Z. Jiang, Separation of oil/water emulsion using Pluronic F127 modified polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes, Separation and Purification Technology, 66 (2009) 591-597.[12] S. Lee, Y. Aurelle, H. Roques, Concentration polarization, membrane fouling and cleaning in ultrafiltration of soluble oil, Journal of Membrane Science, 19 (1984) 23-38.[13] M. Hlavacek, Break-up of oil-in-water emulsions induced by permeation through a microfiltration membrane, Journal of membrane science, 102 (1995) 1-7.[14] R. Zolfaghari, A. Fakhru’l-Razi, L.C. Abdullah, S.S. Elnashaie, A. Pendashteh, Demulsification techniques of water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions in petroleum industry, Separation and Purification Technology, 170 (2016) 377-407.[15] Y. Ding, S. Maruf, M. Aghajani, A.R. Greenberg, Surface patterning of polymeric membranes and its effect on antifouling characteristics, Separation Science and Technology, 52 (2017) 240-257.[16] S.H. Maruf, L. Wang, A.R. Greenberg, J. Pellegrino, Y. Ding, Use of nanoimprinted surface patterns to mitigate colloidal deposition on ultrafiltration membranes, Journal of membrane science, 428 (2013) 598-607.[17] W. Choi, E.P. Chan, J.-H. Park, W.-G. Ahn, H.W. Jung, S. Hong, J.S. Lee, J.-Y. Han, S. Park, D.-H. Ko, Nanoscale pillar-enhanced tribological surfaces as antifouling membranes, ACS applied materials & interfaces, 8 (2016) 31433-31441.[18] J.W. Bae, Y.-H. Cho, Y.-E. Sung, K. Shin, J.Y. Jho, Performance enhancement of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell by employing line-patterned Nafion membrane, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 18 (2012) 876-879.

5

Page 6: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

[19] D.-C. Choi, S.-Y. Jung, Y.-J. Won, J.H. Jang, J.-W. Lee, H.-R. Chae, J. Lim, K.H. Ahn, S. Lee, J.-H. Kim, Effect of Pattern Shape on the Initial Deposition of Particles in the Aqueous Phase on Patterned Membranes during Crossflow Filtration, Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 4 (2017) 66-70.[20] L. Vogelaar, J.N. Barsema, C.J. van Rijn, W. Nijdam, M. Wessling, Phase separation micromolding—PSμM, Advanced materials, 15 (2003) 1385-1389.[21] R.J. Gohari, W. Lau, T. Matsuura, A. Ismail, Effect of surface pattern formation on membrane fouling and its control in phase inversion process, Journal of membrane science, 446 (2013) 326-331.[22] Y.-J. Won, S.-Y. Jung, J.-H. Jang, J.-W. Lee, H.-R. Chae, D.-C. Choi, K.H. Ahn, C.-H. Lee, P.-K. Park, Correlation of membrane fouling with topography of patterned membranes for water treatment, Journal of Membrane Science, 498 (2016) 14-19.[23] Y.K. Lee, Y.-J. Won, J.H. Yoo, K.H. Ahn, C.-H. Lee, Flow analysis and fouling on the patterned membrane surface, Journal of membrane science, 427 (2013) 320-325.[24] M. Xie, W. Luo, S.R. Gray, Surface pattern by nanoimprint for membrane fouling mitigation: Design, performance and mechanisms, Water research, 124 (2017) 238-243.[25] O. Heinz, M. Aghajani, A.R. Greenberg, Y. Ding, Surface-patterning of polymeric membranes: fabrication and performance, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 20 (2018) 1-12.[26] Z.-X. Low, Y.T. Chua, B.M. Ray, D. Mattia, I.S. Metcalfe, D.A. Patterson, Perspective on 3D printing of separation membranes and comparison to related unconventional fabrication techniques, Journal of Membrane Science, 523 (2017) 596-613.[27] T. Femmer, A.J. Kuehne, J. Torres-Rendon, A. Walther, M. Wessling, Print your membrane: Rapid prototyping of complex 3D-PDMS membranes via a sacrificial resist, Journal of Membrane Science, 478 (2015) 12-18.[28] S. Yuan, D. Strobbe, J.-P. Kruth, P. Van Puyvelde, B. Van der Bruggen, Super-hydrophobic 3D printed polysulfone membranes with a switchable wettability by self-assembled candle soot for efficient gravity-driven oil/water separation, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 5 (2017) 25401-25409.[29] S. Badalov, Y. Oren, C.J. Arnusch, Ink-jet printing assisted fabrication of patterned thin film composite membranes, Journal of Membrane Science, 493 (2015) 508-514.[30] N.C. Wardrip, M. Dsouza, M. Urgun-Demirtas, S.W. Snyder, J.A. Gilbert, C.J. Arnusch, Printing-Assisted Surface Modifications of Patterned Ultrafiltration Membranes, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8 (2016) 30271-30280.[31] Y.M.J. Chew, W.R. Paterson, D.I. Wilson, Fluid dynamic gauging: A new tool to study deposition on porous surfaces, Journal of Membrane Science, 296 (2007) 29-41.[32] B. Saini, M.K. Sinha, S.K. Dash, Mitigation of HA, BSA and oil/water emulsion fouling of PVDF Ultrafiltration Membranes by SiO2-g-PEGMA nanoparticles, Journal of Water Process Engineering, (2018).[33] R. Pal, Techniques for measuring the composition (oil and water content) of emulsions—a state of the art review, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 84 (1994) 141-193.[34] I. Sadeghi, A. Aroujalian, A. Raisi, B. Dabir, M. Fathizadeh, Surface modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes by corona air plasma for separation of oil/water emulsions, Journal of Membrane Science, 430 (2013) 24-36.[35] R. Jamshidi Gohari, E. Halakoo, W.J. Lau, M.A. Kassim, T. Matsuura, A.F. Ismail, Novel polyethersulfone (PES)/hydrous manganese dioxide (HMO) mixed matrix membranes with improved anti-fouling properties for oily wastewater treatment process, RSC Advances, 4 (2014) 17587-17596.[36] G. Arthanareeswaran, V.M. Starov, Effect of solvents on performance of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes: Investigation of metal ion separations, Desalination, 267 (2011) 57-63.[37] X. Zhao, Y. Su, J. Cao, Y. Li, R. Zhang, Y. Liu, Z. Jiang, Fabrication of antifouling polymer–inorganic hybrid membranes through the synergy of biomimetic mineralization and nonsolvent induced phase separation, Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3 (2015) 7287-7295.

6

Page 7: ars.els-cdn.com · Web viewCAD of 3D flat support: (a) top view, (b) enlarged cross section, the pore diameter = 0.2 mm, the distance between pores = 0.2 mm and (c) side view, all

[38] G. Zhang, J. Jiang, Q. Zhang, X. Zhan, F. Chen, Amphiphilic poly (ether sulfone) membranes for oil/water separation: Effect of sequence structure of the modifier, AIChE Journal, 63 (2017) 739-750.[39] V. Moghimifar, A.E. Livari, A. Raisi, A. Aroujalian, Enhancing the antifouling property of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes using NaX zeolite and titanium oxide nanoparticles, Rsc Advances, 5 (2015) 55964-55976.[40] H. Yamamura, K. Kimura, Y. Watanabe, Mechanism involved in the evolution of physically irreversible fouling in microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes used for drinking water treatment, Environmental science & technology, 41 (2007) 6789-6794.[41] J. Dickhout, J. Moreno, P. Biesheuvel, L. Boels, R. Lammertink, W. de Vos, Produced water treatment by membranes: A review from a colloidal perspective, Journal of colloid and interface science, 487 (2017) 523-534.[42] Z. Wang, J. Ma, C.Y. Tang, K. Kimura, Q. Wang, X. Han, Membrane cleaning in membrane bioreactors: a review, Journal of membrane science, 468 (2014) 276-307.[43] S.S. Madaeni, T. Mohamamdi, M.K. Moghadam, Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membranes, Desalination, 134 (2001) 77-82.[44] R.J. Gohari, E. Halakoo, W.J. Lau, M.A. Kassim, T. Matsuura, A.F. Ismail, Novel polyethersulfone (PES)/hydrous manganese dioxide (HMO) mixed matrix membranes with improved anti-fouling properties for oily wastewater treatment process, RSC Advances, 4 (2014) 17587-17596.[45] A. Mansourizadeh, A.J. Azad, Preparation of blend polyethersulfone/cellulose acetate/polyethylene glycol asymmetric membranes for oil–water separation, Journal of Polymer Research, 21 (2014) 375.[46] J. Yin, J. Zhou, Novel polyethersulfone hybrid ultrafiltration membrane prepared with SiO2-g-(PDMAEMA-co-PDMAPS) and its antifouling performances in oil-in-water emulsion application, Desalination, 365 (2015) 46-56.[47] Y.-F. Zhao, P.-B. Zhang, J. Sun, C.-J. Liu, Z. Yi, L.-P. Zhu, Y.-Y. Xu, Versatile antifouling polyethersulfone filtration membranes modified via surface grafting of zwitterionic polymers from a reactive amphiphilic copolymer additive, Journal of colloid and interface science, 448 (2015) 380-388.[48] V. Moghimifar, A. Raisi, A. Aroujalian, Surface modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes by corona plasma-assisted coating TiO2 nanoparticles, Journal of Membrane Science, 461 (2014) 69-80.[49] X. Ma, Y. Su, Q. Sun, Y. Wang, Z. Jiang, Enhancing the antifouling property of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes through surface adsorption-crosslinking of poly (vinyl alcohol), Journal of Membrane Science, 300 (2007) 71-78.

7