“Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

22
“Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks

Transcript of “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Page 1: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

“Arrange for Change”

Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks

Page 2: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

One of the first things to understand is that climate science has evolved greatly in recent years – much of the data about climate conditions has grown substantial enough for specific trends to emerge. Scientific consensus about climate change has also evolved. Today, climate scientists are almost in complete agreement that unprecedented climate changes are occurring and that human activities are a reason why.

2

Climate Science Has Come of Age

Hand-drawn maps…

Early - Super Computers

Satellites - High Technology

Page 3: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Throughout Earth’s History - Climate has varied…

3

Page 4: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Agriculture emerges

4.5 oC

1.5 oC

This is 10,000 years of climatic stability that enabled

humanity to evolve as we know our cultures today

The Last 10,000 Years seems to have been Ideal for the Development of Human Societies. Is this a Historic “Sweet Spot” that Enabled Humans to Flourish?

IPCC (2007) forecast of about

2-3 oC, with the band of

uncertainty

4

Page 5: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Synthesis Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Fourth Assessment Report (2007) States:

• The warming of the Earth’s climate system is “unequivocal”.

• Most of the observed increase in globally-averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely (with a confidence of greater than 90%) due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations …

• There is now higher confidence, than in all prior assessments, in the projected patterns of warming and other regional-scale features, including changes in wind patterns, precipitation, and some aspects of extremes and sea ice.

5

Page 6: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

6

In addition, interpreters are getting more questions about “Climate Change” or “Global Warming” from visitors. Although there are no easy answers for many complex science issues, this tool will make it easier to have an informed dialogue with the public and raise awareness about this critical issue of concern for our parks, for our culture.

Visitors are asking about Climate Change

Page 7: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Richard Somerville…

“The scientists of the Intergovernmental Panel on

Climate Change do a good job of assessing the climate – and

projecting the implications through models. They aren’t the best ones to communicate

about what they find.”

Home

So, who is the best?

Role in Communicating Climate Change

7

Page 8: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

The challenge ...

To clearly explain the meaning of observed changes,

and to convey a message of Hope –

one that inspires action rather than despair?

8

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 9: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

To do that,

You need to understand the science, and understand your

audience; you facilitate a meeting of the two in ways

that are relevant and connecting.

Do park users think it’s relevant?

9

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 10: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

2007 study by George Mason Univ:

(12,000 adults)

2 of 3 adults view climate change as a serious problem (14% believed it is not a problem)

2 of 3 expressed confidence that we are individually and collectively able to make the changes needed to combat its effects.

Their kids said the same thing (3 of 4).

10

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 11: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

2007 study by George Mason Univ:

Both types of perceptions – believing that global warming is a threat to human well-being, and believing that it is within our power to limit its impacts – are important motivators to having people perform actions that do so.

“…It appears helpful to convince them both that climate change is a threat, and that there is much we can do through our actions to stop it.”

11

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 12: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

2007 study by George Mason Univ:

Asked respondents how important, or not, 14 specific actions were in terms of “protecting the environment.” On average, 8 of 14 actions were deemed important (notably large).

Also asked if they were taking these actions.

Average number of actions taken was 5.12

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 13: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

NPS Role in Communicating about Climate Change

Who, better than the NPS?

Who else has better access to the resources, to science and research on-the-ground, and to a cadre of trained communicators who can bring climate literacy to a wide range of diverse audiences?

13

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 14: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

How? Certainly, parks could address specific local impacts and implications …

14

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 15: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

How? Certainly, parks could address specific local impacts and implications …

15

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 16: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Possible things to develop:

Talking Points for each Eco-region (in progress)

“Arrange for Change Decision” Tree (in progress)

National Communication Plan

Coordinated presentations at annual workshops(GWS, NAI, NSTA, APPL)

Public accessible web-site (http://nrpcsharepoint/climatechange)

Develop a “Toolbox” for communicators

Hold periodic Web Seminars with scientists

More coordinated Inter-agency efforts16

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 17: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Possible audiences to target:

- Uninterested in Climate change/Unaware - Climate Science Interested - Climate Science Attentive – Help with Policies - Climate Science Engaged - that’s Us!

Approaches that might work:

- Tell compelling and complete stories

- Avoid presenting changes as unsolvable

- Find an optimistic perspective – bring Hope

17

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 18: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

And provide a full “Suite of Products” that can serve multiple audiences…

18

Role in Communicating Climate Change

Page 19: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

19

The challenge for front-line communicators is the complexity of details and huge scope of implications that exist about the issue. Climate change is directly connected to almost every scientific discipline; it effects every living being on the planet, today and into the future. How do interpreters organize the information and choose the most appropriate techniques to convey its meanings effectively? This “Decision Tree” is a “starter” tool that offers interpreters some structure for managing the immense amount of data, and at the same time, organize it so the larger themes and ideas regarding climate change are more accessible to their audiences.

The Interpreters’ “Decision Tree”

Coastal/marine changes bring

severe impacts.

Wildlife ranges are changing.

Vegetative zones are shifting.

Melting ice has worldwide

consequences.

Earth is warming at an accelerating and

unprecedented rate.

Wildfire frequency and duration

increase.

Thawing permafrost has

implications.

Impacts to indigenous people

are severe.

Atmospheric chemistry is changing.

Multiple influences combine into larger

impacts.

Page 20: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Climate Change Decision Tree

20

Let’s examine climate changeas if it were a tree…

Its branches might represent the various implications of change…

An Analogy…

Page 21: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

Melting ice has worldwide

consequences.

Vegetative zones are shifting.

Wildlife ranges are changing.

Coastal/marine changes bring

severe impacts.

Multiple influences combine into larger

impacts.

Atmospheric chemistry is changing.

Impacts to indigenous people

are severe.

Thawing permafrost has

implications.

Wildfire frequency and duration

increase.

Earth is warming at an accelerating and

unprecedented rate.

21

Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate

and much larger changes are projected.

Climate Change Decision Tree

The tool organizes the information.

(Adapted from the key findings, ACIA 2004.)

Page 22: “Arrange for Change” Interpreting Climate Change in Alaska’s National Parks.

National Parks are places that connect us to our collective heritage, natural and cultural. Parks can help us make the critical choices that ensure a way of life that’s sustainable for future generations.

22