Arms-2010-1

60

Transcript of Arms-2010-1

Page 1: Arms-2010-1
Page 2: Arms-2010-1
Page 3: Arms-2010-1

C O N T E N T S1(51).2010

Director GeneralEvgeny Osipov

Deputy Director GeneralVyacheslav Schesnovich

Executive DirectorOleg Perevoschikov

Marketing DirectorAlexander Kiryanov

Commercial DirectorMikhail Baydak

Executive EditorAlexey Makurin

Production EditorEduard Voytenko

EditorsAlexander VelovichAlexander GudkoSvetlana KomagorovaYaroslav Parkhomenko

Marketing ManagerDmitry KuprinYana Zhvirbo

Art DirectorAlvina Kirillova

DesignersAlexander CheredaykoAlexander StrelyaevElena Shishova

IT ManagerPavel Chernyak

Photos and graphics in this issue:Vladimir Scherbakov, Marina Lystseva, Alexey Mikheev, Vitaly Kuzmin, NTV channel, "Sukhoi", JSC Ship-building Yard "Severnaya Verf", KBP Instrument Design Bureau

Circulation: 8000

The magazine is registered in the Committee for Press of the Russian Federation. Certificate № 016692 as of 20.10.1997. Certificate № 77-15450 as of 19.05.2003.

Any material in this publication may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the pub-lisher. The editorial staff’s opinion does not necessarily coincide with that of the authors. Advertisers bear re-sponsibility for the content of provided materials.

ARMS, 2010ADDRESSP.O. Box 77, Moscow, 125057, RussiaTel.: + 7 495 626-52-11Fax.: + 7 499 151-61-50E-mail: [email protected]

Office 1V, 2/6, Moskovsky prospect,Saint Petersburg, 190031, RussiaTel./fax: +7 812 310-61-46E-mail: [email protected]

AIR DEFENCE

8 Missiles

over Hindustan

LAND FORCES

24 KBP-designed

modernized fight-

ing compartment

of the BMP-2 —

an efficient way

of upgrading

armoured vehicles

NAVY

6 OPK and new directions

in MTC

MARKETS

28 India’s Armed Forces’

weapons modernisa-

tion programmes

in 2009

MILITARY AVIATION

2 Russian arms exports

on the rise

COOPERATIONS

4 Sukhoi PAK FA:

first flight

Page 4: Arms-2010-1

COOPERATIONS

2 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

AIRCRAFT TOP THE LIST

Military aircraft have been best

sellers in  the  recent years, account-

ing for 50% of  all exports in  2009.

According to  Rosoboronexport,

Army, Air Defense and Navy weap-

onry made up 19%, 13% and 13.7%

of the sales, respectively. All the oth-

er weaponry types accounted for

the remaining 4% of the total figure.

Rosoboronexport spokes-

men have repeatedly stated that

the  Russian-made Air Defense sys-

tems, especially the  S-300 and

the  new S-400 Triumf, are in  high

demand. Anatoly Isaikin stated

that Russia will begin foreign sales

of  S-400s only after it supplies its

own forces with the  required num-

ber of  such systems. Nevertheless,

Rosoboronexport head says that

“preparatory negotiations are un-

der way”, which has already result-

ed in  setting of  preliminary terms

for potential deliveries. “Such de-

liveries, however, are not going

to  take place neither in  the  com-

ing months nor the  next year”, Mr

Isaikin highlighted.

The S-400 air defense missile sys-

tem was designed to  engage aer-

ial targets including aircraft, UAVs

and cruise missiles both in  the  air

and in  the  outer space as well as

to  carry out non-strategic missile

defense missions. The  new Triumf

system, meant to replace the S-200

and S-300, has an  improved capa-

bility to  destroy new types of  aer-

ial targets, including Stealth air-

craft, small-sized cruise missiles

and ballistic missiles with a  range

within 3,500 km and a speed of up

to 4.8 km per second.

THE UNIQUE FIGHTING VEHICLE

Rosoboronexport sees the  Tank

Support Fighting Vehicle (BMPT) as

RUSSIAN ARMS EXPORTS ON THE RISE

In 2009, Russia sold abroad $7.4 billion worth of military equipment and technology, a figure 10% high-

er compared to that in 2008. The growth trend is expected to persist in 2010 as well, as the contract

portfolio for the next few years currently exceeds $34 billion. In 2009 alone, Russia signed $15 billion

worth of arms contracts, Anatoly Isaikin, head of Russia’s exclusive arms trader Rosoboronexport, said

at a news conference on January 28.

Page 5: Arms-2010-1

COOPERATIONS

1(51).2010 ● 3

a  promising item for the  interna-

tional arms market, among other ad-

vanced programs. Mr Isaikin called

the  vehicle unique, saying “I know

of no other country operating a sim-

ilar piece of  equipment”. The  ve-

hicle has high firepower and of-

fers excellent protection against an-

titank weapons, Rosoboronexport

CEO added.

Despite its incredible perfor-

mance, the  BMPT hasn’t been ad-

opted by the Russian Armed Forces

so far. The vehicle, built on the T-90

MBT chassis, is fitted with a  dual

30mm automatic cannon, four AT

guided missile launchers, a  heavy

machine gun and two automatic

grenade launchers. The  BMPT is ca-

pable of  engaging targets at  a dis-

tance of up to 5 km as well as wiping

the enemy off the surrounding area

with a radius of up to 3 km by firing

its guns and grenade launchers.

The vehicle can simultaneously

track and engage 5 ground targets,

while featuring an  improved armor

compared to a tank.

INDIA: A MAJOR PARTNER

The main buyers of  Russian arms

and equipment are India. Algeria,

China, Venezuela, Malaysia and Syria.

In the  near future, India is going

to  remain Russia’s top military-tech-

nical partner thanks to both the cur-

rently effective and future deals in-

cluding a  tender for 126 fighter air-

craft for the Indian Air Force.

Rosoboronexport CEO is sure that

the Russian-offered Mikoyan MiG-35

is destined to win the  Indian tender.

“By now, the competition is in its mid-

term, but no contender has quit so

far. Let the best aircraft win the race.

We are sure our MiG will make it, as

it meets all the  requirements set

forward by the  Indian Air Force”,

Anatoly Isaikin said.

The MiG-35 belongs to a new uni-

fied combat aircraft family along-

side with the  MiG-29K/MiG-29KUB

sea-borne fighters and MiG-29M/

M2 multirole tactical fighters.

The  Medium Multi-Role Combat

Aircraft (MMRCA) tender for 126

fighters was announced in  August

2007 and obliges the  winner com-

pany to supply the  Indian Air Force

with 18 ready-built aircraft, with

the  rest of  the fighters to  be lin-

cense-produced by HAL enterpris-

es in India.

According to  Indian sourc-

es, the  deal will total Rs 420 billion

(over $10 billion). The  Russian MiG-

35 is rivaled by the Rafale offered by

France’s Dassault Aviation, Gripen

by Sweden’s SAAB, U.S. Boeing F/A-

18 and Lockheed Martin F-16, and

the  Eurofighter Typhoon made

by EADS.

Rosoboronexport CEO also men-

tioned that an additional agreement

will be signed soon to  upgrade

the Admiral Gorshkov heavy aircraft

carrying cruiser for India. The  con-

tract needs a  little more time to be

finalized and stipulates the amount

of  work and the  price. Anatoly

Isaikin said the  deal is a  complex

task for the  Russian shipbuilding

industry which is new to  produc-

ing air carrying ships. In the  past,

all vessels of  this class were built

in  Nikolayev, Ukraine. “We are ab-

solutely new to  such work. Only

the  hull will remain the  same. We

are going to  make a  totally new air

carrier out of  it following the  cus-

tomer’s preferences”, he concluded.

The over $1.5 billion contract

to  modernize the  cruiser which had

been sold to  India, was signed back

in  2004. Initially, the  Indian Navy ex-

pected to  receive the  ship in  2008,

but delivery was later shifted to 2010

after the  required amount of  work

had grown.

As for China, Rosoboronexport

expects lower sales to  this country

in  the  future. “That is quite natural.

China’s defense industry is develop-

ing rapidly”, Anatoly Isaikin noticed,

adding that China’s share in Russian

defense exports had gone down

to  18% in  2009 and could drop fur-

ther to as low as 15%.

ARMS FOR NATO AND ARAB

NATIONS

Russia is negotiating possible

supplies of  a variety of  wepons

to  NATO countries, Anatoly Isaikin

said, omitting the countries’ names

and delivery terms, though. He

mentioned, however, that Russian-

made arms are still sold to  Greece,

Turkey and East European coun-

tries. The  latter, however, account

for upgrade and repair deals for

USSR-supplied equipment rather

than sales.

According to  Mr Isaikin, Ros obo-

ron export is prepared to  supply

weaponry to  Iraq and Afghanistan

provided that the  U.S. gives its con-

sent. Military-technical cooperation

with Arab nations, including Lybia

and Bahrain, also offers Russia favor-

able prospects.

WAY IS FREE FOR PARTNERSHIP

WITH IRAN

Iran-related issues, which

keep topping the  global political

news, weren’t left out by Anatoly

Isaikin during his news confer-

ence, as the  Middle Eastern coun-

try is known to  be willing to  buy

S-300 air defense systems from

Russia. Although the  deal to  sup-

ply Iran with S-300s was signed

in  December 2005, no formal an-

nouncements have yet been made

on the execution of the contract.

The Rosoboronexport CEO poin-

ted out that Iran is not subject

to  the  UN arms embargo. “Nothing

is standing in the way of further mil-

itary-technical cooperation between

Russia and Iran”, Mr Isaikin said, add-

ing that Iran had never violated its

commitments.

Anatoly Isaikin also gave a  sep-

arate comment on  the incident in-

volving the  Russian Sukhoi Su-27

fighter which failed to arrive in time

at an air show in Bahrain last January,

as it hadn’t been permitted to  fly

over Iran. “There was a  bureaucrat-

ic glitch. The  Iranian ground control

didn’t receive a  timely permit from

the  authorities to  allow the  flight”,

Mr Isaikin explained.

The Russian Su-27 was due to  ar-

rive in  Bahrain for an  internation-

al airshow scheduled for January 19.

The  fighter was initially supposed

to  fly through the  Iranian airspace,

but the  country’s authorities re-

fused to grant a pass. Intermediation

of  the two countries’ foreign minis-

tries, however, had helped resolve

the  situation, allowing the  aircraft

to  finally make its way to  Bahrain

on January 20. According to Anatoly

Isaikin, the Iranian government apol-

ogized for the incident after the con-

troversy had been settled.

Page 6: Arms-2010-1

MILITARY AVIATION

4 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

SUKHOI PAK FA:FIRST FLIGHT

n 29 January Sukhoi

PAK FA (Advanced

Aviation System of  Tac-

tical Avaition), also

know as the T-50, per-

formed its maiden flight from the

airfield of Komsomolsk-on-Amur

Aircraft Production Plant (KnAAPO)

in the Russian Far East.

Sukhoi director general Mikhail

Pogosyan commented: "Today we

have started the flight test pro-

gramme of the 5th generation

[fighter] aircraft. This is a big suc-

cess of Russia's science and design-

er's thought. This achievement was

made possible by industrial co-op-

eration of more than a hundred en-

terprises. The PAK FA programme

advances Russia's aircraft and co-

operating industries to the new lev-

el of technological quality. These

aircraft, alongside with modernised

aviation systems of the forth gener-

ation will determine the capabilities

of the Russian Air Force in the com-

ing decades. Sukhoi company plans

further development of the PAK FA

programme together with Indian

partners. I am confident that our

joint project will outperform west-

ern competitors by efficiency-to-

cost criteria, and not only will allow

to strengthen the defence might

of  Russia and India, but will take

a decent place on the world market".

The first flight of the new fight-

er lasted for 47 minutes with Sukhoi

test pilot Sergey Bogdan at the con-

trols and was declared a complete

success. Bogdan shared his impres-

sions of the first flight: "We have

made initial evaluation of the air-

craft's controllability, engine oper-

ations and functioning of the main

systems. The standard procedure

of  landing gear retraction/exten-

sion was performed. The aircraft

showed itself favourably at all phas-

es of the planned flight programme.

It is easy and comfortable to control".

The flight test are anticipated to take

about five-six years.

Ph

oto

by

NT

V c

han

nel

Ph

oto

by

"Su

kho

i"

O

Page 7: Arms-2010-1
Page 8: Arms-2010-1

6 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

nited Industrial Cor po-

ration (ОPK) compris-

es JSC Ship-building

Yard “Severnaya Verf”,

the largest Russian en-

terprise on the construction of sur-

face ships. For the period of almost

100-year service in the RF Navy,

“Severnaya Verf” has constructed

more than 200 combat ships, with

total draught exceeding 500’000

tons. In the present day the yard

performs the major delivery scope

of surface ships (corvette and frig-

ate class) upon the State Defence

Order for the RF Navy, it is a usu-

al participant of Military-Technical

Cooperation (MTC). For the last

years, OPK yards have exported ships

in China (pr.956E, 956EM) and India

(pr.1135.6).

Generally, the yard performs the

repair operations of ships being pre-

viously constructed at it. Among

them the special place is taken by

yacht “Rossia” of Administrative

Department of the President

of   the  Russian Federation (2002).

At the present moment, the yard

is completing the repair operations

of  frigate “Vice Admiral Kulakov” be-

ing a part of the Northern Fleet.

The yard has experienced in re-

pair of ships being constructed at

the other yards, among which is a fa-

mous cruiser “Avrora” (1984-87). It al-

lows the yard to take a new MTC pro-

duction sphere in naval engineer-

ing — repair and modernization.

For many years patrol ships of

pr. 1159Т (frigate “Koni 2”  — as per

NATO classification) are flagman

ships and small-size missile boats

pr.1234Ye (corvette “Nanucka 2”  —

per NATO classification) are ma-

jor impact of three groups (Fleets)

of  Democratic People's Republic

of Algeria (DPRA), located along the

coast of the Mediterranean Sea. With

its draught, ships are provided with

high levels of propulsion and sea-

keeping characteristics, balanced

systems of multipurpose weapon.

Taking into account high mili-

tary characteristics and moderniza-

tion capabilities of ships, DPRA Naval

Command favours to perform ex-

pensive repair and modernization in-

stead of purchasing of new ships.

To implement the Contract with

DPRA, JSC SBY “Severnaya Verf” was

the first yard in ship-building indus-

try, that has performed a complex of

OPK AND NEW DIRECTIONS IN MTCU

Corvette p-1234Е before repairing

Andrey Fomichev

NAVY

Page 9: Arms-2010-1

NAVY

1(51).2010 ● 7

operations upon the creation of sys-

tem of organization and design-en-

gineering support based on CALS-

technology (Continuous Acquisition

and Life cycle Support). Electronic

models of ships, being constructed

almost thirty years ago, and subject-

ed to repair, allow to perform the fol-

lowing:

– perform fair Damage Survey and

describe the ship state per com-

partments;

– enter the repair process in  Com-

mon Electronic Informational

Space of Yard;

– create 3D-model of hull, which

provides possibility to develop

separate hull sections, subjected

to replacement assembled;

– optimize processes of costs and

components purchase manage-

ment;

– organize the integrations of all

participants (Client — Designer —

Yard — Components Suppliers —

Operation and Disposition) of Life

Cycle of Article having passed

modernization-recovery repair,

and having been not accompa-

nied with electronic documenta-

tion yet, in Information Space ON-

line. This let shift the ships opera-

tion to the state-of art and satisfy

Client’s perspective requirements.

For the first time in the ship-

building industry, at the absence

of  mould loft data (in particular per

stabilizers bays and propeller shaft

boss), “re-engineering” operations

have been performed with appli-

cation of laser scanners and follow-

ing 3D-modelling. Basing on the re-

ceived data, tasks of cutting of plates

to be replaced have been integrated

in the Yard Management Common

System as well as plates bending

means have been developed.

The above mentioned became

possible due to the long-term sched-

uled integration of digital intellectu-

al technologies into the production

process.

Formation of the modern repair

system has required taking the de-

cisions upon the complex of process

and metallurgical tasks:

– for the first time in native ship-build-

ing industry, progressive gauges

have been purchased, implement-

ed and utilized. They are used to

inspect the thickness of hull metal

without painting removing that al-

lows to increase the damage survey

quality and  respectively, the repair

process itself due to the increasing

of measuring points number with-

out mechanical grinding;

– pipes cleaning process has been

greatly changed;

– decision has been taken up-

on the  repair of coupling points

of  steel hull and light-alloy su-

perstructure under the conditions

of  significant corrosion and wear-

ing of metal.

Providing the repair quality level,

which corresponds to the world one,

increasing of labour efficiency and

correspondingly, competitive price,

JSC SBY “Severnaya Verf” for  sure

takes a new sphere in surface ship-

building: repair and modernization

of previously exported naval engi-

neering of any production.

At the present moment, first

two ships of projects 1159Т and

1234Ye are on sea trials, repair

of another two ships is proceed-

ed. Together with FSI Ros obo-

ronexport the yard is now review-

ing the possibility to negotiate

new contracts.

P-901 before repairing

P-901 after repairing

Cruiser Aurora

Page 10: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

8 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

MISSILESOVER HINDUSTANThe international community has always marvelled at the ener-The international community has always marvelled at the ener-

gy with which Indian scientists, software and hardware experts gy with which Indian scientists, software and hardware experts

in  weapons systems have been moving on, overtaking and some-in  weapons systems have been moving on, overtaking and some-

times even surpassing achievements of the leading world powers. times even surpassing achievements of the leading world powers.

This is well illustrated by the indigenously developed nuclear weap-This is well illustrated by the indigenously developed nuclear weap-

ons and rather modern rocket industry. The majority of  missile-ons and rather modern rocket industry. The majority of  missile-

related projects for the Ministry of Defence of India are run under related projects for the Ministry of Defence of India are run under

the so called Integrated Guided Missile Development Program the so called Integrated Guided Missile Development Program

focused on the development and series production of several mis-focused on the development and series production of several mis-

sile weapon types including various-range ballistic missiles.sile weapon types including various-range ballistic missiles.

Page 11: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 9

Vladimir Sherbakov

Page 12: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

10 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

INTEGRATED GUIDED MISSILE

DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

The Integrated Guided Missile

Development Program (IGMDP) is

believed to  have commenced of-

ficially in  1983. The  then military

and political leadership of  India set

as its main objective the  develop-

ment of  the national rocket indus-

try to  a  level where the  principle

of  self-reliance would be realisable.

Moreover, experience to  be gained

during implementation of  that pro-

gramme could be utilised when

developing other types of  missile

weapon systems.

At the present time the Integrated

Guided Missile Development

Program encompasses five proj-

ects:  — strategic missile systems

armed with the  Agni-family inter-

mediate-range ballistic missiles and

their modifications;  — tactical/the-

atre missile systems armed with

the  Prithvi-family short-range bal-

listic missiles and their modifica-

tions; — air defence missile systems

armed with the  Akash and Trishul

surface-to-air guided missiles;  —

antitank guided weapon system

armed with the  Nag guided mis-

sile. Sometimes the  BrahMos mis-

sile system is also included into this

Program, which is incorrect since

its development has been started

much later within the framework of a

joint Indo-Russian programme ex-

ecuted by the  BrahMos Aerospace

Limited co-founded by the  Russian

Military Industrial Corporation

“NPO Mashinostroyenia” based

near Moscow and Indian Ministry

of  Defence’s DRDO (Defence

Re search and Development

Organisation). The Integrated Guided

Missile Development Program has

been lately complemented with

the Astra air-to-air guided missile de-

velopment project as well.

It should be noted here that

Delhi was virtually forced into the re-

alisation of  the above Program

by the  then policy of  a number

of  Western countries attempting

to  restrict weapons upgrading by

armies in  most advanced so-called

“third-world” countries by introduc-

ing the  Missile Technology Control

Regime (MTCR). In addition, after

testing its nuclear charge on 18 May

1974 India was submitted to  a  num-

ber of  sanctions which further ham-

pered the  development of  combat

missile systems.

The IGMDP main provisions

were prepared by Dr. Abdul Kalam,

the  then head of  the Defence

Research and Development

Laboratory (DRDL) in Hyderabad, lat-

er elected President of  India, com-

monly named ever since “the fa-

ther of  India’s missile programme. It

took six months for Dr. Abdul Kalam

and his DRDL colleagues to  sort

out all those issues with the  as-

sistance of  the scientific advisor

to the Minister of Defence and DRDO

head Dr. V.S. Arunchalam. On  com-

pleting their work they reported its

results to  the  Minister of  Defence

and Prime Minister of India.

It is interesting enough that in the

beginning there was no mention-

ing of  a single programme: devel-

opment of  missile systems armed

with the  Nag antitank guided mis-

sile, Akash and Trishul surface-to-

air missiles as well as Prithvi and

Indian carrier rockets

Page 13: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 11

Agni ballistic missiles was planned

as a  row of  unrelated projects im-

plemented consecutively one af-

ter another. However, Minister

of Defence R. Venkataraman insisted

that Dr.  Kalam and Dr. Arunchalam

combined all those projects in-

to the  unique Integrated Program.

The  Program officially started

on 27 July 1983.

A special board headed by Dr.

Abdul Kalam was set up to  man-

age practical implementation of the

Integrated Program. Dr. Kalam also

delegated sufficient authority to five

project directors for  executive and

financial activities, leaving to himself

only the most important issues such

as contacts with more than two doz-

ens of  subcontractors. Dr. Kalam’s

popularity grew with the emergence

of  new missiles, which finally culmi-

nated in  his victory at  the elections

of the President of India.

This article treats only those

missile systems that are based

on  the various-purpose Agni/Prithvi-

family ballistic missiles.

PRITHVI MISSILE SYSTEM

The Prithvi (Sanskrit for  “Earth”)

missile is a  single-stage short-range

ground-to-ground ballistic mis-

sile. Indian missile experts derived

their designs from the second-stage

engine of  the surface-to-air mis-

sile for  the  Soviet S-75 Dvina air de-

fence missile system, as well as rock-

et engines designed earlier by India

under the  Devil and Valiant proj-

ects (the Devil project was intend-

ed to  develop an indigenous liquid-

propellant rocket engine drawing

on the analysis of similar Soviet guid-

ed missiles, whereas the Valiant proj-

ect was dedicated to  the  develop-

ment of a multi-stage strategic ballis-

tic missile). At the present time there

are two variants of the Prithvi missile:

one with a shorter-range but heavier

payload, and the  other with a  great-

er-range but lower-weight warhead.

In all other respects the two variants

are virtually identical. The  modifica-

tions are designated “Prithvi  I” and

“Prithvi II” correspondingly.

The Prithvi ballistic missile is a sin-

gle-stage liquid-propellant monob-

lock with a single warhead and an in-

ertial navigation and terminal guid-

Prithvi II ballistic mis-sile mobile launcher

Page 14: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

12 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ance system. Structurally the missile

has a  cylindrical body with a  cone-

shaped head, a cruciform wing in the

middle part and four smaller con-

trol/correction surfaces in  the tail

end of  the missile. The missile body

is made of  aluminium alloys, and is

covered with radio-absorbing mate-

rials. The  missile propulsion unit is

composed of  two liquid-propellant

engines, and its fuel tank is made

of  aluminium alloys as well. The  en-

gine uses a mixture of  the inhibited

red fuming nitric acid as an oxidiser,

and a  compound fuel made of  xyli-

dene (50%) and triethylamine (50%).

Nnormally Tthe missile is fuelled im-

mediately before the  launch, since

fuelled missile can be stored for a few

months only. Thanks to  the  large-ar-

ea wing, the  Prithvi missile is capa-

ble of performing manoeuvres at the

terminal flight leg to  correct its tra-

jectory and penetrate enemy anti-

ballistic missile defence.

Basic specifications of  the Prithvi-

family missiles are as follows: mis-

sile length — 8.55 m (Prithvi I) or 9.0

(Prithvi II), wing span — 2.6 m, launch

weight — about 4,000 kg, minimum

launch range  — 40  km, maximum

launch range — 150 km (Prithvi I with

a  1,000-kg warhead) and 250  km

(Prithvi  II). Some Indian media have

reported that the Prithvi I missile car-

rying a  250-kg warhead might be

launched at a range as great as 500

km — yet it seems hardly probable.

The missile’s circular error prob-

ability (CEP) does not exceed 0.1%

of  the launch range, that is the  CEP

at  the maximum range would make

250  m (even though some Indian

sources suggest that the  CEP could

be as little as 0.01% of  the launch

range, in  our opinion it does not

seem realistic). The  missile is

equipped with an inertial guidance

system. The  Prithvi developers de-

clare that during the pre-flight prep-

aration up to six waypoints at the ter-

minal trajectory leg can be uploaded

into the  onboard mission comput-

er. It is believed that this procedure

must increase probability of  pene-

tration by the missile of enemy anti-

ballistic missile defence, which is fur-

ther improved by applying a special

radio-absorbing coating on  the  mis-

sile body surface (the missile’s ca-

pability for  en route manoeuvring

is equally dubious). It is further af-

firmed that the  onboard guidance

system can correct the missile flight

trajectory within 15 degrees. The lat-

est missile modifications are also

equipped with satellite navigation

system receivers: some experts be-

lieve this to be the reason why India

has agreed on  a  broader coopera-

tion with Russia within the GLONASS

programme. The  missile onboard

computer is based on a dual-proces-

sor principle.

The missile warhead weighs

1,000 kg (Prithvi I) or 500 kg (Prithvi II).

It can be either conventional explo-

sive or tactical nuclear Plutonium-

based charge with a 12–15-kilotonne

equivalent. The  Prithvi ballistic mis-

sile can be armed with different

types of  conventional warheads in-

cluding a  high explosive fragmenta-

tion warhead with preformed strik-

ing elements (it provides kill radius

of 250 m against soft-skinned targets,

such as positions of  missile launch-

ers and radars, as well as concentra-

tions of  manpower or war materiel),

an incendiary warhead (with kill ra-

dius of  up to  500  m), a  cluster war-

head loaded with bomblets or mines,

a  fuel-air explosive (volumetric) war-

head, and a  runway/airfield facili-

ties buster warhead (this warhead

can damage a  runway made of  the

LNC60 grade concrete on  an area

of  up to  40–60-sq.m.). After com-

pletion of  the nuclear tests in  May

1998 Dr.  Kalam, then DRDO head

and scientific advisor to the Minister

of  Defence, made public the  fea-

Dhanush sea-launched bal-listic missile

Dhanush ballistic missile in the assembly shopDhanush ballistic missile in the assembly shop

Page 15: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 13

sibility of  arming the  missile with

a  nuclear charge. It is thought that

since 1997 up to  20 nuclear charg-

es for  the  Prithvi  I ballistic missile

have been produced, and starting

from 1999 up to  10 nuclear charges

for the Prithvi II ballistic missile.

The missile launcher is mounted

on  the  Tatra ‘Kolos’ 4x4 all-terrain

truck. Immediately prior to  launch

the  launcher with the  loaded mis-

sile is separated from the  truck

and is stabilised on the  launch pad.

The  Kolos transporter-launcher ve-

hicle has the  following specifica-

tions: empty weight  — 13,800  kg,

length  — 8.8  m, width  — 2.5  m,

height (at cabin)  — 2.69  m, road

clearance  — 425 mm, engine  —

250-hp 12-cylinder Tatra T-930-3

diesel, maximum speed — 80 km/h,

fuel tank capacity  — 520  l, negoti-

ated obstacles  — vertical wall up

to  0.6  m high, water crossing up

to  1.4  m deep, slope  — up to  30°,

cabin  — equipped with the  NBC

protection system.

The Prithvi ballistic missile devel-

opment project was the  first one

to start in 1983 under the Integrated

Program umbrella. The  Prithvi  I

ground trials began in  1987 and

the  first test flight took place

at  Sriharikota on  25  February 1988.

The Prithvi II missile was first launched

at the Interim Test Range in Balasore

on  27 January 1996. The  Prithvi bal-

listic missile was the first guided mis-

sile successfully developed and pro-

duced in series by India’s own effort.

As a  matter of  fact, liquid-fuel modi-

fications of the missile have a typical

drawback: they must be loaded with

fuel immediately prior to launch. This

routine can pose certain problems

in  field conditions, and seriously de-

grades the system’s combat potential.

The  Prithvi ballistic missile system

was demonstrated for  the  first time

at  the military parade in  commem-

oration of  the Republic Day of  India

on 26 January 1994

It was initially planned that

the  Prithvi  I ballistic missile system

would enter service with the Indian

Army by 1990. However, owing

to delays in the missile development

and a number of test launch failures

it  was only in  the middle of  1994

that the  series production started,

and the missile system was then in-

ducted for trial operation. Seven test

launches had been made by that

time, and in  1994 a  few more mis-

siles were test fired by Indian Army

combat crews (that June the Prithvi

ballistic missile was launched from

Chandipur missile range against

the firing ground on Wheeler Island

at  a range of  some 80 km). After

a  number of  successful test launch-

es the developer/manufacturer was

awarded the  Indian Army’s con-

tract for  the  delivery of  six missile

systems with the  follow-up for  75

more missiles. The  first-batch 20

missiles were delivered to  the  cus-

tomer by October 1995 and were

used to arm the 333rd Missile Group

permanently established in the city

of Secunderabad.

Bhabha Atomic Research Center

is situated in the city of Trombay,

major center of atomic, oil-refining,

petrochemical and chemical indus-

tries, 50  km to the south-east from

Mumbai (former Bombay). It is

India’s principal research centre in

the nuclear power engineering field,

engaged both in fundamental and

applied studies.

Indian atomic industry’s his-

tory dates back to 1945 when

the Institute of Fundamental

Research was established. Dr. Homi

Jehangir Bhabha, first director of

the Institute, was the initiator and

developer of  the Indian Nuclear

Programme officially announced in

March 1944. He considered forma-

tion of  national specialists in the

field of  nuclear power generation

as one of the major goals of the

Institute. “When nuclear energy

is successfully applied to human

activities, and this may happen in a

couple of decades from now, India

will not have to look abroad for

nuclear experts for they will be

formed in this country”.

In April 1948 Atomic Energy

Act was adopted, and in August

1948 Atomic Energy Commission

was set up. On 3 January 1954

the  Commission endorsed set-

ting up of the Atomic Energy

Establishment in Trombay under

its supervision. Since that time all

projects related to nuclear energy

(construction of  nuclear reactors,

design and development of nuclear

weapons, processing of radioac-

tive materials, development of rel-

evant electronic, machine-building

and other technologies and equip-

ment) were transferred from the

Institute of Fundamental Research

to the Atomic Energy Establishment

in Trombay (even though it was offi-

cially opened by Jawaharlal Nehru

only on 20 January 1957).

Another important milestone

in the history of the Indian atomic

industry was laid on 3 April 1954

when the Department of Atomic

Energy was created within the Indian

Government, and Dr. H. Bhabha was

appointed its Secretary. The  Atomic

Energy Establishment was brought

under the control of the new

Department. Organisationally,

the Atomic Energy Commission used

to be a part of the Ministry of Natural

Resources and Scientific Research.

Since then, however, the  new

Department came under direct con-

trol of India’s Prime Minister (at  that

time — Jawaharlal Nehru).

On 22 January 1967 Prime

Minister Indira Gandhi renamed

the Atomic Energy Establishment

as Bhabha Atomic Research Center

to  commemorate its founder

Dr. Homi Bhabha who died in an air

crash on 24 January 1966.

At present BARC researchers con-

duct works in the following direc-

tions:

– elementary particles physics;

– atomic energy engineering sup-

port;

– isotopes analyses;

– radiation medicine;

– nuclear energy applications

to agriculture,

– computers;

– robotics;

– information technologies.

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre

Page 16: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

14 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

The Indian Armed Forces com-

missioned in  due time two modifi-

cations of the Prithvi missile: Prithvi I

(SS-150) for  the  Indian Army, and

Prithvi  II (SS-250) for  the  Indian

Air Force (25 missiles) and later

for  the  Indian Army. It is most prob-

able that the “airborne” modification

of the Prithvi missile was first publicly

demonstrated at the military parade

on  the  occasion of  India’s Republic

Day on  26 January 1995, but its in-

ception into service by the Indian Air

Force was officially announced only

on 18 April 2001 by the then Minister

of  Defence Jaswant Singh in  his

speech to  the  Parliament. He stat-

ed then that it was only a  trial oper-

ation and further acquisition of  this

ballistic missile for the Air Force was

not planned. At present a subsidiary

enterprise of  the Bharat Dynamics

Limited company in  Hyderabad is

producing only the Prithvi II missiles.

There were also reports that

the  Prithvi  II ballistic missile under-

went upgrading in  the second half

of  the 1990s. As a  result, new high-

energy fuel for  the  missile allowed

its developers to  increase the  war-

head weight from 500 kg to 1,000 kg

while retaining the  given flight

range. Some Indian media report

that the upgraded version of the mis-

sile is powered by a solid-propellant

engine. The  first test launch of  this

modification took place on 31 March

2001, and the  missile flight range

then was 250  km. However, there is

every likelihood that it concerns an

entirely new ballistic missile, desig-

nated as “Prithvi III” (see below), rath-

er than the Prithvi II modification.

In 2001 a series of tests were con-

ducted to evaluate combat effective-

ness of a multipurpose combat mod-

ule armed with a row of various-type

warheads: incendiary, cluster with

bomblets, and runway buster war-

head. In the  early 2001 the  Prithvi

ballistic missile systems were in-

cepted into active service and put

on combat duty. The decision about

it was based on  the  analysis of  the

Indian armed forces’ potential dur-

ing the  confrontation with Pakistan

in 2001.

According to  unclassified publi-

cations the  Indian Army has by now

formed as a  minimum three mis-

sile groups numbered 333, 444, and

555. Terminology-wise, an Indian

Army’s missile group corresponds

to  a  Russian missile brigade: that is,

one Prithvi missile group includes

three missile battalions with 12 mis-

sile launchers in each, and three sup-

plementary transporter-launcher

units in  the reserve of  the missile

group commander. Thus it turns out

that the  total number of  the Prithvi

missile system transporter-launch-

er vehicles of  various modifications

in the Indian Army can amount to 45

units. Analysts assume though that

their quantity is much less in  reality.

The third missile group to be formed

in  2003, as was then announced, ac-

tually existed only on paper for some

years. Indian sources still insist that

the  national defence industry is ca-

pable, in  case of  necessity, of  pro-

ducing three to  four such missiles

per month.

It is worth mentioning that after

successful completion of  the Agni

A mockup of the Sukanya class patrol ship with the Dhanush ballistic mis-sile

Dhanush bal-listic missile

Page 17: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 15

intermediate-range ballistic missile

test Mr K. Shantanam, the  DRDO

technical and scientific advisor,

made a  statement that the  Prithvi

ballistic missile had never been

planned to be the principal nuclear

capable delivery vehicle: such role

was considered for  it only in  con-

tingency cases. The  Indian nucle-

ar scientist said in  particular: “Now

we can state that the  Agni solid-fu-

el missile has completely assumed

the  role of  delivering the  nuclear

charge, taking it off from the Prithvi

liquid-fuel missile”.

Developer of  the Prithvi missile

system  — Defence Research and

Development Organisation (DRDO)

of India.

Prime contractor  — Bharat

Dynamics Limited (BDL) company,

Hyderabad.

Subcontractors for the Program:

– Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL)

company, Bangalore  — liquid-fu-

el engine and missile body com-

ponents;

– Bharat Aluminum (Balco) compa-

ny  — components made of  alu-

minium alloys, and missile body

components;

– Bharat Earth Movers Ltd (BEML)

company  — transporter-launch-

ers and other vehicles based

on the Kolos truck;

– Khirkee Explosives and Com bus-

tibles Plant, Pune  — liquid fuel

components.

An estimated cost of  one serial-

ly-produced missile is about 0.74–

1.4 mln USD.

DHANUSH SEA-LAUNCHED

BALLISTIC MISSILE SYSTEM

The Dhanush (Sanskrit for “Bow”)

sea-launched ballistic missile has

been designed within the framework

of the Prithvi ballistic missile develop-

ment programme. Indian specialists

describe colourfully the system com-

position: ‘Dhanush’ is the  launching

unit equipped with the hydraulic sta-

bilisation system, which is a  ‘bow’,

whereas the missile is an ‘arrow’ shot

by means of  the  above mentioned

bow. Indian sources sometimes

designate the  Dhanush otherwise,

as Prithvi III (SS-350).

The Dhanush missile is struc-

turally similar to  its prototype,

the  Prithvi  II single-stage ballistic

missile. Two variants of  the missile

are said to  have been developed:

an anti-ship missile with the  launch

range of around 250 km, and a ship-

to-surface missile with the  launch

range of around 500 km. Indian mis-

sile experts are also said to be devel-

oping a submarine-launched version

of  the Dhanush ballistic missile — if

so, this one should be powered by

a solid-propellant engine.

The Dhanush ballistic missile

specifications are as follows: missle

launch weight — 4,400 kg, warhead

type and weight  — conventional

high explosive, 500  kg (there are re-

ports that the  warhead weight can

be increased up to  1,000 kg), mis-

sile length — 8.56 m. misile body di-

ameter — 1.1 m, number of stages —

one, flight range  — 250–350  km,

CEP  — about 250  m, guidance sys-

tem type  — inertial. The  ship-

based management system allows

launching the  missile at  a pitch an-

gle of  up to  5 degrees and roll an-

gle of  up to  10 degrees. The  mis-

sile pointing accuracy is within one

degree. The  maximum range flight

duration is 300  seconds. The  mis-

sile launch system is said to be able

to also manage the Sagarika tactical

missile. This eventuality makes some

experts speculate that the  Sagarika

and Dhanush missiles are nothing

other than different modifications

of the same prototype derived from

the Prithvi ballistic missile.

The Sukanya class ‘Subhadra’ pa-

trol ship (INS Subhadra, P51) was em-

ployed as a  carrier ship for  the  mis-

Sagarika sea-launched mis-sile test

Page 18: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

16 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

sile tests and trial operation. The first

missile flight test was conducted on-

board this ship, and ended up as a fail-

ure when the  ballistic missile proto-

type broke in two in the air, fell down

and sank at  the 4th second of  the

flight. The  second test launch was

performed in  December 2000 and

the  third one  — on  21  September

2001. The  latter one was consid-

ered a  complete success as the  mis-

sile carrying a  500-kg payload was

launched from the ship off the coast

of  Orissa state, covered the  pre-

planned distance (150  km), and

splashed down in  the defined wa-

ter area of  the Bay of  Bengal. A  rep-

resentative of  the Indian Ministry

of  Defence even declared in  the in-

terview for  “The Hindustan Times”

newspaper that India’s military and

political leaders would soon begin

“to practically employ the  system”.

But in  the same year an official rep-

resentative of  the Indian Navy who

preferred to  remain unnamed point-

ed out that “Indian Navy no longer

considers the  Dhanush ballistic mis-

sile as a platform for nuclear charge

delivery”. Finally, in September 2002

Dr.  Abdul Kalam, the  then scientif-

ic advisor to the Minister of Defence,

announced that the  Dhanush ballis-

tic missile was prepared to enter ser-

vice with the Indian Navy.

The missile was planned to be in-

ducted by the  Indian Navy for  tri-

al operation not later that 2003,

yet no credible information about

this issue has been released so far.

Even though after the  fourth suc-

cessful test onboard the  Subdhara

patrol ship some Indian media re-

ported that the Ministry of Defence

had allegedly placed an order for 30

missiles at the manufacturing plant.

The  serial production missile was

tested during the  fifth trial launch

conducted in  the Bay of  Bengal

on 28 December 2005.

The sea-launched ballistic mis-

sile development is apparently

going to  be stay on  hold, at  least

for  some time in  the near future,

since the  tension in  relations be-

tween India and Pakistan has some-

what eased down, whereas this ship-

borne missile system had been made

as a  deterrent for  Pakistan: it was

planned that Indian surface ships

armed with such systems would sail

to safe positions off main ports and

naval stations of  Pakistan and de-

liver massive missile strikes against

them (some experts even consid-

er the  Dhanush missile to  be noth-

ing else than technology demon-

strator). A model of such carrier ship

with the  Dhanush ballistic missile

launcher onboard was shown at the

Defexpo 2002 International defence

exhibition (it is now showcased

at  the Indian Minister of  Defence

representation area on  the  territory

of the Pragati Maidan exhibition cen-

tre in Delhi).

Developer  — Defence Research

and Development Organisation

(DRDO) of India

Prime contractor  — Bharat

Dynamics Limited (BDL) company,

Hyderabad.

Subcontractor for  the  pro-

gramme  — Hindustan Aeronautics

LTD (HAL) company, Bangalore — en-

gine and missile body components;

Shaurya tactical/theatre ballsistic missile

A hypothetical view of the Sagirika mis-sile outside its transport-launch can-ister

Page 19: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 17

SAGARIKA (SHAURYA) TACTICAL/

THEATRE MISSILE SYSTEM

The Sagarika (Sanskrit

for  “Oceanic”) sea-launched missile

system and its land-based version

“Shaurya” (Sanskrit for  “Valour”) are

a  follow-on development of  the

Prithvi ballistic missile incorpo-

rating new technologies drawn

by Indian experts from the  joint

Russian-Indian BrahMos project.

The  new missile has been devel-

oped since 1991. It  is a  two-stage

missile in  which both stages are

powered by solid-propellant mo-

tors. In contrast to  the  preceding

models of the Prithvi family ballistic

missiles, the  Sagarika and Shaurya

tactical/theatre missiles do not

have an X-form wing in  the mid-

portion of  the missile body, and

their specifications are much clos-

er to  those of  the BrahMos mis-

sile than the  Prithvi ballistic mis-

sile. The  missile flight tests start-

ed in 2004: two successful launches

were performed on 23 January and

19 March 2004.

The missile bode is made of a steel

alloy. The  Sagarika missile specifica-

tions are as follows: length — 10.0 m,

maximum body diameter  — 0.74  m,

launch weight  — about 6,200  kg,

maximum CEP  — not more than

25 m. With the new engine and high-

energy fuel the Sagarika missile can

be fired at a range of 350 to 600 km,

and deliver a  payload weighing

from 500  kg to  1,000  kg. A number

of Indian sources have intimated that

the  missile developer is taking mea-

sures to  increase the  missile launch

range up to  1,300 to  2,500  km and

has requested technical assistance

of  Russia and Israel. The  Sagarika/

Shaurya missile system powered by

solid-propellant engines has a  sub-

stantially greater combat potential

since there is no need any more

to keep a crowd of technical support

vehicles within the missile battalions

as was the case with the Prithvi I and

Prithvi  II liquid-propellant missiles.

The  missile is stored in  a 2.4-m di-

ameter composite transport-launch

canister.

It is also most interesting that

besides ground-to-ground modifi-

cation of the Sagarika missile, Indian

specialists are developing its sub-

marine-launched version (designat-

ed in  some Indian media as Project

K-15) for arming an indigenously de-

veloped advanced nuclear-powered

submarine. The  missile is planned

to  carry a  warhead weighing from

180 kg to 550 kg with either conven-

tional or nuclear (17–150 kT yield)

charge.

Information about the  Sagarika

missile system programme is rather

contradictory, but some media had

reports that the  Sagarika ballistic

missile was launched from a  special

underwater test facility at Chandipur

test range on 27 October 2004, and

on  12 November 2008 sixth test

launch of  this kind was made, but

there are no more data about further

testing since then. The  missile silos

onboard the  advanced submarine

are supposed to accommodate both

one Agni  III ballistic missile special

modification (one Agni IIISL per silo)

and Sagarika missiles (three missiles

per silo). The Sagarika missiles can be

launched from submerged position

at the depth of 50 m (precise launch

depth range is unknown).

AGNI FAMILY STRATEGIC BALLISTIC

MISSILE SYSTEM

First attempts to  develop an in-

digenous long-range strategic mis-

sile were undertaken in  the early

1970s. Thus, Project Valiant was start-

ed in  1972 with the  purpose to  de-

sign and manufacture a  three-stage

liquid-propellant intercontinen-

tal ballistic missile. The  first boost-

er stage was supposed to accommo-

date three liquid-propellant rocket

engines with a 30-tonne thrust each,

and the  second stage should have

had one such engine. At the  same

time civil-purpose rocket special-

ists from the  Indian Space Research

Organisation (ISRO) were develop-

ing a family of space launch vehicles:

in  1980 they made first successful

launch of  a four-stage space launch

vehicle SLV-3.

The technical heritage accumu-

lated in  Project Valiant (cancelled

for  some reason in  1974) as well as

in  the Space Launch Vehicle proj-

ect laid perfect ground for  de-

sign works over the  Agni (Sanskrit

for “Fire”) family ballistic missiles, of-

Launch of the Agni I medium-range ballistic missile.By expert esti-mates at least 10 nuclear charges for these mis-siles have been produced until now.

Page 20: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

18 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ficially started in 1983, although indi-

vidual case studies had been going

on since 1979.

The first member in  this ballis-

tic missile family was the  Agni-

TD/TTB missile (where TD means

“Technology Demonstrator”, and

TTB  — “Technology Test Bed”).

Generally speaking, the  missile was

used as a  technology demonstrator

and test prototype helping to  elab-

orate a number of tasks and compo-

nents, including, first of  all, the  fol-

lowing ones:

– missile design optimisation, de-

termination of  stages number

and composition;

– study of  missile control meth-

ods in  various flight trajectory

phases, especially during reen-

try of  its warhead (reentry ve-

hicle) into dense layers of  the

Earth’s atmosphere at  hyperson-

ic speeds;

– possibility to  introduce in-

to the  reentry vehicle structure

a  multi-directionally reinforced

carbon-fiber preform technology

(MRCP) material, as well as:

– testing of  a new inertial naviga-

tion system.

Indian developers of the new mis-

sile confessed that the first Agni fam-

ily offspring was kind of  a hybrid

of  the Prithvi ballistic missile with

the  S-1 booster stage of  the  SLV-3

launch vehicle. The booster was a lit-

tle modified and employed solid

propellant. To reduce design time,

a  shortened version of  the Prithvi

missile’s liquid-propellant engine

was used in the second stage of the

new missile instead of a solid-propel-

lant engine (yet to be designed).

The first successful test of the new

missile took place on  22 May 1989

at Chandipur test range. For the sec-

ond test the  missile’s second stage

was slightly modified to  take great-

er fuel load. The  last Agni-TD/TTB

ballistic missile was test launched

on  19  February 1994. According

to  Indian sources, during that flight

an upgraded reentry vehicle ca-

pable of  performing self-correc-

tion and terminal evasive manoeu-

vres (after entering into dense layers

of  the Earth’s atmosphere) was test-

ed for  the  first time. The  maximum

missile flight range registered dur-

ing tests was 1,450  km (maximum

possible range was announced to be

1,500 km).

The Agni-TD/TTB missile nev-

er entered service with the  Indian

armed forces, although in  1999 dur-

ing Kargil armed conflict at  least

one such missile was prepared to-

gether with four Prithvi missiles

for  combat employment in  the nu-

clear capable configuration in  case

if Pakistan had begun a  large-scale

aggression against India or had first

employed nuclear weapons. In his

book “Weapons of Peace: The Secret

Story of India’s Quest To Be a Nuclear

Power” published in  India in  2000

Raj Chengappa writes that the above

mentioned five missiles were

brought into Combat Readiness No.

3 status which stipulates that nucle-

ar warheads should be completely

prepared for employment and ready

for  installation on  the  carrier mis-

siles. All the  missiles were moved

and deployed near India’s western

regions in  close vicinity to  the  Indo-

Pakistan border. Some Indian high-

ranking officials and retired gener-

als have even avowed that the  nu-

clear charge was indeed mounted

on  the  Agni missile, and the  missile

itself was brought to the launch posi-

tion, fully loaded with fuel, and ready

for immediate launch.

As of today, the Agni ballistic mis-

sile family has four fully completed

missile modifications with two more

under development:

– Agni-TD/TTB  — a  medium-range

two-stage technology demon-

strator missile (its first stage is

a  solid propellant booster, and

the  second stage  — a  liquid-pro-

A mockup of the Agni ballistic missile railway-based launcherA mockup of the Agni ballistic missile railway-based launcher

Agni II ballistic Agni II ballistic missile mobile missile mobile launcher at the launcher at the military parade military parade in Delhiin Delhi

Page 21: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 19

pellant motor). The  missile has

successfully passed tests, and its

production is terminated;

– Agni  I (or A-1)  — a  single-stage

solid-propellant medium-range

ballistic missile having the launch

range of  850  km with a  1,000-kg

warhead. The missile is in service

with the  Indian Army, its produc-

tion is continued;

– Agni II (or A-2) — a two-stage sol-

id-propellant medium/interme-

diate-range ballistic missile hav-

ing the  launch range of  2,800–

3,000  km with a  1,000-kg war-

head. The missile is in service with

the Indian Army, its production is

continued;

– Agni IIAT (or A-2AT) — an upgrad-

ed version of  the Agni  II ballistic

missile having the  launch range

increased up to  4,000  km with

a  1,500-kg warhead. The  missile

is made of  the state-of-the-art

more durable and light materials.

The missile is under development;

– Agni III — a three-stage solid-pro-

pellant intercontinental ballistic

missile having the  launch range

of  not less than 5,500  km with

a 1,500-kg warhead, or 12,000 km

for a 500-kg warhead;

– Agni  IV (or Agni  III++)  — a  three-

stage solid-propellant intercon-

tinental ballistic missile having

the  launch range of  more than

10,000  km with a  1,000-kg war-

head. The  missile is under devel-

opment.

Indian media sources report

that the  Agni family missiles will

be further upgraded by equipping

them with satellite navigation sys-

tem receivers of  either Russian-

made GLONASS (GLObal NAvigation

Satellite System), for  which Russia

and India have reached a fundamen-

tal agreement to operate it jointly, or

Indian-made IRNSS (Indian Regional

Navigation Satellite System) which

should cover up to 35% of the Globe

according to its Indian developers.

AGNI I MEDIUM-RANGE BALLISTIC

MISSILE

The Agni  I is a  single-stage sol-

id-propellant medium-range ballis-

tic missile fitted with a  separable

warhead and an inertial navigation

system.

The development works over

the  Agni  I missile project were start-

ed in  1994 immediately after suc-

cessful tests of  the Agni-TD/TTB bal-

listic missiles. However, after some

time they were suspended and re-

sumed after successfully tests of the

Agni II ballistic missile. It was revived

on the initiative of the Indian Armed

Forces who demanded urgent in-

duction into service of a ballistic mis-

sile with greater flight range than

that of  the Prithvi missile but less

than the  Agni  II’s. The  range should

be within 300–2,000 km. As a  result

of the design studies it was decided

to  re-engineer the  Agni  II medium-

range ballistic missile instead of  de-

veloping a  new one. Actually one

stage was cut off from the  missile,

and the new missile became thus sin-

gle-stage.

The Agni  I missile specifications

are as follows: length — about 15 m,

maximum missile body diametre  —

1.0  m, launching weight  — about

12 tonnes, reentry vehicle weight with

the nuclear charge — up to 1,000 kg.

Its reentry vehicle is identical to that

mounted on  the  Agni  II medium-

range ballistic missile. The Agni I mis-

sile with the standard-weight reentry

vehicle (1,000 kg) has launch range

of  about 850  km. According to  its

developers, if fitted with a  lower-

weight reentry vehicle (e.g. 500 kg)

the  missile can have its flight range

increased up to 1,200 km. The missile

has the  same booster and electron-

ics as those installed in  the Agni  II

ICBM.

The first test flight of the ballistic

missile topped with a 1,000-kg reen-

try vehicle took place on 25 January

2002. The  missile was launched

from a mobile wheeled launcher (so

Agni IIITD intercontinental ballistic missile prototypeAgni IIITD intercontinental ballistic missile prototype

Developers of the Agni III ICBM at their product

Page 22: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

20 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

called road-mobile launch). The  mis-

sile flew at a range of about 700 km.

On 9 January 2003 the  second mis-

sile was test launched at  a range

of 700 km. The Agni I missile launch-

er can be mounted on a  railway car-

riage base.

The Agni I medium-range ballistic

missile has sufficient flight range and

combat power. Therefore the  mis-

sile can engage any vital installa-

tions on  the  territory of  Pakistan

without having to deploy its launch-

ers in  close vicinity to  the  border.

Besides, the  missile can engage tar-

gets on  the  territory of  Afghanistan,

Iran, and China as well.

By expert estimates, up to ten 200-

kT nuclear warheads for  the  Agni  I

medium-range ballistic missile

have been produced and delivered

to  the  Indian armed forces in  the

period since 1998 until now. Indian

sources report that the Agni I ballistic

missiles are in service with 334th and

444th Missile Groups of  the Indian

Army.

The missile cost amounts

to 3.5 mln USD.

AGNI II MEDIUM-RANGE BALLISTIC

MISSILE

The Agni  II is a  two-stage sol-

id-propellant medium-range

(in  Western terminology -intermedi-

ate-range) ballistic missile fitted with

one separable warhead of  about

200-kilotonne yield and an inertial

navigation system based on  Indian-

designed/Indian-produced laser gy-

roscopes. The  missile development

started in  1979 and was included

into the  Integrated Guided Missile

Development Program in 1983.

The Agni  II specifications are as

follows: missile length  — 19.6  m,

maximum body diameter  — 1.0  m,

missile launch weight   — about

16 tonnes, reentry vehicle weight

with the  nuclear charge  — up

to  1,000  kg, launch range  — not

less than 2,000  km. The  onboard

missile equipment is integrated via

MIL-STD-1553B standard data bus.

The developers succeeded in reduc-

ing length of cables and wires by 8

times compared with a 24-km long

wiring on  the  Agni-TD/TTB ballis-

tic missile. The  Mk.2 reentry vehi-

cle houses one 200–300 kT warhead

(from the  total weight of  1,000  kg,

the  warhead and antiballistic mis-

sile defence penetration means ac-

count for 750 kg, and the rest goes

to  the  reentry vehicle structure).

The missile CEP is 100–200 m, but as

some media have reported, the  de-

velopers have been able to reduce it

to  40  m by introducing new equip-

ment (e.g. satellite navigation sys-

tem receivers). Besides, the  reentry

vehicle of  the missile can be pow-

ered by a  high altitude-correction

liquid-propellant motor. To avoid

overheating, the reentry vehicle en-

ters the  atmosphere at  a high inci-

dence angle.

The A210 type powerplant makes

use of solid-propellant engines in the

first and second stages. The  first

stage booster engine is practical-

ly identical to  that used in  the Agni-

TD/TTB missile which, in its turn, was

derived from the  SLV-3 launch vehi-

cle engine. The  booster uses more

advanced fuel with improved char-

acteristics. Both stages are made

of  the 15CDV6 grade high-strength

steel. The missile launch preparation

now takes only 15 minutes thanks

to  the employment of  the solid-pro-

pellant engines which allow for dras-

tic reduction of  the pre-flight pro-

cedures.

The new missile was first test

launched on  11 April 1999 at  09:47

Indian Standard Time from the  IC-4

launch pad of  then new test range

situated in the inner part of Wheeler

Island off the  coast of  Orissa State

at  the range of  150  km from its

capital, the  city of  Bhubaneshwar.

The  ballistic missile was launched

from a  mobile launching unit made

from a  modified railway carriage re-

sembling structurally a  railway car-

Agni IIITD intercontinen-tal ballistic missile

Agni IIITD intercontinen-tal ballistic missile

Page 23: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 21

riage/launcher in  the Russian rail-

way-mobile Molodets ICBM system.

The  combat crew was accommodat-

ed in  the adjacent re-equipped rail-

way carriage.

The missile was reported to  be

equipped with a  GPS receiv-

er. The  missile with a  700-kg war-

head flew at  a range of  2,100  km

for  11  minutes and splashed down

in  a given water area of  the Bay

of  Bengal. The  missile development

team confirmed that test character-

istics and CEP attained were close

to  design estimates. They also val-

idated estimated maximum flight

range of  up to  2,800  — 3,000  km

for a “special configuration”.

It must be noted that on 14 April

Pakistan responded with another

testing of its Ghauri-2 medium-range

ballistic missile. It was launched

from Tilla-Jogian test range, 40  km

from Jhelum city, Punjab, to  South-

East of Islamabad, almost at the very

border with India. The  missile flew

for 11 minutes at a range of 1,400 km

and fell down in  a defined area

of  the test range near Jiwani city

on  the  coast of  Beluchistan state.

Pakistani specialists affirm that this

nuclear-capable missile has maxi-

mum launch range of  not less than

2,300 km.

The Agni  II missile production

started in  small batches after its

second test had been successful-

ly completed on  17 January 2001

at  Chandipur test range, Orissa (lift-

off at  10:01 Indian Standard Time)

The  launch was performed from

a  mobile launching unit mount-

ed on  the  wheeled chassis (tractor-

trailer). The range was always about

2,100  km. The  main test task was

to  verify the  ballistic missile accura-

cy at  long range. Upon completion

of  the test Professor P. N. Aggarwal,

head of  the Agni programme, said

that the  results of  the flight tests

confirmed that the objectives set be-

fore his team were fully achieved”.

India’s Minister of Defence George

Fernandes in  his letter of  7 March

2001 to  Members of  Parliament an-

nounced that the Indian Government

took decision to  start series pro-

duction of  the Agni  II ballistic mis-

sile. According to  Indian sources,

Bharat Dynamics Limited can pro-

duce up to 12-18 missiles per month.

Speaking to  the  Parliament on  15

May 2002 George Fernandes intimat-

ed that the Government took the fun-

damental decision to  form the  sec-

ond Agni ballistic missile group.

Agni IIITD ICBM test launch

BASIC SPECIFICATIONS OF THE AGNI FAMILY BALLISTIC MISSILES

Characteristics Agni-TD/TTB Agni I Agni II Agni IIAT Agni III Agni IV

First stage mass 10,800 10,800 10,800 20,000 30,500more

than 30,000

Second stage mass 7,000 - 4,200 6,000 12,000more

than 12,000

Third stage mass — — — — — 2,300

Reentry vehicle mass with combat payload

up to 1,000 up to 1,000 up to 1,000 up to 1,500 1,500 or 500 up to 1,000

Missile launch mass, kg: around 19,000 around 12,000 around 16,000 more than 27,000 more than 43,000 up to 50,000

First stage length, m 10.3 10.3 10.3 12.0 6.6 6.8

Second stage length, m 6.0 — 4.8 4.8 4.2 4.2

Third stage length — — — — — 1,0

Reentry vehicle length, m 4.0 4.5 4.5 2.6 3.3 2.0

Missile length, m 20.3 14.8 19.6 19.4 14.1 14.0

First stage diameter, m 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.2 2.0 2.0

Second stage diameter, m 0.8 — 1.0 1.2 1.8 1.8

Third stage diameter, m — — — — — n/a

Maximum reentry vehicle diameter, m

0.8 0.81 0.8 1.0 1.8 1.8

Launch range, km 1,500 850 2,800–3,000 4,0005,500 (1,500 kg)

or 12,000 (500 kg)10,000

Nuclear warhead yield, kT n/a 1x200 1x200 1x200 or 1x300 1x200 or 1x300 3x200 or 3x300

Page 24: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

22 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

In 2003 India’s National Security

Committee endorsed the  request

of  the Indian Armed Forces to  form

two additional missile groups: 334th

Agni I Missile Group and 335th Agni II

Missile Group. On 29 August 2004

the  Agni  II medium-range ballistic

missile was again successfully test

launched (third time in  succession)

from the  test range on  Wheeler

Island. The  launch was attended

by the  Indian Minister of  Defence

Pranab Mukherjee.

Experts estimate that in  the

period since 2000 until now up

to  ten 200-kT nuclear charges

for  the  Agni  II medium-range ballis-

tic missile have been produced and

delivered to the Indian armed forces.

The missile cost amounts

to 4.7 mln USD.

AGNI III INTERCONTINENTAL

BALLISTIC MISSILE

The Agni  III is the  first interconti-

nental ballistic missile (ICBM) devel-

oped and produced by the Indian de-

fence industrial complex. It is a  two-

stage missile powered by solid-pro-

pellant engines.

The Agni  III ICBM specifications

are as follows: missile length  —

14.1 m, maximum diameter — 2.0 m,

missile launch weight  — more than

43 tonnes, reentry vehicle weight

with the  warhead and antiballis-

tic missile defence penetration

means — from 500 to 1,500 kg, reen-

try vehicle type  — monoblock Mk3

of 200 to 300 kT yield, maximum mis-

sile launch range  — 5,500  km (with

the  1,500-kg reentry vehicle mass)

or 12,000  km (with the  500-kg reen-

try vehicle mass). Some media have

published reports that the  Agni  III

ICBM can be employed in  the con-

ventional, non-nuclear configuration

with a  2,490–3,490-kg high explo-

sive warhead. In this case the missile

launch weight can be increased up

to 48 tonnes. The missile reentry ve-

hicle is provided with a fairing to pro-

tect the  warhead from overheating

when it passes through dense layers

of  the atmosphere. The fairing is en-

tirely made of  composites capable

of  withstanding high temperatures

of up to 5,000 degrees Centigrade.

On 7 February 2001, when visit-

ing the AeroIndia 2001 International

Air Show, Dr. B. K. Athre, chief

of  the DRDO and scientific advi-

sor to  the  Minister of  Defence, said

that the Agni III missile was planned

for  induction into operational ser-

vice, and it would have greater

flight range and improved combat

effectiveness. However, it was only

on 17 May 2006 that the DRDO lead-

ers officially acknowledged the very

fact of  the existence of  the inter-

continental ballistic missile devel-

opment programme: on  that day

the  existence of  the missile was re-

vealed, and a  short video footage

about one of  its tests was released

for public.

The announcement of  the new

missile flight tests starting date

was postponed at  least three times

on  both political and technical rea-

sons. Finally, on 9 July 2006 the first

test launch of  the Agni  ICBM was

made at  the test range on  Wheeler

Island which turned out to  be a  fail-

ure. Since the first stage did not sepa-

rate from the second one (there were

also reports that the  second stage

separation had failed), the  Agni  III

missile fell down on  the  ground

short of the target area.

It is noteworthy that initial-

ly the  developers planned to  con-

duct only three flight tests of  the

new missile, considering the  major-

ity of  its components already cer-

tified on  other Agni family missiles

and having no need for  re-certifi-

cation. It could have allowed induc-

tion of  this strategic missile sys-

tem into operational service even

in  2008. Since the  abortive flight

test has compromised prospects

for  successful implementation

of  the charted plans, neither mil-

itary-political leaders nor the  de-

veloping company hasten to  fix

the date of the missile induction in-

to service. At the  same time Indian

experts have already expressed

their opinions about the  possibili-

ty to  derive several new modifica-

tions from the Agni  III ICBM, includ-

ing:  — Agni  IIISL shortened sub-

marine-launched version (approx-

imately 12  m long, equipped with

three independently targeted reen-

try vehicles);  — a  missile equipped

with multiple independently target-

ed reentry vehicles (MIRV);  — as

well as a  three-stage version with

substantially longer flight range.

The Agni  III missile has sufficient

power capacity to reach and engage

any vital installations on the territory

of  Pakistan as well as important tar-

gets on the territory of China, includ-

ing Shanghai and Beijing.

AGNI IIAT MEDIUM-RANGE

BALLISTIC MISSILE

The Agni  IIAT medium-range bal-

listic missile is a  further develop-

ment of the Agni II missile conducted

under the Continuous Improvement

Program for  this missile family (“AT”

stands for Advanced Technology).

The new medium-range ballistic

missile modification features:

– warhead with lower-weight nu-

clear charge (but with greater

yield);

– upgraded engine promising

to  provide increased launch

range of up to 4,000 km;

– first stage greater diameter

booster made of  higher-strength

steel (250-M) enabling the  fuel-

to-booster mass ratio to be raised

to 0.88;

– substitution of steel in the second

stage body structure with new

composite materials enabling

the fuel-to-second-stage mass ra-

tio to be raised to 0.92;

GSLV Mk III launch vehicle

Page 25: Arms-2010-1

AIR DEFENCE

1(51).2010 ● 23

– lower-mass reentry vehicle body

fully made of  composite materi-

als (an option to  mount the  Mk4

type reentry vehicle, developed

for  the  Agni  III ICBM, is also con-

sidered).

AGNI IV INTERCONTINENTAL

BALLISTIC MISSILE

The Agni  IV intercontinental bal-

listic missile is a  follow-on develop-

ment of  the Agni  III ICBM, featuring

an additional third stage powered

by a  solid-propellant engine weigh-

ing about 2.3 tonnes. Its estimated

launch range is supposed to extend

to  10,000  km. The  missile will also

be fitted with a  new independently

targeted reentry vehicle 2.0  m long

(instead of  3.3 m) comprising three

independently targeted warheads

and a  set of  antiballistic missile de-

fence penetration means. There are

plans to load the reentry vehicle with

a  lower-mass nuclear charge (retain-

ing the  same yield) developed dur-

ing nuclear tests conducted by India

in  1998 (under Projects Shakti-I and

Pokhyran-II)

The Agni IV ICBM specifications are

as follows: missile length  — 14.0  m,

launch weight — up to 50 tonnes, re-

entry vehicle weight with the charge

and antiballistic missile defence pen-

etration means — up to 1,000 kg, re-

entry vehicle type  — multiple in-

dependently targeted reentry vehi-

cles; maximum flight range with full

(1000 kg) combat payload  — about

10,000 km.

SURYA-I/SURYA-II

INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC

MISSILES

The Surya (Sanskrit for “Sun”) fam-

ily intercontinental missiles are seen

as advanced ballistic missile technol-

ogy items. Data on these missiles are

rather contradictory. Some sources

intimate that the  Surya II is anoth-

er designation for  the  Agni  IV ICBM.

Other sources publish data accord-

ing to which the new ICBM is derived

from the  Indian Polar Space Launch

Vehicle (PSLV).

The Surya missile is supposed

to  comprise three stages: first and

second stages powered by solid-pro-

pellant engines (modified versions

of  the corresponding PSLV engines),

third stage with a  liquid-propellant

engine derived from the correspond-

ing Vikas engine of  the PSLV launch

vehicle (French design) or a cryogen-

ic engine of the GSLV launch vehicle

(Russian design). The  missile will be

deployed at fixed launch positions.

Flight tests were planned to start

in  2009, induction in  service is ex-

pected in  2015. No reports have

been published so far about the be-

ginning of this missile flight tests.

The Surya I/II ICBM specifica-

tions are as follows: missile length —

40.0  m, missile diameter  — 2.8  m,

launch weight  — about 80 tonnes,

multiple independently targeted re-

entry vehicles  — two or three war-

heads of 15-20 kT yield each (or 200-

300 kT each, according to  other da-

ta sources). The  Surya I missile has

maximum launch range of  5,000  —

8,000 km, whereas the Surya II ICBM

from 12,000 km to 20,000 km.

A special emphasis should be

made on the fact that Indian military

and political leaders always official-

ly denied that the  country conduct-

ed works on  the  development of  in-

tercontinental ballistic missiles. For

example, India’s Minister of  Foreign

Affairs Jaswant Singh said at  the

press-conference in  January 2002:

“ICBM is not our priority, nor our goal”.

Development activities

for  the  Agni and Surya ICBM fami-

lies are implemented by the  follow-

ing parties:

1. Developer  — Defence Research

and Development Organisation

(DRDO) of India;

2. Ballistic missile manufactur-

er  — Bharat Dynamics Limited,

Hyderabad;

3. Developer of  mobile launcher

and transport-loader vehicle (ex-

cepting the  Agni  IV and Surya

family missiles)  — Research &

Development Engineers (R&DE),

Pune.

4. Manufacturer of  mobile launch-

er and transport-loader vehi-

cle (excepting the  Agni  IV and

Surya family missiles)  — Vehicle

Research & Development

Establishment (VRDE), DRDO divi-

sion, Ahmednagar.

5. Manufacturer of  the nucle-

ar charge  — Bhabha Atomic

Research Centre (BARC).

PSLV C3 launch vehicle

GSLV Mk I launch vehicle

PSLV C3-1 launch vehicle

Page 26: Arms-2010-1

LAND FORCES

24 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

t present, the develop-

ment level of armoured

vehicles signifies to a

large extent the military

potential of the country’s

land forces. Infantry fighting vehicles

(IFVs) are the most widely-used type

of the land forces’ hardware. Constant

upgrade of the combat vehicles fleet

is performed by means of developing

novel combat assets and moderniza-

tion of existing armoured vehicles.

The service life of the armoured

vehicles is rather lengthy, amounting

to 30–40 years. Many countries of the

world are retrofitting the majority of

their combat vehicles. The US is cur-

rently refurbishing its Bradley M2A2

IFV up to the M2A3 configuration.

The Russian-made BMP-2 IFV be-

ing the main CV of the land forces in

many countries was put into service

in 1980 and appeared to be superior

to the majority of its foreign counter-

parts in terms of combat character-

istics. Currently, the BMP-2 still com-

plies with the modern requirements

as regards its armour protection and

riding performance.

Analysis of current status and de-

velopmental tendencies of arma-

ment and fire control systems sug-

gests BMP-2’s weapon system lag-

ging behind the modern state of the

art as regards several combat char-

acteristics:

• Guided weapon firing on the

move and when afloat is not pos-

sible because of the wire guid-

ance of the Konkurs missile.

• The Konkurs weapon system

features low rate of fire due to

launcher reloading. There is con-

siderable loss of time during the

reloading procedure, and the op-

erator can get injured by frag-

ments and small arms fire.

• Night firing can be conducted on-

ly by means of the automatic gun

and the PKT machine-gun to the

range of not more than 800 m.

• Non-automated FCS of the BMP-2

(the absence of the on-board

computer, modern sights and tar-

get autotracker) makes it impossi-

ble to perform accurate firing and

constrains the effective range of

fire by the 30mm gun to 1100–

1400 meters. Considerable er-

rors while firing on the move are

caused by insufficient stabiliza-

tion accuracy of the line of sight

implemented by the BPK-2-42

sight rigidly connected with the

weapon.

• Firing from the automated gun

with 30mm rounds with flat tra-

jectory does not allow engage-

ment of hidden and entrenched

manpower.

• Firing at air threats conducted

by means of the 1PZ-3 target as-

pect sight basically has only psy-

chological effect because the kill

probability against a typical aeri-

al target does not exceed several

hundredths.

The lethality of the combat ve-

hicle is determined by the weap-

on system, and it is improvement of

the weapon system that enables to

achieve the highest enhancement

of combat effectiveness. The BMP-2

has large potential of evolution of

the weapon system. KBP Instrument

Design Bureau has solved the prob-

lem of enhancing the fire power of

A

KBP-DESIGNED MODERNIZED FIGHTING COMPARTMENT OF THE BMP-2 — AN EFFICIENT

WAY OF UPGRADING ARMOURED VEHICLES

Weapon system for armoured vehicles (with kornet-e atgm)

Igor Stepanichev

Lev Shvec

Page 27: Arms-2010-1

LAND FORCES

1(51).2010 ● 25

current BMPs that ensures their supe-

riority over all existing IFVs.

The retrofitting is performed on

the basis of the standard BMP-2 tur-

ret with the 2A42 automatic gun

(while retaining the hull and inter-

nal layout of the turret) within a short

period of time. In terms of design it

includes the following:

• installation of two armoured

launchers of the Kornet-E anti-

tank guided missiles on the sides

of the turret. Each launcher is for

two ready-to-fire missiles and is

fitted with stand-alone electrome-

chanical elevation laying drives;

• installation of the gunner’s

combined sight (instead of the

BPK-2-42 sight) with an indepen-

dent LOS stabilization system. The

sight includes optical, thermal

imaging and laser range finding

channels, as well as the missile

guidance channel;

• installation of the digital on-

board computer with a system

of sensors;

• installation of the TV/thermal

automatic target tracker;

• installation of the 30mm gre-

nade-launcher with an autono-

mous drive from the gun and a

magazine of up to 300 grenades;

• installation of the commander’s

panoramic sight with an inde-

pendent LOS stabilization sys-

tem, which includes TV and la-

ser range finding channels.

The weight of additionally mount-

ed weapons and hardware does not

exseed 500  kg, 260  kg out of these

being the weight of additional am-

munition: ATGM and 30mm grenades.

It’s worth to mention the realized

principle of modular arrangement of

the proposed fighting compartment.

The customer according to his own re-

quirements under the limited financ-

ing can select the upgrade package

variant: full or partial package. The

sighting equipment and armament

(panoramic commander’s sight, sec-

ond ATGW launcher, grenade launch-

er) are installed additionally in the rel-

evant locations of the armoured cupo-

la and are connected with FCS by the

cable joint to the connectors in the ar-

mour of the armoured cupola.

The upgraded BMP-2 with the ad-

vanced Б05Я01 (B05Ya01) fighting

compartment has the following ad-

vantages as compared to the stan-

dard BMP-2:

• Thanks to the day-and-night FCS

it provides the precise firing by

all types of ammunition includ-

ing newly developed, guided and

unguided rounds against moving

and stationary targets, engage-

ment of all targets nomenclature

in stationary position, on the move

and afloat by day/at night includ-

ing automatic gun firing at rang-

es up to 4000 m, Kornet-E ATGW —

up to 5500  m and automatic gre-

nade launcher — up to 2100 m.

• Kornet-E ATGW armour penetra-

tion increase up to 1000-1200mm

provides the reliable engage-

ment of advanced ERA-protected

tanks (Leclerc, Abrams, Leopard).

Besides the HEF warhead of the

missile destroys concrete fortifi-

cations and pillboxes. Targets en-

gagement beyond the enemy’s

effective response fire guarantees

the upgraded BMP-2 victory in

the fighting with tanks and IFVs.

• Four (4) ready-to-fire guided mis-

siles positioned in two (2) stabi-

lized launchers of the upgraded

BMP-2 significantly increase the

ATGM fire rate. Here it is not nec-

essary to reload the ATGM launch-

er during the battle that increas-

es the survivability of the loading

soldier and CV in whole because it

doesn’t stop for ATGM reloading

becoming the easy target on the

battlefield.

• The use of TV/TI target autotrack-

er makes it possible to increase

by 3–6 times the tracking accu-

racy as compared to the manual

mode. The man is excluded from

the aiming contour, the firing re-

sults do not depend upon the gun-

ner’s psychophysical condition

that is especially important un-

der the stress conditions of the

battle. The precise target tracking

becomes the guaranteed perfor-

mance which reduces the gunners

training requirements and training

period itself. The target autotrack-

er gives the totally new quality to

the FCS realizing the “fire-and-for-

get” principle when guided missile

firing. In this case the missile cost

is greatly reduced as compared to

the missile with the homing head

acting as target autotracker.

• Kornet ATGW firing with elevation

above LOS practically excludes the

missile detection by the enemy.

• ATGM laser guidance system with

missile TV-lining in the beam

guarantees high immunity to all

types of jamming because the jam

source cannot be in the IFV rear

and can not have the same codes.

• Salvo firing by two Kornet-E

ATGMs in one beam is provided to

penetrate the targets active pro-

tection and to have gurantee en-

gagement of some highly impor-

tant targets.

• The automatic gun and gre-

nade launcher fire accuracy (by

all types of ammunition) is high-

ly increased thanks to consider-

ation of the most important fir-

ing factors: range to the target

(to be measured by the laser

rangefinder or introduced man-

ually), CV and the target veloc-

ity and direction, wind speed,

temperature and air pressure,

charge temperature, round muz-

zle velocity deviation from nom-

inal value, target elevation angle,

roll and pitch angle, round ejec-

tion angle. Thanks to the digital

onboard computer the fire set-

Weapon system for armoured vehicles (with kornet-e atgm). Side view.

Page 28: Arms-2010-1

LAND FORCES

26 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

tings are produced automatically.

The effective firing range of

30mm rounds of the automat-

ic gun is increased from 1100–

1400 m to 1800–2000 m.

• The BMP-2 AD fire effectiveness

is also greatly increased: the kill

probability when firing from au-

tomatic gun against usual air tar-

gets like “helicopter”, “assault air-

craft” is increased by several times

and is close to kill probability of

specialized AD missile-gun close-

in systems, with less ammunition

expenditure. Therefore the BMP

universalization principle is suc-

cessfully realized by giving the

AD capabilities without addition-

al costs.

• The manpower is effectively en-

gaged at ranges up to 2100 m in-

cluding behind terrain slopes and

in trenches thanks to low ballistic

weapons (AG-30M automatic gre-

nade launcher with new GPD-30

grenades).

• Potential of combat operation

of the IFV’s commander extends

owing to installation of the pan-

oramic TV sight with technical vi-

sion. Such a sight is installed in

the BMP for the first time. The

commander has panoramic field-

of-view in azimuth. The field-of-

view in elevation is extended to

60°. The LOS maximal angular ve-

locity increases from 5–6 to 20

degrees per second. This allows

to increase the number of targets

detected by CV in 2.5 times and

also to raise the accuracy of tar-

get designation for the gunner

in 10 times and completely du-

plicate the commander’s opera-

tion as well as to fire against aeri-

al targets in the automatic mode.

Modernization of the BMP-2 an-

swers the purposes of advanced IFVs

in the next 20–30 years, and the

modernized BMP-2 can be success-

fully used till 30–40-ties of the 21st

century.

Modernization of the BMP-2 is

comprehensive and results not on-

ly in ordinary improvement of some

characteristics of the weapon sys-

tem but makes it possible to create

a CV with fundamentally new perfor-

mance, which successfully competes

with other CVs in the military market.

Calculations of the effectiveness

of the improved and organic BMP-2

in combat conditions both as inde-

pendent unit and while supported by

tanks showed that the required num-

ber of vehicles can be reduced by a

factor of 3.8 while keeping the same

level of probability of successful mis-

sion fulfilment.

In terms of lethality the upgrad-

ed BMP-2 reaches the level superior

to the possibly best IFVs like Bradley

(USA) and Marder (Germany). The

technical solutions used in the de-

sign of the Б05Я01 (B05Ya01) fight-

ing compartment allow the BMP-

2 to outperform in terms of com-

bat potential the American M2A2

Bradley IFV by a factor of 2.4 and its

latest upgraded version M2A3 by a

factor of 1.87, and the cost of the

BMP-2 retrofitting is much less.

The new weapon system is a part

of the Б05Я01 fighting compartment,

which, being a part of the BMP-2,

passed all kids of trials with positive

results according to programs coor-

dinated by the Russian MoD. At pres-

ent KBP performs serial production of

the BMP-2 modernized fighting com-

partment.

The main part of the light weight

CVs park of the land forces in some

foreign countries is constituted by

BMP-2 IFVs which are manufactured

at local plants.

The proposed version of BMP-2

modernization was successfully dem-

onstrated outside Russia. In 2004 a

foreign crew trained within a day

and a half conducted firing trials and

showed the results comparable to

those of the Russian crew. The tri-

als were held with the BMP-2K com-

mander’s vehicle, which was re-

equipped by joint efforts of Russian

and foreign specialists within 15 days

at a local plant without preliminary

production preparation.

The Russian party delivered the

FCS, Kornet-E anti-tank guided mis-

sile launchers, grenade launcher

unit and cable set. Foreign special-

ists together with the Russian spe-

cialists dismounted the standard

fighting compartment, upgraded

the armoured cupola, and prepared

mounting seats for installation of the

weapons, FCS units including sights.

The fighting compartment was as-

sembled, adjusted, the acceptance

trials were held and the fighting

compartment was mounted on the

standard chassis of the local-made

BMP-2. After firing at a shooting-

range the upgraded BMP-2 was ac-

cepted. In 2003, 2004 and 2005 the

upgraded BMP-2 successfully passed

demonstration trials in various coun-

tries of the world.

Thus the advantage of the BMP-2

IFVs equipped with the Б05Я01

(B05Ya01) fighting compartment is

high fire power and proven tech-

nology of the BMP-2 modernization.

Moreover, retrofitting of combat

vehicles can be performed not only

at serial-production plants, but al-

so at plants, which repair armoured

vehicles.

Weapon system for armoured vehicles (with kornet-e atgm). Front view.

Page 29: Arms-2010-1

LAND FORCES

1(51).2010 ● 27

Page 30: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

28 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

INDIA’S ARMS PROCUREMENT

POLICY IN 2009

The terrorist attack in  Mumbai

made Indian Government re-

emphasize vital significance

of  the  state security, enhance pro-

ficiency and equipment level of law

enforcement agencies. Analysis

of  the  terrorist act roots helped

to  expose loopholes in  state se-

curity structure and propose a  set

of  organisational and practical

measures to plug them. The Indian

Government approved overall allo-

cation of 60 billion Indian rupees —

INR (1.25 bn USD) for urgent pro-

curement of arms, military and aux-

iliary equipment.

In December 2008 the  Indian

Ministry of  Defence proposed

the  Indian Navy, Coast Guard and

Army to  submit their requests for

urgent equipment acquisitions un-

der the defence capabilities improve-

ment programme. The Indian Interior

Ministry sent similar request to  sub-

ordinate paramilitary and police units.

At the  initial phase a  high priori-

ty is attributed to  the  procurement

of intelligence, surveillance and data

collection systems, special anti-ter-

rorist equipment designed for spe-

cial-purpose forces, as well as high

precision weapons.

High cost systems are procured by

Indian Coast Guard and Navy (both

agencies were sharply criticised after

the terrorist attack in Mumbai).

In late December 2008 India’s

Minister of  Defence A. K. Antony

endorsed the  Indian Coast Guard

(ICG) programme for urgent procure-

ment/lease of  80 high-speed inter-

ception boats available then in  the

market to  carry out efficient patrol-

ling of the national territorial waters,

as well as establishment of  six addi-

tional ICG coastal stations.

In January 2009 the  Indian

Ministry of  Defence issued a  re-

quest for proposals on  delivering

to  the  Indian Navy six new medi-

um-range maritime reconnaissance

aircraft to  replace 10 obsolete BN-

INDIA’S ARMED FORCES’ WEAPONS MODERNISATION

PROGRAMMES IN 2009

Igor Ilyin

In early 2009 India was estimated to be world’s major arms importer if judged by the confirmed orders

logbook. The terrorist attack occurred in Mumbai on 26 November 2008 provoked even greater surge

in India’s spending on purchases of both indigenous and foreign-origin weapons.

Page 31: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 29

2 Islander maritime patrol aircraft,

and another one on setting up an ef-

ficient three-tier surveillance net-

work in  the Indian Ocean Region.

The  Indian Coast Guard also plans

to  procure six additional maritime

patrol aircraft.

The Indian Navy urgently procure

the  first batch of  two Israeli-origin

aerostat-based radar systems to  im-

prove the Indian Coast Guard’s capa-

bility for low-altitude aircraft detec-

tion/tracking within the range of up

to 500 km. One such system costs ap-

proximately 20–30 million USD. This

is the  first contract for the  procure-

ment of such systems for Navy's pur-

poses. The  Navy has been applying

for the  procurement of  these radar

systems for a  long time, but the  ap-

proval is granted just now.

The Indian Air Force also intends

to  deploy similar aerostat-based ra-

dar surveillance system to  protect

the  capital against low-altitude air-

craft intrusion threat. The radars will

transfer the  acquired data to  air de-

fence missile systems positioned

near New Delhi.

In 2004–2005 India purchased two

aerostat-based radar reconnaissance

systems made by Israeli IAI compa-

ny, equipped with the  EL/M-2083

phased array radar providing up

to 500-km target detection range.

In the  nearest future India in-

tends to sign a contract for procure-

ment of four additional Israeli-made

aerostat-based reconnaissance sys-

tems capable of  detecting enemy

low-flying aircraft, helicopters, un-

manned aerial vehicles, and missiles.

The Indian Air Force plans to procure

up to 13 such systems altogether.

On 17 March 2009 the  Indian

Ministry of  Defence approved

the  programme for urgent procure-

ment of Army weapons and military

equipment, greater part of  which

was intended for the  Ghatak com-

mando units. Considering urgen-

cy of  the  supply order, the  Ministry

intends to  purchase the  required

weapons and military equipment

through the  mechanism of  the  US

Foreign Military Sales programme.

At the top of a high-priority items list

one can find general-purpose ma-

chine guns (fitted with night vision

sights), underbarrel grenade launch-

ers, 2,724 night vision sights, 6,908

mirror sights, 612 radio-controlled

detonators, 372 remotely-controlled

fuses (including receivers and trans-

mitters), and 93 special-purpose

parachutes.

Additional acquisit ion

of the Heckler und Koch MP5 subma-

chine guns is planned for comman-

do units.

Besides, the  Indian Ministry

of  Defence plans to  procure new

reconnaissance systems at  the cost

of about 3.1 billion USD.

Worsening of  relations between

New Delhi and Islamabad frequent-

ly provoked India’s new rearma-

ment planning. In  the  decade af-

ter the Indo-Pakistani armed conflict

in  1999 in  Kargil area, Jammu and

Kashmir, for instance, India procured

abroad an  arsenal of  weapons and

military equipment worth 25 billion

USD. Besides urgent arms procure-

ments, the near-term purchases also

will be substantially increased com-

pared with previously approved fig-

ures. As a matter of fact, in the com-

ing 2–3 years India is going to  pro-

cure weapons and military equip-

ment worth 10 billion USD. India’s

total expenditures in  the coming

5 years for purchasing weapons and

military equipment abroad are esti-

mated at  30 billion USD (excepting

urgent procurements).

INDIA’S MILITARY EXPENDITURES

India earmarked defence expen-

ditures for the 2009–2010 fiscal year

(FY) that started on  1 April 2009,

at the amount of 1,417.03 INR (about

28 billion USD). This figure is 34%

greater than appropriations for mili-

tary needs in FY 2008–2009. The de-

fence budget growth is directly coor-

dinated both with the Indian armed

forces’ long-term modernisation

programme and a number of urgent

measures deemed necessary for im-

plementation after the  Mumbai ter-

rorist attack.

Indian Minister of Defence A. K. Antoni and the US Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates, February 2008

Page 32: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

30 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

The augmentation makes up

361.03 billion INR relative to  FY

2008–2009 defence budget fig-

ure of  1056 billion INR approved

by the  Parliament. However, in  re-

al terms the budget growth is 23.6%

compared with FY 2008–2009, since

during that period additional sums

were allocated for defence purposes,

and the  defence expenditures went

up to 1,146 billion INR. Such a signifi-

cant budget increase is explained by

the  requirement for strengthening

the  national defence in  connection

with growing terrorist threats and

tensions in the region.

As in  previous years it was

the  Indian Army that received

the  main part of  fund allocations

(41% or 586.48 billion INR). The Indian

Navy received 83.22 billion INR, and

the Air Force 143.18 billion INR.

The capital expenditures amount

to  548.24 billion INR (one can com-

pare it with 410.07 billion INR in the

revised budget for FY 2008–2009).

The  Indian Air Force has received

the maximum amount of 200 billion

INR, while Army and Navy have their

share of  177.6795 and 118.7373 bil-

lion INR respectively.

The India’s arms procurement

funds for FY 2009–2010 have

amounted to 11.42 billion USD show-

ing a  14.2% increment from simi-

lar figures in  FY 2008–2009 (10 bil-

lion USD).

The Army has received the  great-

est part of  supplementary arms pro-

curement funding among other mil-

itary services. Funds allocated for

this purpose have been increased by

32.5% — from 2.73 to 3.7 billion USD.

The Indian Army particularly in-

tends to  procure 155-mm howit-

zers with the  52-calibre barrel, un-

manned aerial vehicles through

mechanisms of  already opened ten-

ders, mobile artillery regiment com-

mand and control posts, additional

quantities of  the  T-90S main battle

tanks, equipment for special-opera-

tions forces, antitank guided missile

systems, helicopters, cruise missiles,

and combat management systems,

as well as to upgrade the T-72 tanks.

The Indian Air Force receives 4.16

billion USD for arms procurement

which represents a  4.3% increase

compared with 3.98 billion USD

in FY 2008–2009. The Air Force plans

to  start initial financing of  the  126

medium multi-role fighter procure-

ment programme (the  tender for

their delivery is still going on), to pur-

chase unmanned aerial vehicles,

tanker aircraft, helicopters, stand-

off missiles, and upgrade the MiG-29

and Mirage 2000 fighters as well as

air defence missile systems.

The Indian Navy has received 832

billion USD for naval systems pro-

curement, which is a 4.5% increment

compared with 796 billion USD in FY

2008–2009. The Navy’s procurement

plan includes purchases of  nuclear-

powered and conventional subma-

rines, surface ships, unmanned aerial

vehicles, air defence missile systems,

heavy torpedoes for diesel-electric

submarines, maritime reconnais-

sance aircraft, and the P-8I Poseidon

maritime patrol aircraft.

Research, development, test and

evaluation activities have been fund-

ed with 776.6 million USD whereas

in FY 2008–2009 it amounted to 644

million USD. The  Defence Research

T-90S Bhishma Main Battle Tank

9mm MP5-A4 submachine gun

Page 33: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 31

and Development Organisation

(DRDO) of  the  Indian Ministry

of  Defence is now conducting de-

velopment works over a broad spec-

trum of  defence systems and tech-

nologies, including a  ballistic mis-

sile capable of  delivering a  nuclear

charge over the  range of  5,000 km,

cruise missiles, air defence missile

systems, aircraft, helicopters, and un-

manned aerial vehicles.

OVERVIEW OF MAJOR

EVENTS IN INDIA’S MILITARY

COOPERATION WITH FOREIGN

COUNTRIES IN 2009

In 2009 India signed conceptu-

al agreements of  great importance

with Russia and the  United States

of America that will define her long-

term mutual relations in  the field

of  foreign military-technical cooper-

ation with both countries.

Russia. On 7 December 2009 Rus-

sian President Dmitry Medvedev and

Indian Prime Minister Manmohan

Singh signed joint declaration fol-

lowing the  official visit of  the  Indian

Government’s head. They also atten-

ded signing of  intergovernmental

agreements on  the military-technical

cooperation programme for the  pe-

riod of  2011–2020 and on  post-sale

servicing of  Russian weapons and mi-

litary equipment supplied to  India, as

well as the  protocol to  the  two-state

inter-governmental Agreement on  co-

operation in development and produc-

tion of multi-purpose transport aircraft

(dated 12 November 2007).

Moreover, during the Manmohan

Singh’s visit the  two Parties came

to a final agreement on the deadlines

and cost of the Admiral Gorshkov air-

craft carrier upgrading, which be-

came the  main result of  the  nego-

tiations. According to  the  reached

agreement, the total cost of the work

is set at 2.3 billion USD.

USA. India and the USA saw radical

changes in  their military-technical

cooperation in 2009. On 20 July 2009,

as a result of negotiations held by US

State Secretary Hillary Clinton during

her official visit, India and the  USA

signed in  New Delhi the  End-user

verification agreement (EUVA) and

Communication interoperability and

security memorandum of  agree-

ment (CISMOA) as prerequisites for

protection and control of  sensitive

technology transfers in  accordance

with the  US legislation. It lifted last

restrictions that until then hindered

relations of the two countries in the

military-technical cooperation area.

India consented to  substantially

relax restrictions practiced by her

on  acquisitions from foreign suppli-

ers in order to speed up implementa-

tion of the major arms sales contract

with the  Unites States. The  Boeing

Company which in  early January

2009 signed an  agreement on  sup-

ply to  the  Indian Navy of  eight P-8I

maritime patrol aircraft, was freed

from the  offset requirement to  in-

vest 30% of  the  contract price in-

to deals on  buying goods and ser-

vices in  that country. It is a  seem-

Boeing F/A-18E/F «Super Hornet» carri-er-based multi-role fighter

Admiral Gorshkov (Vikramaditya) aircraft carrierAdmiral Gorshkov (Vikramaditya) aircraft carrier

Page 34: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

32 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ingly weighty concession, consider-

ing the total amount of the contract

worth 98 billion INR (2.1 billion USD).

In the  long run Boeing wants

to  augment substantially its share

in the Indian arms market. At this mo-

ment the  company is promoting its

F/A-18E/F aircraft, a contender in the

Indian Air Force’s tender for a  medi-

um multi-role fighter. Boeing has al-

so received a request for information

on  strategic transport aircraft to  be

supplied to the Indian Air Force, and

has sent its proposal for the  deliv-

ery of  the  C-17A Globemaster-3 mili-

tary transport aircraft to the Ministry

of Defence.

After winning the  tender for

the  delivery of  the  P-8I Poseidon

maritime patrol aircraft, Boeing plans

to  propose the  P-8 aircraft as a  con-

tender in another contest for the de-

livery of  a  medium-range maritime

reconnaissance aircraft (MRMRA).

Boeing has offered the  CH-47

Chinook helicopter as a  contender

in  the Indian Ministry of  Defence’s

heavy-lift helicopter acquisition pro-

gramme, as well as the  AH-64H at-

tack helicopter.

In turn, Lockheed Martin plans

in  the near 5 years to  conclude de-

fence-related contracts with India

costing more than 15 billion USD.

In  2008 the  company signed with

the  Indian Ministry of  Defence

a  contract for delivery of  six C-130J

Hercules military transport aircraft

at  a total cost of  about one billion

USD.

Besides, Lockheed Martin has fo-

cused its efforts on  winning in  the

Indian Air Force’s tender for delivery

of 126 medium multi-role fighters

In addition, the  company

will offer to  the  Indian Ministry

of  Defence military transport air-

craft, helicopters for Navy, and mis-

siles. Lockheed Martin is reportedly

planning to conclude an agreement

on joint production and modernisa-

tion of  the  AGM-114 Hellfire-2 mis-

siles intended for employment from

land-based and airborne platforms.

Feasibility of  establishing joint ven-

tures with Indian state-owned en-

terprises, such as Bharat Electronics

Ltd and Bharat Dynamics Ltd, lead-

ing missile manufacturers, is also

studied by the company.

Lockheed Martin holds talks

with representatives of  the  Indian

Ministry of Defence on potential de-

liveries of  the Sniper target designa-

tor pod, Javelin antitank guided mis-

sile systems, and Longbow system.

In the  improved ambience

of Indian-US relationship the compa-

ny has also made offers for the deliv-

ery to India of the most updated ver-

sion of  its Partiot PAC-3 anti-air/anti-

ballistic missile system, Aegis combat

management system, and Mk.41 ver-

tical launchers for Navy.

NAVAL ARMS

NAVAL ARMS TENDERS

FOR INDIA’S NAVY

Tender for 6 Non-Nuclear Submarines

The Indian Defense Ministry has

launched the  procedure of  buy-

ing the  next batch of  submarines

by issuing the  request for six new

diesel-electric submarines under

an  international tender. At present,

the  Navy and Defense Ministry are

studying preliminary responses from

Rosoboronexport, French company

Armaris, German HDW and Spanish

Navantia. The  new batch of  diesel-

electric submarines is estimated

at 300 billion rupees.

The Indian Navy wants the  next

batch of  Project-75A diesel-electric

submarines to  have air-indepen-

dent powerplants. The  new subma-

rines will feature the stealth technol-

ogy and other promising develop-

ments as well as land-based targets

engagement capability. The  subma-

rine should also have vertical missile

launchers. All six submarines will be

built in India in line with the technol-

ogy transfer agreement to be signed

with the winning bidder.

According to  Project-75, India’s

Navy plans to further acquire 30 new

diesel-electric submarines.

Lockheed-Martin C-130J «Super Hercules» mili-tary transport

Boeing C-17A «Globe Master III» military transport

Page 35: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 33

Project 28 Low-Signature Corvettes

Programme

By the  end of  December 2009,

the  Indian Navy planned to  is-

sue a  tender for constructing four

Project 28 (P-28) stealth antisub-

marine corvettes. India’s Defense

Ministry will let Kockums of Sweden,

part of  ThyssenKrupp Marine

Systems, which has a  large experi-

ence in  building 650-t Visby-class

stealth corvettes as well as Greek

company Intermarine and Kangnam

Corporation take part in the tender.

The first two Project 28 corvettes

that will be soon completed were

equipped with a  usual steel sail,

while the  further ships of  this batch

will possess the  sail made of  com-

posite materials.

The construction of  the  leading

P-28 antisubmarine corvette is 80%

complete. Its launching is scheduled

for February 2010. The sail of the sec-

ond ship is 80% complete. The Garden

Reach shipyard has been building

the  ships since 2003 after signing

the letter of intent with India. The ini-

tial project implementation period

was violated as the  designers were

working on the stealth technology.

The cost of  construction in-

creased from 28 billion rupees

(about $600 million) for four Project

28 ships to 70 billion rupees ($1.5 bil-

lion). The leading ship is set for deliv-

ering to the Indian Navy in 2012.

CURRENT PROGRAMMES CARRIED

OUT JOINTLY WITH FOREIGN

COMPANIES

Australia. Licensed Construction of  Boats

for the Coast Guard

In February 2009, Indian company

ABG Shipyard ltd. launched a  high-

speed interceptor boat for the Indian

Coast Guard.

In June 2006, India’s Coast Guard

made a  contract with ABG Shipyard

for building 11 interceptor boats

designed by Australian company

Thorneycroft Maritime & Associates.

One vessel is estimated at  176.3

million rupees (about $3.6 million).

The  whole contract is worth 1,939.4

million rupees (about $40.4 million).

All 11 boats are set for delivery by

the end of 2010. In 2008, the compa-

ny provided the  Indian Coast Guard

with two boats of this project.

Russia. Modernization of Project 877EKM

Diesel-Electric Submarine

In 2009, Russia continued its

long-term programme of upgrading

India’s Project 877EKM diesel-elec-

tric submarines.

July 2009 saw the  signing

of  the  working protocol for the  re-

fit and overhaul of  the  Project

877EKM Sindhurakshak diesel-elec-

tric submarine at  the Zvyozdochka

Ship Repair Centre. The  contract

worth $80 million is to  be signed

in February-March 2010. The subma-

rine will be delivered to Severodvinsk

by a transport ship in June 2010.

The Zvyozdochka Ship Repair

Centre has already upgraded 4

Project 877EKM diesel-electric

submarines of  the  Indian Navy. It

keeps on  repairing and upgrad-

ing the  Sindhukirti submarine in  its

base, the  port of  Visakhapatnam

at  Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. The  con-

tract for modernizing the Sindhukirti

was signed by Rosoboronexport and

India in  September 2002. Its medi-

um repair and overhaul is to be com-

plete in 2011.

In September 2009, the  Zvyoz-

doch ka Ship Repair Centre was ap-

pointed general contractor for

the  re-equipment of  four India’s

diesel-electric submarines. The con-

tract between Rosoboronexport

and India’s Navy provides for equip-

ping four Project 877EKM subma-

rines with Klub-S missile systems

designed by the  Novator Design

Bureau. This system will be installed

on  the Sindhuratna, Sindhuraj,

Sindhushastra and Sindhuvir sub-

marines. The  five-year moderniza-

tion will be implemented at  Indian

shipyards.

Instead of  six torpedo launch-

ers, four submarines will receive

the  Klub-S system with a  range

of 200 km as well as advanced Indian

hydroacoustic equipment and radio

communications systems.

Russia. Project 1135.6 Frigates

On November 27, 2009, the Yantar

Baltic Shipyard floated out the  first

of three Project 1135.6 missile frigates

built for the  Indian Navy. The  frig-

Tabar frigate project 1135.6

Visby class corvette

Page 36: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

34 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ate was named Teg. The programme

stipulates the  construction of  three

ships for India’s Navy. The  rest two

ones still kept on  the slipways were

designated Tarkash and Trikand.

The frigates are designed for search-

ing and destroying enemy subma-

rines as well as for antiaircraft and an-

tisubmarine defense.

The first frigate is set for deliv-

ery in  the middle of  2011, the  sec-

ond one — in late 2011 and the third

one — in 2012.

The $1.6-billion contract for con-

structing three frigates for India’s

Navy was signed on  July 14, 2007

in Delhi.

In December 2009, the  installa-

tion of  weapons systems, namely

two torpedo launchers began on the

Teg frigate. The  BrahMos superson-

ic anti-ship missile system had been

mounted before its floating out. Also,

the frigates are equipped with other

advanced air defense and missile sys-

tems, gun mounts and bomb launch-

ers. The first vessel is 70% complete.

Russia. Renting Project 971U Shchuka-B

K-152 Nerpa Nuclear Submarine

The Project 971U Shchuka-B

K-152 Nerpa nuclear submarine

was delivered to  the  Russian Navy

on December 28, 2009. In September

2009, the  third stage of  the  sub-

marine’s sea trials finished. In  ear-

ly November 2008, the  inadvertent

occurrence of  the  fire extinguishing

system happened during Nerpa’s sea

trials and freon filled the  compart-

ments killing 20 people. The  recov-

ery of  the Nerpa submarine cost 1.9

billion rubles. Its repeat tests com-

menced in July 2009.

Under the  schedule, the  Nerpa

nuclear submarine will be put in ser-

vice with Russia’s Pacific Fleet af-

ter the  state acceptance. After that,

the  submarine will be leased by

India for 10 years. The  contract is

worth $650 million. The  hand-over

of  the  submarine to  India’s Navy is

expected to  take place no sooner

than April 2010.

France. Scorpen Non-Nuclear Submarine

Construction

India will soon have to  pay ex-

tra 20 billion rupees ($410 million)

to French defense companies to pre-

vent further delays in  building 6

Scorpen non-nuclear submarines.

The contracts worth 187.98 bil-

lion rupees allowing for building six

Scorpen-class non-nuclear subma-

rines were concluded by the  Indian

government with French and Indian

companies in  October 2005. It was

initially planned that the  first ship

of this series would be built in France

and the  rest ones  — by Mazagon

Dock Ltd. under the  technology

transfer agreement. Later on, it was

decided, however, to  manufacture

all the six ships in  India. In  line with

the  contract, the  first submarine is

to  be delivered in  December 2012.

After that, it is planned to  commis-

sion one submarine a  year. Thus,

the Indian Navy will receive all these

six submarines by December 2017.

K-152 Nerpa nuclear-pow-ered attack submarine of project 971U Shchuka-B

Scorpen-class non-nuclear submarine

Page 37: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 35

Since December 2006, die-

sel-electric submarines have been

built at  Mumbai-based shipbuild-

ing enterprise Mazagon Dock under

a  French design. The  investigations

show, however, that the first non-nu-

clear submarine will hardly be ready

by the end of 2014.

The French side has demanded

to  largely increase the  cost of  equip-

ment and crucial systems. French

manufacturers have almost doubled

its cost since signing the  agreement

in  October 2005. The  talks on  rising

expenses and delivery conditions

of  almost all systems except com-

bat ones have been carried out for

over a year. Despite starting the con-

struction of  the  hulls for diesel-elec-

tric submarines, manufacturing

their internal equipment had not

been agreed as of  September 2009.

In  August, the  defense acquisitions

council asked the government securi-

ty commission to approve the growth

of  expenses on  French equipment

from €400 to €700 million.

CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS

SIGNED IN 2009

Russia. Renegotiation of  Contract for

Admiral Gorshkov Heavy Aircraft Carrier

India will pay $2.3 billion

to  Russia for upgrading the  Admiral

Gorshkov heavy aircraft carri-

er to  the  Vikramaditya version.

The  initial contract signed by

Rosoboronexport and India’s Defense

Ministry in January 2004 provided for

allocating $974 million for refitting

and re-equipping the ship and $530

million for 16 MiG-29K fighters and

Ka-31 and Ka-27 shipborne antisub-

marine helicopters. It was planned

to  deliver the  carrier to  the  Indian

Navy on August 15, 2008.

The refit process, however,

showed that a  much larger scope

of works had to be done, which raised

the  refit cost, too. Thus, the  carri-

er delivery was deferred to  2012.

In addition, Russia asked to increase

the contract cost up to $2.9 billion.

India has already paid about $724

million for upgrading the  carrier

in several tranches.

Talks on  raising the  cost have

been held on  different levels since

2007. In February 2008, India agreed

to  pay additional $600 million, but

Russian manufacturers said this sum

did not cover all the expenses. The fi-

nal cost was agreed upon during

the  visit of  Indian Prime-Minister

Manmohan Singh to  Moscow in  ear-

ly December 2009.

In case of  timely funding, Russia

is ready to fulfill the contract obliga-

tions and deliver the  carrier no lat-

er than 2012. At present, the  ship is

about 60% complete. Its factory tests

will begin in 2010. The Vikramaditya

will become the  largest Indian com-

bat ship and is expected to serve for

about 30 years.

Italy. In  August 2009, Italian

company Fincantieri declared that

India’s Navy had exercised an  op-

tion for building the  second ocean-

going refueling ship under the  con-

tract signed in  October 2008 af-

ter the  contest also attended by

Russian and South Korean compa-

nies. The  first tanker is set for deliv-

ery by 2010 year-end. The  second

one is to be commissioned in the sec-

ond half of 2011.

Fincantieri has already coop-

erated with Indian customers be-

fore. In 2004, it made two contracts

with shipbuilding company Cochin

Shipyard for designing the  propul-

sion and transferring its produc-

tion technology as well as render-

ing additional services for the  con-

struction of  the  first Indian air de-

fense carrier. These works are un-

derway now. In addition, Fincantieri

supplied the  Indian National

Institute of Ocean Technology with

the Sagar Nidhi oceanographic ship

in late 2007.

Admiral Gorshkov (Vikramaditya) aircraft carrierAdmiral Gorshkov (Vikramaditya) aircraft carrier

MiG-29K carrier-based fighter

Page 38: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

36 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

IMPLEMENTATION OF INDIAN

NATIONAL PROGRAMMES IN 2009

Almost all Indian national de-

fense shipbuilding project are be-

ing carried out jointly with foreign

companies.

AIRCRAFT CARRIERS

Aircraft Carrier Programme

In late February 2009, the  first

national carrier formerly known as

an  air defense carrier was keel laid

at the Cochin Shipyard enterprise.

Design works on  this ship began

in 2001–2002. It was initially planned

to  start its construction in  October

2007 and field it with the Indian Navy

by 2011–2012. The  implementation

of  this project was, however, de-

ferred due to insufficient experience

of Indian designers and delays in de-

liveries of various parts and materials

that could not be made in India.

Launching the  ship was sched-

uled for October 2010 and its field-

ing — for 2016. The carrier’s effective

life will be 50 years. More than 70%

of  the  design was made by Indian

companies. Besides, the  whole ship

will be built by India itself with 70%

of  its parts manufactured in  India,

too.

According to  preliminary estima-

tions, the  national carrier will cost

32.61 billion rupees ($640 million),

but this amount is expected to large-

ly increase due to delays in deliveries

and various technical problems.

The first national carrier will rep-

resent a 37,500-t vessel with a length

of  252 m, width of  58 m and draft

of 8.4 m. It will be powered by a gas

turbine propulsion including 4

General Electric LM 2500 turbines

with a  total capacity of  108,000 hp

propelling the  ship up to  28 knots

(52 km/h) and able to cover 7,500 nm

(13,800 km) at  a speed of  18 knots

(33.5 km/h). The carrier will be armed

with two batteries of  the Trishul ver-

tical-launch air defense missile sys-

tems and four 76-mm Super Rapid

gun mounts. The  deck featuring

STOBAR (short takeoff but arrested

recovery) capability will allow receiv-

ing short and vertical take-off air-

craft including MiG-29K/KUBs and

Harriers.

Under the  initial plans, the  new

carrier will be able to carry up to 30

aircraft including MiG-29K fight-

ers and Ka-31 helicopters as well as

Indian LCA Tejas light combat aircraft

and improved ALH Dhruv advanced

light helicopters.

Repairing Viraat Carrier

The only carrier remaining in India

dubbed Viraat that was undergo-

ing the  overhaul in  the dry dock re-

turned to  the  Navy in  autumn 2009.

The overhaul will allow it to be in ser-

vice till 2015.

The Indian Navy required

speeding up returning the  carrier

to  the  Navy due to  the  delayed de-

livery of the Admiral Gorshkov heavy

carrier. The  ship dubbed in  India

Vikramaditya was set for delivery

in  2008, but its commissioning was

deferred till 2012 due to  technical

and financial reasons.

The Indian Navy expects to  ob-

tain the  first national aircraft carrier

being built at  the Cochin Shipyard

state shipbuilding enterprise in addi-

tion to the Russian ship by 2015. This

will allow discarding the Viraat.

During the refit at Cochin Shipyard,

the  Viraat was equipped with a  new

fire control system, navigation ra-

dars, improved nuclear, biological and

chemical protection as well as deck

landing facilities. The Russian Kashtan

air defense missile gun system was

sent for repair to Russia. Also, the car-

rier is equipped with the Israeli Barak

air defense missile system and BraMos

anti-ship cruise missiles.

In the long run, India plans to field

up to 6 aircraft carriers.

DESTROYERS

Project-15A Destroyers Programme

In September 2009, Mumbai-

based Mazagon Dock Limited

LCA Tejas fighter

Kamov Ka-31 AEW helicopter

Page 39: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 37

launched the  second of  three

Kolkata-class Project-15A stealth de-

stroyers. The ship was named Kochi.

This ship is an  improved version

of Delhi-class destroyers being in ser-

vice now. At present, the Indian Navy

has three destroyers of  this class

dubbed Delhi, Mysore and Mumbai

built in  India under the  Project-15

programme.

Mazagon Dock is currently build-

ing three Project-15A destroyers.

The total cost of the project approved

by the Indian government in 2000 is

84.6 billion rupees. The draft design

was elaborated by the Indian Navy’s

Design Department.

The construction of  the  first

Kolkata-class destroyer under

Project-15A began in  September

2003. The  vessel was launched

in March 2006 when it was 30% com-

plete. Now, it is being equipped with

needed systems. The  third ship was

keel laid in February 2006.

According to  initial plans, Project-

15A ships were to enter service with

the  Indian Navy in  May 2010, 2011

and 2012. Numerous delays, how-

ever, made the  manufacturer defer

the  delivery of  the  first destroyer

for 3 years till 2013. The  reasons in-

clude insufficient funding of  propul-

sion and shafts acquisition and tech-

nical problems with weapons sys-

tems, sensors and fire control system.

Project-15B Destroyers Programme

In April 2009, the  Indian Defense

Acquisition Council approved build-

ing four new Project-15B destroyers

under the Indian Navy Modernization

Programme. This project is the  evo-

lution of  Project-15A allowing for

the construction of Kalkota-class de-

stroyers at  the Mazagon Dock ship-

yard.

The contract will be signed with

Mazagon Dock in the nearest future,

though the ship design has not been

created yet. Four new stealth ships

built under the  national project are

expected to  have land-based target

engagement capability.

Considering delays in  Project-

15A, Project-15B will be probably de-

ferred till a later term, too if the Navy

fails to  finish design works in  time

and place orders for parts and ma-

terials with a large production time.

Viraat R22 air-craft carrier

INS Kochi Kolkata class (Project 15A) destroyer

One of three Kolkata class (Project 15A) destroyers at Mazagon Dock Ltd slipway in Mumbai, 2008

Page 40: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

38 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

The key components for Project-

15B ships including the  propulsion

have not been chosen yet. The  con-

siderable part of  designers want

to  use General Electric LM-2500 gas

turbine powerplants and Western

control systems as in case of Shivalik-

class frigates being built under

Project 17. Some experts, howev-

er, insist that Ukrainian propulsion

should be installed.

To take the  final decision,

Mazagon Dock has issued a  tender

for detailed research and propos-

als on  adjusting the  ship machinery

compartment for LM-2500 turbines

instead of  DT-59 gas turbines and

RG-54 transmission made by Zorya-

Mashproekt. The  bid winner will

work out the  project and will deliv-

er the  needed equipment. The  bid-

ders are represented by US Alion

Science and Technology, French

DCNS, Italian Fincantieri and German

ThyssenKrupp Marine System.

The strong point of  US-designed

turbines is their assembling at  the

HAL-owned plant.

The Indian Navy’s authorities ex-

pect Mazagon Dock to  tell them

the  cost of  Project-15B, after which

the  sides will hold talks to  agree

on  the final conditions. There were

plans to sign the official contract by

the end of 2009.

FRIGATES

Project-17 Frigates Programme

The sea trials of  the  leading

Project-17 frigate dubbed Shivalik

were to start in April 2009 eight and

a  half years after starting its con-

struction. The  ship is to  be deliv-

ered to  the  Indian Navy in  May or

June 2010. The tests, however, began

three months later due to  the  sus-

pension of installing LM2500 gas tur-

bines on the first of three Project-17

multifunctional frigates by General

Electric.

The frigate design was creat-

ed by the  Surface Ships Group

of  the  Indian Navy’s Design

Department. The  Indian govern-

ment approved starting design

works in  1997, but the  contract for

building three ships was signed on-

ly in early 1999. The construction be-

gan two years later due to changing

specifications and problems with im-

porting D-40 steel for the  ship hull

from Russia. Mazagon Dock start-

ed building the  first frigate named

Shivalik on  the basis of  the  Talvar-

class upgraded frigate on  July 11,

2001. In  April 2003, the  vessel was

launched. Building the  second frig-

ate Satpura began in 2002 and it was

launched on June 4, 2004. The third

ship dubbed Sahyadri was keel-laid

on  March 17, 2003 and launched

on May 27, 2005.

The long process of  equipping

the  leading ship was explained

by the  need to  develop a  num-

ber of  new technologies and ad-

just the  ship to  new configurations

of weapons systems.

In particular, the  Kashtan short-

range air defense missile gun system

was replaced by the  combination

of  the  Barak air defense missile sys-

tem, AK-630M gun mount and mis-

sile detection radar, which required

not only altering the ship design but

additional design studies for com-

munications, power supply and dis-

tribution systems.

The final weapons configuration

includes one 76-mm Oto Melara

Super Rapid gun mount, two RBU-

6000 antisubmarine rocket launch-

ers with Purga fire control system,

one 3S90 launcher of  the  Shtil me-

dium-range air defense missile sys-

tem and 8-container 3S14E vertical

launcher for Klub-N missiles with

the 3R-14N-17 fire control system.

In addition, the  ship has four

vertical launchers for the  Barak-1

short-range air defense missile, two

AK-630M shipborne artillery sys-

tems as well as CSN-56 Kavach trap

launchers. Reconnaissance and de-

tection systems include the  Fregat

M2EM three-dimensional radar

with a  detection range of  360 km

designed for the  Shtil air defense

missile system, Garpun BAL-E ra-

dar for the  Klub system, at  least

INS Tabar F44 frigate of Talwar class

INS F47 Shivalik, the lead ship of her class, project 17 frigateINS F47 Shivalik, the lead ship of her class, project 17 frigate

Page 41: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 39

one EL/M-2221 search, tracking

and targeting radar, two Rashmi

I-band navigation radars by Bharat

Electronics and, probably, Scout ra-

dar by Thales. Also, four Orekh tar-

get designation radars for the Shtil

system are available.

The Project 17 frigate features

low radar, infrared and acoustic sig-

nature. The  Shivalik will become

the  first Indian ship able to use heli-

copters at a sea state of up to 6.

Mazagon Dock plans to  deliv-

er the rest two frigates of  the series,

Satpura and Sahyadri, to  the  Indian

Navy by 2010 year-end (the ships will

be probably delivered a year later).

Project-17A Frigate Programme

In June 2009, India’s Defense

Ministry approved the  project

of building seven stealth frigates by

national shipbuilding companies. Its

cost is estimated at  450 billion ru-

pees ($9.24 billion).

The Defense Acquisition Council

of  the  Indian government also ap-

proved this project declaring that

the  Project-17A programme should

be carried out by state shipbuild-

ing companies Mazagon Dock and

Garden Reach.

The programme of  developing

and building Project-17A stealth frig-

ates is part of the Navy’s plans to re-

ceive next-generation ships and

further development of  Project-17

Shivalik multifunctional frigates.

The  Project-17 programme allows

for the  construction of  12 ships

in total.

It is planned that the  Indian

Navy will get the  first stealth frig-

ate of the new project 3-4 years after

finishing deliveries of  Shivalik-class

frigates.

In December 2007, India’s Navy

sent a  request for deliveries of  new

stealth frigates to  nine leading

shipbuilding companies includ-

ing Russian, French, Italian, South

Korean, Spanish and US companies.

It was initially planned that two

leading Project-17A ships would be

built by a foreign shipbuilding com-

pany and the  rest five  — in  India

under a  technology transfer agree-

ment. Official sources, however, say

the  DAC has not approved these

proposals.

Nevertheless, experts say a  for-

eign shipbuilding company should

take part in  the project as the  frig-

ates will be built by a modular meth-

od with ship sections built separate-

ly and then put together. Choosing

the foreign subcontractor, which will

transfer this modular construction

technology to  Indian shipbuilders,

India’s Defense Ministry is consid-

ering sending requests for propos-

als (specification) to  French compa-

ny DCNS, Italian Fincantieri, South

Korean Hyundai, Spanish Navantia,

US Northrop Grumman and an  un-

specified Russian shipyard.

The rarely high cost of  con-

struction ($1.3 billion) is explained

by considerable investments into

the modernization of production fa-

cilities of Indian companies needed

to  manufacture ships by the  modu-

lar method.

TANK LANDING SHIPS

Construction of  Four Landing Platform

Docks

The Indian Defense Ministry plans

to build four landing platform docks

(LPD), which should join the  Austin-

class LPD-14 Trenton helicopter-car-

rying landing platform dock bought

from the  US Navy for $48.44 mil-

lion in  2007 and dubbed Jalashwa.

In  the  nearest 1-2 years the  Indian

Navy plans to  finish designing

the  LPD with characteristics similar

to Jalashwa and ask the government

to approve building a helicopter-car-

rying landing platform dock.

Tank Landing Ships Programme

In May 2009, the  Indian Navy

fielded the fifth tank landing ship —

the  Magar-class large tank landing

ship dubbed Airavat. Its construction

cost some $100 million.

Deck of INS F47 Shivalik. S14E eight-con-tainer vertical launcher for Club-N missiles is clearly seen.

Helicopter han-gars on NS F47 Shivalik frigate

Page 42: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

40 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

The vessel was keel laid in Kolkata

at  the Garden Reach enterprise

in  2004 and launched on  March 27,

2006. The  ship is the  fifth tank land-

ing ship built in  India and the  third

ship of the improved Shardul class.

The leading Magar-class tank

landing ship was designed and built

in  India in  1984 and put into ser-

vice in  1987. It is based on  US tank

landing ships and the  British Sir

Lancelot-class vessel. The  second

ship named Garial entered service

in  1991. In  December 2001, a  con-

tract for building three new tank

landing ships was signed. Two

ships of  this class dubbed Shardul

and Kesari were built under an  im-

proved project and launched

in  April 2004 and June 2005, re-

spectively. The Shardul leading ship

was put into service with the Indian

Navy in  January 2007. The  second

ship dubbed Kesari entered service

in January 2009.

The third ship, a  more advanced

version of  Magar-class ships, was

also designed for amphibious op-

erations. It features modern weap-

ons and radar systems and radically

changed design.

In addition, in 2007, India bought

Austin-class LPD-14 Trenton helicop-

ter-carrying landing platform dock

dubbed Jalashwa removed from ser-

vice in the US.

SUBMARINES

Nuclear Submarines Programme

On July 26, 2009, the first national

nuclear submarine dubbed Arihant

was launched at  the naval base

of  Visakhapatnam. The  submarine

was designed under the  Advanced

Technology Vessel (ATV) programme.

Its development and construction

is estimated at  300 billion rupees

($6.24 billion). Indian defense min-

istry sources say it will enter service

in two years.

The Arihant is the leading of three

nuclear submarines, which construc-

tion was approved by Indian author-

ities. Assembling hulls of the second

and third submarines has already

been finished and their stuffing with

various equipment will soon start

in the dry dock. The submarines will

be fielded in  2015-2017. In  addition,

Indian authorities have approved

plans to  build another two nuclear

submarines of this type.

The Arihant was jointly developed

and manufactured by the  Indian

Defense Ministry’s Defense Research

& Development Organization, Navy,

Department of  Atomic Energy and

private defense company Larsen &

Toubro.

Navy sources say this nuclear sub-

marine will carry 12 vertical-launched

missiles (perhaps Sagarika) and tor-

pedo launchers. It will have a  maxi-

mum submerged speed of  24 knots

and a crew of about 100 people.

The prototype of  the  Sagarika

nuclear submarine-launched ballis-

tic missile was successfully tested

in  February 2008. As India’s Navy

does not have any nuclear subma-

rines so far, the missile was launched

from a  dedicated underwater plat-

form (the exact copy of  the  sub-

marine) near India’s south-eastern

coast not far from Visakhapatnam.

Its operational range is 700 km.

Nevertheless, it is still unknown

whether Sagarika is a  ballistic or

a cruise missile.

The launched nuclear submarine

is already equipped with a  power-

plant, vertical missile launchers and

torpedo tubes. The  next stage will

include checking the  80-MW nu-

clear reactor created jointly with

Russia.

Purchase of  Home-Made Small Diesel-

Electric Submarines

India plans to  buy five small

home-made submarines that should

protect Indian coast from terrorist

attacks. Small submarines will enter

service with the  special operation

forces. Their crew will be 4-6 people.

The  submarines will be able to  dive

deep into the sea. Besides, they can

be remotely controlled and will be

capable of attacking the enemy with

torpedoes. Perhaps, India will dou-

ble the  order for such submarines

and raise their total amount up to 10.

INS L16 Shardul amphibious warfare vessel

INS Jalashva (L41) amphibi-ous transport dock

Page 43: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 41

BOATS AND PATROL SHIPS

Saryu-Class NOPV Naval Offshore Patrol

Vessels

On November 14, 2009, the  Goa

Shipyard enterprise launched

the second of four Saryu-class NOPV

offshore patrol ships ordered by

the Indian Navy.

The vessel is the  version

of  the  Coast Guard’s Sankalp-class

AOPV advanced offshore patrol ves-

sel adjusted for combat operations

on the sea. Its main tasks are patrol-

ling territorial sea, controlling sea

routes, reconnaissance operations,

protection of  offshore oil fields and

escort operations.

The ship dubbed Sunaina was

keel-laid in  September 2007. It is ex-

pected that installing its equipment

will be over by the  second quarter

of 2011.

The Indian government ap-

proved the  construction of  three

NOPV ships in  March 2005 and in-

cluded an  option for building

the  fourth one, which was realized

in 2006. The keel of the leading ship

was laid in the end of 2006. Cutting

steel for the  third vessel began

in  2008. The  Saryu is to  enter ser-

vice with India’s Navy in 2010.

Construction of  AOPV Ships for Coast

Guard

In January 2009, India’s Coast

Guard fielded the  sixth AOPV

Advanced Offshore Patrol Vessel

of  Sankalp class designed and built

by Goa Shipyard Ltd.

The patrol ship dubbed Samrat

is the  sixth AOPV ship and the  sec-

ond one built under the  Sankalp

project. It is the  largest and most

advanced ship in  service with

the  Indian Coast Guard. The  lead

ship of  Sankalp class entered ser-

vice in May 2008.

AOPV ships are being built for

the  Coast Guard by Goa Shipyard.

The  ships are manufactured fully

in  India employing advanced tech-

nologies.

Car Nicobar Class Patrol Ships

Construction Programme

In September 2009, the  Indian

Navy received two Car Nicobar-class

WJFAC (Water Jet Fast Attack Crafts)

patrol ships. The  Cora Divh (T-71)

and Cheriyam (T-72) ships became

the third and fourth ships of the im-

proved series built by Garden Reach.

The  first two vessels named Car

Nicobar (T-69) and Chetlat (T-70) en-

tered service with the  Indian Navy

in February 2009.

The Car Nicobar project is an  im-

proved version of  Bangaram-class

(SDB Mk.5) large patrol ships also

built by Garden Reach. Six ships

of  this class reaching a  speed of  30

knots were put into service from

August 2001 to September 2006.

By October 2010, Garden Reach

should deliver 10 Car Nicobar-class

ships to  the  Indian Navy. Three

ships are under construction now,

of  which two were set for delivery

to  the  Indian Navy in  December

2009. Each vessel costs about 500

million rupees.

Garden Reach is also building

eight offshore patrol boats of  this

class for the Indian Coast Guard and

has already delivered 13 5-t and 12-

t patrol vessels to  various law-en-

forcement bodies. After the  terror-

ist attack on Mumbai, India’s Interior

Ministry ordered 78 fast interceptor

boats totally worth $26.760 million

to  patrol India’s coastline including

48 12-t and 30 5-t vessels.

ADVANCED PROJECTS

USA. Lockheed Martin is negotiat-

ing with India’s Navy representatives

on the possible installation of the Ijis

air/missile defense system on Indian

combat ships and its possible inte-

gration with home-made weapons

systems.

ICGS Sankalp advanced offshore patrol vessel (AOPV) (46)

ICGS Samrat advanced off-shore patrol vessel (AOPV) (47)

Page 44: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

42 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ARMY EQUIPMENT

ARTILLERY SYSTEMS TENDER BY

INDIA’S DEFENSE MINISTRY

Modernization of field cannons

Modernization of  field cannons

is a  major program of  the  Indian

Army. According to  the  field artil-

lery modernization plan, the  Indian

Army plans to import ready kits to as-

semble 3,600 howitzers somewhere

between 2020 and 2025. The  new

equipment will consist primarily

of  155 mm\52 cal towed, wheeled

and tracked cannons as well as

140  155 mm\39 cal ultralight how-

itzers. Additionally, the  Army plans

to  keep 400 45-caliber FH-77Bs and

180 Russian-made 130 mm М-46

Russian-made field cannons, which

have been recently upgraded by

Israel’s Soltam Systems to 155 mm/39

cal. The total value of the deal to sup-

ply cannons meant to re-equip of up

to 220 Indian artillery regiments can

reach $7 billion.

The Indian Defense Ministry post-

ed a tender for superlight, towed and

self-propelled howitzers in February

2008 to  modernize and standardize

its artillery inventory mainly com-

prised of Soviet-made pieces.

Towed artillery system tender

The Indian Defense Ministry post-

ed a  tender for 400 155 mm/52 cal

towed howitzers in  February 2008.

The deal will include an option for li-

censed production of 1,800 cannons

in India.

Eight companies were invited

to take part in the tender. In January

2009, foreign companies submitted

rival bids to supply the  Indian Army

with 155 mm/52 cal towed howitzers.

A following evaluation showed that

only the offers made by BAE Systems

and ST Kinetics met the  Indian

Army’s requirements.

In June 2009, however, Singa-

po re’s ST Kinetics was blacklist-

ed by the  Indian Central Bureau

of  Investigation (CBI) besides oth-

er six companies for alleged involve-

ment in  a corruption case featur-

ing an  Indian defense enterprise’s

top manager. ST Kinetics was on the

investigation list along with Israel’s

IMI, Singapore’s Media Architects,

Poland’s BVT, Indian TS Kishan, RK

International Machine Tools and HYT

Engineering. The  Defense Ministry

announced a  temporary halt in  the

negotiations. The  towed howitzer

tender was therefore suspended for

around half a  year while the  tests

were initially scheduled for the sum-

mer of 2009.

It was as late as December 2009

that the  Indian government decid-

ed to admit the Singaporean compa-

ny to  tests which now have to  take

place before mid-2010. The  Indian

defense Ministry announced, how-

ever, that even if ST Kynetics wins, no

contract is going to  be signed un-

til the  CBI finishes its investigation

and all allegations are cleared. No ex-

pected date of investigation comple-

tion have yet been announced.

ST Kynetics offered the  FH 2000

155mm\52 cal towed howitzer.

The gun, firing 155mm NATO rounds,

weighs 13.5 tons and has a  maxi-

mum towing speed of  80 km\h.

The FH 2000 can fire M107 shells and

ERFB Base Bleed rounds at 19 km and

40 km, respectively, and has a  rate

of  fire of  3 three shells per 15 sec-

FH-2000 155mm towed howitzer

INS Cankarso fast attack craft of Car Nikobar class (T73)

Page 45: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 43

onds to  20 seconds, while its practi-

cal rate of fire is two rounds per min-

ute within half an hour.

Ultralight howitzer tender

The Indian Defense Ministry post-

ed a  tender for 140  155mm/39 cal

ultralight howitzers in  February

of  2008. The  contract, which could

amount to  $740 million, is meant

to  equip two new alpine divisons

with guns capable of  supporting

Army operations in  mountainous

areas. The  Singapore Technologies

Kynetics (ST Kynetics) has been

the top contender until recently.

The  project, however, showed

nearly no progress in  2009 due

to  the  current CBI investigation in-

volving ST Kynetics.

The delay in  the Indian Defense

Ministry’s ultralight howitzer acqui-

sition program allowed BAE Systems

to  compete for the  tender, offer-

ing the  155mm M 777. Although

the company had decided earlier not

to offer the M 777 for the 155mm ul-

tralight howitzer tender by India’s

defense Ministry posted in February

2008 as it supposed to  be failing

to  meet all the  requirements, it has

resumed negotiations. The  current

investigation involving ST Kynetics

has made the  situation rather favor-

able for BAE Syetems, as no other

company in  the world now can put

forward an alternative offer.

ST Kynetics offered a the Pegasus

155mm\39cal light towed howitzer

largely made of light alloys. The gun

weighs 5.400 kg and has a maximum

towing speed of  50 km\h and re-

quires a  crew of  6. The  system can

be carried by either C-130s or heavy-

lift helicopters. The Pegasus can fire

any standard NATO round, including

M107s and ERFB Base Bleed rounds

delivered at distances of up to 19 km

and 30km, respectively. The gun has

a  rate of  fire of  3 rounds in  24 sec-

onds, a  maximum rate of  fire of  4

rounds per minute within aperiod

of  three minutes and a  combat rate

of  2 rounds per minute within half

an hour. To-date, the Pegasus is oper-

ated only by the Singaporean Armed

Forces. This gun is able to  change

fire positions at a speed of up to 12

km\h with the  help of  a  21 kilowatt

diesel engine.

The investigation was bad news

for the Singaporean company which

delivered the  howitzers and test-rel-

evant equipment by a  hired C-130

Hercules in  late May of  2009. By

the  time the  negotiations were halt-

ed, ST Kynetics had finished deploy-

ment of the systems.

The 155mm M 777 howitzer, de-

veloped by BAE Systems to  replace

the outdated M 198s, has better per-

formance and has half the  weight

of  the  latter. The  Ti and Al alloys

have helped to  reduce the  howit-

zer’s weight to  just 4,218 kg. The  M

777 has a length of 10.2 m in fire po-

sition. Less weight means more mo-

bility, allowing the  howitzer to  be

transported not only by C-130s, but

by medium-lift helicopters as well,

which is important as the  latter are

on the list of India’s planned acquisi-

tions. The M 777 includes a new dig-

ital fire control system (DFCS) but

fires the  same rounds as its prede-

cessor along with modern satellite-

guided projectiles.

Self-propelled howitzer tender

The Indian Defense Ministry put

out a  tender for 120  155mm/52 cal

towed and self-propelled howitzers.

In February 2008.

In January 2009, foreign compa-

nies submitted their offers.

The project’s value totals $2 bil-

lion. Although prototype tests were

scheduled for the  summer of  2009,

they are most likely to  have been

postponed.

CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS

SIGNED IN 2009

France. In January 2009, the MBDA

company confirmed reports that

it had signed an  agreement with

the  Indian Defense Ministry

in  December 2008 to  continue li-

M-777 155mm howitzer

Page 46: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

44 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

censed production of. The  validi-

ty period of  the  new agreement is

4 years. The  order was contracted

to  Bharat Dynamics Ltd. The  Indian

Army are planning an additional pur-

chase of  4,100 MILAN 2T anti-tank

guided missile systems. The contract

price is Rs 5.92 billion ($121.3 million).

The contract stipulates that most

of the component parts be manufac-

tured by Bharat Dynamics Ltd along-

side with other Indian companies.

Bharat Dynamics is also responsi-

ble for the final assembly of the anti-

tank missiles. MBDA will supply some

of warhead components.

The Indian Army has been operat-

ing MILAN AT missile systems since

1981. The second generation AT mis-

sile with a  range of  2 km is license-

manufactured by Bharat Dynamics

Ltd for infantry units and combat

vehicles. In  late December 2007,

India abandoned the  plan to  pro-

duce the  MILAN ER systems with

an  extended range in  cooperation

with France after having evaluated

the field test results. It was reported

that in  2008, India signed a  Rs 13.8

billion (around $300 million) con-

tract for 15,000 Russian-designed

Konkurs-M AT missile systems

by Bharat Dynamics. Production

of  Russian-designed Konkurs-M

AT missiles was also contracted

to Bharat Dynamics Ltd.

The decision to  buy a  significant

number of  MILAN 2Ts was first an-

nounced by Deepak Kapoor, Chief

of Staff of the  Indian Army, at a con-

ference of  the  Indian Army and

Defense Ministry leaders in  May

2008.

The MILAN 2T, developed by

MBDA, is fitted with a tandem charge

warhead allowing it to  go through

modern reactive armor. The  modi-

fied MILAN 2T, equipped with an im-

proved solid-propellant engine, tan-

dem charge warhead and a new con-

trol system, has a  range of  2000 m

and a  launch weight of  12 kg. Its

warhead weighs 3 kg. A MILAN AT

missile launcher requires a two-man

crew and can be mounted on  a tri-

pod, a tank or another kind of an ar-

mored vehicle.

STATUS OF INDIA’S NATIONAL

PROGRAMS IN 2009

Modernization of  155mm FH 77B\39 cal

howitzers

The protracted moderniza-

tion of  Indian Army-operated

390  155mm\39 cal FH-77B howit-

zers supplied by Bofors to  45 cali-

ber is facing a  failure risk because

of  the  high requirements put for-

Milan-2 anti-tank missile systemMilan-2 anti-tank missile system

Pegasus 155mm how-itzer

Page 47: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 45

ward by the  Indian Army’s Artillery

Command.

India acquired the  guns in  1987

and still keeps a  total of  410 FH-

77Bs, intending to  expand their ef-

fective range and add a  capability

to fire heavier rounds. Upgrades will

include replacement of  the  barrel

and breech, strengthening of the un-

dercarriage as well as installation

of modern sights.

Despite some Artillery Directorate

members saying that the such a goal

is almost impossible, the  Army com-

mand has no authority to  modify

the  specifications, which is the  pre-

rogative of the Defense Minister.

Detailed specifications made

up by the  Defense Ministry in  2006

remain unfulfilled. In  early 2009,

the  Ministry issued a  modified list

of  requirements, but BAE Systems,

the manufacturer of FH-77Bs, said it

was unable to meet them.

Out of  12 private Indian compa-

nies authorized to  manufacture de-

fense-oriented products, only TATA

and Ordnance Factories Board (OFB)

responded to  the  initiative. The  top

privately-owned defense compa-

ny was among those who refused

to participate.

Today, the  Bofors-manufactured

155mm\39 cal FH-77B howitzer is

the  most advanced artillery system

with the  Indian Army. The  $1.2 bil-

lion (Rs 14 billion) worth deal to  de-

liver 410 such guns was signed

by the  Induian government and

the  Swedish company on  March 24,

1986.

A corruption controversy sparked

by the  deal still haunts Bofors

20  years after, preventing the  com-

pany from getting a contract to sup-

ply field guns to  India. Although

the  FH 77B05 L52 offered by Bofors

was the  only contender in  2006 af-

ter the  Israeli Soltam Systems and

South African Denel were excluded,

Defence Minister A.K. Antony decid-

ed to hold another tender.

Nag AT missile system

The Nag anti-tank missile sys-

tem went into mass production after

stage two of  its final acceptance tri-

als met with success in the Rajasthan

Desert in August of 2009.

Introduction of  the missile in  the

Army was expected to  begin by

the end of 2009.

The Nag AT missile was devel-

oped by DRDO in Hyderabad as part

of  the  Integrated Guided Missile

Development Program (IGMDP)

launched in 1983. The program was

aimed at developing a range of next

generation missiles including Akash

medium-range and Trishul short-

range surface-to-air missiles. Field

tests of  the  Nag AT missile began

in November of 1990.

The missiles will be produced by

the  state-owned Bharat Dynamics,

which is expected to  manufacture

200 units over the  first produc-

tion year. The  output will be raised

twofold over the  following peri-

od. The  Indian Army needs a  total

of 4,000 AT missiles.

The Nag AT missile will be fit-

ted on  armored combat vehi-

cles and Army helicopters. In  addi-

tion to  the  mobile version mount-

ed on  the NAMICA Nag missile ar-

mored carrier fitted with 12 missiles,

out of  which 8 fire-ready, the  Nag

family will include the Helina missile

meant to  be carried on  ALH Dhruv

advanced light helicopters. After

the  land-based version is fully de-

veloped, DRDO will focus on improv-

ing and testing of  the  airborne vari-

ant, which is planned to  be mount-

ed on  a helicopter, carrying 8 mis-

siles in  two launchers. Initial tests

of  the  airborne version are expect-

FH-77B 155mm howitzer

Akash medium-range SAM

Page 48: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

46 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ed to begin in  late 2009. The Helina

AT missile will have a  range of 7 km,

a capability that the land-based Nag

is expected to have after future mod-

ernization.

MLRS Pinaka upgrade program

The Armament Research and

Development Establishment (ARDE)

is working on  an  advanced MLRS

Pinaka variant.

The Pinaka multiple-launch rock-

et system was developed in  1983

by Indian companies supervised by

ARDE to  replace the  Soviet-made

BM-21 Grads. The first prototype was

ready by 1994, with tests starting

in  1995. In  2000, the  Indian Army

raised the  first regiment equipped

with three batteries of  Pinaka

launchers, each battery compris-

ing six pieces along with support

units. Production is currently un-

der way to  equip another regiment

as well. Simultaneously, research is

being performed to  improve both

the launcher and the missiles.

A standard MLRS has a  range

of  between 39 km and 40 km and

can fire a  salvo of  12 rockets in  44

seconds, covering an  area of  3.9

square kilometers. The  missiles can

be fitted with a variety of warheads

thus enabling the  MLRS to  destroy

rugged installations.

ARDE announced that it is cur-

rently developing a  MLRS-fired 7.2

meter-long guided missile capa-

ble of  delivering a  250 kg warhead

at a distance from 70 km to 120 km.

Umanned aerial vehicles are planned

to  be used to  increase the  firing ac-

curacy. The  new missile is expected

to be displayed in 2011 and adopted

by the military in 2012.

The Pinaka, built on  the chassis

of  a  license-produced Tatra-815 8x8

prime mover, has a  combat weight

of  8 tons and is operate by a  five-

men crew. The  system fires 214mm

4.95m-long non-guided rockets

weighing 276 kg each. Every rocket

has a  100kg warhead. A Pinaka bat-

tery is made up of  6 launchers, six

loaders and a  command station fur-

nished with a digital fire control sys-

tem and a weather radar.

INDIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY’S

ARMORED VEHICLE TENDERS

Tender for 500 new APCs

To increase the  capability

of the Army mechanized units, India

plans to buy 100 infantry fighting ve-

hicles to  operate in  variable terrain

regions.

The Indian Army posted a tender

to buy at least 100 IFVs, with the pro-

duction of  the  rest of  the  planned

500 to be licensed to an Indian com-

pany as part of  a  technology trans-

fer deal.

According to  India’s Ministry

of  Defense, the  Army wants to  re-

ceive over 500 new APCs within

five years to  add to  their inventory

consisting of 1,500 Russian-designed

BMP-1s and BMP-2s.

To-date, the  Indian Army has

26 mechanized infantry battalions

equipped with APCs with a  capaci-

ty of 10 soldiers each. Some of those

vehicles are also fitted with AT guid-

ed missile launchers.

According to the Indian Army’s re-

quirements, the new APCs are to be

air-transportable by both the  cur-

rently operated Il-76s and the C-130J,

which are now being acquired.

The weight and size of  the  new

APCs should allow them to be trans-

ported by landing craft including

the  Jalashwa amphibious transport

dock, originally Austin-class LPD-14

Trenton, and Airavat-class tank land-

ing ships.

Light tank tender

The Indian Army is seeking to  ac-

quire 300 light tanks to  increase its

capabilities in  mountain areas over

3000 m above the  sea level border-

ing on China and Pakistan. The Indian

military needs tanks able to  oper-

Pinaka Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher SystemPinaka Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher System

Namica mobile platform (Nag anti-tank mis-sile system on idigenous armored vehi-cle)

Page 49: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 47

ate in  urban and rural conditions,

on  mountain, desert and swampy

terrain and in coastal areas to ensure

superiority over a nuclear enemy.

An international tender is aimed

at  acquiring 200 wheeled and 100

light tracked tanks weighing up

to 22 tons. Responses to the request

are due to be submitted to the Indian

Defense Ministry by October 30, 2009.

The light tank platform should

feature modern communications

and reconnaissance equipment. It

is also has to  be highly mobile and

able to incorporate various modules

to  ensure operability in  a variety

of conditions and regions.

The tender stipulates that the tank

be fit to carry multirole weapon sys-

tems including a  cannon and a  mis-

sile system to provide enough capa-

bility in peace enforcement missions

during high-intensity conflicts.

Wheeled (preferably 8x8) and

tracked light tanks should have

a  height and length not exceeding

2.8 m and 7.8 m, respectively, a  low

profile and high clearance. Tanks

should also offer a floating capability

and all-weather, night and day oper-

ability. The  equipment sets must in-

clude protection systems against la-

ser, infrared and radar homing weap-

ons as well as NBC protection.

By now, most of the Indian Army’s

64 armor regiments operate T-72M1

and T-90S tanks, totaling 2,800 piec-

es. Around 11 regiments still ride up-

graded T-55s, which are being grad-

ually replaced by T-90S and modern-

ized T-72M1 MBTs.

As for light tanks, they are most

likely to  be supplied to  the  two

mountain divisions meant for de-

ployment along the  Chinese border

in  India’s north-east. Light tanks are

easier to transport and thus to rede-

ploy between regions with different

climate and terrain.

Between 90 and 100 light tanks

may be supplied to  two new ar-

mor regiments, with another 200

joining the  reconnaissance regi-

ments of  the  two main strike corps

of  the  Indian Army stationed sta-

tioned in  Ambala (200 km north

of  Delhi) and Jansi (400 km south-

east of the capital).

LBPV tender for National Guard

The Indian National Guard’s ten-

der for light bullet proof vehicles

(LBPVs) received offers from seven

companies. No information is yet

available on the exact number of ve-

hicles to be supplied.

Three offers were reported

to  have made it to  the  final stage

of  the  competition, including

the new 4х4 light patrol armored car

TUR 3 designed by Polish AMZ Kutno.

The TUR 3 vehicle was present-

ed by Vectra, a  partner of  Poland’s

Metaleksport-S, which represents

AMZ Kutno in  India. If the  Tur wins

the  competition, Vectra will be

the  main contractor to  license-pro-

duce over 500 such armored fighting

vehicles (AFVs) in India.

The offered vehicles were put

to  an  extreme conditions test

in  Kashmere in  2009. No informa-

tion is available on the two other ve-

hicles, though. The  two unknown

finalists, however, are most likely

to  include the  American company

Arotech. The winner will be selected

until the end of 2009.

NEGOTIATIONS AND INTENTIONS

Great Britain. In  January of  2009,

India’s Ministry of  Finance accept-

ed an  application by Mahindra and

Mahindra and Britain’s BAE Systems

to  create a  joint venture to  devel-

op and manufacture defense prod-

ucts for both Indian domestic mar-

ket and export.

The companies are allowed

to  invest Rs 289.4 million ($6 mil-

lion) in  the enterprise. According

to  the  Indian regulations on  direct

foreign investments, the Indian com-

pany will hold a  74 per cent share

Sarat BMP-2 infantry fighhting vehicle

T-55 Main Battle Tank

Page 50: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

48 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

in the JV, while BAE Systems will get

a 26 per cent stake.

The previous application sub-

mitted by the  two companies was

rejected by the  Finance Ministry’s

Commission on Foreign Investments

in  October of  2008, as BAE Systems

was willing to  get 49 per cent

of the new company’s shares, which

contradicted the  actual standards.

Following the law, the Indian govern-

ment made no exception in that case.

The new JV will be headquartered

in Delhi, while manufacturing assets

will be in Faridabad. BAE Systems and

Mahindra and Mahindra planned

to  finalize the  enterprise’s structure

and begin production by the  end

of 2009.

Initially, the  new company will

be busy manufacturing add-on ar-

mor for Rakshak AFVs and assem-

bling Axe all-terrain cars alongside

with developing landmine-resistant

vehicles for the Indian Armed Forces.

On its part, BAE Systems is planning

to  cooperate with Mahindra and

Mahindra to  assembly RG-31 Nyala

vehicles in Indian territory .

BAE Systems has already deliv-

ered 165 Casspir APCs to  India’s mil-

itary.

USA. The  MDT Armor Corp.

of  the  U.S.-based Arotech an-

nounced in August of 2009 the com-

pletion of  the  development com-

pletion of  a  new C8 LWAV (Light

Weight Armored Vehicle) meant

for the  Indian market. The  India-

based Concord Safety Systems joint

venture, created by U.S. company

Arotech and co-founded by MKU,

India’s major armor manufactur-

er, and car body maker JN Group,

was offered to take part in  the com-

petition to  supply armored vehi-

cles to  the  Indian Army. Arotech de-

signed the  C8 LWAV light armored

vehicle for the  tender. The  first pro-

totypes were made by Concord

Safety Systems in  Dehradun, India.

In  the  fall of  2009, the  AFVs un-

derwent field trials with the  Indian

Army’s Northern Command. Mass

production of  these vehicles for

paramilitary units is most likely to be

launched in the near future.

CURRENT PROGRAMS INVOLVING

INTERNATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS

Russia. On August 24, 2009, a cere-

mony took place at the Heavy Vehicle

Factory (HVF) in  Avadi to  hand over

the  first batch of  10 T-90S MBTs

(Indian codename “Bishma”) pro-

duced in  India under a  license pro-

vided by Russia, to  the  Indian Army.

The  10 MBTs were sent to  the  73th

Indian Army regiment for trials.

The enterprise is expected to  li-

cense-produce up to  100 T-90S

MBTs annually starting from 2010.

According to  DRDO, every Indian-

made T-90 will cost up to Rs 150 mil-

lion (around $3 million).

The first contract worth $800 mil-

lion (Rs 36.25 billion) to  deliver 310

T-90S MBTs to  India was signed

in 2001. 124 tanks were shipped fully

assembled, with the  other 186 piec-

es assembled at HVF using the ready

kits supplied by Uralvagonzavod.

In  2006, another deal was made al-

lowing India to  license-produce

1,000 T-90S tanks by 2020. On

November 30, 2007, the  Indian gov-

ernment signed a  major deal worth

Rs 49 billion ($1,237 billion) to  buy

347 T-90S MBTs from Russia, includ-

ing 124 fully assembled ones and 223

ready kits.

In May of 2009, India stroke a deal

with Russia for an  additional deliv-

ery of  50 Т-90S MBTs, which will al-

T-72M1 Ajeya of the Indian Army

Light Armoured Patrol Vehicle Tour-3

RG-31 Nyala armored vehicle

Page 51: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 49

low the  equipment of  two tank reg-

iments until the end of 2009.

Russia’s Uralvagonzavod enter-

prise was to  supply India with 60

ready T-90S MBTs in  2009. India al-

so expected to  receive tanks due

to a new contract signed in 2009.

Russia completed transferring

the  MBT manufacturing technology

to the Indian defense industry in late

2008, allowing India to  launch full-

cycle production of T-90s in Avadi.

The T-90S tanks will gradually re-

place the  outdated T-55s and ear-

ly versions of  the T-72. The  total val-

ue of  the  contracts signed amount-

ed to  $3 billion. The  Indian Armed

Forces expect to  receive a  total

of 1,700 T-90S MBTs by 2020.

The reason behind India’s decision

to  buy T-90S MBTs is that the  tank

is a  deep modernization of  the  Т-72

which has long been in  use with

the  country’s land forces. The  tank

acquisition is part of the plan to raise

21 and 40 regiments outfitted with

T-90S and T-72M1 Ajeya MBTs, re-

spectively. The  similarity of  these

models makes personnel training

and maintenance much easier. By

2020, the  total number T-90S and

T-72M1 MBTs operate by the  Indian

Army is expected to hit 3,800.

STATUS OF INDIA’S NATIONAL

PROGRAMS IN 2009

Arjun MBT program

The year 2009 was decisive for

the Arjun program.

In February of 2009, after a  large

number of  adjustments had been

made, the Indian Defense Ministry fi-

nally decided to adopt the Arjun MBT.

The Combat Vehicles Research

and Development Establishment

(CVRDE) is expected to  supply 79

Arjun MBTs, made under the  super-

vision of  the  Defence Research and

Development Organisation (DRDO),

to the Indian ground forces by March

2010. The per unit cost of the tank is

Rs 190 million ($4 million).

By now, the  Indian Defense

Ministry has a delivery agreement for

124 domestically-developed tanks,

with 45 already supplied by June

of 2009. The rest will be delivered by

March of 2010.

To-date, the  Arjun is a  60-ton

MBT fitted with a  120mm cannon.

The tank has a body length of 10.6 m

and a height of 3 m. it is 3.8 m wide

and has a crew of four. The gunner’s

sight, fitted with a  laser range find-

er, is capable of  tracking three tar-

gets simultaneously by day and by

night. The  tank features heavy com-

posite armor, laser illumination sen-

sors, a smoke screen system and NBC

protection. The  battle tank can al-

so be fitted with add-on reactive ar-

mor when necessary. The  Arjun is

equipped with a  1,400 hp MTU en-

gine and RENK transmission, and has

a maximum speed of 70 km\h and 40

km\h on highway and off-road.

The Arjun can effectively engage

targets with up to  450mm-thick ar-

mor at  a distance of  2,500m with

FSAPDS rounds which have a  max-

imum muzzle velocity of  1,660 me-

ters per second. The  tank can al-

so fire HESH high-explosive armor-

piercing, ballistic and shaped-charge

projectiles. The  rate of  fire is 6 to  8

rounds per minute. Secondary arma-

ment includes a coaxial 7.62mm Mg

and a 12,7mm AA MG.

By now, foreign suppliers ac-

count for 25 per cent to  30 per

cent of  the  tank’s components.

In  the  coming years, India plans

to  reduce its dependence on  MBT

part imports by developing replace-

ment components domestically.

Although a  Rs 17.6 billion-

worth contract for 124 Arjun MBTs

was signed in  2000, the  Indian

Parliament’s Defense Commission

stated in  2008 that the  Arjun

MBT showed unsatisfactory re-

sults during the  customer’s win-

ter tests in  the Rajasthan des-

ert in  December of  2007. Army re-

ports said that the  tank needed

a significant number of adjustments

to meet all the requirements. In July

of 2008, the Indian Army Command

announced that it was not go-

ing to  place additional orders for

Arjun MBTs outside the  124-unit or-

der from the Heavy Vehicle Factory

(HVF) in Avadi.

According to  the  Indian Army,

the  Arjun MBT, though a  modern

tank to  remain operational within

the  next decade, can not compete

with next-generation developments.

India is therefore seeking to  de-

sign an  advanced battle tank which

would be highly competitive interna-

tionally in the next 20 years.

DRDO, in  its turn, is pressing

the  Indian Government for an  or-

der of  at  least 500 domestically-

made tanks to  the  Arjun program

and to  use it as the  basis for next

generation tank development.

The Indian top brass insisted

on  the adoption of  the  Arjun MBT

despite despite objections from

the  Ground Forces which agreed

to accept the tank only after the iden-

tified deficiencies are eliminated.

The requirements for the  Arjun

MBT were developed back in  1972.

In  1982, it was announced that

the  prototype tank was ready for

field tests. The vehicle, however, was

officially shown off as late as in 1995.

T-90S Bhishma Main Battle Tank

Page 52: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

50 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

Although the  cost of  the  Arjun pro-

gram development was initially es-

timated at  Rs 150 million, the  fig-

ure has grown to Rs 3 billion by now.

Improved landmine protection armored

vehicle production program

In November 2009, the  Indian

Army received the  first batch of  14

Yukthirath armored vehicles with

improved landmine protection from

the  IOF (Indian Ordnance Factory).

To-date, the  Medak-based enter-

prise is busy working to supply 327

new armored vehicles to the Indian

Armed Forces. The  government,

however, is ready to  allocate addi-

tional funding to  expand the  order

for up to 1,400 units.

The Indian Army and other servic-

es use AFVs with improved landmine

protection extensively in  counterin-

surgency operations in  Jammu and

Cashmere, as well as in other regions.

According to  the  company’s

spokesman, the  AFV Yukthirath’s

performance excels that of  the  pre-

vious versions, as well as of the South

African Casspir APCs.

The 12-ton vehicle was devel-

oped with Israeli aid is built on  the

chassis of  the  currently operation-

al Stallion Mk.3 4x4 trucks. Just like

the South African Casspirs, the new

Indian vehicle has a  monocoque

body with a  V-shape bottom offer-

ing protection against landmine ex-

plosions with a TNT yield of up to 14

kg and 10 kg under the  wheels or

body, respectively, as well as 7.62

mm bullets fired from a  10-meter

distance. The  vehicle also features

bullet-proof windows.

The per unit cost of the AFV is Rs

10 million ($214,000), which is far be-

low the  pricing of  foreign-made ar-

mored vehicles selling for up to Rs 30

million ($640,000).

AIR DEFENCE/ANTI-BALLISTIC

MISSILE SYSTEMS

TALKS AND PLANS

USA. India has entered into pre-

liminary talks with the  USA on  the

procurement of  the  Patriot PAC-3

air defence/anti-ballistic missile sys-

tem. Talks that had been conduct-

ed for two years intensified in  2009,

and entered into technical consul-

tations phase. The  US Department

of  Defense specialists presented

to  Indian experts the  new system’s

capabilities on  its computerized

model. The  Defence Research and

Development Organisation (DRDO)

experts attended at two test launch-

es of  the  system’s interceptor mis-

siles.

France. France intends to  devel-

op together with India a  new short-

range surface-to-air missile (SR SAM).

Talks on this project are nearing con-

clusion. This well may be the  Maitri

project designed to  develop a  new-

generation short-range surface-

to-air missile based on  technolo-

gies from the  MBDA’s MICA missile

and India’s (terminated) Trishul pro-

gramme. The project cost is estimat-

ed at approximately 500 million USD.

It is planned that MBDA will devel-

op the  missile, active homing head,

and engine thrust control system

The  Indian side will develop soft-

ware, flight control and monitoring

system, and perform the missile final

assembly. The Defence Research and

Development Organisation (DRDO)

will also supply for the  project two

3-D target acquisition and tracking

radars capable of  simultaneously

tracking up to 150 targets at a range

of 200 km.

In 2008, when the  DRDO is-

sued performance requirements

for a  joint short-range surface-to-

air missile development project, was

started selection of a foreign partner

in the project.

CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS

CONCLUDED IN 2009

Israel. In  January 2009 India or-

dered 300 additional surface-to-air

missiles for the  Barak air defence

missile system purchased earlier.

The contract cost is 480 million USD.

The Barak air defence missile sys-

tem is an  up-to-date ship-borne

air defence/anti-missile system.

The  Barak system’s surface-to-air

missiles are fired from vertical launch

containers. Target interception is

based on  the radar command line-

of-sight guidance principle. The  sys-

tem provides effective engagement

of  highly agile missiles at  extreme-

ly low altitudes, cruise missiles, la-

ser-guided bombs, aircraft and heli-

copters within the all-round (360-de-

gree) sector. Its surface-to-air mis-

siles are capable of engaging targets

in  any weather conditions by day

and night within the  range of  500

m to 10 km and at the altitude of up

to 5 km.

The Barak surface-to-air missile

has the following specifications: mis-

sile length  — 2.5 m, body diame-

ter — 0.25 m, launch weight — 98 kg,

maximum speed  — 1.6 Mach, war-

Yuktirat armored vehicle with advance anti-mine protec-tion

Arjun Main Battel Tank

Page 53: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 51

head weight — 21.8 kg. The Barak air

defence/anti-missile system (includ-

ing missile containers, EL/M-2221 ra-

dar, and computerised control sys-

tem) costs about 24 million USD.

The  Barak missiles systems were ini-

tially procured because of  delays

in  the development of  the  indige-

nous Trishul/Akash system. The  first

Barak air defence missile system was

delivered in early 2000 and installed

on the INS Viraat aircraft carrier.

India’s DRDO and Israeli IAI

company have been developing

the Barak-2 ship-based air defence/

anti-missile system with the  effec-

tive range of  70 km since January

2006. It is expected that the  pro-

gramme worth 26.06 billion INR

(about 650 million USD) will be com-

pleted by 2011. The  latest air de-

fence/anti-missile system will con-

sist of  four basic components:  —

multifunctional surveillance and

early warning radar with the  oper-

ational range of  350 km;  — weap-

ons control system with communi-

cation links; — vertical launchers; —

and two-stage interceptor missiles.

The  new surface-to-air missile de-

rived from the first basic missile will

be fitted with an  improved seek-

er. The new air defence/anti-missile

systems are planned to be installed

first onboard three INS Calcutta-

project missile destroyers.

Israel. In  its official statement

the  IAI company informed about

the  conclusion of  a  contract

on  27 February 2009 for the  de-

livery to  India of  the  MR-SAM me-

dium-range air defence/anti-mis-

sile system worth 1.4 billion USD.

Under this contract the  IAI com-

pany shall develop and manufac-

ture both land-based and shipborne

air defence/anti-missile systems

for the  Indian Ministry of  Defence.

Some payments due according

to  the  Contract shall be effected

in advance during the development

phase, while the  remaining sum

shall be paid off during a 66-month

delivery period starting within 90

months from the  date of  the  ad-

vance payment acceptance.

This contract is the  largest arms

trade transaction ever concluded be-

tween Israel and India.

In accordance with the  con-

tract, the  IAI company and Defence

Research and Development Orga ni-

sation (DRDO) of the Indian Minister

of  Defence shall develop an  air de-

fence/anti-missile system capable

of  detecting and defeating enemy

aircraft, cruise missiles and surface-

to-surface missiles at  a range of  70

to 80 km.

The Indian Air Force will induct

nine air defence missile battalion,

each battalion including two batter-

ies with the Barak surface-to-air mis-

sile launchers. Each battery will com-

prise the  fire control centre, target

acquisition radar, and three launch-

ers with eight missiles in each.

The contract is a  continuation

of  the  Barak-NG programme start-

ed in  2006 for the  development

of  the  next-generation Barak ship-

borne surface-to-air missile (Israeli

designation — Barak-8).

First tests of  the  Barak MR-SAM

system are expected to  take place

in  three-year time. The  system is ex-

pected to  reach initial operational

capability in 2013.

The Barak is designed to  replace

the Indian Air Force’s obsolete S-125

Pechora-1 air defence missile system.

The  Indian Ministry of  Defence ini-

tially considered an option of procur-

ing the Russian S-300 or US Raytheon

Patriot PAC-3 air defence missile sys-

tems but having made its own evalu-

Barak SAM on INS Viraat car-rier, 2004

Lockheed-Martin Patriot PAC-3 SAMLockheed-Martin Patriot PAC-3 SAM

Page 54: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

52 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ation, decided to  develop the  indig-

enous system.

Within the framework of this pro-

gramme India and Israel conclud-

ed a  separate agreement on  build-

ing a  plant for air defence/anti-mis-

sile system components production

in  Bihar. The  agreement cost is esti-

mated at  240 million USD. The  pro-

duction plant in  Bihar shall be built

to  design made by the  Israeli IMI

company.

Israel. In August 2009, after a lengthy

evaluation period, the Indian Ministry

of Defence approved the contract for

the  procurement of  the  Spyder new

mobile short-range air defence sys-

tems. It has outlined plans to procure

54 missile launchers worth 820 million

USD for three regiments.

The decision to  purchase

the  Israeli system was taken after

the  indigenous Trishul and Akash

short-range air defence missile sys-

tems designed by the  Defence

Research and Development

Organisation (DRDO) had not met

Army’s requirements.

The programme for procure-

ment of  the  Spyder systems (which

are planned for replacement

of  the  Soviet-made Osa-AKM and

Strela-10M air defence missile sys-

tems still in  service) has been elab-

orated for several years. However,

the  Indian Ministry of  Defence has

been reluctant to  endorse signing

of  the  contract because of  a  contin-

ued investigation of  corruption cas-

es against two Israeli companies  —

IAI and Rafael, related to  the  pro-

curement of  the  Barak-1 air de-

fence missile system worth 11.60 bil-

lion INR. Despite remaining suspi-

cions the  Indian Government has

not blacklisted the  Israeli compa-

nies and has continued implementa-

tion of joint projects that are vital for

the national security.

Thus, in  late August 2008

the Defence Acquisitions Council en-

dorsed the  signing up of  an  agree-

ment for the purchase of the Spyder

air defence missile system for

the Indian Air Force. The contract for

the  delivery to  the  Indian Air Force

of  18 Spyder mobile air defence sys-

tems was signed with the  Israeli

Rafael company on  1 September

2008. The  total cost of  the  agree-

ment was 260.05 million USD

(about 11377,1875 billion INR). It was

planned that the  Spyder deliveries

would begin in  2.5 years after sign-

ing the agreement and would be fin-

ished in four years.

The Spyder air defence missile

system is developed by a  consor-

tium of two Israeli companies — IAI

and Rafael. It is a  mobile all-weath-

er short-range surface-to-air mis-

sile system designed to  detect and

destroy enemy aircraft, helicopters,

cruise missiles, unmanned aerial ve-

hicles, and precision-guided muni-

tions. The  system can be deployed

to  provide air defence of  strategic

installations including military bas-

es, communication centres, nuclear

power stations, governmental build-

ings, etc.

The inclined ramp launchers

of  the  Spyder-SR air defence missile

system mounted on  a 6x6-wheeled

chassis are designed to  accommo-

date four missiles. The  Spider am-

munition load includes the  ground-

based version of  the  Derby medi-

um-range air-to-air active radar guid-

ed missile, and the  Python-5 short-

range IR guided missile. The  air de-

fence missile system can operate by

Barak-8 SAM

Page 55: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 53

locking on  target prior to  or after

the  missile launch with the  employ-

ment of  the  fire-and-forget mode

or in-flight target data correction.

The system’s reaction time (from tar-

get acquisition to  combat readiness

status) is 5 seconds.

A typical Spyder battalion con-

sists of  one mobile command and

control post and four to  six mobile

launchers with the  Toplite electro-

optical sensors. The  command and

control post is equipped with the IAI/

ELTA EL/M-2106 ATAR radar capable

of tracking 60 targets simultaneously

at a range of 35 km and two operator

panels with data transfer terminals

allowing data exchange with launch-

ers, adjacent air defence missiles sys-

tems, and superior commanders at a

range of up to 100 km.

The Spyder-SR air defence missile

system can kill targets within the all-

round (360 degrees) sector at a range

of one to 15 km and at altitudes from

20 to 9,000 m. The system is capable

of  defeating both single and group

targets by day and night in  any cli-

matic conditions.

INDIA’S INDIGENOUS

PROGRAMMES REALIZED IN 2009

Akash air defence missile system procure-

ment programme

In January 2009 the  Indian Air

Force signed the  contract with

the Bharat Electronics Ltd for the de-

livery of two battalions of the Akash

medium-range air defence missile

system developed by the  Defence

Research and Development

Organisation (DRDO) of  the  Indian

Ministry of  Defence. The  contract

valued at  12 billion INR (247 million

USD) was signed 14 months after fin-

ishing tests.

The Air Force had been postpon-

ing the signing of the contract since

the  Akash missile system did not

fully meet the  given requirements.

The  Air Force would like to  have

more light and compact missile with

greater operational range and ma-

noeuvrability. The developers intend

to  continue upgrading this air de-

fence missile system during its pro-

duction and operation to improve its

performance characteristics.

Under the initial contract two bat-

talions of  the Akash air defence mis-

sile systems shall be delivered with-

in 36 months. It is expected that

in  future the  Indian Air Force will

place orders for additional quanti-

ties of the air defence missile system

for the  substitution of  Soviet-made

systems. The  Indian Army intends

to  procure the  modified Akash sys-

tems as well.

The Defence Research and

Development Laboratory (DRDL)

started developing the  Akash sur-

face-to-air missile in  1984 un-

der the  Integrated Guided Missile

Development Program that em-

braced various types of  missiles.

Initially 12 years were planned for

the system development but, in fact,

the works took more than 21 years.

The Indian developers remark that

this air defence missile system is in the

same class as the US Patriot and Israeli

Barak systems, but it is a  substantial-

ly lower costing one. The  Akash sur-

face-to-air missile powered by a solid-

propellant engine has length of  5.78

m, launch weight of  more than 700

kg, and warhead weight of  up to  60

kg. The missile can develop a 600-m/

s flight speed and engage single and

group targets flying at  low and me-

dium altitudes at  a range of  3 to  25

km. The single-shot kill probability for

the Akash missile is 85%.

Akash medium-range SAM

Spider-SR SAM on a 6x6 wheeled vehicleSpider-SR SAM on a 6x6 wheeled vehicle

Page 56: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

54 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

The Akash air defence missile sys-

tem includes radars, mobile launch

units, command and control posts,

and other support systems. Missiles

can be mounted on  tracked and

wheeled chassis. The  system in-

cludes the  Rajendra multifunction-

al phased array radar capable of  au-

tonomously tracking 64 targets and

guiding up to 12 missiles.

The Akash system will be manu-

factured by a  group of  companies

under the  management of  Bharat

Electronics Ltd, the prime contractor

of  the  programme. The  programme

implementation will involve 40 sub-

contractors in total.

Some foreign customers have al-

ready expressed their interest in pur-

chasing the  Akash system, and for

that reason the  DRDO has submit-

ted export clearance documents

to the Indian Ministry of Defence and

Foreign Ministry for endorsement. If

approved by the Government, India’s

defence industry will be capable

of  both satisfying domestic needs

of the Indian armed forces for this air

defence missile system and the  mis-

siles, and producing them on foreign

customers’ orders.

National anti-ballistic missile system de-

velopment programme

India’s anti-ballistic missile sys-

tem development programme has

made a  serious headway in  the last

two years. Its major achievements

include two successful launch-

es of  the  PAD anti-missiles derived

from the Prithvi short-range ballistic

missile (PAD  — Prithvi Air Defence)

and AAD interceptor missile (AAD —

Advanced Air Defence) which will

make up the backbone of  India's ad-

vanced anti-ballistic missile system.

In 2009 the Defence Research and

Development Organisation (DRDO)

of  the  Indian Ministry of  Defence

started testing the  Swordfish long-

range tracking radar (LRTR). The LRTR

is planned to be a target acquisition

and fire control radar for the  anti-

ballistic missile system being devel-

oped.

India’s national anti-ballistic mis-

sile is under development for several

years. Its main objective is to provide

detection and interception of  ballis-

tic missiles both at  exo-atmospher-

ic altitudes of  60 to  80 km and en-

do-atmospheric altitudes of 15 to 20

km. At the  first stage the  deployed

anti-ballistic missile system should

ensure protection of New Delhi and

Mumbai. The  anti-ballistic missile

system will include long-range tar-

get acquisition radars, command and

control centres, and batteries with

interceptor missiles.

Missiles of  two types are em-

ployed for interception: exo-atmo-

spheric PAD and endo-atmospher-

ic AAD missiles. The AAD missile will

ensure intercepts at the altitude of 15

to 30 km. The PAD-2 anti-missile with

the  first-stage liquid-fuel booster

and second-stage solid-fuel engine

can attain flight speed of up to 4.5 —

5 Mach. The AAD anti-missile is a sin-

Prithvi II ballictic missile

Brahmos cruise missile

Page 57: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

1(51).2010 ● 55

gle-stage missile. Its basic specifica-

tions are: length — 7.5 m, diameter —

0.5 m, weight — about 1.2 tonnes. It

employs inertial guidance in  the ini-

tial trajectory and active radar guid-

ance in  the terminal leg. Launch is

made from the  launcher mounted

on  the Tatra truck chassis with mis-

siles in transport-launch containers.

India’s national anti-ballistic mis-

sile system is expected to  be de-

ployed in 2015 provided that the test

programme has been completed

successfully and no financial or man-

agerial problems have cropped up.

PROSPECTIVE PROJECTS

India is planning to  devel-

op a  laser anti-ballistic missile sys-

tem to  protect the  country’s terri-

tory against ballistic missile attacks.

This system should be capable of  in-

tercepting and destroying missiles

at the ascending trajectory leg.

An air-based/sea-based laser an-

tiballistic missile system should be

able to  destroy enemy ballistic mis-

siles in  several seconds. The  laser

interception system will provide

more time for the  national anti-bal-

listic missile system to  kill ballistic

missiles launched from the  range

of 2,000 km.

Such technologies are being de-

veloped in  several DRDO laborato-

ries, including the Laser and Science

Technology Centre (LASTEC). In  par-

ticular, it develops an  airborne laser

system similar to the US laser-based

ballistic missile defense system.

It is expected that development

of the system to a series production-

ready prototype capable of  accom-

plishing anti-ballistic missile missions

will take 10 to  15 years. Such long

time for the project implementation

is needed since it must include de-

velopment not only of anti-missile la-

ser, but other equipment as well, in-

cluding target acquisition and track-

ing means and their integration into

a unique, smoothly functioning anti-

ballistic missile system.

MISSILES & ROCKETS

BRAHMOS CRUISE MISSILE

PROGRAMME

In 2009 main efforts

of  the  Russian-Indian joint venture

“Brahmos Aerospace” were focused

on  testing the  BrahMos, Block-II up-

graded cruise missile. On 30 July

2009 the  Indian Army performed

No.4 test launch of  the  land-based

version of  the  BrahMos Block-II up-

graded supersonic cruise missile

in Pokhran test range in the western

part of Rajasthan Desert.

Initial tests of  this modification

were held on  20 January 2009 but

failed. After the  missile control sys-

tem algorithms had been updated

the  repeated tests were successful-

ly conducted on  4 March. The  de-

velopers reported that the  missile

hit the  target at  a range of  about

40 km with the  acceptable accura-

cy. On 29 March 2009 the  Indian

Armed Forces performed the  third

test launch of  the  BrahMos Block-

II missile from a  land-based mobile

autonomous vertical launcher, and

the  missile scored a  hit on  the as-

signed target in  a multitarget envi-

ronment at a range of 50 km.

Tests in July 2009 confirmed com-

pliance of  the  BrahMos Block-II mis-

sile featuring the  improved guid-

ance system with the  requirements

of  the  Indian Armed Forces, and its

preparedness for series production.

According to  these requirements

the  upgraded cruise missile must

be able to select and engage targets

in  multitarget environment (within

a group of other targets) to increase

its target engagement capability

and reduce collateral damage.

The supersonic BrahMos cruise

missile development programme

was started in  the middle of  1999

drawing on  the Onyx II-800 mis-

sile design intended for under-

water launch. To realize this pro-

gramme, the  joint venture (JV)

“BrahMos Aerospace Ltd” was es-

tablished by two co-founders: fed-

eral state unitary enterprise “NPO

Machinostroyenia” (Russia) and

DRDO (India). The  first test launch-

es of the BrahMos cruise missile pro-

totype were performed at  the test

range in Orissa state, India.

“BrahMos” is a  two-stage cruise

missile with the  following parame-

ters: length  — 10 m, body diame-

ter — 0.7 m, launch weight (with con-

tainer) — 3.9 t, operational range —

up to  290 km, flight speed  —

2.9  Mach. This cruise missile can car-

Brahmos anti-ship missile

Page 58: Arms-2010-1

MARKETS

56 ● ARMS Defence Technologies Review

ry a warhead weighing up to 300 kg.

Its performance allows it to fly at var-

ious altitudes from 10 m to 14 km at a

speed three times higher than that

of the US Tomahawk cruise missile.

At present BrahMos Aerospace

Ltd has finished the  development

of  several versions of  its superson-

ic cruise missile. The  land-based

and sea-based missile versions have

been successfully tested and induct-

ed into service by the  Indian Army

and Navy. The  airborne and subma-

rine-launched versions are under de-

velopment at the moment.

The Indian Army took delivery

of  the  first BrahMos LACM (land at-

tack cruise missile) battery in  June

2007. The Indian Army plans to adopt

in the near future three BrahMos mis-

sile batteries, each containing four

mobile launchers based on the Tatra

12x12-wheel truck.

The Indian Navy retrofitted

with the  BrahMos antiship mis-

siles several combatants, includ-

ing the  Rajput destroyer and two

ships of  the  same type. There are

plans to  install the  BrahMos launch-

ers on three INS Project 1135.6 Talwar

frigates being under construction

at  the Yantar shipyards (Kaliningrad,

Russia), and Calcutta destroyers that

will be build at  Mazgon Dock ship-

yards in Mumbai.

On 18 December 2008 the Indian

Navy made first test launch of the su-

personic BrahMos cruise missile from

the  INS Rajput type destroyer with

the  ship-based vertical launcher.

Previously Indian Navy ships fired

missiles from inclined ramp launch-

ers. The vertical launcher used in the

tests was developed and manufac-

tured also by BrahMos Aerospace Ltd.

In contrast to  inclined ramp

launchers, the  vertical launcher al-

lows firing missiles in  an all-round

360-degree sector. The canister-type

vertical launcher accommodates

eight missiles. Surface ships will be

fitted with two such combat mod-

ules. In  future Indian Navy subma-

rines will be equipped with vertical

missile launchers.

In early January 2009, two Indian

Air Force Su-30MKI multi-role fight-

ers were ferried to  Russia for up-

grading that would allow them

to  launch an  airborne version

of  the BrahMos cruise missile. Flight

tests of the BrahMos supersonic mis-

sile air-launched version are planned

for completion by the end of 2012.

Testing of  the  airborne missile

version to be launched from the IAF

Su-30MKI fighter will be conducted

in  parallel with BrahMos Aerospase

upgrading of a submarine-launched

version of the missile.

Russian and Indian engineers

are now engaged in  integrating

the  BrahMos cruise missile onboard

the Su-30MKI carrier-aircraft. BrahMos

Aerospace Ltd managed to  decrease

weight of  the  airborne BrahMos mis-

sile to  facilitate its integration with

the aircraft. The cruise missile’s weight

is now 2,550 kg, length — 8.3 m, and

body diameter — 0.67 m.

If missile integration onboard

the  Su-30MKI aircraft platform is

successful, there are future plans

for a  programme to  retrofit with

the  BrahMos cruise missiles the  Su-

35 combat aircraft and a  5th gener-

ation advanced fighter to  be jointly

developed by Russia and India.

In September 2008 Russia and

India revealed for the  first time

their plans for joint development

of  a  new BrahMos-2 hypersonic mis-

sile. The missile is supposed to attain

maximum speed in the range from 5

to  7 Mach which makes its intercep-

tion practically impossible. BrahMos

Aerospace Ltd intends to  complete

the  BrahMos-2 hypersonic missile

development by 2013.

Upon completion of  the  devel-

opment programme, the  BrahMos

cruise missile will become “a ver-

satile cruise missile” since it will be

adapted for launch from surface

ships, submarines, aircraft, land-

based silos, and mobile launchers.

In the  next decade, the  Indian

Armed Forces can purchase up

to 1,000 BrahMos missiles produced

in different versions. Presently there

are 14 countries listed as potential

buyers of  the  BrahMos missiles. Yet

final decision on  what customers

can purchase the missiles will be tak-

en by the Indian and Russian govern-

ments. Until now no contracts for de-

livery of the BrahMos cruise missiles

to  third counties have been signed.

It is caused, in  particular, by India’s

intention to  first arm its own Army,

Air Force and Navy with this weapon.

BrahMos Aerospace Ltd plans

to produce 50 to 100 missiles annual-

ly. During one decade the company

can manufacture up to 1,000 missiles

from which one half can be export-

ed. In  general it intends to  produce

not less than 2,000 BrahMos missiles

for different customers. At present

the  Indian government has ordered

for its armed forces the BrahMos mis-

siles worth 2 billion USD.

Detailed review of  the  Indian

missile program can be found

in  the article entitled “Missiles over

Hindustan”.

Brahmos ASM mobile launcher

Page 59: Arms-2010-1
Page 60: Arms-2010-1