ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY … · 2018. 11. 9. · QUARTERLY SCI ENTI FIC PROGRESS...

47
UNCLASSIFIED AD266 896 ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA UNCLASSIFIED

Transcript of ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY … · 2018. 11. 9. · QUARTERLY SCI ENTI FIC PROGRESS...

  • UNCLASSIFIED

    AD266 896

    ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCYARLINGTON HALL STATIONARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA

    UNCLASSIFIED

  • I

    NOTICE: When government or other drawings, speci-fications or other data are used for any purposeother than in connection with a definitely relatedgovernment procurement operation, the U. S.Government thereby incurs no responsibility, nor anyobligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Govern-ment may have formilated, furnished, or in any waysupplied the said drawings, specifications. or otherdata is not to be regarded by implication or other-wise as in any manner licensing the holder or anyother person or corporation, or conveying any rightsor permission to manufacture, use or sell anypatented invention that may in any way be relatedthereto.

  • MELLON INST'ITUTE00

    Quarterly Scientific Progress Report

    Report No. 14for the period

    August 1, 1961 - October 31, 1961

    C.>

    STRESS CORROSION OF HIGH STRENGTH STEELS

    AND ALLOYS; ARTIFICIAL ENVIRONMENT

    x E: Rox ,"•I5L

    Research Project No. 389-2 DEC I te

    TtPDR _._ i

    Sponsored by

    U. S. Army Ordnance, Frankford Arsenal

    Mr. H. Rosenthal, Contract Monitor

    Contract No. DA-36-034-ORD-3277RD

  • Approved 46'-I Dr. H. T- AnthonyStaff Adviser

    MELLON INSTITUTE

    Report No. 14

    QUARTERLY SCI ENTI FIC PROGRESS REPORT

    for the period

    August I, 1961- October 31, 1961

    STRESS CORROSIONOF HIGH STRENGTH STEELSAND ALLOY S; ARTIFIC IA L ENVI RONMENT

    Research Prcoject No. 389-2

    Sponsored byU. S. Army Ordnance, Frankford Arsenal

    Mr. H. Rosentha i, Contract Monitor

    Contract No. DA-M-034-ORD-3277RD

    This Report Presented By TheProja ct Staff

    C. 3J. Ovven, FellowW. D. Ruble, Lesearch Assistant

    The publication of this report does aqot necessarily constitute approvalby the Army of the findings or concdasions contained therein.

  • Nor|

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page

    ABSTRACTaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa- ii

    I. INTRODUCTION------------------------------------1

    II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

    Test Methods------.......-.......... zApparatus ------------------- ------ zAlloy Sample Material ------------------------- 3Sample Preparation --------------------------- 4Sample Testing -------------------------------- 5Status of Sample Material ---------------------- 5

    III. EXPERIMENTAL

    Sample Preparation and Heat Treatment 6Stress Corrosion Testing ---------------------- 7

    Bent Beam Tests ----------------------- 8U-Bend Tests --------------------------- 10

    IV. FUTURE WORK ----------------------------------- 13

    II

  • ABSTRACT

    Stress corrosion test methods, apparatus, high strength

    alloy sample material for testing, sample preparation, sample testing,

    and present status of sample material are presented in brief.

    Available heat treatment data for the PH15-7Mo, Vascojet

    1000, D6Ac, and B12OVCA alloys, heat treated to the approximate

    required strength levels of Z00, 220, 240 Kpsi and maximum Y.S. (150,

    170, and maximum for the titanium alloy) are given. Data for the

    remaining alloys, including 300M and Rocoloy 270 are in process.

    Cumulative stress corrosion test data for the various bent beam

    and U-bend tests are presented. Included are bent beam data for 4137

    Co and AM355 alloys, and U-bend data for AM355, PHI5-7Mo, B12OVCA,

    4137 Co, and Ardeform 301. Indicated probability of proneness of these

    alloys to stress corrosion is discussed for each in accordance with

    the data presented.

    ii

  • I. INTRODUCTION

    The project work described herein represents a portion of

    a grant made available by the Army to promote a general scientific

    advancement in the area of case materials for missiles. This specific

    paloject is concerned with the synthetic environment stress corrosion

    testing of specified high strength steels and alloys. The research

    objectives of the project were presented in Report No. 1.

    Natural environmental tests on high strength steels and alloys

    are being conducted by Aerojet General Corporation, with actual produc-

    tion environments and rocket proDellant environments being utilized. By

    prior mutual agreement, the same steel and alloy sheet material will be

    used for both projects and possible heat treatment variations will be

    circumvented by exchanging heat treated material whenever possible.

    A number of drawings and schematic diagrams of apparatus

    and test methods pertinent to the project have been presented in prior

    reports. In addition, surveys of applicable industrial and military

    literature have also been presented previously (Reports 2 and 3).

    This report presents further information on continuing

    U-bend and bent beam tests for the assigned alloys, and for Rocoloy

    270, 4137 Co, and Ardeform 301 missile steels.

  • 2.

    II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

    Test Methods

    A discussion of the U-bend and bent beam test methods

    together with an outline of the synthetic stress corrosion test environ-

    ments used in performing the research are given in the July, 1960,

    Monthly Scientific Report, Report No. 1.

    All recently-exposed (and future) samples being subjected to

    stress corrosion testing are being weighed prior to exposure to the test

    solutions to provide, whenever possible, general corrosion information.

    Apparatus

    Schematic drawings of bent beam sample holders, the U-bend

    test and holders, a sample bending device for bent beam specimens, and

    a stress corrosion test tank were presented in Report Nos. 1 and 3.

    Polyethylene containers are presently being used for the

    stress corrosion exposure of U-bend specimens to the various synthetic

    environments. Each container will adequately hold six U-bend specimens.

    The use of these containers will supplement the sample testing presently

    being conducted in epoxy-coated tanks.

    Construction of shelving and an aeration system (Report No.

    6) together with other pertinent items has facilitated (wherever feasible)

  • 3.

    the transfer of samples under test from the glass containers to the

    epoxy-coated test tanks. The completed facility is illustrated in

    Report No. 7.

    Alloy Sample Material

    The alloys being used in the study on stress corrosion

    inciude:

    1. Low Alloy: Ladish D6Ac.

    2. Si-Modified 4300 Series: 300 M.

    3. Hot-Worked Die Steel: Vascojet 1000.

    4. Cold-Worked PH Steel: AM 355.

    5. Heat-Treated PH Steel: PHi5-7Mo.

    6. Titanium Alloy: B12OVCA.

    7. Low Alloy-Cobalt Modified: 4137 Co.

    8. Low Alloy-Cobal Modified: Rocoloy 270.

    9. Stretch-Formed 1 7/7 Stainless Steel: Ardeform 301.

    All of the sample material is being tested in sheet form

    and was procured as such.

    Chemical analyses for the above listed alloys and for the

    comparative heats are given in their entirety in Table I in Report No.

    13. Physical properties and heat treating surveys for the alloys were

    presented in Report No. 12.

  • rIbU

    4.

    Sample Preparation

    Sheet material of the various alloys was sheared into

    slightly over-size U-bend, bent beam, and tensile specimens in both

    the primary (direction of lowest Y.S. ) and secondary directions. The

    specimens were then wet-ground to width, length, and thickness (if

    necessary). Sampple thickness was maintained between 30 and 50 mils,

    and as close to 50 mils as possible.

    After heat treatment surveys were conducted (see Report

    No. 12) to determine the Y. S. variation with tempering temperatu~re

    for each alloy (not necessary for AM 355), the specimens were heat

    treated to strength levels approximating 200, 220, 240 Kpsi and maximum

    Y.S. Heat treating of the BlZOVCA alloy consisted of aging in an inert

    atmosphere (see Report No. 12).

    All the surfaces except the ends of the heat treated specime-xs

    were then polished with emery paper to remove oxide films, the final

    polish being administered with 240-grit emery. Care was taken to assure

    a uniformly square edge on the specimens. A tendency of the D6Ac,

    V-1000, and 300 M specimens to decarburize was circumvented by

    carefully wet-grinding the surfaces of the heat-treated samples an

    additional 5 mils per surface.

  • 5.

    Sample Testing

    The U-bena specimens were bent into a V-shape with a special

    bending apparatus, sprung into clips (see Report No. 12). and immersed

    in each of the five test solutions (one-molar NaCI, Na 2 SO 4 , NaNOy3

    NaPO3 . and Na 2 S).

    The bent beam specimens were precision-cut to length and

    sprung into a holder with a bending device (see Report No. 12).

    Status of Sample Material

    The present status of the alloy sample material to date:

    1. D6Ac - heat treatment incomplete.

    2. 300M - heat treatment incomplete.

    3. Vascojet 1000 - heat treatment incomplete.

    4. AM 355 - all U-bends and some bent beam samples

    under test.

    5. PHl5-7Mo - all U-bends but no bent beam samples

    under te s t.

    6. B12OVCA - heat treatment incomplete.

    7. 4137 Co - under test.

    8. Rocoloy 270 - undergoing final machining.

    9. Ardeform 301 - under test.

  • -

    6.

    MI. EXPERIMENTAL

    Sample preparation, heat treatment, and stress corrosion

    testing of all alloys noted in the previous section of this report are

    continuing.

    1. Sample Preparation and Heat Treatment

    During the period of this report, the PH15-7Mo, Vascojet

    1000, D6Ac, and B1ZOVCA U-bend and/or bent beam stress corrosion

    specimens were heat treated to the approximate strength levels required.

    These Y.S. level objectives were Z00, 220, Z40 and maximum Kpsi for

    the first three of the above and 150, 170, and Z00 Kpsi for the B12OVCA

    material. Heat treatment schedules were in accordance with the

    information presented in the heat treatment surveys (see Report No. 12)

    for these alloys.

    While all heat treating (including 300M) is not as yet com-

    plete, the available tensile results for a number of these alloys are

    presented in Tables I (PHl5-7Mo), II (Vascojet 1000), and III (D6Ac).

    The Y.S. level objectives of 200, 220, 240 and maximum Kpsi were not"

    precisely obtained but the range of values is sufficient for test purposes.

    In addition, the Y. S. differential for the same tempering temperature in

    the two test directions (primary and secondary) was somewhat greater

    than was anticipated in some case&.

    k

  • 7.

    Photomicrographic work for the various as-received and

    heat treated alloys is incomplete and will be presented in the following

    irepaort.

    A considerable number of heat treated U-bend and bent

    beam samples are undergoing final surface preparation and it is expected

    that test data for same will also be presented in the next report.

    2. Stress Corrosion Testing

    The remainder of the as-received B12OVCA U-bend samples

    and all of the heat-treated PIH5-7Mo U-bend samples have been sub-

    jected to testing during the report period, with other batches soon to

    follow. With all the 4137 Co, AM355, and Ardeform 301 U-bends already

    under test, only the Vascojet 1000, D6Ac, 300M, and Rocoloy 270

    samples remain.

    Some difficulty was encountered in springing the higher

    strength transverse (primary direction; lowest Y.S.) heat-treated

    PH15-7 U-bends into their PVC clips. Fracture of these samples at

    the apex of the V (in the cross-section plastically deformed) occurred

    upon application of the degree of stress required to attach the clip. It

    may be surmised that, for example, the degree of elongation attainable

    in the longitudinal (rolling) direction was not sufficient to allow further

    deformation. This possibility is indicated by the data shown in Table X

    of Report No. 12, containing the heat treatment survey data for this alloy.

    LI

  • £B

    8.

    The problem was circumvented by placing the V-shaped sample on a

    1/2-inch mandrel and then applying sufficient pressure to the sample

    ends to allow attachment of the clip.

    Rearrangement of the tables of cumulative data has been

    undertaken to improve the clarity of comparison of results.

    Bent beam specimens of 4137 Co and AM355 are still under

    test and U-bend testing of 4137 Co, AMA355, PHI5-7MAo, B12OVCA, and

    Ardeform 301 is continuing. A more detailed discussion of the results

    to date for these alloys is provided in the following sections of this

    report.

    Two additional cooperative projects are being undertaken

    on the effect of decarburization and alloying on the proneness to stress

    corrosion of low alloy missile steels. The information obtained will

    be presented at a later date.

    a. Bent Beam Tests

    The AM355 bent beam specimens (secondary direction)

    undergoing stress corrosion testing in the five test solutions (NaCl,

    NaSO4 , NaPO3 , NaNO3 and Na 2 S) have produced no failures to date

    for any test strength level (7516 of 250, 261, and 302 Kpsi Y.S.), nor

    has there been any visual evidence (other than a slight discoloration

    in Na 2 S) of any appreciable general corrosion. The cumulative data

    for these specimens is given in Table IV.

  • 9.

    Bent beam specimens of 4137 Co, exposed to two natural

    environments (marine and semi-industrial) by U. S. Steel Applied

    Research personnel in a cooperative program, have undergone no

    change in status during the report period. The cumulative results to

    date are given in Table V.

    Similar 4137 Co bent beam samples exposed to an industrial

    environment by this Project are reported in Table VI. There have been

    a few sample failures during the report period, none of which have

    included samples tempered at 1100 0F for any Y. S. test level exposure.

    Comparison of the results to date from Tables V and VI (75% of Y.S.

    only) reveal the anomaly discussed in previous reports, i.e., the heavy

    industrial environment provides less susceptibility to stress corrosion

    than the mild industrial or marine environments. This variation from

    the expected is not immediately obvious, since sample preparation was

    identical, but is thought to be a function of sample preparation after

    heat treatment.

    Tables V and VI also indicate that an UOOF temper ( 75% of

    the maximum attainable Y.S. for this alloy) seems to provide immunity

    from stress corrosion, regardless of the test stress level (the tensile

    curve for this alloy shows little if any deviation from a straight line

    function up to the yield point). Stress corrosion susceptibility of this

    alloy may therefore be a function of the Y. S. attained by tempering.

  • I

    10.

    Bent beam specimf is for D6Ac, Vascojet 1000, 300M,

    P1l-5-7Mo, B1ZOVCA, and the remaining direction of AM355 are

    expected to be all under test during the following report period.

    b. U-Bend Tests

    While all strength levels for the various assigned high strength

    steels and alloys and additional, selected alloys are not as yet under

    test, the cumulative U-bend test results to date are discussed in the

    following sections of this report.

    1. AM355 - Only the lowest Y. S., primary direction,

    U-bend specimens are not under test for this alloy and, in view of the

    results to date, testing of added specimens seems unnecessary. The

    cumulative results for the low strength level (250 Kpsi Y.S. in secondary

    direction) samples shown in Table VII, the intermediate strength level

    (261 Kpsi Y.S. in secondary direction) samples, shown in Table VIII,

    and the high strength level (302 Kpsi Y.S. in secondary direction)

    samples, shown in Table IX, indicate a possible susceptibility to stress

    corrosion in NaCl only. If this were a structural weakness, it would be

    one in the direction of rolling (normal to the sample failure, since

    failure is predominantly associated with primary or transverse samples).

    As Table X indicates, neither AM355 nor PHl5-7Mo seem to

    be susceptible to carbon tetrachloride, pentane, or trichloroethane,

    although the higher-strength levels of PH-15 are not represented.

  • S1it.

    2. PH15-7Mo - The cumulative results for the low

    (201 Kpsi Y. S., primary direction), intermediate (208 Kpsi Y.S.,

    primary direction), high (244 Kpsi Y. S., primary direction), and

    maximum strength (286 Kpsi Y. S., primary direction) levels, as

    presented in Tables XI through XIV, indicate no susceptibility of this

    alloy in any of the test environments. However, the higher strength

    specimens have not been exposed to testing for too long a period and

    any conclusion drawn would be preliminary at best.

    3. B12OVCA - The cumulative results for the as.-received

    Primary Heat (Table XV) and Comparative Heat (Table XVI) show no

    susceptibility of this alloy to stress corrosion in any of the test solutions.

    The data, however, are largely inconclusive and the foregoing may be

    considered on a provisional basis, since greater bulk of the data are

    very short range. The higher strength samples will be in test for

    comparison in the next report.

    4. 4137 Co - Table XVII data indicate that this low

    alloy missile steel is susceptible to stress corrosion failure in all test

    environments in widely varying degree. In general, the lower Y.S.

    (higher tempering temperature of U000F) samples were shown to be

    susceptible only in the phosphate and nitrate environments, the chloride,

    sulfate, and sulfide solutions having considerably less effect. The

    U-bend test data correlate on a general basis with the bent beam data

    I

  • I

    previously given for this alloy in that the percent Y. S. attained with

    regard to the Y.S. attainable seems to be one criteria for stress

    corrosion susceptibility.

    The data in Table XVIII for this same steel show that dry air

    and laboratory environments have no apparent effect, whereas those

    samples exposed to a moist air environment are prone to failure at the

    higher Y.S. levels. Note that the U00*F-tempered specimens are not

    affected even in the moist atmosphere.

    5. Ardeform. 301 - The cumulative data. for Sample No. I

    of this material is presented in Table XIX and for Sample No. 2 in

    Table XX. There has been no change in status of these samples over

    the last report period. A possible proneness to stress corrosion in the

    chloride environment is indicated by the test data.

  • 13.

    IV. FUTURE WORK

    During the next report period the main research effort will

    be directed toward sample preparation, completion of sample heat

    treatment, and preparation for presentation of metallographic work.

    Cumulative test results on bent beam and U-bend sample

    tests for all assigned and additional alloys will be presented.

    C. J. Owenrgrr C 'O

    W. D. Ruble RESEARCH ASSISTANT

    U 11-21-61T: 11-21-61 I

  • 14.

    00

    M. %0 c

    Hn 0 0

    044

    4J4

    - ~-400 0

    Hq -,f 14 N (nJ N

    0 0* 4.4 ~ ~ ~ a. '

    oo v U0 0;

    0 0

    U)U

    04) 0 0 a0 o 04'l~

    ýl 0zi4' LA

    04 E-4

  • mamma&

    15.

    0 +)r-~ 1 4 l

    '4-LnN

    .6

    0 A0 0N u

    .

    Hr (nL LM- .n

    .,0,

    E-44

    [-400e 00

    ----

    a -4

    oc - .40 Q% r-~ ( %If

    134 Ln %0 m'IV

    ~ -M M U 4 4.h04) NN1

    a4 *r 4)0 '

    0 go , .~.

    ~~14

    o tou cn

    $4 14

    En '.4 0 0

    00

    z-4~

    E-44 00

  • 16.

    U'9

    0 n LOL '1.0 t- a .

    u boW 04

    0 ;0

    0 00N-- 04~ 00v 0 17 flLA

    k 4Z NC c N N N N ko0

    No '

    ~4 k4cc %0r- N 0 C

    EH VI U) )

    4J

    11.-4

    -4 -4"1 ON -4NN NN U)4

    0 0

    0 04

    (.44 Lo4 w.m

    45

    4) ;4

    LA -

  • 4) 17.

    (Z4

    0*~4)-4

    -4-

    ;4 4

    00

    '4J

    0 V CO 00C ItcC, 00c 11 C" C

    02 )

    0 0~- 000 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 Q-74J4 4J J+ 4- ~ 4.I.& .J .J~4J ~ + ~ J 0 4 4

    4)4

    La '.0 '0'Og4

    ca (V4

    0

    1-4 14 0

    m 0~4A

    04 NN 0 04 -

    0

    U "4)

    4j 0 0 0 10"0 0 000 1000 000 1

    UC

    0 0 00 000 0 *0

    04 z

    zz

  • W >, .4 4 ( If1.8.14 0 0W'b+- ýZ4

    a0 04

    Go w 0~.4U,% -44

    A2 WCl, (~.'44 +

    0 ~ ~ ~ ( + l ~~~

    ;$ (n4 +4S

    0 $i 0

    0 0 0 0U cnU, Ln' n -n -n L. in

    0 N4Lo 0 u '44 1

    >4 0 E-4

    u ;4 14 k EnI'n >:. J 4J .. in

    R4' **A 4 -

    +~ +Sn:10

  • E4)to~. 19.

    000

    0 L0

    00

    0 04

    >0

    0 001--4

    >4 0 14 4)4 >: +4

    Ao 222 4.1(n4* 4) U) 4 -

    z 0 0)

    0 0*

    0 - 4

    0~ 0

    411f

    53 U 0( . 0 4) A ?44 ý g+ N;141 q 4 r4 44 *rl' .,

    + .4r

    k (n kkN .$4 kN$"4. 4 04 44 0 40 0 4

    0C $44

    FA +

    0000

    -- -4-4V4 t%1% "

    04~

    (A4 0E-4 E-4 Lei

    ee I+0 ;41

  • :3 4

    S P - .-

    0

    (H d 0 d d 0 d 0

    zw N N

    0 0 0 0 0

    0 4)C4)

    0 0

    0/ 0 c

    0 ~4-

    ***4 4 '.0'o.-

    z04) N )N

    00 4-1- U a

    a

    D 0 0 0 0

    N~- 9)' U4u o-

    4)0 40

    (44 rA 0 (a0 00: 0 0c 0n 0n 4)4).ý

    U~ U

    44 t

    U- W -4 430

    4)0 Z 0 0 0U, Z ; ZZ

  • E-4i

    cn I I I SI I I I

    0

    'Coo

    *0004.64

    00

    >40z u 44444.14 (

    Ln '41

    Ln 0

    %0 %0%04.a. '0 00 '3 - 0*0 t- or ~0.0 4'- 0..

    140

    0 u

    N 3N Nm N M3 N ar3 '

    4'04'

    0 U u

    a;144k

    00

    a 0 0o

    (UzN

    4"0"a-

  • ,-4.

    E- 0.10 0-C4L C

    E-4

    cd 4 -40

    10 9

    co 0 0 00 0

    ZS 4Z ")) 44 )) 440n 00 00 00 00 >:r

    (d 4-1 04)

    0.% 0O 0 '.0O .0 0 '.O .*0 0S

    04 049: 0~a

    0 0C4 > 4 (d

    1:4C.) 0 &4 0

    00

    C-4 41

    -

    0

    14400

    04z V- 0z 0

  • IIZ 3.

    E4)

    Ta SlotSI

    0 0 0 - 0 0 1

    p 4 N '0 ' 4, 4 1

    .4. p4 Q p 4 P4 P4 W4. 1.0 0

    00 00 00

    00

    01 0Z~

    E-4 ~

    c 4~ .r U %00 4 t-0 E4* 'Io00 0 nN00

  • E4mS S S I * S S I24.

    f14

    cn

    ow r w ow Wo fao a 0w 0'-

    >% >% > % b%> > % > >1-4

    .. O. *.o p 'o'%0 'o %0 N.O %0"1-4 .14 0.4 "4 r.4 r4 P-4 r-4 1-41-

    0 0 04 0)4 0 0 0)0

    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a00100

    04 0. a 44

    %0 0%0 Ln %o %0.1s Ln %o tL. %0

    4 ~ z u000

    uo4a3

    u u -

    cA4 P-4 - 4 -4 W4 (wU 0

    4-b 0 .

    5*4 * *. ,q (4j

    4A10z

    oa cn c4101 Q

    E- ti 0t 0M z z z

  • ~~44

    49

    >%- 61 >%-- > % ý %4

    Ud ( d I(d C d c

    10 10 10 0

    >4' 4.

    0 4) 00 0 00 0 0000 0 00 0 0

    4 41 P-4 -4 -- 4 14-4 P-41-4 --

    0 0 0000 0 0 0 0

    z Cd 0 4)4 a 4)4) 4)4) 4)4) 4) 4) 641)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    U) 4~

    0-4.4

    ~~ b,00 OO 's .'O OO *O. ~.

    0 - ra-4 54 '4-

    -A 0

    NN NN NN N NN

    a4 44) u .4)

    .z.4)4N4)

    4

    6 5. 4

    ON O ON ONN6u0

    o -~4) $4.

    ., I ~4 _5 % 5 1 0 V

    04*W CU 4 04 04

    00

    z- 0 U, 0 0

    z U4cU Zo N d

    16 N

  • 1- a a a a 26.

    c 4,

    n 4)

    E-4 0

    SW .44

    U00GO00 00 00 co00 C.00 G

    4 $4.1 -4-4 P4 .- 4 *-ý.-40 0 0 or0 0 0 0 M

    -W4. 4- J 4- - - W 41 4 -

    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 boU2 *94$

    0 44 0.~ $4'~>

    r$4 .9

    -l u 0 0 0 040 % % % % % 4) 4

    N 0 10~

    $4u4

    4)% E0

    04

    4J040W 0 U2S

    U~ 1 04, 4, 4

    :z ; z

  • IRENE,27.

    00

    r~raz

    4) ..

    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    o c 4 a4 4)4a 4 )4& -W4 -W " " 40* 00 01

    00uS

    o0 u

    HZ a

    E, U)H 0 a%.s

    bO w ~ rn rE0 cn 0 m 4mhOm0%010

    >4) 4b4

    E-4..0 *

    44.

    Nr'J% NN% NN N NO 0%0

    u 14

    144) 144

    0

    0 0

    z 0 o

  • 28.

    E-4 1

    .14

    IA 4E- > a £Wa

    (n s a a a

    oc o 02 ~0 02+4 +A 44 - - W 4b4b +

    00' 2 00 o~00 00r.

    0 00000 00

    00

    > 0 44 e

    0 0 E 0 >4)

    U4, 00 2

    E-4-

    o~ 0u oun Ctr Lou~ oir 0*L.

    o )r 4 4 -4 -4 4 4-b

    4.1

    ""4 V V4. .14 .144

    '*4.

    0

    .14.4 ' -

    0~ o0 0040~0

    S 40 14 $4

    04 0 P4U a.U fl4U E-4 E-4

    40

    0z4- 0I 0 0

    a 4 0 En 044) Z N N o(d c

  • lIIz

    z

    94 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0

    04 00

    U2 ~04 0cn 4.b 0

    -. (D

    U It 14 It.. -

    00100

    (U 044'

    Z)4 0 4

    -4 '04 HHH044 "44 14 14c Q

    * 4)

    0 0C0

    0 0 00

    ;4 z

  • p %fl30.

    E-4 N

    * * 0

    N 1 cN ii. S a I I n nJn

    cn 4 1 140w-U2 634-

    0'>P

    W5

    m - t 0 -.

    r4N0 0 OO%

    0 0 r4-14

    zz *40

    >4 0 t4- p0~~ %D Ln' o

    E-4 r2"4 so

    oo r4 0E.

    Oa Ln 0 co L 0 40c f) O LOC

    E-4 ~ - NN.4 Nr-4N~ NN N~0 45 .1.

    ra 4

    0 4-AE-4

    A

    40

    04 0 12 a$

    4) Z

  • I0 0ii ~i

    %0 %0-0 '0 %.

    r. 090U

    0~ 0) fnen1-4'-

    0n 0

    to0 ~ 0~0 A ~ U 0

    0U) -0 00G 0 U 00 ,

    0N NN -4

    V k4.1~

    *.ý4ý 0 +14

    0 -4

    4aU ( d0 co0' 0oGZ 00

    04.0

  • E-4eSISmmil .

    I

    0Z 0

    .0 U

    0 00 00

    z ago 55 >tIS 5

    I II t0i S

    00 0000

    0 0 11 V VJ14 %04

    r-4.

    0 a

    "04.aaa

    t~cn 0'0 co0 co0 O'r '

    Uto

    0 4. UtUl ~~~ '0- .00.-4Ao '

    0 fa

    -4-

    U>A U

    0-06

    0 0-.

    00

    E-4. 0 4 d (*2 cc

    (n z N N C.

  • E-

    z )Ln )Uf l U)L L CI U)UlA LnLn U c

    4.h

    z0 0o 0 o 0 000S 00a0N a N N N a N

    U)S

    LO N

    -4-

    -4 4ý

    r4r

    0:

    .4 4 w

    4)(0

    V0 '

    r4 ,1 0, 1' 4 .4;

    0 to NoG 0 02 r oui 4; 0 4E-I 1:3: l:

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    (Copies of All Reports)

    No. of Copies

    Office of the Director of Defense Research & EngineeringRoom 3E-1028, The PentagonWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Mr. J. C. Barrett

    Advanced Research Project AgencyThe PentagonWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Dr. B. Mock

    Commander, Army Research OfficeArlington Hall StationArlington 12, Virginia 1

    Office Chief of OrdnanceDepartment of the ArmyWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: ORDTB-Materials

    Comnmanding GeneralAberdeen Proving GroundAberdeen Proving Ground, MarylandATTN•: Dr. C. Pickett, CCL

    Commanding GeneralArmy Ballistic Missile AgencyRedstone Arsenal, AlabamaATTN: Dr. G. H. Reisig 1

    Mr. P. B. Wallace, ORDAB-RPEM 1

    Commanding GeneralOrdnance Tank-Automotive CommandDetroit 9, MichiganATTN: Mr. S. Sobak, ORDMC-IF-2 1

    Commanding GeneralOrdnance Weapons CommandRock Island, IllinoisATTN: Mr. B. Gerke, ORDOW-IA 1

    Commanding OfficerU. S. Army Rocket & Guided Missile AgencyRedstone Arsenal, AlabamaATTN: Mr. Robert Fink, ORDXR-RGA 1

    Mr. W. H. Thomas, ORDXR-IQI 1ORDXR-LXD 1

    !1

    II

  • I DISTRIBUTION LIST(Copies of All Reports Cont'd) No. of CoPies

    Commanding OfficerFrankford ArsenalPhiladelphia 37, PennsylvaniaATTN: Dr. H. Gisser, ORDBA-1330 i

    Mr. H. Markus, ORDBA-1320 1Mr. Hyman Rosenthal, ORDBA-1320 (Technical Supervisor) 1

    Commanding OfficerOrdnance Materials Research OfficeWatertown ArsenalWatertown 72, MassachusettsATTN: RPD 2

    Commanding OfficerPicatinny ArsenalDover, New JerseyATTN: Mr. J. J. Susvuzzo, Plastics & Packaging Lab 1

    Mr. D. Stein, ORDBB-DE-3 1

    Commanding OfficerPLASTECPicatinny ArsenalDover, New Jersey 1

    Commanding OfficerRock Island ArsenalRock Island, IllinoisATTN: Materials Section, Laboratory 1

    Commanding OfficerSpringfield ArmorySpringfield 1, MassachusettsATTN: Mr. R. Korytoski, Research Materials Lab I

    Commanding OfficerWatertown ArsenalWatertown 72, MassachusettsATTN: ORDBE-LX 2

    Commanding OfficerWatervliet ArsenalWatervliet, New YorkATTN: Mr. F. Dashnaw, ORDBF-RR 1

    CommanderArmed Services Technical Information Agencyr Arlington Hall StationArlington, VirginiaATTN: TIFR 210

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    (Copies of All Reports Cont'd)

    No. of Copies

    Chief, Bureau of Naval Weapons

    Department of the NavyRoom 2225, Munitions BuildingWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: RMMP

    Commander, U. S. Naval Ordnance LaboratoryWhite Oak, Silver Spring, MarylandATTN: Code WM

    CommanderU. S. Naval Ordnance Test StationChina Lake, CaliforniaATTN: Technical Library Branch

    Commande rU. S. Naval Research LaboratoryAnacostia StationWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Mr. J. E. Srawley

    Department of the NavyOffice of Naval ResearchWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Code 423

    Department of the NavySpecial Projects OfficeWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: SP 271

    USAF Directorate of Research & DevelopmentRoom 4D-313, The PentagonWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Lt Col J. B. Shipp, Jr. 1

    Wright Air Development DivisionWright-Patterson Air Force BaseDayton, OhioATTN: ASRCEE (WWRCEE) 2

    USAF Edwards AFB6593 Test Group (Development) (DGSCP)Edwards, California

    ATTN: Major F. J. Altiere

    3

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    (Copies of All Reports Cont'd)

    No. of Copies

    AMC Aeronautical Systems CenterWright Patterson Air Force BaseDayton, OhioATTN: Manufacturing & Materials Technology Div., LMBMO 2

    National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationWashington 25, D. C.ATTN: Mr. R. V. Rhode 1

    Mr. G. C. Deutsch 1

    Dr. W. LucasGeorge C. Marshall Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationHuntsville, AlabamaATTN: M-S&M-M 1

    Mr. William A. WilsonGeorge C. Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsville, AlabamaATTN: M-F&AE-M 1

    Defense Metals information CenterBattelle Memorial InstituteColumbus, Ohio I

    Solid Propellant Information AgencyApplied Physics LaboratoryThe Johns Hopkins UniversitySilver Spring, Maryland 3

    Aerojet-General CorporationP. 0. Box 1168Sacramento, CaliforniaATTN: Librarian 1

    Aerojet-General CorporationP. 0. Box 296Azusa, CaliforniaATTN: Librarian 1

    Mr. C. A. Fournier 1

    Allison DivisionGeneral Motors CorporationIndianapolis 6, IndianaATTN: D. K. Hanink, Chief Metallurgist 1

    4

    *:&2

    I{

  • DISTRIBUTION, LIST

    (Copies of All Reports Cont'd)

    No. of Cozies

    Arde Associates100 W. Century RoadParamus, New JerseyATTN: Mr. R. Alper

    Atlantic Research CorporationShirley Highway & Edsall RoadAlexandria, VirginiaATTN: Mr. E. A. Olcott

    Curtiss-Wright CorporationWood-Ridge, New JerseyATTN: Mr. Shurif 1

    A. M. Kettle, Technical Library 1

    Hercules Powder CompanyAllegheny Ballistics LaboratoryP. 0. Box 210, Cumberland, MarylandATTN: Dr. R. Steinberger

    Hughes Aircraft CompanyCulver City, CaliforniaATTN: Librarian 1

    Dr. L. Jaffe, Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of Technology4800 Oak Grove DrivePasadena, California 1

    TAPCO Group23555 Euclid AvenueCleveland 17, OhioATTN: W. J. Piper 1

    Chief of Research & DevelopmentU. S. Army Research & Development Liaison GroupAPO 757, New York, New YorkATTN: Dr. B. Stein

    U. S. Army Ordnance District, Philadelphia128 North Broad StreetPhiladelphia 2, PennsylvaniaATTN: R&D BR, OD

    U. S. Army Research Office (Durham)Box CM, Duke StationDurham, North Carolina

  • I DISTRIBUTION LIST(Case Materials Only)

    No. of Copies

    Allegheny Ludlum Steel CorporationResearch CenterBrackenridge, PennsylvaniaATTN: Mr. R. A. Lula

    Alloyd Research Corporation35 Cambridge ParkwayCambridge, MassachusettsATTN: Dr. S. S. White

    Armco Steel CorporationGeneral OfficesMiddletown, OhioATTN: Mr. J. Barnett

    Battelle Memorial Institute505 King AvenueColumbus 1, OhioATTN: Mr. R. Monroe

    Mr. G. Faulkner

    Borg-Warner CorporationIngersoll Kalamazoo Division1810 N. Pitcher StreetKalamazoo, MichiganATTN: Mr. L. E. Hershey

    The Budd CompanyDefense DivisionPhiladelphia 32, PennsylvaniaATTN: Mr. R. C. Dethloff

    Mr. Ohman

    General Electric CompanyRocket Engine SectionFlight Propulsion Laboratory DepartmentCincinnati 15, Ohio

    Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation A

    45 South Montgomery AvenueYoungstown i, OhioATTN: Mr. H. Steinbrenner

    t6

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    (Case Materials Only Cont'd)

    No. of Copies

    Arthur D. Little, Inc.15 Acorn ParkCambridge 40, Massachusetts

    t ATTN: Dr. R. S. Davis 1

    Lyon, Inc.13881 W. Chicago BoulevardDetroit, MichiganATTN: W. Martin

    Manufacturing Laboratories249 Fifth StreetCambridge 42, MassachusettsATTN: Dr. P. Fopiano 1

    Dr. V. Radcliffe 1

    Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MassachusettsATTN: Prof. Backofen 1

    Prof. M. C. Flemings 1

    Mellon Institute4400 Fifth AvenuePittsburgh 13, PennsylvaniaATTN: C. J. Owen 1

    Dr. H. L. Anthony I

    Norris-Thermador Corporation5215 South Boyle AvenueLos Angeles 48, CaliforniaATTN: Mr. L. Shiller 1

    Ohio State UniversityResearch FoundationColumbus, OhioATTN: Dr. McMaster 1

    The Perkin-Elmer CorporationMain AvenueNorwalk, ConnecticutATTN: Mr. J. Beardsley

    7

  • DISTRIBUTION LIST

    (Case Materials Only Cont'd)

    S~ No. of Copies

    Pratt & Whitney AircraftEast HartfordConnecticutATTN: Mr. W. Dahl

    Mr. C. Baxter

    Reactive Metals CorporationNiles, OhioATTN: Mr. H. Lundstrom

    Republic Steel CorporationResearch CenterIndependence, OhioATTN: Mr. H. P. Manger

    Space Technology Laboratories, Inc.Post Office Box 95001Los Angeles 45, CaliforniaATTN: Technical Information Center Document Procurement

    Titanium Metals Corporation233 BroadwayNew York, New YorkATTN: Mr. G. Erbin

    United States Rubber CompanyResearch CenterWayne, New JerseyATTN: Dr. E. J. Joss

    LibraryRohm & Haas CompanyRedstone Arsenal Research DivisionHuntsville, Alabama

    Douglas Aircraft Company Inc.Santa Monica DivisionSanta Monica, CaliforniaATTN: Mr. J. L. Weisman

    f 8