Argumentativ Indian
-
Upload
neha-rungta -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of Argumentativ Indian
Discussion can be simply defined as a series of exchanges among at least two participants. The
purpose of the Discussion is to interpret your results, that is, to explain, analyze, and compare
them. It has been a part of the Indian psysic for as far as you can remember. As can be read in
the Bhagawat Gita,a conversation between between Krishna and Arjun, the debate is on
whether it is right to fare forward in the name of duty, when the certain consequences of that
action would not result in the welfare of large numbers of friends and relatives of the warring
cousins, but on the contrary bring certain death and destruction to them. Arjuna is definitely
justified in hesitating to take a course of action that would decimate his larger clan. Though
eventually Krishnas argument prevails, that the only way of action is doing ones duty
This highlights that the argumentative indian philosophy which has been part of the indian
culture and tradition for a very long time. Though war and invasion through decades have
mellowed the combatant mindset of the average Indian, none could take away his
argumentative psyche.
He goes on to stress that though ancient indian society was classified on the basis of
gender,class,caste and community and the tradition of argument and disputation was confined
to the elite male population, the participation of women in both political leadership and
intellectual pursuits have not be inegligible.As can be noticed by the appointment of SAROJINI
NAIDU as the President Of The Indian national Congress in 1925.
Internal pluralism involves accommodating all men, women, kings and robbers, old and young.
Gargi questioned the sage Yajnavalkya in the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. And Yajnavalkya's own
wife Maitreyi too engaged him in scholarly debate. Note that both Gargi and Maitreyi are
women.
Heterodoxy was the characteristic of medieval mystical thought including the Bhakti and
Muslim Sufi traditions. Many exponents rejected caste and class, religious divides and other
imbalances Khusro the poet, Kabir the weaver, Dadu the spinner, Ravidas the cobbler and
Sena the barber.
In terms of religion the medival period saw the rise of Jainism and Buddhism which not only
reflected in the message of human equality but is also captured in the nature of the argument
used to undermine the claim to superiority of those occupying higher positions in society.
For centuries Buddhism, not Hinduism, was the predominant religion of India. Buddhism
originated in India in 5th century BCE and prominent early Buddhist schools, such as Theravda
and Mahyna, gained dominance during the Maurya Empire.[161]
Though Buddhism entered a
period of gradual decline in India 5th century CE onwards,[164]
it played an influential role in
shaping Indian philosophy and thought.[161]
And early Indian Buddhism was famous for its public
discussions and ̀ councils' (at Rajagriha, Vaisali, Pataliputra) to settle disputes between different
points of view.and consolidated and promoted the tradition of discussion. Secularism in India
included Muslims, Jews, Parsis, Christians, Bahais, Jains, Sikhs, and each community has
retained its identity within India's spectrum of faiths.The Maurya empire reached its peak at the
time of emperor Asoka, who himself converted to Buddhism after the Battle of Kalinga. This
heralded a long period of stability under the Buddhist emperor. The power of the empire was
vastambassadors were sent to other countries to propagate Buddhism. Akbar too ruled on
the basis of what is now know as a secular state. Though he remained a proper muslim his
whole life, he always encouraged tolerence against other religion and promoted freedom of
religion among its people.It can also be argued that secularism is understood differently by
different people eg. The French have banned the wearing of headscarfs (muslim ladies) in the
country with a view that it prevents them from wearing what the person really wants to wear
as they believe that such a practice potrays gender inequality which cannot be secularism.
CONCLUSION
It can be argued that this richness of the tradition of argument has shaped our social world and
the nature of our culture. It has deeply influenced Indian politics and the development of
democracy in India and emergence of its secular priorities. Though Indias has had a long
culture and tradition of inequalities and discrimination there has also been a lot of evidence of
the argumentative nature Indians throughout history which has not only evolved our culture
and society but also promoted the valve of discussion which received support not only from
leaders like Mahatma Gandhi but also poets like Rabindranath Tagore in contemporary India.