Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

22
Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations Edouard Goudenhoofdt and Laurent Delobbe Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB) June 3, 2013, European Conference on Severe Storms

Transcript of Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Page 1: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Areal rainfall statisticsbased on radar observations

Edouard Goudenhoofdt and Laurent DelobbeRoyal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (RMIB)

June 3, 2013, European Conference on Severe Storms

Page 2: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

RMIB operates a C-band radar since 2001

I Single-polarisation

I Doppler filtering (clutter)

I Located 600 m asl,range of 240 km

I 5-elevation every 5 min(during 2 min)

I Resolution : 1° in azimuth,250 m in range

Page 3: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Quantitative precipitation estimates��

���

���

����

����

����

����

����

������

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��I PCAPPI 800 m above

radar level

I Z = 200R1.6

I Hail:Z > 53 dBZ → 53 dBZ(75 mm/h)

I Cartesian grid 500 mresolution.

I Accumulation by linearinterpolation.

To be validated : clutter mitigation and profilecorrection.

Page 4: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Quantitative precipitation estimates��

���

���

����

����

����

����

����

������

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��

��I PCAPPI 800 m above

radar level

I Z = 200R1.6

I Hail:Z > 53 dBZ → 53 dBZ(75 mm/h)

I Cartesian grid 500 mresolution.

I Accumulation by linearinterpolation.

To be validated : clutter mitigation and profilecorrection.

Page 5: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Merging and verification with denseraingauge networks.

50 km

100 km

Radar and rain gauge networks

SPW (69)RMI(84)Radar

I hourly automaticraingauge network (blue)

I 1E 6 scale difference !I mean field bias : simple

and robustI max range 120 kmI min value 0.1 mmI min 10 valid pairs

A 8-year verification reveals relatively goodaccuracy.

Page 6: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Merging and verification with denseraingauge networks.

� � � � � �

������������������������

���

���

���

���

���

�����

I hourly automaticraingauge network (blue)

I 1E 6 scale difference !I mean field bias : simple

and robustI max range 120 kmI min value 0.1 mmI min 10 valid pairs

A 8-year verification reveals relatively goodaccuracy.

Page 7: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Mean hourly rainfall depth 2005-2012

150 100 50 0 50 100 150

150

100

50

0

50

100

150

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

['A

CR

R']

['bewid - 2012-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_stmeanP8Y)']

I unconditional mean(dry periods are included)

I minimum 0.07 mm(600 mm/year) in theplains

I maximum 0.14 mm(1200 mm/year) in thehills

I clear correlation withtopography (cluttereffect?)

Those results are consistent with raingaugeclimatology.

Page 8: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Mean hourly rainfall depth 2005-2012

180 km

0 200 400 600 800

Elevation [m]

I unconditional mean(dry periods are included)

I minimum 0.07 mm(600 mm/year) in theplains

I maximum 0.14 mm(1200 mm/year) in thehills

I clear correlation withtopography (cluttereffect?)

Those results are consistent with raingaugeclimatology.

Page 9: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Mean hourly rainfall depth 2005-2012

150 100 50 0 50 100 150

150

100

50

0

50

100

150

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

0.13

0.14

['A

CR

R']

['bewid - 2012-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_stmeanP8Y)']

I unconditional mean(dry periods are included)

I minimum 0.07 mm(600 mm/year) in theplains

I maximum 0.14 mm(1200 mm/year) in thehills

I clear correlation withtopography (cluttereffect?)

Those results are consistent with raingaugeclimatology.

Page 10: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Max hourly rainfall depth 2005-2012

200 100 0 100 200

200

100

0

100

200

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

['A

CR

R']

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_stmaxP8Y)']

I High small scalevariations.

I No significant large scaletrend.

I Slightly more max inSouth-East.

Highest values are due to stationary cells and/orhail.

Page 11: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Max hourly rainfall depth 2005-2012

200 100 0 100 200

200

100

0

100

200

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

['A

CR

R']

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_stmaxP8Y)']

I High small scalevariations.

I No significant large scaletrend.

I Slightly more max inSouth-East.

Highest values are due to stationary cells and/orhail.

Page 12: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Probability of hourly rainfall (1 mm).

150 100 50 0 50 100 150

150

100

50

0

50

100

150

1.2

1.6

2.0

2.4

2.8

3.2

3.6

4.0

%

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_spe1P8Y)']

I ranges from 2 % to4 %

I positive effect oftopography

Highly correlated with mean hourly rainfall

Page 13: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Probability of hourly rainfall (1 mm).

150 100 50 0 50 100 150

150

100

50

0

50

100

150

1.2

1.6

2.0

2.4

2.8

3.2

3.6

4.0

%

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_spe1P8Y)']

I ranges from 2 % to4 %

I positive effect oftopography

Highly correlated with mean hourly rainfall

Page 14: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Probability of rainfall exceeding 10 mm.

200 100 0 100 200

200

100

0

100

200

0.016

0.024

0.032

0.040

0.048

0.056

0.064

0.072

%

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_spe10P8Y)']

I ranges from 0.02 %to 0.06 %

I less effect oftopography

I higher probabilitySouth-East of radar

Partially correlated with max hourly rainfall

Page 15: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Probability of rainfall exceeding 10 mm.

200 100 0 100 200

200

100

0

100

200

0.016

0.024

0.032

0.040

0.048

0.056

0.064

0.072

%

['bewid - 2013-01-01 00:00:00 - STAT(scan1_cap_aclPT1H_mfb_spe10P8Y)']

I ranges from 0.02 %to 0.06 %

I less effect oftopography

I higher probabilitySouth-East of radar

Partially correlated with max hourly rainfall

Page 16: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of four differentriver catchment.

��� �� � �� ���

���

��

��

���

������

�������������

�������

������������

���������

I catchment ofdifferent size

I smooth andlogarithmicbehavior

I smallest catchment: max 20 mm

I largest catchment :max 8 mm

Computation of return periods is limited (8 years).

Page 17: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of four differentriver catchment.

��� ��� ��� � � � �� ��

������������������������

����

����

����

����

����

���

���

��������

�������������������������

��������������������

�������������������

�������������������������

I catchment ofdifferent size

I smooth andlogarithmicbehavior

I smallest catchment: max 20 mm

I largest catchment :max 8 mm

Computation of return periods is limited (8 years).

Page 18: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of four differentriver catchment.

��� ��� ��� � � � �� ��

������������������������

����

����

����

����

����

���

���

��������

�������������������������

��������������������

�������������������

�������������������������

I catchment ofdifferent size

I smooth andlogarithmicbehavior

I smallest catchment: max 20 mm

I largest catchment :max 8 mm

Computation of return periods is limited (8 years).

Page 19: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of adjacentequal-area squares.

0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50Mean rainfall depth [mm]

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

Pro

babili

ty

Area = 25 km2

I simpleapproximation of acatchment

I distance less than100 km for bestaccuracy

I space and timestationarity

I independencebetween windows?

Possibility to compute longer return periods?(theoretically 8 years x number of windows)

Page 20: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of adjacentequal-area squares.

0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50Mean rainfall depth [mm]

10-8

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

Pro

babili

ty

Area = 100 km2

I simpleapproximation of acatchment

I distance less than100 km for bestaccuracy

I space and timestationarity

I independencebetween windows?

Possibility to compute longer return periods?(theoretically 8 years x number of windows)

Page 21: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Exceedance probability of adjacentequal-area squares.

0.1 0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50Mean rainfall depth [mm]

10-7

10-6

10-5

10-4

10-3

10-2

10-1

100

Pro

babili

ty

Area = 400 km2

I simpleapproximation of acatchment

I distance less than100 km for bestaccuracy

I space and timestationarity

I independencebetween windows?

Possibility to compute longer return periods?(theoretically 8 years x number of windows)

Page 22: Areal rainfall statistics based on radar observations - ESSL

Conclusions

I Weather radar provide good areal rainfall estimates.

I Areal rainfall exceedance probability can be computed.

I Important application to river catchment.

I Longer return periods could be computed using a largerdomain.

Outlook

I Best single radar QPE reanalysis (almost ready)

I Radar composite to mitigate attenuation and beambroadening

I Effect of rainfall depth duration

I Proof using a proper theoretical framework