Are You a Citizen by Choice or by Presumption 131kb 090411

8/4/2019 Are You a Citizen by Choice or by Presumption 131kb 090411

1/11

1 ARE YOU A U.S. CITIZEN BY CHOICE OR BY PRESUMPTION?

Are you a U.S. citizen at all ?

This is the lead in to all the books I have written since 1990 and an understanding

of all the books I have written. These books are listed at the end and go into moredetail. Bottom line, They need a tax base and you are it .

This will shock most Americans and will explain why the private corporation calledUnited States and of the States can control you as their SUBJECTS. There is only one explicit

way to become a real US citizen and that is found in one original Statute at large and a revised

statute that eliminated the two year wait of the Original Statute. Then there might be another

way to allegedly become a US Citizen. That is by letting them TELL you that you are a UScitizen. Yes they tell you. You dont tell them anything, like a free man and woman would tell

anyone and anything your mind and heart has to say. So let us start with the first original statute-

at-large. This has never been amended since 1824. There are no codes telling you that how to

become a US citizen SUBJECT. You actually believe we won the 1776 war? Think again!The Act of Congress of April 14, 1802, (2 Stat. 153, c. 28, 1; Rev. St. 2165,)provides that "an alien may be admitted to become a citizen of theUnited States in the following manner, and not otherwise Then therevised Statute the act of May 26, 1824, (4: star. 69, c. 186, 1; Rev. St. 2167,) removed the two year limit that (2 Stat. 153, c. 28, 1; Rev. St. 2165 provided.

Now, people have been so brain washed that anything Alien, is an impediment to rational

thought. Many a time, when the health Bill said that Aliens are exempt, all jumped up and downin disgust that these Aliens get everything and you have to pay for these Aliens. Thats the

mental incapacity forced on Americans for the last 235 years in making all Americans the mostignorant people on planet earth. What if I were to tell you that a free man and woman is an

Alien? What if you were shown that when Madison wrote Federalist papers 42 and 43, that hewas so afraid that the Aliens would come in and take over the private corporation they were

setting up? What if you actually took the time to read AND comprehend, The key word is

comprehend, Federalist Papers 42 and 43, to see that the free White man and women were calledAliens before the United States was formed? Yes this is so. So let us venture to a court where

this is spelled out exactly and in clear detail just how to become a U.S. Citizen whereby you

become a subject. Yes a SUBJECT like SLAVE, of 535 criminals named Congress, to do it toyou without so much as a "I aint gonna do it", from you. So we see what the Court had to say

and please note the phrase AND NOT OTHERWISE.

CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS v. REUM. (Circuit Court of Appeals, EighthCircuit. May 29, 1893.).This is a true conclusion of law from that court.Isnt it nice they spell it out in detail, Remembering we live in America thecountry. The United States is NOT a country.

"an alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United

1


2/11

States in the following manner, and not otherwise. First. He shall, twoYears at least prior to his admission, declare before a proper court hisintention to become a citizen of the United States, and to renouncehis allegiance to the potentate or sovereignty of which he may be atthe time a citizen or subject. Second. He shall, at the time of his

application to be admitted, declare, on oath, before some one of thecourts above specified, that he will support the Constitution of theUnited States, and that he absolutely and entirely renounces andabjures all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign prince, potentate,state, or sovereignty; and particularly, by name, to the prince,potentate, state, or sovereignty of which he was before a citizen orsubject, which proceedings shall be recorded by the clerk of thecourt. Third. It shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the courtadmitting such alien that he has resided within the United States five yearsat least, and within the state or territory where such court is at the time heldone year at least and that during that time he has behaved as a man of a

good moral character, attached to the principles of the Constitution of theUnited States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of thesame; but the oath of the applicant shall in no case be allowed to prove hisresidence."

Note: they said MAN. And there is a reason for that, as explained later.This is a plain down and Dirty contract. The word Federal meansCONTRACT so lets see what Webster had to say about the word Federalthat no one really understands what it means.1828 DefinitionFED'ERAL, a. [from L. faedus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. wed. L. vas,vadis, vador, vadimonium. See Heb. to pledge.]

1. Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement orcovenant between parties, particularly between nations.

2. Consisting in a compact between parties, particularly and chieflybetween states or nations; founded on alliance by contract or mutualagreement; as a federal government, such as that of the United States.

FED'ERAL,1913 Definition Federal (federal)Fed"er*al

[L. foedus league, treaty, compact] akin to fides faith: cf. F. fdral. seeFaith.]

Pertaining to a league or treaty; derived from an agreement or covenantbetween parties, especially between nations; constituted by a compactbetween parties, usually governments or their representatives.

2


3/11

Now what did the Padleford Court say in my book The New History ofAmerica here is the direct Quote. A tender of bills is as good as one ofcoin, unless the bills are objected to. To stand by, in silence, and see

another sell your property, binds you. [Ok people how many times has your

property (labor included) been stolen and turned over to the tax man in your

silence? Did you file a refusal for good cause shown?] These are mere

instances of the use of the maxim in the Municipal Law. In the Law ofnations, it is equally potent. Silent acquiescence in the breach of a treaty

binds a nation (Vattel, ch. 16, sec.199, book 1. See book 2, sec. 142 et

seq. as to usucaption and prescription, and sec. 208 as to ratification).

Express consent, then, not being necessary, is there anything from which

consent may be applied? There is--length of time." BUT they lie by

omission on the law of nations bind you. Not so. This is what

James Wilson stated in my Myth and Reality Book that destroys all

the great writers

"Puffendorf thought that the Law of Nature and the Law of Nations were precisely the same, he

has not, in his book on these subjects, treated of the Law of Nations separately, but haseverywhere joined it with the law of nature, properly, so called. His example has been followed

by the greatest part of succeeding writers. But the imitation of it has produced a confusion oftwo objects, which ought to have been viewed and studied distinctly and apart. Through the Lawof Nations, properly so called, be a part of the law of nature; through it spring from the same

source; and through it is attended with the same obligatory power; yet it must be remembered

that its application is made to very different objects. The law of nature is applied to individuals;

the law of nations is applied to states. Mans only bound by the Law of Nature and that is Gods Law. Nations, may enter

into treaties under the Law of Nations while man is not bound by treaties under the Law of

Nations because man, the individual, cannot make treaties with other Nations.The physiocrats were scientists of the natural order who embraced the Law of Nature and

Nations. They regarded privateproperty to be the perfect product of the natural order and

believed if artificial governments [like the United States and the British or French nations] wereremoved; the natural order would resume its usual course at once." End quote

Do you still believe all government is designed to protect the people

from its encroachments, especially since you consented to be a citizen of the

state having a representative in their corporate structure? And another

tidbit from the Court stated;

"Now the principle at the bottom of all these propositions is

this: The States have no power, by the exercise of which, they

can defeat all the ends of government--the General Government, or

any of those ends. But the States, by the exercise of the taxing

power, can take from their inhabitants every cent the inhabitantscan spare, and live.

According to the principle of this decision, therefore, the

States have no power to lay any tax on their inhabitants; and if

they have the power to tax, it follows they have no power to

enable them to keep up their State Governments; and without State

Governments, they have no power to keep themselves alive, as

States. The principle comes to this: thatthe States, in making

3


4/11

the Constitution, intended to give up the power of self-

preservation."

Lastly, the Court at page 491, said this of the People who made the

Constitutions,

"The people of the States who made the Constitution, considered

themselves as the sovereign, and the Government as the subject.

They were the principal- it the agent. That this is also true

none will dispute." THIS IS A LIE OF FRAUD BY DECEPTION.

We all know it is not us people who made the Constitutions but the

select few as stated by the Court at page 520, to wit;

"But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit

in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The

Constitution, it is true, is a compact,but he is not a party to

it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If

they do they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the

right to complain."

YOU SEE HOW THE COURT HAD TO LIE TO COVER TRUTH? They

could not use either nonresident Alien or MAN, and had to use anoxymoron "Private PERSON". This is what Congress wrote in thefederal Register on why nonresident Aliens are not subject to anincome tax and spelled out in spades; quoted from which one are youBook

***The Federal Register, Tuesday, September 7, 1943 Page 12266Section 404.102 of the Federal Register, Congress states: ***

(g) Compensation paid to nonresident alien

individual. ...remuneration for services performed bynonresident alien individuals does not constitute wagessubject to withholding under section 1622..."

What are the regulations designated by the Secretary?

CFR Title 26 Chapter 1 pages 62 & 63 Section 301.6109-1 (g)

Identifying numbers. I bold for clarity.

"Nonresident alien exclusion. This section shall not apply to nonresident

aliens, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships, or foreign private foundationsthat do not have income effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or

business within the United States and do not have an office or place of

business or a fiscal or paying agent in the United States." Obtain mybook Which One Are You, to See what is a trade orbusiness in the United States, spelled out in great Statute

4


5/11

detail

This is what the revised statute May 26, 1824 did and why none of youpatriots reading this ever were United States citizens. They Got you againdidnt they?

"Any alien, being under the age of twenty-one years, who has resided in theUnited States three years next preceding his arriving, at that age, and whohas continued to reside therein to the time he may make application to beadmitted a citizen thereof, may, after he arrives at the age of twenty-oneyears, and after he has resided five years within the United States, includingthe three years of his minority, be admitted a citizen of the United States,without having made the declaration required in the first conditionof section twenty-one hundred and sixty-five; but such alien shall makethe declaration required therein at the time of his admission, and shallfurther declare on oath, and prove to the satisfaction of the court, that, for

two years next preceding, it has been his bona fide intention to become acitizen of the United States; and he shall in all other respects comply with thelaws in regard to naturalization. REMEMBER the United States is aprivate corporation housed in the country of America and all States arealso housed in the Country of America. Why do they call you anAmerican and not a united statesman? Why the Song America theBeautiful? Why not United States the beautiful? Because America is acountry. In the Encyclopedia of America I have from Harper and Rowdated 1955 and used in all schools. Why didn't it say Encyclopedia ofthe United States?

Now lets get you the use ofMAN in the Statute. The Congress changes WORDS to meansomething entirely different than you find in Websters 1828 or 1913 Dictionary.

In Changing the definition they use a TERM of law in the Codes known only to them.

Remember the health bill of Obama where Aliens are used? H.R. 3962, Page 299, Line 7"NONRESIDENT ALIENS, Subsection (a) shall not apply to any individual who is a non

resident individual. And one can find further proof of the nonresident Alien not

paying taxes in the Federal Register.

FORUM CONTRACTUS.The forum of the contract; the court of the placewhere the contract is made; the place where the contract is made, is

considered as a place of jurisdiction. 2 Kent, Comm. 463. quote fromWhich One Are You, book

Well the Term NONRESIDENT ALIEN has not one Blessed Thing to do with geographybut with contract. Yes CONTRACT. If you contract with the U.S. Corporation like in

the above Statutes, then you are Truly a U.S. Citizen and this cannot be a Christian

5


6/11

Nation but for lip service. Yes, this is not a Christian nation any longer because look what you

MAY have done in the statute? YOU would have to renounce The Creator God, shun his

allegiance and take to a new master, in contravention to The Creators command that all hewanted is your allegiance and have no other Gods before you, as is now the United States is your

God. And of course the States in America that also houses the United States, all private

corporations. Isnt that correct? Is it not so that all preachers gave up the Lord for a 501 C 3character? And will not marry anyone unless they have a license from their new master called

The Corporation of the United States? Yes they gave up all Rights Jesus (Immanuel) gave to

MAN. You See the Lord created MAN. The Lord never created the artificial PERSON. DidHE? So preachers are all bound by Lucifer, Not The Lord.. You go to Lucifer's church

every Sunday. Yes, I have proof in the Myth and Reality book

So let us see how else you can become an alleged U.S. Citizen. By fraud of course! Using thePRESUMPTION Rule. YES the United States and States all work on presumption that

you are a US citizen; A SUBJECT or a SLAVE? Your choice; as they both mean the same

thing. But by your actions of accepting who you are, by them telling you who you are, even if

you deny it. Have you evidenced anything what-so-ever that you are not a U.S. Citizen, otherthan just saying you are not a US citizen? No you have not evidenced anything. Why? You

constantly state its YOUR constitution; YOU formed government for your protection:YOU admit to being a U.S. Citizen on many papers you sign. Thats cause for

PRESUMPTION, which is nothing but a lie to keep you under their control. Now shall we take a

look at that definition of PRESUMPTION specifically at the first word in Number 1?

SUPPOSITION another killerWORD defining PRESUMPTION

So lets see what Websters 1828 and 1913 Dictionary say on presumption First to see the word

supposition that no American has a clue to what either WORD actually means.

1828 Definition

PRESUMP'TION, n. [L. proesumption.]

1. Supposition of the truth or real existence of something without direct or positive proof of the

fact, but grounded on circumstantial or probable evidence which entitles it to belief.Presumption in law is of three sorts, violent or strong, probable, and light.

Next to positive proof, circumstantial evidence or the doctrine of presumptionsmust take

place; for when the fact cannot be demonstratively evinced, that which comes nearest to theproof of the fact is the proof of such circumstances as either necessarily or usually attend such

facts. These are called presumptions. Violent presumption is many times equal to full proof.

2. Strong probability; as in the common phrase, the presumption is that an event has taken place,

or will take place.

Poor Webster made a critical error. Yes he did. In the paragraph above #2 He left out the word

either. That makes the word Or, an And, in law. This is what is said; OR, conj.A disjunctiveparticle used to express an alternative or to give a choice of one among two or more things. It is

6


7/11

also used to clarify what has already been said, and in such cases, means ìn other words,' `towit,' or `that is to say.' Or is frequently misused; and courts willconstrue it to mean ànd' where

it is so used.State v, Circuit Court of Dodge County, 176 Wis. 198, 186 N.W. 732, 734;

Northern Commercial Co. v, U.S., C.C.A. Alaska, 217 F. 33,36;Spillman v, Succession of

Spillman, 147 La. 47, So. 489, 490;Smiley v Lenane, 336 Ill. 66, 1 N.E. 2d 213, 216. However,

where the word òr' is preceded by the wordèither,' it is never given a conjunctive meaning.Smith v Farley, 155 App. Div. 813, 140 N.Y.S. 990, 992.

Do you see how the education System Set-up by so called government dumbed youall down so you do not know the English Language or sentence structure at all? To top

that off they created TERMS from WORDS and gave it their definitions. The TERM

NONRESIDENT ALIEN simply means an Alien to their Federal . Federal meaning

CONTRACT! Try this on for size . Did you file your contract 1040 last year? Isn'tit called a FEDERAL (CONTRACT) form ? You bet it is.

Barry video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1GuANgz2RY&feature=relmfu

1913 DefinitionPresumption (presumption)n. (?; 215)

Pre*sump"tion[L. praesumptio: cf. F. prsomption, OF. also presumpcion. See Presume.]

The act of presuming, orbelieving upon probable evidence; the act of assuming or taking for

granted; belief upon incomplete proof.

Ground for presuming; evidence probable, but not conclusive; strong probability; reasonablesupposition; as, the presumption is that an event has taken place.

That which is presumed or assumed; that which is supposed or believed to be real or true, on

evidence that is probable but not conclusive.

Conclusive presumption. See under Conclusive. -- Presumption of fact (Law), an argument of a

fact from a fact; an inference as to the existence ofone fact not certainly known, from theexistence of some other fact known or proved, founded on a previous experience of their

connection; supposition of the truth or real existence of something, without direct or positive

proof of the fact, but grounded on circumstantial or probable evidence which entitles it to belief.Burrill. Best. Wharton. -- Presumption of law (Law), a postulate applied in advance to all cases

of a particular class; e. g., the presumption of innocence and of regularity of records. Such a

presumption is rebuttable or irrebuttable.

Now SUPPOSITION, n. The act of laying down, imagining or admitting as true or existing,

what is known not to be true, or what is not proved.

1. The position of something known not to be true or not proved; hypothesis.

This is only an infallibility upon supposition that if a thing be true, it is impossible to be false.

2.Imagination; belief without full evidence.

1913 DefinitionSupposition (supposition)

7
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1GuANgz2RY&feature=relmfuhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1GuANgz2RY&feature=relmfu


8/11

n. Sup`po*si"tion

[F. supposition, L. suppositio a placing under, a substitution, fr. supponere, suppositium, to put

under, to substitute. The word has the meaning corresponding to suppose. See Sub-, andPosition.]

The act ofsupposing, laying down, imagining, or considering as true or existing, what is knownnot to be true, or what is not proved.That which is supposed; hypothesis; conjecture; surmise; opinion or belief without sufficient

evidence.

So conclusion says they make a lie in presuming you are their SUBJECT Then lay another lie

on you in supposition Making believe the presumed lie with no evidence on their part is

supposed to be the truth. And the beauty part is that you cannot counter it because what themaximum states in their law. BALLENTINE LAW 3rd Edition

FICTION. Derived from Fictio in Roman Law, a fiction is defined as a false

averment on the part of the Plaintiff which the defendant is not allowed totraverse, the object being to give the court jurisdiction. 3rd Ed.(1969) Pg. 468; In the case of "Willful failure to File," the Plaintiff andcourt invents the "fiction" that defendant is a "taxpayer." Motionsand briefs which rely on precepts of law will thereafter be denied orfound frivolous. This point was made clear in Roberts v. Commissioner,176 F 2d 221, 225 (9 C.A., 1949)

So there you have why all patriots lose because the courts are corporation courts

designed upon Fiction to keep the Fictional PERSON , meaning You, who want aconstitution; who claim on your death bed to be a U.S. citizen; to signing any and

everything locking you into their private corporation and Swear to it under penalties ofPerjury a TERM of Statute law, from ever prevailing. That is if You do not attack the plaintiff and his court on jurisdiction ONLY at the outset . That would be what The

Informer has said long, long ago to which all patriots ignored. All of this can be found

in Gilbert's Law Summary.

Gilberts Law Summaries page 33 sections 207- 2112 What constitutes "timely" objection?(a) Under state practice, D is usually required to file his motion to quashservice of process before any other pleading; If he instead files a demurreror answer (or asks for any other relief--even a continuance), he is deemed

to have made a general appearance and submitted himself to thecourt's jurisdiction--even if he alleges lack of jurisdiction as a"defense" in his answer [84 Cal. App. 2d 229(b) In federal practice, D must raise lack of personal jurisdiction byhis initial pleading--in a motion to dismiss, or, if no such motion isfiled, in his answer to the complaint. [FRCP 12(h) Of course you all

8


9/11

know FRCP12h is ADMIRALTY did you not? I have APPENDIX III TABLE

SHOWING DISPOSITION OF ADMIRALTY RULES To FRCP such as Admiralty and all

59 Rules of Admiraltyrule I ........ As to commencement of action see FRCP 3; as to

service of process see FRCP 4(c).

So let me ask this of you. Have you ever followed to the letter of the two statutes tobecome a United States citizen? Either Yes or No?

Have you ever claimed US citizenship? Have you ever claimed the constitution is yours? Have

you ever signed anything under penalty, where in you say you are a U.S. Citizen and it;s all

under presumption? It has to be yes and for two reasons. The next two Questions prove by

Presumption that you are. #1 Did you ever register to Vote? #2 Have you ever signed any IRStax form? Be not so hasty to think you lost and there is no way out. This is what the dumbing

down education system was designed to do. There is a quote in my The Myth and The Reality

book, I use here to prove a point what it does to you.

"Reason and Ignorance, the opposites of each other, influence the great bulk of mankind. If either of thesecan be rendered sufficiently extensive in a country, the machinery of Government goes easily on. Reason

obeys itself, and Ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it." "The Rights of Man," Thomas Paine

Go back and read the case and remember that phrase; AND NOT OTHERWISE. That is very

specific is it not? The Not otherwise would eliminate PRESUMPTION RULE would it not?

Here is what was said by the highest legal person in the United States. The Solicitor General ofthe United States and is self explanatory and the source is given. I am in yellow, as a declared

nonresident alien in 1998 by the Pope, The attorney general of Great Britain, The make

believe US Treasury, The National Accounts Director and the Private IRS.,

An alien owes no allegiance or obedience to our government, or to our constitution, laws, or

proclamations. A citizen subject is bound to obey them all. In refusing such obedience, he is guiltyof crime against his country, and finds in the law of nations no justification for disobedience. An

alien, being under no such obligation, is justified in refusing such obedience. Over an alien enemy, our

government can make no constitution, law, or proclamation of obligatory force, because our laws bindonly our own subjects, and have no extra-territorial jurisdiction.

Over citizens who are subjects of this government, even if they have so far repudiated their

duties as to become enemies, our constitution, statutes, and proclamations are the supreme law of

the land. . The fact that their enforcement is resisted does not make them void.It is not in the power

of armed subjects of the Union to repeal or legally nullify our constitution, laws, or other

governmental acts.

SOURCE: The Legal Classics Library War Powers under The Constitution of the United States

1864 tenth Ed Entered by Act of Congress In the Clerks Office of the District Court of the District

of Massachusetts Special Edition 1997.

And the case that thousands of Patriots kept quoting from the 70's to the 1990's had truth, but

the Patriots were blinded by their Sheer ignorance, was the Erie Railroad case 1882. Not one of

9


10/11

all the patriots from 1882 to present caught it especially a man much malign, Larry Becraft that

had this to say what the Dissenting opinion of Justice Field said and that can be found on the

internet of Larrys website.Larry's Quote. United States v. Erie Ry. Co., 106 U.S. 327, 333, 1 S.Ct. 223 (1882):

Federal tax case, no important principle within majority opinion. However, Justice Field wrote

in his dissent:"The power of the United States to tax is limited to persons, property, and business within

their jurisdiction, as much as that of a state is limited to the same subjects within its jurisdiction."

End quote.. You see he left out the part about the nonresident alien. Here it is what the attorneyfor untruth left out, but Justice Field laid it out so clear that anyone with a brain could see. Field

said this, to shorten the article. I paraphrase;

"The government thus lays a tax, through the instrumentality of the company, upon the

income ofa non-resident alienover whom it cannot justly exercise any control, nor upon

whom it can justly lay any burden.". The power of the United States to tax is limited to

persons, property, and businesswithin their jurisdiction, as much as that of the State is

limited to the same subjectswithin its jurisdiction."

Now go back to the federal Register to see it squares with Fields rendition of WhitingThe Solicitor General of the United States in 1864, some 18 years later in 1882.

The Informer September 1, 2011

BOOKS BY THE INFORMER BOOKS 9-12-11

PRICES[1]-"Which One Are You"

58.00

[2] - Vol. I and I-A, Response to "Which One Are You"

15.00[3] - Vol. II, Response to "Which One Are You"

15.00[4] - Would You Like the Constitution as a Source of Rights

10.00

[5] - The Big Lie

10


11/11

10.00

[6] - The Big Lie III

58.00

[7] - Works of the Informer

7.00

[8] - Reality

5.00

[9] - "The New History of America" (ten or more - 24.00 each)

32.00

[10] - Addendum to New History of America included in above price[11] - The MYTH and The REALITY [New Book available]

35.00

Book #6 is Not discounted. Book #9 is ONLY discounted for ten or more

For mail Outside the United States postage is 6.00 more per item

All payment is either cash or US POSTAL Money ORDER left COMPLETELY BLANK.YOU KEEP THE RECEIPT All other money orders will be returned. Mail to A bar C, 7055

Mountain Rd, Oxford, North Carolina 27565. Include name and address to be shipped..

Buying all books at once, the special price is only $187.00 for the month of September.Shipping and Handling is 10.95 for all books.

11

Are You a Citizen by Choice or by Presumption 131kb 090411

Documents

Transcript of Are You a Citizen by Choice or by Presumption 131kb 090411