are Owners? - Lean Project Design & Delivery › media › img...Identify metrics to measure...

How satisfied

really satisfied

are Owners

April 26 2016

Bevan Mace Balfour Beatty

Steve Jones Dodge Data amp Analytics

2

Objectives for Today

1 Understand research purpose

2 Share preliminary findings

3 Call to action ndash PARTICIPATE

3

Why Research Objectives

1 Create baseline of owner satisfaction

project performance

2 Explore the influence of LCI framework

on project performance

4

Industry Effort Partnership

bull CURT

bull COAA

bull AGC ndash Private Industry Council

bull DBIA

bull Dodge Owner Group

bull e-Builder

5

Satisfaction

Fulfillment of onersquos wishes expectations or

needs or the pleasure derived from this

How satisfied are you with the delivery of

capital projects

ndash Always

ndash Frequently

ndash Sometimes

ndash Infrequently Never

6

Owner Satisfactionanalyticsstoreconstructioncom

7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think

the industry is Efficient

analyticsstoreconstructioncom

8

Methodology

1 Identify metrics to measure satisfaction

project performance

2 Identify factors to understand project

environment

3 Explore variance of ldquoBestrdquo vs ldquoTypicalrdquo

9

Performance Metrics

bull Cost amp Schedule (Quantitative)ndash Actual vs Approval of Capital Project

ndash Actual vs Start of Construction

bull Quality (Qualitative)ndash Features incorporated in design

ndash Craftsmanship during construction

ndash Performance during occupancy

bull Safety (Qualitative)ndash Safety during construction

ndash Safety during maintenance

10

Framework Assessment

bull Organizationalndash Team chemistry alignment

ndash Relatedness

ndash Decision making

bull Commercialndash Time of engagement

ndash Procurement selection method

ndash Delivery method amp contract type

bull Operating Systemndash Traditional methods

ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement

How do you define early engagement

Key stakeholders are engagedhellip

ndash During construction documentation

ndash During design development

ndash During schematic design

ndash Before or during conceptualization

12

Performance Owner Value

Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued

How Owners Define ValueRanking Relative Importance of Performance Metrics

13

Performance CostSchedule

Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects

Variance of Estimated Schedule and Cost

at Construction Start vs Completion

14

Performance Schedule

28 of best projects finish early vs only 9 of typical

Amount of Variance of lsquoOriginal Schedule When Budget Allocatedrsquo vs lsquoFinal Schedulersquo

Complete Behind Original ScheduleComplete Ahead of Original Schedule

Best Performing Projects

28 complete ahead of

schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects

28 complete more than

11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost

63 of best projects under budget vs only 9 of typical

Amount of Variance of lsquoAllocated Capital Costrsquo vs lsquoFinal Costrsquo

Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule

Complete Over Allocated Capital CostComplete Under Allocated Capital Cost

Typical Projects

Half complete over original

allocated capital budget

(vs 15 of best)


63 complete under original


(vs 9 of typical)

16

Performance QualitySafety

Typical Projectsrsquo

quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but

overall impact is not

as dramatic as cost

Positive and Negative Ratings

for Quality and Safety

17

Organizational Aspects

Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance

Single Most Important Factor That

Contributes to Project Performance

18


Early engagement is key aspect of best projects

Timing of Key Stakeholder Engagement (TypicalBest)

Best Performing

Projects75 engage key

stakeholders before

Schematic Design

Typical Projects56 donrsquot engage key

stakeholders until after

Schematic Design

19


Team dynamics gaps between best and typical

Percentage Reporting the Highest (44) Team Dynamics Ratings (TypicalBest)

22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most

frequent contract type

on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward

is only used on best

performing projects

Top Contracting Types on

Typical and Best Projects

( with or without shared savings)

23

Operating System Aspects

1027 biggest gaps between typical and best projects

26


Top 527 Methods Focused on Team Dynamics

28

Most Impactful on Performance

Timing Engage key stakeholders as early as possible

(prior to schematic design)

Team selection Best Value

Form of agreement IPD

Contract type compensation method for key

stakeholders that are contracted to the owner

Guaranteed Maximum Price - or - Cost Reimbursable

with Target and Shared Risk Reward


29


Use (at least) these six highly-rated project team

management and operational methods

ndash Co-location Big Room

ndash Target Value Design

ndash 3D BIM Coordination

ndash ConceptualContinuous Estimating

ndash Visual Management

ndash Last Planner System reg

30

Takeaways

1 Organizational transformations

enable project transformations

2 Earlier engagement requires

different operating skills

3 Project operating system

informs commercial (contract)

31

Impact

What impact do you think lean practices have

on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None

ndash Unable to determine

32

Whatrsquos next

33

Goal Over 150 responses

34

Minimum Requirements

Respondent Profile

bull Must be an Owner

bull Knowledgeable about

construction projects at

their organization

bull In last 3 years completed

more than 5 capital

projects

bull Total capital expenditures

more than $10M

Best amp Typical Projects

bull Construction cost of

$10M or more

bull New Construction or

Major Renovation

bull Completed at least one

year but no more than

five years ago

bull In North America

35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link

ndash tinyurlcomLeanConstruction2

bull Call for Participation

ndash Quick overview to be shared with owners

bull Talking Points

ndash For your use in advance of client interactions to prepare you to addresses

key issues and potential questions (eg benefits confidentiality of data)

bull Offline version of Survey

ndash To share with owners to collect project information in advance of taking the

survey

Bevan Mace ndash bmacebalfourbeattyuscom

Steve Jones ndash stevejonesconstructioncom

2

Objectives for Today

1 Understand research purpose

2 Share preliminary findings

3 Call to action ndash PARTICIPATE

3



project performance



4


bull CURT

bull COAA


bull DBIA


bull e-Builder

5

Satisfaction




capital projects

ndash Always

ndash Frequently

ndash Sometimes


6


7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



3



project performance



4


bull CURT

bull COAA


bull DBIA


bull e-Builder

5

Satisfaction




capital projects

ndash Always

ndash Frequently

ndash Sometimes


6


7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



4


bull CURT

bull COAA


bull DBIA


bull e-Builder

5

Satisfaction




capital projects

ndash Always

ndash Frequently

ndash Sometimes


6


7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



5

Satisfaction




capital projects

ndash Always

ndash Frequently

ndash Sometimes


6


7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



6


7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



7

Industry Efficiency

Most who never

heard of Lean think



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



8

Methodology


project performance


environment


9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



9

Performance Metrics








10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



10



ndash Relatedness






ndash Lean methods

11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



11

Early Engagement







12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



12


Adherence to

Project Schedule

most highly valued


13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



13


Most Typical

Projects complete

behind schedule

over budget

Cost is improved

more than schedule

on Best Performing

Projects



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



14







schedule

(vs 9 of typical)

Typical Projects


11 behind schedule

(vs 9 of best)

15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



15

Performance Cost



Best Performing

Projects

28 complete

ahead of schedule

Typical Projects

56 complete

behind schedule


Typical Projects



(vs 15 of best)




(vs 9 of typical)

16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



16



quality and safety

performance is

already better than

cost and schedule

Best Projects are

13-20 percentage

points better but


as dramatic as cost



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



17


Owners identify

Project Team as

single most

important

contributing factor

to performance



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



18




Best Performing


stakeholders before

Schematic Design



Schematic Design

19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



19




22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



22

Commercial Aspects

GMP is most


on best performing

projects

Cost Reimbursable

with Target and

Shared RiskReward


performing projects




23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



23



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



26



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



28











29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



29










30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



30

Takeaways







31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



31

Impact


on satisfaction

ndash Significant

ndash Moderate

ndash Some

ndash None


32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



32

Whatrsquos next

33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



33


34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



34


Respondent Profile




their organization


more than 5 capital

projects


more than $10M



$10M or more


Major Renovation



five years ago


35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



35

Recruiting Owners

bull Survey Link




bull Talking Points





survey



are Owners? - Lean Project Design & Delivery › media › img...Identify metrics to measure...

Documents

Transcript of are Owners? - Lean Project Design & Delivery › media › img...Identify metrics to measure...