Are Net Zero Buildings too Expensive? · 2016-10-19 · 10/19/2016 1...
Transcript of Are Net Zero Buildings too Expensive? · 2016-10-19 · 10/19/2016 1...
10/19/2016
1
"Cropped Earth with Sunburst" by NASA
Are Net Zero Buildings too Expensive?
Getting to Zero National ForumOctober 12-14, 2016
Bill Maclay, AIA, LEED AP, Principal Maclay Architects
10/19/2016
2
1970
1971
Baer Zomeworks
200019901980 2010
Solar experimentation
Energy Conservation
IAQ Healthy Bldg
Microload NZ Bldg NZ Communities + Planet
2014
Maclay Architects’ Path to Net Zero
Maclay Architects –Net Zero Focus
10/19/2016
3
EUI 19
Maclay Architects’ Net Zero and Net Zero Ready Projects
EUI 18
EUI 9
EUI 33 EUI 19
EUI 77 *Dining Hall with process loads
EUI 16
EUI 17
EUI 18
EUI 17
EUI 7EUI 10
The Putney School Field House
10/19/2016
4
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011• Financial paradigm shift
10/19/2016
5
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011• Financial paradigm shift• Net Zero Design Strategy
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011• Financial paradigm shift• Net Zero Design Strategy
• SF: 16,800
10/19/2016
6
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011• Financial paradigm shift• Net Zero Design Strategy
• SF: 16,800• EUI: 9 kBtu/sf-yr (actual)
The Putney School Field HouseBUILDING TYPE: Net-zero wellness centerSCOPE: New BuildingPROCESS: Community Design
PROJECT SIZE: Phase 17,500 sfPROJECT COST: $4,200,000COST/SQFT: $241/sf
ENERGY INTENSITY (without renewables): 9.6 kbtu/sfENERGY INTENSITY (with renewables): 0 kbtu/sfPERCENT RENEWABLE: 100%AIR INFILTRATION: 0.065 cfm/sfLEED RATING: LEED-NB Platinum anticipated
•Choices in Sustainability•New Financial Paradigm
• Net Zero since 2011• Financial paradigm shift• Net Zero Design Strategy
• SF: 16,800• EUI: 9 kBtu/sf-yr (actual)• EUI with renewables: 0 kBtu/sf-yr
10/19/2016
7
10/19/2016
8
Building Performance Options
Energy Options
10/19/2016
9
Integrated Design
- =
Net Zero Strategy
RENEWABLESMINIMIZE ENERGY LOADS - =NETZERO
10/19/2016
10
NO RENEWABLES
- =
NET ZERO
READY- =
What Is Net Zero Ready?
MINIMIZED ENERGY LOADS
Public Domain
Fuel Mileage for Buildings?
Energy Use Intensity (EUI)Photo by ReinraumPhoto by Bull-Doser / public domain
10/19/2016
11
10-25 EUI kBTU/sf*without process loads
Net Zero Building Metrics
PERFORMANCE METRICS PRESCRIPTIVE METRICS
Maximum 0.1 cfm/sf above grade surface area@ 50 Pascals
© Maclay Architects
US Climate Zones
Optimum Prescriptive measures will vary in zones 1-4
10/19/2016
12
Energy Use Intensity(EUI)
Conservation High-EfficientSystems
Renewables+ +
Heat Pumps(COP 2.3-3.0)
Usually Photovoltaics(sized for annual load)
© Maclay Architects
Key Elements
© Maclay Architects
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost
Best Investment Today
10/19/2016
13
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost• 3-10% of Construction Cost
Best Investment Today
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost• 3-10% of Construction Cost• Solar Financing
Best Investment Today
10/19/2016
14
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost• 3-10% of Construction Cost• Solar Financing
Best Investment Today
• Envelope + ROI
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost• 3-10% of Construction Cost• Solar Financing
Best Investment Today
• Envelope + ROI• Heat Pumps + ROI
10/19/2016
15
• $5-$20/sf Capital Cost• 3-10% of Construction Cost• Solar Financing
Best Investment Today
• Envelope + ROI• Heat Pumps + ROI• Renewables + ROI
Financial Analysis Methodology
INPUTS• Energy Consumption
• Increased Capital Costs for Efficiency
• Capital Cost for PV
• Financing Assumptions
OUTCOMES• Capital and operating
costs
• Cash Flow
10/19/2016
16
Single Family Home
• 1,600 sf• $16/sf Additional construction costs• $14/sf additional solar costs
Financial Analysis – Energy Consumption
INPUTS: Energy Model
Energy Usage, kWh/yr
10/19/2016
17
Financial Analysis–Increased Net Zero Ready Cost
INPUTS• Capital costs
for Net Zero over Code
Financial Analysis–Increased Net Zero Ready Cost
INPUTS• Capital costs
for Net Zero over Code
10/19/2016
18
Financial Analysis–Increased Net Zero Ready Cost
INPUTS• Capital costs
for Net Zero over Code
Financial Analysis – Financial Assumptions
INPUTS
• Interest Rate• Loan Duration• Fuel Escalation Rate
Image: Vermont Fuel Price 2003-2014
10/19/2016
19
Solar Costs
Additional Building Costs
New Single Family
Single Family 30-year Costs
CODE NET ZERO
Interest Costs
New Single Family
Single Family 30-year Costs
CODE NET ZERO
10/19/2016
20
Energy Costs
New Single Family
Single Family 30-year Costs
CODE NET ZERO
New Single Family
Single Family 30-year Costs
CODE NET ZERO
10/19/2016
21
$72,000 savings w/ Federal Tax
Credit
New Single Family
Single Family 30-year Costs
CODE NET ZERO
30-Year Cash Flow
Cumulative Savings
CUMULATIVE SAVINGS OFNET ZERO ABOVE CODE
• 30-Year savings
$60,000
10/19/2016
22
Cumulative Savings
CUMULATIVE SAVINGS OFNET ZERO ABOVE CODE
30-Year Cash Flow
• Savings after 30 years
PLUS FREE SOLAR$60,000
Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building
• 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition
10/19/2016
23
Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building
• 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition • $6 / sf additional cost
Bennington Courthouse and State Office Building
• 65,000 SF Renovation/Addition • $6 / sf additional cost • 3% additional construction cost
10/19/2016
24
EUI – Comparison and Metrics
TypicalExisting Office
Existing Facility
Code Compliant
Net Zero Ready
(actual)
92 113 39 26
Energy Use Intensity Comparison (kBtu/sf-yr)
EUI – Comparison and Metrics
TypicalExisting Office
Existing Facility
Code Compliant
Net Zero Ready
(actual)
92 113 39 26
Energy Use Intensity Comparison (kBtu/sf-yr)
Percent Improvement for Net Zero Ready
254% 335% 50% 0%
10/19/2016
25
© Maclay Architects
Cost estimate- Total Additional Capital Cost
$372,000
$6,182,000
$2,891,000
$1,766,000
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
20 ‐Year Present Value of Operating and Additional Capital Costs for Energy Improvements
Additional Construction Cost NPV of Operating Costs
Existing Building NetZero ReadyCode Compliant
© Maclay Architects
Financial Analysis
20-year Present Value
$750,000Savings
$4 MillionSavings
10/19/2016
26
Cumulative Savings of Net Zero Ready vs Code
© Maclay Architects
ROI =13%
Savings = $750,000
10/19/2016
27
photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com
Renewable NRG SystemsModel Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility
photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com
Renewable NRG SystemsModel Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility
• SF: 77,000 sf
10/19/2016
28
photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com
Renewable NRG SystemsModel Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility
• SF: 77,000 sf• EUI: 18 kBtu/sf/yr (actual)
photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com
Renewable NRG SystemsModel Renewable Office and Manufacturing Facility
• SF: 77,000 sf• EUI: 18 kBtu/sf/yr (actual)• EUI w/ Renewables: 11 kBtu/sf-yr
10/19/2016
29
300,000 SF Mixed Use Masterplan
Net Zero Energy Feasibility Study
In partnership with
Energy Balance, Inc.
10/19/2016
30
Net Zero Masterplan
2.3 MW of PV to be NZ• Rooftops and
carports maximized• + 3 acres of ground
mounted
Community Residential 30-Year Costs
• NZ cumulative savings of $3.8 million including PV tax credits
With 30% Federal Tax Credit for PV
10/19/2016
31
Community Commercial 20-Year CostsOffice and Manufacturing
• NZ with the federal tax credit saves $4.8 million over 20 years
With 30% Federal Tax Credit for PV
FinanceInterest
FinanceInterest
OperatingCosts
PV Costs
So why isn’t everyone doing this?
10/19/2016
32
Paradigm Shift Payback v. Cash Flow
CashFlow
Payback
Achievable
photo by Jim Westphalen
10/19/2016
33
Affordable
photo by Carolyn Bates www.carolynbates.com
Photo by Robert Benson
Beautiful
10/19/2016
34
The time is NOW
Thank youBill Maclay, AIA, LEED AP, Author, Principal Maclay Architects