Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

37
part 5 of 7 part Case Study 1 Product development

description

Product development case study

Transcript of Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Page 1: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

part 5 of 7 part Case Study

1 Product development

Page 2: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Luxury brand Case Study

2

Page 3: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Notes

3

Page 4: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

November 2012

Max Ruckman, Black & Decker HHI

Project Team

Luxury Brand

Business

Development

Case Study Part 6-8

www.maxruckman.com

4

Page 5: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Phase vi

produ

ction

Page 6: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

all agency listings and quality plans are complete and on the line

Bulk build & test

Definition

first full production lot

after the final pilot and

conducted using

production tooling, by

trained persons

Page 7: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

approved capital equipment

Bulk build & test

Inputs

clean pilot lot i.e. no product design, tooling or process changes

successful pilot lot test results

statistically significant reliability assurance test results from the laboratory and field

ramp up goals

production plan

launch plan agreed upon by team and marketing

confirmed product cost

Page 8: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

productivity / waste & variances

Bulk build & test

Actions

build product

safety / process & variances

inventory

measure to all promised deliverables

quality first time pass & finished stock audit

service level

Page 9: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

bulk production review: program manager

to hold monthly post production review,

includes resident engineer

Bulk build & test

Deliverables

salable product for

release to distribution

action plan to address misses

Page 10: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

second pilot of “Product X” was run on “date” at the

manufacturing facility consisting of 120 units

Pilot lot build

summary

Page 11: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

this product is very similar in construction to the

existing “product y” products being built at the

manufacturing facility, and therefore the majority of the processes already in place were carried

forward when this product was built

Pilot lot build

summary

Page 12: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

there are three exceptions in the component assembly area

Pilot lot build

summary

Page 13: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

the operators experience minimal disruption or problems when assembling these components

Pilot lot build

summary

mechanism

design was changed to eliminate “problem A” that occurs in “product X” when under extreme environmental conditions

a plastic spring retainer was replaced with a powdered metal plate and six steel pins.

Page 14: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

no action required

Pilot lot build

summary

Page 15: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

this must be closely monitored by all team members

Pilot lot build

summary

final recommendation: to insure

the product meets the highest

quality standards a

comprehensive audit plan must

be followed, with special attention to the sub-assemblies

Page 16: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

add other issues as needed

Pilot lot build

summary

Page 17: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

cartons

all artwork completed

all revisions and changes were made to carton art work to new

information per marketing request

any other changes required to packaging

Pilot lot test

Packaging example

Page 18: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

“product x” products have been through several different builds,

each time with major improvements to the durability of the design

Pilot lot test

Product testing summary

Page 19: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

the following schedule summarizes the builds

august 2011 prototype build 20 units

october 2011 esl 1 46 units

january 2012 esl 2 145 units

march 2012 pilot lot 1 80 units

april 2012 pilot lot 2 120 units

Pilot lot test

Product testing summary

Page 20: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

tested 54 units including all builds

Pilot lot test

field testing

typical uses: door installation

typical users: home builders, DIYer’s

logged over 5,250 days in the field

Product testing summary

Page 21: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

application based reliability testing

tested approximately 120 units on destructive cycling test

applications: list uses tests performed

Pilot lot test

in-house testing

remaining tests: in the process of completing all rig testing for a complete

analysis of the pilot lot units continuing application testing until failure

Product testing summary

Page 22: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

agency certification

all testing has been

completed and certification

was received if applicable

Pilot lot test

Product testing summary

Page 23: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Phase vii

distri

bution

Page 24: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

audit of product to confirm its acceptable for release to distribution

Sqa confirm

Definition

Page 25: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

audit results

test results

engineering test results

Sqa confirm

Inputs

Page 26: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

supply standard

manufacturing procedures as

dictated by audit results

Sqa confirm

Actions

Page 27: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

release the product to distribution on concluding a “good” result

Sqa confirm

Deliverables

Page 28: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

replacement parts must be available in the service

warehouse before product introduction so they can be

used by the service and reconditioning centers

Service spares

Definition

Page 29: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

manufactured cost of spare parts

Service spares

Inputs

complete engineering BMO & related part drawings

product sales forecast

forecast of replacement parts inventory using in-house testing results

structure of all part masters in supplier database

Page 30: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

receive, inspect and

place replacement

parts into inventory

Service spares

Actions

structure service part masters

develop service BOM

develop list of recommended initial parts order quantities

determine initial parts order quantities

place orders for replacement parts

Page 31: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

ready-to-order

replacement parts

inventory in service

base warehouse

Service spares

Deliverables

Page 32: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

Phase viii

Program

Target

scoring

Page 33: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

access performance of existing similar product to carry-over good features and avoid

recurrence of “old” problems

Post audit

Definition

assist in provision of product feedback

(after-the-sale)

Page 34: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

request from product team for

feedback on current product

Post audit

Inputs

request from

project team to add product to

early warning

Page 35: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

discuss performance of existing similar product with project team (by service repair and/or reconditioning technicians to identify strengths and weaknesses of current similar products)

Post audit

Actions

provide feedback to project team on after-the-sale performance of the product

add product to early warning program

Page 36: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

product feedback information on similar, current product

Post audit

Deliverables

after-the-sale feedback on new products

Page 37: Archetypes case study part 6, 7 & 8 june 24, 2013

November 2012

Max Ruckman, Black & Decker HHI

Project Team

Luxury Brand

Business

Development

Case Study Part 6-8

www.maxruckman.com

37