Arch5110 2014 fall uzunyayla ekim hp

62
research: typology

description

 

Transcript of Arch5110 2014 fall uzunyayla ekim hp

  • research: typology

  • Peabody TerraceTower & Low Rise

    Graduate Student Housingat Harvard UniversitySert, Jackson, Gourley, 1964Bruner Cott, 1996Elkus Manfredi, 2013Cambridge, MAEdward Kim

  • Edward KimSeptember 2014

  • MEMORIAL DRIVE

    PUTNAM AVE

    FLAG

    G S

    TREE

    T

    AKRO

    N S

    TREE

    T

    B

    C

    A PARKING

    VISITORPARKING

    1964 - OpenedSert, Jackson, Gourley

    1996 - RenovationBruner Cott

    2013 - RenovationElkus Manfredi

    FEATURESPlaygroundPaved Roof TerracesThree NurseriesDrugstoreTwo LaundromatsMeeting Room and kitchenTwo Seminar RoomsBicycle ParkingBasemend and Ground Floor Storage

    497 Units1,500 Graduate Students & their Families352 Car Garage

    22 Stories6 Stories4 Stories2 Stories

    boston, maUrban Condition housing typology - peabody terrace - sert jackson gourley, 1964

    Edward Kim

    Peabody Terrace provides housing for 1,500 graduate students and their families. Four separate buildings comprise nearly 500 units, as well as a 350 car garage.

    Three high rise towers are arranged around the site creating a distinct skyline. The lower bar buildings step down in height towards the surrrounding residential scale streets.

    The arrangement of buildings create enclosed courtyard spaces, each of which are connected to one another through alleyways and underpasses. The sites adjacency to Corporal Burns Park and other Harvard buildings creates a strong connection to the rest of Harvards campus.

    This study focuses on Complex A, which is the most unique of the three similar complexes.

    COMMUNITY PROGRAMPlaygroundNurseriesDrugstoreLaundromats

    Meeting Room and KitchenSeminar RoomsBicycle ParkingStorage

    22 STORIES6 STORIES4 STORIES3 STORIES

  • STUDIO 2 BED

    STAIR 1

    2 BED STUDIO

    40-0

    STAIR 2

    STUDIO 1 BED

    STAIR 1

    STUDIO STUDIO

    40-080-0

    31-0

    200-0 200-0

    STAIR 2

    ELEVATOR2 cabs per building

    CORRIDORconnection tosim. oor plan

    (no elevator)

    HIGH RISE22 stories

    LOW RISE3 stories

    MID-LOW RISE6-3 stories

    31-0TYP.

    31-0

    TY

    P.

    STUDIO 2 BED

    STAIR 1

    2 BED STUDIO

    40-0

    STAIR 2

    STUDIO 1 BED

    STAIR 1

    STUDIO STUDIO

    40-080-0

    31-0

    200-0 200-0

    STAIR 2

    ELEVATOR2 cabs per building

    CORRIDORconnection tosim. oor plan

    (no elevator)

    HIGH RISE22 stories

    LOW RISE3 stories

    MID-LOW RISE6-3 stories

    31-0TYP.

    31-0

    TY

    P.STUDIO 2 BED

    STAIR 1

    2 BED STUDIO

    40-0

    STAIR 2

    STUDIO 1 BED

    STAIR 1

    STUDIO STUDIO

    40-080-0

    31-0

    200-0 200-0

    STAIR 2

    ELEVATOR2 cabs per building

    CORRIDORconnection tosim. oor plan

    (no elevator)

    HIGH RISE22 stories

    LOW RISE3 stories

    MID-LOW RISE6-3 stories

    31-0TYP.

    31-0

    TY

    P.

    boston, maAccess & Circulation housing typology - peabody terrace - sert jackson gourley, 1964

    Edward Kim

    The units are designed based on a highly modular system, with only 8 unique unit plans. Any number of different arrangements can be made within the 12-0 x 14-0 structural bays.

    Perhaps the most unique feature is the skip-stop elevator system, which allows for units to extend from one side of the building to the other where the corridor is eliminated. The corridors at levels four and six bridge across to the adjacent bar buildings.

    TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN

    COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL DISTANCE: 40-0

    MAXIMUM EXIT ACCESS TRAVEL DISTANCE: 62-0

    TYPICAL FLOOR PLANAT SKIP-STOP CORRIDOR

    0 25 50

  • Edward Kim

    Unit Types & Aggregation housing typology - peabody terrace - sert jackson gourley 1964

    TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN GFAHI-RISE (TOWER): 2,900 SFLOW-RISE: 8,700 SFTYPICAL FLOOR NET-GROSS RATIO: .64

    4 BUILDINGS497 TOTAL UNITSSTUDIO (415 SF)ONE BED (487 SF)TWO BED (766 SF)THREE BED (960 SF)

    The modular construction system allows for a highly differentiated design comprised of only eight unique unit plans.

    TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN

    STUDIOONE BEDTWO BED

  • DIRECT ACCESS

    DIRECTACCESS

    CORRIDOR ACCESS

    Ground-level residents can directly access their units along the perimeter of the buildings, with private access at the rear facing the courtyard. Residents in units above access their units through shared vestibules either off of the stair or corridor.

    Despite the skip-stop systems efficiency in conserving corridor space and maximizing living space, it is limiting in terms of providing ADA access to the whole building.

    boston, maBuilding Circulation housing typology - peabody terrace - sert jackson gourley, 1964

    Edward Kim

    VERTICAL CIRCULATIONCORRIDORVESTIBULE

  • Worcester SquareRow House

    Various Architects, 1851-1862Boston, MAEdward Kim

  • Edward KimSeptember 2014

    Perspective view southeast, towards Boston Medical Center Campus.

  • ROW HOUSEURBAN FABRIC

    PROJECT SITE

    WORCESTERSQUARE

    Edward Kim

    Urban Condition housing typology - worcester square - various architects, 1851-1862 boston, ma

  • REAR PATIO/SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS

    ENCLOSED PRIVATE PARK

    ROOF TERRACES

    PUBLIC ALLEYPARKINGGARDENSLOADING/TRASH

    Edward Kim

    Urban Condition housing typology - worcester square - various architects, 1851-1862 boston, ma

    The development of Worcester Square was the third consecutive garden square to be developed by the city in the mid 19th century (following Union Park and Chester Square).

    The site consists of 42 lots, generally 25 feet wide and ranging from 85 to 105 feet deep, and opens up to Washington Street at the North sie and the Boston Medical Center at the south.

  • Edward Kim

    Urban Condition housing typology - worcester square - various architects, 1851-1862 boston, ma

    Right:Map of City of Boston (detail)by I. Slatter and B. Callan, 1852.The Garden Squares of Boston, Phebe S. Goodman.

    Left:The Chester Square residence of Rev. R. C. Waterson, ca. 1860s (Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities).The Garden Squares of Boston, Phebe S. Goodman.

    Typical Victorian style front Parlor room overlooking garden

  • SITTING ROOM

    PARLOUR

    BEDROOM

    DINING ROOM

    KITCHEN

    UPPER LEVELLIVING SPACES:DRAWING ROOMBEDROOMSPLAYROOMLIBRARY

    MAIN ENTRY

    SERVICE ENTRY

    MAIDS ROOM

    SITTING ROOM

    PARLOUR

    BEDROOM

    DINING ROOM

    KITCHEN

    UPPER LEVELLIVING SPACES:DRAWING ROOMBEDROOMSPLAYROOMLIBRARY

    MAIN ENTRY

    SERVICE ENTRY

    MAIDS ROOM

    THE 19TH CENTURY ROW HOUSE

    GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR

    The development of Row Houses in Worcester Square shortly followed the development of nearby Chester Square and Union Park, in response to a growing number of Bostonians moving out to the suburbs during the mid 19th century. Its form however, is derived from the homes of Beacon Hill, built as early as the 1630s, consisting of a service floor, a living and entertainment floor, and bedroom floors.

    Edward Kim

    Unit Types & Aggregation housing typology - worcester square - various architects, 1851-1862 boston, ma

  • KITCHEN/FAMILY ROOM

    BEDROOMS

    UPPER UNIT

    LOWER UNIT:

    SHARED ENTRY

    KITCHEN/FAMILY ROOM

    BEDROOMS

    UPPER UNIT

    LOWER UNIT:

    SHARED ENTRY

    THE 21ST CENTURY ROW HOUSEEdward Kim

    Unit Types & Aggregation housing typology - worcester square - various architects, 1851-1862 boston, ma

    GROUND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR

    While the exteriors maintain their original appearance, the interiors of the contemporary Row House in Boston have been significantly altered. In the early 21st Century, much of the South End faced economic downtown, and many of the Row Houses were split up into units to accomodate for a growing immigrant population. With recent real estate booms in the South End, the area has experienced signficant urban renewal. The interiors have been adapted to meet the changing needs of households. As shown in this typical unit, the kitchen has become much more of the focal point and part of the living space.

  • prototype design

  • CONCEPT

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    LIV

    ING

    INC

    UB

    ATO

    R

    LIVING

    INCUBATORLIVING INCUBATOR NETWORK

    DATA

    EXPERIMENTATION

    LEISURE

  • TYPICAL URBAN CONDITION

    DAYCARE

    WORKSHOP

    RAINWATERGARDEN

    LECTUREHALL

    LEASEDOFFICE SPACE

    INCUBATORHALL/LOBBY

    LEASEDRETAIL SPACE

    MULTI-USE DRIVEWAY:FOOD TRUCK VENDORSMARKETS

    TO LOWERPARKING LEVEL

    ENLARGE PEDESTRIANZONE

    COMPOSITE FRAMEWORK

    SITE

    LIV

    ING

    INC

    UB

    ATO

    R

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    -10-0

    ACCESS

  • LEVEL 1

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    RESIDENTLOBBY

    CO-OPKITCHEN

    LEASEDSTOREFRONTSPACE

    WORKSHOP

    DAYCARE

    LECTURE HALL

    MULTI-USE DRIVEWAY

    LOADING/RECEIVING

    GIFT SHOP/INFORMATION

    BIKESTORAGE

    RESIDENTLOBBY

    LEASED OFFICESPACE

    INCUBATOR HALL

  • LEVEL 2

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    FITNESSSTUDIO

    LAUNDRY

    FITNESSSTUDIO

    LEASEDOFFICE

  • LEVEL 3

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    WI-FILOUNGE

    GRILLINGPATIO

    LEASEDOFFICE

  • LEVEL 4

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    LAUNDRY

    GRILLINGPATIO

  • LEVEL 5

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    WI-FILOUNGE

    GRILLINGPATIO

    LEASEDOFFICE

    GRILLINGPATIO

    HOT SPOTLOUNGE

    GAMEROOM

  • ROOF

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/16 = 1-0

    LOUNGETERRACE

    CHILDREN'STERRACE

    DININGTERRACE

    GARDENTERRACE

  • 30'-0

    "

    26'-0"

    BA

    STUDIOTYPICAL

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/8 = 1-0

    5 10 30

  • 30'-0

    "

    26'-0"

    BA

    1 BEDTYPICAL

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/8 = 1-0

    5 10 30

  • 30'-0

    "

    29'-0"

    BC

    2 BEDCORNER

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/8 = 1-0

    5 10 30

  • 50'-0

    "

    29'-0"

    BC

    3 BEDCORNER

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/8 = 1-0

    5 10 30

  • 30'-0

    "

    26'-0"

    BA

    2 BEDDUPLEX

    LIV

    ING

    EdwardKim

    PROTOTYPE DESIGNPROPOSAL16 October 2014

    SCALE 1/8 = 1-0

    (UPPER LEVEL)

    5 10 30

  • DIGITAL SIGNAGE/FACADEALLOWS FOR TRANSIENT RETAIL SPACE TO CHANGE DISPLAYS

  • FLEX SPACEINFORMATION FOR VISITORSEXHIBITION /CONVENTION SPACEBUILDING DIRECTORY

  • CHECKPOINTALLOWS OTHER USERS TO SEEACTIVITY LEVEL AT LOCATIONSWITHIN THE BUILDING

  • COLLABORATIONTRANSIENT OFFICE SPACE FORSTART UPS AND SMALL PROJECT TEAMS

  • mid-review

  • institutionsresearcheducation

    start-ups and incubatorsames business park, somervillecck shared kitchen, dorchestercambridge innovation center, kendall square

    historicindustry, goods, innovation

    age demographic

    urban context site context precedent

    10% 13%

    34%

    26%

    8% 9%

    0-9 10-19 20-34 35-54 55-64 65+

    transit access

    4%BIKE

    12%WALK

    32%DRIVE 46% T

  • flexible building units

    42 cores60 - 65 units

    36 cores50 - 55 units

  • kitchen95 SF

    core115 SF

    80 SF

    40 SF

    bathroom

    type 2

    type 1

    type 3 ADA

    closet

    modular unit core

    14'-0"

    14'-0"

    14'-0

    "14

    '-0"

    5'-0

    "

  • site strategy

    gateway alongpedestrian street

    residential connection

    adjacentgreen space

    unite parcels housing wrapper& public core

    pedestrian street portal

    adjacenthousing

  • ground level plan

    daycare

    retail

    0 5 15

    N

    25

    residentialamenitiy

    incubatorspace

    demo space

    co-op kitchen

  • second level plan

    retail

    0 5 15

    N

    25

    residentialamenitiy

    incubatorspace

    workshopworkspace

    lectureroom

    classroom

  • fourth level plan

    retail

    0 5 15

    N

    25

    residentialamenitiy

  • retailN

    residentialamenitiy

    incubatorspace

    site section0 5 15 25

  • final review

  • 145,000NUMBER OF HIGH-TECH EMPLOYEES[SILICON VALLEY: 213,000]

    +4.3%INCREASE IN TECH JOBSSINCE LAST YEAR

    $441.6 MILLIONVENTURE CAPITAL FUNDING[4TH HIGHEST IN THE U.S.]

    $51.52AVERAGE RENTAL COST FORCOMMERCIAL SPACE, PER SQ FT.

    +8.3%INCREASE IN RENTAL COSTSINCE LAST YEAR

    $57.50AVERAGE RENTAL COSTIN CAMBRIDGE, PER SQ FT.

    +14.7%INCREASE IN CAMBRIDGERENTAL COST SINCE LAST YEAR

    INNOVATION/SEAPORT DISTRICT

    INNOVATION ACTIVITY IN BOSTON

    KENDALLSQUARE

  • D. PRANG PUBLISHING HOUSE

    B. CHICKERING PIANO FACTORY

    A

    BCD

    E

    C. ROXBURY CHEMICAL WORKS

    historic production & manufacturingroxbury and south end

    A. BURKHARDT BREWERY

    E. HOWARD WATCH FACTORY BUILT URBAN FABRIC, BOSTON - 1880 SHORELINE OF ROXBURY CANAL 1/20 1 MILE

  • 10% 13%

    34%

    26%

    8% 9%

    0-9 10-19 20-34 35-54 55-64 65+

    4%BIKE

    12%WALK

    32%DRIVE 46% T

    INSTITUTIONS & COMMERCIAL FABRIC

    BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER

    BOSTON UNIVERSITYSCHOOL OF MEDICINE

    SOUTH BAYSHOPPING CENTER

    1880 SHORELINEROXBURY CANAL

    ORCHARD GARDENSPILOT SCHOOL

    DUDLEYSQUARE

    OBRYANT SCHOOLOF MATH & SCIENCE

    NORTHEASTERNUNIVERSITY

    BEST WESTERN ROUNDHOUSE SUITES

    DUDLEY INN

    HAMPTON INN SUITES

    AISLING BED & BREAKFAST

    AGE DEMOGRAPHIC

    TRANSIENT LODGING ACCOMODATIONS

    COMMUTER TRANSIT ACCESS

    analysis of site areawithin one mile

  • shared workspaces & startup incubators

    AMES BUSINESS PARKSOMERVILLE290,000 SF

    NOT TO SCALE

    BORNSTEIN & PEARL SMALL BUSINESS CENTERDORCHESTER164,000 SF

    MASS CHALLENGESEAPORT DISTRICT26,000 SF

    CAMBRIDGE INNOVATION CENTERCAMBRIDGE150,000 SF

    WORKBARBOSTON & CAMBRIDGEVARIES

    DISTRICT HALLSEAPORT DISTRICT12,000 SF

  • site massing

    PIXELATED FORMPERIMETER HOUSING & EMBEDDED HUBSFAR = 4.02 BUILDINGS, 5 FLOORS

    COMMERCIAL & RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION

  • unit core details

    type 2type 2

    type 1

    type 1 type 3 ADA

    14'-0"

    14'-0"

    14'-0

    "14

    '-0"

    5'-0

    "

  • unit core configurations

  • PLAN 031:300

  • program scenarios

    WORKSPACE

    INCUBATOR HUB PUBLC ZONE WORKSHOP BUILDING

    STOREFRONT

    CONFERENCE

    ASSEMBLY SEATING

    EXHIBITION

    STUDIO

    LABORATORY

    WAREHOUSE

  • pixelated module

    9-0

    22-0

    16-0

  • SITE SECTION1:300

  • PLAN 011:300