ArcelorMittal Upland Tailings Basin Memo - Mining …\Mpls\23 MN\69\23691439 ArcelorMittal -...
-
Upload
phunghuong -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
4
Transcript of ArcelorMittal Upland Tailings Basin Memo - Mining …\Mpls\23 MN\69\23691439 ArcelorMittal -...
Memorandum To: Jaime Johnson (ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine Inc.)
From: Dan Engel, Mark Jacobson
Subject: Survey of Material Deposition at Upland Tailings Basin
Date: May 13, 2014
Project: 23691439.00
On April 7, 2014, ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine Inc. (ArcelorMittal) discovered a washout of the access
road and main perimeter dam along the west abutment of the Upland Tailings Basin (Basin). Upon
discovery, actions were immediately implemented to: (1) minimize the impact of the release from the
washout material (material), (2) investigate the cause of the washout, (3) repair the perimeter dam, (4)
evaluate the potential extent of impact to the surrounding property caused by the washout, and (5) contact
the relevant regulatory authorities. Based on the investigation into the cause of this incident, it has been
determined that a failure occurred at the main perimeter dam along the west abutment. The discharge
from the decant tower typically flows northeast, which is directed by the decant diversion ditch. During
this incident, water flow from the decant tower was redirected due to ice blockage. As a result, water
levels rose until a portion of the dam failed, causing a washout. Aerial photographs (Attachment 1)
preliminarily confirmed that this breach did not cause any tailings material impact outside of the
ArcelorMittal property boundaries. In order to confirm the extent of impact, Barr Engineering Company
(Barr) was immediately contracted to perform a site evaluation. The purpose of this memorandum is to
summarize the results of that investigation.
On April 9 through 11, Barr visually mapped the extent of material deposition, measured the thickness of
material deposition, and evaluated the potential for erosion and transport of material downstream. Figure
1 shows the general location of the area potentially impacted by the event and the Public Waters
Inventory. Figure 2 shows the lateral extent of potential impacts from this event based on a visual
evaluation. Figure 2 further indicates the estimated thickness of material deposited based on
measurements obtained during the field investigation activities.
P:\Mpls\23 MN\69\23691439 ArcelorMittal - Tailings Rel\WorkFiles\April Upland Tailings Basin\Memo\Final Memo\ArcelorMittal Upland Tailings Basin
Memo.docx
Impacted Area Description
The impacted areas are located west of the Basin in Section 15 of Township 59 North and Range 17 West
(Figure 1). Wetlands along the west edge of the Basin are part of a larger wetland. No channels have been
observed within the wetland complex that could drain northward into the unnamed stream located nearly
one mile downstream, which eventually drains into Sand River, part of the Vermilion River Watershed in
the Rainy River Basin (Figure 1).
Field observations
When the Basin overflowed, the water traveled northward along the perimeter road, washed out a portion
of the road, and exited the road in two distinct lobes (Figure 2). Washed out material in the south lobe
traveled approximately 1,000 feet from the road edge. Washed out material in the north lobe traveled
approximately 375 feet from the road edge. Based on the field investigation, none of the material left
ArcelorMittal property nor did it reach any waters listed on the Public Waters Inventory, which is shown
on Figure 1. It is believed that all of the material was deposited into wetland areas. A return site visit
during the growing season is recommended in order to confirm documentation of affected wetlands.
The material is composed of a mixture of fine tailings, coarse tailings, and overburden soils that were
used to construct the dam and roadway. The material was saturated with water in most areas and dark
gray in color. Deposition thickness ranges from 18 inches at the road edge to one inch at the farthest
extents of the impacted areas. The coarser material was deposited immediately, while finer material
traveled the farthest away from the breach.
The percentage of material covering the ground surface was also estimated. The material flowed around
(and not over) some micro-topographical features such as senesced vegetation, tussocks, stumps, and
boulders. Ground surface coverage ranged from 50 to 95 percent. The ground surface was still frozen at
the time of the survey, and snow depth ranged from 8 to 18 inches at the site. Snow texture was icy and
granular, and turbid water was visible under the snow surface. Further field studies and evaluation will be
necessary once the snow has melted and the growing season has begun in order to evaluate overall
impacts of the incident.
Field observations were mapped using a Trimble GeoXH 6000 Global Positioning System (GPS) Unit,
capable of recording positions with sub-foot horizontal accuracy. Photographs were collected with a
Ricoh GPS camera (Attachment 2). The field data were mapped using ArcView 10.2.1 mapping software.
The total footprint of the deposition was subdivided into multiple polygons, each assigned an average
P:\Mpls\23 MN\69\23691439 ArcelorMittal - Tailings Rel\WorkFiles\April Upland Tailings Basin\Memo\Final Memo\ArcelorMittal Upland Tailings Basin
Memo.docx
thickness and percent ground surface coverage. Figure 2 shows the footprint of the impacted area,
categorized by thickness, including the acreage of each specific depositional lobe. Table 1 provides an
estimate of the area of each thickness depositional range.
Footprint and Volume of Material Release
Table 1 and Figure 2 provide details of the location, footprint, and volume of material deposited within
areas located outside of the Basin, but assumed to be wetlands. It is estimated that 114,565 cubic feet of
material was washed out of the dam and roadway and deposited over a total area of 5.88 acres, although
there is not contiguous cover of material within that area. Approximately 3.2 acres of the deposition area
is 4 inches in thickness or less and 2.68 acres contains deposits of 6 inches or more. At this time, it is
believed that most of the impacted area is predominantly coniferous and deciduous forest wetland
communities dominated by balsam fir, ash, speckled alder and willow. Other tree species present at the
site include black spruce, paper birch, white cedar, and aspen. A wetland delineation will be conducted
during the growing season to determine the extent of wetlands affected by the deposition.
Containment
The field investigation included an assessment of the potential for erosion and subsequent transport of
material. Based on that investigation, it was determined that the deposits are unlikely to migrate
downslope or enter any surface waters under conditions of normal precipitation. The affected wetlands
typically consist of shrub and forested plant communities in which hydrology generally ranges from up to
about 6 inches of inundation adjacent to the Basin to no standing water at the farthest extent of deposition.
The ground surface slope ranges from flat to 2 percent in the affected areas, so surface water flow
velocities are limited and the erosive potential for surface runoff is low. Natural ground surface roughness
(stumps, boulders, depressions, hummocks, and hollows) and vegetation also impede concentrated flow
of any surface waters, and naturally contain the material. The nearest surface water is an unnamed stream
(tributary to the Sand River) located approximately 4000 feet northwest of the affected areas (Figure 1).
In addition, no continuous surface water flow paths between the affected wetlands and downstream
waters were observed during the aerial imagery review or the on-site investigation. On the basis of the
aforementioned site observations, there is little potential for material to remobilize and reach any
downstream waters, and no containment measures (e.g. silt fence) appear necessary.
Conclusion
It appears that no wetlands were affected with perennial flow connection to downstream, navigable
waters. The material is confined to areas within approximately 1,000 feet of the Basin with no potential
P:\Mpls\23 MN\69\23691439 ArcelorMittal - Tailings Rel\WorkFiles\April Upland Tailings Basin\Memo\Final Memo\ArcelorMittal Upland Tailings Basin
Memo.docx
for further downstream transport. More detailed delineation of affected wetland areas will be conducted
during the growing season.
Table 1
Material Release Summary
ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine, Inc.
Average Material
Depth (Wet)
Estimated
Material
Coverage* Area
Material Volume
(Wet)
(in) (%) (ac) (cf)
North lobe 12 95 0.035 1,448
North lobe 8 95 0.048 1,314
North lobe 6 95 0.068 1,411
North lobe 1 50 0.216 376
North lobe 4 50 0.024 170
North Lobe Subtotals: 0.391 4,719
South lobe 8 95 1.693 46,242
South lobe 18 95 0.181 11,235
South lobe 12 95 0.221 9,137
South lobe 12 95 0.434 17,968
South lobe 2 80 0.448 2,500
South lobe 2 95 0.180 1,189
South lobe 2 50 0.572 1,992
South lobe 4 90 0.291 3,766
South lobe 4 75 1.467 15,817
South Lobe Subtotals: 5.487 109,847
TOTALS: 5.878 114,565
*Less than 100% due to micro‐topographic features such as vegetation, stumps, and boulders.
Location
Plant Area
LaurentianPit
UplandTailings Basin
Release SiteSee Figure 2
£¤53
169
456721
4567106
456720
San dRive
r
Vermilion River
Wou ri Creek
Unnamed Str
eam
Hay Lake Outlet
Vermilion River
Figure 1SITE LOCATION
APRIL 2014ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine
St. Louis County, MN
Barr
Foote
r: ArcG
IS 10
.2.1,
2014
-04-16
07:25
File:
\\bar
r.com
\GIS
\Clie
nt\Ar
celor
Mitta
l\Work
_Orde
rs\W
etlan
ds\M
aps\R
epor
ts\20
14_T
ailing
s_Ba
sin_B
reach
\Figu
re 1 S
ite Lo
catio
n.mxd
Use
r: dje
National Wetlands InventoryPublic Waters InventoryRivers and Streams
I0 1 20.5
Miles
Site Location
MINNESOTA
Lake Superior
Copyright:© 2013 ESRI, i-cubed, GeoEye
1504
1502
1500
1498
1492
1496
1494
1506150
8
1510
1512
1490
1514
1516
1518
1520
1488
1486
1534
1522
1524
1536
1526
1532
1484
1530
1528
1538
1540
1542154
415
48
1482
1546
1552
1550
1556
1554
1558
1480147
8
1560
1476
1562
1564
1520
1550
1516
1542
1506
1548
1510
1518
1526
1546
1522
1532
1522
1538
1536
1548
156015
58
1518
1560
1532
1514
15461560
1562
1520
1522
1550
1508
1540
1510
1524
1512
1542
1560
1516
1518
15141562
1520
1520
1562 1542
1530
1540
1512
15081506
1512
1522
1522
1526
1518
1512
1508
1544
1560
1520
1516
Figure 2RELEASE AREAS
APRIL 2014ArcelorMittal Minorca Mine
St. Louis County, MN
Barr
Foote
r: ArcG
IS 10
.2.1,
2014
-04-16
06:52
File:
\\bar
r.com
\GIS
\Clie
nt\Ar
celor
Mitta
l\Work
_Orde
rs\W
etlan
ds\M
aps\R
epor
ts\20
14_T
ailing
s_Ba
sin_B
reach
\Figu
re 2 T
ailing
s Rele
ase A
reas.m
xd U
ser: d
je
Ground Elevation (feet)IndexIntermediateRelease Flowpath
Material Thickness (inches)124681218
I0 300 600150
Feet
North Lobe0.39 acre footprint4,700 cubic feet (approx.)
South Lobe5.49 acre footprint109,900 cubic feet (approx.)
Location of overflow
Attachment 1
Aerial Photograph
Attachment 2
Site Photographs
Photograph 4793 – Erosion of perimeter access road, immediately downstream of overflow
Photograph 4830 – North lobe of material deposition, extending northwest from access road
Photograph 4839 – Erosion of access road, immediately upstream of north lobe of deposition
Photograph 4888 – Material in shallow marsh community (south lobe)
Photograph 4918 – Undisturbed shallow marsh (near south lobe)
Photograph 4922 – Thick material deposit in forested wetland (south lobe)
Photograph 4937 – Thin deposit of fine material in shrub wetland (south lobe)
Photograph 4971 – Thick deposit of coarse material (north lobe)
Photograph 5052 – Thin deposit of fines (north lobe)