Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
-
Upload
healthy-lakes-healthy-lives -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
118 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012
Page 1
Great Lakes Aquatic Connectivity Project
Healing Our WatersGreat Lakes Restoration ConferenceCleveland, OhioSeptember 11-13, 2012
Stewart CogswellU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Stream Restoration/Connectivity –
What watershed?
What stream?
What individual site?
What site first?
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 5
Great Lakes Aquatic Connectivity Project
Road/stream crossing & barrier inventories
- consistent approach
- prioritization models
- cost/benefit analysis
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Watershed Connectivity
Status(Cmin)
Total Cost (Millions of Dollars)
Prioritizing Remediation – Pine/Popple River
Percent %
100
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
Page 11
Cost estimates are important for prioritizing projects
• Excavation
• Pipe (bevel and polymer coating)
• Bedding and fill (including raised road elevation)
• Road surfacing
• Haul away old pipe and unusable fill
• Riprap, silt fence
• Dewatering / pumping
• Project administration and surveys
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 12
Key habitat advances:
a) Trimble Yuma
b) Roadsoft - management system
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 13
Next steps -
a) Model development- refine current model- new models (truncated, species)- decision based (remove vs.
remain)
b) Measure biological and habitat response
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 14
Thinking about collecting road/stream crossing data on your watershed?
http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/streamconnect
HOW Cleveland 2012
Page 15HOW Cleveland 2012
Questions?