Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

15
Page 1 Great Lakes Aquatic Connectivity Project Healing Our Waters Great Lakes Restoration Conference Cleveland, Ohio September 11-13, 2012 Stewart Cogswell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

description

This workshop highlights successful large scale, on-the-ground restoration efforts that are re-connecting aquatic habitats fragmented by dams, road crossings, and other man-made alterations in the Upper Great Lakes. Tools and strategies will be shared for planning, financing, and articulating results, including the mutual benefits of restoring streams, improving community infrastructure, and creating local jobs.

Transcript of Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 1: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 1

Great Lakes Aquatic Connectivity Project

Healing Our WatersGreat Lakes Restoration ConferenceCleveland, OhioSeptember 11-13, 2012

Stewart CogswellU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Page 2: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 2

Page 3: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 3

Page 4: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 4

Stream Restoration/Connectivity –

What watershed?

What stream?

What individual site?

What site first?

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 5: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 5

Great Lakes Aquatic Connectivity Project

Road/stream crossing & barrier inventories

- consistent approach

- prioritization models

- cost/benefit analysis

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 6: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 6

Page 7: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 7

Page 8: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 8

Page 9: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 9

Page 10: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 10

0.65

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

0.95

1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Watershed Connectivity

Status(Cmin)

Total Cost (Millions of Dollars)

Prioritizing Remediation – Pine/Popple River

Percent %

100

95

90

85

80

75

70

65

Page 11: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 11

Cost estimates are important for prioritizing projects

• Excavation

• Pipe (bevel and polymer coating)

• Bedding and fill (including raised road elevation)

• Road surfacing

• Haul away old pipe and unusable fill

• Riprap, silt fence

• Dewatering / pumping

• Project administration and surveys

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 12: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 12

Key habitat advances:

a) Trimble Yuma

b) Roadsoft - management system

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 13: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 13

Next steps -

a) Model development- refine current model- new models (truncated, species)- decision based (remove vs.

remain)

b) Measure biological and habitat response

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 14: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 14

Thinking about collecting road/stream crossing data on your watershed?

http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/streamconnect

HOW Cleveland 2012

Page 15: Aquatic Connectivity: Benefitting Streams and Communities-Cogswell, 2012

Page 15HOW Cleveland 2012

Questions?