Aquaphotomics and its extended water mirror concept...
Transcript of Aquaphotomics and its extended water mirror concept...
Aquaphotomics and its extended water mirror concept explain why NIRS can measure low concentration aqueous solutions
George Bázár,1,2,* Zoltán Kovács,1,3 Mariko Tanaka,1 Roumiana Tsenkokva 1,* 1 Biomeasurement Technology Laboratory, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kobe University, Japan
2 Institute of Food and Agricultural Product Qualification, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Kaposvár University, Hungary 3 Department of Physics and Control, Faculty of Food Science, Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary
* To whom correspondence should be addressed E-mail: [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (R.T.)
INTRODUCTION
Low concentration aqueous solutions low spectral intensity of solutes
REFERENCES & ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [1] Tsenkova, R., 2009. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 17, 303-314. [2] Giangiacomo, R., 2006. Food Chemistry, 96, 371-379. [3] Tsenkova, R., 2010. Spectroscopy Europe, 22, 6-10.
http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/bc/ahp/SDPS/SD.PS.water.html
http://www1.lsbu.ac.uk/water/inos.html
10-100mM 1-10mM 0.1-1mM 0.02-0.1mM
11
00
-18
00
nm
factor# 3 3 4 1.75±1.5
R2Cal 0.99±0.00 0.99±0.01 0.84±0.12 0.72±0.09
RMSEC 0.99±0.06 0.34±0.06 0.11±0.04 0.02±0.01
R2CV 0.99±0.00 0.97±0.02 0.48±0.27 -1.17±0.46
RMSECV 1.34±0.22 0.48±0.13 0.19±0.05 0.03±0.00
RPDCV 22.63 6.33 1.56 1.05
13
00
-16
00
nm
factor# 3 3 3.75±0.5 1.75±1.5
R2Cal 0.99±0.00 0.99±0.01 0.80±0.15 0.68±0.09
RMSEC 0.99±0.07 0.34±0.07 0.13±0.07 0.02±0.01
R2CV 0.99±0.00 0.97±0.01 0.33±0.33 -0.91±0.70
RMSECV 1.34±0.23 0.48±0.12 0.22±0.05 0.03±0.00
RPDCV 22.59 6.37 1.37 1.07
10-100mM 1-10mM 0.1-1mM 0.02-0.1mM
11
00
-18
00
nm
factor# 3 3 3 1
R2Cal 0.99 0.98 0.35 0.07
RMSEC 1.03 0.40 0.23 0.03
R2CV 0.99 0.98 0.24 -0.1
RMSECV 1.08 0.42 0.25 0.03
RPDCV 27.94 7.19 1.23 1.15
13
00
-16
00
nm
factor# 3 3 3 1
R2Cal 0.99 0.98 0.33 0.05
RMSEC 1.04 0.40 0.23 0.03
R2CV 0.99 0.98 0.23 -0.04
RMSECV 1.08 0.42 0.25 0.03
RPDCV 28.04 7.13 1.22 1.15
The molecular changes of the water solvent caused by the solute can be detected by NIR spectroscopy and used for qualitative and quantitative analyses [1]
Means and standard deviations of PLSR results on lactose concentration in the four replicate solutions (n = ca.30) at the
different concentration ranges, applying different spectral regions
PLSR results on lactose concentration at the different concentration ranges using the four replicate solutions together (n = ca.120), applying different spectral regions and ‘leave one replicate out’ cross-validation
13
90
-14
25
nm
14
40
-14
75
nm
15
80
-16
15
nm
16
80
-17
00
nm
17
20
-17
55
nm
1100 1350 1600 1800 Wavelengths [nm]
10
0
-10
-20
-30
10
-10
-30
50
0
-50 Reg
ress
ion
po
wer
R
egre
ssio
n p
ow
er
Reg
ress
ion
po
wer
Structural changes of water in sugar solutions presented on aquagram
BUT!
Measuring low concentration of sugar in aqueous solutions based on the molecular changes of water [2]
MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS
10-100mM
1-10mM
0.1-1mM
- Analytical grade lactose diluted in Milli-Q water 0.02-0.1mM range, with 0.01mM steps 0.1-1mM range, with 0.1mM steps 1mM-10mM range, with 1mM steps 10mM-100mM range, with 10mM steps - Four independent replicates were prepared for each concentration range - FOSS XDS spectrometer (FOSS NIRSystems, Inc., Hoganas, Sweden) with RLA module and 1mm cuvette transmittance spectra (logT-1) at 1100-1800nm with 0.5nm spectral step - R Project (www.r-project.org), The Unscrambler v9.7 (CAMO Software AS, Oslo, Norway), Pirouette 4.0 (Infometrics, Inc., Woodinville, WA, USA)
Characteristic changes at water matrix coordinates
describe the water spectral pattern of lactose.
Visualization on aquagram [3]:
1344nm
1364nm
1412nm
1445nm
1475nm
1506nm
1590nm
1380nm
1400nm
1425nm
1440nm
1455nm A = Aquagram value
a = absorbance after MSC μ = average of all spectra
σ = SD of all spectra
A =a − μ
σ
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Ab
sorb
ance
(w
ater
)
0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Ab
sorb
ance
(so
luti
on
s)
0
0.125
0.25
1.5 Ab
sorb
ance (lacto
se)
-2
-1
0
1
2n
d d
eriv
. x1
0-4
(wat
er)
2
2
-2
-1
0
1 2
nd
der
iv. x
10
-4 (s
olu
tio
ns)
2
2
-0.5
-0.25
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1100 1300 1500 1700
1100 1300 1500 1700 1100 1300 1500 1700
1100 1300 1500 1700
11
52
14
12
14
62
13
44
17
80
11
40
1
17
5
12
08
12
76
1
30
2
13
42
1
36
6
13
80
14
50
1
49
0
15
36
15
92
1
61
6
16
46
16
96
1
72
8
17
64
1
79
6
Raw spectra 2nd derivative spectra
2n
d d
eriv. x10
-4 (lacto
se)
water lactose
Aqueous solutions of lactose
(0.02-100mM)
Signals of lactose can hardly be detected in low concentration solutions.
Subtraction of water spectrum from those of the lactose solutions reveals the spectral differences of the different concentrations.
Only water bands dominate
Regression vectors of calibration models
built on the subtracted spectra of
water and lactose solutions show stability among
replicate measurments, and
accentuate the dominant water
regions.
1-10mM 10-100mM
CONCLUSIONS
NIR technique coupled with aquaphotomics concept is useful method for quantification of the investigated carbohydrate solutes at millimolar level. Lactose causes gradual changes in the water molecular matrix, thus, performance of calibration on lactose concentration does not decrease when only the characteristic spectral region of water 1st overtone (1300-1600nm) is applied. In the contrary, it has been demonstrated in the present study that the absorption regions of water provide most useful information on the solutes in case of highly diluted aqueous solutions. Accordingly, the molecular changes of water caused by the solute can be traced and used for describing the amount of dissolved material. NIR technique and aquaphotomics based on the extended water mirror concept provide a quick and accurate alternative for classical analytical measurements even at very low (1-10mM) concentration levels.
Financial support of Japan Society for Promotion of Science (G.B. JSPS P12409) is acknowledged.
Dynamic changes of structure maker and structure breaker characteristics of sugar in
water [2]. Breaker is dominant in low, while maker in high concentrations.
H+·(H2O)4-8
OH-(H2O)1,2,4
H+·(H2O)2
OH-(H2O)1,4
O2-(H2O)4
S0
Free -OH
S0
OH-H bending
H+·(H2O)2 S1
Deionized water
OH-(H2O)4,5
2ν2+ν3
S2, S3
aν1+bν3
(a+b)=2
H+·(H2O)2,6
H+·(H2O)2,6