April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

15
April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active Stat State Capacity Assessment Results

Transcript of April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Page 1: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

April 29, 2014

WA OSPI SISEP Active State

State Capacity Assessment Results

Page 2: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

State Management

Team

Regional Implementation

Team

“District” Teams

N ≈100 Schools

Regional Implementation

Team

“District” Teams

N ≈100 Schools

Regional Implementation

Team

“District” Teams

N ≈100 Schools

Regional Implementation

Team

“District” Teams

N ≈100 Schools

SIS

EP

Su

pp

ort

State Transformation

Specialists

State Design Team

Page 3: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Cascading Logic Model

Student outcomes (monthly data)

TIFA (every teacher, every month)

DCA (Districts 2-3X a year)

RIT (SCA: 2X a year)

SMT/STS (SCA: 2X a year)

Page 4: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Purpose of the SCA

Provide a State Management Team with a regular measure of the state capacity for implementation of evidence-based practices and other effective innovations

Provide a structured process for the development of a State Capacity Action Plan

Provide other State Education Agency (SEA) teams with information to monitor progress towards state capacity building goals

Support a common infrastructure for implementation of effective education for students

Page 5: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

SCA Responders

Page 6: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Scoring key

All Scaling Capacity Items scored using the following format.

Fully In Place 2 points - All dimensions of element adhered to and evidence available to support this rating

Partially In Place 1 point - Some dimensions of element adhered to and/or some dimensions attended to- Action Planning occurs with these elements

Not in Place 0 points - Element not adhered to - Action Planning occurs with these

elements or teams may not be developmentally ready to implement this component

Page 7: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Total Score

4/28/140%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

State Capacity Assessment - WA OSPI

Page 8: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Subscale Scores

SMT Investment SMT System Alignment RIT Functioning 0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

State Capacity Assessent - WA OSPI 4/28/2014

47% 0% 0%

Page 9: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Sub-Subscale Scores

Commit Coord Guidance Docs

Leadership Regional Capacity

System Alignment

Design Team

RIT Orga-nization

Exploration Installation Initial Im-plementa-

tion

Sub-Subscales 0.66 0.8 0.25 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10%

30%

50%

70%

90%

State Capacity Assessment - WA OSPI 4/28/14

Page 10: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Next Step – Action Planning

Review Items with scores of 0 and 1

Identify several items for action planning that may be completed within the next 3 months Look for Quick wins Define the Action Determine:

» Who is responsible» When it will be accomplished» Progress monitoring schedule for problem solving

Page 11: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Get Connected!

www.scalingup.org

SISEP @SISEPcenter

For more on Implementation Sciencehttp://nirn.fpg.unc.edu

www.globalimplementation.org

Page 12: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

HTTP://NIRN.FPG.UNC.EDU

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).

Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature

Implementation Science

Page 13: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

• Annie E. Casey Foundation (EBPs and Cultural Competence)

• William T. Grant Foundation (Implementation Literature Review)

• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Implementation Strategies Grants; National Implementation Awards)

• Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (Implementation Research)

• National Institute of Mental Health (Research And Training Grants)

• Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Program Development And Evaluation Grants)

• Office of Special Education Programs (Scaling up and Capacity Development Center)

• Administration for Children and Families (Child Welfare Leadership; Capacity Development Center)

• Duke Endowment (Child Welfare Reform)

Thank You for Your Support

Page 14: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

©Copyright Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase

This content is licensed under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs. You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works — You may not alter or transform this work.  Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0

Page 15: April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.

Get Connected!

http://implementation.fpg.unc.edu Workgroups Active States CoP

SISEP @SISEPcenter

For more on Implementation Sciencehttp://nirn.fpg.unc.edu

www.scalingup.org