April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.
-
Upload
edgar-hopkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of April 29, 2014 WA OSPI SISEP Active State State Capacity Assessment Results.
April 29, 2014
WA OSPI SISEP Active State
State Capacity Assessment Results
State Management
Team
Regional Implementation
Team
“District” Teams
N ≈100 Schools
Regional Implementation
Team
“District” Teams
N ≈100 Schools
Regional Implementation
Team
“District” Teams
N ≈100 Schools
Regional Implementation
Team
“District” Teams
N ≈100 Schools
SIS
EP
Su
pp
ort
State Transformation
Specialists
State Design Team
Cascading Logic Model
Student outcomes (monthly data)
TIFA (every teacher, every month)
DCA (Districts 2-3X a year)
RIT (SCA: 2X a year)
SMT/STS (SCA: 2X a year)
Purpose of the SCA
Provide a State Management Team with a regular measure of the state capacity for implementation of evidence-based practices and other effective innovations
Provide a structured process for the development of a State Capacity Action Plan
Provide other State Education Agency (SEA) teams with information to monitor progress towards state capacity building goals
Support a common infrastructure for implementation of effective education for students
SCA Responders
Scoring key
All Scaling Capacity Items scored using the following format.
Fully In Place 2 points - All dimensions of element adhered to and evidence available to support this rating
Partially In Place 1 point - Some dimensions of element adhered to and/or some dimensions attended to- Action Planning occurs with these elements
Not in Place 0 points - Element not adhered to - Action Planning occurs with these
elements or teams may not be developmentally ready to implement this component
Total Score
4/28/140%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
State Capacity Assessment - WA OSPI
Subscale Scores
SMT Investment SMT System Alignment RIT Functioning 0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
State Capacity Assessent - WA OSPI 4/28/2014
47% 0% 0%
Sub-Subscale Scores
Commit Coord Guidance Docs
Leadership Regional Capacity
System Alignment
Design Team
RIT Orga-nization
Exploration Installation Initial Im-plementa-
tion
Sub-Subscales 0.66 0.8 0.25 0.33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
State Capacity Assessment - WA OSPI 4/28/14
Next Step – Action Planning
Review Items with scores of 0 and 1
Identify several items for action planning that may be completed within the next 3 months Look for Quick wins Define the Action Determine:
» Who is responsible» When it will be accomplished» Progress monitoring schedule for problem solving
Get Connected!
www.scalingup.org
SISEP @SISEPcenter
For more on Implementation Sciencehttp://nirn.fpg.unc.edu
www.globalimplementation.org
HTTP://NIRN.FPG.UNC.EDU
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M. & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature
Implementation Science
• Annie E. Casey Foundation (EBPs and Cultural Competence)
• William T. Grant Foundation (Implementation Literature Review)
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (Implementation Strategies Grants; National Implementation Awards)
• Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (Implementation Research)
• National Institute of Mental Health (Research And Training Grants)
• Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Program Development And Evaluation Grants)
• Office of Special Education Programs (Scaling up and Capacity Development Center)
• Administration for Children and Families (Child Welfare Leadership; Capacity Development Center)
• Duke Endowment (Child Welfare Reform)
Thank You for Your Support
©Copyright Dean Fixsen and Karen Blase
This content is licensed under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND, Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs. You are free to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work); Noncommercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes; No Derivative Works — You may not alter or transform this work. Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0
Get Connected!
http://implementation.fpg.unc.edu Workgroups Active States CoP
SISEP @SISEPcenter
For more on Implementation Sciencehttp://nirn.fpg.unc.edu
www.scalingup.org