APRIL 2002, PARISIPCN02 M. Ergen A Survey on Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot...

27
APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen A Survey on Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems by Mustafa Ergen Authors: Sinem Coleri, Mustafa Ergen {csinem,ergen}@eecs.berkeley.edu Berkeley Web Over Wireless Group University of California Berkeley
  • date post

    19-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    1

Transcript of APRIL 2002, PARISIPCN02 M. Ergen A Survey on Channel Estimation Techniques Based on Pilot...

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

A Survey on Channel Estimation Techniques

Based on Pilot Arrangement in OFDM Systems

byMustafa Ergen

Authors: Sinem Coleri, Mustafa Ergen{csinem,ergen}@eecs.berkeley.edu

Berkeley Web Over Wireless GroupUniversity of California Berkeley

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Outline

• Motivation for OFDM

• OFDM System Architecture

• Channel Estimation Techniques

• Performance Analysis

• Conclusion

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Motivation for OFDM

• Disadvantages of FDMA– Bad Spectrum Usage

• Disadvantages of TDMA– Multipath Delay spread problem

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

OFDM: Use of Frequency Spectrum

• Efficient use of spectrum– Overlap in frequency spectrum of subcarriers

• Null point of all other subcarriers at the center frequency of any particular subcarrier

Frequency spectrum of the subcarriers

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Multipath Delay Spread

• Multi-path delay spread definition– Time spread between the arrival of the first and last

multipath signal, seen by the receiver.• Received radio signal consisting of a direct signal, plus

reflections from objects

• Multi-path delay spread effect– Inter-Symbol Interference (ISI) when the delayed

multipath signal overlaps with the symbols following it

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

OFDM: Eliminating ISI

• Cyclic Prefix– Prepend the last part of the signal to the beginning of the

signal• Duration of the CP larger than multipath delay spread• Orthogonality of the carriers not affected.

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

OFDM Overview

• Divides high-speed serial information signal into multiple lower-speed sub-signals.– Transmits simultaneously at different frequencies in

parallel.

• Modulation ( BPSK, PSK,QPSK,16QAM, …).

• Pilot subcarriers used to prevent frequency and phase shift errors.

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Benefits of OFDM

• Higher data rates– Overlap of subcarriers

• Lower bandwidth than spread spectrum.– High spectral efficiency

• Lower multi-path distortion– Usage of cyclic prefix

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Our OFDM System Assumptions

Usage of cyclic Prefix

Impulse response of the channel shorter than Cyclic Prefix.

Slow fading effects so that the channel is time-invariant over the symbol interval.

Rectangular Windowing of the transmitted pulses

Perfect Synchronization of transmitter and receiver

Additive, white, Gaussian channel noise

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

System Architecture-1

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

1,...,2,1,0

Nn

kXIDFTnx

1,...,1,0,

1,...,1,,

Nnnx

NNnnNxnx gg

f nwnhnxy ff

1,...,1,0 Nnnyny f

1,...,2,1,0

Nk

nyDFTkY

1,...,1,0

Nk

kWkIkHkXkY 1,...,1,0 NkkH

kYkX

ee

1

76

54

32

System Architecture-2Input to Time Domain

Guard Interval Channel

Guard Removal Output to Frequency Domain

Output Channel EstimationICI AWGNChannel Estimated Channel

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Pilot Arrangement

• Block Type– All sub-carriers

reserved for pilots wit a specific period

• Comb Type– Some sub-carriers are

reserved for pilots for each symbol

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Channel Estimation @Block-Type

1

0

110

1

.

.

.

,...,,

N

N

LS

y

y

y

xxxdiagXwhere

yXh

LS estimate MMSE estimate

MMSEMMSE

kHH

ggH

yy

HHgg

Hgy

yygyMMSE

kN

nj

nkN

yygyMMSE

TN

NT

N

Fgh

nEXFXFRyyER

XFRgyER

yRRg

eN

W

F

whereyRFRh

gaussianmeanzeroiidnnnn

gDFThhhh

nXFgy

]|[|][

][

1

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

,,,],...,,[

)(],...,,[

2

1

2

1

110

110

...

.

.

...

1N1NNW

01NNW

1N0NW

00NW

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Channel Estimation @ Block-Type

Block Type Decision Feedback Interpolation

1,...,1,0 NkkH

kYkX

ee

1,...,0 NkkX

kYkH

puree

He -kth sub-carrier Channel Response Estimated

Xe(k) -> signal demapper -> signal mapper -> Xpure(k)

Use same channel estimation for the whole symbol duration

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Channel Estimation @ Comb-Type Pilot

•Np pilot signals uniformly inserted in X(k)•L=Number of Carriers/Np

•{Hp(k) k=0,1,…,Np} , channel at pilot sub-carriers•Xp input at the kth pilot sub-carrier•Yp output at the kth pilot sub-carrier

LMS EstimateLS Estimate

0,

1,...,1,.inflmpx

Lldata

lmLXkX

1,...,1,0 p

p

pp Nk

kX

kYkH

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Interpolation @ Comb-Type

•Linear Interpolation

•Second Order Interpolation

•Low pass Interpolation

•Spline Cubic Interpolation

•Time Domain Interpolation

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Ll

mHL

lmHmH

lmLHkH

ppp

ee

0

1

Linear Interpolation Second Order Interpolation

Nl

mpHcmpHcmpHc

c

c

c

where

lmLHkH ee

/

11011

,2

1

1

,110

,2

1

1

Low Pass Interpolation (interp in MATLAB)

Interpolation @ Comb-Type

Time Domain Interpolation

Spline Cubic Interpolation (spline in MATLAB)

•Insert zeros into the original sequence

•Low-pass filter while passing original data unchanged

•Interpolation such that mean-square error between ideal and interpolated values min.

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

OFDM SetupParameter Specifications

FFT Size 1024

Number of Carriers 128

Pilot Ratio 1/8

Guard Length 256

Guard Type Cyclic Extension

Sample rate of OFDM signal

44.1kHz

Bandwidth 17.5kHz

Signal Constellation BPSK, QPSK, DQPSK, 16QAM

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Channels

Delay (OFDM samples) Gain Phase(rad)

0 0.2478 -2.5649

1 0.1287 -2.1208

3 0.3088 0.3548

4 0.4252 0.4187

5 0.49 2.7201

7 0.0365 -1.4375

8 0.1197 1.1302

12 0.1948 -0.8092

17 0.4187 -0.1545

24 0.317 -2.2159

29 0.2055 2.8372

49 0.1846 2.8641

Delay Amplitude

0 1

2 0.3162

17 0.1995

36 0.1296

75 0.1

137 0.1

Channel 1 Channel 2

nwnahnh 1

Time Varying Channel (AR Model)

ATTC (Advanced Television Technology Center)

and the Grande Alliance DTV laboratory`s ensemble E model

Simplified version of (Digital Video Broadcasting) DVB-T channel model

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Simulation-1

Modulation BPSK

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 1

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Modulation QPSK

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 1

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

Simulation-2

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Modulation 16QAM

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 1

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

Simulation-3

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Modulation DQPSK

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 1

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

Simulation-4

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Simulation-5

Modulation 16QAM

Channel AR Fading

H(n) Channel 1

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Modulation 16QAM

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 2

Doppler Frequency

70Hz

Simulation-6

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Modulation 16QAM

Channel Rayleigh Fading

H(n) Channel 1

SNR 40dB

Simulation-7

APRIL 2002, PARIS IPCN02 M. Ergen

Conclusion•OFDM System•Block Type

•Direct or Decision Feedback•Comb Type

•LS or LMS estimation at pilot frequencies•Interpolation Techniques

•Linear•Second Order•Low Pass•Spline•Time Domain

•Modulation •BPSK,QPSK,16QAM,DQPSK

•Results:•Comb Type performs better since it tracks fast fading channels.•Low-pass interpolation performs better since mean square error between the interpolated points and their ideal values is minimized.