Apprentice perception of eLearning in Northeast Wisconsin ... · 2 Merbach, Michael, R. Apprentice...
-
Upload
duongquynh -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Apprentice perception of eLearning in Northeast Wisconsin ... · 2 Merbach, Michael, R. Apprentice...
1
Author: Merbach, Michael R.
Title: Apprentice perception of eLearning in Northeast Wisconsin construction
electricity apprenticeship training program.
The accompanying research report is submitted to the University of Wisconsin-Stout, in partial
completion of the requirements for Master of Science in Training and Human Resource Development.
Graduate Degree/ Major: MS Training and Human Resource Development
Research Advisor: Dr. Wendy Dittmann
Submission Term/Year: Spring, 2014
Number of Pages: 58
Style Manual Used: American Psychological Association, 6th edition
I understand that this research report must be officially approved by the Graduate
School and that an electronic copy of the approved version will be made available through the
University Library website
I attest that the research report is my original work (that any copyrightable materials
have been used with the permission of the original authors), and as such, it is automatically protected
by the laws, rules, and regulations of the U.S. Copyright Office.
My research advisor has approved the content and quality of this paper.
STUDENT: NAME: Michael Merbach DATE: 4/22/14
ADVISOR: NAME: Wendy Dittmann, EdD DATE: 4/22/14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
This section to be completed by the Graduate School
This final research report has been approved by the Graduate School.
Director, Office of Graduate Studies: DATE:
2
Merbach, Michael, R. Apprentice perception of eLearning in Northeast Wisconsin
construction electricity apprenticeship training program.
Abstract
Fox Valley Technical College in Appleton, Wisconsin offers a web-based, block-
scheduled, apprenticeship training model for the construction electrician apprentice
program. There is no data to research a program of this type. This research project
consisted of the evaluation of other distance education programs in addition to traditional
face-to-face construction apprenticeship training programs. There was a need to collect
and analyze student perceptions of web-based online learning components in a
construction electrician apprenticeship. This research provides a guide for future
implementation in other apprenticeship training programs and examines the Fox Valley
Technical College program. Methodology used consisted of an electronic survey sent to
currently enrolled and active apprentices in the Northeast Wisconsin training program at
Fox Valley Technical College. The results demonstrate while respondents are satisfied
with the Fox Valley Technical College Apprenticeship instruction as a whole, an overall
dissatisfaction with the eLearning components of the construction electrician
apprenticeship program was prevalent. Considering the majority of participants have
limited previous experience with eLearning systems, technology issues did not contribute
towards the dissatisfaction. Future research could include State of Wisconsin electrical
licensure completion rates for students enrolled in the block scheduled, web enhanced,
and traditional face-to-face apprenticeship programs.
3
Table of Contents
Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 5
List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 6
Chapter I: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7
Statement of the Problem ...................................................................................................11
Purpose of the Study ..........................................................................................................11
Assumptions of the Study ..................................................................................................11
Definition of Terms............................................................................................................12
eLearning. ..........................................................................................................................12
Limitations of the Study.....................................................................................................13
Chapter II: Literature Review ....................................................................................................... 14
Traditional Models of Apprenticeship Training ................................................................14
Adult Learning in Post-Secondary Education (apprenticeships) .......................................19
eLearning ...........................................................................................................................21
Cost of Training .................................................................................................................24
Summary ............................................................................................................................25
Chapter III: Methodology ............................................................................................................. 26
Subject Selection and Description .....................................................................................26
Instrumentation ..................................................................................................................27
Data Collection Procedures ................................................................................................28
Data Analysis .....................................................................................................................28
Limitations .........................................................................................................................29
4
Chapter IV: Results ....................................................................................................................... 30
Participants .........................................................................................................................30
Research Questions ............................................................................................................31
Item Analysis .....................................................................................................................31
Participant Demographics ..................................................................................................32
Perception of Computer Usage ..........................................................................................32
Previous User Ability .........................................................................................................33
Instructional Preference .....................................................................................................34
Classroom Technology Preference ....................................................................................37
Summary ............................................................................................................................38
Chapter V: Discussion .................................................................................................................. 39
Purpose and Objectives ......................................................................................................39
Data Collection ..................................................................................................................39
Limitations of the Study.....................................................................................................40
Conclusions ........................................................................................................................41
Recommendations ..............................................................................................................42
References ..................................................................................................................................... 44
Appendix A: Survey Invite Letter................................................................................................. 46
Appendix B: Implied Consent Letter ............................................................................................ 47
Appendix C: Fox Valley Technical College IRB approval .......................................................... 50
Appendix E: Survey Analysis ....................................................................................................... 57
5
List of Tables
Table 1: Total number of active construction electrician contracts .............................................. 18
Table 2: Average age a registration of construction electricians in Wisconsin ............................ 19
Table 3: Comparison of social definitions of adult learner and apprentice .................................. 21
Table 4: In a course with both web enhanced and traditional methodologies, I learn better
through the web enhance portion ...................................................................................... 36
Table 5: I prefer Blackboard supported courses to traditional courses ......................................... 36
Table 6: How satisfied are you with the paid-related instruction received at FVTC ................... 38
6
List of Figures
Figure 1: Results of WTCS completer survey in respect to when apprentices began working in
their present occupation. ......................................................................................................9
Figure 2: Employment location for Wisconsin apprentices ............................................................9
Figure 3: The O’Malley and McCraw student perception model. .................................................28
Figure 4: Overview of participants in survey instrument. ............................................................30
7
Chapter I: Introduction
The Wisconsin Technical College System (WTCS) provides the training necessary for
the paid-related components of apprentice training in Wisconsin. Apprenticeship is not a new
training model. Apprenticeships are actively in practice today with medical residency a required
element to become a doctor, required flight time with a master flight trainer in preparation of
solo flight for a pilot’s license, and in the transportation field, the process to acquire the
Commercial Driver’s License, or CDL-A, has required classroom instruction combined with
supervised over the road training. The WTCS has been providing academic training
requirements for 35 different career choices amongst the construction, industrial, and service
trades formally since 1911 (Department of Workforce Development, n.d.). Completing an
apprenticeship program is the same as being awarded a degree in doing. On November 14, 2013
Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin identified the value of apprentice training as he signed
Senate Bill 335,
Apprenticeships are some of the most valuable worker training programs available, this
bill will help employers address the current shortage of skilled workers and tailor training
to their specific industry needs. It also encourages skilled workers to continue their
education in rewarding career paths and allows them to earn while they learn. (Evenson,
2013, para. 2).
In Wisconsin the apprentice training experience is shaped by three major signatory
agents. The worker’s employer is the primary member of the apprenticeship training trio
offering the learner stable employment and contractual agreement to train in all aspects of the
skill area identified in the apprentice contract. The second member of the apprenticeship
learning experience is the technical college. The 16 colleges in the WTCS provide the collegiate
8
level educational elements often referred to as paid related instruction (PRI) for the program
participants. The range of apprentice contracts supported by WTCS training identify three to
five year training programs accounting for up to 730 hours of training in a variety of trades. The
third member of the apprentice experience is the Bureau of Apprenticeship Standards (BAS).
The BAS is the regulatory agency operating out of the Wisconsin Department of Workforce
Development (DWD). The DWD oversees the apprentice’s monthly work experience in addition
to approving the curriculum delivered in the college setting.
Employers that utilize the construction electrician apprentice (CEA) training have an
enhanced ability to develop their internal workforce. Employers interested in handing off their
corporate culture and values to high performing workers can utilize the master to apprentice
training as a workforce development mechanism. Employers may select the best and brightest
members of their workforce and offer these candidates the advanced apprenticeship training,
enhancing their abilities and work ethic. The WTCS apprentice completer reports indicate that
66% of apprentice completers were employed in their present occupation prior to the
apprenticeship, 23% indicated they started working at the beginning of their apprenticeship; 11%
said they became employed after completing their apprenticeship; and less than 1% did not
indicate when they were first employed in their present occupation.
9
Figure 1. Results of WTCS completer survey in respect to when apprentices began working in
their present occupation.
The annual report further reveals 95% of the apprentice completers are still in the labor force,
with 91% still employed in the trade for which they received training. “Apprenticeship training
reduces turnover” (Department of Workforce Development, n.d., p. 4). The following figure
illustrates 54% of apprenticeship completers retain employment in the district in which they
trained.
Figure 2. Employment location for Wisconsin apprentices as reported in a WTCS completion
report. Ninety-five percent of the employed apprentices who responded are working in
Wisconsin, 2% are employed out-of-state, and 3% did not indicate where they are employed. Of
those employed in Wisconsin, 54% are employed in the technical college district where they
received their training, and 41% are employed in another technical college district (Wisconsin
Technical College System, 2012).
10
Economic factors are beginning to pose challenges to the traditional model of
apprenticeship training in the construction sector. The new reality in construction work is that
construction projects are fewer and farther apart. Contractors have to mobilize to find work for
their apprenticed employees in order to remain competitive. A consequential effect of the
economic slowdown is a reduction in apprentice trainee numbers.
With the active apprenticed employee needing to travel to these projects, the delivery of
training content to mobilized apprentices has begun to shift towards alternate learning models
including distance and eLearning technologies. One of the alternate learning models is the block
model. The block-learning model is a format in which the learner attends college for consecutive
multi-day periods of training. Web-enhanced learning is applied to the block-learning schedule;
the learner utilizes Computer Based Training (CBT) modules to prepare for the multi-day face-
to-face meetings. These changes in delivery format facilitate the travel arrangements necessary
for the contractor’s nomadic workforce to attend the related training.
A traditional semester of study in CEA would require nine trips to and from the college;
the block arrangement reduces travel expense by allowing the learner to travel to the college and
stay locally for the duration of this block of time.
Change is not new in apprenticeship. The training model for CEA learners in the late
1980s consisted of weekly classes held at night. In the late 1990s the model became a bi-weekly
8-hour daytime training model in which the apprentices are paid for their attendance. The
Wisconsin CEA training program introduced web-enhanced eLearning. In between block
sections, the learner participates in web-based activities to stay in the literature while away at
work. Learner participation in, and acceptance of, the eLearning component is inconsistent.
Apprenticeship programs implemented new learning technologies in the related instruction
11
component without fully understanding the real or perceived impact to the apprentice learner.
The employers’ economic challenges motivated the move to eLearning. A study of construction
electrician apprentice eLearning was not conducted to understand the learner perception of the
eLearning methodologies at the time of implementation.
Statement of the Problem
In 2009, Northeast Wisconsin apprentice training providers adopted a web-enhanced
block-learning model within the construction electrician training program. The acceptance and
engagement of the apprentice eLearning components appears to vary among the apprentices. To
date, there has been no evaluation of the learners’ acceptance and perception of the web-
enhanced block-learning model.
Purpose of the Study
The purpose of the study was to analyze apprentice learner perception of eLearning
components in the Northeast Wisconsin construction electrician apprenticeship. Recent
apprenticeship completers, as well as current active apprentices, provided input in regards to
PRI. Findings and recommendations will benefit students and educational institutions by
aligning apprentice content with the travel demands of employers in the region in regards to
apprentice learner success in the modified apprentice-learning environment. The goal of the
project was to gauge skilled workers desire to continue their education in the apprenticeship
career paths.
Assumptions of the Study
1. The implementation of the web-enhanced program would continue throughout the
duration of the study.
2. CEA program would continue to utilize the block-learning schedule at all levels.
12
3. Apprentice self-efficacy remains consistent throughout the survey participants.
Definition of Terms
This study uses the following terms and definitions:
Blackboard. Blackboard (Bb) is a learning management system that allows faculty to
add resources for students to access online. Power point, Captivate, video, audio, animation, and
other applications are created outside of Blackboard and added into Blackboard courses for
students to enhance teaching and learning efforts.
eLearning. Learning conducted via electronic media, typically on the internet
Indenture. Individuals involved in the apprentice training setting hesitantly use this term,
which has a negative connotation. The modern day usage is not consistent with the current
application or usage of the word in apprentice programs. Its original intent was to describe the
folded and torn contract that was the legal document binding the worker to their employer until
fulfilling the terms of the contract. The local magistrate in company with the employer presided
over the production of this indented artifact. Upon review of the contractual language and
artifacts, the magistrate would release the apprentice from their indenture.
On the job training (OJT).The educational component of the apprentice experience that
happens outside of the school. This training happens under the watchful eye of a skill trades
worker, work performed is consistent with the apprentice employment agreement.
Paid related instruction (PRI). The educational component of the apprentice experience
that happens is a select district of the WTCS. This training happens under the watchful eye of an
apprenticeship instructor employed by the college to facilitate the WTCS state trade curriculum.
The employer pays the apprentice his hourly wage for the time spent in the PRI.
Unpaid related instruction (UPR). The educational component of the apprenticeship
13
experience that happens either in industry or at the college that is not compensated. The
employer may choose to pay the fees for the apprentice, however; the employer is not required to
pay the expense.
Limitations of the Study
1. The study did not include a sample of all the apprentices in the participating schools
in Northeast Wisconsin. The results were limited to the opinions and responses from
apprentice learners active and attending Fox Valley Technical College.
2. The study was a one-time survey of a five-year training experience. This one-time
event likely created a regional snap-shot that may or may not be consistent with an
economic recovery that could shift the workforce back to a localized work PRI
setting.
3. Participants who are paid to attend their training experience had to volunteer to
complete the study. The researcher was not able to identify real or perceived bias in
regards to how compensation affected results.
14
Chapter II: Literature Review
In 2009, Northeast Wisconsin apprentice training providers adopted a web-enhanced
block-learning model within the construction electricity training program. The acceptance and
engagement of the eLearning components appears to vary among the apprentices. To date, there
has been no evaluation of the learners’ acceptance and perception of the web-enhanced block-
learning model. This chapter includes a literature review of apprenticeship training and models
of adult participative behavior in post-secondary education. Past and present traditional models
of apprenticeship training are explored and compared with elements of participant motivation to
overcome real or perceived barriers in construction electrician apprenticeship programs.
Research explored the persistence in apprenticeship training programs leading to satisfactory
completion. Research also identified program modifications from traditional, instructor-led,
classroom-centric instructional modes, to asynchronous delivery methods. A review of existing
models and theories of participative learning behavior enabled better analysis of learner
perception and engagement in web-based learning components in the construction electrician
apprenticeship program.
Traditional Models of Apprenticeship Training
Historically, the traditional apprenticeship learning environment admits new recruits
directly into the work environment, and assigns them a skilled craft worker, or expert, to
supervise and support their performance on the job (Gal & Nachmias, 2011). Gal and Nachmias
(2011) continue to outline this employment period as the initial acquisition of relevant skills and
knowledge. They state, “Once skills were mastered this support would gradually be reduced up
to the point when the apprentice would be fully independent [journey level employee, master of
the trade, qualified to hand off job skills to the next hire]” (Gal & Nachmias, 2011, p. 26).
15
In construction electricity, worker transition to independence follows a consistent training
strategy of combining 10,000 hours of supervised on the job training (OJT) in a variety of work
settings, with 732 hours of paid related instruction (PRI) occurring in a WTCS School. Changes
to an apprenticeship program are not new. Burt Harding, bureau of apprenticeship standards
(BAS) representative, states, “Training strategies for apprentice training programs have
constantly evolved primarily to meet the needs of employer sponsors” (personal communication,
Dec 5, 2013). The contract agreement for a typical workweek in the 1980s consisted of 40 hours
of supervised OJT on the day shift, with another four hours of PRI at night in a WTCS school
(Department of Workforce Development, n.d.). The Aspen Workforce Strategies Initiative
(WSI) reports training and work arrangements such as this prohibited many workers from being
able to secure appropriate day care, causing a large percentage of apprentices to drop out of their
respective training programs, never accomplishing the goal of Journey level worker. Large
worker turnover in workforce development is detrimental to contractor success (Helmer &
Altstadt, 2013). To address the turnover loss, “contractors in the early1990s modified the typical
apprentice contract or work arrangement” (B. Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
The OJT became a 36-hour workweek, with four PRI training hours happening on the day shift.
The change made arranging day care easier and made personal and life struggles of the
apprentice tolerable. This model increased worker retention and made earning while learning a
viable career path (Helmer & Altstadt, 2013).
The training model for the late 1990s had again been modified at the request of the
employers. The biweekly training arrangement had fixed the day care and schedule issues of the
past, but the new travel requirements of today’s employers had the nonresident apprentice
learners traveling to campus four times per month, scheduling the learner to an out-of-district job
16
became cost prohibitive to the company. In the early 2000s, to meet demands of industry,
Wisconsin modified the model of apprenticeship to an 8-hour PRI training day every other week.
The resulting work schedule was “40 hours of work on the ‘A’ week, 32 hours of work on the
‘B’ week plus an 8-hour training day” (B.Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
Worker availablity was doubled and travel expenses reduced. Construction companies liked the
new format; it enabled the apprentice learners to be available for nomadic work. Financially,
apprentice learners liked the new schedule as well; the ability to stay on the job for longer
segments of time meant more money and less travel benefiting both the apprentices and
employers (Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
A 2006 study of the motivational climate of construction apprentices defined motivation
as a “set of independent and dependent relationships that explain the direction amplitude, and
persistence of an individual’s behavior, holding constant the effects of aptitude, skills,
understanding of a task and the constraints of operating in the work environment” (Uwakweh,
2006). Uwakweh’s (2006) survey of motivational climate among construction apprentices in the
Midwest indicated a need for an improved motivational climate for the apprentices “to gauge
what energizes, sustains, and directs behavior” (p. 531). Extended travel, enabled by the latest
apprentice training program model, had put a strain on the family-orientated apprentices. Aspen
WSI (2013) offered several recommendations for consideration in improving learner motivation
in apprenticeship training programs recommendations pertinent to this project are as follows:
Apprenticeship programs should experiment with flexible training options.
Apprenticeship programs and industry leaders should increase oversight of OJT and
job rotations.
Apprenticeship programs and industry stakeholders should develop more mentoring
17
projects.
The WSI report emphasized apprentice completion; the relevance to the researchers’
effort is the suggestion of flexible classroom options to increase motivation and reduce barriers
to academic content. Apprentice learners are adults employed and often have family
responsibilities. “New classroom training options that ease the challenge of working and going
to school at the same time should be considered” to help alleviate the stress of conflicting work
as well as school life (Helmer & Altstadt, 2013, p. 10). O’Malley and McCraw researched
flexible options such as: closed circuit television, interactive television, and correspondence
courses. These courses enabled learning from outside the classroom. In a simulated lecture
environment, lessons could be captured then broadcast later at a convenient time for non-resident
learners. These non-resident learners were the first users of distance learning through the use of
closed circuit television. The research revealed, these methods are not perceived as providing the
same learning impact as the lecture method (O'Malley & McCraw, 1999).
The National Bureau of Economic Research identified December 2007 as the beginning
of a national recession. It was identified as “the peak month, after determining that the
subsequent decline in economic activity was large enough to qualify as a recession” (National
Bureau of Economic Research, 2010, p. 1). Employers began to reduce workforce numbers due
to the inherent delay caused by project funding and design from preceding fiscal budgets (W.
Belanger, personal communication, Nov 19, 2013).
Labor costs contribute 10-50% of total construction project cost depending on the type of
project. In an effort to remain competitive, employers look for ways to reduce cost. Often the
human element is the easiest expense to reduce. Apprentice numbers have been falling steadily
as the economic downturn continues. Table 1 identifies the number of active construction
18
electrician contracts in Wisconsin by year.
Table 1
Total number of active construction electrician contracts
Calendar Year (CY) Total # of Active Contracts in CY
2001 2,252
2002 2,149
2003 2,011
2004 1,862
2005 1,774
2006 1,652
2007 1,599
2008 1,550
2009 1,438
2010 1,300
2011 1,219
2012 1,099
2013 (as of 11/03/13) 1,202
Forward thinking contractors also focus on increasing the skills of their workers while
reducing the cost of training (Russell, 1999). Construction contractors in the present economy
are operating in larger geographical areas to keep their workers employed; the necessary travel is
placing the apprentices farther from the classroom. The researcher contacted the Wisconsin BAS
for input on the new training paradigm taking shape in Wisconsin apprenticeship programs.
Bureau representative Burt Harding stated, “How to train these mobilized construction workers
19
to perform their skilled craftwork in remote locations is under review again” (B. Harding,
personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
Adult Learning in Post-Secondary Education (apprenticeships)
Much of the literature identified apprentice learners as “adult learners.” The Wisconsin
DWD data on active apprentices reports the average age of apprentices in Wisconsin as 24.8
years of age (Department of Workforce Development, n.d.). Table 2 provides a multi-year visual
of age at the time of registration.
Table 2
Average age at registration of construction electricians in Wisconsin
Calendar Year Average age at registration
2001 24.8
2002 24.5
2003 24.3
2004 24.3
2005 24.1
2006 24.2
2007 24.1
2008 24.2
2009 24.4
2010 24.5
2011 24.7
2012 24.8
2013 (as of 11/03/13) 25.1
20
In the national data set WSI reports, the median age was 26 for individuals entering into
apprenticeship agreements initiated between 2006 and 2007, and 19 percent were age 35 or older
(Helmer & Altstadt, 2013). Malcolm Knowles, expert in the field of adult education, developed
the most widely accepted definition of adult learners. Knowles’ social definition states, [when]
an individual begins to perform adult roles such as full-time worker, citizen, spouse, and parent
(Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 2011). Malcolm Knowles identified adult learners by the
following four principles:
Adult learners are involved in the planning and evaluation of their instruction.
Adult learners learn from experience.
Adult learners are most interested in learning content that has immediate relevance
and impact to their job or personal life.
Adult learning is problem-centered rather than content-orientated.
Similarly the DWD identifies contracted apprenticeship learners by the following four
principles (Department of Workforce Development, n.d.) :
“Under contract to the state of Wisconsin for (PRI) (instruction);
“Sponsored in employment for (OJT) (experience);
“Required (UPR) in supporting areas of interest (interest);
“Required (problem centered) credentialing at the end of training: (pp 2-3).
For the purpose of this research, adult principles are synonymous with the apprentice
principles. (See Table 3) These learning principles; prior education conditions, characteristics of
students, and perceived characteristics of eLearning, shape the adult learning paradigm
(O'Malley & McCraw, 1999).
21
Table 3
Comparison of social definition of adult learner and apprentice
Adult learner (Knowles) Apprentice learner(DWD)
Adult learners are involved in the
planning and evaluation of their
instruction
Under contract to the state of
Wisconsin for PRI (instruction)
Adult learners learn from experience Sponsored in employment for OJT
(experience)
Adult learners are most interested in
learning subjects that have immediate
relevance and impact to their job or
personal life
Required UPR in supporting areas
of interest (interest)
Adult learning is problem-centered
rather than content-orientated
Required (problem centered)
credentialing at the end of training
With the adult learners engaged in apprenticeship wanting to be available for their
families, and the contractor need for a mobile workforce, the literature revealed a major theme of
migration towards a modern apprenticeship training method.
eLearning
An option to assure that adult workers who are involved in training can work on the
remote location jobs is to use eLearning. Little (2011) found eLearning to be a “significant
factor for creating knowledge workers, helping companies maintain competitive advantage, and
allowing organizations to operate more efficiently by increasing delivery options for training” (p.
22
19). Apprentice learners are trained. These adult apprentices are struggling with life balance in
their adult role; in addition, the work is farther away from their families. When learning new
material or skills a slow absorption into long term memory is best, eLearning can overload
working memory quickly, overloading the learner’s ability to retain needed skill (Tyler-Smith,
2006). Tyler-Smith (2006) continues stating new material is processed in working memory then
progressively added to the learners’ knowledge structure. Learners new to eLearning are faced
with multiple challenges such as:
Utilizing technology for professional purpose
New learner management system or course website
New course content
Becoming an eLearner
To succeed as an eLearner, adult learners must manage this transition to eLearning without
freezing up or becoming anxious (Tyler-Smith, 2006).
The natural propensity to learn is a form of motivation. For eLearning to be effective in
training adult learners, it is important for learners to absorb the proposed learning techniques in
manageable quantities. A common component for motivation in adult learning is acceptance and
engagement of the instructional content (Harris, Bolander, Lebrun, Docq, & Bouvy, 2004).
Apprentice learners have control over their respective OJT experiences; they don’t always have
control over the PRI of instructional content. Harris et al. (2004) defined academic engagement
as; engaging in the activities of a course program with thoroughness and seriousness,
furthermore, having autonomy over one’s actions and implied control in regards indicates an
internal locus of control (Harris et al., 2004). The eLearning experience is new to
apprenticeship.
23
Harding stated, “eLearning for the 2010’s has been introduced to the service, construction
and industrial trades on an as needed basis” (B. Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
The expense of worker travel is the primary element that initiates the analysis of wether or not
applying eLearning aspects to an apprenticeship program is jsutified. In the case of the
Wisconsin wastewater treatment apprentices, on the job work experiences are very lab and
process intensive. Workers are trained to the expert level right on the job. eLearning
components became a very complementary accessory in the uptake of Science, Technology,
Education, and Mathematical (STEM) skills of the apprentice workers. In an interview with Burt
Harding of the DWD in regards to usage of eLearning in apprenticeship, Harding shared the
waste water treatment apprentices at Moraine Park Technical College:
Wastewater treatment students attend to their STEM studies via online learning
environments, they have such unique training needs as each municipality has unique
water service needs. The apprentices’ PRI is mostly academic training in regards to
codes and standards involving water standards. Truck driving is another example; driver
apprentices only come to school for educational aspect. New technology in
transportation science is introduce in simulators and computer based training modules in
the class room, supervised by expert instructors; at the conclusion of the training period
the apprentices go back out into the field and continue the master apprentice arrangement
of the OJT. (B. Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013)
Additional areas for recently deployed eLearning in Wisconsin Apprenticeship are:
Heavy equipment operators
Carpenters (both millwright and construction)
Roofers
24
Electricians (construction)
Laborers (construction)
These trades have implemented or adopted some form of eLearning in their respective
programs to reduce expense and attempt to increase retention in apprentices.
Apprentice programs put up learning modules in Blackboard or the host college learning
management systems (LMS) utilizing computer based training (CBT) modules for
learners to participate in as home work. Learners then come to the WTCS College for lab
work and instructor led assessment (B. Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013).
Cost of Training
A successful employer apprentice relationship is dependent on a fiscal balance of
proportion. The apprentice employee accepts a decreased wage calculated from the average
wage of skilled trades-workers doing the same job (Department of Workforce Development,
n.d.; Helmer & Altstadt, 2013). WSI (2013) reports the cost of training, wages, and benefits for
an apprentice in a four to five year program can easily reach $200,000 or more. Employee
wages, travel, lodging, books and tuition expenses are costs burdened to the employer. The WSI
report identifies some of the benefits of the training arrangement.
Of course, apprentices’ labor is not without value, and their work contributions create
returns for the employer. In addition, as apprentices’ skills increase, their ability to do a
wider range of work on the jobsite, as well as be more productive and efficient, provides
employers with an increasing return on their investment. (Helmer & Altstadt, 2013, p. 12)
The WSI report authors expose the high price employers commit to when training an apprentice;
the investment in talent supports experimentation with flexible training options (Helmer &
Altstadt, 2013).
25
A training method introduced in the early 2000s was patterned after a Western
European apprenticeship model (B.Harding, personal communication, Dec 5, 2013). The block
model provides a learning environment where:
the learner attends class for multiple days in a row;
training is affordable to the contractor with reduced travel expense;
the workload is attractive to the college due to a more steady predictable work load
for the instructor; and
the offering is desirable to the apprentice providing a predictable repetitive trip home
from the remote jobsite.
The WSI report identified experimenting with flexible training options as one of the
considerations of a new classroom option. Easing the challenges of working full time and raising
a family has employer benefits as well, learners feel motivated and valued by supportive work
environments. The WSI report also identified recognizing employer commitment as one of the
motivators for apprenticeship completion (Helmer & Altstadt, 2013).
Summary
The literature provides sufficient data on the acceptance and apprehension of adult
learners towards the learning management systems deployed in post-secondary education. There
is however, a lack of literature in the perception of apprenticeship specific users engaged in
eLearning. Studies of motivation and persistence as they relate directly to eLearning
management systems in apprenticeship are also lacking. Therefore, collecting additional
information from a survey of both voluntary and involuntary participants in apprentice eLearning
may give insight to the effectiveness in construction apprenticeship training programs.
26
Chapter III: Methodology
Fox Valley Technical College is the first technical college in Wisconsin to offer a block
scheduled, web-enhanced training experience. There is no data for a program of this type. The
purpose of the research was to analyze apprentice acceptance and engagement of the eLearning
components in the Northeast Wisconsin construction electrician apprenticeship. The researcher
developed a survey to collect data in the construction electrician apprenticeship program from
both voluntary and involuntary participants enrolled in the web-enhanced offering. Determining
apprentice inclination to participate in web-enhanced apprenticeship training is the intent of the
study. This chapter includes subject selection and description, instrumentation, data collection
procedures, data analysis, and limitations.
Subject Selection and Description
The sample and population were limited to construction electrician apprentices contracted
between 2007 and 2013 in the Northeast Wisconsin local area apprenticeship committee.
Apprentice participants reporting to this committee represent 35% of the total Wisconsin
construction apprentice learner population. The researcher used a non-probability convenience
sampling, a technique whereby not all members of a population have an equal chance to
participate. He utilized this type of sampling as the participants were readily available to the
researcher. All available apprentices studying in the Fox Valley Technical College (FVTC)
district received the survey. Participation in the survey was on a voluntary basis. The students
being surveyed were all adult apprentice learners with prior higher education and advanced
professional experience in the construction electricity career. The majority of the apprentice
learners attended the block scheduled program at the request of their training sponsor. These
apprentice learners interacted with a minimum of two, not to exceed three, different
27
apprenticeship instructors. The educational experience while enrolled is a combination of online
academic learning combined with hands-on lab based learning in face-to-face learning scheduled
on campus three times per semester. The online components are facilitated in a LMS called
Blackboard (Bb). Bb is available 24 hours per day, seven days a week with several scheduled
due dates for various assigned material. The apprentices progress through the material as a
cohort group. Apprentice learners indentured in the construction electricity trade benefit from
cooperative learning experiences where learners employed at different employers collectively
share OJT learning experiences as they relate to the PRI training materials.
Instrumentation
To gain a better understanding of the apprentice learners’ perceptions of the eLearning
components, the research included a 26-statement survey based on a review of existing literature
on perception of eLearning in adult learners. The researcher used Qualtrics survey software
featuring a six point Likert scale to develop the motivation and persistence in eLearning survey.
The researcher selected the six point Likert scale to collect the data in an effort to gauge the
participants attitudes and feelings in relation to respondents individual training situations. Two
open-ended questions were provided to allow respondents to expand on other aspects of
eLearning. The research survey aligned with the student perception model, where prior
education conditions, characteristics of students, and perceived characteristics of eLearning,
shape the learning paradigm (O'Malley & McCraw, 1999). For the purpose of this study the
survey instrument specifically was aligned with the Bb system utilized at FVTC. Web-
enhanced, eLearning and Bb are considered synonymous with on-line learning and distance
learning.
28
Figure 3. The O’Malley and McCraw student perception model.
Additional survey questions mimicked Tagoe’s review of several technology acceptance models;
learner belief influences attitude, which in turn, lead to learner intention to apply or use and
finally actual usage behaviors (Tagoe, 2012).
Demographic questions identified participation in different program models to the
extent of voluntary or mandatory participation in respondents’ apprenticeship training
methodologies.
Data Collection Procedures
The FVTC institutional review board (IRB), in agreement with UW-Stout IRB, approved
the survey instrument. Participants for the survey received a description of the research, a
consent form, and a link to access to an anonymous online survey and explained the survey
would take approximately five minutes to complete via email. The researcher advised apprentice
learners that their participation in this study was voluntary and their response was anonymous
and confidential. The results of the survey have no link to the respondent.
Data Analysis
Quantitative analysis of the survey results consisted of a Likert scale technique to score
the respondents statements. The researcher individually tabulated each response, then all
statements summed to get representation of the student’s attitude or perception. The scoring goes
29
up based on higher points for positive response.
Qualitative analysis techniques evaluated the open-ended questions. The researcher
sorted through the open-ended question responses and identified themes of support or dissent in
regards to Learning Management Systems (LMS) or Blackboard learning components.
Limitations
1) The survey is only an instrument to identify the needs of a specific group of
apprentice learners.
2) Timeliness of the intended respondents training schedules limited the consistent
uniform access to the survey instrument. Access to the survey was internet only to
participants. Not all participants had access to the internet while travelling for work.
3) The study surveyed learners in the northeast Wisconsin CEA, therefore results cannot
be generalized to other programs.
30
Chapter IV: Results
This chapter provides the results of the electronic research study sent to current students
in the CEA program. The survey intent was to gauge the perception of eLearning components
deployed in 2009. In Northeast Wisconsin apprentice training providers adopted a web-
enhanced block-learning model within the construction electricity training program. The
acceptance and engagement of the eLearning components implemented in a Blackboard based
LMS appears to vary among apprentices in Northeast Wisconsin. The research study provides
information pertaining to the study population and important issues for indentured apprentices in
the web-enhanced program.
Participants
Ninety apprentice learners received the link to an electronic survey. There was an
introduction letter attached to an email message describing the research. The research consisted
of 24 quantitative questions and two qualitative questions. There were 80 attempts at the survey
with one participant not completing the survey. The 79 participants that completed the survey
resulted in an 88% response rate.
Figure 4. Overview of participants in survey instrument.
31
Research Questions
The objective of the study was to examine student perception of the Blackboard elements.
The survey comprised of five subsets of questions focused towards important issues for
apprentices in the web enhanced Blackboard components.
The subsets of questions for this research tool were aligned with five parent themes:
1. What are the participant demographics?
2. What is student perception of computer usage in personal and professional roles?
3. What previous distance or online user ability does the participant possess?
4. Does the apprentice learner instructional preference correlate with their personal
learning preference?
5. What technology do apprentice learners want or appreciate in the classroom?
The researcher developed groups of several questions to address the five themes. The
theme of questions one through three, was to establish the situational attributes of the
participants. The theme of question four was to establish the dispositional attributes of the
participants. The final, or fifth, theme was a set of questions to establish the institutional
attributes of the participants.
Item Analysis
The first question established whether or not the apprentice was a required participant of
newly implemented Blackboard training components which is the purpose of this research
project. A no answer to question one routed the survey participant to the end of the instrument.
Nineteen survey respondents did not have Blackboard elements as part of their training
experience.
32
Participant Demographics
The first theme represented in the study, “What are the participant demographics?”.
correlated to survey questions two through seven, these questions collected demographic
information in regards to: employment, age, academic credit beyond grade 12 as well as
ownership and usage of computer technology. This set of questions determined 98% of
respondents were employed in the construction electrician trade with an average age of 26. Of
the continuing survey participants the majority (54%) of respondents (n=31) had pursued some
college credit beyond high school. The balance of these respondents had accumulated 11-20
credits beyond high school with 26% (n=14) compiling in excess of 31 credits. Establishing that
apprenticeship learners in Northeast Wisconsin are technologically prepared to embrace new
training models in apprenticeship delivery, situational barriers of not having a computer or not
having access to the internet are effectively eliminated.
Perception of Computer Usage
With computer based Blackboard components required in the new apprenticeship model,
the second theme represented, “What is student perception of computer usage in personal and
professional roles?”, a set of questions to identify apprentice learner’s logistical application,
computer product preference, and computer experience; including internet usage.
1. Do you own a computer?
2. Type of computer?
3. Experience with computers?
4. Internet Usage?
5. Percentage of internet usage, personal or professional?
It was determined that 100% of continuing survey respondents reported owning a
33
computer. Surprisingly 20% of respondents (n=11) considered a smart-phone a computer.
Respondents reported computer usage in excess of five years with 74% reported accessing the
internet several times daily for both personal and professional purposes (62% personal or social,
and 37% professional or academic). Respondents reported subscribed internet speed of two
megabits per second or higher.
Previous User Ability
The third theme, “What previous distance or online learner ability does the participant
possess?” of this study represented what the user’s previous ability with the program-required
computer technology. Indicators derived from questions 11, 13, and 14 provided the basis to
declare above average computer skill of the survey respondent. Survey results support computer
skills that are 70% of the ability of a computer expert.
6. Current status of computer skill?
7. Speed of subscribe internet access?
8. Previous web based experience: personal?
9. Previous web based experience: professional?
The survey demonstrated approximately 66% of apprentice learners had engaged in some form
of a web based Learning management system (n=39) for either a personal or professional
purpose.
Prior usage of internet for personal or non-apprenticeship purpose:
College Classes (outside of apprenticeship)
Personal hobbies (hunter safety, boater safety, ATV safety)
CPR First Aid
Various personal interest forums
34
Personal billing
Racing sanctioning bodies (various motorsports)
Youth clubs
Prior usage of internet for professional purpose:
Solar photovoltaic courses
Communicating with employer
Communicating with co workers
Associates degree, pursuit of Bachelor degree
OSHA training
National electrical code training
Instructional Preference
The fourth theme, “Does the apprentice-learners instructional preference correlate with
their personal learning preference?” in this study represented, what does the learner want in the
training program. Indicators derived from questions 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 aligned with the
perception of learning and earning a grade.
Previous sections of the survey addressed instrument elements of student, computer
competence, internet accessibility, and general acceptance of computer technology. In this
section of the survey questions of instructional preference are presented:
10. Web learning is more effective?
11. With traditional and web-enhanced I learn better?
12. Prefer Blackboard elements to traditional?
13. I can learn the same amount in a Blackboard supported course?
14. Can earn the same grade in a Blackboard supported course?
35
Lack of ability with technology and poorly designed training experiences can impact learner
desire to participate. Sub-question set or theme number four juxtaposes perceived learning with
learning effectiveness. Sixty-two percent of respondents (n=38) disagreed with a statement that
“web-enhanced course work is more effective than traditional apprenticeship course work.”
Only 38% of learners (n=18) somewhat agreed they could learn better in web-enhanced
coursework as compared to traditional training methodologies (question 16). When the question
of whether the learner preferred Blackboard courses to traditional course was presented (question
17), 41% (n=23) disagreed or strongly disagreed, while 26% agreed (n=14) with one learner
strongly agreeing. A strong inclination to indifference was evident with 28% of the learners
neither agreeing nor disagreeing (n=16) see Table 4.
36
Table 4
In a course with both web enhanced and traditional methodologies, I learn better through the
web enhance portion.
# of responses Mean Standard Deviation Strongly Agree Somewhat Agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree
3 17 24 10
Total 54 2.64 1.26
Completing the theme of learner’s dispositional preference was a question about the
perception of the amount possible to learn in Blackboard courses compared to traditional
apprenticeship courses. Fifty-three percent of the response either disagreed or strongly disagreed
with the amount possible to learn in Blackboard supported apprenticeship training course. Table
5 demonstrates the overall perception of the apprentice learner instructional preference does not
correlate with their personal learning preference.
Table 5
I prefer Blackboard supported courses to traditional courses.
# of responses Mean Standard Deviation Strongly Agree Agree Neither Agree or Disagree Disagree Strongly Disagree
1 14 16 17 6
Total 54 2.76 1.03
Overall, this section of the survey supported the learners dispositional attributes of Blackboard
training elements is not appealing to apprentice learners. Apprentice learners are using computer
technology daily both personally and professionally. The apprentice learners are using LMS
37
systems personally and professionally. The responses to this section of the survey did not
significantly support apprentice preference towards Blackboard elements in their career training.
Classroom Technology Preference
The last theme of this study identified: “What technology do apprentice learners want or
appreciate in the classroom?” Learners in the Blackboard supported courses clearly did not
support the LMS as a desirable learning environment. The survey asked questions to determine if
the mode of instruction or the LMS system itself lacks support.
20. Is learning to use Blackboard easy?
21. It is easy to become skillful at using Backboard?
22. Is Blackboard user friendly?
23. Is Blackboard a good format for organizing class material?
24. Has previous experience in on-line or web-enhanced environments prepared me for
eLearning?
When asked questions specific to the application and operation of Blackboard,
apprentice learners were in agreement that is easy to learn to use; 88% agreed or strongly agreed
(n=49). Seventy-five percent positively supported the ability of Blackboard training elements to
promote skill development (n=42). Eighty-five percent of the respondents agreed or strongly
agreed (n=48) that Blackboard is a good format for organizing class materials Question 24 asked
the respondents if previous on-line or web enhanced environments had prepared them for
eLearning in the apprenticeship courses and 70% (n=39) agreed or strongly agreed.
The last component of this sub-question asked the respondents if they participate in the web
enhanced models of apprenticeship learning as a condition of their contract. The input
significantly supports 71% contract mandated participation in the Blackboard elements (n=40).
38
Ninety-one percent (n=54) of survey respondents are satisfied or very satisfied with the paid
related training at FVTC.
Table 6
How satisfied are you with the paid-related instruction received at FVTC?
# of responses Mean Standard Deviation Very satisfied Satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
18 33 3
Total 54 4.24 .64
Summary
The research indicates apprentice learners are able to use computer technology to a
competent level. The apprentice learners are able to combine computing technology with
applicable internet access to accomplish both personal and professional tasks at advanced levels.
Students have a negative belief in regards to: effectiveness of, amount learned in, and ability to
earn a satisfactory grade in an eLearning based apprenticeship training model.
Learners prefer a Blackboard supported learning environment. Students report; the Bb
product is easy to use, promotes skill development, is user friendly, and the format is good for
organizing class materials. Students reported participation in the Bb supported web-enhanced
learning model as a required element in their paid related instruction.
39
Chapter V: Discussion
WTCS apprenticeship programs provide valuable training programs for contractors and
manufactures in the state of Wisconsin. Since 1911, employed workers have attended training
experiences shaped in unison by three active partners; department of workforce development,
bureau of apprenticeship standards, and their company sponsor. Work-based learning with
instructor-led training is a well-documented training model; recent change in construction
electricity apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin provided an opportunity to review the
apprenticeship program.
Purpose and Objectives
The primary purpose of this study was to analyze student perceptions of a web enhanced
apprenticeship model implemented into the construction electricity apprenticeship. In 2009,
Northeast Wisconsin apprentice training providers adopted a web-enhanced, block learning
model within the construction electricity apprentice training program in Northeast Wisconsin.
The acceptance and engagement of the apprentice eLearning components appears to vary among
the apprentices. The objective of the study sought to examine student perception of the
eLearning elements deployed in Northeast Wisconsin.
Data Collection
An electronic invite (Appendix A) was sent to all construction apprentice electrician
apprentices attending their PRI at FVTC. The invite requested completion of an electronic
survey (Appendix D). Also included was a statement of implied consent (Appendix B)
indicating the survey tool met the FVTC and UW Stout IRB protocol (Appendix C). Survey
questions related to themes of:
Apprentice computing product preference
40
Perception and application of technology for personal and professional purpose
Would user ability inhibit participation in web-enhanced training?
Does learner instructional preference correlate with their personal learning
preference?
What technology do apprentice learners want or appreciate in the classroom?
These themes corresponded to actionable objectives:
Identify the participants prior educational experiences
Identify apprentice engagement for computer preference
Determine learner generational characteristics
Determine learner instructional preference
Identify classroom technology preference for apprentice learners
Limitations of the Study
1. The study did not include a sample of all the apprentices in the participating schools
in Northeast Wisconsin. The results were limited to the opinions and responses from
participants’ active and attending Fox Valley Technical College.
2. The study was a one-time survey of a five-year training experience. This one-time
event likely created a regional snap shot that may or may not be consistent with an
economic recovery that could shift the workforce back to a localized work PRI
setting.
3. The study required volunteer participants who receive pay to attend their training
experience. The researcher was not able to identify real or perceived bias in regards
to how compensation affected results.
41
Although there are limitations due to no other program offering a web-enhanced
eLearning construction electrician apprenticeship program. The results of this research effort
will provide future data for implementation of new programs in addition to validating the current
web-enhanced apprenticeship offered.
Conclusions
Training models in CEA continually evolve. The current apprentice training experience
utilized in FVTC is a block-scheduled apprenticeship model. The construction contractors in
Northeast Wisconsin liked the model as it reduced travel. In an effort to increase retention and
further reduce training cost, trainers designed a web-enhanced training experience. The
published literature on eLearning suggests that adult learners prefer online learning. Contractors
saw potential to deploy the eLearning elements and reduce cost for travel and per diem for
apprentice learners. The Blackboard enhanced training had the potential to meet the needs of
both learners and contractors alike.
Sometimes the technology or the inability to utilize the computing technology is the
barrier to learning. The results of the study identified the computing demographic of these non-
traditional kinesthetic learners. The researcher evaluated the apprentice learner’s logistical usage
of the internet and varying experience levels. Indicators such as the computing product they
employed to use the internet for personal and professional tasks provided insight to the learner’s
situational ability to navigate the web. Apprentices reported being on the internet several times
per day. Apprentice learners have five or more years of consistent computer use. The research
project revealed, and learner’s survey input supported, that apprentices had the computer and the
ability to navigate the internet to a proficient level. The research could not support the fact that
computer use and internet access are situational barriers.
42
Apprentice learners, like adult learners, indicated that involvement in, and planning of,
the learning experience is important. Furthermore, Blackboard excelled at providing this desired
structure. Knowledge that provides immediate relevance and positive impact to their job or
personal life was most interesting to the adult apprentices. Learners perceived Blackboard
components enable the learner to earn the same grade. However, learners consider the
technology not as effective as the traditional methodology in the area of amount learned. Survey
respondents simply did not prefer to be trained in a web enhanced learning environment.
In summary, the survey results significantly supported overall satisfaction with the
FVTC apprenticeship-training program, including the Blackboard supported structure and
organization of the apprenticeship program. The preferred training is instructor-led traditional
synchronous instruction. Research did not support the asynchronous deliver of training content
via Blackboard as a preferred element for training.
Recommendations
This study supports the following recommendations:
1. Continue to utilize Bb elements in the CEA training program in the Northeast
region of WTCS. A variety of training techniques and training methodology will
benefit the contractors and adult apprentice learners.
2. Instructors and program directors should utilize accepted organizational
development strategy to introduce new apprenticeship training modality, and
account for learner interactions and coursework techniques shall ensure all
students learning styles.
3. More questions that are open-ended could be included into the survey instrument
to enable respondents to communicate their individual training preferences. A
43
second tier of questioning to expand on each of the research objectives could also
be included. Example: “In what ways did your employer prepare you for
participation in the Blackboard elements of the apprenticeship training?”, and
“What elements of the apprenticeship training could be applied directly to the
OJT learning experience?”
This research project provided a good basis to continue research in the area of CEA
completion rates. Comparing traditional apprentice learner’s state credentialing pass/fail rates
against web-enhance block-scheduled pass fail rates would yield usable data in regards to
training effectiveness.
44
References
Christman, S. (2012, September). Preparing for success through apprenticeship. Technology
and engineering teach, 22-28.
Department of Workforce Development. (n.d.). Apprenticeship in Wisconsin: Fullfilling the
needs of industry. Madison, WI: Department of Workforce Development.
Dierdorff, E. C., & Surface, E. A. (2008). Asssessing training needs: Do work experience and
capacity matter? Human performance, 28-48.
Gal, E., & Nachmias, R. (2011, September). Online learning and performance support in
organizational environments using performance support platforms. Performance
Improvement, 25-32.
Harris, R., Bolander, K., Lebrun, M., Docq, F., & Bouvy, M. (2004, April). Linking performance
of control and signs of engagement in the process and content of collaboarative
eLearning. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004
/proceedings/symposia/symposium10/harris_et_al.htm
Helmer, M., & Altstadt, D. (2013). Apprenticeship completion and cancellation in the buildinig
trades.Washington, D.C: Aspen Institute.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The Adult Learner. Burlington, MA:
Butterworth - Heinemann.
Lerman, R. I. (2013). Employer-led training in the United States: Lessons form the OECD.
Washington, D.C: American University and Urban Institute.
Lerman, R. I., Eyster, L., & Chambers, K. (2009). The benefits and challenges of registered
Apprenticeship. Washington, D.C: The Urban Institute.
45
Little, b. (2011, March). The rising popularity of mobile learning southern Europe. eLearn
Magazine, 19-20.
Manocheri, N., & Sharif, K. (2010). A Model-Based Investigation of Learner Attitude towards
Recently Introduced Classroom Technology. Journal of Information Technology
Education, 9, 31-52.
O'Malley, J., & McCraw, H. (1999). Students Perceptions of distance learning, online learning
and the traditional classroom. Carrollton, GA: State University of West Georgia.
Research, N. B. (2010, April 13). Determination of the December 2007 peak in economic
activity. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/dec2008.pdf
Richard, D. (2012). The Richard review of apprenticeships. London: School of Start Ups.
Russell, J. S. (1999). The significance and value of labor. Journal of management and
engineering, 3.
Tagoe, M. (2012). Students' perceptions on incorporating e-learning into teaching and learning at
the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development using
information and Communication Technology 8(1), 91-103.
Tyler-Smith, K. (2006). Early attrition among first time elearners. Journal of Online Learning
and Teaching. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no2/tyler-smith.htm
Uwakweh, B. O. (2006, May). Motivation Climate of Construction Apprentice. Journal of
construction engineering and management, 525-532.
Walker, G. S. (2013, November 14th). Governor. (T. Evenson, Interviewer)
Wisconsin Technical College System. (2012). 2009-10 apprenticeship completer report.
Retrieved from http://www.wtcsystem.edu/reports/data/apprentice/pdf/complete
_report_2008_09.pdf
46
Appendix A: Survey Invite Letter
University of Wisconsin – Stout Menomonie, WI 54751
March 19, 2014
Dear: (apprentice learner)
You are invited to participate in this study about perception of eLearning in construction
electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin. I am inviting you to participate in this research study because you are enrolled in the construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin.
This research is part of a thesis project by Michael Merbach, MS in Training and Human Resource Development student at UW-Stout. This study involves the completion of a brief survey about your student experiences while participating in the eLearning components of your training program. It will take approximately 20 minutes to complete.
The purpose of this study is to improve the apprenticeship program as well as validate the program to use as a guide for future implementation of other programs. This survey is being sent to approximately 40 students. I would greatly appreciate your cooperation in completing the survey. Completing the survey is voluntary, and your responses are strictly confidential.
Attached is the consent to participate in the research study. Please read this prior to completing the online survey. Listed below is a link to the online survey form for completion. Please complete the survey by April 1st, 2014.
If you have any questions about this research, please contact me or the research advisor for this study. We would be happy to answer any questions you might have.
“This research has been reviewed by the UW-Stout IRB as required by the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46.”
https://uwstout.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_1Ldk7ruiVsozZS5
Sincerely,
Michael Merbach Wendy Dittmann, EdD
Research Investigator Research Advisor
(920)996-2875 (715)232-1372
47
Appendix B: Implied Consent Letter
UW-Stout Implied Consent Statement for Research Involving Human Subjects
Consent to Participate In UW-Stout Approved Research
Title: Perception of eLearning in construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast
Wisconsin
Investigator: Research Advisor:
Michael Merbach Wendy Dittmann, EdD
(920)996-2875 (715)232-1372
[email protected] [email protected]
Description:
This is a research study. I am inviting you to participate in this research study because
you are enrolled in the construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin. The
purpose of this research is to analyze student perceptions of the eLearning components of the
construction electrician program. The study will serve to improve and validate the program as
well as provide data for implementation of new programs. Approximately 40 people will take
part in this study. If you agree to take part in this study, your involvement will only last for
approximately 20 minutes. You will be asked to complete a brief survey packet which contains
questions with rating scales as well as open-ended questions to allow for personal
comments/feedback.
Risks and Benefits:
There are no foreseeable risks to participate in this study. You may not benefit personally
from being in this study. However, it is hopeful that, in the future, other people might benefit
from this study because it will assist in improving the apprenticeship program and also serve as a
48
guide for future programs.
Time Commitment and Payment:
The time commitment for completing the survey is approximately 20 minutes. There is
no cost for being in this study. You will not be paid for being in this research study.
Confidentiality:
It will be impossible to link responses to individuals. Your participation in this research
study is confidential to the extent permitted by law. However, it is possible that other people may
become aware of your participation in the study. For example, federal government regulatory
agencies and the University of Wisconsin – Stout Institutional Review Board (a committee that
reviews and approves research studies) may inspect and copy records pertaining to this research.
If a report or article is written about this study, we will describe study results in a summarized
manner so that you cannot be identified.
Right to Withdraw:
Your participation in this study is entirely voluntary. You may choose not to participate
without any adverse consequences to you. Should you choose to participate and later wish to
withdraw from the study, you may discontinue your participation at this time without incurring
adverse consequences.
IRB Approval:
This study has been reviewed and approved by The University of Wisconsin-Stout's
Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB has determined that this study meets the ethical
obligations required by federal law and University policies. If you have questions or concerns
regarding this study please contact the Investigator or Advisor. If you have any questions,
concerns, or reports regarding your rights as a research subject, please contact the IRB
49
Administrator.
Investigator: IRB Administrator:
Michael Merbach Sue Foxwell, Research Services (920)996-2875 152 Vocational Rehabilitation Bldg. [email protected] Menomonie, WI 54751 715-232-2477 Advisor: [email protected] Wendy Dittmann, EdD (715)232-1372 [email protected] FVTC Director of College
Effectiveness: Dr. Patti Frohrib [email protected] Statement of Consent:
By completing the online survey; you understand the study described above, are 18 years
of age, and agree to participate in the project entitled, Perception of eLearning in construction
electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin.
50
Appendix C: Fox Valley Technical College IRB approval
March 12, 2014
Michael Merbach Fox Valley Technical College 1825 N. Blue mound Dr. P.O. Box 2277 Appleton, WI 54912-2277 Dear Mr. Merbach:
Enclosed please find the approved expedited review from the Fox Valley Technical
College Institutional Review Board for your research entitled “Perception of eLearning in
construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin”.
This exempt research is subject to the FVTC IRB regulations including the provision that
a continuing review of the project be conducted at the one year anniversary date of the project
approval. You will be contacted to submit this information to the IRB Board Meeting that occurs
prior to the anniversary date. Failure to submit the continuing review information will require
any research involving FVTC to cease until approval is secured. If the research project concludes
prior to the project approval anniversary date, please submit the research abstract with the
findings of the research to the IRB Chair in order to properly close the project from the IRB open
projects roster.
Please contact me if you have any questions during the course of your research with
FVTC students. Good luck with your research project.
Sincerely, Patricia B. Frohrib, Ph.D. Director of College Effectiveness FVTC IRB Chair
51
Appendix D: Perception of eLearning Survey Instrument
Q1
Dear [Construction Electricity Apprentice] you are invited to participate in this study
about perception of eLearning in construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin.
I am inviting you to participate in this research study because you are enrolled in the construction
electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin. This research is part of a thesis project by
Michael Merbach, MS in Training and Human Resource Development student at UW-Stout. This
study involves the completion of a brief survey about your student experiences while
participating in the eLearning components of your training program. It will take approximately
10 minutes to complete. The purpose of this study is to improve the apprenticeship program as
well as validate the program to use as a guide for future implementation of other programs. This
survey is being sent to approximately 40 students. I would greatly appreciate your cooperation
in completing the survey. Completing the survey is voluntary, your responses are strictly
confidential. “This research has been reviewed by the UW-Stout IRB as required by the Code of
Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46.” By clicking on this survey you agree to participate in the
“perception of eLearning in construction electrician apprenticeship in Northeast Wisconsin.”
You may stop participation at any time and cancel out of the survey. Sincerely, Michael
Merbach
Q2 Blackboard components are part of my apprenticeship experience.
yes (1)
No (2)
If No Is Selected, Then Skip to End of Survey
52
Q3 Employment condition.
Employed Not Employed
Which of the following best describes your
current employment
status?
In the trade (1) Not in the trade (2)
Seeking Employment
(1)
Not available for
employment (2)
Not available other (3)
Q4 which best describes your age?
18-23 (1)
24-29 (2)
30-35 (3)
36-40 (4)
41+ (5)
Q5 Please indicate number of credits earned beyond high-school.
0-10 (1)
11-20 (2)
21-30 (3)
31+ (4)
Q6 Do you own a computer?
Yes (1)
No (2)
Q7 Type of computer you own or use most often.
Desktop (1)
Laptop (2)
Note book or pad (3)
53
Smart phone (4)
Q8 how long have you been using computers?
Less than one year (1)
1-4 years (2)
5 Years or more (3)
Q9 Please indicate how often you access the Internet.
Several times a day (1)
Once a day (2)
Few times a week (3)
few times a month (4)
Rarely (5)
Q10 Percentage of time for Internet access is:
______ Personal or social experiences (1)
______ Professional or academic purposes. (2)
Q11 Current status of computer ability
______ please adjust the bar to your level of computer ability (1)
Q12 Computer service
______ please adjust the bar to the level of internet speed you subscribe to. (1)
Q13 Please describe any previous Personal Blackboard or web based experiences you
have participated in. (Hunter, boater or snowmobile safety, first aid, CPR) including social
media such as: Micro blogging, and community forums.
Q14 Please describe any previous Professional Blackboard or web based procedures or
54
experiences you have participated in. OSHA training, CDL, or vendor specific training.
Q15
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Web enhanced course work is more effective
than traditional methodologies. (1)
Q16
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
In a course with both web
enhanced and traditional
methodologies, I learn better
through the web enhanced portion.
(1)
Q17
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Neither Agree or Disagree (3)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
I prefer Blackboard supported courses to traditional
courses. (1)
Q18
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
I believe that I can learn the same amount in a Blackboard supported
course as in a traditional course. (1)
Q19
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
55
I believe that I can earn the same grade in
a Blackboard supported course as in a traditional course.
(1)
Q20
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Learning to use Blackboard was easy for me. (1)
Q21
Strongly Disagree
(1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
It is easy to become skillful at using the
Blackboard elements. Blackboard promotes skill
development. (1)
Q22
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Blackboard is user friendly (1)
Q23
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Blackboard is a good format for organizing class
material and assignments. (1)
Q24
56
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
Previous experience in on-line or web enhanced
environments has prepared me for eLearning in my
apprenticeship courses. (1)
Q25
Strongly Disagree (1)
Somewhat Disagree (2)
Somewhat Agree (4)
Strongly Agree (5)
I participate in web enhanced
models as a condition of my
contract. (1)
Q26
Very Unsatisfied
(1)
Unsatisfied (2)
N/A (3) Satisfied (4) Very Satisfied (5)
How satisfied are you with the paid-related instruction received at FVTC?
(1)
57
Appendix E: Survey Analysis
Research Objectives
Survey Statements
Sub-question (1)
Sub-question (2)
Sub-question (3)
Sub-question (4)
Sub-question (5)
1) Bb component are part of my training?
2) Are you employed
3) Age 4) Credits beyond high-school Situational
5) Own a computer
6) Type of computer
7) How long using computer
8) Internet access 9) Internet usage personal
10) Professional 11) Computer
ability 12) Internet
speed 13) Previous
internet personal training Institutional
Identify the participant’s prior educational experiences?
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
Identify apprentice engagement for computer preference
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
Determine learner generational characteristics
X X
X
X
X
Determine learner instructional preference.
Identify classroom technology preference for apprentice learner.
58
14) Previous internet professional training
15) Web is more effective
16) Learn better through web
17) Prefer Bb to traditional
18) Learn the same amount
19) Earn the same grade
20) Bb was easy to learn Dispositional
21) Bb promotes
skill development
22) Bb is user friendly
23) Bb is a good format to organize
24) Previous experience prepared me
25) Participation is contract mandated
26) Satisfied with training at FVTC
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X