Applied geog 2009

26
Landform Based Eco- Regional Mapping in Arid Environments: Lessons from the Chihuahuan Desert Michael N. DeMers, Daniel P. Dugas, Walter G. Whitford, and Janet Greenlee

Transcript of Applied geog 2009

Page 1: Applied geog 2009

Landform Based Eco-Regional Mapping in Arid

Environments: Lessons from the Chihuahuan Desert

Michael N. DeMers, Daniel P. Dugas, Walter G. Whitford, and Janet Greenlee

Page 2: Applied geog 2009

Definition

Ecoregion: “recurring pattern of ecosystems associated with characteristic combinations of soil and landform that characterize that region.spatial coincidence of factorsmight involve “convergence” of evidenceoften hierarchical

Page 3: Applied geog 2009

Purpose

Develop a transferable method of rapid assessment of arid lands.

Goals: Method Characteristics

1. Triage-like decision tool for range managers

2. Technology light

3. Transferable to different arid regions

4. Effective

Page 4: Applied geog 2009

Method

Select undisturbed arid regionAssemble subject matter specialistsObtain hard copy of ETM7 imageryVisually classify the landformsConvert to vegetative classificationEvaluate classification

Page 5: Applied geog 2009

Chihuahuan Desert Study

Area: Armendaris

Ranch

Page 6: Applied geog 2009

Armendaris Ranch Study

Area

Page 7: Applied geog 2009

Polygon Mapping

Page 8: Applied geog 2009
Page 9: Applied geog 2009

Selected Study Area Landforms(after Peterson, 1981)

LF2 - Mountain slope LF13 - Depression

LF4 - Fan piedmont LF14 – Sedimentary bedrock hill

LF5 – Alluvial fan LF15 – Lava flow

LF8 – Fan skirt LF19 - Disturbed

LF9 – Lake plain LF20 – Aeolian terrain

LF10 – Alluvial flat LF22 - Bellana

LF12 - Playa LF23 – Inset fans

Page 10: Applied geog 2009

Methods of Geomorphology Classification

Modeled geomorphological units after hierarchical schemes for desert basin and range landforms

Obtained topographic characteristics using 1:15,000 scale, 20’ interval topographic sheets produced from digital files of 1:24,000 USGS sheets.

Designation of geomorphic units on 1:56,000 scale Landsat TM image plots. Band combinations of (5,4,1); (3,2,1); (7, 4, 1); band 1, PCA, etc. (visual interpretation)

Bedrock and sediment-shed mapping based on the geologic maps of Dane and Buchman (1965), Seager, et al. (1975), and Thompson (1992).

Page 11: Applied geog 2009

Obtain and Classify RS Data

Page 12: Applied geog 2009

Bands evaluated:

Rock types = TM 5 & 7.

Rock vs Veg = TM 1.

Combinations:

4, 5, 1

1, 3, 2

1, 4, 7

Page 13: Applied geog 2009

Principle Component Analysis Color Composite

Page 14: Applied geog 2009

Principle Component Analysis with Landform Polygons

Page 15: Applied geog 2009

Basic Geomorphi

c Unit Polygons

Page 16: Applied geog 2009

Variable Type LevelPH physiography: PH1 mountain

PH2 piedmontPH3 basin floor

LF landform: LF1 mountain canyonLF2 mountain slopeLF3 pedimentLF4 fan collarLF5 erosional fan remnantLF6 alluvial fan apronLF7 non-buried fan remnantLF8 alluvial plainLF9 playaLF10 hills of calcareous originLF11 hills and plateaus of igneous

originLF12 active dunesLF13 inactive dunesLF14 coppice dunesLF15 blowoutLF16 arroyo bottomLF17 other

Page 17: Applied geog 2009

2 montane slope4 fan piedmont5 alluvial fan8 fan skirt10 alluvial Flat12 playa13 depression14 sedimentary hills15 lava flows19 disturbed20 aeolian terrain22 balena23 inset fan

Page 18: Applied geog 2009

Vegetation Mapping

Page 19: Applied geog 2009

Verification

Random walk (with vehicle)GPS location plottedSpecies composition recorded9 initial communities identifiedCrosswalking field observations

with landforms yielded 3 additional categories

Page 20: Applied geog 2009

Plant Community Types I

V1 – Rock outcrop bedrock

3A – Desert grassland, shrub-mixed grass series

V2 – Rock outcrop 0 – Desert grassland, montane grassland

V3 - Steep piedmont slopes 3B - Desert grassland, threeawn series

V4 – Gently sloping piedmonts

0 – Desert grassland, gramma grass series

V5 – Fine textured basin drainage

0 – Desert grassland, closed basin playa alkalai sink-riparian

V6 – Run-on piedmont segments

0 – Desert grassland, tobosa series

Page 21: Applied geog 2009

Plant Community Types IIV7 – Upland rolling plains on piedmont

0/1A – Desert grassland grama grass series

V8 – Lava flows + aeolian deposits

4B – Desert grassland, shrub-mixed grass series

V9 – Basins with high gypsum soils

0 – Desert grassland, sacaton series / closed basin-playa-alkali sink riparian

V10 – Aeolian with coppice dunes

1C/2B - Chihuahuan Desert scrubland

V11 – Gentle lower piedmont interfluves with permanent livestock watering points

3C - Disturbed Chihuahuan Desert scrubland

V12 - Gently sloping lower piedmont erosional drainiges w/in 1.5 km of permanent livestock watering points

5C - Disturbed Chihuahuan Desert Scrubland

Page 22: Applied geog 2009
Page 23: Applied geog 2009

Composite Landform / Vegetation Polygons

Page 24: Applied geog 2009

Results

With few exceptions geomorphic map units also mark real vegetation boundaries

Triage mapping of vegetation using geomorphology/vegetation relationships is a useful and valid method

The geomorphology/vegetation relationships identified in the Armendaris Ranch study area are effectively being applied to compare potential (undisturbed) and disturbed rangeland conditions in the Jornada LTER.

Page 25: Applied geog 2009

What’s Next?

1. Create an appropriate methodology to quantitatively asses our accuracy (See Klimaszewski-Patterson)

2. Create a rule-based system to implement the “REAL” triage method of arid land evaluation

3. Export the methodology to a different arid rangeland region

Page 26: Applied geog 2009

Acknowledgements

Armendaris Ranch – general manager Mr. Tom Waddell

Mr. Dallas Bash from the Directorate of the Environment, U. S. Army, Fort Bliss, Texas – imagery.

This research was funded by National Aeronautics and Space Administration/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Grant (#1241945).