Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
-
Upload
kapil-agrawal -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
1/27
ApplicationsandMathematicalDerivationofOptions
Greeksfromfirstprinciple
Hong-YiChen,RutgersUniversity,USA
Cheng-FewLee,RutgersUniversity,USA
WeikangShih,RutgersUniversity,USA
Abstract
Inthischapter,weintroducethedefinitionsofGreekletters.WealsoprovidethederivationsofGreeklettersforcallandputoptionsonbothdividends-payingstockand non-dividends stock. Then we discuss some applications of Greek letters.Finally,weshowtherelationshipbetweenGreekletters,oneoftheexamplescanbeseenfromtheBlack-Scholespartialdifferentialequation.Keywords
Greekletters,Delta,Theta,Gamma,Vega,Rho,Black-Scholesoptionpricingmodel,Black-Scholespartialdifferentialequation
30.1Introduction
Greek lettersaredefined asthe sensitivities of the option pricetoa single-unitchangeinthevalueofeitherastatevariableoraparameter.Suchsensitivitiescanrepresent the different dimensions to the risk inan option. Financial institutionswhoselloptiontotheirclientscanmanagetheirriskbyGreeklettersanalysis.
Inthischapter,wewilldiscussthedefinitionsandderivationsofGreekletters.WealsospecificallyderiveGreeklettersforcall(put)optionsonnon-dividendstockanddividends-payingstock.SomeexamplesareprovidedtoexplaintheapplicationofGreekletters.Finally,wewilldescribetherelationshipbetweenGreeklettersandtheimplicationindeltaneutralportfolio.
30.2Delta( )
The delta of an option, , is defined as the rate of change of the option pricerespectedtotherateofchangeofunderlyingassetprice:
S
=
where is the option price and S is underlying asset price. We next show thederivationofdeltaforvariouskindsofstockoption.
30.2.1DerivationofDeltaforDifferentKindsofStockOptions
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
2/27
FromBlack-Scholesoptionpricingmodel,weknowthepriceofcalloptiononanon-dividendstockcanbewrittenas:
( ) ( )21
dNXedNSCr
tt
= (30.1)
andthepriceofputoptiononanon-dividendstockcanbewrittenas:
( ) ( )rt 2 t 1P Xe N d S N d
= (30.2)
where
s
str
X
S
d
++
=
2ln
2
1
2
t s
2 1 s
s
Sln r
X 2d d
+
= =
tT=
( )N isthecumulativedensityfunctionofnormaldistribution.
( ) ( )
==
1
2
12
1
2
1du
d
dueduufdN
First,wecalculate ( )( )
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1d
e
d
dNdN
=
=
(30
( )( )
( )
rt
d
rX
Sd
d
d
d
d
eX
Se
eee
eee
e
e
d
dNdN
sst
s
s
s
=
=
=
=
=
=
++
2
22
ln
2
22
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
22
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
(30.4)
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
3/27
Eq.(30.2) andEq.(30.3)willbeusedrepetitively indetermining followingGreekletterswhentheunderlyingassetisanon-dividendpayingstock.
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,deltacanbeshownas
1N(d ) = (30.5)
ThederivationofEq.(30.5)isinthefollowing:
( )( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
2 2
1 1
2 2
1 1
1 2rt
1 t
t t t
1 2r1 2
1 t
1 t 2 t
d d
r rt2 2
1 t
t s t s
d d
2 2
1 t t
t s t s
1
N d N dCN d S Xe
S S S
N d N dd dN d S Xe
d S d S
S1 1 1 1N d S e Xe e e
X2 S 2 S
1 1
N d S e S eS 2 S 2
N d
= = +
= +
= +
= +
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,deltacanbeshownas
1N(d ) 1 = (30.6)
ThederivationofEq.(30.6)is
( )( )
( )
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
2 21 1
2 21 1
2 1rt
1 tt t t
2 1r 2 11 t
2 t 1 t
d d
r rt2 21 t
t s t s
d d
2 2t 1 t
t s t s
1
N d N dPXe N d S
S S S
(1 N d ) (1 N d )d dXe (1 N d ) S
d S d S
S1 1 1 1Xe e e (1 N d ) S e
X2 S 2 S
1 1S e N d 1 S e
S 2 S 2
N d 1
= =
=
= +
= +
=
Iftheunderlyingassetisadividend-payingstockprovidingadividendyieldatrateq,Black-Scholes formulas for the prices ofaEuropeancall option onadividend-payingstockandaEuropeanputoptiononadividend-payingstockare
( ) ( )q rt t 1 2C S e N d Xe N d
= (30.7)
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
4/27
and
( ) ( )r qt 2 t 1P Xe N d S e N d
= (30.8)
where
2
t s
1
s
Sln r qX 2
d
+ +
=
2
t s
2 1 s
s
Sln r q
X 2d d
+
= =
To make the following derivations more easily, we calculate Eq. (30.9) and Eq.(30.10)inadvance.
( )2
11 21
1
1N (d )2
d
N d ed
= =
(30.9)
( )
( )
22
2
1 s
22s1
1 s
222 t ss1
21
2
2
2
d
2
d
2
d
d2 2
Sd ln r q
X 22 2
d
( r q )t2
N dN (d )
d
1e
2
1e
2
1e e e
2
1e e e
2
S1e e
X2
+ +
=
=
=
=
=
=
(30.10)
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,deltacanbeshownasq
1e N(d ) = (30.11)
Thederivationof(30.11)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
5/27
( )( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )
( )
( )
2 21 1
21
1 2q q rt1 t
t t t
1 2q q r1 21 t
1 t 2 t
d dq q r (r q)t2 2
1 t
t s t s
d
q q q21 t t
t s t s
N d N dCe N d S e Xe
S S S
N d N dd de N d S e Xe
d S d S
S1 1 1 1e N d S e e Xe e e
X2 S 2 S
1 1e N d S e e S e e
S 2 S 2
= = +
= +
= +
= +
( )
21d
2
q
1e N d
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,deltacanbeshownas
[ ]q 1e N(d ) 1
= (30.12)
Thederivationof(30.12)is
( )( )
( )
( )( )
( )
( )2 21 1
21
2 1r q qt1 t
t t t
2 1r q q2 11 t
2 t 1 t
d d
r (r q) q qt2 21 t
t s t s
d
q 2
tt s
N d N dPXe e N d S e
S S S
(1 N d ) (1 N d )d dXe e (1 N d ) S e
d S d S
S1 1 1 1Xe e e e (1 N d ) S e e
X2 S 2 S
1
S e e eS 2
= =
=
= +
= +
( )( )
21d
q q 2
1 tt s
q
1
1
(N d 1) S e eS 2
e (N d 1)
+
=
30.2.2ApplicationofDelta
Figure30.1showstherelationshipbetweenthepriceofacalloptionandthepriceofitsunderlyingasset.ThedeltaofthiscalloptionistheslopeofthelineatthepointofAcorrespondingtocurrentpriceoftheunderlyingasset.
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
6/27
Figure30.1
Bycalculatingdeltaratio,afinancialinstitutionthatsellsoptiontoaclientcanmakeadeltaneutralpositiontohedgetheriskofchangesoftheunderlyingassetprice.Supposethatthecurrentstockpriceis$100,thecalloptionpriceonstockis$10,and the current deltaof the call option is0.4. A financial institutionsold 10calloption to its client, so that the client has right to buy 1,000 shares at time tomaturity.Toconstructadeltahedgeposition,thefinancialinstitutionshouldbuy0.4x1,000=400sharesofstock.Ifthestockpricegoesupto$1,theoptionpricewillgoupby$0.4.Inthissituation,thefinancialinstitutionhasa$400($1x400shares)gaininitsstockposition,anda$400($0.4x1,000shares)lossinitsoptionposition.The totalpayoffof the financial institution iszero.Ontheotherhand, ifthestockpricegoesdownby$1,theoptionpricewillgodownby$0.4.Thetotalpayoffofthe
financialinstitutionisalsozero.
However, the relationship between option price and stockprice is not linear, sodeltachangesoverdifferentstockprice.Ifaninvestorwantstoremainhisportfolioindeltaneutral,heshouldadjusthishedgedratioperiodically.Themorefrequentlyadjustmenthedoes,thebetterdelta-hedginghegets.
Figure30.2exhibitsthechangeindeltaaffectsthedelta-hedges.Iftheunderlyingstockhasapriceequalto$20,thentheinvestorwhousesonlydeltaasriskmeasurewillconsiderthathisportfoliohasnorisk.However,astheunderlyingstockpriceschanges,eitherupordown,thedeltachangesaswellandthushewillhavetousedifferentdeltahedging.Deltameasurecanbecombinedwithotherriskmeasuresto
yieldbetterriskmeasurement.Wewilldiscussitfurtherinthefollowingsections.
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
7/27
Figure30.2
30.3Theta( )
The theta of an option, , is defined as the rate of change of the option pricerespectedtothepassageoftime:
t
=
where istheoptionpriceandt isthepassageoftime.
If T t = ,theta( )canalsobedefinedasminusonetimingtherateofchangeofthe option price respected to time to maturity. The derivation of suchtransformationiseasyandstraightforward:
( 1)t t
= = =
where T t = istimetomaturity.Forthederivationofthetaforvariouskindsofstockoption,weusethedefinitionofnegativedifferentialontimetomaturity.
30.3.1DerivationofThetaforDifferentKindsofStockOption
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,thetacanbewrittenas:
rt s1 2
SN (d ) rX e N(d )
2
=
(30.13)
Thederivationof(30.13)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
8/27
( )
21
21
r rt 1 2t 2
r r1 1 2 2t 2
1 2
2 2ts s
d
r2t 23
2s ss
d
r rt2
C N(d ) N(d )S r X e N(d ) Xe
N(d ) d N(d ) dS rX e N(d ) Xe
d d
slnr r1 X2 2S e rX e N(d )2 22
S1Xe e e
X2
= = + +
= +
+ + =
+
21
21
2t s
32
s ss
2 2ts s
d
r2t 23
2s ss
2t s
d
2t 3
2s ss
d
t
sln r
r X 2
22
slnr r
1 X2 2S e rX e N(d )2 22
sln r
1 r X 2S e2 22
1S e
2
+
+ +
=
+
+
=
21
2
s
r22
s
rt s1 2
2 rX e N(d )
SN (d ) rX e N(d )
2
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,thetacanbeshownas
rt s1 2
SN (d ) rX e N( d )
2
= +
(30.14)
Thederivationof(30.14)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
9/27
( )
21
r rt 2 12 t
r r 2 2 1 12 t
2 1
2t s
d
r r rt22 3
2s s
P N( d ) N( d )r X e N( d ) Xe S
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) d( r)X e (1 N(d )) Xe S
d d
sln rS1 r X
( r)X e (1 N(d )) Xe e eX2 2
= = +
= +
+ = +
21
21
21
s
2 2ts s
d
2t 3
2s ss
2t s
d
r 22 t 3
2s ss
2ts s
d
2t 3
2s s
2
2
slnr r
1 X2 2S e2 22
sln r
1 r X 2rX e (1 N(d )) S e2 22
slnr r
1 X2S e2 2
+ +
+
= +
+ +
21
2
s
2
sd
r 22 t
s
r t s2 1
r t s2 1
2
2
1 2rX e (1 N(d )) S e2
SrX e (1 N(d )) N (d )
2
SrX e N( d ) N (d )
2
=
=
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,thetacanbeshownas
q
q rt st 1 1 2
S eq S e N(d ) N (d ) rX e N(d )
2
=
(30.15)
Thederivationof(30.15)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
10/27
( )
21
q q r r t 1 2t 1 t 2
q q r r 1 1 2 2t 1 t 2
1 2
2ts
d
q q 2t 1 t 3
2s s
C N(d ) N(d )q S e N(d ) S e r X e N(d ) Xe
N(d ) d N(d ) dq S e N(d ) S e rX e N(d ) Xe
d d
slnr q r q1 X2q S e N(d ) S e e2 2
= = + +
= +
+ +
=
21
2
1
2
s
r
2
s
2t s
d
r (r q)t23
2s ss
2 2ts s
d
q q 2t 1 t 3
2s ss
2 rX e N(d )2
sln r q
S1 r q X 2Xe e eX2 22
slnr r
1 X2 2q S e N(d ) S e e2 22
+ +
+ +
=
21
21
r
2
2t s
d
q 2t 3
2s ss
2
sd
q q r2t 1 t 2
s
qq rt s
t 1 1 2
rX e N(d )
sln r
1 r X 2S e e2 22
1 2q S e N(d ) S e e rX e N(d )2
S eq S e N(d ) N (d ) rX e N(d )
2
+
+
=
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,thetacanbeshownas
q
r q t s2 t 1 1
S erX e N( d ) qS e N( d ) N (d )
2
=
(30.16)
Thederivationof(30.16)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
11/27
( )
21
r r q qt 2 12 t 1 t
r r q q2 2 1 12 t 1 t
2 1
d
r r (r q)t22
P N( d ) N( d )r X e N( d ) Xe ( q)S e N( d ) S e
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) drX e (1 N(d )) Xe qS e N( d ) S e
d d
S1rX e (1 N(d )) Xe e e
X2
= = + +
= +
= +
21
2
1
2t s
32
s ss
2 2ts s
d
q q 2t 1 t 3
2s ss
td
r q 22 t 3
2s s
sln r qr q X 2
22
slnr q r q
1 X2 2qS e N( d ) S e e2 22
sln
1 r q XrX e (1 N(d )) S e e2 2
+
+ +
= +
21
21
2
s
s
2 2ts s
d
q q 2t 1 t 3
2s ss
2
sd
r q q 22 t 1 t
s
r q
2 t
r q2
2
slnr q r q
1 X2 2qS e N( d ) S e e2 22
1 2rX e (1 N(d )) qS e N( d ) S e e2
rX e (1 N(d )) qS e
+
+ +
=
= q
t s1 1
qr q t s
2 t 1 1
S eN( d ) N (d )
2
S erX e N( d ) qS e N( d ) N (d )
2
=
30.3.2ApplicationofTheta( )
Thevalueofoptionisthecombinationoftimevalueandstockvalue.Whentimepasses,thetimevalueoftheoptiondecreases.Thus,therateofchangeoftheoptionpricewithrespectivetothepassageoftime,theta,isusuallynegative.
Becausethepassageoftimeonanoptionisnotuncertain,wedonotneedtomakeathetahedgeportfolio against the effect of the passageof time.However,we stillregard theta as a useful parameter, because it is a proxy of gamma in the deltaneutralportfolio.Forthespecificdetail,wewilldiscussinthefollowingsections.
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
12/27
30.4Gamma( )
Thegammaofanoption, ,isdefinedastherateofchangeofdeltarespectedtotherateofchangeofunderlyingassetprice::
2
2
S S
= =
where istheoptionpriceandSistheunderlyingassetprice.
Becausetheoptionisnotlinearlydependentonitsunderlyingasset,delta-neutralhedgestrategyisusefulonlywhenthemovementofunderlyingassetpriceissmall.Oncetheunderlying asset pricemoveswider, gamma-neutral hedgeisnecessary.Wenextshowthederivationofgammaforvariouskindsofstockoption.
30.4.1DerivationofGammaforDifferentKindsofStockOption
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,gammacanbeshownas
( )1t s
1N d
S
=
(30.17)
Thederivationof(30.17)is
( )
( )
( )
t
2
tt
2
t t
1 1
1 t
t
1
s
1
t s
C
SC
S S
N d d
d S
1
SN d
1N d
S
= =
=
=
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,gammacanbeshownas
( )1t s
1
N dS
=
(30.18)
Thederivationof(30.18)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
13/27
( )
( )
( )
t
2tt
2
t t
1 1
1 t
t1
s
1
t s
P
SP
S S
(N d 1) d
d S
1
SN d
1N d
S
= =
=
=
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,gammacanbeshownas
( )q
1t s
eN d
S
=
(30.19)
Thederivationof(30.19)is
( )
( )
( )
( )
t
2tt
2
t t
q
1
t
1q 1
1 t
q t1
s
q
1
t s
C
SC
S S
e N(d )
S
N d d
e d S
1
Se N d
eN d
S
= =
=
=
=
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,gammacanbeshownas
( )q
1
t s
eN d
S
=
(30.20)
Thederivationof(30.20)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
14/27
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
t
2tt
2
t t
q
1
t
1q 1
1 t
q t1
s
q
1
t s
P
SP
S S
e (N d 1)
S
(N d 1) de
d S
1
Se N d
eN d
S
= =
=
=
=
=
30.4.2ApplicationofGamma( )
Onecanusedeltaandgammatogethertocalculatethechangesoftheoptionduetochanges in the underlying stock price. This change can be approximated by thefollowingrelations.
21
change in option value change in stock price (change in stock price)2
+
Fromtheaboverelation,onecanobservethatthegammamakesthecorrectionforthefactthattheoptionvalueisnotalinearfunctionofunderlyingstockprice.ThisapproximationcomesfromtheTaylorseriesexpansionneartheinitialstockprice.Ifwe let Vbe option value, S be stockprice, andS0 be initial stockprice, then theTaylorseriesexpansionaroundS0yieldsthefollowing.
220 0 0
0 0 0 02
220 0
0 0 02
( ) ( ) ( )1 1( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2! 2!
( ) ( )1( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2!
n
n
n
V S V S V S V S V S S S S S S S
S S S
V S V S V S S S S S o S
S S
+ + + +
+ + +
L
Ifweonlyconsiderthefirstthreeterms,theapproximationisthen,
2
20 00 0 02
2
0 0
( ) ( )1( ) ( ) ( ) ( )2!
1( ) ( )
2
V S V S V S V S S S S S
S S
S S S S
+
+
.
Forexample,ifaportfolioofoptionshasadeltaequalto$10000andagammaequalto$5000,thechangeintheportfoliovalueifthestockpricedropto$34from$35isapproximately,
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
15/27
21change in portfolio value ($10000) ($34 $35) ($5000) ($34 $35)
2
$7500
+
Theaboveanalysiscanalsobeappliedtomeasurethepricesensitivityofinterest
raterelatedassetsorportfoliotointerestratechanges.Hereweintroduce ModifiedDuration and Convexity as risk measure corresponding to the above delta andgamma. Modified durationmeasures the percentage change in asset or portfoliovalueresultingfromapercentagechangeininterestrate.
Change in priceModified Duration Price
Change in interest rate
/ P
=
=
Usingthemodifiedduration,
Change in Portfolio Value Change in interest rate
( P) Change in interest rateDuration
=
=
wecancalculatethevaluechangesoftheportfolio.Theaboverelationcorrespondstothepreviousdiscussionofdeltameasure.Wewanttoknowhowthepriceoftheportfoliochangesgivenachangeininterestrate.Similartodelta,modifieddurationonlyshowthefirstorderapproximationofthechangesinvalue.Inordertoaccountforthenonlinearrelationbetweentheinterestrateandportfoliovalue,weneedasecondorderapproximationsimilarto thegammameasurebefore,thisisthentheconvexitymeasure.Convexityistheinterestrategammadividedbyprice,
/ PConvexity =
andthismeasurecapturesthenonlinearpartofthepricechangesduetointerestrate changes. Using the modified duration and convexity together allow us todevelopfirstaswellassecondorderapproximationofthepricechangessimilartopreviousdiscussion.
2
Change in Portfolio Value P (change in rate)
1P (change in rate)
2
Duration
Convexity
+
Asaresult,(-durationxP)and(convexityxP)actlikethedeltaandgammameasurerespectively inthepreviousdiscussion.This showsthat theseGreeks can alsobeappliedinmeasuringriskininterestraterelatedassetsorportfolio.
Nextwediscusshowtomakeaportfoliogammaneutral.Supposethegammaofa
delta-neutralportfoliois ,thegammaoftheoptioninthisportfolioiso
,ando
isthenumberofoptionsaddedtothedelta-neutralportfolio.Then,thegammaofthisnewportfoliois
o o
+
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
16/27
Tomakeagamma-neutralportfolio,weshouldtrade *o o
/ = options.Because
the position of option changes, the new portfolio is not in the delta-neutral.Weshouldchangethepositionoftheunderlyingassettomaintaindelta-neutral.
Forexample,thedeltaandgammaofaparticularcalloptionare0.7and1.2.Adelta-
neutral portfolio has a gamma of -2,400. To make a delta-neutral and gamma-neutralportfolio,weshould add a longpositionof 2,400/1.2=2,000shares and ashortpositionof2,000x0.7=1,400sharesintheoriginalportfolio.
30.5Vega( )
The vega of an option, , is defined as the rate of change of the option pricerespectedtothevolatilityoftheunderlyingasset:
=
where istheoptionpriceand isvolatilityofthestockprice.Wenextshowthederivationofvegaforvariouskindsofstockoption.
30.5.1DerivationofVegaforDifferentKindsofStockOption
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,vegacanbeshownas
( )t 1S N d = (30.21)
Thederivationof(30.21)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
17/27
21
21
rt 1 2t
s s s
r1 1 2 2t
1 s 2 s
123
2 t s2 2sd
2t 2
s
2
t s
d
r rt2
C N(d ) N(d )S Xe
N(d ) d N(d ) dS Xe
d dS
ln rX 21
S e2
Sln r
X 2S1Xe e e
X2
= =
=
+ +
=
+ +
( )
2 21 1
21
1
2
2
s
1 12 23
2 t s t s2 2 2sd d
2 2t t2 2
s s
3d 2 2s2
t 2
s
t 1
S Sln r ln r
X 2 X 21 1S e S e
2 2
1S e
2
S N d
+ + + +
=
=
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,vegacanbeshownas
( )t 1S N d = (30.22)
Thederivationof(30.22)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
18/27
21
21
rt 2 1t
s s s
r 2 2 1 1t
2 s 1 s
12
t s 2d
r rt22
s
23
2 t s2sd
2t
P N( d ) N( d )Xe S
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) dXe S
d d
Sln rX 2S1
Xe e eX2
Sln r
X 21S e
2
= =
=
+ +
=
+ +
+
2 2
1 1
21
1
2
2
s
1 12 23
2t s t s2 2 2s
d d2 2
t t2 2
s s
3d 2 2s2
t 2
s
t
S Sln r ln r
X 2 X 21 1S e S e
2 2
1S e
2
S N d
+ + + +
= +
=
= ( )1
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,vegacanbeshownas
( )qt 1S e N d = (30.23)
Thederivationof(30.23)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
19/27
21
21
q rt 1 2t
s s s
q r1 1 2 2t
1 s 2 s
123
2 t s2 2sd
q 2t 2
s
t
d
r (r q )t2
C N(d ) N(d )S e Xe
N(d ) d N(d ) dS e Xe
d d
Sln r qX 21
S e e2
Sln r
XS1Xe e e
X2
= =
=
+ +
=
+
2 2
1 1
21
12
s 2
2
s
1 2 23
2 t s t s2 2 s
d dq q2 2
t t2 2
s s
3d 2 2s2
t
q2
S Sln r q ln r q
X 2 X 21 1S e e S e e
2 2
1S e
2
+
+ + + +
=
=
( )
2
s
q
t 1S e N d
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,vegacanbeshownas
( )qt 1S e N d = (30.24)
Thederivationof(30.24)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
20/27
21
21
r qt 2 1t
s s s
r q2 2 1 1t
2 s 1 s
12
t s 2d
r (r q)t22
s
2
sd
q 2t
P N( d ) N( d )Xe S e
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) dXe S e
d d
Sln r qX 2S1
Xe e eX2
1S e e
2
= =
=
+ +
=
+
2 2
1 1
123
t s2 2
2
s
1 2 23
2t s t s2 2 s
d dq q2 2
t t2 2
s s
q
t
Sln r q
X 2
S Sln r q ln r q
X 2 X 21 1S e e S e e
2 2
S e
+ +
+ + + +
= +
=
( )
21
3d 2 2s2
2
s
q
t 1
1e
2
S e N d
=
30.5.2ApplicationofVega( )
Supposeadelta-neutralandgamma-neutralportfoliohasavegaequalto andthevegaofaparticularoptionis
o .Similartogamma,wecanaddapositionof
o/
inoption tomake a vega-neutral portfolio. Tomaintain delta-neutral,we shouldchangetheunderlyingassetposition.However,whenwechangetheoptionposition,the new portfolio is not gamma-neutral. Generally, a portfolio with one optioncannotmaintainitsgamma-neutralandvega-neutralatthesametime.Ifwewantaportfoliotobebothgamma-neutralandvega-neutral,weshouldincludeatleasttwokindofoptiononthesameunderlyingassetinourportfolio.
Forexample,adelta-neutralandgamma-neutralportfoliocontainsoptionA,optionB,andunderlyingasset.Thegammaandvegaofthisportfolioare-3,200and-2,500,
respectively.OptionAhasadeltaof0.3,gammaof1.2,andvegaof1.5.OptionBhasadeltaof0.4,gammaof1.6andvegaof0.8.Thenewportfoliowillbebothgamma-
neutralandvega-neutralwhenaddingA
ofoptionAandB ofoptionBintothe
originalportfolio.
A B
Gamma Neutral: 3200 1.2 1.6 0 + + =
A BVega Neutral: 2500 1.5 0.8 0 + + =
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
21/27
Fromtwoequationsshownabove,wecangetthesolutionthatA
=1000andB =
1250.Thedeltaofnewportfoliois1000x.3+1250x0.4=800.Tomaintaindelta-neutral,weneedtoshort800sharesoftheunderlyingasset.
30.6Rho( )
Therhoofanoptionisdefinedastherateofchangeoftheoptionpricerespectedtotheinterestrate:
rhor
=
where istheoptionpriceandrisinterestrate.Therhoforanordinarystockcalloptionshouldbepositivebecausehigherinterestratereducesthepresentvalueofthestrikepricewhichinturnincreasesthevalueofthecalloption.Similarly,therhoofanordinaryputoptionshouldbenegativebythesamereasoning.Wenextshow
thederivationofrhoforvariouskindsofstockoption.
30.6.1DerivationofRhoforDifferentKindsofstockoption
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,rhocanbeshownas
r
2rho X e N(d )
= (30.25)
Thederivationof(30.25)is
( )
2 21 1
21
r rt 1 2t 2
r r1 1 2 2t 2
1 2
d d
r r rt2 2t 2
s s
d
2t
s
C N(d ) N(d )rho S X e N(d ) Xe
r r r
N(d ) d N(d ) dS X e N(d ) Xed r d r
S1 1S e X e N(d ) Xe e e
X2 2
1S e
2
= =
= +
= +
=
21d
r 22 t
s
r
2
1X e N(d ) S e
2
X e N(d )
+
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,rhocanbeshownas
r
2rho X e N( d ) = (30.26)
Thederivationof(30.26)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
22/27
( )
2 2
1 1
r rt 2 12 t
r r 2 2 1 12 t
2 1
d d
r r rt2 22 t
s s
P N( d ) N( d )rho X e N( d ) Xe S
r r r
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) dX e (1 N(d )) Xe S
d r d r
S1 1X e (1 N(d )) Xe e e S eX2 2
= = +
= +
= + 2 21 1d d
r 2 22 t t
s s
r
2
1 1X e (1 N(d )) S e S e
2 2
X e N( d )
= +
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,rhocanbeshownas
r
2rho X e N(d ) = (30.27)
Thederivationof(30.27)is
( )
2 21 1
q r rt 1 2t 2
q r r1 1 2 2t 2
1 2
d d
q r r (r q)t2 2t 2
s s
t
C N(d ) N(d )rho S e X e N(d ) Xe
r r r
N(d ) d N(d ) dS e X e N(d ) Xe
d r d r
S1 1S e e X e N(d ) Xe e e
X2 2
S e
= =
= +
= +
=
2 21 1d d
q r q2 22 t
s s
r
2
1 1e X e N(d ) S e e
2 2X e N(d )
+
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononadividend-payingstock,rhocanbeshownas
r
2rho X e N( d ) = (30.28)
Thederivationof(30.28)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
23/27
( )
2
1
r r qt 2 12 t
r r q2 2 1 12 t
2 1
d
r r ( r q) qt22 t
s
P N( d ) N( d )rho X e N( d ) Xe S e
r r r
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) dX e (1 N(d )) Xe S e
d r d r
S1 1X e (1 N(d )) Xe e e S e eX2 2
= = +
= +
= +
2
1
2 21 1
d
2
s
d d
r q q2 22 t t
s s
r
2
1 1X e (1 N(d )) S e e S e e
2 2
X e N( d )
= +
=
30.6.2ApplicationofRho()
Assumethataninvestorwouldliketoseehowinterestratechangesaffectthevalue
ofa3-monthEuropeanput option she holdswith the following information. Thecurrent stock price is $65 and the strike price is $58. The interest rate and thevolatility of the stock is 5% and 30% per annum respectively. The rho of thisEuropeanputcanbecalculatedasfollowing.
2
r (0.05)(0.25)
put 2
1ln(65 58) [0.05 (0.3) ](0.25)
2Rho X e N(d ) ($58)(0.25)e N( ) 3.168(0.3) 0.25
+
= =
Thiscalculationindicatesthatgiven1%changeincreaseininterestrate,sayfrom5% to 6%, the value of this European call option will decrease 0.03168 (0.01 x3.168). This simple example can be further applied to stocks that pay dividendsusingthederivationresultsshownpreviously.
30.7DerivationofSensitivityforStockOptionsRespectivewithExercisePrice
ForaEuropeancalloptiononanon-dividendstock,thesensitivitycanbeshownas
rt2
Ce N(d )
X
=
(30.29)
Thederivationof(30.29)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
24/27
)(
2
1)(
2
1
1121)(11
21
)()(
)(
)()(
)(
2
22
2
22
2
2
2
22
1
1
1
22
1
21
21
2
1
2
1
dNe
X
SedNe
X
Se
Xe
X
SeXedNeX
eS
X
d
d
dNXedNe
X
d
d
dNS
X
dNXedNe
X
dNS
X
C
r
t
d
s
rt
d
s
s
rt
d
rr
s
d
t
rr
t
rr
t
t
=
=
=
=
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononanon-dividendstock,thesensitivitycanbeshownas
rt
2
Pe N( d )
X
=
(30.30)
Thederivationof(30.30)is
2 21 1
r rt 2 12 t
r r 2 2 1 12 t
2 1
d d
r r rt2 22 t
s s
r
2
P N( d ) N( d )e N( d ) Xe S
X X X
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) de (1 N(d )) Xe S
d X d X
S1 1 1 1 1 1e (1 N(d )) Xe e e S e
X X X2 2
e (1 N(d
= +
= +
= +
=
2 21 1d d
t t2 2
s s
r
2
S S1 1)) e e
X X2 2
e N( d )
+
=
ForaEuropeancalloptiononadividend-payingstock,thesensitivitycanbeshownas
rt2
Ce N(d )
X
=
(30.31)
Thederivationof(30.31)is
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
25/27
2 21 1
21
q r rt 1 2t 2
q r r1 1 2 2t 2
1 2
d d
q r r (r q )t2 2t 2
s s
d
2
s
C N(d ) N(d )S e e N(d ) Xe
X X X
N(d ) d N(d ) dS e e N(d ) Xe
d X d X
S1 1 1 1 1 1S e e e N(d ) Xe e eX X X2 2
S1e
2
=
=
=
=
21dq q
rt t22
s
r
2
e S e1e N(d ) e
X X2
e N(d )
=
ForaEuropeanputoptiononadividend-payingstock,thesensitivitycanbeshownas
rt2P e N( d )
X
=
(30.32)
Thederivationof(30.32)is
2 21 1
r r qt 2 12 t
r r q2 2 1 12 t
2 1
d d
r r (r q) qt2 22 t
s s
P N( d ) N( d )e N( d ) Xe S e
X X X
(1 N(d )) d (1 N(d )) de (1 N(d )) Xe S e
d X d X
S1 1 1 1 1 1e (1 N(d )) Xe e e S e e
X X X2 2
= +
= +
= +
2 21 1d dq q
r t t2 22
s s
r
2
S e S e1 1e (1 N(d )) e e
X X2 2
e N( d )
= +
=
30.8RelationshipbetweenDelta,Theta,andGamma
So far, the discussion has introduced the derivation and application of eachindividualGreeksandhowtheycanbeappliedinportfoliomanagement.Inpractice,the interactionor trade-off between these parameters is of concern aswell. For
example,recallthepartialdifferentialequationfor theBlack-Scholesformulawithnon-dividendpayingstockcanbewrittenas
2
2 2
2
1
2rS S r
t S S
+ + =
Where isthevalueofthederivativesecuritycontingentonstockprice, Sisthepriceofstock,ristheriskfreerate,and isthevolatilityofthestockprice,and tis
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
26/27
thetimetoexpirationofthederivative.Giventheearlierderivation,wecanrewritetheBlack-ScholesPDEas
2 21
2rS S r + + =
Thisrelationgivesusthetrade-offbetweendelta,gamma,andtheta.Forexample,suppose there are two delta neutral( 0) = portfolios, one with positive gamma
( 0) > andtheotheronewithnegativegamma ( 0) < andtheybothhavevalueof
$1 ( 1) = .Thetrade-offcanbewrittenas
2 21
2S r+ =
For the first portfolio, if gamma ispositive and large, then theta isnegative andlarge.Whengammaispositive,changeinstockpricesresultinhighervalueoftheoption.Thismeansthatwhenthereisnochangeinstockprices,thevalueoftheoptiondeclinesasweapproachtheexpirationdate.Asaresult,thethetaisnegative.Ontheotherhand,whengammaisnegativeandlarge,changeinstockpricesresultinlower option value. Thismeansthatwhen there isno stockprice changes, thevalueoftheoption increases asweapproach the expirationand thetais positive.Thisgivesusatrade-offbetweengammaandthetaandtheycanbeusedasproxyforeachotherinadeltaneutralportfolio.
30.9Conclusion
Inthischapterwehaveshownthederivationofthesensitivitiesoftheoptionpricetothechangeinthevalueofstatevariablesorparameters.ThefirstGreekisdelta(
)whichistherateofchangeofoptionpricetochangeinpriceofunderlyingasset.Oncethedeltaiscalculated,thenextstepistherateofchangeofdeltawithrespecttounderlyingassetpricewhichgivesusgamma( ).Anothertworiskmeasuresaretheta( )andrho( ),theymeasurethechangeinoptionvaluewithrespectto
passingtimeandinterestraterespectively.Finally,onecanalsomeasurethechangeinoptionvaluewithrespecttothevolatilityoftheunderlyingassetandthisgivesusthevega(v ).
Therelationshipbetweentheseriskmeasuresareshown,oneoftheexamplecanbeseen from the Black-Scholes partial differential equation. Furthermore, theapplications of these Greeks letter in the portfolio management have also been
discussed.Riskmanagementisoneoftheimportanttopicsinfinancetoday,bothforacademicsandpractitioners.Giventherecentcreditcrisis,onecanobservethatitiscrucialtoproperlymeasuretheriskrelatedtotheevermorecomplicatedfinancialassets.
References
Bjork,T.,ArbitrageTheoryinContinuousTime,OxfordUniversityPress,1998.
-
7/27/2019 Applications and Mathematical Derivation of Options Greeks From First Principle
27/27
Boyle, P. P., & Emanuel, D. (1980). Discretely adjusted option hedges. Journal of
FinancialEconomics,8(3),259-282.Duffie,D.,DynamicAssetPricingTheory,PrincetonUniversityPress,2001.
Fabozzi,F.J.,FixedIncomeAnalysis,2ndEdition,Wiley,2007.Figlewski, S. (1989). Options arbitrage in imperfect markets. Journal of Finance,
44(5),1289-1311.Galai,D.(1983).Thecomponentsofthereturnfromhedgingoptionsagainststocks.
JournalofBusiness,56(1),45-54.Hull,J.,Options,Futures,andOtherDerivatives6thEdition,Pearson,2006.
Hull,J.,&White,A.(1987).Hedgingtherisksfromwritingforeigncurrencyoptions. JournalofInternationalMoneyandFinance,6(2),131-152.
Karatzas, I. and Shreve, S.E., Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, Springer,
2000.Klebaner,F.C.,IntroductiontoStochasticCalculuswithApplications,ImperialCollege
Press,2005.McDonlad,R.L.,DerivativesMarkets2ndEdition,Addison-Wesley,2005.
Shreve, S.E., Stochastic Calculus for Finance II: Continuous Time Model, Springer,2004.
Tuckman,B., FixedIncomeSecurities:ToolsforToday'sMarkets, 2ndEdition,Wiley,2002.