Application of ionic liquids to the electrodeposition of ...€¦ · Electrodeposition of metals is...
Transcript of Application of ionic liquids to the electrodeposition of ...€¦ · Electrodeposition of metals is...
Application of ionic liquids to the electrodeposition of metals
Andrew P. Abbott* and Katy J. McKenzie
Received 24th May 2006, Accepted 11th July 2006
First published as an Advance Article on the web 28th July 2006
DOI: 10.1039/b607329h
The electrodeposition of most of technologically important metals has been shown to be possible
from a wide range of room temperature molten salts, more commonly known today as ‘ionic
liquids’. These liquids are currently under intense scrutiny for a wide variety of applications some
of which have already been commercialized. Despite the fact that electrodeposition was the first
application studied in these liquids no metal deposition processes have as yet been developed to
an industrial scale. This review addresses the practical and theoretical aspects that need to be
considered when choosing ionic liquids for metal deposition. It details the current understanding
of the physical and chemical properties of these interesting fluids and highlights the areas that
need to be considered to develop practical electroplating systems. The effect of composition and
temperature on viscosity and conductivity are discussed together with the fundamental
approaches required to synthesise new liquids.
Introduction
Electrodeposition of metals is essential for a variety of in-
dustries including electronics, optics, sensors, automotive and
aerospace to name but a few. The main metals of interest
include Cr, Ni, Cu, Au, Ag, Zn and Cd together with a number
of copper and zinc-based alloys. The electroplating industry,
which dates back well over 100 years, is based solely on
aqueous solutions due to the high solubility of electrolytes
and metal salts resulting in highly conducting solutions. Water
does, however, suffer from the drawback that it has a relatively
narrow potential window, and hence the deposition of metals
with large negative reduction potentials such as Cr and Zn is
hindered by poor current efficiencies and hydrogen embrittle-
ment of the substrate. The main driving force for non-aqueous
electrolytes has been the desire to deposit refractory metals
such as Ti, Al and W.
High temperature molten salts have been extensively used
for the electrowinning of metals such as Li, Na, Ti and Al.1–3
It was the aim of developing lower temperature eutectics that
led firstly to the formation of LiCl/KCl/AlCl3 eutectics4 and
then in the 1950s to ethylpyridinium chloride/AlCl3 mixtures.5
Work by Osteryoung with the N-butylpyridinium cation,6 and
later by Hussey et al.7 using 1-ethyl-3-methyl-imidazolium as a
cation really led to the first concerted studies in the area of
ionic liquids. Wilkes and Zaworotko8 found that air- and
water-stable salts could be produced using tetrafluoroborate
or ethanoate anions. From these studies the arbitrary defini-
tion arose of an ionic liquid being an ionic material with a
melting point below 100 1C. This low melting point arises
because the salts have large, non-symmetrical organic cations
and hence low lattice energies although the relationship
between structure and phase behaviour is still not fully
understood.
The history and chemical properties of these liquids are
covered in several almost legendary reviews.9–12 While appli-
cations of ionic liquids have been proposed which vary from
fuel desulfurization13 to precious metal processing14 very few
have come to practical fruition although several are at pilot
scale. The main processes that use an ionic liquid are BASF’s
BASIL process15 and the Dimersols process.16 The former
uses the ionic liquid as a phase transfer catalyst to produce
alkoxyphenylphosphines which are precursors for the syn-
thesis of photoinitiators used in printing inks and wood coatings.
The phosphines are prepared by the reaction of phenyl-
chlorophosphines with alcohols and the imidazole acts as a
proton scavenger. The latter uses a Lewis acid catalyst for the
dimerization of butenes into C8 olefins which are usually
further hydroformylated giving C9 alcohols used in the
manufacture of plasticizers.
By far the largest academic activity has been with chemical
synthesis and metal deposition and while the lack of commer-
cialized processes naturally has some economic reasons many
of these will decrease as production scales are increased. In the
field of metal deposition there are still key issues to be
addressed to obtain a deposit with the correct morphology
and physical properties and it is in an endeavor to explain the
origin of these discrepancies that this review focuses on the
aspects involved in metal deposition from ionic liquids. It is
the aim of this review to look at the more fundamental aspects
of metal deposition and question the areas that need to be
addressed before practical use can be made of these interesting
systems.
Why use ionic liquids for electrodeposition?
Initially the main drive to use ionic liquids was the ability to
obtain high concentrations of aluminium in a highlyChemistry Department, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK LE17RH. E-mail: [email protected]; Fax: +44 116 252 3789
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4265
INVITED ARTICLE www.rsc.org/pccp | Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
conducting aprotic medium for aluminium deposition.17 As
ionic liquids have developed, the key advantages of the liquids
have become:
� the wide potential windows,
� high solubility of metal salts,
� avoidance of water and metal/water chemistry and
� high conductivity compared to non-aqueous solvents.
Due to their low vapour pressures ionic liquids are well
suited to perform electrodeposition at a range of temperatures.
At elevated temperatures there is less concern about viscosity
and conductivity and phenomena such as nucleation, surface
diffusion and crystallisation associated with metal deposition
can be accelerated. The use of ionic liquids heralds not only
the ability to electrodeposit metals that have hitherto been
impossible to reduce in aqueous solutions but also the cap-
ability to engineer the redox chemistry and control metal
nucleation characteristics. It is the latter area that is only
now being addressed and will no doubt be the focus of
research over the forthcoming decade.
Several recent reviews have covered the use of ionic liquids
in electrochemistry17–21 and the most comprehensive of these
is the book by Ohno,22 which not only covers the fundamental
aspects but also a wide range of applications including lithium
batteries, photoelectrochemical cells, fuel cells and capacitors.
Reviews by Compton23 and Endres are also recommended for
their coverage of fundamental electrochemistry and electro-
deposition.20,24 For ionic liquids to be used efficiently, they
need not only be economically viable but also simple to handle
and recyclable. While it is impractical that ionic liquids will
compete with all aqueous solutions in large markets where the
current technology works effectively, it is realistic that they
should proffer an alternative for the deposition of metals that
can only currently be applied using vapour deposition. It is
also realistic that ionic liquids could have applications in such
fields as electroless deposition where the chemistry of aqueous
solutions limits the systems that can be studied. Ionic liquids
could also present an alternative to environmentally hazar-
dous processes such as the use of chromic acid for the
electrodeposition of chromium or the use of cyanide with
silver plating.
It is generally accepted that the cation is more important in
controlling the physical properties of the salt whereas the anion
has a greater effect upon the stability and chemical reactivity.
Cations
Table 2 shows that cationic structure and size affect the
viscosity and conductivity of the liquid and hence will control
mass transport of metal ions to the electrode surface. Cations
will also be adsorbed at the electrode surface at the deposition
potential and hence the structure of the double layer is cation
dependent. While phosphonium25,26 and sulfonium27 based
ionic liquids have been described, the vast majority of systems
used for metal deposition have been based on nitrogen-based
cations and these will be the main ones considered in this
review. Table 1 shows the range of nitrogen-based cations that
have been studied. Imidazolium based cations have been
favoured due to their superior fluidity and conductivity and
of these 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium is the most preferred
due to its high conductivity.28,29 Much of the preliminary work
was performed with pyridinium cations.30,31 A range of pyr-
rolidinium based ionic liquids have been described recently
and while these have not yet been extensively utilised for
electrochemistry their wide potential windows will certainly
make them useful.32–34
Ionic liquids with alternative cations such as those derived
from biodegradable imidazoles,35 lactams,36 amino acids37
and choline38 have been prepared although it is only the last
of these which has been used for metal deposition. These
alternatives may eventually present viable alternatives for
larger scale applications due to either simplicity of synthesis
or availability of starting materials, however issues such as
narrower potential windows and lower conductivities will have
to be overcome. From an environmental viewpoint, choline
based salts are the most promising since choline chloride is
made quantitatively in a one-pot, solvent-less process using
HCl, ethylene oxide and trimethylamine.
The other important role that the cation probably plays in
electrodeposition is in controlling the structure and most
importantly the Helmholtz layer thickness. This area is prac-
tically unstudied although Endres39 has shown that the cation
appears to control the morphology of aluminium deposited
from various triflamide based ionic liquids.
Anions
Anions will also affect the conductivity and viscosity of the
ionic fluids (see below). The anion can also affect the coordi-
nation geometry around the metal ion, which affects the
reduction potential, reduction current and nucleation. This
area is almost unstudied although Katayama40 has collated the
results for various metal salts in chloroaluminate melts. It is
imperative that systematic studies are also carried out into the
thermodynamics of metal ion reduction in ionic liquids with
nominally non-coordinating anions.
Ionic liquids can be divided into two major classes; those
based on discrete anions and those with anionic complexes.
These two classes of compounds have quite different charac-
teristics, which will lead to different applications. Both types of
liquid are tuneable and the variables are largely common to
both systems.
Discrete anions
Table 1 shows a range of discrete anions that have been used.
It is an interesting observation that despite their short history
there are more ionic solvents that have been reported and
characterised than molecular ones.
The large range of anion–cation combinations possible
means that the physical and chemical properties can be
tailored to the specific application and this is the subject of a
corresponding review by Endres.24 The ability to combine an
inert cation and anion by simple metathesis is viewed as being
a key advantage of these types of liquids. The ionic liquids
with optimum conductivity and viscosity are generally highly
fluorinated ensuring good shielding of the charge from the
cation.
4266 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
Anions such as BF4� and PF6
� were initially used quite
extensively because of their wide potential window,41,42 how-
ever, slow hydrolysis by water, yielding HF, has led to an
increase in the use of water stable anions such as
(CF3SO2)2N�.43 These have even larger potential windows
and have higher conductivities and lower viscosities than the
corresponding BF4� and PF6
� salts. Other anions such as
(CN)2N�,44 p-toluenesulfonate and methylsulfonate32 have
also recently been described but have not been extensively
used for metal deposition.
One issue associated with the use of ionic liquids with
discrete anions is that they are new materials and one barrier
to commercialisation could be the registration costs of these
compounds. The large-scale production of some imidazolium
compounds has meant that some of the more exotic com-
pounds are now available for electrochemical applications.
Some of these new materials show such significant electro-
chemical stability that application to smaller-scale devices, like
batteries and capacitors, may nullify current economic bar-
riers. Some ionic liquids have potential windows in excess of
Table 1 A selection of cations and anions used to make ionic liquids
Nitrogen based cations Discrete anions
Name Abbreviation
1-Butyl-3-ethylimidazolium [BEIm]1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate [BMIm]BF4
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [BMIm]PF6
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [BMIm]Tf2N1-Butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [BMP]Tf2N1-Butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [BMMIm]Tf2N1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium trifluoromethane sulfonate [BMIm]TfO1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate [EMIm]BF4
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [EMIm]Cl1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium dicyanamide [EMIm][dca]1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [EMIm] PF6
1-Octyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide [OMIm] TF2N1-Propyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium [PMP]Trifluoroacetate TFABis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Tf2NTrifluoromethanesulfonate TfO
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4267
5 V although this is strongly dependent on water content and
electrode material.22
Complex anions
Eutectic based ionic liquids can be expressed in terms of the
following general formula R1R2R3R4N+ X. z Y.
The ionic liquids described can be subdivided into three
types where R1R2R3R4N+ is for example a choline-like cation
such as HOC2H4N+(CH3)3, X is generally a halide anion
(usually Cl�). They are based on equilibria set up between X�
and a Lewis or Brønsted acid Y, z refers to the number of Y
molecules which complex X�.
e.g. 3AlCl3 + 2Cl� 2 AlCl4� + Al2Cl7
� or Cl� + 2
urea 2 Cl�.2urea.
Eutectic Type 1 Y=MClx, M= Zn,45,46 Sn,38 Fe,47 Al,17
Ga48
Eutectic Type 2 Y=MClx � yH2O, M=Cr,49 Co, Cu, Ni,
Fe
Eutectic Type 3 Y = RZ, Z = CONH2,50 COOH,51 OH
The relative proportions of anionic species depend on the
ionic liquid composition. The ability to vary the composition
of Lewis or Brønsted acid adds an additional dimension to the
tuneability of the eutectic-based ionic liquids. The anionic
species have been identified for Type I, II and III based
eutectics where Al,52 Sn,53 Zn,53 Cr49 and urea50 are the
complexing agents and some studies have quantified the
proportion of species present.52,53 They are also clearly useful
for electroplating if the metal of interest falls in the category
defined above under Type I or Type II as the metal ion
concentration can be as high as 10 mol dm�3.
There is some controversy over the classification of complex
anions as ionic liquids. It could, however, be argued that
discrete anions are just a subset of complex anions where the
Lewis acid and Lewis base are present in equimolar amounts
and the equilibrium constant lies considerably over to the right
e.g. R4N+ F� + BF3 2 R4N
+ BF4�
The term ionic liquids can be used to describe a wide range
of materials with similar properties. Authors such as Angell54
have shown that systems such as Ca(NO3)2 � 4H2O and
LiCl � 5.8H2O have some properties similar to ionic liquids
which opens the debate as to where ionic liquids finish and
solutions start. Inevitably practical plating systems might need
to have a significant molecular component either as a bright-
ener, diluent or complexing agent.
Synthesis of ionic liquids
While the number of ionic liquids has expanded almost
exponentially over the past 20 years it is evident that new
classes of salts will be developed in the coming years. It is
evident that just like molecular solvents where classes of
liquids such as alcohols or alkanes have specific applications,
so ionic liquids such as triflamides will have uses such as
deposition of metals with large negative reduction poten-
tials.55,56 The compounds listed in Table 1 are by no means
exhaustive and it has been estimated that there are more than
1018 ionic liquids.57
The synthesis of ionic liquids usually begins with the
quaternisation of an imidazole, pyridine, phosphine or amine,
for example, to produce the cationic component.58 The qua-
ternisation is carried out usually using an alkylhalide. Pre-
dominantly the halides are made by this method although
other salts such as CF3SO3 can also be made in this way.59 The
halide can then be exchanged for the desired anion by reaction
with a metal salt (most frequently silver e.g. R4N Cl + Ag
Tf2N - R4N Tf2N + AgClk), Brønstead acid or an ion
exchange resin. In industry Tf2N based liquids are commonly
made by acid/base titration from R4NOH and H-Tf2N or by
metathesis reaction with LiTf2N and R4NCl.
Synthesis of complex anions is trivial and involves
simple mixing of the quaternary ammonium halide with
a Lewis or Brønstead acid, generally with moderate
heating. An additional advantage of using complex anions
is the fact that they are simple mixtures of two components
so can be split to give the original components for recycling
or disposal.
Table 2 Physical properties of various ionic liquids
Salt g/mN m�1 R+/A R�/A P(r 4 R) Z/103 Pa s T/K
EMIm BF4 46.7 3.31 2.50 38 298EMIm TfO 39.2 3.31 2.97 45 293EMIm Tf2N 39.6 3.31 3.62 34 293EMIm (CN)2 42.6 3.31 2.66 16 298BMIm BF4 46.6 3.55 2.50 3.06 � 10�5 219 298BMIm PF6 48.8 3.55 2.78 7.85 � 10�5 450 298BMIm Tf2N 37.5 3.55 3.62 1.20 � 10�4 69 298HMIm PF6 43.4 3.81 2.78 1.06 � 10�4 585 298OMIm PF6 36.5 4.03 2.78 3.20 � 10�3 682 303Acetylcholine Tf2N 38.6 3.70 3.62 4.85 � 10�5 240 298BzCOOC2H4N(CH3)3 Tf2N 37.71 3.96 3.62 1.76 � 10�5 6570 298Me2N(Bz)(C2H4OH) Tf2N 39.51 3.72 3.62 3.28 � 10�5 762 298Me2N(C2H4Br)(C2H4OH) Tf2N 40.02 3.59 3.62 4.52 � 10�5 626 298(C4H9)4N picrate 26.4 4.13 3.66 5.29 � 10�3 51 364PhCH2mim Tf2N 40.8 3.73 3.62 1.99 � 10�5 110 298NaCl 98 1.02 1.81 0.836 0.7 1273Water 71.8 1.87 2.74 � 10�2 1.00 298CH2Cl2 26.54 2.62 0.141 0.39 303
4268 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
Potential window
Before deciding which type of ionic liquid is most suitable for
the deposition of a given metal it is important to consider the
reduction potential of the metal and the potential window of
the liquid. This is not always trivial as reduction potentials are
significantly affected by the coordination of the anion to the
metal. The redox potentials for most metals have been collated
for chloroaluminate40 based liquids but insufficient data is
available for other anion systems. Preliminary evidence in
Type II eutectics shows that the relative redox potentials of
metals are related to the coordination geometry of the metal
centre. It has been shown that the difference in the reduction
potentials of metals with similar co-ordination geometry, e.g.
Pb(II) and Zn(II) are very similar to the difference in the
standard aqueous redox potentials.60 The reduction potentials
of metals with different co-ordination geometries e.g. Ag(I)
and Zn(II) are significantly different. Metals with octahedral
coordination geometries do not tend to give reversible electro-
deposition characteristics, however this depends on the ionic
liquid and the available anions as to whether a deposited metal
can be stripped away from the electrode surface.
The redox limits are related to the stability of the anion and
cation. In general most quaternary ammonium cations will
have relatively similar reduction potentials, although direct
comparison of literature values are complicated by issues of
purity, electrode material and reference electrodes. The reduc-
tion of quaternary ammonium cations produces a very reac-
tive neutral radical which can further decompose to
alkylamines, alkanes and a range of other products.61 Matsu-
moto62 showed that for various Tf2N� salts using a glassy
carbon electrode, the negative reduction limit decreased in the
order PrMe3N+ 4 PhMe3N
+ 4 EMI 4 BP whereas the
positive oxidation limit remained constant. Protogenic ionic
liquids such as EtNH3NO3 evolve hydrogen at relatively low
over-potentials and may therefore be less useful for most
electrodeposition experiments. The electrolytes have, however,
been found to be useful electrolytes for fuel cells.62,63
Discrete anions such as BF4�, PF6
� and Tf2N� are stable to
reduction. The largest potential window reported to date is
that of N-methyl N0-propyl piperidinium triflamide which was
found to be stable over a 5.8 V window.64 Most imidazolium-
based salts with discrete anions have potential windows in the
range 4 to 5 V and are stable down to potentials of �2.2 V vs.
Fc/Fc+,65 which is clearly advantageous for the deposition of
metals such as Al, Ti, Li and Na. The addition of water to
these systems, however, decreases the potential window be-
cause the water molecules will aggregate making hydrogen
evolution easier at the electrode surface. The effect of water
added to imidazolium salts is given by Schroeder et al.66 and
Matsumoto65 where decreases in the cathodic limit of ca. 2 V
are reported.
Katase et al. studied the deposition of Li, Mg, Ni, Zn, Al,
La, and Dy in trimethyl-n-hexylammonium bis(trifluoro-
methyl)sulfonyl)amide (TMHA-Tf2N), and found that despite
the wide electrochemical window (5 V) the presence of small
amounts of water caused some problems in metal electrode-
position.67 For Type I and II eutectics it is usually the
reduction of the metal that defines the negative potential limit.
Type I eutectics have been prepared with Zn, Sn, Fe, Al, Ge,
Ga and Cu halides. The more Lewis acidic the metal halide the
more negative is its reduction potential. Because the negative
reduction potential is related to the Lewis acidity of the liquid,
the relative proportions of metal and quaternary ammonium
salts will also affect the potential window. Type I haloalumi-
nate mixtures were some of the original ionic liquids made and
these systems have been studied in considerable detail. They
have the most negative reduction limits and potential limits
down to �2.6 V vs. Fc/Fc+ have been reported68 using ethyl
methyl imidazolium salts on a tungsten electrode in Lewis
basic chloroaluminate melts (xAlCl3= 0.4). While they have
clearly been studied for aluminium deposition Fe, Co, Ni, Cu,
Zn, Ga, Pd, Ag, Cd, In, Sn, Sb, Te, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb and Bi
have been deposited as pure metals andMg, Sr, Ti, Cr, Nd and
La have been deposited as alloys.64 The deposition of these
metals is mostly of academic interest since the water sensitivity
of the chloroaluminate melts will not make them a realistic
alternative. The deposition of alloys is, however, of consider-
able use because aluminium alloys are difficult to form parti-
cularly given the difference in reduction potentials between
aluminium and most alloying metals. A more comprehensive
review of chloroaluminate potential windows is given by
Matsumoto.65
The oxidative limit for Type I and II eutectics is generally
the evolution of chlorine although this is usually electrode
specific as many metal electrode materials will oxidise in
preference. Type II eutectics were developed to extend the
range of metals that could be included in ionic liquids.49
Relatively little is known about these systems and to date
the only metal that has been shown to be successfully depos-
ited from this type of liquid is chromium. The waters of
hydration play an important role in the stability and fluidity
of these liquids. The waters do not behave as bulk water and
the potential window is limited by the reduction of metal in the
chromium case rather than water. The metal can be reduced
with high current efficiency and this is unaffected by the
addition of up to 10 wt% water suggesting that the water is
strongly associated with the chloride anions or the metal
centre.
In general, eutectic based ionic liquids are considerably less
susceptible to the addition of water and unpublished data
from a number of workers in the field actually shows that
the presence of small amounts of water is actually beneficial
to deposit morphology. Even the chloroaluminate systems
are tolerant of moderate amounts of water.69,70 This is clearly
an important issue for the development of practical electro-
plating systems but the effect of water has not yet been
quantified.
For ionic liquids with large halide concentrations break-
down of metal oxides on electrode surfaces is prevalent. This
means that few metals are actually inert in these liquids and for
the vast majority of eutectic systems the anodic limit is not
governed by the liquid but rather by the oxidation of the
electrode material. Even metals such as Pt, Au, Al and Ti can
be oxidised in ionic liquids as the oxides are broken down in
high ionic strength liquids. This is more prevalent in eutectic-
based ionic liquids where the chloride ions act as good ligands
for the dissolving metal ions. This has advantages for metal
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4269
plating as it means that soluble anodes can be used for almost
all metals. This is particularly useful for aluminium as it
ensures that aluminium concentrations in solution remain
approximately constant and it minimises the handling of
moisture sensitive compounds. It also means that the over-
potential required to drive the deposition process is small. The
same has been shown for chromium deposition on a 500 ml
scale using chromium rod anodes, but further scale up would
necessitate the design of a different type of anode as chromium
sheet and rod are not available on a commercial scale. The
ease of metal dissolution means that most electrodes can be
pre-etched in situ in the ionic liquid such that subsequent
deposition leads to better adherence to the substrate. Endres
et al.71 have recently shown that the adhesion of aluminium to
mild steel is greatly enhanced by etching the electrode in situ in
the ionic liquid prior to deposition. While this is a well-known
technique in aqueous electrolytes it has seldom been applied to
ionic liquids. The technique could be used for substrates that
are difficult to electrodeposit onto, such as aluminium, and
while we have shown qualitatively that this is possible it
appears to be ionic liquid specific and the etch time and
potential are not trivial to optimise. The instability of anodic
materials will however present difficulties for systems that
require inert anodes e.g. for alloy deposition or electro-win-
ning applications and this is an important matter that needs to
be urgently addressed.
The electrodissolution of metals in ionic liquids has been
utilised for electropolishing of stainless steel.72,73 This was
performed using a type III eutectic where the hydrogen bond
donor is ethylene glycol. The process is essentially the same as
the sulfuric and phosphoric acid process currently operated
but the process is considerably more current efficient (ca. 90%)
and the electrolyte is non-corrosive and non-toxic. This has
been scaled up to 1.3 tonnes in a pilot plant, thus demonstrat-
ing that ionic liquids have significant potential for metal
finishing applications. It may also be that other metal finishing
applications such as anodising or chromating may lend them-
selves to this sort of approach.
Systems studied
To date the majority of technologically important metals have
been electrodeposited from ionic liquids with both discrete and
complex anions. The deposits have mostly been amorphous or
nano-crystalline. Examples of the metals studied are shown in
Table 3. A comprehensive review is given by Endres in a recent
article20 and aluminium17,18 eutectics are reviewed in a number
of other articles.22 The metals studied have been dependent on
the discovery of new ionic liquids. In the 1960s and 1970s the
study of ionic liquids was dominated by the deposition of
aluminium and some aluminium alloys, although the main
advances were made in the 1990s. Table 3 shows that the
majority of transition block elements have been studied in
chloroaluminate liquids and while they may not be practically
applicable to the deposition of pure metals the deposition of
aluminium based alloys would be technologically very impor-
tant if the processes could be optimised and scaled up to
obtain bright crystalline deposits of the desired composition.
Of significant note are studies of Al/Ti and Al/Cr alloys which
should offer good corrosion and wear resistance.74,75
The introduction of discrete anions in the 1990s8 heralded a
wider range of metals that could be electrodeposited and the
air and moisture stability of these systems makes them a great
technological advance. The reduction of viscosity to ca. 10 cP
(0.01 Pa s) has also highlighted them as potential candidates
for deposition of reactive metals such as Li and Ti.55,56
Conductivities of 10 mS cm�1 still represent a difficulty for
industrial plating applications particularly if dimensionally
stable anodes are used for the electrodeposition of metals with
large negative reduction potentials as it will necessitate the use
of large over-potentials with high current densities and this
will result in significant ohmic loss.
Studies of deposition in ionic liquids still need to address the
issue of material nucleation and growth and the identification
of suitable brighteners/levellers. Endres and Freyland have
used scanning tunnelling microscopy to investigate the funda-
mental issues of metal nucleation in a variety of ionic
liquids.76–78 Electrocrystallisation of Ni and Co and their
respective alloys with Al were studied in AlCl3/bmimC- and
bmimPF6. Clear differences were observed in the 2-D phase
formation of the Ni monolayer vs. Co island formation. This
was ascribed to the difference in interfacial free energies of
these two metals. Electrodeposition of the aluminium alloys
with Ni and Co was found to be very similar. In both cases,
codeposition starts at potentials positive of the pure alumi-
nium redox potential and as the Al content increases the grain
size of the alloy decreases.
Table 3 Examples of metals deposited from ionic liquids
Ionic liquid type
Discrete anions BF4� Cd,115 Cu,116 Sb,117 In,118 Sn,119 Pd/In,120 Pd,120 Au,121 Ag122,123,Pd/Au,121 In/Sb,119 Cd/Te,124 Pd/Ag125
PF6� Ag,123 Ge,76–78,126
(F3CSO2)2N� Li,127–129 Mg,130 Ti,131 Al,39 Si,132,133 Ta,134 La,135 Sm,135 Cu,136 Co,137 Eu,138 Ag,139–141 Cs142 Ga,143
Ga/As,144 In/Sb,145 Sn,146 Nb/Sn,147–149
Type I Eutectics AlCl3 Al,17,18 Fe,113,150–152 Co,152,153 Ni,152 Cu,152,154,155 Zn,156 Ga,157–158 Pd,113,159 Au,160,161 Ag,152,162,163
Cd,164 In,165 Sn,166 Sb,167 Te,168 Ti,169 Cr,170 Hg,171 Na,172 Li,173 Tl,174 La,175 GaAs,176,177 Pb178 andBi179
Al alloys with Ag,180,181 Fe,182 Mg,183 Mn,184 Ni,152,185,186 Cu,187 Co,188 Sr,189 Ti,190 Cr,191 Nb,192,193
Nd194,195 and La175,194,195
ZnCl2 Zn,45,196 Sn,197 Zn/Fe,198 Zn/Pt,199 Zn/Co,200 Zn/Sn,197,200 Cd,201 Zn/Cd,201 Zn/Cu,45 Zn/Te202
Zn/Ni,203Zn/Co/Dy204
Type II Eutectics CrCl3.6H2O Cr49
Type III Eutectics Urea Zn,106 Zn/Sn,106 Sn106 Cu,105 Zn/Pb,104 Ag,105
Ethylene Glycol Zn,106 Sn,106 Zn/Sn106
4270 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
Very few studies have addressed the physical properties of
the films such as hardness and roughness, which are vital. One
report shows that nanocrystalline aluminium has improved
hardness over bulk aluminium but the number of such studies
needs to be increased to demonstrate the potential advantages
for metal deposition offered by ionic liquids.79
While Type II and III eutectics may appear to address
metals that can already be deposited from aqueous systems,
the ability to replace environmentally hazardous chemicals
such as CrO3 and KCN together with the ability to fine tune
the composition and morphology of alloys are clearly
advantageous to already mature market products. Before
attempting to optimise ionic liquids for electrodeposition
applications it is important to appreciate the ways in which
ionic liquids differ from aqueous solutions. The principle
factors are viscosity, conductivity, speciation, potential win-
dow, double layer structure, redox potentials and metal hy-
droxide/oxide chemistry. All of these factors will affect the
rate at which metal ions diffuse to the electrode surface and
the thermodynamics and kinetics of the metal reduction
process. These in turn control the nucleation and growth
mechanisms and affect the material morphology and it is the
fundamental mechanism of material growth that needs to be
understood. There are numerous parameters that can be
systematically varied to change the deposition characteristics.
These are:
� Temperature
� Cation� Anion
� Electrolytes� Metal salts
� Hydrogen bond donor
� Diluents
� Anode material
� Brighteners� Pre-treatment protocol.
� Complexing agents
Viscosity
One of the main differences between ionic liquids and aqueous
solutions is the comparatively high viscosity of the former.
Table 2 shows that viscosities are typically in the range 10–
500 cP (0.01–0.50 Pa s) and this has a concomitant effect upon
the diffusion coefficients not only of the metal species to the
electrode but also the counter ions and complexants away
from the diffusion layer. Fig. 1 shows the viscosity of various
ionic liquids with discrete and complex anions. It can be seen
that cation structure has a significant effect but the type of
anion is equally if not more important in governing mass
transport.
A number of groups have studied the effect of viscosity on
diffusion coefficient. By comparing the diffusion coefficients
obtained from conductivity and NMR studies some groups
have claimed to obtain information about the ion–ion inter-
actions.80 a more detailed analysis of the effect of diffusion
coefficient on voltammetry is given by Compton.81
Most new liquids characterise the viscosity as a function of
temperature and the majority find that it varies in an Arr-
henius manner with temperature, viz;
ln Z ¼ ln Z0 þEZ
RTð1Þ
where EZ is the activation energy viscous flow and Z0 is a
constant. Others have found that it obeys a Vogel–
Tamman–Fulcher relationship.82 A comprehensive study of
viscosity is that of VanderNoot82 and there are several collec-
tions of viscosity data in recent reviews.9,22,83
One method of analyzing the viscosity of ionic liquids is
using hole theory.84 This was developed for molten salts but
has been shown to be very useful for ionic liquids. We have
recently shown that the values of EZ are related to the size of
the ions and the size of the voids present in the liquid.51
The viscosity of room temperature ionic liquids is several
orders of magnitude higher than high temperature molten salts
due partially to the difference in size of the ions, but also due
to the increased void volume. At elevated temperatures, how-
ever, the viscosity decreases by more than one order of
magnitude.
It has been shown85 that hole theory can be applied to both
ionic and molecular fluids to account for viscosity. The
Fig. 1 Viscosity of various ionic liquids as a function of temperature
(A) discrete anions: triethylsulfonium, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium,
1-butyl-1-methyl pyrrolidinium and acetylcholine bistriflimide (data
taken from ref. 82) and (B) complex anions: choline chloride (ChCl)
with urea,50 ethylene glycol73 and CrCl3.6H2O49 and benzyl tri-
methylammonium chloride with AlCl3 (ref. 82).
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4271
viscosity of a fluid, Z, can be modeled by assuming it behaves
like an ideal gas, but its motion was restricted by the avail-
ability of sites of the ions/molecules to move into. Hence it was
shown that
Z ¼ m�c=2:12sPðr4RÞ ð2Þ
Where m is the molecular mass (for ionic fluids this was taken
as the geometric mean), �c is the average speed of the molecule
(= 8kT/pm)1/2) and s is the collision diameter of the molecule
(4pR2). The probability of finding a hole of radius, r, greater
than the radius of the solvent molecule, R, in a given liquid,
(P(r 4 R)) is given by integration of the following expres-
sion.84
Pdr ¼ 16
15ffiffiffipp a7=2 r6 e�ar
2
dr ð3Þ
where a = 4pg/kT and g is the surface tension. The good
correlation obtained between the calculated and measured
viscosities showed that it is valid to think of the viscosity of
fluids as being limited by the availability of holes. It is evident
from eqns (1) and (2) that decreased viscosity can be obtained
by decreasing the surface tension of the liquid i.e. increasing
the free volume, or by decreasing the ionic radius.
This explains why the ionic liquids with the lowest viscosity
have highly fluorinated anions. Comparatively little surface
tension data has been reported but work by Branco et al. and
Huddleston et al. showed that ionic liquids with fluorinated
anions have low surface tensions and low viscosities.55,86,87
The effect of the cation is less clear since in the case of the
imidazolium cation (I) as the length of the R group increases
the viscosity should initially decrease as the ion–ion interac-
tions and hence the surface tension decrease. However, as the
alkyl group increases in size its mobility will decrease due to a
lack of suitably sized voids for the cations to move into and
this explains the data presented by Tokuda et al. who showed
a minimum in viscosity for ethyl methyl imidazolium salts.29
Conductivity
The conductivity of an ionic liquid is also strongly dependent
upon temperature and in an analogous manner to viscosity it
is found to change in an Arrhenius manner
ln s ¼ lns0 �EL
RTð4Þ
where EL is the activation energy for conduction and s0 is a
constant. It has been noted that the empirical Walden rule84
(LZ = constant) is applicable to ionic liquids, where L is the
molar conductivity and Z is the viscosity. Deviations from the
Walden rule have previously been used to explain ionic
association in proton transfer ionic liquids.88,89 The Walden
rule is normally only valid for ions at infinite dilution where
ion–ion interactions can be ignored which is clearly not the
case in ionic liquids.
Since viscosity is limited by the availability of holes then
charge mobility can be considered as being equal to the
migration of holes in the opposite direction to that of the
ions. Since the fraction of suitably sized holes in ambient
temperature ionic liquids is very low (ca. 10�6) the holes can be
assumed to be at infinite dilution and migration should be
described by a combination of the Stokes–Einstein and
Nernst–Einstein equations.
l+ = z2Fe/6pZR+ (5)
where z is the charge on the ion, F is the Faraday constant and
e is the electronic charge. This would explain why so many
studies of conductivity in ionic fluids have noted that the
empirical Walden rule is valid. Since the Stokes–Einstein
equation is valid for both ions then the conductivity of the
salt can be determined since
L = l+ + l� (6)
an expression can be written for the conductivity, k
k ¼ z2Fe
6pZ1
Rþþ 1
R�
� �rMw
ð7Þ
where r is the density and Mw is the molar mass of the ionic
fluid. Hence all of the theories developed for limiting molar
conductivities in molecular solvents are also applicable to ionic
liquids where there is an infinite dilution of suitably sized holes.90
High temperature molten salts do not obey eqn (7) since the
fraction of suitably sized holes is much larger (ca. 0.5) and
hence ionic activity becomes an important factor and because
the ions are smaller than in the high temperature analogues the
ionic association constant will be significant.
Using eqns (2) and (7) it is possible to postulate the
minimum viscosity and conductivity that an ionic liquid can
achieve. To obtain an optimum conductivity and viscosity the
ion size and surface tension of the liquid need to be as small as
possible. It is therefore evident why the highest reported
conductivity for an ionic liquid to date is that of
EtNH3+NO3
� (ca. 150 mS cm�1 at 298 K).54 It is difficult
to foresee a system that could have smaller ions that would still
be a liquid with the obvious exception of protogenic liquids
such as sulfuric, formic and acetic acids which could be
thought of as extreme ionic liquids.
Added electrolytes
Aqueous electroplating solutions typically have conductivities
in the region of 100–500 mS cm�1 because they are mostly high
strength aqueous acids.91 This allows high current densities to
be applied with only limited ohmic loss. Ionic liquids have
significantly lower conductivities at room temperature and
besides increasing the temperature one way to increase the
conductivity could be to add a small inorganic cation such as
Li+ that could have an increased mobility compared to the
large organic cation. This could have an effect upon the
viscosity and freezing point of the liquid as the small cation
will be strongly associated with the anions, but the presence of
a small amount should be negligible. This has been attempted
by a number of groups particularly those developing lithium
ion batteries, but the effect on the conductivity has not been as
significant as expected.92,93 Other salts such as Na+ and K+
have negligible solubility in most ionic liquids. The addition of
electrolytes is clearly an area that requires considerable in-
vestigation in the future.
4272 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
The addition of lithium ions will also have a considerable
effect on the structure of the double layer. Few studies have
been carried out on the structure of the double layer in an ionic
liquid but those that have tend to suggest that the models used
for aqueous solutions are inappropriate in ionic liquids.94,95
One study on imidazolium salts such as triflate, (F3CSO2)2N�
and BF4� suggested that a layered model of alternating anions
and cations was appropriate to describe the structure.95 Work
by Baldelli96,97 which probed the electric field at the ionic
liquid-electrode interface using sum frequency generation
spectroscopy and electrochemistry came to the conclusion that
the double layer is one-ion-layer thick. The double layer
capacitance in an ionic liquid is considerably smaller than in
an aqueous solution and less than that predicted by having a
perfect Helmholtz layer at the interface. One possible explana-
tion of this could be that ion pairs are present on the electrode
surface at all potentials.
Assuming that most metals are reduced at potentials nega-
tive of the potential of zero charge then the electrode must be
coated with a layer of cations at least 6–7 A thick. Since most
metal species are anionic these must be incorporated in or
close to the Helmholtz layer. Adding small ions such as Li+ to
an ionic liquid will decrease the Helmholtz layer thickness
considerably and should make metal ion reduction easier. This
should enhance nucleation and it has been shown qualitatively
to be the case for the deposition of chromium from an eutectic
mixture of chromium chloride and choline chloride. The
incorporation of up to 10 mol% LiCl led to a change of
deposit morphology from microcrystalline to nano-crystalline
and a change in visual appearance from metallic to black.98
Endres also studied the effect of LiF on the nucleation of
tantalum in 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis(trifluoro-
methylsulfonyl)imide. It was found that dense, thick, corro-
sion resistant coatings could be achieved from this electrolyte
system.99
An additional issue that has not been addressed is the
structure of the diffusion layer during the electrolysis process.
Silva100 has proposed that when the metal nucleates at the
electrode surface the layer close to the electrode surface
becomes depleted of metal complex and rich in counter anions.
In principle this could affect the coordination chemistry of
metal ions approaching the electrode–ionic liquid interface.
For instance, in the deposition of aluminium from a Lewis
acidic chloroaluminate liquid the diffusion layer will become
more Lewis basic and the aluminium species present52 could
change from Al2Cl7� to AlCl4
�. This would have a clear effect
upon the growth characteristics and may explain the tendency
for ionic liquids to form nano-crystalline deposits i.e. as the
Lewis acidity changes the rate of growth may decrease and the
rate of nucleation may increase in comparison. A study using
quartz crystal microbalance with probe beam deflection101
analysis could quantify the depletion of the diffusion layer of
metal and the build up of anions. There are still many
unanswered questions on nucleation and on the role of the
rigid and diffuse double layer, therefore many more experi-
ments are required.
An additional complexity will be that the cation will affect
the surface energy of the growing metal nucleus and adsorp-
tion could affect the relative energetics of the nucleation and
growth processes which would have a concomitant effect on
deposit morphology. Endres has found that deposition of
aluminium from Tf2N� salts shows a marked effect of the
cation on deposit morphology.39 This could be due to an
adsorption phenomenon that either limits nucleation or pre-
vents growth. This is another reason why capacitance mea-
surements are urgently required to understand the growth
mechanism in these liquids.
Thermal properties
In general ionic liquids with discrete anions have significantly
wider liquid ranges than the eutectic based liquids. Some imide
based salts are liquid over a 400 to 500 K range. Type I
eutectics have smaller liquid ranges but are still relatively
robust and can withstand temperatures up to ca. 250 1C
without significant decomposition. Type II eutectics are ex-
tremely sensitive to water content and hence temperature.
They are hydrophilic and absorb water from the atmosphere,
but this is also the case for aqueous solutions such as the
chromic acid solution used for chromium plating. It has been
shown that these types of eutectics98 function best in the range
40–60 1C where the water content remains approximately
constant. Type III eutectics depend upon the thermal proper-
ties of the hydrogen bond donor but generally the upper limit
to which they can be used is ca. 150–200 1C.
An additional issue that has not been sufficiently addressed
is the heat capacity of the liquids. The relatively low electrical
conductivity of ionic liquids can lead to ohmic heating when
significant currents are passed through the electrolytes. This
can mean that the liquids actually have to be cooled rather
than heated during large-scale electrolysis. To some extent
heating the plating liquid will not cause it to boil, but it can
affect nucleation and deposit morphology. Waliszewski
et al.102 studied the heat capacity of imidazolium and pyridi-
nium salts and found it had values ranging from 300 to 600
J K�1 mol�1. Hence ionic liquids are easier to heat than
aqueous solutions but alternatively they may suffer to a
greater extent from ohmic heating. These results were con-
firmed by Crosthwaite et al. who studied a wider range of
liquids and found that the heat capacities increased linearly
with the molar mass of the ionic liquid.31
Metal salts
Probably the key issue still to be addressed with the design of
ionic plating systems is the coordination chemistry and con-
centration of the metal complex. It affects both the thermo-
dynamics and kinetics of metal ion reduction and hence is a
major contributory factor to deposit morphology and proper-
ties. To understand the issues it is necessary to make a
comparison with current water-based plating systems. Table
4 lists some constituents of the most commonly used aqueous
electroplating solutions. It is apparent that many have strong
ligands such as oxides or cyanides or oxidising agents present,
which significantly affect the coordination geometry of the
metal complexes. In addition a cocktail of brighteners are
added to most commercial electroplating systems which affect
adsorption, mass transport and coordination chemistry.91
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4273
Most of the ionic liquid systems listed in Table 3 have been
performed using chlorides, and the metal complexes formed
are dependent upon the Lewis acidity of the metal and Lewis
basicity of the ionic liquid. In aqueous plating solutions
chlorides are rarely used as they tend to yield black powdery
deposits. This is thought to be due to the ease of nucleation
leading to large numbers of small nuclei formed at the
electrode surface. This is therefore an issue that needs to be
addressed in future ionic liquids design. Type I eutectic based
ionic liquids necessarily have high metal concentrations and
will tend to promote nucleus formation. The addition of a
strong complexing agent to hinder nucleation may not be
trivial as it will also affect the charge on the metal centre
and affect the interaction between the metal centre and the
halide anion of the ammonium salt. Hence some brighteners
can affect the phase behaviour e.g. the addition of ethylene
diamine to a choline chloride: zinc chloride eutectic mixture
causes the system to freeze despite both components being
liquid.
A number of oxides have been found to dissolve in high
concentrations in Type III eutectics.60 While these have been
studied in terms of electrowinning of metals from ores, the
potential exists to use them for metal plating.103 One issue that
arises is the speciation of the oxide following dissolution.
FAB-MS data have shown that some metals particularly with
acid based hydrogen bond donors revert to the halometalate
complexes e.g. CuO gives CuCl3�.104 Urea based liquids give
complexes when the oxygen is still attached to the metal centre
e.g. ZnO gives [ZnOCl � urea]�.60Fig. 2 shows the first example of the anion effect on the
reduction potential for the Cu2+/Cu+ and Cu+/Cu couples
for various copper salts in a Type III eutectic of
HOC2H4N(CH3)3 Cl: 2urea.105 It is surprising that the redox
potential is so significantly affected since the counter ion is
present in such a small concentration (ca. 20 mM) compared
to the chloride ion (41 M) which shows that the anion
remains bound to the metal upon dissolution. It can also be
seen that the anion not only shifts the redox potential by a
significant amount but also that the trend in Cu2+/Cu+ redox
couples does not match that of the Cu+/Cu couples. The
redox potentials can be changed by up to 100 mV in this way.
Bulk deposition of copper from all of these ionic liquids leads
to black powdery deposits over a wide current density region.
The addition of well known complexing agents such as ethy-
lene diamine and EDTA can have a more significant effect on
redox potentials as shown in Fig. 1B where the position of a
stripping potentials can be shifted by over 250 mV. The
complexing agents are clearly hindering the ability of the
metal to be reduced and therefore hindering nucleation. Bulk
deposition from ionic liquid containing just CuCl2 produces
black, powdery deposits whereas the addition of a complexing
agent can lead to lustrous copper deposits.105
A further issue that has been largely overlooked in ionic
liquids is the importance of the concentration of metal ions. In
systems such as the Type I and II liquids this is interlinked
with all of the physical properties of the liquid since the metal
salt is the anionic component of the liquid. In many cases the
working concentration equates to 5 to 10 mol dm�3 which
although seemingly high is not overly different to many
Table 4 Typical concentrations of metal salts used in commercialaqueous electroplating solutions91
Metal ElectrolyteConcentration ofmetal salts/g dm�3
Chromium CrO3, H2SO4 250–450Copper CuSO4, Potash alum, H2SO4 60–200Nickel NiSO4, NiCl2, Boric acid 200–350Silver Ag salts (various), KCN 80–200
Fig. 2 Cyclic voltammogram of a Pt electrode (diameter 1 mm) in ChCl: 2 urea eutectic containing (A) 20 mM of the following copper salts
Cu(OAc)2 (dashed line), CuCO4 (thin solid line) CuCl2 (dotted line) and CuCl2 + 5 wt.% LiSO4 (thick solid line) (B) 20 mM CuCl2 with ethylene
diamine (thick solid line) 1,10-phenathroline (dashed line) acetonitrile (dotted line) and Na2EDTA (thin solid line).
4274 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
aqueous plating solutions as shown in Table 3. Of more
importance is the effect of metal ion concentration on ionic
liquids with discrete anions and Type III eutectics. In these
cases the metal speciation is strongly controlled by the anion in
the former case and the hydrogen bond donor in the latter.
An additional complication is that in all ionic liquids the
metal complex will tend to dissolve to form anionic species and
these will have a significant effect on viscosity and mass
transport and hence the effect of concentration of metal ions
on reduction current will not be linear. Added to this is the fact
that the anions of the metal salt will further affect the viscosity
leading to an extremely complicated effect of the metal salt on
the deposition characteristics. None of these factors have yet
been quantified or even highlighted.
Hydrogen bond donor
In Type III eutectics the presence of a Brønstead acid changes
the redox potential of the metal and this could act as a built in
brightener. It has previously been shown that changing the
hydrogen bond donor (HBD) from an alcohol to an amide can
change the redox potentials of metals.105 This is partly because
the HBD has a marked effect on viscosity and conductivity
(see above) but also it will change the potential window of the
liquid and the stability/reduction potential of the metal com-
plex. This affects not only the morphology of the metals
deposited from these media but also the composition of alloys
formed. Recent work106 on Zn/Sn alloys has shown that
changing the HBD can change the alloy formed from a 2
phase alloy to a homogeneous alloy.
Diluents
The idea of adding molecular diluents to ionic liquids may
seem counter productive but it is perfectly logical that the
addition of small molecules will have two effects: they decrease
the surface tension of the liquid, increasing the molar free
volume and facilitating easier ion movement. Secondly, the
diluent molecules become part of the mobile species and
lubricate the ion movement. The most appropriate diluent will
depend upon the metal being deposited and the ionic liquid
being used. Several groups have investigated the addition of
small amounts of a variety of co-solvents to ionic liquids and
they have been shown to have a significant effect on the
viscosity of the mixtures.107 This has the advantage that only
a small amount of diluent is required to decrease viscosity and
increase conductivity.
Hussey et al. studied Lewis acidic AlCl3-emimCl ionic
liquids [450 mol% AlCl3] and found that although aluminum
could be electroplated from the neat liquid, the quality of the
electrodeposit is greatly enhanced by the addition of benzene
as a cosolvent.108 The same group studied the deposition of
Ag/Al alloys from the same melt and found that the addition
of benzene hindered the adsorption of silver on the electrode
surface. Attempts to deposit Ni and Ni alloys from chloro-
aluminate melts found that the addition of benzene (20 wt%)
produced a bright deposit at low current densities but a black,
finely-divided powder was produced at higher current densi-
ties.109 Lin and Sun110 studied the analogous chlorozincate
melts and found that the addition of benzene hindered zinc
nucleation. Moy and Emmenegger111 suggested that while
aromatic diluents were effective at producing bright metallic
deposits, substituted aryl fluorides and chlorides were more
stable in Lewis acidic chloroaluminate melts. Hence the effect
of diluents is not fully understood and considerably more
work is needed to understand this variable.
The most suitable diluent and the optimum concentration
will be specific to each metal and ionic liquid. Water may also
be a suitable diluent in some cases acting as both a ligand and
viscosity improver. It has been shown that it is beneficial for
the deposition of metals such as Cr. In some chloride based
eutectics (Type I–III) the presence of water does not signifi-
cantly decrease the potential window until approximately
10 wt.% water is added.98
Anode material
Most work to date has either used soluble anodes or has not
considered the anodic reaction. Even metals such as Cr and Al
have been used as soluble anodes as they can be readily
oxidised in ionic liquids. This is naturally important as it
means that the over-potential for the overall process is small.
No pure metals have been found that do not anodically
dissolve and even Pt, Au and Ti can be made to dissolve in
eutectic based liquids.105 Graphite has been used, but it
fragments following electrolysis at high over-potentials leaving
a black powdered residue at the base of the cell. While anode
dissolution may be advantageous for some metal deposition
applications, for others it may prove problematic e.g. for alloy
deposition or for electrowinning applications. In some cases,
e.g. chromium, it may be impossible to obtain electrodes
because the metals are not commercially available in a suitable
form. The anodic processes occurring in the ionic liquids
containing discrete anions have not been well characterised.
They will be extremely complex as the fluorinated anions tend
to be very stable and act as poor ligands. This means that both
metal dissolution and solution oxidation will both be difficult.
If inert anodes, e.g. iridium oxide coated titanium, are used
then it is difficult to envisage what the anodic process will be
and this is important to determine as the systems will have to
operate at relatively high current densities.
Brighteners
Brighteners are essential to most electroplating systems and
are thought to function by two mechanisms in aqueous
solutions; by complexing the metal ions and decreasing their
reduction potential to make it more difficult to nucleate metal
clusters or by adsorption of an organic species on the electrode
surface blocking nucleation and hindering growth. No sys-
tematic studies have been carried out in ionic liquid using the
types of brighteners used in aqueous solutions and this is
clearly an area that needs to be addressed to see if the bright-
eners function in the same way as they do in water.
Brighteners that involve a complexation with a solution-
based species will depend upon the comparative strength of the
ionic liquid–metal interactions. It would therefore be logical to
suppose that ionic liquids with discrete anions would be likely
to work directly with brighteners used in aqueous solutions as
the interaction between the metal salt and the anion will be
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4275
considerably weaker than those between the metal salt and the
brightener. In eutectic based ionic liquids the chloride anions
act as strong Lewis bases and could decrease the relative
interaction between the metal salt and the brightener.
Brighteners which rely on electrostatic or hydrophobic
interactions may function in ionic liquids but their efficacy is
likely to be surface and cation/anion specific. As with other
solutes in ionic liquids, the general rule of like dissolving like is
applicable i.e. ionic species will generally be soluble as will
species capable of interacting with the anion. Aromatic species
tend to exhibit poor solubility in ionic liquids consisting of
aliphatic cations and vice versa.
The principle of using brighteners in ionic liquids has not
really been demonstrated but recent unpublished results by
Caporali112 showed that semi-bright aluminium could be
obtained using 5 g l�1 phenanthroline as a brightener in a
[BMIm]Cl/AlCl3 ionic liquid. We have also studied the use of
brighteners in choline-based ionic liquids105 and Fig. 3 shows
the effect on the deposit morphology of adding acetonitrile as
a brightener to a ChCl: urea eutectic containing copper(II)
chloride. Visually the deposit formed without acetonitrile is
black and powdery whereas the one with a brightener has a
mirror finish. A range of brighteners have been added to
choline-based ionic liquids and Fig. 4 shows that suitable
compounds have been developed for the deposition of silver,
copper, nickel, zinc and zinc alloys. Endres studied the use of
nicotinic acid for the deposition of Pd and Al/Mn alloys from
an AlCl3-1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ionic liquid
and showed that in contrast to producing a brighter surface
finish it aided the formation of nanocrystalline deposits.113
Pre-treatment protocols
There is very little difference between the pre-treatment pro-
tocols in aqueous solutions and those in ionic liquids other
than in the latter the work-piece needs to be dried before
insertion into the plating solution. A number of methods have
been studied but by far the best adhesion is obtained by
degreasing in a chlorinated solvent, followed by an aqueous
pickle, rinse, dry and then anodic etch in the ionic liquid prior
to deposition. Anodic etch potentials and times are dependent
on the substrate and the ionic liquid used. The main issue is the
removal of the oxide film. Metals such as Al and Mg will
require a larger anodic pulse for a longer period than other
metals such as Cu or Ni. Metal oxide dissolution is easier in
ionic liquids containing a metal that is a good oxygen scaven-
ger. Endres has shown that the adhesion of aluminium to mild
steel is greatly enhanced by an anodic pulse prior to deposi-
tion. It was shown that this alloy was formed between the
substrate and the coating metal.71
Concluding remarks
In conclusion, it has been shown that the majority of metals
can now be electrodeposited from ambient temperature ionic
liquids. It is most likely that ionic liquids will be task specific
with discrete anions being used for metals that cannot be
electrodeposited from aqueous solutions such as Al, Li, Ti, V
and W. Type I eutectics will probably be the most suitable for
Al, Ga and Ge. Type II eutectics are most suitable for Cr and
Type III are most suited to Zn, Cu, Ag and associated alloys.
Type III will also find application in metal winning, oxide
recycling and electropolishing.
Before this technology can find large scale application a
number of fundamental aspects have to be addressed. Firstly
Fig. 3 SEM images of copper deposited from ChCl: 2 urea eutectic
containing 20 mM CuCl2 (A) without and (B) with acetonitrile added
as a brightener.
Fig. 4 Photograph of brass samples coated with metals from various
choline-based ionic liquids.
4276 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
the double layer structure needs to be more thoroughly
analysed and the effects of electrolytes, brighteners, tempera-
ture and composition need to be quantified. Next, the effect of
complexing agents on the redox properties of metals needs to
be ascertained as this is vital to the development of novel alloy
plating techniques. It is likely that diluents will have to be
studied to improve mass transport properties, increase con-
ductivity and improve nucleation characteristics. Finally the
subject of brighteners will have to be addressed. It will
probably start by the application of the systems currently used
in aqueous solutions but will inevitably rely on the informa-
tion gained from double layer studies to develop material with
the correct interfacial properties.
The future for ionic liquid based technology in metal
finishing is extremely bright but more fundamental aspects
of metal growth will have to be studied so that the subject
becomes a practical reality instead of an academic curiosity. A
concerted effort is now taking place through an European
project involving 33, mostly industrial, partners to focus on
the aspects addressed in this review and so it is likely that
many of the issues highlighted above will be answered in the
course of the next 3 years.114
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the EU under the FP6
programme for funding this work through the IONMET
project.
References
1 W. H. Kruesi and D. J. Fray, Metall. Trans. B, 1993, 24B, 605.2 D. J. Fray and G. Z. Chen, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2004, 20, 295.3 C. Grjotheim, M. Krohn, K. Malinovsky, A. Matiasovsky and J.Thonstad, Aluminum Electrolysis, 2nd edn, Aluminium-Verlag,Dusseldorf, 1982.
4 F. Lantelme, H. Alexopoulos, M. Chemla and O. Haas, Electro-chim. Acta, 1988, 33, 761.
5 F. H. Hurley and T. P. Weir, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1951, 98, 207.6 H. L. Chum, V. R. Koch, L. L. Miller and R. A. Osteryoung, J.Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 3264.
7 J. S. Wilkes, J. A. Levisky, R. A. Wilson and C. L. Hussey, Inorg.Chem., 1982, 21, 1263.
8 J. S. Wilkes and M. J. Zaworotko, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-mun., 1992, 965.
9 P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton, Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
10 T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071.11 P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39,
3772.12 M. J. Earle and K. R. Seddon, Pure Appl. Chem., 2000, 72, 1391.13 S. Zhang and Z. Conrad Zhang, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 376.14 J. A. Whitehead, G. A. Lawrence and A. McCluskey, Green
Chem., 2004, 6, 313.15 M. Maase,Multiphase Homogeneous Catalysis, ed. B. Cornils, W.
A. Herrmann, I. T. Horvath, W. Leitner, S. Mecking, H. Olivier-Bourbigou and D. Vogt, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2005, 560.
16 Y. Chauvin, H. Olivier, C. N. Wyrvalski, L. C. Simon, R. deSouza and J. Dupont, J. Catal., 1997, 165, 275.
17 J. S. Wilkes, ACS Symp. Ser., 2002, 818, 214.18 Y. Zhao and T. J. Vandernoot, Electrochim. Acta, 1997, 42, 3.19 S. Zein El Abedin and F. Endres, ChemPhysChem, 2006, 7, 58.20 F. Endres, ChemPhysChem, 2002, 3, 144.21 F. Endres, Z. Phys. Chem., 2004, 218, 255.22 Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, ed. H. Ohno, JohnWiley
& Sons, New York, 2005.
23 M. C. Buzzeo, R. G Evans and R. G. Compton, ChemPhysChem,2004, 5, 1106.
24 F. Endres and S. Zein El Abedin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006,8, 2101.
25 C. J. Bradaric, A. Downard, C. Kennedy, A. J. Robertson and Y.H. Zhou, in Ionic Liquids as Green Solvents: Progress and Pro-spects, ed. R. D. Rogers and K. R. Seddon, ACS Symp. Ser.,Vol. 856, American Chemical Society, Washington D.C., 2003,pp. 41–56.
26 C. J. Bradaric, A. Downard, C. Kennedy, A. J. Robertson and Y.H. Zhou, Green Chem., 2003, 5, 143.
27 L. Xiao and K. E. Johnson, Can. J. Chem., 2004, 82, 491.28 A. Noda andM.Watanabe, Electrochemistry (Tokyo, Jpn), 2002,
70, 140.29 H. Tokuda, K. Hayamizu, K. Ishii, M. Abu Bin Hasan Susan and
M. Watanabe, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 6103.30 M. Lipsztajn and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1985,
132, 1126.31 J. M. Crosthwaite, M. J. Muldoon, J. K. Dixon, J. L. Anderson
and J. F Brennecke, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2005, 37, 559.32 J. Golding, S. Forsyth, D. R. MacFarlane, M. Forsyth and G. B.
Deacon, Green Chem., 2002, 4, 223.33 J. Sun, D. R. MacFarlane and M. Forsyth, Electrochim. Acta,
2003, 48, 1707.34 S. Forsyth, J. Golding, D. R. MacFarlane and M. Forsyth,
Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 46, 1753.35 N. Gathergood, P. J. Scammells and M. T. Garcia, Green Chem.,
2006, 8, 156.36 Z. Du, Z. Li, S. Guo, J. Zhang, L. Zhu and Y. Deng, J. Phys.
Chem. B, 2005, 109, 19542.37 K. Fukumoto, M. Yoshizawa and H. Ohno, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2005, 127, 2398.38 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, H. Munro, R. Rasheed
and V. Tambyrajah, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1, 2010.39 S. Zein El Abedin, E. M. Moustafa, R. Hempelmann, H. Natter
and F. Endres, ChemPhysChem, 2006, 7, 1535.40 Y. Katayama, in Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, ed. H.
Ohno, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005p. 111.41 J. Fuller, R. T. Carlin and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 1997, 144, 3881.42 B. M. Quinn, Z. Ding, R. Moulton and A. J. Bard, Langmuir,
2002, 18, 1734.43 P. Bonhote, A.-P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram
and M. Gratzel, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1168.44 D. R. MacFarlane, M. Forsyth, J. Golding and G. B. Deacon,
Green Chem., 2002, 4, 444.45 (a) N. Koura, T. Endo and Y. Idemoto, J. Non-Cryst. Solids,
1996, 205, 650; (b) L. Simanavicius, A. Stakenas and A. Starkis,Electrochim. Acta, 1997, 42, 1581; (c) Y. Lin and I. Sun, Electro-chim. Acta, 1999, 44, 2771.
46 (a) P. Chen, M. Lin and I. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000147, 3350; (b) P. Chen and I. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 46,1169.
47 M. S. Sitze, E. R. Schreiter, E. V. Patterson and R. G. Freeman,Inorg. Chem., 2001, 40, 2298.
48 J.-Z. Yang, Y. Jin, W. G. Xu, Q.-G. Zhang and S. L. Zang, FluidPhase Equilib., 2005, 227, 41.
49 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies and R. Rasheed,Chem.–Eur. J., 2004, 10, 3769.
50 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, R. Rasheed and V.Tambyrajah, Chem. Commun., 2003, 70.
51 A. P. Abbott, D. Boothby, G. Capper, D. L. Davies and R.Rasheed, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 9142.
52 L. Heerman and W. D’Olislager, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 4704.53 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, H. Munro and R.
Rasheed, Inorg. Chem., 2004, 43, 3447.54 W. Xu and C. A. Angell, Science, 2003, b, 422.55 L. C. Branco, J. N. Rosa, J. J. M Ramos and C. A. M. Afonso,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2002, 8, 3671.56 J. Fuller and R. T. Carlin, in Molten Salts, ed. P. C. Trulove, H.
C. De Long, G. R. Stafford and S. Deki, The ElectrochemicalSociety Proceedings Series, Pennington, New Jersey, 1998.
57 K. R. Seddon, Ionic liquids: Designer solvents?, in The Interna-tional George Papatheodorou Symposium: Proceedings, ed. S.Boghosian, V. Dracopoulos, C. G. Kontoyannis and G. A.
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4277
Voyiatzis, Institute of Chemical Engineering and High Tempera-ture Chemical Processes, Patras, 1999, pp. 131–135.
58 A. J. Carmichael, M. Deetlefs, M. J. Earle, U. Froehlich and K.R. Seddon, Ionic liquids: Improved syntheses and new products,ACS Symposium Series, 2003, 856, 14.
59 C. M. Gordon, in Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, ed. P. Wasserscheid,T. Welton, Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim Germany 2003.p. 7.
60 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, R. Rasheed and P.Shikotra, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 6497.
61 M. Galova, Electrochim. Acta, 1984, 29, 323.62 H. Matsumoto, M. Yanagida, K. Tanimoto, T. Kojima, Y.
Tamiya and Y. Miyazaki, inMolten Salts XII, ed. P. C. Truelove,Electrochemistry Society, 2000, p 186.
63 A. B. H. Susan, A. Noda, S. Mitsuchima and M. Watanabe,Chem. Commun., 2003, 938.
64 H. Sakaebe and H. Matsumoto, Electrochem. Commun., 2003,594.
65 Electrochemical Aspects of Ionic Liquids, ed. H. Matsumoto andH. Ohno, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2005, pp. 35–54.
66 U. Schroder, J. D. WadHawan, R. G. Compton, F. Marken, P.A. Z. Suarez, C. S. Consorti, R. F. de Sousa and J. Dupont, NewJ. Chem., 2000, 24, 1009.
67 T. Katase, T. Onishi, S. Imashuku, K. Murase, T. Hirato and Y.Awakura, Electrochemistry (Tokyo, Jpn), 2005, 73, 686.
68 R. T. Carlin and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1988,252, 81.
69 S. Sahami and R. A. Osteryoung, Anal. Chem., 1983, 55, 1970.70 A. P. Abbott, C. A. Eardley, N. S. Farley and A. Pratt, J. Appl.
Electrochem., 2001, 31, 1345.71 QX. Liu, S. Zein El Abedin and F. Endres, Surf. Coat. Technol.,
2006, DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.01.065.72 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, K. J. McKenzie and K. S. Ryder,
Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51, 4420.73 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, B. Swain and D. Wheeler, Trans. Inst.
Met. Finish., 2005, 82, 51.74 T. Tsuda, C. L. Hussey, G. R. Stafford and J. E. Bonevich, J.
Electrochem. Soc., 2003, C234, 150.75 M. R. Ali, A. Nishikata and T. Tsuru, Electrochim. Acta, 1997,
42, 2347.76 W. Freyland, C. A. Zell, S. Zein El-Abedin and F. Endres,
Electrochim. Acta, 2003, 48, 3053.77 S. Zein El-Abedin and F. Endres, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002,
4, 1640.78 F. Endres, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2001, 3, 3165.79 M. Bukowski, H. Natter, F. Endres and R. Hempelmann,
GDCh–Monographie, 2003, 29, 92.80 A. Noda, K. Hayamizu and M. Watanabe, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2000, 105, 4603.81 (a) R. G. Evans, O. V. Klymenko, P. D. Price, S. G. Davies, C.
Hardacre and R. G. Compton, ChemPhysChem, 2005, 6, 526; (b)R. G. Evans, A. J. Wain, C. Hardacre and R. G. Compton,ChemPhysChem, 2005, 6, 1035.
82 O. O. Okoturo and T. J. VanderNoot, J. Electroanal. Chem.,2004, 568, 167.
83 (a) D. Swartling, L. Ray, S. Compton and D. Ensor, Bull.Biochem. Biotechnol., 2000, 13, 1; (b) R. Hagiwara and Y. Ito,J. Fluorine Chem., 2000, 105, 221.
84 J. O’M. Bockris and A. K. N. Reddy, Modern Electrochemistry,Plenum Press, New York, 1970, vol. 1, ch. 6.
85 A. P. Abbott, ChemPhysChem, 2004, 5, 1242.86 J. G. Huddleston, A. E. Visser, W. M. Reichert, H. D. Willauer,
G. A. Broker and R. D. Rogers, Green Chem., 2001, 3, 156.87 W. Martino, J. Fernandez de la Mora, Y. Yoshida, G. Saito and
J. Wilkes, Green Chem., 2006, 8, 390.88 W. Xu, E. I. Cooper and C. A. Angell, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003,
107, 6170.89 E. I. Cooper and C. A. Angell, Solid State Ionics, 1983, 10, 617.90 A. P. Abbott, ChemPhysChem, 2005, 6, 2404.91 The Canning Handbook, E & F. N. Spoon Ltd., London, 23rd
edn, 1989.92 (a) M. Hirao, H. Sugimoto and H. Ohno, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
2000, 147, 4168; (b) M. Yoshizawa, W. Xu and C. A. Angell, J.Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 15411.
93 (a) J. Sun, L. R. Jordan, M. Forsyth and D. R. MacFarlane,Electrochim. Acta, 2001, 46, 1703; (b) M. Yamada and I. Honma,Electrochim. Acta, 2003, 48, 2411.
94 R. J. Gale and R. A. Osteryoung, Electrochim. Acta, 1980, 25,1527.
95 (a) C. Nanjundiah, S. F. McDevitt and V. R. Koch, J. Electro-chem. Soc., 1997, 144, 3392; (b) C. Nanjundiah, J. L. Goldman, S.F. McDevitt and V. R. Koch, Proc. Electrochem. Soc., 1997,96–25, 301.
96 S. Baldelli, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 27, 109.97 S. Rivera-Rubero and S. Baldelli, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108,
15133.98 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, R. K. Rasheed, J. Archer
and C. John, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish., 2004, 82, 14.99 S. Zein El Abedin, H. K. Farag, E. M. Moustafa, U. Welz-
Biermann and F. Endres, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2005, 7, 2333.100 F. Silva, private communication.101 M. J. Henderson, A. R. Hillman and E. Vieil, Electrochim. Acta,
2000, 45, 3885.102 D. Waliszewski, I. Stepniak, H. Piekarski and A. Lewandowski,
Thermochim. Acta, 2005, 433, 149.103 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper and P. Shikotra, Trans. Inst. Min.
Metall., Sect. C, 2006, 115, 15.104 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, K. J. McKenzie and S. U.
J. Obi, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2006, 51, 1280.105 A. P. Abbott, K. J. McKenzie and U. Ibekwe, unpublished
results.106 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, K. J. McKenzie and K. S. Ryder, J.
Electroanal. Chem., in press.107 (a) A. G. Avent, P. A. Chaloner, M. P. Day and T. Welton, J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 3405; (b) Q. Liao, W. R. Pitner,G. Stewart and C. L. Hussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144, 936;(c) C. Comminges, R. Barhdadi, M. Laurent and M. Troupel, J.Chem. Eng. Data, 2006, 51, 680; (d) D. Chakrabarty, A. Chakra-borty, D. Seth and N. Sarkar, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2005, 109, 1764;(e) K. R. Seddon, A. Stark and M. J. Torres, Pure Appl. Chem.,2000, 72, 2275; (f) R. L. Perry, K. M. Jones, W. D. Scott, Q. Liaoand C. L. Hussey, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1995, 40, 615.
108 (a) Q. Zhu, C. L Hussey and G. R. Stafford, J. Electrochem. Soc.,2001, 148, C88; (b) Q. Liao, W. R. Pitner, G. Steward and C. LHussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144, 936.
109 W. R. Pitner, C. L Hussey and G. R. Stafford, J. Electrochem.Soc., 1996, 143, 130.
110 Y. F. Lin, I.-W. Sun and I. Wen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 146,1054.
111 R. Moy and F. P. Emmenegger, Electrochim. Acta, 1992, 37,1061.
112 S. Caporali, private communication.113 F. Endres, M. Bukowski, R. Hempelmann and H. Natter, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 3428.114 http://www.ionmet.com.115 P.-Y. Chen and I.-W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 3163.116 P.-Y. Chen and I.-W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 1999, 44, 441.117 M.-H. Yang and I.-W. Sun, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2003, 33, 1077.118 M.-H. Yang and I.-W. Sun, J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 2004, 51, 253.119 M. Morimitsu, Y. Nakahara, Y. Iwaki and M. Matsunaga, J.
Min. Metall. Metall., 2003, 39, 59.120 S.-I. Hsiu, C.-C. Tai and I.-W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51,
2607.121 F.-Y. Su, J.-F. Huang and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2004,
151, C815.122 Y. Katayama, S. Dan, T. Miura and T. Kishi, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 2001, 148, C102.123 P. He, H. T. Liu, Z. Y. Li, Y. Liu, X. D. Xu and J. H. Li,
Langmuir, 2004, 20, 10260.124 S.-I. Hsiu and I.-W. Sun, J. Appl. Electrochem., 2004, 34, 1057.125 C.-C. Tai, F.-Y. Su and I.-W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 50,
5504.126 F. Endres and C. Schrodt, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2,
5517.127 H. Matsumoto, M. Yanaida, K. Tanimoto, T. Kojima, Y.
Tamiya and Y. Miyazaki, in Molten Salts XII, ed. P. C. Trulove,H. C. De Long, G. R. Stafford and S. Deki, Proc. Vol. 99-41,Electrochemical Society, 1999, p. 186.
4278 | Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006
128 H. Sakaebe and H. Matsumoto, Electrochem. Commun., 2003, 5,594.
129 Y. Katayama, T. Morita, M. Yamagata and T. Miura, Electro-chemistry (Tokyo, Jpn), 2003, 71, 1033.
130 L. Nu, Y. Yanna, W. Jun, X. Jiulin; and W. P. Jinqiang,Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2005, 8, C166.
131 I. Mukhopadhyay, C. L. Aravinda, D. Borissov andW. Freyland,Electrochim. Acta, 2005, 50, 1275.
132 N. Borisenko, S. Z. El Abedin and F. Endres, J. Phys. Chem. B,2006, 110, 6250.
133 S. Zein El Abedin, N. Borissenko and F. Endres, Electrochem.Commun., 2004, 6, 510.
134 S. Zein El Abedin, H. K. Farag, E. M. Moustafa, U. Welz-Biermann and F. Endres, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2005, 7, 2333.
135 M. Yamagata, Y. Katayama and Y. Miura, in Molten Salt XIII,ed. H. C. De Long, R. W. Bradshaw, M. Matsunaga, G. R.Stafford and P. C. Trulove, vol. 19, Electrochemical society, 2002,p. 640.
136 K. Murase, K. Nitta, T. Hirato and Y. Awakura, J. Appl.Electrochem., 2001, 31, 1089.
137 R. Fukui Y. Katayama and T. Miura, Electrochemistry (Tokyo,Jpn), 2005, 73, 567.
138 A. I. Bhatt, I. May, V. A. Volkovich, D. Collison, M. Helliwell, I.B. Polovov and R. G. Lewin, Inorg. Chem., 2005, 44, 4934.
139 Y. Katayama, T. Miura and T. Kishi, Hyomen Gijutsu, 2001, 52,64.
140 T. Miura, Yoyuen, 2002, 45, 61.141 Y. Katayama, M. Yukumoto, M. Yamagata, T. Miura and T.
Kishi, in Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Molten Salt Chemistry Technology,ed. C. Nianyi and Q. Zhiyu, Shanghai University Press, 2001,p. 190.
142 P.-Y. Chen and C. L. Hussey, Electrochim. Acta, 2004, 49, 5125.143 S. P. Wicelinski, R. J. Gale and J. S. Wilkes, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1987, 134, 262.144 M. K. Carpenter and M. W. Verbrugge, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1990, 137, 123.145 M. K. Carpenter and M. W. Verbrugge, J. Mater. Res., 1994, 9,
2584.146 G. Lin and N. Koura, Denki Kagaku, 1997, 65, 149.147 N. Koura, G. Ling and H. Ito, Hyomen Gijutsu, 1995, 45, 1162.148 G. Ling and N. Koura, Hyomen Gijutsu, 1997, 48, 454.149 N. Koura, T. Umebayashi, Y. Idemoto and G. Ling, Electro-
chemistry (Tokyo, Jpn), 1999, 67, 684.150 C. Nanjundiah, K. Shimizu and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electro-
chem. Soc., 1982, 11, 2474.151 M. Lipsztajn and R. A. Osteryoung, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 716.152 R. T. Carlin, H. C. De Long, J. Fuller and P. C. Trulove,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145, 1598.153 J. A. Mitchell, W. R. Pitner, C. L. Hussey and G. R. Stafford,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143, 3448.154 C. Nanjundiah and R. A. Osteryoung, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1983,
130, 1312.155 F. Endres and A. Schweizer, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2,
5455.156 W. R. Pitner and C. L. Hussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144,
3095.157 P. Y. Chen, Y. F. Lin and I. W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999,
146, 3290.158 M. W. Verbrugge andM. K. Carpenter, AIChE J., 1990, 36, 1097.159 H. C. De Long, J. S. Wilkes and R. T. Carlin, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 1994, 141, 1000.160 X.-H. Xu and C. L. Hussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1992, 139, 3103.161 E. R. Schreiter, J. E. Stevens, M. F. Ortwerth and R. G. Freeman,
Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 3935.162 X. H. Hu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1992, 139, 1295.163 Y. Katayama, S. Dan, T. Miura and T. Kishi, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 2001, 148, C102.
164 P. Y. Chen and I. W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2000, 45, 3163.165 J. S. Y. Liu and I. W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144,
140.166 X.-H. Xu and C. L. Hussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1993, 140,
618.167 D. A. Habboush and R. A. Osteryoung, Inorg. Chem., 1984, 23,
1726.168 E. G. S. Jeng and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1997, 144, 2369.169 T. Tsuda, C. L. Hussey, G. R. Stafford and J. E. Bonevich, J.
Electrochem. Soc., 2003, 150, C234.170 M. R. Ali, A. Nishikata and T. Tsuru, Electrochim. Acta, 1997,
42, 2347.171 X.-H. Xu and C. L. Hussey, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1993, 140, 1226.172 G. E. Gray, P. A. Kohl and J. Winnick, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1995, 142, 3636.173 B. J. Piersma, Proc. Electrochem. Soc., 1994, 94, 415.174 E. G.-S. Jeng and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145,
1196.175 T. Tsuda and Y. Ito, Proc. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 99–41, 100.176 S. P. Wicelinski and R. J. Gale, Proc. Electrochem. Soc., 1987,
134, 262.177 M. K. Carpenter and M. W. Verbrugge, J. Electrochem. Soc.,
1987, 87–7, 591.178 C. L. Hussey and X. Xu, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, 138, 1886.179 L. Heerman and W. D’Olieslager, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, 138,
1372.180 C. A. Zell, F. Endres and W. Freyland, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
1999, 1, 697.181 F. Endres and W. Freyland, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102, 10229.182 R. T. Carlin, H. C. De Long, J. Fuller and P. C. Trulove, J.
Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145, 1598.183 M. Morimitsu, N. Tanaka and M. Matsunaga, Chem. Lett., 2000,
1028.184 J. C. Li, S. H. Nan and Q. Jiang, Surf. Coat. Technol., 1998, 106,
135.185 W. R. Pitner, C. L. Hussey and G. R. Stafford, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 1996, 143, 130.186 C. A. Zell and W. Freyland, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2001, 337, 293.187 B. J. Tierney, W. R. Pitner, J. A. Mitchell, C. L. Hussey and G. R.
Stafford, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145, 3110.188 R. T. Carlin, P. C. Trulove and H. C. De Long, J. Electrochem.
Soc., 1996, 143, 2747.189 Y. S. Fung andW. B. Zhang, J. Appl. Electrochem., 1997, 27, 857.190 N. Guo, J. Gio and S. Xiong, Fushi Kexue Yu Fanghu Jishu, 1998,
10, 290.191 M. R. Ali, A. Nishikata and T. Tsuru, Electrochim. Acta, 1997,
42, 2347.192 N. Koura, T. Kato and E. Yumoto, Hyomen Gijutsu, 1994, 45,
805.193 G. T. Cheek, H. C. De Long and P. C. Trulove, Proc. Electro-
chem. Soc., 2000, 99–41, 527.194 D. Wei and M. Okido, Curr. Top. Electrochem., 1997, 5, 21.195 I. Galasiu, R. Galasiu and J. Thonstad,Nonaqueous Electrochem.,
1999, 461.196 S.-I. Hsiu, J.-F. Huang, I.-W. Sun, C.-H. Yuan and J. Shiea,
Electrochim. Acta, 2002, 47, 4367.197 J.-F. Huang and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2003, 150, E299.198 J.-F. Huang and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2004, 151, C8.199 J.-F. Huang and I.-W. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2004, 49, 3251.200 A. P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, R. Rasheed and
V. Tambyrajah, Trans. Inst. Met. Finish., 2001, 79, 204.201 J.-F. Huang and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2002, 149, E348.202 M.-C. Lin, P.-Y. Chen and I.-W. Sun, J. Electrochem. Soc., 2001,
148, C653.203 N. Koura, Y. Suzuki, Y. Idemoto, T. Kato and F. Matsumoto,
Surf. Coat. Technol., 2003, 169, 120.204 H.-Y. Hsu and C.-C. Yang, Z. Naturforsch., 2003, 58b, 139.
This journal is �c the Owner Societies 2006 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 4265–4279 | 4279