Application No: 2017/3822 Application Type:

FULL

Case Officer: Steve Elliott Ward: Walton South Ward

Expiry Date: 07/03/2018

Location: Sherwood House 40 Severn Drive Walton-On-Thames Surrey KT12 3BH

Proposal: Two-storey side/rear extension to west side of building, two-storey rear extension to east of building, alterations to existing parking and new access and associated landscaping following demolition of existing plant room

Applicant: Asprey Healthcare

Agent: Mr Mike Bunyan Carless & Adams Partnership 6 Progress Business Centre Whittle Parkway Bath Road Slough SL1 6DQ

Decision Level: If Permit – Sub Committee If Refuse – Sub Committee

Recommendation: Permit

Representations: 31 letters of representation have been received from 20 separate households raising the following concerns:

• The proposal would result in the building doubling in size

• Out of keeping with the scale and character of the area

• Overly dominant in appearance

• Loss of open space

• Loss of privacy

• Loss of a view

• Loss of trees

• Lack of parking spaces

• No security lighting has been proposed

• Additional noise and disturbance

• Additional clinical and commercial waste will be created

• Pollution from delivery/refuse vehicles using the service bay

• Insufficient drainage information

• Impact upon protected species

• Boundary is not in the correct place

• Plans do not include extensions added to properties within Walton Park

• The development will be on top of sewer pipes

This application has been promoted to the Sub Committee by Councillor if the recommendation is to permit

***This application qualifies for Public Speaking***

R e p o r t Description

1. The site consists of Sherwood House and associated grounds located on the north side of Severn Drive in the Design and Character Sub-Area of WAL06: Rydens. The building was constructed in the mid-1980s and provides residential accommodation and care for elderly residents.

Constraints

2. The relevant planning constraint is:

• Tree Preservation Order Policy

3. In addition to the National Planning Policy Framework and the National Planning Practice Guidance, the following local policies and guidance are relevant to the determination of this application:

Core Strategy 2011

CS1 – Spatial Strategy CS2 – Housing provision, location and distribution CS3 – Walton on Thames CS16 – Social and community infrastructure CS17 – Local character, design and density CS19 – Housing type and size CS20 – Older people CS25 – Travel and accessibility CS26 – Flooding

Development Management Plan 2015 DM1 – Presumption in favour of sustainable development DM2 – Design and amenity DM6 – Landscape and trees DM7 – Access and parking DM8 – Refuse, recycling and external plant DM9 – Social and community facilities DM10 – Housing Design and Character SPD 2012 Companion Guide: Walton on Thames Developer Contributions SPD 2012 Flood Risk SPD 2016

4. Relevant Planning History

Reference Description Decision

2015/3736 Tree Preservation Order EL:13/14 - ash trees - crown lift and reduction of branch over highway (see application on line for details).

Consent granted.

2013/1261 3 timber cabins (28sqm) following demolition of existing shed (15.5sqm).

Permitted.

2009/1539 Single storey rear extensions, a single storey front extension, an entrance canopy, rear dormer windows to create 8 additional bedrooms and provision of additional parking.

Permitted.

84/1234 Erection of extension to rear gardens of dwelling houses on Walton Park Walton Charities.

Permitted.

84/0396 Erection of a pair of semi-detached houses and a detached house each with an attached garage, to provide accommodation for staff of Sherwood House

Permitted.

82/0624 Erection of two-storey building to provide 24 Permitted.

single-person and 6 two-person bedsitting units together with 2 three-person wardens flats, dining and other communal facilities, access road and car parking.

Proposal

5. Planning permission is sought for a two-storey side/rear extension to west side of building,

two-storey rear extension to east of building, alterations to existing parking and new access and associated landscaping following demolition of existing plant room.

6. The plans were amended during the determination period. Residents were notified in writing

regarding the amendments.

Consultations

7. Surrey County Council (SuDS) – Identified that should permission be granted a suitably worded surface water drainage condition be imposed.

8. Tree Officer – Raised no arboricultural objection subject to suitably worded tree protection and

landscaping conditions being imposed.

9. Natural England – Raised no objection.

10. Surrey Wildlife Trust – Raised no objection, however request that works to Building B1 are carried out in a precautionary manner under the supervision of a qualified ecological watching brief and that a condition be imposed requiring the recommendations identified within paragraphs 4.3.2 and 4.3.3 of the submitted Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Bat Building Assessment and Bat Survey Report dated October 2017 and prepared by Carless & Adams Partnership to be carried out.

11. Surrey County Council (Highways) - Based upon the information supplied the Highway

Authority has assessed the impact of the proposal on highway safety and capacity and raised no objections, subject to suitably worded conditions and informatives being imposed.

Positive and Proactive Engagement

12. Paragraphs 186-187 of the NPPF require officers to work with the applicant in a positive and

proactive manner to resolve problems before the application is submitted and to foster the delivery of sustainable development. This requirement is met within Elmbridge through the availability of pre-application advice.

13. Pre-application advice was sought in advance of the submission of this application. The

outcome of which was that there was no objection in principle. However, concerns were raised in relation to the overdevelopment of the site, the impact of the additional parking and the protection of significant trees.

Planning Considerations

14. The main planning considerations in the determination of this application are:

• Principle of development

• Housing provision

• The design of the proposal and its impact on the character of the area and the street scene

• The impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties

• Amenity for the future occupiers

• Access and parking

• Trees

• SuDS

• Ecology and Biodiversity

• Financial contributions

Principle of development

15. The application site is currently occupied with a two-storey detached care facility. The proposed extension of the existing building for residential use is encouraged by policies CS1 and CS2 of the Core Strategy and by the NPPF.

Housing provision

16. In the Council’s 2016/17 Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) it was identified as an objective within the Housing for Older People; that to meet the needs of an ever increasingly ageing population through a variety of measures, including lifetime homes, specialist accommodation and care and support services that respond to their needs. This proposal would allow for the care home 65 separate bedrooms, this is an increase of 30 bedrooms.

The design of the proposal and its impact on the host dwelling, the character of the area and the street scene

17. This proposal seeks permission to extend an existing building. The majority of the works take place along the western side of the site and at the rear of the eastern end of the building. The height of the proposed extensions will not exceed the height of the existing building.

18. The proposal will therefore add to the overall width of the building. However, given the size of

the plot and the separation distances that exist to the side boundaries, it is considered that the built form within this proposal will not appear excessive when viewed from within the street scene or harm the visual character of the area.

19. The depth of the building will increase, however, screening does existing along the side

boundary and this will help to mitigate the impact upon the views from within the street scene.

20. The proposal does involve moving the car park from the rear of the site to the front of the site. This is not considered to be detrimental to the overall character of the area given that there is currently a large area of hardstanding which is capable of parking a number of vehicles.

21. The materials proposed will match those within the existing building and therefore not detract

upon the visual appearance of the area.

22. The proposed extension adjacent to the nearest neighbouring property within Severn Drive will be 12.5m. As a result, the proposed siting of the extension will not significantly impact upon the existing separation distance and therefore, it is considered that this proposal will not create a terrace affect or detract upon the views from within the street scene.

The impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties

23. The proposed depth of the extension at the rear of the eastern end of the building will stagger, with the rear most point will be 5.33m from the rear boundary. As a result, this elevation would project beyond the rear garden of No. 38 Severn Drive. Having identified the depth of the proposed extension, when measured from the rear corner of the dwelling (not the garage) the proposed distance between the extended part of the building and the neighbouring property exceeds 18m. At this distance, in conjunction with the proposed height and orientation (north-westerly) the proposed extension will not create any significant loss of light. In addition, the separation distance from No. 38 Severn Drive is considered sufficient to ensure that this element of the proposal will not appear overbearing for the occupiers when viewed from within their rear garden.

24. The plans indicate that the separation distance from the rear elevation of the proposed

extension to No. 10 Walton Park will be approximately 25m (not 28m as shown the site plan

due to a recent extension) decreasing to 24.74m from the rear of No. 4a. At these distances it is considered that no adverse loss of light will be created.

25. Due to the extensions straddling the boundaries of No’s. 4 and 4a and No’s. 8 and 10, it is

considered that the majority of the views from these properties will remain unaffected, particularly given the plans indicate that the evergreen screening that currently exists will be replaced with new trees. The inclusion of a suitably worded landscaping condition will ensure that the new trees will be of an adequate size and species to add further protection to the neighbouring properties.

26. The proposed plans show that the only first floor rear facing windows that are capable of

overlooking the rear gardens of the properties within Walton Park are either landing, laundry or plant room windows. As a result, these windows should be obscurely glazed, this can be achieved through imposing a suitably worded condition.

27. The existing car parking area is to be relocated and therefore it is considered that the number

of vehicle movements at the rear of the site will be significantly reduced. Amenity for the future occupiers

28. The proposed development will use up a considerable amount of the existing green space that currently surrounds the existing Care Home. However, planning policy does not identify the amount of space to be that is required to be retained. Given the size of the site and the nature of the care being provided, it is considered that the amount of space subject to a suitable landscaping proposal being put forward is sufficient.

Highways

29. The proposal provides 23 off-street parking spaces including 2 disabled bays, a service bay and secure cycle parking.

30. The majority of the parking spaces will be at the front of the site (18, including the 2 disable

bays). The service bay is situated at the rear of the site and the secure cycle area is in between the existing trees situated in the south east corner of the site.

31. The Parking Standards within DM7 identify that there should be 1 parking space per 2

residents OR an individual assessment/justification. The identifies ratio would require a total of 33 parking spaces. The submitted Transport Statement provides a predicted car parking accumulation. This was derived from data held within the TRICS database. The parking accumulation has considered the worst-case scenario. This would result in a maximum of 20 cars requiring a space at any one time. This would still provide space for 3 cars to be parked.

32. The secure cycle storage area would allow for 6 cycles to be accommodated.

33. The collection of refuse has also been assessed and a swept path analysis has been

undertaken based on a 10.22m long refuse vehicle. This analysis confirms that a refuse vehicle can enter and exit the site in a forward gear.

34. The Highway Authority have assessed the details provided and confirmed that this proposal

will have no adverse impact upon highway safety or capacity. Having identified the concerns of local residents regarding the potential for increased traffic and over spill parking. The Highway Authority has considered these in the context of the local highway network, particularly immediately adjacent to the site on Severn Drive - a wide carriageway road with no on street parking restrictions and concluded that on street parking in the vicinity of the site would be acceptable in terms of highway safety and capacity should this occur. The highway Authority have suggested that a number of conditions be imposed, including a Method of Construction Statement.

35. In light of the above, it is considered that this proposal suitably addresses parking and other

highway issues.

Trees

36. The Tree Officer has assessed the information provided by the applicant and undertaken a visit to the site and confirmed that subject to suitably worded tree protection and landscaping conditions being imposed, no objections are raised on arboricultural grounds.

SuDS

37. The application site is not within Flood Zones 2 or 3 or within an area that is at risk of surface water flooding. However, the Government in April 2015 strengthened planning policy relating to the provision of sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) for ‘major’ planning applications.

38. As part of this proposal Surrey County Council as the lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) have

identified that the insufficient information has been provided regarding the proposed surface water strategy. However, consider that this could be dealt with by condition and therefore prior to any works commencing on site a surface water drainage scheme will need to be submitted to and approved in writing. This condition is considered to be appropriate and will address the concerns raised by the LLFA.

Ecology and Biodiversity

39. This application has been supported by an Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Bat Building Assessment and Bat Report, prepared by Corylus Ecology, dated October 2017.

40. While the objections from Surrey Bat Group are noted, the Surrey Wildlife Trust have

assessed the information provided and note that the further emergence survey for the main building was carried out at a suboptimal time of year. They advise that any works that take place to the main building are carried out in a precautionary manner under the supervision of a qualified ecological watching brief. In this regard an informative to advise the applicant of the requirements to apply for a European Protected Species Derogation Licence.

41. It has also been suggested that in order to protect reptiles and breeding birds a condition be

imposed to ensure the recommendations suggested within paragraphs 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.9 and 4.3.10 of the submitted Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Bat Building Assessment and Bat Report are carried out.

42. The development also offers the opportunity to restore or enhance biodiversity within the site.

As a result, it is considered reasonable to impose a condition to ensure that the development proceeds in line with the recommendations set out within paragraph 4.5.2 of the Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Bat Building Assessment and Bat Report.

Financial considerations

43. The proposal is considered to constitute C2 use and therefore would not require a financial contribution in relation to affordable housing or CIL.

Matters raised in Representations

44. The concerns raised in relation to the views across the green, are not considered to be a material planning consideration on the basis that nobody has the right of a view across a parcel of land.

45. Should the applicant wish to add any security lighting within the site it is considered

reasonable that a condition be imposed requiring details to be provided and agreed in writing prior to installation.

46. Concerns have been raised about the accuracy of the boundary. Land ownership is Civil

matter and if land has been included within this proposal that is not in the ownership of the applicant it may result in a new application having to be submitted.

47. Building over sewers is not a material planning consideration. This would be addressed under

separate legislation (Building Regulations).

48. All other matters have been addressed above.

Conclusion

49. On the basis of the above and in light of any other material considerations, the proposal is considered to be in accordance with the Development Plan. Accordingly, the recommendation is to grant permission.

The development does not require a CIL contribution

Recommendation: Grant Permission

Conditions/Reasons 1 TIME LIMIT (FULL APPLICATION)

The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. Reason: To comply with Section 51 of Part 4 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.

2 LIST OF APPROVED PLANS The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the following list of approved plans: A 725 10 Rev A and 22 Rev A received on 27 November 2017 and A-725 01 Rev D, 02 Rev C, 20 Rev B, 21 Rev B received on 9 April 2018. Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out in a satisfactory manner.

3 MATERIALS TO MATCH

The materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces of the extension shall match as nearly as is practically possible those of the existing building to which it is attached, in colour, type, finish and profile. Reason: To ensure that a satisfactory external appearance is achieved of the development in accordance with Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

4 OBSCURE GLAZING

The first floor rear facing windows serving the laundry room, stairwell and plant room of the development hereby permitted shall be glazed with obscure glass and fitted with non-opening principal lights, and subsequently maintained in this form. Such glass shall be sufficiently obscure to prevent loss of privacy. The affixing of an obscure film will not be sufficient. Reason: To preserve the reasonable privacy of neighbouring residents in accordance with Policy DM2 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

5 LANDSCAPING - SCHEME

NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL TAKE PLACE UNTIL FULL DETAILS OF BOTH HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING WORKS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE BOROUGH COUNCIL AND THESE WORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT AS APPROVED. THIS SCHEME SHALL INCLUDE INDICATIONS OF ALL HARD SURFACES, WALLS, FENCES, ACCESS FEATURES, THE EXISTING TREES AND HEDGES TO BE RETAINED, TOGETHER WITH THE NEW PLANTING TO BE CARRIED OUT, AND DETAILS OF THE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO PROTECT EXISTING FEATURES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. Reason: To preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

6 LANDSCAPING - IMPLEMENTATION ALL HARD AND SOFT LANDSCAPING WORKS SHALL BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DETAILS. ARBORICULTURAL WORK TO EXISTING TREES SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY OTHER DEVELOPMENT, OTHERWISE ALL REMAINING LANDSCAPING WORK AND NEW PLANTING SHALL BE CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO THE OCCUPATION OF ANY PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT OR IN ACCORDANCE TO THE TIMETABLE AGREED WITH THE BOROUGH COUNCIL. ANY TREES OR PLANTS, WHICH WITHIN A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS OF THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS IN PURSUANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT DIE, ARE REMOVED, OR BECOME SERIOUSLY DAMAGED OR DISEASED, SHALL BE REPLACED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE WITH OTHERS OF SIMILAR SIZE AND SPECIES, FOLLOWING CONSULTATION WITH THE BOROUGH COUNCIL, UNLESS THE BOROUGH COUNCIL GIVES WRITTEN CONSENT TO ANY VARIATION. Reason: To preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

7 LANDSCAPING - TREE PLANTING AND AFTERCARE

No works or development shall take place until full details of all proposed tree planting, the proposed times of planting, and arrangements for aftercare over a period of 5 years have been approved in writing by the Borough Council. All tree planting and aftercare shall be carried out in accordance with those details and at those times. If within a period of five years from the date of the planting of any tree, that tree, or any planted in replacement for it, is removed, uprooted or destroyed or dies, another tree of the same species and size as that originally planted shall be planted in the same place, unless the Borough Council gives its written consent to any variation. Reason: To preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

8 TREE PROTECTION AND PRE-COMMENCEMENT INSPECTION

BEFORE DEVELOPMENT TAKES PLACE TREE PROTECTION MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND ANY FURTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUBMITTED ARBORICULTURAL INFORMATION. THE APPLICANT SHALL ARRANGE A PRE-COMMENCEMENT MEETING AFTER THE INSTALLATION OF THE TREE PROTECTION BETWEEN THE BOROUGH COUNCIL AND THE APPLICANT'S PROJECT ARBORICULTURIST TO ALLOW INSPECTION AND VERIFICATION OF THE PROTECTION MEASURES. Reason: This permission is granted on the basis that the trees would remain on site to mitigate the impact of the development and to preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015. It is considered necessary for this to be a pre-commencement condition because the demolition and construction works could have implications for the future health and amenity of retained trees within the site.

9 TREE PROTECTION

In this condition "retained tree" means an existing tree, which is to be retained in accordance with the approved plans and particulars; and paragraphs (a) and (b) below shall have effect until the expiration of 5 years from the first occupation of the development.

a) no retained tree shall be cut down, uprooted or destroyed, nor shall any retained tree be pruned other than in accordance with the approved plans and particulars, without the written approval of the Borough Council. Any pruning shall be carried out in accordance with British Standard 3998 (tree work) and in accordance with any supplied arboricultural method statement.

b) if any retained tree is removed, uprooted or destroyed or dies, another tree shall be planted at the same place and that tree shall be of such size and species, and shall be planted at such time, as may be specified in writing by the Borough Council.

c) tree protection shall be maintained in-situ and not moved or removed until all construction has finished and equipment, materials, or machinery are removed from site.

d) any arboricultural protection information and plans submitted as part of the application, and listed in the approved plans condition, or submitted to meet a condition of consent shall be

implemented and adhered to at all times during the construction process unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Borough Council. This shall include any requirement for arboricultural supervision and site monitoring. This condition may only fully be discharged on completion of the development subject to satisfactory written evidence of contemporaneous supervision and monitoring of tree protection throughout construction by the appointed arboriculturist. Reason: This permission is only granted on the basis that the trees would remain on site to mitigate the impact of the development and to preserve and enhance the visual amenities of the locality in accordance with Policy DM6 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

10 VISIBILITY ZONES

The development hereby approved shall not be first occupied unless and until the proposed vehicular access has been constructed and provided with visibility zones in accordance with [the approved plans and thereafter the visibility zones shall be kept permanently clear of any obstruction over 1.05m high. Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety, the free flow of traffic nor cause inconvenience to other highway users in accordance with Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

11 CYCLE PARKING

The development hereby approved shall not be first occupied unless and until space has been laid out within the site in accordance with the approved plans for vehicles and cycles. All cycle parking shall be secure, covered and lit Thereafter the parking areas shall be retained and maintained for their designated purposes. Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety, the free flow of traffic nor cause inconvenience to other highway users in accordance with Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

12 METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

NO DEVELOPMENT SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT PLAN, TO INCLUDE DETAILS OF:

(a) PARKING FOR VEHICLES OF SITE PERSONNEL, OPERATIVES AND VISITORS (b) LOADING AND UNLOADING OF PLANT AND MATERIALS (c) STORAGE OF PLANT AND MATERIALS (d) PROGRAMME OF WORKS (INCLUDING MEASURES FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT) (e) PROVISION OF BOUNDARY HOARDING BEHIND ANY VISIBILITY ZONES (f) MEASURES TO PREVENT THE DEPOSIT OF MATERIALS ON THE HIGHWAY

HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY. ONLY THE APPROVED DETAILS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT. Reason: In order that the development should not prejudice highway safety, the free flow of traffic nor cause inconvenience to other highway users in accordance with Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015. It is considered necessary for this to be a pre-commencement condition because the demolition and construction works could have implications on highway safety and amenity and should be agreed before any works begin.

13 TRAVEL PLAN

Prior to the commencement of the development a Travel Plan shall be submitted for the written approval of the Local Planning Authority in accordance with the sustainable development aims and objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework, Surrey County Council’s “Travel Plans Good Practice Guide”, and in general accordance with the 'Heads of Travel Plan' document (if appropriate, specify). And then the approved Travel Plan shall be implemented (trigger point to be added on site specific basis) and for each and every subsequent occupation of the development, thereafter maintain and develop the Travel Plan to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority. Reason: The above condition(s)is/are required in recognition of Section 4 "Promoting Sustainable Transport " in the National Planning Policy Framework 2012 and Policy DM7 of the Elmbridge Development Management Plan 2015.

14 SuDS The development hereby permitted shall not commence until details of the design of a surface water drainage system has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The details shall include:

(a) A design that satisfies the SuDS Hierarchy. (b) A design that is compliant with the national Non-Statutory Technical Standards for SuDS, the

NPPF and the Ministerial Statement for SuDS. (c) A design that follows the principle s of the Flood Risk Assessment by Michael Aubrey

Partnership ref C3069 dated 9 November 2017. The proposed discharge peak rate from the site is to be agreed with the sewer provider and the Local Plannig Authority.

(d) Details of how Sustainable Drainage Systems will cater for system failure or exceedance events, both on and off site.

(e) Details of how the Sustainable Drainage System will be protected and maintained during the construction of the development.

(f) Finalised drawings ready for construction to include : a finalised drainage layout detailing the location of SuDS elements, pipe diameters and their respective levels and long and cross sections of each SuDS element.

(g) A management and maintenance regimes and responsibilities. Reason: To ensure the design meets the technical standards for SuDS and the final drainage design does not increase flood risk on or off site. In accordance with CS26 of the Core Strategy 2011 and the NPPF.

15 DRAINAGE

Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby approved, a verification report carried out by a qualified drainage engineer must be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority to demonstrate that the Sustainable Drainage System has been constructed as per the agreed scheme. Reason: To ensure that the Sustainable Drainage System is designed to the technical standards.

16 ECOLOGY

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the recommendations suggested within paragraphs 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.3.9 and 4.3.10 of the submitted Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey, Bat Building Assessment and Bat Report. Reason: To ensure that the development is carried out in accordance with the NPPF.

Informatives 1 Other Works to the Highway

The permission hereby granted shall not be construed as authority to carry out any works on the highway or any works that may affect a drainage channel/culvert or water course. The applicant is advised that a permit and, potentially, a Section 278 agreement must be obtained from the Highway Authority before any works are carried out on any footway, footpath, carriageway, verge or other land forming part of the highway. All works on the highway will require a permit and an application will need to submitted to the County Council's Street Works Team up to 3 months in advance of the intended start date, depending on the scale of the works proposed and the classification of the road. Please see http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/road-permits-and-licences/the-traffic-management-permit-scheme. The applicant is also advised that Consent may be required under Section 23 of the Land Drainage Act 1991. Please see www.surreycc.gov.uk/people-and-community/emergency-planning-and-community-safety/floodingadvice.

2 The developer is advised that as part of the detailed design of the highway works required by the above condition(s), the County Highway Authority may require necessary accommodation works to street lights, road signs, road markings, highway drainage, surface covers, street trees, highway verges, highway surfaces, surface edge restraints and any other street furniture/equipment.

3 BATS All species of bat found in the UK are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and under the Conservation of Species & Habitats Regulations 2010. Together this legislation makes it an offence to kill, capture or disturb the animal, or to damage or destroy a breeding site or resting place of such an animal. Therefore, in the event that bats or signs of bats are encountered during the development, works should be stopped immediately and advice sought from a qualified bat specialist or Natural England.

0 25 50m

40

4

6

4a

38

SITEBOUNDARY

WALTON PARK

SEVERN DRIVE

-

ProjectLocation

Title

Scale Date Drawn Checked

Job No. Drawing No. RevisonReproduced for the purpose of identifying the location of thesite based upon the ordnance survey with the permission ofHer Majesty's Stationary Office. Crown Copyright reserved

Licence No. AR100007606

www.carless-adams.co.uk

ArchitectsBuilding SurveyorsQuantity SurveyorsProject ManagersCDM Co-ordinators

6 Progress Business CentreWhittle ParkwayBath RoadSloughSL1 6DQ

Tel: 01628 665131Fax: 01628 663327

CarlessAdamsPartnership

&

EXISTING CARE HOMESHERWOOD HOUSE, SEVERN ROAD, WALTON-ON-THAMES

725

LOCATION PLAN

1:1250@A4 JAN 17

A A10

MB

9 GARDEN ELEVATION

7 COURTYARD ELEVATION 8 COURTYARD ELEVATION

10 GARDEN ELEVATION

11 NORTH EAST ELEVATION (REAR)EXISTING TILES

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOFTILES

EXISTING DOOR AND ROOFCANOPY TO BE REMOVED

EXISTING TILES

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOFTILES

EXISTING TIMBER WINDOWSTO BE PAINTED

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING FACE BRICK WALL

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOFTILES

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

NEW FACE BRICK WALLTO MATCH EXISTING

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOFTILES

NEW TIMBER WINDOWSTO MATCH EXISTING.PAINTED FINISH.

NEW RAINWATERGUTTER & DOWN PIPESTO MATCH EXISTING.

9

7

3

4

2

1

5

KEY PLAN

86

1011

NEW PLASTIC RAINWATER GOODSTO MATCH EXISTING

-

Client

Project

Location

Title

Scale Date Drawn Checked

Job No. Drawing No. RevisonFor construction purposesdimensions shall not be scaled &

figured dimensions must be verifiedon site before work commences.

This drawing is Copyright ©

Rev. Revision Date Drawn Checked

A1@1:200 NOV 16 MJB

www.carless-adams.co.ukTel: 01628 665131Fax: 01628 663327

ASPREY HEALTHCARE

PROPOSED CARE HOME REFURBISHMENT & EXTENSION

SHERWOOD HOUSE, SEVERN DRIVE, WALTON-ON-THAMES

725

ELEVATIONS 7 - 11

A A22

CarlessAdamsPartnership

Architects

Building Surveyors

Quantity Surveyors

Project Managers

CDM Co-ordinators

6 Progress Business CentreWhittle ParkwayBath RoadSloughSL1 6DQ

&

A FOR PLANNING APPLICATION. 24.11.2017 JE MB

4 NORTH EAST ELEVATION (REAR)

NEW ADDITIONEXISTING CARE HOMENEW ADDITION

NEW LIFT SHAFT

5 GARDEN ELEVATION

6 GARDEN ELEVATION

9

7

3

4

2

1

5

KEY PLAN

86

1011

EXTG. TILED FACADE

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING TIMBER WINDOWFRAMES TO BE PAINTED

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

NEW FACEBRICK WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING

RAINWATER GUTTERS AND DOWN PIPESTO MATCH EXISTING

NEW PROFILED CONCRETE ROOFTILES TO MATCH EXISTING

EXSISTING PROFILED CONCRETEROOF TILES

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

NEW FACEBRICK WALLS TO MATCH EXISTING

PLASTIC RAINWATER GUTTERS ANDDOWN PIPES TO MATCH EXISTING

NEW TIMBER WINDOW FRAMES TO MATCHEXISTING. PAINTED FINISH.

NEW PROFILED CONCRETE ROOFTILES TO MATCH EXISTING

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING TIMBER WINDOWS TO BE PAINTED

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOFTILES

EXISTING FACEBRICK WALL

NEW/ MODIFIED GLAZED UNIT WITHCONCERTINA DOORS. FINISHES TOMATCH ADJACENT WINDOWS.

-

Client

Project

Location

Title

Scale Date Drawn Checked

Job No. Drawing No. RevisonFor construction purposesdimensions shall not be scaled &

figured dimensions must be verifiedon site before work commences.

This drawing is Copyright ©

Rev. Revision Date Drawn Checked

A1@1:200 NOV 16 MJB

www.carless-adams.co.ukTel: 01628 665131Fax: 01628 663327

ASPREY HEALTHCARE

PROPOSED CARE HOME REFURBISHMENT & EXTENSION

SHERWOOD HOUSE, SEVERN DRIVE, WALTON-ON-THAMES

725

ELEVATIONS 4 - 6

A B21

CarlessAdamsPartnership

Architects

Building Surveyors

Quantity Surveyors

Project Managers

CDM Co-ordinators

6 Progress Business CentreWhittle ParkwayBath RoadSloughSL1 6DQ

&

A FOR PLANNING APPLICATION. 24.11.2017 JE MB

B REVISIONS RELATED TO BEDROOM 65 AND 64 19.03.2018 RZ JE

2 SOUTH EAST ELEVATION (FACING PARKING)

1 SOUTH WEST ELEVATION (FRONT)OPTION 1

NEW ADDITION EXISTING CARE HOME

NEW ENTRANCE

3 NORTH WEST ELEVATION (FACING P.O.S.)

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING FACEBRICK WALLS AND CILLS

EXISTING TIMBER WINDOWFRAMES TO BE PAINTED

EXTG. TILED FACADE

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

EXISTING TIMBER WINDOWFRAMES TO BE PAINTED

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

NEW FACEBRICK COLUMNS TO MATCH EXTG. WALLS.

NEW POWDER COATED ALUMINIUM FRAMEDGLAZING. POWDER COAT COLOUR RAL 7037.

PAINTED STEEL TRUSSES

DOTTED LINE OF EXISTINGPLANT ROOM TO BE

DEMOLISHED

NEW THROUGH COLOUR RENDER.COLOUR IVORY 016 WEBER PRAL M.

NEW FACEBRICK WALLS & CILLS TO MATCHEXISTING

NEW TIMBER WINDOWS TOMATCH EXISTING. PAINTEDFINISH.

EXISTING PROFILED CLAY ROOF TILES

NEW PROFILED CLAY TILES TOMATCH EXISTING

9

7

3

4

2

1

5

KEY PLAN

86

1011

NEW PLASTIC RAINWATERGOODS TO MATCH EXISTING

NEW PLASTIC RAINWATERGOODS TO MATCH EXISTING

WINDOWS WITH FIXED PANES& OPAQUE GLASS

-

Client

Project

Location

Title

Scale Date Drawn Checked

Job No. Drawing No. RevisonFor construction purposesdimensions shall not be scaled &

figured dimensions must be verifiedon site before work commences.

This drawing is Copyright ©

Rev. Revision Date Drawn Checked

A1@1:200 NOV 16 MJB

www.carless-adams.co.ukTel: 01628 665131Fax: 01628 663327

ASPREY HEALTHCARE

PROPOSED CARE HOME REFURBISHMENT & EXTENSION

SHERWOOD HOUSE, SEVERN DRIVE, WALTON-ON-THAMES

725

ELEVATIONS 1 - 3

A B20

CarlessAdamsPartnership

Architects

Building Surveyors

Quantity Surveyors

Project Managers

CDM Co-ordinators

6 Progress Business CentreWhittle ParkwayBath RoadSloughSL1 6DQ

&

A FOR PLANNING APPLICATION. 24.11.2017 JE MB

B REVISIONS RELATED TO BEDROOM 65 AND 64 19.03.2018 RZ JE