Application Management in Europe...commissioned by TREND STUDY Application Management in Europe...
Transcript of Application Management in Europe...commissioned by TREND STUDY Application Management in Europe...
commissioned by
TREND STUDY
Application Management in Europe Status quo, developments, and new requirements due to the cloud, DevOps, and agile software development
Authors: Sabrina Donatell i Karsten Leclerque January 2019
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 2
CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 Key Findings ........................................................................................................................... 4 Status Quo: Application Management Today ................................................................................. 5 Relevance of SAP Application Management ......................................................................................... 6 With SAP into the cloud .......................................................................................................................... 7 The Role of Service Providers ............................................................................................................... 10 Developments in Application Management ................................................................................ 13 Nearshore vs. Offshore ......................................................................................................................... 13 The Role of new Technologies .............................................................................................................. 15 New Requirements in Application Management .................................................................. 16 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 20 Disclaimer, usage rights, independence, and data protection ........................................................... 21 About Itell igence ................................................................................................................................. 22 About PAC ........................................................................................................................................... 23
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 3
Application management in Europe Status quo, developments, and new requirements due to the cloud, DevOps, and agile software development
Sabrina Donatell i, Analyst Karsten Leclerque, Head of Infrastructure & Cloud Services Practice January 2019
INTRODUCTION
For years, application management has been at the center of companies’ IT
agenda. However, processes and requirements which used to be sufficient for
running companies’ operations, are no longer feasible. The digital era demands
a new approach to application management; one which helps automate
businesses as well as improve agil ity, speed, and efficiency.
Originally, application management targeted assuring the availabil ity and
stabil ity of an application while at the same time freeing up internal resources
for more innovative tasks. With increasing maturity, however, value propositions
changed from simply “running” an application towards steady optimization of
delivery.
Factors such as price pressure, increasing usage of software as a service, and cloud adoption
have all become obstacles to regular application management. At the same time, however, the
need for standardized processes, as well as legacy modernization and overall cost reduction wil l
continue to put application management on IT decision-makers’ agenda.
In order to get a better overview of the status quo and future development in the field of SAP
application management, PAC questioned 207 SAP and IT managers between July and August
2018 across various countries in Europe, asking about their views and opinions. The study aims to
provide a current overview of how companies are maintaining and refining existing software
applications, and what challenges they see in this regard, also in terms of developments such
as the cloud, software as a service, DevOps, or agile software projects.
“As of now, we are at a stage where we
are trying to evaluate which
solution or technology can help
us improve our current system.”
(statement of a participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 4
KEY FINDINGS
• Increasing complexity as the main issue
96% of participants see their SAP landscape as a challenge due to the high degree of customization and adaptations. With SAP’s wide range of solutions targeting individual processes, customers are faced with the dilemma of which applications best support their business. As many companies use or wil l use a number of different cloud applications and deployment models in parallel, they have to face complexity in terms of integration and the management of these solutions.
External provider, yes – but mainly for specific tasks
75% work either predominately or partially with an external service provider when it
comes to their SAP Basis support. Likewise, 77% say they prefer to work with an external
service provider when it comes to their user help desk and 61% with regards to the
planning and execution of tests.
• New requirements for service providers • Although 77% say they prefer to have an external service provider involved in rather
general tasks such as application management and hosting of an application, at the same time, 76% expect their service providers to be involved in providing application transformational support and facil itating cloud implementation.
• External providers are not always the preferred option • The results have shown that companies prefer not to work with an external service
provider in areas where they believe to have sufficient in-house resources (88%) or when they perceive their application to be too strategic to have support provided by a third party (85%). When it comes to external service providers, there are companies who prefer not to work with them as they believe collaboration would restrict their agil ity (72%).
• Nearshore vs. offshore • 79% of participants in this study have stated that they are taking advantage of nearshore
resources. Offshoring is used by 69% of companies. Of those companies using nearshore
resources, 46% are convinced that this share wil l increase in the coming years. In
contrast, 34% of those employing offshore resources today plan to reduce this usage in
the coming years.
The role of automation and AI technologies 41% of participants are already using automation or artif icial intell igence-based
technologies for the management of their SAP systems or are planning to do so. At the
same time, 46% are interested in employing these technologies in their organization.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 5
STATUS QUO: APPLICATION MANAGEMENT TODAY
Up until now, application management could be grouped together with what
could be seen as “traditional” IT, which is highly process and governance
driven, involves deployment and maintenance, and, overall, is mainly focused
on “keeping the l ights on” of an application.
However, with digital transformation evolving, application management has to
support the modernization of companies’ business, thereby having to make
room for topics such as cloud, analytics, and mobility. At the same time,
innovation is taking on a much more prominent role than ever before with the
number of new developments and changes to a company’s application
landscape further increasing.
The question that naturally presents itself is then, how can application
management make this shift? And more precisely, how can today’s application
management support companies’ digital transformation process while sti l l
ensuring management and maintenance at the lowest possible costs?
96% see the SAP system landscape as a challenge due to the high degree of customization and adaptations.
“Times are changing and so is the technology. Moving forwards,
we will be implementing
application management
automation and AI technologies.”
(statement of a participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 6
RELEVANCE OF SAP APPLICATION MANAGEMENT
SAP has a strong market presence or even market leadership in all considered
countries. Although the market is highly mature, maturity does not mean
stagnation. The SAP portfolio is constantly changing, thus keeping both SAP
customers and service providers busy.
As a result of various acquisit ions over the last few years, SAP is today capable
of offering a wide range of solutions to its customers. That said, the most widely
used solutions are the “older” ERP systems (SAP R/3, SAP ECC).
Which of the following SAP on-premises solutions are already in use at your company, are planned for the next two years, or have at least been discussed?
Init ially, we explicitly asked for locally operated on-premises SAP solutions, i.e., not cloud-based
solutions:
Much more interesting is the fact that half of respondents are already using or planning to use
the in-memory platform SAP HANA. It can be used as the database for the data warehouse (SAP
BW) and for SAP ERP. A large proportion of respondents (49%) are operating an SAP CRM solution
at the moment. Looking at this in general, topics such as customer experience and customer
satisfaction have become a priority for many companies.
Furthermore, this shows that there is a number of companies who have already gained some
experience with the technical foundation of SAP’s next-generation ERP system SAP S/4HANA.
About 20% of the companies have already deployed this new application on-premises.
“The efficiency of our company has increased due to
the implementation
of an SAP solution.”
(statement of a participant)
21%
23%
24%
24%
27%
28%
31%
32%
33%
39%
45%
49%
36%
31%
26%
36%
24%
22%
28%
16%
31%
25%
15%
18%
25%
34%
29%
24%
24%
36%
28%
17%
21%
20%
10%
23%
SRM
S/4HANA
SAP C/4 HANA (formerly SAPHybris)
SAP BW, SAP BI, SAP BO
SAP industry solution
SAP HANA
SAP PI/PO
SAP ERP (ECC)
HCM
SCM
SAP R/3
CRM
Already in use Planned In discussion
n = 207
© P
AC -
a C
XP G
roup
Com
pa
ny, 2
018
'Neither in use nor planned' and 'not relevant' not shown
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 7
WITH SAP INTO THE CLOUD
Since SAP first announced Business ByDesign and with it, its serious entry into the SaaS business,
the cloud portfolio of SAP has increased tremendously – amongst other things due to the
acquisit ions of SuccessFactors, Ariba, Concur, and Fieldglass.
Which of the following SAP cloud solutions are already in use, are planned for the next two years, are still being discussed or are not relevant?
Cloud applications have become common for many of the respondents. A large number (39%)
of them have deployed SAP’s new ERP suite SAP S/4HANA in the cloud.
Another result this study has revealed shows a tendency by companies towards investments into
cloud-based platforms (i.e., SAP Cloud Platform & SAP Leonardo, SAP Analytics Cloud), with 56%
of respondents saying they are already using or planning to use both solutions. This makes sense
as these solutions support the development and deployment of data-driven applications. More
and more, such applications complement existing ERP backbones. Also, digital topics such as
the Internet of Things (IoT) are facil itated by these solutions.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 8
The level of complexity keeps increasing
With SAP’s wide range of solutions targeting individual processes, customers are
faced with the dilemma of which applications best support their business. The
results show that there is a large number of companies who prefer adding
solutions that support their separate processes, i.e., Ariba for procurement (63%)
and SuccessFactors for human capital management (77%). According to SAP’s
product strategy, these solutions shall complement the core ERP system.
Feeding this new level of complexity is not only the high number of SAP solutions
– be it on-premises, as SaaS, or cloud-hosted – but also the large number of
possible third-party products. A significant number of respondents stated that
in addition to their SAP cloud applications they are using further cloud solutions
such as Microsoft Office 365, Google’s G Suite, or Salesforce, for instance. And
beyond these most common products, a big variety of further SaaS solutions
from different vendors were mentioned to be in use.
Challenges brought forward by SAP application management
Traditional IT tasks – efficiently supporting and automating processes, resulting in a reduction of
overall costs – have lost nothing in terms of their importance. However, the increasing complexity
due to the number of different solutions being deployed makes such tasks even more difficult.
In addition, digitalization and the resulting increased pace of change and innovativeness mean
that companies are facing new challenges regarding management of their SAP systems.
With regard to management of your SAP systems: Which of the following aspects represent a major or minor challenge?
As many companies use or will use a number of different cloud applications in parallel, they have to face complexity in terms of integration and the management of these solutions.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 9
Complexity as the dominant challenge
The majority of participants (96%) perceive the excessive complexity of the SAP landscape as a
challenge due to the high degree of customization and adaptations. This shows that in the past,
SAP systems were the target of individual customization in order to make the software fit
companies’ business processes.
With cloud-based solutions, this level of individualization is no longer an option as solutions come
as standard packages, with a more l imited level of customization available. As a result,
companies now have to change their business processes to fit the new software – providing
companies with a unique chance to combine new software implementation with an overall
business transformation.
For 91% of respondents, the complexity of hybrid IT landscapes is posing a challenge. This
complexity can be related to the increasing number of different platforms and deployment
models companies have in place, often from various providers. Such hybrid IT landscapes often
comprise legacy IT, private and public cloud models, as well as self-operated and (out)sourced
infrastructures, and thus require consistent end-to-end governance, compliance, and security.
The harmonization of SAP landscapes following mergers and acquisit ions is obviously only
relevant for companies with an M&A history; but if relevant, hardly any decision-maker considers
this to be only a minor challenge.
User experience and new technologies
85% said they perceive the need for optimization in relation to user-fr iendliness as a challenge.
This speaks in support for the cloud as the overall user experience is usually up to date and
handling is much more convenient.
85% of respondents see the need for optimization in relation to agil ity and flexibil ity to take on new trends and new technologies as challenging. Companies seem to consider their existing SAP landscapes as not sufficiently flexible to support often agile developments in digital business areas. Interestingly, there was a larger number of participants from France, the UK, and the Netherlands or Luxembourg who saw this as a challenge.
Security and compliance not among the top challenges
Only 34% perceive security and compliance related optimization as a major challenge – which
is good news. Nevertheless, overall, 63% do see need for optimization in these areas.
New challenges related to security and compliance can again be related to the ris ing level of
complexity. It is of course much more difficult to guarantee security standards or to meet
compliance requirements when handling a wide range of various applications, infrastructure
platforms, and vendors.
Compared to these major challenges, topics such as increasing internationalization, lack of
resources in IT, need for optimization in relation to transparency and predictabil ity, lack of
support for new business processes, and the need to modernize SAP application infrastructure
are considered as a major challenge by a smaller number of participants.
.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 10
THE ROLE OF SERVICE PROVIDERS
The study has shown that, although varying in degree and complexity, there is
almost no area in which companies do not work with external service providers.
Particularly when it comes to SAP applications, external providers have a large
quantity of experts at hand who can offer the required competences.
In the highly competitive SAP services market, however, service providers have
to work harder than ever to differentiate themselves from their r ivals. From a
user perspective, clear positioning and differentiation on the provider side is
highly beneficial as it allows to pick and choose service providers whose specific
competencies are most suitable to the company’s individual needs and use
cases.
Does your company predominantly or partially work with external service providers
for the following SAP-related project and operating services?
“I do not see a major difference when it comes to
the services which different
vendors provide.” (statement of a
participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 11
External provider, yes – but mainly for specific tasks
Overall it can be said that companies usually prefer to collaborate with external service
providers when it comes to topics which are less differentiable from a customer perspective.
Indeed, 75% either work predominately or partially with an external service provider when it
comes to their SAP Basis support. Likewise, 77% say they prefer to work with an external service
provider when it comes to their user help desk; i.e., tasks that can be standardized and easily
processed nearshore or offshore.
This is also true for custom-specific development, which is realized predominantly with external
support by almost half of the interviewed companies. However, in addition, custom development
increasingly takes place in digital topics, where interest is high but internal competences are sti l l
low (e.g. Leonardo for IoT).
Application management – mostly covered by external providers
The study has shown that particularly when it comes to application management, companies
prefer to work with external service providers (66%). However, only 15% are ready to leave this
topic fully in the hands of external service providers – more than half prefer selective support
from their supplier, and 29% maintain and optimize their SAP applications without significant
external support.
When asked for specific tasks related to application management services, 62% of participants
state services involving application monitoring, 61% work with an external provider for
application optimization, 55% for application management (incident, problem, and change
management), 36% for support/service desk, 34% for BPO, and 34% for technical management.
SaaS will increase the level of external collaboration
With the trend towards SaaS generally increasing, companies wil l increasingly be seeking the
help of external service providers for operation of their SAP SaaS solutions over the coming years.
Indeed, 43% of participants have agreed on this. This is usually due to the lack of ski l ls and
competences within companies, but which can already be found at service providers. Ideally,
by collaborating with external providers in implementing and operating their SaaS solutions,
companies wil l have the opportunity to benefit not only from providers’ technical capabil it ies,
but also from their innovativeness, as cloud migration can often be considered a trigger for
business transformation.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 12
External providers are not always the preferred option
There are some cases where companies prefer not to work with an external partner. Although
this has much to do with the organization itself – its structure, management, and overall
preferences – there are also some quantifiable reasons.
For what reason do you not work with an external service provider for your application management?
The study has clearly shown that companies prefer not to work with an external service provider when they perceive their application to be too strategic.
Another 88% mention that they have sufficient in-house resources available.
A large number of study participants were also skeptical about offshoring on the provider side, as well as the associated language and cultural challenges.
Another interesting finding is the fact that many companies believe
collaboration would restrict them in their agil ity. In fact, application management with an
external partner has quite often been merely an extension of a company’s current state at lower
costs. And actually, several survey participants complained that their current suppliers are not
proactive enough when it comes to valuable changes or innovations.
“They always think their responsibility
ends once the contract is signed.”
(statement of a participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 13
DEVELOPMENTS IN APPLICATION MANAGEMENT
As is the case in many other areas of IT, traditional application management is
also undergoing significant changes and developments. At the same time,
internal IT departments are trying to handle the current tremendous challenges
with ever more l imited resources in terms of headcount and knowledge.
NEARSHORE VS. OFFSHORE
One such example has been the growing importance of near- and offshoring for application
management services in recent years. In particular, the ever-growing need for lower prices has
increased companies’ demand for low-cost services. As a result, 79% of participants in this study
stated that they are taking advantage of nearshore resources. Offshoring is used by 69% of
companies.
79% use nearshore resources to manage their SAP systems.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 14
Are near- or offshore resources used for the management of your SAP systems? And what do you think: Will the share increase, stay the same or decline over the next
two years?
The results of this study show that the nearshore/offshore trend is not about to stop anytime soon.
Although most participants make use of nearshore and offshore resources, it appears that
particularly for those companies who participated in this study, nearshore seems to be the
preferable solution. Indeed, the results demonstrate that the nearshoring concept is functioning
well since of those companies who are taking advantage of nearshoring, 46% want to increase
this share in the coming years. Respondents from Germany in particular believe that this share
wil l increase in the next two years.
In contrast, 34% of those employing offshore resources today plan to reduce this usage in the
coming years.
At the same time, companies who at this point are not using near- or offshoring remain rather
skeptical and do not plan on using near- or offshoring anytime soon.
In PAC’s opinion, offshoring or nearshoring wil l be highly impacted by the move towards greater
automation in the next few years. Artif icial intell igence (AI) or cognitive intell igence wil l be used
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 15
particularly for routine delivery processes, service desk, or testing. Although costs can be
minimized by lower labor costs, these can be decreased further if labor costs are omitted
completely – making near- or offshoring even obsolete to some extent.
THE ROLE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Given the current cloud, mobile, analytics, and digitalization agendas, many companies have
been starting platform modernization projects within their organization. These include
application consolidation and standardization of systems, but also topics such as automation
and artif icial intell igence. Indeed, 41% of participants in this study have already implemented or
are planning to implement automation or artif icial intell igence-based technologies for the
management of their SAP systems. At the same time, 46% are interested in these new
technologies for their organization.
Are technologies such as automation or artificial intelligence used for the management of your SAP systems or in the SAP user communication technologies?
Although these new technologies are sti l l rather in their infancy, interest from companies at the
moment is huge. In PAC’s opinion, automation and AI even have the capacity to be the next
big thing in application management after offshoring and nearshoring – not only in terms of
further cost savings but also regarding the increase of quality, reliabil ity and agil ity.
New technologies, new benefits
These new technologies can also bring companies many other benefits beyond
cost savings. For example, overall quality could be improved as automation
software is much less l ikely to make errors in documentation compared to
humans.
Documentation can also be automated and thus be sped up tremendously,
which is particularly relevant in agile or DevOps scenarios. One aspect that
companies have to keep in mind is the fact that although automation can
clearly offer many new benefits, the initial effort companies have to invest can
be quite high and should not be underestimated.
“We are looking at aspects of AI and
are trying to better understand how we can make the most
out of it.” (statement of a
participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 16
NEW REQUIREMENTS IN APPLICATION MANAGEMENT
Application management as it is today has been mainly addressing the “systems
of record” world, with highly standardized and rigid delivery processes. “Systems
of engagement”, in contrast, have to be responsive, agile, and collaborative.
In addition, today’s demands call for integration of mobile devices, data
analytics, cloud computing, and social media. Topics such as IoT wil l
additionally increase the need for different IT architectures.
All these new requirements lead to the desire to quickly implement innovations
with overall much shorter cycle times than has previously been the case.
New requirements for service providers
What can generally be said is that, based on the results of this study, companies are more l ikely
to obtain external support when it comes to operational services. Indeed, 78% of companies
prefer to have an external service provider involved in rather general tasks such as application
management and hosting of an application.
However, a large group of respondents also see the role of service providers in offering
transformational support of their solutions and help with cloud implementation (76%).
76% see the role of service providers in offering transformational support & help with cloud implementation.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 17
What kind of operation support would you like from an external SAP service provider?
Multi- vs. single-vendor
The trend in recent years has clearly been towards multi-vendor sourcing (i.e., to select several
providers based on their individual key competences for specific service towers or technologies).
However, strategies are diverse. A third of the survey participants prefer a “one-stop shopping
model” for their SAP landscape – including hosting and application management services
through a single provider. Another 45% agree in part.
Finally, a suitable sourcing strategy depends on the requirements and targets of a company. A
single-vendor approach holds the risk of dependency on one provider, while a multi-vendor
approach means multi-vendor management, and thus increased complexity.
Customers seek greater commitment from their service provider
Which payment models would you prefer when working with an external SAP service
provider?
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 18
A mix of ticket-based, time & material, and fixed-price models have so far been the predominant
commercial models for SAP application management. With increasing maturity on the provider
side and businesses looking for greater cost visibil ity, PAC has seen a greater focus on fixed-price
models in recent years. The results of this study demonstrate this fact as 93% state that they either
fully or partially prefer SLA-based payment models, which at the same time indicates that
customers are seeking a greater commitment from their service provider.
Outcome-based pricing puts even greater responsibil ity on the provider side since payment is
directly associated with the achievement of agreed KPI improvements. Such agreements can
be related to an increase in the level of quality, to cost reduction, to a reduction in the number
of tickets etc., or even to real business KPIs on the client side. This payment model is preferred
by 81% of companies in this study.
Moving away from simply “keeping the lights on”
When the surveyed decision-makers were asked for their expectations regarding their external
service partners’ offerings, the answers were manifold.
Open question: Are there support services that you would want from an SAP service provider but that you currently do not see on the market – be it in terms of current
challenges or your future strategy? Overall, many seem rather happy with the available service
offerings. There were hardly any real gaps identif ied between
the customers’ requirements and the providers’ portfolios.
Nevertheless, the study participants have a number of
suggestions and requests for their service suppliers.
They are sti l l asking for typical application management
services, such as support with end-of-l ife application
management for applications that are not migrated or
transformed, but that wil l remain business crit ical in the short to
mid term.
But most wishes are related to services beyond mere maintenance and incident handling, i.e.,
the “need to be more proactive when it comes to the delivery of services”.
With the emergence of cloud delivery models, clients are demanding more technical consulting
and support, beyond mere application support, and also help with multi-vendor management.
In addition, clients expect support with regards to their investments in SAP software and how to
make out most of it. Several interviewees asked for more onsite support, more flexibil ity during
the contract term, closer collaboration with the internal IT teams, and more knowledge transfer
from the provider to the client.
This demand for closer local collaboration is a general trend as established application
management delivery concepts are not totally suitable for agile projects in new digital areas.
And it goes hand in hand with the participants’ wishes for their service suppliers to provide
support not only with the application but also with business transformation.
Consequently, customers would l ike their suppliers to have deeper industry-specific know-how
to allow a stronger business alignment, and they want them to take more responsibil ity, e.g.
through real outcome-based pricing models.
“All relevant services can be
found on the market, you just have to choose
which ones best suit your requirements.”
(statement of a participant)
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 19
But as mentioned before, the survey participants do not generally miss these kinds of support
services on the provider side; today, they seem just not to be part of most application
management agreements.
And even if the required services are generally available on the market, it seems challenging for
IT decision-makers to find the right service partner; some complained about a lack of
transparency regarding the providers' positioning, strategy, and roadmap.
How to overcome the typical “Dev vs. Ops dilemma”
More than ever, we seem to face a typical dilemma when it comes to operations services. On
the one hand, customers are searching for comprehensive support, ideally with their
infrastructures, applications, and business transformation, and expect providers to bring in
innovation proactively during the contract term. On the other hand, they are aiming to ensure
reliabil ity with ever-decreasing operations costs – lower costs were by far the most frequently
mentioned requirement.
This dilemma has been well known in the IT outsourcing market, but it is far from being unique to
the relationship between client and external supplier. Almost all internal IT departments are
currently looking for the best way to implement DevOps concepts in their companies in order to
support the needs of increasingly agile businesses. However, this challenge is even bigger when
it comes to realizing DevOps approaches with the involvement of external service partners.
Customers expect more comprehensive support with operations, but also with optimization,
transformation, and migration. And most service suppliers do have the capabil it ies and offerings
to help.
But this kind of partnership requires new forms of collaboration, incentivation, and pricing.
Agreements that help to reduce operations costs, while freeing up budgets for joint investment
in innovation, may be a good option. Modularized service packages on the provider side – a
request put forward by one of the participants – that can flexibly be customized according to
the specific client’s needs, may be another.
Obviously, the experts’ statements confirm that the requirements for managing an SAP
application landscape have been changing. A mere “keeping the l ights on” approach, which
was typical for SAP application management services in the past, wil l no longer be sufficient.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 20
METHODOLOGY
Between July and August 2018, PAC interviewed 207 SAP and IT managers from large companies
of various industries across Europe. Based on a CATI (computer-assisted telephone interview)
approach, professionals from France, Germany, the UK, the Nordics (Denmark, Finland, Iceland,
Norway, Sweden), the Netherlands, and Luxembourg participated in this study. In addition, it
was ensured that only participants from large companies with revenues of more than
EUR 500 mil l ion took part in the study.
The aim of the study was, in essence, to get an overview of the status quo and future
development in the field of SAP application management and, more precisely, how companies
are maintaining and refining existing software applications, and what challenges they see in this
regard also in terms of developments such as the cloud, software as a service, DevOps, or agile
software projects.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 21
DISCLAIMER, USAGE RIGHTS, INDEPENDENCE, AND DATA PROTECTION
The creation and distribution of this study was supported by Itell igence.
For more information, please visit www.pac-online.com.
Disclaimer
The contents of this study were compiled with the greatest possible care. However, no l iabil ity
for their accuracy can be assumed. Analyses and evaluations reflect the state of our knowledge
in January 2019 and may change at any time. This applies in particular, but not exclusively, to
statements made about the future. Names and designations that appear in this study may be
registered trademarks.
Usage rights
This study is protected by copyright. Any reproduction or dissemination to third parties, including
in part, requires the prior explicit authorization of Itell igence. The publication or dissemination of
tables, graphics etc. in other publications also requires prior authorization.
Independence and data protection
This study was produced by Pierre Audoin Consultants (PAC – a CXP Group Company).
Itell igence had no influence on the analysis of the data and the production of the study.
The participants in the study were assured that the information they provided would be treated
confidentially. No statement enables conclusions to be drawn about individual companies and
no individual survey data was passed to Itell igence or any other third party. All participants in
the study were selected at random. There is no connection between the production of the study
and any commercial relationship between the respondents and Itell igence.
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 22
ABOUT ITELLIGENCE
itell igence is a leading international full-service provider for SAP
solutions, employing more than 7,500 highly qualif ied employees in 25
countries. As SAP-certif ied provider of cloud services, itell igence has
received many partner awards and is SAP Platinum Partner. itell igence
oversees complex projects in the SAP solution-based environment
worldwide.
The company’s services for SAP solutions range from consulting and
licensing to application management and hosting, as well as
proprietary industry-specific solutions. Expert managed services,
industry experience, and a global service infrastructure enable
itell igence to provide the ideal platform for SAP support.
All managed services are offered through scalable, flexible and cost-
effective delivery models to ensure the right balance between local
support and global economies of scale. Working around the world,
itell igence is responsible for numerous projects, across national borders
and diverse business landscapes. Based on global expertise and
experience, itell igence delivers world-class services and solutions
through local experts that understand the requirements of specific
markets; from regulatory challenges to employee culture.
We offer worldwide support, tailored to SAP customers’ needs – our
managed services ensure optimal SAP operation.
For more information, please visit: www.itell igencegroup.com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/itell igence
Twitter: https://twitter.com/itell igencecorp
i tell igence AG | Headquarter Königsbreede 1 33605 Bielefeld, Germany Phone: +49 (0)521 9 14 48-0 gms@itel l igencegroup.com www.itel l igencegroup.com
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 23
ABOUT PAC
Founded in 1976, Pierre Audoin Consultants (PAC) is part of CXP Group,
the leading independent European research and consulting firm for
the software, IT services, and digital transformation industry.
CXP Group offers its customers comprehensive support services for the
evaluation, selection, and optimization of their software solutions and
for the evaluation and selection of IT services providers, and
accompanies them in optimizing their sourcing and investment
strategies. As such, CXP Group supports ICT decision-makers in their
digital transformation journey.
Further, CXP Group assists software and IT services providers in
optimizing their strategies and go-to-market approaches with
quantitative and qualitative analyses as well as consulting services.
Public organizations and institutions equally base the development of
their IT policies on our reports.
Capitalizing on 40 years of experience, based in 8 countries (with 17
offices worldwide) and with 140 employees, CXP Group provides its
expertise every year to more than 1,500 ICT decision-makers and the
operational divisions of large enterprises as well as mid-market
companies and their providers. CXP Group consists of three branches:
Le CXP, BARC (Business Application Research Center), and Pierre
Audoin Consultants (PAC).
For more information, please visit: www.pac-online.com
PAC’s latest news: www.pac-online.com/blog
Follow us on Twitter: @CXPgroup
PAC – a CXP Group Company Holzstr. 26 80469 Munich, Germany Tel.: +49 (0)89 23 23 68 0 [email protected] www.pac-online.com
Appl icat ion Management in Europe – Copyr ight CXP Group, 2019 24