Applicability of Mechanical Strength Tests for Biomass Pellet
Transcript of Applicability of Mechanical Strength Tests for Biomass Pellet
Applicability of
Mechanical Strength
Tests for Biomass
Pellet
Characterisation
Presented by: Dr Orla Williams
Co-Authors: Carol Eastwick, Donald Giddings, Sam Kingman,
Peter Sage, Edward Lester
Scope of Study
Aims: To explore how biomass pellet mechanical strength relates to milling
behaviour
Objective: Determine durability, quasi-static and dynamic strength of biomass
pellets and correlate results to milling energy in 3 different mills; Hardgrove
Grindability Index (HGI), Ring-Roller, and Knife Mill
Wood Pellets Sunflower
Pellets
Eucalyptus
Pellets
Miscanthus
Pellets
Steam Exploded
PelletsMicrowave
Pellets
Pellet Durability Test
• Pellet durability
tested in
accordance
with BS EN
15210-1:2009
• 𝐷𝑢 =𝑚𝐴
𝑚𝐵× 100
• Sunflower and
mixed wood
pellets failed to
meet standards
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
EUCALYPTUS PELLETS
MIXED WOOD PELLETS
STEAM EXPLODED PELLETS
SUNFLOWER PELLETS
MISCANTHUS PELLETS
Pellet Durability (%)
96.5% 97.5%
Correlation between Durability and Milling Energy
y = 1.4495x - 127.2
R² = 0.9204
y = 1.7657x - 144.95
R² = 0.9957
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Mill
ing
En
ergy
(kW
h/t
)
Durability (%)
Ring-Roller Mill
Ring-Roller Mill Outlier
Knife Mill
Knife Mill Outlier
97.5% Durability Limit
Correlation between HGI and Durability
Eucalyptus Pellets
Miscanthus Pellets
Steam
Exploded Pellets
Olive Pellets
Mixed Wood Pellets
Sunflower Pellets
y = 7.9907x - 763.73
R² = 0.9937
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
HG
I
Durability (%)
97.5% Durability Limit
Quasi-Static Mechanical Tests
• Samples measured in 3 orientations axial, diametral and flexure using
Instrom Mechanical Testing Machine
• Stress and strain values obtained from Force-Extension curves
• Test gives low strain rate (1 mm/min) mechanical strength for biomass
pellets
Correlation between Diametral Strain and HGI
Eucalyptus Pellets
Mixed Wood Pellets
Miscanthus Pellets
Sunflower Pellets
Steam Exploded Pellets
y = -0.8005x + 28.63
R² = 0.9432
0
5
10
15
20
25
15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31
Stra
in (
%)
HGI
Correlation between Diametral Stress and Ring-Roller Mill Energy
Eucalyptus Pellets
Mixed Wood Pellets
Miscanthus Pellets
Sunflower Pellets
Microwave Pellets
y = 0.1607x + 4.2578
R² = 0.8628
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Dia
met
ric
Stre
ss (
MPa
)
Milling Energy (kWh/t)
SHPB Outputs
• Impact creates strain single which is converted into
voltage output
• Engineering strain is obtained from:
𝑒𝑠 𝑡 = 2𝐶𝑏𝐿𝑠 0
𝑡
𝜀𝑅𝑑𝑡
• Engineering stress is obtained from:
𝑠𝑠 𝑡 =𝐴𝐵𝐴𝑠𝐸𝑏𝜀𝑇(𝑡)
Correlation between Axial Young’s Modulus and Knife Milling Energy
Mixed Wood PelletsMiscanthus Pellets
Sunflower Pellets Microwave Pellets
y = 1.3552x - 6.1374
R² = 0.9461
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
15 20 25 30 35
You
ng'
s M
od
ulu
s (M
Pa)
Milling Energy (kWh/t)
Correlation between Axial Young’s Modulus and Ring-Roller Milling Energy
Mixed Wood PelletsMiscanthus Pellets
Sunflower PelletsMicrowave Pellets
y = 1.1362x + 11.174
R² = 0.9248
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
You
ng'
s M
od
ulu
s (M
Pa)
Milling Energy (kWh/t)
Conclusions
• The pellet durability correlated with HGI (provided the pellet durability was
over 97.5%) and the milling energies from a knife mill and ring-roller mill
• Low durability will result in pellets that are unsuitable for transport and
comminution.
• The compressive strength of the biomass pellets at low and high strain rates
and in multiple orientations was obtained using quasi-static and dynamic
mechanical tests.
• At low strain rates, the biomass pellets showed the highest rigidity in axial
orientations under a uniformly distributed load (axial and diametral
orientations), and poor rigidity when subjected to point loads (flexure test).
• Dynamic mechanical strength and rigidity were highest in the diametral
orientation.
Conclusions
• Pellet strength was greater at high strain rates than at low strain rates.
• Orientation was an important factor in relating mechanical strength to milling
energy.
• Correlations were only observed in the diametral orientation at low strain
rates and in the axial orientation at high strain rates.
• Different torrefaction methods have varying impacts on pellet strength.
• Mechanical tests of biomass pellets can provide an indication of how a pellet
will break down in the mill, but further work is required to enhance their
accuracy for commercially produced biomass pellets.