Appendix D Transportation Technical Report

Appendix D

Transportation Technical Report

Environmental Assessment May 2015 Tempe Streetcar

This page is intentionally left blank.

Environmental Assessment May 2015 Tempe Streetcar

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION PAGE

1.0 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................12.0 2015 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS .................................................1

2.1 EXISTING STREET CLASSIFICATION..................................................... 12.2 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS ....................................................... 12.3 EXISTING CURBSIDE USES: ON-STREET PARKING, LOAD ZONES,

BUS ZONES .............................................................................................. 42.4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME.................................................................. 62.5 EXISTING TRANSIT................................................................................ 102.6 EXISTING PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS ....................................... 12

3.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 133.1 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................... 133.2 TRAFFIC DIVERSION CONSIDERATIONS............................................ 153.3 SPECIAL EVENTS .................................................................................. 153.4 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS AND APPROACH....................... 153.5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS ..................................... 24

4.0 IMPACTS TO ON-STREET AND OTHER OFF-STREET PARKING...................... 284.1 ON-STREET PARKING IMPACTS .......................................................... 284.2 OFF-STREET PARKING IMPACTS ........................................................ 31

5.0 IMPACTS TO ON-STREET LOADING ZONES........................................................ 315.1 2035 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE ............................................................. 315.2 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE.................................................................... 315.3 LOADING ZONE REPLACEMENT OPPORTUNITIES............................ 32

6.0 IMPACTS ON PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES..................................... 326.1 2035 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE ............................................................. 326.2 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE.................................................................... 33

7.0 IMPACTS ON TRANSIT ............................................................................................ 357.1 2035 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE ............................................................. 357.2 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE.................................................................... 35

8.0 IMPACTS ON FREIGHT ROUTES............................................................................ 378.1 FREIGHT RAILROAD FACILITIES.......................................................... 378.2 FREIGHT RAILROAD IMPACTS............................................................. 37

Transportation Technical Report Page i May 2015Environmental AssessmentTempe Streetcar

9.0 IMPACTS ON TRUCK ROUTES............................................................................... 379.1 TRUCK ROUTES IN TEMPE................................................................... 379.2 TRUCK ROUTE IMPACTS...................................................................... 37

10.0 IMPACTS ANTICIPATED DURING CONSTRUCTION - MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC................................................................................................................................. 38

10.1 2035 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE ............................................................. 3810.2 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE.................................................................... 38

TABLES

TABLE 1: EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS ALONG THE PLANNED TEMPE STREETCAR ALIGNMENT ............................................................... 3

TABLE 2A: EXISTING CURBSIDE USES – ALONG PLANNED STREETCAR ALIGNMENT – DOWNTOWN LOOP .............................................................. 5

TABLE 2B: EXISTING CURBSIDE USES – ALONG PLANNED STREETCAR ALIGNMENT ON APACHE BLVD................................................................... 5

TABLE 3: AVERAGE WEEKDAY 24-HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME1.................................. 7TABLE 4: 2015 PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUME ................................................... 9TABLE 5: TEMPE BUS TRANSIT ROUTES ................................................................. 10TABLE 6: 2015 PM PEAK HOUR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE COUNTS................. 12TABLE 7: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS DEFINITIONS ..................................... 14TABLE 8: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS DEFINITIONS ................................ 14TABLE 9: 2035 PM PEAK HOUR NO-BUILD AND BUILD TURN MOVEMENT

COUNTS....................................................................................................... 18TABLE 10: 2035 PM PEAK NO-BUILD AND BUILD PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE

COUNTS—SIGNAL INTERSECTIONS ........................................................ 19TABLE 11: INTERSECTION LOS AND DELAY (PM PEAK)........................................ 26TABLE 12: INTERSECTIONS OPERATING AT LOS E AND LOS F (PM PEAK)......... 28TABLE 13: DOWNTOWN TEMPE ON-STREET PARKING INVENTORY AND

IMPACTS WITH 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE .............................................. 29TABLE 14: APACHE BLVD ON-STREET PARKING INVENTORY AND IMPACTS

WITH 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE ............................................................... 30TABLE 15: 2035 NO-BUILD AND BUILD TRANSIT OPERATIONS ............................. 35TABLE 16: SHARED BUS STOP AND STREETCAR STATION LOCATION ............... 36

Transportation Technical Report Page ii May 2015Environmental AssessmentTempe Streetcar

FIGURES

FIGURE 1: PROPOSED TEMPE STREETCAR ALIGNMENT........................................ 2 FIGURE 2: 2015 SCENARIO STUDY INTERSECTIONS............................................... 8 FIGURE 3: VALLEY METRO LIGHT RAIL ALIGNMENT AND STATIONS................... 11 FIGURE 4: 2035 SCENARI O STUDY INTERSECTIONS ............................................ 17 FIGURE 5A: TYPICAL BIKE BOX................................................................................. 34 FIGURE 5B: LEFT TURN BIKE BOX DIAGRAM .......................................................... 34

Transportation Technical Report Page iii May 2015Environmental AssessmentTempe Streetcar

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report provides an assessment of, and potential mitigation for, the impacts of the 2035 No-Build and 2035 Build Alternatives, on the following transportation elements: traffic operations, on-street and off-street parking, transit, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, freight routes, and truck routes within the project study area.

This information will assist Valley Metro and the City of Tempe in understanding the potential transportation impacts of the proposed project and in developing appropriate design strategies, where needed, to avoid or minimize adverse impacts.

The impacts of the Build and No-Build Alternatives in the year 2035 are assessed in this report. Definitions of the No-Build and Build Alternatives may be found in Chapter 2 of the Environmental Assessment (EA).

2.0 2015 EXISTING TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS

2.1 EXISTING STREET CLASSIFICATION

The roadways upon which the planned streetcar will traverse – Mill Ave, University Dr,Rio Salado Pkwy and Apache Blvd - are classified as arterials; Ash Ave is classified as a collector street. These arterials are designed to carry large volumes of traffic, and also to accommodate transit, bicyclists and pedestrians.

2.2 EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS

Table 1 documents the existing roadway conditions along the planned Tempe streetcar corridor. The proposed streetcar alignment starts on Rio Salado Pkwy west of Rural Rd and continue west on Rio Salado Pkwy to Ash Ave where the route turns south and continues on Ash Ave to University Dr. At University Dr the alignment turns east and continues to Mill Ave, where the route turns north on Mill Ave through Downtown andjoins track at Rio Salado Pkwy. At University Dr the alignment runs south on Mill Ave curving along the Gammage Curve onto Apache Blvd where the route continues east and terminates near Dorsey Ln (as shown in Figure 1). Segments of Rio Salado Pkwy, Ash Ave, University Dr and Downtown Mill Ave comprise the planned Downtown Tempe one-way counter-clockwise streetcar route. Included in the documentation of existing roadway conditions along the planned streetcar route is the current travel lane configuration, intersection signalization, traffic volume, transit operations, on-street parking availability and pedestrian/bicycle facilities.

Transportation Technical Report Page 1 May 2015Environmental AssessmentTempe Streetcar

FIGURE 1: PROPOSED TEMPE STREETCAR ALIGNMENT

Source: Valley Metro, 2015


TA

BLE

1:E

XIST

ING

RO

AD

WA

Y C

HA

RA

CTE

RIS

TIC

S A

LON

G T

HE

PLA

NN

ED T

EMPE

STR

EETC

AR

ALI

GN

MEN

TR

oadw

ay S

egm

ent

Trav

el L

anes

Spee

d Li

mit

Inte

rsec

tions

Tran

sit R

oute

sO

n-St

reet

Pa

rkin

gB

icyc

lePe

dest

rian

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y

R

ural

Rd

to M

ill A

ve

Two

lane

s ea

ch

dire

ctio

n R

aise

d m

edia

n

Rur

al R

d to

M

ill A

ve: 3

5 M

PH

Sign

aliz

edH

ayde

n Fe

rry

Dr

Pac

kard

Dr

Rur

al R

d

No

Uns

igna

lized

FL

AS

H: P

acka

rd D

rto

Rur

al R

dN

one

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y

M

ill A

ve to

Ash

Ave

Two

lane

s ea

ch

dire

ctio

nR

aise

d m

edia

n

Mill

Ave

toA

sh A

ve:

30 M

PH

Sign

aliz

edM

ill Av

eA

sh A

ve

Uns

igna

lized

Map

le A

veN

o tra

nsit

serv

ice

on th

is s

egm

ent o

f Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

yN

one

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s

Ash

Ave

R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy

to

Uni

vers

ity D

r

One

lane

eac

h di

rect

ion

Cen

ter t

urn

lane

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

yto

U

nive

rsity

Dr:

30 M

PH

Sign

aliz

edU

nive

rsity

Dr

5th

St

3rd

St (

LRT

cros

sing

)R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

No

Uns

igna

lized

48

:48t

h S

t. R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

to 5

th S

t62

: Har

dy D

r.R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

to 5

th S

t

Bot

h si

des

north

of W

. 5th

St

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s.M

id-b

lock

cro

ssin

g at

Fire

S

tatio

n #6

Uni

vers

ity D

rA

sh A

ve to

Mill

Ave

Two

lane

s ea

ch

dire

ctio

nC

ente

r tur

n la

ne/s

hort

land

scap

ed m

edia

n w

est o

f Myr

tle A

ve

Ash

Ave

toM

yrtle

Ave

:35

MP

H

Sign

aliz

edA

sh A

ve

Mill

Ave

No

Uns

igna

lized

30: U

nive

rsity

Dr:

Ash

Ave

to M

ill A

veN

one

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s

Mill

Ave

Uni

vers

ity D

r. to

R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

One

lane

in e

ach

dire

ctio

nR

aise

d/la

ndsc

aped

med

ian

Uni

vers

ity D

r to

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y: 3

0 M

PH

Sign

aliz

edU

nive

rsity

Dr

7th

St

6th

St

4th

St (

ped

cros

sing

)3r

d S

t (LR

T cr

ossi

ng)

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y

Uns

igna

lized

2ndS

treet

LRT

Sta

tion

on 3

rd S

t wes

t of M

ill A

ve65

: Mill

Ave

/Kyr

ene

Rd

sout

h of

5th

St

66: M

ill A

ve /K

yren

e R

dso

uth

of 5

th S

tO

RB

IT E

arth

: Rio

Sal

ado

to 5

th S

tO

RB

IT J

upite

r:5t

h S

t to

Uni

vers

ity D

rO

RB

IT M

ercu

ry:

5th

St t

o U

nive

rsity

Dr

FLA

SH

back

/FLA

SH

For

war

d: U

nive

rsity

Dr t

o G

amm

age

Wes

t sid

e on

ly

north

of 2

ndS

tB

oth

side

s no

rth o

f 2nd

St

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s

Mill

Ave

Apa

che

Blv

d to

U

nive

rsity

Ave

Thre

e la

nes

sout

hbou

ndO

ne la

ne n

orth

boun

dR

aise

d m

edia

n

Apa

che

Blv

d to

Uni

vers

ity

Dr:

35

MP

H

Sign

aliz

edA

pach

e B

lvd

10th

St9t

hSt

Uns

igna

lized

12th

StG

amm

age

Pkw

y/11

th

St

65: M

ill A

ve/K

yren

e R

dso

uth

of 5

th S

t66

: Mill

Ave

/Kyr

ene

Rd

sout

h of

5th

St

OR

BIT

Ven

us: U

nive

rsity

to 1

0th

St

FLA

SH

: Uni

vers

ity D

rto

11th

St

OR

BIT

Jup

iter:

Uni

vers

ity D

rto

Gam

mag

ePk

wy.

Non

eS

tripe

d bi

cycl

e la

ne

north

boun

d on

lyS

idew

alks

bot

h si

des

Apa

che

Blv

dM

ill A

ve to

D

orse

y Ln

Two

lane

s ea

ch

dire

ctio

nR

aise

d m

edia

nC

ente

r tur

n la

ne

Kyr

ene

to

Rur

alR

d:

35 M

PH

Sign

aliz

edFo

rest

Ave

Col

lege

Ave

Nor

mal

Dr

McA

lliste

r Ave

Pas

eo D

el S

aber

Rur

al R

d

Uns

igna

lized

Sun

set D

r

Flas

h: F

ores

t Ave

to M

cCal

iste

r Ave

OR

BIT

Jup

iter:

Fore

st A

ve to

Col

lege

Ave

LRT

Sta

tion

on A

pach

e B

lvd

at D

orse

y Ln

Bot

h si

des

north

of W

. Te

rrac

e R

d

Stri

ped

bicy

cle

lane

ea

ch d

irect

ion

Sid

ewal

ks b

oth

side

s

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 3

May

201

5E

nviro

nmen

tal A

sses

smen

tTe

mpe

Stre

etca

r

2.3 EXISTING CURBSIDE USES: ON-STREET PARKING, LOAD ZONES, BUS ZONES

Curbside uses of the public right of way contribute to the vitality and function of urban commercial streets. On-street parking is a valuable asset for local residents and businesses with limited or no off-street parking. On-street parking in Tempe is metered and time-limited to encourage turnover and to discourage long-term parking. The presence of parked cars also serves to buffer pedestrians from moving traffic and enhances the pedestrian environment.

Curbside load zones accommodate deliveries and pick-up drop off activities out of the travel lanes. Tempe City Code Chapter 19-1.b(4) defines a curb loading zone as a space adjacent to a curb reserved for the exclusive use of vehicles during the loading or unloading of passengers or materials. These too are valuable assets where off-street loading is not an option. Transit service also requires curbside space for passenger boardings and alightings.

According to the Downtown Tempe Community web site (http://www.millavenue.com)there are over 500 on-street parking spaces within the Mill Ave District. On-street parking is a component of the over 8,000 parking spaces in garages and surface lots available in the District.

Along the proposed streetcar alignment in the downtown loop, each of these curbside uses on Mill and Ash Aves is allocated space – metered parking is striped on the pavement, load zones are striped green on the curb and transit zones are striped red on the curb. Table 2A identifies the curbside uses on Mill and Ash Aves within the Tempe downtown loop. University Dr does not have on-street parking or curb loading zones in the downtown loop; however, a bus zone is located mid-block between Ash Ave and Mill Ave. Rio Salado Pkwy has no curbside uses within the loop.

Along the proposed streetcar alignment, Apache Blvd is the only other roadway segment outside the downtown loop with on-street parking and bus zones. Table 2B summarizes the curbside uses along Apache Boulevard. Neither Rio Salado Pkwy nor Mill Ave south of University Dr contain any curbside uses.


TABLE 2A: EXISTING CURBSIDE USES – ALONG PLANNED STREETCAR ALIGNMENT – DOWNTOWN LOOP

Road Segment

Mill AveEast Side*

Mill AveWest Side

Ash AveEast Side

Ash AveWest Side*

UniversityDr to7th St

Parking spaces: 3Curb load zone: 0

Bus zone @ mid-block

Parking Spaces: 0Curb load zone: mid-block

Bus zone @ 7th St.Parking 0paces: 0Curb load zone: 0Bus zone: None

Parking Spaces: 0Curb load zone: 0Bus zone: None

6th St to7th St

Parking spaces: 5Curb load zone: mid-block

Bus zone @ 7th St.


Bus zone @ 6th St.

6th St to5th St

Parking spaces: 5Curb load zone mid-block

Bus zone @ 6th St.


Bus zone @ 5th St.

5th St to4th St

Parking Spaces: 5Curb load zone: mid-block

Bus zone @ 5th St.


Bus zones: None Parking spaces: 9Curb load zone: 0

Bus zone @ 3rd St.

Parking spaces: 16Curb load zone: 0Bus zone: None4th St to

3rd StParking spaces: 4

Curb load zone: south partBus zone @ 3rd St.


Bus zone @ 3rd St.3rd St to

Rio SaladoPkwy

Parking Spaces: 11Curb load zone: 0

Bus zone @ Rio Salado


Bus zone @ Rio Salado

Parking Spaces: 7Curb load zone: 0

Bus zone @Rio Salado


Bus zone @Rio Salado

* Proposed Streetcar alignmentSource: Google Maps satellite images and Streetview, field check

TABLE 2B: EXISTING CURBSIDE USES – ALONG PLANNED STREETCAR ALIGNMENT ON APACHE BLVD

Road Segment Apache Blvd: North Side Apache Blvd: South Side

Forest Ave/ College Ave

Parking spaces:5 Curb load zone:0

Bus Zone: College Ave

Parking spaces:0 Curb load zone:0 Bus Zone: None

College Ave / NormalAve



Bus Zone: College Ave

Normal Ave / McCalister Ave


Bus Zone: McAllister


McAllister Ave / Paseo Del Saber



Bus Zone: McCalister Ave

Paseo Del Saber/ Rural Rd

Parking spaces:19 Curb load zone:0 Bus Zone: Rural


Rural Rd/ Terrace RdParking spaces:15 Curb load zone:0

Bus Zone: Terrace


Bus Zone: Rural RdSource: Google Maps satellite images and Streetview, field check


2.4 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME

2.4.1 Average Daily Traffic

Average Daily Traffic (ADT), is the total volume of vehicle traffic of a highway or road for a year divided by 365 days. This helps assess the level of exposure on the study roadway.

Table 3 provides the average weekday vehicle trips along the planned streetcaralignment on Rio Salado Pkwy, Ash Ave, Mill Ave, University Dr, and Apache Blvd.Historical traffic data was obtained from the City of Tempe Traffic Counts available on the MAG Transportation Data Management System. Blank cells in Table 3 indicate that no data is available. It was observed that the volumes along most of the study corridorsand study intersections decreased in the past 10 years.

2.4.2 2015 PM Peak Hour Traffic Counts

Table 4 provides the 2015 PM Peak approach volume for each leg of intersections along the planned streetcar route, and the turning movement counts. Intersection numbers correspond to Figure 2 which shows the 2015 study intersections. Rural Rd has relatively higher volume compared to the other study roadway segments along which proposed streetcar alignment is proposed..


TA

BLE

3:A

VER

AG

E W

EEK

DA

Y 24

-HO

UR

TR

AFF

IC V

OLU

ME1

Segm

ent

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y:

Har

dy D

r to

Mill

Ave

10,0

117,

652

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y:

Rur

al R

d to

McC

linto

ckR

d13

,806

14,0

95

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y:

Ash

Ave

to M

ill A

ve9,

312

Mill

Ave

:R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

to U

nive

rsity

Dr

18,1

9116

,623

Mill

Ave

: U

nive

rsity

Dr t

o A

pach

e B

lvd

35,8

6932

,936

20,1

58

Mill

Ave

: 13

th S

t to

Bro

adw

ay R

d25

,257

24,3

97

Ash

Ave

s/o

R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

7,81

3

Apa

che

Blv

d:

Rur

al R

d to

Mill

Ave

28,6

2318

,699

18,3

88

Uni

vers

ity D

r: M

ill A

ve to

Rur

al R

d26

,641

21,1

60

Uni

vers

ity D

r: M

ill A

ve to

Prie

st D

r30

,227

27,6

74

1 Blan

k ta

ble

cells

indi

cate

no

data

is a

vaila

ble.

Sou

rce:

http

://m

ag.m

s2so

ft.co

m/tc

ds/ts

earc

h.as

p?lo

c=M

ag&

mod

His

toric

al c

ount

s: C

ity o

f Tem

pe T

raffi

c C

ount

s M

ap a

nd H

DR

201

1 C

ount

s

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 7

May

201

5E

nviro

nmen

tal A

sses

smen

tTe

mpe

Stre

etca

r

FIGURE 2: 2015 SCENARIO STUDY INTERSECTIONS


TA

BLE

4:2

015

PMPE

AK

HO

UR

TR

AFF

IC V

OLU

ME

Int.

IDIn

ters

ectio

n N

ame

Nor

thbo

und

(NB

)So

uthb

ound

(SB

)Ea

stbo

und

(EB

)W

estb

ound

(WB

)N

BL

NB

TN

BR

SBL

SBT

SBR

EBL

EBT

EBR

WB

LW

BT

WB

R1

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / R

ural

Rd

6615

3621

026

013

5028

146

986

621

210

215

687

2R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

/ Pac

kard

Rd

382

214

514

84

1294

8511

633

70

3R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

/ Hay

den

Ferry

Acc

ess

00

026

70

5624

1053

00

410

394

Mill

Ave

/ R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

3223

923

319

026

914

119

165

243

119

279

825

Ash

Ave

/ R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

127

143

938

213

92

21

124

72

272

6A

sh A

ve/ 3

rd S

t7

567

278

306

1526

13

291

647

Ash

Ave

/ 5t

h S

t20

347

5962

166

9890

143

2854

103

978

Ash

Ave

/ Fi

re S

tatio

n0

371

00

300

00

00

00

19

Ash

Ave

/ U

nive

rsity

Dr

639

3321

61

157

171

781

8644

614

140

10M

ill A

ve /

Uni

vers

ity D

r23

726

427

810

152

151

116

591

345

183

430

114

11M

ill A

ve /

7th

St

7138

947

6250

627

610

8073

844

12M

ill A

ve /

6th

St

4339

221

4850

027

1123

5523

440

13M

ill A

ve /

5th

St

8129

256

6236

935

5187

9769

7954

14M

ill A

ve /

4th

St

942

30

048

316

00

210

00

15M

ill A

ve /

3rd

St

2241

021

1943

78

315

3813

739

16**

Mill

Ave

/ 2n

d S

t17

478

00

418

1324

039

00

017

*M

ill A

ve /

9th

St

2073

724

2310

2518

74

8424

060

18M

ill A

ve /

10th

St

5372

511

07

1115

2926

612

121

115

1819

*M

ill A

ve /

11th

St

5868

858

106

1315

81

043

434

160

20M

ill A

ve /

Apa

che

Blv

d0

392

00

603

041

30

280

00

21M

ill A

ve /

13th

St

9342

194

880

820

1712

410

722

375

322

Apa

che

Blv

d / F

ores

t Ave

10

118

50

108

5977

25

2055

595

23A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Col

lage

Ave

570

8629

00

132

080

420

015

447

20

24A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Nor

mal

Ave

00

180

097

7410

4811

2054

316

625

Apa

che

Blv

d / M

cAlis

ter A

ve33

928

5814

122

9095

019

4957

160

26A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Pas

eo D

el S

aber

(Ped

)0

00

00

00

1036

00

680

027

Apa

che

Blv

d / R

ural

Rd

296

1131

182

195

1687

208

289

498

321

182

239

126

28A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Ter

race

Rd

918

2159

3223

2268

69

1953

441

29A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Dor

sey

Ln0

00

890

8690

710

040

466

6130

Rur

al R

d/ U

nive

rsity

Dr

166

1041

190

238

1306

197

252

951

263

192

489

109

Not

e:* F

utur

e S

igna

ls w

ith S

treet

car P

roje

ct, *

* Fut

ure

Sig

nalb

y O

ther

sE

B-E

astb

ound

, WB

-W

estb

ound

, NB

-N

orth

boun

d, S

B –

Sou

thbo

und,

R -

Rig

ht tu

rn, T

-Th

roug

h tra

ffic,

L -

Left

turn

Sou

rce:

City

of T

empe

and

HD

R tr

affic

cou

nt d

ata

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 9

May

201

5E

nviro

nmen

tal A

sses

smen

tTe

mpe

Stre

etca

r

2.5 EXISTING TRANSIT

Rural Rd, Mill Ave, Apache Blvd, and Rio Salado Pkwy are some of the arterials in the study area that were identified as most productive transit routes in the Tempe Transportation Master Plan (Tempe TMP, January 2015). Mill Ave supports local and regional north-south transit service, with connections within Downtown Tempe and the Arizona State University campus, and to adjacent neighborhoods

Transit service in the Tempe streetcar study area currently provides both local and regional connections, including bus and light rail modes.

2.5.1 Bus

Valley Metro bus transit routes connect the Downtown Tempe area with points throughout the region. Table 5 summarizes the existing bus transit service that operates on or near the planned Tempe streetcar alignment and station locations.

TABLE 5: TEMPE BUS TRANSIT ROUTESRoute Corridor Service Frequency

Valley Metro Route-30 University Dr 30 minutes

Valley Metro Route-48 Rio Salado Pkwy, Ash Ave via 5th St 30 minutes

Valley Metro Route-62 Farmers Ave, Ash Ave, 5th St via University Dr 30 minutes

Valley Metro Route-65 Mill Ave from Rio Salado Pkwy via Baseline Rd 30 minutes

Valley Metro Route-66 Mill Ave (from McKellips St) via Baseline Rd 30 minutes

Flash Back/ ForwardLoop: Apache Blvd, Mill Ave, Rio Salado Pkwy, Packard Dr and MacAllister Ave. Interlined with Flash MacAllister

12 minutes

Orbit Earth Connects Downtown Tempe with Tempe Marketplace through north Tempe neighborhoods 15 minutes

Orbit JupiterTravels between Downtown Tempe and McClintock High School (serving the Tempe Public Library)

20 minutes

Orbit Mercury Travels between Downtown Tempe and the Escalante Center 10 minutes

Orbit Venus Circulates between Downtown Tempe and Broadway Rd/Beck Ave 15 minutes

Source: City of Tempe and Valley Metro, 2015 Transit Schedules online


2.5.2 LRT

Valley Metro Rail provides light rail service between Phoenix and Mesa via Tempe. Figure 3 shows the LRT alignment in the Tempe/Mesa section. Downtown Tempe is served by a light rail station at Mill Ave at 3rd St. On weekdays, the current span of service at the Mill Ave/3rd St station is from about 4AM to Midnight with a frequency of service ranging from 10 minutes to 20 minutes, depending on the time of day and day of the week.

FIGURE 3: VALLEY METRO LIGHT RAIL ALIGNMENT AND STATIONS


2.6 EXISTING PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS

Non-motorized transportation is a significant component of existing and planned mobility in Downtown Tempe and nearby neighborhoods. Recent pedestrian and bicycle counts are documented in Table 6. Mill Ave and Apache Blvd accommodate high volumes of both pedestrians and bicyclists, largely due to the adjacent and nearby land uses, and the provision of superior facilities for these users. The existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities along the streetcar route are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 6: 2015 PM PEAK HOUR PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE COUNTS

IntersectionPedestrian Volume Bicycle Volume

East leg

West leg

North leg

South leg EB WB NB SB

Rio Salado Pkwy / Rural Rd 24 8 2 7 0 1 1 1Rio Salado Pkwy / Packard Rd 7 10 10 4 3 1 1 0Rio Salado Pkwy / Hayden Ferry Access 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 5Mill Ave / Rio Salado Pkwy 37 53 19 4 0 8 12 28Ash Ave / Rio Salado Pkwy 12 1 0 10 1 7 2 5Ash Ave / 3rd St 30 4 10 10 0 4 2 1Ash Ave / 5th St 18 12 66 49 26 52 21 7Ash Ave / Fire Station 22 0 0 182 0 7 11 11Ash Ave / University Dr 27 58 29 17 46 35 15 11Mill Ave / University Dr 156 87 154 175 33 59 36 36Mill Ave / 7th St 174 146 91 35 2 8 35 31Mill Ave / 6th St 110 111 230 261 1 9 33 32Mill Ave / 5th St 304 327 256 120 23 24 18 29Mill Ave / 4th St 227 233 108 54 4 1 30 37Mill Ave / 3rd St 30 68 124 110 4 6 25 36Mill Ave / 2nd St 5 5 5 5 5 5 25 36Mill Ave / 9th St 25 17 36 46 7 4 46 36Mill Ave / 10th St 39 34 86 134 49 130 21 15Mill Ave / 11th St 27 6 36 1 3 17 24 22Mill Ave / Apache Blvd 37 0 0 15 0 18 5 0Mill Ave / 13th St 10 15 41 25 23 41 14 29Apache Blvd / Forest Ave 48 2 11 36 15 12 7 25Apache Blvd / Collage Ave 89 36 27 23 16 14 36 141Apache Blvd / Normal Ave 178 2 28 92 24 39 0 4Apache Blvd / McAlister Ave 93 104 54 90 14 18 7 14Apache Blvd / Paseo Del Saber (Pedestrian Crossing) 549 71 28 112 30 16 61 50Apache Blvd / Rural Rd 117 97 147 187 36 16 0 5Apache Blvd / Terrace Rd 5 13 11 13 15 0 18 7Apache Blvd / Dorsey Ln 42 0 48 0 15 16 0 1Rural Rd/ University Dr 80 84 97 130 10 10 10 10Note: EB - Eastbound, WB - Westbound, NB - Northbound, SB - SouthboundSource: City of Tempe and HDR traffic count data 2015


3.0 TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS

This section of the report summarizes the traffic operations analysis conducted for the Tempe Streetcar project. The traffic analysis was conducted for the PM peak hour traffic conditions at the study intersections shown in Figure 2 in Section 2.4 for the following scenarios:

2015 Existing Conditions2035 No-Build 2035 Build Alternative

The PM peak hour was selected for analysis because this is typically when the highest potential for congestion can occur, and thus it represents a worst-case scenario. This analysis documents and compares the impacts of each of the above scenarios based on the conceptual design available at this phase of the study. Detailed analysis using more advanced traffic analysis software will be conducted in Final Design.

3.1 METHODOLOGY

Traffic analysis of roadway and intersection operational performance for the study scenarios was performed using the Synchro/SimTraffic simulation analysis package (version 8, Build 803, revision 743) developed by Trafficware, Ltd, which evaluates intersection delay and congestion based on procedures similar to those given in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (Chapters 18,19 and 20). Basic inputs used for Synchro relate primarily to traffic data including traffic volumes, lane geometry (i.e., number of lanes, lane widths, turn-lane storage lengths), signal timing data, heavy vehicle traffic levels, on-street parking, bus blockage and a variety of other data items.

It should be noted that Synchro is limited when assessing streetcar operations. Since streetcar will operate much like a bus, the Synchro model will consider streetcar as part of the bus/transit codings. This was agreed to be sufficient by City of Tempe and Valley Metro staff to be used for the No-Build Alternative and Build Alternative so that the results could be compared with regard to overall intersection level of service and delays. As mentioned, more sophisticated traffic software will be used in Final Design for the Build Alternative.

The methodology used in this study was based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), for the determination of Level of Service (LOS) for existing traffic conditions and future traffic conditions. The analysis results are expressed using LOS and Intersection Delay.

Level of Service (LOS) is a quantitative measure based on intersection delay and capacity. LOS is frequently expressed in qualitative terms as LOS A (free-flow) to LOS F (congested). Tables 7 and 8 provide LOS definitions for signalized and unsignalized


intersections, respectively. The “Description” column of each table qualitatively describes the perception of traffic conditions by motorists and passengers, while the “Average Delay” column quantitatively describes the number of seconds of delay per vehicle associated with each LOS.

TABLE 7: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS DEFINITIONSLevel of Service Description Average Delay

(seconds/vehicle)

A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorableprogression and/or short cycle length.

B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. > 10 – 20

COperations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear.

> 20 – 35

DOperations with longer delay due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume to capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable.

> 35 – 55

EOperations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay.

> 55 – 80

F Operations with delay unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. > 80

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010

TABLE 8: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS DEFINITIONSLevel of Service Description Average Delay

(second/vehicle)

A Little or no delay 0 – 10

B Minor delay > 10 – 15

C Average delay > 15 – 25

D Moderate delay > 25 – 35

E Lengthy delay > 35 – 50

F Excessive delay/gridlock > 50

Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010


3.2 TRAFFIC DIVERSION CONSIDERATIONS

Traffic diversion and traffic reroute assessment were discussed with City of Tempe Traffic and Valley Metro staff. Comparing the MAG Regional Travel Demand Models (TDM) No-Build and Build projected volumes developed in 2012 revealed very little change between the two alternatives and in some locations the Build projected volumes were less than the No-Build. The project team concluded that for the purposes of this study at this phase, the traffic operations analysis results would focus on a comparative analysis between alternatives and would consider traffic diversions to have an insignificant impact on the analysis. During the next phase of study and design, the preferred alternative will be modeled to include potential traffic diversion, and mitigation will be proposed at that time if needed.

3.3 SPECIAL EVENTS

Many special events occur along Mill Ave during the course of the year. This often involves complete closure of Mill Ave between Rio Salado Pkwy and University Dr. This traffic analysis did not include assessments of any special event as part of this study phase.

3.4 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS AND APPROACH

This traffic analysis employed a conventional approach that included basic data collection efforts, investigation of existing roadway and traffic conditions, and analysis of the above mentioned study scenario operational impacts.

New traffic counts (auto, pedestrian and bicycle) were performed at all signalized intersections along the proposed streetcar alignment where current counts were older than 5 years. These are summarized in Table 4 and 6. These counts were performed in the later parts of 2014 and were conducted when classes at Arizona State University (ASU) were in session. Traffic signal timings were provided by the City of Tempe.

As mentioned earlier, the study analyzed the PM peak hour traffic conditions, as the evening peak period is expected to generate the most congested traffic conditions during a weekday.

3.4.1 Traffic Volumes

3.4.1.1 2015 Existing Volumes: Auto, Pedestrian, and Bicycle

Existing 2015 and Historical Average Weekday Traffic 24-Hour Traffic Volumes and 2015 PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Counts are summarized in Section 2.4 inTables 3 4 and 6. As mentioned above, for this study, new traffic counts (auto,


pedestrian and bicycle) were performed at all intersections where current counts were older than 5 years. Rural Rd has relatively higher volume compared to the other study roadway segments along which proposed streetcar alignment is proposed.

3.4.1.2 2035 No-Build Traffic Volumes: Auto, Pedestrian, and Bicycle

Development of the 2035 No-Build traffic volumes considered past and planned economic growth for Tempe; review of previous traffic analysis reports; review of the MAG Regional Travel Demand Model (TDM); and various meetings with City of Tempe Traffic Engineering and Valley Metro staff. Based on these elements, it was agreed that an assumed 1% annual growth rate would be utilized to develop all auto, pedestrian and bicycle 2035 No-Build volumes with the exception of Rio Salado Pkwy study intersections.

The Marina Heights development is anticipated to add more traffic to Rio Salado Pkwy. For 2035 background traffic for Rio Salado Pkwy intersections 0% (NO) growth to 2015existing traffic volumes was assumed to account for the addition of more transportation alternatives in the study area. The State Farm 2035 site generated traffic was added to Rio Salado Pkwy intersections. The future traffic signals at Access B and Access D to the Marina Heights development were included in the traffic analysis. The trip generation and distribution, and lane configuration and turn lane storage length at signalized access intersections were per the Marina Heights Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA).

The traffic volumes are anticipated to increase along all the study corridors with no planned roadway improvements in 2035 No Build. Rural Road which is one of the heavy traffic corridors in the City and Rio Salado Parkway with the Marina Heights development are anticipated to have relatively more traffic compared to the other study roadway segments along which the streetcar alignment is proposed.

3.4.1.3 2035 Build Traffic Volumes: Auto, Pedestrian, and Bicycle

Development of the turning movement counts (TMC) for the 2035 Build Alternative required review and understanding of the MAG TDM for the Tempe Streetcar study. Comparing the TDM No-Build and Build projections developed in 20121, very little change occurred between the two and, in some locations, the Build volumes were less than the No-Build. Therefore, it was agreed that the 2035 Build Alternative volumes and TMC's would be the same as the 2035 No-Build volumes as shown in Table 9. This also applies to the 2035 Build bicycle volumes as shown in Table 10.

1 The projections were developed in 2012 as part of the initial project proposal which was never advanced. The current project alignment has been somewhat modified for the current project. Refer to Chapter 2 of the EA for additional information about specific project route modifications since 2012.


FIGURE 4: 2035 SCENARIO STUDY INTERSECTIONS


TA

BLE

9:2

035

PM P

EAK

HO

UR

NO

-BU

ILD

AN

D B

UIL

D T

UR

NM

OVE

MEN

TC

OU

NTS

INTI

DIn

ters

ectio

n N

ame

Nor

thbo

und

(NB

)So

uthb

ound

(SB

)Ea

stbo

und

(EB

)W

estb

ound

(WB

)N

BL

NB

TN

BR

SBL

SBT

SBR

EBL

EBT

EBR

WB

LW

BT

WB

R1

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / R

ural

Rd

114

1536

210

260

1350

329

745

1236

488

102

220

872

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / P

acka

rd R

d48

921

440

933

267

7318

5814

711

743

860

2aR

io S

alad

o P

kwy

/ Acc

ess

D0

00

301

012

118

1715

00

747

232b

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y/ M

arin

aH

ts S

tatio

n P

ed S

igna

l10

00

00

00

1733

00

869

02c

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / A

cces

s B

00

032

60

324

5814

070

080

960

2dR

io S

alad

o P

kwy/

Mar

ina

Hts

Sta

tion

Ped

Sig

nal2

00

00

00

017

330

086

90

3R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

/ Hay

den

Ferr

y A

cces

s0

00

267

056

2411

980

012

4139

3aR

io S

alad

o P

kwy/

Hay

den

Ferr

y S

tatio

n P

ed S

igna

l0

00

00

00

1220

00

1297

04

Mill

Ave

/ R

io S

alad

o P

kwy

3230

923

321

331

914

119

177

443

119

980

211

4aR

io S

alad

o P

kwy/

Ash

Ave

Sta

tion

Ped

Sig

nal

00

00

00

094

40

012

220

5A

sh A

ve /

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y1

321

439

504

139

22

11

247

297

36

Ash

Ave

/ 3r

d S

t9

692

3310

373

1832

14

351

787

Ash

Ave

/ 5t

h S

t24

423

7276

203

120

110

174

3466

126

118

8A

sh A

ve /

Fire

Sta

tion

045

30

036

60

00

00

01

9A

sh A

ve /

Uni

vers

ity D

r77

1140

264

119

220

995

310

554

749

171

10M

ill A

ve /

Uni

vers

ity D

r28

932

233

912

363

662

142

721

421

223

525

139

11M

ill A

ve /

7th

St

8747

557

7661

733

712

9889

1054

12M

ill A

ve /

6th

St

5247

826

5961

033

1328

6728

549

13M

ill A

ve /

5th

St

9935

668

7645

043

6210

611

884

9666

14M

ill A

ve /

4th

St

1151

60

058

920

00

260

00

15M

ill A

ve /

3rd

St

2750

026

2353

310

386

4616

948

16M

ill A

ve /

2nd

St

2158

30

051

016

290

480

00

17a

Mill

Ave

/9th

Ave

Sta

tion

Ped

Sig

nal

098

10

1280

00

00

00

017

Mill

Ave

/ 9t

h S

t24

899

2928

1251

229

510

229

073

18M

ill A

ve /

10th

St

6588

513

49

1361

3532

714

825

718

2219

Mill

Ave

/ 11

th S

t71

839

7112

916

0510

10

5252

519

520

Mill

Ave

/ A

pach

e B

lvd

047

80

073

60

504

034

00

021

Mill

Ave

/ 13

th S

t11

351

411

510

986

2421

151

131

272

924

22A

pach

e B

lvd

/ For

est A

ve1

01

226

013

272

942

624

677

116

23A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Col

lage

Ave

700

105

354

016

10

981

244

188

576

024

Apa

che

Blv

d / N

orm

al A

ve0

022

00

118

9012

7913

2466

320

325

Apa

che

Blv

d / M

cAlis

ter A

ve40

1134

7117

149

110

1159

2360

697

7326

Apa

che

Blv

d / P

aseo

Del

Sab

er (P

ed)

00

00

00

012

640

083

00

27A

pach

e B

lvd

/ Rur

al R

d36

113

8022

223

820

5825

435

360

839

222

229

215

427

aR

ural

Rd/

Rur

al S

tatio

n P

ed S

igna

l 10

00

00

00

1068

00

446

027

bR

ural

Rd/

Rur

al S

tatio

n P

ed S

igna

l 20

00

00

00

1068

00

446

028

Apa

che

Blv

d / T

erra

ce R

d11

2226

7239

2827

837

1123

652

5029

Apa

che

Blv

d / D

orse

y Ln

00

010

90

105

110

866

049

569

7430

Rur

al R

d/ U

nive

rsity

Dr

203

1270

232

290

1594

240

307

1160

321

234

597

133

Not

e:*

Futu

re S

igna

ls w

ith S

treet

car P

roje

ct ;

EB

-E

astb

ound

, WB

-W

estb

ound

, NB

-Nor

thbo

und,

SB

-S

outh

boun

d;R

-Rig

ht tu

rn, T

-Th

roug

h tra

ffic,

L -

Left

turn

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 1

8M

ay 2

015

Env

ironm

enta

l Ass

essm

ent

Tem

pe S

treet

car

TA

BLE

10:

2035

PM

PEA

KN

O-B

UIL

D A

ND

BU

ILD

PED

ESTR

IAN

/BIC

YCLE

CO

UN

TS—

SIG

NA

L IN

TER

SEC

TIO

NS

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

2035

Ped

estr

ian

Volu

me

2035

Bic

ycle

Vol

ume

East

leg

Wes

t leg

Nor

th le

gSo

uth

leg

EBW

BN

BSB

NoB

uild

B

uild

NoB

uild

B

uild

NoB

uild

B

uild

NoB

uild

B

uild

NoB

uild

/B

uild

NoB

uild

/B

uild

NoB

uild

/B

uild

NoB

uild

/B

uild

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / R

ural

Rd

3030

1010

22

99

01

11

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y / P

acka

rd R

d9

912

1212

125

54

11

0R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy

/ Acc

ess

D0

00

00

00

00

00

0R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy/

Mar

inaH

ts S

tatio

n Pe

d Si

gnal

10

00

700

00

00

00

0R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy

/ Acc

ess

B0

00

00

00

00

00

0R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy/

Mar

inaH

ts S

tatio

n Pe

d Si

gnal

20

00

700

00

00

00

0R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy

/ Hay

den

Ferr

y Ac

cess

22

44

00

00

16

00

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y/ H

ayde

n Fe

rry

Stat

ion

Ped

Sign

al0

00

60

00

00

00

0M

ill A

ve /

Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y47

4767

6724

245

50

1015

36R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy/

Ash

Ave

Sta

tion

Ped

Sign

al0

00

200

00

00

00

0As

h Av

e / R

io S

alad

o Pk

wy

1515

11

00

1313

19

36

Ash

Ave

/ 3rd

St

3838

55

1313

1391

05

31

Ash

Ave

/ 5th

St

2323

1515

8484

6211

433

6627

9As

h Av

e / F

ire S

tatio

n28

280

00

023

123

10

914

14As

h Av

e / U

nive

rsity

Dr

3434

7474

3743

2222

5844

1914

Mill

Ave

/ U

nive

rsity

Dr

198

198

110

110

196

196

222

222

4275

4646

Mill

Ave

/ 7t

h S

t22

122

118

518

511

611

644

443

1044

39M

ill A

ve /

6th

St

140

140

141

141

292

330

331

331

111

4241

Mill

Ave

/ 5t

h S

t38

638

641

541

532

532

515

215

229

3023

37M

ill A

ve /

4th

St

288

288

296

296

137

137

6969

51

3847

Mill

Ave

/ 3r

d S

t38

3886

8615

722

814

014

05

832

46M

ill A

ve /

2nd

St

66

66

66

66

66

3246

Mill

Ave

/9th

Ave

Sta

tion

Ped

Sig

nal

00

091

00

00

00

00

Mill

Ave

/ 9t

h S

t32

3222

2246

4658

589

558

46M

ill A

ve /

10th

St

5050

4343

109

109

170

170

6216

527

19M

ill A

ve /

11th

St

3434

88

4612

11

14

2230

28M

ill A

ve /

Apa

che

Blv

d47

470

00

019

190

236

0M

ill A

ve /

13th

St

1313

1919

5252

3232

2952

1837

Apac

he B

lvd

/ For

est A

ve59

592

214

1444

4418

159

31Ap

ache

Blv

d / C

olla

ge A

ve11

011

044

172

3333

2828

2017

4417

4Ap

ache

Blv

d / N

orm

al A

ve21

921

92

235

3511

311

330

480

5Ap

ache

Blv

d / M

cAlis

ter A

ve11

511

512

812

867

6711

111

117

229

17Ap

ache

Blv

d / P

aseo

Del

Sab

er (P

ed)

676

676

8787

3535

138

138

3720

7562

Apac

he B

lvd

/ Rur

al R

d14

414

412

012

018

118

123

023

044

200

6R

ural

Rd/

Rur

al S

tatio

n Pe

d Si

gnal

10

00

60

00

00

00

0R

ural

Rd/

Rur

al S

tatio

n Pe

d Si

gnal

20

00

70

00

00

00

0Ap

ache

Blv

d / T

erra

ce R

d6

616

5714

1416

1619

022

9Ap

ache

Blv

d / D

orse

y Ln

5252

00

5925

50

018

200

1R

ural

Rd/

Uni

vers

ity D

r10

210

210

710

712

312

316

516

513

1313

13N

ote:

EB-E

astb

ound

, WB

-Wes

tbou

nd, N

B -N

orth

boun

d, S

B -S

outh

boun

d

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 1

9M

ay 2

015

Env

ironm

enta

l Ass

essm

ent

Tem

pe S

treet

car

For the 2035 Build pedestrian volumes, streetcar passenger boarding and alighting projections at the proposed streetcar stops were obtained from the FTA STOPSprogram. Based on crosswalk locations near each proposed streetcar stop, the streetcar passenger traffic was estimated and then added to the background No-Build pedestrian volumes as shown in Table 6. Figure 3 shows the 2035 study intersections.

3.4.2 Roadway Geometry

The 2015 existing roadway geometry, including lane configurations and turn lane storage lengths, has been obtained from available base mapping, aerial surveys and field reviews. This data was used for the 2015 existing conditions and 2035 No-Build Synchro modeling.

For the 2035 Build Alternative, the roadway geometry, lane configurations and streetcar stops used in Synchro were based on drawings provided/developed by HDR dated February 2015. Based on these drawings, three locations would require roadway lane configuration changes, or restricted turn movements to accommodate the streetcar operation. These are:

Along Mill Ave between University Dr and 11th St – the number of southbound lanes is reduced from 3 lanes to 2 lanes to accommodate streetcar.At Ash Ave and University Dr – the westbound to southbound left turn movement is removed/restricted to allow streetcar operations.At Apache Blvd and Dorsey Ln – eastbound left turn lane is removed and is changed to two through lanes with shared left turn and right turn movements from these through lanes. The signal phasing is changed to split phasing for eastbound and westbound movements.

3.4.3 Design Speed

Speed limits used for Synchro 2015 existing conditions, 2035 No-Build and 2035 Build Alternative scenarios are those that are currently posted along the planned streetcar corridor as follows:

30 mph - Mill Ave between Rio Salado Pkwy and University Dr; Rio Salado Pkwybetween Mill Ave and Ash Ave; Ash Ave between Rio Salado Pkwy andUniversity Dr..35 mph - Rio Salado Pkwy between Mill Ave and Rural Rd; Mill Ave between University Dr and Apache Blvd; Apache Blvd between Mill Ave and Dorsey Lane; and University Dr.


3.4.4 Signal Timing and Phasing

The existing signal timing and phasing information along the study corridor was provided by the City of Tempe and was used for the 2015 scenario in Synchro. For the 2035 No-Build scenario, signal timings were adjusted to optimize performance using the existing signal phasing.

For the 2035 Build scenario streetcar operations, in general, occur in the travel lanes along Mill Ave, University Dr. and Apache Blvd with general purpose traffic and will operate with the existing signal system. Along Ash Ave, the streetcar operates in “semi-exclusive” right of way in the southbound curb lane but mixes with right turning vehicles/lanes at intersections and driveway locations. Along Rio Salado Pkwy, the streetcar is median running between Mill Ave and Packard Dr. There are a few locations where streetcar operations will require: new signals; transit detection to allow signal phasing changes that enable the streetcar to transition from one lane to the next at signalized locations; and/or transit detection to create a transit signal phase to allow the streetcar to move through the intersection exclusively.

City of Tempe will be signalizing Mill Ave and 2nd St (Intersection #16) in near future. The Marina Heights Development will be installing new signals at their Access B (Intersection #2d) and Access D (Intersection #2a) on Rio Salado Parkway in 2018. Note that the intersection numbers in parenthesis coincide with the locations shown in Figure 4.

New traffic signals, which also include pedestrian signals, are proposed at the existing un-signalized locations on Mill Ave at 9th St (Intersection #17) and 11th St (Intersection #19) for the 2035 Build Alternative to help the neighborhood and commercial access traffic flow (ingress and egress).

New pedestrian signals for access to streetcar stops have been proposed per Valley Metro design criteria for the 2035 Build Alternative:

2b – Rio Salado Pkwy between Marina Heights proposed signalized Access B and Access D2c – Rio Salado Pkwy between Marina Heights proposed signalized Access B and Access D3a – Rio Salado Pkwy between Mill Ave and Hayden Ferry Access Signal4a – Rio Salado Pkwy between Mill Ave and Ash Ave17a—Mill Ave between University Dr and 9th St (this mid-block pedestrian signal to access center streetcar stop would need to be studied further in the next design phase with advanced traffic operational software that can simulate streetcar operations and any impacts to the University Dr and Mill Ave intersection)


27a, 27b – Apache Blvd east of Rural Rd signalized intersection

Transit detection allowing signal phasing changes for the 2035 Build Alternative are needed:

a) On Mill Ave at:9th St (new signalized intersection) to allow southbound streetcar to transition from left turn lane straight through the intersection;10th St to allow southbound streetcar to transition from left turn lane straight through the intersection;11th St (new signalized intersection) to allow southbound streetcar to transition from left turn lane to the curb lane through the intersection;

b) On Rio Salado Pkwy at:Hayden Ferry Dr to allow eastbound streetcar to transition from left turn lane through the intersection;

c) On Apache Blvd at:Terrace Rd to allow streetcar to transition through the intersection;

Transit detection for transit signal phases for 2035 Build Alternative is needed at:University Dr and Mill Ave to allow streetcar to transition from eastbound left turnlane to southbound striped median; allow auto eastbound to northbound left turns, auto northbound to eastbound right turns and auto southbound to westbound right turns during this phase as well.University Dr and Ash Ave to allow streetcar to transition from the southbound curb lane along Ash Ave across the intersection to the eastbound left turn lane on University Dr.Rio Salado Pkwy and Ash Ave to allow streetcar to transition from the westbound left turn lane through the intersection to the southbound curb lane and allow auto westbound to southbound left turns; allow auto westbound to northbound right turns and allow auto northbound to eastbound right turns during this phase as well.Rio Salado Pkwy and Mill Ave has two transit phases

1. to allow streetcar to transition from westbound left turn lane straight through the intersection; allow auto westbound to southbound left turnsand auto northbound to eastbound right turns during this phase as well;

2. to allow streetcar to transition from northbound left turn lane through the intersection to eastbound and allow auto northbound to westbound left turns.

The current analysis assumes both phases occurring simultaneously during all cycles, which is a conservative approach.


In the 2035 Build alternative, split phase for eastbound and westbound moments is proposed at the Apache Blvd and Dorsey Ln intersection as the eastbound left turn lane is removed.

3.4.5 Streetcar and Transit Input

As mentioned in Section 3.1, Synchro has limitations with regard to assessing streetcar operations. Since the streetcar will operate much like a bus, the Synchro model was coded as such. For streetcar and bus stop input into Synchro, it was decided that the “bus blockage factors” would be modified. The streetcar is modeled to operate at a 10 minute headway, which implies that, on an average, six cycles per hour will be impacted due to streetcar operation. Presently the traffic signals along the streetcar alignment operate at 110 second cycle length which equates to 33 cycles per hour. During discussions with City of Tempe Traffic staff it was assumed that 4 out of the 33 cycles per hour (or 12 percent of the total hourly cycles) will be impacted during streetcar operations so a bus blockage factor of 0.12 will be reasonable/conservative to apply at all signalized intersections where streetcar stops occur.

This streetcar blockage factor was input in addition to the background transit bus blockage factors for the 2035 Build Alternative. For description of background bus transit operations see Section 2.5.

The Valley Metro Light Rail tracks currently cross Mill Ave and Ash Ave just north of 3rdSt and also join Apache Blvd at Terrace Rd and run east. The light rail uses a "predictive priority" signal detection at the signalized locations which allows light rail the ability to have priority over auto/general purpose traffic. Since the streetcar will operate in traffic much like a bus, it is assumed that light rail will have priority over streetcar operations. For the purposes of this traffic operations analysis, based on the limitations of Synchro to model streetcar and LRT operations, no light rail crossing input into the model was considered.

More sophisticated software will be used to model traffic and streetcar operations in Final Design.

3.4.6 Parking Input

The maneuvers into and out of on-street parking spaces are expected to impact the traffic flow on Mill Ave and Apache Blvd and inputs used in Synchro. The number of such maneuvers during the PM peak hour considers the number of existing on-street parking spaces for 2015 and the 2035 No-Build Alternative and proposed on-street parking spaces for the 2035 Build Alternative.


For existing on-street parking space counts, and in the 2035 No-Build and 2035 Build Alternative, refer to Table 13 in Section 4.0.

3.5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS RESULTS

Table 11 provides the overall PM Peak Hour average intersection level of service (LOS) and delay for the 2015 Existing, 2035 No-Build Alternative, and 2035 Build Alternative. The LOS was calculated utilizing the data input discussed in Sections 3.4.1 through 3.4.6. Note that the City of Tempe considers any LOS from A through E to be acceptable during peak periods. LOS F implies the intersection is congested during peak hour and is considered not-acceptable. Those intersections operating at LOS E and F in the three study scenarios are summarized in Table 12. Although LOS E is considered acceptable during peak periods, this LOS indicates the intersections are approaching congestion and need to be monitored for future traffic flow changes.

3.5.1 2035 No-Build Traffic Volumes

Based on these results, the 2035 No-Build Alternative will operate at an acceptable LOSat all the study intersections with the exception of the Rural Rd/Rio Salado Pkwyintersection which would operate at a LOS F. Some of the intersections that experience more delays (greater than 10 seconds) in 2035 No-Build compared to existing 2015 are Rio Salado Pkwy and Rural Rd, Rio Salado Pkwy and Packard Rd, Apache Blvd and Rural Rd and Rural Rd and University Drive.

With the Marina Heights development, Rio Salado Pkwy study intersections will be experiencing more traffic in 2035 with both the Build and No-Build Alternatives. Based on the opening year (2018) and future year (2023) traffic from the Marina Heights development2 the City of Tempe may coordinate for possibility of shift schedules with State Farm, the major tenant, to help reduce the peak hour traffic operations along Rio Salado Pkwy.

All the Rural Rd study intersections would operate at LOS E or F.

3.5.2 2035 Build Traffic Volumes

Similar to the No-Build Alternative, the 2035 Build Alternative, will operate at an acceptable LOS at all the study intersections with the exception of Rural Rd/Rio Salado Pkwy intersections, which would operate at LOS F. The LOS F is due to the additional traffic generated by the regional growth and is not a direct result of the Tempe Streetcar project. As with the No-Build Alternative, all the Rural Rd study intersections wouldoperate at LOS E or F.

2 Marina Heights, Traffic Impact Analysis, July 2013


The Rio Salado Pkwy intersection at Mill Ave changes from LOS D with the No-Build Alternative to LOS E (an increase of 37 seconds of intersection delay) with the addition of transit phases to each traffic signal cycle in the 2035 Build Alternative. The analysis assumes both the northbound to eastbound transit phase and westbound transit phase occur at every cycle which is a conservative approach. During the streetcar operation, only one transit phase occurs each cycle and a maximum of 12 cycles will have the streetcar phase during the peak hour, which will improve the intersection performance.

The current analysis assumed no traffic volume reduction and transit phase occurring every cycle for the 2035 Build scenario, which is a conservative approach. Most of the study intersections along the alignment still operate at LOS D or better in the Build analysis. The City of Tempe vision is for complete streets with multi-modal transportation options, especially in Downtown and around Arizona State University. As there are no geometric improvements planned along the study alignments, it is anticipated that alternate transportation modes will be more utilized in the future. The delays will be less than estimated in the current analysis. The increase in travel times for both auto and transit will be minor.

The proposed streetcar 2035 Build Alternative will not have a significant adverse effects on traffic compared to 2035 No-Build, as most of the study intersections along the streetcar alignment operate at LOS D or better. As summarized in Table 11, there are 3 intersections (Rio Salado Pkwy and Mill Ave, Apache Blvd and Paseo Del Saber (Ped Signal) and Apache Blvd and Dorsey Ln) which have more than 10 seconds increase in intersection delay compared to No-Build.


TA

BLE

11:

INTE

RSE

CTI

ON

LOS

AN

D D

ELA

Y(P

M P

EAK

)

Int. ID

Inte

rsec

tion

Nam

e

2015

Exi

stin

g 20

35 N

o Bu

ild

2035

Bui

ld

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

1Ri

o Sa

lado

Pkw

y / R

ural

Rd

53

D 84

F

85

F 2

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy

/ Pac

kard

Rd

24

C 70

E

64

E 2a

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy

/ Acc

ess D

-

17

B 10

B

2bRi

o Sa

lado

Pkw

y/ M

arin

aHts

Sto

p Pe

d Si

gnal

1 N

o Si

gnal

3

A 2c

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy

/ Acc

ess B

-

18

B 24

C

2dRi

o Sa

lado

Pkw

y/ M

arin

aHts

Sto

p Pe

d Si

gnal

2 N

o Si

gnal

6

A 3

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy

/ Hay

den

Ferr

y Ac

cess

9

A 12

B

14

B 3a

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy/

Hay

den

Ferr

y St

op P

ed S

igna

l N

o Si

gnal

21

C

4M

ill A

ve /

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy

33

C 39

D

76

E 4a

Rio

Sala

do P

kwy/

Ash

Ave

Sto

p Pe

d Si

gnal

N

o Si

gnal

4

A 5

Ash

Ave

/ Rio

Sal

ado

Pkw

y 44

D

41

D 51

D

6As

h Av

e / 3

rd S

t 7

A 8

A 12

B

7As

h Av

e / 5

th S

t 11

B

13

B 15

B

8As

h Av

e / F

ire S

tatio

n 2

A 3

A 2

A 9

Ash

Ave

/ Uni

vers

ity D

r 16

B

20

C 31

C

10M

ill A

ve /

Uni

vers

ity D

r 33

C

42

D 47

D

11M

ill A

ve /

7th

St

19

B 21

C

21

C12

Mill

Ave

/ 6t

h St

13

B

15

B 15

B

13M

ill A

ve /

5th

St

22

C 24

C

21

C14

Mill

Ave

/ 4t

h St

3

A 4

A 3

A 15

Mill

Ave

/ 3r

d St

9

A 10

A

10

A 16

Mill

Ave

/ 2n

d St

N

o Si

gnal

10

A

12

B 17

aM

ill A

ve/9

th A

ve S

top

Ped

Sign

al

No

Sign

al

23

C17

Mill

Ave

/ 9t

h St

N

o Si

gnal

14

B

18M

ill A

ve /

10th

St

28

C 43

D

27

C

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 2

6M

ay 2

015

Env

ironm

enta

l Ass

essm

ent

Tem

pe S

treet

car

Int. ID

Inte

rsec

tion

Nam

e

2015

Exi

stin

g 20

35 N

o Bu

ild

2035

Bui

ld

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

Inte

rsec

tion

Dela

y (S

econ

ds)

LOS

19M

ill A

ve /

11th

St

No

Sign

al

15

B 20

Mill

Ave

/ Ap

ache

Blv

d 14

B

11

B 11

B

21M

ill A

ve /

13th

St

19

B 23

C

22

C22

Apac

he B

lvd

/ For

est A

ve

12

B 11

B

11

B 23

Apac

he B

lvd

/ Col

lage

Ave

16

B

20

B 21

C

24Ap

ache

Blv

d / N

orm

al A

ve

3 A

2 A

1 A

25Ap

ache

Blv

d / M

cAlis

ter A

ve

9 A

9 A

8 A

26Ap

ache

Blv

d / P

aseo

Del

Sab

er (P

ed)

0 A

0 A

13

B 27

Apac

he B

lvd

/ Rur

al R

d 48

D

79

E 79

E

27a

Rura

l Rd/

Rur

al S

top

Ped

Sign

al 1

N

o Si

gnal

2

A 27

bRu

ral R

d/ R

ural

Sto

p Pe

d Si

gnal

2

No

Sign

al

2 A

28Ap

ache

Blv

d / T

erra

ce R

d 23

C

19

B 13

B

29Ap

ache

Blv

d / D

orse

y Ln

23

C

32

C 48

D

30Ru

ral R

d/ U

nive

rsity

Dr

47

D 71

E

72

E N

ote:

LOS

from

HCM

2000

Syn

chro

repo

rts a

re su

mm

arize

d

Tran

spor

tatio

n Te

chni

cal R

epor

tPa

ge 2

7M

ay 2

015

Env

ironm

enta

l Ass

essm

ent

Tem

pe S

treet

car

TABLE 12: INTERSECTIONS OPERATING AT LOS E AND LOS F (PM PEAK)

Scenario Intersections Operating at LOS E Intersections Operating at LOS F

2015 Existing None None

2035 No-BuildRio Salado Pkwy / Packard Rd

Rural Rd / Apache BlvdRural Rd / University Dr

Rural Rd / Rio Salado Pkwy

2035 Build

Rio Salado Pkwy / Mill AveRio Salado Pkwy / Packard Rd

Rural Rd / Apache BlvdRural Rd / University Dr

Rural Rd / Rio Salado Pkwy

4.0 IMPACTS TO ON-STREET AND OTHER OFF-STREET PARKING

4.1 ON-STREET PARKING IMPACTS

4.1.1 2035 No-Build Alternative

The No-Build Alternative would have no adverse impacts to on-street or off-street parking since it would not involve roadway geometry changes or construction of new or demolition of existing parking facilities (other than possibly some as a result of planneddevelopment in and near the project area). In these cases, the City of Tempe zoning regulations would dictate the parking requirements which are based on providing appropriate parking supply to address the demand for the new development. 2035 Build Alternative

4.1.2 2035 Build Alternative

An inventory of all existing on-street parking spaces, loading zones and bus stops along Mill Ave and Ash Ave in Downtown Tempe was performed. The inventory of existing on-street parking spaces is included in Table 13. For the portion of the streetcar alignment on Mill Avenue south of University Dr there are no on-street parking spaces. The inventory of on-street parking spaces on Apache Boulevard is shown in Table 14.In summary, the Build Alternative will result in the loss of 44 on-street parking spaces and no off-street parking spaces. Impacts to existing on-street parking by street are described below.

4.1.2.1 Mill AveFor the 2035 Build Alternative, in Downtown Tempe, the streetcar would run in the northbound travel lane with the flow of traffic, minimizing impacts to the existing on-street parking. Due to the streetcar stops and bike lane transitions, eight parking


spaces would be displaced on the east side of Mill Ave. The project would not displace any existing parking on the west side of Mill Ave. See Table 13.

TABLE 13: DOWNTOWN TEMPE ON-STREET PARKING INVENTORY AND IMPACTS WITH 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Street Segment

Mill AveEast Side*

Mill AveWest Side*

Ash AveEast Side

Ash AveWest Side

ExistingParking/No-Build

2035Build


2035Build


2035Build


2035Build

Rio Salado/ 3rd St 11 2 17 17 7 7 3 0

3rd St/4th St

4 6 5 79 6 16 0

4th St/5th St

5 5 5 6

5th St/6th St

5 1 5 4

0 0 0 06th St/7th St

5 5 5 5

7th St/University

3 3 0 3

Total Parking 33 22 37 37 16 13 19 0

Parking Losses 11 0 3 19

Source: Parking Inventory, March, 2015*There is no existing on-street parking on Mill Ave south of University Dr

4.1.2.2 Ash AveThe 2035 Build streetcar alignment on Ash Ave between Rio Salado Pkwy and University Dr would run southbound in a semi-exclusive lane adjacent to the curb with shared operations with right turns into driveways and intersections. Based on the track and lane configuration design, all 19 existing parking spaces would be displaced on the west side of Ash Ave and three parking spaces would be eliminated on the east side. See Table 13.

4.1.2.3 Apache BlvdTable 14 summarizes the Apache Blvd on-street parking and the impacts with the proposed streetcar alignment.


TABLE 14: APACHE BLVD ON-STREET PARKING INVENTORY AND IMPACTS

WITH 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE

Street Segment

North Side South SideExistingParking/No-Build

2035Build


2035Build

Forest/ College 5 5 0 0

College/ Normal 16 16 12 12

Normal/ McCalister 5 5 19 19

McCalister/ Paseo Del Saber 9 9 8 8

Paseo Del Saber/ Rural 19 19 8 8

Rural/ Terrace 15 12 13 2

Total Parking 69 66 60 49Parking Losses 3 11

Source: Parking Inventory, March, 2015

Rio Salado Pkwy and University Dr do not have on-street parking and hence no impact with the proposed streetcar alignment.

4.1.2.4 Parking Replacement OpportunitiesThere is a minor loss of eight on-street parking spaces on Mill Ave for which no replacement is provided. The loss of 22 parking spaces on Ash Ave could not be replaced by creating additional on-street parking in the vicinity; however there is a substantial amount of off-street parking available nearby.

Visual observations indicate that the parking stalls along Ash Ave, which are metered/short-term parking, are not utilized during most times of the day (non-event days) and that most vehicles parking in this area are more likely to use the free off-street surface parking for the businesses they would be attending such as Macayos and the Bash on Ash restaurants. Some also use the covered pay parking garage south of 5th Ave rather than use the on-street parking along Ash Ave.

The loss of 14 spaces on Apache Boulevard could not be replaced by creating additional on-street parking in the vicinity. Visual observations indicate low utilization of the parking spaces along Apache Boulevard where the losses would occur so elimination of these spaces would not result in an adverse impact.


4.2 OFF-STREET PARKING IMPACTS

According to the Downtown Tempe Authority, with nearly 7,500 off-street parking spaces currently, and several private developments including additional off-street public parking capacity, a sufficient amount of off-street parking was deemed available given current and anticipated future parking demand. Also, ASU provides ample off-street parking spaces for students, staff, and faculty in the form of parking structures and surface lots along Apache Boulevard, Rural Road, and Rio Salado Parkway. As ASU’s planned Athletics District development takes root, several surface lots will be converted to campus buildings, but parking capacity will be retained through the construction of parking structures. Also, recent developments including Marina Heights and Hayden Farry on Rio Salado Parkway include structured parking facilities for employees and visitors. It is conservatively estimated that between 11,000-14,000 off-street parking spaces are available throughout the project study area.

It has been determined that there is insufficient demand for a park-and-ride facility to accommodate daily streetcar operations during the regular work week. However, there may be a temporary need for parking to accommodate some special events that occur in Downtown Tempe as the City of Tempe and Arizona State University (ASU) host special events throughout the year such as the Insight Block Party, Festival of the Arts, and P.F. Chang’s Rock-and-Roll Marathon. The need to accommodate parking for these infrequent uses would be investigated during final design.

5.0 IMPACTS TO ON-STREET LOADING ZONES

5.1 2035 NO-BUILD ALTERNATIVE

There are no anticipated loading zone impacts for the 2035 No-Build Alternative, as there are no planned developments or roadway geometry changes or construction activity that would impact the loading zones.

5.2 2035 BUILD ALTERNATIVE

5.2.1 Mill AveFour on-street loading zones on the east side of Mill Ave currently exist and are located in four block segments between: 3rd St and 4th St; 4th St and 5th St; 5th St and 6th St;and 6th St and 7th St. One loading zone on the east side of Mill Avenue between 5th and 6th streets would be removed..

On the west side of Mill Ave, there are no impacts to the 4 on-street loading zones.There are no existing on-street loading zones along Mill Ave south of University Dr.


5.2.2 Ash AveThere are no existing or planned on-street loading zones on either side of Ash Avebetween Rio Salado Pkwy and University Dr.

5.2.3 Rio Salado PkwyThere are no existing or planned on-street loading zones on either side of Rio Salado Pkwy between Ash Ave and Rural Rd.

5.2.4 Apache BlvdThere are no existing or planned on-street loading zones on either side of Apache Blvdbetween Mill Ave and Dorsey Lane.

5.2.5 University DrThere are no existing or planned on-street loading zones on either side of University Drbetween Mill Ave and Ash Ave.

5.3 LOADING ZONE REPLACEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

One loading zone on the east side of Mill Avenue between 5th and 6th streets would be removed. The displaced loading zone would be relocated to 6th street where between two and four parking spaces would serve as a new loading zone. Through on-street signage and city policy, on-street parking availability may be temporarily restricted at certain locations and times during low-volume travel periods on weekdays to accommodate loading and deliveries for businesses.

6.0 IMPACTS ON PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES

There are continuous pedestrian facilities (sidewalks and crosswalks) along each side of all arterials in the entire study area. These facilities appear to be of adequate design and code compliance; although as part of this study there has not been an inventory of sidewalk width, curb ramp compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) standards, or a sidewalk capacity analysis.

In general, there are continuous, striped bicycle lanes all along the Tempe Streetcar alignment on Mill Ave, Rio Salado Pkwy, Apache Blvd and Ash Ave. There is a segment along Mill Ave, between University Dr and 12th St, in the southbound direction that is not striped, but cyclists use the third southbound travel lane.


All of the existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities will be preserved and maintained in the 2035 No-Build Alternative. There are no planned developments or roadway


geometry changes or construction activity that would impact the pedestrian and bicycle facilities.


6.2.1 Pedestrian Facilities

For the 2035 Build Alternative, relocation of the existing sidewalks around the curbside streetcar stops may be required, and crosswalks and curb ramps may need to be replaced. The design of new pedestrian facilities will be based on the Tempe Streetcar Urban Design Guidelines. These guidelines are currently being developed especiallyfor this project and will be consistent with the City of Tempe and ADA standards. The streetcar stop design and pedestrian connectivity are an important component of these new guidelines. The actuated pedestrian signals and pedestrian pushbuttons at signalized intersections shall benefit the pedestrian traffic operations and safety along the streetcar alignment.

6.2.2 Bicycle Facilities

For the 2035 Build Alternative, the continuous striped bicycle facilities will be maintained, with some reconfiguration. The segment along Mill Ave, between University Dr and 12th St would be striped as an exclusive southbound bicycle lane. This can be accommodated because the 3rd southbound travel lane would be reduced to 2 travel lanes plus a bicycle lane to accommodate the Tempe Streetcar. Thecontinuous striped bicycle facilities shall benefit the bicycle safety

Along the Tempe Streetcar corridor on Mill Ave, the northbound bicycle lane would be located to the right of the streetcar trackway and next to the sidewalk for the Build Alternative. Where on-street parking is maintained, the bicycle lane would be located between the trackway and parking spaces. At streetcar stops, the bicycle lane would be located between the stop and the sidewalk. See Chapter 2 of the EA for typical cross sections.

Along Ash Ave, the southbound bicycle lane would be located to the left of the streetcar trackway, adjacent to the travel lane.

A bicycle lane design that offers a buffer from moving traffic by placing the bicycle lanes between on-street parking and sidewalk, referred to as a “cycle track”, is an option that could be further evaluated during Final Design.

Safe bicycle turns across the trackway at intersections should be performed at angles greater than 60 degrees. Figure 5A and 5B shows a typical “Bike Box” that gives a bicyclist greater visibility and allows a bicyclist to safely make a left turn or to get


through an intersection ahead of cars. For bicycle lanes that run parallel to the trackway, a “Left Turn Bike Box” design (shown in Figure 5) is proposed to facilitate a bicyclists’ safe maneuver across the tracks. These turns are typically referred to “Copenhagen left turns” and are becoming the standard design across the country. These proposed designs will be further studied and designed during Final Design.

FIGURE 5A: TYPICAL BIKE BOX

Source: Seattle Department of Transportation

FIGURE 5B: LEFT TURN BIKE BOX DIAGRAM

Source: City of Portland


It is advisable to encourage slower bike speeds through the design of the bicycle lane where it transitions between the streetcar stop and the curb. Since Mill Ave in Downtown Tempe is a very active urban setting with large volumes of pedestrians and streetcar riders crossing the bicycle lane to the sidewalks, design elements should be used to slow bicycle speeds (10 - 15 mph) such as reduced taper lengths as the bicycle lane transitions behind the streetcar stop, and adequate signage and pavement markings.

7.0 IMPACTS ON TRANSIT


There are no changes to Valley Metro bus and LRT operations for the No-Build Alternative, as there are no planned route changes or construction activity that would impact the transit operations.


There are no changes to Valley Metro bus and LRT operations for the Build Alternative. Streetcar will be operating in addition to the existing Valley Metro bus and LRT operations in 2035 Build Alternative.

Table 15 summarizes the weekday bus operations in 2035.

TABLE 15: 2035 NO-BUILD AND BUILD TRANSIT OPERATIONS

Transit Mode/RouteWeekday Headway/Frequency (Minutes)

No-Build Alternative (2035) Build Alternative (2035)Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak

High Capacity TransitLight Rail 12 12 12 12Tempe Streetcar 6 3Local BusRoute 1 – Washington St/Jefferson St 45 45 45 45Route 30 – University Dr 30 30 30 30Route 40 – Apache Blvd/Main St 30 30 30 30Route 45 – Broadway Rd 15 15 15 15Route 48 – 48th St/Rio Salado Pkwy 15 15 15 15Route 56 – Priest Dr 15 30 15 30Route 61 – Southern Ave 15 30 15 30Route 62 – Hardy Dr/Guadalupe Rd 15 30 15 30Route 65 – Mill Ave/Kyrene Rd 30 30 30 30Route 66 – Mill Ave/Kyrene Rd 30 30 30 30Route 72 – Scottsdale Rd/Rural Rd 20 20 20 20Route 81 – Hayden Rd/McClintock Dr 15 15 15 15Express Bus


Transit Mode/RouteWeekday Headway/Frequency (Minutes)

No-Build Alternative (2035) Build Alternative (2035)Peak Off-Peak Peak Off-Peak

Route 511 - Scottsdale Airpark 30 N/A 30 N/ARoute 520 - Tempe/Southern 90 N/A 90 N/ARoute 551 - Ahwatukee/Tempe 30 N/A 30 N/ARed Mountain Connector 90 N/A 90 N/ACirculatorsFlash 10 10 10 10Flash McAllister 20 20 20 20Orbit Earth 15 15 15 15Orbit Jupiter 15 15 15 15Orbit Mars 15 15 15 15Orbit Mercury 10 10 10 10Orbit Venus 15 15 15 15ASU Shuttles1

ASU Shuttle - Tempe to Polytechnic 30 30 30 30ASU Shuttle - Tempe to CDB 60 60 60 60ASU Shuttle - Tempe to West Campus 30 30 30 301 ASU Shuttle services operate between ASU campuses and are not open to the public. Source: Valley Metro, 2014

Valley Metro bus routes and Flash/Orbit circulator service would interline with the streetcar on Mill Ave, and they would share many of the stops, as listed in the Table 16below.

TABLE 16: SHARED BUS STOP AND STREETCAR STATION LOCATIONLocation Platform Type Orientation Of Stop On

Street3rd St/Ash Ave Side platform on curbside lane Southbound5th St/Ash Ave Side platform on curbside lane SouthboundUniversity Dr/Ash Ave Side platform on curbside lane Southbound6th St/Mill Ave Side platform on curbside lane Northbound3rd St/Mill Ave Side platform on curbside lane Northbound

There is no change to bus routes and circulator service between No Build and Build alternatives per Table 4. There will be added streetcar stop delays at the locations where they share the stops along Mill Ave.

There are no added delays at bus stops along Rio Salado Pkwy as the streetcar is median running and also along Apache Boulevard where streetcar stations are in the median.


8.0 IMPACTS ON FREIGHT ROUTES

8.1 FREIGHT RAILROAD FACILITIESUnion Pacific Railroad (UPRR) owns the rail corridor and operates freight hauling trains on the corridors in the Phoenix Subdivision as shown in the Arizona State Rail Plan, March 2011, published by the Arizona Department of Transportation.

UPRR operates about eight trains per day on their main line running along Ash Ave and then over Mill Ave.

The City of Tempe, in conjunction with the Arizona Corporation Commission, Union Pacific Railroad and Federal Railroad Administration, established a railroad Quiet Zone in Tempe in 2012. The Quiet Zone includes the portion of the UPRR north of Broadway Rd from city limit to city limit.

8.2 FREIGHT RAILROAD IMPACTSBoth the 2035 No-Build and Build alternatives will have no impacts on the movement of freight on the UPRR. However, freight rail operations may occasionally indirectly impact streetcar operations. Where the railroad intersects east/west streets with at-grade crossings, delays caused by freight trains to the movement of westbound traffic and southbound streetcar, could potentially create a back-up across Ash Ave, especially at 5th St, where the freight railroad is about 30 feet west of Ash Ave. There may be times when right turning vehicles at 5th St are stopped on the streetcar tracks waiting for a freight train to pass. Currently there are illuminated “Train Activity” signs to inform turning traffic from Ash Ave to westbound on 5th St. Additional signage at this intersection to instruct drivers to avoid stopping on the streetcar tracks may be helpful to avoid blocking the southbound streetcar on Ash Ave.

9.0 IMPACTS ON TRUCK ROUTES

9.1 TRUCK ROUTES IN TEMPEThere are no designated arterial truck routes within the City of Tempe. However, the arterial system, typified within the Tempe streetcar study area by Rio Salado Pkwy, Mill Ave, University Dr, and Apache Blvd, accommodates truck traffic related to commercial freight hauling to, from, through and within Tempe.

9.2 TRUCK ROUTE IMPACTS

9.2.1 2035 No-Build Alternative

No impacts are anticipated to existing truck routes along the project corridor as there are no existing truck routes. The current trucking on the Mill Ave will remain the same as there are no anticipated changes to roadway geometry or construction activity.


9.2.2 2035 Build Alternative

The trucking on Mill Ave may be impacted by the operation of the streetcar. With the streetcar operating in the through lane, there would be minor delays when streetcars stop at stations. In general, since the streetcar would operate in traffic as a large vehicle or transit bus, there should be minimal additional travel delays in the northboundtravel direction within the Downtown area.

Truck deliveries to businesses along Mill Ave north of University Dr. would be impacted due to the loss of some of the on-street loading zones. As mentioned in Section 5,there would be loading zone replacement opportunities either by converting parking spaces to loading zones along Mill Ave or creating loading zones behind some of the existing businesses/buildings. This will be further evaluated in Final Design.

10.0 IMPACTS ANTICIPATED DURING CONSTRUCTION -MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC


No impacts are anticipated to the roadway segments along the project corridor.


The construction of the Tempe Streetcar project will include a number of elements including utility relocation, roadway improvements, and track and streetcar stop construction. These construction elements will impact and create disruptions to auto, bus, pedestrian and bicycle operations. These construction elements are temporary and once completed, traffic control will be restored to normal conditions.

This section of the report discusses traffic control and maintenance of traffic concepts during construction.

In general, maintenance of traffic (auto, bus, pedestrian and bicycle) facilities, will require a traffic control plan to be developed during preliminary and final design and will be developed in accordance with City of Tempe and Federal guidelines to minimize impacts to traffic and maintain access to residences, businesses, community facilities and services and local streets. The traffic control plan will include measures to:

Maintain a minimum of one traffic lane in each direction on Mill Ave, Rio Salado Pkwy, Ash Ave, Apache Blvd and University Dr and on intersecting streets where construction activities are required. There may be short duration (weekend) full closures for construction of trackwork at intersections. Evaluation of such full


closures versus longer construction in stages at each intersection would be evaluated during Final Design.Temporary closure of sidewalks and crosswalks are possible during construction. Detours will be established and signage will be provided to safely guide pedestrians along detour routes until the sidewalks and crosswalks are restored per ADA accessibility guidelines.Temporary closure of bicycle lanes may be required. Detours will be established to safely guide bicyclists on the detour route. Proper wayfinding signs and pavement markings will be used to guide bicyclists through detours along temporary routes.


APPENDIX(TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - SYNCHRO REPORTS)


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis1: Mill Avenue & Rio Salado Parkway 2/9/2015

Tempe Streetcar 2015 Existing Condition 5:00 pm 1/15/2015 Baseline Synchro 8 ReportHDR Inc Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 191 652 43 119 279 82 32 239 233 190 269 141Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1587 3150 1592 3046 1546 1402 1105 1572 1650 1298Flt Permitted 0.35 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 587 3150 252 3046 945 1402 1105 753 1650 1298Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 208 709 47 129 303 89 35 260 253 207 292 153RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 26 0 0 0 150 0 0 79Lane Group Flow (vph) 208 752 0 129 366 0 35 260 103 207 292 74Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 20 4 4 20 55 39 39 55Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 8 12Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 38.4 27.2 35.2 25.6 45.2 41.9 41.9 57.2 49.9 49.9Effective Green, g (s) 40.4 30.2 37.2 28.6 47.2 44.9 44.9 58.2 52.9 52.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.27 0.34 0.26 0.43 0.41 0.41 0.53 0.48 0.48Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 326 864 214 791 428 572 451 489 793 624v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.24 0.06 0.12 0.00 c0.19 c0.05 0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.15 0.03 0.09 0.18 0.06v/c Ratio 0.64 0.87 0.60 0.46 0.08 0.45 0.23 0.42 0.37 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 38.0 28.0 34.2 18.3 23.7 21.2 14.7 18.0 15.7Progression Factor 0.76 0.82 1.45 1.24 1.31 1.17 2.43 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.5 7.7 3.2 0.2 0.0 2.4 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.4Delay (s) 22.1 38.7 43.9 42.5 24.0 30.0 52.7 15.0 19.3 16.1Level of Service C D D D C C D B B BApproach Delay (s) 35.1 42.9 40.1 17.2Approach LOS D D D B

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 33.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.61Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis2: Mill Avenue & 2nd Street 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 39 17 478 418 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1417 1351 1425 1417Flt Permitted 0.98 0.49 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1417 703 1425 1417Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 42 18 520 454 14RTOR Reduction (vph) 40 0 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 28 0 18 520 466 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 5 5 5 5Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 37Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm NA NAProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.73 0.73 0.73Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 77 511 1036 1030v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.36 0.33v/s Ratio Perm 0.03v/c Ratio 0.37 0.04 0.50 0.45Uniform Delay, d1 25.1 2.1 3.2 3.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 0.1 1.7 1.3Delay (s) 28.0 2.2 5.0 4.3Level of Service C A A AApproach Delay (s) 28.0 4.9 4.3Approach LOS C A A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 6.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.49Actuated Cycle Length (s) 55.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis3: Mill Avenue & 3rd Street 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 5 38 13 7 39 22 410 21 19 437 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.64 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.62 1.00 0.66 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 989 814 1055 793 1477 1402 1078 1539 1394Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 749 814 807 793 730 1402 1078 794 1394Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 34 5 41 14 8 42 24 446 23 21 475 9RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 37 0 0 38 0 0 0 3 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 9 0 14 12 0 24 446 20 21 484 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 129 114 114 129 71 31 31 71Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 6 26 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 98.9 98.9 98.9 98.9 98.9Effective Green, g (s) 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 101.9 101.9 101.9 101.9 101.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 75 82 81 79 619 1190 915 674 1183v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.02 0.32 c0.35v/s Ratio Perm c0.05 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.03v/c Ratio 0.45 0.11 0.17 0.15 0.04 0.37 0.02 0.03 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 49.1 49.4 49.3 1.4 2.0 1.4 1.4 2.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.1 1.0Delay (s) 52.4 49.3 49.7 49.6 1.5 2.9 1.4 1.5 3.1Level of Service D D D D A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 50.6 49.6 2.8 3.1Approach LOS D D A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis4: Mill Avenue & 4th Street 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 21 9 423 483 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1093 1593 1425 1425 570Flt Permitted 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1093 766 1425 1425 570Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 23 10 460 525 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 2Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2 10 460 525 15Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 56 242Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 39Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type custom Perm NA NA PermProtected Phases 1 1Permitted Phases 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 1.2 41.8 41.8 41.8 41.8Effective Green, g (s) 4.2 44.8 44.8 44.8 44.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 83 623 1160 1160 464v/s Ratio Prot 0.32 c0.37v/s Ratio Perm c0.00 0.01 0.03v/c Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.40 0.45 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 23.5 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.0Progression Factor 1.00 0.18 0.19 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.3 0.1Delay (s) 23.5 0.2 1.2 2.8 1.1Level of Service C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 23.5 1.2 2.7Approach LOS C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 87 97 69 79 54 81 292 56 62 369 35Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.41Flpb, ped/bikes 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1027 1288 908 1297 1041 1458 1402 517 1370 1357 499Flt Permitted 0.61 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 659 1288 908 926 1041 613 1402 517 709 1357 499Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 55 95 105 75 86 59 88 317 61 67 401 38RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 68 0 23 0 0 0 30 0 0 19Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 95 37 75 122 0 88 317 31 67 401 19Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 266 125 125 266 340 316 316 340Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 24 25 19 30Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 24 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 58.5 53.2 53.2 57.5 52.7 52.7Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 60.5 55.2 55.2 59.5 55.7 55.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.54 0.51 0.51Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 233 456 321 328 369 385 703 259 418 687 252v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.12 c0.01 0.23 0.01 c0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.04 0.08 0.11 0.06 0.08 0.04v/c Ratio 0.24 0.21 0.12 0.23 0.33 0.23 0.45 0.12 0.16 0.58 0.08Uniform Delay, d1 25.0 24.7 23.9 24.9 26.0 12.7 17.6 14.5 12.4 19.0 13.9Progression Factor 1.00 0.99 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.02 0.86 1.39 0.93 0.95 2.07Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 1.0 0.7 1.6 2.4 0.1 1.9 0.9 0.1 3.4 0.6Delay (s) 27.2 25.5 28.3 26.6 28.4 13.0 17.1 21.1 11.6 21.5 29.5Level of Service C C C C C B B C B C CApproach Delay (s) 27.0 27.8 16.8 20.8Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 21.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 10.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 23 55 23 4 40 43 392 21 48 500 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.80Flpb, ped/bikes 0.54 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 866 805 883 663 1488 1379 972 1463 1357 969Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 662 805 631 663 600 1379 972 704 1357 969Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 12 25 60 25 4 43 47 426 23 52 543 29RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 44 0 0 31 0 0 0 8 0 0 9Lane Group Flow (vph) 12 41 0 25 16 0 47 426 15 52 543 20Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 239 272 272 239 116 114 114 116Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 34 33Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 180 219 172 180 403 927 653 473 912 651v/s Ratio Prot c0.05 0.02 0.31 c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.07 0.02v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.15 0.09 0.12 0.46 0.02 0.11 0.60 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 29.6 30.7 30.3 29.8 6.4 8.5 6.0 6.4 9.8 6.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.58 1.76 2.73 0.58 0.38 0.47Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 1.5 0.1 0.4 2.6 0.1Delay (s) 29.7 30.8 30.4 29.9 10.7 16.5 16.4 4.1 6.3 2.9Level of Service C C C C B B B A A AApproach Delay (s) 30.7 30.1 15.9 6.0Approach LOS C C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 13.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 6 10 80 73 8 44 71 389 47 62 506 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.72 1.00 1.00 0.76Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.97 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1400 1540 1023 1463 1379 873 1395 1357 922Flt Permitted 0.99 0.64 1.00 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1386 1031 1023 578 1379 873 670 1357 922Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 7 11 87 79 9 48 77 423 51 67 550 29RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 62 0 0 34 0 0 0 10 0 0 10Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 43 0 79 23 0 77 423 41 67 550 19Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 95 36 36 95 152 181 181 152Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 8 36 32Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 390 290 288 383 915 579 444 900 611v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.31 c0.41v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.08 0.13 0.05 0.10 0.02v/c Ratio 0.11 0.27 0.08 0.20 0.46 0.07 0.15 0.61 0.03Uniform Delay, d1 29.3 30.7 29.0 7.2 9.0 6.5 6.9 10.5 6.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.04 1.32 1.73 2.02 2.51Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.1 1.6 0.2 0.6 2.6 0.1Delay (s) 29.3 30.9 29.1 9.2 10.9 8.8 12.6 23.8 16.0Level of Service C C C A B A B C BApproach Delay (s) 29.3 30.1 10.5 22.3Approach LOS C C B C


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis8: Mill Avenue & University Drive 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 116 591 345 183 430 114 237 264 278 101 521 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.85Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1507 3083 1035 1580 3173 814 3090 1623 1080 3090 3071 1209Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 575 3083 1035 272 3173 814 3090 1623 1080 3090 3071 1209Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 126 642 375 199 467 124 258 287 302 110 566 55RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 240 0 0 88 0 0 171 0 0 34Lane Group Flow (vph) 126 642 135 199 467 36 258 287 131 110 566 21Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 160 182 182 160 91 162 162 91Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 34 61 37 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 16 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 18 0Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA PermProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 26.6 26.6 40.3 29.0 29.0 12.4 44.7 44.7 7.4 39.7 39.7Effective Green, g (s) 37.5 29.6 29.6 42.3 32.0 32.0 13.4 47.7 47.7 8.4 42.7 42.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.27 0.27 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.12 0.43 0.43 0.08 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 279 829 278 250 923 236 376 703 468 235 1192 469v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 0.21 c0.09 0.15 c0.08 0.18 0.04 c0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.13 c0.22 0.04 0.12 0.02v/c Ratio 0.45 0.77 0.49 0.80 0.51 0.15 0.69 0.41 0.28 0.47 0.47 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 26.3 37.1 33.8 25.9 32.4 28.9 46.3 21.4 20.1 48.7 25.2 21.0Progression Factor 0.82 0.87 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.73 1.08 3.66 1.33 0.57 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 3.8 0.4 15.0 0.2 0.1 2.8 1.2 1.0 0.5 1.2 0.2Delay (s) 21.9 36.0 20.5 40.9 32.6 29.1 36.4 24.3 74.4 65.1 15.5 21.1Level of Service C D C D C C D C E E B CApproach Delay (s) 29.4 34.1 45.8 23.4Approach LOS C C D C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 6 121 211 15 18 53 725 110 7 1115 29Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.85 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.91 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1254 1427 1569 1556 1119 1593 4453Flt Permitted 0.92 0.58 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1167 861 291 1556 1119 340 4453Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 28 7 132 229 16 20 58 788 120 8 1212 32RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 3 0 0 0 21 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 133 0 0 262 0 58 788 99 8 1242 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 89 139 139 89 35 41 41 35Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 51 135 22 16Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 14 0Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 33.6 33.6 64.4 64.4 64.4 64.4 64.4Effective Green, g (s) 36.6 36.6 67.4 67.4 67.4 67.4 67.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 388 286 178 953 685 208 2728v/s Ratio Prot c0.51 0.28v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 c0.30 0.20 0.09 0.02v/c Ratio 0.34 0.92 0.33 0.83 0.15 0.04 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 27.6 35.2 10.3 16.7 9.1 8.4 11.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 2.18 2.09 2.84 0.75 0.93Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 31.6 4.7 8.1 0.4 0.3 0.5Delay (s) 27.8 66.9 27.3 43.0 26.2 6.6 11.1Level of Service C E C D C A BApproach Delay (s) 27.8 66.9 40.0 11.0Approach LOS C E D B

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 28.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.4% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis12: Mill Avenue & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement NBL NBT SBT SBR NEL NERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 392 603 0 413 28Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 3539 3408Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 3539 3408Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 426 655 0 449 30RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 6 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 426 655 0 473 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 16Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 1 1 2Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 78.2 78.2 19.8Effective Green, g (s) 81.2 81.2 22.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.21Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2612 2612 706v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 c0.19 c0.14v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.16 0.25 0.67Uniform Delay, d1 4.3 4.6 40.1Progression Factor 2.19 1.36 0.69Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 1.9Delay (s) 9.5 6.5 29.7Level of Service A A CApproach Delay (s) 9.5 6.5 29.7Approach LOS A A C

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 14.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis13: Mill Avenue & 13th St 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 17 124 107 223 75 3 93 421 94 8 808 20Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1663 1671 1764 1846 1753 3379 1749 3490Flt Permitted 0.70 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.40 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1229 1671 406 1846 461 3379 744 3490Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 18 135 116 242 82 3 101 458 102 9 878 22RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 32 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 18 219 0 242 84 0 101 546 0 9 899 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 26 26 43 16 10 10 16Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 24 43 15 30Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 4Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 18.7 37.8 37.8 60.2 60.2 60.2 60.2Effective Green, g (s) 20.7 20.7 37.8 39.8 62.2 62.2 62.2 62.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.34 0.36 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 314 325 667 260 1910 420 1973v/s Ratio Prot 0.13 c0.10 0.05 0.16 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.15 0.22 0.01v/c Ratio 0.08 0.70 0.74 0.13 0.39 0.29 0.02 0.46Uniform Delay, d1 36.8 41.7 28.7 23.5 13.3 12.4 10.5 14.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.03 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.59Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 5.4 7.7 0.0 4.3 0.4 0.1 0.7Delay (s) 36.8 47.1 37.1 22.4 17.6 12.8 7.2 9.0Level of Service D D D C B B A AApproach Delay (s) 46.4 33.3 13.5 9.0Approach LOS D C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.57Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis14: Ash Street & Rio Salado Parkway 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 2 1 1 247 2 272 1 271 439 382 139 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1563 1597 2359 1593 2935 1163 3028 1646Flt Permitted 0.90 0.73 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1442 1216 2359 349 2935 1163 1822 1646Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 2 1 1 268 2 296 1 295 477 415 151 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 223 0 0 394 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 0 270 73 1 295 83 415 152 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 1 12 12 1Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 7 2 5Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 3 3 2 4Permitted Phases 3 3 3 2 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 24.1 24.1 24.1 16.2 16.2 16.2 51.7 51.7Effective Green, g (s) 27.1 27.1 27.1 19.2 19.2 19.2 54.7 54.7Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.50 0.50Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 355 299 581 60 512 202 906 818v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.22 0.03 0.00 0.07 c0.23v/c Ratio 0.01 0.90 0.13 0.02 0.58 0.41 0.46 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 31.3 40.2 32.2 37.6 41.7 40.4 18.0 15.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.89 2.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 27.4 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 1.7 0.5Delay (s) 31.3 63.0 80.0 37.6 42.6 40.9 19.7 15.8Level of Service C E F D D D B BApproach Delay (s) 31.3 71.9 41.5 18.6Approach LOS C E D B

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 43.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.60Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.4% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis15: Ash Street & 3rd Street 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 1 3 29 1 64 7 567 27 8 306 15Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1575 1443 1560 1385 1585 1414 1101 1555 1391Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1178 1443 1240 1385 912 1414 1101 648 1391Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 28 1 3 32 1 70 8 616 29 9 333 16RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 61 0 0 0 6 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 28 1 0 32 10 0 8 616 23 9 348 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 4 31 31 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 2 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 5.6 5.6 5.6 5.6 52.4 52.4 52.4 52.4 52.4Effective Green, g (s) 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.6 55.4 55.4 55.4 55.4 55.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 144 177 152 170 721 1119 871 512 1100v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.01 c0.44 0.25v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01v/c Ratio 0.19 0.01 0.21 0.06 0.01 0.55 0.03 0.02 0.32Uniform Delay, d1 27.6 27.0 27.6 27.1 1.5 2.7 1.6 1.5 2.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.8Delay (s) 27.8 27.0 27.9 27.2 1.6 4.6 1.6 1.6 2.8Level of Service C C C C A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 27.7 27.4 4.5 2.8Approach LOS C C A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis16: Ash Street & 5th Street 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 143 28 54 103 97 20 347 59 62 166 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.91 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1449 1554 1497 1379 986 1573 1624 1575 1425 1160Flt Permitted 0.68 1.00 0.64 1.00 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.32 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1045 1554 1005 1379 986 1029 1624 530 1425 1160Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 98 155 30 59 112 105 22 377 64 67 180 107RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 10 0 0 0 52 0 13 0 0 0 65Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 175 0 59 112 53 22 428 0 67 180 42Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 69 51 51 69 12 19 19 12Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 27 54 22 7Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 24.6 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.4 18.4Effective Green, g (s) 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.39Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 524 779 504 692 494 400 631 206 554 451v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.08 c0.26 0.13v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.02 0.13 0.04v/c Ratio 0.19 0.22 0.12 0.16 0.11 0.06 0.68 0.33 0.32 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 7.7 7.3 7.4 7.2 10.5 13.9 11.8 11.7 10.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.89 1.10 0.83 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.0 2.3 0.3 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 8.3 8.4 6.9 7.1 8.4 8.7 15.7 12.1 11.9 10.7Level of Service A A A A A A B B B BApproach Delay (s) 8.3 7.5 15.3 11.6Approach LOS A A B B

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 11.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42Actuated Cycle Length (s) 55.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis17: Ash Street & FireStation6 2/9/2015


Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1 371 0 0 300Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1611 1863 1863Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1611 1863 1863Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1 403 0 0 326RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 403 0 0 326Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 23 23Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 4 6 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Effective Green, g (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.76 0.76Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 32 1419 1419v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.22 0.18v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.00 0.28 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 2.0 1.9Progression Factor 1.00 0.89 0.99Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.5 0.4Delay (s) 26.4 2.2 2.3Level of Service C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.4 2.2 2.3Approach LOS C A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis18: Ash Street & University Drive 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 171 781 86 44 614 140 63 9 33 216 1 157Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.91Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3463 1752 3400 1715 1489 1719 1433Flt Permitted 0.31 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.52 1.00 0.65 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 566 3463 486 3400 938 1489 1179 1433Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 186 849 93 48 667 152 68 10 36 235 1 171RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 16 0 0 0 27 0 0 127Lane Group Flow (vph) 186 935 0 48 803 0 0 78 9 0 236 44Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 30 18 30 18 60 28 28 60Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 48 36 16 11Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 72.8 72.8 72.8 72.8 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2Effective Green, g (s) 75.8 75.8 75.8 75.8 28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 390 2386 334 2342 240 381 302 367v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 0.24v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 0.10 0.08 0.01 c0.20 0.03v/c Ratio 0.48 0.39 0.14 0.34 0.33 0.02 0.78 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 7.9 7.3 5.9 7.0 33.2 30.6 38.0 31.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.17 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.82Incremental Delay, d2 4.1 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.0 11.4 0.1Delay (s) 12.1 7.8 7.7 7.1 33.5 30.6 51.2 57.2Level of Service B A A A C C D EApproach Delay (s) 8.5 7.1 32.6 53.7Approach LOS A A C D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis19: Rio Salado Parkway & Hayden Ferry 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1053 410 39 267 56Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 3539 1548 3433 1583Flt Permitted 0.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 920 3539 3539 1548 3433 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1145 446 42 290 61RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 9 0 52Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1145 446 33 290 9Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 83.2 83.2 83.2 83.2 14.8 14.8Effective Green, g (s) 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2 16.8 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 712 2741 2741 1198 524 241v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.13 c0.08v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02 0.01v/c Ratio 0.04 0.42 0.16 0.03 0.55 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 2.9 4.1 3.2 2.9 43.1 39.7Progression Factor 0.26 0.21 0.65 0.71 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.1Delay (s) 0.8 1.2 2.2 2.1 44.4 39.8Level of Service A A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 1.2 2.2 43.6Approach LOS A A D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis20: Packard Dr & Rio Salado Parkway 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 4 1294 85 116 337 0 38 2 214 51 4 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.90Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1553 3433 3539 1751 2953 1761 3122Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.55 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1553 3433 3539 1380 2953 1014 3122Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 4 1407 92 126 366 0 41 2 233 55 4 9RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 9 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 4 1407 62 126 366 0 41 64 0 55 4 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 4 4 10 10 7 7 10Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 1 1Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 1.0 59.5 59.5 7.5 66.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0Effective Green, g (s) 2.0 62.5 62.5 8.5 69.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.08 0.63 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 62 2010 882 265 2219 376 805 276 851v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.40 c0.04 0.10 0.02 0.00v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.03 c0.05v/c Ratio 0.06 0.70 0.07 0.48 0.16 0.11 0.08 0.20 0.00Uniform Delay, d1 53.1 17.0 10.7 48.6 8.5 30.0 29.7 30.8 29.1Progression Factor 1.05 1.42 1.44 0.96 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.9 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 55.8 26.1 15.6 47.0 5.5 30.0 29.8 30.9 29.1Level of Service E C B D A C C C CApproach Delay (s) 25.5 16.2 29.8 30.6Approach LOS C B C C


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis21: Rural Road/Scottsdale Road & Rio Salado Parkway 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 469 866 212 102 156 87 66 1536 210 260 1350 281Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1556 3433 3539 1569 1770 4948 1770 4875Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.10 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1556 3433 3539 1569 207 4948 191 4875Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 510 941 230 111 170 95 72 1670 228 283 1467 305RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 57 0 0 61 0 16 0 0 26 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 510 941 173 111 170 34 72 1882 0 283 1746 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 7 7 2 8 24 24 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+pt NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 17.5 32.0 38.1 6.8 23.3 37.5 41.1 35.0 53.2 43.1Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 35.0 40.1 9.8 26.3 39.5 43.1 38.0 54.2 46.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.32 0.36 0.09 0.24 0.36 0.39 0.35 0.49 0.42Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 577 1126 567 305 846 563 181 1709 312 2043v/s Ratio Prot c0.15 c0.27 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.01 0.03 c0.38 c0.13 0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.01 0.13 0.32v/c Ratio 0.88 0.84 0.31 0.36 0.20 0.06 0.40 1.10 0.91 0.85Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 34.8 25.0 47.2 33.5 23.1 24.4 36.0 31.1 28.9Progression Factor 1.28 0.56 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 12.0 4.2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 55.1 27.8 4.8Delay (s) 69.2 23.9 3.3 47.4 33.5 23.1 24.9 91.1 58.8 33.8Level of Service E C A D C C C F E CApproach Delay (s) 34.8 35.0 88.7 37.2Approach LOS C C F D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 53.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis22: Apache Boulevard & Forest 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 772 5 20 555 95 1 0 1 185 0 108Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1760 3269 1744 3441 1621 1770 1285Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 678 3269 574 3441 1526 1770 1285Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 64 839 5 22 603 103 1 0 1 201 0 117RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 96 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 844 0 22 699 0 0 0 0 201 21 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 36 36 11 2 48 48 2Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 15 12 7 25Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Split NAProtected Phases 1 1 2! 2! 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 80.9 80.9 80.9 80.9 17.1 17.1 17.1Effective Green, g (s) 83.9 83.9 83.9 83.9 20.1 20.1 20.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.18 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 517 2493 437 2624 278 323 234v/s Ratio Prot c0.26 0.20 c0.11 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.04 0.00v/c Ratio 0.12 0.34 0.05 0.27 0.00 0.62 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 3.4 4.2 3.2 3.9 36.7 41.4 37.4Progression Factor 0.69 0.68 2.25 2.32 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.0 2.7 0.1Delay (s) 2.9 3.2 7.5 9.2 36.7 44.1 37.4Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 3.2 9.2 36.7 41.7Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 11.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.39Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis23: College Avenue & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 804 200 154 472 0 57 0 86 290 0 132Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.85Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.90 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3234 1265 1755 3208 1674 1305 1585 1353Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3234 1265 501 3208 1674 1305 1585 1353Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 874 217 167 513 0 62 0 93 315 0 143RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 97Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 874 177 167 513 0 62 0 18 315 0 46Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 27 23 23 27 36 90 90 36Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 16 14 36 142Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA custom custom custom customProtected Phases 6 2 7Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 18.6 18.6 32.6 32.6Effective Green, g (s) 68.4 68.4 68.4 68.4 21.6 21.6 33.6 35.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.32Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2010 786 311 1994 328 256 484 437v/s Ratio Prot 0.27 0.16 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 c0.33 0.04 0.01 0.13 0.03v/c Ratio 0.43 0.23 0.54 0.26 0.19 0.07 0.65 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 10.8 9.1 11.8 9.4 36.9 36.0 33.1 26.1Progression Factor 0.90 0.91 0.77 0.66 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.6 6.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 3.1 0.0Delay (s) 10.4 8.9 15.6 6.5 37.0 36.1 36.2 26.1Level of Service B A B A D D D CApproach Delay (s) 10.1 8.7 36.4 33.1Approach LOS B A D C


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis24: Normal Ave & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 74 1048 11 20 543 166 0 0 18 0 0 97Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.99 0.93Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.86 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1758 3274 1138 1726 3274 1247 1591 1505Flt Permitted 0.43 1.00 1.00 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 794 3274 1138 433 3274 1247 1591 1505Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 80 1139 12 22 590 180 0 0 20 0 0 105RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 1139 10 22 590 156 0 0 20 0 0 105Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 93 93 28 2 180Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 24 39 4Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm Free FreeProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1 1 1 1 Free FreeActuated Green, G (s) 98.0 92.4 92.4 92.4 92.4 92.4 110.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 104.0 95.4 95.4 95.4 95.4 95.4 110.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.95 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 826 2839 986 375 2839 1081 1591 1505v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.35 0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.01 0.05 0.13 0.01 0.07v/c Ratio 0.10 0.40 0.01 0.06 0.21 0.14 0.01 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 0.2 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 1.78 3.06 8.23 0.63 0.60 0.71 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1Delay (s) 0.3 4.9 8.1 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.0 0.1Level of Service A A A A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 4.7 0.9 0.0 0.1Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 3.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.38Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis25: Apache Boulevard & McAllister Avenue 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 950 19 49 571 60 33 9 28 58 14 122Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.84Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1719 3234 1146 1721 3158 1545 1602 1335Flt Permitted 0.38 1.00 1.00 0.26 1.00 0.83 0.69 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 691 3234 1146 470 3158 1313 1151 1335Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 98 1033 21 53 621 65 36 10 30 63 15 133RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 26 0 0 0 116Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 1033 17 53 682 0 0 50 0 0 78 17Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 55 91 91 55 105 94 94 105Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14 18 7 14Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 1 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 86.8 86.8 86.8 86.8 86.8 11.2 11.2 11.2Effective Green, g (s) 89.8 89.8 89.8 89.8 89.8 14.2 14.2 14.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.13 0.13 0.13Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 564 2640 935 383 2578 169 148 172v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.01 0.11 0.04 c0.07 0.01v/c Ratio 0.17 0.39 0.02 0.14 0.26 0.30 0.53 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 2.2 2.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 43.4 44.8 42.3Progression Factor 0.89 0.75 1.10 1.80 1.81 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.4 1.6 0.1Delay (s) 2.6 2.5 2.1 4.5 4.5 43.7 46.3 42.4Level of Service A A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 2.5 4.5 43.7 43.8Approach LOS A A D D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 8.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.41Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.8% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis26: Paseo Del Saber & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1044 0 0 679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3274 3274Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3274 3274Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1135 0 0 738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1135 0 0 738 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 113 113 28 72 554 554 72Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 16 62 51Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 110.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 110.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3274 3274v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 0.23v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.35 0.23Uniform Delay, d1 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.1Delay (s) 0.3 0.1Level of Service A AApproach Delay (s) 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis27: Rural Road & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 289 498 321 182 239 126 296 1131 182 195 1687 208Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1678 3274 992 1725 3274 1070 3433 4842 3433 4902Flt Permitted 0.47 1.00 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 839 3274 992 557 3274 1070 3433 4842 3433 4902Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 314 541 349 198 260 137 322 1229 198 212 1834 226RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 135 0 0 99 0 20 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 314 541 214 198 260 38 322 1407 0 212 2046 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 148 189 189 148 98 118 118 98Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 36 16 5Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 41.6 29.8 29.8 36.6 27.3 27.3 10.9 41.4 8.5 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 43.6 32.8 32.8 38.6 30.3 30.3 11.9 44.4 10.5 43.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.40 0.10 0.39Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 430 976 295 304 901 294 371 1954 327 1916v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.17 0.06 0.08 c0.09 0.29 0.06 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 c0.22 0.17 0.04v/c Ratio 0.73 0.55 0.73 0.65 0.29 0.13 0.87 0.72 0.65 1.07Uniform Delay, d1 25.8 32.5 34.6 26.7 31.4 29.9 48.3 27.6 48.0 33.5Progression Factor 0.85 0.79 0.55 1.42 0.28 0.28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.2 2.2 14.0 3.7 0.8 0.9 18.2 2.3 3.3 41.4Delay (s) 27.2 27.7 33.1 41.5 9.6 9.2 66.5 29.9 51.3 74.9Level of Service C C C D A A E C D EApproach Delay (s) 29.1 20.1 36.6 72.7Approach LOS C C D E

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 47.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis28: Terrace Road & Apache Boulevard 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 22 811 9 19 534 41 9 18 21 59 32 23Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3531 1770 3491 1770 1602 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3531 1770 3491 1770 1602 1770 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 24 882 10 21 580 45 10 20 23 64 35 25RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 40 0 0 44 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 24 891 0 21 621 0 10 3 0 64 16 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 11 13 13 11 13 5 5 13Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 15 18 7Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA NA ProtProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 8 4 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 4.2 51.3 2.9 50.0 4.8 4.8 20.0 20.0Effective Green, g (s) 7.2 54.3 5.9 53.0 7.8 7.8 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.49 0.05 0.48 0.07 0.07 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 2.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 115 1743 94 1682 125 113 482 431v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.25 0.01 0.18 c0.01 0.00 c0.04 0.01v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.21 0.51 0.22 0.37 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 48.7 18.9 49.9 18.0 47.7 47.6 30.2 29.4Progression Factor 0.89 0.96 0.77 1.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Delay (s) 43.5 19.0 39.0 24.7 47.8 47.6 30.2 29.4Level of Service D B D C D D C CApproach Delay (s) 19.7 25.2 47.6 29.8Approach LOS B C D C

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 23.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.34Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.7% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis29: Apache Boulevard & Dorsey Lane 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBU WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 710 40 466 61 89 86Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 13.0 6.0 13.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1770 3406 1770 1561Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1770 3406 1770 1561Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 98 772 43 507 66 97 93RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 5 0 0 84Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 772 43 568 0 97 9Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 48 48Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 16 1Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA NA customProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 4Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 10.4 62.5 12.0 64.1 10.5 10.4Effective Green, g (s) 10.4 62.5 12.0 64.1 10.5 10.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.57 0.11 0.58 0.10 0.09Clearance Time (s) 6.0 13.0 6.0 13.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 167 2010 193 1984 168 147v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 c0.22 0.02 0.17 c0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.01v/c Ratio 0.59 0.38 0.22 0.29 0.58 0.06Uniform Delay, d1 47.7 13.1 44.7 11.5 47.6 45.3Progression Factor 0.67 1.71 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 0.5 2.7 0.4 3.0 0.1Delay (s) 34.9 23.0 47.4 11.9 50.6 45.4Level of Service C C D B D DApproach Delay (s) 24.3 14.3 48.1Approach LOS C B D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 23.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 31.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.6% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis40: Rural Road & University Drive 2/9/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 252 951 263 192 489 109 166 1041 190 238 1306 197Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1746 3518 1430 1770 3539 1444 3433 4819 3433 4794Flt Permitted 0.35 1.00 1.00 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 645 3518 1430 191 3539 1444 3433 4819 3433 4794Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Adj. Flow (vph) 274 1034 286 209 532 118 180 1132 207 259 1420 214RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 38 0 0 35 0 24 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 1034 248 209 532 83 180 1315 0 259 1616 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 83 87 87 83 135 101 101 135Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 45.9 36.9 45.9 48.1 38.0 50.0 9.0 30.0 12.0 33.0Effective Green, g (s) 47.9 39.9 49.9 50.1 41.0 54.0 11.0 33.0 14.0 36.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.36 0.45 0.46 0.37 0.49 0.10 0.30 0.13 0.33Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 380 1276 648 246 1319 708 343 1445 436 1568v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.29 0.04 c0.09 0.15 0.01 0.05 0.27 c0.08 c0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.14 c0.30 0.04v/c Ratio 0.72 0.81 0.38 0.85 0.40 0.12 0.52 0.91 0.59 1.03Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 31.6 19.9 25.8 25.5 15.1 47.0 37.1 45.3 37.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.6 5.7 0.1 22.2 0.9 0.0 0.7 10.1 1.5 30.9Delay (s) 28.0 37.3 20.0 47.9 26.4 15.2 47.7 47.2 46.8 67.9Level of Service C D C D C B D D D EApproach Delay (s) 32.6 30.1 47.2 65.0Approach LOS C C D E



Tempe Streetcar 2035 No Build 5:00 pm 1/15/2015 2035 No Build Synchro 8 ReportHDR Inc Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 191 774 43 119 980 211 32 309 233 213 319 141Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1593 3155 1592 3075 1568 1402 1086 1585 1650 1244Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.23 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 140 3155 357 3075 597 1402 1086 390 1650 1244Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 208 841 47 129 1065 229 35 336 253 232 347 153RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 17 0 0 0 172 0 0 104Lane Group Flow (vph) 208 885 0 129 1277 0 35 336 81 232 347 49Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 5 5 24 67 47 47 67Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 15 36Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 57.6 47.0 51.6 44.0 30.4 27.4 27.4 39.4 32.4 32.4Effective Green, g (s) 59.6 50.0 53.6 47.0 32.4 30.4 30.4 40.4 35.4 35.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.45 0.49 0.43 0.29 0.28 0.28 0.37 0.32 0.32Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 229 1434 270 1313 211 387 300 241 531 400v/s Ratio Prot c0.10 0.28 0.04 c0.42 0.01 0.24 c0.08 0.21v/s Ratio Perm 0.40 0.19 0.04 0.08 c0.28 0.04v/c Ratio 0.91 0.62 0.48 0.97 0.17 0.87 0.27 0.96 0.65 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 30.8 22.7 17.1 30.9 28.5 37.9 31.1 31.8 32.0 26.3Progression Factor 1.42 0.57 0.98 0.69 1.03 1.04 1.75 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 27.9 0.4 0.4 17.3 0.1 19.6 1.9 47.0 6.2 0.6Delay (s) 71.7 13.4 17.1 38.7 29.4 58.9 56.5 78.8 38.2 27.0Level of Service E B B D C E E E D CApproach Delay (s) 24.5 36.7 56.3 48.7Approach LOS C D E D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 38.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.3% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 39 17 478 418 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1403 1351 1425 1417Flt Permitted 0.98 0.44 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1403 624 1425 1417Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 32 52 23 634 554 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 49 0 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 0 23 634 569 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 6 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 46Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm NA NAProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.73 0.73 0.73Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 76 453 1036 1030v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.44 0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.04v/c Ratio 0.46 0.05 0.61 0.55Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 2.1 3.7 3.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.60Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.2 2.7 1.8Delay (s) 29.5 2.3 6.4 10.7Level of Service C A A BApproach Delay (s) 29.5 6.2 10.7Approach LOS C A B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 5 38 13 7 39 22 410 21 19 437 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.55 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 881 736 950 693 1479 1402 1057 1538 1393Flt Permitted 0.68 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.41 1.00 1.00 0.43 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 631 736 696 693 641 1402 1057 704 1393Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 41 7 50 17 9 52 29 544 28 25 580 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 44 0 0 46 0 0 0 5 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 13 0 17 15 0 29 544 23 25 591 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 157 140 140 157 86 38 38 86Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 8 32 46Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0 97.0Effective Green, g (s) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 73 85 81 80 534 1168 880 586 1160v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.02 0.39 c0.42v/s Ratio Perm c0.06 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.04v/c Ratio 0.56 0.15 0.21 0.19 0.05 0.47 0.03 0.04 0.51Uniform Delay, d1 50.1 47.7 48.0 47.9 1.7 2.7 1.7 1.7 2.9Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.1 0.1 1.6Delay (s) 55.9 48.0 48.5 48.3 1.9 4.1 1.8 1.9 4.5Level of Service E D D D A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 51.3 48.3 3.9 4.4Approach LOS D D A A




Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 21 9 423 483 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1073 1593 1425 1425 539Flt Permitted 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1073 651 1425 1425 539Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 28 12 561 640 21RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 3Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 9 12 561 640 18Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 69 296Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 47Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type custom Perm NA NA PermProtected Phases 1 1Permitted Phases 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 2.7 40.3 40.3 40.3 40.3Effective Green, g (s) 5.7 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 512 1121 1121 424v/s Ratio Prot 0.39 c0.45v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.02 0.03v/c Ratio 0.08 0.02 0.50 0.57 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 22.3 1.3 2.1 2.3 1.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.32 0.42 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 1.4 2.1 0.2Delay (s) 22.4 0.5 2.3 4.4 1.5Level of Service C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.4 2.3 4.3Approach LOS C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 87 97 69 79 54 81 292 56 62 369 35Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.37Flpb, ped/bikes 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1003 1288 850 1248 1012 1518 1402 475 1416 1357 453Flt Permitted 0.57 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 598 1288 850 855 1012 494 1402 475 651 1357 453Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 68 115 129 92 105 72 107 387 74 82 489 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 83 0 23 0 0 0 35 0 0 23Lane Group Flow (vph) 68 115 46 92 154 0 107 387 39 82 489 23Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 325 152 152 325 415 386 386 415Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 29 30 23 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 24 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 59.7 52.8 52.8 56.3 51.1 51.1Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 61.7 54.8 54.8 58.3 54.1 54.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.56 0.50 0.50 0.53 0.49 0.49Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 456 301 303 358 350 698 236 388 667 222v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.15 c0.02 0.28 0.01 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.05v/c Ratio 0.32 0.25 0.15 0.30 0.43 0.31 0.55 0.17 0.21 0.73 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 25.9 25.2 24.2 25.7 27.1 13.4 19.1 15.1 13.3 22.2 15.0Progression Factor 1.02 1.02 1.25 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.77 0.93 0.85 0.90 1.79Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 1.0 2.6 3.8 0.2 2.7 1.3 0.1 6.2 0.8Delay (s) 30.1 26.8 31.2 28.2 30.8 12.6 17.5 15.4 11.4 26.3 27.6Level of Service C C C C C B B B B C CApproach Delay (s) 29.3 29.9 16.3 24.4Approach LOS C C B C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 23 55 23 4 40 43 392 21 48 500 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.51 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.76Flpb, ped/bikes 0.52 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 830 782 880 628 1494 1379 924 1460 1357 923Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 628 782 600 628 491 1379 924 611 1357 923Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 15 30 73 30 5 53 57 520 28 64 663 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 39 0 0 0 9 0 0 10Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 50 0 30 19 0 57 520 19 64 663 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 292 331 331 292 141 140 140 141Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 11 42 41Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 171 213 163 171 330 927 621 411 912 620v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.03 0.38 c0.49v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.09 0.23 0.18 0.11 0.17 0.56 0.03 0.16 0.73 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 29.8 31.1 30.6 30.0 6.7 9.5 6.0 6.6 11.5 6.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.71 2.28 0.64 0.37 0.55Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.0 2.2 0.1 0.7 4.2 0.1Delay (s) 29.9 31.3 30.8 30.1 11.6 18.3 13.8 4.9 8.5 3.5Level of Service C C C C B B B A A AApproach Delay (s) 31.1 30.4 17.5 8.0Approach LOS C C B A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 6 10 80 73 8 44 71 389 47 62 506 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.71Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1384 1532 980 1471 1379 806 1391 1357 865Flt Permitted 0.99 0.60 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 963 980 470 1379 806 580 1357 865Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 8 13 106 97 11 58 94 516 62 82 671 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 38 0 0 42 0 0 0 10 0 0 10Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 89 0 97 27 0 94 516 52 82 671 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 116 44 44 116 185 221 221 185Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 10 44 39Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 386 271 276 311 915 534 384 900 574v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.37 c0.49v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.10 0.20 0.06 0.14 0.03v/c Ratio 0.23 0.36 0.10 0.30 0.56 0.10 0.21 0.75 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 30.3 31.6 29.2 7.8 9.9 6.7 7.3 12.3 6.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01 0.92 1.14 1.67 1.95 2.08Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.1 2.2 2.2 0.3 1.0 4.3 0.1Delay (s) 30.4 31.8 29.2 10.1 11.3 7.9 13.1 28.2 13.5Level of Service C C C B B A B C BApproach Delay (s) 30.4 30.8 10.8 26.0Approach LOS C C B C

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 20.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.63Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.4% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 116 591 345 183 430 114 237 264 278 101 521 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.00 1.00 0.82Flpb, ped/bikes 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1529 3083 964 1586 3173 697 3090 1623 1008 3090 3071 1166Flt Permitted 0.28 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 458 3083 964 215 3173 697 3090 1623 1008 3090 3071 1166Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 154 784 458 243 570 151 314 350 369 134 691 68RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 213 0 0 106 0 0 190 0 0 44Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 784 245 243 570 45 314 350 179 134 691 24Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 196 222 222 196 110 198 198 110Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 42 75 46 46Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 16 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 18 0Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA PermProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 37.5 27.8 27.8 42.1 30.1 30.1 13.8 42.0 42.0 8.2 36.4 36.4Effective Green, g (s) 39.5 30.8 30.8 44.1 33.1 33.1 14.8 45.0 45.0 9.2 39.4 39.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.28 0.28 0.40 0.30 0.30 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.08 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 268 863 269 248 954 209 415 663 412 258 1099 417v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.25 c0.12 0.18 c0.10 0.22 0.04 c0.23v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.25 c0.28 0.07 0.18 0.02v/c Ratio 0.57 0.91 0.91 0.98 0.60 0.22 0.76 0.53 0.43 0.52 0.63 0.06Uniform Delay, d1 25.7 38.2 38.3 29.3 32.8 28.8 45.9 24.5 23.3 48.3 29.2 23.1Progression Factor 0.82 0.84 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.64 1.44 3.51 1.26 0.70 0.94Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 11.2 28.2 50.7 0.7 0.2 2.6 1.1 1.2 0.6 2.2 0.2Delay (s) 22.7 43.3 48.7 79.9 33.4 29.0 31.9 36.3 83.2 61.4 22.7 22.0Level of Service C D D E C C C D F E C CApproach Delay (s) 42.8 44.5 51.7 28.5Approach LOS D D D C

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 42.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.81Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 6 121 211 15 18 53 725 110 7 1115 29Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.82 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1212 1405 1593 1556 1058 1593 4449Flt Permitted 0.92 0.55 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1118 805 197 1556 1058 133 4449Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 34 8 160 280 20 24 70 961 146 9 1479 38RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 3 0 0 0 23 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 183 0 0 321 0 70 961 123 9 1515 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 109 170 170 109 43 50 50 43Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 62 165 27 19Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 14 0Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 39.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 396 285 116 919 625 78 2628v/s Ratio Prot c0.62 0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 c0.40 0.36 0.12 0.07v/c Ratio 0.46 1.13 0.60 1.05 0.20 0.12 0.58Uniform Delay, d1 27.4 35.5 14.3 22.5 10.4 9.9 14.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.39 1.41 1.42 0.65 0.70Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 92.2 20.6 42.0 0.7 2.1 0.7Delay (s) 27.7 127.7 40.6 73.8 15.5 8.5 10.4Level of Service C F D E B A BApproach Delay (s) 27.7 127.7 64.6 10.4Approach LOS C F E B

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 43.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service DHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement NBL NBT SBT SBR NEL NERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 392 603 0 413 28Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 3539 3406Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 3539 3406Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 520 800 0 548 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 520 800 0 580 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 1 1 2Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 74.8 74.8 23.2Effective Green, g (s) 77.8 77.8 26.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.24Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2503 2503 811v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.23 c0.17v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.21 0.32 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 6.1 38.5Progression Factor 0.36 0.71 0.61Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 2.4Delay (s) 2.2 4.6 26.0Level of Service A A CApproach Delay (s) 2.2 4.6 26.0Approach LOS A A C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 17 124 107 223 75 3 93 421 94 8 808 20Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1644 1662 1765 1843 1770 3371 1750 3489Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.33 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1195 1662 344 1843 314 3371 612 3489Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 23 164 142 296 99 4 123 558 125 11 1071 27RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 30 0 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 276 0 296 102 0 123 667 0 11 1097 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52 32 32 52 19 13 13 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 29 52 18 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 4Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 22.0 41.7 41.7 56.3 56.3 56.3 56.3Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 24.0 41.7 43.7 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.40 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 260 362 333 732 166 1786 324 1849v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 c0.13 0.06 0.20 0.31v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.21 c0.39 0.02v/c Ratio 0.09 0.76 0.89 0.14 0.74 0.37 0.03 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 34.3 40.3 27.4 21.1 20.0 15.2 12.4 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.72 0.66 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.73Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 8.2 22.6 0.0 25.5 0.6 0.2 1.2Delay (s) 34.3 48.6 42.2 13.9 45.5 15.8 8.7 14.1Level of Service C D D B D B A BApproach Delay (s) 47.6 34.9 20.3 14.0Approach LOS D C C B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 2 1 1 247 2 973 1 321 439 504 139 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1561 1552 2408 1593 2935 1157 3018 1646Flt Permitted 0.91 0.73 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1450 1182 2408 309 2935 1157 1724 1646Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 2 1 1 268 2 1058 1 349 477 548 151 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 765 0 0 383 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 0 270 293 1 349 94 548 152 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 13 1 15 15 1Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 3 6Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 3 3 2 4Permitted Phases 3 3 3 2 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 27.5 27.5 27.5 18.7 18.7 18.7 45.8 45.8Effective Green, g (s) 30.5 30.5 30.5 21.7 21.7 21.7 48.8 48.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 402 327 667 60 578 228 764 730v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.09v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.23 0.12 0.00 0.08 c0.32v/c Ratio 0.01 0.83 0.44 0.02 0.60 0.41 0.72 0.21Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 37.3 32.7 35.6 40.2 38.6 25.0 18.8Progression Factor 1.00 0.65 1.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 8.7 0.1 0.0 1.2 0.4 5.7 0.6Delay (s) 28.8 32.8 51.0 35.6 41.5 39.0 30.7 19.4Level of Service C C D D D D C BApproach Delay (s) 28.8 47.3 40.0 28.2Approach LOS C D D C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 1 3 29 1 64 7 567 27 8 306 15Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1570 1421 1550 1377 1584 1414 1084 1559 1390Flt Permitted 0.70 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.33 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1150 1421 1231 1377 832 1414 1084 537 1390Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 34 1 4 38 1 85 9 752 36 11 406 20RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 74 0 0 0 8 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 2 0 38 12 0 9 752 28 11 425 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 13 13 13 5 38 38 5Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 3 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 5.9 5.9 5.9 5.9 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1 52.1Effective Green, g (s) 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 55.1 55.1 55.1 55.1 55.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 180 156 175 654 1113 853 422 1094v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.01 c0.53 0.31v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03 0.01 0.03 0.02v/c Ratio 0.23 0.01 0.24 0.07 0.01 0.68 0.03 0.03 0.39Uniform Delay, d1 27.5 26.7 27.5 26.9 1.6 3.4 1.6 1.6 2.3Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 3.3 0.1 0.1 1.0Delay (s) 27.8 26.7 27.8 27.0 1.6 6.7 1.7 1.7 3.3Level of Service C C C C A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 27.6 27.2 6.4 3.3Approach LOS C C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 143 28 54 103 97 20 347 59 62 166 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1424 1548 1486 1379 947 1569 1623 1575 1425 1153Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1003 1548 917 1379 947 966 1623 430 1425 1153Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 190 37 72 137 129 27 460 78 82 220 130RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 69 0 13 0 0 0 74Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 216 0 72 137 60 27 525 0 82 220 56Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 62 62 84 15 23 23 15Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 33 66 27 9Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6Effective Green, g (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 463 714 423 636 437 414 696 184 611 494v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.10 c0.32 0.15v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.19 0.05v/c Ratio 0.26 0.30 0.17 0.22 0.14 0.07 0.75 0.45 0.36 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 9.3 8.6 8.8 8.5 9.2 13.3 11.1 10.6 9.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.21 0.77 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.0 4.1 0.6 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 10.4 10.3 8.7 8.8 10.9 7.1 18.1 11.7 10.7 9.5Level of Service B B A A B A B B B AApproach Delay (s) 10.4 9.6 17.6 10.5Approach LOS B A B B




Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1 371 0 0 300Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1611 1863 1863Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1611 1863 1863Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1 492 0 0 398RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 492 0 0 398Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 28Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 4 6 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Effective Green, g (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.76 0.76Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 32 1419 1419v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.26 0.21v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.00 0.35 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 2.1 2.0Progression Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.6 0.5Delay (s) 26.4 2.4 2.5Level of Service C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.4 2.4 2.5Approach LOS C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 171 781 86 44 614 140 63 9 33 216 1 157Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.89Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1750 3459 1762 3380 1709 1475 1709 1404Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.63 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 440 3459 360 3380 787 1475 1123 1404Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 227 1036 114 58 814 186 84 12 44 286 1 208RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 7 0 0 17 0 0 0 32 0 0 132Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 1143 0 58 983 0 0 96 12 0 287 76Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 37 20 20 37 74 34 34 74Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 58 44 19 14Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 70.2 70.2 70.2 70.2 27.8 27.8 27.8 27.8Effective Green, g (s) 73.2 73.2 73.2 73.2 30.8 30.8 30.8 30.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 292 2301 239 2249 220 413 314 393v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.29v/s Ratio Perm c0.52 0.16 0.12 0.01 c0.26 0.05v/c Ratio 0.78 0.50 0.24 0.44 0.44 0.03 0.91 0.19Uniform Delay, d1 12.8 9.2 7.3 8.7 32.5 28.8 38.3 30.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.43Incremental Delay, d2 18.2 0.8 2.1 0.5 0.5 0.0 29.0 0.1Delay (s) 31.0 10.0 10.5 9.9 33.0 28.8 67.4 43.1Level of Service C A B A C C E DApproach Delay (s) 13.4 9.9 31.7 57.2Approach LOS B A C E

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 20.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.5% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1198 1241 39 267 56Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 3539 1547 3433 1583Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 323 3539 3539 1547 3433 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1302 1349 42 290 61RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 9 0 52Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1302 1349 33 290 9Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 83.2 83.2 83.2 83.2 14.8 14.8Effective Green, g (s) 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2 16.8 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 250 2741 2741 1198 524 241v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 c0.38 c0.08v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 0.01v/c Ratio 0.10 0.48 0.49 0.03 0.55 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 3.0 4.4 4.5 2.9 43.1 39.7Progression Factor 0.90 0.84 2.17 3.14 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.1Delay (s) 3.4 4.2 10.4 9.0 44.4 39.8Level of Service A A B A D DApproach Delay (s) 4.1 10.4 43.6Approach LOS A B D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 73 1858 147 117 438 60 48 9 214 409 33 267Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1550 3433 3539 1537 1756 2967 1758 3000Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.56 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1550 3433 3539 1537 902 2967 1039 3000Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 79 2020 160 127 476 65 52 10 233 445 36 290RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 42 0 0 31 0 63 0 0 190 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 2020 118 127 476 34 52 180 0 445 136 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 5 5 12 12 9 9 12Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 1Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 54.0 54.0 5.0 55.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 57.0 57.0 6.0 58.0 58.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.05 0.53 0.53 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 1833 803 187 1866 810 311 1024 358 1036v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.57 c0.04 0.13 0.06 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 0.06 c0.43v/c Ratio 0.51 1.10 0.15 0.68 0.26 0.04 0.17 0.18 1.24 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 26.5 13.8 51.1 14.2 12.6 25.0 25.1 36.0 24.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.16 2.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 54.8 0.4 5.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 130.9 0.0Delay (s) 52.2 81.3 14.2 63.9 16.7 27.4 25.1 25.1 166.9 24.7Level of Service D F B E B C C C F CApproach Delay (s) 75.5 26.7 25.1 106.7Approach LOS E C C F

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 69.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 9.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.9% ICU Level of Service FAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 745 1236 488 102 220 87 114 1536 210 260 1350 329Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1554 3433 3539 1568 1770 4943 1770 4852Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.11 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1554 3433 3539 1568 219 4943 201 4852Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 810 1343 530 111 239 95 124 1670 228 283 1467 358RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 53 0 0 60 0 16 0 0 35 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 810 1343 477 111 239 35 124 1882 0 283 1790 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 9 9 2 10 30 30 10Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+pt NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 35.0 43.0 6.8 24.8 38.0 41.0 33.0 50.2 38.2Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 38.0 45.0 9.8 27.8 40.0 43.0 36.0 51.2 41.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.35 0.41 0.09 0.25 0.36 0.39 0.33 0.47 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 1222 635 305 894 570 212 1617 296 1817v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 c0.38 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.05 c0.38 c0.12 0.37v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.01 0.18 0.32v/c Ratio 1.30 1.10 0.75 0.36 0.27 0.06 0.58 1.16 0.96 0.99Uniform Delay, d1 45.0 36.0 27.7 47.2 32.9 22.8 26.3 37.0 31.3 34.1Progression Factor 1.04 0.70 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 135.3 46.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.6 80.9 39.9 17.9Delay (s) 182.2 71.1 16.7 47.4 33.0 22.8 29.0 117.9 71.2 52.0Level of Service F E B D C C C F E DApproach Delay (s) 93.9 34.4 112.5 54.6Approach LOS F C F D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 84.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service FHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 772 5 20 555 95 1 0 1 185 0 108Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1760 3268 1747 3438 1608 1770 1282Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 558 3268 451 3438 1519 1770 1282Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 78 1024 7 27 736 126 1 0 1 245 0 143RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 113 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 1031 0 27 854 0 0 0 0 245 30 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 44 44 14 2 59 59 2Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 18 15 9 31Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Split NAProtected Phases 1 1 2! 2! 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 78.1 78.1 78.1 78.1 19.9 19.9 19.9Effective Green, g (s) 81.1 81.1 81.1 81.1 22.9 22.9 22.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 411 2409 332 2534 316 368 266v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.25 c0.14 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.06 0.00v/c Ratio 0.19 0.43 0.08 0.34 0.00 0.67 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 5.5 4.0 5.1 34.5 40.0 35.3Progression Factor 1.08 1.17 0.59 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.0 3.5 0.1Delay (s) 5.8 7.1 2.9 2.9 34.5 43.5 35.4Level of Service A A A A C D DApproach Delay (s) 7.0 2.9 34.5 40.5Approach LOS A A C D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 10.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 804 200 154 472 0 57 0 86 290 0 132Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.83Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.87 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3234 1253 1757 3208 1653 1251 1544 1309Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3234 1253 381 3208 1653 1251 1544 1309Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1066 265 204 626 0 76 0 114 385 0 175RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 118Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1066 225 204 626 0 76 0 29 385 0 57Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 33 28 28 33 44 110 110 44Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 20 17 44 174Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA custom custom custom customProtected Phases 6 2 7Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 65.4 65.4 65.4 65.4 18.6 18.6 32.6 32.6Effective Green, g (s) 68.4 68.4 68.4 68.4 21.6 21.6 33.6 35.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.20 0.20 0.31 0.32Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2010 779 236 1994 324 245 471 423v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.20 c0.08v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.53 0.05 0.02 0.17 0.04v/c Ratio 0.53 0.29 0.86 0.31 0.23 0.12 0.82 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 11.7 9.6 17.0 9.8 37.2 36.4 35.3 26.3Progression Factor 0.89 0.97 0.90 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 0.9 31.6 0.4 0.1 0.1 10.6 0.1Delay (s) 11.3 10.2 46.9 6.8 37.4 36.4 45.9 26.4Level of Service B B D A D D D CApproach Delay (s) 11.1 16.7 36.8 39.8Approach LOS B B D D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 74 1048 11 20 543 166 0 0 18 0 0 97Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.99 0.92Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.86 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 3274 1099 1734 3274 1229 1591 1487Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 690 3274 1099 324 3274 1229 1591 1487Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 98 1390 15 27 720 220 0 0 24 0 0 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 1390 13 27 720 188 0 0 24 0 0 129Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 113 113 35 2 219Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 48 5Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm Perm NA Perm Free FreeProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1 1 1 1 Free FreeActuated Green, G (s) 98.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 110.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 104.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 110.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 749 2797 939 276 2797 1050 1591 1487v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.42 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.01 0.08 0.15 0.02 0.09v/c Ratio 0.13 0.50 0.01 0.10 0.26 0.18 0.02 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 0.2 2.0 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.4 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 0.37 0.37 0.00 1.01 1.06 2.94 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1Delay (s) 0.1 1.3 0.0 2.0 1.8 4.4 0.0 0.1Level of Service A A A A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 1.2 2.4 0.0 0.1Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 1.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.46Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 950 19 49 571 60 33 9 28 58 14 122Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.82Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1721 3234 1109 1728 3152 1512 1582 1291Flt Permitted 0.32 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.78 0.66 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 582 3234 1109 358 3152 1211 1092 1291Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 1260 25 65 757 80 44 12 37 77 19 162RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 27 0 0 0 139Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 1260 20 65 833 0 0 66 0 0 96 23Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 67 111 111 67 128 115 115 128Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 17 22 9 17Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 1 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2 12.8 12.8 12.8Effective Green, g (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 88.2 88.2 15.8 15.8 15.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.14 0.14 0.14Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 466 2593 889 287 2527 173 156 185v/s Ratio Prot c0.39 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.02 0.18 0.05 c0.09 0.02v/c Ratio 0.26 0.49 0.02 0.23 0.33 0.38 0.62 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 2.7 3.5 2.2 2.6 2.9 42.7 44.2 41.1Progression Factor 0.53 0.41 0.73 2.28 2.37 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.3 0.5 5.0 0.1Delay (s) 2.6 2.0 1.6 7.8 7.3 43.2 49.2 41.2Level of Service A A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 2.1 7.3 43.2 44.2Approach LOS A A D D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1044 0 0 679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3274 3274Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3274 3274Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1384 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1384 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 138 138 35 87 676 676 87Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 37 20 75 62Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 110.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 110.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 3274 3274v/s Ratio Prot c0.42 0.27v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.42 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1Delay (s) 0.4 0.1Level of Service A AApproach Delay (s) 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 289 498 321 182 239 126 296 1131 182 195 1687 208Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1696 3274 920 1743 3274 1010 3433 4818 3433 4885Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 1.00 0.21 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 665 3274 920 380 3274 1010 3433 4818 3433 4885Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 383 660 426 241 317 167 393 1500 241 259 2237 276RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 137 0 0 117 0 20 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 383 660 289 241 317 50 393 1721 0 259 2499 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 181 230 230 181 120 144 144 120Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 44 20 6Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 38.0 27.0 27.0 29.0 22.0 22.0 11.0 44.8 10.2 45.0Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 30.0 30.0 31.0 25.0 25.0 12.0 47.8 12.2 48.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.43 0.11 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 357 892 250 206 744 229 374 2093 380 2131v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.20 c0.09 0.10 c0.11 0.36 0.08 c0.51v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 c0.31 0.24 0.05v/c Ratio 1.07 0.74 1.16 1.17 0.43 0.22 1.05 0.82 0.68 1.17Uniform Delay, d1 32.9 36.4 40.0 36.1 36.4 34.5 49.0 27.4 47.0 31.0Progression Factor 0.92 0.93 0.92 1.05 0.32 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 66.8 5.1 104.3 114.1 1.7 2.0 60.5 3.8 4.0 83.1Delay (s) 97.1 39.1 141.2 152.1 13.4 25.7 109.5 31.2 51.0 114.1Level of Service F D F F B C F C D FApproach Delay (s) 83.9 62.3 45.6 108.2Approach LOS F E D F

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 79.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 22 811 9 19 534 41 9 18 21 59 32 23Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3530 1770 3490 1770 1598 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3530 1770 3490 1770 1598 1770 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 29 1075 12 25 708 54 12 24 28 78 42 30RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 48 0 0 52 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 1086 0 25 758 0 12 4 0 78 20 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 16 16 14 16 6 6 16Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 19 22 9Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA NA ProtProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 8 4 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 4.4 48.4 4.2 48.2 6.4 6.4 20.0 20.0Effective Green, g (s) 7.4 51.4 7.2 51.2 9.4 9.4 30.0 30.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.47 0.07 0.47 0.09 0.09 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 2.0 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 119 1649 115 1624 151 136 482 431v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.31 0.01 0.22 c0.01 0.00 c0.04 0.01v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.24 0.66 0.22 0.47 0.08 0.03 0.16 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 48.6 22.6 48.7 20.1 46.3 46.1 30.4 29.5Progression Factor 0.91 0.77 1.29 0.54 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 1.4 0.3 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 44.5 18.8 63.0 11.7 46.4 46.2 30.5 29.5Level of Service D B E B D D C CApproach Delay (s) 19.5 13.4 46.2 30.0Approach LOS B B D C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 710 20 97 466 61 47 0 26 89 0 86Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 13.0 6.0 13.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3521 1770 3389 1770 1398 1770 1559Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3521 1770 3389 1273 1398 1770 1559Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 942 27 129 618 81 62 0 34 118 0 114RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 31 0 0 106 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 968 0 129 693 0 62 3 0 118 8 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 59 59 52 52Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 18 20 1Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Split NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 4 4Permitted Phases 8Actuated Green, G (s) 12.2 46.5 17.0 51.3 9.5 9.5 8.0 8.0Effective Green, g (s) 12.2 46.5 17.0 51.3 9.5 9.5 8.0 8.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.42 0.15 0.47 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.07Clearance Time (s) 6.0 13.0 6.0 13.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 196 1488 273 1580 109 120 128 113v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.27 c0.07 c0.20 0.00 c0.07 0.01v/s Ratio Perm c0.05v/c Ratio 0.61 0.65 0.47 0.44 0.57 0.02 0.92 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 46.6 25.3 42.4 19.7 48.3 46.0 50.7 47.5Progression Factor 1.13 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 1.9 5.8 0.9 6.7 0.1 55.2 0.1Delay (s) 55.7 21.8 48.2 20.6 54.9 46.1 105.9 47.6Level of Service E C D C D D F DApproach Delay (s) 25.5 24.9 51.8 77.3Approach LOS C C D E


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Rio Salado Parkway & Access B 2/26/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 1407 809 60 326 324Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 63 1529 879 65 354 352RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 26 0 157Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 1529 879 39 354 195Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 5.8 78.4 66.6 66.6 19.6 19.6Effective Green, g (s) 5.8 78.4 66.6 66.6 19.6 19.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.71 0.61 0.61 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 181 2522 2142 958 611 282v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.43 0.25 0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.12v/c Ratio 0.35 0.61 0.41 0.04 0.58 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 50.3 8.0 11.4 8.8 41.4 42.4Progression Factor 1.12 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 1.0 0.6 0.1 1.3 7.1Delay (s) 57.4 7.8 12.0 8.9 42.8 49.5Level of Service E A B A D DApproach Delay (s) 9.8 11.8 46.1Approach LOS A B D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Rio Salado Parkway & Access D 2/26/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 1715 748 23 301 121Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1593 3185 3185 1425 3090 1425Flt Permitted 0.31 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 519 3185 3185 1425 3090 1425Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 20 1864 813 25 327 132RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 7 0 113Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 1864 813 18 327 19Turn Type pm+pt NA NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 2 6 4Actuated Green, G (s) 95.4 95.4 88.9 88.9 18.6 18.6Effective Green, g (s) 95.4 95.4 88.9 88.9 18.6 18.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.71 0.71 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 414 2411 2247 1005 456 210v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.59 0.26 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.01 0.01v/c Ratio 0.05 0.77 0.36 0.02 0.72 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 4.1 9.0 7.3 5.5 51.2 46.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 2.5 0.5 0.0 5.3 0.2Delay (s) 4.2 11.4 7.8 5.6 56.5 46.6Level of Service A B A A E DApproach Delay (s) 11.4 7.7 53.7Approach LOS B A D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 252 951 263 192 489 109 166 1041 190 238 1306 197Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.83 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1761 3518 1316 1770 3539 1392 3433 4818 3433 4821Flt Permitted 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 302 3518 1316 264 3539 1392 3433 4818 3433 4821Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 334 1261 349 255 648 145 220 1380 252 316 1732 261RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 68 0 24 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 334 1261 309 255 648 77 220 1608 0 316 1975 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 123 165 165 123 107 102 102 107Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13 13 13 13Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 33.0 42.0 37.2 27.2 37.2 9.0 36.0 10.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 36.0 46.0 39.2 30.2 41.2 11.0 39.0 12.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.33 0.42 0.36 0.27 0.37 0.10 0.35 0.11 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 354 1151 550 244 971 521 343 1708 374 1753v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.36 0.06 c0.10 0.18 0.02 0.06 0.33 c0.09 c0.41v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.18 0.27 0.04v/c Ratio 0.94 1.10 0.56 1.05 0.67 0.15 0.64 0.94 0.84 1.13Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 37.0 24.3 30.0 35.4 22.8 47.6 34.4 48.1 35.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 33.0 56.6 0.8 69.9 3.6 0.0 3.1 11.7 15.3 64.9Delay (s) 59.4 93.6 25.1 99.9 39.1 22.8 50.7 46.1 63.4 99.9Level of Service E F C F D C D D E FApproach Delay (s) 75.4 51.6 46.7 94.9Approach LOS E D D F

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 70.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.09Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.1% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group


Tempe Streetcar 2035 Build 5:00 pm 1/15/2015 2035 Build H2 Alternative Synchro 8 ReportHDR Inc Page 1

Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 191 774 43 119 980 211 32 309 233 213 319 141Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.87Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1593 3155 1210 3075 1199 1402 1115 1588 1650 1238Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 174 3155 185 3075 323 1402 1115 286 1650 1238Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 208 841 47 129 1065 229 35 336 253 232 347 153RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 17 0 0 0 170 0 0 112Lane Group Flow (vph) 208 884 0 129 1277 0 35 336 83 232 347 41Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 24 5 5 24 67 47 47 67Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 10 15 36Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 60 0 0 60 4 4 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA custom pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 1 6 5 11 2 3 9 8 11 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 43.6 37.6 52.8 37.0 29.6 23.6 30.0 32.6 26.6 26.6Effective Green, g (s) 45.6 40.6 54.8 40.0 32.6 26.6 36.0 34.6 29.6 29.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.37 0.50 0.36 0.30 0.24 0.33 0.31 0.27 0.27Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 3.0 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 162 1164 248 1118 159 339 364 172 444 333v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.28 c0.08 0.42 c0.02 0.24 0.02 c0.09 0.21v/s Ratio Perm c0.45 0.18 0.05 0.05 c0.34 0.03v/c Ratio 1.28 0.76 0.52 1.14 0.22 0.99 0.23 1.35 0.78 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 27.9 30.4 18.4 35.0 28.9 41.6 26.9 35.0 37.2 30.4Progression Factor 2.37 0.42 1.58 0.48 1.07 0.99 1.74 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 164.1 2.4 0.6 72.3 0.2 42.9 0.3 190.3 12.8 0.8Delay (s) 230.2 15.2 29.6 89.1 31.2 84.0 47.0 225.3 50.0 31.2Level of Service F B C F C F D F D CApproach Delay (s) 56.0 83.7 66.0 101.6Approach LOS E F E F




Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 39 17 478 418 13Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1403 1351 1425 1417Flt Permitted 0.98 0.44 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1403 624 1425 1417Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 32 52 23 634 554 17RTOR Reduction (vph) 49 0 0 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 0 23 634 569 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 6 6 6 6Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6 46Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm NA NAProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1Actuated Green, G (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Effective Green, g (s) 3.0 40.0 40.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.73 0.73 0.73Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 76 453 1036 1030v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.44 0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.04v/c Ratio 0.46 0.05 0.61 0.55Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 2.1 3.7 3.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.35 2.00 2.97Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 0.2 2.4 1.7Delay (s) 29.5 3.0 9.8 11.9Level of Service C A A BApproach Delay (s) 29.5 9.5 11.9Approach LOS C A B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 31 5 38 13 7 39 22 410 21 19 437 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.51 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 819 777 996 660 1493 1231 934 1544 1393Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.72 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 611 777 755 660 622 1231 934 684 1393Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 41 7 50 17 9 52 29 544 28 25 580 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 43 0 0 0 6 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 41 15 0 17 18 0 29 544 22 25 591 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 228 140 140 228 86 38 38 86Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 8 32 46Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34 0 4 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 15.2 15.2 15.2 15.2 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8 82.8Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 85.8 85.8 85.8 85.8 85.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 128 124 109 485 960 728 533 1086v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.03 c0.44 0.42v/s Ratio Perm c0.07 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.04v/c Ratio 0.41 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.06 0.57 0.03 0.05 0.54Uniform Delay, d1 41.1 39.1 39.2 39.4 2.8 4.8 2.7 2.8 4.6Progression Factor 1.03 1.08 1.00 1.00 0.62 0.66 1.21 0.99 0.91Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 2.2 0.1 0.1 1.7Delay (s) 43.4 42.3 39.4 39.6 2.0 5.4 3.4 2.9 5.9Level of Service D D D D A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 42.8 39.6 5.1 5.8Approach LOS D D A A




Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 21 9 423 483 16Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1073 1593 1425 1425 539Flt Permitted 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1073 651 1425 1425 539Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 28 12 561 640 21RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 3Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 9 12 561 640 18Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 69 296Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 47Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type custom Perm NA NA PermProtected Phases 1 1Permitted Phases 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 2.7 40.3 40.3 40.3 40.3Effective Green, g (s) 5.7 43.3 43.3 43.3 43.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 512 1121 1121 424v/s Ratio Prot 0.39 c0.45v/s Ratio Perm c0.01 0.02 0.03v/c Ratio 0.08 0.02 0.50 0.57 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 22.3 1.3 2.1 2.3 1.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.48 0.54 0.83 0.57Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 1.4 1.9 0.2Delay (s) 22.4 0.7 2.6 3.7 0.9Level of Service C A A A AApproach Delay (s) 22.4 2.5 3.7Approach LOS C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 51 87 97 69 79 54 81 292 56 62 369 35Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.70 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.39 1.00 1.00 0.37Flpb, ped/bikes 0.63 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1003 1288 850 1248 1012 1518 1402 475 1416 1357 453Flt Permitted 0.57 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.44 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 598 1288 850 855 1012 494 1402 475 651 1357 453Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 68 115 129 92 105 72 107 387 74 82 489 46RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 83 0 23 0 0 0 35 0 0 23Lane Group Flow (vph) 68 115 46 92 154 0 107 387 39 82 489 23Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 325 152 152 325 415 386 386 415Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 29 30 23 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 24 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 59.7 52.8 52.8 56.3 51.1 51.1Effective Green, g (s) 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 61.7 54.8 54.8 58.3 54.1 54.1Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.56 0.50 0.50 0.53 0.49 0.49Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 212 456 301 303 358 350 698 236 388 667 222v/s Ratio Prot 0.09 c0.15 c0.02 0.28 0.01 c0.36v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.05 0.11 0.15 0.08 0.10 0.05v/c Ratio 0.32 0.25 0.15 0.30 0.43 0.31 0.55 0.17 0.21 0.73 0.10Uniform Delay, d1 25.9 25.2 24.2 25.7 27.1 13.4 19.1 15.1 13.3 22.2 15.0Progression Factor 0.96 0.94 1.33 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.79 0.92 0.52 0.63 1.06Incremental Delay, d2 3.7 1.2 1.0 2.6 3.8 0.1 2.6 1.2 0.1 6.2 0.8Delay (s) 28.4 25.0 33.2 28.2 30.8 12.9 17.6 15.2 7.0 20.3 16.6Level of Service C C C C C B B B A C BApproach Delay (s) 29.1 29.9 16.4 18.2Approach LOS C C B B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 11 23 55 23 4 40 43 392 21 48 500 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 0.76Flpb, ped/bikes 0.51 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 807 782 880 611 1494 1208 924 1460 1357 923Flt Permitted 0.72 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.31 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 611 782 600 611 491 1208 924 611 1357 923Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 15 30 73 30 5 53 57 520 28 64 663 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 53 0 0 39 0 0 0 9 0 0 10Lane Group Flow (vph) 15 50 0 30 19 0 57 520 19 64 663 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 330 331 331 330 141 140 140 141Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 11 42 41Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 71.0Effective Green, g (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 166 213 163 166 330 812 621 411 912 620v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.03 0.43 c0.49v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.05 0.12 0.02 0.10 0.03v/c Ratio 0.09 0.23 0.18 0.12 0.17 0.64 0.03 0.16 0.73 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 29.8 31.1 30.6 30.1 6.7 10.3 6.0 6.6 11.5 6.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 1.52 2.66 0.65 0.37 0.57Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.0 3.4 0.1 0.7 4.2 0.1Delay (s) 29.9 31.3 30.8 30.2 11.7 19.1 16.1 4.9 8.5 3.6Level of Service C C C C B B B A A AApproach Delay (s) 31.1 30.4 18.3 8.0Approach LOS C C B A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 6 10 80 73 8 44 71 389 47 62 506 27Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.95 1.00 0.79 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.71Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1384 1532 980 1471 1379 806 1391 1357 865Flt Permitted 0.99 0.60 1.00 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.40 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 963 980 470 1379 806 580 1357 865Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 8 13 106 97 11 58 94 516 62 82 671 36RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 38 0 0 42 0 0 0 10 0 0 10Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 89 0 97 27 0 94 516 52 82 671 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 116 44 44 116 185 221 221 185Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 3 10 44 39Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 2 2 1 1Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0Effective Green, g (s) 31.0 31.0 31.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0 73.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 386 271 276 311 915 534 384 900 574v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.37 c0.49v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.10 0.20 0.06 0.14 0.03v/c Ratio 0.23 0.36 0.10 0.30 0.56 0.10 0.21 0.75 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 30.3 31.6 29.2 7.8 9.9 6.7 7.3 12.3 6.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.66 1.94 2.07Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 0.1 2.5 2.5 0.4 1.0 4.3 0.1Delay (s) 30.4 31.8 29.2 10.3 12.5 7.0 13.0 28.1 13.4Level of Service C C C B B A B C BApproach Delay (s) 30.4 30.8 11.6 25.9Approach LOS C C B C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 116 591 345 183 430 114 237 264 278 101 521 51Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.86Flpb, ped/bikes 0.94 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1492 3083 957 1593 3173 658 3090 1623 1096 3090 3071 1232Flt Permitted 0.36 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 564 3083 957 194 3173 658 3090 1623 1096 3090 3071 1232Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 154 784 458 243 570 151 314 350 369 134 691 68RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 292 0 0 99 0 0 159 0 0 42Lane Group Flow (vph) 154 784 166 243 570 52 314 350 210 134 691 26Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 196 222 222 196 110 198 198 110Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 42 75 46 46Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 16 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 18 0Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA custom Prot NA customProtected Phases 1 9 6 5 2 3 8 9 7 4 9Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 49.8 30.6 30.6 46.6 37.6 37.6 13.4 34.3 44.5 7.9 28.8 39.0Effective Green, g (s) 51.8 33.6 33.6 47.6 40.6 40.6 14.4 37.3 50.5 8.9 31.8 45.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.28 0.28 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.31 0.42 0.07 0.27 0.38Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 403 870 270 230 1082 224 373 508 465 231 820 465v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.25 c0.12 0.18 c0.10 0.22 c0.05 0.04 c0.23 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.17 c0.31 0.08 0.14 0.01v/c Ratio 0.38 0.90 0.61 1.06 0.53 0.23 0.84 0.69 0.45 0.58 0.84 0.06Uniform Delay, d1 21.3 41.1 37.1 32.8 31.5 28.0 51.2 35.8 24.4 53.2 41.2 23.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 12.1 2.9 75.0 0.2 0.2 15.1 7.5 0.7 2.4 10.3 0.0Delay (s) 21.6 53.2 40.0 107.8 31.7 28.2 66.3 43.2 25.1 55.6 51.5 23.5Level of Service C D D F C C E D C E D CApproach Delay (s) 45.4 50.3 43.8 50.0Approach LOS D D D D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 7 4 84 24 0 60 20 737 24 23 1025 18Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1273 1263 1591 1556 1320 1210 4560Flt Permitted 0.98 0.77 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1247 984 89 1556 1320 206 4560Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 9 5 111 32 0 80 27 977 32 30 1359 24RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 86 0 0 78 0 0 0 10 0 2 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 39 0 0 34 0 27 977 22 30 1381 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 46 58 58 46 22 32 32 22Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 9 5 58 46Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 60 0 0Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NAProtected Phases 2 2 1 9 1 9Permitted Phases 2 2 1 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 13.0 13.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 79.0 85.0Effective Green, g (s) 13.0 13.0 75.0 75.0 75.0 79.0 85.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.72 0.77Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 147 116 60 1060 900 184 3523v/s Ratio Prot c0.63 0.01 c0.30v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03 0.30 0.02 0.11v/c Ratio 0.26 0.29 0.45 0.92 0.02 0.16 0.39Uniform Delay, d1 44.1 44.3 8.0 15.0 5.7 10.7 4.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.67 0.96 1.00 0.65 0.54Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 6.2 12.0 8.3 0.0 0.4 0.1Delay (s) 48.4 50.5 17.4 22.7 5.7 7.4 2.3Level of Service D D B C A A AApproach Delay (s) 48.4 50.5 22.0 2.4Approach LOS D D C A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 14.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.7% ICU Level of Service DAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 6 121 211 15 18 0 778 110 7 1115 29Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.83 0.98 0.97 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.89 0.99 0.98 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.99 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1214 1404 2916 1593 4449Flt Permitted 0.91 0.56 1.00 0.11 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1115 822 2916 190 4449Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 34 8 160 280 20 24 0 1032 146 9 1479 38RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 2 0 0 10 0 0 3 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 187 0 0 322 0 0 1168 0 9 1514 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 109 170 170 109 43 50 50 43Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 62 165 27 19Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 14 0Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA NA D.P+P NAProtected Phases 2 2 1 9 1 9Permitted Phases 2 2 1Actuated Green, G (s) 39.0 39.0 49.0 55.0 59.0Effective Green, g (s) 42.0 42.0 52.0 61.0 61.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.47 0.55 0.55Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 425 313 1378 220 2467v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.00 c0.34v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 c0.39 0.02v/c Ratio 0.44 1.03 0.85 0.04 0.61Uniform Delay, d1 25.2 34.0 25.5 14.5 16.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.77 0.64Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 58.1 5.9 0.1 0.4Delay (s) 25.5 92.1 30.7 11.2 11.0Level of Service C F C B BApproach Delay (s) 25.5 92.1 30.7 11.0Approach LOS C F C B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 1 0 43 43 4 160 58 688 58 106 1315 8Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.87 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1419 1600 1035 1593 3024 1205 4571Flt Permitted 1.00 0.79 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.25 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1417 1316 1035 91 3024 315 4571Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 1 0 57 57 5 212 77 912 77 141 1744 11RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 42 0 0 0 177 0 6 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 16 0 0 62 35 77 983 0 141 1755 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 121 1 1 121 8 34 34 8Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 22 30 28Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 60 0 0Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA D.P+P NAProtected Phases 2 2 1 9 1 9Permitted Phases 2 2 2 1 1Actuated Green, G (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 74.0 74.0 80.0 84.0Effective Green, g (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 74.0 74.0 80.0 84.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.67 0.67 0.73 0.76Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 215 169 61 2034 277 3490v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.03 c0.38v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.05 0.03 c0.85 0.34v/c Ratio 0.07 0.29 0.21 1.26 0.48 0.51 0.50Uniform Delay, d1 38.9 40.4 39.8 18.0 8.7 5.5 5.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.91 1.33 1.25 0.41Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 3.4 2.7 198.3 0.8 1.1 0.1Delay (s) 39.5 43.7 42.5 232.7 12.4 7.9 2.1Level of Service D D D F B A AApproach Delay (s) 39.5 42.8 28.3 2.6Approach LOS D D C A




Movement NBL NBT SBT SBR NEL NERLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 392 603 0 413 28Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95 0.97Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 3539 3406Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.96Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 3539 3406Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 520 800 0 548 37RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 5 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 520 800 0 580 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 19Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 1 1 2Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 74.8 74.8 23.2Effective Green, g (s) 77.8 77.8 26.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.24Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2503 2503 811v/s Ratio Prot 0.15 c0.23 c0.17v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.21 0.32 0.71Uniform Delay, d1 5.5 6.1 38.5Progression Factor 0.34 1.00 0.61Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.3 2.4Delay (s) 2.1 6.4 26.0Level of Service A A CApproach Delay (s) 2.1 6.4 26.0Approach LOS A A C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 17 124 107 223 75 3 93 421 94 8 808 20Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1644 1662 1765 1843 1770 3371 1750 3489Flt Permitted 0.69 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.33 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1195 1662 344 1843 314 3371 612 3489Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 23 164 142 296 99 4 123 558 125 11 1071 27RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 30 0 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 23 276 0 296 102 0 123 667 0 11 1097 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52 32 32 52 19 13 13 19Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 29 52 18 37Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 4Turn Type Perm NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 22.0 22.0 41.7 41.7 56.3 56.3 56.3 56.3Effective Green, g (s) 24.0 24.0 41.7 43.7 58.3 58.3 58.3 58.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.38 0.40 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 260 362 333 732 166 1786 324 1849v/s Ratio Prot 0.17 c0.13 0.06 0.20 0.31v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 c0.21 c0.39 0.02v/c Ratio 0.09 0.76 0.89 0.14 0.74 0.37 0.03 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 34.3 40.3 27.4 21.1 20.0 15.2 12.4 17.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.70 0.65 1.00 1.00 0.55 0.61Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 8.2 22.6 0.0 25.5 0.6 0.2 1.3Delay (s) 34.3 48.6 41.7 13.8 45.5 15.8 7.0 12.0Level of Service C D D B D B A BApproach Delay (s) 47.6 34.5 20.3 11.9Approach LOS D C C B




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 2 1 1 247 2 973 1 321 439 504 139 2Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00Frt 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1561 1552 2439 1593 2935 1175 3018 1445Flt Permitted 0.90 0.73 1.00 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1440 1182 2439 329 2935 1175 1724 1445Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 2 1 1 268 2 1058 1 349 477 548 151 2RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 672 0 0 333 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3 0 0 270 386 1 349 144 548 152 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 13 1 15 15 1Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 9 3 6Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 0 34 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type Perm NA D.Pm NA custom Perm NA custom Perm NAProtected Phases 3 3 9 9 2 9 4Permitted Phases 3 3 3 2 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 24.3 40.1 34.1 17.4 17.4 27.2 36.5 36.5Effective Green, g (s) 27.3 43.1 40.1 20.4 20.4 33.2 39.5 39.5Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.39 0.36 0.19 0.19 0.30 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 357 463 889 61 544 365 619 518v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.12 0.05 0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 c0.23 0.11 0.00 0.08 c0.32v/c Ratio 0.01 0.58 0.43 0.02 0.64 0.39 0.89 0.29Uniform Delay, d1 31.2 26.4 26.4 36.6 41.4 30.4 33.1 25.3Progression Factor 1.00 0.22 2.34 1.37 1.09 2.10 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.5 0.6 16.9 1.4Delay (s) 31.2 6.9 62.0 50.1 46.6 64.6 50.0 26.7Level of Service C A E D D E D CApproach Delay (s) 31.2 50.8 57.0 44.9Approach LOS C D E D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 26 1 3 29 1 64 7 567 27 8 306 15Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1559 1111 1127 1366 1580 1414 1031 1551 1220Flt Permitted 0.63 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.49 1.00 1.00 0.32 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1036 1111 895 1366 815 1414 1031 525 1220Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 34 1 4 38 1 85 9 752 36 11 406 20RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 3 0 0 72 0 0 0 7 0 1 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 34 2 0 38 14 0 9 752 29 11 425 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 13 91 91 13 5 38 38 5Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 5 3 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 34 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NAProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 13.8 13.8 13.8 13.8 84.2 84.2 84.2 84.2 84.2Effective Green, g (s) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 87.2 87.2 87.2 87.2 87.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 169 136 208 646 1120 817 416 967v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.01 c0.53 0.35v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.04 0.01 0.03 0.02v/c Ratio 0.22 0.01 0.28 0.07 0.01 0.67 0.03 0.03 0.44Uniform Delay, d1 40.8 39.5 41.2 39.9 2.4 5.1 2.4 2.4 3.6Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.02 0.74 0.75 0.42 1.56 2.41Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 0.1 1.3Delay (s) 41.1 39.5 40.7 40.7 1.8 6.7 1.1 3.9 10.1Level of Service D D D D A A A A BApproach Delay (s) 40.9 40.7 6.4 9.9Approach LOS D D A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 143 28 54 103 97 20 347 59 62 166 98Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 0.89 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1424 1528 1397 1379 947 1569 1623 1575 1231 996Flt Permitted 0.67 1.00 0.59 1.00 1.00 0.58 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1003 1528 862 1379 947 966 1623 430 1231 996Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 190 37 72 137 129 27 460 78 82 220 130RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 69 0 13 0 0 0 74Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 216 0 72 137 60 27 525 0 82 220 56Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 84 114 114 84 15 23 23 15Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 33 66 27 9Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 34 34Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 6 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6Effective Green, g (s) 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4 25.4 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6 23.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 463 705 398 636 437 414 696 184 528 427v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.10 c0.32 0.18v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.03 0.19 0.06v/c Ratio 0.26 0.31 0.18 0.22 0.14 0.07 0.75 0.45 0.42 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 9.3 8.7 8.8 8.5 9.2 13.3 11.1 10.9 9.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 1.36 0.67 0.85 1.44 1.42 4.33Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 4.1 0.6 0.2 0.0Delay (s) 10.4 10.4 9.4 9.3 12.2 6.2 15.3 16.5 15.7 41.2Level of Service B B A A B A B B B DApproach Delay (s) 10.4 10.4 14.9 23.5Approach LOS B B B C




Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1 371 0 0 300Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 0.86 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1611 1863 1863Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1611 1863 1863Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1 492 0 0 398RTOR Reduction (vph) 1 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 492 0 0 398Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 28 28Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 14Turn Type NA NA NAProtected Phases 4 6 6Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Effective Green, g (s) 1.1 41.9 41.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.02 0.76 0.76Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 32 1419 1419v/s Ratio Prot c0.00 c0.26 0.21v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.00 0.35 0.28Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 2.1 2.0Progression Factor 1.00 0.83 0.94Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.5 0.5Delay (s) 26.4 2.3 2.3Level of Service C A AApproach Delay (s) 26.4 2.3 2.3Approach LOS C A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 171 781 86 44 614 140 63 9 33 216 1 157Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.89Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.96 1.00Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1748 3457 1761 3373 1709 1475 1477 1213Flt Permitted 0.21 1.00 0.17 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.63 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 390 3457 306 3373 793 1475 971 1213Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 227 1036 114 58 814 186 84 12 44 286 1 208RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 18 0 0 0 32 0 0 141Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 1142 0 58 982 0 0 96 12 0 287 67Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 43 22 22 43 74 34 34 74Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 58 44 19 14Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 34Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0Effective Green, g (s) 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 1979 175 1931 223 415 273 341v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 0.29v/s Ratio Perm c0.58 0.19 0.12 0.01 c0.30 0.06v/c Ratio 1.02 0.58 0.33 0.51 0.43 0.03 1.05 0.20Uniform Delay, d1 23.5 15.0 12.4 14.2 32.3 28.6 39.5 30.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90Incremental Delay, d2 65.0 1.2 5.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 68.3 0.1Delay (s) 88.5 16.2 17.4 15.1 32.8 28.6 103.7 27.0Level of Service F B B B C C F CApproach Delay (s) 28.1 15.3 31.5 71.5Approach LOS C B C E




Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 24 1198 1241 39 267 56Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 3539 1545 3433 1583Flt Permitted 0.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 208 3539 3539 1545 3433 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 26 1302 1349 42 290 61RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 18 0 52Lane Group Flow (vph) 26 1302 1349 24 290 9Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 6Turn Type D.P+P NA NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 9 1 9 1 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 77.2 83.2 59.6 59.6 14.8 14.8Effective Green, g (s) 81.2 85.2 61.6 61.6 16.8 16.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.77 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 431 2741 1981 865 524 241v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.37 c0.38 c0.08v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.02 0.01v/c Ratio 0.06 0.48 0.68 0.03 0.55 0.04Uniform Delay, d1 7.5 4.4 17.2 10.8 43.1 39.7Progression Factor 0.11 0.00 1.08 0.80 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.1 1.3 0.1Delay (s) 0.9 0.1 20.2 8.7 44.4 39.8Level of Service A A C A D DApproach Delay (s) 0.1 19.9 43.6Approach LOS A B D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 73 1858 147 117 438 60 48 9 214 409 33 267Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.87Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1550 3433 3539 1537 1756 2967 1758 3000Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.49 1.00 0.56 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1550 3433 3539 1537 902 2967 1039 3000Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 79 2020 160 127 476 65 52 10 233 445 36 290RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 42 0 0 31 0 63 0 0 190 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 79 2020 118 127 476 34 52 180 0 445 136 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 12 5 5 12 12 9 9 12Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 1 1Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 8 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 4.0 54.0 54.0 5.0 55.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0Effective Green, g (s) 5.0 57.0 57.0 6.0 58.0 58.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.52 0.52 0.05 0.53 0.53 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 0.2 0.2 1.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 1833 803 187 1866 810 311 1024 358 1036v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.57 c0.04 0.13 0.06 0.05v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.02 0.06 c0.43v/c Ratio 0.51 1.10 0.15 0.68 0.26 0.04 0.17 0.18 1.24 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 51.3 26.5 13.8 51.1 14.2 12.6 25.0 25.1 36.0 24.7Progression Factor 1.02 0.79 1.02 1.02 0.66 0.51 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 52.2 0.3 5.7 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 130.9 0.0Delay (s) 52.8 73.1 14.4 57.6 9.6 6.5 25.1 25.1 166.9 24.7Level of Service D E B E A A C C F CApproach Delay (s) 68.2 18.4 25.1 106.7Approach LOS E B C F




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 745 1236 488 102 220 87 114 1536 210 260 1350 329Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1554 3433 3539 1568 1770 4943 1770 4852Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.11 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1554 3433 3539 1568 219 4943 201 4852Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 810 1343 530 111 239 95 124 1670 228 283 1467 358RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 53 0 0 60 0 16 0 0 35 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 810 1343 477 111 239 35 124 1882 0 283 1790 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 9 9 2 10 30 30 10Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 1 1Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 9 0Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+pt NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 19.0 35.0 43.0 6.8 24.8 38.0 41.0 33.0 50.2 38.2Effective Green, g (s) 20.0 38.0 45.0 9.8 27.8 40.0 43.0 36.0 51.2 41.2Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.35 0.41 0.09 0.25 0.36 0.39 0.33 0.47 0.37Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.2 1.0 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 624 1222 635 305 894 570 212 1617 296 1817v/s Ratio Prot c0.24 c0.38 0.06 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.05 c0.38 c0.12 0.37v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.01 0.18 0.32v/c Ratio 1.30 1.10 0.75 0.36 0.27 0.06 0.58 1.16 0.96 0.99Uniform Delay, d1 45.0 36.0 27.7 47.2 32.9 22.8 26.3 37.0 31.3 34.1Progression Factor 1.21 0.83 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 135.3 46.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 2.6 80.9 39.9 17.9Delay (s) 189.8 75.9 15.2 47.4 33.0 22.8 29.0 117.9 71.2 52.0Level of Service F E B D C C C F E DApproach Delay (s) 98.3 34.4 112.5 54.6Approach LOS F C F D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 85.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service FHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.8% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 59 772 5 20 555 95 1 0 1 185 0 108Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1760 3268 1747 3438 1608 1770 1282Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.92 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 558 3268 451 3438 1519 1770 1282Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 78 1024 7 27 736 126 1 0 1 245 0 143RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 2 0 0 113 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 78 1031 0 27 854 0 0 0 0 245 30 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 44 44 14 2 59 59 2Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 18 15 9 31Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Split NAProtected Phases 1 1 2! 2! 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2Actuated Green, G (s) 78.1 78.1 78.1 78.1 19.9 19.9 19.9Effective Green, g (s) 81.1 81.1 81.1 81.1 22.9 22.9 22.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.21 0.21 0.21Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 411 2409 332 2534 316 368 266v/s Ratio Prot c0.32 0.25 c0.14 0.02v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.06 0.00v/c Ratio 0.19 0.43 0.08 0.34 0.00 0.67 0.11Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 5.5 4.0 5.1 34.5 40.0 35.3Progression Factor 1.23 1.35 0.58 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 3.5 0.1Delay (s) 6.4 8.0 2.8 2.7 34.5 43.5 35.4Level of Service A A A A C D DApproach Delay (s) 7.9 2.7 34.5 40.5Approach LOS A A C D

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 11.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service BHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ICU Level of Service EAnalysis Period (min) 15! Phase conflict between lane groups.c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 804 200 154 472 0 57 0 86 290 0 132Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.71Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.87 1.00Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2815 1252 1757 2815 1313 1259 1544 1126Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2815 1252 364 2815 1313 1259 1544 1126Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1066 265 204 626 0 76 0 114 385 0 175RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 113Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1066 222 204 626 0 76 0 32 385 0 62Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 33 28 28 33 172 110 110 172Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 20 17 44 174Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 70 0 0 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10Turn Type NA Perm Perm NA custom custom custom customProtected Phases 6 2 7Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 4 4Actuated Green, G (s) 62.0 62.0 62.0 62.0 22.0 22.0 36.0 36.0Effective Green, g (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 37.0 39.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.23 0.23 0.34 0.35Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1663 739 215 1663 298 286 519 399v/s Ratio Prot 0.38 0.22 c0.07v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 c0.56 0.06 0.03 0.18 0.06v/c Ratio 0.64 0.30 0.95 0.38 0.26 0.11 0.74 0.16Uniform Delay, d1 14.8 11.2 21.0 11.8 34.9 33.7 32.3 24.3Progression Factor 0.83 0.85 0.71 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 1.0 48.9 0.6 0.2 0.1 5.7 0.1Delay (s) 14.1 10.5 63.8 7.7 35.0 33.8 37.9 24.3Level of Service B B E A D C D CApproach Delay (s) 13.4 21.5 34.3 33.7Approach LOS B C C C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 74 1048 11 20 543 166 0 0 18 0 0 97Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.99 0.92Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.86 0.86Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1759 3262 1735 3274 1229 1591 1487Flt Permitted 0.37 1.00 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 690 3262 318 3274 1229 1591 1487Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 98 1390 15 27 720 220 0 0 24 0 0 129RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 98 1405 0 27 720 188 0 0 24 0 0 129Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 113 113 35 2 219Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 30 48 5Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm NA Perm Free FreeProtected Phases 2 1 1Permitted Phases 1 1 1 Free FreeActuated Green, G (s) 98.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 91.0 110.0 110.0Effective Green, g (s) 104.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 94.0 110.0 110.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 749 2787 271 2797 1050 1591 1487v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 c0.43 0.22v/s Ratio Perm 0.11 0.08 0.15 0.02 0.09v/c Ratio 0.13 0.50 0.10 0.26 0.18 0.02 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 0.2 2.0 1.3 1.5 1.4 0.0 0.0Progression Factor 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.38 0.24 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1Delay (s) 0.1 1.4 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.1Level of Service A A A A A A AApproach Delay (s) 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.1Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 1.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service AHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 6.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.8% ICU Level of Service CAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 950 19 49 571 60 33 9 28 58 14 122Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.94 1.00 0.82Flpb, ped/bikes 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.91 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1721 3214 1730 3152 1512 1582 1291Flt Permitted 0.32 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.78 0.66 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 582 3214 347 3152 1211 1092 1291Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 1260 25 65 757 80 44 12 37 77 19 162RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 27 0 0 0 139Lane Group Flow (vph) 119 1284 0 65 833 0 0 66 0 0 96 23Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 67 111 111 67 128 115 115 128Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 17 22 9 17Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA PermProtected Phases 1 1 2 2Permitted Phases 1 1 2 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 85.2 85.2 85.2 85.2 12.8 12.8 12.8Effective Green, g (s) 88.2 88.2 88.2 88.2 15.8 15.8 15.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.14 0.14 0.14Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 466 2577 278 2527 173 156 185v/s Ratio Prot c0.40 0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.19 0.05 c0.09 0.02v/c Ratio 0.26 0.50 0.23 0.33 0.38 0.62 0.13Uniform Delay, d1 2.7 3.6 2.7 2.9 42.7 44.2 41.1Progression Factor 0.82 0.65 0.01 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.6 1.8 0.3 0.5 5.0 0.1Delay (s) 3.4 2.9 1.8 0.9 43.2 49.2 41.2Level of Service A A A A D D DApproach Delay (s) 3.0 0.9 43.2 44.2Approach LOS A A D D




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1044 0 0 679 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 2881 2881Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 2881 2881Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1384 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1384 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 35 138 138 35 87 676 676 87Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 37 20 75 62Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parking (#/hr) 10 10Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 74.8 74.8Effective Green, g (s) 76.8 76.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 0.2Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2011 2011v/s Ratio Prot c0.48 0.31v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.69 0.45Uniform Delay, d1 9.6 7.3Progression Factor 1.11 1.72Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 0.3Delay (s) 12.5 12.9Level of Service B BApproach Delay (s) 12.5 12.9 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B B A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 289 498 321 182 239 126 296 1131 182 195 1687 208Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.68 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98Flpb, ped/bikes 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1671 2881 919 1754 2881 770 3433 4818 3433 4885Flt Permitted 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 792 2881 919 291 2881 770 3433 4818 3433 4885Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 383 660 426 241 317 167 393 1500 241 259 2237 276RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 144 0 0 118 0 20 0 0 14 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 383 660 282 241 317 49 393 1721 0 259 2499 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 181 230 230 181 120 144 144 120Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 44 20 6Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 60 0 0 60 60 0 3 0 0 3 3Parking (#/hr) 10 10 10 10Turn Type pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 34.0 26.0 26.0 34.0 26.0 26.0 11.0 44.8 10.2 45.0Effective Green, g (s) 36.0 29.0 29.0 36.0 29.0 29.0 12.0 47.8 12.2 48.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.33 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.43 0.11 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 331 759 242 214 759 203 374 2093 380 2131v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.23 0.09 0.11 c0.11 0.36 0.08 c0.51v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 c0.31 0.27 0.06v/c Ratio 1.16 0.87 1.16 1.13 0.42 0.24 1.05 0.82 0.68 1.17Uniform Delay, d1 35.6 38.7 40.5 32.1 33.5 31.9 49.0 27.4 47.0 31.0Progression Factor 0.70 0.76 0.59 0.57 0.48 1.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 94.0 10.4 103.0 98.7 1.6 2.7 60.5 3.8 4.0 83.1Delay (s) 118.8 39.7 126.7 117.1 17.8 56.0 109.5 31.2 51.0 114.1Level of Service F D F F B E F C D FApproach Delay (s) 85.6 59.6 45.6 108.2Approach LOS F E D F

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 79.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service HAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group



Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER SER2Lane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 22 811 9 19 434 41 9 18 21 59 32 23Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1345 3530 1770 3063 1770 1608 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.98 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1345 3530 1770 3063 1770 1608 1770 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 29 1075 12 25 576 54 12 24 28 78 42 30RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 46 0 0 56 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 29 1086 0 25 625 0 12 6 0 78 16 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 14 16 16 14 57 6 6 57Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 19 22 9Bus Blockages (#/hr) 60 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Split NA NA ProtProtected Phases 1 6 9 5 2 9 8 8 4 4Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 3.0 48.8 3.0 48.8 8.8 8.8 14.4 14.4Effective Green, g (s) 6.0 54.8 6.0 54.8 11.8 11.8 24.4 24.4Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.50 0.05 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.22Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 13.0 13.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 73 1758 96 1525 189 172 392 351v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.31 0.01 0.20 c0.01 0.00 c0.04 0.01v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.40 0.62 0.26 0.41 0.06 0.03 0.20 0.05Uniform Delay, d1 50.3 20.0 49.9 17.4 44.1 44.0 34.8 33.6Progression Factor 1.00 0.59 1.49 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0Delay (s) 51.5 12.4 74.8 2.6 44.2 44.0 34.9 33.7Level of Service D B E A D D C CApproach Delay (s) 13.4 5.3 44.0 34.3Approach LOS B A D C




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 90 710 20 97 366 61 47 0 26 89 0 86Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.99Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3503 1770 3304 1770 1029 1187 1562Flt Permitted 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.67 1.00 0.73 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3503 1770 3304 1252 1029 918 1562Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 119 942 27 129 485 81 62 0 34 118 0 114RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 11 0 0 29 0 0 96 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1087 0 129 555 0 62 5 0 118 18 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 52 52 255 255Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 18 20 1Turn Type Split NA Split NA Perm NA Perm NAProtected Phases 6 6 2 2 8 4Permitted Phases 8 4Actuated Green, G (s) 34.0 27.0 27.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0Effective Green, g (s) 34.0 27.0 27.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 13.0 13.0 13.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1082 434 810 193 159 141 241v/s Ratio Prot c0.31 0.07 c0.17 0.01 0.01v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 c0.13v/c Ratio 1.00 0.30 0.69 0.32 0.03 0.84 0.07Uniform Delay, d1 38.0 33.8 37.7 41.4 39.5 45.2 39.8Progression Factor 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 26.5 1.7 4.7 1.0 0.1 31.7 0.0Delay (s) 50.0 35.5 42.3 42.3 39.6 76.9 39.8Level of Service D D D D D E DApproach Delay (s) 50.0 41.1 41.4 58.7Approach LOS D D D E


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis30: Rio Salado Parkway & Access B 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 58 1407 809 60 326 324Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1345 3539 3503 3433 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1345 3539 3503 3433 1583Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 63 1529 879 65 354 352RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 4 0 0 157Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 1529 940 0 354 195Bus Blockages (#/hr) 60 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type Prot NA NA NA PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 4Actuated Green, G (s) 11.1 78.4 61.3 19.6 19.6Effective Green, g (s) 11.1 78.4 61.3 19.6 19.6Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.71 0.56 0.18 0.18Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 135 2522 1952 611 282v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 c0.43 0.27 0.10v/s Ratio Perm c0.12v/c Ratio 0.47 0.61 0.48 0.58 0.69Uniform Delay, d1 46.7 8.0 14.7 41.4 42.4Progression Factor 0.67 2.37 0.81 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 1.0 0.8 1.3 7.1Delay (s) 33.5 19.9 12.7 42.8 49.5Level of Service C B B D DApproach Delay (s) 20.5 12.7 46.1Approach LOS C B D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis31: Rio Salado Parkway & Access D 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 18 1715 748 23 301 121Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.97 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1210 3185 3171 3090 1425Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 377 3185 3171 3090 1425Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 20 1864 813 25 327 132RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2 0 0 112Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 1864 836 0 327 20Bus Blockages (#/hr) 60 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type pm+pt NA NA NA PermProtected Phases 5 2 6 4Permitted Phases 2 4Actuated Green, G (s) 81.1 81.1 74.5 16.9 16.9Effective Green, g (s) 81.1 81.1 74.5 16.9 16.9Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.68 0.15 0.15Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 297 2348 2147 474 218v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 c0.59 0.26 c0.11v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.01v/c Ratio 0.07 0.79 0.39 0.69 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 4.3 9.2 7.8 44.1 40.0Progression Factor 0.08 0.22 0.56 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 1.6 0.5 4.2 0.2Delay (s) 0.4 3.6 4.9 48.2 40.2Level of Service A A A D DApproach Delay (s) 3.6 4.9 45.9Approach LOS A A D


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis32: Rio Salado Parkway & Marina Hts Station Ped Signal 1 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1733 0 0 869 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3115 3115Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3115 3115Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1884 0 0 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1884 0 0 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 82.0 82.0Effective Green, g (s) 82.0 82.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2322 2322v/s Ratio Prot c0.60 0.30v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.81 0.41Uniform Delay, d1 9.0 5.1Progression Factor 0.13 0.70Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.5Delay (s) 3.0 4.1Level of Service A AApproach Delay (s) 3.0 4.1 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis33: Rio Salado Parkway & Marina Hts Station Ped Signal 2 5/7/2015




HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis34: Rio Salado Parkway & HaydenFerry Station Ped Signal 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1220 0 0 1297 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 3539Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 3539Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1326 0 0 1410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1326 0 0 1410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 63.0 63.0Effective Green, g (s) 63.0 63.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.57Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2026 2026v/s Ratio Prot 0.37 c0.40v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.65 0.70Uniform Delay, d1 16.1 16.7Progression Factor 1.98 0.47Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 1.5Delay (s) 32.8 9.4Level of Service C AApproach Delay (s) 32.8 9.4 0.0 0.0Approach LOS C A A A

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 20.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service CHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.45Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis35: Rio Salado Parkway & Rio Salado/Ash Station Ped Signal 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 944 0 0 1222 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3115 3115Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3115 3115Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1026 0 0 1328 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1026 0 0 1328 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 82.0 82.0Effective Green, g (s) 82.0 82.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2322 2322v/s Ratio Prot 0.33 c0.43v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.44 0.57Uniform Delay, d1 5.3 6.2Progression Factor 1.01 0.30Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.3Delay (s) 5.7 2.2Level of Service A AApproach Delay (s) 5.7 2.2 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis36: Mill Avenue & Mill 9th Ave Station Ped Signal 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 1280 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1416 4678Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 1416 4678Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1066 0 0 1391 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1066 0 0 1391 0Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 60 0Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 78.0 78.0Effective Green, g (s) 78.0 78.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1004 3317v/s Ratio Prot c0.75 0.30v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 1.06 0.42Uniform Delay, d1 16.0 6.6Progression Factor 0.31 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 37.7 0.4Delay (s) 42.7 7.0Level of Service D AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 42.7 7.0Approach LOS A A D A


HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis37: Rural Station Ped Signal 1 5/7/2015




HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis38: Apache Boulevard & Rural Station Ped Signal 2 5/7/2015


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 0 1068 0 0 646 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 6.0 6.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.95Frt 1.00 1.00Flt Protected 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 3539Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 3539Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1161 0 0 702 0 0 0 0 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1161 0 0 702 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Turn Type NA NAProtected Phases 1 1Permitted PhasesActuated Green, G (s) 82.0 82.0Effective Green, g (s) 82.0 82.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75Clearance Time (s) 6.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 2638 2638v/s Ratio Prot c0.33 0.20v/s Ratio Permv/c Ratio 0.44 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 5.3 4.4Progression Factor 0.11 0.71Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.2Delay (s) 1.1 3.4Level of Service A AApproach Delay (s) 1.1 3.4 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A A A A




Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsVolume (vph) 252 951 263 192 489 109 166 1041 190 238 1306 197Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.91 0.97 0.91Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.96Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 1762 3518 1402 1770 3539 1421 3433 4796 3433 4764Flt Permitted 0.16 1.00 1.00 0.14 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 303 3518 1402 264 3539 1421 3433 4796 3433 4764Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92Growth Factor (vph) 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122% 122%Adj. Flow (vph) 334 1261 349 255 648 145 220 1380 252 316 1732 261RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 40 0 0 68 0 24 0 0 18 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 334 1261 309 255 648 77 220 1608 0 316 1975 0Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 102 107 107 102 165 123 123 165Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 13 13 13 13Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 7 0Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+ov pm+pt NA pm+ov Prot NA Prot NAProtected Phases 1 6 3 5 2 7 3 8 7 4Permitted Phases 6 6 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 47.0 33.0 42.0 37.2 27.2 37.2 9.0 36.0 10.0 37.0Effective Green, g (s) 48.0 36.0 46.0 39.2 30.2 41.2 11.0 39.0 12.0 40.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.33 0.42 0.36 0.27 0.37 0.10 0.35 0.11 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 6.0 5.0 5.0 6.0 5.0 6.0Vehicle Extension (s) 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 355 1151 586 244 971 532 343 1700 374 1732v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 c0.36 0.05 c0.10 0.18 0.02 0.06 0.34 c0.09 c0.41v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.17 0.27 0.04v/c Ratio 0.94 1.10 0.53 1.05 0.67 0.14 0.64 0.95 0.84 1.14Uniform Delay, d1 26.4 37.0 23.9 30.0 35.4 22.7 47.6 34.5 48.1 35.0Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 32.4 56.6 0.4 69.9 3.6 0.0 3.1 12.3 15.3 70.6Delay (s) 58.8 93.6 24.3 99.9 39.1 22.8 50.7 46.8 63.4 105.6Level of Service E F C F D C D D E FApproach Delay (s) 75.2 51.6 47.2 99.8Approach LOS E D D F

Intersection SummaryHCM 2000 Control Delay 72.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service EHCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.10Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.3% ICU Level of Service GAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

lscott

Typewritten Text

lscott

Typewritten Text

This page was intentionally left blank.

lscott

Typewritten Text

lscott

Typewritten Text

Appendix D Transportation Technical Report

Documents

Transcript of Appendix D Transportation Technical Report