APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L:...

139
APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 Data for previous years in this Annual Report may differ slightly from the numbers in the prior Annual Report. This is because complaint data is subject to change during the course of an investigation. For example, an allegation may be included in the early part of the investigation and then not pleaded after a closer look at the evidence. Therefore, numbers run from the CCRB database at one point in time may slightly differ from numbers run from another point in time. Rather than reusing the counts published in prior years, we have updated all counts to provide you with the most up to date data. In addition, when discussing closed cases, we now use the case closing date (the date a complaint is marked as closed in our database) rather than the panel date (the date a panel is scheduled to vote on a complaint) as the date which marks final closure of a complaint. All of these changes are minor and do not affect the substance of any previous reports. A Note on Methodology

Transcript of APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L:...

Page 1: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

APPENDIXCCRB COMPLAINT DATA

2015

Data for previous years in this Annual Report may differ slightly from the numbers in the prior Annual Report. This is because complaint data is subject to change during the course of an investigation. For example, an allegation may be included in the early part of the investigation and then not pleaded after a closer look at the evidence. Therefore, numbers run from the CCRB database at one point in time may slightly differ from numbers run from another point in time. Rather than reusing the counts published in prior years, we have updated all counts to provide you with the most up to date data. In addition, when discussing closed cases, we now use the case closing date (the date a complaint is marked as closed in our database) rather than the panel date (the date a panel is scheduled to vote on a complaint) as the date which marks final closure of a complaint. All of these changes are minor and do not affect the substance of any previous reports.

A Note on Methodology

Page 2: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Title Page

Table 1A: Total Allegations and Total Complaints Received------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11

Table 1B: Types of Allegations in Complaints Received----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12

Table 1C: Total Intake------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13

Table 2: Distributions of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14

Table 3: Distributions of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15

Table 4: Distributions of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16

Table 5: Distributions of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17

Table 6: Where Civilian Complaints Were Reported---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18

Table 7A: How Complaints Filed with the CCRB Were Reported------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19

Table 7B: How Complaints Filed with the NYPD Were Reported------------------------------------------------------------------------ 20

Table 8: Race of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics----------------------------------------------------------- 21

Table 9: Race of Subject Officers Compared to New York City Police Department Demographics---------------------------------------- 22

Table of Contents

2

Page 3: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 10: Sex of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics----------------------------------------------------------- 23

Table 11: Gender of Subject Officers Compared to NYPD Demographics---------------------------------------------------------------- 24

Table 12: Age of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics----------------------------------------------------------- 25

Table 13: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct---------------------------------------------------------- 26

Table 13A: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Manhattan--------------------------------------------- 27

Table 13B: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Bronx------------------------------------------------- 28

Table 13C: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Brooklyn---------------------------------------------- 29

Table 13D: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Queens------------------------------------------------ 30

Table 13E: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Staten Island----------------------------------------- 31

Table 15: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough or Other Commands----------------------------------------------------------- 32

Table 15A: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Manhattan South------------------------------------------------------------ 33

Table 15B: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Manhattan North------------------------------------------------------------ 34

Table 15C: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Bronx---------------------------------------------------------------------- 35

3

Page 4: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15D: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Brooklyn South------------------------------------------------------------- 36

Table 15E: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Brooklyn North------------------------------------------------------------- 37

Table 15F: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens South--------------------------------------------------------------- 38

Table 15G: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens North--------------------------------------------------------------- 39

Table 15H: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Staten Island-------------------------------------------------------------- 40

Table 15I: Attribution of Complaints to Special Operations Division--------------------------------------------------------------- 41

Table 15J: Attribution of Complaints to Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands----------------------------------------------------- 42

Table 15K: Attribution of Complaints to Traffic Control Division------------------------------------------------------------------ 43

Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44

Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints to Housing Bureau---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 45

Table 15N: Attribution of Complaints to Organized Crime Control Bureau------------------------------------------------------------ 46

Table 15O: Attribution of Complaints to Detective Bureau-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 47

Table 15P: Attribution of Complaints to Other Bureaus----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48

4

Page 5: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15Q: Attribution of Complaints to Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands------------------------------------------- 49

Table 16: Reasons for Police-Civilian Encounters that Led to a Complaint---------------------------------------------------------- 50

Table 17: Charges Stemming from Encounter----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 52

Table 18A: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Cases Measured from Date of Report-------------------------------------------------- 53

Table 18B: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Substantiated Cases Measured from Date of Report------------------------------------ 54

Table 19: Rate at Which the CCRB Made Findings on the Merits---------------------------------------------------------------------- 55

Table 20: Age of Docket* Measured from the Date of Incident----------------------------------------------------------------------- 56

Table 21: Age of Docket* Measured from the Date of Report------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57

Table 22A: Age of Substantiated Cases from the Date of Incident------------------------------------------------------------------- 58

Table 23A: Age of Substantiated Cases from the Date of Report--------------------------------------------------------------------- 59

Table 24A: Disposition of Cases--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60

Table 24B: Disposition of Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 61

Table 25: Disposition of Force Allegations---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 62

5

Page 6: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 25A: Disposition of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 63

Table 25B: Disposition of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64

Table 25C: Disposition of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 65

Table 25D: Disposition of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66

Table 25E: Disposition of Force Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 67

Table 26: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 68

Table 26A: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69

Table 26B: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 70

Table 26C: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 71

Table 26D: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 72

Table 26E: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 73

Table 27: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 74

Table 27A: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 75

6

Page 7: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 27B: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 76

Table 27C: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 77

Table 27D: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 78

Table 27E: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 79

Table 28: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 80

Table 28A: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 81

Table 28B: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82

Table 28C: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83

Table 28D: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84

Table 28E: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 85

Table 29: Disposition of Specific Race-related Offensive Language Allegations----------------------------------------------------- 86

Table 30: CCRB Disciplinary Recommendations for Substantiated Cases--------------------------------------------------------------- 87

Table 32: Police Department Disciplinary Penalties Imposed by Year of NYPD Closure------------------------------------------------ 89

7

Page 8: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 33: Determinations to Recommend Other Misconduct Noted (OMN) Allegations---------------------------------------------------- 90

Table 34: Misconduct Rate--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 91

Table 35: Race of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated-------------------------------------------------------------------- 92

Table 36: Race of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated------------------------------------------------------------ 93

Table 37: Gender of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated------------------------------------------------------------------ 94

Table 38: Gender of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated---------------------------------------------------------- 95

Table 39: Age of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated--------------------------------------------------------------------- 96

Table 40: Education of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated------------------------------------------------------- 97

Table 41: Residence of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated----------------------------------------------- 98

Table 42: Rank of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated---------------------------------------------------- 99

Table 43: Tenure at Incident of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated-------------------------------------- 100

Table 44A: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Manhattan------------------------------------------- 101

Table 44B: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Bronx----------------------------------------------- 102

8

Page 9: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44C: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Brooklyn-------------------------------------------- 103

Table 44D: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Queens---------------------------------------------- 104

Table 44E: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Staten Island--------------------------------------- 105

Table 45: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated------------------------------------------------------ 106

Table 46A: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Manhattan South---------------------- 107

Table 46B: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Manhattan North---------------------- 108

Table 46C: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Bronx-------------------------------- 109

Table 46D: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Brooklyn South----------------------- 110

Table 46E: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Brooklyn North----------------------- 111

Table 46F: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Queens South------------------------- 112

Table 46G: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Queens North------------------------- 113

Table 46H: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Staten Island------------------------ 114

Table 46I: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Special Operations Division------------------------- 115

9

Page 10: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46J: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands--------------- 116

Table 46K: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Traffic Control Division---------------------------- 117

Table 46L: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Transit Bureau-------------------------------------- 118

Table 46M: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Housing Bureau-------------------------------------- 120

Table 46N: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Organized Crime Control Bureau---------------------- 121

Table 46O: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Detective Bureau------------------------------------ 122

Table 46P: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated - Other Bureaus------------------------------------- 123

Table 46Q: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated to Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands-- 124

Table 47: MOS Who Have Received At Least One CCRB Complaint----------------------------------------------------------------------- 125

10

Page 11: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Force (F) 4,832 29.4% 4,615 29.4% 4,695 31.7% 4,197 30.7% 3,684 28.8%

Abuse of Authority (A) 7,953 48.3% 7,692 49.0% 7,063 47.7% 6,646 48.6% 6,685 52.3%

Discourtesy (D) 3,152 19.2% 2,872 18.3% 2,572 17.4% 2,337 17.1% 1,986 15.5%

Offensive Language (O) 520 3.2% 504 3.2% 475 3.2% 481 3.5% 417 3.3%

Total Allegations 16457 100.0% 15683 100.0% 14805 100.0% 13661 100.0% 12772 100.0%

Total Complaints 5,969 5,742 5,388 4,777 4,461

Monthly Rate* 497 478 449 398 372

Table 1A: Total Allegations and Total Complaints Received 2011 - 2015

* Monthly rate refers to the average monthly number.

11

Page 12: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Force (F) 2,891 48.4% 2,844 49.5% 2,793 51.8% 2,411 50.5% 2,086 46.8%

Abuse of Authority (A) 3,607 60.4% 3,495 60.9% 3,069 57.0% 2,891 60.5% 2,818 63.2%

Discourtesy (D) 2,549 42.7% 2,381 41.5% 2,076 38.5% 1,819 38.1% 1,514 33.9%

Offensive Language (O) 459 7.7% 454 7.9% 430 8.0% 429 9.0% 363 8.1%

Total Complaints 5,969 5,742 5,388 4,777 4,461

Table 1B: Types of Allegations in Complaints Received 2011 - 2015*

* This table presents the number of complaints containing one or more allegations of each FADO type.

12

Page 13: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Complaints within CCRB jurisdiction

5,969 37.1% 5,742 39.1% 5,388 46.7% 4,777 38.0% 4,461 41.3%

Referrals to Office of the Chief of Department

8,185 50.9% 7,271 49.6% 5,034 43.6% 6,403 51.0% 5,257 48.7%

Referrals to Internal Affairs Bureau

1,739 10.8% 1,452 9.9% 936 8.1% 1,218 9.7% 834 7.7%

Referrals to Other Agencies

189 1.2% 203 1.4% 178 1.5% 164 1.3% 244 2.3%

Total Intake 16,082 100% 14,668 100% 11,536 100% 12,562 100% 10,796 100%

Monthly Rate* 1,340 1,222 961 1,047 900

Table 1C: Total Intake 2011 - 2015

* Monthly rate refers to the average monthly number.

13

Page 14: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 2: Distributions of Force Allegations 2011 - 2015

Type of Force Allegation2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Animal 5 0.1% 1 0.0% 2 0.0% 1 0.0% 2 0.1%

Chokehold 163 3.4% 163 3.5% 202 4.3% 244 5.8% 172 4.7%

Flashlight as club 20 0.4% 16 0.3% 7 0.1% 7 0.2% 3 0.1%

Gun as club 33 0.7% 22 0.5% 21 0.4% 15 0.4% 13 0.4%

Gun fired 21 0.4% 10 0.2% 9 0.2% 11 0.3% 9 0.2%

Gun Pointed 285 5.9% 275 6.0% 299 6.4% 268 6.4% 191 5.2%

Handcuffs too tight 47 1.0% 42 0.9% 39 0.8% 64 1.5% 35 1.0%

Hit against inanimate object 145 3.0% 128 2.8% 159 3.4% 140 3.3% 103 2.8%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)

252 5.2% 218 4.7% 181 3.9% 165 3.9% 131 3.6%

Nonlethal restraining device 25 0.5% 32 0.7% 49 1.0% 74 1.8% 106 2.9%

Other 18 0.4% 26 0.6% 73 1.6% 111 2.6% 162 4.4%

Other blunt instrument as a club

56 1.2% 58 1.3% 39 0.8% 44 1.0% 23 0.6%

Pepper spray 281 5.8% 206 4.5% 188 4.0% 148 3.5% 118 3.2%

Physical force* 3,416 70.7% 3,368 73.0% 3,372 71.8% 2,856 68.0% 2,578 70.0%

Police shield 8 0.2% 6 0.1% 8 0.2% 10 0.2% 5 0.1%

Radio as club 30 0.6% 23 0.5% 14 0.3% 18 0.4% 6 0.2%

Vehicle 27 0.6% 21 0.5% 33 0.7% 21 0.5% 27 0.7%

Total 4,832 100.0% 4,615 100.0% 4,695 100.0% 4,197 100.0% 3,684 100.0%

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped and bit.

14

Page 15: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 3: Distributions of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2011 - 2015

Type of Abuse of Authority Allegation2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Failure to show search warrant 45 0.6% 62 0.8% 51 0.7% 72 1.1% 83 1.2%

Frisk 704 8.9% 650 8.5% 592 8.4% 477 7.2% 393 5.9%

Gun Drawn 118 1.5% 119 1.5% 120 1.7% 125 1.9% 97 1.5%

Improper dissemination of medical info 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 40 0.5% 38 0.5% 56 0.8% 72 1.1% 204 3.1%

Premises entered and/or searched 735 9.2% 795 10.3% 742 10.5% 843 12.7% 781 11.7%

Property damaged 136 1.7% 204 2.7% 153 2.2% 239 3.6% 241 3.6%

Question 186 2.3% 160 2.1% 159 2.3% 161 2.4% 164 2.5%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 142 1.8% 147 1.9% 172 2.4% 155 2.3% 157 2.3%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 92 1.2% 76 1.0% 65 0.9% 63 0.9% 102 1.5%

Refusal to provide name/shield number 773 9.7% 755 9.8% 707 10.0% 747 11.2% 910 13.6%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 4 0.1%

Retaliatory arrest 14 0.2% 3 0.0% 12 0.2% 13 0.2% 8 0.1%

Retaliatory summons 34 0.4% 23 0.3% 29 0.4% 26 0.4% 43 0.6%

Search (of person) 1135 14.3% 1015 13.2% 822 11.6% 693 10.4% 586 8.8%

Seizure of property 36 0.5% 28 0.4% 48 0.7% 30 0.5% 53 0.8%

Stop 1444 18.2% 1257 16.3% 1043 14.8% 867 13.0% 782 11.7%

Strip-searched 233 2.9% 234 3.0% 228 3.2% 206 3.1% 136 2.0%

Threat of arrest 722 9.1% 694 9.0% 654 9.3% 544 8.2% 635 9.5%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 514 6.5% 506 6.6% 419 5.9% 419 6.3% 367 5.5%

Threat of summons 33 0.4% 41 0.5% 42 0.6% 47 0.7% 69 1.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 52 0.7% 60 0.8% 55 0.8% 59 0.9% 66 1.0%

Threat to notify ACS 54 0.7% 30 0.4% 34 0.5% 35 0.5% 39 0.6%

Vehicle search 401 5.0% 467 6.1% 487 6.9% 443 6.7% 373 5.6%

Vehicle stop 309 3.9% 328 4.3% 373 5.3% 307 4.6% 392 5.9%

Total 7953 100.0% 7692 100.0% 7063 100.0% 6646 100.0% 6685 100.0%

15

Page 16: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 4: Distributions of Discourtesy Allegations 2011 - 2015

Type of Discourtesy Allegation

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Action 160 5.1% 132 4.6% 181 7.0% 217 9.3% 226 11.4%

Demeanor/tone 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 8 0.3% 3 0.1% 6 0.3%

Gesture 30 1.0% 25 0.9% 24 0.9% 18 0.8% 23 1.2%

Other 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 4 0.2% 4 0.2% 7 0.4%

Word 2956 93.8% 2709 94.3% 2355 91.6% 2095 89.6% 1724 86.8%

Total 3152 100.0% 2872 100.0% 2572 100.0% 2337 100.0% 1986 100.0%

16

Page 17: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 5: Distributions of Offensive Language Allegations 2011 - 2015

Type of Offensive Language Allegation

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

Ethnicity 81 15.6% 59 11.7% 61 12.8% 73 15.2% 55 13.2%

Gender 78 15.0% 58 11.5% 75 15.8% 89 18.5% 79 18.9%

Other 21 4.0% 14 2.8% 21 4.4% 17 3.5% 27 6.5%

Physical disability 7 1.3% 8 1.6% 14 2.9% 9 1.9% 8 1.9%

Race 269 51.7% 287 56.9% 243 51.2% 234 48.6% 182 43.6%

Religion 10 1.9% 14 2.8% 9 1.9% 14 2.9% 17 4.1%

Sexual orientation 54 10.4% 64 12.7% 52 10.9% 45 9.4% 49 11.8%

Total 520 100.0% 504 100.0% 475 100.0% 481 100.0% 417 100.0%

17

Page 18: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 6: Where Civilian Complaints Were Reported 2011 - 2015

Where Civilian Complaints Were Reported

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total Count % of Total

CCRB 3675 61.6% 3313 57.7% 2589 48.1% 2985 62.5% 2418 54.2%

NYPD 2280 38.2% 2413 42.0% 2784 51.7% 1777 37.2% 2001 44.9%

OTHER 14 0.2% 16 0.3% 15 0.3% 15 0.3% 42 0.9%

Total 5969 100.0% 5742 100.0% 5388 100.0% 4777 100.0% 4461 100.0%

18

Page 19: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

How Complaints Filed with the CCRB Were

Reported

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Phone 1,755 47.8% 1,431 43.2% 1,209 46.7% 1,510 50.6% 1,078 44.6%

In-person 136 3.7% 130 3.9% 140 5.4% 149 5.0% 123 5.1%

Mail 63 1.7% 71 2.1% 86 3.3% 58 1.9% 54 2.2%

Call Processing System 1,253 34.1% 1,089 32.9% 571 22.1% 744 24.9% 605 25.0%

E-mail 6 0.2% 50 1.5% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 6 0.2%

On-line website 458 12.5% 538 16.2% 579 22.4% 519 17.4% 551 22.8%

Fax 4 0.1% 4 0.1% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 1 0.0%

Total Complaints 3,675 100% 3,313 100% 2,589 100% 2,985 100% 2,418 100%

Table 7A: How Complaints Filed with the CCRB Were Reported 2011 - 2015

19

Page 20: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

How Complaints Filed with the NYPD Were

Reported

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Phone 2,182 95.7% 2,274 94.2% 2,671 95.9% 1,725 97.1% 1,905 95.4%

In-person 83 3.6% 120 5.0% 85 3.1% 44 2.5% 62 3.1%

Mail 5 0.2% 4 0.2% 9 0.3% 4 0.2% 9 0.5%

E-mail / internet / fax 10 0.4% 15 0.6% 19 0.7% 4 0.2% 20 1.0%

Total Complaints 2,280 100% 2,413 100% 2,784 100% 1,777 100% 1,996 100%

Table 7B: How Complaints Filed with the NYPD Were Reported 2011 - 2015

20

Page 21: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5-Year Total NYCPop. %

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

White 726 12.1% 741 12.7% 663 12.7% 642 12.9% 678 14.8% 3,450 13.0% 33.3%

Black 3,369 56.1% 3,281 56.3% 2,903 55.5% 2,718 54.6% 2,376 51.9% 14,647 55.0% 25.5%

Hispanic 1,603 26.7% 1,491 25.6% 1,373 26.3% 1,308 26.3% 1,176 25.7% 6,951 26.1% 28.6%

Asian 131 2.2% 123 2.1% 130 2.5% 127 2.6% 182 4.0% 693 2.6% 12.7%

Others 172 2.9% 196 3.4% 160 3.1% 185 3.7% 166 3.6% 879 3.3% 0.8%

Subtotal 6,001 100.0% 5,832 100.0% 5,229 100.0% 4,980 100.0% 4,578 100.0% 26,620 100.0% 100.0%

Unknown 2,851 2,672 2,556 1,931 1,677 11,687

Total 8,852 8,504 7,785 6,911 6,255 38,307

Table 8: Race of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics 2011 - 2015

21

Page 22: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 9: Race of Subject Officers Compared to New York City Police Department Demographics 2011 - 2015

Race

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count % of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Count % of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Count % of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Count % of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Count % of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

White 2928 50.4% 52% 2684 49.9% 52% 2917 52.1% 52% 2455 49.8% 52% 2417 51.4% 51%

Black 1019 17.5% 16% 941 17.5% 16% 937 16.7% 16% 818 16.6% 16% 709 15.1% 15%

Hispanic 1589 27.3% 26% 1511 28.1% 26% 1468 26.2% 26% 1409 28.6% 27% 1289 27.4% 27%

Asian 267 4.6% 5% 228 4.2% 5% 268 4.8% 6% 238 4.8% 6% 281 6.0% 7%

Other 11 0.2% 0% 19 0.4% 0% 6 0.1% 0% 7 0.1% 0% 5 0.1% 0%

Subtotal 5814 100.0% 100% 5383 100.0% 100% 5596 100.0% 100% 4927 100.0% 100% 4701 100.0% 100%

Officer unidentified 3831 65.9% 0% 3921 72.8% 0% 3303 59.0% 0% 3054 62.0% 0% 2594 55.2% 0%

Total 9645 9304 8899 7981 7295

22

Page 23: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5-Year Total NYC Pop %

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

Male 6,039 71.5% 5,603 70.5% 5,263 71.5% 4,673 70.3% 4,223 69.9% 25,801 70.8% 47.50

Female 2,408 28.5% 2,346 29.5% 2,100 28.5% 1,976 29.7% 1,817 30.1% 10,647 29.2% 52.50

Subtotal 8,447 100.0% 7,949 100.0% 7,363 100.0% 6,649 100.0% 6,040 100.0% 36,448 100.0% 100.0%

Unknown/Other 405 4.8% 555 7.0% 422 5.7% 262 3.9% 215 3.6% 1,859 100.0%

Total 8,852 8,504 7,785 6,911 6,255 38,307

Table 10: Gender of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics 2011 - 2015

23

Page 24: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Male 5,042 90.2% 83% 4,671 90.2% 83% 4,893 91.2% 83% 4,356 91.0% 83% 4,203 90.7% 83%

Female 548 9.8% 17% 510 9.8% 17% 475 8.8% 17% 430 9.0% 17% 431 9.3% 17%

Total 5,590 100.0% 100.0% 5,181 100.0% 100.0% 5,368 100.0% 100.0% 4,786 100.0% 100.0% 4,634 100.0% 100.0%

Unknown 3,749 3,827 3,179 2,972 2,532

Total 9,339 9,008 8,547 7,758 7,166

Table 11: Gender of Subject Officers Compared to NYPD Demographics 2011 - 2015

24

Page 25: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5-Year Total NYC Pop %

Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total Number % of Total

14 and under 128 2.0% 123 2.0% 122 1.9% 113 2.0% 92 1.7% 578 2.0% 18%

15-24 2,022 32.1% 1,881 30.9% 1,855 29.5% 1,518 27.0% 1,355 25.5% 8,631 29.1% 14%

25-34 1,766 28.0% 1,699 27.9% 1,875 29.8% 1,626 28.9% 1,653 31.1% 8,619 29.1% 17%

35-44 1,150 18.3% 1,141 18.7% 1,135 18.1% 1,077 19.2% 957 18.0% 5,460 18.4% 14%

45-54 882 14.0% 856 14.0% 851 13.5% 812 14.5% 780 14.7% 4,181 14.1% 14%

55-64 271 4.3% 318 5.2% 328 5.2% 361 6.4% 346 6.5% 1,624 5.5% 11%

65 and over 82 1.3% 76 1.2% 119 1.9% 112 2.0% 138 2.6% 527 1.8% 12%

Subtotal 6,301 100.0% 6,094 100.0% 6,285 100.0% 5,619 100.0% 5,321 100.0% 29,620 100.0% 100.0%

Unknown 2,551 2,410 1,500 1,292 933 8,686 100.0%

Total 8,852 8,504 7,785 6,911 6,254 38,306

Table 12: Age of Alleged Victims Compared to New York City Demographics 2011 - 2015

* Source: https://www.health.ny.gov/statistics/vital_statistics/2010/table01.htm

25

Page 26: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Borough 2011 - 2015

Citywide 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Bronx 1,457 1,265 1,079 1,012 973 5,786

Brooklyn 2,018 1,976 1,841 1,596 1,449 8,880

Manhattan 1,325 1,308 1,265 1,073 1,059 6,030

Queens 910 901 930 787 759 4,287

Staten Island 230 259 243 265 179 1,176

New York City 5,940 5,709 5,358 4,733 4,419 26,159

Outside NYC 29 33 30 44 42 178

Total 5,969 5,742 5,388 4,777 4,461 26,337

26

Page 27: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13A: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Manhattan 2011 - 2015

Manhattan South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

001 Precinct 76 73 40 51 42 282

005 Precinct 40 43 51 27 41 202

006 Precinct 71 63 56 58 49 297

007 Precinct 53 55 42 35 37 222

009 Precinct 51 67 70 37 48 273

010 Precinct 44 34 43 24 33 178

013 Precinct 51 62 60 38 49 260

017 Precinct 46 42 41 26 32 187

Midtown North Precinct 67 77 80 67 67 358

Midtown South Precinct 97 90 99 100 87 473

Manhattan South Total 596 606 582 463 485 2,732

Manhattan North

019 Precinct 45 38 36 38 46 203

020 Precinct 40 26 35 40 26 167

023 Precinct 98 93 82 59 85 417

024 Precinct 36 46 49 44 29 204

025 Precinct 100 87 93 89 88 457

026 Precinct 30 42 43 31 31 177

028 Precinct 80 72 76 66 46 340

030 Precinct 39 44 58 44 49 234

032 Precinct 120 105 60 78 63 426

033 Precinct 62 46 60 45 46 259

034 Precinct 67 92 72 61 51 343

Central Park Precinct 2 5 6 3 6 22

Manhattan North Total 719 696 670 598 566 3,249

Manhattan Total 1,315 1,302 1,252 1,061 1,051 5,981

27

Page 28: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13B: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Bronx 2011 - 2015

Bronx 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

040 Precinct 103 165 154 148 141 711

041 Precinct 120 102 83 72 60 437

042 Precinct 95 102 85 76 106 464

043 Precinct 145 114 98 109 82 548

044 Precinct 215 197 136 131 93 772

045 Precinct 50 37 33 39 33 192

046 Precinct 209 142 102 109 101 663

047 Precinct 164 134 116 107 106 627

048 Precinct 132 79 87 68 71 437

049 Precinct 53 60 39 44 58 254

050 Precinct 28 31 24 31 34 148

052 Precinct 142 94 113 76 87 512

Bronx Total 1,456 1,257 1,070 1,010 972 5,765

28

Page 29: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13C: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Brooklyn 2011 - 2015

Brooklyn South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

060 Precinct 83 81 73 82 84 403

061 Precinct 45 52 47 51 31 226

062 Precinct 35 32 36 44 39 186

063 Precinct 46 61 46 41 39 233

066 Precinct 21 16 25 20 29 111

067 Precinct 109 114 109 101 98 531

068 Precinct 37 38 30 29 22 156

069 Precinct 52 53 57 57 53 272

070 Precinct 124 115 107 68 67 481

071 Precinct 93 102 88 70 78 431

072 Precinct 47 50 51 43 35 226

076 Precinct 32 51 30 22 28 163

078 Precinct 21 17 33 33 39 143

Brooklyn South Total 745 782 732 661 642 3,562

Brooklyn North

073 Precinct 212 205 161 149 126 853

075 Precinct 347 287 264 231 215 1,344

077 Precinct 159 107 120 101 64 551

079 Precinct 135 161 183 104 85 668

081 Precinct 126 97 105 90 78 496

083 Precinct 102 119 87 80 58 446

084 Precinct 51 47 64 42 44 248

088 Precinct 41 51 41 45 55 233

090 Precinct 67 68 51 53 46 285

094 Precinct 25 33 30 27 20 135

Brooklyn North Total 1,265 1,175 1,106 922 791 5,259

Brooklyn Total 2,010 1,957 1,838 1,583 1,433 8,821

29

Page 30: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13D: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Queens 2011 - 2015

Queens South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

100 Precinct 35 32 28 25 31 151

101 Precinct 85 91 74 69 59 378

102 Precinct 48 51 57 35 52 243

103 Precinct 108 99 124 96 108 535

105 Precinct 71 74 75 64 80 364

106 Precinct 61 64 49 43 40 257

107 Precinct 36 37 46 34 35 188

113 Precinct 102 100 109 121 94 526

Queens South Total 546 548 562 487 499 2,642

Queens North

104 Precinct 51 49 50 48 26 224

108 Precinct 21 35 22 23 28 129

109 Precinct 54 46 48 37 30 215

110 Precinct 56 38 52 36 37 219

111 Precinct 21 22 17 17 18 95

112 Precinct 26 23 28 21 22 120

114 Precinct 63 81 83 71 51 349

115 Precinct 73 55 64 39 44 275

Queens North Total 365 349 364 292 256 1,626

Queens Total 911 897 926 779 755 4,268

30

Page 31: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 13E: Where Incidents that Led to a Complaint Took Place by Precinct - Staten Island 2011 - 2015

Staten Island 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

120 Precinct 149 177 124 101 58 609

121 Precinct 0 0 41 107 60 208

122 Precinct 64 63 63 39 34 263

123 Precinct 16 17 12 16 26 87

Staten Island Total 229 257 240 263 178 1,167

Outside City / Unidentified 48 72 62 81 72 335

31

Page 32: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Patrol Services Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Patrol Borough Manhattan South Total 282 258 283 211 242 1276

Patrol Borough Manhattan North Total 389 369 399 286 279 1722

Patrol Borough Bronx Total 799 705 592 530 526 3152

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Total 410 468 435 347 369 2029

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Total 611 588 588 419 423 2629

Patrol Borough Queens South Total 318 295 335 245 271 1464

Patrol Borough Queens North Total 207 194 205 158 149 913

Patrol Borough Staten Island Total 117 149 145 145 109 665

Special Operations Division Total 25 22 39 34 54 174

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands Total 0 3 0 1 1 5

Total 3,158 3,051 3,021 2,376 2,423 14,029

Other Bureaus

Traffic Control Division Total 57 52 46 42 64 261

Transit Bureau Total 175 177 213 151 143 859

Housing Bureau Total 239 266 255 207 226 1193

Organized Crime Control Bureau Total 352 298 273 220 185 1328

Detective Bureau Total 166 174 217 206 196 959

Other Bureaus Total 45 53 73 66 83 320

Total 1,034 1,020 1,077 892 897 4,920

Other Commands

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands Total

30 38 36 27 32 163

Total 4,222 4,109 4,134 3,295 3,352 19,112

Table 15: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough or Other Commands* 2011 - 2015

* Since complaints with allegations against subject officers assigned to more than one command are assigned to each of the commands with a subject officer, the total number of complaints appears higher than the total annual complaints listed in Table 1.

32

Page 33: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15A: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Manhattan South 2011 - 2015

Manhattan South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

001 Precinct 29 25 16 20 16 106005 Precinct 13 12 24 11 22 82006 Precinct 40 30 34 36 28 168007 Precinct 32 20 20 15 18 105009 Precinct 21 26 27 9 15 98010 Precinct 33 19 20 16 15 103013 Precinct 19 25 31 14 27 116Midtown South Precinct 23 24 34 26 33 140017 Precinct 17 20 24 14 14 89Midtown North Precinct 27 28 28 26 29 138Precincts Total 254 229 258 187 217 1,145Patrol Borough Manhattan South Task Force 7 3 4 8 4 26Patrol Borough Manhattan South HQ 20 25 14 15 18 92Patrol Borough Manhattan South Anti-Crime Unit 1 1 7 1 3 13Patrol Borough Manhattan South Total 282 258 283 211 242 1,276

33

Page 34: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15B: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Manhattan North 2011 - 2015

Manhattan North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

019 Precinct 25 18 21 18 25 107020 Precinct 22 20 25 23 16 106023 Precinct 39 36 34 22 28 159024 Precinct 16 30 31 23 10 110025 Precinct 39 37 33 35 25 169026 Precinct 11 17 14 8 10 60Central Park Precinct 4 9 8 10 6 37028 Precinct 31 19 33 29 33 145030 Precinct 29 22 36 19 25 131032 Precinct 48 41 28 32 26 175033 Precinct 25 28 35 19 25 132034 Precinct 41 44 45 26 29 185Precincts Total 330 321 343 264 258 1,516Patrol Borough Manhattan North Task Force 8 5 15 5 1 34Patrol Borough Manhattan North HQ 40 41 38 16 19 154Patrol Borough Manhattan North Anti-Crime Unit 11 2 3 1 1 18Manhattan North Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Manhattan North Total 389 369 399 286 279 1,722

34

Page 35: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15C: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Bronx 2011 - 2015

Bronx 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

040 Precinct 18 48 54 48 57 225041 Precinct 43 53 42 32 33 203042 Precinct 46 36 39 33 56 210043 Precinct 51 38 35 40 31 195044 Precinct 107 97 67 66 46 383045 Precinct 27 22 17 20 20 106046 Precinct 92 78 44 44 55 313047 Precinct 58 59 62 44 60 283048 Precinct 63 34 34 25 29 185049 Precinct 35 24 22 21 31 133050 Precinct 18 12 13 14 17 74052 Precinct 46 50 51 37 27 211Precincts Total 604 551 480 424 462 2,521Patrol Borough Bronx Task Force 11 17 7 4 0 39Patrol Borough Bronx HQ 181 136 101 100 63 581Patrol Borough Bronx Anti-Crime Unit 3 1 4 2 1 11Bronx Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Bronx Total 799 705 592 530 526 3,152

35

Page 36: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15D: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Brooklyn South 2011 - 2015

Brooklyn South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

060 Precinct 25 24 22 24 30 125061 Precinct 25 27 23 30 14 119062 Precinct 23 23 24 20 27 117063 Precinct 32 35 30 26 20 143066 Precinct 11 15 16 9 20 71067 Precinct 41 48 47 36 40 212068 Precinct 19 23 17 17 13 89069 Precinct 29 30 38 26 27 150070 Precinct 66 52 63 30 30 241071 Precinct 41 52 38 37 55 223072 Precinct 25 29 27 22 24 127076 Precinct 10 25 15 11 9 70078 Precinct 12 12 19 14 20 77Precincts Total 359 395 379 302 329 1,764Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Task Force 7 9 7 4 0 27Patrol Borough Brooklyn South HQ 40 61 38 35 26 200Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Anti-Crime Unit 4 3 11 6 14 38Brooklyn South Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Total 410 468 435 347 369 2,029

36

Page 37: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15E: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Brooklyn North 2011 - 2015

Brooklyn North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

073 Precinct 57 56 50 45 38 246075 Precinct 109 100 98 91 90 488077 Precinct 69 53 59 39 33 253079 Precinct 51 54 85 40 51 281081 Precinct 59 47 39 33 38 216083 Precinct 58 55 50 33 22 218084 Precinct 11 20 27 19 17 94088 Precinct 18 17 18 15 23 91090 Precinct 22 28 22 25 17 114094 Precinct 16 17 19 18 16 86Precincts Total 470 447 467 358 345 2,087Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Task Force 7 8 11 7 2 35Patrol Borough Brooklyn North HQ 129 125 103 53 70 480Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Anti-Crime Unit 5 8 7 1 6 27Brooklyn North Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Total 611 588 588 419 423 2,629

37

Page 38: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15F: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens South 2011 - 2015

Queens South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

100 Precinct 18 14 18 13 15 78101 Precinct 56 51 41 38 30 216102 Precinct 21 24 27 22 33 127103 Precinct 56 38 65 33 54 246105 Precinct 48 40 45 29 52 214106 Precinct 29 33 22 21 17 122107 Precinct 15 16 20 19 18 88113 Precinct 51 52 60 51 34 248Precincts Total 294 268 298 226 253 1,339Patrol Borough Queens South Task Force 3 5 5 2 0 15Patrol Borough Queens South HQ 20 18 31 17 16 102Patrol Borough Queens South Anti-Crime Unit 1 4 1 0 2 8Queens South Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Queens South Total 318 295 335 245 271 1,464

38

Page 39: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15G: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Queens North 2011 - 2015

Queens North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

104 Precinct 31 31 35 27 14 138108 Precinct 13 29 12 16 20 90109 Precinct 29 24 28 17 16 114110 Precinct 28 19 30 17 18 112111 Precinct 17 13 7 9 10 56112 Precinct 15 14 19 14 15 77114 Precinct 32 33 26 29 22 142115 Precinct 24 20 32 20 27 123Precincts Total 189 183 189 149 142 852Patrol Borough Queens North Task Force 5 3 3 1 0 12Patrol Borough Queens North HQ 10 7 12 7 7 43Patrol Borough Queens North Anti-Crime Unit 3 1 1 1 0 6Patrol Borough Queens North Total 207 194 205 158 149 913

39

Page 40: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15H: Attribution of Complaints to Patrol Borough Staten Island 2011 - 2015

Staten Island 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

120 Precinct 65 94 64 53 29 305122 Precinct 29 34 32 22 17 134123 Precinct 8 10 6 6 19 49121 Precinct 0 0 32 59 39 130Precincts Total 102 138 134 140 104 618Patrol Borough Staten Island Task Force 10 7 6 3 1 27Patrol Borough Staten Island HQ 5 2 3 2 4 16Patrol Borough Staten Island Anti-Crime Unit 0 2 2 0 0 4Staten Island Housing Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Staten Island Court Section 0 0 0 0 0 0Staten Island Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0Patrol Borough Staten Island Total 117 149 145 145 109 665

40

Page 41: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15I: Attribution of Complaints to Special Operations Division 2011 - 2015

Special Operations 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Emergency Services Unit and Squads 1-10 25 20 36 28 29 138Harbor Unit 0 0 1 1 0 2Aviation Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Canine Team 0 2 1 4 1 8Mounted Unit 0 0 1 0 1 22 SOD Strategic Response Group 0 0 0 0 23 23Special Operations Division Headquarters 0 0 0 1 0 1Disorder control 0 0 0 0 0 0Special Operations Division Total 25 22 39 34 54 174

41

Page 42: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15J: Attribution of Complaints to Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 2011 - 2015

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Chiefs Office 0 3 0 1 1 5Special Operations Division Taxi Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands Total 0 3 0 1 1 5

42

Page 43: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15K: Attribution of Complaints to Traffic Control Division 2011 - 2015

Traffic Control Division 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Traffic Control Division - Headquarters Command 0 0 0 0 0 0Manhattan Traffic Task Force 20 25 16 8 6 75Brooklyn Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0Bronx Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0Queens Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0Surface Transportation Enforcement Division (STED) 5 4 0 4 3 16Bus Unit 3 0 2 1 5 11Traffic Control Parking Enforcement District 0 0 0 0 0 0Traffic Control Tow Units 0 0 0 0 0 0Traffic Control Summons Enforcement 0 0 0 0 0 0Traffic Command Intersection Control 0 0 0 0 0 0Traffic Control Intelligence Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Highway District 0 2 1 2 5 10Highway Unit #1 14 9 9 9 14 55Highway Unit #2 7 7 7 4 15 40Highway Unit #3 6 4 7 9 13 39Highway Unit #4 0 0 0 0 0 0Highway Unit #5 2 1 4 4 2 13Highway Safety Enforcement Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Movie and TV Unit 0 0 0 1 1 2Traffic Control Division Total 57 52 46 42 64 261

43

Page 44: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau 2011 - 2015

Transit Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Transit Bureau Headquarters 22 30 37 21 16 126

Transit Bureau Authority Liaison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Inspections 0 0 0 1 0 1

Transit Bureau Spec. Invest. Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Crime Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Patrol Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Manhattan 0 0 0 1 0 1

Transit Bureau Bronx 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Queens 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Brooklyn 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB DT01 8 12 13 5 9 47

TB DT02 11 8 9 12 8 48

TB DT03 22 16 12 15 11 76

TB DT04 16 12 18 8 8 62

TB DT11 7 8 9 5 8 37

TB DT12 5 4 12 10 10 41

TB DT20 9 19 14 10 4 56

TB DT23 9 2 2 3 3 19

TB DT30 14 11 15 10 16 66

TB DT32 7 10 13 7 8 45

TB DT33 9 19 18 14 13 73

TB DT34 9 6 11 8 11 45

Transit Bureau Manhattan Task Force 5 2 4 2 2 15

Transit Bureau Bronx Task Force 1 1 5 3 2 12

Transit Bureau Queens Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Brooklyn Task Force 5 2 2 4 2 15

Transit Bureau Homeless Outreach Unit 2 3 5 2 2 14

Transit Division Canine Unit 1 1 2 1 0 5

Transit Bureau Vandal Unit 3 1 1 1 0 6

Transit Bureau Special Operations Unit 2 3 0 2 1 8

TB Anti-Terrorism 8 7 11 6 9 41

Transportation Bureau and Transit Other Commands 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Total 175 177 213 151 143 859

44

Page 45: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints to Housing Bureau 2011 - 2015

Housing Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Housing Bureau (Office of the Chief Command Center) 0 1 0 0 0 1Housing Bureau Special Operations Section 2 3 0 0 0 5PSA 1 27 29 30 24 31 141PSA 2 54 43 32 22 22 173PSA 3 24 31 32 27 13 127PSA 4 9 22 18 18 27 94PSA 5 24 20 18 20 30 112PSA 6 19 12 13 10 13 67PSA 7 29 32 22 22 33 138PSA 8 17 19 30 20 23 109PSA 9 14 18 26 20 12 90Housing Bureau Brooklyn/Staten Island 0 0 0 0 0 0Housing Bureau Manhattan 0 0 0 0 0 0Housing Bureau Bronx/Queens 0 0 1 0 1 2Housing Bureau Investigations 0 0 0 0 0 0Housing Bureau Elevator Vandalism Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0Housing Bureau Operations and Misc. Commands 0 0 0 0 0 0Housing Bureau Total 239 266 255 207 226 1,193Housing Borough Brooklyn Impact Response Team 3 15 9 9 10 46Housing Borough Manhattan Impact Response Team 9 10 11 10 10 50Housing Borough Bronx/Queens Impact Response Team 8 11 13 5 1 38Housing Bureau Total 239 266 255 207 226 1,193

45

Page 46: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15N: Attribution of Complaints to Organized Crime Control Bureau 2011 - 2015

Organized Crime Control Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Queens Narcotics 41 28 21 31 41 162Manhattan North Narcotics 45 42 42 37 24 190Manhattan South Narcotics 7 9 20 12 12 60Bronx Narcotics 80 79 72 28 28 287Staten Island Narcotics 18 21 18 18 12 87Brooklyn North Narcotics 103 76 56 53 32 320Brooklyn South Narcotics 39 32 33 31 30 165Narcotics Headquarters 4 4 4 2 0 14Auto Crime Division 1 1 2 1 3 8Vice Enforcement Division 9 1 2 0 1 13Drug Enforcement Task Force 0 0 1 1 1 3Organized Crime Headquarters 5 5 2 6 1 19Organized Crime Control Bureau Total 352 298 273 220 185 1,328

46

Page 47: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15O: Attribution of Complaints to Detective Bureau 2011 - 2015

Detective Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Detective Bureau Headquarters 0 1 0 1 4 6Central Investigation and Resource Division 0 0 0 2 0 2Special Investigations Division 3 0 4 1 3 11Special Victims Division 4 5 6 3 6 24Forensic Investigations Division 1 0 0 0 0 1Fugitive Enforcement Division 30 38 51 59 56 234Gang Division 36 33 56 62 38 225Detective Borough Bronx 23 31 17 16 21 108Detective Borough Manhattan 16 17 21 12 14 80Detective Borough Brooklyn 25 28 35 30 22 140Detective Borough Queens 25 18 20 16 28 107Detective Borough Staten Island 3 3 7 3 4 20DB Queens North Operations 0 0 0 1 0 1DB Queens South Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0Detective Bureau Total 166 174 217 206 196 959

47

Page 48: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15P: Attribution of Complaints to Other Bureaus 2011 - 2015

Other Bureaus 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Internal Affairs Bureau

Internal Affairs Bureau 2 4 8 0 5 19

Criminal Justice Bureau

Court Division 36 46 63 62 72 279

Court Bureau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Court LMSI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Court Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Criminal Justice Headquarters 0 0 0 1 1 2

Support Services Bureau

Property Clerk Division 2 0 1 1 3 7

Fleet Services 3 1 0 0 1 5

Central Records Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Personnel Bureau

Applicant Processing Division 0 0 1 1 1 3

Health Services 1 1 0 1 0 3

Personnel Bureau Headquarters 1 1 0 0 0 2

Other Bureaus Total 45 53 73 66 83 320

48

Page 49: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 15Q: Attribution of Complaints to Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands 2011 - 2015

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Deputy Commissioner Legal Matters - License Division 1 1 0 1 0 3Deputy Commissioner Legal Matters - Legal Bureau 0 1 0 0 0 1DC Training 0 0 0 0 0 0Deputy Commissioner Training - Police Academy 2 1 0 0 0 3Deputy Commissioner Training - Police Academy Training

0 5 2 3 2 12

Deputy Commissioner Training - In-service Training Section

4 2 5 3 2 16

Deputy Commissioner Management and Budget 1 1 2 2 2 8Police Commissioner Office 1 1 1 0 0 3Community Affairs Division 0 0 0 0 0 0Chief of Community Affairs 2 1 1 0 0 4Community Affairs Juvenile Section 0 0 0 0 0 0School Safety Bronx/Manhattan 0 1 1 3 3 8School Safety Queens/Brooklyn 0 2 1 2 3 8Office of Equal Employment 0 0 0 0 0 0Deputy Commissioner Operations 5 0 2 0 1 8DC Operations Financial Mgmt. 0 0 0 0 0 0Intelligence Division 13 20 17 10 12 72Chief of Department 1 1 4 2 2 10Department Advocate 0 0 0 0 1 1Deputy Commissioner Public Information 0 0 0 0 0 0Crime Prevention 0 0 0 0 0 0First Deputy Commissioner 0 0 0 0 0 0Office of Management, Analysis and Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0Quality Assurance Division 0 0 0 0 0 0Deputy Commissioner Counterterrorism 0 1 0 0 3 4Chief of Department Evaluation Section 0 0 0 1 1 2Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands Total

30 38 36 27 32 163

49

Page 50: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 16: Reasons for Police-Civilian Encounters that Led to a Complaint 2011 - 2015*

Type of Encounter 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

Aided case 26 0.4% 32 0.6% 19 0.4% 21 0.4% 47 1.1%

Assist ACS or other agency 1 0.0% 5 0.1% 5 0.1% 4 0.1% 4 0.1%

C/V at PCT to file complaint of crime 47 0.8% 55 1.0% 45 0.8% 33 0.7% 58 1.3%

C/V at PCT to obtain information 65 1.1% 58 1.0% 60 1.1% 61 1.3% 71 1.6%

C/V at PCT to retrieve property 22 0.4% 24 0.4% 13 0.2% 18 0.4% 15 0.3%

C/V intervened on behalf of/observed encounter w/3rd party

103 1.7% 129 2.3% 109 2.0% 70 1.5% 67 1.5%

C/V requested info from officer 29 0.5% 31 0.5% 51 0.9% 33 0.7% 26 0.6%

C/V requested investigation of crime 110 1.8% 112 2.0% 115 2.1% 79 1.7% 83 1.9%

C/V telephoned PCT 139 2.3% 214 3.7% 263 4.9% 213 4.5% 105 2.4%

CV already in custody 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%

Demonstration/protest 28 0.5% 25 0.4% 4 0.1% 9 0.2% 19 0.4%

Dispute 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

EDP aided case 57 1.0% 46 0.8% 59 1.1% 71 1.5% 100 2.3%

EDP Aided Cases 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

Execution of arrest/bench warrant 80 1.3% 104 1.8% 81 1.5% 102 2.1% 109 2.5%

Execution of search warrant 147 2.5% 132 2.3% 127 2.4% 154 3.2% 137 3.1%

Moving violation 212 3.6% 267 4.7% 232 4.3% 265 5.6% 323 7.3%

Other 1356 22.7% 1152 20.1% 1142 21.3% 605 12.7% 847 19.1%

Other violation of VTL 162 2.7% 181 3.2% 156 2.9% 136 2.9% 171 3.9%

Others 5 0.1% 4 0.1% 4 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

Parade/special event 9 0.2% 9 0.2% 13 0.2% 7 0.1% 6 0.1%

Parking violation 112 1.9% 118 2.1% 105 2.0% 90 1.9% 80 1.8%

PD auto checkpoint 14 0.2% 11 0.2% 12 0.2% 10 0.2% 6 0.1%

PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - auto

261 4.4% 288 5.0% 280 5.2% 210 4.4% 203 4.6%

50

Page 51: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

* The CCRB began capturing this information on July 1, 2004 (after a board vote) and captures it only if the complainant or alleged victim voluntarily expresses this belief.

PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - bldg

368 6.2% 369 6.4% 364 6.8% 395 8.3% 227 5.1%

PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street

1598 26.8% 1404 24.5% 1159 21.6% 1338 28.1% 846 19.1%

PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - subway

131 2.2% 152 2.7% 152 2.8% 149 3.1% 132 3.0%

PD telephones CV 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

Regulatory inspection 1 0.0% 7 0.1% 3 0.1% 9 0.2% 6 0.1%

Report of Disturbance/Noise Complaint

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

Report of other crime 156 2.6% 151 2.6% 133 2.5% 112 2.4% 132 3.0%

Report-dispute 314 5.3% 300 5.2% 283 5.3% 242 5.1% 240 5.4%

Report-domestic dispute 143 2.4% 133 2.3% 139 2.6% 134 2.8% 182 4.1%

Report-gun possession/shots fired 79 1.3% 54 0.9% 52 1.0% 37 0.8% 44 1.0%

Report-noise/disturbance 64 1.1% 51 0.9% 54 1.0% 35 0.7% 44 1.0%

Report-possession/sale of narcotics 47 0.8% 42 0.7% 62 1.2% 74 1.6% 41 0.9%

Stop/Question/Frisk 0 0.0% 8 0.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Summons/Complainant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

Traffic accident 73 1.2% 52 0.9% 63 1.2% 42 0.9% 49 1.1%

Traffic Incidents/Accident/Prk Violation

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Transit checkpoint 4 0.1% 2 0.0% 9 0.2% 4 0.1% 5 0.1%

Vehicle Stop and Check 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total 5,963 100.0% 5,725 100.0% 5,370 100.0% 4,764 100.0% 4,430 100.0%

No Data 6 0.1% 17 0.3% 18 0.3% 13 0.3% 31 0.7%

Complainant and/or alleged victim believes he or she was the subject of "Racial profiling"*

58 61 60 36 41

51

Page 52: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 17: Charges Stemming from Encounter, 2011 - 2015

Type of Encounter 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent Count Percent

No arrest made or summons issued 2,761 46.4% 2,700 47.3% 2,361 44.0% 1,954 41.1% 1,929 43.7%

Parking summons issued 79 1.3% 66 1.2% 82 1.5% 93 2.0% 57 1.3%

Moving violation summons issued 140 2.4% 156 2.7% 129 2.4% 181 3.8% 206 4.7%

Other VTL violation summons issued 121 2.0% 139 2.4% 113 2.1% 96 2.0% 114 2.6%

Summons - disorderly conduct 284 4.8% 207 3.6% 179 3.3% 134 2.8% 98 2.2%

Summons - harrassment (against a PO) 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%

Summons - OGA 1 0.0% 2 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Summons - other violation/crime 373 6.3% 297 5.2% 259 4.8% 235 4.9% 240 5.4%

Arrest - disorderly conduct 152 2.6% 126 2.2% 87 1.6% 62 1.3% 32 0.7%

Arrest - harrassment (against a PO) 5 0.1% 4 0.1% 3 0.1% 1 0.0% 0 0.0%

Arrest - OGA 141 2.4% 123 2.2% 95 1.8% 33 0.7% 21 0.5%

Arrest - resisting arrest 175 2.9% 167 2.9% 181 3.4% 239 5.0% 142 3.2%

Arrest - assault (against a PO) 73 1.2% 85 1.5% 93 1.7% 66 1.4% 54 1.2%

Arrest - other violation/crime 1,641 27.6% 1,627 28.5% 1,774 33.1% 1,651 34.7% 1,519 34.4%

Juvenile Report 9 0.2% 7 0.1% 8 0.1% 15 0.3% 6 0.1%

Total 5,955 100.0% 5,706 100.0% 5,366 100.0% 4,760 100.0% 4,419 100.0%

No Data 14 36 22 17 42

Total - Arrest 2,187 36.7% 2,132 37.4% 2,233 41.6% 2,052 43.1% 1,768 40.0%

Total - Summons 998 16.8% 867 15.2% 764 14.2% 739 15.5% 716 16.2%

52

Page 53: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Average

Avg. Days Avg. Days Avg. Days Avg. Days Avg. Days

Full Investigations 287 333 377 310 223 306

Mediations 189 208 288 201 120 201

Mediation Attempted 270 262 353 274 186 269

Withdrawn, Victim Uncooperative / Unavailable / Unidentified Complainants

102 103 127 93 65 98

All Cases 167 180 212 184 137 176

Table 18A: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Cases Measured from Date of Report 2011 - 2015

53

Page 54: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five-Year Average

Charges 355 415 448 390 274 376

Command Discipline 334 436 434 364 249 363

Instructions / Formalized Training 335 390 409 338 232 341

No Recommendation 377 463 410 561 325 427

All Substantiated Cases 350 419 440 373 250 366

Table 18B: Average Days for the CCRB to Close Substantiated Cases Measured from Date of Report 2011 - 2015*

*Numbers are for cases closed at any point during the year in question.

54

Page 55: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 19: Rate at Which the CCRB Made Findings on the Merits* 2011 - 2015

* Findings on the merits include "substantiated, "employee exonerated," and "unfounded" - those findings where the board was able to come to a definite conclusion about the validity of the allegation after conducting a full nvestigation. Findings not on the merits include "unsubstantiated", "MOS unidentified", "MOS terminated / retired / resigned" and "miscellaneous closure".

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Findings on the Merits 3,285 1,783 3,071 3,021 4,096

No Findings on the Merits 3,550 2,520 4,686 4,408 5,045

Total Allegations Closed After Full Investigation 6,835 4,303 7,757 7,429 9,141

Rate at Which the CCRB Made Findings on the Merits

48% 41% 40% 41% 45%

55

Page 56: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Age of Case in Months

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Docket Number % of Docket Number % of Docket Number % of Docket Number % of Docket

0-4 Months 1,570 59.5% 2,124 51.7% 1,389 58.6% 963 53.9% 915 89.0%

5-7 Months 590 22.4% 868 21.1% 457 19.3% 439 24.6% 70 6.8%

8 Months 115 4.4% 168 4.1% 102 4.3% 85 4.8% 5 0.5%

9 Months 103 3.9% 160 3.9% 98 4.1% 70 3.9% 4 0.4%

10 Months 90 3.4% 142 3.5% 53 2.2% 60 3.4% 6 0.6%

11 Months 53 2.0% 149 3.6% 59 2.5% 71 4.0% 1 0.1%

12 Months 27 1.0% 101 2.5% 37 1.6% 21 1.2% 4 0.4%

13 Months 23 0.9% 90 2.2% 26 1.1% 25 1.4% 4 0.4%

14 Months 27 1.0% 92 2.2% 46 1.9% 16 0.9% 2 0.2%

15 Months 12 0.5% 70 1.7% 31 1.3% 16 0.9% 1 0.1%

16 Months 9 0.3% 53 1.3% 37 1.6% 8 0.4% 1 0.1%

17 Months 7 0.3% 41 1.0% 21 0.9% 6 0.3% 4 0.4%

18 Months or older 12 0.5% 54 1.3% 14 0.6% 7 0.4% 11 1.1%

NA 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 2,638 100% 4,112 100% 2,370 100% 1,787 100% 1,028 100%

Table 20: Age of Docket* Measured from the Date of Incident 2011 - 2015

* The age of the docket is measured by the number of open cases at the end of each reporting period.

56

Page 57: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Age of Case in Months

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

0-4 Months 1,655 62.7% 2,286 55.6% 1,516 64.0% 1,053 58.9% 960 93.4%

5-7 Months 569 21.6% 800 19.5% 432 18.2% 414 23.2% 48 4.7%

8 Months 101 3.8% 160 3.9% 104 4.4% 76 4.3% 4 0.4%

9 Months 100 3.8% 158 3.8% 96 4.1% 67 3.7% 2 0.2%

10 Months 75 2.8% 152 3.7% 36 1.5% 56 3.1% 1 0.1%

11 Months 43 1.6% 132 3.2% 19 0.8% 54 3.0% 0.0%

12 Months 21 0.8% 105 2.6% 25 1.1% 15 0.8% 2 0.2%

13 Months 20 0.8% 75 1.8% 22 0.9% 15 0.8% 2 0.2%

14 Months 20 0.8% 81 2.0% 41 1.7% 11 0.6% 0.0%

15 Months 13 0.5% 57 1.4% 28 1.2% 15 0.8% 0.0%

16 Months 7 0.3% 47 1.1% 25 1.1% 4 0.2% 0.0%

17 Months 6 0.2% 29 0.7% 18 0.8% 1 0.1% 2 0.2%

18 Months or older 8 0.3% 30 0.7% 8 0.3% 6 0.3% 7 0.7%

Total Docket 2,638 100% 4,112 100% 2,370 100% 1,787 100% 1,028 100%

Table 21: Age of Docket* Measured from the Date of Report 2011 - 2015

* The age of the docket is measured by the number of open cases at the end of each reporting period.

57

Page 58: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Age of Case in Months

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

3 or younger 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.3% 3 1.0% 62 11.8%

4 Months 2 1.3% 1 0.6% 1 0.3% 3 1.0% 60 11.4%

5 Months 3 1.9% 0 0.0% 2 0.6% 10 3.2% 50 9.5%

6 Months 3 1.9% 2 1.1% 3 1.0% 16 5.1% 42 8.0%

7 Months 8 5.0% 2 1.1% 5 1.6% 12 3.8% 41 7.8%

8 Months 14 8.8% 4 2.3% 6 1.9% 15 4.8% 28 5.3%

9 Months 17 10.6% 8 4.5% 10 3.2% 20 6.4% 34 6.5%

10 Months 17 10.6% 4 2.3% 14 4.5% 14 4.5% 35 6.7%

11 Months 17 10.6% 10 5.7% 14 4.5% 22 7.0% 36 6.8%

12 Months 19 11.9% 10 5.7% 13 4.2% 23 7.3% 43 8.2%

13 Months 16 10.0% 20 11.4% 19 6.1% 37 11.8% 23 4.4%

14 Months 9 5.6% 30 17.0% 38 12.2% 30 9.6% 25 4.8%

15 Months 19 11.9% 34 19.3% 32 10.3% 26 8.3% 13 2.5%

16 Months 12 7.5% 25 14.2% 55 17.6% 28 8.9% 17 3.2%

17 Months 4 2.5% 17 9.7% 59 18.9% 40 12.8% 11 2.1%

18 Months or older 0 0.0% 9 5.1% 40 12.8% 14 4.5% 6 1.1%

Total Docket 160 100% 176 100% 312 100% 313 100% 526 100%

Table 22A: Age of Substantiated Cases from the Date of Incident 2011 - 2015

Table 22B: Average Days for the CCRB to CloseSubstantiated Cases from the Date of Incident 2011 - 2015*

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Average Number of Days 356 430 452 387 265

*Numbers are for cases closed at any point during the year in question.

58

Page 59: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Age of Case in Months

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

Number % of Docket

3 or younger 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.6% 3 1.0% 79 15.0%

4 Months 2 1.3% 2 1.1% 3 1.0% 4 1.3% 69 13.1%

5 Months 3 1.9% 0 0.0% 3 1.0% 12 3.8% 49 9.3%

6 Months 3 1.9% 2 1.1% 2 0.6% 16 5.1% 43 8.2%

7 Months 11 6.9% 1 0.6% 7 2.2% 14 4.5% 37 7.0%

8 Months 15 9.4% 7 4.0% 5 1.6% 20 6.4% 26 4.9%

9 Months 17 10.6% 8 4.5% 10 3.2% 16 5.1% 36 6.8%

10 Months 17 10.6% 7 4.0% 18 5.8% 20 6.4% 41 7.8%

11 Months 17 10.6% 10 5.7% 16 5.1% 22 7.0% 26 4.9%

12 Months 18 11.3% 10 5.7% 13 4.2% 26 8.3% 40 7.6%

13 Months 15 9.4% 24 13.6% 22 7.1% 41 13.1% 21 4.0%

14 Months 9 5.6% 30 17.0% 38 12.2% 30 9.6% 24 4.6%

15 Months 18 11.3% 30 17.0% 37 11.9% 22 7.0% 9 1.7%

16 Months 13 8.1% 25 14.2% 53 17.0% 27 8.6% 17 3.2%

17 Months 2 1.3% 14 8.0% 52 16.7% 33 10.5% 6 1.1%

18 Months or older 0 0.0% 6 3.4% 31 9.9% 7 2.2% 3 0.6%

Total Docket 160 100% 176 100% 312 100% 313 100% 526 100%

Table 23A: Age of Substantiated Cases from the Date of Report 2011 - 2015

Table 23B: Average Days for the CCRB to CloseSubstantiated Cases from the Date of Report 2011 - 2015*

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Average Number of Days 350 419 440 373 250

*Numbers are for cases closed at any point during the year in question.

59

Page 60: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Total

Full Investigations Number % of Full Inv.

Number % of Full Inv.

Number % of Full Inv.

Number % of Full Inv.

Number % of Full Inv.

Number % FullInv.

Substantiated 160 8.3% 176 14.1% 312 15.0% 313 16.6% 526 24.2% 1,487 16%

Unsubstantiated 1,072 55.9% 699 56.1% 1,234 59.3% 1,025 54.4% 1,045 48.0% 5,075 55%

Unfounded 223 11.6% 82 6.6% 131 6.3% 147 7.8% 150 6.9% 733 8%

Exonerated 345 18.0% 209 16.8% 285 13.7% 265 14.1% 294 13.5% 1,398 15%

MOS Unidentified 119 6.2% 81 6.5% 120 5.8% 135 7.2% 162 7.4% 617 7%

Total 1,919 100% 1,247 100% 2,082 100% 1,885 100% 2,177 100% 9,310 100%

Mediation Closures Number % Med. Closures

Number % Med. Closures

Number % Med. Closures

Number % Med. Closures

Number % Med. Closures

Number % FullInv.

Mediated 138 37.4% 76 26.6% 135 34.2% 185 47.4% 192 46.4% 726 39%

MediationAttempted 231 62.6% 210 73.4% 260 65.8% 205 52.6% 222 53.6% 1,128 61%

Total 369 100% 286 100% 395 100% 390 100% 414 100% 1,854 100%

Case Resolution Rate* 2,288 37% 1,533 36% 2,477 35% 2,275 43% 2,591 50% 11,164 37%

Table 24A: Disposition of Cases 2011 - 2015

* "Case Resolution Rate" is the percentage of all closed complaints that are resolved through either a full investigation or mediation. It excludes cases where a civilian withdrew his/her complaint, did not cooperate with the investigation and/or was not available.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Total

Other Dispositions Number % of Total Closures

Number % of Total Closures

Number % of Total Closures

Number % of Total Closures

Number % of Total Closures

Number % of Total Closures

Complaint withdrawn 751 12.0% 479 11.2% 728 10.2% 480 9.0% 372 7.1% 2,810 10%

Complainant/Victim/Witness uncooperative

2,318 37.1% 1,747 40.9% 2,575 36.1% 1,888 35.3% 1,644 31.4% 10,172 36%

Complainant/Victim/Witness unavailable

823 13.2% 469 11.0% 1,269 17.8% 577 10.8% 436 8.3% 3,574 13%

Victim unidentified 57 0.9% 30 0.7% 54 0.8% 19 0.4% 31 0.6% 191 1%

Miscellaneous 8 0.1% 10 0.2% 21 0.3% 20 0.4% 14 0.3% 73 0%

Administrative closure 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 89 1.7% 146 2.8% 235 1%

Total Cases Closed 6,245 4,268 7,124 5,348 5,234 28,219

60

Page 61: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Total

Full Investigations Number% of Full

Inv. Number% of Full

Inv. Number% of Full

Inv. Number% of Full

Inv. Number% of Full

Inv. Number% of Full

Inv.

Substantiated - Charges 251 3.7% 275 6.4% 501 6.6% 421 5.8% 384 4.2% 1,832 5.2%

Substantiated - Command Discipline 56 0.8% 88 2.1% 146 1.9% 168 2.3% 572 6.3% 1,030 2.9%

Substantiated - Instructions 15 0.2% 12 0.3% 39 0.5% 126 1.7% 320 3.5% 512 1.5%

Substantiated - No Recommendation 11 0.2% 2 0.0% 14 0.2% 5 0.1% 4 0.0% 36 0.1%

Subtotal - Substantiated Allegations

333 4.9% 377 8.8% 700 9.2% 720 9.9% 1,280 14.1% 3,410 2.4%

Unfounded 789 11.7% 341 8.0% 485 6.4% 598 8.2% 786 8.7% 2,999 8.6%

Exonerated 2,163 32.0% 1,065 24.9% 1,886 24.7% 1,703 23.3% 2,030 22.4% 8,847 25.3%

Subtotal - Findings on the Merits 3,285 48.6% 1,783 41.7% 3,071 40.3% 3,021 41.4% 4,096 45.2% 15,256 1.5%

Unsubstantiated 2,721 40.3% 1,993 46.7% 3,710 48.7% 3,304 45.3% 3,813 42.1% 15,541 44.4%

Department Employee Unidentified 748 11.1% 495 11.6% 842 11.0% 970 13.3% 1,155 12.7% 4,210 12.0%

Total 6,754 100% 4,271 100% 7,623 100% 7,295 100% 9,064 100% 35,007 100%

Table 24B: Disposition of Allegations 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Total

Mediation Closures Number% Med. Closures Number

% Med. Closures Number

% Med. Closures Number

% Med. Closures Number

% Med. Closures Number

% TotalClosures

Mediated 288 36.7% 161 26.3% 299 33.8% 382 47.4% 372 43.8% 1,502 1.9%

Mediation Attempted 496 63.3% 451 73.7% 586 66.2% 424 52.6% 478 56.2% 2,435 3.1%

Total 784 100% 612 100% 885 100% 806 100% 850 100% 3,937 5.0%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Five Year Total

Other Dispositions Number% Total Closures Number

% Total Closures Number

% Total Closures Number

% Total Closures Number

% Total Closures Number

% TotalClosures

Complaint Withdrawn 1,516 8.8% 959 8.4% 1,408 7.4% 891 5.9% 774 4.9% 5,548 7.1%

Complainant/Victim/Witness uncooperative

6,076 35.4% 4,470 39.1% 6,430 33.8% 4,693 31.0% 4,051 25.5% 25,720 32.7%

Complainant/Victim/Witness unavailable

1,813 10.5% 971 8.5% 2,405 12.6% 1,077 7.1% 788 5.0% 7,054 9.0%

Victim unidentified 162 0.9% 104 0.9% 161 0.8% 66 0.4% 80 0.5% 573 0.7%

Miscellaneous 83 0.5% 32 0.3% 134 0.7% 305 2.0% 288 1.8% 842 1.1%

Refer to IAB 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total 9,650 56.1% 6,536 57.2% 10,538 55.3% 7,032 46.5% 5,981 37.6% 39,737 50.5%

Total Closed Allegations 17,188 11,419 19,046 15,133 15,895 78,681

61

Page 62: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 33.3%

Chokehold 29 5.4% 0 0.0% 260 48.2% 157 29.1% 85 15.8% 8 1.5%

Flashlight as club 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 8 36.4% 8 36.4% 3 13.6% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 1 1.9% 2 3.7% 27 50.0% 15 27.8% 8 14.8% 1 1.9%

Gun fired 1 2.1% 38 80.9% 5 10.6% 2 4.3% 1 2.1% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 15 1.8% 510 60.1% 186 21.9% 58 6.8% 73 8.6% 6 0.7%

Handcuffs too tight 2 1.4% 4 2.9% 91 65.0% 27 19.3% 16 11.4% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 17 6.0% 42 14.9% 123 43.8% 57 20.3% 38 13.5% 4 1.4%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 14 2.7% 208 39.8% 135 25.9% 89 17.0% 73 14.0% 3 0.6%

Nonlethal restraining device 2 2.5% 62 76.5% 6 7.4% 9 11.1% 1 1.2% 1 1.2%

Other 7 3.8% 17 9.2% 73 39.5% 53 28.6% 33 17.8% 2 1.1%

Other blunt instrument as a club 7 5.1% 6 4.3% 56 40.6% 40 29.0% 26 18.8% 3 2.2%

Pepper spray 17 3.4% 331 66.3% 65 13.0% 34 6.8% 45 9.0% 7 1.4%

Physical force 207 3.1% 2,843 41.9% 2,182 32.2% 813 12.0% 662 9.8% 77 1.1%

Police shield 0 0.0% 10 35.7% 14 50.0% 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 1 3.6%

Radio as club 1 2.5% 3 7.5% 11 27.5% 21 52.5% 4 10.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 3 6.1% 5 10.2% 25 51.0% 13 26.5% 3 6.1% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 324 3.2% 4,084 39.8% 3,268 31.9% 1,398 13.6% 1,072 10.4% 114 1.1%

Table 25: Disposition of Force Allegations 2011 - 2015

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

62

Page 63: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Chokehold 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 40 45.5% 37 42.0% 9 10.2% 1 1.1%

Flashlight as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 27.3% 5 45.5% 3 27.3% 0 0.0%

Gun fired 0 0.0% 12 92.3% 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 1 0.5% 122 67.0% 28 15.4% 16 8.8% 15 8.2% 0 0.0%

Handcuffs too tight 0 0.0% 2 6.7% 19 63.3% 7 23.3% 2 6.7% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 0 0.0% 9 15.8% 23 40.4% 17 29.8% 7 12.3% 1 1.8%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 2 1.7% 52 43.7% 24 20.2% 23 19.3% 18 15.1% 0 0.0%

Nonlethal restraining device 0 0.0% 7 63.6% 0 0.0% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 1 9.1%

Other 0 0.0% 2 18.2% 2 18.2% 5 45.5% 2 18.2% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as a club 0 0.0% 2 8.3% 10 41.7% 10 41.7% 1 4.2% 1 4.2%

Pepper spray 3 2.4% 95 77.2% 3 2.4% 12 9.8% 8 6.5% 2 1.6%

Physical force 6 0.4% 722 53.0% 313 23.0% 190 14.0% 116 8.5% 15 1.1%

Police shield 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 4 44.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 4 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 13 0.6% 1,030 50.1% 474 23.1% 337 16.4% 181 8.8% 21 1.0%

Table 25A: Disposition of Force Allegations 2011

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

63

Page 64: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Chokehold 1 2.2% 0 0.0% 21 45.7% 18 39.1% 6 13.0% 0 0.0%

Flashlight as club 1 14.3% 1 14.3% 2 28.6% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 85.7% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0%

Gun fired 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 0 0.0% 54 59.3% 21 23.1% 6 6.6% 10 11.0% 0 0.0%

Handcuffs too tight 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 12 60.0% 5 25.0% 3 15.0% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 2 8.0% 3 12.0% 8 32.0% 9 36.0% 3 12.0% 0 0.0%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 2 2.8% 34 47.2% 17 23.6% 10 13.9% 9 12.5% 0 0.0%

Nonlethal restraining device 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as a club 0 0.0% 1 5.9% 8 47.1% 4 23.5% 3 17.6% 1 5.9%

Pepper spray 0 0.0% 44 67.7% 11 16.9% 2 3.1% 8 12.3% 0 0.0%

Physical force 20 2.5% 378 46.9% 248 30.8% 82 10.2% 73 9.1% 5 0.6%

Police shield 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 6 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 1 12.5% 3 37.5% 3 37.5% 1 12.5% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 26 2.2% 523 44.1% 364 30.7% 149 12.6% 119 10.0% 6 0.5%

Table 25B: Disposition of Force Allegations 2012

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

64

Page 65: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Chokehold 1 1.1% 0 0.0% 54 61.4% 11 12.5% 18 20.5% 4 4.5%

Flashlight as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 0 0.0% 2 14.3% 6 42.9% 5 35.7% 0 0.0% 1 7.1%

Gun fired 0 0.0% 15 93.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 6.3% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 2 1.2% 105 62.9% 37 22.2% 9 5.4% 11 6.6% 3 1.8%

Handcuffs too tight 1 3.6% 1 3.6% 17 60.7% 5 17.9% 4 14.3% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 2 3.4% 8 13.8% 34 58.6% 4 6.9% 9 15.5% 1 1.7%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 1 0.8% 48 37.2% 46 35.7% 16 12.4% 17 13.2% 1 0.8%

Nonlethal restraining device 0 0.0% 10 90.9% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 1 10.0% 3 30.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as a club 1 2.6% 0 0.0% 18 47.4% 7 18.4% 11 28.9% 1 2.6%

Pepper spray 0 0.0% 78 65.5% 21 17.6% 5 4.2% 13 10.9% 2 1.7%

Physical force 36 2.3% 675 43.0% 545 34.7% 152 9.7% 132 8.4% 29 1.8%

Police shield 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 3 42.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 30.0% 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 66.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 45 2.0% 949 41.7% 790 34.7% 227 10.0% 221 9.7% 42 1.8%

Table 25C: Disposition of Force Allegations 2013

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

65

Page 66: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Chokehold 7 5.5% 0 0.0% 57 44.9% 39 30.7% 23 18.1% 1 0.8%

Flashlight as club 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 45.5% 4 36.4% 2 18.2% 0 0.0%

Gun fired 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 3 1.5% 116 59.8% 38 19.6% 18 9.3% 17 8.8% 2 1.0%

Handcuffs too tight 1 3.6% 0 0.0% 20 71.4% 3 10.7% 4 14.3% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 5 8.1% 10 16.1% 26 41.9% 11 17.7% 9 14.5% 1 1.6%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 1 1.1% 35 37.2% 19 20.2% 20 21.3% 17 18.1% 2 2.1%

Nonlethal restraining device 1 4.8% 17 81.0% 0 0.0% 3 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 5 26.3% 4 21.1% 7 36.8% 3 15.8% 0 0.0%

Other blunt instrument as a club 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 8 36.4% 8 36.4% 3 13.6% 0 0.0%

Pepper spray 4 4.2% 59 62.1% 13 13.7% 9 9.5% 8 8.4% 2 2.1%

Physical force 46 3.2% 528 37.2% 491 34.6% 182 12.8% 155 10.9% 19 1.3%

Police shield 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%

Radio as club 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 1 16.7% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 3 20.0% 3 20.0% 6 40.0% 2 13.3% 1 6.7% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 72 3.4% 779 36.6% 696 32.7% 309 14.5% 245 11.5% 28 1.3%

Table 25D: Disposition of Force Allegations 2014

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

66

Page 67: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of ForceAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Animal 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0%

Chokehold 19 10.0% 0 0.0% 88 46.3% 52 27.4% 29 15.3% 2 1.1%

Flashlight as club 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun as club 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 7 63.6% 1 9.1% 2 18.2% 0 0.0%

Gun fired 1 7.1% 8 57.1% 3 21.4% 2 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gun Pointed 9 4.2% 113 52.8% 62 29.0% 9 4.2% 20 9.3% 1 0.5%

Handcuffs too tight 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 23 67.6% 7 20.6% 3 8.8% 0 0.0%

Hit against inanimate object 8 10.1% 12 15.2% 32 40.5% 16 20.3% 10 12.7% 1 1.3%

Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) 8 7.4% 39 36.1% 29 26.9% 20 18.5% 12 11.1% 0 0.0%

Nonlethal restraining device 1 3.0% 25 75.8% 5 15.2% 1 3.0% 1 3.0% 0 0.0%

Other 6 4.3% 7 5.0% 64 45.4% 37 26.2% 25 17.7% 2 1.4%

Other blunt instrument as a club 5 13.5% 1 2.7% 12 32.4% 11 29.7% 8 21.6% 0 0.0%

Pepper spray 10 10.3% 55 56.7% 17 17.5% 6 6.2% 8 8.2% 1 1.0%

Physical force 99 6.1% 540 33.2% 585 36.0% 207 12.7% 186 11.4% 9 0.6%

Police shield 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 4 57.1% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Radio as club 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 2 28.6% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 0 0.0%

Vehicle 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 75.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 168 6.4% 803 30.7% 944 36.1% 376 14.4% 306 11.7% 17 0.7%

Table 25E: Disposition of Force Allegations 2015

* "Physical force" includes: dragged/pulled, pushed/shoved/threw, beat, punched/kicked/kneed, slapped, fought, and bit.

67

Page 68: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 504 29.4% 331 19.3% 596 34.8% 26 1.5% 239 13.9% 19 1.1%

Gun Drawn 3 1.1% 164 58.2% 58 20.6% 30 10.6% 24 8.5% 3 1.1%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 91 35.5% 41 16.0% 90 35.2% 10 3.9% 23 9.0% 1 0.4%

Premises entered and/or searched 277 12.8% 1,295 59.9% 452 20.9% 26 1.2% 92 4.3% 20 0.9%

Property damaged 24 5.7% 70 16.7% 190 45.3% 46 11.0% 89 21.2% 0 0.0%

Question 79 17.9% 206 46.7% 102 23.1% 4 0.9% 49 11.1% 1 0.2%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 30 6.2% 1 0.2% 292 60.3% 80 16.5% 71 14.7% 10 2.1%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 35 18.9% 6 3.2% 86 46.5% 13 7.0% 39 21.1% 6 3.2%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

152 8.4% 10 0.6% 1,210 66.9% 186 10.3% 228 12.6% 24 1.3%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 11 7.1% 4 2.6% 112 72.3% 13 8.4% 14 9.0% 1 0.6%

Retaliatory arrest 30 65.2% 3 6.5% 11 23.9% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 4.3%

Retaliatory summons 97 73.5% 8 6.1% 24 18.2% 2 1.5% 0 0.0% 1 0.8%

Search (of person) 285 14.5% 191 9.7% 1,085 55.3% 51 2.6% 318 16.2% 33 1.7%

Seizure of property 10 12.3% 26 32.1% 31 38.3% 3 3.7% 10 12.3% 1 1.2%

Stop 554 22.5% 784 31.9% 801 32.6% 24 1.0% 262 10.7% 32 1.3%

Strip-searched 38 6.2% 129 20.9% 344 55.8% 40 6.5% 54 8.8% 11 1.8%

Threat of arrest 68 5.4% 371 29.7% 586 46.8% 49 3.9% 151 12.1% 26 2.1%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 46 3.9% 108 9.2% 689 58.7% 133 11.3% 179 15.3% 18 1.5%

Threat of summons 7 9.9% 15 21.1% 40 56.3% 4 5.6% 5 7.0% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 13 8.3% 35 22.4% 77 49.4% 6 3.8% 24 15.4% 1 0.6%

Threat to notify ACS 7 7.3% 43 44.8% 36 37.5% 5 5.2% 5 5.2% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 234 18.5% 359 28.4% 515 40.8% 16 1.3% 119 9.4% 20 1.6%

Vehicle stop 95 12.9% 255 34.6% 299 40.5% 2 0.3% 78 10.6% 9 1.2%

Total Docket 2,690 15.0% 4,455 24.8% 7,728 43.0% 769 4.3% 2,073 11.5% 239 1.3%

Table 26: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2011 - 2015

68

Page 69: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 77 21.2% 98 27.0% 128 35.3% 10 2.8% 47 12.9% 3 0.8%

Gun Drawn 1 1.7% 50 86.2% 4 6.9% 1 1.7% 2 3.4% 0 0.0%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 6 27.3% 6 27.3% 5 22.7% 1 4.5% 4 18.2% 0 0.0%

Premises entered and/or searched 7 2.0% 259 74.6% 60 17.3% 5 1.4% 14 4.0% 2 0.6%

Property damaged 0 0.0% 11 22.9% 20 41.7% 11 22.9% 6 12.5% 0 0.0%

Question 8 10.3% 49 62.8% 11 14.1% 0 0.0% 10 12.8% 0 0.0%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 3 4.1% 0 0.0% 41 55.4% 21 28.4% 9 12.2% 0 0.0%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 3 13.0% 0 0.0% 9 39.1% 2 8.7% 9 39.1% 0 0.0%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

8 2.5% 2 0.6% 212 66.3% 46 14.4% 46 14.4% 6 1.9%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 16 76.2% 3 14.3% 1 4.8% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory arrest 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3%

Retaliatory summons 20 83.3% 1 4.2% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Search (of person) 36 8.1% 47 10.6% 262 59.3% 20 4.5% 69 15.6% 8 1.8%

Seizure of property 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0%

Stop 88 16.1% 194 35.4% 186 33.9% 12 2.2% 57 10.4% 11 2.0%

Strip-searched 4 3.4% 32 26.9% 65 54.6% 7 5.9% 9 7.6% 2 1.7%

Threat of arrest 3 1.4% 90 43.5% 72 34.8% 11 5.3% 27 13.0% 4 1.9%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 4 1.7% 32 13.6% 124 52.5% 41 17.4% 32 13.6% 3 1.3%

Threat of summons 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 62.5% 0 0.0% 3 37.5% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 0 0.0% 10 45.5% 6 27.3% 2 9.1% 4 18.2% 0 0.0%

Threat to notify ACS 0 0.0% 15 62.5% 4 16.7% 4 16.7% 1 4.2% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 20 8.3% 86 35.5% 106 43.8% 5 2.1% 23 9.5% 2 0.8%

Vehicle stop 6 4.5% 72 54.5% 41 31.1% 0 0.0% 12 9.1% 1 0.8%

Total Docket 297 8.8% 1,058 31.4% 1,385 41.1% 203 6.0% 386 11.4% 44 1.3%

Table 26A: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2011

69

Page 70: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 70 30.8% 30 13.2% 88 38.8% 1 0.4% 36 15.9% 2 0.9%

Gun Drawn 0 0.0% 29 76.3% 3 7.9% 2 5.3% 3 7.9% 1 2.6%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 1 6.3% 5 31.3% 10 62.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Premises entered and/or searched 17 7.7% 149 67.1% 43 19.4% 2 0.9% 11 5.0% 0 0.0%

Property damaged 0 0.0% 4 10.8% 15 40.5% 7 18.9% 11 29.7% 0 0.0%

Question 23 36.5% 24 38.1% 13 20.6% 0 0.0% 3 4.8% 0 0.0%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 4 7.8% 1 2.0% 30 58.8% 11 21.6% 5 9.8% 0 0.0%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 3 10.0% 2 6.7% 16 53.3% 3 10.0% 4 13.3% 2 6.7%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

15 7.0% 2 0.9% 153 71.2% 19 8.8% 25 11.6% 1 0.5%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 72.7% 3 27.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory arrest 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory summons 9 75.0% 0 0.0% 3 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Search (of person) 28 10.8% 22 8.5% 156 60.2% 8 3.1% 41 15.8% 4 1.5%

Seizure of property 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

Stop 90 29.0% 67 21.6% 111 35.8% 3 1.0% 38 12.3% 1 0.3%

Strip-searched 4 4.8% 27 32.5% 37 44.6% 9 10.8% 5 6.0% 1 1.2%

Threat of arrest 10 6.4% 41 26.1% 79 50.3% 7 4.5% 19 12.1% 1 0.6%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 7 4.5% 10 6.4% 93 59.2% 19 12.1% 26 16.6% 2 1.3%

Threat of summons 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 2 11.1% 3 16.7% 9 50.0% 1 5.6% 3 16.7% 0 0.0%

Threat to notify ACS 1 7.7% 8 61.5% 2 15.4% 0 0.0% 2 15.4% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 18 14.4% 44 35.2% 49 39.2% 3 2.4% 10 8.0% 1 0.8%

Vehicle stop 6 9.5% 18 28.6% 29 46.0% 0 0.0% 9 14.3% 1 1.6%

Total Docket 311 14.7% 489 23.0% 954 45.0% 99 4.7% 252 11.9% 17 0.8%

Table 26B: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2012

70

Page 71: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 117 32.2% 63 17.4% 134 36.9% 5 1.4% 40 11.0% 4 1.1%

Gun Drawn 0 0.0% 27 49.1% 16 29.1% 6 10.9% 5 9.1% 1 1.8%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 6 17.6% 5 14.7% 16 47.1% 2 5.9% 5 14.7% 0 0.0%

Premises entered and/or searched 58 12.4% 264 56.7% 115 24.7% 6 1.3% 16 3.4% 7 1.5%

Property damaged 1 1.0% 14 14.6% 55 57.3% 5 5.2% 21 21.9% 0 0.0%

Question 16 20.0% 42 52.5% 18 22.5% 0 0.0% 4 5.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 1 1.0% 0 0.0% 73 73.7% 7 7.1% 13 13.1% 5 5.1%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 5 10.6% 4 8.5% 23 48.9% 4 8.5% 8 17.0% 3 6.4%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

28 7.1% 1 0.3% 273 68.8% 40 10.1% 50 12.6% 5 1.3%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 1 3.0% 0 0.0% 24 72.7% 2 6.1% 6 18.2% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory arrest 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 3 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory summons 17 60.7% 3 10.7% 8 28.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Search (of person) 76 18.3% 35 8.4% 231 55.5% 8 1.9% 59 14.2% 7 1.7%

Seizure of property 1 6.7% 5 33.3% 3 20.0% 2 13.3% 3 20.0% 1 6.7%

Stop 144 24.8% 174 30.0% 196 33.8% 3 0.5% 57 9.8% 6 1.0%

Strip-searched 6 4.3% 27 19.3% 94 67.1% 3 2.1% 9 6.4% 1 0.7%

Threat of arrest 9 3.4% 75 28.5% 145 55.1% 5 1.9% 22 8.4% 7 2.7%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 8 3.0% 18 6.7% 181 67.0% 18 6.7% 40 14.8% 5 1.9%

Threat of summons 1 5.6% 3 16.7% 14 77.8% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 1 3.6% 4 14.3% 17 60.7% 1 3.6% 5 17.9% 0 0.0%

Threat to notify ACS 1 7.1% 4 28.6% 8 57.1% 1 7.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 54 21.8% 64 25.8% 110 44.4% 3 1.2% 14 5.6% 3 1.2%

Vehicle stop 26 16.0% 47 29.0% 73 45.1% 0 0.0% 14 8.6% 2 1.2%

Total Docket 582 15.1% 880 22.8% 1,830 47.4% 121 3.1% 391 10.1% 57 1.5%

Table 26C: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2013

71

Page 72: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 91 26.1% 64 18.4% 126 36.2% 3 0.9% 58 16.7% 6 1.7%

Gun Drawn 0 0.0% 36 52.9% 17 25.0% 5 7.4% 9 13.2% 1 1.5%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 17 34.0% 4 8.0% 22 44.0% 0 0.0% 7 14.0% 0 0.0%

Premises entered and/or searched 74 15.4% 260 54.1% 113 23.5% 4 0.8% 24 5.0% 6 1.2%

Property damaged 4 4.9% 9 11.1% 40 49.4% 7 8.6% 21 25.9% 0 0.0%

Question 13 15.3% 34 40.0% 24 28.2% 2 2.4% 11 12.9% 1 1.2%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 14 10.7% 0 0.0% 76 58.0% 15 11.5% 22 16.8% 4 3.1%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 9 30.0% 0 0.0% 15 50.0% 0 0.0% 5 16.7% 1 3.3%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

36 9.1% 2 0.5% 268 67.5% 40 10.1% 42 10.6% 9 2.3%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 2 7.4% 0 0.0% 18 66.7% 3 11.1% 4 14.8% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory arrest 8 88.9% 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory summons 23 85.2% 0 0.0% 3 11.1% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 3.7%

Search (of person) 57 13.7% 35 8.4% 237 57.0% 7 1.7% 73 17.5% 7 1.7%

Seizure of property 3 14.3% 8 38.1% 7 33.3% 1 4.8% 2 9.5% 0 0.0%

Stop 99 21.4% 135 29.2% 168 36.4% 4 0.9% 48 10.4% 8 1.7%

Strip-searched 7 5.9% 18 15.1% 68 57.1% 5 4.2% 17 14.3% 4 3.4%

Threat of arrest 20 6.8% 72 24.6% 139 47.4% 10 3.4% 43 14.7% 9 3.1%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 9 3.9% 30 13.2% 125 54.8% 19 8.3% 40 17.5% 5 2.2%

Threat of summons 2 11.8% 7 41.2% 5 29.4% 1 5.9% 2 11.8% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 4 10.5% 6 15.8% 21 55.3% 0 0.0% 7 18.4% 0 0.0%

Threat to notify ACS 2 8.7% 11 47.8% 9 39.1% 0 0.0% 1 4.3% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 54 18.2% 72 24.2% 129 43.4% 2 0.7% 32 10.8% 8 2.7%

Vehicle stop 12 7.3% 39 23.8% 90 54.9% 0 0.0% 19 11.6% 4 2.4%

Total Docket 560 14.7% 842 22.1% 1,721 45.1% 128 3.4% 487 12.8% 74 1.9%

Table 26D: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2014

72

Page 73: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Abuse of AuthorityAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Frisk 149 36.0% 76 18.4% 120 29.0% 7 1.7% 58 14.0% 4 1.0%

Gun Drawn 2 3.2% 22 34.9% 18 28.6% 16 25.4% 5 7.9% 0 0.0%

Improper dissemination of medical info

0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Other 61 45.5% 21 15.7% 37 27.6% 7 5.2% 7 5.2% 1 0.7%

Premises entered and/or searched 121 18.7% 363 56.2% 121 18.7% 9 1.4% 27 4.2% 5 0.8%

Property damaged 19 12.1% 32 20.4% 60 38.2% 16 10.2% 30 19.1% 0 0.0%

Question 19 14.1% 57 42.2% 36 26.7% 2 1.5% 21 15.6% 0 0.0%

Refusal to obtain medical treatment 8 6.2% 0 0.0% 72 55.8% 26 20.2% 22 17.1% 1 0.8%

Refusal to process civilian complaint 15 27.3% 0 0.0% 23 41.8% 4 7.3% 13 23.6% 0 0.0%

Refusal to provide name/shield number

65 13.5% 3 0.6% 304 63.2% 41 8.5% 65 13.5% 3 0.6%

Refusal to show arrest warrant 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Refusal to show search warrant 8 12.7% 3 4.8% 46 73.0% 2 3.2% 3 4.8% 1 1.6%

Retaliatory arrest 11 64.7% 2 11.8% 4 23.5% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Retaliatory summons 28 68.3% 4 9.8% 8 19.5% 1 2.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Search (of person) 88 20.5% 52 12.1% 199 46.3% 8 1.9% 76 17.7% 7 1.6%

Seizure of property 6 20.0% 8 26.7% 13 43.3% 0 0.0% 3 10.0% 0 0.0%

Stop 133 23.9% 214 38.4% 140 25.1% 2 0.4% 62 11.1% 6 1.1%

Strip-searched 17 11.0% 25 16.1% 80 51.6% 16 10.3% 14 9.0% 3 1.9%

Threat of arrest 26 7.9% 93 28.1% 151 45.6% 16 4.8% 40 12.1% 5 1.5%

Threat of force (verbal or physical) 18 6.4% 18 6.4% 166 58.9% 36 12.8% 41 14.5% 3 1.1%

Threat of summons 4 16.7% 4 16.7% 14 58.3% 2 8.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Threat to damage/seize property 6 12.0% 12 24.0% 24 48.0% 2 4.0% 5 10.0% 1 2.0%

Threat to notify ACS 3 13.6% 5 22.7% 13 59.1% 0 0.0% 1 4.5% 0 0.0%

Vehicle search 88 25.1% 93 26.5% 121 34.5% 3 0.9% 40 11.4% 6 1.7%

Vehicle stop 45 20.7% 79 36.4% 66 30.4% 2 0.9% 24 11.1% 1 0.5%

Total Docket 940 19.6% 1,186 24.8% 1,838 38.4% 218 4.6% 557 11.6% 47 1.0%

Table 26E: Disposition of Abuse of Authority Allegations 2015

73

Page 74: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 35 9.2% 7 1.8% 253 66.2% 36 9.4% 47 12.3% 4 1.0%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 3 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 2 3.7% 0 0.0% 30 55.6% 7 13.0% 13 24.1% 2 3.7%

Other 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 5 71.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 14.3%

Word 320 5.6% 301 5.3% 3,569 62.3% 632 11.0% 831 14.5% 79 1.4%

Total Docket 358 5.8% 308 5.0% 3,860 62.4% 678 11.0% 891 14.4% 86 1.4%

Table 27: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2011 - 2015

74

Page 75: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 3 7.0% 1 2.3% 29 67.4% 6 14.0% 4 9.3% 0 0.0%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 40.0% 3 30.0% 3 30.0% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0%

Word 20 1.7% 74 6.2% 724 61.0% 203 17.1% 151 12.7% 14 1.2%

Total Docket 23 1.9% 75 6.0% 758 61.1% 212 17.1% 158 12.7% 15 1.2%

Table 27A: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2011

75

Page 76: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 4 7.8% 0 0.0% 38 74.5% 3 5.9% 6 11.8% 0 0.0%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 50.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Word 33 4.2% 53 6.7% 534 67.2% 69 8.7% 98 12.3% 8 1.0%

Total Docket 37 4.3% 53 6.2% 576 67.5% 73 8.6% 106 12.4% 8 0.9%

Table 27B: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2012

76

Page 77: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 2 3.0% 2 3.0% 50 74.6% 5 7.5% 7 10.4% 1 1.5%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 57.1% 1 7.1% 4 28.6% 1 7.1%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Word 61 4.7% 55 4.3% 866 67.3% 107 8.3% 172 13.4% 26 2.0%

Total Docket 63 4.6% 57 4.2% 927 67.6% 113 8.2% 183 13.3% 28 2.0%

Table 27C: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2013

77

Page 78: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 9 9.1% 0 0.0% 62 62.6% 9 9.1% 17 17.2% 2 2.0%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 25.0% 3 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 8 72.7% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 1 9.1%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Word 63 5.5% 82 7.2% 677 59.4% 115 10.1% 180 15.8% 23 2.0%

Total Docket 73 5.8% 82 6.5% 748 59.6% 127 10.1% 198 15.8% 26 2.1%

Table 27D: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2014

78

Page 79: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of DiscourtesyAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Action 17 13.9% 4 3.3% 74 60.7% 13 10.7% 13 10.7% 1 0.8%

Demeanor/tone 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Gesture 1 7.7% 0 0.0% 7 53.8% 2 15.4% 3 23.1% 0 0.0%

Other 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Word 143 10.8% 37 2.8% 768 58.0% 138 10.4% 230 17.4% 8 0.6%

Total Docket 162 11.1% 41 2.8% 851 58.2% 153 10.5% 246 16.8% 9 0.6%

Table 27E: Disposition of Discourtesy Allegations 2015

79

Page 80: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 9 6.1% 0 0.0% 94 63.5% 23 15.5% 22 14.9% 0 0.0%

Gender 9 5.3% 0 0.0% 114 67.5% 16 9.5% 28 16.6% 2 1.2%

Other 2 3.6% 0 0.0% 32 58.2% 11 20.0% 9 16.4% 1 1.8%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 13 76.5% 1 5.9% 3 17.6% 0 0.0%

Race 10 1.9% 0 0.0% 332 62.1% 89 16.6% 91 17.0% 13 2.4%

Religion 4 11.1% 0 0.0% 24 66.7% 2 5.6% 3 8.3% 3 8.3%

Sexual orientation 4 3.6% 0 0.0% 76 69.1% 12 10.9% 18 16.4% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 38 3.6% 0 0.0% 685 64.0% 154 14.4% 174 16.3% 19 1.8%

Table 28: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2011 - 2015

80

Page 81: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 69.2% 4 15.4% 4 15.4% 0 0.0%

Gender 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 84.2% 1 5.3% 2 10.5% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Race 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 48 54.5% 24 27.3% 15 17.0% 1 1.1%

Religion 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 85.7% 1 14.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Sexual orientation 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 73.3% 2 13.3% 2 13.3% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 104 63.0% 37 22.4% 23 13.9% 1 0.6%

Table 28A: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2011

81

Page 82: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 10 58.8% 5 29.4% 2 11.8% 0 0.0%

Gender 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 11 64.7% 1 5.9% 4 23.5% 0 0.0%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0%

Race 1 1.4% 0 0.0% 49 69.0% 11 15.5% 9 12.7% 1 1.4%

Religion 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0%

Sexual orientation 1 4.2% 0 0.0% 19 79.2% 3 12.5% 1 4.2% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 3 2.1% 0 0.0% 99 70.2% 20 14.2% 18 12.8% 1 0.7%

Table 28B: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2012

82

Page 83: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 3 9.4% 0 0.0% 21 65.6% 3 9.4% 5 15.6% 0 0.0%

Gender 2 5.6% 0 0.0% 26 72.2% 4 11.1% 3 8.3% 1 2.8%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 0 0.0%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Race 3 2.2% 0 0.0% 88 63.3% 14 10.1% 28 20.1% 6 4.3%

Religion 2 28.6% 0 0.0% 4 57.1% 0 0.0% 1 14.3% 0 0.0%

Sexual orientation 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 64.3% 2 7.1% 8 28.6% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 10 4.0% 0 0.0% 163 64.9% 24 9.6% 47 18.7% 7 2.8%

Table 28C: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2013

83

Page 84: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 3 8.6% 0 0.0% 20 57.1% 6 17.1% 6 17.1% 0 0.0%

Gender 5 12.8% 0 0.0% 21 53.8% 3 7.7% 9 23.1% 1 2.6%

Other 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 41.7% 4 33.3% 3 25.0% 0 0.0%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 83.3% 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 0 0.0%

Race 4 3.7% 0 0.0% 67 62.0% 17 15.7% 17 15.7% 3 2.8%

Religion 1 9.1% 0 0.0% 6 54.5% 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 2 18.2%

Sexual orientation 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 15 65.2% 3 13.0% 3 13.0% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 15 6.4% 0 0.0% 139 59.4% 34 14.5% 40 17.1% 6 2.6%

Table 28D: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2014

84

Page 85: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Offensive LanguageAllegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified

Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Ethnicity 3 7.9% 0 0.0% 25 65.8% 5 13.2% 5 13.2% 0 0.0%

Gender 1 1.7% 0 0.0% 40 69.0% 7 12.1% 10 17.2% 0 0.0%

Other 2 8.7% 0 0.0% 14 60.9% 2 8.7% 4 17.4% 1 4.3%

Physical disability 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 0 0.0%

Race 2 1.6% 0 0.0% 80 62.0% 23 17.8% 22 17.1% 2 1.6%

Religion 1 12.5% 0 0.0% 6 75.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 12.5%

Sexual orientation 1 5.0% 0 0.0% 13 65.0% 2 10.0% 4 20.0% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 10 3.6% 0 0.0% 180 64.5% 39 14.0% 46 16.5% 4 1.4%

Table 28E: Disposition of Offensive Language Allegations 2015

85

Page 86: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Type of Race-related Offensive Language Allegation

Substantiated Exonerated Unsubstantiated Unfounded Officer Unidentified Miscellaneous

Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate Number Rate

Asian 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 57.1% 1 7.1% 5 35.7% 0 0.0%

Black 8 1.8% 0 0.0% 276 63.6% 64 14.7% 73 16.8% 13 3.0%

Hispanic 1 1.5% 0 0.0% 36 54.5% 17 25.8% 12 18.2% 0 0.0%

Other Race 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 75.0% 1 25.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

White 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 53.8% 5 38.5% 1 7.7% 0 0.0%

Total Docket 10 1.9% 0 0.0% 331 62.0% 89 16.7% 91 17.0% 13 2.4%

Table 29: Disposition of Specific Race-related Offensive Language Allegations 2011 - 2015

86

Page 87: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 30: CCRB Disciplinary Recommendations for Substantiated Cases 2011 - 2015

Table 30B: CCRB Disciplinary Recommendations for Officers against Whom the CCRB Substantiated Allegations 2011 - 2015

Penalty Recommendation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 Year Total

Charges 108 124 200 158 130 720

Command Discipline 33 43 79 83 219 457

Instructions 12 8 27 70 174 291

No Recommendation 7 1 6 2 3 19

Total 160 176 312 313 526 1487

Charges Rate 68% 70% 64% 50% 25% 48%

Recommendation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 Year Total

Charges 149 169 306 254 199 1077

Command Discipline 42 62 112 112 344 672

Instructions 15 11 34 98 241 399

No Recommendation 7 1 11 4 3 26

Total 213 243 463 468 787 2174

Charges Rate 70% 70% 66% 54% 25% 50%

87

Page 88: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 31: Police Department Disposition of Substantiated Cases by Year of NYPD Closure 2011 - 2015 (Excluding APU Cases)

Police Department Disposition 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Guilty After Trial 11 14 10 4 1

Pled Guilty to charges and specifications 18 15 11 5 0

Pled Guilty to charges and specifications as CD 0 0 0 0 0

Command Discipline 60 46 34 31 105

Instructions 135 153 112 66 140

Subtotal: Disciplinary Action 224 228 167 106 246

Not guilty after trial 7 6 4 6 1

Charges dismissed 0 0 0 5 0

Statute of limitations expired 1 24 51 17 1

Department declined to prosecute (DUP) 46 72 75 41 19

Subtotal: No Disciplinary Action 54 102 130 69 21

Total Closed Cases 278 330 297 175 267

Filed (officer no longer a member of NYPD) 4 5 4 0 4

Total Processed Cases 282 335 284 140 270

Disciplinary Action Rate 81% 69% 58% 74% 92%

Gulity After Trial Rate 61% 70% 71% 100% 50%

Conviction Rate 81% 83% 84% 100% 50%

Department Declined to Prosecute 17% 22% 27% 19% 7%

88

Page 89: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 32: Police Department Disciplinary Penalties Imposed by Year of NYPD Closure* 2011 - 2015 (Excluding APU Cases)

Penalty 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Terminated 2 1 1 0 0

Suspension for or loss of vacation time of 31 or more days and/or Dismissal Probation

3 1 6 3 1

Suspension for or loss of vacation time of 21 to 30 days

1 4 4 1 0

Suspension for or loss of vacation time of 11 to 20 days

7 9 5 2 0

Suspension for or loss of vacation time of 1 to 10 days

16 13 5 3 0

Command Discipline B 56 46 34 15 34

Command Discipline A 4 0 0 16 71

Formalized Training** 0 0 0 3 75

Instructions*** 135 154 112 63 65

Warned & admonished/Reprimanded 0 0 0 0 0

Total 224 228 167 106 246

*Cases closed by the police department in a particular year often stem from CCRB referrals from earlier years.

89

Page 90: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 33: Determinations to Recommend Other Misconduct Noted (OMN) Allegations* 2011 - 2015

Category 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Total

With Substantiated

FADO Allegation

Without Substantiated

FADO Allegation

With Substantiated

FADO Allegation

Without Substantiated

FADO Allegation

With Substantiated

FADO Allegation

Without Substantiated

FADO Allegation

With Substantiated

FADO Allegation

Without Substantiated

FADO Allegation

With Substantiated

FADO Allegation

Without Substantiated

FADO Allegation

False official statement 3 0 7 1 11 2 23 2 60 0 109

Failure to produce stop and frisk report 32 84 47 57 97 59 66 75 107 41 665

Failure to prepare a memo book entry 78 331 108 361 242 646 187 560 284 325 3,122

Failure to document strip search 0 3 0 7 1 7 0 6 8 5 37

Other Misconduct 4 31 0 1 6 8 17 24 25 29 145

Subtotal 117 449 162 427 357 722 293 667 484 400

Total 566 589 1,079 960 884 4,078

* When a determination to recommend other misconduct occurs in a case in which an allegation of force, abuse of authority, discourtesy, or offensive language (FADO) was substantiated, it is categorized as "with subbed FADO allegation." When such an allegation is not substantiated, the determination to recommend other misconduct is categorized as "without subbed FADO allegation."

90

Page 91: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 34: Misconduct Rate 2011 - 2015

By Case2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Five YearTotal

Substantiated Cases With Other Misconduct Noted

56 81 171 143 222 673

Substantiated Cases Without Other Misconduct Noted

104 95 141 170 304 814

Other Misconduct Noted Without Substantiation 254 243 437 390 242 1,566

Total Cases of Misconduct 414 419 749 703 768 3,053

Full Investigations 1,919 1,247 2,082 1,885 2,177 9,310

Subantiation Rate 8.3% 14.1% 15.0% 16.6% 24.2% 16.0%

OMN Rate 16.2% 26.0% 29.2% 28.3% 21.3% 24.0%

Misconduct Rate by Case 21.6% 33.6% 36.0% 37.3% 35.3% 32.8%

91

Page 92: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NYC Pop%

Five Year Total

Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal

White 17 6.7% 24 9.1% 44 8.6% 76 15.1% 116 13.3% 33.30 277 11.5%

Black 168 66.4% 161 60.8% 318 62.5% 280 55.8% 486 55.7% 25.50 1,413 58.8%

Hispanic 62 24.5% 68 25.7% 119 23.4% 122 24.3% 225 25.8% 28.60 596 24.8%

Asian 5 2.0% 5 1.9% 14 2.8% 12 2.4% 21 2.4% 12.70 57 2.4%

Other Race 1 0.4% 7 2.6% 14 2.8% 12 2.4% 25 2.9% 0.80 59 2.5%

Total 253 100.0% 265 100.0% 509 100.0% 502 100.0% 873 100.0% 100.0% 2,402 100.0%

Unknown 47 61 65 85 182 440

Total 300 326 574 587 1,055 2,842

Table 35: Race of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

92

Page 93: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

White 114 53.5% 52% 123 50.6% 52% 267 57.7% 52% 252 54.0% 52% 403 51.3% 51%

Black 35 16.4% 16% 42 17.3% 16% 63 13.6% 16% 86 18.4% 16% 118 15.0% 15%

Hispanic 57 26.8% 26% 72 29.6% 26% 118 25.5% 26% 110 23.6% 27% 228 29.0% 27%

Asian 7 3.3% 5% 6 2.5% 5% 13 2.8% 6% 19 4.1% 6% 36 4.6% 7%

Other Race 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 2 0.4% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0%

Total 213 100.0% 100% 243 100.0% 100% 463 100.0% 100% 467 100.0% 100% 785 100.0% 100%

Unknown 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 0%

Total 213 243 463 468 787

Table 36: Race of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

93

Page 94: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NYC Pop.

%

Five Year Total

Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal

Male 229 79.8% 245 76.8% 422 75.9% 421 74.5% 738 72.4% 47.50 2055 74.8%

Female 58 20.2% 74 23.2% 134 24.1% 144 25.5% 282 27.6% 52.50 692 25.2%

Total 287 100.0% 319 100.0% 556 100.0% 565 100.0% 1,020 100.0% 100.0% 2,747 100.0%

Unknown/Other 13 7 18 22 35 95

Total 300 326 574 587 1,055 2,842

Table 37: Gender of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

94

Page 95: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Male 183 85.9% 83% 220 90.5% 83% 432 93.3% 83% 433 92.7% 83% 729 92.9% 83%

Female 30 14.1% 17% 23 9.5% 17% 31 6.7% 17% 34 7.3% 17% 56 7.1% 17%

Total 213 100.0% 100% 243 100.0% 100% 463 100.0% 100% 467 100.0% 100% 785 100.0% 100%

Unknown 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 0%

Total 213 243 463 468 787

Table 38: Gender of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

95

Page 96: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NYC Pop.

%

Five Year Total

Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal Number% of

Subtotal

14 and under 4 1.6% 4 1.5% 11 2.2% 4 0.8% 30 3.3% 17.8 53 2.1%

15-24 82 32.9% 79 28.7% 145 28.8% 166 31.5% 268 29.0% 14.4 740 29.9%

25-34 70 28.1% 101 36.7% 115 22.8% 162 30.7% 263 28.5% 17.0 711 28.7%

35-44 52 20.9% 36 13.1% 98 19.4% 94 17.8% 173 18.7% 14.1 453 18.3%

45-54 30 12.0% 38 13.8% 86 17.1% 68 12.9% 121 13.1% 13.5 343 13.8%

55-64 8 3.2% 15 5.5% 39 7.7% 24 4.6% 53 5.7% 10.9 139 5.6%

65 and over 3 1.2% 2 0.7% 10 2.0% 9 1.7% 15 1.6% 12.1 39 1.6%

Subtotal 249 100.0% 275 100.0% 504 100.0% 527 100.0% 923 100.0% 100.0% 2,478 100.0%

Unknown 51 51 70 60 132 364

Total 300 326 574 587 1,055 2,842

Table 39: Age of Victims Whose Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

96

Page 97: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Less Than H.S. Grad 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 2 0.4% 0% 2 0.4% 0% 0 0.0% 0%

H.S. Equiv 1 0.5% 2% 1 0.4% 2% 4 0.9% 1% 2 0.4% 1% 5 0.6% 1%

H.S. Grad 23 10.8% 12% 20 8.2% 10% 42 9.1% 9% 34 7.3% 8% 76 9.7% 8%

College Study - No Degree

101 47.4% 43% 125 51.4% 43% 214 46.2% 42% 212 45.4% 42% 365 46.5% 42%

Associate Degree 27 12.7% 15% 32 13.2% 15% 57 12.3% 16% 65 13.9% 16% 103 13.1% 16%

Baccalaureate Degree 58 27.2% 26% 60 24.7% 27% 135 29.2% 28% 141 30.2% 30% 219 27.9% 31%

Working Towards Masters Degree

0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 1 0.2% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 1 0.1% 0%

Masters Degree 2 0.9% 2% 5 2.1% 2% 5 1.1% 2% 10 2.1% 2% 13 1.7% 2%

Working Towards PhD and/or Law Degree

0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 0 0.0% 0%

PhD and/or Law Degree

1 0.5% 0% 0 0.0% 0% 3 0.6% 0% 1 0.2% 0% 3 0.4% 0%

Total 213 100.0% 100% 243 100.0% 100% 463 100.0% 100% 467 100.0% 100% 785 100.0% 100%

Unknown 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% 2 0%

Total 213 243 463 468 787

Table 40: Education of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

Numbers based on MOS education level at the end of the year in which the allegation was substantiated.

97

Page 98: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Bronx 21 9.9% 9.1% 31 12.8% 8.7% 46 9.9% 8.2% 34 7.3% 8.2% 66 8.4% 8.2%

Brooklyn 14 6.6% 11.8% 22 9.1% 11.8% 33 7.1% 11.3% 47 10.0% 11.3% 70 8.9% 11.2%

Manhattan 6 2.8% 3.8% 9 3.7% 3.8% 16 3.5% 3.5% 12 2.6% 3.4% 19 2.4% 3.3%

Queens 31 14.6% 16.4% 26 10.7% 16.4% 59 12.7% 16.4% 72 15.4% 16.2% 105 13.3% 16.4%

Staten Island 24 11.3% 11.2% 14 5.8% 11.1% 59 12.7% 10.9% 58 12.4% 11.0% 102 13.0% 11.0%

NYC Total 96 45.1% 52.3% 102 42.0% 51.8% 213 46.0% 50.3% 223 47.6% 50.1% 362 46.0% 50.1%

Nassau 30 14.1% 15.4% 39 16.0% 15.5% 78 16.8% 15.9% 78 16.7% 16.3% 132 16.8% 16.6%

Orange 19 8.9% 6.5% 26 10.7% 6.4% 30 6.5% 6.4% 28 6.0% 6.3% 55 7.0% 6.1%

Putnam/Ulster/Duchess 9 4.2% 1.6% 5 2.1% 1.6% 9 1.9% 1.9% 7 1.5% 1.9% 14 1.8% 1.8%

Rockland 13 6.1% 3.7% 15 6.2% 3.8% 17 3.7% 4.1% 16 3.4% 4.0% 39 5.0% 4.0%

Suffolk 35 16.4% 15.2% 35 14.4% 15.5% 74 16.0% 15.5% 86 18.4% 15.5% 120 15.2% 15.3%

Westchester 11 5.2% 5.3% 21 8.6% 5.5% 42 9.1% 5.9% 29 6.2% 6.0% 63 8.0% 6.0%

Non-NYC Total 117 54.9% 47.7% 141 58.0% 48.3% 250 54.0% 49.7% 244 52.1% 50.0% 423 53.7% 49.8%

Unknown 0 0 0 1 2

Total 213 100% 243 100% 463 100% 468 100% 787 100%

Table 41: Residence of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

Numbers based on MOS residence at the end of the year in which the allegation was substantiated.

98

Page 99: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Police Officer 138 64.8% 64.8% 151 62.1% 65.9% 312 67.4% 65.9% 314 67.1% 65.2% 492 62.5% 65.5%

Detective 3 20 9.4% 8.6% 19 7.8% 8.1% 38 8.2% 7.7% 37 7.9% 7.9% 93 11.8% 8.2%

Detective 2 2 0.9% 3.0% 4 1.6% 2.8% 9 1.9% 2.8% 8 1.7% 2.8% 8 1.0% 2.6%

Detective 1 0 0.0% 1.0% 0 0.0% 1.0% 1 0.2% 1.0% 2 0.4% 1.0% 2 0.3% 1.0%

Detective Specialist 0 0.0% 1.6% 2 0.8% 1.5% 1 0.2% 1.8% 1 0.2% 2.1% 16 2.0% 2.1%

Sergeant 42 19.7% 12.0% 54 22.2% 11.8% 74 16.0% 11.8% 75 16.0% 12.0% 130 16.5% 11.9%

Lieutenant 9 4.2% 4.4% 11 4.5% 4.3% 19 4.1% 4.3% 19 4.1% 4.3% 29 3.7% 4.2%

Lieutenant commander detective

1 0.5% 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.4% 0 0.0% 0.4%

Captain 1 0.5% 1.2% 2 0.8% 1.2% 3 0.6% 1.2% 5 1.1% 1.2% 4 0.5% 1.1%

Deputy Inspector 0 0.0% 0.5% 0 0.0% 0.5% 1 0.2% 0.5% 1 0.2% 0.5% 0 0.0% 0.5%

Chiefs and other ranks 0 0.0% 2.4% 0 0.0% 2.5% 5 1.1% 2.5% 5 1.1% 2.6% 12 1.5% 2.5%

Officer Unidentified 0 0.0% .0% 0 0.0% .0% 0 0.0% .0% 1 0.2% .0% 1 0.1% .0%

Total 213 100% 100% 243 100% 100% 463 100% 100% 468 100% 100% 787 100% 100%

Table 42: Rank of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

Numbers based on MOS rank at the end of the year in which the allegation was substantiated.

99

Page 100: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Number% of

SubtotalNYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. % Number

% of Subtotal

NYPD Pop. %

Less than 1 year 6 2.8% 4.6% 11 4.5% 5.9% 9 1.9% 5.7% 10 2.1% 4.4% 8 1.0% 5.7%

1 year 14 6.6% 3.7% 8 3.3% 4.3% 31 6.7% 5.7% 40 8.5% 5.6% 32 4.1% 4.2%

2 years 19 8.9% 1.4% 16 6.6% 3.6% 16 3.5% 4.2% 21 4.5% 5.5% 57 7.2% 5.3%

3 years 15 7.0% 5.9% 20 8.2% 1.4% 28 6.0% 3.5% 21 4.5% 4.1% 68 8.6% 5.3%

4 years 24 11.3% 5.3% 27 11.1% 5.8% 48 10.4% 1.4% 17 3.6% 3.5% 33 4.2% 4.0%

5 to 7 years 44 20.7% 20.2% 50 20.6% 19.8% 141 30.5% 17.3% 136 29.1% 12.2% 134 17.0% 10.3%

8 to 11 years 36 16.9% 15.6% 41 16.9% 15.7% 79 17.1% 20.6% 118 25.2% 22.4% 228 29.0% 24.0%

12 to 15 years 25 11.7% 12.4% 32 13.2% 14.4% 46 9.9% 14.8% 53 11.3% 14.0% 98 12.5% 14.5%

16 years and over 30 14.1% 30.9% 38 15.6% 29.1% 65 14.0% 26.8% 51 10.9% 28.3% 127 16.1% 26.7%

Officer unidentified 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 2 0.3%

Total 213 100% 100% 243 100% 100% 463 100% 100% 468 100% 100% 787 100% 100%

Table 43: Tenure at Incident of Subject Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

100

Page 101: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44A: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Manhattan 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Manhattan South

001 Precinct 1 1 3 2 1 8

005 Precinct 1 1 0 2 3 7

006 Precinct 0 0 0 4 3 7

007 Precinct 1 0 4 2 4 11

009 Precinct 0 4 5 2 9 20

010 Precinct 1 1 3 5 1 11

013 Precinct 0 1 4 3 1 9

017 Precinct 0 1 0 2 3 6

Midtown North Precinct 2 1 3 2 5 13

Midtown South Precinct 1 2 3 7 9 22

Manhattan South Total 7 12 25 31 39 114

Manhattan North

019 Precinct 2 2 0 4 4 12

020 Precinct 1 3 0 3 1 8

023 Precinct 3 4 8 1 7 23

024 Precinct 0 1 5 3 1 10

025 Precinct 9 7 5 1 15 37

026 Precinct 1 2 2 0 4 9

028 Precinct 0 3 3 1 7 14

030 Precinct 2 1 4 2 8 17

032 Precinct 4 3 8 5 4 24

033 Precinct 0 2 1 3 7 13

034 Precinct 3 1 3 4 3 14

Central Park Precinct 1 1 0 1 0 3

Manhattan North Total 26 30 39 28 61 184

Manhattan Total 33 42 64 59 100 298

Percentage of Citywide Substantiated Complaints 20.6% 23.9% 20.5% 18.8% 19.0% 20.04%

101

Page 102: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44B: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Bronx 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Bronx

040 Precinct 6 4 11 11 19 51

041 Precinct 2 4 6 10 11 33

042 Precinct 4 4 3 4 11 26

043 Precinct 4 8 6 7 13 38

044 Precinct 11 9 11 11 16 58

045 Precinct 0 1 2 0 5 8

046 Precinct 3 15 10 3 15 46

047 Precinct 5 5 5 6 18 39

048 Precinct 2 3 4 0 6 15

049 Precinct 2 1 1 2 7 13

050 Precinct 0 3 2 0 4 9

052 Precinct 6 2 11 5 10 34

Bronx Total 45 59 72 59 135 370

Percentage of Citywide Substantiated Complaints 28.1% 33.5% 23.1% 18.8% 25.7% 24.88%

102

Page 103: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44C: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Brooklyn 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Brooklyn South

060 Precinct 0 4 6 2 10 22

061 Precinct 0 0 0 5 5 10

062 Precinct 0 0 2 3 1 6

063 Precinct 1 3 2 2 7 15

066 Precinct 0 0 2 3 2 7

067 Precinct 2 3 10 7 10 32

068 Precinct 0 2 1 0 4 7

069 Precinct 2 1 4 5 5 17

070 Precinct 3 1 6 5 7 22

071 Precinct 2 5 6 4 5 22

072 Precinct 2 1 2 1 5 11

076 Precinct 0 0 5 2 1 8

078 Precinct 1 0 0 1 2 4

Brooklyn South Total 13 20 46 40 64 183

Brooklyn North

073 Precinct 7 9 13 9 14 52

075 Precinct 8 8 23 22 21 82

077 Precinct 2 2 6 6 7 23

079 Precinct 7 5 5 20 16 53

081 Precinct 6 3 5 4 13 31

083 Precinct 1 2 7 3 9 22

084 Precinct 0 1 1 2 5 9

088 Precinct 3 0 1 2 5 11

090 Precinct 1 0 2 5 5 13

094 Precinct 1 0 2 3 5 11

Brooklyn North Total 36 30 65 76 100 307

Brooklyn Total 49 50 111 116 164 490

Percentage of Citywide Substantiated Complaints 30.6% 28.4% 35.6% 37.1% 31.2% 32.95%

103

Page 104: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44D: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Queens 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Queens South

100 Precinct 0 0 0 0 2 2

101 Precinct 4 2 2 4 12 24

102 Precinct 2 1 1 4 6 14

103 Precinct 5 4 4 10 10 33

105 Precinct 1 0 6 5 9 21

106 Precinct 0 3 3 0 1 7

107 Precinct 2 0 2 4 2 10

113 Precinct 1 6 9 10 16 42

Queens South Total 15 16 27 37 58 153

Queens North

104 Precinct 1 4 0 4 4 13

108 Precinct 1 0 2 2 5 10

109 Precinct 1 1 3 2 4 11

110 Precinct 3 0 2 4 3 12

111 Precinct 0 0 1 1 2 4

112 Precinct 0 0 2 1 2 5

114 Precinct 1 0 4 7 5 17

115 Precinct 2 0 3 1 3 9

Queens North Total 9 5 17 22 28 81

Queens Total 24 21 44 59 86 234

Percentage of Citywide Substantiated Complaints 15.0% 11.9% 14.1% 18.8% 16.3% 15.74%

104

Page 105: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 44E: Where Incidents that Led to a Substantiated Complaint Took Place - Staten Island 2011 - 2015

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Staten Island

120 Precinct 4 4 13 8 14 43

121 Precinct 0 0 0 6 16 22

122 Precinct 5 0 6 3 8 22

123 Precinct 0 0 2 3 2 7

Staten Island Total 9 4 21 20 40 94

Percentage of Citywide Substantiated Complaints 5.6% 2.3% 6.7% 6.4% 7.6% 6.32%

105

Page 106: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Patrol Services Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Patrol Borough Manhattan South Total 4 9 21 19 27 80

Patrol Borough Manhattan North Total 20 27 42 33 50 172

Patrol Borough Bronx Total 52 71 81 60 146 410

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Total 16 24 38 48 57 183

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Total 35 21 66 83 93 298

Patrol Borough Queens South Total 13 21 30 47 66 177

Patrol Borough Queens North Total 12 4 20 28 40 104

Patrol Borough Staten Island Total 8 3 27 25 42 105

Special Operations Division Total 0 1 1 0 6 8

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands Total 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 160 181 326 343 527 1537

Other Bureaus

Traffic Control Division Total 1 0 1 6 8 16

Transit Bureau Total 3 5 10 14 24 56

Housing Bureau Total 13 12 35 16 54 130

Organized Crime Control Bureau Total 29 25 53 44 87 238

Detective Bureau Total 5 17 31 41 70 164

Other Bureaus Total 3 2 19 15 40 79

Total 54 61 149 136 283 683

Other Commands

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands Total 0 0 3 3 10 16

Undetermined 0 1 1 1 2 5

Total 214 243 479 483 822 2241

Table 45: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated 2011 - 2015

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

106

Page 107: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46A: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Manhattan South 2011 - 2015

Manhattan South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

001 Precinct 1 1 4 2 1 9

005 Precinct 0 1 0 1 4 6

006 Precinct 0 0 0 3 1 4

007 Precinct 1 1 2 3 3 10

009 Precinct 0 2 4 0 4 10

010 Precinct 1 1 2 3 2 9

013 Precinct 0 1 3 0 0 4

Midtown South Precinct 0 1 1 2 4 8

017 Precinct 0 1 0 1 3 5

Midtown North Precinct 1 0 2 2 4 9

Precincts Total 4 9 18 17 26 74

Patrol Borough Manhattan South Task Force 0 0 0 1 0 1

Patrol Borough Manhattan South HQ 0 0 2 1 1 4

Patrol Borough Manhattan South Anti-Crime Unit 0 0 1 0 0 1

Patrol Borough Manhattan South Total 4 9 21 19 27 80

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

107

Page 108: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46B: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Manhattan North 2011 - 2015

Manhattan North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

019 Precinct 1 1 0 4 4 10

020 Precinct 1 1 0 4 1 7

023 Precinct 2 5 7 2 3 19

024 Precinct 0 2 6 4 0 12

025 Precinct 2 5 6 1 9 23

026 Precinct 0 2 2 0 0 4

Central Park Precinct 0 1 0 0 1 2

028 Precinct 0 2 1 1 3 7

030 Precinct 3 2 3 2 9 19

032 Precinct 1 1 1 5 5 13

033 Precinct 0 1 0 2 6 9

034 Precinct 3 1 6 3 5 18

Precincts Total 13 24 32 28 46 143

Patrol Borough Manhattan North Task Force 2 0 0 0 0 2

Patrol Borough Manhattan North HQ 0 2 9 4 3 18

Patrol Borough Manhattan North Anti-Crime Unit 1 1 1 1 1 5

Manhattan North Impact Response Team 4 0 0 0 0 4

Patrol Borough Manhattan North Total 20 27 42 33 50 172

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

108

Page 109: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46C: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Bronx 2011 - 2015

Bronx 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

040 Precinct 3 2 2 9 12 28

041 Precinct 5 1 7 9 10 32

042 Precinct 4 5 2 1 13 25

043 Precinct 4 3 5 2 8 22

044 Precinct 6 6 11 5 20 48

045 Precinct 0 1 2 0 3 6

046 Precinct 3 16 9 1 11 40

047 Precinct 4 3 5 5 23 40

048 Precinct 4 5 4 0 4 17

049 Precinct 2 1 2 5 12 22

050 Precinct 0 5 0 0 6 11

052 Precinct 3 1 9 1 4 18

Precincts Total 38 49 58 38 126 309

Patrol Borough Bronx Task Force 0 0 4 1 1 6

Patrol Borough Bronx HQ 8 21 18 20 19 86

Patrol Borough Bronx Anti-Crime Unit 1 1 1 1 0 4

Bronx Impact Response Team 5 0 0 0 0 5

Patrol Borough Bronx Total 52 71 81 60 146 410

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

109

Page 110: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46D: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Brooklyn South 2011 - 2015

Brooklyn South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

060 Precinct 0 0 1 3 5 9

061 Precinct 1 0 0 4 3 8

062 Precinct 0 0 2 4 1 7

063 Precinct 1 6 2 2 7 18

066 Precinct 0 1 1 2 3 7

067 Precinct 0 1 7 4 13 25

068 Precinct 0 1 1 0 3 5

069 Precinct 3 2 3 6 3 17

070 Precinct 2 1 6 7 6 22

071 Precinct 3 4 3 3 2 15

072 Precinct 4 2 4 2 5 17

076 Precinct 0 0 4 5 0 9

078 Precinct 0 0 0 2 2 4

Precincts Total 14 18 34 44 53 163

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Task Force 0 2 0 0 1 3

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South HQ 1 4 4 2 1 12

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Anti-Crime Unit 0 0 0 2 2 4

Brooklyn South Impact Response Team 1 0 0 0 0 1

Patrol Borough Brooklyn South Total 16 24 38 48 57 183

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

110

Page 111: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46E: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Brooklyn North 2011 - 2015

Brooklyn North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

073 Precinct 3 1 3 5 7 19

075 Precinct 8 2 26 18 23 77

077 Precinct 1 2 5 3 3 14

079 Precinct 6 4 3 20 23 56

081 Precinct 7 1 5 10 10 33

083 Precinct 0 2 13 1 5 21

084 Precinct 0 0 0 1 4 5

088 Precinct 1 0 1 4 0 6

090 Precinct 1 0 2 3 5 11

094 Precinct 2 0 0 3 3 8

Precincts Total 29 12 58 68 83 250

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Task Force 2 0 0 1 2 5

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North HQ 2 8 8 13 6 37

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Anti-Crime Unit 0 1 0 1 2 4

Brooklyn North Impact Response Team 2 0 0 0 0 2

Patrol Borough Brooklyn North Total 35 21 66 83 93 298

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

111

Page 112: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46F: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Queens South 2011 - 2015

Queens South 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

100 Precinct 0 0 0 0 0 0

101 Precinct 4 3 5 7 10 29

102 Precinct 0 2 2 4 6 14

103 Precinct 4 5 1 13 10 33

105 Precinct 1 0 5 6 11 23

106 Precinct 0 3 6 1 0 10

107 Precinct 3 0 1 5 2 11

113 Precinct 0 7 4 7 18 36

Precincts Total 12 20 24 43 57 156

Patrol Borough Queens South Task Force 0 0 0 0 1 1

Patrol Borough Queens South HQ 0 1 5 4 7 17

Patrol Borough Queens South Anti-Crime Unit 0 0 1 0 1 2

Queens South Impact Response Team 1 0 0 0 0 1

Patrol Borough Queens South Total 13 21 30 47 66 177

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

112

Page 113: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46G: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Queens North 2011 - 2015

Queens North 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

104 Precinct 0 1 0 5 9 15

108 Precinct 2 0 3 2 10 17

109 Precinct 1 1 2 4 7 15

110 Precinct 6 0 3 9 2 20

111 Precinct 0 0 1 0 1 2

112 Precinct 0 0 3 1 3 7

114 Precinct 0 0 4 5 2 11

115 Precinct 0 0 4 0 3 7

Precincts Total 9 2 20 26 37 94

Patrol Borough Queens North Task Force 0 2 0 0 0 2

Patrol Borough Queens North HQ 1 0 0 2 1 4

Patrol Borough Queens North Anti-Crime Unit 2 0 0 0 2 4

Patrol Borough Queens North Total 12 4 20 28 40 104

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

113

Page 114: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46H: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Patrol Borough Staten Island 2011 - 2015

Staten Island 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

120 Precinct 3 3 11 10 15 42

122 Precinct 5 0 8 7 5 25

123 Precinct 0 0 5 2 2 9

121 Precinct 0 0 0 6 19 25

Precincts Total 8 3 24 25 41 101

Patrol Borough Staten Island Task Force 0 0 2 0 0 2

Patrol Borough Staten Island HQ 0 0 0 0 1 1

Patrol Borough Staten Island Anti-Crime Unit 0 0 1 0 0 1

Staten Island Housing Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Staten Island Court Section 0 0 0 0 0 0

Staten Island Impact Response Team 0 0 0 0 0 0

Patrol Borough Staten Island Total 8 3 27 25 42 105

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

114

Page 115: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46I: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Special Operations Division 2011 - 2015

Special Operations 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Emergency Services Unit and Squads 1-10 0 1 1 0 6 8

Harbor Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Aviation Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Canine Team 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mounted Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 SOD Strategic Response Group 0 0 0 0 0 0

Special Operations Division Headquarters 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disorder control 0 0 0 0 0 0

Special Operations Division Total 0 1 1 0 6 8

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

115

Page 116: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46J: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 2011 - 2015

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Chiefs Office 0 0 0 0 0 0

Special Operations Division Taxi Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other Patrol Services Bureau Commands Total 0 0 0 0 0 0

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

116

Page 117: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46K: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Traffic Control Division 2011 - 2015

Traffic Control Division 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Traffic Control Division - Headquarters Command 0 0 0 0 0 0

Manhattan Traffic Task Force 1 0 0 2 0 3

Brooklyn Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bronx Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Queens Traffic Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Surface Transportation Enforcement Division (STED) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bus Unit 0 0 0 0 1 1

Traffic Control Parking Enforcement District 0 0 0 0 0 0

Traffic Control Tow Units 0 0 0 0 0 0

Traffic Control Summons Enforcement 0 0 0 0 0 0

Traffic Command Intersection Control 0 0 0 0 0 0

Traffic Control Intelligence Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Highway District 0 0 0 1 2 3

Highway Unit #1 0 0 0 1 1 2

Highway Unit #2 0 0 1 1 1 3

Highway Unit #3 0 0 0 0 2 2

Highway Unit #4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Highway Unit #5 0 0 0 1 1 2

Highway Safety Enforcement Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Movie and TV Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Traffic Control Division Total 1 0 1 6 8 16

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

117

Page 118: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46L: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Transit Bureau 2011 - 2015

Transit Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Transit Bureau Headquarters 2 0 5 1 4 12

Transit Bureau Authority Liaison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Inspections 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Spec. Invest. Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Crime Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Patrol Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Manhattan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Bronx 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Queens 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Brooklyn 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB DT01 0 1 0 2 1 4

TB DT02 0 0 0 2 2 4

TB DT03 0 0 1 2 2 5

TB DT04 0 2 0 3 3 8

TB DT11 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB DT12 0 0 0 0 1 1

TB DT20 1 0 0 0 0 1

TB DT23 0 0 0 0 0 0

TB DT30 0 0 1 2 5 8

TB DT32 0 0 0 0 2 2

TB DT33 0 0 1 0 3 4

TB DT34 0 2 2 0 1 5

Transit Bureau Manhattan Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Bronx Task Force 0 0 0 1 0 1

Transit Bureau Queens Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Brooklyn Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Homeless Outreach Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Division Canine Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Vandal Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Special Operations Unit 0 0 0 1 0 1

TB Anti-Terrorism 0 0 0 0 0 0

118

Page 119: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Transportation Bureau and Transit Other Commands 0 0 0 0 0 0

Transit Bureau Total 3 5 10 14 24 56

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

119

Page 120: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46M: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Housing Bureau 2011 - 2015

Housing Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Housing Bureau (Office of the Chief Command Center) 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Special Operations Section 0 0 1 0 0 1

PSA 1 0 1 5 0 10 16

PSA 2 3 3 7 1 2 16

PSA 3 2 0 3 3 6 14

PSA 4 0 0 3 3 6 12

PSA 5 3 0 3 0 7 13

PSA 6 2 0 3 0 0 5

PSA 7 0 3 3 1 7 14

PSA 8 0 2 1 1 9 13

PSA 9 0 0 3 5 1 9

Housing Bureau Brooklyn/Staten Island 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Manhattan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Bronx/Queens 0 0 0 1 1 2

Housing Bureau Investigations 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Elevator Vandalism Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Operations and Misc. Commands 0 0 0 0 0 0

Housing Bureau Total 13 12 35 16 54 130

Housing Borough Brooklyn Impact Response Team 0 0 2 0 1 3

Housing Borough Manhattan Impact Response Team 2 1 1 1 4 9

Housing Borough Bronx/Queens Impact Response Team 1 2 0 0 0 3

Housing Bureau Total 13 12 35 16 54 130

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

120

Page 121: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46N: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Organized Crime Control Bureau 2011 - 2015

Organized Crime Control Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Queens Narcotics 7 4 4 4 18 37

Manhattan North Narcotics 4 5 6 4 10 29

Manhattan South Narcotics 0 0 1 0 4 5

Bronx Narcotics 5 5 15 14 13 52

Staten Island Narcotics 2 0 3 4 13 22

Brooklyn North Narcotics 8 8 13 11 14 54

Brooklyn South Narcotics 2 2 9 7 14 34

Narcotics Headquarters 0 1 1 0 0 2

Auto Crime Division 0 0 1 0 0 1

Vice Enforcement Division 1 0 0 0 0 1

Drug Enforcement Task Force 0 0 0 0 0 0

Organized Crime Headquarters 0 0 0 0 1 1

Organized Crime Control Bureau Total 29 25 53 44 87 238

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

121

Page 122: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46O: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated Detective Bureau 2011 - 2015

Detective Bureau 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Detective Bureau Headquarters 0 0 0 0 0 0

Central Investigation and Resource Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Special Investigations Division 1 1 0 0 1 3

Special Victims Division 0 0 1 0 0 1

Forensic Investigations Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fugitive Enforcement Division 1 0 16 15 35 67

Gang Division 2 9 6 15 21 53

Detective Borough Bronx 0 0 2 3 6 11

Detective Borough Manhattan 1 1 4 3 1 10

Detective Borough Brooklyn 0 6 1 2 4 13

Detective Borough Queens 0 0 1 3 1 5

Detective Borough Staten Island 0 0 0 0 1 1

DB Queens North Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0

DB Queens South Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0

Detective Bureau Total 5 17 31 41 70 164

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

122

Page 123: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46P: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated - Other Bureaus 2011 - 2015

Other Bureaus 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Internal Affairs Bureau

Internal Affairs Bureau 0 0 0 0 1 1

Criminal Justice Bureau

Court Division 3 2 17 15 37 74

Court Bureau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Court LMSI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Court Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0

Criminal Justice Headquarters 0 0 0 0 0 0

Support Services Bureau

Property Clerk Division 0 0 0 0 1 1

Fleet Services 0 0 1 0 1 2

Central Records Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Personnel Bureau

Applicant Processing Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Health Services 0 0 1 0 0 1

Personnel Bureau Headquarters 0 0 0 0 0 0

Other Bureaus Total 3 3 20 16 42 84

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

123

Page 124: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Table 46Q: Assignment of Officers Against Whom Allegations Were Substantiated to Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands 2011 - 2015

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total

Deputy Commissioner Legal Matters - License Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Legal Matters - Legal Bureau 0 0 0 0 0 0

DC Training 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Training - Police Academy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Training - Police Academy Training 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Training - In-service Training Section 0 0 0 0 1 1

Deputy Commissioner Management and Budget 0 0 0 1 1 2

Police Commissioner Office 0 0 0 0 0 0

Community Affairs Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Chief of Community Affairs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Community Affairs Juvenile Section 0 0 0 0 0 0

School Safety Bronx/Manhattan 0 0 0 0 1 1

School Safety Queens/Brooklyn 0 0 0 0 0 0

Office of Equal Employment 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Operations 0 0 0 1 0 1

DC Operations Financial Mgmt. 0 0 0 0 0 0

Intelligence Division 0 0 3 1 5 9

Chief of Department 0 0 0 0 0 0

Department Advocate 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Public Information 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crime Prevention 0 0 0 0 0 0

First Deputy Commissioner 0 0 0 0 0 0

Office of Management, Analysis and Planning 0 0 0 0 0 0

Quality Assurance Division 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioner Counterterrorism 0 0 0 0 2 2

Chief of Department Evaluation Section 0 0 0 0 0 0

Deputy Commissioners and Miscellaneous Commands Total 0 0 3 3 10 16

Table shows MOS command as recorded at the time of complaint.

124

Page 125: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

These tables pertain to 3,590 MOS who have received at least one CCRB complaint with at least one substantiated allegation during their entire history on the force (as of February 18, 2016)

Table 47A: MOS Ethnicity

Ethnicity Count % of Total

American Indian 3 0.0%

Asian 127 4.0%

Black 550 15.0%

Hispanic 954 27.0%

White 1956 54.0%

Grand Total 3590 100.0%

Table 47C: MOS Rank

Rank Count % of Total

POM 1570 43.0%

SGT 586 16.0%

DT3 566 16.0%

LT 227 6.0%

DT2 165 5.0%

DTS 106 3.0%

SDS 94 3.0%

DT1 69 2.0%

CPT 66 2.0%

SSA 35 1.0%

LCD 28 1.0%

DI 26 1.0%

INS 24 1.0%

LSA 15 0.0%

DC 10 0.0%

AC 1 0.0%

COD 1 0.0%

COI 1 0.0%

Grand Total 3590 100.0%

Table 47B: MOS Sex

Rank Count % of Total

Female 319 9.0%

Male 3271 91.0%

Grand Total 3590 100.0%

Table 47D: MOS Education Level

Education Level Count % of Total

College Study - No Degree

1621 45.0%

Baccalaureate Degree 985 27.0%

Associate Degree 473 13.0%

H.S. Grad 367 10.0%

Masters Degree 84 2.0%

H.S. Equiv 37 1.0%

PhD and/or Law Degree 10 0.0%

Less Than H.S. Grad 9 0.0%

Working Towards Masters Degree

3 0.0%

Working Towards PhD and/or Law Degree

1 0.0%

Grand Total 3590 98.0%

125

Page 126: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

This table pertains to 3,590 MOS who have received at least one CCRB complaint with at least one substantiated allegation during their entire history on the force (as of February 18, 2016)

Table 47E: MOS Command

Current Rank Count % of Total

WARRSEC 94 2.6%

NARCBBX 59 1.6%

NARCBMN 56 1.6%

INT CIS 51 1.4%

075 PCT 49 1.4%

046 PCT 46 1.3%

C R C 45 1.3%

NARCBBN 45 1.3%

044 PCT 44 1.2%

NARCBQN 44 1.2%

040 PCT 40 1.1%

DB GLD 38 1.1%

079 PCT 34 0.9%

120 PCT 33 0.9%

103 PCT 32 0.9%

047 PCT 31 0.9%

067 PCT 29 0.8%

NARCBBS 29 0.8%

049 PCT 28 0.8%

GVS DIV 28 0.8%

I.A.B. 28 0.8%

101 PCT 26 0.7%

105 PCT 26 0.7%

PBBX 25 0.7%

043 PCT 24 0.7%

073 PCT 23 0.6%

It is important to note that an officer's current rank or command may or may not be the rank or command at the time of incident.

126

Page 127: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

MTS PCT 23 0.6%

042 PCT 22 0.6%

081 PCT 22 0.6%

F S S 22 0.6%

PSA 4 22 0.6%

041 PCT 21 0.6%

048 PCT 21 0.6%

E S U 21 0.6%

O C C B 21 0.6%

O C I D 21 0.6%

025 PCT 20 0.6%

033 PCT 20 0.6%

070 PCT 20 0.6%

083 PCT 20 0.6%

113 PCT 20 0.6%

PSA 5 20 0.6%

028 PCT 19 0.5%

030 PCT 19 0.5%

034 PCT 19 0.5%

121 PCT 19 0.5%

JT T/F 19 0.5%

108 PCT 18 0.5%

GANG BX 18 0.5%

PSA 7 18 0.5%

PSA 8 18 0.5%

001 PCT 17 0.5%

071 PCT 17 0.5%

104 PCT 17 0.5%

110 PCT 17 0.5%

122 PCT 17 0.5%

FORCEID 17 0.5%

127

Page 128: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

PSA 1 17 0.5%

PSA 3 17 0.5%

019 PCT 16 0.4%

023 PCT 16 0.4%

052 PCT 16 0.4%

068 PCT 16 0.4%

090 PCT 16 0.4%

102 PCT 16 0.4%

MTN PCT 16 0.4%

PSA 2 16 0.4%

D-E T/F 15 0.4%

GANG BN 15 0.4%

MAN CT 15 0.4%

NARCBSI 15 0.4%

PSA 9 15 0.4%

SRG 1 15 0.4%

024 PCT 14 0.4%

050 PCT 14 0.4%

072 PCT 14 0.4%

084 PCT 14 0.4%

AUTO CD 14 0.4%

CW T TF 14 0.4%

PBBS 14 0.4%

PBMS 14 0.4%

PROPCLK 14 0.4%

SRG 2 14 0.4%

SRG 4 14 0.4%

017 PCT 13 0.4%

061 PCT 13 0.4%

062 PCT 13 0.4%

075 DET 13 0.4%

128

Page 129: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

077 PCT 13 0.4%

094 PCT 13 0.4%

114 PCT 13 0.4%

BKLN CT 13 0.4%

DB BX 13 0.4%

INT OAS 13 0.4%

PSA 6 13 0.4%

TB DT02 13 0.4%

005 PCT 12 0.3%

006 PCT 12 0.3%

088 PCT 12 0.3%

107 PCT 12 0.3%

109 PCT 12 0.3%

H BX/Q 12 0.3%

HWY 02 12 0.3%

PBMN 12 0.3%

PBQ/N 12 0.3%

TB DT03 12 0.3%

060 PCT 11 0.3%

111 PCT 11 0.3%

GANG Q 11 0.3%

M E L D 11 0.3%

NARCBMS 11 0.3%

POL LAB 11 0.3%

TB DT33 11 0.3%

WTC CMD 11 0.3%

009 PCT 10 0.3%

013 PCT 10 0.3%

023 DET 10 0.3%

032 PCT 10 0.3%

040 DET 10 0.3%

129

Page 130: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

115 PCT 10 0.3%

123 PCT 10 0.3%

BX CT 10 0.3%

CD OFF 10 0.3%

DB SVD 10 0.3%

F.T.S. 10 0.3%

HWY 05 10 0.3%

PBBN 10 0.3%

PBBN SU 10 0.3%

REC TNG 10 0.3%

T.A.R.U 10 0.3%

TB DT01 10 0.3%

TB DT30 10 0.3%

007 PCT 9 0.3%

010 PCT 9 0.3%

020 PCT 9 0.3%

026 PCT 9 0.3%

067 DET 9 0.3%

069 PCT 9 0.3%

078 PCT 9 0.3%

CTERRDV 9 0.3%

HARBOR 9 0.3%

HWY 01 9 0.3%

INSUPDV 9 0.3%

PBBS SU 9 0.3%

QM SEC 9 0.3%

SOD SRG 9 0.3%

TB DT04 9 0.3%

TB RESP 9 0.3%

043 DET 8 0.2%

044 DET 8 0.2%

130

Page 131: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

048 DET 8 0.2%

063 PCT 8 0.2%

066 PCT 8 0.2%

077 DET 8 0.2%

106 PCT 8 0.2%

113 DET 8 0.2%

A P DIV 8 0.2%

C C A S 8 0.2%

GANG M 8 0.2%

HWY 03 8 0.2%

HWY DST 8 0.2%

P C O 8 0.2%

P S B 8 0.2%

TB DT32 8 0.2%

047 DET 7 0.2%

073 DET 7 0.2%

081 DET 7 0.2%

103 DET 7 0.2%

112 PCT 7 0.2%

114 DET 7 0.2%

C E D 7 0.2%

DB BSVS 7 0.2%

DBQS OP 7 0.2%

ESS 05 7 0.2%

MTN DET 7 0.2%

MTS DET 7 0.2%

OCDE-SF 7 0.2%

PBQ/S 7 0.2%

TB DT12 7 0.2%

TB VTF 7 0.2%

042 DET 6 0.2%

131

Page 132: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

045 PCT 6 0.2%

060 DET 6 0.2%

069 DET 6 0.2%

071 DET 6 0.2%

076 PCT 6 0.2%

083 DET 6 0.2%

100 PCT 6 0.2%

CENROBB 6 0.2%

DB BNHM 6 0.2%

ESS 03 6 0.2%

ESS 06 6 0.2%

ESU CAN 6 0.2%

MED DIV 6 0.2%

NAR DIV 6 0.2%

OMAP 6 0.2%

PA UPTU 6 0.2%

PBBX SU 6 0.2%

PBSI 6 0.2%

QNS CT 6 0.2%

TB DT34 6 0.2%

046 DET 5 0.1%

052 DET 5 0.1%

063 DET 5 0.1%

115 DET 5 0.1%

120 DET 5 0.1%

BKROBSQ 5 0.1%

BXROBSQ 5 0.1%

CD OP/U 5 0.1%

CI&RDIV 5 0.1%

DB BSHM 5 0.1%

DB BXHM 5 0.1%

132

Page 133: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

DB HATE 5 0.1%

DB QSVS 5 0.1%

DB SI 5 0.1%

ESS 09 5 0.1%

FM DIV 5 0.1%

H MAN 5 0.1%

HQ SEC 5 0.1%

MP SQD 5 0.1%

PBMN SU 5 0.1%

RMB QAD 5 0.1%

S O D 5 0.1%

SP INV 5 0.1%

SRG 3 5 0.1%

TB DT20 5 0.1%

028 DET 4 0.1%

041 DET 4 0.1%

050 DET 4 0.1%

079 DET 4 0.1%

088 DET 4 0.1%

101 DET 4 0.1%

108 DET 4 0.1%

111 DET 4 0.1%

122 DET 4 0.1%

AV.UNIT 4 0.1%

BM SEC 4 0.1%

BOMB SQ 4 0.1%

CPK PCT 4 0.1%

DB FCTF 4 0.1%

DB RTCC 4 0.1%

DBSV Z2 4 0.1%

DBSV Z3 4 0.1%

133

Page 134: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

DC OPER 4 0.1%

DET BUR 4 0.1%

EMP REL 4 0.1%

ESS 02 4 0.1%

ESS 07 4 0.1%

ESS 10 4 0.1%

FLT SVC 4 0.1%

INT BUR 4 0.1%

INT EPU 4 0.1%

INT PSS 4 0.1%

MB SSZN 4 0.1%

MC/SQD 4 0.1%

MOUNTED 4 0.1%

PBQS SU 4 0.1%

009 DET 3 0.1%

024 DET 3 0.1%

026 DET 3 0.1%

032 DET 3 0.1%

068 DET 3 0.1%

070 DET 3 0.1%

094 DET 3 0.1%

105 DET 3 0.1%

107 DET 3 0.1%

112 DET 3 0.1%

123 DET 3 0.1%

ADM SUP 3 0.1%

BARRIER 3 0.1%

CRJ BUR 3 0.1%

CT LMSI 3 0.1%

DA NY 3 0.1%

DB BKLN 3 0.1%

134

Page 135: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

DB MAN 3 0.1%

DB MSVS 3 0.1%

DB QNS 3 0.1%

ESS 04 3 0.1%

ESS 08 3 0.1%

GANG BS 3 0.1%

GANG DV 3 0.1%

GANG SI 3 0.1%

HBM IRT 3 0.1%

INT UOU 3 0.1%

PBMS SU 3 0.1%

POL ACD 3 0.1%

QB SSZN 3 0.1%

R M D 3 0.1%

SP FRDS 3 0.1%

SPL TRN 3 0.1%

SRG 5 3 0.1%

SS DIV 3 0.1%

TB CAN 3 0.1%

TB DT11 3 0.1%

010 DET 2 0.1%

013 DET 2 0.1%

020 DET 2 0.1%

030 DET 2 0.1%

034 DET 2 0.1%

045 DET 2 0.1%

072 DET 2 0.1%

078 DET 2 0.1%

090 DET 2 0.1%

100 DET 2 0.1%

102 DET 2 0.1%

135

Page 136: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

110 DET 2 0.1%

121 DET 2 0.1%

A&E SQD 2 0.1%

ADM DIV 2 0.1%

BUS UT 2 0.1%

C/PRV D 2 0.1%

CD IRS 2 0.1%

COD SAS 2 0.1%

COMMDIV 2 0.1%

CPK DET 2 0.1%

CT EPES 2 0.1%

D C M B 2 0.1%

DB BXSV 2 0.1%

DB MNHM 2 0.1%

DB QNHM 2 0.1%

DBSV Z1 2 0.1%

ESS 01 2 0.1%

FOR INV 2 0.1%

FUG ENF 2 0.1%

H BKLYN 2 0.1%

HBK IRT 2 0.1%

I T B 2 0.1%

JUV CRM 2 0.1%

L S S D 2 0.1%

LIC DIV 2 0.1%

PB EMD 2 0.1%

PB POS 2 0.1%

PBQN SU 2 0.1%

QNROBSQ 2 0.1%

RM BUR 2 0.1%

S T D 2 0.1%

136

Page 137: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

SSD INV 2 0.1%

TB ATU 2 0.1%

TB BKTF 2 0.1%

TB BQTF 2 0.1%

TB DT23 2 0.1%

TB M/TF 2 0.1%

TRB TED 2 0.1%

VICE 2 0.1%

001 DET 1 0.0%

017 DET 1 0.0%

019 DET 1 0.0%

025 DET 1 0.0%

033 DET 1 0.0%

049 DET 1 0.0%

061 DET 1 0.0%

062 DET 1 0.0%

084 DET 1 0.0%

104 DET 1 0.0%

106 DET 1 0.0%

109 DET 1 0.0%

C/SCENE 1 0.0%

CAB COD 1 0.0%

CD OP/D 1 0.0%

CEN REC 1 0.0%

D C L M 1 0.0%

D C P I 1 0.0%

DA QNS 1 0.0%

DA S/I 1 0.0%

DB MSHM 1 0.0%

DB TSIU 1 0.0%

DBBKZ10 1 0.0%

137

Page 138: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

DBBN OP 1 0.0%

DBCR Z1 1 0.0%

DBM ZN1 1 0.0%

DBM ZN2 1 0.0%

DC ADM 1 0.0%

DC TRNG 1 0.0%

DCA C U 1 0.0%

DCCP 1 0.0%

DIS CTL 1 0.0%

DPT INV 1 0.0%

EM OPS 1 0.0%

GVSD Z1 1 0.0%

HBXQIRT 1 0.0%

HSG BUR 1 0.0%

I T S D 1 0.0%

JB/R/TF 1 0.0%

LDS TRN 1 0.0%

LEG BUR 1 0.0%

MNROBSQ 1 0.0%

PCO L U 1 0.0%

PER BUR 1 0.0%

PI&REQ 1 0.0%

S P I S 1 0.0%

S.I. CT 1 0.0%

SOD HOU 1 0.0%

STAFFSV 1 0.0%

TAXI UT 1 0.0%

TB 1 0.0%

TB BK 1 0.0%

TB C/AN 1 0.0%

TB LIAS 1 0.0%

138

Page 139: APPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 - New YorkAPPENDIX CCRB COMPLAINT DATA 2015 ... Table 15L: Attribution of Complaints to Transit Bureau-----44 Table 15M: Attribution of Complaints

Current Rank Count % of Total

TB MANH 1 0.0%

TB SOD 1 0.0%

TRP BUR 1 0.0%

YTH SS 1 0.0%

Grand Total 3590 100.0%

139