APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL...

306
APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT

Transcript of APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL...

Page 1: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT

Page 2: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 3: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

 

AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT 

FortheProposed1020S.FigueroaStreetProject

1020S.FigueroaStreetLosAngeles,CA

Preparedfor:

HAZENS GROUP – JIA YUAN USA CO., INC. 801SouthFigueroaStreet,Suite1800

LosAngeles,CA90017

Preparedby:

ESAPCR80SLakeAvenue,Suite570

Pasadena,CA91101TEL626.204.6170FAX626.204.6171

June2016

Page 4: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 5: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR i

Table of Contents 

Page

ACRONYMSANDABBREVIATIONS....................................................................................................................................1 

EXECUTIVESUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................................ES‐1 

1.0INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................................1 1.1  ExistingConditions..............................................................................................................................................................1 1.2  ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................................................................1 

1.2.1HotelTower.......................................................................................................................................................................1 1.2.2ResidentialUses...............................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.3Podium(CommercialUsesandParking)..............................................................................................................2 1.2.4Construction......................................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.5Operation............................................................................................................................................................................2 

1.3  ExistingSiteEmissions.......................................................................................................................................................5 1.4  ExistingAirQualityConditions.......................................................................................................................................6 

1.4.1RegionalAirQuality.......................................................................................................................................................6 1.4.2LocalAirQuality..............................................................................................................................................................8 

2.0REGULATORYSETTINGANDSIGNIFICANCETHRESHOLDS..........................................................................15 2.1  RegulatorySetting.............................................................................................................................................................15 

2.1.1Federal..............................................................................................................................................................................15 2.1.2State...................................................................................................................................................................................19 2.1.3Regional............................................................................................................................................................................20 2.1.4Local...................................................................................................................................................................................24 

2.2  SignificanceThresholds..................................................................................................................................................25 2.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................26 2.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................27 2.2.3ToxicAirContaminants.............................................................................................................................................28 2.2.4ConsistencywithAirQualityPlansandPolicies.............................................................................................29 

3.0METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................................................................31 3.1  ConsistencywithAirQualityPlan...............................................................................................................................31 3.2  ConstructionEmissions...................................................................................................................................................31 

3.2.1EmissionsfromConstructionEquipment..........................................................................................................32 3.2.2EmissionsfromOn‐RoadTrips..............................................................................................................................33 3.2.3EmissionsfromArchitecturalCoating................................................................................................................34 3.2.4EmissionsfromPaving..............................................................................................................................................34 

3.3  OperationalEmissions.....................................................................................................................................................35 3.3.1AreaSources(ConsumerProductsandCoatings)..........................................................................................36 3.3.2BuildingEnergyUsage...............................................................................................................................................37 3.3.3MobileSourceEmissions..........................................................................................................................................37 3.3.4StationarySourceEmissions...................................................................................................................................39 

3.4  ToxicAirContaminantImpacts(ConstructionandOperations)...................................................................40 

Page 6: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Table of Contents (Continued) 

Page

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR ii

3.5  LandUseCharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeatures......................................................................................40 3.5.1LandUseCharacteristics...........................................................................................................................................40 3.5.2ProjectDesignFeatures.............................................................................................................................................44 

4.0COMPLIANCEWITHAMBIENTAIRSTANDARDS...............................................................................................47 4.1  RegionalSignificanceThresholds...............................................................................................................................47 

4.1.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................47 4.1.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................48 

4.2  LocalizedSignificanceThresholds..............................................................................................................................50 4.2.1ConstructionEmissions.............................................................................................................................................50 4.2.2OperationalEmissions...............................................................................................................................................51 

4.3  LocalizedCarbonMonoxideImpacts.........................................................................................................................51 4.4  ToxicAirContaminants‐Construction....................................................................................................................53 4.5  ToxicAirContaminants‐Operation..........................................................................................................................60 

5.0CUMULATIVEANALYSIS.............................................................................................................................................62 5.1  ConstructionImpacts.......................................................................................................................................................62 5.2  OperationalImpacts.........................................................................................................................................................62 

6.0SUMMARYOFRESULTS..............................................................................................................................................65 6.1  Construction.........................................................................................................................................................................65 6.2  Operation...............................................................................................................................................................................65 

APPENDICES

APPENDIXA:AIRQUALITYWORKSHEETSANDOUTPUTFILES

List of Figures 

Figure Page

1  VicinityLocationMap.........................................................................................................................................................3 2  AerialPhotographofProjectSiteandVicinity.........................................................................................................4 3  SensitiveReceptorLocationsNearesttotheProjectSite.................................................................................12 4  ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentSource‐ReceptorDiagram................................................................57 

Page 7: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

  – PRELIMINARY WORKING DRAFT –   

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR iii

List of Tables 

Table Page

1 EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions(poundsperday)a.........................................................................................5 2 PollutantStandardsandAmbientAirQualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations..........9 3 AmbientAirQualityStandards....................................................................................................................................16 4 SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty)...................................................................18 5 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................47 6 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a...................48 7 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a...........49 8 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions(poundsper

day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................49 9 Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................50 10 Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedConstructionEmissions(poundsperday)a.................51 11 InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsperday)a.........52 12 FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedLocalizedOperationalEmissions(poundsper

day)a.......................................................................................................................................................................................52 13 OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesforPointEstimateDose

Calculations(L/kgbodyweight)..............................................................................................................................55 14 OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidential

CancerRisk..........................................................................................................................................................................56 15 MaximumCarcinogenicRiskforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptorsfromConstruction................................59 16 MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors.................................................59 

Page 8: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 9: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 1

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS  

Acronym  Description 

ASF agesensitivityfactor

ASHRAE AmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,andAir‐ConditioningEngineers

AQMP AirQualityManagementPlan

ATCM AirToxicsControlMeasure

BACT BestAvailableControlTechnology

Basin SouthCoastAirBasin

CAA CleanAirAct

CalEEMod CaliforniaEmissionsEstimatorModel

CARB CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard

CEC CaliforniaEnergyCommission

CEUS CommercialEnd‐UseSurvey

CEQA CaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct

City CityofLosAngeles

CO carbonmonoxide

CPF CancerPotencyFactor

DPF dieselparticulatefilter

DPM dieselexhaustparticulatematter

EF emissionfactor

EMFAC on‐roadvehicleemissionsfactormodel

FAH fractionoftimeathome

GVWR grossvehicleweightrating

HARP HotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram

hp horsepower

HRA healthriskassessment

HVAC heating,ventilation,andairconditioning

LAMC LosAngelesMunicipalCode

LOS LevelofService

LST localizedsignificancethreshold

LUT LandUseTransportation

MATESIV MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy,May2015

MERV MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue

MPO MetropolitanPlanningOrganization

NAAQS NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards

NO nitricoxide

NO2 nitrogendioxide

NOX nitrogenoxides

OEHHA OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthandHazardAssessment

Pb lead

PM2.5 fineparticulates

Page 10: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Acronyms and abbreviations    June 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 2

Acronym  Description 

PM10 particulatematter

ppm partspermillion

RTIP RegionalTransportationImprovementProgram

RTP/SCS RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy

SCAG SouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments

SCAQMD SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictSIP StateImplementationPlan

SO2 sulfurdioxide

TAC toxicaircontaminant

µg/m3 microgramspercubicmeter

µm micrometers

URF UnitRiskFactor

USEPA UnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency

VDECS VerifiedDieselEmissionControlStrategies

VMT vehiclemilestraveled

VOC volatileorganiccompounds

Page 11: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR ES‐1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 

HazensGroup–JiaYuanUSACo.,Inc.,theApplicant,proposestodevelopthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject(theProject)onanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,OlympicBoulevardtothenorth,and11thStreettothesouth.InaccordancewiththerequirementsundertheCaliforniaEnvironmentalQualityAct(CEQA),thisTechnical Report provides an estimate of air quality emissions for the Project and predicts the potentialimpacts from construction and operational activities. The report includes the categories and types ofemission sources resulting from the Project, the calculation procedures used in the analysis, and anyassumptionsorlimitations.

TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionoftheDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictoftheCentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectwouldconsistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuses.Overall,theProjectwouldatotalofupto300hotelrooms,650residentialcondominiumunits,anduptoapproximately80,000sfofretail,restaurant,andothercommercialuses,foratotalofapproximately1,130,000squarefeetoffloorarea.TheProjectincludesdemolition of all existing on‐site buildings and features, excavation for subterranean parking, andconstructionofbuildings.

ThisreportsummarizesthepotentialfortheProjecttoconflictwithanapplicableairqualityplan,toviolateanairqualitystandardorthreshold,toresultinacumulativelynetincreaseofcriteriapollutantemissions,toexposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations,ortocreateobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.Thefindingsoftheanalysesareasfollows:

The incremental increase in emissions from construction and operation of the Project would notexceedtheregionaldailyemissionthresholdssetforthbytheSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict(SCAQMD).Thus,theProjectwouldnotresultinaregionalviolationofapplicableairqualitystandardsorjeopardizethetimelyattainmentofsuchstandardsintheSouthCoastAirBasin.

Theincrementalincreaseinon‐siteemissionsfromconstructionandoperationoftheProjectwouldnotexceedthe localizedsignificancethresholdsset forthbytheSCAQMD. Thus, theProjectwouldnotresult ina localizedviolationofapplicableairqualitystandardsorexposeoff‐sitereceptors tosubstantiallevelsofregulatedaircontaminants.

Emissions from the increase in trafficdue tooperationof theProjectwouldnothavea significantimpact upon 1‐hour or 8‐hour local carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations due to mobile sourceemissions.

Project operations would not expose off‐ or on‐site receptors to significant levels of toxic aircontaminants.Construction‐phasedieselparticulateemissionswouldbereducedbyimplementationofProjectDesignFeature (PDF)‐AQ‐1andwouldresult in less thansignificantconstructionhealthriskimpacts.

Projectconstructionandoperationswouldnotresultinsignificantlevelsofodors.

The Projectwould be consistentwith air quality policies set forth by the City of Los Angeles, theSCAQMD,andtheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments(SCAG).

TheProjectwouldnotresultinasignificantcumulativeairqualityimpact.

Page 12: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 13: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 1

1.0  INTRODUCTION 

1.1  EXISTING CONDITIONS  

Theproposed1020S.FigueroaStreetProjectislocatedonanapproximately2.7acre(116,660squarefeet)‘L’‐shapedsite(ProjectSite)boundedbyS.FigueroaStreettothewest,S.FlowerStreettotheeast,OlympicBoulevardtothenorth,and11thStreettothesouth.TheProjectSiteislocatedinthesouthwestportionoftheDowntowncommunityoftheCityofLosAngeles(City)whichfallswithintheSouthParkdistrictoftheCentralCityCommunityPlanArea.TheProjectSiteshowninFigure1,VicinityLocationMap.TheProjectSiteisinahighlyurbanizedandactiveareaadjacenttoLALIVE,StaplesCenterArena,MicrosoftTheater,andincloseproximitytotheLosAngelesConventionCenter.

TheProjectSiteiswellservedbyanetworkofregionaltransportationfacilities.TheProjectSiteislocatedapproximately 0.2 miles north of the Pico Station operated by the Los Angeles County MetropolitanTransportationAuthority(Metro). ThePicoStationservestheBlueLineandtheExpoLine.TheBlueLineprovidesrailservicebetweentheCityofLongBeachandDowntownLosAngeleswithconnectingservicetotheMetroGreenLine(servingNorwalk,RedondoBeach,andLAXviashuttle).RegionalaccesstotheProjectSite isprovidedby thePasadena/HarborFreeway (I‐110/SR110), locatedapproximately0.3miles to thewest; the SantaMonica Freeway (I‐10) located approximately 0.5miles to the south; and, theHollywoodFreeway(US‐101),locatedapproximately1.5milestothenorth.Thesethreefreewaysalsoprovideaccesstothe Golden State/Santa Ana Freeway (I‐5) to the north, and the San Bernardino Freeway (I‐10) and thePomonaFreeway(SR‐60)totheeastandsoutheast,respectively.

The Project Site is currently developed with the Luxe City Center Hotel (Luxe Hotel) on the northwestportionoftheProjectSitewiththeremainderoftheProjectSitedevelopedwithsurfaceparking.TheLuxeHotelisa112,748squarefoot,ninestory,100foottallbuildingthatincludes178guestrooms,amainlobby,meetingrooms,an interior restaurant,an indoor/outdoorbarand loungearea (NixonBarandLounge), afitnesscenter,andaone‐levelparkingdeckwithparkingbelowandabovethedeck,allofwhichwouldbedemolishedandremovedtosupportdevelopmentoftheProject.Figure2,AerialPhotographofProjectSiteandVicinity,showstheProjectSiteandsurroundinglanduses.

1.2  PROJECT DESCRIPTION 

TheProjectwouldconsistofmixed‐useresidential,hotelandcommercialuseswithtworesidentialtowersandonehoteltower.PhaseIoftheProjectwouldincludeconstructionofthe34storyHotelTower,locatedonthecornerof11thStreetandS.FigueroaStreetwouldincludeupto300hotelrooms,banquet,conferencespaceandvariousamenities.PhaseIwouldalsoincludeconstructionoftheResidentialTower1thatwouldincludeup to290residentialunitsandwouldbe locatedat thecornerof11thStreetandS.FlowerStreet.DuringPhase2,theResidentialTower2wouldbeconstructedthatwouldincludeupto360residentialunitsandwouldbelocatedatthecornerofS.FigueroaStreetandOlympicBoulevard.

1.2.1  Hotel Tower 

ConstructedduringPhaseIoftheProject,onthesouthwestportionoftheProjectSitedirectlyacrossfromStaplesCenter,a34storyHotelTowerisproposedthatwouldhaveamaximumheightof430feet.Itwould

Page 14: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.0  Introduction    June 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 2

be designed as a high‐quality hotelwith up to 300 hotel rooms, alongwith banquet facilities, conferencespaceandamenities,foratotalof280,000sfofhoteluse.Additionalamenitieswouldalsobelocatedatthetop/penthouseleveloftheHotelTower(HotelRooftopAmenityDeck),includingaswimmingpool,bar,spatub,loungingarea,andfunctionspace.

1.2.2  Residential Uses  

Developed as part of Phase 1 of the Project, Residential Tower 1would be constructed at the southeastcorneroftheProjectSiteattheintersectionof11thStreetandFlowerStreet.TheResidentialTower1wouldbe 32 stories above grade with a maximum height of 490 feet and would include up to 290 residentialcondominium units consisting of lofts, studios, one‐bedroom, two‐bedroom, three‐bedroom units, andpenthouseunits. Phase2wouldincludeconstructionofResidentialTower2, locatedonthenorthwesternportion of the Project Site at the intersection of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard. ResidentialTower2wouldbe38storiesabovegrade,withamaximumheightof540 feet.Phase2would include theconstructionof360unitsconsistingoflofts,studios,one‐bedroom,two‐bedroom,three‐bedroomunits,andpenthouseunits.Amenitiesassociatedwiththeresidentialtowerswouldincludelobbies,fitnesscenters,andrecreationalspace.

1.2.3  Podium (Commercial Uses and Parking) 

ThePodiumareawouldincludeupto80,000sfofcommercialuses,including40,000sfofcommercialuseand40,000sfofrestaurantuseslocatedwithintwo‐storiesfronting11thStreet,S.FigueroaStreet,OlympicBoulevard, and S. Flower Street. The Podiumwould be 75 feet in height and levels three and four of thePodiumwouldincluderesidentialunitsandhotelamenities.

1.2.4  Construction 

The Project will be constructed in two phases. Construction of Phase 1 of the Project is expected tocommenceinthethirdquarterof2017andwouldbecompletedinthesecondquarterof2020.ConstructionofPhase2oftheProjectwouldbeginimmediatelyafterPhase1andwouldbecompletedinthefirstquarterof2023.Totalcutwouldbeapproximately202,000cubicyardsofsoil1andnofillwouldberequiredontheSite.Adetaileddiscussionof themethodologyused to estimate the construction emissions is provided inSection3.0,Methodology,below.

1.2.5  Operation 

TheProjectwould increasethebuilding floorareaontheSiteandassociatedvehicle tripsascomparedtoexistingconditions. Therefore, the incremental increase inairemissions isestimated fortheProject. TheProjectwouldbebuilttomeetorexceedcurrentbuildingenergyefficiencystandards,whichwouldminimizeoperationalemissions.AdetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheoperationalemissionsisprovidedinSection3.0,Methodology,below.

1 Includedinthiscalculationisasoilexpansionfactorof1.25

Page 15: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Los AngelesConvention CenterWest Exhibit Hall

Los AngelesConvention

Center

Staples Center

LA LIVE

PROJECT SITE

FIGURE

Source: ESRI, 2015; PCR Services Corporation, 2015.

0 800 1,600 Feet

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project

Vicinity Location Map1

PROJECTSITE

Page 16: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Olympic Boulevard

W 11th Street

W 12th Street

S Fig

ueroa

Stree

t

W 9th Street

¬«110

S Flo

wer St

reet

Staples Center

MicrosoftTheater

LA LIVE

LA LIVE

The Ritz-Carlton Residences and

JW Marriott (Hotel/Residences)

Construction

Construction

Multi-Family

Multi-Family Multi-

Family

Commercial

Retail/Parking

Multi-Family

Multi-Family Multi-

Family

Multi-Family

Multi-Family

OfficePetroleumBuilding/Office

Restaurant

Mixed Use/Multi-Family

Park

Multi-FamilyCommercial Mixed Use/

Multi-family

Multi-Family

Parking

Hotel

Hotel

OfficeOffice

MedicalOffice

Multi-Family

Salvation ArmyDepartment

of Water and Power

FIGURE

Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.

0 300 Feet1020 S. Figueroa Street Project

Aerial Photograph of Project Site and Vicinityo 2

Project Site

Page 17: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

June 2016    1.0  Introduction 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 5

1.3  EXISTING SITE EMISSIONS  

TheProjectSiteislocatedwithintheDowntownareaoftheCityofLosAngeles,andiscurrentlydevelopedwith the nine‐story Luxe Hotel and surrounding surface parking lots, which would be demolished andremoved from theProject Site. Air pollutant emissions are currently associatedwith vehicle trips to andfromtheexistingProjectSite,on‐sitecombustionofnaturalgasforheatingandcooking,on‐sitecombustionemissions from landscapingequipment,andon‐site fugitiveemissions fromtheuseofconsumerproductsand architectural coatings. Emissions are estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model(CalEEMod), which is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniformplatformforgovernmentagencies,landuseplanners,andenvironmentalprofessionalstoquantifypotentialcriteria pollutant and greenhouse gas emissions from a variety of land use projects. CalEEMod wasdeveloped in collaboration with the air districts of California. Regional data (e.g., emission factors, triplengths,meteorology, source inventory, etc.) have been provided by the various California air districts toaccount for local requirements and conditions. The model is considered to be an accurate andcomprehensive tool for quantifying air quality and GHG impacts from land use projects throughoutCalifornia.2BuildingelectricityandnaturalgasusageratesareadjustedtoaccountforpriorTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandards.3Mobile sourceemissionsareestimatedbasedonCARB’supdatedversionofthe on‐road vehicle emissions factor (EMFAC) model. The most recent version is EMFAC2014, which“represents ARB's current understanding ofmotor vehicle travel activities and their associated emissionlevels.”4AdetaileddiscussionofthemethodologyusedtoestimatetheemissionsisprovidedinSection3.0,Methodology,below.

TheexistingProjectSiteemissionsaresummarizedinTable1,EstimatedExistingSiteEmissions.Asshown,the primary source of emissions is from transportation. Detailed emissions calculations are provided inAppendixA.

Table 1 

Estimated Existing Site Emissions (pounds per day) a  

Source  VOC  NOX  CO  SO2  PM10  PM2.5 

ExistingSiteEmissions Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 5 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) <1 1 1 <1 <1 <1MotorVehicles 2 1 15 <1 7 2TotalExistingSiteEmissions 7 2 16 <1 7 2   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations  Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. 

Source:  ESA PCR, 2016 

2 See:http://www.caleemod.com.3 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,CalEEModUser'sGuide,AppendixF,Section5,July2013,http://caleemod.com/.AccessedNovember

2015.FactorsforthepriorTitle24standardareextrapolatedbasedonthetechnicalsourcedocumentation.4 California Air Resources Board, Mobile Source Emissions Inventory, http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/categories.htm#emfac2014.

AccessedApril2016.

Page 18: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.0  Introduction    June 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 6

1.4  EXISTING AIR QUALITY CONDITIONS 

1.4.1  Regional Air Quality 

The distinctive climate of the Basin is determined primarily by its terrain and geographical location.Regionalmeteorology is dominated by a persistent high pressure areawhich commonly resides over theeasternPacificOcean.Seasonalvariationsinthestrengthandpositionofthispressurecellcausechangesintheweatherpatternsofthearea. Warmsummers,mildwinters, infrequentrainfall,moderatedaytimeon‐shorebreezes, andmoderatehumidity characterize local climatic conditions. Thisnormallymild climaticconditionisoccasionally interruptedbyperiodsofhotweather,winterstorms,andhoteasterlySantaAnawinds.

TheBasinisanareaofhighairpollutionpotential,particularlyfromJunethroughSeptember.Thisconditionis generally attributed to the large amount of pollutant emissions, light winds and shallow verticalatmosphericmixing.Thisfrequentlyreducespollutantdispersion,thuscausingelevatedairpollutionlevels.PollutantconcentrationsintheBasinvarywithlocation,seasonandtimeofday.Ozoneconcentrations,forexample,tendtobeloweralongthecoast,higherinthenearinlandvalleysandlowerinthefarinlandareasoftheBasinandadjacentdesert.

Certainairpollutantshavebeenrecognizedtocausenotablehealthproblemsandconsequentialdamagetothe environment either directly or in reaction with other pollutants, due to their presence in elevatedconcentrationsintheatmosphere.Suchpollutantshavebeenidentifiedandregulatedaspartoftheoverallendeavortopreventfurtherdeteriorationandfacilitateimprovementinairquality.ThefollowingpollutantsareregulatedbytheUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA)andaresubjecttoemissionscontrolrequirementsadoptedbyfederal,stateandlocalregulatoryagencies.Thesepollutantsarereferredtoas“criteriaairpollutants”asaresultof thespecificstandards,orcriteria,whichhavebeenadoptedforthem.Abriefdescriptionofthehealtheffectsofthesecriteriaairpollutantsareprovidedbelow.

Ozone(O3):Ozoneisasecondarypollutantformedbythechemicalreactionofvolatileorganiccompoundsand nitrogen oxides (NOX) under favorable meteorological conditions such as high temperature andstagnation episodes. Ozone concentrations are generallyhighestduring the summermonthswhendirectsunlight,lightwind,andwarmtemperatureconditionsarefavorable.Anelevatedlevelofozoneirritatesthelungs and breathing passages, causing coughing and pain in the chest and throat, thereby increasingsusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfectionsandreducingtheabilitytoexercise.Effectsaremoresevereinpeoplewithasthmaandother respiratoryailments. Long‐termexposuremay lead to scarringof lung tissueandmaylowerthelungefficiency.

VolatileOrganicCompounds(VOCs).VOCsaretypicallyformedfromcombustionoffuelsand/orreleasedthroughevaporationoforganicliquids.SomeVOCsarealsoclassifiedbytheStateastoxicaircontaminants.These are compounds comprised primarily of atoms of hydrogen and carbon. Internal combustionassociated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of hydrocarbons, as are architectural coatings.EmissionsofVOCsthemselvesarenot“criteria”pollutants;however,theycontributewithNOXtoformationofO3andareregulatedasO3precursoremissions.

NitrogenDioxide(NO2)andNitrogenOxides(NOX):NOX isa termthat refers toagroupof compoundscontainingnitrogenandoxygen.TheprimarycompoundsofairqualityconcernincludeNO2andnitricoxide

Page 19: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

June 2016    1.0  Introduction 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 7

(NO),which canquicklyoxidize in the atmosphere to formNO2.Ambient air quality standardshavebeenpromulgated for NO2, which is a reddish‐brown, reactive gas. The principle form of NOX produced bycombustionisNO,butNOreactsquicklyintheatmospheretoformNO2,creatingthemixtureofNOandNO2referred to as NOX. Major sources of NOX emissions include power plants, large industrial facilities, andmotor vehicles. Emissions of NOX are a precursor to the formation of ground‐level ozone. NO2 canpotentiallyirritatethenoseandthroat,aggravatelungandheartproblems,andmayincreasesusceptibilitytorespiratoryinfections,especiallyinpeoplewithasthma.AccordingtotheCaliforniaAirResourcesBoard(CARB), “NO2 is an oxidizing gas capable of damaging cells lining the respiratory tract. Exposure toNO2alongwithothertraffic‐relatedpollutants,isassociatedwithrespiratorysymptoms,episodesofrespiratoryillnessandimpairedlungfunctioning.Studiesinanimalshavereportedbiochemical,structural,andcellularchangesinthelungwhenexposedtoNO2abovethelevelofthecurrentstateairqualitystandard. Clinicalstudiesofhumansubjects suggest thatNO2exposure to levelsnear the current standardmayworsen theeffectof allergens in allergic asthmatics, especially in children.”5NO2 also contributes to the formationofparticulatematter(PM10). Theterms“NOX”and“NO2”aresometimesusedinterchangeably. However,theterm “NOX” is primarily usedwhen discussing emissions, usually from combustion‐related activities. Theterm “NO2” is primarily used when discussing ambient air quality standards. More specifically, NO2 isregulatedasacriteriaairpollutantundertheCleanAirActandsubjecttotheambientairqualitystandards,whereasNOXandNOarenot.Incaseswherethethresholdsofsignificanceorimpactanalysesarediscussedin the context ofNOX emissions, it is basedon the conservative assumption that allNOX emissionswouldoxidizeintheatmospheretoformNO2.

CarbonMonoxide (CO): Carbon monoxide is primarily emitted from combustion processes and motorvehicles due to incomplete combustion of fuel. Elevated concentrations of CO weaken the heart'scontractionsandlowertheamountofoxygencarriedbytheblood.Itisespeciallydangerousforpeoplewithchronic heart disease. Inhalation of CO can cause nausea, dizziness, and headaches at moderateconcentrationsandcanbefatalathighconcentrations.

SulfurDioxide(SO2): MajorsourcesofSO2includepowerplants,largeindustrialfacilities,dieselvehicles,and oil‐burning residential heaters. Emissions of sulfur dioxide aggravate lung diseases, especiallybronchitis. It also constricts the breathing passages, especially in asthmatics and people involved inmoderatetoheavyexercise.Sulfurdioxidepotentiallycauseswheezing,shortnessofbreath,andcoughing.High levelsofparticulates appear toworsen theeffectof sulfurdioxide, and long‐termexposures tobothpollutantsleadstohigherratesofrespiratoryillness.

ParticulateMatter(PM10andPM2.5):Thehumanbodynaturallypreventstheentryoflargerparticlesintothebody. However,smallparticles including fugitivedust,withanaerodynamicdiameterequal toor lessthantenmicrons(PM10)andevensmallerparticleswithanaerodynamicdiameterequaltoorlessthan2.5microns(PM2.5),canenterthebodyandaretrappedinthenose,throat,andupperrespiratorytract.Thesesmallparticulatescouldpotentiallyaggravateexistingheartandlungdiseases,changethebody'sdefensesagainst inhaledmaterials, and damage lung tissue. The elderly, children, and thosewith chronic lung orheartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Lungimpairmentcanpersistfortwotothreeweeksafterexposuretohighlevelsofparticulatematter.Sometypesofparticulatescouldbecometoxicafterinhalationduetothepresenceofcertainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.Theelderly,children,

5 California Air Resources Board, “Nitrogen Dioxide – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/no2‐1/no2‐1.htm.

AccessedMay2016.

Page 20: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.0  Introduction    June 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 8

andthosewithchroniclungorheartdiseasearemostsensitivetoPM10andPM2.5.Inchildren,studieshaveshownassociationsbetweenPMexposureandreduced lungfunctionand increasedrespiratorysymptomsand illnesses.6 Lung impairment can persist for two to three weeks after exposure to high levels ofparticulatematter. Some typesofparticulates couldbecome toxicafter inhalationdue to thepresenceofcertainchemicalsandtheirreactionwithinternalbodyfluids.

Lead (Pb): Lead is emitted from industrial facilities and from the sanding or removal of old lead‐basedpaint.Smeltingorprocessingthemetalistheprimarysourceofleademissions,whichisprimarilyaregionalpollutant. Leadaffects thebrainandotherpartsof thebody'snervous system. Exposure to lead inveryyoungchildrenimpairsthedevelopmentofthenervoussystem,kidneys,andbloodformingprocessesinthebody.

1.4.2  Local Air Quality 

1.4.2.1  Existing Ambient Air Quality in the Surrounding Area 

The SCAQMDmaintains a network of air qualitymonitoring stations located throughout the Air Basin tomeasureambientpollutantconcentrations.ThemonitoringstationmostrepresentativeoftheProjectSiteisthe Central Los Angeles County Monitoring Station, located at 1630 North Main Street, Los Angeles, CA90012.Criteriapollutantsmonitoredatthisstationincludeozone,NO2,CO,SO2,PM10,andPM2.5.Themostrecent data available from the SCAQMD for this monitoring station are from years 2010 to 2014.7 ThepollutantconcentrationdatafortheseyearsaresummarizedinTable2,PollutantStandardsandAmbientAirQualityDatafromRepresentativeMonitoringStations.

1.4.2.2  Existing Health Risk in the Surrounding Area 

BetweenJuly2012andJune2013,theSCAQMDconductedtheMultipleAirToxicsExposureStudy(MATESIV), which is a follow‐up to previous air toxics studies conducted in the Air Basin. TheMATES IV FinalReport was issued in May 2015. The study, based on actual monitored data throughout the Air Basin,consisted of several elements. These included amonitoring program, an updated emissions inventory ofTACs,andamodelingeffort tocharacterizecarcinogenicriskacross theAirBasin fromexposure toTACs.Thestudyappliedatwo‐kilometer(1.24‐mile)gridovertheAirBasinandreportedcarcinogenicriskwithineachgridspace(coveringanareaoffoursquarekilometersor1.54squaremiles).ThestudyconcludedthattheaverageofthemodeledairtoxicsconcentrationsmeasuredateachofthemonitoringstationsintheAirBasin equates to a background cancer risk of approximately 418 in 1,000,000 primarily due to dieselexhaust, which is about 65 percent lower than the previous MATES III cancer risk.8 Subsequent to theSCAQMD’s risk calculations estimates performed for MATES IV, the California Environmental ProtectionAgencyOffice of EnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment (OEHHA) updated themethods for estimating

6 California Air Resources Board, “Particulate Matter – Overview,” http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/caaqs/pm/pm.htm.

AccessedMay2016.7 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,HistoricalDatabyYear,http://www.aqmd.gov/smog/historicaldata.htm. Accessed

April2016.8 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)

ES‐2.

Page 21: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

June 2016    1.0  Introduction 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 9

Table 2  

Pollutant Standards and Ambient Air Quality Data from Representative Monitoring Stations 

Pollutant/Standard  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014 

O3(1‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)Days>CAAQS(0.09ppm)

0.0981

0.0870

0.0930

0.0810

0.1133

O3(8‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)

4thHigh8‐hourConcentration(ppm)Days>CAAQS(0.070ppm)Days>NAAQS(0.075ppm)

0.0800.06411

0.0650.06000

0.0770.06821

0.0690.06000

0.0940.07272

NO2(1‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)

98thPercentileConcentration(ppm)NO2(Annual)

AnnualArithmeticMean(0.030ppm)

0.0890.071

0.025

0.1100.067

0.023

0.0770.069

0.025

0.0900.063

0.022

0.0820.067

0.022CO(1‐hour)

MaximumConcentration(ppm)CO(8‐hour)

MaximumConcentration(ppm)

3

2.3

‐‐

2.4

‐‐

1.9

‐‐

2.0

3

2.0SO2(1‐hour)

MaximumConcentration(ppm)99thPercentileConcentration(ppm)

SO2(24‐hour)MaximumConcentration(ppm)

0.010‐‐

0.015

0.0200.011‐‐

0.0050.005‐‐

0.0060.005‐‐

0.0050.004‐‐

PM10(24‐hour)MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)Samples>CAAQS(50µg/m3)Samples>NAAQS(150µg/m3)

PM10(AnnualAverage)AnnualArithmeticMean(20µg/m3)

4200

27.1

531029

8040

30.2

5710

29.5

6630

30.6PM2.5(24‐hour)

MaximumConcentration(µg/m3)98thPercentileConcentration(µg/m3)

Samples>NAAQS(35µg/m3)PM2.5(Annual)

AnnualArithmeticMean(12µg/m3)

39.227.12

11.9

49.331.54

13.00

58.731.84

12.55

43.129.01

11.95

59.934.56

12.36Lead

Maximum30‐dayaverage(µg/m3) 0.020 0.012 0.014 0.013 0.013   

Notes: ppm = parts per million; µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter 

Sources:    South  Coast  Air  Quality Management  District,  Historical  Data  by  Year,  http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐studies/historical‐data‐by‐year.    Accessed  April  2016;  California  Air  Resources  Board,  Air  Quality  Data  Statistics, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/.    Accessed  April  2016;  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  AirData, http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_rep_mon.html.  Accessed April 2016. 

Page 22: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.0  Introduction    June 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 10

cancerrisks.9Theupdatedmethodutilizeshigherestimatesofcancerpotencyduringearly lifeexposuresand uses different assumptions for breathing rates and length of residential exposures. When combinedtogether,SCAQMDstaffestimatesthatrisksforthesameinhalationexposurelevelwillbeabout2.5to2.7times higher using the updatedmethods. This would be reflected in the average lifetime air toxics riskestimated from the monitoring sites data going from 418 per million to 1,023 per million.10 Under theupdatedOEHHAmethodology,adoptedinMarchof2015,therelativereductioninriskfromtheMATESIVresultscomparedtoMATESIIIwouldbethesame(about65percent).

Approximately68percentoftheriskisattributedtodieselparticulateemissions,approximately22percentto other toxics associated with mobile sources (including benzene, butadiene, and formaldehyde), andapproximately10percentofallairbornecarcinogenicriskisattributedtostationarysources(whichincludeindustriesandothercertainbusinesses,suchasdrycleanersandchromeplatingoperations).11Thestudyalso found lower ambient concentrations of most of the measured air toxics compared to the levelsmeasuredinthepreviousstudyconductedduring2004and2006.Specifically,benzeneand1,3‐butadiene,pollutants generated mainly from vehicles, were down 35 percent and 11 percent, respectively.12 Thereductionswereattributedtoairqualitycontrolregulationsandimprovedemissioncontroltechnologies.Inadditiontoairtoxics,MATESIVincludedcontinuousmeasurementsofblackcarbonandultrafineparticles(particlessmallerthan0.1micronsinsize),whichareemittedbycombustionofdieselfuels.Samplingsiteslocatednearheavily‐traffickedfreewaysornear industrialareaswerecharacterizedby increased levelsofblackcarbonandultrafineparticlescomparedtomoreruralsites.

As part of the MATES IV, the SCAQMD prepared maps that show regional trends in estimated outdoorinhalationcancerriskfromtoxicemissions,aspartofanongoingefforttoprovideinsightintorelativerisks.Themapsrepresenttheestimatednumberofpotentialcancerspermillionpeopleassociatedwithalifetimeofbreathingairtoxics(24hoursperdayoutdoorsfor70years).Thebackgroundpotentialcancerriskpermillionpeople in theProjectareausing theupdateOEHHAmethodology isestimatedat1,516permillion(comparedtoanoverallSouthCoastAirBasin‐wideriskof1,023permillion).13Generally,theriskfromairtoxics is lower near the coastline: it increases inland,with higher risks concentrated near diesel sources(e.g.,freeways,airports,andports).

1.4.2.3  Sensitive Receptors 

Certainpopulationgroups,suchaschildren,elderly,andacutelyandchronicallyillpersons(especiallythosewithcardio‐respiratorydiseases),areconsideredmoresensitivetothepotentialeffectsofairpollutionthanothers. Sensitive land useswithin 500 feet of the Project Site are shown inFigure3, SensitiveReceptorLocationsNearesttotheProjectSite,andincludethefollowing:

9 CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,OfficeofHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgram,RiskAssessment

Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015).10 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)

2‐11.11 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)

ES‐2.12 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalReport–MultipleAirToxicsExposureStudyintheSouthCoastAirBasin,(2015)

6‐1.13 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,MultipleAirToxicsExposure Study,MATES IVCarcinogenicRisk InteractiveMap,

http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/air‐quality‐data‐studies/health‐studies/mates‐iv.AccessedMay2016.

Page 23: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

June 2016    1.0  Introduction 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 11

Multi‐Family Residential Dwellings at LA LIVE: The Ritz‐Carlton Residences are located across S.FigueroaStreetwestoftheProjectSite.

Multi‐FamilyResidentialDwellings:Severalhighrisemixed‐useresidentialbuildingsare locatedtothe north of the Project Site across from Olympic Boulevard. Mid‐ and high‐rise multi‐familyresidentialarealsolocatedeastoftheProjectSitefrontingonS.FlowerStreet.High‐riseresidentialbuildingsarelocatedapproximately300feettothesouthoftheProjectSiteacrossfrom11thStreet.

FutureResidentialUses:Mixed‐useprojectsthatincorporateresidentialusesincludetheFigCentralproject and the Circa project. These projects are currently under construction and are locatedapproximately80feetand700feetthesouthoftheProjectSiterespectively.

Future Residential Uses: Mixed‐use project that incorporates residential uses at the proposedOlympicTowerproject.Theprojectisnotcurrentlyunderconstructionandislocatedapproximately140feetnorthoftheProjectSite.

AllotherairqualitysensitivereceptorsarelocatedatgreaterdistancesfromtheProjectSite,andwouldbelessimpactedbyProjectemissions.Impactsarequantifiedfortheabovesensitivereceptors.

Page 24: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Olympic Boulevard

W 11th Street

W 12th Street

S Fig

ueroa

Stree

t

W 9th Street

S Flo

wer St

reet

LA LIVE

LA LIVE

The Ritz-Carlton Residences and

JW Marriott (Hotel/Residences)

Construction

Construction

Multi-Family

Multi-Family

Multi-Family

Commercial

Retail/Parking

Multi-Family

Multi-Family Multi-

Family

Multi-Family

Office

PetroleumBuilding/Office

Restaurant

Mixed Use/Multi-Family

Multi-FamilyCommercial

Mixed Use/Multi-family

Multi-Family

Parking

Hotel

Hotel

Departmentof Water

and Power

FIGURE

Source: Google Maps, 2015 (Aerial); PCR Services Corporation, 2016.

0 200 400 Feet1020 S. Figueroa Street Project

Sensitive Receptor LocationsNearest to the Project Siteo 3

Project SiteSensitive Receptor500-ft Buffer fromProject Site

Page 25: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

June 2016    1.0  Introduction 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 13

Thispageintentionallyblank.

Page 26: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 27: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 15

2.0  REGULATORY SETTING AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 

2.1  REGULATORY SETTING 

Anumberofstatutes,regulations,plansandpolicieshavebeenadoptedwhichaddressairqualityconcerns.TheProjectSiteandvicinityissubjecttoairqualityregulationsdevelopedandimplementedatthefederal,State,and local levels. At the federal level, theUnitedStatesEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(USEPA) isresponsible for implementationofthefederalCleanAirAct(CAA). Someportionsof theCAA(e.g.,certainmobile source requirements and other requirements) are implemented directly by the USEPA. OtherportionsoftheCAA(e.g.,stationarysourcerequirements)areimplementedthroughdelegationofauthoritytoStateandlocalagencies.

Anumberof plans andpolicieshave been adoptedby various agencies that address air quality concerns.ThoseplansandpoliciesthatarerelevanttotheProjectarediscussedbelow.

2.1.1  Federal 

The federal CleanAirAct of 1963was the first federal legislation regarding air pollution control andhasbeenamendednumeroustimesinsubsequentyears,withthemostrecentamendmentsoccurringin1990.At the federal level, theUSEPA is responsible for implementation of certain portions of theCleanAirActincluding mobile source requirements. Other portions of the Clean Air Act, such as stationary sourcerequirements,areimplementedbystateandlocalagencies.

TheCleanAirActestablishesfederalairqualitystandards,knownasNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)andspecifies futuredates forachievingcompliance. The1990AmendmentstotheCleanAirActidentifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforareasnotmeetingtheNAAQS.Theseamendmentsrequirebothademonstrationofreasonablefurtherprogresstowardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsfor failure toattainor tomeet interimmilestones. Title I (NonattainmentProvisions)andTitle II (MobileSourceProvisions)oftheCleanAirActaremostapplicabletothedevelopmentandoperationsoftheProject.TitleIprovisionswereestablishedwiththegoalofattainingtheNAAQSforthefollowingcriteriapollutants:(1)O3;(2)NO2;(3)CO;(4)SO2;(5)PM10;and(6) lead. Table3,AmbientAirQualityStandards,showstheNAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachcriteriapollutant.

The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is an area designated as non‐attainmentbecause it does not currentlymeet NAAQS for certain pollutants regulated under the Clean Air Act. TheCleanAirActsetscertaindeadlinesformeetingtheNAAQSwithintheBasinincluding:(1)1‐hourO3bytheyear2010;(2)8‐hourO3bytheyear2024;14(3)PM10bytheyear2006;and(4)PM2.5bytheyear2015.OntheNAAQSatallmonitoringstationsandtheUSEPAapprovedtherequestforre‐designationtoattainmentJune11,2007,theUSEPAreclassifiedtheAirBasinasafederal“attainment”areaforCOandapprovedthe

14 The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadlineforthe1997standardof80partsperbillionis2024.The8‐hourozoneattainmentdeadline

forthe2008standardof75partsperbillionis2032.

Page 28: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    June 2016 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 16

Table 3  

Ambient Air Quality Standards  

Pollutant Average 

Time California Standards a National Standards b 

Concentration c  Method d Primary c,e Secondary c,f  Method g

O3h1Hour

0.09ppm(180µg/m3)

UltravioletPhotometry

— SameasPrimaryStandard

UltravioletPhotometry

8Hour 0.070ppm(137µg/m3)

0.070 ppm(137µg/m3)

NO2i

1Hour 0.18ppm(339µg/m3) GasPhase

Chemi‐luminescence

100ppb(188µg/m3)

NoneGasPhaseChemi‐luminescenceAnnual

ArithmeticMean

0.030ppm(57µg/m3)

53ppb(100µg/m3)

SameasPrimaryStandard

CO

1Hour20ppm

(23mg/m3)Non‐Dispersive

InfraredPhotometry(NDIR)

35ppm(40mg/m3)

None Non‐DispersiveInfrared

Photometry(NDIR)

8Hour9.0ppm

(10mg/m3)9ppm

(10mg/m3)8Hour(LakeTahoe)

6ppm(7mg/m3)

— —

SO2j

1Hour0.25ppm

(655µg/m3)

UltravioletFluorescence

75ppb(196µg/m3) —

UltravioletFluorescence;

Spectrophotometry(Pararosaniline

Method)9

3Hour — —0.5ppm(1300µg/m3)

24Hour 0.04ppm(105µg/m3)

0.14ppm(forcertainareas)j

AnnualArithmeticMean

— 0.030ppm(forcertainareas)j

PM10k

24Hour 50µg/m3GravimetricorBetaAttenuation

150µg/m3SameasPrimaryStandard

InertialSeparationandGravimetric

Analysis

AnnualArithmeticMean

20µg/m3 —

PM2.5k

24Hour NoSeparateStateStandard 35µg/m3SameasPrimaryStandard InertialSeparation

andGravimetricAnalysisAnnual

ArithmeticMean

12µg/m3 GravimetricorBetaAttenuation

12.0µg/m3k 15µg/m3

Leadl,m

30DayAverage

1.5µg/m3

AtomicAbsorption

— —

HighVolumeSamplerand

AtomicAbsorption

CalendarQuarter

—1.5µg/m3 (for

certainareas)m Sameas

PrimaryStandardRolling3‐

MonthAveragem

‐‐ 0.15µg/m3

VisibilityReducingParticlesn

8Hour

Extinctioncoefficientof0.23perkilometer—visibilityoftenmilesormore(0.07—30milesormoreforLakeTahoe)duetoparticles

whenrelativehumidityislessthan

NoFederalStandards

Page 29: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

Table 3 (Continued)   

Ambient Air Quality Standards  

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 17

Pollutant Average 

Time California Standards a National Standards b 

Concentration c  Method d Primary c,e Secondary c,f  Method g

70percent.Method:BetaAttenuationandTransmittance

throughFilterTape.Sulfates(SO4)

24Hour 25µg/m3Ion

ChromatographyHydrogenSulfide

1Hour0.03ppm(42µg/m3)

UltravioletFluorescence

VinylChloridel

24Hour0.01ppm(26µg/m3)

GasChromatography

 a  California  standards  for ozone,  carbon monoxide  (except 8‐hour  Lake Tahoe),  sulfur dioxide  (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and 

particulate matter  (PM10, PM2.5, and  visibility  reducing particles), are  values  that are not  to be exceeded.   All others are not  to be equaled or exceeded.   California ambient air quality standards are  listed  in the Table of Standards  in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. 

b  National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a  year.   The ozone  standard  is attained when  the  fourth highest 8‐hour  concentration measured at each  site  in a  year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard.  For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24‐hour average concentration above 150 micrograms/per cubic meter (μg/m3) is equal to or less than one.  For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard.  

c  Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated.  Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature  of  25°C  and  a  reference  pressure  of  760  torr.   Most measurements  of  air  quality  are  to  be  corrected  to  a  reference temperature of 25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr; ppm  in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.   

d  Any equivalent procedure which can be shown to the satisfaction of the California Air Resources Board to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.   

e  National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.   f  National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse 

effects of a pollutant.   g  Reference method as described by  the USEPA.   An “equivalent method” of measurement may be used but must have a “consistent 

relationship to the reference method” and must be approved by the USEPA.   h  On October 1, 2015, the national 8‐hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. i   To attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations 

at each site must not exceed 100 ppb. j   On June 2, 2010, a new 1‐hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24‐hour and annual primary standards were revoked.  To 

attain the 1‐hour national standard, the 3‐year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1‐hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed 75 ppb.  The 1971 SO2 national standards (24‐hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is  designated  for  the  2010  standard,  except  that  in  areas  designated  non‐attainment  for  the  1971  standards,  the  1971  standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. 

k  On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 μg/m3. l   The California Air Resources Board has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure 

for adverse health effects determined.   These actions allow  for  the  implementation of control measures at  levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants. 

m  The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3‐month average.  The 1978 lead standard (1.5 μg/m3 as a quarterly average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated non‐attainment for the 1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved. 

n  In 1989, the California Air Resources Board converted both the general statewide 10‐mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30‐mile 

visibility standard to  instrumental equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards, respectively. 

 Source:  California  Air  Resources  Board,  Ambient  Air  Quality  Standards  (10/1/15),  http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf.  

Accessed January 2016.

Page 30: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 18

COmaintenanceplanfortheAirBasin.15TheAirBasinpreviouslyexceededtheNAAQSforPM10,buthasmeteffectiveJuly26,2013.16TheAirBasindoesnotmeettheNAAQSforO3andPM2.5andisclassifiedasbeinginnon‐attainment forthesepollutants. Table4,SouthCoastAirBasinAttainmentStatus(LosAngelesCounty),liststhecriteriapollutantsandtheirrelativeattainmentstatus.

TheCleanAirActalsospecifies futuredates forachievingcompliancewith theNAAQSandmandates thatstatessubmitandimplementaStateImplementationPlan(SIP)forlocalareasnotmeetingthesestandards.Theseplansmust includepollution controlmeasures that demonstrate how the standardswould bemet.The1990amendmentstotheCleanAirActidentifyspecificemissionreductiongoalsforbasinsnotmeetingthe NAAQS. These amendments require both a demonstration of reasonable further progress towardattainmentandincorporationofadditionalsanctionsforfailuretoattainortomeetinterimmilestones.

TitleIIoftheCleanAirActpertainstomobilesources,suchascars,trucks,buses,andplanes.Reformulatedgasoline,automobilepollutioncontroldevices,andvaporrecoverynozzlesongaspumpsarea fewof themechanismstheUSEPAusestoregulatemobileairemissionsources.TheprovisionsofTitleIIhaveresultedintailpipeemissionstandardsforvehicles,whichhavestrengthenedinrecentyearstoimproveairquality.6 “ApprovalandPromulgationofImplementationPlansandDesignationofAreasforAirQualityPlanningPurposes:California,Final

Rule.”FederalRegister72(11May2007):26718‐26721

7 FederalRegister,Vol.78,No.123,June26,2013,38223‐38226.

Table 4 

South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status (Los Angeles County) 

Pollutant  National Standards  California Standards 

Ozone(1‐hourstandard) N/Aa Non‐attainment–ExtremeOzone(8‐hourstandard) Non‐attainment– Extreme Non‐Attainment

CarbonMonoxide Attainment AttainmentNitrogenDioxide Attainment AttainmentSulfurDioxide Attainment Attainment

PM10 Attainment Non‐attainmentPM2.5 Non‐attainment Non‐attainmentLead Non‐attainment Attainment

VisibilityReducingParticles N/A UnclassifiedSulfates N/A Attainment

HydrogenSulfide N/A UnclassifiedVinylChloride N/A N/Ab

   

N/A = not applicable  a  The NAAQS for 1‐hour ozone was revoked on June 15, 2005 for all areas except Early Action Compact areas. b  In 1990  the California Air Resources Board  identified vinyl chloride as a  toxic air contaminant and determined 

that it does not have an identifiable threshold.  Therefore, the California Air Resources Board does not monitor or make status designations for this pollutant. 

 Source:  United States Environmental Protection Agency, The Green Book Non‐attainment Areas for Criteria 

Pollutants, http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/greenbk/index.html.  Accessed April 2016; California Air Resources Board, Area Designations Maps/State and National, http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Accessed April 2016. 

Page 31: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 19

Forexample,thestandardsforNOXemissionshaveloweredsubstantiallyandthespecificationrequirementsforcleanerburninggasolinearemorestringent.

2.1.2  State 

2.1.2.1  California Clean Air Act 

TheCaliforniaCleanAirAct,signedintolawin1988,requiresallareasoftheStatetoachieveandmaintainthe CAAQS by the earliest practical date. The CAAQS apply to the same criteria pollutants as the federalCleanAirActbutalsoincludeState‐identifiedcriteriapollutants,whichincludesulfates,visibility‐reducingparticles, hydrogen sulfide, and vinyl chloride. CARB has primary responsibility for ensuring theimplementation of the California Clean Air Act, responding to the federal Clean Air Act planningrequirementsapplicabletothestate,andregulatingemissionsfrommotorvehiclesandconsumerproductswithinthestate.Table2showstheCAAQScurrentlyineffectforeachofthecriteriapollutantsaswellastheotherpollutantsrecognizedbythestate.AsshowninTable2,theCAAQSincludemorestringentstandardsthantheNAAQSformostofthecriteriaairpollutants.

Health and Safety Code Section 39607(e) requires CARB to establish and periodically review areadesignationcriteria.Table3providesasummaryoftheattainmentstatusoftheLosAngelesCountyportionof the Air Basin with respect to the state standards. The Air Basin is designated as attainment for theCalifornia standards for sulfates and unclassified for hydrogen sulfide and visibility‐reducing particles.Becausevinylchlorideisacarcinogenictoxicaircontaminant,CARBdoesnotclassifyattainmentstatusforthispollutant.

2.1.2.2  California Air Resources Board Air Quality and Land Use Handbook 

TheCARBpublished theAirQualityandLandUseHandbook in April 2005 to serve as a general guide forconsidering impacts tosensitive receptors from facilities thatemitTACemissions. Therecommendationsprovidedthereinarevoluntaryanddonotconstitutearequirementormandateforeitherlanduseagenciesorlocalairdistricts. Thegoaloftheguidancedocumentistoprotectsensitivereceptors,suchaschildren,the elderly, acutely ill, and chronically ill persons, from exposure to TAC emissions. Some examples ofCARB’ssitingrecommendationsincludethefollowing:(1)avoidsitingsensitivereceptorswithin500feetofafreeway,urbanroadwith100,000vehiclesperday,orruralroadswith50,000vehiclesperday;(2)avoidsiting sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100trucksperday,morethan40truckswithoperatingtransportrefrigerationunitsperday,orwheretransportrefrigerationunit operations exceed300hoursperweek); and (3) avoid siting sensitive receptorswithin300feetofanydrycleaningoperationusingperchloroethyleneandwithin500feetofoperationswithtwoormoremachines.

2.1.2.3  California Air Resources Board On‐Road and Off‐Road Vehicle Rules 

In2004,CARBadoptedanAirborneToxicControlMeasure(ATCM)tolimitheavy‐dutydieselmotorvehicleidling in order to reduce public exposure to diesel PM and other Toxic Air Contaminants (TACs). Themeasureappliestodiesel‐fueledcommercialvehicleswithgrossvehicleweightratingsgreaterthan10,000pounds that are licensed to operate onhighways, regardless ofwhere they are registered. Thismeasuredoesnotallowdiesel‐fueledcommercialvehiclestoidleformorethan5minutesatanygiventime.

Page 32: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 20

In2008CARBapprovedtheTruckandBusregulationtoreduceNOX,PM10,andPM2.5emissionsfromexistingdiesel vehicles operating in California. The requirementswere amended inDecember2010 and apply tonearlyalldieselfueledtrucksandbusseswithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan14,000pounds.Forthelargesttrucksinthefleet,thosewithagrossvehicleweightratinggreaterthan26,000pounds,therearetwomethods to complywith the requirements. The firstway is for the fleetowner to retrofit or replaceengines,startingwiththeoldestenginemodelyear,tomeet2010enginestandards,orbetter.Thisisphasedover8years,startingin2015andwouldbefullyimplementedby2023,meaningthatalltrucksoperatingintheStatesubjecttothisoptionwouldmeetorexceedthe2010engineemissionstandardsforNOXandPMby2023.Thesecondoption,ifchosen,requiresfleetowners,startingin2012,toretrofitaportionoftheirfleetwith diesel particulate filters achieving at least 85percent removal efficiency, so that by January1, 2016their entire fleet is equipped with diesel particulate filters. However, diesel particulate filters do nottypically lowerNOX emissions. Thus, fleet owners choosing the secondoptionmust still complywith the2010engineemissionstandardsfortheirtrucksandbussesby2020.

In addition to limitingexhaust from idling trucks,CARB recentlypromulgatedemission standards foroff‐road diesel construction equipment of greater than 25 horsepower (hp) such as bulldozers, loaders,backhoesandforklifts,aswellasmanyotherself‐propelledoff‐roaddieselvehicles.TheregulationadoptedbytheCARBonJuly26,2007,aimstoreduceemissionsbyinstallationofdieselsootfiltersandencouragingthe retirement, replacement, or repowerofolder, dirtier engineswithneweremission controlledmodels.Implementationisstaggeredbasedonfleetsize(whichisthetotalofalloff‐roadhorsepowerundercommonownership or control), with the largest fleets to begin compliance January 1, 2014. Each fleet mustdemonstrate compliance through one of twomethods. The first option is to calculate andmaintain fleetaverageemissionstargets,whichencouragestheretirementorrepoweringofolderequipmentandrewardsthe introduction of newer cleaner units into the fleet. The second option is to meet the Best AvailableControl Technology (BACT) requirements by turning over or installing Verified Diesel Emission ControlStrategies(VDECS)onacertainpercentageofitstotalfleethorsepower.ThecomplianceschedulerequiresthatBACTturnoversorretrofits(VDECSinstallation)befullyimplementedby2023inallequipmentinlargeandmediumfleetsandacross100percentofsmallfleetsby2028.

2.1.3  Regional 

2.1.3.1  South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 

Asindicatedpreviously,theCityofLosAngelesislocatedwithintheSouthCoastAirBasin.TheSCAQMDhasjurisdictionoveranareaofapproximately10,743squaremiles.ThisareaincludesallofOrangeCounty,LosAngelesCountyexcept for theAntelopeValley, thenon‐desertportionofwesternSanBernardinoCounty,andthewesternandCoachellaValleyportionsofRiversideCounty.TheBasinisasub‐regionoftheSCAQMDjurisdiction.Whileairqualityinthisareahasimproved,theBasinrequirescontinueddiligencetomeetairqualitystandards.

TheSCAQMDhasadoptedaseriesofAirQualityManagementPlans(AQMP)tomeettheCAAQSandNAAQS.SCAQMDandCARBhaveadoptedthe2012AQMPwhichincorporatesthelatestscientificandtechnologicalinformation and planning assumptions, including the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG) 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and updated

Page 33: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 21

emissioninventorymethodologiesforvarioussourcecategories.17TheFinal2012AQMPwasadoptedbytheAQMD Governing Board on December 7, 2012. Control measure IND‐01 was approved for adoption andinclusionintheFinal2012AQMPattheFebruary1,2013GoverningBoardmeeting.

Therefore, the2012AQMPis themostappropriateplantouse forconsistencyanalysis. TheAQMPbuildsupon other agencies’ plans to achieve federal standards for air quality in the Basin. It incorporates acomprehensivestrategyaimedatcontrollingpollutionfromallsources,includingstationarysources,andon‐road and off‐road mobile sources. The 2012 AQMP builds upon improvements in previous plans, andincludes new and changing federal requirements, implementation of new technology measures, and thecontinueddevelopmentofeconomicallysound,flexiblecomplianceapproaches.Inaddition,ithighlightsthesignificant amount of emission reductions needed and the urgent need to identify additional strategies,especially in the area of mobile sources, to meet all federal criteria pollutant standards within the timeframesallowedunderthefederalCleanAirAct.

The2012AQMP’skeyundertaking is tobringtheBasin intoattainmentwithNAAQSfor24‐hourPM2.5by2014.Italsointensifiesthescopeandpaceofcontinuedairqualityimprovementeffortstowardmeetingthe20238‐hourozonestandarddeadlinewithnewmeasuresdesignedtoreducerelianceontheCAASection182(e)(5) long‐termmeasures for NOX and VOC reductions. SCAQMD expects exposure reductions to beachieved through implementation of new and advanced control technologies as well as improvement ofexistingtechnologies.

Thecontrolmeasures in the2012AQMPconsistof fourcomponents: (1)Basin‐wideandEpisodicShort‐term PM2.5 Measures; (2) Contingency Measures; (3) 8‐hour Ozone Implementation Measures; and (4)TransportationandControlMeasuresprovidedbySCAG. ThePlanincludeseightshort‐termPM2.5controlmeasures, 16 stationary source8‐hourozonemeasures, 10 early actionmeasures formobile sources andsevenearlyactionmeasuresareproposedtoacceleratenear‐zeroandzeroemissiontechnologiesforgoodsmovementrelatedsources,andfiveon‐roadandfiveoff‐roadmobilesourcecontrolmeasures. Ingeneral,theDistrict’scontrolstrategyforstationaryandmobilesourcesisbasedonthefollowingapproaches: (1)availablecleanertechnologies;(2)bestmanagementpractices;(3)incentiveprograms;(4)developmentandimplementation of zero‐ near‐zero technologies and vehicles and control methods; and (5) emissionreductions frommobilesources. Controlstrategies intheAQMPwithpotentialapplicabilitytoshort‐termemissionsfromconstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectincludestrategiesdenotedintheAQMPasONRD‐04 and OFFRD‐01,which are intended to reduce emissions from on‐road and off‐road heavy‐dutyvehiclesandequipment.DescriptionsofmeasuresONRD‐04andOFFRD‐01areprovidedbelow:

ONRD‐04 –AcceleratedRetirement ofOlderOn‐RoadHeavy‐DutyVehicles: This proposed measureseeks toreplaceupto1,000heavy‐dutyvehiclesperyearwithnewerornewvehicles thatataminimum,meetthe2010on‐roadheavy‐dutyNOXexhaustemissionsstandardof0.2gramsperbrakehorsepower‐hour(g/bhp‐hr).Giventhatexceedancesofthe24‐hourPM2.5airqualitystandardoccurintheMiraLomaregion,priority will be placed on replacing older diesel trucks that operate primarily at the warehouse anddistribution centers located in the Mira Loma area. Funding assistance of up to $35,000 per vehicle isproposedandtheleveloffundingwilldependupontheNOXemissionscertificationlevelofthereplacementvehicle. In addition, a provision similar to the Surplus Off‐RoadOption for NOX (SOON) provision of the

17 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,2012AirQualityManagementPlan,http://www.aqmd.gov/home/library/clean‐air‐

plans/air‐quality‐mgt‐plan/final‐2012‐air‐quality‐management‐plan.AccessedApril2016.

Page 34: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 22

statewide In‐UseOff‐RoadFleetVehicleRegulationwill be sought to ensure that additionalNOX emissionreductionbenefitsareachieved.

OFFRD‐01–ExtensionoftheSoonProvisionforConstruction/IndustrialEquipment:Thismeasureseekstocontinue the Surplus Off‐Road Option for NOX (SOON) provision of the statewide In‐Use Off‐Road FleetVehicleRegulationbeyond2014throughthe2023timeframe.InordertoimplementtheSOONprograminthis timeframe, funding of up to $30 million per year would be sought to help fund the repower orreplacement of older Tier 0 and Tier 1 equipment, with reductions that are considered surplus to thestatewideregulationwithTier4orcleanerengines.

SeveralSCAQMDrulesadoptedtoimplementportionsoftheAQMPmayapplytoconstructionoroperationoftheProject. Forexample,SCAQMDRule403requirestheimplementationofbestavailablefugitivedustcontrolmeasuresduringactiveconstructionperiodscapableofgeneratingfugitivedustemissionsfromon‐siteearth‐movingactivities,construction/demolitionactivities,andconstructionequipmenttravelonpavedand unpaved roads. Also, SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds fromarchitecturalcoatingsandsolvents,whichlowerstheemissionsofodorouscompounds.TheProjectmaybesubjecttothefollowingSCAQMDrulesandregulations:

Regulation IV – Prohibitions: This regulation sets forth the restrictions for visible emissions, odornuisance, fugitive dust, various air emissions, fuel contaminants, start‐up/shutdown exemptions andbreakdownevents.ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:

Rule402–Nuisance:Thisrulestatesthatapersonshallnotdischargefromanysourcewhatsoeversuch quantities of air contaminants or othermaterial which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, orannoyancetoanyconsiderablenumberofpersonsortothepublic,orwhichendangerthecomfort,repose,healthorsafetyofanysuchpersonsorthepublic,orwhichcause,orhaveanaturaltendencytocause,injuryordamagetobusinessorproperty.

Rule403–FugitiveDust: Thisrulerequiresprojects toprevent,reduceormitigate fugitivedustemissions fromasite. Rule403restrictsvisible fugitivedusttotheprojectproperty line,restrictsthenetPM10emissionstolessthan50microgramspercubicmeter(µg/m3)andrestrictsthetrackingoutofbulkmaterialsontopublicroads. Additionally,projectsmustutilizeoneormoreofthebestavailable control measures (identified in the tables within the rule). Mitigation measures mayincludeaddingfreeboardtohaulvehicles,coveringloosematerialonhaulvehicles,watering,usingchemicalstabilizersand/orceasingallactivities. Finally,acontingencyplanmayberequired ifsodeterminedbytheUSEPA.

RegulationXI–SourceSpecificStandards: RegulationXI setsemissions standards for specific sources.ThefollowingisalistofruleswhichmayapplytotheProject:

Rule1113–ArchitecturalCoatings:Thisrulerequiresmanufacturers,distributors,andendusersofarchitecturalandindustrialmaintenancecoatingstoreduceVOCemissionsfromtheuseofthesecoatings,primarilybyplacinglimitsontheVOCcontentofvariouscoatingcategories.

Rule1134–EmissionsofOxidesofNitrogenfromStationaryGasTurbines: ThisrulespecifiesNOXemissionslimits,monitoring,sourcetesting,andrecordkeepingrequirementsforstationarygasturbines0.3megawatt(MW)andlarger.

Page 35: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 23

Rule1138–ControlofEmissionsfromRestaurantOperations:Thisrulespecifiesemissionsandodorcontrolrequirementsforcommercialcookingoperationsthatusechain‐drivencharbroilerstocookmeat.

Rule1146.2–EmissionsofOxidesofNitrogen fromLargeWaterHeatersandSmallBoilersand Process Heaters: This rule requires manufacturers, distributors, retailers, refurbishers,installers, andoperatorsofnewandexistingunits to reduceNOXemissions fromnatural gas‐firedwaterheaters,boilers,andprocessheatersasdefinedinthisrule.

Rule1186–PM10EmissionsfromPavedandUnpavedRoads,andLivestockOperations: Thisruleappliestoownersandoperatorsofpavedandunpavedroadsandlivestockoperations.Theruleis intended to reduce PM10 emissions by requiring the cleanup of material deposited onto pavedroads,useofcertifiedstreetsweepingequipment,andtreatmentofhigh‐useunpavedroads(seealsoRule403).

Rule1403–AsbestosEmissionsfromDemolition/RenovationActivities:Thisrulerequiresownersandoperatorsofanydemolitionorrenovationactivityandtheassociateddisturbanceofasbestos‐containingmaterials, any asbestos storage facility, or any activewaste disposal site to implementwork practice requirements to limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovationactivities,includingtheremovalandassociateddisturbanceofasbestos‐containingmaterials.

RegulationXIII–NewSourceReview(NSR):RegulationXIIIsetsrequirementsforpreconstructionreviewrequiredunderboth federal and state statutes fornewandmodified sources located in areas thatdonotmeet the Clean Air Act standards ("non‐attainment" areas). NSR applies to both individual permits andentirefacilities.AnypermitthathasanetincreaseinemissionsisrequiredtoapplyBACT.FacilitieswithanetincreaseinemissionsarerequiredtooffsettheemissionincreasebyuseofEmissionReductionCredits(ERCs).Theregulationprovidesfortheapplication,eligibility,registration,useandtransferofERCs.Forlowemittingfacilities,theSCAQMDmaintainsaninternalbankthatcanbeusedtoprovidetherequiredoffsets.In addition, certain facilities are subject toprovisions that requirepublic notice andmodeling analysis todeterminethedownwindimpactpriortopermitissuance.

The SCAQMDpublished aCEQAAirQualityHandbook (theHandbook) inNovember1993 to provide localgovernmentswithguidanceforanalyzingandmitigatingproject‐specificairqualityimpacts.TheHandbookprovidesstandards,methodologies,andproceduresforconductingairqualityanalysesinCEQAdocumentsand was used extensively in the preparation of this analysis. However, the SCAQMD is currently in theprocessof replacing theHandbookwith theAirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbook. While thisprocess isunderway, the SCAQMD recommends that the lead agency avoid using the screening tables in theHandbook’sChapter6,becausethetableswerederivedusinganobsoleteversionofCARB’smobilesourceemissionfactorinventory,andthetripgenerationcharacteristicofthelandusesidentifiedinthesescreeningtableswerebasedonthefiftheditionoftheITETripGenerationManual, insteadofthemostcurrentsixthedition. Additionally, the lead agency should avoid using the on‐roadmobile source emission factors inTableA9‐5‐J1 throughA9‐5‐L in theHandbook. TheSCAQMD instead recommendsusingotherapprovedmodels to calculate emissions from landuseprojects, such asCalEEMod.18 To assist the lead agency, thisassessmentfollowsSCAQMD’srecommendations.

18 South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993),

http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/ceqa‐air‐quality‐handbook‐(1993). Accessed April2016.

Page 36: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 24

In June 2003, the SCAQMDpublished a document called theLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodologythat is intended toprovidevoluntaryguidance for leadagencies inanalyzing localizedairquality impactsfromprojects.19ThedocumentwasrevisedinJuly2008toincorporateadditionalguidanceregardingPM2.5emissions.20 The Localized SignificanceThresholdMethodology was also used in the preparation of thisassessment.

The SCAQMD has also adopted land use planning guidelines in the May 2005 Guidance Document forAddressingAirQuality Issues inGeneral Plans and Local Planning21which, like the CARB Handbook, alsoconsiders impacts to sensitive receptors from facilities that emit TACs. SCAQMD’s distancerecommendations are the same as those provided by CARB (e.g., the same siting criteria for distributioncentersanddrycleaningfacilities). TheSCAQMD’sdocumentintroduceslanduse‐relatedpoliciesthatrelyon design and distance parameters to manage potential health risk. These guidelines are voluntaryinitiativesrecommendedforconsiderationbylocalplanningagencies.

TheSCAQMDreleasedtheDraft2016AQMPonJune30,2016forpublicreviewandcomments.ThepublicreviewperiodendedAugust4,2016andthepublichearingisscheduledforDecember2,2016atwhichtimetheSCAQMDGoverningBoardwill consider approving theAQMP. Key elementsof theDraft2016AQMPinclude implementing fair‐share emissions reductions strategies at the federal, state, and local levels;establishingpartnerships,funding,andincentivestoacceleratedeploymentofzeroandnear‐zero‐emissionstechnologies; and taking credit from co‐benefits from greenhouse gas, energy, transportation and otherplanningefforts.ThestrategiesincludedintheDraft2016AQMPareintendedtodemonstrateattainmentoftheNationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)forthefederalnon‐attainmentpollutants(ozoneandPM2.5).

2.1.3.2  Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide and Congestion Management Plan 

SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino andImperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, communitydevelopment and the environment. SCAG is the federally designatedmetropolitan planning organization(MPO)forthemajorityofthesouthernCaliforniaregionandisthelargestMPOinthenation.Withregardtoairqualityplanning,SCAGhaspreparedtheRTPandRegionalTransportationImprovementProgram(RTIP),which address regional development and growth forecasts and form the basis for the land use andtransportationcontrolportionsoftheAQMPandareutilizedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecastsand consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP, RTIP, and AQMP are based on projectionsoriginatingwithinlocaljurisdictions.

2.1.4  Local 

Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Los Angeles, have the authority and responsibility to reduce airpollution through its land use decision‐making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for theassessmentandmitigationofairemissionsresultingfromitslandusedecisions.TheCity’sGeneralPlanAir

19 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology,(2008).20 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,FinalMethodology toCalculateParticulateMatter (PM)2.5andPM2.5Significance

Thresholds,(2006).21 South CoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,GuidanceDocument forAddressingAirQuality Issues inGeneral Plans and Local

Planning,(May2005),http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/aqguide/aqguide.html.AccessedApril2016.

Page 37: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 25

QualityElementincludesCitywidegoals,objectives,andpoliciesrelatedtoairqualityresources.Anumberof these goals, objectives, and policies are relevant to the Project and are related to traffic mobility,minimizingparticulate emissions fromconstructionactivities,discouraging single‐occupancyvehicle trips,managingtrafficcongestionduringpeakhours,andincreasingenergyefficiencyinCityfacilitiesandprivatedevelopments.

TheCity of LosAngeles is also responsible for the implementation of transportation controlmeasures asoutlinedintheAQMP. Throughcapital improvementprograms, localgovernmentscanfundinfrastructurethat contributes to improved air quality by requiring such improvements as bus turnouts as appropriate,installationofenergy‐efficientstreetlights,andsynchronizationoftrafficsignals. InaccordancewithCEQArequirementsand theCEQAreviewprocess, theCityassesses theairquality impactsofnewdevelopmentprojects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionarypermitsandmonitorsandenforcesimplementationofsuchmitigationmeasures.

The City has adopted regulations regarding the filtration of outdoor air for indoor environments.Subsections99.05.504.5.3and99.04.504.6oftheLosAngelesMunicipalCode(LAMC)requirethatbuildingslocatedwithin 1,000 feet of a freewayprovide regularly occupied areas of the buildingwith air filtrationmediaforoutsideandreturnairthatmeetsorexceedstheAmericanSocietyofHeating,Refrigerating,andAir‐ConditioningEngineers(ASHRAE)Standard52.2MinimumEfficiencyReportingValue(MERV)of13,tothe satisfactionof theCityofLosAngelesDepartmentofBuildingandSafety. PerASHRAEStandard52.2(2012),MERV13wouldresultinaremovalefficiencyof50percentforparticlesfrom0.3to1.0micrometers(µm),85percentfor1.0to3.0µm,and90percentfor3.0to10.0µm.22

2.2  SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 

PursuanttoAppendixGoftheStateCEQAGuidelines,theProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactrelatedtoairqualityifitwould:

a. Conflictwithorobstructtheimplementationoftheapplicableairqualityplan;

b. Violateanyairqualitystandardorcontributesubstantiallytoanexistingorprojectedairqualityviolation;

c. Resultinacumulativelyconsiderablenetincreaseofanycriteriapollutantforwhichtheprojectregion is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(includingreleasingemissionswhichexceedquantitativethresholdsforozoneprecursors);

d. Exposesensitivereceptorstosubstantialpollutantconcentrations;or

e. Createobjectionableodorsaffectingasubstantialnumberofpeople.

As discussed in the Initial Study, which is contained in Appendix A of the Draft EIR, and in Chapter 6.0,Subsection F, Effects FoundNot to be Significant, of the Draft EIR, the Project would have a less thansignificant impact with regard to odors (item “e”) above. As such, no further analysis of this topic isnecessary.

22 ASHRAE, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air‐Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size.

https://www.ashrae.org/File%20Library/docLib/StdsAddenda/52_2_2012_2015Supplement.pdf.AccessedDecember17,2015.

Page 38: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 26

The L.A. CEQAThresholdsGuide incorporates the screening questions, and pursuant to the Appendix Gguideline, defers to threshold guidance establishedby the SCAQMD, in particular to theCEQAAirQualityHandbook. Further, the L.A.CEQAThresholdsGuide provides guidance in the application of the SCAQMDguidance.

TheSCAQMDisintheprocessofdevelopinganAirQualityAnalysisGuidanceHandbooktoreplacetheCEQAAirQualityHandbook. In the interim, supplemental guidance has been adopted by the SCAQMD. Thepotential air quality impacts of the Project are, therefore, evaluated according to numeric indicatorsdevelopedbytheSCAQMDintheCEQAAirQualityHandbookandsupplementalguidancefromtheSCAQMD.23

2.2.1  Construction Emissions 

TheSCAQMDhasestablishednumericalemissionindicatorsofsignificanceforconstruction.Thenumericalemission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with acritical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protectpublichealth.24Given that construction impacts are temporaryand limited to the constructionphase, theSCAQMDhasestablishednumeric indicatorsof significance specific toconstructionactivity. Basedon theindicatorsintheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbook,theProjectwouldpotentiallycauseorcontributetoanexceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:

AQ‐1: RegionalconstructionemissionsfrombothdirectandindirectsourceswouldexceedanyofthefollowingSCAQMDprescribeddailyemissionsthresholds:25

75poundsadayforVOC;

100poundsperdayforNOX;

550poundsperdayforCO;

150poundsperdayforSO2;

150poundsperdayforPM10;or

55poundsperdayforPM2.5.

In addition, the SCAQMD has developed amethodology to assess the potential for localized emissions tocauseanexceedanceofapplicableambientairqualitystandardsorambientconcentration limits. Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:

AQ‐2: Maximumdaily localizedemissionsofNOXand/orCOduringconstructionaregreater thanthe applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambient

23 WhiletheSCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbookcontainssignificancethresholdsforlead,Projectconstructionandoperationwould

notincludesourcesofleademissionsandwouldnotexceedtheestablishedthresholdsforlead. UnleadedfuelandunleadedpaintshavevirtuallyeliminatedleademissionsfromcommerciallanduseprojectssuchastheProject. Asaresult,leademissionsarenotfurtherevaluatedinthisDraftEIR.

24 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.25 South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),

http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedApril2016.

Page 39: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 27

concentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientairqualitystandardsforNO2and/orCO.26

AQ‐3: Maximum daily localized emissions of PM10 and/or PM2.5 during construction are greaterthan the applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambientconcentrations in the vicinity of the Project Site to exceed 10.4 μg/m3 over 24 hours(SCAQMDRule403controlrequirement).

Asdiscussedpreviouslyunder subsection3.a., theSCAQMDhasestablished screening criteria that canbeused to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significancethresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air qualitystandardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisusesthescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.

2.2.2  Operational Emissions 

TheSCAQMDhasestablishednumericalemission indicatorsof significance foroperations. Thenumericalemission indicators are based on the recognition that the Air Basin is a distinct geographic area with acritical air pollution problem for which ambient air quality standards have been promulgated to protectpublic health.27 The SCAQMD has established numeric indicators of significance in part based on Section182(e) of theCleanAirActwhich identifies10 tonsper year ofVOC as a significance level for stationarysourceemissionsinextremenon‐attainmentareasforozone.28AsshowninTable4,theBasinisdesignatedasextremenon‐attainmentforozone.TheSCAQMDconvertedthissignificanceleveltopoundsperdayforozoneprecursoremissions(10tonsperyear×2,000poundsperton÷365daysperyear=55poundsperday). Thenumeric indicators forotherpollutantsarealsobasedon federalstationarysourcesignificancelevels. Based on the indicators in the SCAQMDCEQAAirQualityHandbook,the Projectwould potentiallycauseorcontributetoanexceedanceofanambientairqualitystandardifthefollowingwouldoccur:

AQ‐4: Operational emissions exceed any of the following SCAQMD prescribed daily regionalnumericindicators:29

55poundsadayforVOC;

55poundsperdayforNOX;

550poundsperdayforCO;

150poundsperdayforSOX;

150poundsperdayforPM10;or

55poundsperdayforPM2.5.26 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),

http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.

27 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐2.28 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook(1993)6‐1.29 South Coast Air Quality Management District, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),

http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedApril2016.TheL.A.CEQAThresholdsGuidealsoincludesathresholdof10tonsperyearofVOCs;however,thisisequivalenttotheSCAQMDdailythresholdof55poundsperday.

Page 40: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 28

In addition, the SCAQMD has developed amethodology to assess the potential for localized emissions tocauseanexceedanceofapplicableambientairqualitystandards.Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:

AQ‐5: MaximumdailylocalizedemissionsofNOXand/orCOduringoperationaregreaterthantheapplicablelocalizedsignificancethresholds,resultinginpredictedambientconcentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitegreaterthanthemoststringentambientairqualitystandardsforNO2and/orCO.30

AQ‐6: Maximumdaily localizedemissionsofPM10and/orPM2.5duringoperationaregreater thanthe applicable localized significance thresholds, resulting in predicted ambientconcentrationsinthevicinityoftheProjectSitetoexceed2.5μg/m3over24hours(SCAQMDRule1303allowablechangeinconcentration).

Asdiscussedpreviouslyunder subsection3.a., theSCAQMDhasestablished screening criteria that canbeused to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significancethresholds and therefore not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the applicable ambient air qualitystandardsorambientconcentrationlimitswithoutproject‐specificdispersionmodeling.Thisanalysisusesthescreeningcriteriatoevaluateimpactsfromlocalizedemissions.

Impactswouldbeconsideredsignificantifthefollowingwouldoccur:

AQ‐7: Thefollowingconditionswouldoccuratanintersectionorroadwaywithinone‐quartermileofasensitivereceptor:

The Project would cause or contribute to an exceedance of the CAAQSone‐houroreight‐hourCOstandardsof20or9.0partspermillion(ppm),respectively;

2.2.3  Toxic Air Contaminants 

Basedon theCityofLosAngelesCEQAThresholdsGuide andcriteriaset forthby theSCAQMD, theProjectwould expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of toxic air contaminants if any of thefollowingwouldoccur:31

AQ‐8: The Project emits carcinogenic materials or TACs that exceed the maximum incrementalcancerriskofteninonemillionoracancerburdengreaterthan0.5excesscancercases(inareasgreaterthanorequalto1in1million)oranacuteorchronichazardindexof1.0.

Asdiscussedpreviouslyundersubsection3.a., construction impacts fromTACsareevaluatedqualitativelybecauseof thesporadicand temporarynatureof constructionemissions. TheProjectwouldhave limited

30 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),

http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.

31 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrict,CEQAAirQualityHandbook,Chapter6(DeterminingtheAirQualitySignificanceofaProject) and Chapter 10 (Assessing Toxic Air Pollutants), (1993); SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, (March 2011),http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd‐air‐quality‐significance‐thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. AccessedSeptember2015.

Page 41: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    2.0  Regulatory Setting and Significance Thresholds 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 29

sourcesofTACsassociatedwithoperations. Therefore,aqualitativeassessmentwillbeusedtodeterminewhethertheProjectwouldresultinasignificantimpactbyexceedingtheabove‐referencedstandard.

2.2.4  Consistency with Air Quality Plans and Policies 

TheProjectwouldhaveasignificantimpactifitwould:

AQ‐9: Substantiallyconflictwithorobstruct implementationofrelevantairqualitypolicies in theGeneral Plan or other adopted regional and local plans adopted for reducing air qualityimpacts.

Page 42: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 43: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 31

3.0  METHODOLOGY 

Theevaluationofpotential impacts toregionaland localairquality thatmayresult fromtheconstructionandlong‐termoperationsoftheProjectisconductedasfollows. AdditionaldetailsareprovidedintheAirQualityTechnicalReportinAppendixA.

3.1  CONSISTENCY WITH AIR QUALITY PLAN 

TheSCAQMDisrequired,pursuanttotheCleanAirAct,toreduceemissionsofcriteriapollutantsforwhichtheAirBasin is innon‐attainmentof theNAAQS(e.g.,ozoneandPM2.5). TheSCAQMD’s2012AirQualityManagement Plan contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducingemissions and achieving the NAAQS. These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional growthprojections prepared by the SCAG. As part of its air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the RegionalComprehensivePlanandGuideandthe2016‐2040RegionalTransportationPlan/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy, which provide the basis for the land use and transportation components of the Air QualityManagementPlanandareusedinthepreparationoftheairqualityforecastsandtheconsistencyanalysisincluded in the Air Quality Management Plan. Both the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Air QualityManagementPlanarebased,inpart,onprojectionsoriginatingwithcountyandcitygeneralplans.

The 2012 Air QualityManagement Planwas prepared to accommodate growth, reduce the high levels ofpollutantswithintheareasunderthejurisdictionofSCAQMD,returncleanairtotheregion,andminimizethe impact on the economy. Projects that are consistent with the assumptions used in the Air QualityManagementPlandonotinterferewithattainmentbecausethegrowthisincludedintheprojectionsutilizedintheformulationoftheAirQualityManagementPlan.Thus,projects,uses,andactivitiesthatareconsistentwith the applicable growth projections and control strategies used in the development of the Air QualityManagement Plan would not jeopardize attainment of the air quality levels identified in the Air QualityManagementPlan,eveniftheyexceedtheSCAQMD’snumericindicators

3.2  CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS 

ConstructionoftheProjecthasthepotentialtogeneratetemporarycriteriapollutantemissionsthroughtheuse of heavy‐duty construction equipment, such as excavators and forklifts, and through vehicle tripsgenerated fromworkers andhaul trucks traveling to and from theProject Site. In addition, fugitivedustemissions would result from demolition and various soil‐handling activities. Mobile source emissions,primarily NOX, would result from the use of construction equipment such as dozers and loaders.Constructionemissionscanvarysubstantiallyfromdaytoday,dependingonthelevelofactivity,thespecifictypeofconstructionactivity,andprevailingweatherconditions.Theassessmentofconstructionairqualityimpactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.

Daily regional emissions during construction are forecasted by assuming a conservative estimate ofconstructionactivities(i.e.,assumingallconstructionoccursat theearliest feasibledate)andapplyingthemobile source and fugitive dust emissions factors. The emissions are estimated using the CalEEMod(Version 2013.2.2) software, an emissions inventory software program recommended by the SCAQMD.CalEEMod is based on outputs from OFFROAD and EMFAC, which are emissions estimation modelsdevelopedbyCARBandusedtocalculateemissionsfromconstructionactivities,includingon‐andoff‐roadvehicles. The input values used in this analysiswere adjusted to beProject‐specific based on equipment

Page 44: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 32

types and the construction schedule. These values were then applied to the construction phasingassumptionsused inthecriteriapollutantanalysistogeneratecriteriapollutantemissionsvalues foreachconstruction activity. Detailed construction equipment lists, construction scheduling, and emissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.

Constructionhaulandvendortruckemissionsduringgrading,concretepourandbuildingconstructionwereevaluatedusingregionalheavy‐dutytruckemissionfactorsfromEMFAC2014.Dailytrucktripsanddefaulttrip lengthdatawereusedtoassessroadwayemissionsfromtruckexhaust,aswellastypicalCARBidlingtimes of local emissions on‐site. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix A. Construction of theProject would be separated into two consecutive phases. Phase 1 is estimated to take approximately 33months, starting as early as 2017 with completion by 2020. Subphases of construction would includedemolitionof theassociatedparking, siteclearing,grading,excavation, subterraneanparkingandbuildingconstruction. Phase 2 is estimated to take approximately 31 months, starting as early as 2020 withcompletion by 2023. Subphases of construction would include demolition of the existing buildings andassociatedparking,siteclearing,grading,excavation,subterraneanparkingandbuildingconstruction.TheProjectwouldexportapproximately99,800cubicyardsofsoilduringPhase1and102,300cubicyardsofsoilduringPhase2. Constructionwouldgenerateapproximately16,000 square feetofpavingdemolitiondebrisduringPhase1and353,000squarefeetofdemolitiondebris(asphalt,interiorandexteriorbuildingdemolition,andgeneralconstructiondebris)duringPhase2.Emissionsfromtheseactivitiesareestimatedbyconstructionphase. It shouldbenoted that themaximumdailyemissionsarepredictedvalues for theworst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccurforeverydayofProjectconstruction.ThemaximumdailyemissionsarecomparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.

The localized effects from theon‐site portion of the emissions are evaluated at nearby sensitive receptorlocationspotentially impactedby theProject according to theSCAQMD’sLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology (June2003, revised July2008), which reliesonon‐sitemassemission rate screening tablesandproject‐specificdispersionmodeling,whereappropriate.ThelocalizedsignificancethresholdsareonlyapplicabletoNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.ForNOXandCO,thethresholdsarebasedontheambientairqualitystandards.ForPM10andPM2.5,thethresholdsarebasedonrequirementsinSCAQMDRule403,FugitiveDust.TheSCAQMDhasestablishedscreeningcriteriathatcanbeusedtodeterminethemaximumallowabledailyemissionsthatwouldsatisfythelocalizedsignificancethresholdsandthereforenotcauseorcontributetoanexceedance of the applicable ambient air quality standards without project‐specific dispersionmodeling.ThelocalizedanalysisisbasedonthisSCAQMDscreeningcriteria.Thescreeningcriteriadependon:(1)theareainwhichtheprojectislocated,(2)thesizeoftheprojectsite,and(3)thedistancebetweentheprojectsite and the nearest sensitive receptor (e.g., residences, schools, hospitals). The Project Site is located inCentralLosAngelesareaandisapproximately2.7acresinsize.Theoff‐sitereceptorsarelocatedadjacenttotheProjectSitetothenorth,south,andeast.Therefore,thescreeningcriteriaapplicabletoa2‐acresiteintheCentralLosAngelesareawithsensitivereceptorslocated25metersawaywereused.

3.2.1  Emissions from Construction Equipment 

Mobilesourceemissions,primarilyNOXandPM,wouldresultfromtheuseofconstructionequipmentsuchas bulldozers, wheeled loaders, and cranes. During the finishing phase, the application of architecturalcoatings(i.e.,paints)andotherbuildingmaterialswouldreleasereactiveorganiccompounds.Constructionemissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity, the specific type of

Page 45: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 33

operation and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. The assessment of construction air qualityimpactsconsiderseachofthesepotentialsources.

Truckandconstructionequipmentemissionswillvarywithenginemodelyearsinwhichnewerequipmentwill emit fewerpollutants. As a conservative assumption, theCalEEModmodeluses anemission rate forequipment and truckswhich represents an averagemodel year for available equipmentwithin the basin.TheequipmentmixandconstructiondurationforeachstageisdetailedinAppendixA.CalEEModcalculatestheexhaustemissionsbasedonCARBOFFROADmethodologyusingtheequationpresentedbelow.

ConstructionOff‐RoadEquipment:

EmissionsDiesel[g]=∑i(EFi×Popi×AvgHPi×Loadi×Activityi

Where: EFi = EmissionfactorfromOFFROAD[g/bhp‐hr] Popi = Population[quantityofsameequipmenttype] AvgHPi = Maximumratedaveragehorsepower[hp] Loadi = LoadFactor[dimensionless] Activityi = Hoursofoperation[hours] i = EquipmentType

CalEEMod default methodologies, mentioned in USEPA AP‐42 were also used to describe fugitive dustemissions from construction phases. The CalEEMod tool provides options for specifying equipment,horsepower ratings, load factors, and operational hours per day. Construction equipment lists for eachphase of activity were provided by the applicant and/or applicant’s construction contractor(s) andarchitect(s).

The amount of construction equipment used and the duration of construction activity could have asubstantial effect upon the amount of construction emissions, concentrations and the resulting impactsoccurring at any one time. As such, the emission forecasts provided reflect a specific set of conservativeassumptionsbasedontheexpectedconstructionscenariowhereinarelativelylargeamountofconstructionisoccurringinarelativelyintensivemanner.

3.2.2  Emissions from On‐Road Trips 

Constructiongenerateson‐roadvehicleexhaust,evaporative,anddustemissionsfrompersonalvehiclesforworkerandvendorcommuting,andtrucksforsoilandmaterialhauling.TheseemissionsarebasedonthenumberoftripsandVMTalongwithemissionfactorsfromEMFAC.

RunningemissionsforallpollutantsandPMemissionsfromtireandbrakewearweredividedbytheVMTofeachrespectivevehicleclassfromeachscenarioyearandadjustedforunitconversionstoderiveemissionfactorsinunitsofgramsperVMT.Allotheremissions(includingevaporative)weredividedbythenumberoftrips to derive emission factors in units of grams per trip. The emissions from mobile sources werecalculatedwiththetriprates,triplengthsandemissionfactorsforrunningfromEMFACasfollows:

Page 46: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 34

ConstructionOn‐RoadTrips:

Emissionspollutant=VMT*EFrunning,pollutant

Where:Emissionspollutant = emissionsfromvehiclerunningforeachpollutant[g]VMT = vehiclemilestraveled[miles]

EFrunning,pollutant = emissionfactorforrunningemissions[g/mile]

3.2.3  Emissions from Architectural Coating 

VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatings.TheCalEEModtool calculates the VOC evaporative emissions from application of residential and non‐residential surfacecoatingsusingthefollowingequation:

ConstructionArchitecturalCoatingEmissions:

EAC=EFACxF*Apaint

Where:E = emissions[lbVOC]EF = emissionfactor[lb/sqft]A = buildingsurfacearea[sqft].

TheCalEEModtoolassumesthetotalsurfaceforpaintingequals2.7timesthefloorsquarefootageforresidentialand2timesthatfornonresidentialsquarefootagedefinedbytheuser.Allofthelanduseinformationprovidedbyametricotherthansquarefootagewillbeconvertedtosquarefootageusingthedefaultconversionsoruserdefinedequivalence.

F = fractionofsurfacearea[%].

ThedefaultvaluesbasedonSCAQMDmethodsusedintheircoatingrulesare75percentfortheinteriorsurfacesand25percentfortheexteriorshell.Parkingareasarebasedon6percentcoverage.

The emission factor (EF) is based on theVOC content of the surface coatings and is calculated estimatedusingtheequationbelow:

ConstructionSurfaceCoatingEmissionFactor:

EFAC=Cvoc/454[g/lb]x3.785[L/Gal]/180[sqft] Where:

EF = emissionfactor[lb/sqft]C = VOCcontent[g/L].Thisvariesbylocationandyear

Theemission factors for coating categoriesare calculatedusing theequationabovebasedondefaultVOCcontentprovidedbytheairdistrictsorCARB’sstatewidelimits.

3.2.4  Emissions from Paving 

While there is no specific screen associatedwith asphalt paving emissions, CalEEMod estimates VOC off‐gassingemissionsassociatedwithasphaltpavingofparkinglotsusingthefollowingequation:

Page 47: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 35

ConstructionPavingEmissions:

EAPEFAPAParking Where: E = emissions[lb] EF = emissionfactor[lb/acre].TheSMAQMDdefaultemissionfactoris2.62lb/acre.

A = areaoftheparkinglot[acre]

3.3  OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS 

Operation of the Project has the potential to generate criteria pollutant emissions through vehicle tripstravelingtoandfromtheProjectSite.Inaddition,emissionswouldresultfromareasourceson‐sitesuchasnatural gas combustion, landscaping equipment, and use of consumer products. Stationary sources ofemissions may be generated by on‐site charbroiling associated with food preparation activities at theproposedrestaurantlandusesiftherestaurantweretoinstallcharbroilingequipment.Operationalimpactswere assessed for the Interim Year (2020) when Phase 1 becomes operational concurrent with Phase 2constructionandforfullProjectbuildout(2023).

TheoperationalemissionsareestimatedusingtheCalEEModsoftware.CalEEModwasusedtoforecastthedaily regional emissions from area and stationary sources that would occur during long‐term Projectoperations. In calculating mobile‐source emissions, the trip length values were based on the distancesprovidedinCalEEMod. Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthetrip rates in the traffic study.32 The trips take into account trip reductions from Project characteristicsincludinginternalcapturefromco‐locatingcommercialandresidentialusesontheProjectSiteandtransitandpedestriantrips.MobileemissionswereestimatedseparatelyusingtheresultingCalEEMod‐calculatedannual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and regional emission factors from EMFAC2014 because CalEEModreliesontheolderEMFAC2011.DetailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedinAppendixA.

Areasourceemissionsarebasedonnaturalgas(buildingheatingandwaterheaters),landscapingequipment,andconsumerproductusage (includingpaints) ratesprovided inCalEEMod. Natural gasusage factors inCalEEMod are based on the California Energy Commission (CEC) California Commercial EndUse Survey(CEUS) data set,which provides energy demandby building type and climate zone.33 However, since thedata from the CEUS is from 2002, correction factors are incorporated into CalEEMod to account for theappropriateversionoftheTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsineffect.

Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysourcesmayincludecharbroilingofmeatthatmayoccuron‐siteduringfoodpreparationactivitiesintherestaurantkitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMD.Inordertoprovideaconservativeanalysis, itwasassumedthattherestaurantwouldcharbroilmeatwithrelativelyhighemissionfactors(i.e.,hamburgermeatandchicken).ThequantityofmeatcharbroiledintherestaurantisbasedonsurveydatafromtheSCAQMD.TheestimatedemissionsaccountforreductionsfromcompliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule1138.

32 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).33 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed

April2016.

Page 48: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 36

Operational airquality impacts are assessedbasedon the incremental increase in emissions compared tobaselineconditions.UnderCEQA,thebaselineenvironmentalsettingforanEIRisestablishedatoraroundthetimethattheNoticeofPreparationfortheEIRispublished.Asdiscussedpreviously,theProjectSiteiscurrentlydevelopedwiththenine‐storyLuxeHotelandsurroundingsurfaceparkinglots.Therefore,thenetoperational emissions generated by the proposed Project are equal to the Project’s emissionsminus theexisting Project Site emissions. The maximum daily net emissions from operation of the Project arecomparedtotheSCAQMDdailyregionalnumericindicators.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.

The localized effects from the on‐site portion of daily emissions from Project operation are evaluated atnearbysensitivereceptorlocationspotentiallyimpactedbytheProjectaccordingtotheSCAQMD’sLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).ThelocalizedimpactsfromoperationoftheProjectareassessedsimilartoconstruction,asdiscussedpreviously.

Emissions of CO are produced in greatest quantities from motor vehicle combustion and are usuallyconcentratedatorneargroundlevelbecausetheydonotreadilydisperseintotheatmosphere,particularlyunder cool, stable (i.e., low or no wind) atmospheric conditions. Localized areas where ambientconcentrationsexceedstateand/orfederalstandardsaretermedCOhotspots.ThepotentialfortheProjectto cause or contribute to the formation of off‐site CO hotspots are evaluated based on prior dispersionmodelingofthefourbusiestintersectionsintheAirBasinthathasbeenconductedbytheSCAQMDforitsCOAttainment Demonstration Plan in the AQMP. The analysis compares the intersectionswith the greatestpeak‐hour traffic volumes that would be impacted by the Project to the intersections modeled by theSCAQMD. Project‐impacted intersections with peak‐hour traffic volumes that are lower than theintersectionsmodeled by the SCAQMD, in conjunctionwith lower background CO levels, would result inloweroverallCOconcentrationscomparedtotheSCAQMDmodeledvaluesinitsAQMP.

3.3.1  Area Sources (Consumer Products and Coatings) 

Area source emissions were calculated using CalEEMod default assumptions for of the multi‐familyresidential, retail, and restaurant land uses. Area sources include hearths, consumer product use,architecturalcoatings,andlandscapemaintenanceequipment.Emissionsassociatedwithnaturalgasusagein space heating, water heating, and stoves as these are calculated in the building energy use modulediscussedbelow.

3.3.1.1  Consumer Products 

Consumer products are chemically formulated products used by household and institutional consumers,including,butnot limited to,detergents; cleaningcompounds;polishes; floor finishes; cosmetics;personalcare products; home, lawn, and gardenproducts; disinfectants; sanitizers; aerosol paints; and automotivespecialtyproducts;butdoesnot includeotherpaintproducts, furniturecoatings,orarchitecturalcoatings.SCAQMDdidanevaluationofconsumerproductusecomparedtothetotalsquarefootageofbuildingsusingdata from CARB consumer product Emission Inventory. To calculate the VOC emissions from consumerproductuse,thefollowingequationwasusedinCalEEMod:

Page 49: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 37

ConsumerProducts:

EmissionsEFBuildingArea

Where:EF=poundsofVOCperbuildingsquarefootperday

Thefactoris2.04x10‐5lbs/sqft/dayforSCAQMDareas.

BuildingArea=Thetotalsquarefootageofallbuildingsincludingresidentialsquarefootage.

3.3.1.2  Architectural Coatings 

VOCoff‐gassingemissionsresultfromevaporationofsolventscontainedinsurfacecoatingssuchasinpaintsand primers. The methodology for operations is the same as the construction methodology mentionedabove.

3.3.2  Building Energy Usage 

Withregardtoenergyusage, theconsumptionof fossil fuelstogenerateelectricityandtoprovideheatingandhotwatergeneratescriteriapollutants. Futurefuelconsumptionratesareestimatedbasedonspecificsquare footage of themulti‐family residential, retail, and restaurant landuses, aswell aspredictedwatersupply needs of the Project. Energy usage (off‐site electricity generation and on‐site natural gasconsumption) for the Project is calculatedwithin CalEEModusing the CECCEUS data set.34 This data setprovidesenergyintensitiesofdifferentlandusesthroughoutthestateanddifferentclimatezones.However,since the data from the CEUS is from 2002, the CalEEMod software incorporates correction factors toaccountforcompliancewiththeTitle24BuildingStandardsCode.

Naturalgas‐relatedemissionsofcriteriapollutantsassociatedwithoperationoftheProjectarebasedonthesizeofthemulti‐familyresidential,retail,andrestaurant landuses,thenaturalgasdemandfactorsforthelanduses.NaturalgasdemandisbasedondatafromtheCEUS,whichlistsenergydemandbybuildingtype.35However,sincethedatafromtheCEUSisfrom2002,CalEEModincorporatescorrectionfactorstoaccountforcompliancewiththe2008Title24BuildingStandardsCode.SincetheProjectwouldalsoberequiredtomeettheTitle24standardsineffectatthetimeofbuildingpermitapplication,thisanalysisincorporatesanadditional correction factor to account for the updatedTitle 24Building Standards Code. The correctionfactorsareappliedonlytothenewbuildingconstruction.Naturalgasdemandfortheretainedexistingusesdoesnotincorporatetheadditionalcorrectionfactorinordertoaccountfortheageofthebuildings.

3.3.3  Mobile Source Emissions 

Thetripdistanceswereappliedtothemaximumdailytripestimates,basedonthetripgenerationratesforeachlanduseprovidedbytheProjectTrafficStudy36toestimatethetotalVMT.TheVMTestimatestakeintoaccount tripandVMTreductions fromProject landusecharacteristics including internalcapture fromco‐locatinglandusesontheProjectSite,pedestriantrips,nearbytransitoptions,andnearbyoff‐siteresidential,commercial,restaurant,entertainment,andofficelanduses.DetailsregardingtripreductionareprovidedinAppendixA.

34 CaliforniaEnergyCommission,CaliforniaCommercialEnd‐UseSurvey,http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/Chart.aspx.Accessed

April2016.35 California Energy Commission, California Commercial End‐Use Survey,

http://capabilities.itron.com/CeusWeb/ChartsSF/Default2.aspx.AccessedApril2016.36 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).

Page 50: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 38

3.3.3.1  Trip Type 

Thetriptypebreakdowndescribesthepurposeofthetripgeneratedateachlanduse.Forexample,thetriptypebreakdown indicates thepercentageof tripsgeneratedat single familyhome forwork, for shopping,andforotherpurposes.Multiplyingthetotaltripsforalandusebytriptypebreakdownpercentageyieldstripsofagiventriptype. TwosetsoftriptypebreakdownareusedinCalEEMod–residentialbreakdownandcommercialbreakdown.

Residentialtriptype: Theseincludehome‐work(H‐W),home‐shop(H‐S),orhome‐other(H‐O).Ahome‐worktriprepresentsthetripfromthehometotheworkplace.Ahome‐shoptriprepresentsthetripfromthehometoalandusewhereshoppingtakesplace(generallyretail).Ahome‐otherrepresentsallothertypesoftrips generated from the resident such as school, entertainment, etc. The trip type breakdown is fromdistrict supplied information or the 1999 Caltrans Statewide Travel Survey is used as default or specificinformationobtainedfromthevariousDistricts.

Commercial trip type: These include commercial‐customer (C‐C), commercial‐work (C‐W) andcommercial‐nonwork (C‐NW). A commercial‐customer trip represents a trip made by someone who isvisiting thecommercial landuse topartake in theservicesofferedby theSite. Thecommercial‐work triprepresentsatripmadebysomeonewhoisemployedbythecommercial landusesector. Thecommercial‐nonworktriprepresentsatripassociatedwiththecommerciallanduseotherthanbycustomersorworkers.AnexampleofC‐NWtrips includes tripsmadebydeliveryvehiclesofgoodsassociatedwith the landuse.The trip type breakdown from the number or workers and or truck trips from ITE and an analysis ofinformationprovidedfortheSCABwasusedasdefaulttoassignthetriptypebreakdownsforalllanduses.Ifanexactmatchtoalandusewasnotavailable,datafromasimilarlandusewasusedasasurrogate.

3.3.3.2  Primary Trip Length 

InCalEEMod,eachtriptypehasaprimarytriplengthassociatedwithit.Thesetriplengthsarebasedonthelocationandurbanizationselectedontheprojectcharacteristicscreen. Thesevaluesweresuppliedbythedistrictsoruseadefaultaverageforthestate. Eachdistrict(orcounty)alsoassignstriplengthsforurbanandruralsettings.

3.3.3.3  Pass‐by and Diverted Trips 

Trip link types further describe the characteristics of the trip attracted to each land use, whether it’s aprimarytrip,adivertedlinktrip,orapass‐bytrip.Forexample,acommercialcustomerpass‐bytripcouldbeapersongoingfromhometoshoponhis/herwaytowork.Inaddition,acommercialcustomerdiverted‐linktripcouldbeapersongoingfromhometowork,andonitswaymakingadiversiontoshop. Pass‐bytripsgeneratevirtuallynoadditional runningemissionsbutcouldgenerateadditional restingandstartupemissions.Divertedtripsgeneratelessrunningemissionscomparedtoprimarytrips,andcanalsogenerateadditionalrestingandstartupemissions.

3.3.3.4  Mobile Source Emission Factors 

BecauseCalEEModdoesnotincorporateCARB’smostrecenton‐roademissionsfactormodel,mobilesourceemissionfactorsarebasedonEMFAC2014.Themodelwasrunintheemissionsmode(alsoreferredtoasthe “Burden”mode) and used to generate South Coast Air Basin‐specific vehicle fleet emission factors in

Page 51: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 39

units of grams or metric tons per mile, which is the same methodology used by CalEEMod to generateemission factorsusing thepriorEMFAC2011model. Theseemission factorsare thenapplied to thedailyVMTtoobtaindailymobilesourceemissions.

ModelingfortheProjectwasconductedusingthevehiclefleetmixfortheSouthCoastAirBasinasprovidedinEMFAC2014.Mobilesourceemissionsaregenerallycalculatedasfollows:

Mobile:

Emissions=(∑i(Units×ADT×DTRIP×EF)i)

Where: Units = Numberofvehicles(samevehiclemodelyearandclass) ADT = Averagedailytriprate[trips/day] DTRIP = Tripdistance[miles/trip] EF = Emissionfactor[poundspermile] i = Summationindex

EmissionsfrommotorvehiclesaredependentonmodelyearsandthespecifictypesofvehiclesthatareusedtotraveltoandfromtheProjectSite. Theemissionswerecalculatedusingarepresentativemotorvehiclefleetmix fortheSouthCoastAirBasin fortheopeningyearof theProject. Asdiscussedabove,allvehicletypeswouldvisit theProjectSite; therefore, theuseof themotorvehicle fleetmix for theSouthCoastAirBasinisanappropriatemodelingparameter.

3.3.4  Stationary Source Emissions 

Stationary‐sourceemissionsareestimatedseparatelyoutsideoftheCalEEModsoftware.Stationarysourcesmayincludecharbroilingofmeatthatmayoccuron‐siteduring foodpreparationactivities inarestaurantkitchen.StationarysourceemissionsarecalculatedbasedonemissionsfactorsavailablefromtheSCAQMDfor charbroiling.37 In order to provide a conservative analysis, itwas assumed that the restaurantwouldcharbroilmeatwith relatively high emission factors (i.e., hamburger and chickenmeat). The quantity ofmeat charbroiled in the restaurant isbasedonsurveydata from theSCAQMD.38 TheestimatedemissionsaccountforreductionsfromcompliancewithemissionscontrolrequirementsconsistentwithSCAQMDRule1138.Ingeneral,stationary‐sourcecharbroilingemissionsarecalculatedasfollows:

StationarySourceCharbroiling:

Emissions=(∑i(QMEAT×EF×(1‐C)i)

Where: QMEAT = Quantityofmeatproductcharbroiledinaday[pounds/day] EF = Emissionfactor[poundspollutantperpoundsmeat] C = Emissionscontrolfactor[percent] i = Summationindex

37 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations,

http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed April2016.

38 Ascitedin:SanJoaquinValleyUnifiedAirPollutionControlDistrict,FinalDraftStaffReportRule4692(CommercialCharbroiling),February21,2002.

Page 52: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 40

3.4  TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANT IMPACTS (CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONS) 

The potential for the Project to cause impacts from TACs are evaluated by conducting a screening‐levelanalysis.Thescreening‐levelanalysisconsistsofreviewingtheProject’sSiteplanandProjectdescriptiontoidentifyanynewormodifiedTACemissionsources.IfitisdeterminedthattheProjectwillintroduceanewsourceofTACs,ormodifyanexistingsource,thendownwindsensitivereceptorlocationsareidentifiedandasite‐specificanalysisisconducted.

ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionsduringconstructionwouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematteremissions associated with heavy‐duty equipment during demolition, excavation and grading activities.ConstructionactivitiesassociatedwiththeProjectwouldbesporadic,transitory,andshortterminnature..OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperforminghealthriskassessments(HRAs)undertheState’stheAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramRiskAssessment(AB2588)regulation.InMarch2015,OEHHA adopted revised guidelines that update the previous guidance by incorporating advances in riskassessmentwithconsiderationofinfantsandchildrenusingAgeSensitivityFactors(ASF).TheconstructionHRAwasperformed inaccordancewith therevisedOEHHAAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments (OEHHA Guidance).39 The analysis incorporates the estimatedconstructionemissions,aspreviouslydiscussed,anddispersionmodelingusingtheUSEPAAERMODmodelwithmeteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.

During long‐termoperations,TACscouldbeemittedaspartofperiodicmaintenanceoperations, cleaning,painting,etc.,and fromperiodicvisits fromdelivery trucksandservicevehicles. However, theseusesareexpected to be occasional and result in minimal exposure to off‐site sensitive receptors. As the Projectconsists of residential, hotel, and commercial/restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources ofsubstantiveTACemissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations. Thusaqualitativeanalysisisappropriate.

WithregardtooperationalTACemissions,sensitivelandusesandnewsourcesorTACs.TheSCAQMDandCARBprovideguidanceregardingsitingsourcesofTACsnearoff‐sitesensitivereceptors. As theProjectconsists of residential, hotel, retail, and restaurant uses, the Project would not include sources of TACemissionsidentifiedbytheSCAQMDorCARBsitingrecommendations

3.5  LAND USE CHARACTERISTICS AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES 

3.5.1  Land Use Characteristics 

The Project would represent an urban infill development, since it would be undertaken on a currentlydevelopedsite,andwouldbe locatednearexistingoff‐sitecommercialandretaildestinationsand incloseproximitytoexistingpublictransitstops,whichwouldresultinreducedvehicletrips,VMT,andassociatedtransportationemissionscomparedtothestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.

TheCaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation(CAPCOA)hasprovidedguidanceformitigatingorreducingemissionsfromlandusedevelopmentprojects. InSeptember2010,CAPCOAreleasedaguidance

39 OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk

Assessments,(2015).

Page 53: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 41

document titledQuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasureswhichprovidesemissionreductionvaluesfor recommendedreductionmeasures.40TheCAPCOAguidancedocumentwasutilized in thisanalysis forquantifyingreductionsduetolandusecharacteristicsandProjectDesignFeaturesinCalEEMod.

The landuse characteristics listedbeloware consistentwith theCAPCOAguidancedocument, andwouldreduce vehicle trips to and from the Project Site compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basinaverage. Theywould therefore result in a corresponding reduction in VMT and associated air pollutantemissions.

IncreasedDensity:Increaseddensity,measuredintermsofpersons,jobs,ordwellingunitsperunitarea, reducesemissionsassociatedwith transportationas it reduces thedistancepeople travel forwork or services and provides a foundation for the implementation of other strategies such asenhanced transit services. This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐1.41According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburbansettingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurban infill42locationand ismixed‐use; therefore, thismeasureapplies to theProject. TheProjectwould increasetheProjectSitedensity toapproximately241dwellingunitsperacreand206 jobsperacre(refertoSection4.I,Population,Housing,andEmployment,oftheDraftEIR,whichprovidesemploymentdatausedtoestimatethenumberofjobsperacre).

LocationEfficiency: Location efficiencydescribes the locationof a project relative to the typeofurbanlandscapesuchasanurbanarea,compactinfill,orsuburbancenter.Ingeneral,comparedtothestatewideaverage,aprojectcouldrealizeVMTreductionsupto65percentinanurbanarea,upto30percentinacompactinfillarea,orupto10percentinasuburbancenterforlanduse/locationstrategies.43 This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐2.44 According toCAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban and suburban settings forresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject. AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute to VMT reductions under this measure include the geographiclocationoftheprojectwithintheregion.TheProjectSiterepresentsanurbaninfilllocationwithin

40 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010).41 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)155‐158.42 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures, (2010)59‐60. Theproject

areameetsthecharacteristicsforanurbansettingwithrespecttotypicalbuildingheightsof6storiesormuchhigher,gridstreetpattern,minimalsetbacks,constrainedparking,highparkingprices,highqualityrailservice(i.e.,MetroBlue,Expo,RedandPurpleLines),locationrelativetoregionalcores(5milesorless)andjobs/housingbalance(theCentralCityCommunityPlanAreahasanexistingjobs/housingratioofapproximately7.2).

43 CalEEMod,bydefault,assumesthattripdistancesintheSouthCoastAirBasinareslightlylongerthanthestatewideaverage.Thisisdue to the fact that commute patterns in the South CoastAirBasin involve a substantial portion of the population commutingrelativelyfardistances,whichisdocumentedintheSouthernCaliforniaAssociationofGovernments2016RegionalTransportationPlan(RTP)/SustainableCommunitiesStrategy(SCS). TheRTP/SCSshows that,evenunder futurePlanconditions,upwardsof50percentofallworktripsare10milesorlonger(SCAG,PerformanceMeasuresAppendix,p.7,2012). TheRTP/SCSdoesnotspecifythecurrentpercentageofwork tripsgreater than10miles in theregion,but itcanbeassumed that thepercentage iscurrentlygreaterthan50percentsincethegoaloftheRTP/SCSistoreduceoverallVMTintheregion.Itisthusreasonabletoassumethatthetripdistances inSouthCoastAirBasinareanalogous to thestatewideaveragegiven that thedefaultmodel tripdistances in theSouthCoastAirBasin are slightly longer but still generally similar to the statewide average. Therefore, projects could achievesimilar levelsofVMT reduction (65percent inanurbanarea,30percent ina compact infillarea,or10percent fora suburbancenter)comparedtotheSouthCoastAirBasinaverage.

44 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)159‐161.

Page 54: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 42

the Downtown area of the City of Los Angeles. The Project Site is served by existing publictransportationlocatedwithinaquarter‐mile.TheProjectSiteiswithinanactiveurbancenterwithmany existing off‐site commercial, entertainment, hotel, and residential buildings. The locationefficiencyoftheProjectSitewouldresultinsynergisticbenefitsthatwouldreducevehicletripsandVMT compared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average and would result incorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

IncreasedLandUseDiversityandMixed‐Uses: Locating different types of land uses near oneanother can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and could beaccommodatedbyalternativemodesoftransportation,suchaspublictransit,bicycles,andwalking.This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐3.45 According to CAPCOA, thereduction in VMT from thismeasure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially forruralmaster‐plannedcommunities)formixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject. AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute toVMT reductionsunder thismeasure include thepercentage ofeach land use type in the project. The Project would co‐locate complementary commercial andresidential landusesinclosetoproximitytoexistingoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses. TheProjectwouldincludeon‐siteretailandresidentiallandusesandwouldbelocatedwithinaquarter‐mileofoff‐sitecommercialandresidentialuses,aswellasmajortransitfacilities. TheincreasesinlandusediversityandmixofusesontheProjectSite,aswellasproximitytotransit,wouldreducevehicle tripsandVMTbyencouragingwalkingandnon‐automotive formsof transportation,whichwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

Increased Destination Accessibility: This measure corresponds to CAPCOA guidance measureLUT‐4.46 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from this measure applies to urban andsuburban settings for residential, retail, office, industrial, andmixed‐use projects. The Project islocated inanurbaninfill locationandismixed‐use, includingresidentialandretailuses; therefore,thismeasureapplies to theProject. According to theCAPCOAguidance, factors that contribute toVMT reductions under thismeasure include the distance to downtown ormajor job center. TheProjectwouldbelocatedinanareathatoffersaccesstomultipleothernearbydestinations,includingrestaurant,bar,office,retail,entertainment,movietheater,andresidentialuses. TheProjectSiteisalsolocatednearotherjobcentersintheregionandwithintheDowntownareaitself.Theaccesstomultiple destinations in close proximity to the Project Site would reduce vehicle trips and VMTcompared to the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average, encourage walking and non‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

Increased Transit Accessibility: Locating a project with high density near transit facilitiesencouragestheuseoftransitbypeopletravelingtoorfromaprojectsite.Thismeasurecorrespondsto CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐5.47 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMT from thismeasure applies to urban and suburban settings (also potentially for rural settings adjacent to acommuterrailstationwithconvenientaccesstoamajoremploymentcenter)forresidential,retail,office, industrial, andmixed‐use projects. The Project is located in an urban infill location and ismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.AccordingtotheCAPCOAguidance,factors

45 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)162‐166.46 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)167‐170.47 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)171‐175.

Page 55: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 43

thatcontribute toVMTreductionsunder thismeasure includethedistanceto transitstationsneartheProject. TheProjectwouldbe locatedwithinaquarter‐mileofpublic transportation, includingexisting Metro bus routes (e.g., 4, 28, 81, 442, 460, 701, 721, 728, 910/950, Commuter Express422/423/438/448/534,DASHF)andtheMetroBlueandExpoLines,andnearbyaccesstotheMetroRedandPurpleLineswithinone‐halfmile. TheProjectwouldprovideaccess toon‐siteuses fromexisting pedestrian pathways. The Project would also provide parking for bicycles on‐site toencourage utilization of alternative modes of transportation. The increased transit accessibilitywould reduce vehicle trips and VMT versus the statewide and South Coast Air Basin average,encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

ImproveDesignofDevelopment:Improvedstreetnetworkcharacteristicswithinaneighborhoodenhanceswalkabilityandconnectivity.Characteristicsincludestreetaccessibilityusuallymeasuredin terms of number of intersections (e.g., four‐way intersections) per squaremile. Thismeasurecorresponds to CAPCOA guidance measure LUT‐9.48 According to CAPCOA, the reduction in VMTfromthismeasureappliestourbanandsuburbansettingsforresidential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use;therefore,thismeasureappliestotheProject.TheProjectwouldbelocatedinahighlystreet‐accessibleareawithapproximately76four‐wayintersectionswithinaonemileareaoftheProjectSite,whichexceedsthestandard intersection density assumed in baseline VMT modeling. The increased intersectiondensitywouldreducevehicletripsandVMTversusthestatewideandSouthCoastAirBasinaverage,encouragewalkingandnon‐automotiveformsoftransportation,andwouldresultincorrespondingreductionsintransportation‐relatedemissions.

ProvidePedestrianNetworkImprovements:Providingpedestrianaccessthatminimizesbarriersandlinksaprojectsitewithexistingorplannedexternalstreetsencouragespeopletowalkinsteadofdrive.ThismeasurecorrespondstoCAPCOAguidancemeasureSDT‐1.49AccordingtoCAPCOA,thereduction inVMT fromthismeasureapplies tourban, suburban, andrural settings for residential,retail,office,industrial,andmixed‐useprojects.TheProjectislocatedinanurbaninfilllocationandismixed‐use; therefore, thismeasure applies to the Project. According to the CAPCOA guidance,factorsthatcontributetoVMTreductionsunderthismeasureincludepedestrianaccessconnectivitywithintheprojectandto/fromoff‐sitedestinations. AsdiscussedinSection4.J,TransportationandTraffic,thewalkabilityofexistingfacilitiesisbasedontheavailabilityofpedestrianroutesnecessaryto accomplish daily tasks without the use of an automobile. These attributes are quantified byWalkScore.comandassignedascoreoutof100points.WiththevariouscommercialbusinessesandentertainmentfacilitiesadjacenttoresidentialneighborhoodsoftheDowntownareaandproximitytopublictransit,thewalkabilityoftheDowntownareaisapproximately90points;50thiscomparestothecitywidescoreof64points. Asdiscussed inChapter2.0,ProjectDescription, theProjectwouldimprovethestreet‐levelpedestrianenvironmentandconnectivitywithintheLALIVE,StaplesCenter,the Los Angeles Convention Center and the surrounding streetscape, with the creation of newpedestrianscalefeaturessuchasapublicplazaalongS.Figueroawithstreetlevelretail/restaurantuses,streettreesandlandscaping,publicart,andsignageandlighting. TheProjectwouldpromote

48 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)182‐185.49 CaliforniaAirPollutionControlOfficersAssociation,QuantifyingGreenhouseGasMitigationMeasures,(2010)186‐189.50 WalkScore.com(www.walkscore.com)ratestheProjectSite(1020S.FigueroaStreet)withascoreof90of100possiblepoints(scores

accessedonMarch16,2016fortheDowntownLosAngelesdistrict). WalkScorecalculatesthewalkabilityofspecificaddressesbytakingintoaccounttheeaseoflivingintheneighborhoodwithareducedrelianceonautomobiletravel.

Page 56: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 44

pedestrian activities and connections to interior uses. Pedestrian access to the Hotel Tower andlobbywouldbefromahotelmotor‐courton11thStreetandfromthehotellobbyfrontingS.FigueroaStreet. Pedestrian access to the two stories of commercial and restaurant frontage along theperiphery of the Podium fronting 11th Street, S. Figueroa Street, S. Flower Street, and OlympicBoulevard would be directly from those streets at the ground level or via elevators, stairs orescalators.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyforResidentialTower1atthecornerof11thStreetandS.FlowerStreetwouldbefromS.FlowerStreet.PedestrianaccesstothelobbyofResidentialTower2at the corner of S. Figueroa Street and Olympic Boulevard would be from Olympic Boulevard.Pedestrianaccess to the residentialunits in thePodiumat thestreet levelwouldbeviaeither theResidential Tower 1 or Residential Tower 2 residential lobbies. In summary, the Project wouldprovidean internalpedestriannetwork forProjectvisitorsand residents that links to theexistingoff‐site pedestrian network including existing off‐site sidewalks, and would therefore result in asmallreductioninVMTandassociatedtransportation‐relatedemissions.

3.5.2  Project Design Features 

TheProjectwouldachieveseveralobjectivesof theCityofLosAngelesGeneralPlanFrameworkElement,Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable CommunitiesStrategy,andSouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictAirQualityManagementPlanforestablishingaregionallandusepatternthatpromotessustainability.TheProjectwouldsupportpedestrianactivityintheDowntownarea,andcontributetoalandusepatternthataddresseshousingneedsandreducesvehicletripsandairpollutionbylocatingresidentialuseswithinanareathathaspublictransit(withaccesstoexistingregional bus and rail service), and employment opportunities, restaurants and entertainment all withinwalkingdistance.

TheProjectwouldbedesigned to incorporategreenbuilding techniquesandothersustainability features.KeyProjectDesignFeatures thatwouldcontribute toenergyefficiencies include theuseof glass/windowareas for ventilation and daylight accessibility, low albedo (high reflectivity) color paving to reduce heatisland effect and drought tolerant landscaping. Other building features would include such items asstormwater retention; installationofheating, ventilation, andair conditioning (HVAC)systems thatutilizeozone‐friendly refrigerants; use of materials and finishes that emit low quantities of VOCs; use of highefficiency fixturesandappliances,waterconservation features;andrecyclingof solidwastes. TheProjectwouldalsoprovidebicycleparkingandpreferredparkingfor fuelefficientorelectricvehicle. TheProjectwould also be designed to complywith the City of LosAngelesGreenBuildingOrdinance. The followingProjectDesignFeatureswouldreduceairpollutantemissionsaswellasgreenhousegasemissions:

PDF‐AQ‐1: GreenBuildingMeasures: TheProjectwouldbedesignedandoperatedtomeetorexceedtheapplicablerequirementsoftheStateofCaliforniaGreenBuildingStandardsCodeandtheCityofLosAngelesGreenBuildingCodeandachievetheequivalentoftheUSGBCLEEDSilverCertificationlevel.Greenbuildingmeasureswouldinclude,butarenotlimitedtothefollowing:

TheProjectwouldimplementaconstructionwastemanagementplantodivertallmixed construction and demolition debris to City certified construction anddemolition waste processors, consistent with the Los Angeles City CouncilapprovedCouncilFile09‐3029;

Page 57: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    3.0  Methodology 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 45

The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reducebuildingenergycostby14percentfornewconstructioncomparedtotheTitle24BuildingEnergyEfficiencyStandardsas specified in theLEED2009EnergyandAtmospherecredit1(EAc1);

The Project would be designed to optimize energy performance and reducebuildingenergycostbyinstallingenergyefficientappliancesthatmeettheUSEPAENERGYSTARratingstandardsorequivalent;

The Project would include double‐paned windows to keep heat out duringsummermonthsandkeepheatinsideduringwintermonths.

The Project would include lighting controls with occupancy sensors to takeadvantageofavailablenaturallight.

TheProjectwouldreduceoutdoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof50percentcomparedtobaselinewaterconsumption.Reductionswouldbeachievedthroughdrought‐tolerant/Californianativeplantspeciesselection,artificialturf,irrigationsystemefficiency,alternativewatersupplies(e.g.,rainwaterharvestingforuseinlandscaping),and/orsmartirrigationsystems(e.g.,weather‐basedcontrols).

TheProjectwouldreduceindoorpotablewaterusebyaminimumof40percentcomparedtobaselinewaterconsumptionbyinstallingwaterfixturesthatexceedapplicablestandards.

The Project would provide on‐site recycling areas, consistent with City of LosAngeles strategies and ordinances,with the goal of achieving 70 percentwastediversionby2020,and90percentby2025.

ToencouragecarpoolingandtheuseofelectricvehiclesbyProjectresidentsandvisitors,theApplicantshalldesignateaminimumof8percentofon‐siteparkingforcarpooland/oralternative‐fueledvehicles,andtheProjectdesignwillprovidefor the installation of the conduit and panel capacity to accommodate futureelectricvehiclechargingstationsinto10percentoftheparkingspaces.

PDF‐AQ‐2: Construction Measures: The Project shall utilize off‐road diesel‐poweredconstruction equipment thatmeets or exceeds the CARB andUSEPA Tier 4off‐roademissions standards for equipment rated at 50 hp or greater during Projectconstruction.Equipment,suchastowercranes,weldersandpumpsshallbeelectricoralternative fueled (i.e., non‐diesel). To the extent possible, pole powerwill bemadeavailable for use with electric tools, equipment, lighting, etc. Alternative‐fueledgenerators shall be used when commercial models that have the power supplyrequirementstomeettheconstructionneedsoftheProjectarereadilyavailablefromlocal suppliers/vendors. These requirements shall be included in applicable biddocumentsandsuccessfulcontractor(s)mustdemonstrate theability tosupplysuchequipment.Acopyofeachunit’scertifiedtierspecificationormodelyearspecificationandCARBorSCAQMDoperatingpermit(ifapplicable)shallbeavailableuponrequestatthetimeofmobilizationofeachapplicableunitofequipment.

PDF‐AQ‐3: Control ofVOCs: The Project shall utilize low‐emitting materials pursuant to therequirementsoftheLEEDLow‐EmittingMaterialCreditorequivalent.Indoorcoatingsshallbelimitedto50gramsperliterofVOCsorless.

Page 58: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.0  Methodology    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 46

InadditiontotheProjectDesignFeatures,theProjectwouldbesubjecttoregulatoryrequirementsofotheragenciessuchastheAQMD.Theserequirementsinclude:

1. Demolition,GradingandConstructionActivities:CompliancewithprovisionsoftheSCAQMDDistrict Rule 403. The Project shall comply with all applicable standards of the SouthernCalifornia Air QualityManagement District, including the following provisions of District Rule403:

All unpaved demolition and construction areas shall bewetted at least twice dailyduring excavation and construction, and temporary dust covers shall be used toreduce dust emissions andmeet SCAQMD District Rule 403.Wetting could reducefugitivedustbyasmuchas50percent.

Theconstructionareashallbekeptsufficientlydampenedtocontroldustcausedbygrading and hauling, and at all times provide reasonable control of dust caused bywind.

All clearing, earth moving, or excavation activities shall be discontinued duringperiodsofhighwinds(i.e.,greaterthan15mph),soastopreventexcessiveamountsofdust.

Alldirt/soilloadsshallbesecuredbytrimming,wateringorotherappropriatemeanstopreventspillageanddust.

All dirt/soil materials transported off‐site shall be either sufficiently watered orsecurelycoveredtopreventexcessiveamountofdust.

General contractors shall maintain and operate construction equipment so as tominimizeexhaustemissions.

Truckshavingnocurrenthaulingactivityshallnotidlebutbeturnedoff.

2. Anti‐IdlingRegulation: InaccordancewithSection2485 inTitle13of theCaliforniaCodeofRegulations, the idling of all diesel‐fueled commercial vehicles (weighing over 10,000pounds)duringconstructionshallbelimitedtofiveminutesatanylocation.

3. FuelRequirements: In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code ofRegulations,operationofanystationary,diesel‐fueled,compression‐ignitionenginesshallmeetspecifiedfuelandfueladditiverequirementsandemissionstandards.

4. Architectural Coatings: The Project shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113 and utilizearchitecturalcoatingsthatmeettheVOCcontentrequirements.

5. Restaurant Odors: The Project shall install odor‐reducing equipment in accordance withSCAQMDRule1138.

Page 59: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 47

4.0  COMPLIANCE WITH AMBIENT AIR STANDARDS 

4.1  REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 

4.1.1  Construction Emissions 

Theworst‐casedailyemissionswerecalculatedasmaximumdailyconstructionemissionsforeachphasebyyear. Some individual construction phases do overlap and it should be noted that the maximum dailyemissionsarepredictedvaluesfortheworst‐casedayanddonotrepresenttheemissionsthatwouldoccurforeverydayofconstruction.ConstructionPhase1and2,however,wouldnotoverlap.Detailedemissionscalculations are provided in Appendix A. Results of the criteria pollutant calculations are presented inTable5,Phase1–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions,andTable6,Phase2–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalConstructionEmissions.Asshowntherein,construction‐relateddailyemissionsforthecriteria and precursor pollutants (VOC, NOX, CO, SOX, PM10, and PM2.5) would not exceed the SCAQMDnumeric indicators. These calculations include appropriate dust control measures required to beimplemented during each phase of development, as required by SCAQMD Rule 403 (Control of FugitiveDust). Construction emission estimates also include emissions reductions from implementation of theProjectDesignFeatures,suchastheuseofequipmentthatmeettheTier4emissionsstandardsforoff‐roadconstruction equipment. Therefore,with respect to regional emissions from Phase 1 and 2 constructionactivities,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.

Table 5 

Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  VOC  NOX  CO  SO2  PM10 b  PM2.5 

2017–SitePreparation <1 1 7 <1 2 1

2017–Demolition <1 3 16 <1 1 <1

2017–Grading 2 54 40 <1 6 3

2017–Foundation 1 22 25 <1 2 <1

2018–Foundation 1 19 24 <1 2 <1

2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 28 14 62 <1 10 3

2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving

28 14 67 <1 10 3

2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 28 12 55 <1 10 3

MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions

28 54 67 <1 10 3

SCAQMDNumericIndicators 75 100 550 150 150 55

Over/(Under) (47) (46) (483) (150) (140) (52)

ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations  Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. 

b  Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.  Source:  ESA PCR, 2016

 

Page 60: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 48

Table 6 

Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  VOC  NOX  CO  SO2  PM10 b  PM2.5 

2020–Demolition 1 7 24 <1 3 1

2020–Grading 2 38 36 <1 6 2

2020–Foundation 1 15 23 <1 1 <1

2021–Foundation 1 14 23 <1 1 <1

2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving

14 10 45 <1 7 2

2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 14 9 35 <1 7 2

2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 14 6 33 <1 7 2

MaximumRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions

14 38 45 <1 7 2

SCAQMDNumericIndicators 75 100 550 150 150 55

Over/(Under) (61) (62) (505) (150) (143) (53)

ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations  Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. 

b  Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.  Source:   ESA PCR, 2016 

4.1.2  Operational Emissions 

Operationalemissionswereassessedformobile,area,andstationarysources.Operationalcriteriapollutantemissions were calculated for the Project for an interim year which corresponds to buildout of Phase 1(2020)withconcurrentconstructionofPhase2andthefullbuildoutyear(2023).Dailytripgenerationratesfor theProjectwereprovidedby theProject trafficstudy51and include tripsassociatedwith theproposedcondos,hotel,office,retailspace,andrestaurants.OperationalemissionestimatesalsoincorporatethegreenbuildingdesignfeaturesdetailedinPDF‐AQ‐1,includingindoorandoutdoorwaterreductionandincreasedenergyefficiency.WithregardtoVOCs,SCAQMDRule1113wouldbeenforcedandtheLEEDorequivalentdesignfeaturewouldbeimplementedthatlimitsinteriorarchitecturalcoatingemissionsto50g/L.DetailedemissionscalculationsareprovidedinAppendixA.

ResultsofthecriteriapollutantcalculationsarepresentedinTable7,InterimYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissionsandTable8,FullBuildoutYear–MaximumUnmitigatedRegionalOperationalEmissions.Theincreaseinoperational‐relateddailyemissions(Projectemissionsminusexistingemissions)forthecriteriaandprecursorpollutants(VOC,NOX,CO,SOX,PM10,andPM2.5)wouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDthresholdsofsignificanceduringinterimoperationswhencombinedwithon‐goingconstructionemissions.

51 GibsonTransportationConsulting,Inc.,TrafficStudyforthe1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California,(2016).

Page 61: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 49

Table 8 

Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  VOC  NOX  CO  SO2  PM10  PM2.5 

Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout) Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 35 1 54 <1 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) <1 4 3 <1 <1 <1Stationary(Charbroiling) <1 – – – 0.9 0.9MotorVehicles 3 2 23 <1 33 9

TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions 39 8 91 <1 34 10

ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed) 7 2 16 <1 7 2

MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions

32 6 75 <1 27 8

SCAQMDNumericIndicators 55 55 550 150 150 55

Over/(Under) (23) (49) (475) (150) (123) (48)

ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations  Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A.Source:  ESA PCR, 2016 

Table 7 

Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Regional Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  VOC  NOX  CO  SO2  PM10  PM2.5 

Phase1Operations

Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 21 <1 24 <1 <1 <1

Energy(NaturalGas) <1 3 2 <1 <1 <1

Stationary(Charbroiling) <1 – – – 0.9 0.9

MotorVehicles 2 1 19 <1 19 5

Phase2MaximumConstructionEmissions 14 38 45 <1 7 2

TotalProjectOn‐SiteandOff‐SiteEmissions 38 43 96 <1 27 8

ExistingOperationalEmissions(removed) 7 2 16 <1 7 2

MaximumNetRegional(On‐SiteandOff‐Site)Emissions

31 41 80 <1 20 6

SCAQMDNumericIndicators 55 55 550 150 150 55

Over/(Under) (24) (14) (470) (150) (130) (49)

ExceedsThresholds? No No No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due to rounding in the modeling calculations  Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. Source:   ESA PCR, 2016

 

Page 62: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 50

Therefore,withrespecttoregionalemissionsfromoperations,impactswouldbelessthansignificantduringinterimoperations.Atfullbuildout,theincreaseinlong‐termoperationalemissionswouldalsonotexceedthresholdsforregionalcriteriapollutantemissions.Therefore,Project‐relatedoperationalemissionswouldresultinaless‐than‐significantimpact.

4.2  LOCALIZED SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS 

4.2.1  Construction Emissions 

The localized construction air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in theSCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (June 2003, revised July 2008).52The screeningcriteria provided in the Localized Significance ThresholdMethodology were used to determine localizedconstructionemissions thresholds for theProject. Themaximumdaily localizedemissions foreachof theconstruction phases and localized significance thresholds are presented inTable 9, Phase1–MaximumUnmitigated Localized Construction Emissions and Table 10, Phase 2 –Maximum Unmitigated LocalizedConstructionEmissions. Asshowntherein,maximumlocalizedconstructionemissionsforsensitivereceptorswouldnotexceedthelocalizedthresholdsforNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5.Therefore,withrespecttolocalizedconstructionemissions,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.

Table 9 

Phase 1 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  NOX  CO  PM10 b  PM2.5 

2017–SitePreparation 1 6 2 1

2017–Demolition 1 15 1 <1

2017–Grading 8 33 3 1

2017–Foundation 4 21 <1 <1

2018–Foundation 4 21 <1 <1

2018–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 4 21 <1 <1

2019–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving 4 29 <1 <1

2020–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 3 21 <1 <1MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 8 33 3 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 8 5Over/(Under) (100) (1,015) (5) (4)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No   

a  Totals may  not  add  up  exactly  due  to  rounding  in  the modeling  calculations    Detailed  emissions  calculations  are provided in Appendix A. 

b  Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.  

Source:  ESA PCR, 2016 

52 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Localized Significance Thresholds, (2003, revised 2008),

http://www.aqmd.gov/home/regulations/ceqa/air‐quality‐analysis‐handbook/localized‐significance‐thresholds. Accessed April2016.

Page 63: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 51

Table 10 

Phase 2 – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Construction Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  NOX  CO  PM10 b  PM2.5 

2020–Demolition 2 23 2 <1

2020–Grading 6 32 3 1

2020–Foundation 3 21 <1 <1

2021–Foundation 3 21 <1 <1

2021–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating,Paving 3 21 <1 <1

2022–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 2 12 <1 <1

2023–BuildingConstruction,ArchitecturalCoating 2 12 <1 <1MaximumLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 6 32 3 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 8 5Over/(Under) (102) (1,016) (5) (4)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No   

a  Totals may  not  add  up  exactly  due  to  rounding  in  the modeling  calculations    Detailed  emissions  calculations  are provided in Appendix A. 

b  Emissions include fugitive dust control measures consistent with SCAQMD Rule 403.  

Source:  ESA PCR, 2016 

4.2.2  Operational Emissions 

The localized operational air quality analysis was conducted using the methodology described in theSCAQMDLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodology(June2003,revisedJuly2008).Thescreeningcriteriaprovidedin theLocalizedSignificanceThresholdMethodologywereusedtodetermine localizedoperationalemissionsthresholdsfortheProject.Themaximumdailyincreaseinlocalizedemissions(Projectemissionsminus existing emissions) and localized significance thresholds arepresented inTable11, InterimYear–Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions and Table 12, Full Buildout Year – MaximumUnmitigated Localized Operational Emissions.   As shown therein, the increase in maximum localizedoperationalemissions forsensitivereceptorswouldnotexceedthe localizedthresholds forNOX,CO,PM10,andPM2.5duringboththeinterimyear(2020,Phase1operations)andfullbuildoutyear(2023,Phases1and2 operations). Therefore, with respect to localized operational emissions, impacts would be less thansignificant.

4.3  LOCALIZED CARBON MONOXIDE IMPACTS 

The potential for the Project to cause or contribute to CO hotspots is evaluated by comparing Projectintersections(bothintersectiongeometryandtrafficvolumes)withpriorstudiesconductedbytheSCAQMDinsupportoftheirAQMPsandconsideringexistingbackgroundCOconcentrations.Asdiscussedbelow,thiscomparisondemonstratesthattheProjectwouldnotcauseorcontributeconsiderablytotheformationofCOhotspots,thatCOconcentrationsatProjectimpactedintersectionswouldremainwellbelowtheambientairqualitystandards,andthatnofurtherCOanalysisiswarrantedorrequired.AsshownpreviouslyinTable2,COlevelsintheProjectAreaaresubstantiallybelowthefederalandstatestandards.MaximumCOlevelsinrecentyearsare3ppm(one‐houraverage)and2.4ppm(eight‐houraverage)comparedtothethresholdsof

Page 64: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 52

Table 12 

Full Buildout Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  NOX  CO  PM10  PM2.5 

Phase1and2Operations(FullBuildout) Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) 1 54 <1 <1Energy(NaturalGas) 4 3 <1 <1Stationary(Charbroiling) – – 0.9 0.9

TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions 5 57 1 1

ExistingOn‐SiteOperationalEmissions(removed) 1 1 <1 <1

MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 4 56 1 1SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 2 2Over/(Under) (104) (992) (2) (2)ExceedsThresholds? No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due  to  rounding  in  the modeling calculations   Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. 

 

Source:  ESA PCR, 2016 

Table 11 

Interim Year – Maximum Unmitigated Localized Operational Emissions (pounds per day) a 

Source  NOX  CO  PM10  PM2.5 

Phase1Operations

Area(ConsumerProducts,Landscaping) <1 24 <1 <1

Energy(NaturalGas) 3 2 <1 <1

Stationary(Charbroiling) – – 0.9 0.9

TotalProjectOn‐SiteEmissions 3 26 1 1

ExistingOperationalOn‐SiteEmissions(removed) 1 1 <1 <1

MaximumNetLocalized(On‐Site)Emissions 2 25 1 1

SCAQMDNumericIndicators 108 1,048 2 2

Over/(Under) (106) (1,023) (1) (1)

ExceedsThresholds? No No No No   

a  Totals may not add up exactly due  to  rounding  in  the modeling calculations   Detailed emissions calculations are provided in Appendix A. 

 

Source:   ESA PCR, 2016 

Page 65: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 53

20ppm(one‐houraverage)and9.0(eight‐houraverage). CarbonmonoxidedecreaseddramaticallyintheAirBasinwiththeintroductionofthecatalyticconverterin1975.NoexceedancesofCOhavebeenrecordedat monitoring stations in the Air Basin for some time and the Air Basin is currently designated as a COattainmentareaforboththeCAAQSandNAAQS.Thus,itisnotexpectedthatCOlevelsatProject‐impactedintersectionswouldrisetothelevelofanexceedanceofthesestandards.

Additionally,theSCAQMDconductedCOmodelingforthe2003AQMPforthefourworst‐caseintersectionsin the Air Basin. These include: (a)Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; (b) Sunset Boulevard andHighlandAvenue;(c)LaCienegaBoulevardandCenturyBoulevard;(d)LongBeachBoulevardandImperialHighway. In the2003AQMP, theSCAQMDnotes that the intersectionofWilshireBoulevard andVeteranAvenue is themost congested intersection inLosAngelesCounty,with an averagedaily traffic volumeofabout100,000vehiclesperday.53Thisintersectionislocatedneartheon‐andoff‐rampstoInterstate405inWestLosAngeles. Theevidenceprovided inTable4‐10ofAppendixVof the2003AQMPshows that thepeakmodeledCOconcentrationduetovehicleemissionsatthesefourintersectionswas4.6ppm(one‐houraverage) and 3.2 (eight‐hour average) at Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue.54 When added to theexistingbackgroundCOconcentrations,thescreeningvalueswouldbe7.6ppm(one‐houraverage)and5.6ppm(eight‐houraverage).

BasedontheProject’sassociatedTrafficStudy,ofthestudiedintersectionsthatarepredictedtooperateataLevelofService(“LOS”)ofD,E,orFunderfutureoperationalyearplusProjectconditions,oneintersectionwould potentially have peak traffic volumes of approximately 62,000 per day.55 As a result, COconcentrations are expected to be approximately 5.9 ppm (one‐hour average) and 4.4 ppm (eight‐houraverage)orless,whichwouldnotexceedthethresholds.56Totaltrafficvolumesatthemaximumimpactedintersection would likely have to more than double to contribute to a CO hotspot given that vehiclesoperating today have reduced CO emissions as compared to vehicles operating in year 2003 when theSCAQMD conducted the AQMP attainment demonstrationmodeling. Thus, this comparison demonstratesthat the Project would not contribute considerably to the formation of CO hotspots and no further COanalysisisrequired.TheProjectwouldresultinlessthansignificantimpactswithrespecttoCOhotspots.

4.4  TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ CONSTRUCTION  

ThegreatestpotentialforTACemissionswouldberelatedtodieselparticulatematteremissionsassociatedwith heavy equipment operations during demolition, grading and excavation, and building constructionactivities.Inaddition,incidentalamountsoftoxicsubstancessuchasoils,solvents,andpaintswouldbeused.

53 South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2003 Air Quality Management Plan, Appendix V: Modeling and Attainment

Demonstrations,(2003)V‐4‐24.54 Theeight‐houraverageisbasedona0.7persistencefactor,asrecommendedbytheSCAQMD.55 GibsonTransportationConsulting, Inc.,TrafficStudy for the1020S.FigueroaStreetProject,LosAngeles,California, (2016). The

traffic volume of approximately 62,000was estimated based on the peak hour intersection volumes under futurewith Projectconditionsandthegeneralassumptionthatpeakhourtripsrepresentapproximately10percentofdailytripvolumes(theFederalHighway Administration considers 10 percent to be a standard assumption; see http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/tmip/publications/other_reports/tod_modeling_procedures/ch02.cfm). The peak value was estimated at the intersection of FigueroaStreetandOlympicBoulevard.

56 TheexpectedCOconcentrationsarecalculatedbasedontheratioof62,000/100,000multipliedbythescreeningvaluesof4.6ppm(one‐houraverage)and3.2ppm(eight‐houraverage)andaddingthebackgroundconcentrations.ActualCOvaluewouldlikelybelessthantheexpectedvaluesreportedintheanalysisastheaverageCOemissionsfrommotorvehiclesoperatingtodayhavedeclinedascomparedtomotorvehiclesoperatinginyear2003.

Page 66: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 54

TheseproductswouldcomplywithallapplicableSCAQMDrulesfortheirmanufactureanduse.TheProjectwillbesubject toseveralSCAQMDrulesdesignedto limitexposuretoTACsduringconstructionactivities.The Project would be required to comply with the CARB Air Toxics Control Measure that limits dieselpoweredequipmentandvehicle idling tonomore than5minutesata location, and theCARB In‐UseOff‐Road Diesel Vehicle Regulation; compliance with these would minimize emissions of TACs duringconstruction. The Project would also complywith the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403 if asbestos isfound during the renovation and construction activities. Furthermore, the Project would voluntarilyimplementthecontrolmeasuresdescribedinPDF‐AQ‐2.

OEHHAisresponsiblefordevelopingandrevisingguidelinesforperformingHRAsundertheState’stheAirToxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment (AB 2588) regulation. InMarch 2015, OEHHA adopted newguidelines which updates the previous guidance by incorporating advances in risk assessment withconsideration of infants and children using Age Sensitivity Factors (ASF). These changes also take intoaccount the sensitivity of children to TAC emissions, different breathing rates, and time spent at home.Children have a higher breathing rate compared to adults and would likely spend more time at homeresulting in longer exposure durations. On June 5, 2015, SCAQMD incorporated these guidelines in torelevantrulesdesignedforpermittingofstationarysources.57Althoughconstructionwouldbetemporary,construction impacts associatedwith TACs are addressed quantitatively in a refinedHRA. TheHRAwasperformed inaccordancewith theOEHHAAirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealth Risk Assessments (OEHHA Guidance).58 The analysis incorporates the estimated constructionemissions, as previously discussed, and dispersion modeling using the USEPA AERMOD model withmeteorologicaldatafromtheclosestSCAQMDmonitoringstation.

Thecancerriskvalues fordieselparticulatematter(DPM)considersexposurevia the inhalationpathway.Thepotential exposure throughotherpathways (e.g., ingestion) requires substance and site‐specific data,and the specific parameters for DPM are not known for these pathways.59 The OEHHA guidelinesrecommends the incorporation of several factors to quantify the carcinogenic compound dose via theinhalation pathway. Once determined, the dose ismultiplied by the compound‐specific inhalation cancerpotency factor to derive the cancer risk estimate. The dose takes into account the concentration at asensitivereceptor.Thecancerpotencyfactoriscompound‐specific.Inperforminghealthriskcalculations,carcinogeniccompoundsarenotconsideredtohavethresholdlevels(i.e.,doselevelsbelowwhichtherearenorisks).Anyexposure,therefore,willhavesomeassociatedrisk.Incrementalhealthrisksassociatedwithexposuretocarcinogeniccompoundsisdefinedintermsoftheprobabilityofdevelopingcancerasaresultofexposure to a chemical at a given concentration. Under a deterministic approach (i.e., point estimatemethodology),thecancerriskprobabilityisdeterminedbymultiplyingthechemical’sannualconcentrationbyitsunitriskfactor(URF). TheURFforDPMrecommendedbytheScientificReviewPanel60is3.0x10‐4permicrogrampercubicmeter(µg/m3).ThisvaluecorrespondstoaCancerPotencyFactor(CPF)of1.1permilligram/kilogram (bodyweight)perday (mg/kg(bw)‐day). TheURF forDPMmeans that for receptors

57 South Coast Air Quality Management District, Minutes of the June 5, 2015 Meeting, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐

source/Agendas/Governing‐Board/2015/2015‐Jul10‐001.pdf?sfvrsn=8,AccessedSeptember28,201558 OfficeofEnvironmentalHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgramGuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRisk

Assessments,(2015).59 CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard,ReporttotheAirResourcesBoardontheProposed IdentificationofDieselExhaustasaToxicAir

Contaminant,PartAExposureAssessment,ApprovedbytheScientificReviewPanel,(1998).60 TheScientificReviewPanel ischargedwithevaluating the riskassessmentsof substancesproposed for identificationas toxicair

contaminantsbyCARB,OEHHA,andtheDepartmentofPesticideRegulation(DPR),andthereviewofguidelinespreparedbyOEHHA.

Page 67: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 55

withanannualaverageconcentrationof1µg/m3 in theambientair, theprobabilityof contractingcancerover a 70‐year lifetime of exposure is 300 in 1million. The URF also assumes that a person is exposedcontinuously for a 70 year lifetime. This approach for calculating cancer risk is intended to result inconservative(i.e.,healthprotective)estimatesofhealthimpactsandisusedforassessingriskstosensitivereceptors.Theestimationofcancerriskusesthefollowingalgorithms:

Risk=Doseinhalation×InhalationCPF×ASF (Equation1)Where: Doseinhalation=CAIR×DBR×A×EF×ED×FAH/AT (Equation2) InhalationCPF=inhalationcancerpotencyfactor ASF=agesensitivityfactorWhere: CAIR=concentrationofcompoundinairinmicrogramspercubicmeter(µg/m3) DBR=breathingrateinliterperkilogramofbodyweightperday(L/kg‐bodyweight/day) A=inhalationabsorptionfactor(1forDPM) EF=exposurefrequencyindaysperyear(day/year) ED=exposuredurationinyears(year) FAH=fractionoftimeathome AT=averagingtimeperiodoverwhichexposureisaveragedindays(day)

TheOEHHArecommendedvaluesfortheparameterslistedabovewereusedintheHRAanalysis.Thedailybreathingrate(DBR)usedintheanalysiswasbasedonwasbasedonOEHHArecommendationswhichvarydependingonagewhichareshowninTable13,OEHHARecommendedResidentialDailyBreathingRatesforPointEstimateDoseCalculations(L/kgbodyweight). The recommended exposure frequency (EF) is 350daysperyearwhichisequivalentto0.96(350days/365daysayear).Theinhalationabsorptionfactor(A)isassumedtobe1forinhalationbasedriskassessment.

As indicated inEquation1above,eachagegrouphasdifferentexposureparameterswhichrequirecancerrisktobecalculatedseparatelyforeachagegroup.Valuesforfractionoftimeathome(FAH)arepresentedinTable14,OEHHARecommendationsforFractionofTimeatHome(FAH)forEvaluatingResidentialCancerRisk. Once dose is calculated, cancer risk is calculated by accounting for cancer potency of the specificpollutant,andtheagesensitivityfactor(ASF).

Non‐cancerchronicimpactswereassessedbasedontheHazardIndex.Theevaluationofchronicimpactsisbased on themaximum annual emissions over a 12‐months period of construction activity. The chronic

Table 13 

OEHHA Recommended Residential Daily Breathing Rates for Point Estimate Dose Calculations (L / kg body weight) 

  3rd Trimester  0<2 Years  2<9 Years  2<16 Years  16<30 Years 

Average 225 658 535 452 21095thPercentile 361 1090 861 745 335   

Source:  OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual.  February 2015.  

Page 68: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 56

HazardIndexiscalculatedbydividingthemaximummodeledannualaverageconcentrationatthemaximumimpacted sensitive receptor by the Reference Exposure Level (REL). The REL is the concentration at orbelowwhichnoadversehealtheffectsareanticipated.Forexample,OEHHAhasrecommendedanambientconcentrationof 5µg/m3 as the chronic inhalationREL forDPMexhaust. Therefore, a sensitive receptorexposedtoanannualaverageDPMconcentrationof5µg/m3or lesswouldnotresult inachronic impact.Non‐cancerchronicimpactsaffectspecifictargetorgansystems(alsocalledtoxicologicalendpoints),suchastheeye,nervoussystem,reproductivesystem,andrespiratorysystem.ThechronichealthimpactwiththemaximumHazardIndexforthesametargetorgansystemisusedforimpactdetermination.

Sensitive receptors used for modeling were placed at the location of sensitive receptor (i.e., residential)buildingsneartotheProjectSite. Heavy‐dutyequipmentandtrucksweremodeledasvolumesourcesandwerelocatedontheProjectSiteandonroadwaysthattruckswouldpotentiallytravelonwithina0.25miledistance of the Project Site. Figure 4, Construction Health Risk Assessment Source‐Receptor Diagram,providesadiagramshowingthelocationsofsourceofProjectconstruction‐relatedDPMemissionswithinao.25mileoftheProjectSiteandnearbysensitivereceptors.HealthriskcalculationswereperformedusingaspreadsheettoolconsistentwiththeOEHHAGuidanceandCARBHotspotsAnalysisandReportingProgram(HARP) version 2 spreadsheet methodology. Table 15,MaximumCarcinogenicRisk forOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors from Construction, summarizes the carcinogenic risk for representative receptors locatedthroughouttheProjectSitevicinity.Forcarcinogenicexposures, thecancerrisk fromDPMemissionsfromconstruction of the Project is estimated to result in amaximum carcinogenic risk of less than 8 per onemillion.Themaximumimpactwouldoccuratsensitivelanduses(residences)directlysouthoftheProjectSite. Asdiscussedpreviously, the lifetimeexposureunderOEHHAguidelines takes intoaccountearly life(infantandchildren)exposure.Itshouldbenotedthatthecalculatedcancerriskconservativelyassumesthatexposure of sensitive receptors (residential uses) would not have any mitigation, such as mechanicalfiltration.Asthemaximumimpactwouldbelessthantheriskthresholdof10inonemillion,impactswouldbeconsideredlessthansignificant.

Potential non‐cancer effects of chronic (i.e., long term) DPM exposureswere evaluated using the HazardIndexapproachasdescribedintheOEHHAGuidance.Ahazardindexequaltoorgreaterthan1.0representsasignificantchronichealthhazard.AsshowninTable16,MaximumNon‐CancerChronicImpactsforOff‐SiteSensitiveReceptors,nearbyoff‐sitesensitivereceptorswouldnotbeexposedtochronicimpactsthatwouldexceed the thresholdof1.0. Themaximum impactwouldoccurat sensitive receptorsdirectlyeastof theProjectSite.Therefore,non‐cancerchronicimpactswouldbeconsideredlessthansignificant.Theprocessofassessinghealthrisksandimpactsincludesadegreeofuncertainty.Thelevelofuncertaintydependson

Table 14 

OEHHA Recommendations for Fraction of Time at Home (FAH) for Evaluating Residential Cancer Risk 

Age Range  Fraction of Time at Residence 

3rdTrimesterand0<2Years 0.852<16Years 0.7216‐70Years 0.73

   

Source:  OEHHA Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual.  February 2015. 

Page 69: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

FIGUREConstruc on Health Risk Assessment

Source-Receptor Diagram1020 S. Figueroa Street Project 4

Source: PCR Services Corpora on, 2016.

0 0.3 km

N

P C R

Page 70: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 58

Thispageintentionallyblank.

Page 71: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 59

Table 15 

Maximum Carcinogenic Risk for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors from Construction 

SensitiveReceptorMaximumCancerRisk(#inonemillion)

Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite 7.9MaximumIndividualCancerRiskThreshold 10

ExceedsThreshold? No   

Source:  ESA PCR, 2016

 Table 16 

 Maximum Non‐Cancer Chronic Impacts for Off‐Site Sensitive Receptors 

Sensitive Receptor  Chronic Hazard Index 

Residence–South/SoutheastofProjectSite 0.009TotalHazardIndex 1.0Exceedsthreshold? No

   

Source: ESA PCR, 2016 

the availability of data and the extent towhich assumptions are relied upon in caseswhere the data areincompleteorunknown.AllHRAsrelyuponscientificstudiestoreducethelevelofuncertainty;however,itis not possible to completely eliminate uncertainty from the analysis. Where assumptions are used tosubstituteforincompleteorunknowndata,itisstandardpracticeinperformingHRAstoerronthesideofhealthprotectiontoavoidunderestimatingorunderreportingtherisk to thepublic. Ingeneral, sourcesofuncertainty thatmay lead toanoverestimationoranunderestimationof therisk includeextrapolationoftoxicity data in animals to humans and uncertainty in the exposure estimates. In addition to uncertainty,thereexists“anaturalrangeorvariabilityinmeasuredparametersdefiningtheexposurescenario”andthatthe“thegreatestquantitativeimpactisvariationamongthehumanpopulationinsuchpropertiesasheight,weight, food consumption, breathing rates, and susceptibility to chemical toxicants.”61As mentionedpreviously, it is typical to err on the side of health protection by assessing risk on the most sensitivepopulations, suchaschildrenand theelderly,bymodelingpotential impactsbasedonhigh‐endbreathingrates,byincorporatingagesensitivityfactors,andbynottakingintoaccountexposurereductionmeasures,suchasmechanicalairfiltrationbuildingsystems.

TheProjectSitepreviouslyhadagasstationandautorepairshopattheintersectionofFigueroaStreetandOlympic Boulevard, which were removed from the Project Site in 1990 and replaced with the existingsurfaceparkinglot.Duringremovalofthegasstation,soilcontaminationwasreportedattheundergroundstorage tanks (USTs) and fuel dispensers. A vapor extraction system (VES) remediation system removed

61 CaliforniaEnvironmentalProtectionAgency,OfficeofHealthHazardAssessment,AirToxicsHotSpotsProgram,RiskAssessment

Guidelines,GuidanceManualforPreparationofHealthRiskAssessments,(2015)1‐5.

Page 72: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards    September 2016 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 60

90percentofthetotalestimatedgasolinethatleakedfromthestationandLAFDissuedaNoFurtherActionletteronJune10,1994.A530‐gallondieselUST,transitionpump,andassociatedundergroundpipingwereabandoned in place below the existing hotel driveway and landscaped median under a Covenant andAgreementwiththeCity.Petroleumhydrocarbonswereidentifiedinshallowsoilsamplesinthevicinityofthe abandonedUST and associated piping. Refer to Section 4.E,HazardsandHazardousMaterials, of theDraftEIR foradditionaldetails. Asdiscussed inSection4.E, the removalof these soils and infrastructurewouldlikelyrequirespecialhandlingduringexcavation,includingadditionalanalyticalcharacterization,soilsegregation, and transport off‐site to be recycled/disposed of in accordancewith Federal, State and localregulations. TheProjectwould implementMitigationMeasuresMM‐HAZ‐1 (SoilManagementPlan),MM‐HAZ‐2(HealthandSafetyPlan),andMM‐HAZ‐3(AdditionalSiteTesting) toensurethatanycontaminatedsoils are properly identified, excavated and disposed of off‐site in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 1166(VolatileOrganicCompoundEmissionsfromDecontaminationofSoil),toavoidsignificantimpactsorriskstoworkersorthepublicintheeventthatelevatedlevelsofsubsurfacegasesareencounteredduringgradingandexcavation,and toconductadditional subsurfacesoilandsoil gassamplingand testing inaccordancewith the recommendations of the SummaryReport forLimitedSoilandSoilGas Investigation,LuxeHotel,prepared by Terra‐Petra and dated April 10, 2016. Recommendations pertaining to remediation, publichealth,andworkersafetybasedontheadditionalsamplingandtestingwouldbeincorporatedintotheSoilManagement Plan. Implementation of MM‐HAZ‐1, MM‐HAZ‐2, and MM‐HAZ‐3 would ensure thatcontaminated soils and materials are removed from the Project Site and transported in a manner thatminimizes or prevents the potential for contaminated soils and materials from becoming airborne orotherwisereleasedintotheenvironment.Asaresult,healthimpactsfromcontaminatedsoilsandmaterialswouldnotsubstantiallycontributetoconstructionhealthrisksandwouldbelessthansignificant.

4.5  TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS ‐ OPERATION  

Project operations would generate only minor amounts of diesel emissions from delivery trucks andincidentalmaintenanceactivities. Truckswouldcomplywith theapplicableprovisionsof theCARBTruckandBusregulationtominimizeandreducePMandNOXemissionsfromexistingdieseltrucks.Therefore,theProjectoperationswouldnotbeconsideredasubstantialsourceofdieselparticulates.

In addition, Project operationswould only result inminimal emissions of air toxics frommaintenance orotherongoing activities, such as from theuseof architectural coatings andotherproducts. TheProject’srestaurantusescouldpotentiallygenerateTACsifcharbroilingactivitiesoccurattherestaurant,whichhasthepotentialtogeneratesmallamountsofchemicalsthatareknownorsuspectedbytheStateofCaliforniatocausehumanhealth impacts.62However, restaurantcharbroiling in theAirBasinwouldberequired tocomplywith SCAQMD Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations), which requires theinstallationofemissionscontrolsoncharbroilers. Theemissionscontrolswouldreduce thealreadysmallamounts of TAC emissions associatedwith charbroiling by approximately 83 percent,63such that adversehealthimpactsarenotexpectedtooccuratnearbysensitivereceptors.Asaresult,toxicorcarcinogenicairpollutants are not expected to occur in any meaningful amounts in conjunction with operation of theproposedlanduseswithintheProjectSite. BasedontheusesexpectedontheProjectSite,potential long‐

62 U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,PolycyclicAromaticHydrocarbons(PAHs),January2008,http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/

wastemin/minimize/factshts/pahs.pdf.AccessedApril2016.63 U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,Methods forDevelopingaNationalEmission Inventory forCommercialCookingProcesses:

TechnicalMemorandum,(2003).

Page 73: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    4.0  Compliance with Ambient Air Standards 

 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 61

termoperationalimpactsassociatedwiththereleaseofTACswouldbeminimalandwouldnotbeexpectedtoexceedtheSCAQMDthresholdsofsignificance.Therefore,impactswouldbelessthansignificant.

Page 74: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 62

5.0  CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS 

The Project would result in the emission of criteria pollutants forwhich the region is in non‐attainmentduringbothconstructionandoperation. TheBasinfailstomeetnationalstandardsforO3,PM10andPM2.5,andthereforeisconsideredafederal“non‐attainment”areaforthesepollutants.

AsshowninTable5,Table6,Table7,andTable8,regionalemissionscalculatedforProjectconstructionandoperationsarelessthantheapplicableSCAQMDdailysignificancethresholds.Thethresholdsaredesignedto assist the region in attaining the applicable State and national ambient air quality standards. Thesestandardsapply tobothprimary(criteriaandprecursor)andsecondarypollutants (ozone). Although theProjectSiteislocatedinaregionthatisinnon‐attainmentforozoneandPM10,theemissionsassociatedwiththe Project would not be cumulatively considerable as the emissions would fall below SCAQMD dailysignificance thresholds. Inaddition, theProjectwouldbeconsistentwith theAQMP,which is intended tobringtheBasinintoattainmentforallcriteriapollutants.

5.1  CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 

ThereareanumberofcumulativeprojectsintheProjectareathathavenotyetbeenbuiltorarecurrentlyunder construction. Since the Applicant has no control over the timing or sequencing of the cumulativeprojects, any quantitative analysis to ascertain daily construction emissions that assumes multiple,concurrent construction projects would be speculative. For this reason, the SCAQMD’s methodology toassessaproject’scumulativeimpactdiffersfromthecumulativeimpactsmethodologyemployedelsewherein this technical report. The SCAQMD recommends that project‐specific air quality impacts be used todeterminethepotentialcumulativeimpactstoregionalairquality.

With respect to the Project’s short‐term construction‐related air quality emissions and cumulativeconditions, the SCAQMD has developed strategies to reduce criteria pollutant emissions outlined in theAQMPpursuant to the federalCleanAirActmandates. Assuch,constructionof theProjectwouldcomplywithSCAQMDRule403 requirementsand theATCM to limitheavydutydieselmotorvehicle idling tonomorethan5minutesatanygiventime. Inaddition, theProjectwouldutilizeaconstructioncontractor(s)that complieswith required and applicableBACTand the In‐UseOff‐RoadDiesel VehicleRegulation. PerSCAQMDrulesandmandates,aswellastheCEQArequirementthatsignificantimpactsbemitigatedtotheextent feasible, these same requirements (i.e., Rule 403 compliance, the implementation of all feasiblemitigation measures, and compliance with adopted AQMP emissions control measures) would also beimposedonconstructionprojects in theAirBasin,whichwouldincludeeachof thecumulativeprojects inthe Project Area. As shown above in Table5, Table 6, Table 9, and Table 10, regional and localizedconstructionemissionsassociatedwith theProjectwouldnotexceed theSCAQMDnumeric indicators. Assuch,theProject’scontributiontocumulativelysignificantconstructionimpactstoairqualitywouldnotbecumulativelyconsiderableandcumulativeimpactswouldbelessthansignificantforregionalandlocalizedcriteriapollutantsduringconstruction.

5.2  OPERATIONAL IMPACTS 

The SCAQMD’s approach for assessing cumulative impacts related to operations or long‐termimplementation is based on attainment of ambient air quality standards in accordance with therequirements of the federal and State CleanAir Acts. As discussed earlier, the SCAQMDhas developed acomprehensiveplan,theAQMP,whichaddressestheregion’scumulativeairqualitycondition.

Page 75: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

September 2016    5.0  Cumulative Analysis 

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 63

Asignificantimpactmayoccurifaprojectwouldaddacumulativelyconsiderablecontributionofafederalorstate non‐attainment pollutant. Because the Los Angeles County portion of the Air Basin is currently innonattainmentforozone,NO2,PM10,andPM2.5,cumulativeprojectscouldexceedanairqualitystandardorcontributetoanexistingorprojectedairqualityexceedance.Cumulativeimpactstoairqualityareevaluatedunder two sets of thresholds for CEQA and the SCAQMD. In particular, Section 15064(h)(3) of theCEQAGuidelines provides guidance in determining the significance of cumulative impacts. Specifically, Section15064(h)(3)statesinpartthat:

“Aleadagencymaydeterminethataproject’sincrementalcontributiontoacumulativeeffectis not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in apreviouslyapproved plan ormitigationprogramwhich provides specific requirements thatwillavoidorsubstantiallylessenthecumulativeproblem(e.g.,waterqualitycontrolplan,airqualityplan, integratedwastemanagementplan)within the geographicarea inwhich theprojectislocated. Suchplansorprogramsmustbespecifiedinlaworadoptedbythepublicagency with jurisdiction over the affected resources through a public review process toimplement, interpret, or make specific the law enforced or administered by the publicagency…”

ForpurposesofthecumulativeairqualityanalysiswithrespecttoCEQAGuidelinesSection15064(h)(3),theProject’sincrementalcontributiontocumulativeairqualityimpactsisdeterminedbasedoncompliancewiththeSCAQMDadopted2012AQMP.TheProjectwouldnotconflictwithorobstructimplementationofAQMPandwouldbeconsistentwiththegrowthprojectionsintheAQMP.

Nonetheless, SCAQMD no longer recommends relying solely upon consistency with the AQMP as anappropriate methodology for assessing cumulative air quality impacts. The SCAQMD recommends thatproject‐specific air quality impacts be used to determine the potential cumulative impacts to regional airquality. As discussed previously, the Projectwould not exceed the SCAQMD regional numeric indicators.Therefore, theProject’s incrementalcontributionto long‐termemissionsofnon‐attainmentpollutantsandozoneprecursors, considered togetherwith cumulative projects,wouldnot be cumulatively considerable,andthereforethecumulativeimpactoftheProjectwouldbelessthansignificant.

Page 76: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 77: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

1020S.FigueroaStreetProject AirQualityTechnicalReportESAPCR 65

6.0  SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

Air pollutant emissions associatedwith the Project have been evaluated to determine the level of impactfromconstructionactivitiesandfutureoperationsoftheProject.

6.1  CONSTRUCTION 

Construction of the Project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy‐dutyconstruction equipment and through vehicle trips generated from constructionworkers traveling to andfrom the Project Site. In addition, fugitive dust emissions would result from grading and constructionactivities. However,useof typical construction equipment (in termsof size andage/emission standards)andcompliancewithRule403requirements(regardingdustcontrolmeasuressuchaswateringtwicedailyand track out prevention measures), minimizes air emissions to the extent warranted. In addition, theProjectwouldimplementPDF‐AQ‐1,PDF‐AQ‐2,andPDF‐AQ‐3tominimizeconstruction‐relatedemissions.

As shown in Table 5 and 6, regional construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD numericindicators.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoregionalconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.AsshowninTable9and10localizedemissionswouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDnumericindicators.Therefore,impactsrelatedtolocalizedconstructionemissionswouldbelessthansignificant.AsshowninTable15andTable 16, construction‐related health impacts would not exceed the thresholds and would be less thansignificant.Asaresult,Project‐relatedconstructionimpactswouldbelessthansignificant.

6.2  OPERATION 

Air pollutant emissions associated with Project operations would be generated by the consumption ofnaturalgasandbytheoperationofon‐roadvehicles.AsshowninTable7,Table8,Table11,andTable12,regionalandlocalizedemissionsassociatedwiththeProjectwouldnotexceedtheSCAQMDdailysignificancethresholds. Inaddition, theProjectwouldnotresult inaCOhotspot,oremitunhealthy levelsof toxicaircontaminants and odiferous emissions. Furthermore, the Projectwould be consistentwith applicable airqualityplansandpolicies.Therefore,impactsrelatedtoProjectoperationalemissionsandconsistencywithapplicableairqualitymanagementplans,policies,orregulationswouldbelessthansignificant.

Page 78: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 79: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

     

APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS AND OUTPUT FILES 

Page 80: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 81: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020S.FigueroaStreetAirQualityTechnicalReportAppendixA,AirQualityWorksheetsA.1 ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput

TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)

A.2 OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput–Existing

CalEEModOutput–Project

A.3 OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions

A.4 OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions

A.5 SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403

A.6 ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations

Page 82: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.1ConstructionEmissions(CalEEModandEMFAC2014)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput

TruckEmissions(EMFAC2014)

Page 83: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Project Information

Land Use Units Res. Pop.Existing Uses

Hotel 178             rooms 112,748    sf

Project Phase 1Residential + Amenities 290             DU 352,000    sf 473

Loft/Studio 141               DU1‐Bedroom 73                 DU2‐Bedroom 68                 DU3‐Bedroom 4                   DUPenthouse 4                   DU

Retail/Commercial 15.0            ksf 15,000      sfRestaurant 15.0            ksf 15,000      sf

Hotel 300             rooms 280,000    sf

Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐             spaces ‐            sfSubterranean Parking Structure 437             spaces 174,800    sfOpen Space 29.3            ksf 0.67           acre

Project Phase 2Residential + Amenities 360             DU 418,000    sf 587

Loft/Studio 167               DU1‐Bedroom 94                 DU2‐Bedroom 91                 DU3‐Bedroom 4                   DUPenthouse 4                   DU

Commercial 25.0            ksf 25,100      sfRestaurant 25.0            ksf 25,100      sf

Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐             spaces ‐            sfSubterranean Parking Structure 362             spaces 144,800    sfOpen Space 20.5            ksf 0.47           acrePlaza Area 5.0              ksf 5,000        sf

Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf) 2.70            acres 116,660    sfSources:  Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016

Enclosed Parking with ElevatorUnenclosed Parking with Elevator

City Park

High‐rise Apartment

CalEEMod Land Use Type

High‐rise Apartment

Strip Mall

Hotel

Quality Restaurant

Hotel

City Park

Strip MallQuality Restaurant

Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator

Surface Parking

Page 84: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Construction Schedule and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs

CalEEMod Construction Phase Start Date  End Date No. Work Days

Demo (SF)

Demo Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Demo Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Demo Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Soil Export a

(CY)Soil Import 

(CY)

Soil Haul Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Soil Haul Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Soil Haul Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Concrete Mat 

Volume a

(CY)

Concrete Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Vendor One‐Way 

Trips/Max Day b

Worker One‐Way 

Trips/Max Day c

Phase 1Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5                 10              Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 10               16,000   11              20              5                15              Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 51                      99,800                   ‐                      14              14,258                   160  30              Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50                         9,500                    9            2,112                 50  25              Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 618             100             700            Paving d 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 21                10                Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 394             100            

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 72               353,000 11              1,957         25              20              Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 35                    102,300                   ‐                      14              14,615                   160  15              Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 43                         8,600                    9            1,912                 50  20              Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 558             100             500            Paving d 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 20                10                Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 375             70              

Notes:

a. Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).

b. Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.c. Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.

d. Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.

Sources:  Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016

Page 85: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Project Information

Phase 1 Start 100 Haul Trucks Concrete Trucks Vendor Trucks WorkersSite Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 10Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 15Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 160 30Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50 25Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 100 700 810 <‐ Max DayPaving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 10Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 100

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 25 20Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 160 15Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 50 20Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 100 500 580 <‐ Max DayPaving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 10Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 70

Trucks per Day

Page 86: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs

Construction Equipment

Heavy‐Duty EquipmentNo. of Heavy‐

Duty EquipmentHours of 

Operation/DayHours of 

Operation/WeekPhase 1Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40

Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 40

Mass Grading/Excavation Excavators 2 8 40Graders 1 8 40Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40Scrapers 1 8 40Bore/Drill Rig 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40Pump 4 8 40

Building Construction Cranes (Electric) 1 8 40Forklifts 3 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Welders (Electric) 1 8 40Generator Sets 1 8 40Pump 2 8 40

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 30Paving Pavers 1 8 40

Rollers 1 8 40Paving Equipment 1 8 40

Phase 2Demolition Excavators 1 8 40

Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 40Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8 40

Mass Grading/Excavation Excavators 2 8 40Graders 1 8 40Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 40Scrapers 1 8 40Bore/Drill Rig 1 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 40Pump 4 8 40

Building Construction Cranes (Electric) 1 8 40Forklifts 3 8 40Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8 40Welders (Electric) 1 8 40Generator Sets 1 8 40Pumps (Electric) 2 8 40

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6 30Paving Pavers 1 8 40

Rollers 1 8 40Paving Equipment 1 8 40

Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Construction Phase

Page 87: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRResource Loaded Construction Schedule

last updated:6/3/2015

On‐Site/Off‐Road EquipmentMonth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 3 5 7 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Phase: PHASE 1 PHASE 2Site PreparationRubber Tired Dozers 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1 1 1

DemolitionExcavators 1 1 1Rubber Tired Dozers 1 2 2 2Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 3 3 3Water Trucks 1 1 1 1

Mass Grading/ExcavationExcavators 2 2 2 2 2Graders 1 1 1 1 1Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1 1 1 1Scrapers 1 1 1 1 1Bore‐Drill Rig 1 1 1 1 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 2 2 2 2Water Trucks 1 1 1 1 1

FoundationTractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 2 2 2 2 2Pump 4 4 4 4 4 4

Building ConstructionCranes (Electric) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Forklifts 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Welders (Electric) 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3Generator Sets 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1Pump 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

Architectural CoatingsAir Compressors 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Paving Pavers 1 1 1 1Rollers 1 1 1 1Paving Equipment 1 1 1 1Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

2019 20208 1 2 4 6 8

2021 20222017 2018

Page 88: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Construction Equipment and California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Inputs

Architectural Coating Area Calculations

CalEEMod assumes the total surface for architectural coating equals:

Residential Coating Area 2.7                               times the floor square footage75% interior25% exterior

Nonresidential Coating Area 2                                  times the square footage75% interior25% exterior

Parking Lot Coating Area 6% of the square footage0% exterior for subterranean

Source: SCAQMD, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, (1993) A9‐124.

Phase 1

Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Residential 352,000                       712,800                       237,600                      

Total Residential 712,800                       237,600                      ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD

Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Hotel 280,000                       420,000                       140,000                      Commercial 15,000                          22,500                          7,500                           Quality Restaurant 15,000                          900                               7,500                           Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐                                ‐                                ‐                               Subterranean Parking Structure 174,800                       10,488                          ‐                               

Total Non‐Residential 453,888                       155,000                      ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD

Non‐Residential Land Uses

Residential Land UsesLand Use

Land Use

Page 89: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Phase 2

Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Residential 418,000                       846,450                       282,150                      

Total Residential 846,450                       282,150                      

Area (sf) Interior (sf) Exterior (sf)Commercial 25,100                          37,650                          12,550                         Quality Restaurant 25,100                          37,650                          12,550                         Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐                                ‐                                ‐                               Subterranean Parking Structure 144,800                       8,688                            ‐                               

Total Non‐Residential 83,988                          25,100                         ENTER VALUES ABOVE INTO CALEEMOD

Land Use

Residential Land UsesLand Use

Non‐Residential Land Uses

Page 90: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Phase 1: DemolitionDemolition ScheduleStart Date 8/15/2017End Date 8/28/2017Work Days 10

Demolition QuantitiesLand Use Amount UnitsSidewalk 16                            KSF

Demolition VolumeTotal Sidewalk Area (KSF) 16                           Sidewalk Thickness (ft) 0.5                          Building Volume (ft3) 8,000                     Building Volume (CY) 296.30                   Debris Volume (CY) 100                          (rounded, estimated)

Truck Size (CY) 11                           Total Truck Trips 10                            (rounded, estimated)Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 20                           Daily Truck Trips 2                              trips/day

Page 91: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Phase 2: DemolitionDemolition ScheduleStart Date 6/29/2020End Date 10/6/2020Work Days 72

Demolition QuantitiesLand Use Amount UnitsExisting Hotel Demo 332                          KSFSidewalk 21                            KSF

Demolition VolumeTotal Sidewalk Area (KSF) 21                           Sidewalk Thickness (ft) 0.5                          Building Volume (ft3) 10,500                   Building Volume (CY) 388.89                   Debris Volume (CY) 100                          (rounded, estimated)

Truck Size (CY) 11                           Total Truck Trips 10                            (rounded, estimated)Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 20                           

Existing Hotel Demo (one‐way) 1,937                     Sidewalk Demo (one‐way) 20                           Total Truck Trips (one‐way) 1,957                     Daily Truck Trips 28                            trips/day

Page 92: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829

Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.67 20,300.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 12:12 PM

LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction

South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 93: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 757,650.00 453,888.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757650 453888

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 252,550.00 155,000.00

Water And Wastewater -

Solid Waste -

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Vehicle Trips -

Woodstoves - No hearths

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Page 94: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/6/2020 7/8/2019

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/2/2021 4/7/2020

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 21.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 51.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 394.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 618.00

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00

Page 95: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 15.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 114.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 73.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,475.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.47 0.67

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 99,800.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,300.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/8/2020 6/10/2019

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 76.50 2.70

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2020 10/4/2018

Page 96: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 41,393.5615

41,393.5615

4.4589 0.0000 41,487.1991

33.5730 7.4003 40.9732 10.5828 7.0110 17.5938Total 95.3287 134.8673 223.5520 0.5027

0.0000 11,030.1141

11,030.1141

0.7428 0.0000 11,045.7133

8.9421 1.2130 10.1552 2.3715 1.1742 3.54572020 29.3531 21.1202 55.4382 0.1434

0.0000 12,600.3241

12,600.3241

1.1330 0.0000 12,624.1173

9.0539 1.7927 10.8466 2.4011 1.7162 4.11742019 30.4873 30.5399 65.9009 0.1559

0.0000 11,736.5916

11,736.5916

0.8249 0.0000 11,753.9138

8.9421 1.5984 10.5405 2.3715 1.5481 3.91962018 30.2624 25.2342 61.8527 0.1436

0.0000 6,026.5317

6,026.5317 1.7582 0.0000 6,063.4548

6.6349 2.7961 9.4310 3.4387 2.5724 6.01112017 5.2260 57.9731 40.3602 0.0598

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 84.00 100.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 25.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 419.00 700.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 30.00

Page 97: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

21

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7

7 Paving Paving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 5

618

6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 5 394

5 Building Construction Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 5

51

4 Foundation Paving 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 5 50

3 Grading Grading 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 5

5

2 Demolition Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 10

End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0011.45 93.94 26.35 19.31 93.82 49.00

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

11.75 87.13 1.29 0.00

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 41,393.5615

41,393.5615

4.4589 0.0000 41,487.1991

29.7303 0.4485 30.1787 8.5395 0.4330 8.9725Total 84.1246 17.3523 220.6743 0.5027

0.0000 11,030.1141

11,030.1141

0.7428 0.0000 11,045.7133

8.9421 0.1112 9.0533 2.3715 0.1063 2.47772020 27.5455 4.2953 56.3839 0.1434

0.0000 12,600.3241

12,600.3241

1.1330 0.0000 12,624.1172

9.0539 0.1308 9.1847 2.4011 0.1257 2.52692019 27.8694 5.1571 67.9984 0.1559

0.0000 11,736.5916

11,736.5916

0.8249 0.0000 11,753.9138

8.9421 0.1129 9.0550 2.3715 0.1077 2.47922018 27.9159 4.8056 62.4985 0.1436

0.0000 6,026.5317

6,026.5317 1.7582 0.0000 6,063.4548

2.7922 0.0936 2.8857 1.3954 0.0934 1.48872017 0.7938 3.0943 33.7935 0.0598

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 98: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38

Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74

Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36

Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38

Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Load Factor

Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power

Acres of Paving: 0

Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000

Page 99: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTPaving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00

Building Construction 7 700.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Foundation 6 25.00 0.00 0.00

Grading 8 30.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Demolition 5 15.00 0.00 0.00

Site Preparation 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38

Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36

Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Pumps 2 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29

Page 100: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003

114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Total 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003

114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003

114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Worker 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

6.0221 0.8418 6.8639 3.3102 0.7744 4.0847Total 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120

1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

0.8418 0.8418 0.7744 0.7744Off-Road 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120

0.0000 0.00006.0221 0.0000 6.0221 3.3102 0.0000 3.3102Fugitive Dust

CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment

Use Soil Stabilizer

Water Exposed Area

Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

Clean Paved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2017

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Page 101: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

1.6062 1.6062 1.5022 1.5022Off-Road 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245

0.0000 0.00001.5750 0.0000 1.5750 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Demolition - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003

114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Total 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003

114.4058 114.4058 5.6300e-003

114.52390.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Worker 0.0374 0.0470 0.5870 1.4200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

2.3486 0.0195 2.3681 1.2910 0.0195 1.3105Total 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120

0.0000 1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195Off-Road 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120

0.0000 0.00002.3486 0.0000 2.3486 1.2910 0.0000 1.2910Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 102: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003

171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

0.6142 0.0379 0.6522 0.0930 0.0379 0.1309Total 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245

0.0000 2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

0.0379 0.0379 0.0379 0.0379Off-Road 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245

0.0000 0.00000.6142 0.0000 0.6142 0.0930 0.0000 0.0930Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003

171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Total 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003

171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003

171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

1.5750 1.6062 3.1812 0.2385 1.5022 1.7407Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245

Page 103: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556

0.0000 0.00002.4568 0.0000 2.4568 1.3064 0.0000 1.3064Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Total 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003

343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Worker 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

6.2995 2.7934 9.0929 3.3498 2.5699 5.9197Total 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556

5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

2.7934 2.7934 2.5699 2.5699Off-Road 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556

0.0000 0.00006.2995 0.0000 6.2995 3.3498 0.0000 3.3498Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

171.6086 171.6086 8.4400e-003

171.78590.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Total 0.0561 0.0705 0.8806 2.1200e-003

Page 104: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Worker 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Total 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Off-Road 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Foundation - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Total 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003

343.2173 343.2173 0.0169 343.57180.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Worker 0.1123 0.1411 1.7611 4.2500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

2.4568 0.0909 2.5477 1.3064 0.0909 1.3973Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556

Page 105: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Off-Road 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Foundation - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Total 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003

286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Worker 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

286.0144 286.0144 0.0141 286.30990.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Total 0.0936 0.1175 1.4676 3.5400e-003

Page 106: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Total 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325

Page 107: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Total 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003

275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Worker 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Total 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003

275.3719 275.3719 0.0131 275.64610.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Worker 0.0844 0.1066 1.3335 3.5400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 108: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

7,710.4130

7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991

7,710.4130

7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Total 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274

2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Off-Road 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 109: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

7,418.0838

7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989

7,418.0838

7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Total 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274

2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Off-Road 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

7,710.4130

7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991

7,710.4130

7,710.4130 0.3657 7,718.0918

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.3619 2.9858 37.3365 0.0991

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 110: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Total 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274

2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Off-Road 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

7,418.0838

7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989

7,418.0838

7,418.0838 0.3423 7,425.2717

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.1739 2.7386 34.3141 0.0989

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 111: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

7,117.8636

7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988

7,117.8636

7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

7,117.8636

7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988

7,117.8636

7,117.8636 0.3242 7,124.6715

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0377 2.5393 31.9862 0.0988

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

Page 112: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,101.4876

1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Total 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142

1,101.4876

1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Worker 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total 25.1938 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003

281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

Page 113: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total 25.1616 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,101.4876

1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Total 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142

1,101.4876

1,101.4876 0.0522 1,102.5845

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Worker 0.3374 0.4265 5.3338 0.0142

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 114: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1,059.7263

1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531

1.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Worker 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,059.7263

1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531

1.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Total 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141

1,059.7263

1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531

1.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Worker 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 115: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,016.8377

1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102

1.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Total 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141

1,016.8377

1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102

1.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Worker 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total 25.1373 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,059.7263

1,059.7263 0.0489 1,060.7531

1.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Total 0.3106 0.3912 4.9020 0.0141

Page 116: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Total 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Off-Road 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.8 Paving - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,016.8377

1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102

1.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Total 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141

1,016.8377

1,016.8377 0.0463 1,017.8102

1.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Worker 0.2911 0.3628 4.5695 0.0141

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

Page 117: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003

106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003

105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003

106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003

106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003

105.9726 105.9726 4.8900e-003

106.07530.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0311 0.0391 0.4902 1.4100e-003

Page 118: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829

Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.67 20,300.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 12:10 PM

LUXE Hotel - Phase 1 Construction

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 119: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 757,650.00 453,888.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757650 453888

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 252,550.00 155,000.00

Water And Wastewater -

Solid Waste -

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Vehicle Trips -

Woodstoves - No hearths

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment in AQ Construction Model Inputs

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Page 120: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 5/6/2020 7/8/2019

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 12/2/2021 4/7/2020

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 50.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 21.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 10.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 51.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 394.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 618.00

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00

Page 121: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 15.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 114.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 5.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 73.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,475.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.47 0.67

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 99,800.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,300.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/8/2020 6/10/2019

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 76.50 2.70

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/30/2020 10/4/2018

Page 122: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 39,775.9624

39,775.9624

4.4589 0.0000 39,869.6001

33.5730 7.4003 40.9732 10.5828 7.0110 17.5938Total 95.4584 135.8058 213.0305 0.4809

0.0000 10,520.1991

10,520.1991

0.7428 0.0000 10,535.7983

8.9421 1.2130 10.1552 2.3715 1.1742 3.54572020 29.3912 21.4017 52.1699 0.1362

0.0000 12,063.6230

12,063.6230

1.1330 0.0000 12,087.4162

9.0539 1.7927 10.8466 2.4011 1.7162 4.11742019 30.5291 30.8490 62.4214 0.1487

0.0000 11,186.9721

11,186.9721

0.8249 0.0000 11,204.2943

8.9421 1.5984 10.5405 2.3715 1.5481 3.91962018 30.3099 25.5682 58.2224 0.1365

0.0000 6,005.1682

6,005.1682 1.7582 0.0000 6,042.0913

6.6349 2.7961 9.4310 3.4387 2.5724 6.01112017 5.2282 57.9870 40.2168 0.0595

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 84.00 100.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 25.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 419.00 700.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 30.00

Page 123: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

21

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7

Acres of Paving: 0

7 Paving Paving 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 5

618

6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 5 394

5 Building Construction Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 5

51

4 Foundation Paving 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 5 50

3 Grading Grading 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 5

5

2 Demolition Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 5 10

End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0011.45 93.94 26.35 19.31 93.82 49.00

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

11.74 86.53 1.35 0.00

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 39,775.9624

39,775.9624

4.4589 0.0000 39,869.6000

29.7303 0.4485 30.1787 8.5395 0.4330 8.9725Total 84.2544 18.2909 210.1528 0.4809

0.0000 10,520.1991

10,520.1991

0.7428 0.0000 10,535.7983

8.9421 0.1112 9.0533 2.3715 0.1063 2.47772020 27.5837 4.5768 53.1157 0.1362

0.0000 12,063.6230

12,063.6230

1.1330 0.0000 12,087.4162

9.0539 0.1308 9.1847 2.4011 0.1257 2.52692019 27.9112 5.4663 64.5189 0.1487

0.0000 11,186.9721

11,186.9721

0.8249 0.0000 11,204.2943

8.9421 0.1129 9.0550 2.3715 0.1077 2.47922018 27.9635 5.1396 58.8682 0.1365

0.0000 6,005.1682

6,005.1682 1.7582 0.0000 6,042.0913

2.7922 0.0936 2.8857 1.3954 0.0934 1.48872017 0.7960 3.1081 33.6500 0.0595

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 124: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36

Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Pumps 2 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38

Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74

Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36

Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38

Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Demolition Excavators 0 8.00 162 0.38

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Load Factor

Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power

Residential Indoor: 712,800; Residential Outdoor: 237,600; Non-Residential Indoor: 453,888; Non-Residential Outdoor: 155,000

Page 125: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

6.0221 0.8418 6.8639 3.3102 0.7744 4.0847Total 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120

1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

0.8418 0.8418 0.7744 0.7744Off-Road 1.5071 16.2365 12.3344 0.0120

0.0000 0.00006.0221 0.0000 6.0221 3.3102 0.0000 3.3102Fugitive Dust

CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment

Use Soil Stabilizer

Water Exposed Area

Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

Clean Paved Roads

3.2 Site Preparation - 2017

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00

Building Construction 7 700.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Foundation 6 25.00 0.00 0.00

Grading 8 30.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Demolition 5 15.00 0.00 0.00

Site Preparation 2 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38

Page 126: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003

107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Total 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003

107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003

107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Worker 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

2.3486 0.0195 2.3681 1.2910 0.0195 1.3105Total 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120

0.0000 1,228.2737

1,228.2737 0.3763 1,236.1768

0.0195 0.0195 0.0195 0.0195Off-Road 0.1459 0.6323 6.2998 0.0120

0.0000 0.00002.3486 0.0000 2.3486 1.2910 0.0000 1.2910Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003

107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Total 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003

107.2846 107.2846 5.6300e-003

107.40280.1118 9.0000e-004

0.1127 0.0296 8.3000e-004

0.0305Worker 0.0382 0.0516 0.5392 1.3300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 127: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

0.6142 0.0379 0.6522 0.0930 0.0379 0.1309Total 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245

0.0000 2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

0.0379 0.0379 0.0379 0.0379Off-Road 0.2845 1.2326 14.8426 0.0245

0.0000 0.00000.6142 0.0000 0.6142 0.0930 0.0000 0.0930Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003

161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Total 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003

160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003

161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

1.5750 1.6062 3.1812 0.2385 1.5022 1.7407Total 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245

2,457.4682

2,457.4682 0.6235 2,470.5620

1.6062 1.6062 1.5022 1.5022Off-Road 2.7216 26.5855 20.8712 0.0245

0.0000 0.00001.5750 0.0000 1.5750 0.2385 0.0000 0.2385Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Demolition - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 128: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Total 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003

321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Worker 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

6.2995 2.7934 9.0929 3.3498 2.5699 5.9197Total 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556

5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

2.7934 2.7934 2.5699 2.5699Off-Road 5.1137 57.8321 38.5991 0.0556

0.0000 0.00006.2995 0.0000 6.2995 3.3498 0.0000 3.3498Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Grading - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003

161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Total 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003

160.9269 160.9269 8.4400e-003

161.10420.1677 1.3500e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2400e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0573 0.0775 0.8088 1.9900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 129: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Total 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

1.7164 1.7164 1.6798 1.6798Off-Road 3.0279 24.2164 20.1142 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Foundation - 2017

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Total 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003

321.8538 321.8538 0.0169 322.20830.3353 2.7000e-003

0.3380 0.0889 2.4900e-003

0.0914Worker 0.1145 0.1549 1.6177 3.9800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

2.4568 0.0909 2.5477 1.3064 0.0909 1.3973Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556

0.0000 5,683.3145

5,683.3145 1.7414 5,719.8830

0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0556

0.0000 0.00002.4568 0.0000 2.4568 1.3064 0.0000 1.3064Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 130: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Total 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003

268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Worker 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.0000 3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 3,128.6682

3,128.6682 0.4099 3,137.2763

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Total 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003

268.2115 268.2115 0.0141 268.50690.2794 2.2500e-003

0.2817 0.0741 2.0700e-003

0.0762Worker 0.0954 0.1291 1.3481 3.3200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 131: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Total 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003

258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Worker 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Total 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

3,117.6902

3,117.6902 0.3833 3,125.7397

1.4777 1.4777 1.4479 1.4479Off-Road 2.6591 21.9585 19.8947 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Foundation - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

Page 132: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

7,229.4960

7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928

7,229.4960

7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Total 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274

2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

1.3778 1.3778 1.3328 1.3328Off-Road 2.3694 19.8161 17.3282 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Total 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003

258.1963 258.1963 0.0131 258.47050.2794 2.1900e-003

0.2816 0.0741 2.0200e-003

0.0761Worker 0.0858 0.1171 1.2200 3.3100e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 133: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Total 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274

2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

1.1896 1.1896 1.1506 1.1506Off-Road 2.0973 18.0678 17.1707 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

7,229.4960

7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Total 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928

7,229.4960

7,229.4960 0.3657 7,237.1748

7.8244 0.0613 7.8856 2.0751 0.0567 2.1317Worker 2.4035 3.2780 34.1600 0.0928

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,643.2424

2,643.2424 0.3802 2,651.2273

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 134: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6,954.2681

6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926

6,954.2681

6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,630.6068

2,630.6068 0.3637 2,638.2449

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

6,954.2681

6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Total 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926

6,954.2681

6,954.2681 0.3423 6,961.4560

7.8244 0.0602 7.8845 2.0751 0.0558 2.1308Worker 2.2100 3.0058 31.3071 0.0926

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 135: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Total 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

0.0000 2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

0.0389 0.0389 0.0389 0.0389Off-Road 0.2918 1.2646 17.9959 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

6,671.6880

6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926

6,671.6880

6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Total 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274

2,613.9647

2,613.9647 0.3505 2,621.3259

1.0338 1.0338 0.9999 0.9999Off-Road 1.8870 16.5343 17.0511 0.0274

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Building Construction - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 136: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total 25.1938 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003

281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2018

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

6,671.6880

6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Total 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926

6,671.6880

6,671.6880 0.3242 6,678.4958

7.8244 0.0598 7.8842 2.0751 0.0555 2.1305Worker 2.0711 2.7856 29.1264 0.0926

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 137: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1,032.7851

1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Total 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133

1,032.7851

1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Worker 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01023.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,032.7851

1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Total 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133

1,032.7851

1,032.7851 0.0522 1,033.8821

1.1178 8.7500e-003

1.1265 0.2964 8.1000e-003

0.3045Worker 0.3434 0.4683 4.8800 0.0133

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 138: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94733.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Total 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132

993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Worker 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total 25.1616 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 139: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total 25.1373 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Total 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132

993.4669 993.4669 0.0489 994.49371.1178 8.6000e-003

1.1264 0.2964 7.9700e-003

0.3044Worker 0.3157 0.4294 4.4724 0.0132

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 140: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Total 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132

953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Worker 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 24.9248 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90573.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 24.8951

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Total 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132

953.0983 953.0983 0.0463 954.07081.1178 8.5400e-003

1.1263 0.2964 7.9200e-003

0.3044Worker 0.2959 0.3979 4.1609 0.0132

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 141: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

0.0000 1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003

99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003

99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003

99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Total 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0000

1,104.4866

1,104.4866 0.3495 1,111.8250

0.4047 0.4047 0.3723 0.3723Off-Road 0.7129 7.4677 7.1826 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.8 Paving - 2019

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 142: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003

99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003

99.3467 99.3467 4.8900e-003

99.44940.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 8.0000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0316 0.0429 0.4472 1.3200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 143: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 360.00 Dwelling Unit 5.81 418,000.00 587

Quality Restaurant 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,500.00 0

Parking Lot 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 362.00 Space 3.26 144,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 11:56 AM

LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction

South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 144: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Exterior 282150 236513

tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Interior 846450 709540

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 323,175.00 83,988.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 323175 60000

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 107,725.00 25,100.00

Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Vehicle Trips -

Water And Wastewater -

Solid Waste -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Page 145: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblFireplaces NumberGas 306.00 246.50

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 36.00 29.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/23/2021 1/25/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/14/2023 11/9/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/10/2023 12/6/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/16/2023 8/9/2021

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/21/2024 1/13/2023

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 72.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 35.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 375.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 558.00

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00

Page 146: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 165.60 133.40

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Building Construction

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 2.00

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 4.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 3.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 360,000.00 418,000.00

tblLandUse Population 1,030.00 587.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 102,300.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,500.00

tblFireplaces NumberWood 18.00 14.50

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 52.50 2.70

Page 147: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 18.00 14.50

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 18.00 14.50

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 484,362.31 290,617.38

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,134,982.18 680,989.31

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,851,813.04 1,111,087.82

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 14,787,131.03 11,911,855.55

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 23,455,449.22 18,894,667.43

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,588,342.81 4,553,005.69

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 349.00 500.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 15.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 20.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 75.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 20.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,606.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,788.00 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 22.81 13.69

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 26.25 15.75

Page 148: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015.20 91.65 25.43 24.14 91.35 44.61

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

12.82 85.67 -1.28 0.00

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 28,507.9415

28,507.9415

3.6939 0.0000 28,585.5134

21.9027 0.3335 22.2361 6.4571 0.3227 6.7799Total 42.2093 11.5634 146.1101 0.3639

0.0000 7,177.3208

7,177.3208 0.5179 0.0000 7,188.1968

6.3713 0.0740 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022023 13.6883 2.5319 33.4877 0.0979

0.0000 7,262.7412

7,262.7412 0.5310 0.0000 7,273.8914

6.3713 0.0741 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022022 13.7667 2.6379 34.7913 0.0979

0.0000 8,536.7378

8,536.7378 0.8985 0.0000 8,555.6069

6.4830 0.0933 6.5763 1.7193 0.0897 1.80902021 14.0291 3.3860 45.1133 0.1105

0.0000 5,531.1418

5,531.1418 1.7465 0.0000 5,567.8183

2.6771 0.0922 2.7693 1.3584 0.0921 1.45052020 0.7252 3.0076 32.7178 0.0577

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 28,507.9416

28,507.9416

3.6939 0.0000 28,585.5134

25.8277 3.9920 29.8197 8.5123 3.7289 12.2412Total 48.4149 80.7038 144.2637 0.3639

0.0000 7,177.3208

7,177.3208 0.5179 0.0000 7,188.1968

6.3713 0.5015 6.8728 1.6897 0.4777 2.16742023 14.4549 10.1419 32.9183 0.0979

0.0000 7,262.7412

7,262.7412 0.5310 0.0000 7,273.8914

6.3713 0.5771 6.9484 1.6897 0.5496 2.23932022 14.6168 10.9917 34.2645 0.0979

0.0000 8,536.7378

8,536.7378 0.8985 0.0000 8,555.6069

6.4830 1.0069 7.4899 1.7193 0.9477 2.66702021 15.4688 18.4245 43.3764 0.1105

0.0000 5,531.1418

5,531.1418 1.7465 0.0000 5,567.8183

6.6021 1.9065 8.5086 3.4136 1.7540 5.16762020 3.8745 41.1457 33.7046 0.0577

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 149: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36

Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38

Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40

Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38

Load Factor

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7

Acres of Paving: 0

Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power

375

6 Paving Paving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 5 20

5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 5

43

4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 5 558

3 Foundation Paving 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 5

72

2 Grading Grading 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 5 35

End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 5

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

Page 150: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment

Use Soil Stabilizer

Water Exposed Area

Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

Clean Paved Roads

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00

Architectural Coating 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 5 500.00 0.00 0.00

Foundation 6 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 8 15.00 0.00 0.00

Demolition 7 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38

Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36

Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Pumps 0 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38

Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74

Page 151: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

1.8822 0.0610 1.9432 0.2850 0.0610 0.3460Total 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387

0.0000 3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

0.0610 0.0610 0.0610 0.0610Off-Road 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387

0.0000 0.00001.8822 0.0000 1.8822 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

4.8261 1.6496 6.4757 0.7307 1.5335 2.2642Total 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387

3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

1.6496 1.6496 1.5335 1.5335Off-Road 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387

0.0000 0.00004.8261 0.0000 4.8261 0.7307 0.0000 0.7307Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.2 Demolition - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 152: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003

152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Total 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003

152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003

152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

6.4344 1.9052 8.3397 3.3691 1.7528 5.1219Total 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555

5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

1.9052 1.9052 1.7528 1.7528Off-Road 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555

0.0000 0.00006.4344 0.0000 6.4344 3.3691 0.0000 3.3691Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Grading - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 153: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Total 2.1184 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Off-Road 2.1117 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Foundation - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003

152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Total 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003

152.5257 152.5257 6.9500e-003

152.67150.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0437 0.0544 0.6854 2.1200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

2.5094 0.0909 2.6003 1.3140 0.0909 1.4048Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555

0.0000 5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555

0.0000 0.00002.5094 0.0000 2.5094 1.3140 0.0000 1.3140Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 154: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

0.0000 3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

203.3675 203.3675 9.2600e-003

203.56200.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0582 0.0726 0.9139 2.8200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 155: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

0.0000 3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003

200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Total 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003

200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003

200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Total 1.9029 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Off-Road 1.8962 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Foundation - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 156: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

5,006.1519

5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708

5,006.1519

5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Total 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143

1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Off-Road 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003

200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Total 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003

200.2461 200.2461 8.8700e-003

200.43230.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0551 0.0679 0.8598 2.8300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 157: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Total 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143

1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Off-Road 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

5,006.1519

5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708

5,006.1519

5,006.1519 0.2217 5,010.8070

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3777 1.6965 21.4948 0.0708

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 158: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4,923.6203

4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707

4,923.6203

4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

4,923.6203

4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707

4,923.6203

4,923.6203 0.2123 4,928.0778

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3048 1.5918 20.2419 0.0707

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 159: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

4,848.3940

4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707

4,848.3940

4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Total 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143

1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Off-Road 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2023

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 160: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003

700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Total 12.3082 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

4,848.3940

4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707

4,848.3940

4,848.3940 0.2039 4,852.6769

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2361 1.4988 19.0983 0.0707

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 161: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Total 12.2938 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003

700.8613 700.8613 0.0310 701.51300.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1929 0.2375 3.0093 9.9100e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 162: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003

689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003

689.3068 689.3068 0.0297 689.93090.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1827 0.2229 2.8339 9.9000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 163: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003

678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Total 12.2809 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 164: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003

100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003

100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003

100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Total 0.6298 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144

1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Off-Road 0.6154 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Paving - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003

678.7752 678.7752 0.0286 679.37480.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1731 0.2098 2.6738 9.9000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 165: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003

100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003

100.1230 100.1230 4.4300e-003

100.21610.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0276 0.0339 0.4299 1.4200e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1517 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144

0.0000 1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 166: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics -

Land Use - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Construction Phase - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 360.00 Dwelling Unit 5.81 418,000.00 587

Quality Restaurant 25.00 1000sqft 0.57 25,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,500.00 0

Parking Lot 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 362.00 Space 3.26 144,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/19/2016 11:54 AM

LUXE Hotel - Phase 2 Construction

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 167: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Exterior 282150 236513

tblAreaCoating Area_Residential_Interior 846450 709540

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 323,175.00 83,988.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 323175 60000

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 107,725.00 25,100.00

Demolition - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Grading - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Architectural Coating - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Vehicle Trips -

Water And Wastewater -

Solid Waste -

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Trips and VMT - See "Hazen AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Page 168: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblFireplaces NumberGas 306.00 246.50

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 36.00 29.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/23/2021 1/25/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/14/2023 11/9/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 2/10/2023 12/6/2021

tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/16/2023 8/9/2021

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 43.00

tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/21/2024 1/13/2023

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 72.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 30.00 35.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 375.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 558.00

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 8.00

Page 169: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 165.60 133.40

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 7.00 8.00

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Demolition

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Foundation

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Building Construction

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 2.00

tblOffRoadEquipment PhaseName Grading

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 4.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 3.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 0.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 2.00 1.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 0.00

tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 360,000.00 418,000.00

tblLandUse Population 1,030.00 587.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 102,300.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 20,473.20 20,500.00

tblFireplaces NumberWood 18.00 14.50

tblGrading AcresOfGrading 52.50 2.70

Page 170: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 18.00 14.50

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 18.00 14.50

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 484,362.31 290,617.38

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,134,982.18 680,989.31

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,851,813.04 1,111,087.82

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 14,787,131.03 11,911,855.55

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 23,455,449.22 18,894,667.43

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,588,342.81 4,553,005.69

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 349.00 500.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 8.00 10.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 20.00 15.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 20.00

tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 75.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 18.00 20.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,606.00 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 12,788.00 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 22.81 13.69

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 26.25 15.75

Page 171: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0015.20 91.65 25.43 24.14 91.35 44.61

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

12.80 85.11 -1.34 0.00

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 27,431.0782

27,431.0782

3.6939 0.0000 27,508.6501

21.9027 0.3335 22.2361 6.4571 0.3227 6.7799Total 42.2825 12.0951 139.5819 0.3482

0.0000 6,828.4658

6,828.4658 0.5179 0.0000 6,839.3419

6.3713 0.0740 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022023 13.7113 2.6945 31.4318 0.0927

0.0000 6,909.2518

6,909.2518 0.5310 0.0000 6,920.4020

6.3713 0.0741 6.4453 1.6897 0.0705 1.76022022 13.7906 2.8119 32.6517 0.0928

0.0000 8,171.7798

8,171.7798 0.8985 0.0000 8,190.6489

6.4830 0.0933 6.5763 1.7193 0.0897 1.80902021 14.0547 3.5758 42.8419 0.1053

0.0000 5,521.5809

5,521.5809 1.7465 0.0000 5,558.2574

2.6771 0.0922 2.7693 1.3584 0.0921 1.45052020 0.7259 3.0129 32.6565 0.0575

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated ConstructionROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.0000 27,431.0782

27,431.0782

3.6939 0.0000 27,508.6501

25.8277 3.9920 29.8197 8.5123 3.7289 12.2412Total 48.4881 81.2355 137.7355 0.3482

0.0000 6,828.4658

6,828.4658 0.5179 0.0000 6,839.3419

6.3713 0.5015 6.8728 1.6897 0.4777 2.16742023 14.4778 10.3046 30.8624 0.0927

0.0000 6,909.2518

6,909.2518 0.5310 0.0000 6,920.4020

6.3713 0.5771 6.9484 1.6897 0.5496 2.23932022 14.6407 11.1657 32.1249 0.0928

0.0000 8,171.7798

8,171.7798 0.8985 0.0000 8,190.6489

6.4830 1.0069 7.4899 1.7193 0.9477 2.66702021 15.4944 18.6143 41.1050 0.1053

0.0000 5,521.5809

5,521.5809 1.7465 0.0000 5,558.2574

6.6021 1.9065 8.5086 3.4136 1.7540 5.16762020 3.8752 41.1509 33.6433 0.0575

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

2.0 Emissions Summary

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)

Unmitigated Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 172: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Foundation Paving Equipment 0 8.00 130 0.36

Foundation Pavers 0 8.00 125 0.42

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Scrapers 1 8.00 361 0.48

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40

Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41

Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38

Grading Bore/Drill Rigs 1 8.00 205 0.50

Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40

Demolition Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38

Load Factor

Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 2.7

Acres of Paving: 0

Residential Indoor: 846,450; Residential Outdoor: 282,150; Non-Residential Indoor: 83,988; Non-Residential Outdoor: 25,100

OffRoad Equipment

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power

375

6 Paving Paving 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 5 20

5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 5

43

4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 5 558

3 Foundation Paving 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 5

72

2 Grading Grading 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 5 35

End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Demolition Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 5

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase

Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date

Page 173: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment

Use Soil Stabilizer

Water Exposed Area

Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads

Clean Paved Roads

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 3 10.00 0.00 0.00

Architectural Coating 1 70.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 5 500.00 0.00 0.00

Foundation 6 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 8 15.00 0.00 0.00

Demolition 7 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Paving Rollers 1 8.00 80 0.38

Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36

Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Building Construction Welders 0 8.00 46 0.45

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Pumps 0 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Cranes 0 8.00 226 0.29

Foundation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37

Foundation Rollers 0 8.00 80 0.38

Foundation Pumps 4 8.00 84 0.74

Page 174: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

1.8822 0.0610 1.9432 0.2850 0.0610 0.3460Total 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387

0.0000 3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

0.0610 0.0610 0.0610 0.0610Off-Road 0.4575 1.9826 22.8175 0.0387

0.0000 0.00001.8822 0.0000 1.8822 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

4.8261 1.6496 6.4757 0.7307 1.5335 2.2642Total 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387

3,733.8882

3,733.8882 1.0535 3,756.0113

1.6496 1.6496 1.5335 1.5335Off-Road 3.2226 32.3834 29.7480 0.0387

0.0000 0.00004.8261 0.0000 4.8261 0.7307 0.0000 0.7307Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.2 Demolition - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 175: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003

143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Total 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003

142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003

143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

6.4344 1.9052 8.3397 3.3691 1.7528 5.1219Total 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555

5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

1.9052 1.9052 1.7528 1.7528Off-Road 3.8309 41.0913 33.0192 0.0555

0.0000 0.00006.4344 0.0000 6.4344 3.3691 0.0000 3.3691Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.3 Grading - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 176: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Total 2.1184 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

1.0951 1.0951 1.0738 1.0738Off-Road 2.1117 18.3264 19.6096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Foundation - 2020

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003

143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Total 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003

142.9647 142.9647 6.9500e-003

143.11060.1677 1.2800e-003

0.1690 0.0445 1.1900e-003

0.0457Worker 0.0444 0.0597 0.6241 1.9800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

2.5094 0.0909 2.6003 1.3140 0.0909 1.4048Total 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555

0.0000 5,378.6161

5,378.6161 1.7396 5,415.1467

0.0909 0.0909 0.0909 0.0909Off-Road 0.6815 2.9532 32.0324 0.0555

0.0000 0.00002.5094 0.0000 2.5094 1.3140 0.0000 1.3140Fugitive Dust

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 177: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.0000 3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

0.0000 3,093.6753

3,093.6753 0.3437 3,100.8919

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Total 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

190.6197 190.6197 9.2600e-003

190.81420.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5800e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0592 0.0796 0.8322 2.6400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 178: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Total 0.3458 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

0.0000 3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.0452 0.0452 0.0452 0.0452Off-Road 0.3391 1.4693 20.9096 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003

187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Total 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003

187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003

187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Total 1.9029 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 6.7000e-003

3,093.9428

3,093.9428 0.3306 3,100.8849

0.9340 0.9340 0.9161 0.9161Off-Road 1.8962 16.6317 19.4830 0.0325

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.4 Foundation - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 179: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4,691.5328

4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663

4,691.5328

4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Total 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143

1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.5306 0.5306 0.5016 0.5016Off-Road 0.9327 8.5993 9.4485 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003

187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Total 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003

187.6613 187.6613 8.8700e-003

187.84750.2236 1.7100e-003

0.2253 0.0593 1.5900e-003

0.0609Worker 0.0560 0.0744 0.7815 2.6500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 180: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Total 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143

1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.4467 0.4467 0.4227 0.4227Off-Road 0.8355 7.7686 9.3751 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2022

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

4,691.5328

4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Total 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663

4,691.5328

4,691.5328 0.2217 4,696.1880

5.5888 0.0428 5.6316 1.4822 0.0397 1.5219Worker 1.3998 1.8601 19.5367 0.0663

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.0271

1,368.0271 0.2727 1,373.7547

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 181: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4,613.5418

4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662

4,613.5418

4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.3660

1,368.3660 0.2707 1,374.0498

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

4,613.5418

4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662

4,613.5418

4,613.5418 0.2123 4,617.9994

5.5888 0.0427 5.6316 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.3258 1.7444 18.3650 0.0662

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 182: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Total 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

0.0000 1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.0214 0.0214 0.0214 0.0214Off-Road 0.1603 0.6945 9.8832 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

4,542.3809

4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662

4,542.3809

4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Total 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143

1,368.7036

1,368.7036 0.2686 1,374.3436

0.3820 0.3820 0.3617 0.3617Off-Road 0.7649 7.1303 9.3351 0.0143

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.5 Building Construction - 2023

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 183: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003

656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Total 12.3082 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85370.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

4,542.3809

4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Total 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662

4,542.3809

4,542.3809 0.2039 4,546.6637

5.5888 0.0427 5.6315 1.4822 0.0396 1.5218Worker 1.2562 1.6415 17.2949 0.0662

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

Page 184: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Total 12.2938 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83290.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2022

Unmitigated Construction On-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003

656.8146 656.8146 0.0310 657.46630.7824 5.9900e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1960 0.2604 2.7351 9.2800e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.85373.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 185: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003

645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.83293.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003

645.8959 645.8959 0.0297 646.51990.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1856 0.2442 2.5711 9.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 186: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Total 12.1190 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80173.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

3.9600e-003

Off-Road 0.0297 0.1288 1.8324 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003

635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Total 12.2809 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003

281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.80170.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e-003

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 12.0893

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 187: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003

93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003

93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003

93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Unmitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Total 0.6298 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144

1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.3326 0.3326 0.3060 0.3060Off-Road 0.6154 6.3303 7.1764 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

3.7 Paving - 2021

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Total 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003

635.9333 635.9333 0.0286 636.53290.7824 5.9800e-003

0.7884 0.2075 5.5500e-003

0.2131Worker 0.1759 0.2298 2.4213 9.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-SiteROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

Page 188: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003

93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Total 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003

93.8307 93.8307 4.4300e-003

93.92380.1118 8.6000e-004

0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e-004

0.0304Worker 0.0280 0.0372 0.3907 1.3300e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Total 0.1517 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving 0.0144

0.0000 1,080.1265

1,080.1265 0.3493 1,087.4625

0.0183 0.0183 0.0183 0.0183Off-Road 0.1373 0.5948 8.4638 0.0112

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Construction On-Site

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 189: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectConstruction Schedule, Demolition and Soil Excavation Quantities, and Vehicle Trips

Construction Phase Start Date  End Date No. Work Days

Demo (SF) a

Demo Truck Capacity (CY)

Demo Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Demo Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Soil Export(CY) a

Soil Import (CY)

Soil Haul Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Soil Haul Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Soil Haul Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Concrete Mat Volume

(CY)

Concrete Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Concrete Mat Volume 

a

(CY)

Concrete Truck 

Capacity (CY)

Concrete Truck Total One‐Way Trips

Concrete Truck Daily One‐Way Trips

Vendor One‐Way 

Trips/Max Day b

Worker One‐Way 

Trips/Max Day c

Phase 1Site Preparation 8/8/2017 8/14/2017 5 10              Site Demolition 8/15/2017 8/28/2017 10 16,000         11                20               5                 15              Mass Grading/Excavation 8/29/2017 11/7/2017 51 99,800       ‐              14               14,258       160             30              Foundation 11/8/2017 1/16/2018 50 9,500            9                  2,112          50               9,500          9                 2,112         50               25              Building Construction 1/17/2018 5/29/2020 618 100             700            Paving d 6/10/2019 7/8/2019 21 10                Architectural Coating 10/4/2018 4/7/2020 394 100            

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition 6/29/2020 10/6/2020 72 353,000       11                1,957          25               20              Mass Grading/Excavation 10/7/2020 11/24/2020 35 102,300     ‐              14               14,615       160             15              Foundation 11/25/2020 1/22/2021 43 8,600            9                  1,912          50               8,600          9                 1,912         50               20              Building Construction 1/25/2021 3/15/2023 558 100             500            Paving d 11/9/2021 12/6/2021 20 10                Architectural Coating 8/9/2021 1/13/2023 375 70              

Notes:

a. Soil export quantities and foundation concrete mat quantities provided by Hazens Group (December 2015).

b. Vendor trips are associated with the Building Construction phase and are based on CalEEMod assumptions.c. Worker trips are based on CalEEMod assumptions.

d. Phase assumed to be part of the "Exterior Skin‐Podium (L1) Exterior Buildout and Store Fronts" construction activities.

Sources:  Hazens Group, Februrary 2016; PCR Services Corporation, Februrary 2016

Page 190: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Regional Emissions

On‐Road Truck Regional Running Emissions

Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐Way Running Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year One‐Way  per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (pounds/day)

Truck Trips per Day CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)

Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0 0.2010       6.4607     0.7497     0.0160     0.0718     0.0687     1,682.50  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 20 0.2010       6.4607     0.7497     0.0160     0.0718     0.0687     1,682.50  0.04          1.42          0.17          0.00          0.02          0.02          2                                   Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 20 0.2010       6.4607     0.7497     0.0160     0.0718     0.0687     1,682.50  1.42          45.58        5.29          0.11          0.51          0.48          275                              Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.2010       6.4607     0.7497     0.0160     0.0718     0.0687     1,682.50  0.55          17.80        2.07          0.04          0.20          0.19          80                                Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.1470       5.5223     0.5703     0.0164     0.0393     0.0376     1,719.62  0.41          15.22        1.57          0.05          0.11          0.10          26                                Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 7 0.1791       4.2733     1.1255     0.0141     0.0552     0.0528     1,501.68  0.28          6.59          1.74          0.02          0.09          0.08          262                              Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 7 0.1662       4.0394     1.0697     0.0144     0.0489     0.0468     1,539.98  0.26          6.23          1.65          0.02          0.08          0.07          281                              Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 7 0.1415       3.6097     0.9920     0.0148     0.0345     0.0330     1,580.79  0.22          5.57          1.53          0.02          0.05          0.05          120                              Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0 0.1791       4.2733     1.1255     0.0141     0.0552     0.0528     1,501.68  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0 0.1662       4.0394     1.0697     0.0144     0.0489     0.0468     1,539.98  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0 0.1415       3.6097     0.9920     0.0148     0.0345     0.0330     1,580.79  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0 0.1662       4.0394     1.0697     0.0144     0.0489     0.0468     1,539.98  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 20 0.1136       4.4601     0.4738     0.0171     0.0212     0.0203     1,790.29  0.13          4.92          0.52          0.02          0.02          0.02          64                                Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 20 0.1136       4.4601     0.4738     0.0171     0.0212     0.0203     1,790.29  0.80          31.47        3.34          0.12          0.15          0.14          201                              Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.1136       4.4601     0.4738     0.0171     0.0212     0.0203     1,790.29  0.31          12.29        1.31          0.05          0.06          0.06          60                                Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.1118       3.9978     0.4791     0.0172     0.0192     0.0184     1,800.48  0.31          11.02        1.32          0.05          0.05          0.05          36                                Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 7 0.1168       3.1486     0.9165     0.0152     0.0136     0.0130     1,622.06  0.18          4.86          1.41          0.02          0.02          0.02          278                              Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 7 0.1145       2.9646     0.9116     0.0155     0.0124     0.0118     1,655.51  0.18          4.58          1.41          0.02          0.02          0.02          301                              Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 7 0.0797       1.7668     0.8481     0.0154     0.0056     0.0053     1,654.08  0.12          2.73          1.31          0.02          0.01          0.01          61                                Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 0 0.1168       3.1486     0.9165     0.0152     0.0136     0.0130     1,622.06  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 0 0.1145       2.9646     0.9116     0.0155     0.0124     0.0118     1,655.51  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 0 0.0797       1.7668     0.8481     0.0154     0.0056     0.0053     1,654.08  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 0 0.1168       3.1486     0.9165     0.0152     0.0136     0.0130     1,622.06  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions

Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling Time Idling Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year Number of   per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (pounds/day)

Trucks CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)

Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 2.4393       56.1771   10.3466   0.0641     0.2216     0.2120     6,720.16  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 2.4393       56.1771   10.3466   0.0641     0.2216     0.2120     6,720.16  0.01          0.15          0.03          0.00          0.00          0.00          0                                   Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 2.4393       56.1771   10.3466   0.0641     0.2216     0.2120     6,720.16  0.22          4.95          0.91          0.01          0.02          0.02          14                                Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 2.4393       56.1771   10.3466   0.0641     0.2216     0.2120     6,720.16  0.11          2.58          0.48          0.00          0.01          0.01          5                                   Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 1.9800       50.0628   8.2237     0.0632     0.1541     0.1475     6,631.77  0.09          2.30          0.38          0.00          0.01          0.01          2                                   Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 1.6825       48.4813   17.2427   0.0668     0.1491     0.1427     7,062.39  0.09          2.67          0.95          0.00          0.01          0.01          44                                Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 1.5610       44.5192   16.0614   0.0660     0.1241     0.1188     6,989.52  0.09          2.45          0.89          0.00          0.01          0.01          46                                Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 1.3726       38.0209   14.3710   0.0652     0.0740     0.0708     6,907.51  0.08          2.10          0.79          0.00          0.00          0.00          19                                Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 1.6825       48.4813   17.2427   0.0668     0.1491     0.1427     7,062.39  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 1.5610       44.5192   16.0614   0.0660     0.1241     0.1188     6,989.52  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 1.3726       38.0209   14.3710   0.0652     0.0740     0.0708     6,907.51  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 1.5610       44.5192   16.0614   0.0660     0.1241     0.1188     6,989.52  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.9730       35.1225   3.8999     0.0617     0.0158     0.0151     6,466.46  0.01          0.48          0.05          0.00          0.00          0.00          3                                   Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.9730       35.1225   3.8999     0.0617     0.0158     0.0151     6,466.46  0.09          3.10          0.34          0.01          0.00          0.00          9                                   Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.9730       35.1225   3.8999     0.0617     0.0158     0.0151     6,466.46  0.04          1.61          0.18          0.00          0.00          0.00          4                                   Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.9340       33.1449   3.7248     0.0611     0.0137     0.0131     6,401.61  0.04          1.52          0.17          0.00          0.00          0.00          2                                   Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 15 1.1982       28.7657   12.5576   0.0641     0.0182     0.0174     6,793.52  0.07          1.59          0.69          0.00          0.00          0.00          42                                Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 1.1319       26.9322   11.9202   0.0634     0.0158     0.0151     6,722.53  0.06          1.48          0.66          0.00          0.00          0.00          44                                Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.9446       18.8169   10.8527   0.0610     0.0096     0.0092     6,475.05  0.05          1.04          0.60          0.00          0.00          0.00          9                                   Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 1.1982       28.7657   12.5576   0.0641     0.0182     0.0174     6,793.52  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 1.1319       26.9322   11.9202   0.0634     0.0158     0.0151     6,722.53  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.9446       18.8169   10.8527   0.0610     0.0096     0.0092     6,475.05  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 1.1982       28.7657   12.5576   0.0641     0.0182     0.0174     6,793.52  ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

On‐Road Truck Fugitive Dust Emissions (Paved Road Dust (RD), Break Wear (BW), Tire Wear (TW))

Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐Way Fugitive Dust Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year One‐Way  per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (pounds/day)

Truck Trips per Day PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) RD BW TW RD BW TW RD BW TW RD BW TW

Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0 0.2998       0.0617     0.0360     0.0736     0.0265     0.0090     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 20 0.2998       0.0617     0.0360     0.0736     0.0265     0.0090     0.0661     0.0136     0.0079     0.0162     0.0058     0.0020    Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 20 0.2998       0.0617     0.0360     0.0736     0.0265     0.0090     2.1154     0.4356     0.2540     0.5192     0.1867     0.0635    Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.2998       0.0617     0.0360     0.0736     0.0265     0.0090     0.8263     0.1701     0.0992     0.2028     0.0729     0.0248    Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.2998       0.0639     0.0373     0.0736     0.0274     0.0093     0.8263     0.1761     0.1027     0.2028     0.0755     0.0257    Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 7 0.2998       0.0988     0.0245     0.0736     0.0423     0.0061     0.4627     0.1524     0.0378     0.1136     0.0653     0.0094    Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 7 0.2998       0.1025     0.0254     0.0736     0.0439     0.0064     0.4627     0.1582     0.0392     0.1136     0.0678     0.0098    Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 7 0.2998       0.1061     0.0263     0.0736     0.0455     0.0066     0.4627     0.1638     0.0407     0.1136     0.0702     0.0102    Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0 0.2998       0.0988     0.0245     0.0736     0.0423     0.0061     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0 0.2998       0.1025     0.0254     0.0736     0.0439     0.0064     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0 0.2998       0.1061     0.0263     0.0736     0.0455     0.0066     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0 0.2998       0.1025     0.0254     0.0736     0.0439     0.0064     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 20 0.2998       0.0682     0.0397     0.0736     0.0292     0.0099     0.3305     0.0751     0.0438     0.0811     0.0322     0.0110    Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 20 0.2998       0.0682     0.0397     0.0736     0.0292     0.0099     2.1154     0.4808     0.2804     0.5192     0.2061     0.0701    Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.2998       0.0682     0.0397     0.0736     0.0292     0.0099     0.8263     0.1878     0.1095     0.2028     0.0805     0.0274    Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.2998       0.0692     0.0404     0.0736     0.0297     0.0101     0.8263     0.1908     0.1113     0.2028     0.0818     0.0278    Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 7 0.2998       0.1096     0.0273     0.0736     0.0470     0.0068     0.4627     0.1691     0.0421     0.1136     0.0725     0.0105    Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 7 0.2998       0.1127     0.0281     0.0736     0.0483     0.0070     0.4627     0.1740     0.0434     0.1136     0.0746     0.0108    Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 7 0.2998       0.1157     0.0289     0.0736     0.0496     0.0072     0.4627     0.1786     0.0446     0.1136     0.0765     0.0112    Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 0 0.2998       0.1096     0.0273     0.0736     0.0470     0.0068     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 0 0.2998       0.1127     0.0281     0.0736     0.0483     0.0070     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 0 0.2998       0.1157     0.0289     0.0736     0.0496     0.0072     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 0 0.2998       0.1096     0.0273     0.0736     0.0470     0.0068     ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐           

Summary of On‐Road Truck Regional Emissions

Regional Emissions(pounds/day)

Construction Phase Source Year PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5 PM2.5 CO2eROG NOX CO SO2 Dust Exh Total Dust Exh Total (metric tons/year)

Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               B Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 0.05           1.58          0.19          0.00          0.09          0.02          0.10          0.02          0.02          0.04          2                                   C Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 1.63           50.53        6.20          0.12          2.80          0.53          3.33          0.77          0.50          1.27          288                              D Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 0.67           20.38        2.54          0.05          1.10          0.21          1.30          0.30          0.20          0.50          85                                E Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 0.50           17.52        1.95          0.05          1.11          0.12          1.22          0.30          0.11          0.41          27                                F Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 0.37           9.27          2.69          0.03          0.65          0.09          0.75          0.19          0.09          0.28          306                              G Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 0.34           8.69          2.54          0.03          0.66          0.08          0.74          0.19          0.08          0.27          327                              H Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 0.29           7.67          2.32          0.03          0.67          0.06          0.72          0.19          0.05          0.25          138                              F Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               G Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               H Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               G Paving d ‐ 2019 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

Phase 2I Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 0.14           5.40          0.58          0.02          0.45          0.02          0.47          0.12          0.02          0.15          67                                J Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 0.89           34.56        3.69          0.13          2.88          0.15          3.03          0.80          0.14          0.94          210                              K Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 0.36           13.90        1.48          0.05          1.12          0.06          1.18          0.31          0.06          0.37          64                                L Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 0.35           12.54        1.49          0.05          1.13          0.05          1.18          0.31          0.05          0.36          38                                M Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 0.25           6.44          2.11          0.03          0.67          0.02          0.70          0.20          0.02          0.22          320                              N Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 0.24           6.06          2.06          0.03          0.68          0.02          0.70          0.20          0.02          0.22          345                              O Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 0.18           3.76          1.91          0.03          0.69          0.01          0.70          0.20          0.01          0.21          70                                M Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               N Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               O Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               M Paving d ‐ 2021 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               

Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐             ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐                               B Demolition ‐ 2017 0.1             1.6            0.2            0.0            0.1            0.0            0.1            0.0            0.0            0.0            1.77                             C Grading ‐ 2017 1.6             50.5          6.2            0.1            2.8            0.5            3.3            0.8            0.5            1.3            288.29                        D Foundation ‐ 2017 0.7             20.4          2.5            0.0            1.1            0.2            1.3            0.3            0.2            0.5            85.24                          E Foundation ‐ 2018 0.5             17.5          1.9            0.0            1.1            0.1            1.2            0.3            0.1            0.4            27.45                          F Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018 0.4             9.3            2.7            0.0            0.7            0.1            0.7            0.2            0.1            0.3            305.71                        G Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019 0.3             8.7            2.5            0.0            0.7            0.1            0.7            0.2            0.1            0.3            326.96                        H Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020 0.3             7.7            2.3            0.0            0.7            0.1            0.7            0.2            0.1            0.2            138.16                        

Phase 2I Demolition ‐ 2020 0.1             5.4            0.6            0.0            0.4            0.0            0.5            0.1            0.0            0.1            67.36                          J Grading ‐ 2020 0.9             34.6          3.7            0.1            2.9            0.2            3.0            0.8            0.1            0.9            209.57                        K Foundation ‐ 2020 0.4             13.9          1.5            0.0            1.1            0.1            1.2            0.3            0.1            0.4            64.06                          L Foundation ‐ 2021 0.4             12.5          1.5            0.1            1.1            0.1            1.2            0.3            0.1            0.4            38.14                          M Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021 0.2             6.4            2.1            0.0            0.7            0.0            0.7            0.2            0.0            0.2            319.79                        N Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022 0.2             6.1            2.1            0.0            0.7            0.0            0.7            0.2            0.0            0.2            345.00                        O Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023 0.2             3.8            1.9            0.0            0.7            0.0            0.7            0.2            0.0            0.2            69.95                          

Page 191: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Localized (On‐Site Idling) Emissions

On‐Road Truck On‐Site Idling Emissions

Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling Time Idling Emissions Factor Regional EmissionsConstruction Phase Source Year Number of  per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (pounds/day)

Trucks CO2e(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 CO2e ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 (metric tons/year)

A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 2.4393    56.1771  10.3466  0.0641    0.2216      0.2120    6,720.16 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              B Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 2.4393    56.1771  10.3466  0.0641    0.2216      0.2120    6,720.16 0.01        0.15        0.03        0.00        0.00        0.00        0                                 C Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 2.4393    56.1771  10.3466  0.0641    0.2216      0.2120    6,720.16 0.22        4.95        0.91        0.01        0.02        0.02        14                               D Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 2.4393    56.1771  10.3466  0.0641    0.2216      0.2120    6,720.16 0.11        2.58        0.48        0.00        0.01        0.01        5                                 E Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 1.9800    50.0628  8.2237    0.0632    0.1541      0.1475    6,631.77 0.09        2.30        0.38        0.00        0.01        0.01        2                                 F Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 1.6825    48.4813  17.2427  0.0668    0.1491      0.1427    7,062.39 0.09        2.67        0.95        0.00        0.01        0.01        44                               G Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 1.5610    44.5192  16.0614  0.0660    0.1241      0.1188    6,989.52 0.09        2.45        0.89        0.00        0.01        0.01        46                               H Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 1.3726    38.0209  14.3710  0.0652    0.0740      0.0708    6,907.51 0.08        2.10        0.79        0.00        0.00        0.00        19                               F Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 1.6825    48.4813  17.2427  0.0668    0.1491      0.1427    7,062.39 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              G Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 1.5610    44.5192  16.0614  0.0660    0.1241      0.1188    6,989.52 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              H Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 1.3726    38.0209  14.3710  0.0652    0.0740      0.0708    6,907.51 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              G Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 1.5610    44.5192  16.0614  0.0660    0.1241      0.1188    6,989.52 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              

I Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.9730    35.1225  3.8999    0.0617    0.0158      0.0151    6,466.46 0.01        0.48        0.05        0.00        0.00        0.00        3                                 J Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.9730    35.1225  3.8999    0.0617    0.0158      0.0151    6,466.46 0.09        3.10        0.34        0.01        0.00        0.00        9                                 K Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 25 0.9730    35.1225  3.8999    0.0617    0.0158      0.0151    6,466.46 0.04        1.61        0.18        0.00        0.00        0.00        4                                 L Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.9340    33.1449  3.7248    0.0611    0.0137      0.0131    6,401.61 0.04        1.52        0.17        0.00        0.00        0.00        2                                 M Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 15 1.1982    28.7657  12.5576  0.0641    0.0182      0.0174    6,793.52 0.07        1.59        0.69        0.00        0.00        0.00        42                               N Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 1.1319    26.9322  11.9202  0.0634    0.0158      0.0151    6,722.53 0.06        1.48        0.66        0.00        0.00        0.00        44                               O Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.9446    18.8169  10.8527  0.0610    0.0096      0.0092    6,475.05 0.05        1.04        0.60        0.00        0.00        0.00        9                                 M Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 1.1982    28.7657  12.5576  0.0641    0.0182      0.0174    6,793.52 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              N Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 1.1319    26.9322  11.9202  0.0634    0.0158      0.0151    6,722.53 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              O Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.9446    18.8169  10.8527  0.0610    0.0096      0.0092    6,475.05 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              M Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 1.1982    28.7657  12.5576  0.0641    0.0182      0.0174    6,793.52 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              

Phase 1A Site Preparation ‐ 2017 ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐          ‐                              B Demolition ‐ 2017 0.0           0.2           0.0           0.0           0.0           0.0           0.1                              C Grading ‐ 2017 0.2           5.0           0.9           0.0           0.0           0.0           13.7                           D Foundation ‐ 2017 0.1           2.6           0.5           0.0           0.0           0.0           5.3                              E Foundation ‐ 2018 0.1           2.3           0.4           0.0           0.0           0.0           1.7                              F Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2018 0.1           2.7           1.0           0.0           0.0           0.0           44.0                           G Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2019 0.1           2.5           0.9           0.0           0.0           0.0           45.6                           H Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2020 0.1           2.1           0.8           0.0           0.0           0.0           18.7                           

Phase 2I Demolition ‐ 2020 0.0           0.5           0.1           0.0           0.0           0.0           2.9                              J Grading ‐ 2020 0.1           3.1           0.3           0.0           0.0           0.0           9.1                              K Foundation ‐ 2020 0.0           1.6           0.2           0.0           0.0           0.0           3.6                              L Foundation ‐ 2021 0.0           1.5           0.2           0.0           0.0           0.0           2.1                              M Building Construction, Architectural Coating, and Paving ‐ 2021 0.1           1.6           0.7           0.0           0.0           0.0           41.6                           N Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2022 0.1           1.5           0.7           0.0           0.0           0.0           43.7                           O Building Construction and Architectural Coating ‐ 2023 0.1           1.0           0.6           0.0           0.0           0.0           8.6                              

Page 192: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Emissions Rate for Dispersion Modeling

Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Running Emissions Rates

Daily Work Days Work Hours One‐WayRunning 

Emissions Factor

Emissions Rate during Work 

PeriodConstruction Phase DPM Source Year One‐Way per Year per Day Trip Distance (grams/mile) (grams/second)

Truck Trips per Day(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) PM10 PM10

Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 0.736 0.0718 0.00E+00Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 0.736 0.0718 9.16E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 0.736 0.0673 2.75E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 0.736 0.0673 8.59E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 0.736 0.0552 7.05E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 0.736 0.0552 1.41E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 0.736 0.0357 9.12E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 0.736 0.0212 5.42E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 0.736 0.0393 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 0.736 0.0357 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 0.736 0.0212 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 0.736 0.0357 0.00E+00

Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction: 1.26E‐03Work Days: 734

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 1.143 0.0212 2.11E‐05Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 1.143 0.0345 2.19E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 1.143 0.0345 6.84E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 1.143 0.0192 3.81E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 1.143 0.0192 7.62E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 1.143 0.0167 6.62E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 1.143 0.0054 2.14E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 1.143 0.0192 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 1.143 0.0167 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 1.143 0.0054 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 1.143 0.0192 0.00E+00

Average Rate for Phase 2 Construction: 4.19E‐05Work Days: 708

Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Health Risk Assessment On‐Road Truck Idling Emissions Rates

Daily Work Days Work Hours Idling TimeIdling Emissions 

Factor

Emissions Rate during Work 

PeriodConstruction Phase DPM Source Year Number of  per Year per Day per Truck (grams/hour) (grams/second)

Trucks(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) PM10 PM10

Phase 1Site Preparation ‐ 2017 0 5 8 15 0.2216 0.00E+00Site Demolition T7 Single Construction 2017 5 10 8 15 0.2216 9.62E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2017 160 51 8 15 0.1798 2.50E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2017 50 38 8 25 0.1798 1.30E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2018 50 12 8 25 0.1491 1.08E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2018 100 249 8 15 0.1491 1.29E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2019 100 261 8 15 0.1334 1.16E‐04Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2020 100 108 8 15 0.0158 1.37E‐05Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2018 0 324 8 15 0.1541 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2019 0 261 8 15 0.1334 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2020 0 70 8 15 0.0158 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2019 0 21 8 15 0.1334 0.00E+00

Average Rate for Phase 1 Construction: 1.26E‐03Work Days: 734

Phase 2Existing Hotel Demolition T7 Single Construction 2020 25 72 8 15 0.0158 3.42E‐06Mass Grading/Excavation T7 Single Construction 2020 160 35 8 15 0.0740 1.03E‐04Foundation ‐ Year 1 T7 Single Construction 2020 50 27 8 15 0.0740 3.21E‐05Foundation ‐ Year 2 T7 Single Construction 2021 50 16 8 25 0.0137 9.93E‐06Building Construction ‐ Year 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2021 100 245 8 25 0.0137 1.99E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2022 100 260 8 15 0.0118 1.02E‐05Building Construction ‐ Year 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 2023 100 53 8 15 0.0019 1.62E‐06Architectural Coating ‐ Year 1 ‐ 2021 0 105 8 15 0.0137 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2022 0 260 8 15 0.0118 0.00E+00Architectural Coating ‐ Year 3 ‐ 2023 0 10 8 15 0.0019 0.00E+00Paving d ‐ 2021 0 20 8 15 0.0137 0.00E+00

Average Rate for SEQ Construction Activity/Taxiway: 1.08E‐05Work Days: 708

Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Page 193: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectOn‐Road Truck Emission Factors (Aggregate Model Year, Aggregate Speeds)

EMFAC2014 (v1.0.7) Emission RatesRegion Type: Sub‐AreaRegion: Los Angeles (SC)Calendar Years: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023Season: AnnualVehicle Classification: EMFAC2011 CategoriesUnits: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, g/mile for RUNEX, PMBW and PMTW, g/trip for STREX, HTSK and RUNLS, g/vehicle/hour for IDLEX, RESTL and DIURN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS GREENHOUSE GASESRegion CalYr VehClass MdlYr Speed Fuel ROG_RUNEX ROG_IDLEX NOx_RUNEX NOx_IDLEX CO_RUNEX CO_IDLEX SO2_RUNEX SO2_IDLEX PM10_BW PM10_TW PM10_RUNEX PM10_IDLEX PM2.5_BW PM2.5_TW PM2.5_RUNEX PM2.5_IDLEX CO2_RUNEX CO2_IDLEX CH4_RUNEX CH4_IDLEX CO2e_RUNEX CO2e_IDLEX

Los Angeles County (SC) 2017 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.2010             2.4393          6.4607          56.1771        0.7497          10.3466        0.0160          0.0641          0.0617             0.0360             0.0718             0.2216               0.0265              0.0090             0.0687              0.2120              1,682.27      6,717.33   0.0093         0.1133      1,682.50         6,720.16     Los Angeles County (SC) 2018 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1470             1.9800          5.5223          50.0628        0.5703          8.2237          0.0164          0.0632          0.0639             0.0373             0.0393             0.1541               0.0274              0.0093             0.0376              0.1475              1,719.45      6,629.47   0.0068         0.0920      1,719.62         6,631.77     Los Angeles County (SC) 2019 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1395             1.8138          5.2121          46.8318        0.5526          7.5222          0.0167          0.0625          0.0660             0.0385             0.0357             0.1334               0.0283              0.0096             0.0342              0.1276              1,751.30      6,553.65   0.0065         0.0842      1,751.46         6,555.76     Los Angeles County (SC) 2020 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1136             0.9730          4.4601          35.1225        0.4738          3.8999          0.0171          0.0617          0.0682             0.0397             0.0212             0.0158               0.0292              0.0099             0.0203              0.0151              1,790.16      6,465.33   0.0053         0.0452      1,790.29         6,466.46     Los Angeles County (SC) 2021 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1118             0.9340          3.9978          33.1449        0.4791          3.7248          0.0172          0.0611          0.0692             0.0404             0.0192             0.0137               0.0297              0.0101             0.0184              0.0131              1,800.35      6,400.53   0.0052         0.0434      1,800.48         6,401.61     Los Angeles County (SC) 2022 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1093             0.8932          3.5874          31.0120        0.4820          3.5401          0.0172          0.0604          0.0703             0.0410             0.0167             0.0118               0.0301              0.0102             0.0160              0.0113              1,806.13      6,331.29   0.0051         0.0415      1,806.26         6,332.33     Los Angeles County (SC) 2023 T7 single construction Aggregated Aggregated All 0.0724             0.5123          1.4332          15.7439        0.4229          1.8973          0.0169          0.0576          0.0712             0.0415             0.0054             0.0019               0.0305              0.0104             0.0052              0.0018              1,766.65      6,032.38   0.0034         0.0238      1,766.74         6,032.98     

Los Angeles County (SC) 2017 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1987             1.8352          4.5768          52.8409        1.2131          18.6009        0.0138          0.0675          0.0956             0.0237             0.0673             0.1798               0.0410              0.0059             0.0644              0.1720              1,462.69      7,127.20   0.0566         0.3591      1,464.11         7,136.18     Los Angeles County (SC) 2018 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1791             1.6825          4.2733          48.4813        1.1255          17.2427        0.0141          0.0668          0.0988             0.0245             0.0552             0.1491               0.0423              0.0061             0.0528              0.1427              1,500.25      7,053.85   0.0573         0.3416      1,501.68         7,062.39     Los Angeles County (SC) 2019 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1662             1.5610          4.0394          44.5192        1.0697          16.0614        0.0144          0.0660          0.1025             0.0254             0.0489             0.1241               0.0439              0.0064             0.0468              0.1188              1,538.52      6,981.37   0.0584         0.3260      1,539.98         6,989.52     Los Angeles County (SC) 2020 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1415             1.3726          3.6097          38.0209        0.9920          14.3710        0.0148          0.0652          0.1061             0.0263             0.0345             0.0740               0.0455              0.0066             0.0330              0.0708              1,579.32      6,899.75   0.0589         0.3106      1,580.79         6,907.51     Los Angeles County (SC) 2021 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1168             1.1982          3.1486          28.7657        0.9165          12.5576        0.0152          0.0641          0.1096             0.0273             0.0136             0.0182               0.0470              0.0068             0.0130              0.0174              1,620.57      6,786.08   0.0594         0.2977      1,622.06         6,793.52     Los Angeles County (SC) 2022 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.1145             1.1319          2.9646          26.9322        0.9116          11.9202        0.0155          0.0634          0.1127             0.0281             0.0124             0.0158               0.0483              0.0070             0.0118              0.0151              1,653.99      6,715.52   0.0609         0.2806      1,655.51         6,722.53     Los Angeles County (SC) 2023 MHDT/HHDT Aggregated Aggregated All 0.0797             0.9446          1.7668          18.8169        0.8481          10.8527        0.0154          0.0610          0.1157             0.0289             0.0056             0.0096               0.0496              0.0072             0.0053              0.0092              1,652.56      6,468.37   0.0608         0.2671      1,654.08         6,475.05     

Source:  California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014, http://www.arb.ca.gov/emfac/2014/.  Accessed February 2016.

Page 194: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUXE Hotel ProjectRoad Dust Emission Factors

Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)

Formula: EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)

Where:EFDust,P = Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliersL = road surface silt loading (g/m2)W = average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)

Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5

k 0.9979 0.2449sL 0.1 0.1W 2.4 2.4

EFDust,P 3.00E‐01 7.36E‐02

Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)

Formula: EFDust,U = (k ( s / 12)1 × (Sp / 30)0.5 / (M / 0.5)0.2) ‐ C)

Where:EFDust,U = Unpaved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliers = surface material silt content (%)Sp = mean vehicle speed (mph)M = surface material moisture content (%)C = Emission Factor for 1980s vehicle fleet exhaust, brake wear, and tire wear

Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5

k 816.47 81.65s 4.3% 4.3%Sp 15 15M 0.5% 0.5%C 0.00047 0.00036

EFDust,U 5.20E+00 5.19E‐01

Sources:SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2011.1.CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).PCR Services Corporation, 2013.

Page 195: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.2OperationalEmissions(CalEEMod)

EmissionsModelInputs

CalEEModOutput–Existing

CalEEModOutput–Project

Page 196: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project EIRAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Trip Generation Rates

Land Use Units Res. Pop. Trips/dayTrip Rate (trips/unit) Trips/day

Trip Rate (trips/unit)

Existing Uses (2015)Hotel 178            rooms 112,748    sf 1,090 6.12 1,090 6.12Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐             spaces ‐             sfSubterranean Parking Structure 86              spaces 34,400      sfSurface Parking Lot 198            spaces 79,200      sf

Interim Year (Phase 1 ends 2020)Residential + Amenities 290            DU 352,000    sf 473 1,054 3.63 949 3.27

Retail/Commercial 15.0           ksf 15,000      sf 564 37.60 314 20.93Restaurant 15.0           ksf 15,000      sf 1,678 111.87 934 62.27

Hotel 300            rooms 280,000    sf 1,838 6.13 1,654 5.51

Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐             spaces ‐             sfSubterranean Parking Structure 437            spaces 174,800    sfOpen Space 29.3           ksf 0.67           acre

Full Buildout (Phase 1 + 2 ends 2023)Residential + Amenities 650            DU 770,000    sf 1060 2,139 3.29 1,925 2.96

Commercial 40.0           ksf 40,000      sf 1,503 37.58 836 20.90Restaurant 40.0           ksf 40,000      sf 4,476 111.90 2,490 62.25

Hotel 300            rooms 280,000    sf 1,838 6.13 1,654 5.51

Above‐Grade Parking Structure ‐             spaces ‐             sfSubterranean Parking Structure 799            spaces 319,600    sfOpen Space 49.8           ksf 1.14           acrePlaza Area 5.0             ksf 5,000         sf

Lot Area (acres)/Developed Area (sf) 2.70           acres 116,660    sfSources:  Hazens Group, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016 Source:  Traffic Study, March 2016; PCR Services Corporation, March 2016

Notes:Reductions from transit were accounted for in trip rates.However, transit/walk‐in reductions were taken by CalEEMod using defaults.

Hotel

Quality Restaurant

Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator

City ParkSurface Parking

Strip Mall

Enclosed Parking with ElevatorCity Park

High‐rise Apartment

Unenclosed Parking with Elevator

Strip MallQuality Restaurant

Hotel

Mitigated

CalEEMod Land Use Type

Hotel

High‐rise Apartment

Unmitigated

Surface Parking

Unenclosed Parking with ElevatorEnclosed Parking with Elevator

Page 197: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"

Energy Use -

Energy Mitigation -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2015

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Hotel 178.00 Room 2.70 112,748.00 0

Parking Lot 198.00 Space 0.00 79,200.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 86.00 Space 0.00 34,400.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/11/2016 3:23 PM

Luxe Hotel Existing Operations

South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 198: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

8,545.9452

8,545.9452 0.3657 0.0167 8,558.7927

5.5083 0.2203 5.7286 1.4714 0.2070 1.6784Total 9.7421 11.2965 45.4399 0.0870

7,636.5919

7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997

5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mobile 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Energy 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.12

2.0 Emissions Summary

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.12

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.12

tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.93 2.70

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2015

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.77 0.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.78 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 224286 175938

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 258,456.00 112,748.00

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Page 199: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total 1,089.36 1,089.36 1,089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00

Hotel 1,089.36 1,089.36 1089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399

Annual VMT

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

7,636.5919

7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997

5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Unmitigated 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825

7,636.5919

7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997

5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mitigated 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.00 2.23 2.23 1.00 20.94 2.240.00 5.47 0.21 0.00 5.83 0.72

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.18 1.40 0.29 1.10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

8,355.5182

8,355.5182 0.3621 0.0132 8,367.2069

5.5083 0.2082 5.7166 1.4714 0.1949 1.6663Total 9.7247 11.1378 45.3066 0.0860

7,636.5919

7,636.5919 0.3480 7,643.8997

5.5083 0.1625 5.6708 1.4714 0.1492 1.6206Mobile 4.3764 10.5383 44.7547 0.0825

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Energy 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 200: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

914.78580.0576 909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.01674.5500e-003

0.0576 0.0576 0.0576

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.1999

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.0834 0.7577 0.6365

0.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075

5.0 Energy Detail

SBUS MH

0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Page 201: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Unmitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Mitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Total 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Hotel 6.11001 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Total 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Hotel 7728.64 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

UnmitigatedNaturalGa

s UseROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10

Page 202: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Landscaping 4.8200e-003

4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

4.4817

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

0.7959

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Landscaping 4.8200e-003

4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

4.4817

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

0.7959

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 203: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Area Coating - See "Luxe Hotel Operational Inputs"

Energy Use -

Energy Mitigation -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Vehicle Trips - See Traffic Study

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1227.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2015

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Hotel 178.00 Room 2.70 112,748.00 0

Parking Lot 198.00 Space 0.00 79,200.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 86.00 Space 0.00 34,400.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/11/2016 3:22 PM

Luxe Hotel Existing Operations

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 204: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

8,169.5758

8,169.5758 0.3660 0.0167 8,182.4293

5.5083 0.2217 5.7300 1.4714 0.2082 1.6796Total 9.9396 11.8374 45.4006 0.0829

7,260.2225

7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362

5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mobile 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Energy 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.12

2.0 Emissions Summary

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.12

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.12

tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.93 2.70

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2015

tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.77 0.00

tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.78 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 224286 175938

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 258,456.00 112,748.00

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Page 205: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total 1,089.36 1,089.36 1,089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00

Hotel 1,089.36 1,089.36 1089.36 2,599,399 2,599,399

Annual VMT

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

7,260.2225

7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362

5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Unmitigated 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783

7,260.2225

7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362

5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mitigated 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.00 2.33 2.33 1.00 20.94 2.340.00 5.44 0.21 0.00 5.79 0.72

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.18 1.34 0.29 1.16

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

7,979.1489

7,979.1489 0.3623 0.0132 7,990.8434

5.5083 0.2096 5.7180 1.4714 0.1962 1.6676Total 9.9221 11.6787 45.2673 0.0819

7,260.2225

7,260.2225 0.3483 7,267.5362

5.5083 0.1639 5.6723 1.4714 0.1505 1.6219Mobile 4.5738 11.0792 44.7153 0.0783

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Energy 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Area 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 206: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Hotel 7728.64 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

914.7858

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0576 909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.01674.5500e-003

0.0576 0.0576 0.0576

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.1999

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.0834 0.7577 0.6365

0.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075

5.0 Energy Detail

SBUS MH

0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Page 207: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

909.2522 909.2522 0.0174 0.0167 914.78580.0576 0.0576 0.0576 0.0576Total 0.0834 0.7577 0.6365 4.5500e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Page 208: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Landscaping 4.8200e-003

4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

4.4817

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

0.7959

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Unmitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Mitigated 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Total 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

718.8253 718.8253 0.0138 0.0132 723.19990.0455 0.0455 0.0455 0.0455Hotel 6.11001 0.0659 0.5990 0.5032 3.5900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 209: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Total 5.2824 4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.1011 0.1011 2.9000e-004

0.10731.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

1.8000e-004

Landscaping 4.8200e-003

4.7000e-004

0.0488 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

4.4817

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

0.7959

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 210: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Phase -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829

Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,473.20 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 7:11 PM

LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)

South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 211: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163

tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.50 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblFireplaces NumberGas 246.50 0.00

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 29.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757910 453888

tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00

Energy Use -

Waste Mitigation -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"

Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Trips and VMT -

Page 212: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.07

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.63

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.47

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.63

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03

tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 13.69 14.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 15.75 14.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.04 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 133.40 647.00

Page 213: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.50 0.00

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 680,989.31 105,850.00

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.50 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 1,733,346.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 290,617.38 1,733,346.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 559,996.23 522,896.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 493,402.13

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,111,087.82 167,900.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 11,911,855.55 4,577,447.97

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 4,553,005.69 2,749,446.45

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 829,422.31

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 782,637.87

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.07

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 18,894,667.43 7,260,779.53

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.47

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.63

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.47

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.07

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13

Page 214: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.00 4.17 4.17 2.28 23.21 4.180.00 8.38 0.37 0.00 8.68 1.23

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.27 3.20 0.50 1.80

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 21,520.8804

21,520.8804

0.7691 0.0567 21,554.6217

15.4773 0.6476 16.1249 4.1356 0.6229 4.7584Total 32.0962 23.3169 117.2778 0.2548

18,382.7173

18,382.7173

0.6674 18,396.7318

15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mobile 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381

3,094.9150

3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Energy 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 22,456.2610

22,456.2610

0.7871 0.0739 22,495.6949

15.4773 0.7068 16.1841 4.1356 0.6821 4.8177Total 32.1819 24.0877 117.8690 0.2595

18,382.7173

18,382.7173

0.6674 18,396.7318

15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mobile 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381

4,030.2956

4,030.2956 0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233

0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Energy 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated OperationalROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10Exhaust PM10

2.0 Emissions Summary

Page 215: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.001943 0.002491 0.004392 0.000576 0.002140

SBUS MH

0.510092 0.059583 0.181091 0.139410 0.042694 0.006692 0.016202 0.032692

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

64.40 19.00 45 40 15

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

69.00 19.00 38 18 44

Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40

48.00 19.00 66 28 6

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Total 4,624.80 4,624.80 4,624.80 7,296,747 7,296,747

Strip Mall 436.05 436.05 436.05 567,845 567,845

Quality Restaurant 1,297.05 1,297.05 1297.05 1,268,719 1,268,719

Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00

Annual VMT

Apartments High Rise 1,052.70 1,052.70 1052.70 2,459,740 2,459,740

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

18,382.7173

18,382.7173

0.6674 18,396.7318

15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Unmitigated 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381

18,382.7173

18,382.7173

0.6674 18,396.7318

15.4773 0.3193 15.7966 4.1356 0.2946 4.4301Mitigated 11.1028 20.4826 91.1977 0.2381

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 216: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4,030.2956 4,030.2956

0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233

0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Total 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202

637.4672 637.4672 0.0122 0.0117 641.34670.0404 0.0404 0.0404 0.0404Apartments High Rise

5418.47 0.0584 0.4994 0.2125 3.1900e-003

8.2192 8.2192 1.6000e-004

1.5000e-004

8.26925.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

Strip Mall 69.863 7.5000e-004

6.8500e-003

5.7500e-003

4.0000e-005

1,126.5592 1,126.5592

0.0216 0.0207 1,133.4153

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714Quality Restaurant 9575.75 0.1033 0.9388 0.7886 5.6300e-003

2,258.0500 2,258.0500

0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921

0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4,054.8233

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.2553 4,030.2956

4,030.2956 0.0773 0.07390.0202 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553

3,094.9150

3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.3694 3.3267 2.5875

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

5.0 Energy Detail

Page 217: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

44.13980.1323 0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.00001.2700e-003

0.1323 0.1323 0.1323

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.1398

Unmitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838

0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.0000

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior

No Hearths Installed

ROG NOx CO SO2

3,094.9150 3,094.9150

0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Total 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

463.9058 463.9058 8.8900e-003

8.5000e-003

466.72900.0294 0.0294 0.0294 0.0294Apartments High Rise

3.9432 0.0425 0.3634 0.1546 2.3200e-003

6.1131 6.1131 1.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

6.15033.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

Strip Mall 0.0519616 5.6000e-004

5.0900e-003

4.2800e-003

3.0000e-005

1,047.8350 1,047.8350

0.0201 0.0192 1,054.2119

0.0664 0.0664 0.0664 0.0664Quality Restaurant 8.9066 0.0961 0.8732 0.7335 5.2400e-003

1,577.0611 1,577.0611

0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588

0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 218: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

16.9740

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

2.9973

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

16.9740

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

2.9973

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10

Page 219: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Off-road Equipment -

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Phase -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2020

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 290.00 Dwelling Unit 4.68 352,000.00 829

Quality Restaurant 15.00 1000sqft 0.34 15,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 0.47 Acre 0.47 20,473.20 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 437.00 Space 3.93 174,800.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 7:10 PM

LUXE Hotel - Interim Year (Phase 1)

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 220: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 290,000.00 352,000.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163

tblFireplaces NumberWood 14.50 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblFireplaces NumberGas 246.50 0.00

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 29.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 757910 453888

tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00

Energy Use -

Waste Mitigation -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"

Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Trips and VMT -

Page 221: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.07

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.63

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.47

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.63

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03

tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 13.69 14.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 15.75 14.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.04 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2020

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 133.40 647.00

Page 222: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 14.50 0.00

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 680,989.31 105,850.00

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 14.50 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 1,733,346.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 290,617.38 1,733,346.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 559,996.23 522,896.67

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 493,402.13

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,111,087.82 167,900.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 11,911,855.55 4,577,447.97

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 4,553,005.69 2,749,446.45

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 829,422.31

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 782,637.87

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.07

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 18,894,667.43 7,260,779.53

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.47

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.63

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.47

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.07

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13

Page 223: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.00 4.33 4.33 2.27 23.21 4.350.00 8.36 0.37 0.00 8.66 1.23

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.26 3.08 0.48 1.89

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.0000 20,647.7628

20,647.7628

0.7706 0.0567 20,681.5339

15.4773 0.6496 16.1269 4.1356 0.6247 4.7603Total 32.5651 24.2244 121.6730 0.2430

17,509.5997

17,509.5997

0.6688 17,523.6441

15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mobile 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262

3,094.9150

3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Energy 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 21,583.1434

21,583.1434

0.7885 0.0739 21,622.6071

15.4773 0.7088 16.1861 4.1356 0.6839 4.8195Total 32.6509 24.9952 122.2641 0.2477

17,509.5997

17,509.5997

0.6688 17,523.6441

15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mobile 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262

4,030.2956

4,030.2956 0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233

0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Energy 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Area 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2.0 Emissions Summary

Page 224: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.001943 0.002491 0.004392 0.000576 0.002140

SBUS MH

0.510092 0.059583 0.181091 0.139410 0.042694 0.006692 0.016202 0.032692

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

64.40 19.00 45 40 15

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

69.00 19.00 38 18 44

Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40

48.00 19.00 66 28 6

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Total 4,624.80 4,624.80 4,624.80 7,296,747 7,296,747

Strip Mall 436.05 436.05 436.05 567,845 567,845

Quality Restaurant 1,297.05 1,297.05 1297.05 1,268,719 1,268,719

Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00

Annual VMT

Apartments High Rise 1,052.70 1,052.70 1052.70 2,459,740 2,459,740

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

17,509.5997

17,509.5997

0.6688 17,523.6441

15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Unmitigated 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262

17,509.5997

17,509.5997

0.6688 17,523.6441

15.4773 0.3213 15.7986 4.1356 0.2964 4.4320Mitigated 11.5718 21.3902 95.5929 0.2262

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 225: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

4,030.2956 4,030.2956

0.0773 0.0739 4,054.8233

0.2553 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553Total 0.3694 3.3267 2.5875 0.0202

637.4672 637.4672 0.0122 0.0117 641.34670.0404 0.0404 0.0404 0.0404Apartments High Rise

5418.47 0.0584 0.4994 0.2125 3.1900e-003

8.2192 8.2192 1.6000e-004

1.5000e-004

8.26925.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

5.2000e-004

Strip Mall 69.863 7.5000e-004

6.8500e-003

5.7500e-003

4.0000e-005

1,126.5592 1,126.5592

0.0216 0.0207 1,133.4153

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714Quality Restaurant 9575.75 0.1033 0.9388 0.7886 5.6300e-003

2,258.0500 2,258.0500

0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921

0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4,054.8233

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.2553 4,030.2956

4,030.2956 0.0773 0.07390.0202 0.2553 0.2553 0.2553

3,094.9150

3,094.9150 0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.3694 3.3267 2.5875

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

5.0 Energy Detail

Page 226: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

44.13980.1323 0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.00001.2700e-003

0.1323 0.1323 0.1323

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.1398

Unmitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838

0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.0000

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior

No Hearths Installed

ROG NOx CO SO2

3,094.9150 3,094.9150

0.0593 0.0567 3,113.7501

0.1960 0.1960 0.1960 0.1960Total 0.2837 2.5559 1.9963 0.0155

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

463.9058 463.9058 8.8900e-003

8.5000e-003

466.72900.0294 0.0294 0.0294 0.0294Apartments High Rise

3.9432 0.0425 0.3634 0.1546 2.3200e-003

6.1131 6.1131 1.2000e-004

1.1000e-004

6.15033.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

3.9000e-004

Strip Mall 0.0519616 5.6000e-004

5.0900e-003

4.2800e-003

3.0000e-005

1,047.8350 1,047.8350

0.0201 0.0192 1,054.2119

0.0664 0.0664 0.0664 0.0664Quality Restaurant 8.9066 0.0961 0.8732 0.7335 5.2400e-003

1,577.0611 1,577.0611

0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588

0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 227: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

16.9740

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

2.9973

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 0.0000 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Total 20.7097 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

43.2481 43.2481 0.0425 44.13980.1323 0.1323 0.1323 0.1323Landscaping 0.7384 0.2784 24.0838 1.2700e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

16.9740

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

2.9973

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 228: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Phase -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 650.00 Dwelling Unit 10.48 770,000.00 1060

Quality Restaurant 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 1.14 Acre 1.14 49,800.00 0

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 799.00 Space 7.19 319,600.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 6:27 PM

LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations

South Coast Air Basin, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 229: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1101600 345888

tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 519,750.00 438,750.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 1,559,250.00 1,316,250.00

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Waste Mitigation -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Energy Use -

Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Trips and VMT -

Page 230: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 36.50 37.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 42.00 37.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.10 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 299.00 1,450.00

tblLandUse Population 1,859.00 1,060.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 650,000.00 770,000.00

tblFireplaces NumberWood 32.50 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 49,658.40 49,800.00

tblFireplaces NumberGas 552.50 0.00

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 65.00 0.00

Page 231: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 805,956.01

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 7,851,670.73

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 26,698,986.59 10,262,792.60

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,358,288.74 634,394.33

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 12,141,348.50 7,331,857.20

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,962,900.86 447,733.33

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,278,412.99

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 42,350,116.65 16,278,912.40

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,006,280.67

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.48

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.03

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.03

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.29

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.48

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.29

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.48

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.03

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13

tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.29

tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95

tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

Page 232: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 44,155.2014

44,155.2014

2.0454 0.0995 44,229.0005

27.3215 1.4786 28.8001 7.2982 1.4097 8.7079Total 66.5769 62.6817 313.5807 0.4474

38,631.0048

38,631.0048

1.8479 38,669.8097

27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mobile 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174

5,427.3782

5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Energy 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 45,440.7547

45,440.7547

2.0700 0.1231 45,522.3775

27.3215 1.5600 28.8815 7.2982 1.4911 8.7893Total 66.6947 63.7336 314.3380 0.4538

38,631.0048

38,631.0048

1.8479 38,669.8097

27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mobile 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174

6,712.9315

6,712.9315 0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853

0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Energy 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2.0 Emissions Summary

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 32.50 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 32.50 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 774,979.69 4,622,257.80

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,815,971.49 282,266.67

Page 233: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total 8,597.90 8,597.90 8,597.90 12,893,077 12,893,077

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00

Strip Mall 1,161.20 1,161.20 1161.20 1,512,170 1,512,170

Quality Restaurant 3,459.20 3,459.20 3459.20 3,383,641 3,383,641

Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00

Annual VMT

Apartments High Rise 2,138.50 2,138.50 2138.50 4,996,822 4,996,822

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

38,631.0048

38,631.0048

1.8479 38,669.8097

27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Unmitigated 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174

38,631.0048

38,631.0048

1.8479 38,669.8097

27.3215 0.8376 28.1590 7.2982 0.7686 8.0668Mitigated 30.7513 57.5915 256.4040 0.4174

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.00 2.83 2.83 1.19 19.15 2.840.00 5.22 0.28 0.00 5.46 0.93

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.18 1.65 0.24 1.41

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 234: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6,753.7853

0.4252 6,712.9315

6,712.9315 0.1287 0.12310.0336 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252

5,427.3782

5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.6154 5.5227 4.1752

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075

5.0 Energy Detail

SBUS MH

0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

64.40 19.00 45 40 15

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

69.00 19.00 38 18 44

Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40

48.00 19.00 66 28 6

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Page 235: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6,712.9315 6,712.9315

0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853

0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Total 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336

1,428.8058 1,428.8058

0.0274 0.0262 1,437.5013

0.0905 0.0905 0.0905 0.0905Apartments High Rise

12144.8 0.1310 1.1192 0.4763 7.1400e-003

21.9178 21.9178 4.2000e-004

4.0000e-004

22.05121.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

Strip Mall 186.301 2.0100e-003

0.0183 0.0153 1.1000e-004

3,004.1579 3,004.1579

0.0576 0.0551 3,022.4407

0.1903 0.1903 0.1903 0.1903Quality Restaurant 25535.3 0.2754 2.5035 2.1029 0.0150

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2,258.0500 2,258.0500

0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921

0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 236: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

98.78260.2973 0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.00002.8400e-003

0.2973 0.2973 0.2973

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.7826

Unmitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588

0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.0000

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior

No Hearths Installed

ROG NOx CO SO2

5,427.3782 5,427.3782

0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Total 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

1,039.7888 1,039.7888

0.0199 0.0191 1,046.1168

0.0659 0.0659 0.0659 0.0659Apartments High Rise

8.8382 0.0953 0.8145 0.3466 5.2000e-003

16.3017 16.3017 3.1000e-004

3.0000e-004

16.40091.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

Strip Mall 0.138564 1.4900e-003

0.0136 0.0114 8.0000e-005

2,794.2266 2,794.2266

0.0536 0.0512 2,811.2318

0.1770 0.1770 0.1770 0.1770Quality Restaurant 23.7509 0.2561 2.3285 1.9560 0.0140

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1,577.0611 1,577.0611

0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588

0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 237: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

29.7871

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

3.9138

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

29.7871

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

3.9138

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

UnmitigatedROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive

PM10

Page 238: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

Project Characteristics - LADWP, 2015 Power Integrated Resource Plan, Table C-1, (2015) C-12.

Land Use - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Phase -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

1163 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.006

31

Climate Zone 11 Operational Year 2023

Utility Company Los Angeles Department of Water & Power

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)

Strip Mall 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0

Apartments High Rise 650.00 Dwelling Unit 10.48 770,000.00 1060

Quality Restaurant 40.00 1000sqft 0.92 40,000.00 0

Hotel 300.00 Room 10.00 280,000.00 0

City Park 1.14 Acre 1.14 49,800.00 0

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 5.00 1000sqft 0.11 5,000.00 0

Population

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 799.00 Space 7.19 319,600.00 0

1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 4/14/2016 6:28 PM

LUXE Hotel - Full Buildout Operations

South Coast Air Basin, Winter

1.0 Project Characteristics

Page 239: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblFireplaces FireplaceHourDay 3.00 0.00

tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00

tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1101600 345888

tblFireplaces FireplaceDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Exterior 519,750.00 438,750.00

tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Residential_Interior 1,559,250.00 1,316,250.00

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation -

Water Mitigation -

Waste Mitigation -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

Woodstoves - No woodstoves nor fireplaces.

Area Coating - Parking lot square footage adjustment as in "AQ Construction Model Inputs"

Energy Use -

Water And Wastewater - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Solid Waste - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs"

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -

Demolition -

Grading -

Architectural Coating -

Vehicle Trips - See "LUXE Hotel Operational Inputs" and "Project Trip and VMT Reductions"

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Vechicle Emission Factors -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Off-road Equipment -

Trips and VMT -

Page 240: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 4.72

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 6.90 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 5.74

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 8.40 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 36.50 37.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 42.00 37.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.10 0.00

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 164.25 234.00

tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2023

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 299.00 1,450.00

tblLandUse Population 1,859.00 1,060.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 1227.89 1163

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 435,600.00 280,000.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 650,000.00 770,000.00

tblFireplaces NumberWood 32.50 0.00

tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 49,658.40 49,800.00

tblFireplaces NumberGas 552.50 0.00

tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 65.00 0.00

Page 241: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 0.00 805,956.01

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 845,559.00 7,851,670.73

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 26,698,986.59 10,262,792.60

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,358,288.74 634,394.33

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 12,141,348.50 7,331,857.20

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,962,900.86 447,733.33

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,278,412.99

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 7,610,031.00 12,454,374.27

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 42,350,116.65 16,278,912.40

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 0.00 1,006,280.67

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 86.48

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 44.32 29.03

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 6.13

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 20.43 29.03

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 3.29

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 6.13

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 86.48

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 3.29

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 86.48

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 42.04 29.03

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 6.13

tblVehicleTrips HW_TL 14.70 10.05

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 3.29

tblVehicleTrips HO_TL 8.70 5.95

tblVehicleTrips HS_TL 5.90 4.03

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 16.60 11.35

Page 242: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 42,261.9812

42,261.9812

2.0476 0.0995 42,335.8270

27.3215 1.4897 28.8111 7.2982 1.4198 8.7180Total 68.2281 65.4309 322.4446 0.4268

36,737.7846

36,737.7846

1.8501 36,776.6361

27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mobile 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968

5,427.3782

5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Energy 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 43,547.5345

43,547.5345

2.0723 0.1231 43,629.2039

27.3215 1.5711 28.8926 7.2982 1.5013 8.7995Total 68.3459 66.4827 323.2018 0.4332

36,737.7846

36,737.7846

1.8501 36,776.6361

27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mobile 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968

6,712.9315

6,712.9315 0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853

0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Energy 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Area 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

2.2 Overall Operational

Unmitigated Operational

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

2.0 Emissions Summary

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00

tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 32.50 0.00

tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 32.50 0.00

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 774,979.69 4,622,257.80

tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 1,815,971.49 282,266.67

Page 243: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total 8,597.90 8,597.90 8,597.90 12,893,077 12,893,077

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00

Strip Mall 1,161.20 1,161.20 1161.20 1,512,170 1,512,170

Quality Restaurant 3,459.20 3,459.20 3459.20 3,383,641 3,383,641

Hotel 1,839.00 1,839.00 1839.00 3,000,443 3,000,443

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00

Annual VMT

Apartments High Rise 2,138.50 2,138.50 2138.50 4,996,822 4,996,822

4.2 Trip Summary Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT

36,737.7846

36,737.7846

1.8501 36,776.6361

27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Unmitigated 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968

36,737.7846

36,737.7846

1.8501 36,776.6361

27.3215 0.8486 28.1701 7.2982 0.7788 8.0770Mitigated 32.4025 60.3407 265.2679 0.3968

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Category lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

0.00 2.95 2.95 1.19 19.15 2.960.00 5.18 0.28 0.00 5.42 0.93

NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.17 1.58 0.23 1.48

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 244: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6,753.7853

0.4252 6,712.9315

6,712.9315 0.1287 0.12310.0336 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252

5,427.3782

5,427.3782 0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

NaturalGas Unmitigated

0.6154 5.5227 4.1752

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437

Category lb/day lb/day

NaturalGas Mitigated

0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

4.4 Fleet Mix

Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

ROG NOx CO SO2

0.001923 0.002530 0.004314 0.000602 0.002075

5.0 Energy Detail

SBUS MH

0.516610 0.060517 0.179979 0.140587 0.041566 0.006616 0.015092 0.027587

LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1

64.40 19.00 45 40 15

Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

69.00 19.00 38 18 44

Strip Mall 11.35 5.74 4.72 16.60

61.60 19.00 58 38 4

Quality Restaurant 11.35 5.74 4.72 12.00

0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Hotel 11.35 5.74 4.72 19.40

48.00 19.00 66 28 6

Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

19.20 40.60 86 11 3

City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 33.00

H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Apartments High Rise 10.05 4.03 5.95 40.20

4.3 Trip Type Information

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W

Page 245: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6,712.9315 6,712.9315

0.1287 0.1231 6,753.7853

0.4252 0.4252 0.4252 0.4252Total 0.6154 5.5227 4.1752 0.0336

1,428.8058 1,428.8058

0.0274 0.0262 1,437.5013

0.0905 0.0905 0.0905 0.0905Apartments High Rise

12144.8 0.1310 1.1192 0.4763 7.1400e-003

21.9178 21.9178 4.2000e-004

4.0000e-004

22.05121.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

1.3900e-003

Strip Mall 186.301 2.0100e-003

0.0183 0.0153 1.1000e-004

3,004.1579 3,004.1579

0.0576 0.0551 3,022.4407

0.1903 0.1903 0.1903 0.1903Quality Restaurant 25535.3 0.2754 2.5035 2.1029 0.0150

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

2,258.0500 2,258.0500

0.0433 0.0414 2,271.7921

0.1430 0.1430 0.1430 0.1430Hotel 19193.4 0.2070 1.8817 1.5806 0.0113

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

Unmitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 246: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

98.78260.2973 0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.00002.8400e-003

0.2973 0.2973 0.2973

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.7826

Unmitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588

0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.0000

Category lb/day lb/day

Mitigated 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

Use Low VOC Paint - Residential Interior

No Hearths Installed

ROG NOx CO SO2

5,427.3782 5,427.3782

0.1040 0.0995 5,460.4083

0.3437 0.3437 0.3437 0.3437Total 0.4975 4.4708 3.4179 0.0271

1,039.7888 1,039.7888

0.0199 0.0191 1,046.1168

0.0659 0.0659 0.0659 0.0659Apartments High Rise

8.8382 0.0953 0.8145 0.3466 5.2000e-003

16.3017 16.3017 3.1000e-004

3.0000e-004

16.40091.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

1.0300e-003

Strip Mall 0.138564 1.4900e-003

0.0136 0.0114 8.0000e-005

2,794.2266 2,794.2266

0.0536 0.0512 2,811.2318

0.1770 0.1770 0.1770 0.1770Quality Restaurant 23.7509 0.2561 2.3285 1.9560 0.0140

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

1,577.0611 1,577.0611

0.0302 0.0289 1,586.6588

0.0999 0.0999 0.0999 0.0999Hotel 13.405 0.1446 1.3142 1.1039 7.8900e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

NaturalGas Use

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

Page 247: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

29.7871

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

3.9138

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2

Mitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

0.0000 96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 0.0000 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Total 35.3281 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

96.8184 96.8184 0.0935 98.78260.2973 0.2973 0.2973 0.2973Landscaping 1.6271 0.6194 53.7588 2.8400e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hearth 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products

29.7871

0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating

3.9138

NBio- CO2

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

SubCategory lb/day lb/day

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2

6.2 Area by SubCategory

Unmitigated

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Page 248: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.3OperationalEmissions(EMFAC2014)

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)TripandVMTReductions

ExistingandProject(InterimandFullBuildout)MobileSourceEmissions

Page 249: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))

Purpose:This section provides calculations for vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reductions from BAU characteristics based on guidance contained in the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA),Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures (August 2010).

Notes on Calculations:1. Percent VMT reduced is calculated individually for each measure based on the formulas for each measure.2. Certain individual measures or groups of measures have VMT reduction caps, as indicated in the calculations. 3. The location type determines the VMT reduction caps for LUT‐2 as well as the global transportation VMT reduction cap.4. The VMT reduction cap for the LUT/SDT/PDT/TST group of measures is 5% less than the global transportation cap.5. When summing the total VMT reductions from multiple measures, a double counting correction is applied as follows.

a. The total percent reductions from the different measures are  NOT added together to avoid double counting. VMT reductions for each successive measure are applied only to the "remaining" VMT after the reductions from the previous measure have been taken out.

b. In order to calculate the "effective" VMT reduction percent due to multiple measures, the following formula is applied:Total Percent VMT Reduction % =

= 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ Measure 1 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 2 Reduction %) × (100% ‐ Measure 3 Reduction %) × … ]

Example:Measure 1 VMT Reduction = 5%Measure 2 VMT Reduction = 10%Measure 3 VMT Reduction = 7%Total Percent VMT Reduction % = 100% ‐ [(100% ‐ 5%) × (100% ‐ 10%) × (100% ‐ 7%)]

 = 100% ‐ [(95%) × (90%) × (93%)] = 100% ‐ 79.5% = 20.5%    (this is less than 5% + 10% + 7% = 22%, due to the double counting correction)

Note: Values in the above example are in percent format and 95% is equivalent to 0.95 in decimal format.Multiplying values that are less than 1 in decimal format results in a smaller number.

Page 250: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

EXISTING SETTINGDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))

BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT

Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station

Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 70%

Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 29.82% Cap: 65%

LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.08% Cap: 30%

A (housing) = (Number of  DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: ‐               A = 0%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 43.7             A = 119%B = 0.07%

LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%

Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%

LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use

                   = (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐               a1 = ‐           

Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐               a2 = ‐           a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐               a3 = ‐           ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐               a4 = ‐           a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐               a5 = ‐           a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐               a6 = ‐           a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐              a4 = industrial

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)

a6 = park

LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B  [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0              

(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)

Urban:  The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.

Suburban:  The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.

Page 251: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit =  ‐50x + 38  [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2  [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]

% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67

LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing

% of units below market rate:

(Note: Only effective up to 30%)

LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and

0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)

LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban               = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78               B = 0.12

(Note: Only effective up to 100)

Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV

SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations

Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%

100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%

25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y

100% of intersctions with improvements: Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% of intersections

with

 improvem

ents

Page 252: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]

Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)

SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)

SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects

SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3

SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9

Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%

PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5

Actual Parking Spaces: ‐              ITE Parking Spaces: ‐              

PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$            A = 85%

PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices

[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$            B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$            

PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)

Page 253: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%

TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode =  17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%

4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%

Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:

TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage

B =  0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01

Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:

TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]

B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32

C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved

Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban

1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:

TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%

Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%

TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban

5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%

B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Page 254: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:

TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban

10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%

Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips

B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z

Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%

Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)

TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules

9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%

B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% X

Employee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]

TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program

Sche

dule

Employee Participation

Setting

Daily Transit Subsidy

Page 255: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000      

C = 1,000        Urban Suburban: 2,000      2,000        Suburban

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.

TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips

   = 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67

TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)

TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.

TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A

Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%

B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:

TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out

A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%

B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Setting

Daily Parking Charge

Page 256: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

INTERIM YEAR:  1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))

PROPOSED PROJECT

Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station

Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 70%

Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 30.26% Cap: 65%

LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.70% Cap: 30%

A (housing) = (Number of  DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: 107.4         A = 500%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 151.5         A = 500%B = 0.07%

LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%

Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%

LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use

                   = (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐                a1 = ‐           Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐                a2 = ‐           a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐                a3 = ‐           ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐                a4 = ‐           a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐                a5 = ‐           a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐                a6 = ‐           a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐               a4 = industrial

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)a6 = park

LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B  [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0             

(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)

Urban:  The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.

Suburban:  The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.

Page 257: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit =  ‐50x + 38  [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2  [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]

% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67

LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing

% of units below market rate:

(Note: Only effective up to 30%)

LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and

0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)

LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban               = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78              B = 0.12 (Estimated based on count of intersections within 1 mile radius of project site.)

(Note: Only effective up to 100)

Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 2.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV

SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 2.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations

Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): X 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%

100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%

25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y100% of intersctions with improvements: Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% of intersections

with

 improvem

ents

Page 258: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]

Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)

SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)

SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects

SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3

SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9

Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%

PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5

Actual Parking Spaces: ‐             ITE Parking Spaces: ‐             

PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$           A = 85%

PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices

[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$           B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$           

PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)

Page 259: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%

TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode =  17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%

4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%

Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:

TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage

B =  0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01

Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:

TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]

B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32

C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved

Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban

1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:

TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%

Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%

TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban

5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%

B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Page 260: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:

TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban

10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%

Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips

B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z

Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%

Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)

TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules

9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%

B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% XEmployee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]

TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program

Setting

Daily Transit Subsidy

Sche

dule

Employee Participation

Page 261: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000     

C = 1,000      Urban Suburban: 2,000     2,000      Suburban

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.

TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips

   = 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67

TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)

TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.

TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A

Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%

B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:

TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out

A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%

B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Setting

Daily Parking Charge

Page 262: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

FULL BUILDOUT:  1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportQuantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures ‐ Transportation (Based on CAPCOA Guidance (August 2010))

BUSINESS AS USUAL PROJECT

Location Type Global % VMT Reduction Cap Location Type Global % VMT Reduction CapUrban: 75% Suburban Center: 20%Less than 5 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtJobs‐rich (jobs/housing ratio greater than 1.5) Balanced jobs‐housingTypical buildings are 6 stories or higher Typical buildings are 2 storiesGrid street pattern Grid street patternMinimal setbacks Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feetParking constrained on‐ and off‐street Parking somewhat constrained on‐street; ample off‐streetParking prices high/highest in the region Parking prices low (if priced at all)High‐quality rail; bus service at 10 min or less in peak hours Bus service at 20 ‐ 30 min and/or commuter rail station

Compact Infill: 40% Suburban: 15%Typically 5 ‐ 15 miles from central business district Typically 20 miles or more from central business districtBalanced jobs‐housing (jobs/housing ratio from 0.9 to 1.2) Housing‐richTypical buildings are 2 ‐ 4 stories Typical buildings are 1 ‐ 2 storiesGrid street pattern Curvilinear street pattern (cul‐de‐sac based)Setbacks 0 ‐ 20 feet Parking between street and buildings; large lot residential Total Global Transportation VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 75%Parking constrained Parking ample; largely surface lot‐based (Includes double counting correction.)Parking prices low/moderate No parking pricesRail w/in 2 miles; bus service at 15 min or less in peak hours Limited bus service at 30 minute headways or more Total LUT/SDT/PDT/TST VMT Reduction = 31.65% Cap: 70%

Land Use/Location Transportation Measures (65% Reduction Cap) Total LUT % VMT Reduction = 30.26% Cap: 65%

LUT‐1 Increase Density % VMT Reduction = A × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.70% Cap: 30%

A (housing) = (Number of  DU/acre ‐ 7.6 ) / 7.6 Number of DU/acre: 240.7           A = 500%A (jobs) = (Number of Jobs/acre ‐ 20 ) / 20 Number of Jobs/acre: 205.9           A = 500%B = 0.07%

LUT‐2 Increase Location Efficiency % VMT Reduction Cap for all LUT measures Urban LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 65%Compact Infill LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 30%

Suburban Center LUT % VMT Reduction Cap: 10%

LUT‐3 Increase Diversity of Urban and % VMT Reduction = Land Use × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Suburban Developments (Mixed Use) Land Use = % increase in land use index vs. single use

                   = (Land Use Index ‐ 0.15) / 0.15 Single family sqft: ‐               a1 = ‐           

Land Use Index = ‐a / ln(6) Multi‐family sqft: ‐               a2 = ‐           a = ∑ ai × ln(ai) Commercial sqft: ‐               a3 = ‐           ai = building floor area / total square feet of area considered Industrial sqft: ‐               a4 = ‐           a1 = single family Institutional sqft: ‐               a5 = ‐           a2 = multi‐family Park sqft: ‐               a6 = ‐           a3 = commercial B = 0.09 Total sqft: ‐              a4 = industrial

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) a5 = institutional (Note: If ai = 0, then set ai = 0.0000001)

a6 = park

LUT‐4 Increase Destination Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Center Distance × B  [not to exceed 20%] % VMT Reduction = 18.33% Cap: 20%Center Distance = (12 ‐ Miles to downtown or job center) / 12B = 0.20 Miles to downtown or job center: 1.0              

(Distance to Downtown's Financial District)(Note: Only effective for 8 miles or less)

Suburban:  The suburban project will have at least three uses of the following on site and/or offsite within ¼‐mile: Residential Development, Retail Development, Park, Open Space, or Office.

Urban:  The urban project will be predominantly characterized by properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design.

Page 263: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

LUT‐5 Increase Transit Accessibility % VMT Reduction = Transit × B  [not to exceed 30%] % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 30%Transit = % project transit ‐ % typical ITE transit

(ACOUNTED FOR IN TRAFFIC STUDY) % project transit =  ‐50x + 38  [where x = 0 ‐ 0.5 miles to transit] Miles to transit:‐4.4x + 15.2  [where x = 0.5 ‐ 3 miles to transit]

% typical ITE transit = 1.3% (Note: Only effective for 3 miles or less)B = 0.67

LUT‐6 Integrated Affordable and % VMT Reduction = 4% × % units BMR % VMT Reduction = 0.00%Below Market Rate Housing

% of units below market rate:

(Note: Only effective up to 30%)

LUT‐7 Orient Project Toward Non‐Auto Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐3Corridor (If included in LUT‐3, VMT reduction should be at least 0.5% per 1% inprovement in transit frequency and

0.5% per 10% increase in transit ridership)

LUT‐8 Locate Project near Bike Path/Bike Lanes Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐4(If included in LUT‐4, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

LUT‐9 Improve Design of Development % VMT Reduction = Intersections × B % VMT Reduction = 14.00%Intersections = % increase vs. typical ITE suburban               = (Intersections per square mile of project ‐ 36) / 36 Intersections per square mile: 78               B = 0.12

(Note: Only effective up to 100)

Neighborhood/Site Enhancement Measures (5% Reduction Cap without NEV; 15% Reduction Cap with NEV) Total SDT % VMT Reduction = 2.00% Cap: 5% without NEVCap: 15% With NEV

SDT‐1 Provide Pedestrian Network VMT reduction based on urban/rural context and % VMT Reduction = 2.00%Improvements pedestrian accomodations

Pedestrian network on‐site and connecting off‐site (urban/suburban): X 2%Pedestrian network on‐site (urban/suburban): 1%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐2 Provide Traffic Calming Measures Marked crosswalks, count‐down signal timers, % VMT Reduction = 0.00%curb extensions, speed tables, rasied crosswalks, % of streets with improvementsraised intersections, median islands, tight corner radii, 25% of streets with improvements: A A B C Droundabouts, on‐street parking, planter strips with trees, 50% of streets with improvements: B W 0.25% 0.25% 0.50% 0.50%chicanes/chokers, and others. 75% of streets with improvements: C X 0.25% 0.50% 0.50% 0.75%

100% of streets with improvements: D Y 0.50% 0.50% 0.75% 0.75%Z 0.50% 0.75% 0.75% 1.00%

25% of intersctions with improvements: W50% of intersctions with improvements: X75% of intersctions with improvements: Y

100% of intersctions with improvements: Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

with

 improvem

ents

% of intersections

Page 264: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

SDT‐3 Neighborhood Electric Vehicle Network % VMT Reduction = Pop × Number × NEVPop × Number = NEVs per household [0.04 to 1.0] % VMT Reduction = 0.00%NEV = VMT reduction rate per household [12.7%]

Low NEVs per Household: 0.04High NEVs per Household: 1.0

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

SDT‐4 Create Urban Non‐Motorized Zones Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐1(If included in SDT‐1, VMT reduction should be at least 0.01% to 0.2%)

SDT‐5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street Design Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 1% of worker commute per additional mile of bike lanes per square mile)

SDT‐6 Provide Bike Parking in Non‐Residential Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Projects (If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.625%)

SDT‐7 Provide Bike Parking in Multi‐Unit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9Residential Projects

SDT‐8 Provide Electric Vehicle Parking Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in SDT‐3

SDT‐9 Dedicated Land for Bike Trails Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9

Parking Policy/Pricing (20% Reduction Cap) Total PDT % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20%

PDT‐1 Limit Parking Supply % VMT Reduction = % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 12.50%= (Actual Parking ‐ ITE Parking) / ITE Parking × 0.5

Actual Parking Spaces: ‐              ITE Parking Spaces: ‐              

PDT‐2 Unbunble Parking Costs from Property % VMT Reduction = Change in vehicle cost × elasticity × A % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13%Change in vehicle cost = Monthly parking cost × (12/$4000)Elasticity = 0.4 Monthly parking cost: ‐$            A = 85%

PDT‐3 Implement Market Price Public Parking % VMT Reduction = Park$ × B % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%(On‐Street) Park$ = Percent increase in on‐street parking prices

[minimum of 25%] Actual On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$            B = 0.11 Baseline On‐Street Parking Price: ‐$            

PDT‐4 Require Residential Area Parking Permits Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in PDT‐1, ‐2‐, and ‐3(If included in LUT‐9, VMT reduction should be at least 0.09% to 0.36% depending on land use)

Page 265: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Transit System Improvements (10% Reduction Cap) Total TST % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 10%

TST‐1 Provide a Bus Rapid Transit System % VMT Reduction = Riders × Mode × Lines × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 3.2%Riders = 28%Mode =  17% Urban Center Urban Center: 17%

4% Urban Urban: 4%1.30% Suburban Suburban: 1.30%

Lines = Percent of lines serving project converting to BRTD = 0.67 (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

Lines Converting to BRT: 0%Total Baseline Lines:

TST‐2 Implement Transit Access Improvements Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐3 Expand Transit Network % VMT Reduction = Coverage × B × Mode × D % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 8.2%Coverage = % increase in transit network coverage

B =  0.65 Urban Center Urban Center: 17% 0.650.72 Urban Urban: 4% 0.721.01 Suburban Suburban: 1.30% 1.01

Mode = 17% Urban Center4% Urban (Mark an "X" in one of the above)

1.30% SuburbanD = 0.67 Coverage:

TST‐4 Increase Transit Service Frequency/Speed % VMT Reduction = Headway × B × C × Mode × E % VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 2.5%Headway = % reduction in headways [15% ‐ 80%]

B = 0.32 Urban Urban Center: 17% 0.320.36 Suburban Urban: 4% 0.32

C = 50% < 50% lines improved Suburban: 1.30% 0.3685% >= 50% lines improved

Mode = 17% Urban Center (Mark an "X" in one of the above)4% Urban

1.30% Suburban Headway:E = 0.67 Percent of Lines Improved:

TST‐5 Provide Bike Parking Near Transit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

TST‐6 Provide Local Shuttles Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TST‐3 and ‐4

Commute Trip Reduction (25% Reduction Cap ‐ WORK VMT ONLY) Total TRT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 25%% Work VMT of Total VMT: 2.5%

Total TRT % Overall VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15%

TRT‐1 Implement Voluntary Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 6.2%Trip Reduction Program A = 6.2% Urban

5.4% Suburban Center Urban: 6.2%5.2% Suburban Suburban Center: 5.4%

B = % employees eligible Suburban: 5.2%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Page 266: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐2 Implement Required Commute % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 21.0%Trip Reduction Program A = 21%

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:

TRT‐3 Provide Ride‐Sharing Programs % Work VMT Reduction = Commute × Employee % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 15.0%Commute = 15% Urban

10% Suburban Center Urban: 15%5% Suburban Suburban Center: 10%

Employee = % employees eligible Suburban: 5%

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐4 Implement Subsidized or Discounted % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 20.0%Transit Program A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips

B = % employees eligible Urban: AC = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0] Suburban Center: B W X Y Z

Suburban: C A 6.2% 12.9% 20% 20%B 3.4% 7.3% 16.4% 20%

Transit Subsidy: $0.75 W C 1.5% 3.3% 7.9% 20%Transit Subsidy: $1.49 XTransit Subsidy: $2.98 YTransit Subsidy: $5.96 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Eligible:

TRT‐5 Provide End of Trip Facilities Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3(If included, Work VMT reduction should be 2% to 5%, or total VMT reduction should be 0.02% to 0.625%)

TRT‐6 Encourage Telecommuting and % Reduction in Commute VMT % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 5.5%Alternate Work Schedules

9‐day/80‐hour Work Week: A4‐day/40‐hour Work Week: B V W X Y ZTelecommuting 1.5 Days: C A 0.07% 0.21% 0.35% 0.70% 1.75%

B 0.15% 0.45% 0.75% 1.50% 3.75%Employee Participation: 1% V C 0.22% 0.66% 1.10% 2.20% 5.50%Employee Participation: 3% WEmployee Participation: 5% X

Employee Participation: 10% YEmployee Participation: 25% Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

TRT‐7 Implement Commute Trip Reduction % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 4.0%Marketing A = % reduction in commute vehicle trips [4%]

B = % employees eligible % Employees Eligible:C = Adjustment from VT to VMT [1.0]

TRT‐8 Implement Preferential Permit Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in TRT‐1 through ‐3Parking Program

Daily Transit Subsidy

Setting

Employee Participation

Sche

dule

Page 267: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

TRT‐9 Implement Car‐Sharing Program % Work VMT Reduction = A × B / C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 0.74%A = % reduction in car‐share member annual VMT [37%]B = number of car share members per shared car [20] Urban: 1,000      

C = 1,000        Urban Suburban: 2,000      2,000        Suburban

(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

TRT‐10 Implement a School Pool Program Not applicable.

TRT‐11 Provide Employer‐Sponsored % Work VMT Reduction = A × B × C % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 13.4%Vanpool/Shuttle A = % shift in vanpool mode share of commute trips

   = 2% to 20% A: Shift in Vanpool Mode Share:B = % employees eligible B: Employees Eligible:C = 0.67

TRT‐12 Implement Bike Sharing Program Not quantified separately; Assumed to be included in LUT‐9 and SDT‐5(If included, total VMT reduction should be at least 0.03%)

TRT‐13 Implement School Bus Program Not applicable.

TRT‐14 Price Workplace Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 19.7%A = % reduction in commute VMTB = % employees subject to priced parking Urban: A

Suburban Center: B W X Y ZSuburban: C A 6.9% 12.5% 16.8% 19.7%

B 1.8% 3.7% 5.4% 6.8%Daily Parking Charge: $1 W C 0.5% 1.2% 1.9% 2.8%Daily Parking Charge: $2 XDaily Parking Charge: $3 YDaily Parking Charge: $6 Z

(Mark an "X" in one of the above for each group)

% Employees Subject to Priced Parking:

TRT‐15 Implement Employee Parking % Work VMT Reduction = A × B % Work VMT Reduction = 0.00% Cap: 7.7%Cash‐Out

A = 7.7% Urban Urban: 7.7%4.5% Suburban Center Suburban Center: 4.5%3.0% Suburban Suburban: 3.0%

B = % employees eligible(Mark an "X" in one of the above)

% Employees Eligible:

Setting

Daily Parking Charge

Page 268: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportDaily Vehicle Miles Traveled Adjustments

Existing and Project VMT

Land Use (CalEEMod Land U Daily Interim Year Project Trips

Project UsesResidential Units 4.54        Baseline trip rate per DU 4.11         Baseline trip rate per DU(High‐Rise Apartments) ‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)

3.63        Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 3.29         Trip rate per DU less Transit/Walk Adj.

‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)

14.70      H‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 14.70      H‐W Trip Length (Baseline)5.90        H‐S Trip Length (Baseline) 5.90         H‐S Trip Length (Baseline)8.70        H‐O Trip Length (Baseline) 8.70         H‐O Trip Length (Baseline)

10.05      H‐W Trip Length (Project) 10.05      H‐W Trip Length (Project)4.03        H‐S Trip Length (Project) 4.03         H‐S Trip Length (Project)5.95        H‐O Trip Length (Project) 5.95         H‐O Trip Length (Project)

Hotel 8.17          Baseline trip rate per Room 8.17        Baseline trip rate per Room 8.17         Baseline trip rate per Room(Hotel) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐25% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)

6.13          Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 6.13        Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj. 6.13         Trip rate per Room less Transit/Walk Adj.

‐29.8% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)

8.40          C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40        C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40         C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60        C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90          C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90        C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90         C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)

5.89          C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74        H‐W Trip Length (Project) 5.74         C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.65        C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35      H‐S Trip Length (Project) 11.35      C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.84          C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72        H‐O Trip Length (Project) 4.72         C‐NW Trip Length (Project)

Restaurant 127.13   Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf 127.15   Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf(Quality Restaurant) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)

‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)86.47      Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj. 86.48      Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments

‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)

8.40        C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40         C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90        C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90         C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)

5.74        C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74         C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.35      C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35      C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.72        C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72         C‐NW Trip Length (Project)

Retail 42.73      Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf 42.70      Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf(Strip Mall) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐20% Internal Capture Adjustment (Traffic Study)

‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study) ‐15% Transit/Walk Adjustment (Traffic Study)29.07      Baseline trip rate per 1000 sf less Adj. 29.03      Trip rate per 1000 sf less Adjustments

‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA) ‐31.7% VMT Reduction (CAPCOA)

8.40        C‐C Trip Length (Baseline) 8.40         C‐C Trip Length (Baseline)16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline) 16.60      C‐W Trip Length (Baseline)6.90        C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline) 6.90         C‐NW Trip Length (Baseline)

5.74        C‐C Trip Length (Project) 5.74         C‐C Trip Length (Project)11.35      C‐W Trip Length (Project) 11.35      C‐W Trip Length (Project)4.72        C‐NW Trip Length (Project) 4.72         C‐NW Trip Length (Project)

Residential Common Areas Trips included in residential land use Trips included in residential land use Trips included in residential land useAbove‐Grade Parking Structure Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own tripsSubterranean Parking Structure Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own tripsOpen Space Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips Land use does not generate its own trips

Daily Existing Trips

Source: PCR Service Corporation, (2016); Gibson Traffic Consulting, (2016).

Daily Full Buildout Project Trips

Page 269: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas AssessmentMobile Source Emissions

PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2_5 PM2_5 PM2_5Year Period ROG NOx CO SOx RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total CO2

2015 Winter 9.60E‐08 7.26E‐08 7.81E‐07 1.52E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.50E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.20E‐09 8.93E‐082015 Summer 8.04E‐08 5.73E‐08 7.01E‐07 1.40E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.65E‐08 3.47E‐07 8.11E‐08 7.14E‐09 8.83E‐082015 Annual 1.54E‐04

2015 Max 9.60E‐08 7.26E‐08 7.81E‐07 1.52E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.50E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.20E‐09 8.93E‐08 1.54E‐042020 Winter 5.42E‐08 3.79E‐08 4.35E‐07 1.31E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐082020 Summer 5.26E‐08 3.44E‐08 4.57E‐07 1.39E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐082020 Annual 1.33E‐04

2020 Max 5.42E‐08 3.79E‐08 4.57E‐07 1.39E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.90E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.10E‐09 8.92E‐08 1.33E‐042023 Winter 4.39E‐08 2.73E‐08 3.40E‐07 1.17E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐082023 Summer 4.25E‐08 2.48E‐08 3.59E‐07 1.23E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐082023 Annual 1.18E‐04

2023 Max 4.39E‐08 2.73E‐08 3.59E‐07 1.23E‐09 3.31E‐07 1.88E‐08 3.49E‐07 8.11E‐08 8.00E‐09 8.91E‐08 1.18E‐04Notes:a.  RD = Road Dustb.  Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire WearSource:  EMFAC2014

Daily Annual CO2PM10 PM10 PM10 PM2_5 PM2_5 PM2_5

Scenario VMT ROG NOx CO SOx RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total RD a Exh+BW+TW b Total Scenario VMT (MT/yr)Existing 9,624 1.8 1.4 15.0 0.03 6.4 0.4 6.7 1.6 0.2 1.7 Existing 2,599,399 362Interim Year 27,015 2.9 2.0 24.7 0.07 17.9 1.0 18.9 4.4 0.4 4.8 Interim Year 7,296,747 878Full Buildout 47,734 4.2 2.6 34.3 0.12 31.6 1.8 33.4 7.7 0.8 8.5 Full Buildout 12,893,077 1,381

Notes: Source:  CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016a.  RD = Road Dustb.  Exh = Exhaust; BW = Break Wear; TW = Tire WearSource:  CalEEMod (VMT); ESA PCR, 2016

Emission Factors (tons/mi)

Emissions (lbs/day)

Page 270: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

6

Page 271: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectAir Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment

Paved Road Dust Emission Factors (Assumes No Precipitation)

Formula: EFDust,P = (k (sL)0.91 × (W)1.02)

Where:EFDust,P = Paved Road Dust Emission Factor (having the same units as k)k = particle size multipliersL = road surface silt loading (g/m2)W = average fleet vehicle weight (tons) (CARB uses 2.4 tons as a fleet average vehicle weight factor)

Emission Factor (grams per VMT)PM10 PM2.5

k 0.9979 0.2449sL 0.1 0.1W 2.4 2.4

EFDust,P 3.00E‐01 7.36E‐02

Sources:

SCAQMD, CalEEMod, Version 2013.2.2.CARB, Entrained Dust from Paved Road Travel: Emission Estimation Methodology Background Document , (1997).

USEPA, AP‐42 , Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.2.1 ‐ Paved Roads, (2011).

ESA PCR, 2016.

Page 272: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.4OperationalProjectCharbroilerEmissions

Page 273: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street ProjectDraft Environmental Impact ReportAir Quality Assessment

Project ‐ Estimated Charbroiler Stationary Source Emissions

Quantity3

Source1

VOC PM10 (lb/day) VOC PM10 VOC PM10

ProjectCharbroiler ‐ 25% fat Hamburger 3.94                        32.65                     116.5           86% 83% 0.06             0.65            Charbroiler ‐ Chicken 1.82                        10.48                     116.5           86% 83% 0.03             0.21            

Total Emissions 0.09             0.85            

Notes:1. Source type is based on the meat with the highest emission factors.2.

3.4.

5. It is assumed that PM10 emissions also represent PM2.5 emissions.

Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016.

South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1138 (Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations) regulates PM10 and VOC emissions from fast‐food restaurants with charbroilers.  Catalytic oxidizers reduce VOC emissions by approximately 86 percent and PM10 emissions by approximately 83 percent.

Uncontrolled Emission Factors2

(lb/1000 lb)Controlled Emissions5

(pounds/day)Emissions Controls4

(percent reduction)

Quantity of meats charbroiled is based on the average pounds of meat cooked per restaurant consisting of 50% hamburger meat and 50% chicken.

South Coast Air Quality Management District, Emission Factors for Commercial Cooking Operations, http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default‐source/rule‐book/Proposed‐Rules/1138/par1138pdsr_appendixi.pdf?sfvrsn=2.  Accessed April 2016.

Page 274: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.5SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictRule403

Page 275: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

403 - 1

(Adopted May 7, 1976) (Amended November 6, 1992) (Amended July 9, 1993) (Amended February 14, 1997)

(Amended December 11, 1998)(Amended April 2, 2004) (Amended June 3, 2005)

RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST

(a) Purpose

The purpose of this Rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in

the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (man-made) fugitive dust sources by

requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions.

(b) Applicability

The provisions of this Rule shall apply to any activity or man-made condition

capable of generating fugitive dust.

(c) Definitions

(1) ACTIVE OPERATIONS means any source capable of generating fugitive

dust, including, but not limited to, earth-moving activities,

construction/demolition activities, disturbed surface area, or heavy- and

light-duty vehicular movement.

(2) AGGREGATE-RELATED PLANTS are defined as facilities that produce

and / or mix sand and gravel and crushed stone.

(3) AGRICULTURAL HANDBOOK means the region-specific guidance

document that has been approved by the Governing Board or hereafter

approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA. For the South Coast

Air Basin, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document is the

Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook dated December 1998. For the

Coachella Valley, the Board-approved region-specific guidance document

is the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook dated April 2,

2004.

(4) ANEMOMETERS are devices used to measure wind speed and direction

in accordance with the performance standards, and maintenance and

calibration criteria as contained in the most recent Rule 403

Implementation Handbook.

(5) BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES means fugitive dust

control actions that are set forth in Table 1 of this Rule.

Page 276: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 2

(6) BULK MATERIAL is sand, gravel, soil, aggregate material less than two

inches in length or diameter, and other organic or inorganic particulate

matter.

(7) CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITY is any facility that has a

cement kiln at the facility.

(8) CHEMICAL STABILIZERS are any non-toxic chemical dust suppressant

which must not be used if prohibited for use by the Regional Water

Quality Control Boards, the California Air Resources Board, the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or any applicable law, rule

or regulation. The chemical stabilizers shall meet any specifications,

criteria, or tests required by any federal, state, or local water agency.

Unless otherwise indicated, the use of a non-toxic chemical stabilizer shall

be of sufficient concentration and application frequency to maintain a

stabilized surface.

(9) COMMERCIAL POULTRY RANCH means any building, structure,

enclosure, or premises where more than 100 fowl are kept or maintained

for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale or other

distribution.

(10) CONFINED ANIMAL FACILITY means a source or group of sources of

air pollution at an agricultural source for the raising of 3,360 or more fowl

or 50 or more animals, including but not limited to, any structure,

building, installation, farm, corral, coop, feed storage area, milking parlor,

or system for the collection, storage, or distribution of solid and liquid

manure; if domesticated animals, including horses, sheep, goats, swine,

beef cattle, rabbits, chickens, turkeys, or ducks are corralled, penned, or

otherwise caused to remain in restricted areas for commercial agricultural

purposes and feeding is by means other than grazing.

(11) CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES means any on-site

mechanical activities conducted in preparation of, or related to, the

building, alteration, rehabilitation, demolition or improvement of property,

including, but not limited to the following activities: grading, excavation,

loading, crushing, cutting, planing, shaping or ground breaking.

(12) CONTRACTOR means any person who has a contractual arrangement to

conduct an active operation for another person.

(13) DAIRY FARM is an operation on a property, or set of properties that are

contiguous or separated only by a public right-of-way, that raises cows or

Page 277: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 3

produces milk from cows for the purpose of making a profit or for a

livelihood. Heifer and calf farms are dairy farms.

(14) DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means a portion of the earth's surface

which has been physically moved, uncovered, destabilized, or otherwise

modified from its undisturbed natural soil condition, thereby increasing

the potential for emission of fugitive dust. This definition excludes those

areas which have:

(A) been restored to a natural state, such that the vegetative ground

cover and soil characteristics are similar to adjacent or nearby

natural conditions;

(B) been paved or otherwise covered by a permanent structure; or

(C) sustained a vegetative ground cover of at least 70 percent of the

native cover for a particular area for at least 30 days.

(15) DUST SUPPRESSANTS are water, hygroscopic materials, or non-toxic

chemical stabilizers used as a treatment material to reduce fugitive dust

emissions.

(16) EARTH-MOVING ACTIVITIES means the use of any equipment for any

activity where soil is being moved or uncovered, and shall include, but not

be limited to the following: grading, earth cutting and filling operations,

loading or unloading of dirt or bulk materials, adding to or removing from

open storage piles of bulk materials, landfill operations, weed abatement

through disking, and soil mulching.

(17) DUST CONTROL SUPERVISOR means a person with the authority to

expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure

compliance with all Rule 403 requirements at an active operation.

(18) FUGITIVE DUST means any solid particulate matter that becomes

airborne, other than that emitted from an exhaust stack, directly or

indirectly as a result of the activities of any person.

(19) HIGH WIND CONDITIONS means that instantaneous wind speeds

exceed 25 miles per hour.

(20) INACTIVE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means any disturbed surface

area upon which active operations have not occurred or are not expected to

occur for a period of 20 consecutive days.

(21) LARGE OPERATIONS means any active operations on property which

contains 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area; or any earth-moving

operation with a daily earth-moving or throughput volume of 3,850 cubic

Page 278: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 4

meters (5,000 cubic yards) or more three times during the most recent

365-day period.

(22) OPEN STORAGE PILE is any accumulation of bulk material, which is

not fully enclosed, covered or chemically stabilized, and which attains a

height of three feet or more and a total surface area of 150 or more square

feet.

(23) PARTICULATE MATTER means any material, except uncombined

water, which exists in a finely divided form as a liquid or solid at standard

conditions.

(24) PAVED ROAD means a public or private improved street, highway, alley,

public way, or easement that is covered by typical roadway materials, but

excluding access roadways that connect a facility with a public paved

roadway and are not open to through traffic. Public paved roads are those

open to public access and that are owned by any federal, state, county,

municipal or any other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.

Private paved roads are any paved roads not defined as public.

(25) PM10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller

than or equal to 10 microns as measured by the applicable State and

Federal reference test methods.

(26) PROPERTY LINE means the boundaries of an area in which either a

person causing the emission or a person allowing the emission has the

legal use or possession of the property. Where such property is divided

into one or more sub-tenancies, the property line(s) shall refer to the

boundaries dividing the areas of all sub-tenancies.

(27) RULE 403 IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK means a guidance

document that has been approved by the Governing Board on April 2,

2004 or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA.

(28) SERVICE ROADS are paved or unpaved roads that are used by one or

more public agencies for inspection or maintenance of infrastructure and

which are not typically used for construction-related activity.

(29) SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLING means the operation of two PM10samplers in such a manner that one sampler is started within five minutes

of the other, and each sampler is operated for a consecutive period which

must be not less than 290 minutes and not more than 310 minutes.

(30) SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN means the non-desert portions of Los

Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties and all of Orange

Page 279: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 5

County as defined in California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section

60104. The area is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the

north and east by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto

Mountains, and on the south by the San Diego county line.

(31) STABILIZED SURFACE means any previously disturbed surface area or

open storage pile which, through the application of dust suppressants,

shows visual or other evidence of surface crusting and is resistant to wind-

driven fugitive dust and is demonstrated to be stabilized. Stabilization can

be demonstrated by one or more of the applicable test methods contained

in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook.

(32) TRACK-OUT means any bulk material that adheres to and agglomerates

on the exterior surface of motor vehicles, haul trucks, and equipment

(including tires) that have been released onto a paved road and can be

removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal

operating conditions.

(33) TYPICAL ROADWAY MATERIALS means concrete, asphaltic

concrete, recycled asphalt, asphalt, or any other material of equivalent

performance as determined by the Executive Officer, and the U.S. EPA.

(34) UNPAVED ROADS means any unsealed or unpaved roads, equipment

paths, or travel ways that are not covered by typical roadway materials.

Public unpaved roads are any unpaved roadway owned by federal, state,

county, municipal or other governmental or quasi-governmental agencies.

Private unpaved roads are all other unpaved roadways not defined as

public.

(35) VISIBLE ROADWAY DUST means any sand, soil, dirt, or other solid

particulate matter which is visible upon paved road surfaces and which

can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal

operating conditions.

(36) WIND-DRIVEN FUGITIVE DUST means visible emissions from any

disturbed surface area which is generated by wind action alone.

(37) WIND GUST is the maximum instantaneous wind speed as measured by

an anemometer.

(d) Requirements

(1) No person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust from any

active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area such that:

Page 280: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 6

(A) the dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line

of the emission source; or

(B) the dust emission exceeds 20 percent opacity (as determined by the

appropriate test method included in the Rule 403 Implementation

Handbook), if the dust emission is the result of movement of a

motorized vehicle.

(2) No person shall conduct active operations without utilizing the applicable

best available control measures included in Table 1 of this Rule to

minimize fugitive dust emissions from each fugitive dust source type

within the active operation.

(3) No person shall cause or allow PM10 levels to exceed 50 micrograms per

cubic meter when determined, by simultaneous sampling, as the difference

between upwind and downwind samples collected on high-volume

particulate matter samplers or other U.S. EPA-approved equivalent

method for PM10 monitoring. If sampling is conducted, samplers shall

be:

(A) Operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with 40 Code

of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix J, or appropriate

U.S. EPA-published documents for U.S. EPA-approved equivalent

method(s) for PM10.

(B) Reasonably placed upwind and downwind of key activity areas and

as close to the property line as feasible, such that other sources of

fugitive dust between the sampler and the property line are

minimized.

(4) No person shall allow track-out to extend 25 feet or more in cumulative

length from the point of origin from an active operation. Notwithstanding

the preceding, all track-out from an active operation shall be removed at

the conclusion of each workday or evening shift.

(5) No person shall conduct an active operation with a disturbed surface area

of five or more acres, or with a daily import or export of 100 cubic yards

or more of bulk material without utilizing at least one of the measures

listed in subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(E) at each vehicle egress

from the site to a paved public road.

(A) Install a pad consisting of washed gravel (minimum-size: one inch)

maintained in a clean condition to a depth of at least six inches and

extending at least 30 feet wide and at least 50 feet long.

Page 281: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 7

(B) Pave the surface extending at least 100 feet and at least 20 feet

wide.

(C) Utilize a wheel shaker/wheel spreading device consisting of raised

dividers (rails, pipe, or grates) at least 24 feet long and 10 feet

wide to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages

before vehicles exit the site.

(D) Install and utilize a wheel washing system to remove bulk material

from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site.

(E) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and

the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the actions specified in

subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(D).

(6) Beginning January 1, 2006, any person who operates or authorizes the

operation of a confined animal facility subject to this Rule shall implement

the applicable conservation management practices specified in Table 4 of

this Rule.

(e) Additional Requirements for Large Operations

(1) Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large

operation subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable actions

specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the

applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable

performance standards can not be met through use of Table 2 actions; and

shall:

(A) submit a fully executed Large Operation Notification (Form 403

N) to the Executive Officer within 7 days of qualifying as a large

operation;

(B) include, as part of the notification, the name(s), address(es), and

phone number(s) of the person(s) responsible for the submittal, and

a description of the operation(s), including a map depicting the

location of the site;

(C) maintain daily records to document the specific dust control

actions taken, maintain such records for a period of not less than

three years; and make such records available to the Executive

Officer upon request;

Page 282: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 8

(D) install and maintain project signage with project contact signage

that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403 Implementation

Handbook, prior to initiating any earthmoving activities;

(E) identify a dust control supervisor that:

(i) is employed by or contracted with the property owner or

developer;

(ii) is on the site or available on-site within 30 minutes during

working hours;

(iii) has the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust

mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule

requirements;

(iv) has completed the AQMD Fugitive Dust Control Class and

has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the

class; and

(F) notify the Executive Officer in writing within 30 days after the site

no longer qualifies as a large operation as defined by paragraph

(c)(18).

(2) Any Large Operation Notification submitted to the Executive Officer or

AQMD-approved dust control plan shall be valid for a period of one year

from the date of written acceptance by the Executive Officer. Any Large

Operation Notification accepted pursuant to paragraph (e)(1), excluding

those submitted by aggregate-related plants and cement manufacturing

facilities must be resubmitted annually by the person who conducts or

authorizes the conducting of a large operation, at least 30 days prior to the

expiration date, or the submittal shall no longer be valid as of the

expiration date. If all fugitive dust sources and corresponding control

measures or special circumstances remain identical to those identified in

the previously accepted submittal or in an AQMD-approved dust control

plan, the resubmittal may be a simple statement of no-change (Form

403NC).

(f) Compliance Schedule

The newly amended provisions of this Rule shall become effective upon adoption.

Pursuant to subdivision (e), any existing site that qualifies as a large operation

will have 60 days from the date of Rule adoption to comply with the notification

and recordkeeping requirements for large operations. Any Large Operation

Page 283: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 9

Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan which has been accepted prior

to the date of adoption of these amendments shall remain in effect and the Large

Operation Notification or AQMD-approved dust control plan annual resubmittal

date shall be one year from adoption of this Rule amendment.

(g) Exemptions

(1) The provisions of this Rule shall not apply to:

(A) Dairy farms.

(B) Confined animal facilities provided that the combined disturbed

surface area within one continuous property line is one acre or less.

(C) Agricultural vegetative crop operations provided that the combined

disturbed surface area within one continuous property line and not

separated by a paved public road is 10 acres or less.

(D) Agricultural vegetative crop operations within the South Coast Air

Basin, whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than

10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:

(i) voluntarily implements the conservation management

practices contained in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook;

(ii) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form

documenting sufficient conservation management

practices, as described in the Rule 403 Agricultural

Handbook; and

(iii) makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the

Executive Officer upon request.

(E) Agricultural vegetative crop operations outside the South Coast Air

Basin whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than

10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations:

(i) voluntarily implements the conservation management

practices contained in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley

Agricultural Handbook; and

(ii) completes and maintains the self-monitoring form

documenting sufficient conservation management

practices, as described in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley

Agricultural Handbook; and

(iii) makes the completed self-monitoring form available to the

Executive Officer upon request.

Page 284: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 10

(F) Active operations conducted during emergency life-threatening

situations, or in conjunction with any officially declared disaster or

state of emergency.

(G) Active operations conducted by essential service utilities to

provide electricity, natural gas, telephone, water and sewer during

periods of service outages and emergency disruptions.

(H) Any contractor subsequent to the time the contract ends, provided

that such contractor implemented the required control measures

during the contractual period.

(I) Any grading contractor, for a phase of active operations,

subsequent to the contractual completion of that phase of earth-

moving activities, provided that the required control measures have

been implemented during the entire phase of earth-moving

activities, through and including five days after the final grading

inspection.

(J) Weed abatement operations ordered by a county agricultural

commissioner or any state, county, or municipal fire department,

provided that:

(i) mowing, cutting or other similar process is used which

maintains weed stubble at least three inches above the soil;

and

(ii) any discing or similar operation which cuts into and

disturbs the soil, where watering is used prior to initiation

of these activities, and a determination is made by the

agency issuing the weed abatement order that, due to fire

hazard conditions, rocks, or other physical obstructions, it

is not practical to meet the conditions specified in clause

(g)(1)(H)(i). The provisions this clause shall not exempt

the owner of any property from stabilizing, in accordance

with paragraph (d)(2), disturbed surface areas which have

been created as a result of the weed abatement actions.

(K) sandblasting operations.

(2) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) shall not apply:

(A) When wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour, provided that:

Page 285: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 11

(i) The required Table 3 contingency measures in this Rule are

implemented for each applicable fugitive dust source type,

and;

(ii) records are maintained in accordance with subparagraph

(e)(1)(C).

(B) To unpaved roads, provided such roads:

(i) are used solely for the maintenance of wind-generating

equipment; or

(ii) are unpaved public alleys as defined in Rule 1186; or

(iii) are service roads that meet all of the following criteria:

(a) are less than 50 feet in width at all points along the

road;

(b) are within 25 feet of the property line; and

(c) have a traffic volume less than 20 vehicle-trips per

day.

(C) To any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface

area for which necessary fugitive dust preventive or mitigative

actions are in conflict with the federal Endangered Species Act, as

determined in writing by the State or federal agency responsible

for making such determinations.

(3) The provisions of (d)(2) shall not apply to any aggregate-related plant or

cement manufacturing facility that implements the applicable actions

specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the

applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable

performance standards of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) can not be met

through use of Table 2 actions.

(4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) shall not apply to:

(A) Blasting operations which have been permitted by the California

Division of Industrial Safety; and

(B) Motion picture, television, and video production activities when

dust emissions are required for visual effects. In order to obtain

this exemption, the Executive Officer must receive notification in

writing at least 72 hours in advance of any such activity and no

nuisance results from such activity.

(5) The provisions of paragraph (d)(3) shall not apply if the dust control

actions, as specified in Table 2, are implemented on a routine basis for

Page 286: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 12

each applicable fugitive dust source type. To qualify for this exemption, a

person must maintain records in accordance with subparagraph (e)(1)(C).

(6) The provisions of paragraph (d)(4) shall not apply to earth coverings of

public paved roadways where such coverings are approved by a local

government agency for the protection of the roadway, and where such

coverings are used as roadway crossings for haul vehicles provided that

such roadway is closed to through traffic and visible roadway dust is

removed within one day following the cessation of activities.

(7) The provisions of subdivision (e) shall not apply to:

(A) officially-designated public parks and recreational areas, including

national parks, national monuments, national forests, state parks,

state recreational areas, and county regional parks.

(B) any large operation which is required to submit a dust control plan

to any city or county government which has adopted a District-

approved dust control ordinance.

(C) any large operation subject to Rule 1158, which has an approved

dust control plan pursuant to Rule 1158, provided that all sources

of fugitive dust are included in the Rule 1158 plan.

(8) The provisions of subparagraph (e)(1)(A) through (e)(1)(C) shall not apply

to any large operation with an AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan

provided that there is no change to the sources and controls as identified in

the AQMD-approved fugitive dust control plan.

(h) Fees

Any person conducting active operations for which the Executive Officer

conducts upwind/downwind monitoring for PM10 pursuant to paragraph

(d)(3) shall be assessed applicable Ambient Air Analysis Fees pursuant to

Rule 304.1. Applicable fees shall be waived for any facility which is

exempted from paragraph (d)(3) or meets the requirements of paragraph

(d)(3).

Page 287: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 13

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Bac

kfil

ling

01

-1

01-2

01-3

Sta

bili

ze b

ackf

ill m

ater

ial w

hen

not a

ctiv

ely

hand

ling

; and

S

tabi

lize

bac

kfil

l mat

eria

l dur

ing

hand

ling

; and

S

tabi

lize

soi

l at c

ompl

etio

n of

act

ivit

y.

Mix

bac

kfil

l soi

l wit

h w

ater

pri

or to

mov

ing

Ded

icat

e w

ater

truc

k or

hig

h ca

paci

ty h

ose

to

back

fill

ing

equi

pmen

t E

mpt

y lo

ader

buc

ket s

low

ly s

o th

at n

o du

st

plum

es a

re g

ener

ated

M

inim

ize

drop

hei

ght f

rom

load

er b

ucke

t

Cle

arin

g an

d gr

ubbi

ng02

-1

02-2

02-3

Mai

ntai

n st

abil

ity

of s

oil t

hrou

gh p

re-w

ater

ing

of

site

pri

or to

cle

arin

g an

d gr

ubbi

ng; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze s

oil d

urin

g cl

eari

ng a

nd g

rubb

ing

acti

viti

es; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze s

oil i

mm

edia

tely

aft

er c

lear

ing

and

grub

bing

act

ivit

ies.

Mai

ntai

n li

ve p

eren

nial

veg

etat

ion

whe

re

poss

ible

App

ly w

ater

in s

uffi

cien

t qua

ntit

y to

pre

vent

ge

nera

tion

of

dust

plu

mes

Cle

arin

g fo

rms

03-1

03

-203

-3

Use

wat

er s

pray

to c

lear

for

ms;

or

Use

sw

eepi

ng a

nd w

ater

spr

ay to

cle

ar f

orm

s; o

r U

se v

acuu

m s

yste

m to

cle

ar f

orm

s.

Use

of

high

pre

ssur

e ai

r to

cle

ar f

orm

s m

ay c

ause

ex

ceed

ance

of

Rul

e re

quir

emen

ts

Cru

shin

g 04

-1

04-2

Sta

bili

ze s

urfa

ce s

oils

pri

or to

ope

rati

on o

f su

ppor

t equ

ipm

ent;

and

S

tabi

lize

mat

eria

l aft

er c

rush

ing.

Fol

low

per

mit

con

diti

ons

for

crus

hing

equ

ipm

ent

Pre

-wat

er m

ater

ial p

rior

to lo

adin

g in

to c

rush

er

Mon

itor

cru

sher

em

issi

ons

opac

ity

App

ly w

ater

to c

rush

ed m

ater

ial t

o pr

even

t dus

t pl

umes

Page 288: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 14

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Cut

and

fil

l 05

-1

05-2

Pre

-wat

er s

oils

pri

or to

cut

and

fil

l act

ivit

ies;

and

Sta

bili

ze s

oil d

urin

g an

d af

ter

cut a

nd f

ill a

ctiv

itie

s.

For

larg

e si

tes,

pre

-wat

er w

ith

spri

nkle

rs o

r w

ater

truc

ks a

nd a

llow

tim

e fo

r pe

netr

atio

n U

se w

ater

truc

ks/p

ulls

to w

ater

soi

ls to

dep

th

of c

ut p

rior

to s

ubse

quen

t cut

s

Dem

olit

ion

– m

echa

nica

l/m

anua

l 06

-1

06-2

06-3

06-4

Sta

bili

ze w

ind

erod

ible

sur

face

s to

red

uce

dust

; and

Sta

bili

ze s

urfa

ce s

oil w

here

sup

port

equ

ipm

ent a

nd

vehi

cles

wil

l ope

rate

; and

S

tabi

lize

loos

e so

il a

nd d

emol

itio

n de

bris

; and

C

ompl

y w

ith

AQ

MD

Rul

e 14

03.

App

ly w

ater

in s

uffi

cien

t qua

ntit

ies

to

prev

ent t

he g

ener

atio

n of

vis

ible

dus

t plu

mes

Dis

turb

ed s

oil

07-1

07-2

Sta

bili

ze d

istu

rbed

soi

l thr

ough

out t

he c

onst

ruct

ion

site

; and

S

tabi

lize

dis

turb

ed s

oil b

etw

een

stru

ctur

es

Lim

it v

ehic

ular

traf

fic

and

dist

urba

nces

on

soil

s w

here

pos

sibl

e If

inte

rior

blo

ck w

alls

are

pla

nned

, ins

tall

as

earl

y as

pos

sibl

e A

pply

wat

er o

r a

stab

iliz

ing

agen

t in

suff

icie

nt q

uant

itie

s to

pre

vent

the

gene

rati

on o

f vi

sibl

e du

st p

lum

es

Ear

th-m

ovin

g ac

tivi

ties

08-1

08-2

08-3

Pre

-app

ly w

ater

to d

epth

of

prop

osed

cut

s; a

nd

Re-

appl

y w

ater

as

nece

ssar

y to

mai

ntai

n so

ils

in a

da

mp

cond

itio

n an

d to

ens

ure

that

vis

ible

em

issi

ons

do n

ot e

xcee

d 10

0 fe

et in

any

dir

ecti

on; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze s

oils

onc

e ea

rth-

mov

ing

acti

viti

es a

re

com

plet

e.

Gra

de e

ach

proj

ect p

hase

sep

arat

ely,

tim

ed

to c

oinc

ide

wit

h co

nstr

ucti

on p

hase

U

pwin

d fe

ncin

g ca

n pr

even

t mat

eria

l m

ovem

ent o

n si

te

App

ly w

ater

or

a st

abil

izin

g ag

ent i

n su

ffic

ient

qua

ntit

ies

to p

reve

nt th

e ge

nera

tion

of

visi

ble

dust

plu

mes

Page 289: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 15

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Impo

rtin

g/ex

port

ing

of b

ulk

mat

eria

ls

09-1

09-2

09-3

09-4

09-5

Sta

bili

ze m

ater

ial w

hile

load

ing

to r

educ

e fu

giti

ve

dust

em

issi

ons;

and

M

aint

ain

at le

ast s

ix in

ches

of

free

boar

d on

hau

l ve

hicl

es; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze m

ater

ial w

hile

tran

spor

ting

to r

educ

e fu

giti

ve d

ust e

mis

sion

s; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze m

ater

ial w

hile

unl

oadi

ng to

red

uce

fugi

tive

du

st e

mis

sion

s; a

nd

Com

ply

wit

h V

ehic

le C

ode

Sec

tion

231

14.

Use

tarp

s or

oth

er s

uita

ble

encl

osur

es o

n ha

ul tr

ucks

C

heck

bel

ly-d

ump

truc

k se

als

regu

larl

y an

d re

mov

e an

y tr

appe

d ro

cks

to p

reve

nt s

pill

age

Com

ply

wit

h tr

ack-

out

prev

enti

on/m

itig

atio

n re

quir

emen

ts

Pro

vide

wat

er w

hile

load

ing

and

unlo

adin

g to

red

uce

visi

ble

dust

plu

mes

Lan

dsca

ping

10

-1

Sta

bili

ze s

oils

, mat

eria

ls, s

lope

s A

pply

wat

er to

mat

eria

ls to

sta

bili

ze

Mai

ntai

n m

ater

ials

in a

cru

sted

con

diti

on

Mai

ntai

n ef

fect

ive

cove

r ov

er m

ater

ials

S

tabi

lize

slo

ping

sur

face

s us

ing

soil

bin

ders

un

til v

eget

atio

n or

gro

und

cove

r ca

n ef

fect

ivel

y st

abil

ize

the

slop

es

Hyd

rose

ed p

rior

to r

ain

seas

on

Roa

d sh

ould

er

mai

nten

ance

11

-1

11-2

App

ly w

ater

to u

npav

ed s

houl

ders

pri

or to

cle

arin

g;

and

App

ly c

hem

ical

dus

t sup

pres

sant

s an

d/or

was

hed

grav

el to

mai

ntai

n a

stab

iliz

ed s

urfa

ce a

fter

co

mpl

etin

g ro

ad s

houl

der

mai

nten

ance

.

Inst

alla

tion

of

curb

ing

and/

or p

avin

g of

roa

d sh

ould

ers

can

redu

ce r

ecur

ring

mai

nten

ance

co

sts

Use

of

chem

ical

dus

t sup

pres

sant

s ca

n in

hibi

t veg

etat

ion

grow

th a

nd r

educ

e fu

ture

ro

ad s

houl

der

mai

nten

ance

cos

ts

Page 290: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 16

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Scr

eeni

ng

12-1

12

-2

12-3

Pre

-wat

er m

ater

ial p

rior

to s

cree

ning

; and

L

imit

fug

itiv

e du

st e

mis

sion

s to

opa

city

and

plu

me

leng

th s

tand

ards

; and

S

tabi

lize

mat

eria

l im

med

iate

ly a

fter

scr

eeni

ng.

Ded

icat

e w

ater

truc

k or

hig

h ca

paci

ty h

ose

to s

cree

ning

ope

rati

on

Dro

p m

ater

ial t

hrou

gh th

e sc

reen

slo

wly

and

m

inim

ize

drop

hei

ght

Inst

all w

ind

barr

ier

wit

h a

poro

sity

of

no

mor

e th

an 5

0% u

pwin

d of

scr

een

to th

e he

ight

of

the

drop

poi

nt

Sta

ging

are

as

13-1

13

-2S

tabi

lize

sta

ging

are

as d

urin

g us

e; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze s

tagi

ng a

rea

soil

s at

pro

ject

com

plet

ion.

L

imit

siz

e of

sta

ging

are

a L

imit

veh

icle

spe

eds

to 1

5 m

iles

per

hou

r L

imit

num

ber

and

size

of

stag

ing

area

en

tran

ces/

exis

ts

Sto

ckpi

les/

Bul

k M

ater

ial

Han

dlin

g

14-1

14-2

Sta

bili

ze s

tock

pile

d m

ater

ials

. S

tock

pile

s w

ithi

n 10

0 ya

rds

of o

ff-s

ite

occu

pied

bu

ildi

ngs

mus

t not

be

grea

ter

than

eig

ht f

eet i

n he

ight

; or

mus

t hav

e a

road

bla

ded

to th

e to

p to

all

ow

wat

er tr

uck

acce

ss o

r m

ust h

ave

an o

pera

tion

al w

ater

ir

riga

tion

sys

tem

that

is c

apab

le o

f co

mpl

ete

stoc

kpil

e co

vera

ge.

Add

or

rem

ove

mat

eria

l fro

m th

e do

wnw

ind

port

ion

of th

e st

orag

e pi

le

Mai

ntai

n st

orag

e pi

les

to a

void

ste

ep s

ides

or

fac

es

Page 291: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 17

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Tra

ffic

are

as f

or

cons

truc

tion

acti

viti

es

15-1

15-2

15-3

Sta

bili

ze a

ll o

ff-r

oad

traf

fic

and

park

ing

area

s; a

nd

Sta

bili

ze a

ll h

aul r

oute

s; a

nd

Dir

ect c

onst

ruct

ion

traf

fic

over

est

abli

shed

hau

l ro

utes

.

App

ly g

rave

l/pa

ving

to a

ll h

aul r

oute

s as

so

on a

s po

ssib

le to

all

fut

ure

road

way

are

as

Bar

rier

s ca

n be

use

d to

ens

ure

vehi

cles

are

on

ly u

sed

on e

stab

lish

ed p

arki

ng a

reas

/hau

l ro

utes

Tre

nchi

ng

16-1

16-2

Sta

bili

ze s

urfa

ce s

oils

whe

re tr

ench

er o

r ex

cava

tor

and

supp

ort e

quip

men

t wil

l ope

rate

; and

S

tabi

lize

soi

ls a

t the

com

plet

ion

of tr

ench

ing

acti

viti

es.

Pre

-wat

erin

g of

soi

ls p

rior

to tr

ench

ing

is a

n ef

fect

ive

prev

enti

ve m

easu

re.

For

dee

p tr

ench

ing

acti

viti

es, p

re-t

renc

h to

18

inch

es

soak

soi

ls v

ia th

e pr

e-tr

ench

and

res

umin

g tr

ench

ing

Was

hing

mud

and

soi

ls f

rom

equ

ipm

ent a

t th

e co

nclu

sion

of

tren

chin

g ac

tivi

ties

can

pr

even

t cru

stin

g an

d dr

ying

of

soil

on

equi

pmen

t

Tru

ck lo

adin

g 17

-1

17-2

Pre

-wat

er m

ater

ial p

rior

to lo

adin

g; a

nd

Ens

ure

that

fre

eboa

rd e

xcee

ds s

ix in

ches

(C

VC

23

114)

Em

pty

load

er b

ucke

t suc

h th

at n

o vi

sibl

e du

st p

lum

es a

re c

reat

ed

Ens

ure

that

the

load

er b

ucke

t is

clos

e to

the

truc

k to

min

imiz

e dr

op h

eigh

t whi

le lo

adin

g

Tur

f O

vers

eedi

ng

18-1

18-2

App

ly s

uffi

cien

t wat

er im

med

iate

ly p

rior

to

cond

ucti

ng tu

rf v

acuu

min

g ac

tivi

ties

to m

eet o

paci

ty

and

plum

e le

ngth

sta

ndar

ds; a

nd

Cov

er h

aul v

ehic

les

prio

r to

exi

ting

the

site

.

Hau

l was

te m

ater

ial i

mm

edia

tely

off

-sit

e

Page 292: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Ru

le 4

03 (

con

t.)

(Am

end

ed J

un

e 3,

200

5)

TA

BL

E 1

B

ES

T A

VA

ILA

BL

E C

ON

TR

OL

ME

AS

UR

ES

(A

pp

lica

ble

to

All

Con

stru

ctio

n A

ctiv

ity

Sou

rces

)

403

- 18

Sou

rce

Cat

egor

y

C

ontr

ol M

easu

re

G

uid

ance

Unp

aved

road

s/pa

rkin

g lo

ts

19-1

19-2

Sta

bili

ze s

oils

to m

eet t

he a

ppli

cabl

e pe

rfor

man

ce

stan

dard

s; a

nd

Lim

it v

ehic

ular

trav

el to

est

abli

shed

unp

aved

roa

ds

(hau

l rou

tes)

and

unp

aved

par

king

lots

.

Res

tric

ting

veh

icul

ar a

cces

s to

est

abli

shed

un

pave

d tr

avel

pat

hs a

nd p

arki

ng lo

ts c

an

redu

ce s

tabi

liza

tion

req

uire

men

ts

Vac

ant l

and

20-1

In

inst

ance

s w

here

vac

ant l

ots

are

0.10

acr

e or

larg

er

and

have

a c

umul

ativ

e ar

ea o

f 50

0 sq

uare

fee

t or

mor

e th

at a

re d

rive

n ov

er a

nd/o

r us

ed b

y m

otor

ve

hicl

es a

nd/o

r of

f-ro

ad v

ehic

les,

pre

vent

mot

or

vehi

cle

and/

or o

ff-r

oad

vehi

cle

tres

pass

ing,

par

king

an

d/or

acc

ess

by in

stal

ling

bar

rier

s, c

urbs

, fen

ces,

ga

tes,

pos

ts, s

igns

, shr

ubs,

tree

s or

oth

er e

ffec

tive

co

ntro

l mea

sure

s.

Page 293: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403 - 19

Table 2 DUST CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS

FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS

Earth-moving (except construction cutting and filling areas, and mining operations)

(1a) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations each subsequent four-hour period of active operations; OR

(1a-1) For any earth-moving which is more than 100 feet from all property lines, conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in length in any direction.

Earth-moving:Construction fill areas:

(1b) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D-2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas which have an optimum moisture content for compaction of less than 12 percent, as determined by ASTM Method 1557 or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer and the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction process as expeditiously as possible after achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations during each subsequent four-hour period of active operations.

Page 294: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403-20

Table 2 (Continued) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS

Earth-moving:Construction cut areas and mining operations:

(1c) Conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible emissions from extending more than 100 feet beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area is inaccessible to watering vehicles due to slope conditions or other safety factors.

Disturbed surface areas (except completed grading areas)

(2a/b) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by wind driven fugitive dust must have an application of water at least twice per day to at least 80 percent of the unstabilized area.

Disturbed surface areas: Completed grading areas

(2c) Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days of grading completion; OR

(2d) Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive disturbed surface areas.

Inactive disturbed surface areas

(3a) Apply water to at least 80 percent of all inactive disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, excluding any areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due to excessive slope or other safety conditions; OR

(3b) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR

(3c) Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days after active operations have ceased. Ground cover must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30 percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of planting, and at all times thereafter; OR

(3d) Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b), and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all inactive disturbed surface areas.

Page 295: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403-21

Table 2 (Continued) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS

Unpaved Roads (4a) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at least once per every two hours of active operations [3 times per normal 8 hour work day]; OR

(4b) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; OR

(4c) Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface.

Open storage piles (5a) Apply chemical stabilizers; OR (5b) Apply water to at least 80 percent of the surface

area of all open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; OR

(5c) Install temporary coverings; OR (5d) Install a three-sided enclosure with walls with no

more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a minimum, to the top of the pile. This option may only be used at aggregate-related plants or at cement manufacturing facilities.

All Categories (6a) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 2 may be used.

Page 296: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403-22

TABLE 3 CONTINGENCY CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS

FUGITIVE DUST SOURCECATEGORY

CONTROL MEASURES

Earth-moving (1A) Cease all active operations; OR (2A) Apply water to soil not more than 15 minutes prior to

moving such soil. Disturbed surface areas

(0B) On the last day of active operations prior to a weekend, holiday, or any other period when active operations will not occur for not more than four consecutive days: apply water with a mixture of chemical stabilizer diluted to not less than 1/20 of the concentration required to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of six months; OR

(1B) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2B) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3

times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a minimum of four times per day; OR

(3B) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR (4B) Utilize any combination of control actions (1B), (2B),

and (3B) such that, in total, these actions apply to all disturbed surface areas.

Unpaved roads (1C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2C) Apply water twice per hour during active operation;

OR(3C) Stop all vehicular traffic.

Open storage piles (1D) Apply water twice per hour; OR (2D) Install temporary coverings.

Paved road track-out (1E) Cover all haul vehicles; OR (2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of

Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads.

All Categories (1F) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 3 may be used.

Page 297: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005)

403-23

Table 4 (Conservation Management Practices for Confined Animal Facilities)

SOURCECATEGORY

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

ManureHandling

(1a)(1b)

Cover manure prior to removing material off-site; AND Spread the manure before 11:00 AM and when wind conditions are less than 25 miles per hour; AND

(Onlyapplicable to Commercial PoultryRanches)

(1c)

(1d)

Utilize coning and drying manure management by removing manure at laying hen houses at least twice per year and maintain a base of no less than 6 inches of dry manure after clean out; or in lieu of complying with conservation management practice (1c), comply with conservation management practice (1d). Utilize frequent manure removal by removing the manure from laying hen houses at least every seven days and immediately thin bed dry the material.

FeedstockHandling

(2a) Utilize a sock or boot on the feed truck auger when filling feed storage bins.

DisturbedSurfaces

(3a)

(3b)

(3c)

Maintain at least 70 percent vegetative cover on vacant portions of the facility; OR Utilize conservation tillage practices to manage the amount, orientation and distribution of crop and other plant residues on the soil surface year-round, while growing crops (if applicable) in narrow slots or tilled strips; OR Apply dust suppressants in sufficient concentrations and frequencies to maintain a stabilized surface.

UnpavedRoads

(4a)

(4b)

(4c)

Restrict access to private unpaved roads either through signage or physical access restrictions and control vehicular speeds to no more than 15 miles per hour through worker notifications, signage, or any other necessary means; OR Cover frequently traveled unpaved roads with low silt content material (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a minimum depth of four inches); OR Treat unpaved roads with water, mulch, chemical dust suppressants or other cover to maintain a stabilized surface.

EquipmentParking Areas

(5a)

(5b)

Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR Apply material with low silt content (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a depth of four inches).

Page 298: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AppendixA.6ConstructionHealthRiskAssessmentCalculations

Page 299: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment

Annual Work Days Work Hours Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year DPM  per Year per Day during

Emissions a  Work Period(pounds/year) (days/year) (hours/day) (grams/second)

Off‐Road EquipmentPhase I

Site Preparation Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 0.1 5 8 3.15E‐04Demolition Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 0.4 10 8 5.98E‐04Grading Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 4.6 51 8 1.43E‐03Foundation‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 1 1.7 38 8 7.13E‐04

Foundation‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 0.5 12 8 7.09E‐04Building Construction‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 9.7 249 8 6.12E‐04Architectural Coating‐1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 2 0.2 63 8 6.00E‐05

Building Construction‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 10.2 261 8 6.13E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 1.0 261 8 6.28E‐05Paving Off‐Road Equipment Year 3 0.4 21 8 2.85E‐04

Building Construction‐3  Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 4.2 108 8 6.12E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 0.3 70 8 6.30E‐05

Phase IIDemolition Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 4.4 72 8 9.62E‐04Grading Off‐Road Equipment Year 4 3.2 35 8 1.43E‐03Foundation‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year4 1.2 27 8 7.12E‐04

Foundation‐2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.7 16 8 7.09E‐04Building Construction‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 5.2 245 8 3.37E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 1 Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.4 105 8 6.30E‐05Paving Off‐Road Equipment Year 5 0.4 20 8 2.83E‐04

Building Construction‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 6 5.6 260 8 3.37E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 2 Off‐Road Equipment Year 6 1.0 260 8 6.30E‐05

Building construction‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 7 1.1 53 8 3.39E‐04Architectural Coating‐ 3 Off‐Road Equipment Year 7 0.0 10 8 6.30E‐05

Subtotal

Maximum 12‐Month Emissions Off‐Road Equipment 13.0 261 8 7.85E‐04(for Chronic HI analysis)

Notes:

a. California Air Resources Board, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod).

Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Emission Rates

Page 300: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total Work Days Work Hours One‐Way DPM Running Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year One‐Way  per Year per Day Trip Distance Emissions during

Truck Trips per Day a Factor b Work Period(days/year) (hours/day) (miles) (grams/mile) (grams/second)

On‐Road TrucksPhase I

Site Preparation Year 1 5 8 0.00E+00Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 1 2 10 8 0.86 0.0718 4.29E‐07Grading T7 Single Construction Year 1 280 51 8 0.86 0.0718 1.18E‐05Foundation‐1 T7 Single Construction Year 1 43 38 8 0.86 0.0718 2.42E‐06

Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 2 43 12 8 0.86 0.0393 4.21E‐06Building Construction‐1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 2 111 249 8 0.86 0.0552 7.35E‐07Architectural Coating‐1 Year 2 63 8

Building Construction‐2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 3 111 261 8 0.86 0.0489 6.21E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 3 261 8Paving Year 3 21 8

Building Construction‐3  On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 4 111 108 8 0.86 0.0345 1.06E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 4 70 8

Phase IIDemolition T7 Single Construction Year 4 28 72 8 0.86 0.0212 2.46E‐07Grading T7 Single Construction Year 4 420 35 8 0.86 0.0212 7.61E‐06Foundation‐ 1 T7 Single Construction Year4 45 27 8 0.86 0.0212 1.06E‐06

Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 5 45 16 8 0.86 0.0192 1.61E‐06Building Construction‐ 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 5 111 245 8 0.86 0.0136 1.84E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 1 Year 5 105 8Paving Year 5 20 8

Building Construction‐ 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 6 111 260 8 0.86 0.0124 1.58E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 6 260 8

Building construction‐ 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 7 111 53 8 0.86 0.0056 3.49E‐07Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 7 10 8

Maximum 12‐Month Emissions On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks 433 261 8 0.86 0.0597 2.95E‐06(for Chronic HI analysis)

Notes:a. The portion of the on‐road trip length within a 1/4 mile of the Project Site.b. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

On‐Road Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates

Page 301: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

Total Work Days Work Hours Idling Time DPM Idling Emissions RateConstruction Phase DPM Source Year Number of   per Year per Day per Truck Emissions during

Trucks Factor a Work Period(days/year) (hours/day) (minutes) (grams/min) (grams/second)

On‐Road TrucksPhase I

Site Preparation Year 1 5 8 15Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 1 2 10 8 15 2.22E‐01 2.31E‐05Grading T7 Single Construction Year 1 280 51 8 15 2.22E‐01 6.34E‐04Foundation‐1 T7 Single Construction Year 1 43 38 8 15 2.22E‐01 1.31E‐04

Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 2 43 12 8 15 1.54E‐01 2.88E‐04Building Construction‐1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 2 111 249 8 15 1.49E‐01 3.46E‐05Architectural Coating‐1 Year 2 63 8 15

Building Construction‐2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 3 111 261 8 15 1.24E‐01 2.75E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 3 261 8 15Paving Year 3 21 8 15

Building Construction‐3  On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 4 111 108 8 15 7.40E‐02 3.96E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 4 70 8 15

Phase II 15Demolition T7 Single Construction Year 4 28 72 8 15 1.58E‐02 3.19E‐06Grading T7 Single Construction Year 4 420 35 8 15 1.58E‐02 9.86E‐05Foundation‐ 1 T7 Single Construction Year4 45 27 8 15 1.58E‐02 1.37E‐05

Foundation‐2 T7 Single Construction Year 5 45 16 8 15 1.37E‐02 2.01E‐05Building Construction‐ 1 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 5 111 245 8 15 1.82E‐02 4.29E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 1 Year 5 105 8 15Paving Year 5 20 8 15

Building Construction‐ 2 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 6 111 260 8 15 1.58E‐02 3.51E‐06Architectural Coating‐ 2 Year 6 260 8 15

Building construction‐ 3 On‐Road MHDT/HHDT Trucks Year 7 111 53 8 15 9.58E‐03 1.05E‐05Architectural Coating‐ 3 Year 7 10 8 15

Maximum 12‐Month Emissions Idling MHDT/HHDT Trucks 433 261 8 15 0.1740 1.50E‐04(for Chronic HI analysis)

Notes:

a. California Air Resources Board, EMFAC2014 on‐road vehicle emissions model.

Source:  PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Idling Construction Haul, Concrete, and Vendor Truck Emission Rates

Page 302: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment

AERMOD Source Characteristics

Emission Source Source Number Length  Source Group Release Length Length Initial Initial Plume Plume Exit Inside Exit FlowType of Sources of Line Unitized Height of Side X of Side Y Lateral Vertical Height Width Temp Diameter Rate

Emission Rate(m) (g/s) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (m) (°F) (ft) (ft3/s)

Source Group 1Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Volume 12 0.0833 5                15              15              3.49          1.16          n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aPhase I

Source Group 2Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment Volume 15 0.0667 5                15              15              3.49          1.16          n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aPhase II

Source Group 2On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1 Line‐Volume 1 192.7 0.1484 6                n/a n/a 10.2          16.0          n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2 Line‐Volume 1 128.5 0.0990 6                n/a n/a 10.2          16.0          n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3 Line‐Volume 1 335.9 0.2588 6                n/a n/a 10.2          21.0          n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4 Line‐Volume 1 111.1 0.0856 6                n/a n/a 10.2          24.0          n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5 Line‐Volume 1 234.1 0.2336 6                n/a n/a 10.2          12.0          n/a n/a n/aOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6 Line‐Volume 1 295.8 0.2951 6                n/a n/a 10.2          12.0          n/a n/a n/a

Source Group 3Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase I Volume 1 1.0000 5                26              26              6.05          1.16          n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Source Group 4 Volume 1 1.0000 5                26              26              6.05          1.16          n/a n/a n/a n/a n/aIdling Haul and Vendor Trucks Phase II

Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Page 303: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment

AERMOD Results

Emission Source Source Source Group Unitized Max AERMOD ConcentrationType South‐East (383360.00, 3767670.00)

Source Group 1 51.99Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase I) Volume

Source Group 2Off‐Road Heavy‐Duty Construction Equipment (Phase 2) Volume 8.47

Source Group 3 4.57On‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 1 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 2 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 3 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 4 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 5 Line‐VolumeOn‐Road Haul and Vendor Trucks 6 Line‐Volume

Source Group 4 34.78Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase I) Volume

Source Group 5 4.57Idling Haul and Vendor Trucks (Phase II) Volume

Source:  Lakes Environmental, AERMOD View 9.1.0 (Version 15181), 2016; PCR Services Corporation, 2016

Page 304: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment

Maximum Individual Cancer Risk Calculations ‐ Sensitive Receptors located Southeast of the Project Site

Phase I Off-Road Equipment On-Road Idling Off-Road Equipment On-Road IdlingSite Preparation Year 1 5 0.000314995 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3rd 1.64E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Demolition Year 1 10 0.00059849 4.29E-07 2.31E-05 3rd 3.11E-02 1.96E-06 8.03E-04Grading Year 1 51 0.001432917 1.18E-05 6.34E-04 3rd 7.45E-02 5.38E-05 2.20E-02Foundation-1 Year 1 38 0.000712883 2.42E-06 1.31E-04 0<2 3.71E-02 1.11E-05 4.54E-03

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Foundation-2 Year 2 12 0.000708738 4.21E-06 2.88E-04 0<2 3.68E-02 1.92E-05 1.00E-02Building Construction-1 Year 2 249 0.000612279 7.35E-07 3.46E-05 0<2 3.18E-02 3.36E-06 1.20E-03Architectural Coating-1 Year 2 63 5.9999E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 3.12E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction-2 Year 3 157 0.000613093 6.21E-07 2.75E-05 0<2 3.19E-02 2.84E-06 9.56E-04Building Construction-2 Year 3 104 0.000613093 6.21E-07 2.75E-05 2<16 3.19E-02 2.84E-06 9.56E-04Architectural Coating- 2 Year 3 157 6.27576E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 3.26E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Architectural Coating- 2 Year 3 104 6.27576E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 3.26E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Paving Year 3 21 0.000284995 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0<2 1.48E-02 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction-3 Year 4 108 0.00061249 1.06E-06 3.96E-05 2<16 3.18E-02 4.84E-06 1.38E-03Architectural Coating- 3 Year 4 70 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 3.28E-03 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

Phase IIDemolition Year 4 72 0.000962484 2.46E-07 3.19E-06 2<16 0.008152238 1.13E-06 1.46E-05Grading Year 4 35 0.001430976 7.61E-06 9.86E-05 2<16 0.012120367 3.48E-05 4.51E-04Foundation- 1 Year4 27 0.000711655 1.06E-06 1.37E-05 2<16 0.006027716 4.83E-06 6.26E-05

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Foundation-2 Year 5 16 0.000708738 1.61E-06 2.01E-05 2<16 0.006003012 7.37E-06 9.19E-05Building Construction- 1 Year 5 245 0.000336851 1.84E-07 4.29E-06 2<16 0.002853132 8.42E-07 1.96E-05Architectural Coating- 1 Year 5 105 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Paving Year 5 20 0.000283495 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.002401205 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building Construction- 2 Year 6 260 0.000336802 1.58E-07 3.51E-06 2<16 0.002852713 7.20E-07 1.60E-05Architectural Coating- 2 Year 6 260 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

0 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0.00E+00Building construction- 3 Year 7 53 0.000338768 3.49E-07 1.05E-05 2<16 0.002869364 1.60E-06 4.78E-05Architectural Coating- 3 Year 7 10 6.29989E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 2<16 0.000533601 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

Cancer Risk CalculationsParameter Age Bins Exposure Age Bin

3rd Trimester 0 <  2 2 < 16 16 < 30 31 < 70

DBR Daily Breathing Rate (L/kg (body weight) per day) 361 1090 745 335 290A Inhalation absorption factor (default = 1). 1 1 1 1 1EF Exposure Frequency (days/year) 350 350 350 350 350ED Exposure Duration (years) 0.25 2 14 14 30.25 40 70.25FAH Fraction of Time at Home 1 0.85 0.72 0.73 0.73AT Averaged Exposure Time Period (days) 25550 25550 25550 25550 25550ASF Age Sensitvity Factor 10 10 3 1 1

CONC Toxic Air Contaminant Concentration (µg/m3) 5.84E‐02 2.27E‐02 2.10E‐03 0.00E+00 0DOSE [= CONC × DBR × A × EF × ED × FAH / AT]  (mg/kg‐d) 7.22E‐02 5.75E‐01 2.16E‐01 0.00E+00 0.00E+00

CPF Cancer Potency Factor (mg/kg‐d)‐1

Diesel Particulate Matter 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1

RISK Cancer Risk (in one million)  [= DOSE × CPF × ASF] 7.94E‐01 6.33E+00 7.12E‐01 0.00E+00 7.83E+00 0.00E+00 7.83E+00

MICREmission Rate

Total 70 Year 

Work Day per Year Age binPhase 1

Phase 2

Page 305: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
Page 306: APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORTplanning.lacity.org/.../Appendix_C_Air_Quality_Technical_Report.pdf · APPENDIX C – AIR QUALITY TECHNICAL REPORT ... ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

1020 S. Figueroa Street Project Draft Environmental Impact ReportConstruction Health Risk Assessment

Maximum Non‐cancer Chronic Hazards / Toxicological Endpoints*

Receptor Group Pollutant CREL1 CONC WFrac CONCWF HI ALIM BN CVS DEV ENDC EYE HEM IMMUN KIDN NS REPRO RESP SK Threshold Over?

MEI Sensitive ‐ East DPM 5.00E+00 4.61E‐02 1.00E+00 4.61E‐02 9.22E‐03 ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            ‐            9.22E‐03 ‐            1.0 NO

Sources:

1. California Air Resources Board, "Consolidated Table of OEHHA/ARB Approved Risk Assessment Health Values" and "OEHHA/ARB Approved Chronic Reference Exposure Levels and Target Organs," http://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/healthval/healthval.htm.

Tables last updated: January 30, 2014. Downloaded 03/13/2014.

Where: * Key to Toxicological Endpoints

CONCWF Pollutant Concentration (µg/m3) multiplied by the weight fraction ALIM Alimentary Tract EYE Eye NS Nervous SystemCREL Chronic Reference Exposure Level BN Bone HEM Hematologic System REPRO Reproductive SystemHI Hazard Index CVS Cardiovascular System IMMUN Immune System RESP Respiratory SystemMEI Maximally Exposed Individual DEV Developmental System KIDN Kidney SK SkinWFrac Weight fraction of speciated component ENDC Endocrine System