APPENDIX A

Original Comment Letters

S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I A

Governor 's Off ice of Planning and Research

State Clear inghouee and Planning Unit

tffi-Arnold

SchwarzotoggerOovsrnor

Sean Walsh'Director

June 3,2005

Nicholas HendriclaCity of Los Angeles Planning Department200 North Spring Street, Room 750Los Angeles, CA 90012

Subject: Sierra Canyon Secondary SchoolSCH#: 2004011102

Dear Nicholas Hendricks:

R E C E I V E DCITYOF LOs ANGELES

JUN 09 ZOOsENVIRONMENTAL

UNIT

Letter No. I

The State Clearinghouse submitted the above named Draft EIR to selected state agencies for review. On theenclosed Document Details Report please note that the Clearinghouse.has listed the state agencies thatreviewed your document. The review period closed on June 2,2005, and the cornments fi'om theresponding agency (ies) is (are) enclosed. If this comment package is not in order, please notifl the StateClearinghouse immediately. Please refer to the project's ten-digit State Clearinghouse number in futurecorespondence so that we may respond promptly.

Please note that $ection 21104(c) of the California Public Resources Code states that:

"A responsible or other public agency shall only make substantive comments regarding thoseactivities involved in a project which are within an area of expertise of the agency or which arerequired to be carried out or approved by the agency. Those comments shall be supported byspecific documentation."

These comments are forwarded for use in preparing your-final environmental docunrent. Should you needmore information,or clarification of the enclosed conrments. we recommend that you cor.rtact thecommenting agercy directly.

This letter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for draftenviroumental documents, pulsuant to the California Envjronmental Quality Act. Please contact the StateClearinghouse at (9i6) 445-0613 ifyou have any questions regarding the environmental review process.

Sincerely,

1 0 1

Terry RobertsDirector, State Clearinghouse

Enclosulescc: Resources Agency

14OO TE}TTH STREET P.O. BOX 3Q44 SACB"AMEI'ITO, CALIFOB,NIA 96812-3044TEL (916) 446-0613 FAX (916) 823'3018 www.0pr'ca.gov

Document Details RePortState Glearinghouse Data Base

scH# 2004011102ProjectTltle Slerra Canyon Secondary School

Lead Agency Los Angeles City Planning Department

Type EIR Draft EIR

Descriplon Vesting Conditional Use Permit to allow development of a 5s0-student secondary school on a 4'89

(net) acre site in the (T)RE11-1 and A2-1 zones and, pursuant to Los Angeles Municipal Code Section

12.24.F,to provide relief from various height and setback requirements. The project would include a

classroom building, athletics center (500 person occupancy), performing arts center (600 seats)'

administration building and aquatics center (80 person occupancy) totaling 120,542 feet of floor area.parking would be provided in an at-grade parking levelfor 236 vehicles with access provided from the

extension of Rinaldi Street. The design will use simple building masses to complement site

topography with an emphasis on natural materials, colors and textures and an efficient footprint that

utilizes the site's sloping character. The project will be built in up to three phases with initial occupancy

by modular classrooms on the upper part of the site and temporary parking on the lower park of the

site. The development of the project is expected to be completed by the year 2010. Demolition of an

existing single-family residence will be required and approximately 19,800 cy of material would be

excavated from the site'

Lead Agency ContactName NicholasHendricks

Agency City of Los Angeles Planning Department

Phone (213) 978-1355email

Address 200 North Spring Street, Room 750

City Los Angeles

Fax

State CA ZiP 90012

Project LocationCounty Los Angeles

CityRegion

Cross Streefs De Soto / RinaldiParcelNo. 2706-007-004Township Range Secfion Base

Proximity to:Highways 118

Airports +2 miles - Van NuYsRailways

WatenuaysSchools

Land IJse Vacant; Single-Farnily Residence / (T)RE1 1-1: A2-1l Very Low ll Residential

project lssues AestheticA/isual; Air euality; Archaeologic-Historic; Cumulative Effects; Drainage/Absorption;

Geologic/Seismic; Growth lnducing; Landuse; Noise; Public Services; Soil

Erosion/Compaction/Grading; Traffic/Circulation; Vegetation; Water Quality; Wildlife

Reviewing Resources Agency; Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 7; Department of Parks and

Agencies Recreation; Native American Heritage Commission; Department of Health Services; Office of Historic

preservation; Department of Fish and Game, Region 5; Department of Water Resources; California

Highway patrol; Caltrans, District 7; Department of Toxic Substances Control

Date Received O4l1gt2OO5 Start of Review 04t1912005 End of Review 0610212005

Note: Blanks in data fields result from insufficient information provided by lead agency'

DEPARTImNT OF TRANSPORTATTONDISTRICT 7, REGIONAL PLANNINGIGR/CEQABRANCHIOO MAIN STREET, MS # 16LOS ANCELES, CL 9mt2-36f,6PHONE: (213) 897-3747FAX: (213) 897-1337

[ 5 ) E G I E I V E i n rN'T;;'ffi;" uFIet your power!

Be energy efficient!CITY PIJ\N|\{INUDIVISION OF TAND

IGR/CEQA No. 050443ALSierra Canyon Secondary SchoolVic. LA-l18 / PM R2.72SCH No. 200M01r102

April 22,2005

Ms. Sue Chang, Senior City plannerDeparhent of City PlanningCity of Los Angeles200 North Spring StreetLos Angles, CA 900t2

Dear Ms. Chang:

will need to be implemented. We recommendtransport students to and from the schools.

Letter No. 2

Thank you for including the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in theenvironmental review process for the above referenced projeci. The proposed project isto construct a 55O-student secondary schoor on a 4.g9 acre site.

We would like to remind you that atl applicable transportation relatedthe use of multi-passengervehicles ,of

,.0,

Storm water run-off is a sensitive issue for Los Angeles and Ventura counties. please U.l ,.0:mindful that projects need to be designed to discharge clean run-off water. J

Any transportation of heavy construction equipment and./or materials which requires theuse of oversiz6d-transport vehicles on State highways will require a Caltranstransportation pei:mit. We recommend that large size truck irips be limited to off-peakcofirmute periods. Thank you for the opportunity to have reviewed this project.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (213) 897-3747 or Alan Linthe project coordinator at (213) 897-8391 and refer ro IGR/CEeA No. 050443AL.

Sincerely,

2.04

\*--W-"^*YCHERYL J. POWELLIGR/CEQA Branch Chief cc: Scott Morgan, State Clearinghouse

"Caltrans improves mobility across Catifumia"

, STATEOFC.ALrcRN{A

PIJEUC UTILITIES COTTM|SSIONqprrEtnrh griE?. ArJE slo3rreB8e.€a sta Letter No. 3

FileNo. SCH2OO4otnAzlvfay3l,2005

NigbolasHdicksCity ofl"os Angele, ftnrrent of CityPlng200N- SFing Steg Room 750InsAryelcs, CA 90012

Subiec*: Sierra Caryon Sccondary Scbool

- . Des.lfie llm&hkg:--

sF.F6lffiJUil 00 20$

ruF*

As &sotas agBcyrcryomsibl, fqtail saftfyrithin Crli&EdE, werccommcod&d&s progos6Sicfls CdJtoll Secmdary School Fojest be plEorcd qtfih eF saftty ofths rqil cocidm iD mind.Thc peoposed Fojd is n€ar trG souh€Nn califomirr Rrgioual Rgii aubsriry-Ivrgilloli* righ-of-uny- The fuU aevctopsnt of &e projcct aswill inpuease ffic volrrcs-nst oly q sheets .and d ingsections, but also at st-grade bighsrcy-mil cxossi4gs.

saf*yconsideoiqs may include, but arerct limiEdb, fu following itcrns:o Gode'separmiim o'f fu'croasings along mqic tborowhfues. Feocing to liErit the apsEss of pcdcsuims onb trG raitred deLt-of-qEy

' o tmerovems$s to wming dstti€s atcrcisting d€radc highway.mit "r6gingto lryrlvEructrs to taffic BiEFating at iffiscstios adiccut o crossingsr Imrovemffilo roadnnyseomrrryand lm stripiry D!6r cnqssinspr Incmsed en&rceurcut of traffic lcws atcrossnge Ir dsefetymroeoessprogtlnqrrailreledhazards

I

crossiags. Wo*ing q'im Cmmission stafii:arly in thc comgtUsinp$rc fic saf€tyto nor6risb ad ecdestims in tbc community.

phaeewinho$

Ple* advise us on tb strhls ofths pject If fryrr harle any ryestionsmc dd (2t3) 57C7Wt or atrma@lur.oe,gor

EgfiEr, plcaeocotract

Rail Oossings Engiffiitrg Sl€ctioCon$ffi Ptolbdion & Saety Divisior

cc: Rsn lv{athicflt, SCRRA

3.01

Theabovendiond safttyirnpoveneuts sbouldbc eonciMuruo dgo,nf is songht fornew*ldo@!s; fric insludcs rnttiqElonncryyrys at tb Chats$urft Stresdbitbiffiy-lail a-erad.

MWDMETNOPOLITAN WATEN USTRICT OF SOUTHENN CALIFONMA

Letter No. 4

Exeutive Office

June 3,2005

Mr. Nicholas HendricksDepartment of City Planning200 N. Spring Street, Suite 750Los Angeles, Californi a 90012

Dear Mr. Hendricks:

E,FJPfiI^Y-88JUN 1 0 20ciEf'I\4RONMENTAt

UNIT

Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Sierra Canyon Middle Schgol

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern Califomia (Metropolitan) has received a copy ofthe Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) for the Siena Canyon Middle School(Project). The Project consists of a 550-student (maximum enrollment) private secondary schoolnorth of the Rinaldi Street extension. The Project would include a classroom building, athleticscenter (500 person capacity), performing arts center (600 seats), administration building andaquatics center (80 person occupancy), and totaling 120,542 feet of floor area. Parking would beprovided in an at-grade parking level for 236 vehicles with access provided from the extension ofRinaldi Street. The Project site is located at 11023 Lurline Avenue in the Chatsworthcommunity of the city of Los Angeles. The 4.89-acre site is bounded by Los AngelesDepartment of Water and Power properfy on the north and northwest (including a small coveredstorage reservoir) and two vacant single-family lots on the west. Partially improved LurlineAvenue forms the eastern site boundary. The.southern site boundary is defined by the existingtermini of Rinaldi Street, east of De Soto Avenue, and by the right-of-way for the futureextension of Rinaldi Street, which curves in a northeasterly direction through currently vacantproperty. Metropolitan is providing comment on this Draft EIR as a potentially affected agency.

]

N{etropolitan staff review of the Draft EIR indicates that Metropolitan owns and operates afacility, which traverses the Project boundaries in a generally north-south direction.Metropolitan's West Valley Feeder is an approximately 54-inch diameter pipeline located withinpermanent easement right-of-way. Metropolitan must be allowed to maintain access to itsfacilities at all times, in order to repair and maintain the current condition of this facility.Therefore, Metropolitan objects to the construction or maintenance of any structures within oureasement areas.

Metropolitan's Substructures Team staff reviewed design plans and provided a letter dated,February 28,2005 (attached), which identified various requirements and issues that need toresolved. Approval of the Project where it could impact Metropolitan's property must becontingent on resolution of these issues and Metropolitan's approval of design plans for theProject.

4.01

4.02

4.03,f

700 N. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90012 . Mailing Address: Box 54153, Los Angeles, California 90054-0153 . Telephone (213) 217-6000

THE METROPOLITANWATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA

Mr. Nicholas HendricksPage2June 3,2005

In addition, Metropolitan encourages projects within its service area to include waterconservation measures. Water conservation, reclaimed water use, and groundwater rechargeprograms are integral components to regional water supply planning. Metropolitan supportsmitigation measures such as using water efficient hxtures, drought-tolerant landscaping, andreclaimed water to offset any increase in water use associated with the proposed project.

We appreciate the i5pportunity to provide input to your planning process and we look forward toreceiving future environmental documentation, including a copy of the Draft EIR, for thisproject. If we can be of further assistance, please contact Mr. William Fong of theEnvironmental Planning Team at (213) 217 -6899.

Very truly yours,

4.M

.8,,--?fJ,L*lF.\ tXru J. SimonekL' / Manager, Environmental Planning Team

LIM/rdl(Public Folders/EPU/Letters/02-JLJN-05Boc - Nicholas Hendricks)

Enclosure: Metropolitan letter dated February 28,2005

8'##..F'!^H'EBJUN 1 0 ?005ENVIRONMENTAL

UNITMWD West Valley Feeder No. I

Sta. 1280+00 to l29l+00Substr. Job No. 4036-05-001

February 28,2005

Mr. John J. MasottaPrincipalParallax Associations, Inc.5763 Uplander WayCulver City, CA 90230

Dear Mr. Masotta:

Sierra Canyon High School - Rinaldi Street

Lhank you for your letter dated January 21,2005, submitting prints of the site plans(Sheets A0 through A5), concept grading plans (Sheets Cl and C2), preliminary wetutility connectiory plan (Sheet H1), post developed hydrology map 1^Sfre et12) and aMWD pipeline exhibit (Sheet Wl), for the proposed school ilt" i-piovements locatedatll023 Lurline Avenue in the Chatsworth area of the city of Los ingeles.

We have reviewed your submitted plans and reports, and our comments and requirementsare as follows:

l. The locations of our 54-inch-inside-diameter prestressed concrete West ValleyFeeder No. I pipeline and accompanying 20-foot-wide permanent easement right-of-way, as shown on all pertinent sheets of your plans, are generally in agreem"entwith our records. Please clarifu and revise sheets cl, c2,Hl,H2 and wl toreference our pipeline as a 54-inch-inside-diameter prestressed concrete pipe,not a 78-inch reinforced concrete pipe. In addition, we request that our tiiangularshaped permanent easement right-oi-way located at Rinaldi Street (MWD

4.05

Mr. John J. MasottaIage2Iebruary 28,2005

Parcel 1801-8-3, approximate MWD Station 1290+00) also be shown andidentified as Metropolitan's on all pertinent sheets of your plans.

Enclosed for your inforrnation and use are prints of our Drawings J-272g andJ-2729 and Right-of-Way Map l80l-8. l .05 (cont.)

2.

-J .

The proposed bridge/deck over a segment of our pipeline (from Station lZg4+OOto 1286+00), as shcwn on all pertinent sheets of yourplans, is not acceprable toM€tropolitan- The terms of Metropolitan's p.t-urr.rri easement deed prohibitthe construction or maintenance of any structures within our easement areas.Please revise your plans accordingly.

4.06

Based on plans revised per our comments in Item 2 above,in order for

-l

Metropolitan to further analyze your proposed grading and driveway that would Irequire up to approximately 7 feet of cut along our pipeline (from Siation l2S6+0dto'729I+00), we request that a geotechnical report be submitted for our review for | +.ozthe school site. The geotechnical report should provide, but not be limited to. the Idepth of bedrock, stratigraphy of the area, compressibility of soil layers based on Iceiosolidation and other tests, grollnd t^,reter elevation and building ilads. in addl- |tion, the report should also address settlement and,/or rebound calculations due to Iexc-avation and building loads, at every l0-foot section along the pipeline. J

Provided 1-foot minimum vertical clearances are maintained from our pipeline,the proposed 8-inch storm drain, 8-inch sewer lines, 8-inch fire water line and6-inch water line that crosses our pipeline at four locations, as shown on Sheet Clof your concept grading plans uttO tit of your preliminary *rt riifi,v c"o'nnections,are acceptable to lv{etropolitan. However, the proposed 6-inch sewer line connec-tion, which ties into the 8-inch sewer line within our permanent easement right-of-way, is not acceptable to Metropolitan. Please revise the sewer line tie-in tooutside the limits of our right-of-way.

We request that all sewer and reclaimed water lines crossing our pipeline beinstalled in a continuous steel sleeve as a secondary containmentlor a distanceextending a minimum of l0 feet beyond the outside edges of our pipeline.

4 .

Mr. John J. MasottaPage 3February 28,2005

The installation of the sewer and reclaimed water lines must also conform to allcounty and state health code requirements as relates to the installation of sewer' and reclaimed water lines in the vicinity of pressurizedwater lines.

The proposed equestrian trail over a portion of our pipeline and within our ]lpermanent easement right-of-way, as shown on Sheets A2 andA3 of your site Iplans, is acceptable to Metropolitan. However, please note that this tiail would Ibe shut dorvn should Metropolitan need to gain access to our pipeline in this area. I

I

Our West Valley Feeder No. I pipeline within the limits of this project is aprestressed concrete pipeline (PCP). Please note thaf PCP is subject to a cata-strophic failure if damage occurs to the prestressingwire. Such damage couldoccur by the direct impact of construction equipment upon the pipe, oi if th"mortar coating, which protects the prestressing wire, is in some way damagedor cracked and corrosion occurs. Therefore, when excavating or potholing, nopower equipment, including backhoes, may be used within 2 feetof our pipe.Only hand equipment will be allowed.

5.

6.

7.

8.

4.08(cont.)

4.09

4.10

4 . t lA#.s;and the specifications of al1 consimction eqtriprnent propost,ci ro be usedover our pipeline must be submitted for our review and written approval at least30 days prior to their use.

We request a stipulation be added to your plans or specifications to notifyMr. Kimber Rose of our water system operations Group, telephone(818) 832-2134, at least two worki4g days (Monday through Thursday)prior to starting any work in the vicinity of our facilities.

We are returning one print each of Sheets A0 through 45 of your site plans, Sheets C I lland C2 of your concept grading plans, Sheet H1 (preliminary wet utiliiy connections Iplan), Sheet H2 (post developed hydrology map) and Sheet Wl (MWD pipeline exhibit), I

u't1stamped "REVIEWED - CORRECTTONS NorED - RESUBMITTAi REQUTREDI

Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's easement shall be subject to the paramountright of Metropolitan to use the easement for the purpose for which it was acquired. Ifat any time Metropolitan or its assigns should, in the exercise of their rights, find it

] " '

Mr. John J. MasottaPage 4February 28,2005

necessary to remove any of the facilities from the easement, such removal and replace- lO.r1(cont.)ment shall be at the expense of the owner of the facitity. -|

Provided that the driveway proposed along our pipeline and within our right-of-way isapproved, please note that the driveway could be unavailable at any time, for a periodof time, in the event excavation of our pipeline becomes necessary for maintenanceand repair, replacement, or the addition of anoth€ipipeline. Metropolitan will not berespcnsible fier, any distupfrons.fs*e-trivffiyifihi .

For any further coffespondence with Metropolitan relating to this project, please makereference to the Substructures Job Number shown in the upper rigirhano corner of thefirst page of this letter. Should yor require any additional-informlation, please contactMr. Ken Chung, telephone (zlj)217-7670.

Very truly yours,

Kieran M. Callanan, P.E.Manager, Substructures Team

KC/lyDOC 4036-05-001

Enclosures (la)

4. r5

Mt John J. MasottaPage 5Febnrary 28,2A05

boc: K. M. CallananK. ChungD. W. DeanK. RoseSubstruclures BookSubstructures File

w/plans

w/plene

Madin A' Woll, President Djana Dixon'Davis, Vice-President (Chair, Beautification) Linda Ross, Secretary Teena Takata, TreasurerBeatrice Berman Anna cox Robert Dager Jud'ith Daniets Jay Davis 'cnaiGs-busheck

Jerry Engtand (Chair, Equestrian; co.Chair, Landuse) Allen Glazer (chair, outrBach) chris Harding Daniel Htfuman wirriam trugles_Timothy lmel (chair, Transpoilation) charles KnollsArthur Schlefstein Andp van der Valk Linda van oer valk ico-crtair, rJno Usil 'liarc

wintersLand Use Committee

CIIATSWORTH NEIGIIBORIIOOD COUNCILP.O. Box 3395, Chatsworth, CA9l3l3-339s

(818) 464-3sl 1 - Fur (818) 464-3slswww. chatsw orthcouncil. or g

Re: Draft Environmental lmpact ReportSiena Canyon Secondary SchoolEtR 2004-0164-EtR11023 Lurline AvenueChatsworth, CA 9131 1

June 3,2005

N icholas Hendricks, Environmental Review coordinatorEnvironmental Review section, Department of city planning200 N. Spring Street, Room 750Los Angeles, CA 90012

8,F,F.fi[MfiSJUN 00 2005ENV,RONIi4iNTAI

Letter No. 5

Dear Mr. Hendricks,

The Chatsworth Neighborhood Council's Land Use Committee (hereafter Land Use Committee)submits the below comments on the above-referenced draft Environmental lmpact Report.These comments are based on commentary at a recent meeting of it's Land Use Committee,which included input by various stakeholders, as well as a reviefu of the DEIR, 2004-0164-ElR.

The following questions remained after the High School staff and project managers made theirpresentation. Therefoq, we bring these questions fonrvard to the attention of tnl CityEnvironmental Review Section, especially when considering "Alternatives 1 through i,,, pages 1t o 4 . - _ 9 . - . ' r -

1 . Height of the buildings, especially the "tower" that was illustrated in the elevationsketche-s and site layout shown to the Land Use Committee on May 19, 2005 is notclear. The applican! and his representative said the design was not a firm height ordesign. Concerns that the visual impact would overpowei the residentialneighborhoods that have pre-existing (for decades) in and around the site has notbeen mitigated, since the height is stiil undetermined.

Because of the terraced nature of the site, elevations of the tower, the mainclassroom building, the buildings near the swimming pool, the performing arts center,and the gymnasium are requested, both from the final grade tevel surrou-nOing tnebuilding and the finalelevation from a consistent point,bn say, Rinaldi Street]

2- Noise from a public address system travels much further, especially one used to callstudents; to alert the entire grounds to the start of eventysporting and otherwise.

5.01

I5.02

Sound from announoements should not to exceed beyond the S00 foot distance from lt.r,the school's boundary, as per L.A.M.C. Pages 1-22 of the DEIR, "Noise'Operation,

l{cont.)does not conectfy depict noise impac,ts. J

3. A'haul route" for removal of 19,800 cubic yards of material has not been identified. I ^^This should not be handled at the subdivision level, but should be delineated at the l)'urearliest opportunity I

4. Section lV - "TransportationlCirculation" - The greatest con@rns shown at themeeting developed as the applicant described the parking spaces as equivalent tothe minimum City requirements for parking on site. Simple addition shows every oneof the 236 spaced filled by faculty, students, or staff at all times. The concern, t-hen isthat additional students or parents or staff, visitors, salesman, support ormaintenance carsftrucks, visiting teams and/or adult specfator, and on and on, willhave to go to a "satellite" parking area to be bussed to the site. The applicant statedno offsite parking sites have yet been secured or even identified. No bus routes ortruck routes have been identified as part of the Draft ElR. Thus the impacts on theneighborhoods around these'hubs'have not been identified to be studied. Forinstance, a basketball meet with seating for 500 may bring an extra 2S0 cars to thesite. All these cars must find parking in our community, and then, transportationroutes to the event on school grounds, and a returning route. lmpacts from suchactivity - perhaps several times a month, were not addressed by the draft EIR; norwere routes and 'hub sites" identified by the applicant.

This is the major issue not mitigated, that the Land Use Committee found on May 1g,2005. These issues must be carefully thought out, and mitigated with items such asthe following:

Additional Parking on siteReductions of school site eventsReductions of student numbers and/or visitorsExtensive transportation plans that can be documentedRealistic parking space quotas set by the CityDesignated visitor parking areascontrolling hours major facilities are used to eliminate and/or reduceconflicts with normal school operationLimit use of major facilities (performing arts center and gymnasium) to onlyone event to run simultaneously.

Please review the above, and advise us of appropriate answers at your earliest convenience.

Sincerely,

5.04

(tr.*.-, Llrt ,r d.t.ttj ,,--/-.]-

Linda van der ValkCo-ChairLand Use Committee

fi,Ff,EltfigJW 09 2005ENy,BgillyEfl,rAr

CHATSWORTH NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCILP.O. Box 3395, Chatsworth, CA 91313-3395

(818) 464-3srl - Fax (818) 464-3s8swww. chatsw or thcounc i l. or g

Martin A. Woll, President Diana Dixon-Davis, Mce-President (Chair, Beautification) Linda Ross, Secretary Teena Takata, TreasurerBeatrice Berman Anna Cox- Robert Dager Judith Daniels Jay Davis Charles Dusheck Jerry England (Chair, Equestrian; Co-Chair, LandUse) Allen Glazer (Chair, Outreach) Chris Harding Daniel Huffman William Hughes Timothy lmel (Chair, Transportation) Charles Knolls

Arthur Schlefstein Andre van der Valk Linda van der Valk (Co-Chair, Land Use) Marc WintersLand Use Committee

a.

June 6, 2005

Nicholas Hendricks, Environmental Review Coordinator :Environmental Review Section, Department of City Planning200 N. Spring Street, Room 750Los Angeles, CA 9OO12

Re: Draft Environmental lmpact ReportSierra Canyon Secondary SchoolEIR 2004-0164-EtR11023 Lurline AvenueChatsworth. CA 91311 Letter No. 6

2. Will the city give a definitive answer if there will be parking on Rinaldi Avenue, south of the1118 Freeway to DeSoto Street.

3. Will the new sound wall along RinaldiStreet be landscaped on both sides of the wall? ] O.O:

4. Will the storm drain behind Celtic Street be secured in some manner as to discourage itfrom being an "attractive nuisance," Preferably with landscaping.

5. Prior to approval of the high school building height will there be a demonstration to view itJl O.Ostrue perspective from the neighborhood? -�l

6.01

6.02

-16. Are there plans to discourage speeding on Rinaldi Street? lt has not been discouraged with I a.odon the streets opened from Devonshire Street to Rinaldi Street into Porter Ranch. |

-

7. What are the hours of operation for the high school, with special attention to after school ]|U.0,activities? I

8. Will the lighting, P.A. system, bell system be addressed as the building are completed Wi;lthere be a yearly evaluation. What are the lighting requirements? Will there be a glow at night | 6.08from the high school? J

16.09-

] o,ro

] u t t

Sincerelv,

/2^-efuTEENA A. TAKATARecording Secretary, Land Use Committee

9. Will there be a yearly evaluation as this project progresses?

10. Will DeSoto Street have no parking west of Tulsa Street to the 1 18 Freeway?

11. Can the high school be encouraged to landscape with mature grovrrth?

\ Letter No. 7

RESPONSE TO SIERRA CANYON EIR - STEVE KREYNES

g.|FdFfirvED -1|ANGELES

II offer the following suggestions JUN 0 g 200b | 7.0r

Please no buzzers or ringing bells. ENV;R9NMENTA' l

No noise from athletics or performing arts intruding on residential neighbors J 7.02

Use a sound wall not a 5 Vzfoot wall to block some of the noise which otherwise would Iintrude on the home residents. Supplement that with a bountiful use of trees and high I l.Olbushy foliage. )

Schedule athletics and performing arts to completion prior to 5 or 6 p.m to protect the 1 ,.*residents from instrusive noise. J l*

JunF3,2fi)5

R€g; Sicra Ceuyonlffidle Scbol

Letter No. 8

E#f.EH€8

qincrqptrt"t

JUil 0s ffiE|t1H!fl,nr

Ve ae very ooumred abouf |bG Sfuma Qaryon School po]lcnNcfutbofioo4Fomost ffo ob and polhfbn lerclr will be idolerabb. A scbool qlortf activilieq^Art pcrbnuanccs, smiffining rce*s will cr,c*c a lot ofmi* md . Thca€hicl€swillpoft all owr orr eigbbortood and*ill cr€afieuosa&Ehildleo-

ftralloftu ond oru

I *0,JI '0 ,J

]*:01]

* *

VIe do ot need'a'echoolto destoytbe c.hractcr ofthe ae,sore vuy fioc schools doun tte mad.

Plesse conridsr movbg ltp projed to dotb sire.

ED AND CHRISTINE KOZDROWICKI10935 OKLAIIOITIIE AVctrATsvoRlrr, cA" 9B1l , ,

- , t - r - b { r . ^

il e'4{ ['h42fn *t rvr 1 6

J U H - r 3 - o 5 r ' r o N r 7 a l 8 7 7 2 5 3 2 7 P - 0 1

9.01

lb: City of Los Angetcs, l)epartmeur of City Plenning200 North Sprlng Street, Room 750LosAngeles, CA 90012

F"rom: C. T. Lin10958 Okfahoma Avc.Chatsworth, CA 9l3lt

Subject: Sicrra Canyon Secondrry SchoolscH # 2004011102

Dntc: June 13,2005

Letter No. 9

This is a request for the approval on raising the height of rlre exisring brick wafl on rhenorth side of my residence propcrty located at 10958 OklahornaAve., Chatsworth, CA9 | 3 | I and for asking Sierra Canyon School to pay to build rhe raised brick wall alongthe said property line.

After having consuhed with sanje Rarnavale, chicf operating olliceq of SierraCanyon School, about the noise that may bc generated by the traffic and rhe schooland potential intrusion or vartdalism, he asked me to subrnit this requesr to raise thcheight of thc cxisting brick wall that runs along rhe sourh side of Rinaldi Srrect,irnmediately adjacent to the current construction site of the paved street and the frrtureSieua Canyon Secondary School. Mr. Ratnavale, on behalf of Sicrra Canyon School,has agreed to Pay for the expenses incurred in raising an additional4-5 feet of brickwall above the cxisting wall once the City of Los Angeles has approved tSis rcquest.

The wall runs about 160 fcet along thc property line of my residence by the south sideof Rinaldi Street, immediately next to a slreet access opening that is currently presenrin the cxisting wall, connecting between Oklahorna Avenue and Rinaldi Srr.eet. It hasbeen decided by the City and the Schoolrhat rhis existing opening will be blocked andsealed with brickwork to avoid the residential area nearby the opening ro bcconre anaccess for dropping-off and picking-up studenrs in the future.

Please give this request a favorablc consideration and reply to me through a regularmail scnt to my home addrcss at the location nbove, or through fax ar 8 18-772-5327(please call first). Thank you very much.

Letter No. 10

6/5/05

General Comment:The site has been rezoned once to increase density (additional dwellings)-now

agan? The Porter Ranch development has already placed a burden on this *Ju--no*more? The floor areg olthe proposed project is equivalent to 60 dwellings currentlyrezoned for only 7. We believe this neighborhood has already done its f*r share topromote growth/commerce in LA.

Specific Comments:

II-A: Proiect ?escriptionSpecial Events/School Events (page II-16): We are opposed to events occurring duringtypical non-school hours or on holidays or weekends. Thesd activities are not conduciveto our low density residential area. We suggest you use the existing school's facilities forthese events.

Proiect Phasing: Adequate on site parking must be construeted prior to occupying anytemporary classrooms. Also, how long will this temporary school be operated? We seelittle discussion regarding operational criteria and mitigation measures for the temporaryschool. This is a separate project by itself and needs to be thoroughly discussed!

lV-A: Aesthetics/Views1. The variance requested is for a 69' height as opposed to the 45' rnax height

limitation (i.e. exceeds by 53%). Additionally, this height increase will appeareven higher since the school is to be built on a hill above the local residences

2- No detailed explanation is given as to why there must be a significant heightvariance. Some parts could be buitt below grade.

3. Construction of the homes and property line walls south of Rinaldi prior toopening the school would help alleviate this significant aesthetic impact onexisting adj acent homes.

lV.-B: Air OualitvConstruction Mitigation Measures: The Porter Ranch Developer has done a poor jobat keeping dust under control in this windy area. We need a 24-hour hot line to call foran immediate response.

1V-B-8: Suspend operations when wind eusts exceed 25 mph and begin an aggressivewatering schedule.

lV-H: NoiseGeneral: There is no adjustment in noise calculations for:

1. school height above existing residences2. normal daily afternoon breeze/wind from the Northwest.

I110.02

J] ro.or

l

10.01

10.05

10.06

] rooe

] , , *

1,,,,

1 ^ f (

10.09

Construction Noise: Table lV H-7 indicates significant impact of construction noise to Ilocal residents based on conservative (brgh) noiJe estimates-for the complet"J Ril; ;. I ro.roWhat will be construction noise impacts if Rinaldi St. noise is significantly lessi

--

JOperationGeneral ( ptges H13-14): Noise from car alarms, horns, radios, bells, pA and chimes areaveraged into continuous noise to lead to the conclusion they are not a significant impact.fhis is not true if you live close to these nuisance noises. Additional mitlgation is neededfor these short term noises.

Athletics Center and Performing Arts Center: All exit doors should face away from l1o.t,residences or have a permanent sound barrier constructed in front of them. .J ------

J

Aquatics Ccnter and Campus Plaza: Any amplified noise/PA system shall be deri*r"Aland operated to be inaudible at 150' from schoolproperty line. This is consistent;tt

-- | tO.t:

L.A. City municipal code goveming noise that privaie residences can emit tcrradte, ii, Isections lr2.0l & 114.04). Design should allow for typical wind.

t0 . l I

10.14

r0.15

l0:16

10.17

0.22

] t o *

1

Mitigation:Hl: How will they be monitored? What are suitable noise attenuation devices?Playing of radios/boom boxes shall not be permitted on the construction site.H2: Send notice to residences within %mileof the site.H3: Disturbance call response should be within l0 minutes. Notice to residenceswithin %mileof site.H4: Following the standard LA City Code is not acceptable mitigation forconstruction of a 120,000 square foot facility in a low density resldential zone.Construction should be limited to Monday through Friday from 7am to 4:39pm,and no construction on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidayr. gnir site was areaayrezoned and increased in density for the construction of only 7 dwe[ings.)H5: what is the duration of the construction sound barrieriH7: (Sarne as Aquatics Center Comment)H8: There should be no special events outside of normal school hours andnormal school days. This is a low density residential area and should not bedisturbed at all by the school during typical leisure time.

Note: A possible noise mitigation measure that was not included is requiring the housesand block fences planned for south of future Rinaldi St. be constructed priorio the schoolopening. This would help create a buffer zone from school and Rinaldf St. noise. Thiscould be a major mitigation for the local residents.

Simificance After MitieationParking Level Noise: Intennittent noise (car alarms, homs, radio, etc) is significant tothe community. The parking structure southwest wall should be closed off or have apermanent sound barrier placed in front of it.

Chimes and P.A. Noise: Same as response to H7.

ll

I ro.rsf 10.1e

] 'o''o

I| 10 .21

J

Z

Special Event Noise: Same as response to H8.

Last sentences of Chapter lV-H reads: "Thus, the proposed project would contributeto significant cumulative noise impacts over a24-how period ai tttir location. Thisimpact is considered cumulatively significant and unavoidable."

l. However, we see no analysis to show that the 'tnavoidable" impact on theLurline residences is truly unavoidable. please clarify,

lVJ: Transportation and CirculationParking:

l. Calculation of 236 spacos was done using zoning code requirements for assemblyareas. Please explain how 136 spaces is enough for 550 students every day.(236-100 staffspaces:I36 student spaces )l space per 4 students.)

2. How will you assure cars are not parked on adjacent residential streets due toheavy DeSoto Ave. traffic for typical school days (or special events, page J2B)?

3. How will you assure that parents will not use Nashville or Lurline to drip offsfudents "across the street from the school"?

Mitigation Measures:J l :

How will you enforce (mandatory student) two person car pool rule?Explain TDM numeric goals and how you will meet those goals so that 136student parking spaces are adequate. The DEIR provides only a generalguideline.

3. The TDM study should be done twice a year (Spring and Fall). How many daysare studied?

4. Send TDM study results to residents within 2000' south and east of the school.5. TDM study should not be terminated after 5 years unless approved by Chatsworth

Neighborhood Council.6. What are penalties for school not meeting TDM goals?7. what are penalties for students/parents violating TDM requirements?

J2: This is unclear. A drawing is needed to clarifu. NOTE: wE wrLLNoT ACCEpTANY MODIFICATIONS WHICH ENCOURAGE USE OF TULSA STREET.ADDITIONALLY, THE RESTRICTED LEFT TURN RFQUIREMENT MUSTREMAIN. The applicant should analyze if other restrictions would be beneficial.

J4: This mitigation should be physically completed prior to school opening.

J5: Same as J4.

J6: Same as J4.

J9: The TDM should include provisions requiring parents and students to not use Tulsaand Lurline as "short cuts" to the school. They need to sign a statement acknowledging

J to.ro

Il

10.35

llll

t0.25

l .2.

10.26

r0.27

10.28

] ,0,n

10.31

r0.32

10.33

10.34

] ' o r o

3

this annually. Penalties should be described on the statement. School should k I

of vehicle license fiut oumuer, (updated annually) of students, parents, *o rdp,f, [1 | to'lz (cont')

violators can be easily tracked. __-

J

Two of the impacts stated as significant and unavoidable include:l. Visual (height)2. Noise (residences south of Rinaldi)

These impacts could be reduced by:l. Building school structures partially below grade2. Possible design changes, but none were discussed or analyzed. No reason was

given!!

These above impacts are described as unavoidable because of the design chosen. This ismade clear when reading the last sentence of page Vl: "Thus, in ordeito meet theobjectives, the project is being proposed despite the significant and unavoidable visualimpacts and cumulative noise, fire, and police protection impacts."

This means to us that the local residents "objectives"of having a project whichproduces similar impacts as few single farnily homes as approved by the cunent plan willnot meet in favor of meeting the school's objectives,

Also, the last sentences of part A reads, "Overall, the benefits realizedthrough theachievement of the project objectives would justifo the relatively minimal silnificant andunavoidable impacts." We disagree. These sentences should be removed as there is noevidence to prove this statement. (Those who approve the EIR make this decision.)

VI-B Alternatives

Alternate 4: (Reduced enrollment, 365 students)This project is much less intrusive to the community with fewer impacts. It is

rejected mainly because of its subterranean parking. Why is this so bad? Ii appears thatthe applicant will only accept an A+ facility with *all the amenities" rather than acompromised A- facility.

Alternate 5: (Alternate sites)There was no discussion about building on vacant commerciaUresidential land

north of the 118 freeway in Porter Ranch. Please discuss this altemative.

The alternate project located west of DeSoto Ave. was rejected mainly because ofthe possible cumulative impact from two schools close togetler. However, Table VI-lshows that impacts of this altemate site can be mitigated to the same level as theproposed site. Additionally, this comparison neglects to statd that the residents east ofDeSoto Ave. have, and continue to take, the "brunf'of the impacts from the huge porter

10.38

] , , , ,

]

' �040

] * . ,

1'"t

Ranch development (taffic, noise, construction dust, etc.). The residents west of DeSotoAve. have partially isolated themselves from the Porter Ranch development by blockingentry on Tulsa St., requiring the future Rinaldi St. to be constructed asa non-sicondaryhighway and apparently not wanting the development of a high school in their area toeducate many of the children living in Porter Ranch. Therefore, because of continuousimpacts from the Porter Ranch development, we suggest it is more appropriate to buildthis school west of DeSoto Ave. (Alt.s). l'-"=',

,

We, a goup of concerned residents of Tulsa Sheet, tlunk you for your consideration.welo2y' forward to reading your responses and discussing them with you.

-],,,,

(cont)

Scott and Jrilene Munson20649 Tulsa St.

and Supaha

and Fran Goodsite

6

Oune 2, 2OO5

Nieholae Hendrlclssr snvissnnental coordlnotqrEnvironuental Reveiv SectionDepartnent pf City plaoning'2OO North sprtng Street, R6on ?50Los Angel.es, Cal. l for;r la gOOtz

Regardiag:f

Clratsror tsh, ca l i forn ia 91311 - l - - - .

' -Ea,r'|tr; ttend;lir*g ;.- ..'-..*'*-'-

FollorrtnE are '"6mnbnts on tlre Sierra CanfonDrart Envtronnenrar rnpaer n.poiil

-iri-2"66il;il:

IIT i.n order_of descrtpt&on in the Jociiint,

EAF-ZOO4-Or64-EIR state Clearlaghoos, lno.Sierra Canyon Middre Sctroot ffOZ: r,uriine

Letter No. 11

EFF,FT.HE8Jtfrt 00 m5'BifmmHtnt

lfi[T

z ZOO44OtttOaArrenue

rts SchoslR. Theee

ful-1y naklngMy connents

oottb6ir

Alternat iwe-:3not neutlon

ia stid.tta4a,'1^;t . Beduc inE

r s w i s u a lwh i le s t , l t1

i t ' s c r i t i e a t -

then to fotto$ and cross-refenc" t;;h;'tIiIEneE e?ly to follot and.cross_refence to the texl: : : .** i f _1 gxplainat io+,r,o i l re potnt-ani eactuavarldi ty can be-errbEtaat iat ia.---

ur 's res

AJ-ternati-res to reduee or avoid significant itrdflcugses rhe viF,uar i$o€rof tbe lroposar; ilII3i::1:g_ 9ga t_ ErrGfr oEffi" s aes i Eie c

- trrE- r ayout t aprcordatnid earbir.nt-i"rrl--ii-;:"; ;ii:

rhls project deslgc'ras sbacfred lnto;rtrc; i f f i- - - - - Y . - t s 9 .

of, at-rrdentsr . r Y r a q l

i .e. incone,yas dCternlned frou th€ need to bui. ldr

E.

ao

I 1 . 0 1

and Xrerforning st3gee on a sloping ,tt" "t gr""tenrollueat reiluces the scope oi ttre proJ,ect and ilupacts on ttre surroundlnE- exiitinq i".i6rrt"rhood,provlding the scl.ool rlth-rlre oppoitun{[i-t," bull6trucures.

g1qic-.{?rdq.9r- -d.{g!:84 tLq s-itg, rhiF res&.*"u"e+ ;;'ir..--' ttRirt$f lc a- e?tlrE-l€gE ai-FY?i i i i nv-eu"ti ga r ion . {a bh i e . pro J ecr-qoeg.not go thaougq.:t4a eupalvigion profiss: trre iinpi"I-or. .4trt_haur ins . throue-h a

- sstuiFgnl.ri - i e bnornlustv . ar eiripr l# ;

- L;L;$i ;etnce' la thls eade, triiie-uirl u9 ""v"i'ar 99"s1!-l"i-""n+.+rpcrioa

construction o5leration HitLgatLotr !,feasures rv-a-s{a 8_6 docsnot def,ihe rhe rr+ul' loute _tEar_ril l be uaio-to-tirE fslaoo

tbat coul'd conrinee fooff ani on ror yeiG,;il;trdil"ii';.ilIi-i-l3^":-:::t?_ i :_ :I:_ _1f._9.!! T3"r- *Tpor t a i.t

-in aa r ;;;; l " F

-tiJ}iffi . i"proveaea in caaerer fr<ii ttre ctty of Lo.s engeii--rliit"Ii,.-..'*'

I:::tB::!:"::l{ f tsnal and. srreei _ rn_prov"i"it"iv . E; -ile'peir

Lake Banch Projqbt, for_ uhictr_;'*i" t ire "plricint tr"-";I l#responslble for. aegotd,.atlng th" tero, . . "-itb. i- iot-i;#;i, .Ec '1,er .Frsr€ Eor.aeE5rE;raErn€t Ene tern, , . " " !c . !s r {ot fem*IrJ-e.

T:.?:?:_ltl:_pl:i-.,o!-. il: ii_ rhe. counTy ?f r,"". i"s{ii"!-iat:.p,coaditioni for surdtvi.sioa ana-tii iart ;; E havl tre,- : - - - es 'sr ! - ! - rsr . qtr r r LIa l l Ic ' l l [p fgvemcU.q8l navie ] teef tF F z r - |' ' ' ! s '

| ^ - . ' . l+ o r 3 .

tI

i or supervisorhatsoever tg' Slerra canyon Schoof it r a a

piritott"ntal- Bevl6tt, or accountablliby tg

fi;"i;-r"i ir,r= particular lmproveuent' - rtrle ttris migigilti-on to a cougEI ergJ3ct_t1t1;;=';si11;;i;;-;iir. sru'ra canloit stle9l in;;o;;;t-oeBcliptl"". llY-: ?isli:}:":: :l:':l;; '."itinniii i ' tegtifie'1.in f,ront or the;;;";1i;-putiiit ed elsnlrlcant a'ouats orri"oiaea ioc.rnents wlttr the-city 9f-1q5--ATi i i i-"ofiuiln,'grlsass*g; 1or -11' and 1-2'1 Ygt',, . . ..couia eveniualiy- inc.lude_S111:*-?_.1?:1_"o- iis-." gri.d!"-g-ir.=oog-h rZ nalce fi.'rdln

.-'ictrrar:+-+rag*-tq- ecld !t{.qSs rtrom a niddlein bhe lugvelil'intioned pilErtcitl'?' t1h€1roiiirii-a"icribed or pres-n9tg.' 'ttotbet tlre Gtlte saner llre stio"iote of t'tre prbject doe

ilr tne stated '9 tlrrough 12 9!ad-e' t:h?91:In addlition, the descrLBtion - of the - Itu-l rql"'"""-ii:s pto* that thb ninipun city rcguiii""--r" ilot :11I i":1:1"1="?:d*:i':::l=-;[;dt-or t]rought lra" been Eea11y put- torar

Ii"i?i"-ana piixlns issues tbat':tneilitt3l""r"ent descrloeA al uitlgation ileasurQ TDUconducting lt 's svtl nonitoring ProEraEi-cenot encourage honestyr objeetlvLty' or- tlre

oversigtht cornnlttee not cannected to the

;h;-;ffi;ounalng conn.ni'ty that 6one honestt" i toay periSai. nhe Tbu-ptan,l:r9:t:3^ina uiaaie- sctrool ls Itot effectLve as tlre

;il';;; to observg t8I191s.111':-:o-11:iii'"r'"s-"ti" ' isaiting en'tr!2 into tlre sclro;;"nliir-or studeais-to- ":3 tlil^:?"1:::1eveiyaay occurance vtrich the school. canB

the incieased enrollment that h":-?"::T:;l[J;-i;;; "ii.[en."' 19o':1-t1: :?11T

-, :;;iiioli"ir+"-i" r, PY.the use or slsplthat eaclr ""I-E*"iv patli'ig- :!l":;tffYevery' ddyl arr'i"y'ui -.e9a1!--ana €tudbnts'ersTit"tt takac ara-oS at 1u!' ?:-:l:.l:t":i.;. , erin, e"ie l-rqiog . arts ' athletic'a ' ' o

oeetins' 4! til.-"iiiioTg."lll.o::"*:: :*u"ii"g-prG-entatioa of the^DELR to theEi,i"Jir ' tlie afrrtcant etated that the

seneratea everlE"i- ll1-"i-:"::t*::* ( -

vLth l{o geferenc}e1 lrrocegs of

Clty of Loete i.naProltriate te

Ealta6r no nentionLt rs recorded coP 'tlre Seeondary School

tsuolth NeiShborhood1 l i t i ture and

I.e€ that thls eltepacte fl-L-+ta.te6 fe l ] . . - . r t lov canvhen the tcttoo]-

I f ,ot disclosed=act' - Joelng;*tr qttr--

ollll€lrt nrrlberB ELaYno t na tch . f i ha ings

I1 .03(cont.)

1 l .04

::l;;iiil=-i;;' paitrng' "'a-:'-!:"?1 ::' 'Cirriers - fhe-aiOii:"t. "::rl::t*:fii;.;;;;oi--t"u-55'r-Ju-uaa. be- done to tde.lili"iririty -or- euctr a nitigatl'on treagure

, ;;;';;-giiai..i tri erre aelglrborhood du-r.l

.gs and thScr n-see on -l

:;:?"?t""[35;*lI"'"u lrr.osts nitigiatlng tlre Jvi1l generate' Ttre -l

has the TPPLICI}{T I:t,ainll,, ttris does Ipoeeibi l . i tY of an I

:lroo1 that can ateurc Ip is preaent during Ii at the elenentrY I t t.OeDEIB ctaiua- One Igal l l Parked and II f,or Pick-uP and In tor hourg is an I

nitigate because o-f I( ilreEarrY) througtl )Dolnts of Lhls PaPer I, - adld{t lonr cal .culate Iral-).-*itr,tr. be oc.cuPled IAny v is i toEr o r i f Ilus planned rreBues; I: a paren t l teacher I l tnzrd o f f -s i te ParXtng ' |

- " " '

rtsrorth Nelghbgrhood Il r f lof of t raf f ic I

nlglrts) rould fitl Itre sctrool bY Private Iry- theee hub eitee-; I3;and exPlore the Ito- the olcvlvous ln- - In9 any school actiwltfl

2 o f

t.tt , ,t 1I JHI El ff ' .t 4t it ;i l .t il . fr ' ai .: :; r

. !

!

f . :' :. . i{:

i ;i :

,

Ttre DEfR does nlt.aadress the the inmediatto-Uhe aeighborhood streets.aF rnaldi rt l tand' there ia no ocqll\ott pariirrg d-";;;;ectredule of ewenqe this seloo.l pi"poseu ii:!il!_the elty Pl.dnn{ns Dep'artdest irot pa""nlnlqun -slraee r-gguirenent for ttre scho6l tnunD{ar that v111 burden ttre neighborhoodsttrat the school -._t11= gLvea no th-ought. lfitinnedi.ate i.de#i{icaEiaa arrd prooF. oi arr"icllog-r year_ for hub parktas ti?iiiui; ;;-ancr tbe routes the private traneport-t ion- iEi:li:#3++*.tst F;sE++H+:-Er*iito

ii:-"?3..*?lIt _9f ghg apericiiio"-Je--"ii'"itsgf or gggfogy ttudy- WLtlrout addraesing-nusD consiC.er dqunsizi+g i t . s 6cope of oieteacher/Btaff s ize, andTor agulrr .ng Eore I

t ion etttrer requiiesbtfity ttcoughout the

eess of 5OO to 8OO cirs)i ] - l . use. as rel1 as aII

-

ni t i ,Eat iou,F ' | # - - -

xs as mucll anDhe bui ldlnge, landacap_n1€ lssue the schoola t l .on , l t , s r tudent and

for parklng at all

docuraent used to identifi'oposed proJect beconeaTtre above innacts'r'ne aDove lnpaces

t iEated; aad therefore lr 1.08

- lnpacts.of the propoealbe siEaed ' 'No paiki iE",. Hearing the anblt iousls of intrredtate concernaver as acqeptable tlie I I-4eet i Lt . ie an i l . I 'oElca:ith a penasaant inpaEt

I1.07cont.)

t iaes.

The Draft Environnental fupact Report is aand n i t ig ia te , i f pose lb le , i ssues-before t r .a burden to the conqunity and city ;;;nif"f have cited ar€ not a{n6r; hawe iot-ueen-need to be looked Lnto as 6oon as possibteCondit ionat Use procers to sort thlough.

and not left to ttre

you'for lrour attention to thesre,

7r4e Plunb3 4 1 - 6 L 9 3

lhank

Jeanni( 8 1 8 )

lrour

3 o f 3