APPELLANT’S_OPPOSITION_TO_APPELLEES'_MOTION(S)_FOR_SUMMARY_AFFIRMANCE_DCC_10-5091-cv_070410

8/9/2019 APPELLANTS_OPPOSITION_TO_APPELLEES'_MOTION(S)_FOR_SUMMARY_AFFIRMANCE_DCC_10-5091-cv_070410

1/33

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUITNO: 10-5091.(C.A. NO. 09-1249)\ CChristopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, , -3 -i nAppellant, 3 .l- s TIC)-v. z) -9. ,%

l 4 01 .ldrJNEW YORK PROVINCE OF THE " >-.I . . ., . - . . .. . .opposition to the ~~pe l l e6s ' ' ~o t i o~ (s )or Summary ~ff innancef Judge ' ,

. .2 I . . ~. . . .>~ . . ' .: .. ... ' . . . ,.. ,-. . . . .. * : . ' . -.' . . . . , .RichardJ. ~'mn's a r d r,201 0 Memorandum Opinion &d order g=a"ting

.. . . . . .Federal~~~ellee'sandNEWYORKPROVINCEFTHESOCIE+:. :. . . _. . . , ., . ,

. . . . . .. . .+.5 :: ," . , . : . , , .. I - . . '. : . . ' . ... ! ,.JESUS, et al Motions daismiss; and beyond the ~ederal-reach ofduty " . : *.. .

. . ... . . . . . ,. ,and neglect of honest setvice, Appellant respectfully desires theremand foran opporiunity to amend the Complaint to include the state actions of theState of New York in failure to enforce the law as a violation of Appellants -- -sovereign inalienable rights lead to notorious Jesuit Chief of staff to hew AYork Roman Catholic Governor David Paterson among others who interfere;

1


2/33

withNewYorkdomesticAffairsinjuringPlaintiff/Appellantandhisrightto

contractandproperty.

Background2. AppellantreallegesthefactsthattheNewYorkProvinceoftheSocietyofJesusisaCorporationintheStateofNewYorkandwhose

memberswithanexclusiveoathhavenotdulyregisteredwiththeNewYork

SecretaryofStateortheAttorneyGeneral,asbothareagentsoftheNew

YorkProvinceoftheSocietyofJesus,thatotherwiseisacompellingstate

issueoflawenforcementundercivilrightslaw;andnotwithstandingthefact

thatthereisafederalmatterbecausethenPresidentRonaldReaganon

January10,1984forthefirsttimeinUSAhistoryrecognizedthe

sovereigntyoftheVaticanState,inwhatmayonlybecomparedtoa

concordant.

3. TherebyrecognizedstatesovereigntymakesalltheemployeesandswornmembersofthemilitaryorderoftheSocietyofJesusasthePopes

personalmilitiasubjecttoregistrationasforeignagentsofasovereignstate

undertherespectiveprovisionsoftheForeignAffairsstatutesandalsofall

underprovisionsoftheViennaConventiononConsularAffairswithrelated

law,whichisexclusivelyintheoriginaljurisdictionoftheSCOTUS;andthat

suchagentswhohaveexclusivelyswornfealtytothePopeattheVatican

2


3/33

StateandwhooperateintheHolySeepresentinNewYorkCityatthe

UnitedNationsalongwiththeSovereignMilitaryOrderofMalta(SMOM),a

sovereignstaterecognizedbytheUSA,actwithfederalagenciesand

officialsandwithnamedAppelleeswhohavepledgedexclusiveoathof

allegiance,includingtheoathgivenforOPUSDEI,andordeclaredfealtyto

thePope,theJesuitGeneraloftheSocietyofJesus,theGrandMasterof

theSMOM,aresubjecttotheForeignAffairsLawswithdualallegianceand

maynotalsoserveAppellantasasovereignpersonofNewYorkwhohas

exclusiveallegiancetotheUSAinexchangeforprotectionandhonest

servicesdeniedbyFederalAppelleesalongwiththosesimilarlysituated.

4. ItremainstruethatthespecificnamedFederalemployees,liketraitorRobertHansen,whohavepledgedanoathtothePopeoragreetoemploy

individualswhohavepledgedsuchanoathdividingallegiancetotheUSA,

thatFederalAppelleesareessentiallyunregisteredforeignagentswho

cannotsimultaneouslyfaithfullyupholdtheU.S.Constitutionandlawsand

todefendtheUSAandthesovereignStatesandAppellantagainstenemies

foreignordomesticareactingwithcrossallegianceandconflictofinterest.

Standing5. ThatPlaintiff/Appellantinjuryandstandingareafunctionofindividualinalienablesovereignrightsandtothoserightsgrantedtothe

3


4/33

formationoftheUSAinexchangefortheProtectionguaranteedtoPlaintiff

bytheUSA,andoritsagentswhofailedinprovisionofhonestservices.

6. AsfortheallegedlackofStandingStrunkdeniestheallegationandarguesasfollows:

7. Standingasadoctrinetolimitjudicialreviewhasgonethroughdifferentphases.Itshistoryshowsthatstandingreallydoesnothaveany

oneconstitutionalstandardandthatitsstandardmaychangeovertime

giventheexistingpoliticalandsocialenvironment.SeeRichardJ.Pierce,

Jr.,IsStandingLaworPolitics?77N.C.L.Rev.1741,1788(1999).The

WarrenCourtdevelopedwhatitbelievedwasarelaxedviewofstanding.

AssociationofDataProcessingOrganizations,Inc.v.Camp,397U.S.150

(1979).TheBurgerCourtthenmadeitmoredifficulttoestablishstanding.

Allenv.Wright,468U.S.737(1984).ThentheearlyRehnquistCourtmade

itevenmoredifficulttoprovestanding.Lujanv.DefendersofWildlife,504

U.S.555(1992)(pluralityopinion).UndertheinfluenceofJusticeKennedy,

theRehnquistCourtinitslateryearsopenedthecourt'sdoorsomewhat.

DefendersofWildlife,(Kennedy,J.,concurring);FECv.Akins,524U.S.11

(1998).Today,undertheRobertsCourt,thelawofstandingisnotsoclear.

CompareMassachusettsv.EPA,127S.Ct.2553(2007)(granting

4


5/33

standing),withHeinv.FreedomFromReligionFoundation,551U.S.587

(2007)(denyingstanding)).

8. Whatisreallybehindstandingisseparationofpowers.AsJusticeScaliastatedbeforejoiningtheCourt,"thejudicialdoctrineofstandingisa

crucialandinseparableelementof[separationofpowers],whosedisregard

willinevitablyproduce...anover-judicializationoftheprocessesofself-

governance."AntoninScalia,TheDoctrineofStandingasanEssential

ElementoftheSeparationofPowers,17SuffolkU.L.Rev.881(1983)

[hereafterScalia].Relyingontheseparationofpowersdoctrine,thecourts

havesaidthattheycannotdictatethemethodsusedbytheexecutiveto

enforcethelawsfortodosowouldbeinterferingwiththePresident's

responsibilityto"takecarethatthelawsbefaithfullyexecuted."Allenv.

Wright,468U.S.737,761(1984).Onthecourt'sproperrole,JusticeScalia

stated:"[T]helawofstandingroughlyrestrictscourtstotheirtraditional

undemocraticroleofprotectingindividualsandminoritiesagainst

impositionsofthemajority,andexcludesthemfromtheevenmore

undemocraticroleofprescribinghowtheothertwobranchesshould

functioninordertoservetheinterestsofthemajorityitself."Scalia,at881.

9. Themajorseparationofpowersconcernsvoicedinmodernstandingcasesisthefreedomoftheexecutivebranch(see,M.,Lujan,504U.S.555;

5


6/33


7/33

dependsonthemeritsofPlaintiff'contentions.Warthv.Seldin,422U.S.490,500(1975)(citationsomitted).10. InthewordsofChiefJusticeWaiteinMinorv.Happersett:Therecannotbeanationwithoutapeople.Theveryideaofapoliticalcommunity,suchasanationis,impliesanassociationofpersonsforthepromotionoftheirgeneralwelfare.Eachoneofthepersonsassociatedbecomesamemberofthenationformedbytheassociation.Heowesitallegianceandisentitledtoitsprotection.Allegianceandprotectionare,inthisconnectionreciprocalobligations.Theoneisacompensationfortheother:allegianceforprotectionandprotectionforallegiance.Minorv.Happersett,88U.S.162(1875).

11. ChiefJusticeWaiteagaininstructsinUnitedStatesv.Cruiksahank,92U.S.542(1875):WehaveinourpoliticalsystemagovernmentoftheUnitedStatesandagovernmentofeachoftheseveralStates.Eachoneofthesegovernmentsisdistinctfromtheothers,andeachhascitizensofitsownwhooweitallegiance,andwhoserights,withinitsjurisdiction,itmustprotect....Citizensarethemembersofthepoliticalcommunitytowhichtheybelong.Theyarethepeoplewhocomposethecommunity,andwho,intheirassociatedcapacity,haveestablishedorsubmittedthemselvestothe

dominionofagovernmentforthepromotionoftheirgeneralwelfareandtheprotectionoftheirindividualaswellastheircollectiverights.Intheformationofagovernment,thepeoplemayconferuponitsuchpowersastheychoose.Thegovernment,whensoformed,may,andwhencalleduponshould,exerciseallthepowersithasfortheprotectionoftherightsofitscitizensandthepeoplewithinitsjurisdiction;butitcanexercisenoother.Thedutyofagovernmenttoaffordprotectionislimitedalwaysbythepoweritpossessesforthatpurpose.***Heowesallegiancetothetwodepartments[stateandfederalgovernment],sotospeak,andwithintheirrespectivespheresmustpaythepenalties,whicheachexactsfordisobediencetoitslaws.Inreturn,hecandemandprotectionfromeachwithinitsownjurisdiction.Id.at549-51.InCorfieldv.Coryell,W6F.Cas.546(C.C.E.D.Pa.1823)(No.3,230),welearn:

7


8/33

Theprivilegesandimmunities,whichbelong,ofright,tothecitizensofallfreegovernmentsincludeprotectionbythegovernment...withtherighttoacquireandpossesspropertyofeverykind,andtopursueandobtainhappinessandsafety;subjectneverthelesstosuchrestraintsasthegovernmentmayjustlyprescribeforthegeneralgoodofthewhole.12. AppellantcanseethattheSupremeCourtandothercourtshavesaidthatacitizenhasarighttoreceiveprotectionandsafetyfromthe

governmentinreturnforwhichhegivesallegiancetothatgovernment.As

JusticeWaiteinCruiksahanksaid,therighttoreceiveprotectionisnotonly

arightthatbelongstothecollectivesocietybutalsototheindividual.Itis

theindividual'srighttoreceiveprotectionfromthegovernment,whichwas

thereasonthattheFoundersconstitutedthenewfederalConstitutional

Republic,believingthattheindividualwouldbebetterprotectedifthere

wereaunifiednationalgovernmenttoprovidethatprotection.

13. Citizenshipdeterminesallegiance.Acitizenentrustshis/herallegiancetothegovernmentinexchangeforitsprotection,whichincludes

thegovernmentprovidingfortheperson'ssafety,security,andtranquility.

UndertheFifthAmendmentandtheFourteenthAmendment,apersonis

entitledtolife,liberty,andpropertyandcannotbedeprivedofthoserights

bythegovernmentwithoutdueprocessoflaw.Hence,underthe

Constitution,apersonisentitledtoreceivefromthegovernmentits

protectionofhis/herlife,liberty,andproperty.Thesecomponents

8


9/33

necessarilyincludetherighttosafety,security,andtranquility.

14. Canonereasonablydenythatpersonsshouldhavearighttoprotectthemselves?TheFifteenthandNineteenthAmendmentrecognizethat

citizenshavetherighttovotefortheirrepresentativesandprotectthatright.

Citizensexercisetheirrighttoprotectthemselvesbyvotingfor

representativesinwhomtheyentrusttheirlife,liberty,andpropertyand

expecttheserepresentativestobestprotecttheirsafety,security,and

tranquility.Hence,ifpersonsareexpectedtovoteforthoserepresentatives

whomtheybelievewillbestprotectthemandthatrightisprotectedbythe

Constitution,apersonalsohasaconstitutionalrighttobringanaction

undertheFifthAmendmentagainstthefederalgovernmentand/orits

agentstodemandthatthegovernmentcontinuetoprovidehim/herwiththe

protectionheisentitledundertheConstitution.

15. ThesovereignpowerinourConstitutionalRepubliclieswiththepeopleandtheConstitutiontheyestablishedtolimitthepowerofthe

FederalgovernmentandthustheCongressanditsmemberswhoarepart

ofthatgovernment.SeeChisholmv.Georgia,2U.S.(2Dall.)419(1793)

(explainsthatitisthepeoplewhoaresovereigninourConstitutional

Republic).Anypartytoacontractasstandingtoenforceit.

9


10/33

Response Argument16. ThatinOctoberof1979myfriendRobertK.DornansoughttoremoveFr.RobertDrinanS.J.( )aDemocratelectedtotheHouse(1970-1981),

andtoremovehim,BobDornanmetwithPopeJohnPaulIIandconvinced

thePopetoorderFr.DrinantoleavetheCongress(seeExhibit A.).1 Robert Frederick Drinan,S.J.(November15,1920January28,2007)wasaRomanCatholicJesuitpriest,lawyer,humanrightsactivist,andDemocraticU.S.RepresentativefromMassachusetts.HewasalsoalawprofessoratGeorgetownUniversityLawCenterforthelasttwenty-sixyearsofhislife.Whoseeducationandlegal

careerDrinangrewupinHydePark,MassachusettsandgraduatedfromHydeParkHighSchoolin1938.HereceivedaB.A.andanM.A.fromBostonCollegein1942andjoinedtheJesuitOrderthesameyear;hewasordainedasaCatholicpriestin1953.HereceivedanLL.M.andLL.B.fromGeorgetownUniversityLawCenterin1950,andadoctorateintheologyfromGregorianUniversityinRomein1954,inadditiontoreceiving21honorarydegreesthroughouthislife.HestudiedinFlorencefortwoyearsbeforereturningtoBoston,wherehewasadmittedtothebarin1956.HeservedasdeanoftheBostonCollegeLawSchoolfrom1956until1970,duringwhichtimehealsotaughtasaprofessoroffamilylawandchurch-staterelations.DuringthisperiodhewasalsoavisitingprofessoratotherschoolsincludingtheUniversityofTexasSchoolofLaw,andservedonseveralMassachusettsstatecommissionsconvenedtostudylegalissuessuchasjudicialsalariesandlawyerconflictsofinterest.SoughtelectiontoCongressin1970,ananti-VietnamWarplatform,narrowlydefeatinglongtimeRepresentativePhilipJ.Philbin,whowasservingontheHouseArmedServicesCommittee,intheDemocraticprimary.DrinanwentontowinelectiontotheHouseofRepresentatives,andwasre-electedfourtimes,servingfrom1971until1981.HewasthefirstoftwoRomanCatholicpriests(theotherbeingRobertJohnCornellofWisconsin)toserveasavotingmemberofCongress.DrinansatonvariousHousecommittees,andservedasthechairoftheSubcommitteeonCriminalJusticeoftheHouseJudiciaryCommittee.Hewasalsoadelegatetothe1972DemocraticNationalConvention.

Drinan(alongwithfellowFr.JohnMcLaughlin,S.J.oftheNBCMcLaughlinReport)wasthefirstmemberofCongress,inJuly1973,tointroducearesolutioncallingfortheimpeachmentofPresidentRichardNixon,thoughnotfortheWatergateScandalthatultimatelyendedNixon'spresidency.DrinanbelievedthatNixon'ssecretbombingofCambodiawasillegal,andassuch,constituteda"highcrimeandmisdemeanor".However,theJudiciaryCommitteevoted21to12againstincludingthatchargeamongthearticlesofimpeachmentthatwereeventuallyapprovedandreportedouttothefullHouseofRepresentatives.AsamemberoftheJudiciaryCommittee,DrinanplayedanintegralroleintheCongressionalinvestigationofNixonAdministration misdeedsandcrimes.ThroughoutDrinan'spoliticalcareer,hisconsistentsupportof abortionrightsdrewsignificantoppositionfromChurchleaders,whohadalsorepeatedlyrequestedthathenotholdpoliticalofficeinthefirstplace.DrinanattemptedtoreconcilehispositionwithofficialChurchdoctrinebystatingthatwhilehewaspersonallyopposedtoabortion,consideringit"virtualinfanticide,"itslegalitywasaseparateissuefromitsmorality.Thisargumentfailedtosatisfyhiscritics.AccordingtotheWallStreetJournal,Drinanplayedakeyroleinthepro-choiceplatformbecomingacommonstancewithpoliticiansintheKennedyfamily.

10
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Ordershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rightshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representativeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representativeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Ordershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rightshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Artshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%27s_degreehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Collegehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Artshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%27s_degreehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Collegehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Lawshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Lawshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Lawshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_College_Law_Schoolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_College_Law_Schoolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_College_Law_Schoolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_School_of_Lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_School_of_Lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interesthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Vietnam_Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interesthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Vietnam_Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Armed_Serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_electionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Armed_Serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_electionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_John_Cornellhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_John_Cornellhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Judiciary_Committeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_Democratic_National_Conventionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Judiciary_Committeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_Democratic_National_Conventionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_Scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_Scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanours#Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanours#Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Journalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Journalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_familyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_familyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_familyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street_Journalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pro-choicehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachmenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanours#Americanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Menuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_Scandalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nixonhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_in_the_United_Stateshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1972_Democratic_National_Conventionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Judiciary_Committeehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_John_Cornellhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_electionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Committee_on_Armed_Serviceshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_J._Philbinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_to_the_Vietnam_Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interesthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Texas_School_of_Lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_College_Law_Schoolhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_Universityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Lawshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_Lawshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Collegehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%27s_degreehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_of_Artshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park_High_School_(Massachusetts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Park,_Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgetown_University_Law_Centerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusettshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representativeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_of_Representativeshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_(United_States)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rightshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Ordershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Churchhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesus


11/33

17. ThereisnoplaceintheUSAfortheJesuitssocialdemocracydoctrineandsocialjusticetheoryandliberationtheologyandcollective

classwarfaredevisedtointerferewithdomestictranquilly,andarepublican

formofgovernmentthatisantitheticaltotherightsofsovereignindividuals

andcontrarytotheexistenceoftheUnionasdevisedbytheFounders.

18. Manyformsofgovernmenthaverisenandfallenthroughoutallofhistory.ManydifferentFormsofGovernmentstillexistinthisworld.

Experimentsinthedifferentformsofgovernmentshavebeencarriedout

andavastamountofexpensiveexperiencehasbeenaccumulatedby

mankindinitsstruggletofindaFormofGovernmentthatis,onitsface,the

mostexpressiveoftherequirementsforanindividualhumanbeing's

freedomandhisorherpursuitofHappiness.TheFounderswereNOT

experimentingwhentheycreatedourparticularanduniqueFormof

Governmentmadearationalselectionbasedonfactualhistoricknowledge

andtheirownpracticalexperience.TheyfoundedOurFormofGovernment

ontheauthorityofthe"LawsofNatureandNature'sGod"asexpressedin

theDeclarationofIndependenceandNewYorksConstitution.The

Foundershadcertainbasicconceptsthattheydideverythingtheycouldto.

express,butmoreimportant,alsoguaranteetoallAmericanstheywould

foreverbeproudpossessorsofcertainandascertainableUnalienable

11


12/33

Rightsnotthen,orsincethen,enjoyedunderanyotherFormof

Government.

19. OuruniqueFormofAmericanGovemment(s)especiallyinNewYorkwhenitenteredtheUnionisnotaDemocracyinwhichpeoplerule

themselvesdirectly,orindirectlythroughunrestrainedrepresentatives,in

whichthewillofthemajorityalonegoverns.Incidentaltothedefinitionof

Democracy,asprintedandpublishedbytheUnitedStatesgovernment,

andentitledTheUnitedStatesWarDepartmentTrainingManualT-M2000-

25of30November1928,wediscoverthefollowing:

"Democracy.Agovernmentofthemasses.Authorityderivedthroughmassmeetingoranyotherformof'direct'expression.Attitudetowardpropertyrightsiscommunistic,negatingpropertyrights.Attitudetowardslawisthatthewillofthemajorityshallregulate,whateveritshallbebasedupon;deliberation,orgovernbypassion,prejudiceandimpulse,withoutrestraintorregardtoconsequences.Resultsindemagoguery,license,

agitation,discontentandanarchy.Mob-ocracy."

20. ThatdefinitionofDemocracybytheUnitedStatesWarDepartmentsetforththemilitarytrainingdefinitionofDemocracy.It,andmanyother

evidencesof.thattruthfuldefinitionmustbeacceptedasauthenticbyany

AmericanCourtofproperandcompetentjurisdiction.Believeitornot,

shortlyaftertheRoosevelt"BankingHoliday"inthenineteenthirties,"hush-

hush"ordersfromtheWhiteHousesuddenlydemanded(bytheployof

PresidentialPrerogative,weassume)thatallcopiesoftheTrainingManual

12


13/33

bewithdrawnfromtheU.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice*andtheU.S.Army

Posts.Theywere,withoutexplanation,supposedtohavebeendestroyed.

21. TheFormofGovernmentdefinedasDemocracywasconsidered,andwiselyrejected,byourFoundingFathers.OurFormofGovernmenthasa

writtenConstitution,whichguaranteeseveryStateofthisUniontohavea

RepublicanFormofGovernment.ArticleIV,Section4oftheConstitution

fortheUnitedStatesofAmericareadsasfollows:

"TheUnitedStatesshallguaranteetoeveryStateinthisUnionaRepublicanFormofGovernment,andshallprotecteachofthemagainstInvasion;andon,ApplicationoftheLegislature,oroftheExecutive(whentheLegislaturecannotbeconvened)againstdomesticViolence."

22. ThewordDemocracydoesnotappearanywhereintheConstitution.ArticleIVSection4oftheConstitutionexpresslyrestrictedtheFormof

GovernmentdefinedasDemocracyfromallofthegovernmentsinUnion

styledastheUnitedStatesofAmerica.OurAmericanFormof

GovernmentsinUnionarecorrectlydefinedasConstitutionalRepublics.

TheSourceofalloftheauthorityforalloftheexercisesofgovernmental

powersresidesinandisinherentinthePeopleoftheUnitedStatesof

AmericawhoseStatus-at-lawistheABSOLUTESOVEREIGNTYofthe

UnitedStatesofAmericaOurFormofGovernmentisagovernmentbythe

consentoftheAbsoluteSovereigntytobegovernedThatisgenerally

13


14/33

expressedasagovernmentofthePeople,bythePeople,andFORthe

People!

23. Itisnotnatural,norwasitevernatural,foranindividualhumanbeingatanytimeinhistoryinanyoneormoreoftheEarthlyFormsof

GovernmenttohaveDivineRightsandbe,therefore,exemptfromthelaws

whichalloftheotherhumanbeingswererequiredbytheDivineAbsolute

Sovereigntoobey.NohumanbeingisabovetheLawsofNatureand

Nature'sGodregardlessofthenameordefinitiongivenNaturesGodby

differentgroupentities.

24. OurFoundersestablishedaFormofGovernment,whichisourInheritance,whereinallhumanbeingsareequalbeforemanmadelawsand

are,endowedbytheircreatorwithascertainableUnalienableRights,

amongwhichareLife,Liberty,andthepursuitofHappiness.Anyotherform

ofGovernment,bywhatevernamesisanUNNATURALFormof

Government.AndtheUnitedStatesSupremeCourtdeclaredthat:Where

rightssecuredbytheConstitutionareinvolved,thereshallbeno

rulemakingorlegislationthatwouldabrogatethem.(Mirandav.Arizona

385US436)

25. Therewestand!InourFormofGovernment,therearedefinitewrittenConstitutionalProvisions,whicharetheSupremeLaw(s)oftheLand;and

14


15/33

bywhichamajorityisofnoconsequence,andbywhichStatesand

IndividualsareguaranteedcertainUnalienableRights,whichare

EXPRESSLYRESERVEDtotheStates,ortothepeople.These

UnalienableRightsareplacedbeyondtheattackofourownGovernments

inUnion.

26. Further,notmanyhistorybookstellusthatpriorto1776ThomasJefferson,theauthoroftheDeclarationofIndependence,wasstudyingin

FranceunderProfessorFranciosQuesnay(1694-1774)whowasthe

originatorofthepoliticalphilosophyknownasPhysiocracy.Physiocracyis

definedasaFormofGovernmentbasedontheLawsofNatureand

Nature'sGod.Obviously,ourFormofGovemment(s)inUnionisfounded

onthefundamentalprinciplethateachandeveryhumanbeingisacreature

ofNature'sGodandhasbeenendowedbytheirCreatorwithcertain

physicalandspiritualcharacteristics,attributes,andnatures.Tothese

characteristics,attributes,andnaturescertainrightsattachwhichwe

inherentandareanintegralpartofeveryhumanbeing'sNature.

27. AsmanhasbeenendowedbyhisCreatorwithreasonandfreewill,heispossessedwithNaturalRighttopersonalfreedom,whichissimplythe

exerciseofhisFreeWill.AsmanhasbeenendowedbyhisCreatorwiththe

instinctanddutytoworship,hemustbefreetoexercisethisinstinctand

15


16/33

dutyaccordingtothedictatesofhisownconscience--theNaturalRightof

freedomofreligiousWorship.Asmanhasthethirstforknowledge(curiosity)andthecapacitytoimpartinstructiontoothers,hemusthavethe

NaturalRighttoeducation.Asmanhasbeenendowedwiththecapacity

anddutytopropagatehisspecies,andhischildrenareincapableofself-

sustenanceforalongperiodoftime,thencertainlyNaturehasordained

thathemustfulfillthisobligationbythemostsuitablemeans--thefamily.As

natureobligesmantosustainhimselfandtoprovideforthosenaturally

dependentuponhim,hemusthavethenaturalrighttoproduce,acquire

andpossessthosephysicalthings(privateproperty)whicharenecessary

forthefulfillmentoftheseobligations.

28. ThereareotherNaturalUnalienableRightsoffreehumanbeings,whicharenotclearlyaninstinctivepartofman'sphysicalnaturebutarea

partofman'sspiritualnature,withoutwhichmanwouldceasetobeafree

humanbeing.Historyandhumanexperiencehasdemonstratedthatcertain

UnalienableRightsareindispensabletoeveryfreehumanbeingifheor

sheisnottobe,knowinglyorunknowingly,apoliticalslave.

29. Thereare,amongothers,fourfundamentalUnalienableRights,whichahumanbeingmustPossesstoactuallybeaFreeHumanBeing-these

fundamentalunalienableRightsmust,infact,bebeyondthereachofany

16


17/33

FormofGovernmentorman;theyare:(A)TheRighttoFreedomof

Contract;(B)TheRighttoEarnaLivelihood;(C)TheRighttoEnjoyALLof

theFruitsoftheHumanBeing'sLabor;and(D)Therighttoacquire

Ownership;and

30. AsMankindisolderthanallmanmadeformsofgovernment,someofMankind'sUnalienableRightsare,likewise,olderthananymanmadeForm

ofGovernment,andthereforecannotbesaidtohavebeencreatedbyany

government.Thisbeingso,theyarebytheirNATURE,beyondany

governmentalorganization.TheyareNATURALLYdefinedtoforeverbe

exemptedoutofthegeneralpowersofgovernment.

31. ThatthehistoryoftheJesuitOrdersongoingandunbrokenmissionasmilitiatothePopeistototallyandforevereliminateremnantsofthe

ProtestantreformationtoreinstallthePopeasthesingleinfallibleworld

absolutemonarchoverallmattersspiritualandtemporalbarnoneandare

activelysettoeliminatetheUSAthatclaimstohavenationalsovereignty,

sect,tribeormovementliketheShiite,Tibetans,andJewswhobelievein

thecomingofasingleabsolutemonarchormessiahotherthanthePope.

32. Thatthehistory,hiddenknowledgeandoccultmattersoftheSocietyofJesusisamatterofnationalsecurityforsurvivaloftheindividualagainst

theJesuitscommunistcollectivehereinNewYorkandtheseveralStates.

17


18/33

33. IaskedEricJonPhelpstomaketheattachedAffidavitregardingthePoweroftheSocietyofJesusinRussiaFromCzarAlexanderItothe

PresenttosummarizetheJesuitsmanufactureoftheUSSR/ThirdRome

andColdWarnowbeingrevisitedtodestroytheUSAtoday(seeExhibit B).34. IsubscribetowhatMr.Phelpsstatesatparagraph45ofExhibitB:ThatduringthePopesColdWarHoaxtheJesuitPapacyincontrolofbothEastandWest,wasperfectingitsinternationalist/anti-nationalistsocialist-communistrevolution;itsUnifiedInternationalIntelligenceCommunity;itsInternationalBankingCartel;itsInternationalMafia

OrganizedCrimeSyndicate;itsInternationalDrugTrade;itsplottoassembleamilitarycoalitionofnationstoonedayattackandsubjugatethehereticandliberalAmericanpeoples,saidcoalitionhavingbeenbuiltandfinancedbythePopesCFR-controlledAmericangovernment;thattheculminationofthisplotwillbeaSino-Soviet-MusliminvasionintoNorthAmericaendingwhatisleftoftheGrandandGloriousWhiteNorthernEuropeanProtestantReformation;

35. ThatPlaintiffsdemandforprotectionintheenforcementofthevariousForeignAffairsstatutesasappliestotheSocietyofJesusand

thoseFederalofficerswithallegiancetoRomeiswellfoundedand

essentialandparalleltothedemandtocontroltheborders,forwhichthe

JesuitsandtheAmericanConferenceofBishopsareculpablefor

interferencewiththedomesticaffairsofeachStateoftheseveralStatesas

wellasforthearbitraryandcapriciousnonenforcementoftheImmigration

andNaturalizationActof1965withamendments.

18


19/33

36. TheSacredPrincipleoftheAmericanFormofGovernmentinUnionisdeniedbyanyonewhousedthepowersofpublicofficetostirupclass

conflict,tocauseoppositionofclassagainstclass,andallwhocannot

worktogethertowardanationaldestiny,intentionallystirupdomestic

internalstrifethatisnolessviciousthanininternationalaffairs.

37. OnAugust27,1664,theCatholicKingCharlesII(thenbrotherofJamesDukeofAlbanyofScotland)attackedtheNewAmsterdamDutch

Republicatpeace,withfourEnglishfrigatesthatsailedintoNew

Amsterdam'sharboranddemandedNewNetherland'ssurrender,

whereuponNewNetherlandwasprovisionallycededbydirector-general

PeterStuyvesant;thisresultedintheSecondAnglo-DutchWar,between

EnglandandtheDutchRepublic.

38. In1667,theDutchdidnotpresstheirclaimsonNewNetherland,nordidtheyrelinquishthemeither,intheTreatyofBreda,inreturnforan

exchangewiththetinyIslandofRuninNorthMaluku,richinnutmegsand

theguaranteeforthefactualpossessionofSuriname,thatyearcapturedby

them.TheNewAmsterdamcitywassubsequentlyrenamedNewYork,

aftertheDukeofYork,laterKingJamesIIwhowithacloseadviserSir

EdwardPetre,3rdbaronetS.J.(16311699)anEnglishJesuitandprivy

19
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Stuyvesanthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Dutch_Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Englandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Breda_(1667)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_(island)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Malukuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutmeghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surinamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Yorkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Yorkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_II_of_Englandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_councillorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privy_councillorhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_of_Jesushttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_II_of_Englandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Yorkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Yorkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surinamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutmeghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Malukuhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_(island)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Breda_(1667)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_Republichttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Englandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Anglo-Dutch_Warhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Stuyvesant


20/33

councilor, who after fleeing England in 1688 formed the Masonic GrandOrient Lodge in France, forming the foundation of the French Revolution.39. The Protestant Strunk family from the Holy Roman Palatinate of

Baden settled in Pennsylvania in 1756 along with others of the Palatinatewho had immigrated to New York in 1710, and who after 1723 sick of theirill treatment in Jesuit I English New York headed for Pennsylvania ust asothers of the Palatinate looked to the frontiers of the Mohawk River Valley.In 1776, my family members were American revolutionaries against theoppression of England monarchial feudalism and now the Jesuit counterrevolutionaries.40. Appellant respectfully desires the remand of this case for an

opportunity to amend the Complaint to include the state actions of the Stateof New York in failure to enforce the law as a violation of Appellant'ssovereign inalienable rights that interfere with New York domestic Affairsinjuring Plaintiff1Appellant's right to contract and property. Respectfullysubmitted by,Dated: July

Brooklyn New York Christopher-Earl: Strunk' in esse593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281 ' *Brooklyn New York 11238(845) 901 6767 Email: [email protected]


21/33


22/33

2 Celebrate Life MarchApril 2007 MarchApril 2007 Celebrate

In April 2004, USA Today ranPelosis announcement, I fullyintend to receive Communion, one way or another Im certainlyconcerned when the Churchcomes together and says its goingto sanction people in public officefor speaking their conscience andwhat they believe.

For years I have supportedAmerican Life Leagues crusade toend the sacrilege of pro-abortionCatholic politicians receivingHoly Communion and apparentlythe plea was heard in Rome.

Considering elections, in June2004, Vatican official CardinalJoseph Ratzinger, now PopeBenedict XVI, warned U.S. bish-ops that if politicians who supportabortion or euthanasia try toreceive the Eucharist, the minis- ter of Holy Communion mustrefuse to distribute it. He citedPope John Paul IIs definitiveencyclicalEvangelium Vitae, stating:In the case of an intrinsicallyunjust law, such as a law permit- ting abortion or euthanasia, it istherefore never licit to obey it or totake part in a propaganda cam-paign in favor of such a law or votefor it. Christians have a graveobligation of conscience not tocooperate formally in practices

which, even if permitted by civil legislation, are contrary to Godslaw This cooperation can never be justified either by invokingrespect for the freedom of othersor by appealing to the fact thatcivil law permits it or requires it.

Even so, Pelosis propagandaincluded a Mass in recognition ofHouse Speaker-Elect NancyDAlesandro Pelosi, at her almamater Trinity University in

Washington, D.C. on Jan. 3. Iwasnt invited, but I went. HouseSergeant at Arms Bill Livingoodand his men welcomed me. Then Iwas invited to sit among dissidentpoliticians, but I sat farther back to worship Christ, pray forNancys change of heart and avoid the appearance of approving thespectacle.

Father Drinan damage

To my horror, the presider ofPelosis Mass was 86-year-old

Father Robert Drinan, S.J.,whom I had known for 34 years.

In 1973, when Rep. Drinan ofMassachusetts, a Democrat andthe first Catholic priest elected toCongress, wrote in defense ofRoev. Wade, I was hosting my fifth sea-son ofThe Robert K. Dornan Show, a live TV talk program in LosAngeles. I had been exposing the terror of abortion in Californiasince Gov. Ronald Reagans (R)1967 signature on the no-restric- tions law, which he later calledthe worst mistake of [his] life.

That summer, Fr. Drin paigned against the Vietnat my parish Saint Paul thein Westwood, California. asked Fr. Drinan about hisof Roe, he swiftly, violeninexplicably karate chopneck with his right hand. MSallie broke down in teardidnt expect that, huh? heat me. Ive been warned abright-wingers. I restrained but direct combat withresumed when I was eleCongress as a Republican.

In 1977, my first yeaHouse and Drinans sevefirst attack of the 95th C was made against the Hyde Amendment, now law preventing taxpayer to kill babies in the womb

Drinan was waging preborn innocents and he propaganda game doalways wore his Roman cohe misappropriated C teaching. The scandalexample unfolded quickl

By Robert K. Dornan

My parents did not raise me to be speaker of

the House. They raised me to be holy. They

raised me to do the right thing, claimed NancyPelosi (D-Calif.) as a Baltimore street was

named after her. But there is more to the story

because shes just the latest and maybe themost dangerous leader in the long campaign by

anti-Catholics within the Church who mislead

Americans, get elected and advance the culture

of death.

NANCY PELOSIS FAITH IN THE CULTURE OF DEATNancy Pelosis faith in the culture of death

(Left) ALLs youth group proSpeaker Pelosis politics as shSt. Peters Catholic Church on

Rev. Drinan testifies at the Cimpeachment hearings Nov. 1


23/33

4 Celebrate Life MarchApril 2007 MarchApril 2007 Celebrate

Catholic congressmen beganheir pattern of voting to supportbortion, using Fr. Bobs bless-g as an excuse. Not one of those

1 has come home to truth andspect for life right up to this year

f 2007.In 1978, with the help of Rear

Admiral John OConnor, head of.S. Navy chaplains and future

ardinal and archbishop of mybirthplace New York City, Ibrought to the House floor anmendment to the defense appro-riations bill. It would ban federalefense dollars from funding abor-onsand a miracle happened. Itassed with a bigger margin thanhe glorious Hyde amendment.

More hard work was ahead to gainenate acceptance in Joint Con-

rence Committee and then thegnature of self-proclaimed born-gain Christian, President Jimmyarter (D). Yet before the first votethe House, there was Drinan the

riest, telling his fellow Catholicemocrats and anyone else who

would listen, Defeat Dornan, thismendment is uncharitable.

During the vote, I moved torinans side as he went to put his

oting card into one of the cham-

ber boxes. I implored him not tobetray all my and your years ofJesuit tradition. I put my handover the voting slot. He gave me asneering laugh, moved to anotherbox and quickly voted against myamendment. God forgive you,Father Death, I whispered at him.

For two and a half more years,I said that prayer many times. Butthese encounters were not the halfof it.

The pope steps in

In October 1979, WashingtonD.C. was electrified by the firstvisit from Pope John Paul II, whohad been the Vicar of Christ for just one year. The peoples popeheld a huge Mass which Sallie and

I attended on the National Mall.President Carter met with himat the White House and invited themembers of Congress to meet himon the front lawn. Sallie stood tomy right in a line of dignitaries and the ruggedly handsome Vicar ofChrist approached us. My heartwas pounding. The pontiff took my wifes hands in his. My beautifulSallie Dornan beamed with joy.She tried to turn the pope from her-

self to me saying, Your Holiness, this is my husband, CongressmanBob Dornan, who tries to defendlife, but she couldnt finish becausethe tears began flowing.

Your Holiness, I said, myname is Robert Dornan. I serve inCongress with a Jesuit priestnamed Robert Drinan. Im Jesuiteducated and I try to pass lawsagainst abortion, but this priest, a law professor, tries to block meand cancels my every vote. Andthe worst part is that 21 congress-men pack around him and followhis lead on abortion. Help me.

The pope moved his left handup my right arm and stronglygripped it. I know. I know, hesaid as our right hands were stillclasped. Then the Holy Father leaned closer and commanded,Write to me.

I wrote to His Holiness and gotword when my letter was the onlything on his desk. In 1980, news of the popes decision spread likewildfire on Capitol Hill. The May19 issue ofTime magazine reported that Drinan had called his cam-paign manager and said, Im notrunning for re-election. Ive beenforbidden to do so by the pope.

Fr. Drinan left Congress and taught law at GeorgetownUniversity, but didnt cease hisabortion campaign. In 1996, hewroteNew York Times andNationalCatholic Reporter op-eds approvingPresident Bill Clintons veto of thePartial-Birth Abortion Ban. Bearin mind what partial-birth abor-tion is: An abortionist reaches into the mothers womb, grabs thebabys feet with forceps and pullshim out, except for part of hishead. He rolls the baby over so hedoesnt have to look at the inno-cent childs face. He jams a pair ofscissors into the back of the babys

skull and spreads the scissorsapart, making a hole. The abor-tionist removes the scissors, sticksa suction tube into the skull andvacuums out the little babys brain.

In 1998, Drinan caused fur-ther scandal as a character witnessat the impeachment hearings ofPresident Clinton (D). In 2004, headvised pro-abortion Catholic presidential candidate Sen. JohnKerry (D-Mass.). In 2007, Fr.Drinan turned the Pelosi Massinto anti-American politics, allunder the guise that he and Nancycared about the children of Darfur

and New Orleans. After he died on Jan. 28,Speaker Pelosi said, FatherDrinan was an inspiration to somany in Congress, not just thosewho served with him but those ofus who came after. And I fear forhis immortal soul.

For the children?

I also fear for the first woman tobe two heartbeats away from the presidency. Evidently, NancyPelosi is Drinans star disciple.This propaganda maven, who branded herself as a devoutCatholic grandmother, also favorsdiabolical partial-birth abortion.

In Congress, I urged her and alldissident Catholics to vote pro-life.

On one occasion, both Nancyand I were working a door, which means standing at one offive entrances to the House cham- ber and confronting members tovote one way or another on a billup for vote. An abortion measurewas up for the vote and Pelosi wasin my face at the west doorthrough which most of the seniormembers entered off the elevators.

Nancy, I sincerely inquired,how can you, a Catholic mom with

five children, be so aggressive forabortion? We have the same num-ber of sons and daughters. Nancy, you are going against Catholic teaching and our popes plea tostand up for life. I dont know of asingle bishop in America, not even the most liberal ones, who is pro-choice to kill little human fetuses.They all say its murder.

Oh, come on Bob, Pelosi laughed. What would you do ifone of your daughters was rapedby a black man?

Her racist excuse was appal-ling, but she wouldnt retract it.

For 20 years this lawmaker hasobstinately been an accessory toevery type of abortion and it is amatter of public record. On Jan.22, the 34th anniversary of Roe v.Wade, Speaker Pelosi promised, AsI have throughout my time inCongress, I will continue to work toensure a womans right to choose.

She led the charge for federalfunding of human embryonic stemcell research, which kills defenselessembryonic persons. Last July she preached, This research has the biblical power to cure Lets allpray the president will have a changeof heart and a change of mind. But ifnot, lets work very hard to makesure that members of Congress rep-resent their constituents and over-ride a presidential veto.

This is Nancy Pelosis workfor the children and now shes the most powerful woman in America. On Jan. 14, FatherJohn Malloy, S.D.B., pastor ofSaints Peter and Paul Church inher San Francisco home diocese,released an open letter tellingPelosi to stop calling herselfCatholic and receiving theEucharist because you are fooling yourself and many goodCatholics.1 But her archbishop,

George Niederauer, remainAnd Archbishop Donald WWashington, D.C. refusedPelosi and other dissidencians Holy Communion. Hthe burden on faithful lay with his retort, What agoing to do about it? (P

Post-Gazette, Jan. 22).

Call to action

Well, I call Americanational prayer and edcampaign, including distof this article.

Several U.S. bishops Canon Law 915, but manySign the petition to thConference of Catholic Biwww.CatholicCrusade.com

I also urge my fellow patriots to write brief lettertress about the bishops wh tially let Catholic politiaway with murder to His Benedict XVI via MonsignoGenswein, Private SecretaHoly Father, 00120 VPellegrino, Citta del Vatican

This isnt just aboutPelosi. Its about our Church and countrys futuabout saving millions of Achildren.

Hon. Robert K. Dornan served in1977-83, 1985-97. He served in thactive-reserve 1953-75. Hes an ad

American Life League, a speaker

substitute national radio host. (EdAnita Crane contributed to this a

1 A priest writes to Nancy Pelosi,2007, California Catholic Daily.

2 Contact details from A plea to thfor help by Barbara Kralis, Jan. 2

Renew America.

E-mail this article from ourweb s ite www.CLmagazine.

Rep. Dornan pleads for Pope John Paul IIs help on the White Houselawn, Oct. 1979


24/33

AffidavitPower of the Society of Jesus in RussiaFrom Czar Alexander I to the Present

I, Eric Jon Phelps, Author of Vatic& Assassins: "WoundedIn The House OfMY Friend ",Third Edition, concerninggihe istory of the ubiquitous,Counter Reformation Society of Jesus in Russia, do solemnly state:

1. That in 1723AD Czar Peter the Great expelled the Society of Jesus. from Orthodox Russia for attempting to usurp the Romanov throneand reduce its citizens to the absolute Temporal Power of the Pope of

Rome;2. That by the mid-Eighteenth Century the power of the Society of Jesushad grown sogreat, that nearly every monarch in Europe was under

the power of a Jesuit confessor or adviserdirectingaffairsof state;3. That due to this vast Jesuit power employed by the Jesuit Superior

General to create commercial monopolies as well as assassinateselected enemies of the Society, be they popes or kings, the Order wasexpelled fiomRomanCatholicPortugal in 1759,&om RomanCatholic France in 1764, from Roman Catholic Spain in 1767, andfrom Roman CatholicMalta in 1768;

4. That due to the most pow& European Roman Catholic monarchs,including the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, expelling theCompany of Jesus fkomtheir nationsand empires, Franciscan PopeClement XIV, after a four-year investigation, promulgated the lengthyBull, Dominus a c Redemptor Noster, forever suppressing andextinguishing the Society of Jesus in. 773;

5. Thatbecause of the papacy's suppression of the Society of Jesus,Pope ClementXIV was poisoned with a measured dose of "aquetta,"subjecting the "Vicar of Christ" to excruciating pain and prolongedsuffering before he died in 1774; .

,

EXHIBIT B


25/33

6. That because of the Orders suppression throughout the Holy RomanEmpire as well as the entire Roman Catholic world, the Society sought

and received protection from non-Roman Catholic monarchs. Three of

those monarchs (all of whom were racial Germans) were Frederick II

the Great of Prussia, Protector of the German Lutheran Church;

Catherine II the Great of Russia, Protector of the Russian Orthodox

Church; and King George III, Protector of the English Anglican Church

and Protestant Faith of Great Britain;

7. That as a result of the Orders protection from both Frederick andCatherine, Roman Catholic Poland was partitioned by those monarchs,

eliminating the rule of Polands Roman Catholic monarch, thereby

rendering the popes Bull of none effect in that nation, saving the Orders

massive property holdings and treasure from confiscation;

8. That as a result of the Orders admittance into Russia, the Companyestablished its headquarters therein, and began to plot the neutralization

of all anti-papal priests and nuns within the Russian Orthodox Church;

9. That as a result of the Orders admittance into Russia, the Companysought to usurp and control the power of the Romanov monarchy,

proposing to submit both Czar and Orthodox Patriarch to the Temporal

Power of a future pope of Rome within the control of the Order;

10. That as a result of the Orders admittance into Russia, EmpressCatherine created the Pale of Settlement for Russian Jews, forcing

them into a specific geographical region, later to be exterminated by

Masonic Jesuit Temporal Coadjutors Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin whose

Gestapo and NKVD worked together during World War II;

11. That as a result of the Orders suppression by Pope Clement XIV, theCompany founded a host of other secret societies including the Bavarian

Illuminati in 1776;

12. That having founded the Bavarian Illuminati from Ingolstadt Collegenear Munich, Bavaria, the Company used its new occult secret society to

consolidate all Masonic power into its hands, thereby creating

Illuminized Freemasonry, directed at its apex by the Jesuit General;

2 of 9


26/33

13. That having established its invisible power in Russia, Prussia, Polandand England, the Company then launched the Masonic French

Revolution and subsequent Napoleonic Wars, taking vengeance on all

enemies daring to curtail the power of the Order;

14. That during the Napoleonic Wars, Masonic Jesuit Temporal CoadjutorNapoleon Bonaparte I drove the Knights of Malta from Malta, the Order

finding refuge in Russia via the power of Czar Paul I, later murdered by

the Company for refusing to wage war on Lutheran Germany;

15. That during the time of the Napoleonic Wars, the acting Jesuit Generalin Russia reduced the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta to his service

in anticipation of the Orders formal restoration by the pope, which

restoration would come in 1814;

16. That as a result of Napoleons Jesuit War on the Vatican, on the RomanCatholic monarchs of Europe, and on the Protestant nations of Europe,

including Germany and the Calvinist Republic of the United Netherlands,

Pope Pius VII restored the Society of Jesus to its former power in August

of 1814, one month prior to the commencement of the Congress of

Vienna that restored the Papal States to the rule of the Pope;

17. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna (1814-1815), the Company ofJesus set out to destroy all constitutional republics, especially the

Constitutional Republic of these United States of America, considered to

be the font of all anti-divine right and anti-papal movements in Europe;

18. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna and the Orders quest tocontrol the Romanov monarchy in Russia, Czar Alexander I issued his

famous ukase in 1820 expelling the Society of Jesus from all the

Russias. Knowing the Order would then seek to secretly overthrow his

imperial power via Grand Orient Freemasonry, in 1822 Bible-friendly

Alexander closed every Masonic lodge in the empire;

19. That as a result of the expulsion of the Society of Jesus from Russia andthe closing of all Masonic lodges within the empire, Czar Alexander I

was given the poison cup in 1825 in accordance with the bloody Fourth

Vow taken by the highest of the Professed Jesuits within the Order;

3 of 9


27/33

20. That as a result of the Congress of Vienna, the Secret Treaty of Veronawas convened by Prussia, Austria and Russia (1822), plotting the

overthrow of the Protestant-Calvinist, constitutionally limited, anti-

absolute monarchy, government of these United States of America;

21. That as a result of the Secret Treaty of Verona, James Monroe issued hisbeloved Monroe Doctrine (1823), warning all European Powers to stay

out of the Western Hemisphere to the chagrin of the Jesuit Order;

22. That as a result of the Orders past expulsion from Orthodox Russia byCzars Peter the Great and Alexander I, the Jesuits contrived another

means by which it would be able to reduce the Russian Orthodox

monarchy and peoples, to the Temporal Power of the Pope now governed

by the Jesuit General: that means would be Marxian Socialist-

Communism. For the Company had perfected the socialist tenets of SirThomas Mores Utopia while the Order had operated its 59 socialist-

communist Reductions in Paraguay (1609-1759). These tenets were

codified into The Communist Manifesto, its penholder being Masonic Jew

Karl Marx, its authors being the Jesuits resident in England;

23. That as a result of the practical effects of Napoleons war on papalpolitical tyranny coupled with the preaching of the Reformation Bible

throughout Europe and America during the 19th

Century, the Jesuit Order

was suppressed once again throughout Europe, so much so, the Company

has called it the Century of Disaster;

24. That during the Century of Disaster, the Jesuit Order remainedformally expelled from Russia since 1820. Beginning with the reign of

the great Alexander II, Russia was beginning to experience political

liberty at the hand if her greatest of Czars. But on the day he was to sign

a written Constitution limiting the power of the monarchy and abolishing

the secret police (the Okhrana), he was assassinated by the Anarchists,

hired assassins of the Jesuits, later to murder President McKinley;

25. That as a result of Alexander IIs brutal murder, the assassinationhaving succeeded on the fifth attempt, the only Jew involved in the

murder was blamed by successor Alexander III who then launched a

bloody pogrom killing tens of thousands of Jews throughout Russia;

4 of 9


28/33

26. That as a result of Alexander IIIs pogroms, the Order instilled a hatredfor the Romanov dynasty in the hearts of Russian Jews. This was

necessary as the Order was to use its obedient Masonic Jews to lead the

Bolshevik Revolution giving the appearance to the world that Bolshevik

Communism was in fact Jewish Bolshevik Communism;

27. That as a result of Alexander IIIs pogroms, his son and successor, CzarNicholas II, would launch the bloodiest pogroms in Russian history,

further driving the Jews of Russia into the Orders Bolshevik Communist

revolutionary camp;

28. That in preparation for the Orders overthrow of Orthodox Russiapursuant to the Council of Trent, Moscow being the Third Rome, the

Jesuits trained their prize student for the task, Josef Stalin. Educated by

Roman Catholic Capuchin priests in Gori, Georgia, Stalin was given ascholarship by those priests to attend the Orthodox Tiflis Seminary in

Tiflis, Georgia. There, under the tutorship of secret Jesuit, Orthodox

Father Demetrius, Stalin was taught the doctrines of Marxian

Communism in preparation for the Bolshevik Revolution (1917);

29. That as a result of the Orders control of Czars Alexander III andNicolas II, while exciting anti-Czarist fury among the Jews of Russia, the

Bolshevik Revolution was a success. From 1920 to 1922 the Order

conducted a Bolshevik Civil War throughout Russia, killing off all

nationalist resistance led by Orthodox patriots. The Jesuit-led Bolsheviks

totally decapitated all leaders within the Russian Orthodox Church who

were against the Papacy, over 5,000 priests and nuns losing their lives;

30. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Civil War against theWhite Russian Orthodox, Masonic President Warren G. Harding gave

over 60 million dollars to the Reds in 1922---the same year Stalin

readmitted the Jesuits into Russia---further entrenching their rule;

31. That as a result of the successful Red Bolshevik Revolution, Edmund A.Walsh, an American Jesuit priest from Georgetown University, was

dispatched to Moscow to negotiate for the Vatican with the Bolsheviks.

From 1922 to 1924 Walsh resided in the new, Jesuit slave state of the

USSR naming Josef Stalin Secretary of the Communist Party;

5 of 9


29/33

32. That as a result of the elimination of the Romanov Dynasty and thesubordination of the Russian Orthodox clergy, Edmund Walsh, in his

Total Empire: The Roots and Progress of World Communism(Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1951), page 28, wrote

about the Russian Revolution of 1917, that it was,

. . . the most significant single political event in the history of Western

civilization since the decline and disappearance of the Roman Empire.;

33. That the reason Jesuit Edmund Walsh put such tremendous weight uponthe success of the Bolshevik Revolution lay in the fact the Order had

used its Marxist Socialist-Communism to submit its old enemy, Orthodox

Moscow, the Third Rome, to the Roman Papal Caesar. Constantinople,

the Second Rome, had fallen to Romes apparent enemy of Islam in

1453 AD, thereby conveniently benefitting the papacy; Moscow, hadfallen to Romes apparent enemy of Communism in 1917 AD, also

conveniently benefitting the papacy, the world in fact to be deprived of

the truth that both Islam and Communism are creations of the Vatican;

34. That the Jesuits were now in total control of the Bolshevik Communistsruling the USSR with deadly cruelty, the Julian calendar was replaced

with the Gregorian calendar (1917) composed by the Jesuit Christopher

Clavius; that every Jewish leader during the Revolution was slowly and

systematically executed or murdered save one, Lazar M. Kaganovitch;

that Jesuit Coadjutor Josef Stalin launched a murderous inquisition

against the Orthodox peoples of the Ukraine, starving from 7 to 10

million people in one year; that the inquisition extended to Protestant

Mennonites, Lutherans and Baptists throughout the USSR in accordance

with the Black Popes Counter Reformation Council of Trent;

35. That the Jesuits were now in control of the USSR, Jesuit Edmund A.Walsh sat in the White House next to his servant, Masonic American

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, when the president formally recognized

the USSR as a sovereign nation in 1933;

36. That as a result of FDR recognizing the USSR, massive projects werebegun by American cartel-capitalists, including Masonic Henry Ford

furnishing the Gorky auto plant mechanizing the Soviet War Machine;

6 of 9


30/33

37. That because the Jesuit Order plotted to use the White Protestant,Baptist and Roman Catholic Middle Class of its American Empire to

build Romes Red Communist monster in Moscow, the USSR was made

a partner of the Allies during World War II, FDR giving 11.3 billion

dollars in Lend Lease funds and materials to Stalin, never to be repaid to

the American people;

38. That as a result of the Jesuit Order being in total control of its CFR-directed American government since no later than 1865 with Romes

assassination of President Abraham Lincoln, FDR gave all of Eastern

Europe into the hands of the USSR at the Yalta Conference at the

command of Jesuits Harry Hopkins and Averell Harriman, in preparation

for the ensuing Cold War Hoax during which the Society of Jesus would

use its CIA and KGB to destroy all genuine, Eastern European /Russian

Bible-believers as well as all true nationalists, furthering the Ordersquest for world government under a Jesuit-directed Pope of Rome;

39. That during the Popes Cold War Hoax (premised upon the hoax ofmutual airborne nuclear war as explained in VAIII) the Orders CFR-

controlled American government provided the financing and technology

for the building of the Black Popes Soviet War Machine, erecting the

Kama River truck factory during the 1970s facilitated by Jesuit Fordham

University-trained Knight of Malta William J. Casey before becoming

the Director of Romes pro-Nazi, Central Intelligence Agency;

40. That upon the conclusion of the Jesuit Generals Second Thirty YearsWar (1914-1945), the American OSS/CIA continued to work together

with the Soviet NKVD/KGB throughout the entirety of the Cold War

Hoax; that this secret alliance is referred to in the Jesuit Orders

Hollywood Theater release, The Good Shepherd(2006);

41. That during this time of secret, mutual collaboration between theAmerican, Soviet and British intelligence agencies, stupendous acts of

treason were committed against the American people, including CIACounterintelligence Chief James Angleton giving many of the Agencys

top secrets over to Anatoli Golitsin, a Soviet KGB officer in the US.

Anthony Cave Brown makes this clear in his Treason in the Blood(New

York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1994), page 555:

7 of 9


31/33

Angleton . . . demonstrated his confidence in Golitsin [a supposed

defector] by making available to him the CIA files on the personnel of

the main operating section of the CIA in the Cold War with Russia, the

thousand-odd men and women of the Soviet Division.;

42. That during the Cold War Hoax, both the American and Sovietintelligence agencies were manned with ex-Nazis, the papacy saving its

Nazi Gestapo/SS/SD inquisitional mass-murderers from justice under the

guise of fighting either Communism in the East or Capitalism in the

West as proven by author John Loftus in his Unholy Trinity: How the

Vaticans Nazi Networks Betrayed Western Intelligence to the Soviets

(New York: St. Martins Press, 1991);

43. That during the Cold War Hoax, former Nazi intelligence chiefReinhard Gehlen ran the West German BND in conjunction with the EastGerman SSD, Stasi. For ex-SS Nazi Hans Felfe, Gehlens right-hand

man in the BND, also worked for the East German SSD/Stasi for over

twenty years; thus, BND Chief Reinhard Gehlen and SSD Chief Marcus

Wolf worked together for over twenty years perfecting the East-West

united intelligence community subject to the Jesuit Papacy, partitioned

Berlin serving as a foremost rendezvous for East-West agencies:

44. That during the Cold War Hoax, Moscow served as a training base forthe Jesuit Orders world revolutionary socialist communists, including

Fidel Castro, Michael (Martin Luther) King, Yasser Arafat, Jesuit-

trained Bill Clinton and indeed, president-elect Barry Davis Obama;

45. That during the Popes Cold War Hoax the Jesuit Papacy in control ofboth East and West, was perfecting its internationalist/anti-nationalist

socialist-communist revolution; its Unified International Intelligence

Community; its International Banking Cartel; its International Mafia

Organized Crime Syndicate; its International Drug Trade; its plot to

assemble a military coalition of nations to one day attack and subjugate

the heretic and liberal American peoples, said coalition having beenbuilt and financed by the Popes CFR-controlled American government;

that the culmination of this plot will be a Sino-Soviet-Muslim invasion

into North America ending what is left of the Grand and Glorious White

Northern European Protestant Reformation;

8 of 9


32/33

46. That I, Eric Jon Phelps, am willing to testify as to the accuracy of everystatement above in any venue permissible.

FURTHER Affiant Saith Not.

Affirmed and so Subscribed before me on this day of June,in the year of 2010.

Lh&wEric Jon a l p s ,Affiant 7203 South Fort Zellers Rd.Apt. DNewmanstown, PA17073

AClllA N LEAWNotary hrbllcbOROWiH,aeRKsCOUMYMy Comml~lon xplrsr Apr 21,2012


33/33

. .. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Appeal 10-509 1 cvCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On July 52010.1, Christopher Earl Stmnk, under penalty of pe ury pursuantto 28 USC 91746, caused the service of a copy of APPELLANT'S -OPPOSITION TO APPELLEES MOTION(S) FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCEsigned-~uly,2010 as a complete set of which each placed in a sealed folder

properly addressed with proper postage served by USPS mail upon:

KYMIAN D. RAYSpecial Assistant United States Attorney555 4th St., N.W. -2 -2vlWashington, D.C. 20530 0 goL 10n* ;knJohn Michael Bredehoft, Esq. = II -+c?

KAUFMAN& CANOLES, P.C.o mVI '-777

c150 West Main Street -P.O. Box 3037 C', --2,f'l-4 -5-0Notfolk, VA 23514 c 94 522-. . . j ,P4' - rn '

Ido declare and certify under penalty of pe ury:

Dated: July5 ,2010Brooklyn, New Yor YChristopher- Earl:Strunk inesse593 Vanderbilt Avenue - 8281Brooklyn., New York 11238(845)901 6767 Email: [email protected]

APPELLANT’S_OPPOSITION_TO_APPELLEES'_MOTION(S)_FOR_SUMMARY_AFFIRMANCE_DCC_10-5091-cv_070410

Documents

Transcript of APPELLANT’S_OPPOSITION_TO_APPELLEES'_MOTION(S)_FOR_SUMMARY_AFFIRMANCE_DCC_10-5091-cv_070410