APEX Report: March 31 – April 1, 2009 Fulvia Pilat Time Meeting, April 7, 2009.
-
Upload
jerome-sanders -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
4
Transcript of APEX Report: March 31 – April 1, 2009 Fulvia Pilat Time Meeting, April 7, 2009.
APEX Report:March 31 – April 1, 2009
Fulvia Pilat
Time Meeting, April 7, 2009
APEX Schedule March 31 - April 1 2009
3:30am00:30am8pm 10:30pm
08-27Optics, beta*measurementsBai
Store rot9312x12 rampBBQ
OPERATIONSIR nonlinear corrections Pilat
6am
Store rot936x6 ramp
09-05D0-DX studyMacKay
Test of beta*=0.5mramp Bruno Tepikian
8am
No beampp93lowbeta
AGS OFF
Injection
DrivenTripletOscillationsmeasurementMintyThieberger
09-22Spin tune vs. orbitPtitsyn, Bai
Injection
Driven triplet oscillations Thieberger, Minty, +team
Summary: Measurement log of driven triplet oscillation measurements in the blue ring for offline analysis given in table above. Triplet quadrupole Q2 in sector 6 was modulated using 2 actuators driven in phase with variable frequency and amplitude. The triplet positions (8 detectors in all), the beam positions at the IP’s, and the betatron tunes were recorded. Complete data sets were acquired for three driving frequencies. -Thieberger, Montag, Fischer, Michnoff, Minty
Horizontal beam position Horizontal tune
Example of data for actuator drive frequency of 10.30 Hz with successively decreasing drive amplitude
IR corrections (yellow) Pilat, Zimmer
Normal sextupole and skew sextupole in the IR6 and IR8 triplets gets readjusted during the set-up phase. Blue got adjusted several week ago, yellow slipped during set-up and ramp-up, and was canceled in the last 2 APEX sessions due to down-time
12x12 rotator ramp, no Artus, IPM, BBQ on the ramp, anticogged (blue used by driven triplet oscillation study)
Check/fix orbit, coupling, separate tunes >0.012
Take BBQ tune data as a function of bump amplitude (IR bumps for sextupole correction span both triplets)horizontal bump normal sextupolevertical bump skew sextupole1 normal and 1 skew sextupole per triplet available to correctcorrectors at xmax affect mostly the H-tune, at ymax mostly the V-tune, not quite orthogonal knobs but close
Nice operational instructions by Chris Zimmer:http://www.cadops.bnl.gov/AGS/Operations/docum/NLOCorrection.html Instructions are also in OpsWiki under the name 'IRBump‘
Binello, Zimmer working on automation of correction for 100 GeV PP run
IR8normalsextupole
IR6:normalsextupole
Effect of IR correction on tune ripple ( from Michiko)
Spin tune study Ptitsyn, Bai
APEX: ramp 2
APEX: ramp 1
operation
300 murad angle -> 0.046 spin tune shift at 250 GeVOrbit angle in snakes
Snake angle in present operation
At 9 o’clock the zero orbit angle at snake location leads to few mm excursion at a neighboring location.In both rings.
Indication of Blue spin tune at injection is further away from 1/2 with no change of snake orbital angle
-0.3mrad snake angle at injection in Blue seems to push the spin tune either close or further away from 1/2
+-0.3mrad snake orbital angle change along the ramp:
Yellow shows difference in polarization transmission Difference in Blue is not so clear . Spin tune close to ½
(?).
Conclusions
APEX Schedule April 8, 2009
4pm
109 bunches
2pm7am 9:30am
Pp93109 bunchesRegular intensity
07-19, 07-20Noise from Main PSSchultheissMinty
6pm
09-05D0-DX studyMacKaySatogata
08-17Tuning ofpp93lowbetaramp Bruno
7pm11:00am
08-17Commissioningpp93lowbetaramp SatogataTepikianPtitsynMarusic, etc.(commissioning team)
pp93lowbetaRampsNo beam
pp93lowbetaRamps w/beamBBQFEEDBACK
Back to physics
pp9312x12 rampBBQ
Injection
08-29, 08-10Polarimeter:rate dependenceHuang,ZelenskiPol team
CONTINGENT:OPERATIONSHigh intensitystudyBai