APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

26
APEX Cameron BBQ 3N ov06 BBQ and Other BBQ and Other Developments Developments Peter Cameron

Transcript of APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

Page 1: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

BBQ and Other DevelopmentsBBQ and Other Developments

Peter Cameron

Page 2: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback

– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail

• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement

– two parameters – non-lin chrom and momentum offset

• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…

• Monopole squid

Page 3: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback

• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement

(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)

• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – frequency must avoid synchrotron frequency, possible beam

loss, not clear S/N is better than slow radial

– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of

synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…

– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)

Page 4: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Summary of Chromaticity

t

t

vert

horiz

+5

-5

dp/p of +/-10-4 gives ~+/-100 radial modulation (RHIC&LHC)

-5

-5

+5

+5

Q'

Q'

Q'ramp 6380

ramp 6382

ramp 6381

in RHIC modulation is at 1Hz

chrom - good results under sequencer control

Page 5: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback

• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement

(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)

• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,

not clear S/N is better than slow radial

– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of

synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…

– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)

Page 6: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

SPS testing Sep 2006courtesy Ralph Steinhagen

Page 7: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

so far – S/N poor for comparatively large dp/p

Page 8: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback

• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement

(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)

• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,

not clear S/N is better than slow radial

– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of

synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…

– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)

Page 9: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

courtesy C.Y. Tan

Page 10: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

courtesy C.Y. Tan

Page 11: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Multi-tone methodMulti-tone method

• Recent (yesterday) results from SPS– 3 tones – central lock plus 2 side tones– same kicker power at all 3 lines– 40Hz offset– PLL BW 20 Hz– fs ~100Hz to 200Hz – general statement - “good results” - no quantitative data yet

• Difficult to implement at RHIC– varying synchrotron frequency on ramp, as low as ~10Hz at transition– PLL BW ~10Hz– just the same, it is worth studying, especially in light of……

• Hermann’s suggestion – 10 tone? 100 tone? – 3D AFE gives headroom on S/N before emittance growth becomes an issue– with FPGA-based BBQ it becomes somewhat trivial (at least from

hardware/software point-of-view) to lock MANY loops on the beam – starts to look more like continuous BTF

Page 12: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback

• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement

(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)

• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,

not clear S/N is better than slow radial

– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of

synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…

– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantage – no proper theoretical understanding (yet)

Page 13: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

continuous continuous head-tailhead-tail

Page 14: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Rhodri Jones – continuous head tail 500 turn simulation results, phase difference between head and tail (settling time evident)

Page 15: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

head tail

lowpass filtered head x tail

1 second

mean = .758

mean = .283

February 2006 RHIC Run 6 - continuous head-tail chromaticity measurement using BBQ (no momentum perturbation)

Marek and Rhodri

Page 16: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Chromaticity Measurement and FeedbackChromaticity Measurement and Feedback• Chrom feedback – the final step in ramp ‘automation’?• “Present measurement quality is questionable” – AD et al• Possible alternative techniques for continuous measurement

(desirable for feedback)– phase modulation (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)

• advantage - does not stress tune tracker (mod freq beyond PLL BW)• disadvantages – limited to <~1/2 synchrotron frequency, possible beam loss,

not clear S/N is better than slow radial

– 3 tone method (Hermann’s suggestion – 100 tone) (SPS, RHIC?)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages – additional excitation/emittance growth, complication of

synchrotron satellites, requires knowledge of eta, bunch length,…

– continuous head-tail (SPS, Tevatron, RHIC)• advantage – no momentum perturbation• disadvantages

– no proper theoretical understanding (yet – effort at both CERN and FNAL)– RHIC results not repeated at SPS

• Marek is working on improved detector

Page 17: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback

– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail

• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch – use 3D AFE?• Central frequency measurement

– two parameters – non-lin chrom and momentum offset

• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…

• Monopole squid

Page 18: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback

– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail

• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement

– ‘two’ parameters – non-linearities and momentum offset

• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…

• Monopole squid

Page 19: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Tune spread measurement methods

• Sliding window fit to response to Artus kick • gives amplitude dependence of coherent tune

• Schottky – difficult to get needed resolution• (upper width + lower width) - (2 x rev width) • gives tune spread due to octupole and higher, (plus beam-beam,…)

• Zoomed Schottky • width of central line of incoherent betatron distribution • gives tune spread due to all contributions (sextupole, octupole, beam-beam,…)

• Central Frequency - all contributions

from 23 Jan 04 BMX meeting

Page 20: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

LF Schottky at Injection

chrom = (lower - upper) / dp/p

tune spread =(lower + upper) - (2 x rev)

gives tune spread due to octupole and higher, (plus beam-beam,…)

Page 21: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

zoomed HF Schottky - revolution line

At store with storage RF on

central line ‘infinitely narrow’

Synchrotron freq ~ 250Hz

Page 22: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

LF Schottky at injection - 9 Dec 03

BH ~ 41 Hz~ .0005

BV ~ 29 Hz ~ .0003

YH ~ 81 Hz~ .001

YV ~ 30 Hz ~ .0003

Page 23: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Page 24: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

• Data from Dec 03 RHIC BMX• Max beam lifetime was not at central frequency• At that time not obvious how to improve RHIC performance using this measurement

• Steve Tepikian presentation a few weeks ago

• effect of NL chrom on tune footprint, beta fcns,…• suggests why CF not optimal

A possible relatively simple APEX:• two knobs – amount beam is off-momentum, and non-lin corrector strength• explore this parameter space for beam lifetime

Page 25: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

OutlineOutline• 60Hz harmonics - covered yesterday• Chromaticity measurement/feedback

– slow (1Hz) radial modulation – the baseline– slow (<0.5 fs) or fast (>>fs) phase modulation– multitone– continuous head-tail

• e-cloud tune shift along the bunch• Central frequency measurement

– ‘two’ parameters – non-linearities and momentum offset

• BTF– optimize (Wolfram) – BBTF for lumi,…

• Monopole squid

Page 26: APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06 BBQ and Other Developments Peter Cameron.

APEX Cameron BBQ 3Nov06

Monopole squidMonopole squid• just a heads up• squid based monopole detector proposed

to PAC by Chaudhari et al• committee recommendation was to get

experience with squid in RHIC IP radiation environment – concern is spurious radiation-induced quantum flux jumps

• test installation is in preparation for IP10• will need ~1hr access at start of APEX to

transfer helium to the dewar