“Shot Noise” - IEUVIieuvi.org/TWG/Resist/2008/022808/GMG-080228-ShotNoiseLER022808.pdfLER 5435 0...
Transcript of “Shot Noise” - IEUVIieuvi.org/TWG/Resist/2008/022808/GMG-080228-ShotNoiseLER022808.pdfLER 5435 0...
02/28/08 Gallatin 1
“Shot Noise”
G. Gallatin
02/28/08 Gallatin 2
02/28/08 Gallatin 3
02/28/08 Gallatin 4
02/28/08 Gallatin 5
02/28/08 Gallatin 6
02/28/08 Gallatin 7
Probability distribution for absorbing a photon and releasing an acid ~ Image intensity
Probability for releasing a fixed number of acids ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )NN rPrPrPrrrPr
Lrrr
Lrr
2121 ,,, =
( ) PoissonAaPn =<<
~1mm
~1mmExposure tool fixes exposure dose over mm2 areas
N is fixed in mm2 areas A
Any single feature lives in an area a ~ micron2
� a << A
Probability of getting n acids in area a << A
“Shot noise for free”Consistent with quantum mechanics
� Interference patterns build up one absorption at a time
Even with the net number of acids fixed on the macr oscale get “shot noise”on the microscale.
02/28/08 Gallatin 8
LER Model � RLS Model
Acids
ResolutionDiffusion/deprotection“blur” develops around each acid during PEB
Net DeprotectionDensity = Sum of“blurs” around each acid
Grayscale plot net deprotectiondensity
Resist edge position occurs at a fixed value of deprotection~Critical Ionization
Model
Resist edge with low spatial frequency content
= LER
PEB
SensitivityExposure dose releases acids.Image intensity at position x � Probability of acid release at x
Acid
2D Illustration
Burns,et.al., JVST B 2002
Intensity =1 Intensity =0
Development
Gallatin SPIE 2005
02/28/08 Gallatin 9
Exposure
( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( )
[ ]
( )
( ) ( ) ( )[ ]( ) ( ) ( )[ ]( )
( ) ( )( )eaphotons/ar# Dose Saturation 1/C photons)(area/# C Dill
ea)photons/ar(# Dose
exp10,exp10,, :Solution
time))reaphotons/(a (#intensity Image ,
n volumeinteractioPAG -photon
photon. absorbedgenerated/ acids # "Efficiency Quantum"
ckness)resist thi intensity, ed transmitt exp (ty absorptiviresist
,0,,,
,0,,
at time position at density PAG ,
sat
PAGPAGAcid
AcidPAGPAGAcid
AcidPAGPAG
PAG
EvQ
trIrE
rEvQrtrIvQrtr
trI
v
Q
TT
trrrIvQtrrIvQt
tr
trrtr
trtr
==⇒===
−−=−−=
×==
====−=
−==∂
∂
−=
=
α
αραρρ
αα
ρραραρ
ρρρ
ρ
rr
rrrrr
r
rrrrrr
rrr
rr
(Only PAGs within volume v surrounding the position of absorption can be affected)
02/28/08 Gallatin 10
Exposure Statistics
Previous slide � Exposure is deterministic. IT IS NOT
Quantum Mechanics � Probability of photon absorption ~ Image Intensity
( )
( )( )( )
( ) ( )( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )NNacidacidacidNN
net
acid
rCE
a
rCE
aacid
rCE
rCE
Acid
arParParParararP
eearP
r
a
a
er
er
tr
,,,,,,,,,
ondistributiy probabilitNet
1,
at generated be toacidan for on distributiy Probabitit
released NOT acid 0
released acid 1Let
position at acidan release not toPAG a ofy Probabilit
1position at acidan release PAG to a ofy Probabilit
yprobabilit a as dinterprete be should ,
22112211
0,1,
rL
rrrL
rr
r
r
r
r
r
rr
r
r
=
+−=
⇔=⇔=
=
−=
−−
−
−
δδ
ρ
02/28/08 Gallatin 11
( )
( ) 0,
umresist vol theinto loaded moleculesPAG ofnumber total the
sPAG' allfor on distributiy probabilitJoint
1 PAG onefor on distributiy Probabilit
me with voluanywhere becan PAG Each
umeresist vol t the throughouddistributeuniformly moleculesPAG Consider
ondistributiy probabilitlocation PAG eon with thdistributi release acid thecombine toNeed
AT
N
V
Nr
ATVN
ATVPN
V
V
N
PAG
NN
PAG
==⇒
==
===⇒
=⇒
−−
rρ
02/28/08 Gallatin 12
Constant Dose “Blur “LER
Also get…
• The explicit analytic form for the deprotection distribution around a released acid.
• The spatial frequency content (on average) of the roughness.
RLS TradeoffePAGs/volum#
volume
ninteractio Acid-Photon
RangeDiffusion PEB
Efficiency Quantum
tyAbsorptivi
Dose
Intensity Image
exposure
=
=
==
==
=×==
PAG
v
DtR
Q
tIE
I
ρ
α
LER Model
Result:
Put all the pieces together….do the math to get approximate scaling law……
3
1
REvQI
Ic
sizePAGedge
LER αρσ
∂≈
Intrinsic Resist “Blur”
( ) ( )[ ]( )( ) ( ) ( )[ ]( )2'3
232
'exp'
'exp111
rQvErErrrd
rQvErrrd
QvsDV
sDV
PAG
LERPAG
Base
rrrr
rrr
αρ
αραρ
σ ρρ
−∂−′∫
−−−−′∫
=
⊥′
′
02/28/08 Gallatin 13
0 50 100 150 200
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
0 50 100 150 200
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
initialacid profile
Gaussian fit(w1/2 = 44.9 nm)
Lorentzian fit( w1/2 = 50.9 nm)
HOST profile
HO
ST
Fra
ctio
n
Lateral Position (nm)
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Numerical Chemical Kinetics Result
1D Simulation
1D Analytic Form
~ Area integral of full 3D form
- 100 - 50 50 100
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Lateral Position (nm)
Evaluate 1D result
� Matches full numerical simulation Hinsberg, et. al, SPIE 03
� And experimental shape Hoffnagle, Opt. Letts. 02
02/28/08 Gallatin 14
( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )( )( )( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )
−+
−+
−
×=
−
ββπββπ
ππβ
ββ
ββ
RerfR
RerfR
eeR
RnormPSD
RR
214
212
2221
2
2
2
3
22
LER Model � Analytical form of the PSD
Normalization factor ~ σLER2
Formula below is valid for small k. For large k, compute PSD perturbatively for an analytic solution or do the integral numerically.
PSD “shape”: Depends only on Rβ = R2πν
ν = ν = ν = ν = Spatial Frequency (cycles/micron)0.1 1 10 100 1000
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
R = 30nm
R = 20nm
R = 10nm
Can determine resist parameters from roughness data
• rms roughness � σLER � norm
• Intrinsic resist “blur” R is determined by fitting the analytic PSD “shape” to |FFT(data)|2 / norm
02/28/08 Gallatin 15
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =21.3 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =18.7 nm
Highest Dose
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =22.5 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =20.7 nm
5435EUV2D
5435EUV2D
60 nm
50 nm
Lowest Dose
02/28/08 Gallatin 16
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =15.2 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =16.2 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =16.5 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =17.3 nm
60 nm
50 nm
Highest DoseLowest Dose 5271MET2D
5271MET2D
02/28/08 Gallatin 17
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =15.2 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =15.2 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =16.5 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =17.5 nm
60 nm
50 nm
Highest DoseLowest Dose 54965496
02/28/08 Gallatin 18
60 nm
50 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =19.8 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =18.7 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =19.3 nm
5 10 50 100 50010- 5
10- 4
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
cycles�micronR =20.8 nm
Lowest Dose Highest DoseEHEH
02/28/08 Gallatin 19
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Dose
LER
5435
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
5
10
15
20
Dose
LER
5271
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
5
10
15
20
Dose
LER
5496
0 5 10 15 200
5
10
15
Dose
LER
EH
LER Data Compared to the Scaling Law Red = 50 nm dense L/SBlack = 60 nm dense L/SDots = data, Curve = model using measuredvalues of ILS, PAG density, Dill-C, Dose, Blur,….
nm
nm
nm
nm
3
11
REvQILSc
sizePAG
LER αρσ ≈
2≈c
EUV2DEUV2D MET2DMET2D
“A”“A” “B”“B”
02/28/08 Gallatin 20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
2
4
6
8
10
Dose
LER
5435
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
5
10
15
20
Dose
LER
5271
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 350
5
10
15
Dose
LER
5496
0 5 10 15 200
2
4
6
8
10
12
Dose
LER
EH
LER Data Compared to the Scaling Law with Saturation Effects Included
nm
nm
nm
nm
sizeEvQ
sizePAGedge
LEReREvQI
Ic ααρ
σ −
∂≈
3
1
5.1≈c
“A”“A” “B”“B”
EUV2DEUV2D MET2DMET2D
02/28/08 Gallatin 21
0 1 2 3 4 5
2
4
6
8
10