Anzors Sept 2012
-
Upload
profmtaylor -
Category
Documents
-
view
198 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Anzors Sept 2012
![Page 1: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Moving Towards Population Based Computational
Modelling of Total Joint Replacement
Professor Mark Taylor
![Page 2: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Total Joint Replacement
Excellent survivorship at 10 years
New designs regularly enter the market
Increasingly difficult to assess whether design changes will improve performance
![Page 3: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Sources of VariabilityThe Patient Surgery
•Age/activity level•Bone quality/geometry
•Soft tissue quality•Body weight
•Experience•Personal preference
•Alignment •Surgical approach
![Page 4: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Femoral Head Resurfacing
Initial early-mid term clinical results impressive
However: High incidence of femoral
neck fracture in first 6 months
5 fold increase in revision rate in small diameter heads as compared to large diameter heads1 http://www.orthoassociates.com
1Shimmin et al, JBJS(Br), 2010
![Page 5: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
FE analysis of the resurfaced femoral head:Modelling of an individual
patient
![Page 6: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1x BW
3x BW
Subject specific models
![Page 7: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Subject specific models
- Significant strain shielding within the head
- Increase in strain on the superior aspect of the neck
- Peak strain occurs around the inferior aspect of the neck
![Page 8: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Comparison of a small vs. large femur
Small femur Large femur
![Page 9: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Typical FE analysis of the resurfaced femoral head
Typically model the “average” patient
Ideal implantation, single size
Parametric studies on limited number of variables
Attempt to extrapolate results to larger patient population
Patient variability swamps differences?
![Page 10: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Typical FE analysis of the resurfaced femoral head
Typically model the “average” patient
Ideal implantation, single size
Parametric studies on limited number of variables
Attempt to extrapolate results to larger patient population
Patient variability swamps differences?
This will not predict small percentage of failuresRadical re-think of pre-clinical testing needed!
![Page 11: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
FE analysis of the resurfaced femoral head:
Modelling of 10’s of patients
![Page 12: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
x N
- Model multiple femurs from a range of patients- Examine mean, standard deviation, range….- Perform statistical tests when comparing designs
The brute force approach
Radcliffe et al, Clin. Biomech., 2007
![Page 13: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Weight: 95.312 kg (54 – 136)Height: 1.76 m (1.57 – 1.88) Age: 40.75 years (18 – 57)Gender: male dominated
Patient Data
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Hip 609 Hip 613 Hip 628 Hip 631 Hip 636 Hip 608 Hip 626 Hip 607 Hip 625 Hip 612 Hip 610 Hip 630 Hip 614 Hip 635 Hip 627 Hip 634
Hip Number
Hei
ght (
cm) /
Wei
ght
(kg)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
BM
I
Height (cm) Weight (kg) BMI
The brute force approach
![Page 14: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Radcliffe et al, PhD Thesis, 2007
N=16
Influence of cementing the stem
![Page 15: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Radcliffe et al, PhD Thesis, 2007
N=16
Influence of cementing the stem
![Page 16: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Radcliffe et al, PhD Thesis, 2007
N=16
Influence of implant position
![Page 17: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Radcliffe et al, PhD Thesis, 2007
N=16
- Very labour intensive-Impractical to examine 100’s of
femurs- Still difficult to compare differences
across sizes
The brute force approach
![Page 18: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
FE analysis of the resurfaced femoral head:
Modelling of 100’s of patients
![Page 19: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Construction of a Statistical ModelPrincipal Component Analysis
![Page 20: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Bryan et al, Med. Eng. Phys., 2010
Statistical Shape and Intensity Model (n=46)
Mode 1 – Scaling of morphology and properties
Mode 2 – Scaling and neck anteversion
Model 3 – Neck anteversionand head/neck ratio
![Page 21: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Using governing PCA equation it is possible to generate new, realistic femur models from the variations captured by the model
Generation of New Instances
![Page 22: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Automated Implantation – Run through MatlabHypermesh (Booleans) -> Ansys ICEM (meshing)-> Marc MSC (FE)
Fully scripted from statistical model to FE results
Automated Implantation
![Page 23: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Representative examples from N=400
Modulus
Modulus
Strain
![Page 24: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Results (N=400)
Bryan et al, J. Biomech., 2012
![Page 25: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Results (N=400)
Bryan et al, J. Biomech., 2012
![Page 26: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Results - Comparison between head sizes
Small diameter heads show:- Increased strain shielding- Elevated strains at the superior femoral neck
N=20
N=25
Bryan et al, J. Biomech., 2012
![Page 27: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Developed methodology has significant potential for improving preclinical assessment
• There are issues:• Statistical shape and intensity models only as good as the training set
• Robust automation• Forces may need to link with musculoskeletal models
• Verification/validation
Statistical Shape and Intensity Model
![Page 28: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Drive for ‘real time’ tools
Future directions…….
Femoral neck fracture
(KAIST, Korea) Implant Positioning (Imperial College, UK)
Diaphyseal fracture reduction
(Brainlab, Germany)
![Page 29: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Rapid patient specific modelling………
Surrogate modelFR = axb + cyd +……
100’s to 1000s of simulations
![Page 30: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
FE simulation
Approx. 300 secs
Surrogate model
Approx. 0.2 secs
![Page 31: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Acknowledgements
Dr Rebecca BryanDr Ian Radcliffe
Dr Mike StricklandDr Francis Galloway
Dr Martin BrowneDr Prasanth Nair
![Page 32: Anzors Sept 2012](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022081403/556c874ad8b42a7a738b462b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)