Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine
-
Upload
masood-akhtar -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
4
Transcript of Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine
![Page 1: Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021403/575075a61a28abdd2e9a9c6e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Technical Note
Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus)
cell culture vaccine
Masood Akhtar*, C.S. Hayat, Zafar Iqbal
Department of Veterinary Parasitology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan
Accepted 4 January 1999
Abstract
Antigenic response of midgut, Boophilus microplus, cell culture vaccine was evaluated. The antibody titres against the gut-
membrane (GM) and gut-soluble (GS) antigens were measured by indirect hemagglutination test. The antibody response
against GM antigen was signi®cantly higher (p < 0.01) than that of GS antigen. It was assumed on the basis of antibody titres
against GM and GS antigens that the in vitro propagated midgut cells, Boophilus microplus, contained substantial membrane
and membrane associated immunogenic components. # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Boophilus microplus; Cell culture; Gut soluble; Gut membrane; Antigenic response
1. Introduction
The ability to manipulate organisms on the mole-
cular level and the advent of modern immunological
procedures have provided potentially new alternatives
for tick control. Antigens from partially engorged
female Boophilus microplus have been used with
variable success to immunize animals against tick
infestation (Johnston et al., 1986). Midgut of the ticks
has been used as an immunogen (Opdebeeck et al.,
1988b, a; Jackson and Opdebeeck, 1990), but its
feasibility as a vaccine requires the production of
the antigenic material in large quantity. Partial success
with in vitro propagation of the midgut cells (Akhtar et
al., 1992) has encouraged the investigators to produce
a cell culture derived antitick vaccine. This paper
describes the immunogenic response to vaccine
prepared from in vitro propagated midgut cells of
Boophilus microplus.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Chemosterilization of ticks
Fifty, semi-engorged, adult female, Boophilus
microplus, were obtained from the tick colony (Akhtar
and Hayat, 1993) maintained by the Department of
Veterinary Parasitology, University of Agriculture,
Faisalabad, Pakistan. Ticks were surface sterilized
by submersion and intermittent agitation in 0.5%
benzalkonium chloride solution. The ticks were then
washed with 70% alcohol until they were cleared of
Small Ruminant Research 33 (1999) 189±192
*Corresponding author.
0921-4488/99/$ ± see front matter # 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
PII: S 0 9 2 1 - 4 4 8 8 ( 9 9 ) 0 0 0 1 1 - 5
![Page 2: Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021403/575075a61a28abdd2e9a9c6e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
benzalkonium chloride, and then rinsed in three
changes of sterilized distilled water.
2.2. Tissue extirpation and disaggregation
Chemosterilized ticks were dissected to separate
the midguts (Opdebeeck et al., 1988b). The dissected
guts were given several washings with balanced
salt solution (0.5 g/ml) and dissociated by a simple
teasing method (Guru et al., 1976). The suspension
was centrifuged at 1500 rpm at 48C for 20 min. The
sediment was washed twice with balanced salt solu-
tions and the cell pellet was collected for further
use.
2.3. In vitro propagation of midgut cells
Midgut cells of Boophilus microplus were propa-
gated on Grace's insect medium (Sigma, USA) sup-
plemented with 5% bovine foetal calf serum (heat
inactivated at 568C for 30 min) and antibiotics (Potas-
sium Penicillin 100 IU/ml and Streptomycin sulphate
100 mg/ml; Shanghai Pharmaceutical Industry, China)
along with fungizone (50 IU/ml) as described pre-
viously (Akhtar et al., 1992).
2.4. Cell harvesting
Cells adherent to the surface of culture ¯asks were
harvested physically using rubber policemen. Cell
culture suspension was removed and poured into
sterile centrifuge tubes. The ¯asks were rinsed 2±3
times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH
7.2) and added to the tubes containing cell culture
suspension. Finally, the pooled cell suspension was
centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 30 min at 48C. Super-
natant was discarded and sediment resuspended in
fresh PBS. The cells were given three washings with
PBS by centrifugation at 48C. Pellet was collected and
reconstituted in minimum volume of PBS. Protein
concentrations were assayed using the method of
Bradford (1976) and the suspension was diluted with
PBS to attain the desired concentration of 5 mg per ml.
2.5. Cell culture vaccine and its administration
Midgut cell culture vaccine was prepared by emul-
sifying the harvested cells in a double volume of
Freund's complete adjuvant (Sigma, USA). Twenty
male lohi sheep (2 years age, 30 kg average weight)
maintained by the Department of Veterinary Parasi-
tology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
were used as experimental model because sheep are
inexpensive and closely related immunologically to
cattle/buffalo (Tizzard, 1992). All the sheep were
rendered free from helminth parasites by using oxfen-
dazole, at 7 ml per animal orally Systamex ICI Pak.).
The parasite free status of the animals was con®rmed
through regular faecal examination for 2 weeks before
experiment. Animals were divided into two equal
groups. One group of 10 animals was inoculated with
midgut cell culture vaccine (2.5 ml/animal) intramus-
cularly followed by same booster dose 3 weeks later.
The 10 animals in the control group were injected with
adjuvant and PBS at the same time as the vaccinated
animals.
2.6. Antigens preparation for indirect
hemagglutination test
Midguts of the chemosterilized ticks, Boophilus
microplus, were dissected and gut-soluble (GS) and
gut-membrane (GM) antigens were prepared (Opde-
beeck et al., 1988b). Brie¯y, the guts were disrupted in
an ultra homogenizer (Ultra-Turrax, Janke and Kunkel
KG, Staufen, UK) in 0.15 M PBS, pH 7.2, containing
1 mM disodium EDTA, sonicated (Rapid 600, Ultra-
Sonic; Shipley Yorks, UK) for 10 min in 30±60 s
burst, and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 1 h to yield
GS and membrane associated (GM) gut antigens. GM
was homogenized in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.2, containing
5 mM disodium EDTA. All procedures were carried
out at 4±88C.
2.7. Serology
Sheep were bled from the jugular vein pre-vaccina-
tion and at 21 days post-vaccination. Blood thus
collected was allowed to coagulate, the clot was
broken with a glass rod and blood tubes were kept
at 48C for over night. Serum then was aspirated with
Pasteur's pipettes and stored at ÿ208C till used. Sera
collected were tested for antibody levels by indirect
hemagglutination test (Akhtar, 1995) in comparison
with the positive and negative controls.
190 M. Akhtar et al. / Small Ruminant Research 33 (1999) 189±192
![Page 3: Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021403/575075a61a28abdd2e9a9c6e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3. Results
Indirect hemagglutination (IHA) test was used to
detect the antibody titres in sera from sheep vaccinated
with midgut, Boophilus microplus, cell culture vac-
cine. Antitick antibody titres in pre-vaccinated sera
were nil in all the animals. The antibody titres against
GM an GS antigens were found in sera from all
vaccinated sheep but not in sera from control sheep
injected with adjuvant and PBS, 21 days post-inocu-
lation. The antibody response against GM antigen was
signi®cantly higher (p < 0.01) than that against GS
antigen (Table 1). The IHA antibody titre against GM
antigen ranged from 1 : 16 to 1 : 128. Among 10
samples processed, three each showed antibody titre
1 : 16 and 1 : 64 while two each showed antibody titre
1 : 32 and 1 : 128. On the other hand, the IHA anti-
body titre against GS antigen ranged from 1 : 2 to
1 : 32. Among 10 samples processed, the antibody
titres were 1 : 2, 1 : 4, 1 : 8, 1 : 16 and 1 : 32 in three,
one, three, one and two samples, respectively.
4. Discussion
Antibodies reactive with tick extracts have been
detected by a number of investigators (Willadsen,
1980; Wikel, 1984; Johnston et al., 1986; Opdebeeck
et al., 1988b; Jackson and Opdebeeck, 1989) but this is
the ®rst report which describes the immunogenic
activity of the midgut antigens derived from cell
culture. Moreover, IHA has been used for the ®rst
time for assaying the anti-tick antibody titres. The
antibody response against GM antigen was signi®-
cantly higher (p < 0.01) than that against GS antigen
(Table 1). Similar immune response against GM anti-
gen has been observed by Jackson and Opdebeeck
(1989) who have used midgut extract of Boophilus
microplus as vaccine in cattle. It is speculated that gut
membrane may contain B-cell mitogens which
potentiate synthesis of antibodies to the GM antigens
in the sheep vaccinated with midgut extract as in
case of cattle (Jackson and Opdebeeck, 1989). This
speculation can also be supported by the fact that
polyclonal activation of B-cells and (hypergamma
globulinaemia) are also associated with other parasitic
diseases, like malaria and trypanosomiasis (Wakelin,
1984).
Unfortunately challenge experiments to measure
protective immunity were not possible on sheep as
they are not regarded as suitable hosts for Boophilus
microplus because few ticks survive the entire life
cycle on sheep. But such a high level of antibody titres
have been correlated to protection following vaccina-
tion having GM components (Wong and Opdebeeck,
1989; Jackson and Opdebeeck, 1989). It can be
assumed on the basis of antibody titres against GM
and GS antigens that the in vitro propagated midgut
cells of the tick Boophilus microplus, contained con-
siderable membrane and membrane associated com-
ponents.
The use of parasite cell membranes as targets for
protective immunity has been reviewed by Gitter
(1983). Enzymes and chemoreceptors have been con-
sidered as membrane antigens and may form immu-
nological reactions which destroy the cell. Membrane
glycoproteins of parasites have been used for protect-
ing animals (Scott and Snary, 1979; Scott et al., 1985).
Johnston et al. (1986) protected cattle against Boo-
philus microplus with a crude adult tick extract which
included both particulate and soluble components or
particulate components only. Supernatant and pellet
prepared by centrifugation gave 79% and 65% protec-
tion, respectively against Boophilus microplus. Opde-
beeck et al., 1988b, a) have also reported high
protection (91%) by membrane antigen from the
midgut of Boophilus microplus challenge larval and
adult ticks.
Table 1
Antibody titre against GM and GS antigens of Boophilus microplus
in sheep vaccinated with cell culture vaccine at 21 days post-
vaccination. All titres were negative at day zero
Animals No. IHA antibody titre
GM GS
1 1 : 64 1 : 8
2 1 : 64 1 : 8
3 1 : 32 1 : 8
4 1 : 128 1 : 32
5 1 : 32 1 : 4
6 1 : 16 1 : 2
7 1 : 16 1 : 2
8 1 : 64 1 : 16
9 1 : 128 1 : 32
10 1 : 16 1 : 2
M. Akhtar et al. / Small Ruminant Research 33 (1999) 189±192 191
![Page 4: Antigenic response of midgut (Boophilus microplus) cell culture vaccine](https://reader031.fdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022021403/575075a61a28abdd2e9a9c6e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Better understanding of parasite cell membrane
structure would be of great help in selecting immuno-
gens. Membranes form a three dimensional ¯uid
mosaic in which proteins (including glycoproteins
and lipoproteins) are dispersed through a lipid layer
(Capaldi and Green, 1972; Singer and Nicolson,
1992). Most membrane proteins are organized into
complexes with molecular weights between 10 000
and 200 000 and subunits with molecular weights of
about 10 000±50 000 (Capaldi and Green, 1972).
Work is in progress to purify the cell membrane,
membrane-associated and subunit components from
the in vitro propagated midgut cells of the tick,
Boophilus microplus. Hopefully this will be helpful
in better vaccine preparation which would be more
effective in promoting protection than the midgut cell
culture vaccine used in the present study.
References
Akhtar, M., 1995. Studies on the immunization of buffalo against
Boophilus microplus. Ph.D thesis, University of Agriculture,
Pakistan.
Akhtar, M., Hayat, C.S., 1993. Ecology and laboratory propagation
of the tick Boophilus microplus. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 3, 78.
Akhtar, M., Hayat, C.S., Ashfaque, M., Iqbal, Z., Afaq, M., 1992.
In vitro propagation of midgut cell of Boophilus microplus.
Pakistan Vet. J. 12, 196.
Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the
quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the
principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72, 248.
Capaldi, R.A., Green, D.E., 1972. Membrane protein and
membrane structure. FEBS Lett. 25, 205.
Gitter, C., 1983. Immunity to ticks. In: Warren, K.S., Boweres, J.Z.
(Eds.), Parasitology ± A Global Prospective. Springer, New
York. p. 220.
Guru, P.U., Dhanda, V., Gupta, N.P., 1976. Cell cultures derived
from the developing adults of three species of ticks, by a
simplified technique. Indian J. Med. Res. 64, 1041±1045.
Jackson, L.A., Opdebeeck, J.P., 1989. The effect of antigen
concentration and vaccine regimen on the immunity induced by
membrane antigens from the midgut of Boophilus microplus.
Immunology 68, 272.
Jackson, L.A., Opdebeeck, J.P., 1990. Humoral immune response
of Hereford cattle vaccinated with midgut antigens of the cattle
tick Boophilus microplus. Parasite Immunol. 12, 141.
Johnston, L.A.Y., Kemp, D.H., Pearson, R.D., 1986. Immunization
of cattle against Boophilus microplus using extracts derived
from adult female ticks: effects of induced immunity on tick
populations. Int. J. Parasitol. 16, 27.
Opdebeeck, J.P., Wong, J.Y.M., Jackson, L.A., Dobson, C., 1988a.
Vaccine to protect Hereford cattle against the cattle ticks,
Boophilus microplus. Immunology 63, 363.
Opdebeeck, J.P., Wong, J.Y.M., Jackson, L.A., Dobson, C., 1988b.
Hereford cattle immunized and protected against Boophilus
microplus with soluble and membrane associated antigens from
the midgut of ticks. Parasite Immunol. 10, 405.
Scott, M.T., Snary, D., 1979. Protective immunization of mice
using cell surface glycoprotein from Trypanosoma cruzi.
Nature 282, 73.
Scott, M.T., Neal, R.A., Woods, N.C., 1985. Immunization of
Marmosets with Trypanosoma cruzi cell surface glycoprotein
(GP 90). Trans. R. Soc. Tropical Medicine Hygiene 79, 751.
Singer, S.J., Nicolson, G.L., 1992. The fluid mosaic model of the
structure of cell membrane. Science 175, 720.
Tizzard, I.R., 1992. Veterinary Immunology: An Introduction, 4th
ed. Saunders, Philadephia, PA.
Wakelin, D., 1984. Immunity to Parasites. Edward Arnald Ltd,
London, 48, p. 71.
Wikel, S.K., 1984. Immunomodulation of host responses to
ectoparasite infestation ± an overview. Vet. Parasitol. 14,
321±339.
Willadsen, P., 1980. Immunity to ticks. Adv. Parasitol. 18, 293±
313.
Wong, J.Y.M., Opdebeeck, J.P., 1989. Protective efficacy of
antigens solubilized from gut membranes of the cattle tick
Boophilus microplus. Int. J. Parasitol. 3, 195.
192 M. Akhtar et al. / Small Ruminant Research 33 (1999) 189±192