Antenna NOL
Transcript of Antenna NOL
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
1/75
EC2353 -Antenna and wave propagation
Introduction
An antenna is an electrical conductor or system of conductors Transmission - radiates electromagnetic energy into space
Reception - collects electromagnetic energy from space
In two-way communication, the same antenna can be used for transmission andreception
An antenna is a circuit element that provides a transition form a guided wave on a
transmission line to a free space wave and it provides for the collection ofelectromagnetic energy.
In transmit systems the RF signal is generated, amplified, modulated and applied
to the antenna
In receive systems the antenna collects electromagnetic waves that are cutting
through the antenna and induce alternating currents that are used by the receiver
CONCEPT OF VECTOR POTENTIAL
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
2/75
Hertzian dipole
A simple practical antenna is a doublet or Hertzian dipole (see a figure below). Itis very short length of wire over which the current distribution can be assumed uniform.
Maxwells equations show that such an antenna when energized by a high frequency
current is associated with an induction field which decreases inversely as square of thedistance and a radiation field which decreases inversely as distance only. The later is still
measurable at large distances from the doublet and is well-known radiation field used in
radio communications
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
3/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
4/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
5/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
6/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
7/75
DEFINITIONS
Radiation Intensity. In a given direction, the power radiated form an antenna perunit solid angle.
Directive Gain. In a given direction, 4 times the ratio of theradiation intensity in
that direction to the total power radiated by the antenna.
Directivity. The value of the directive gain in the direction of its maximum value.
Power Gain. In a given direction, 4 times the ratio of the radiationintensity in
that direction to the net power accepted by the antenna from the connected
transmitter. NOTES: (1) When thedirection is not stated, the power gain is usuallytaken to be thepower gain in the direction of its maximum value. (2) Power gain
does not include reflection losses arising from mismatchof impedance.
Beamwidth is the angular separation of the half-power points of the radiatedpattern
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
8/75
Bandwidthis the difference between the upper and lowercutoff frequencies
of,for example, a filter, a communication channel, or a signal spectrum, and istypically measured in hertz. In case of abaseband channel or signal, the andwidth
is equal to its upper cutoff frequency. Bandwidth in hertz is a centralconcept in
many fields, including electronics,information theory, radiocommunications,
signal processing, and spectroscopy GAIN
Gain is an antenna property dealing with an antenna's ability to
direct its radiated power in a desired direction, or to receiveenergy preferentially from a desired direction. However, gain is
not a quantity which can be defined in terms of physical quantities
such as the Watt, ohm or joule, but is a dimensionless ratio.As a consequence, antenna gain results from the interaction of
all other antenna characteristics.Antenna characteristics of gain,
beamwidth, and efficiency areindependent of the antenna's use for
either transmitting or receiving. Generally these characteristics are
more easilydescribed for the transmitting case, however, theproperties apply as well to receiving applications.
Radiation resistance
An important property of a transmitting antenna is its radiation resistance which is
associated with power radiated by the antenna. If I is the r.m.s (root mean square)
antenna current and Rr is its radiation resistance, then the power radiated is I2Rrwatts where Rr is afictitious resistance which accounts for the radiated power
somewhat like a circuit resistance which dissipates heat. The larger the radiation
resistance the larger the power radiated by the antenna. In contrast, for receivingantenna its input impedance is important. The input impedance is defined as the ratio
of voltage to current at its input and it must be generally matched to the connecting
line or cable. The input impedance may or may not be equal to radiation resistance,though very often it does. In most case Rr may be calculated or it can be determined
experimentally.
Half-wavelength dipole
This type of antenna is a special case where each wire is exactly one-quarter ofthe wavelength, for a total of a half wavelength. The radiation resistance is about 73
ohms if wire diameter is ignored, making it easily matched to a coaxial transmission
line. The directivity is a constant 1.64, or 2.15 dB. Actual gain will be a little less dueto ohmic losses.
Folded dipole
A folded dipole is a dipole where an additional wire (/2) links the two ends of the
(/2) half wave dipole. The folded dipole works in the same way as a normal dipole,but the radiation resistance is about 300ohms rather than the 75 ohms which is
expected for a normal dipole. The increase in radiation resistance allows the antennato be driven from a 300 ohm balanced line.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutoff_frequencieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutoff_frequencieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_filterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_filterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_channelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_spectrumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basebandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm_(unit)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm_(unit)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cutoff_frequencieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_filterhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_channelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_spectrumhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basebandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronicshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_processinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohm_(unit) -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
9/75
RECIPROCITY:
An antenna ability to transfer energy form the atmosphere to its receiver with the
same efficiency with which it transfers energy from the transmitter into theatmosphere
Antenna characteristics are essentially the same regardless of whether an antenna
is sending or receiving electromagnetic energyAn antenna with a non-uniform distribution of current over its length L can be considered
as having a shorter effective length Le over which the current is assumed to be uniformand equal to its peak. The relationship between Le and L is given by:
Effective aperture
The power received by an antenna can be associated with collecting area. Every
antenna may be considered to have such a collecting area which is called its effective
aperture A. If Pd is a power density at the antenna and Pr is received power, then:
Polarization is the direction of the electric field and is the same as the physical
attitude of the antenna
A vertical antenna will transmit a vertically polarized waveThe receive and transmit antennas need to possess the same polarization
Antenna Gain
Relationship between antenna gain and effective areaG = antenna gain
Ae = effective areaf= carrier frequencyc = speed of light ( 3 108 m/s)
= carrier wavelength
Radiation Pattern
Radiation pattern is an indication of radiated field strength around the antenna.
Power radiated from a /2 dipole occurs at right angles to the antenna with no
power emitting from the ends of the antenna. Optimum signal strength occurs at
right angles or 180 from opposite the antenna
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
10/75
Radiation pattern
Graphical representation of radiation properties of an antenna
Depicted as two-dimensional cross section
Beam width (or half-power beam width)
Measure of directivity of antenna
Reception pattern Receiving antennas equivalent to radiation pattern
Antenna Temperature
( ) is a parameter that describes how much noise an antenna produces in a given
environment. This temperature is not the physical temperature of the antenna. Moreover,an antenna does not have an intrinsic "antenna temperature" associated with it; rather the
temperature depends on its gain pattern and the thermal environment that it is placed in.
To define the environment, we'll introduce a temperature distribution - this is the
temperature in every direction away from the antenna in spherical coordinates. For
instance, the night sky is roughly 4 Kelvin; the value of the temperature pattern in thedirection of the Earth's ground is the physical temperature of the Earth's ground. This
temperature distribution will be written as . Hence, an antenna's temperature willvary depending on whether it is directional and pointed into space or staring into the sun.
For an antenna with a radiation pattern given by , the noise temperature is
mathematically defined as:
This states that the temperature surrounding the antenna is integrated over the entire
sphere, and weighted by the antenna's radiation pattern. Hence, an isotropic antennawould have a noise temperature that is the average of all temperatures around the
antenna; for a perfectly directional antenna (with a pencil beam), the antenna temperature
will only depend on the temperature in which the antenna is "looking".
The noise power received from an antenna at temperature can be expressed in terms ofthebandwidth(B) the antenna (and its receiver) are operating over:
In the above,Kis Boltzmann's constant (1.38 * 10^-23 [Joules/Kelvin = J/K]). The
receiver also has a temperature associated with it ( ), and the total system temperature
(antenna plus receiver) has a combined temperature given by . This
temperature can be used in the above equation to find the total noise power of the system.
These concepts begin to illustrate how antenna engineers must understand receivers and
the associated electronics, because the resulting systems very much depend on each other.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
11/75
A parameter often encountered in specification sheets for antennas that operate in certain
environments is the ratio ofgain of the antenna divided by the antenna temperature (or
system temperature if a receiver is specified). This parameter is written as G/T, and hasunits of dB/Kelvin [dB/K].
UNIT _2 WIRE ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA ARRAYS
Half wave antenna
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
12/75
Quarter wave or unipole antenna
The quarter wave or unipole antenna is a single element antenna feed at one end,that behaves as a dipole antenna. It is formed by a conductor in length. It is fed in
the lower end, which is near a conductive surface which works as a reflector (see
Effect of ground). The current in the reflected image has the same direction and
phase that the current in the real antenna. The set quarter-wave plus image formsa half-wave dipole that radiates only in the upper half of space.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)#Effect_of_groundhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)#Effect_of_ground -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
13/75
Antenna array is a group of antennas or antenna elements arranged to provide the
desired directional characteristics. Generally any combination of elements can form anarray. However, equal elements in a regular geometry are usually used.
PATTERN MULTIPLICATION
The pattern multiplication principle states that the radiation patterns of an array ofN
identical antennas is equal to the product of the element pattern Fe( ) (pattern of one of
the antennas) and the array patternFa( ), whereFa( ) is the pattern obtained uponreplacing all of the actual antennas with isotropic sources.
LOOP ANTENNAThe small loop antenna is a closed loop as shown in Figure 1. These antennas
have low radiation resistance and high reactance, so that theirimpedance is
difficult to match to a transmitter. As a result, these antennas are most often
used as receive antennas, where impedance mismatch loss can be tolerated.
The radius is a, and is assumed to be much smaller than a wavelength (a
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
14/75
Figure 1. Small loop antenna.
Since the loop is electrically small, the current within the loop can be
approximated as being constant along the loop, so thatI= .
The fields from a small circular loop are given by:
The variation of the pattern with direction is given by , so that the
radiation pattern of a small loop antenna has the same power pattern as that of a
short dipole. However, the fields of a small dipole have the E- and H- fields
switched relative to that of a short dipole; the E-field is horizontally polarized
in the x-y plane.
The small loop is often referred to as the dual of the dipole antenna, because if
a small dipole had magnetic current flowing (as opposed to electric current as
in a regular dipole), the fields would resemble that of a small loop.
While the short dipole has a capacitive impedance (imaginary part of
impedance is negative), the impedance of a small loop is inductive (positive
imaginary part). The radiation resistance (and ohmic loss resistance) can be
increased by adding more turns to the loop. If there are Nturns of a small loop
antenna, each with a surface area S(we don't require the loop to be circular at
this point), the radiation resistance for small loops can be approximated (in
Ohms) by:
For a small loop, the reactive component of the impedance can be determined
by finding the inductance of the loop, which depends on its shape (then
X=2*pi*f*L). For a circular loop with radius a and wire radiusp, the reactive
component of the impedance is given by:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
15/75
Small loops often have a low radiation resistance and a highly inductivecomponent to their reactance. Hence, they are most often used as receive
antennas. Exaples of their use include in pagers, and as field strength probes
used in wireless measurements.
Loop antenna
A loop antennahas a continuous conducting path leading from
one conductor of a two-wire transmission line to the other conductor. All planar loops are
directional antennas with a sharp null, and have a radiation pattern similar to the dipoleantenna. However, the large and small loops have different orientations with respect to
their radiation pattern.
Small loops
A loop is considered asmall loop if it is less than 1/4 of awavelength in circumference. Most directional receiving loops are about 1/10 of a
wavelength. The small loop is also called the magnetic loopbecause it is more sensitivie
to the magnetic componentof the electromagnetic wave. As such, it is less sensitive tonear field electric noise when properly shielded. The received voltage of a small loop can
be greatly increased by bringing the loop into resonance with a tuning capacitor.
Since the small loop is small with respect to a wavelength, thecurrent around the antenna is nearly completely in phase. Therefore, waves approaching
in the plane of the loop will cancel, and waves in the axis perpendicular to the plane of
the loop will be strongest. This is the opposite mechanism as the large loop.
Large loops
The (large) loop antenna is similar to a dipole, except that the
ends of the dipole are connected to form a circle, triangle () or square. Typically a loop isa multiple of a half or full wavelength incircumference. A circular loop gets higher gain
(about 10%) than the other forms of large loop antenna, as gain of this antenna is directly
proportional to the area enclosed by the loop, but circles can be hard to support in a
flexible wire, making squares and triangles much more popular. Large loop antennas aremore immune to localized noise partly due to lack of a need for a groundplane. The large
loop has its strongest signal in the plane of the loop, and nulls in the axis perpendicular to
the plane of the loop. This is the opposite orientation to the small loop.
AM loops
AM loops are loops tuned for the AM broadcasting band.
Because of the extremely long wavelength, an AM loop may have multiple turns of wire
and still be less than 1/10 of a wavelength. Typically these loops are tuned with acapacitor, and may also be wound around a ferriterod to increase aperture.
Direction finding with loops
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_loophttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcastinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_(magnet)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_(magnet)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_aperturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_aperturehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_loophttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_loophttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_broadcastinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrite_(magnet)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_aperture -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
16/75
Loops are somewhat directional along the axis of highest gain,
but have a sharp null in the axis perpendicular to their highest gain. Therefore, when
using a loop for direction finding, the plane of the antenna is rotated until the signaldisappears. As planar loops have a 180 degree symmetry, other methods must be used to
determine if the signal is in front or behind the loop.
Frequently, a dipole and a loop are used together, to obtain acombined cardioid radiation pattern with a sharp null on only one side.
Uniform linear array
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardioidhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardioid -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
17/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
18/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
19/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
20/75
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
21/75
Slot antennas are used typically at frequencies between 300 MHz and
24 GHz. These antennas are popular because they can be cut out of whateversurface they are to be mounted on, and have radiation patterns that are roughly
omnidirectional (similar to a linear wire antenna, as we'll see). The polarization
is linear. The slot size, shape and what is behind it (the cavity) offer design
variables that can be used to tune performance.
Consider an infinite conducting sheet, with a rectangular slot cut out of
dimensions a and b, as shown in Figure 1. If we can excite some reasonable
fields in the slot (often called the aperture), we have an antenna.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.html -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
22/75
Figure 1. Rectangular Slot antenna with dimensions a and b.
To gain an intuition about slot antennas, first we'll learn Babinet's principle (put
into antenna terms by H. G. Booker in 1946). This principle relates the radiated
fields and impedance of an aperture or slot antenna to that of the field of its
dual antenna. The dual of a slot antenna would be if the conductive materialand air were interchanged - that is, the slot antenna became a metal slab in
space. An example of dual antennas is shown in Figure 2:
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
23/75
Figure 2. Dual antennas.
Note that a voltage source is applied across the short end of the slot. This
induces an E-field distribution within the slot, and currents that travel around
the slot perimeter, both contributed to radiation. The dual antenna is similar to a
dipole antenna. The voltage source is applied at the center of the dipole, so that
the voltage source is rotated.
Babinet's principle relates these two antennas. The first result states that the
impedance of the slot ( ) is related to the impedance of its dual antenna ( )
by the relation:
In the above, is the intrinsic impedance of free space. The second majorresult of Babinet's/Booker's principle is that the fields of the dual antenna are
almost the same as the slot antenna (the fields components are interchanged,
and called "duals"). That is, the fields of the slot antenna (given with a
subscript S) are related to the fields of it's complement (given with a subscript
C) by:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/impedance.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/intrinsicimpedance.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/impedance.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/intrinsicimpedance.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
24/75
Hence, if we know the fields from one antenna we know the fields of the other
antenna. Hence, since it is easy to visualize the fields from a dipole antenna, the
fields and impedance from a slot antenna can become intuitive if Babinet's
principle is understood.
Note that thepolarization of the two antennas are reversed. That is, since the
dipole antenna on the right in Figure 2 is vertically polarized, the slot antenna
on the left will be horizontally polarized.
Duality Example
As an example, consider a dipole similar to the one shown on the right in
Figure 2. Suppose the length of the dipole is 14.4 centimeters and the width is 2
centimeters, and that the impedance at 1 GHz is 65+j15 Ohms. The fields fromthe dipole antenna are given by:
What are the fields from a slot at 1 GHz, with the same dimensions as the
dipole?
Using Babinet's principle, the impedance can be easily found:
The impedance of the slot for this case is much larger, and while the dipole's
impedance is inductive (positive imaginary part), the slot's impedance is
capacitive (negative imaginary part). The E-fields for the slot can be easily
found:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/antennapol.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/antennapol.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
25/75
We see that the E-fields only contain a phi (azimuth) component; the antenna istherefore horizontally polarized.
Horn antennas are very popular at UHF (300 MHz-3 GHz) and higher
frequencies (I've heard of horns operating as high as 140 GHz). They often
have a directional radiation pattern with a high gain , which can range up to 25
dB in some cases, with 10-20 dB being typical. Horns have a wide impedance
bandwidth, implying that the input impedance is slowly varying over a wide
frequency range (which also implies low values forS11 orVSWR). The
bandwidth for practical horn antennas can be on the order of 20:1 (for instance,
operating from 1 GHz-20 GHz), with a 10:1 bandwidth not being uncommon.
The gain often increases (and thebeamwidthdecreases) as the frequency of
operation is increased. Horns have very little loss, so the directivity of a horn is
roughly equal to its gain.
Horn antennas are somewhat intuitive and not relatively simple to manufacture.
In addition, acoustic horns also used in transmitting sound waves (for example,
with a megaphone). Horn antennas are also often used to feed a dish antenna, or
as a "standard gain" antenna in measurements.
Popular versions of the horn antenna include the E-plane horn, shown in Figure
1. This horn is flared in the E-plane, giving the name. The horizontal dimension
is constant at w.
Figure 1. E-plane horn.
Another example of a horn is the H-plane horn, shown in Figure 2. This horn is
flared in the H-plane, with a constant height for the waveguide and horn ofh.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/impedance.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/sparameters.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/vswr.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/impedance.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/sparameters.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/vswr.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
26/75
Figure 2. H-Plane horn.
The most popular horn is flared in both planes as shown in Figure 3. This is a
pyramidal horn, and has widthB and heightA at the end of the horn.
Figure 3. Pyramidal horn.
Horns are typically fed by a section of a waveguide, as shown in Figure 4. The
waveguide itself is often fed with a short dipole, which is shown in red in
Figure 4. A waveguide is simply a hollow, metal cavity. Waveguides are used
to guide electromagnetic energy from one place to another. The waveguide in
Figure 4 is a rectangular waveguide of width b and height a, with b>a. The E-
field distribution for the dominant mode is shown in the lower part of Figure 1.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
27/75
Figure 4. Waveguide used as a feed to horn antennas.
Reflector AntennaTo increase the directivity of an antenna, a fairly intuitive solution is to use a
reflector. For example, if we start with a wire antenna (lets say a half-wave
dipole antenna), we could place a conductive sheet behind it to direct radiation
in the forward direction. To further increase the directivity, a corner reflector
may be used, as shown in Figure 1. The angle between the plates will be 90
degrees.
Figure 1. Geometry of Corner Reflector.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
28/75
The radiation pattern of this antenna can be understood by using image theory,
and then calculating the result via array theory. For ease of analysis, we'll
assume the reflecting plates are infinite in extent. Figure 2 below shows the
equivalent source distribution, valid for the region in front of the plates.
Figure 2. Equivalent sources in free space.
The dotted circles indicate antennas that are in-phase with the actual antenna;
the x'd out antennas are 180 degrees out of phase to the actual antenna.
Assume that the original antenna has an omnidirectional pattern given by .Then the radiation pattern (R) of the "equivalent set of radiators" of Figure 2
can be written as:
The above directly follows from Figure 2 and array theory (kis the wave
number. The resulting pattern will have the same polarization as the original
vertically polarized antenna. The directivity will be increased by 9-12 dB. The
above equation gives the radiated fields in the region in front of the plates.
Since we assumed the plates were infinite, the fields behind the plates are zero.
The directivity will be the highest when dis a half-wavelength. Assuming the
radiating element of Figure 1 is a short dipole with a pattern given by ,
the fields for this case are shown in Figure 3.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
29/75
Figure 3. Polar and azimuth patterns of normalized radiation pattern.
The radiation pattern, impedance and gain of the antenna will be influenced by
the distance dof Figure 1. The input impedance is increased by the reflector
when the spacing is one half wavelength; it can be reduced by moving the
antenna closer to the reflector. The lengthL of the reflectors in Figure 1 are
typically 2*d. However, if tracing a ray travelling along the y-axis from the
antenna, this will be reflected if the length is at least . The height of the
plates should be taller than the radiating element; however since linear antennasdo not radiate well along the z-axis, this parameter is not critically important.
The Parabolic Reflector
Antenna (Satellite Dish)The most well-known reflector antenna is the parabolic reflector antenna, commonly
known as a satellite dish antenna. Examples of this dish antenna are shown in the
following Figures.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
30/75
Figure 1. The "big dish" of Stanford University.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
31/75
Figure 2. A random "direcTV dish" on a roof.
Parabolic reflectors typically have a very high gain (30-40 dB is common) and low cross
polarization. They also have a reasonable bandwidth, with the fractional bandwidth being
at least 5% on commercially available models, and can be very wideband in the case of
huge dishes (like the Stanford "big dish" above, which can operate from 150 MHz to 1.5
GHz).
The smaller dish antennas typically operate somewhere between 2 and 28 GHz. The large
dishes can operate in the VHF region (30-300 MHz), but typically need to be extremely
large at this operating band.
The basic structure of a parabolic dish antenna is shown in Figure 3. It consists of a feed
antenna pointed towards a parabolic reflector. The feed antenna is often a horn antenna
with a circular aperture.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fractionalBW.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fractionalBW.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
32/75
Figure 3. Components of a dish antenna.
Unlike resonant antennas like the dipole antenna which are typically approximately a
half-wavelength long at the frequency of operation, the reflecting dish must be much
larger than a wavelength in size. The dish is at least several wavelengths in diameter, but
the diameter can be on the order of 100 wavelengths for very high gain dishes (>50 dB
gain). The distance between the feed antenna and the reflector is typically several
wavelenghts as well. This is in contrast to the corner reflector, where the antenna is
roughly a half-wavelength from the reflector.
In the next section, we'll look at the parabolic dish geometry in detail and why a parabola
is a desired shape.
To start, let the equation of a parabola with focal lengthFcan be written in the
(x,z) plane as:
This is plotted in Figure 1.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/reflectors/cornerReflector.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/reflectors/cornerReflector.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
33/75
Figure 1. Illustration of parabola with defining parameters.
The parabola is completely described by two parameters, the diameterD and
the focal lengthF. We also define two auxilliary parameters, the vertical height
of the reflector (H) and the max angle between the focal point and the edge of
the dish ( ). These parameters are related to each other by the following
equations:
To analyze the reflector, we will use approximations from geometric optics.
Since the reflector is large relative to a wavelength, this assumption is
reasonable though not precisely accurate. We will analyze the structure viastraight line rays from the focal point, with each ray acting as a plane wave.
Consider two transmitted rays from the focal point, arriving from two distinct
angles as shown in Figure 2. The reflector is assumed to be perfectly
conducting, so that the rays are completely reflected.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
34/75
Figure 2. Two rays leaving the focal point and reflected from the parabolicreflector.
There are two observations that can be made from Figure 2. The first is that
both rays end up travelling in the downward direction (which can be
determined because the incident and reflected angles relative to the normal of
the surface must be equal). . The rays are said to be collimated. The second
important observation is that the path lengths ADE and ABC are equal. This
can be proved with a little bit of geometry, which I won't reproduce here. These
facts can be proved for any set of angles chosen. Hence, it follows that:
All rays emanating from the focal point (the source or feed antenna) will be
reflected towards the same direction.
The distance each ray travels from the focal point to the reflector and then
to the focal plane is constant.
As a result of these observations, it follows the distribution of the field on the
focal plane will be in phase and travelling in the same direction. This gives rise
to the parabolic dish antennas highly directional radiation pattern. This is why
the shape of the dish is parabolic.
Finally, by revolving the parabola about the z-axis, a paraboloid is obtained, as
shown below.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.html -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
35/75
For design, the value of the diameterD should be increased to increase the gain
of the antenna. The focal lengthFis then the only free parameter; typical
values are commonly given as the ratioF/D, which usually range between 0.3and 1.0. Factors affecting the choice of this ratio will be given in the following
sections.
In the next section, we'll look at gain calculations for a parabolic reflector
antenna.
The fields across the aperture of the parabolic reflector is responsible for this
antenna's radiation. The maximum possible gain of the antenna can be
expressed in terms of the physical area of the aperture:
The actual gain is in terms of the effective aperture, which is related to the
physical area by the efficiency term ( ). This efficiency term will often be on
the order of 0.6-0.7 for a well designed dish antenna:
Understanding this efficiency will also aid in understanding the trade-offs
involved in the design of a parabolic reflector. The efficiency can be written as
the product of a series of terms:
We'll walk through each of these terms.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/aperture.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/aperture.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
36/75
Radiation Efficiency
The radiation efficiency is the usual efficiency that deals with ohmic losses,
as discussed on the efficiency page. Since horn antennas are often used as
feeds, and these have very little loss, and because the parabolic reflector istypically metallic with a very high conductivity, this efficiency is typically
close to 1 and can be neglected.
Aperture Taper Efficiency
The aperture radiation efficiency is a measure of how uniform the E-field is
across the antenna's aperture. In general, an antenna will have the maximum
gain if the E-field is uniform in amplitude and phase across the aperture (the
far-field is roughly the Fourier Transform of the aperture fields). However, the
aperture fields will tend to diminish away from the main axis of the reflector,
which leads to lower gain, and this loss is captured within this parameter.
This efficiency can be improved by increasing the F/D ratio, which also lowers
the cross-polarization of the radiated fields. However, as with all things in
engineering, there is a tradeoff: increasing theF/D ratio reduces the spillover
efficiency, discussed next.
Spillover Efficiency
The spillover efficiency is simple to understand. This measures the amount
of radiation from the feed antenna that is reflected by the reflector. Due to the
finite size of the reflector, some of the radiation from the feed antenna will
travel away from the main axis at an angle greater than , thus not being
reflected. This efficiency can be improved by moving the feed closer to the
reflector, or by increasing the size of the reflector.
Other Efficiencies
There are many other efficiencies that I've lumped into the parameter . This
is a major of all other "real-world effects" that degrades the antenna's gain and
consists of effects such as:
Surface Error - small deviations in the shape of the reflector degrades
performance, especially for high frequencies that have a small wavelength and
become scattered by small surface anomalies
Cross Polarization - The loss of gain due to cross-polarized (non-
desirable) radiation
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
37/75
Aperture Blockage - The feed antenna (and the physical structure that
holds it up) blocks some of the radiation that would be transmitted by the
reflector.
Non-Ideal Feed Phase Center - The parabolic dish has desirable properties
relative to a single focal point. Since the feed antenna will not be a point
source, there will be some loss due to a non-perfect phase center for a horn
antenna.
Calculating Efficiency
The efficiency is a function of where the feed antenna is placed (in terms ofF
andD) and the feed antenna's radiation pattern. Instead of introducing complex
formulas for some of these terms, we'll make use of some results by S. Silver
back in 1949. He calculated the aperture efficiency for a class of radiation
patterns given as:
TYpically, the feed antenna (horn) will not have a pattern exactly like the
above, but can be approximated well using the function above for some value
ofn. Using the above pattern, the aperture efficiency of a parabolic reflector
can be calculated. This is displayed in Figure 1 for varying values of and the
F/D ratio.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
38/75
Figure 1. Aperture Efficiency of a Parabolic Reflector as a function ofF/D orthe angle , for varying feed antenna radiation patterns.
Figure 1 gives a good idea on design of optimal parabolic reflectors. First,D is
made as large as possible so that the physical aperture is maximized. Then the
F/D ratio that maximizes the aperture efficiency can be found from the above
graph. Note that the equation that relates the ratio ofF/D to the angle can be
found here.
In the next section, we'll look at the radiation pattern of a parabolic antenna.
In this section, the 3d radiation patterns are presented to give an idea of what
they look like. This example will be for a parabolic dish reflector with the
diameter of the dishD equal to 11 wavelengths. TheF/D ratio will be 0.5. A
circular horn antenna will be used as the feed.
The maximum gain from the physical aperture is ; the
actual gain is 29.3 dB = 851, so we can conclude that the overall efficiency is
77%. The 3D patterns are shown in the following figures.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/reflectors/dish2.php#eq1http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/reflectors/dish2.php#eq1 -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
39/75
As can be seen, the pattern is highly directional. The HPBWis approximately 5
degrees, and the front-to-back ratio is approximately 33 dB.
LENS ANTENNA.Another antenna that can change spherical waves into flat plane waves is thelens antenna. This antenna uses a microwave lens, which is similar to an optical lens to straighten thespherical wavefronts. Since this type of antenna uses a lens to straighten the wavefronts, its design is
based on the laws of refraction, rather than reflection. Two types of lenses have been developedto provide a plane-wavefront narrow beam for tracking radars, while avoiding the problems
associated with the feedhorn shadow. These are the conducting(acceleration) type and
the dielectric (delay) type. The lens of an antenna is substantially transparent to microwave energy thatpasses through it. It will, however, cause the waves of energy to be either converged or
diverged as they exit the lens. Consider the action of the two types of lenses. The conducting type of lens
is illustrated in figure 1-10, view A. This type of lens consists of flat metal strips placed parallel to theelectric field of the wave and spaced slightly in excess of one-half of a wavelength. To the wave
these strips look like parallel waveguides. The velocity of phase propagation of a wave is greater in a
waveguide than in air. Thus, since the lens is concave, the outer portions of the transmitted
spherical waves are accelerated for a longer interval of time than the inner portion.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPatDefs.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
40/75
Helical AntennaAntennas List Antenna Theory Home
Helix antennas have a very distinctive shape, as can be seen in the following
picture.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/ -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
41/75
Photo courtesy of Dr. Lee Boyce.
The most popular helical antenna (often called a 'helix') is a travelling wave
antenna in the shape of a corkscrew that produces radiation along the axis of thehelix. These helixes are referred to as axial-mode helical antennas. The benefits of
this antenna is it has a wide bandwidth, is easily constructed, has a real input
impedance, and can produce circularly polarized fields. The basic geometry is
shown in Figure 1.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
42/75
Figure 1. Geometry of Helical Antenna.
The parameters are defined below.
D - Diameter of a turn on the helix.
C- Circumference of a turn on the helix (C=pi*D).
S- Vertical separation between turns.
- pitch angle, which controls how far the antenna grows in the z-direction
per turn, and is given by
N- Number of turns on the helix.
H- Total height of helix,H=NS.
The antenna in Figure 1 is a left handed helix, because if you curl your fingers on
your left hand around the helix your thumb would point up (also, the waves
emitted from the antenna are Left Hand Circularly Polarized). If the helix was
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
43/75
wound the other way, it would be a right handed helical antenna.
The pattern will be maximum in the +z direction (along the helical axis in Figure
1). The design of helical antennas is primarily based on empirical results, and the
fundamental equations will be presented here.
Helices of at least 3 turns will have close to circular polarization in the +z
direction when the circumference Cis close to a wavelength:
Once the circumference Cis chosen, the inequalites above roughly determine the
operating bandwidth of the helix. For instance, ifC=19.68 inches (0.5 meters),then the highest frequency of operation will be given by the smallest wavelength
that fits into the above equation, or =0.75C=0.375 meters, which corresponds to
a frequency of 800 MHz. The lowest frequency of operation will be given by the
largest wavelength that fits into the above equation, or =1.333C=0.667 meters,
which corresponds to a frequency of 450 MHz. Hence, the fractional BW is 56%,
which is true of axial helices in general.
The helix is a travelling wave antenna, which means the current travels along the
antenna and the phase varies continuously. In addition, the input impedance is
primarly real and can be approximated in Ohms by:
The helix functions well for pitch angles ( ) between 12 and 14 degrees.
Typically, the pitch angle is taken as 13 degrees.
The normalized radiation pattern for the E-field components are given by:
For circular polarization, the orthogonal components of the E-field must be 90
degrees out of phase. This occurs in directions near the axis (z-axis in Figure 1) of
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fractionalBW.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fractionalBW.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
44/75
the helix. The axial ratio for helix antennas decreases as the number of loopsNis
added, and can be approximated by:
The gain of the helix can be approximated by:
In the above, c is the speed of light. Note that for a given helix geometry (specified
in terms ofC, S, N), the gain increases with frequency. For an N=10 turn helix,
that has a 0.5 meter circumference as above, and an pitch angle of 13 degrees(giving S=0.13 meters), the gain is 8.3 (9.2 dB).
For the same example helix, the pattern is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Normalized radiation pattern for helical antenna (dB).
The Half-Power Beamwidth for helical antennas can be approximated (in degrees)
by:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/axial.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/axial.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
45/75
Yagi-Uda AntennaAntennas List Antenna Theory .com
The Yagi-Uda antenna or Yagi is one of the most brilliant antenna designs. It is
simple to construct and has a high gain, typically greater than 10 dB. These
antennas typically operate in the HF to UHF bands (about 3 MHz to 3 GHz),
although theirbandwidth is typically small, on the order of a few percent of the
center frequency. You are probably familiar with this antenna, as they sit on top of
roofs everywhere. An example of a Yagi-Uda antenna is shown below.
The Yagi antenna was invented in Japan, with results first published in 1926. The
work was originally done by Shintaro Uda, but published in Japanese. The work
was presented for the first time in English by Yagi (who was either Uda's
professor or colleague, my sources are conflicting), who went to America and
gave the first English talks on the antenna, which led to its widespread use. Hence,
even though the antenna is often called a Yagi antenna, Uda probably invented it.
A picture of Professor Yagi with a Yagi-Uda antenna is shown below.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/main.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/bandwidth.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
46/75
In the next section, we'll explain the principles of the Yagi-Uda antenna.
The basic geometry of a Yagi-Uda antenna is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Geometry of Yagi-Uda antenna.
The antenna consists of a single 'feed' or 'driven' element, typically a dipole or a
folded dipole antenna. This is the only member of the above structure that is
actually excited (a source voltage or current applied). The rest of the elements
are parasitic - they reflect or help to transmit the energy in a particular
direction. The length of the feed element is given in Figure 1 asF. The feed
antenna is almost always the second from the end, as shown in Figure 1. This
feed antenna is often altered in size to make it resonant in the presence of the
parasitic elements (typically, 0.45-0.48 wavelengths long for a dipole antenna).
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/foldeddipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/resonant.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/dipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/foldeddipole.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/resonant.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
47/75
The element to the left of the feed element in Figure 1 is the reflector. The
length of this element is given asR and the distance between the feed and the
reflector is SR. The reflector element is typically slightly longer than the feed
element. There is typically only one reflector; adding more reflectors improves
performance very slightly. This element is important in determining the front-
to-back ratio of the antenna.
Having the reflector slightly longer than resonant serves two purposes. The first
is that the larger the element is, the better of a physical reflector it becomes.
Secondly, if the reflector is longer than its resonant length, the impedance of
the reflector will be inductive. Hence, the current on the reflector lags the
voltage induced on the reflector. The director elements (those to the right of the
feed in Figure 1) will be shorter than resonant, making them capacitive, so that
the current leads the voltage. This will cause a phase distribution to occur
across the elements, simulating the phase progression of a plane wave across
the array of elements. This leads to the array being designated as a travelling
wave antenna. By choosing the lengths in this manner, the Yagi-Uda antenna
becomes an end-fire array - the radiation is along the +y-axis as shown in
Figure 1.
The rest of the elements (those to the right of the feed antenna as shown in
Figure 1) are known as director elements. There can be any number of directors
N, which is typically anywhere fromN=1 toN=20 directors. Each element is of
lengthDi, and separated from the adjacent director by a length SDi. As alluded
to in the previous paragraph, the lengths of the directors are typically less than
the resonant length, which encourages wave propagation in the direction of the
directors.
The above description is the basic idea of what is going on. Yagi antenna
design is done most often via measurements, and sometimes computer
simulations. For instance, lets look at a two-element Yagi antenna (1 reflector,
1 feed element, 0 directors). The feed element is a half-wavelength dipole,
shortened to be resonant (gain = 2.15 dB). The gain as a function of the
separation is shown in Figure 2.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
48/75
Figure 2. Gain versus separation for 2-element Yagi antenna.
The above graph shows that the gain is increases by about 2.5 dB if the
separation SD is between 0.15 and 0.3 wavelengths. Similarly, the gain can be
plotted as a function of director spacings, or as a function of the number ofdirectors used. Typically, the first director will add approximately 3 dB of
overall gain (if designed well), the second will add about 2 dB, the third about
1.5 dB. Adding an additional director always increases the gain; however, the
gain in directivity decreases as the number of elements gets larger. For
instance, if there are 8 directors, and another director is added, the increases in
gain will be less than 0.5 dB.
In the next section, I'll go further into the design of Yagi-Uda antennas.
The design of a Yagi-Uda antenna is actually quite simple. Because Yagi antennas havebeen extensively analyzed and experimentally tested, the process basically follows this
outline:
Look up a table of design parameters for Yagi antennas
Build it (or model it numerically), and tweak it till the performance is acceptable
As an example, consider the table published in "Yagi Antenna Design" by P Viezbicke
from the National Bureau of Standards, 1968, given in Table I. Note that the "boom" is the
long element that the directors, reflectors and feed elements are physically attached to, and
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
49/75
dictates the lenght of the antenna.
Table I. Optimal Lengths for Yagi-Uda Elements, for Distinct Boom Lengths
d=0.0085
SR=0.2
Boom Length of Yagi-Uda Array (in )
0.4 0.8 1.2 2.2 3.2 4.2
R 0.482 0.482 0.482 0.482 0.482 0.475
D1 0.442 0.428 0.428 0.432 0.428 0.424
D2 0.424 0.420 0.415 0.420 0.424
D3 0.428 0.420 0.407 0.407 0.420
D4 0.428 0.398 0.398 0.407D5 0.390 0.394 0.403
D6 0.390 0.390 0.398
D7 0.390 0.386 0.394
D8 0.390 0.386 0.390
D9 0.398 0.386 0.390
D10 0.407 0.386 0.390
D11 0.386 0.390
D12 0.386 0.390D13 0.386 0.390
D14 0.386
D15 0.386
Spacing
between
directors,
(SD/ )
0.20 0.20 0.25 0.20 0.20 0.308
Gain (dB) 9.25 11.35 12.35 14.40 15.55 16.35
There's no real rocket science going on in the above table. I believe the authors of
the above document did experimental measurements until they found an optimized
set of spacings and published it. The spacing between the directors is uniform and
given in the second-to-last row of the table. The diameter of the elements is given
by d=0.0085 . The above table gives a good starting point to estimate the
required length of the antenna (the boom length), and a set of lengths and spacings
that achieves the specified gain. In general, all the spacings, lengths, diamters
(including the boom diameter) are design variables and can be continuously
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
50/75
optimized to alter performance. There are thousands of tables that further give
results, such as how the diamter of the boom affects the results, and the optimal
diamters of the elements.
As an example of Yagi-antenna radiation patterns, a 6-element Yagi antenna (with
axis along the +x-axis) is simulated in FEKO (1 reflector, 1 driven half-wavelength dipole, 4 directors). The resulting antenna has a 12.1 dBi gain, and the
plots are given in Figures 1-3.
Figure 1. E-plane gain of Yagi antenna.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
51/75
Figure 2. H-Plane gain of Yagi antenna.
Figure 3. 3-D Radiation Pattern of Yagi antenna.
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
52/75
The above plots are just an example to give an idea of what the radiation pattern of
the Yagi-Uda antenna resembles. The gain can be increased (and the pattern made
more directional) by adding more directors or optimizing spacing (or rarely,
adding another refelctor). The front-to-back ratio is approximately 19 dB for this
antenna, and this can also be optimized if desired.
A LONG-WIRE ANTENNA is an antenna that is a wavelength or more long at the operating frequency.These antennas have directive patterns that are sharp in both the horizontal and vertical planes.
BEVERAGE ANTENNAS consist of a single wire that is two or more wavelengths long.
A V ANTENNA is a bi-directional antenna consisting of two horizontal, long wires arranged to form a V.
The RHOMBIC ANTENNA uses four conductors joined to form a rhombus shape. This antenna has awide frequency range, is easy to construct and maintain, and is noncritical as far as operation and
adjustment are concerned.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/fronttobackratio.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
53/75
The TURNSTILE ANTENNA consists of two horizontal, half-wire antennas mounted at right angles to
each other.
LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNA
LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNA
In telecommunication, a log-periodic antenna (LP,
also known as a log-periodic array) is abroadband, multielement,
unidirectional, narrow-beamantenna that has impedance and
radiation characteristics that are regularly repetitive as a
logarithmic function of the excitation frequency. The individual
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phased_arrayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadbandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directional_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(electronics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_impedancehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunicationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phased_arrayhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadbandhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directional_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(electronics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_impedancehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
54/75
components are often dipoles, as in a log-periodic dipole array
(LPDA).
Log periodic antennas are arrays that are designed to be
self-similarand thus are fractal antenna arrays. It is normal to
drive alternating elements with a circa 180o ( radian) phase shiftfrom the last element. This is normally done by wiring the
elements alternatingly to the two wires in a balanced transmission
line.The length and spacing of the elements of a log- increase
logarithmically from one end to the other.The result of this
structural condition is that if a plot is made of the input impedance
as a function of log of frequency then the variation will be periodic
i.e. the impedance will go through the cycles of variation in such a
way that each cycle is exactly like its preceding one and hence thename.
Log.-Periodic Antenna, 250 2400 MHz
Mutual impedance& self-impedance The method helps us to compute voltages, currents and
impedances in antenna systems. The method understands the
voltage, which is observed at the input port of every single
antenna element, being induced by the radiation ofallthe
antenna elements (including the own element). The voltage
can be composed from contributions of single elements. Each
contribution is proportional to the current of the respective
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-similarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dipole_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-similarhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antennahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antenna -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
55/75
element. E.g., voltage U1 at the input of the first antenna
element equals to the summation
whereI1,I2,I3 are currents at the input ports of single
elements,Z11,Z12,Z13 are impedances.Z11 is self-impedance,Z1n are mutual impedances between the first
element and the other elements in the antenna system. These
impedances depend on the mutual position and mutual
distance of antenna elements
Biconical antenna
A biconical antenna consists of an arrangement of two conicalconductors, which is
driven bypotential, charge, or an alternating magnetic field(and the associatedalternating electric current) at the vertex. The conductors have a common axis and vertex.
The two cones face in opposite directions. Biconical antennas are broadband dipoleantennas, typically exhibiting a bandwidth of 3octaves or more.
Omnidirectional Biconical Antenna
Microstrip or patch antennas are becoming increasingly useful because they can
be printed directly onto a circuit board. They are becoming very widespread
within the mobile phone market. They are low cost, have a low profile and areeasily fabricated.
Consider the microstrip antenna shown in Figure 1, fed by a microstrip
transmission line. The patch, microstrip and ground plane are made of high
conductivity metal. The patch is of lengthL, width W, and sitting on top of a
substrate (some dielectric circuit board) of thickness h withpermittivity .
The thickness of the ground plane or of the microstrip is not critically
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_(geometry)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conductor_(material)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_chargehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_currenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertex_(geometry)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_rotationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octave_(disambiguation)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octave_(disambiguation)http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Schwarzbeck_RE_1790.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cone_(geometry)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conductor_(material)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potentialhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_chargehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_fieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_currenthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertex_(geometry)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axis_of_rotationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octave_(disambiguation)http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/permittivity.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
56/75
important. Typically the height h is much smaller than the wavelength of
operation.
(a) Top View
(b) Side View
Figure 1. Geometry of Microstrip (Patch) Antenna.
The frequency of operation of the patch antenna of Figure 1 is determined by
the lengthL. The center frequency will be approximately given by:
-
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
57/75
The above equation says that the patch antenna should have a length equal to
one half of a wavelength within the dielectric (substrate) medium.
The width Wof the antenna controls the input impedance. For a square patch
fed in the manner above, the input impedance will be on the order of 300
Ohms. By increasing the width, the impedance can be reduced. However, to
decrease the input impedance to 50 Ohms often requires a very wide patch. The
width further controls the radiation pattern. The normalized pattern is
approximately given by:
In the above, kis the free-space wavenumber, given by . The magnitude
of the fields, given by:
The fields are plotted in Figure 2 forW=L=0.5 .
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/wavenumber.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
58/75
Figure 2. Normalized Radiation Pattern for Microstrip (Patch) Antenna.
The directivity of patch antennas is approximately 5-7 dB. The fields are
linearly polarized. Next we'll consider more aspects involved in Patch
(Microstrip) antennas.
Spiral antenna
In microwavesystems, a spiral antenna is a type of RF antenna. It is shaped as a two-arm spiral, or more arms may be used.[1] Spiral antennas operate over a wide frequency
range and have circularpolarization. Spiral antennas were first described in 1956.
Applications
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_antenna#cite_note-0%23cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_rangehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_rangehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwavehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiralhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_antenna#cite_note-0%23cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_rangehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_rangehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
59/75
A spiral antenna transmits EM waves having a circular polarization. It will receive
linearly polarized EM waves in any orientation, but will attenuate signals received with
the opposite circular polarization. A spiral antenna will reject circularly polarized wavesof one type, while receiving perfectly well waves having the other polarization.
One application of spiral antennas is wideband communications. Another application ofspiral antennas is monitoring of the frequency spectrum. One antenna can receive over a
wide bandwidth, for example a ratio 5:1 between the maximum and minimum frequency.Usually a pair of spiral antennas are used in this application, having identical parameters
except the polarization, which is opposite (one is right-hand, the other left-hand oriented).
Spiral antennas are useful for microwave direction-finding.[2]
Elements
The antenna includes two conductive spirals or arms, extending from the center outwards.
The antenna may be a flat disc, with conductors resembling a pair of loosely-nested clock
springs, or the spirals may extend in a three-dimensional shape like a screw thread. Thedirection of rotation of the spiral defines the direction of antenna polarization. Additional
spirals may be included as well, to form a multi-spiral structure. Usually the spiral is
cavity-backed, that is there is a cavity of air or non-conductive material or vacuum,surrounded by conductive walls; the cavity changes the antenna pattern to a
unidirectional shape. The output of the antenna
Measuring Radiation Pattern
and an Antenna's Gain
Antennas (Home)Antenna Measurements
Home
Previous: Measurements
Ranges
Now that we have ourmeasurement equipment and an antenna range, we can
perform some measurements. We will use the source antenna to illuminate the
antenna under test with a plane wave from a specific direction. Thepolarization
andgain (for the fields radiated toward the test antenna) of the source antenna
should be known.
Due to reciprocity, the radiation pattern from the test antenna is the same for both
the receive and transmit modes. Consequently, we can measure the radiationpattern in the receive mode for the test antenna.
The test antenna is rotated using the test antenna's positioning system. The
received power is recorded at each position. In this manner, the magnitude of the
radiation pattern of the test antenna can be determined. We will discussphase
measurements andpolarization measurements later.
The coordinate system of choice for the radiation pattern is spherical coordinates.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_antenna#cite_note-1%23cite_note-1http://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/equipment.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/antennapol.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/sphericalCoordinates.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiral_antenna#cite_note-1%23cite_note-1http://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/equipment.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/ranges.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/antennapol.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/radPattern.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/soon.htmlhttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/sphericalCoordinates.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
60/75
Measurement Example
An example should make the process reasonably clear. Suppose the radiation
pattern of a microstrip antenna is to be obtained. As is usual, lets let the direction
the patch faces ('normal' to the surface of the patch) be towards the z-axis.
Suppose the source antenna illuminates the test antenna from +y-direction, asshown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. A patch antenna oriented towards the z-axis with a Source illumination
from the +y-direction.
In Figure 1, the received power for this case represents the power from the angle:
. We record this power, change the position and record again.
Recall that we only rotate the test antenna, hence it is at the same distance from
the source antenna. The source power again comes from the same direction.
Suppose we want to measure the radiation pattern normal to the patch's surface
(straight above the patch). Then the measurement would look as shown in Figure2.
http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/patches/patch.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
61/75
Measuring Gain
Antennas (Home) Antenna MeasurementsBack: Measurement of
Antenna Radiation Patterns
On the previous page on measuring radiation patterns, we saw how theradiation pattern of an antenna can be measured. This is actually the "relative"
radiation pattern, in that we don't know what the peak value of the gain actually is
(we're just measuring the received power, so in a sense can figure out how
directive an antenna is and the shape of the radiation pattern). In this page, we will
focus on measuring the peak gain of an antenna - this information tells us how
much power we can hope to receive from a given plane wave.
We can measure the peak gain using the Friis Transmission Equationand a "gain
standard" antenna. A gain standard antenna is a test antenna with an accurately
known gain and polarization (typically linear). The most popular types of gainstandard antennas are the thin half-wave dipole antenna (peak gain of 2.15 dB) and
thepyramidal horn antenna (where the peak gain canbe accurately calculated and
is typically in the range of 15-25 dB). Consider the test setup shown in Figure 1. In
this scenario, a gain standard antenna is used in the place of the test antenna, with
the source antenna transmitting a fixed amount of power (PT). The gains of both
of these antennas are accurately known.
Figure 1. Record the received power from a gain standard antenna.
From the Friis transmission equation, we know that the power received (PR) is
given by:
http://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/friis.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/friis.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/eplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/hplane.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/polarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/crosspolarization.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/http://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/antenna.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/measurements/radpattern.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/friis.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/halfwave.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/aperture/horn.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
62/75
If we replace the gain standard antenna with our test antenna (as shown in Figure
2), then the only thing that changes in the above equation is GR - the gain of the
receive antenna. The separation between the source and test antennas is fixed, and
the frequency will be held constant as well.
Figure 2. Record the received power with the test antenna (same source antenna).
Let the received power from the test antenna bePR2. If the gain of the test antenna
is higher than the gain of the "gain standard" antenna, then the received power will
increase. Using our measurements, we can easily calculate the gain of the test
antenna. Let Ggbe the gain of the "gain standard" antenna,PR be the power
received with the gain antenna under test, and PR2 be the power received with thetest antenna. Then the gain of the test antenna (GT) is (in linear units):
The above equation uses linear units (non-dB). If the gain is to be specified in
decibels, (power received still in Watts), then the equation becomes:
And that is all that needs done to determine the gain for an antenna in a particular
direction.
Efficiency and Directivity
http://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/decibels.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/definitions/decibels.php -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
63/75
Recall that the directivity can be calculated from the measured radiation pattern
without regard to what the gain is. Typically this can be performed by
approximated the integral as a finite sum, which is pretty simple.
Recall that the efficiency of an antenna is simply the ratio of the peak gain to thepeak directivity:
Hence, once we have measured the radiation pattern and the gain, the efficiency
follows directly from these.
In the next section, we'll look at measuring the phase of an antenna's radiationpattern.
Anechoic chamber
An anechoic chamber
An anechoic chamber is a room designed to stop reflections of either sound orelectromagnetic waves. They are also insulated from exterior sources ofnoise. The
combination of both aspects means they simulate a quiet open-space of infinite
dimension, which is useful when exterior influences would otherwise give false results.Anechoic chambers were originally used in the context ofacoustics(sound waves) to
minimize the reflections of a room. Theirradiofrequency counterpart have also been inuse for a few decades, for example to test antennas, radars, orelectromagneticinterference.
The wavelength of audible sound in air falls in the same range as that of commonly used
radio waves, and their propagation patterns bear many similarities. This is why both types
look similar.
Anechoic chambers range from small compartments to ones as large as aircraft hangars.The size of the chamber depends on the size of the objects to be tested and the frequency
http://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noisehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acousticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acousticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiofrequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_waveshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Anechoic_chamber.jpghttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/directivity.phphttp://www.antenna-theory.com/basics/gain.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noisehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acousticshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflection_(physics)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiofrequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interferencehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_waves -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
64/75
range of the signals used, although scale models can sometimes be used by testing at
shorter wavelengths.
Acoustic anechoic chambers
Anechoic chambers are commonly used in acoustics to conduct experiments in nominally"free field" conditions. All sound energy will be traveling away from the source with
almost none reflected back. Common anechoic chamber experiments include measuring
the transfer functionof a loudspeakeror the directivity of noise radiation from industrialmachinery. In general, the interior of an anechoic chamber is very quiet, with typical
noise levels in the 1020 dBA range. According toGuinness World Records, 2005,
Orfield Laboratory'sNIST certifiedEckel Industries-designed anechoic chamber is "Thequietest place on earth" measured at 9.4 dBA.[1][2] The human ear can typically detect
sounds above 0 dB, so a human in such a chamber would perceive the surroundings as
devoid of sound.
The University of Salford has a number of Anechoic chambers, of which unofficially oneis the quietest in the world with a measurement of 12.4 dBA. [3]
Semi-anechoic chambers
Full anechoic chambers aim to absorb energy in all directions. Semi-anechoic chambers
have a solid floor that acts as a work surface for supporting heavy items, such as cars,washing machines, or industrial machinery, rather than the mesh floor grille over
absorbent tiles found in full anechoic chambers. This floor is damped and floating on
absorbent buffers to isolate it from outside vibration or electromagnetic signals. Arecording studiomay utilize a semi-anechoic chamber to produce high-quality music free
of outside noise and unwanted echoes.
Radio-frequency anechoic chambers
An RF anechoic chamber.
The internal appearance of the radio frequency (RF) anechoic chamber is sometimes
similar to that of an acoustic anechoic chamber, however, the interior surfaces of the RF
anechoic chamber are covered with radiation absorbent material (RAM) instead of
acoustically absorbent material [1]. The RF anechoic chamber is typically used to housethe equipment for performing measurements ofantennaradiation patterns,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_functionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_functionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudspeakerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directivityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Recordshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Recordshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Recordshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NISThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eckel_Industrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eckel_Industrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-0%23cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-0%23cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-1%23cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Salfordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-2%23cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_studiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_studiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_absorbent_materialhttp://www.tdkrfsolutions.com/absorbers.htmhttp://www.tdkrfsolutions.com/absorbers.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_patternhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Radio-frequency-anechoic-chamber-HDR-0a.jpghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_functionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudspeakerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directivityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decibelhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Recordshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NISThttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eckel_Industrieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-0%23cite_note-0http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-1%23cite_note-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Salfordhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anechoic_chamber#cite_note-2%23cite_note-2http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recording_studiohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_frequencyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radar_absorbent_materialhttp://www.tdkrfsolutions.com/absorbers.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antenna_(radio)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pattern -
7/28/2019 Antenna NOL
65/75
electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and radar cross sectionmeasurements. Testing can
be conducted on full-scale objects, includingaircraft, or on scale models where the
wavelengthof the measuring radiation is scaled in direct proportion to the target size.Coincidentally, many RF anechoic chambers which use pyramidal RAM also exhibit
some of the properties of an acoustic anechoic chamber, such as attenuation of sound and
shielding from outside noise.
Radiation absorbent material
The RAM is designed and shaped toabsorb incident RF radiation (also known asnon-
ionising radiation), as effectively as possible, from as many incident directions as
possible. The more effective the RAM is the less will be the level ofreflected RFradiation. Many measurements inelectromagnetic compatibility(EMC) and antenna
radiation patterns require that spurious signals arising from the test setup, including
reflections, are negligible to avoid the risk of causingmeasurement errors andambiguities.
One of the most effective types of RAM comprises arrays ofpyramid shaped pieces, each
of which is constructed from a suitably lossy material. To work effectively, all internal
surfaces of the anechoic chamber must be entirely covered with RAM. Sections of RAMmay be temporarily removed to install equipment but they must be replaced before
performing any tests. To be sufficiently lossy, RAM can neither be a goodelectrical
conductornor a good electrical insulatoras neither type actually absorbs any power.Typically pyramidal RAM will comprise a rubberizedfoam material impregnated with
controlled mixtures ofcarbonand iron. The length from base to tip of the pyramid
structure is chosen based on the lowest expected frequency and the amount of absorption
required. For low frequency damping, this distance is often 24 inches, while high
frequency panels are as short as 34 inches. Panels of RAM are installed with the tipspointing inward to the chamber. Pyramidal RAM attenuates signal by two effects:
scattering and absorption. Scattering can occur both coherently, when reflected waves arein-phase but directed away from the receiver, or incoherently where waves are picked up
by the receiver but are out of phase and thus have lower signal strength. This incoherent
scattering also occurs within the foam st