Antenna Design Considerations for LTE Enabled · PDF file1 Antenna Design Considerations for...

download Antenna Design Considerations for LTE Enabled · PDF file1 Antenna Design Considerations for LTE Enabled Tablets Rensheng (Ray) Sun, Ph.D EM Software & Systems (USA), Inc. Hampton,

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Antenna Design Considerations for LTE Enabled · PDF file1 Antenna Design Considerations for...

  • 1

    Antenna Design Considerations for LTE

    Enabled Tablets

    Rensheng (Ray) Sun, Ph.DEM Software & Systems (USA), Inc.

    Hampton, VA 23666

    Mobile Antenna Systems ConferenceDenver, CO

    September 18-19, 2012

  • 2

    Outline

    LTE-MIMO and antenna design challenges

    Multiband planar monopole antenna for LTE MIMO systems

    Antenna arrays on tablet computer Impedance matching improvements Channel capacity analysis Conclusion

  • 3

    LTE-MIMO and Antenna Design Challenges

  • 4

    LTE-MIMO

    MIMO technologies have been widely used in LTE todeliver enhanced performance, such as higher user datarates, improved system capacity and coverage, reducedlatency, etc.

    Tx 1

    Tx 2

    Tx 3

    Tx 4

    Base station

    Rx 1

    Rx 2

    Rx 3

    Rx 4

    Mobile terminal

    Signal Separator

    Transmission Channel

  • 5

    Design Implementations and Challenges

    LTE antennas offer many practical design andimplementation challenges due to the size of theportable terminal on which they areimplemented/designed

    Challenges in designing antennas for a LTE/MIMOsystem Antenna matching Isolation between the antennas Cross-correlation Interactions with neighboring components on mobile

    devices

  • 6

    Challenge - Isolation Techniques

    Placing the antennas half a wavelength apart as a ruleof thumb for low enough correlation Not attractive because of the space required for separation

    Using branch line hybrid with passive inductors andcapacitors to decouple the antenna ports1

    Orthogonally polarized elements offer significant portisolation

    Characteristic modes analysis for surface currentdistributions to provide orthogonal decoupling throughsystematic approach

    1. Rashid Ahmad Bhatti, Soongyu Yi, and Seong-Ook Park, Compact Antenna Array With Port Decoupling for LTE-Standardized Mobile Phones, IEEE Antennas & Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 8, 2009

  • 7

    Compact Dual Port Antenna for LTE mobile phone applications

    Two orthogonal radiating elements areused to achieve pattern diversity

    The problem of separation between theantennas for the isolation is overcomeby having zero separation

    Qinjiang Rao and Dong Wang, A Compact Dual-Port Diversity Antenna for Long-Term Evolution Handheld Devices, IEEE Transactions onVehicular Technology, Vol. 59, No. 3, March 2010

    There are no additional neutralization stubs(or) hybrids used to provide isolation

    The zero separation leads to size reductionresulting in compact design Dual port inverted

    PIFA

  • 8

    Meander-line Loaded Planar Monopole Antenna for

    Multiband LTE MIMO Systems

  • 9

    Planar Monopole Antenna for Multiband LTE

    The planar antenna covers five frequency bands for LTE applications, including 746-787 MHz, 1710-1755 MHz, 2110-2155 MHz, 2305-2400 MHz, and 2500-2690 MHz

    The ultra-wideband planar monopole itself covers 1700 MHz to 2900 MHz

    Meandering microstrip line is loaded to provide resonance at LTE 700 MHz band

    Overall size: 88mm x 50mm x 1.6mm

    Yuan Yao, etc., Multiband Planar Monopole Antenna for LTE MIMO Systems, International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, Vol.2012, Article ID 890705.

  • 10

    Reflection Coefficient for a Single Antenna Itself

    Good matching across five bands: 746-787 MHz, 1710-1755 MHz, 2110-2155 MHz, 2305-2400 MHz, and 2500-2690 MHz

  • 11

    Triangular Surface Mesh for MoM/SEP solver

    Solved using MoM/SEP (surface equivalence principle)

    Mesh size: 1.74 mm

    Surface triangles: 7,282

    Peak memory: 3.48 GB

    Runtime: 10 minutes/freq with 8-processor parallel solver

  • 12

    Surface Currents & Radiation Pattern at 760 MHz

  • 13

    Surface Currents & Radiation Pattern at 2.6 GHz

  • 14

    Two Antenna Elements Integrated on a Generic Tablet

  • 15

    Antennas Integrated with Generic Tablet

    The model includes two antennas, case, LCD panel, battery, PCB

    Dimensions (W x H x D)7.6 x 4.8 x 0.39 inches

  • 16

    Antennas Integrated with Generic Tablet(cut plane view)

    Dimensions (W x H x D)7.6 x 4.8 x 0.39 inches

  • 17

    Tetrahedral Mesh for FEM/MoM solver

    Solved with FEM/MoM

    Mesh size: 3.15 mm

    Surface triangles: 5,093

    Tetrahedra: 74,942

    Peak memory: 10.13 GB

    Runtime: 36 minutes/freq with 8-processor parallel solver

  • 18

    Radiation Pattern (Both Antennas Excited; 2.6 GHz)

  • 19

    Radiation Pattern (#1 excited; #2 terminated)

    Gaintotal

    Gaintheta

    Gainphi

  • 20

    Radiation Pattern (#2 excited; #1 terminated)

    Gaintotal

    Gaintheta

    Gainphi

  • 21

    S-parameters for the two antennas on tablet

  • 22

    Impedance Matching Improvement with Optenni Lab

    * Thanks to Mr Jussi Rahola at Optenni for helping with the optimization

  • 23

    Matching Circuit Design in Optenni Lab

    Read in the impedance data in Touchstone format

    Specify the target frequency bands

    Available components: inductors, capacitors, resistors, transmission lines, two-port S parameter blocks

    Note: efficiency of matching circuits is optimized, not the impedance match

    Multiport module containing simultaneous multiport matching (optimization of antenna efficiency) coming later this year

  • 24

    Efficiency without Matching

  • 25

    Matching Circuit with Discrete Components

  • 26

    S-parameters

  • 27

    Efficiencies

  • 28

    Matching Circuit with Microstrip Lines

    Microstrip lines, eps_r=4.8, thickness 1 mm. Width:T1-T3: 1mmT4 3.4 mm, T5: 2.1 mm, T6: 3.1 mm

  • 29

    S parameters

  • 30

    Efficiency

  • 31

    Channel Capacity Analysis

    * Thanks to Mr Oliver Stbler at AWE for helping with the simulations

  • 32

    Channel Capacity

    Channel capacity can be calculated from the channelmatrices obtained from measurements

    Alternatively, The channel capacity is computed by post processing the

    ray data from a fixed transmitter in a certain environment(channel) for different positions of the receiver

    The channel capacity is computed as;

    where,HF is the channel matrix is the SNR

  • 33

    Indoor Environment

    Commercial software WinProp from AWE Communications is used to calculate the channel capacity

    www.awe-communications.com

  • 34

    MIMO Configurations

  • 35

    1x2 MIMO system

    2x2 MIMO system

    Channel Capacity in Indoor Environment

  • 36

    Simulation along a trajectory in an urban area (1x2 MIMO)

    Channel Capacity in Urban Environment

  • 37

    Simulation along a trajectory in an urban area (2x2 MIMO)

    Channel Capacity in Urban Environment

  • 38

    Conclusion

    Challenges in designing antennas for LTE-MIMO system arebriefly discussed

    Simulation results for a multiband planar monopole antennais discussed

    Interactions/coupling between two-element array integratedon a generic tablet is studied

    Impedance matching optimization is performed to enhancethe performance of the multiband multiport system

    The channel capacity of the antennas on a tablet is computedin both indoor and urban environments