Annual Report on Port State Control related to ISM Code on … · Chapter 1 ISM deficiency cases...
27
July 2010 Annual Report on Port State Control related to ISM Code on Ships with SMC issued by ClassNK 2009
Transcript of Annual Report on Port State Control related to ISM Code on … · Chapter 1 ISM deficiency cases...
July 2010
Annual Report on Port State Control
related to ISM Code
on Ships with SMC issued by ClassNK
2009
CONTENTS Introduction ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 1
Chapter 1 ISM deficiency cases
1.1 Total number and average rate ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2
1.2 Comparison ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2
.1 Per factors related to ship ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 2
.2 Per factors related to Company ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 6
.3 Per port state who carried out PSC inspection ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 9
Chapter 2 ISM deficiencies and PSC actions
2.1 Comparison of deficiencies per ISM Code requirement ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 10
2.2 Comparison of deficiencies and detentions per port state ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 11
2.3 Analysis of deficiencies recorded along with PSC actions applied ・・・・・ 12
Appendix Extract from PSC inspection reports ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・ 15
1
Introduction This annual report is to offer ship management companies and others concerned with ship safety management systems analysis of cases where deficiencies related to ISM Code requirements were recorded as a result of port state control (PSC) inspection, which may be useful in reviewing a ship safety management system for its improvement. The analysis was made with information available from reports of PSC inspections that were carried out in the world in the year 2009 for ships holding an international safety management certificate issued by ClassNK under the authorization of the flag administration. Statistic data of such cases in the past several years are also presented to show changes by calendar year. It comprises of two chapters. Chapter 1 presents analysis of the cases where deficiencies related to ISM Code requirements were recorded in the PSC reports showing comparison of number of such cases per type, age, gross tonnage and flag of ship, number of ships under the management, etc. of Company and port state. Chapter 2 focuses on the deficiencies recorded and actions required by port states for their rectification. In this report, terms defined below are used.
NKSMC ship Ship holding an international safety management certificate issued by ClassNK
NKDOC company Company holding a Document of Compliance issued by ClassNK
ISM deficiency Deficiency of a safety management system related to a requirement of ISM Code
ISM deficiency case Case where any ISM deficiencies were recorded in a PSC inspection report
ISM deficiency ship Ship having a safety management system an ISM deficiency of which was recorded in a PSC inspection report
ISM deficiency rate* Percentage of ISM deficiency ships to the whole NKSMC ships or a group of NKSMC ships in consideration
* Defining ISM deficiency rate as percentage of ISM deficiency cases to NKSMC ships that subjected to a PSC inspection is more meaningful. However, as the total number of such NKSMC ships is unknown, the total number of the whole or a group of NKSMC ships was used instead.
2
Chapter 1 ISM deficiency cases 1.1 Total number and average rate The total numbers of ISM deficiency cases and the average ISM deficiency rates in the past 4 years are shown in Table 1.1.1. The rate shows decreasing since 2008 and became 4.4% in 2009.
Table 1.1.1 Total number and rate of ISM deficiency cases
Year
ISM deficiency cases
(A)
NKSMC ships
total No. （B）
ISM deficiency rate
（A/B）
2006 121 3895 3.1
2007 142 3993 3.6
2008 202 4148 4.9
2009 178 4073 4.4
1.2 Comparison
1.2.1 Per factors related to ship
(a) Per type of ship
ISM deficiency rate per type of ship is shown in Table 1.2.1(a) and Figure 1.2.1(a).
The ISM deficiency rate of bulk carrier increased.slightly.
The ISM deficiency rate of the other cargo ship, oil tanker and gas carrier decreased since 2008.
There was no report of ISM deficiency of chemical tanker, passenger & MODU in 2009.
Table 1.2.1 (a) ISM deficiency rate per type of ship
ISM deficiency rate （％） （A/B）
Type of ship
No. of ISM deficiency
cases 2009 (A)
No. of NKSMC ships
2009 (B)
2006
2007
2008
2009
Bulk carrier 89 1467 4.5 4.8 5.1 6.1
Other cargo ship 75 1542 3.2 3.3 6.4 4.9
Oil tanker＊ 12 802 0.6 2.3 2.0 1.5
Chemical tanker** 0 40 13.6 7.0 0.0 0.0
Gas carrier 2 216 0.0 0.5 2.9 0.9
Passenger & MODU 0 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 178 4073 3.1 3.6 4.9 4.4
* Including oil/chemical tankers. ** Excluding oil/chemical tanker.
3
Figure 1.2.1(a) ISM deficiency rate per type of ship
(b) Per age of ship
The numbers of ISM deficiency ships per age group of ship in 2006 to 2009 are shown in Table 1.2.1(b) together with the numbers of NKSMC ship and the ISM deficiency rates in Figure 1.2.1(b)-1, and ISM deficiency rate per type and age group of ship in 2009 in Figure 1.2.1(b)-2.
The older a ship is greater the ISM deficiency rate tends to be. Such tendency is more conspicuous for bulk carrier and other cargo ship.. This is attributed to the increase in the number of deficiencies due to inadequate maintenance of ship including equipment and fittings with aging of ships.
Table 1.2.1(b) No. of ISM deficiency ships per age group of ship
No. of ISM deficiency cases （A） No. of NKSMC ships （B） Age
2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
0 - 4 13 14 32 24 1109 959 1440 1586
5 - 9 25 23 32 23 974 855 822 832
10 - 14 15 38 57 52 678 966 849 817
15 - 19 21 13 12 27 367 420 355 355
20 - 24 34 27 35 29 501 364 373 238
25 - 13 27 34 23 266 429 309 245
Total 121 142 202 178 3895 3993 4148 4073
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0‐4 5‐9 10‐14 15‐19 20-24 25-
2006
2007
2008
2009
0 . 0
2 . 0
4 . 0
6 . 0
8 . 0
1 0 . 0
1 2 . 0
1 4 . 0
B u lk c a rrie r O th e r c a rg osh ip
O i l ta n k e r Ch e m ic a lta n ke r
G as c ar rie r Pa s se n g e r& M O DU
2 00 6
2 00 7
2 00 8
2 00 9
ISM defic. rate (%)
ISM defic. rate (A/B) (%)
Figure 1.2.1(b) -1 ISM deficiency rate per age group of ship
4
Figure 1.2.1(b) -2 ISM deficiency rate (%) per ship type and age group of ship
(c) Per gross tonnage of ship
The numbers of ISM deficiency cases per gross-tonnage group of ship in 2006 to 2009 are shown in Table 1.2.1(c) together with the numbers of NKSMC ship, and the ISM deficiency rates in Figure 1.2.1(c).
The ISM deficiency rate of large ships of more than 80,000 gross tonnage has stayed low continuously and increased double from around 1 % for the past 3 years to 2 %.
Table 1.2.1(c) No. of ISM deficiency ships per GT group of ship
No. of ISM deficiency cases （A） No. NKSMC ships (B) GT （ x 1,000） 2006 2007 2008 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009
0 - 10 34 34 67 47 1253 1197 1189 1149
10 - 20 29 44 34 45 755 749 782 741
20 - 30 18 24 32 21 490 488 505 459
30 - 40 18 18 39 29 486 533 551 556
40 - 50 11 10 13 15 289 340 380 363
50 - 60 3 4 8 5 156 168 197 212
60 - 80 4 4 4 7 136 141 135 150
80 - 4 4 5 9 330 377 409 443
Total 121 142 202 178 3895 3993 4148 4073
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-80 80-
2006
2007
2008
2009ISM defic. rate (A/B) (%)
Figure 1.2.1(b) -1 ISM deficiency rate per age group of ship
0
5
10
15
20
0‐4 5‐9 10‐14 15‐19 20-24 25-
Bulk carrier
Other cargo ship
Oil tanker
ISM defic. rate (A/B) (%)
Figure 1.2.1(c) ISM deficiency rate per GT group GT ( x 1,000)
5
(d) Per flag of ship
ISM deficiency rate per flag of ship in 2006 to 2009 is shown in Table 1.2.1(d) together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases.
Table 1.2.1(d) ISM deficiency rate per flag of ship
2006 2007 2008 2009 Flag No. Rate No. Rate No. Rate No. Rate
Cyprus 12 14.8 3 4.1 7 10.3 5 8.5 St. Vincent and the Grenadines - - 1 5.3 4 30.8 1 8.3
Malta 2 1.6 2 1.7 10 8.5 10 8.3 Liberia 11 5.8 10 5.2 12 6.2 15 8.3 Turkey 2 3.7 3 6.0 4 8.3 4 7.8 Marshall Islands 3 5.3 5 8.2 4 4.2 7 6.2 Japan - - 4 3.0 5 3.6 9 6.0 Panama 57 2.7 78 3.4 113 4.7 106 4.5 Greece - - - - 3 6.4 2 4.4 Malaysia 1 1.7 3 6.4 1 2.3 1 2.8 H.K., China 12 4.7 10 4.3 11 4.7 6 2.7 Philippines 3 3.7 1 1.2 4 6.1 1 2.1 Singapore 8 1.9 10 2.3 16 3.7 9 2.0 Bahamas 1 1.2 6 6.8 2 2.0 1 0.9 (Others) 9 - 6 - 6 - 1 -
Total/Average 121 3.1 142 3.6 202 4.9 178 4.4
6
1.2.2 Per factors related to Company Note: The analysis presented in this section covers only NKSMC ships under the management of NKDOC Companies but not those issued with DOC by another organization.
(a) Per number of ships under management of Company
ISM deficiency rate per group of Companies corresponding to the number of ships under their management in 2008 are shown in Table 1.2.2(a) together with ISM deficiency rate.
The ISM deficiency rate of the group of 1-5 ships is 8.5%, the highest, followed by that of 6-10 ships, 4.8%, 11-15 ships, 4.7%.
In 2008 the ISM deficiency rate decreased for the group with larger number of ships under their management. In 2009 the ISM deficiency rate for the group with over 16 ships was almost the same rate except for the group with 31-40 ships.
Table 1.2.2(a) ISM deficiency rate per number of ships under management of Company
No. of ships under
management No. of
Companies
No. of ISM deficiency
cases (A)
No. of NKSMC ships
(B)
ISM deficiency
rate (A/B)
1 - 5 345 66 776 8.5 6 - 10 89 31 652 4.8 11 - 15 44 26 553 4.7 16 - 20 25 10 449 2.2 21 - 30 25 17 648 2.6 31 - 40 9 11 316 3.5 41 - 50 7 8 320 2.5 51 - 5 9 359 2.5 Total 549 178 4073 4.4
Figure 1.2.2(a) ISM deficiency rate per No. of ships under management of Company
0123456789
1-5 6-10 11-15 16-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-
ISM defic. rate (%)
No. of ships under management of Company
7
(b) Per length of Company’s SMS operation
The numbers of ISM deficiency cases and ISM deficiency rate per length of Company’s operation of ship safety management system in 2009 are shown in Table 1.2.2(b). The length of Company’s SMS operation, in terms years, is based on the assumption that the Companies started such operation when it was issued with NKDOC for the first time.
Although the ISM deficiency rate shows the large drop among the groups with 3-5 years of length of SMS operation, there is a trend that greater the years of length of operation are smaller the figures become among the groups with over 10 years of length of SMS operation.
Table 1.2.2(b) ISM deficiency rate per length of Company’s SMS operation
No. of ISM deficiency cases
(A)
No. of NKSMC ships
(B) Length of SMS
operation No. of
Companies Total Per
company Total Per company
ISM deficiency rate (A/B)
16 4 0 0.00 74 18.5 0.0 15 22 12 0.55 531 24.1 2.3 14 48 28 0.58 683 14.2 4.1 13 79 27 0.34 708 9.0 3.8 12 58 18 0.31 361 6.2 5.0 11 14 8 0.57 139 9.9 5.8 10 11 7 0.64 75 6.8 9.3 9 28 8 0.29 139 5.0 5.8 8 39 18 0.46 278 7.1 6.5 7 17 7 0.41 89 5.2 7.9 6 16 7 0.44 87 5.4 8.0 5 9 1 0.11 57 6.3 1.8 4 15 3 0.20 89 5.9 3.4 3 19 1 0.05 100 5.3 1.0 2 22 9 0.41 63 2.9 14.3 1 26 6 0.23 38 1.5 15.8
Total 427 160 0.37 3511 8.2 4.6
ISM defic. rate (%)
Length of Company’s SMS operation
Figure 1.2.2 (b) ISM deficiency rate per length of Company’s SMS operation
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
8
(c) Per country/region in which Company is located ISM deficiency rate per country/region in which Companies are located is shown in Table 1.2.2(c) , together with the numbers of ISM deficiency cases, and in Figure 1.2.2(c).
The averaged ISM deficiency rate of ships under the management of Companies located in Greece, Korea and Taiwan has increased each to 10 % from 7.1 % in 2008, to 7.2 % from 3.4 %, to 5.5 % from 3.3 %.
That of ships under the management of Companies located in Turkey has decreased to 9.0 % from 9.9 % in 2008 and that in China has decreased to 5.0 % from 8.8 % in 2008.
Although the rate in Japan was equivalent, those of ships under the management of those in other countries were decreased.
Table 1.2.2(c) ISM deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located
Country/Region No. of Companies
No. of ISM deficiency
cases (A)
No. of NKSMC ships
(B)
ISM deficiency rate
(A/B)
Greece 88 30 301 10.0 Turkey 29 10 111 9.0 Korea 19 8 111 7.2 Taiwan 13 7 128 5.5 China 29 3 60 5.0 Japan 204 82 1858 4.4 H.K.(China) 24 12 284 4.2 Philippines 27 6 192 3.1 Germany 4 1 35 2.9 Singapore 52 13 666 2.0 U.K. 6 1 62 1.6 Thailand 6 1 62 1.6 (Others) 48 4 203 2.0
Total 549 178 4073 4.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Gre
ece
Turk
ey
Kore
a
Taiw
an
Chi
na
Japa
n
H.K
.(Chi
na)
Phi
lippi
nes
Ger
man
y
Sin
gapo
re
U.K
.
Thai
land
ISM defic. rate (%)
Figure 1.2.2(c) Deficiency rate per country/region in which company are located
9
1.2.3 Per port state who carried out PSC inspection The number of ISM deficiency cases per port state who executed PSC is shown in Table 1.2.3.
● The numbers of ISM deficiency cases in Australia, China and Korea were equivalent in 2008.
● The numbers of ISM deficiency cases in many other countries were shown decreased or increased
● The number of ISM deficiency cases in U.S.A. decreased half to 17 cases in 2009 from 34 cases in 2008 and 2007.
Table 1.2.3 ISM deficiency case per port state
who executed PSC
No. of ISM deficiency cases Authority 2006 2007 2008 2009
Australia 37 26 48 47 U.S.A. 15 34 34 17 Japan 22 10 19 14 China 14 9 12 12 Spain - 2 8 12 Korea 11 4 11 11 Belgium 2 6 4 7 Argentina 4 1 1 6 U.K. 12 7 7 5 India - - 2 5 Italy 4 5 9 5 Brazil 2 1 3 4 Canada 2 5 3 4 Netherlands 2 4 0 4 New Zealand - - - 4 Germany 5 - 6 3 H.K.(China) 8 1 0 3 Russia 4 6 5 3 Singapore 2 1 2 3 Iran - - 2 2 Egypt - - - 1 France 2 4 7 1 Greece - - - 1 Ireland - - 2 1 Israel - - - 1 Portugal - 2 0 1 Qatar - - - 1 Poland - 2 4 0 Taiwan - - 3 0 Viet Nam - - 2 0 Chile - 3 1 0 (Others) 11 10 7 0
Total 159 143 202 178
10
Chapter 2 ISM deficiencies and PSC actions
2.1 Comparison of ISM deficiencies per ISM Code requirement The total numbers of ISM deficiencies recorded in PSC reports in 2005 to 2008 and those divided according to ISM Code requirements, by its sections, are shown in Table 2.1. Table 2.1 Total No. of ISM deficiencies and distribution per ISM Code requirement
ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* Total
2006 5 4 9 3 10 44 19 38 11 109 15 6 8 2 283
2007 1 4 1 2 9 26 32 27 20 92 17 7 3 0 241
2008 1 19 14 2 24 27 46 33 30 114 21 6 6 2 345
2009 0 5 10 1 11 23 37 25 17 109 5 4 3 22 272
99* : The ISM Code requirement with which the deficiencies were raised was not specified.
Section Requirements for
1 General (1.2.3 Compliance with mandatory rules, etc.)
2 Safety and environmental protection policy
3 Company responsibilities and authority
4 Designated persons
5 Master’s responsibility and authority
6 Resources and personnel
7 Development of plans for shipboard operations
8 Emergency preparedness
9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences
10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment
11 Documentation
12 Company verification, review and evaluation
13 Certification and periodical verification
The total number of ISM deficiencies decreased to 272 in 2009 with the decrease of ISM deficiency cases to 178. The number of ISM deficiencies per ISM deficiency case is 1.5 decreased from 1.7 in 2008.
Percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “10.Maintenance of the ship and equipment” increased to 40.0% from 33.0% in 2008.
The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “6.Resources and personnel” and “8.Emergency preparedness” changed to 8.4% from 7.8% and to 9.2% from 9.6% respectively.
Whereas the percentage of ISM deficiencies related to “7.Development of plans for shipboard operations” is around 13% equivalent to that in 2008, that of “9.Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences” decreased to 6.2% from 8.6% in 2008.
11
2.2 Comparison of deficiencies and detention per port state The numbers of ISM deficiencies and detentions of ship recorded in PSC reports in 2009 per ISM Code requirements and port state who executed PSC are shown in Table 2.2.1. Those in the brackets are the numbers of detention. Table 2.2.1 No. of ISM deficiencies & detention per port state & ISM Code requirements
ISM Code requirements (Section No.) Authority 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 99* Total
1 1 3 10 7 6 32 1 4 65 Australia (2) (1) (2) (1) (4) (10) 1 1 4 2 2 2 9 1 1 1 5 29 Spain (1) (1) (4) (1) (2) (1) (3) (1) (2) (16) 2 1 4 3 5 6 1 22 Japan (1) (2) (3) 3 4 1 8 2 3 21 U.S.A. (1) (1) 1 2 3 2 5 1 3 17 Korea (1) (1) (2) (4) (1) (9) 1 1 5 3 5 15 Belgium (1) (1) (3) (3) (5) (13) 2 2 7 1 3 15 China (1) (2) (3) 1 3 3 1 1 1 10 U.K. (2) (1) (1) (1) (5) 1 3 2 4 10 Argentina (3) (3) 1 1 2 4 8 Netherlands (2) (2) 1 5 3 2 6 3 5 28 1 2 4 60 (Others) (4) (1) (1) (1) (9) (1) (2) (19) 0 5 10 1 11 23 37 25 17 109 5 4 3 22 272 Total (0) (1) (6) (1) (2) (10) (5) (12) (6) (34) (1) (0) (1) (5) (84)
( ): Number of detention 99*: The ISM Code requirement by Section with which the deficiencies were raised was not specified.
The largest number of ISM deficiencies was pointed out at PSC inspections carried out in Australia, followed by Spain, Japan, U.S.A. and Korea.
As to the number of detention of the ship, Spain was the largest, followed by Belgium, Australia and Korea.
The detainable ISM deficiencies related to “10.Maintenance of the ship and equipment” numbered 34 which accounted for 40% of all the detainable ones, and then the percentage of those related to “8.Emergency preparedness” and “6. Resources and personnel” are 14.6% and 12.1%, respectively.
12
2.3 Analysis of deficiencies recorded along with PSC actions applied
The distribution of ISM deficiencies recorded in PSC reports in 2009 per ISM Code requirements by its sections and PSC actions taken is shown in Table 2.3.1 and the distribution of the same by ISM Code requirement in Figure 2.3.1.
Table 2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per ISM Code requirement and PSC Action
PSC Action Codes1) 10 15 16 17 18 302) 40 50 70 99 -
ISM Code req.
Sect. No.
Total
Def
ic. r
ectif
ied
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
by
next
por
t
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
w
ithin
14
days
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
be
fore
dep
artu
re
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
w
ithin
3 m
onth
s
Gro
unds
for d
eten
tion
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
w
ithin
7 d
ays
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
w
ithin
30
days
Def
ic. t
o be
rect
ified
be
fore
bac
k to
US
port
Oth
ers
Unk
now
n
1 0
2 5 1 1 2 1
3 10 1 2 6 1
4 1 1
5 11 1 1 6 2 1
6 23 4 8 10 1
7 37 1 1 1 6 20 5 2 1
8 25 1 10 12 2
9 17 2 6 6 1 2
10 109 1 3 2 13 47 34 1 1 1 6
11 5 2 1 1 1
12 4 1 1 1 1
993) 3 1 1 1
Unknown 22 1 3 6 5 1 2 2 2
GT 09 272 2 6 6 32 107 84 2 1 8 8 16
GT 084) 345 3 1 10 49 130 92 2 4 19 14 21Notes: 1) The Action Codes are those used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU, and USCG as follows.
Action Code 10, 15, 16, 17 and 30 are used under Paris MOU, Tokyo MOU and USCG Action Code 18 and 99 are used under Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU Action Code 40, 50 and 70 are used under USCG.
2) The number of Action Codes 30 includes Action Code 19 “Rectify major non conformity before departure (Only for ISM defective items and always with a detainable deficiency)” used under Paris MOU, Vina Del Mar MOU, etc., not used under Tokyo MOU and USCG.
3) Related ISM Code requirement is not specified. 4) Ground total. The data of 2008 were presented for comparison.
13
Analysis with collected ISM deficiency data, which are summarized in Table 2.3.1, and the descriptions of ISM deficiencies related to the requirements of ISM Code Sections 6 to 10 recorded in PSC inspection reports along with PSC actions are presented below.
For more information, the examples of PSC inspection report carried out in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Spain, Greece, India, Japan, Korea and U.S.A in 2009 are given at the Appendix, showing the ISM deficiencies raised together with deficiencies on ship constructions, equipment, operation, etc.
General
Among PSC actions, per Action Code, applied to the ISM deficiencies, the number of the deficiencies related to “Defic. to be rectified within 3 months” was the largest one which accounted for 39.3%, followed by those related to “Grounds for detention” accounting for 30.8% and those related to “Defic. to be rectified before departure” accounting for 11.7%.
The number of detainable deficiencies in 2009 decreased to 84 from 92 in 2008, though the percentage of that against the total number of deficiencies increased. Among the numbers per ISM Code requirement, “10. Maintenance of ship and equipment” was the largest one, followed by “8. Emergency preparedness” and “6. Resources and personnel”.
ISM Code Section 6 Resources and personnel
The ratio of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 6 to the whole has been increasing slightly to 8.4% in 2009 and the ratio of “Ground for detention” has been increasing to 43.4% from 25.9%. However, verification in PSC inspection for personal understanding of contingency performance, operation of safety equipment and environment protection equipment, operation of GMDSS facilities, ballast water management system, etc. are not only completeness of documents or records but sometimes extended to observation of personal performance. In case of poor performance, it results in ISM related detainable deficiency in addition to deficiencies of the above.
ISM Code Section 7 Development of plans for shipboard operations
The percentage of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 7 to the whole was 13.6 % similar to that in 2008, but that of “Ground for detention” has been increasing to 13.5%. The main deficiency related to ISM related deficiency was that the operation on board does not comply with SMS procedure or there is no evidence on board to comply with. In case, only no documented procedure, such case is treated mostly as deficiency “To be rectified within 3 months”.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
10 15 16 17 18 30 40 50 70 99
2008
2009
Action Code Figure 2.3.1 Distribution of ISM deficiencies per ISM Code requirement
No. of ISM defic.
14
ISM Code Section 8 Emergency preparedness
The ratio of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 8 to the whole was 9.1% similar to that in 2008, but that of “Ground for detention” has been increasing to 48% from 24.2% in 2008.
Almost deficiencies corresponding to the following result in ISM related detainable deficiency in addition to the deficiencies.
(a) The crew were found unfamiliar with the procedures of abandon ship and/or fire protection and extinguishing, or operation of lifeboats & launching appliances or a fixed fire extinguishing system.
(b) Serious damages or malfunctioning were found on life-saving appliances, fire extinguishing systems.
ISM Code Section 9 Reports and analysis of non-conformities, accidents and hazardous occurrences
The ratio of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 9 to the whole decreased to 6.2% from 8.7% in 2008, but the percentage of “Ground for detention” has been increasing to 35.2% from 13.3%. Almost deficiencies pointed out were “Malfunction of hull construction, facilities, equipment, etc., had not been reported to the company as non conformity in accordance with the company SMS procedure. There were the cases that no report of the deficiencies to Flag Government, Classification Society, Port Authority, etc. was raised as ISM related deficiency. Recurrence of the previous deficiencies pointed out by PSCO may result in ISM related detainable deficiency.
ISM Code Section 10 Maintenance of the ship and equipment
The ratio of ISM deficiencies related to ISM Code 10 to the whole has been increasing to 40% from 33% in 2008.
Among the action codes mentioned above: “Defic. to be rectified within 3 months” increased to 43.1% (36.8% in 2008), “Ground for detention” decreased to 31.1% (36.8% in 2008) and “Defic. to be rectified before departure” decreased to 11.9% (15.8% in 2008 )
The deficiencies which pointed out as the evidence of ISM deficiency related to maintenance were those of the fire fighting equipment, ventilators & air pipes, life saving appliance, main engine, auxiliary engine, various pumps, hatch covers, emergency lights, etc..
The following equipment/facilities were frequently pointed out due to malfunction or poor maintenance.
(a) Fire fighting equipment/facilities
Main & emergency fire pump, self closing device of fire door, fireman’s outfit, hydrant, fire extinguisher, fire damper, leakage of F.O & L.O. etc.
(b) Ventilators & air vent. pipes
Corrosion, wear & tear, poor or no operation due to sticking, etc.
(c) Life saving appliances
Engine of life boat engine, hull of life boat, furnishings of life boat/raft, on-load-release gear/sling hook, life buoy, fittings, etc.
15
Appendix Extract from PSC inspection reports
An extract from reports of PSC inspections carried out in Argentina, Australia, Belgium,
Brazil, Canada, China, Spain, Greece, India, Japan, Korea and U.S.A. in 2009 is given at the
Appendix showing below the descriptions of ISM deficiencies together with relevant
deficiencies on ship constructions, equipment, etc.
１．Argentina
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 17 1.Freeboard marks were not printed properly.
- 17 2.Draft marks were not painted properly.
- 17 3.Aux. Generator No.1 had oil leakages.
- 17 4.Aux. Generator No.2 had oil leakages.
- 17 5.Manometer indicator of FO pressure out of service.
- 17 6.Some pyrometers of Aux. Generators 1, 2 and 3 out of service.
- 17 7.Manometer indicator of main fire pump No.1 out of service.
- 30 8.Vacuum Pumps of main fire pumps 1 & 2 not working.
- 17 9.Air ventilation on E/R above compressor was out of service (open/close).
- 17 10.Steering Gear Room had excessive oil on floor.
- 30 11.Main fire line on Main Deck holed and corroded (in way of Hold No.5, Port).
- 30 12.Refrigerating water E/R main pipe holed and corroded.
- 17 13.Operational Instructions for lifeboat on Port side not available.
- 16 14.Steering Gear had hydraulic leaks.
6 18 15.Some crew members were not familiarized with GMDSS equipment and fire
alarm panel.
10 30 16.Objective evidence that maintenance for the ship in general and it's
equipment are not adequate.
- 17 17.The hull had three(3) cracks on Hold No.4 (1 PT and 2 ST).
- 17 1.Engine room on purifier areas dirty ( excessive L.O and F.O on dripping cup).
- 17 2.Pressure gauge of F.O. purifier No.2 don't work.
- 16 3.Main engine has F.O and L.O leaks.
- 17 4.Fire and ballast pump has leak by gland packing.
- 17 5.Fire and General. service pump has leak by gland packing.
- 17 6.Pressure gauge of suction on S.W. cool pump and S.W. service pump don't
work.
- 17 7.S.W. service pump and Cool. S.W. pump has water leaks by gland packing.
- 17 8.Pressure gauge of bilge pump (suction) don't work.
- 17 9.Excessive garbage on board. all recipient are full.
- 17 10.Some lamps of main electric lighting system don't work.
- 17 11.Some crew members on bridge unknown EPIRB operation.
- 30 12.No.2 servo motor power unit is out of order.
- 17 13.Pipe of the main fire line is broken between No.2 c/h and No.3 c/h.
10 30 14.Maintenance of the ship and equipment is not adequate.
２．Australia
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
-
-
99
17
1.Grain calculations not meeting requirements of grain code, Angle heel
exceeded.
2.AIS Status incorrect, displaying vessel in fishing.
- 17 3.Australia charts 818 & 819 not onboard, 800 series to Mackay missing.
16
7 18 4.Passage planning procedure inadequate in ensuring required charts onboard.
- 17 5.Water ingress alarm, Hold 3 active no cargo onboard.
7 18 6.No ISM procedure for helicopter operation, training of crew, emergency
equipment preparedness.
7 18 7.Arrival/Departure checklist does not include AIS equipment.
- 16 8.SOLAS Training Manual not ship specific.
- 15 9.No records navigation activity pilot to berth.
- 30 10.Funnel dampers defective.
- 17 11.All fire extinguishers marked expiry 5 Dec. 2008.
- 17 12.Port lifeboat painter incorrectly rigged.
- 30 13.Port lifeboat on-load release defective.
- 17 14.Crew unfamiliar with operation internal accommodation dampers.
- 17 15.Crew unfamiliar with operation lifeboat emergency steering.
8 30 16.ISM System fails to ensure emergency preparedness, items 6,10,12,13.
6 30 17.System fails to ensure crew familiar with shipboard operation, items
1,2,5,10,11,12,13,14.
- 17 1.Australia pilot book NP 13 & IAMSAR Vol. III outdated.
- 17 2.Port lifeboat: fwd & aft rails uneven (about 1m longer by stem).
- 30 3.Port lifeboat; fwd release gear cam plate not properly set & hook release gear
frozen hard.
- 30 4.Stb'd lifeboat; cam plate for release gear dangerously out of correct setting.
- 17 5.E/R access to steering gear compartment: door tied back.
- 99 6.Sewage treatment plant blower defective.
- 30 7.Auto stopping of discharge to overboard on 15ppm alarm condition not working.
17 8.Lifeboats not launching in more 3 months.
- 17 9.Key personnel not familiar with procedures for launching & recovery of lifeboat.
8 30 10.The defective lifeboats are objective evidence that vessel's SMS fails to
ensure lifesaving equipment are in a state of preparedness.
10 18 11.The deficiencies are objective evidence that SMS fails to ensure proper
training of crew & maintenance of ship & equipment.
- 30 1.Stb'd E/R fire damper defective.
- 30 2.Several fire damper trunks serving vehicle deck wasted/holed. Affected areas
concealed by painted tape.
- 30 3.Mushroom vent serving steering flat unable to close, vent trunk wasted/holed
with affected area covered by painted tape.
- 17 4.Embarkation light for port lifeboat not operational.
- 17 5.Embarkation light swivel arrangement not operational on port and stb'd liferaft
stations.
- 16 6.Port lifeboat 1 oar split.
- 17 7.Access chains to port embarkation ladder seized.
- 17 8.E/R sandbox adjacent to boiler and incinerator - scoop missing.
- 17 9.Aux. Boiler aft gauge glass not operational.
- 17 10.Earth fault 440V supply MSB (one light/phase).
- 17 11.Repairs made to oily water separator casing through use of compound, no
evidence of reporting to Class/Flag.
10 30 12.Vessel's SMS has not ensured the maintenance of ship and equipment as
per Pt 10 of the ISM Code as evidenced by the above deficiencies.
7 30 13.Not all plans for shipboard operation are being completed as per SMS- no
evidence of Hot Work Permit onboard or notification to local Port Authority of
same when gas cutting defective E/R fire damper.
17
３．Belgium
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 30 1.Insufficient pressure, priming pump inoperable.
- 17 2.Electrical motor out of service (PS), port & stb'd side safety switch missing.
- 17 3.Several air pipes & sounding pipes on deck not marked, gangway instructions
missing.
- 30 4.Ballast control panel & gauges partly inoperative (control room & engine room)
Survey result: clearly indicated as OUT OF USE instead of placing them in order
as stated in column 3.
- 17 5.Stb'd side lifeboat: Axe needed to operate aft release hook fwd rope support
cracked.
- 17 6.M/E cooling water line; severe corrosion with leaks / cracks.
- 17 7.Sharp edges on side bollard top plates.
- 17 8.Several valves on fire line at shore connection points seized.
- 17 9.Excessive corrosion of side shell inside bow thruster electrical room.
- 16 10.Bow thruster electrical room & forecastle store: bilge well strainers
obstructed & one bilge level switch disconnected.
- 17 11.Bow thruster electrical room: bulkhead & ceiling insulation damaged / missing.
- 17 12.Bow thruster electrical room: ventilation ducts heavily corroded & damaged.
- 17 13.M/E alarm panel out of order.
- 17 14.Fuel overflow tank alarm cannot be tested.
- 17 15.Acetylene & oxygen regulating valves corroded & damaged, flexible hose not
correct for gas use.
- 30 16.Hold No.1 stb'd mushroom corroded damaged on top.
- 17 17.Several naked electrical connections & loose switches (bow thruster
electrical cabinet room, bunkering station, under floor plates at OWS equipment).
10 30 18.Several deficiencies showing lack of maintenance and/or maintenance
procedures: external audit required.
- 17 19.Several windows of accommodation corroded / damaged.
４．Brazil
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 17 1.Steering Gear Compartment found dirty.
- 17 2.Steering Gear dropping hydraulic oil from port side piston #1 and from control
valve of port side tank.
- 16 3.Remove all flammable materials from the Steering Gear Compartment.
- 30 4.Emergency Fire Pump with insufficient discharge pressure.
- 17 5.Fresh Water Generator out of order and not maintained properly.
- 30 6.Oil Mist Detector not working properly.
- 17 7.No.2 Cargo Hold forward hydraulic pipe holed and oil leaking;
No.4 Cargo Hold hatch cover forward piston leaking hydraulic oil;
No.4 Cargo Hold hatch cover aft piston leaking hydraulic oil.
- 17 8.Lifeboat water container without shelflife.
- 17 9.Lifejacket container found empty and cover found cracked.
- 17 10.Annual servicing of SCBA not found. Hydrostatic test overdue.
- 17 11.Annual servicing record of EEBD not found.
- 30 12.There is a clear evidence that the ship does not substantially comply with the
requirements of the ISM Code.
- 17 1.Medical Oxygen Certificate expire on 06/10/2008.
- 17 2.Shaft chain broken.
- 17 3.Engine instructions is not available and ship's name shall be painted on the
covers.
18
- 17 4.Master house #2 - Derrick control valve leaking hydraulic fluid.
- 17 5.Master house #2 - Hoist winch #3 leaking hydraulic fluid.
- 17 6.Master house #2 - Hoist winch #4 leaking hydraulic fluid.
- 17 7.Master house #1 - Hoist winch #1 leaking hydraulic fluid.
- 17 8.Master house #1 - Derrick control valve leaking hydraulic fluid.
- 17 9.Incinerator shall be tested before departure.
- 17 10.Fire Hydrant is leaking.
- 17 11.Engine room - Service pipe holed.
- 30 12.Auxiliary hydraulic sea water pipe for cooling system holed.
- 17 13.Fresh water pipe holed.
- 17 14.Steering Gear Room - Free material shall be collected / Fettered and
Fastened.
10 30 15.Maintenance of ship and equipment - There is evidence that not comply with
the requirements of the code.
５．Canada
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 99 1.Not properly filled. Sections 11.1/2/3.
- 17 2.Safety locks on FWD and AFT on load release hooks of portside lifeboat
incorrectly set.
- 17 3.Green reference marks on safety lock of all on load release hooks partly or
completely missing.
- 16 4.MOB lifebuoys of insufficient weight.
3 30 5.Lack of crew and officers familiarization for lifeboat launching and recovery.
- 30 6.Port side lifeboat on load release gear adjusted by crew.
- 16 7.Steering pump on emergency power to be indicated on bridge console and in
steering gear.
- 16 8.Stowage location of immersion suits in forecastle not identified.
- 16 9.SOLAS training manual to be revised for equipment on board.
- 16 10.Missing/unreadable launching instructions for launching lifeboats and liferafts
at boat stations.
６．China
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 17 1.Air vent for fresh water tank at port side ---broken and rusted seriously.
- 30 2.Top block at aft part of stb'd side lifeboat; rusted seriously & broken.
- 17 3.Safety Pin for emergency releasing hook of STB side L/B is inoperable.
- 30 4.Securing device for rudder of port side L/B rusted seriously and disconnected
with boat body, result in the rudder malfunction.
- 17 5.Air pipe for T/G L.O Tank rusted seriously and holed.
- 17 6.Ventilator for No.6 cargo hold can not be closed.
- 17 7.Voice space No.3 ---Manhole' cover can not be closed due to the deformed.
- 30 8.Connecting lever for releasing hook (FORE and AFT) of stb'd side L/B rusted
seriously.
- 17 9.Water ingress detector---No.7 Cargo hold pre alarm can not be reset.
- 17 10.Window wiper for bridge front window was inoperative.
- 30 11.Oil water separator is out of order, the 3-way valve is inoperative when oil
content alarm activated ( over 15 PPM)
- 30 12.No sampling water found after oil content meter during function testing of oily
filtering system.
8 30 13.Engineer officer does not familiar with M/E emergency operating procedure.
- 17 14.Level gauge for both side sewage holding tanks malfunctioning.
19
- 30 15.All the drain pipes for No.1 and No.2 A/E high pressure fuel lines are
disconnecting.
- 16 1.EEBD & Immersion suit not approved by NK on fire control plan.
- 17 2.The light of EMG. Exit from elevator out of working.
- 17 3.Ventilator of bridge not marked 'open - close'.
- 17 4.One signal lamp cover dirty.
- 16 5.Edge of cargo hatch cover rusted and holed (No.1-No.5).
- 16 6.Bracket of cargo hold cover rusted and damaged (No.1-No.5).
- 16 7.Enter guide for cargo hold (No.1-No.5) deformed and fractured.
- 16 8.Enter guide for cargo hold (No.1-No.5) deformed and fractured or cargo hold
on main deck rusted and fracture (No.1-No.5).
- 16 9.Light support on main deck rusted and holed.
- 16 10.Portable light switch container near accommodation rusted and holed.
- 30 11.Fire damper for engine room (funnel) not closed fully.
- 30 12.Hatch cover on funnel rusted and holed.
- 30 13.Hatch cover on funnel not closed completed.
- 17 14.Top of funnel enclose plate have hole.
- 17 15.Exhaust pipe of main engine connecting with funnel plate not weather tight.
- 17 16.Boxes stowed at back of main switch board.
- 17 17.Cover of light in engine room broken.
- 17 18.Instruction of oily water separator not clear.
- 16 19.Ventilator grating of No.5 cargo hold rusted seriously.
- 16 20.Fire hose box on main deck cracked.
- 16 21.Ventilator cover support for forecastle rusted and holed.
- 16 22.Cover of gear wheel for windlass rusted and holed.
- 16 23.Pin support for chain stopper on forecastle deck rusted and holed.
- 16 24.Ventilation outlet grating for forecastle rusted seriously.
- 17 25.Fire damper for generator room not closed completely.
- 17 26.Nozzle for fire hose box on main deck missing.
- 16 27.Container cover support rusted and holed.
- 17 28.Embarkation ladder foot ring rusted seriously.
10 30 29.Above all deficiencies proved that maintenance of ship and equipment not
carried out properly.
７．Spain
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 17 1.No agreement of type of ship between Certificates of Construction, IOPP &
Registry.
- 17 2.Oil filtering Equipment indicated in IOPP Supplement is not correct.
- 17 3.IOPP Supplement does not include SOPEP.
- 17 4.I.PP Supplement does not indicate Oil content meter of Oil filtering equipment.
- 5.Sludge quantities disagreement in several entries.
- 6.IAFS Certificate incorrect box filled.
- 17 7.Steam pipes on deck not insulated.
- 17 8.Main Fire Pump leakage & rusted.
- 17 9.M/E Exhaust Gas thermometer out of order.
- 17 10.Main Air Compressor cooling water leakage.
- 17 11.Oil filtering equipment recirculation capacity to test in port not installed.
- 30 12.The pump is not properly maintained and pressure insufficient.
6 30 13.Personnel familiarity with emergency procedures and operation procedures
not according SMS.
- 17 1.Not updated, expired.
- 17 2.Continuous Synopsis Record not updated, expired.
20
- 17 3.Unsafe.
- 17 4.Not properly filled.
4 30 5.Not carried out Initial Verification according ISM Code Part B 14.4.
6 30 6.Crew do not understand working language.
- 17 7.Not marked with actual ship's name.
- 30 8.Lack of Training.
- 30 9.Lack of Training.
- 30 10.Lack of communication in working language.
- 30 11.ISM Manual not completed, not in order, in different languages.
- 30 12.Master not familiarized with Manual.
13 17 13.Certificates have not index.
- 30 1.Operation instructions for S/G not legible in the S/G Room.
- 16 2.Name Plates for valves missing or not legible.
- 30 3.Manifold between M/E Cylinders and Exhaust Pipe found dirty.
- 30 4.Fire dampers in funnel not working.
- 30 5.MF/HF radio installation inoperative.
- 30 6.Remote control valve for dewatering in bosun store inoperative.
- 30 7.Lack of hot water in ratings shower.
- 17 8.Lack of fresh vegetables and fruits for the intended voyage.
- 30 9.Insulation of steam and injection pipes deficient.
- 30 10.FO Pipes to M/E deficient insulation and leaking.
- 16 11.IOPP Supplement Form A not properly filled.
- 17 12.High quantity of oil residues on board.
10 30 13.Maintenace not according with the SMS.
- 17 14.Fire alarm panel with trouble failure.
- 17 15.No.1 Main Generator D/E F.O leakage.
- 17 16.No.3 Main Generator leaking by the cooling pump.
- 17 17.No.1 Main Gen. D/E high pressure leakage alarms inoperative.
- 17 18.Remote control wire handle for LSA brake found broken.
- 17 19.Pyrometrs and thermometers in No.1, 2 and 3 Main Generator D/E found
most inoperative.
- 17 20.No.3 Main Gen. D/E high pressure leakage alarms inoperative.
- 17 21.No.1 leaking by the crankcase tap, area underneath dirty.
- 17 22.FPT stop valve found inoperative.
８．Greece
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 99 1.Oil Record Book not properly filled.
- 99 2.Garbage Record Book not properly filled.
- 99 3.Incorrect entries.
- 15 4.Not as required.
6 18 5.Not according SMS.
9 30 6.Missing.
- 30 7.Operating hand lever (open/close) for engine room ventilation fans No.3, 4
found inoperative.
A/C unit fan operating lever found stuck.
- 30 8.Fresh water cooling pump of No.3 diesel generator found leaking.
- 30 9.Emergency fire pump water seal found leaking.
- 17 10.Medical aid in engine room found expired.
- 17 11.Unsafe.
8 18 12.Not according SMS.
- 17 13.Insulation wetted through with oil for diesel engine filtering of No.3.
- 30 14.Pressure gauge and thermometer of fuel oil for D/G No.3 and fresh water
cooling pipe to be replaced.
21
- 17 15.Not properly posted. Watchkeeping schedule to be posted in engine room
consol panel.
- 17 16.Not posted. Master list to be posted in engine room.
- 17 17.Damaged. Insulation rubber/ gasket of cargo hatch cover to be replaced
found worn out.
- 15 18.IMO signs.
- 30 19.Box of operation of emergency stop of hydraulic pump at ships aft and for
lifebuoy light at ships aft found broken, to be replaced.
- 30 20.Annual SVDR report to be provided on board.
10 30 21.Maintenance of ship equipment to be improved according ship's SMS manual
due to above deficiencies.
- 30 22.Insulation rubber gasket of cargo hold No.6 hatch cover (upper part) to be
replaced, found worn out.
- 30 23.During abandon ship drill and lowering of lifeboat lashing wire aft grip was
stuck and as a result lifeboat was improperly lowered. Abandon ship drill was
not carried out successfully. Inspection suspended to rectify problem. CIC on
LSA was not completed.
- 17 24.Sailing directions No.29 edition 8008, No.24, No.48 edition 2006 have not
replaced.
９．India
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
8 30 1.Emergency preparedness - No one responded to emergency alarm.
- 30 2.SAT-C malfunctioning.
10 30 3.Emergency maneuvering of Main engine disconnected.
- 17 4.Improper entries in oil record book.
- 17 5.Chief officer not aware of loading details.
- 17 6.BDR's not available on-board.
- 17 7.Hydraulic test reports of portable fire extinguishers not available onboard.
- 30 8.Oil traces found on discharge line of OWS.
１０．Japan
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 99 1.Turning point and next course for navigation into log book - not recorded well.
- 17 2.Embarkation light - not move, stuck by paint.
- 30 3.Motor of R/boat davit - malfunction.
- 16 4.Drain plug of R/boat - not complied with the regulation of SOLAS.
- 17 5.Drain plug of R/boat - missing.
- 17 6.Limit switch of boat davit - malfunction.
- 17 7.No entry in muster list for man overboard drill.
- 17 8.Crew did not wear immersion suits properly.
- 16 9.Illumination magnetic compass viewing system - not turned on.
- 17 10.Radar mast support wire - slack.
- 16 11.Bubble in the magnetic compass on flying bridge deck.
- 17 12.Lower red light for not under command vessel - D/M.
- 17 13.Ragar reflector of R/boat - unable to produce upon request.
- 17 14.Emergency fire pump - not operated properly.
- 30 15.Crew unable to demonstrate proficiency in fire drill.
8 30 16.Emergency preparedness - not understood by the crew.
- 17 17.Check list of life saving appliance was "OK" when it was not.
- 17 18.Buoyancy of R/boat - detached.
- 17 19.Embarkation ladder setting position on starboard side - not on boarded
R/boat.
22
- 30 20.Crew unable to demonstrate proficiency in man overboard drill.
- 30 21.Isolating valve for fire main line was not provided outside the machinery
space.
- 17 22.Master unfamiliar with light and shape on the Japan Maritime Safety Laws and
Regulation.
- 99 23.Release device of R/boat - not complied with SOLAS convention.
- 17 24.Crew unable to demonstrate proficiency in emergency steering drill.
- 30 25.Release mechanism for launching of R/boat - not complied with SOLAS
Regulation.
- 99 1.Turning point & next course for navigation into Log book: not recorded well.
- 16 2.Selector dial of 2 Way VHF Radio telephone: not cleared.
- 17 3.Officer did not wear Immersion suits properly.
- 17 4.No entry in Muster list for man overboard drill.
- 17 5.Master & all officers unfamiliar with light & shape on the Japan Maritime Safety
Laws & Regulations.
- 17 6.Officer unfamiliar with international code of signals.
- 16 7.Sky light of E/R: not kept closed tightly.
- 17 8.Boarding ladder of Rescue boat: unable to produce upon request.
- 17 9.Radar reflector of Rescue boat: unable to produce upon request.
- 17 10.Crew can not understood isolating valve location.
- 17 11.S.G. of battery in the battery room: not enough (50%).
6 18 12.Management company for the vessel is incapable of comprehending the
significance & importance of the capability of the Master on international voyage
who is not able to take communications with the out side of the vessel.
- 30 13.Crew unable to demonstrate proficiency in fire drill.
8 30 14.Emergency preparedness ineffective training & vessel familiarization program
evidence: not understood by the crew.
１１．Korea
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 17 1.Load line not marked properly.
- 30 2.Loading cargo not on the list of cargo operation and P&A manual. Fitness cert.
of cargo not original.
- 16 3.Engine parameter record book not maintained.
- 17 4.Air cylinder of lifeboat unable to be tested.
9 30 5.Ship's collision accident (defect of hull) not reported to port state according to
SOLAS reg.
- 17 6.Volt meter of GMDSS power source out of order.
- 17 7.Lifebuoy (3pcs) on boat deck defective.
- 16 8.Emergency generator auto starting not tested periodically.
- 17 9.Pressure valve of cargo tanks opened manually during loading.
- 99 10.Ship's safety management system found ineffective by the above deficiencies.
- 17 1.Self-closing device of doors for steering gear room & fire control station not
working.
- 17 2.E/R alarm device in steering gear not working.
- 99 3.Chief engineer's certificate endorsed by flag state not onboard ( only copy ).
- 30 4.Hydrostatic release unit of EPIRB expired.
- 17 5.VDR indicating following alarm signal
. - no signal form AIS
- no signal form speed log
- 30 6.Abandon ship drill - life boat not launched to sea level since Aug. 2008.
- 17 7.Doppler log unable to measure ship speed ( Indicating 4.3 knots at moored ).
- 17 8.Two covers of fluorescent lamp in steering gear room broken.
- 30 9.AIS inoperative - no target data available.
23
- 17 10.EM'CY light supporter for life raft ( port ) broken.
- 17 11.Remote shut off valve wire of EM'CY D/G F.O. tank not installed.
10 30 12.Above deficiencies are objective evidence that ship's SMS fail to satisfy the
requirement of ISM Code.
１2．U.S.A.
ISM Code
Section
Action
Code Deficiencies
- 70 1.Two windows found shattered on board. Ensure windows are weathertight to
the satisfaction of attending class surveyor. Windows in question are cabin # 108
& engineer's dressing room.
- 17 2.Two cement patches found on main deck aft of cargo hold #5. Repairs to be
completed to the satisfaction of attending class surveyor.
- 17 3.The shaft tube stern seal was found oil leaking into the engine room. Stern
tube seal to be repaired to the satisfaction of attending class surveyor.
- 30 4.Stb'd. Lifeboat motor found not able to start. Prove proper operation of both
Lifeboats to the satisfaction of Class. Vessel crew used parts of port lifeboat to
fix starboard boat.
- 30 5.Emergency Generator has soft patch on main lube oil supply line. Vessel to
make permanent repairs to main lube oil line to satisfaction to attending class
surveyor.
- 30 6.Oily Water Separator auto stop device (3-way valve) not operable. Upon 15
PPM alarm system would continue to pump oily water mixture overboard. Prove
proper operation oily water separator and automatic stopping device to the
satisfaction of attending class surveyor.
10 30 7.Vessel failed to follow the Safety Management System with regard to reporting
leaking shaft seal, holed lube oil line on emergency generator, damaged windows,
holes in main deck and inoperatable OWS as required by vessel
SMS-TD005,4,3,6. Recommend ISM audit be conducted to the satisfaction of the
Recognized Organization.
For more information on this publication, please contact the Safety Management Systems Department
1-8-5, Ohnodai, Midori-ku, Chiba 267-0056, Japan TEL：+81-43-294-5999 FAX：+81-43-294-7206 e-mail: [email protected]
http://www.classnk.or.jp
