ANNUAL REPORT BY THE DESIGN BUILD EXECUTIVE … · As mandated by the Design Build Project Delivery...
Transcript of ANNUAL REPORT BY THE DESIGN BUILD EXECUTIVE … · As mandated by the Design Build Project Delivery...
ANNUAL REPORT BY THE DESIGN BUILD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
REGARDING THE STATUS OF THE CITY OF BALTIMORE’S
DESIGN BUILD PROJECTS
As mandated by the Design Build Project Delivery Procedures approved by the Board of
Estimates on November 2, 2011, the Design Build Executive Committee (“DBEC”) is required to
annually report on the description, status and participation by minority and women owned businesses
on all pending Design Build projects. In addition, the DBEC makes recommendations regarding
policy changes or implementation measures. The DBEC submits this Annual Report for 2019
covering the three projects currently under contract and approved by the DBEC and Board of
Estimates.
I. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CENTRAL AVENUE PROJECT, TR 12317
2019
The Central Avenue Design-Build (DB) Project (“Project”) is Baltimore City’s Department
of Transportation’s (“DOT”) first design-build project. It was advertised on September 2, 2015 and
Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued on June 15, 2016. The Project primarily consists of the
reconstruction of Central Avenue between Lancaster Street and Baltimore Street into an urban
boulevard. A key element of the Project is the extension of Central Avenue with a new Harbor Point
Connector Bridge over the tidal inlet waters to the Harbor Point development site. The length of the
Harbor Point Connector Bridge is approximately 260 feet. The total length of the roadway
reconstruction on Central Avenue is approximately 3,200 linear feet (8 blocks). The scope of
roadwork includes full-depth pavement reconstruction, concrete curb/gutter and sidewalk
reconstruction, construction of ADA-compliant pedestrian ramps and driveway entrances within the
Project limits, roadway drainage system improvements, new street and pedestrian lighting, new
pavement marking and signing, upgrades to water, sewer, and conduit utilities, and new traffic and
pedestrian signals.
A. Project Status as of July 2019
The Central Avenue Project was awarded to Allan Myers MD, Inc., (“Myers”) on March 30,
2016. The Contract amount was $46,777,777.00. There are three Extra Work Orders totaling
$3,0474,400.00. The current Contract amount is $49,852,177.00. The Project utilizes multiple
funding sources including Federal Aid, Transportation Improvement Funds (TIF), and City Capital
Improvement Funds.
Schedule
Notice to Proceed (NTP) was issued for June 15, 2016 and the original completion
was to be June 2021, which is NTP plus 5 years.
Myers’ originally proposed to complete the work by approximately early 2020.
However, construction challenges and site conditions required schedule adjustments.
Currently, the schedule has reverted to approximately the June 2021 time period.
Page 2 of 15
The Harbor Point Connector Bridge, which was part of Phase 1, was partially opened
to traffic and pedestrians on July 2, 2018. Presently only the east sidewalk remains
closed to pedestrians.
The contractor has completed Phase 1 construction of Central Avenue between
Lancaster Street and Aliceanna Street except for construction of the Aliceanna Street
Bridge. Phase 1 is approximately 95% complete. On-going Phase 1 work includes
the north portion of the Aliceanna Street Bridge, final surface paving and traffic
markings.
Phase 2, extending from beyond Aliceanna Street to just south of Baltimore Street,
including coordination, submittals, approvals, and construction, is ongoing. Phases 1
and 2 include many elements of pedestrian amenities and streetscape elements. Phase
2 construction started in the Fall of 2018 and continues.
Bozzuto Construction Inc., (“Bozzuto”) on behalf of Harbor East Development Group
(Harbor East), is constructing a new 26 story Liberty East high-rise building which includes
the new Whole Foods Market, luxury condominiums, and high-end apartments is located
between Lancaster Street and Aliceanna Street (south to north) and Central Avenue and Eden
Street (west to east). Liberty East is approaching completion with early occupancy in the
summer of 2019. Rigorous coordination and cooperation have been necessary amongst all
contractors. Work has progressed satisfactorily on both projects.
Scope Changes and Change Orders
There have been several scope changes on the project under Phase 1and 2. These
have included: additional aesthetic treatments on the bridge, installation of more
energy efficient lighting, a delay in positioning of the north crane near Ouzo Bay,
structural concrete restoration to two sections of the Central Avenue culvert top slab
(located between Lancaster and Fleet Streets), and relocation and addition of utility
infrastructure to accommodate present and future City needs.
Change orders have included limiting staging areas, interactions with adjacent
developers and property owners, time between bidding and awarding, various
investigations for potential changes such as DPW’s backflow preventer or DOT’s
realignment of the Lancaster Street intersection, prohibition of the staging of the
south crane on a barge instead of on Harbor Point, unexpected field conditions,
accommodation of businesses, and various necessary conduit design revisions. The
change order requests originating from Myers are being actively addressed and
resolved by the City. A limited few of the potential change orders may require
resolution through the contract mandated City claims process.
Logistics (Ongoing Progress)
The Fleet Street Bridge design is approved and utility work in this area has begun.
Design submittals are essentially complete for Phase 2 work.
The Phase 2 Streetscape design review is complete.
Construction submittals such as RFIs, materials selection, shop drawings, redline
revisions continue to be submitted, reviewed and processed timely.
The City is coordinating with all stakeholders, property developers, contractors, City
design and City construction management sections as needed.
Page 3 of 15
Special Considerations
The Liberty East /Whole Foods high-rise has begun leasing apartment units.
There have been work zone and construction overlaps between Bozzuto and Myers
with several of them requiring changes to the Bozzuto schedule or construction and/or
the Myers schedule and construction.
Utility relocations and approvals are challenging, time consuming , and complicated.
This is due in part to the involvement of 3rd party lessees as well as the abundance of
active existing utilities in the corridor.
The City has continued to conduct meetings and facilitate full communication within
DOT and DPW, Myers and multiple stakeholders. The most recent public outreach
meeting was conducted on March 26th, 2019.
Traffic detours and congestion are ongoing challenges.
In addition to being the City’s first DB project and one of DOT’s largest construction
projects, this project is also technically very complex and located in a highly
developed and growing portion of the City. Once the construction moves north of
Aliceanna Street, we anticipate the work will progress smoothly toward completion
by mid-2021.
B. Minority and Women Owned Business Participation
The Project is federally funded, and state Disadvantaged Business Enterprise standards
apply, not the City’s MBE/WBE. Myers is meeting the established 30% overall DBE goal, 28%
construction and 2% design goals as shown below. The breakouts below reflect the commitments
that Myers had received at the time of bidding. Myers continues to make adjustments as the design
becomes more complete, in order to meet the participation goals:
Design Phase DBE participation Total Paid to Date
July 2019
Athavale, Lystad & Associates $428,500.00 $453,466.72 105.83%
Floura Teeter Landscape Architects, Inc. $62,000.00 $102,942.36 166.04%
J.K. Datta Consultants, Inc.* $206,500.00 $0.00 0.00%
Findling, Inc. $299,500.00 $293,121.45 97.87%
Synterra Ltd. $82,900.00 $92,900.00 112.06%
Albrecht Engineering, Inc. $62,000.00 $54,978.85 88.68%
Remline Corporation $82,900.00 $88,428.52 106.67%
TOTAL DESIGN DBE PARTICIPATION $1,224,300.00 (2.46%)
TOTAL DESIGN DBE PARTICIPATION THRU JULY 2019 $1,085,837.90 (88.69%)
Page 4 of 15
Construction Phase DBE Participation
J&M Sweeping $250,000.00 $32,369.85 12.95%
Barbie’s Recycling & Hauling, Inc. $1,200,000.00 $96,494.00 8.04%
Load Runner Trucking $1,200,000.00 $317,635.25 26.47%
Quarry Products Unlimited, Inc. $155,000.00 $0.00 0.00%
Machado Construction Co. Inc. $4,400,000.00 $933,722.96 21.22%
Priceless Industries, Inc. $145,000.00 $19,545.68 13.48%
Native Terrain Restoration Services $290,000.00 $0.00 0.00%
Traffic Systems, Inc. $2,650,000.00 $659,808.80 24.90%
Road Safety, LLC. $200,000.00 $76,401.34 38.20%
Nasir and Associates, LLC. $2,500,000.00 $2,490,140.83 99.61%
Mohawk Bridge & Iron Inc. $700,000.00 $430,600.61 61.51%
Wilton Corporation $200,000.00 $149,521.33 74.76%
Doughboy Hauling $15,694.97 $15,694.97 100.00%
GE Frisco $165,181.12 $160,684.11 97.28%
Hirshmugl Heine & Assoc. $4,680.00 $4,680.00 100.00%
TNM Trucking $106,539.00 $102,935.00 96.62%
Traffic Engineering Services $71,462.96 $71,462.96 100.00%
Utility Imaging $13,937.50 $13,937.50 100.00%
Handon Services $95,760.47 $95,760.47 100.00%
Aaron’s Concrete Pumping Inc. $14,100.14 $14,100.14 100.00%
Ackerman & Baynes, LLC $182,835.87 $182,835.87 100.00%
DACO Construction $49,804.91 $49,804.91 100.00%
Rowen Concrete $2,146.58 $2,146.58 100.00%
Sunrise Safety Services $18,479.52 $18,479.52 100.00%
Keys Materials & Utilities $25,302.62 $25,302.62 100.00%
CC’s Industries, LLC $16,070.32 $16,070.32 100.00%
Patrick Thomas Trucking $8,806.00 $8,806.00 100.00%
M Luis Products $3,319.97 $3,319.97 100.00%
TOTAL CONST. DBE PARTICIPATION $14,684,121.95 (29.45%)
TOTAL CONST. DBE PARTICIPATION THRU JULY 2019 $5,992,261.59 (40.81%)
TOTAL DBE PARTICIPATION $15,908,421.90 (31.91%)
TOTAL DBE PARTICIPATION THRU JULY 2019 $7,078,099.49 (44.49%)
C. Implementation and Policy Challenges with Recommendation
The Project is at approximately the mid-point stage - post procurement. The DOT is
developing specific and detailed recommendations to submit to the DBEC regarding implementation
Page 5 of 15
or policy challenges to enhance future DB procurements. The specific and detailed
recommendations, upon completion, will be reviewed internally and submitted for the DBEC’s
consideration.
II. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
COMPREHENSIVE CONDUIT FACILITY DESIGN, MANAGEMENT, AND
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES PROJECT (PMAR) TR 16020
The Comprehensive Conduit Facility Design, Management, and Construction Services
Project (“Project”) is one of the Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) and the City’s first
Program Manager at Risk projects. DOT approached the DBEC about the possibility of structuring
the Project using a Program Manager at Risk (“PMAR”) approach.
The PMAR delivery method is essentially a hybrid of the Design Build method. The DBEC
concluded that given the similarity between this PMAR project and traditional design build projects
that the Project should comply, to the greatest extent possible, with the Design Build Resolution of
the BOE and be overseen by the DBEC. Suitability of the project for the PMAR approach was
determined by several factors. During development of the Request for Proposals, DOT and the
Conduit Section determined that an expedited schedule was required because untimely project
execution would result in loss of available funding. Additionally, it was determined that the nature
of the work is not conducive to Design-Bid-Build; inspection, design, construction, and database
population must occur concurrently lending itself to Program/Asset Management. For maintaining
the conduit infrastructure, design work does not necessarily dictate construction. Instead inspection
reveals the need for design and then construction commences. The BOE agreed with the approach
selected by DOT and DBEC and awarded the contract in August 2016.
The Project primarily consists of inspection of conduit manholes (i.e. the structural condition,
duct occupancy, cable owner identification, etc.), installation of an asset security mechanism
retrofitted to secure/monitor entry of conduit manholes and cable racks as needed; design,
construction, excavation, modification, repair of manhole chimney top slab, manhole replacement,
and conduit duct bank; construction management; data input into a GIS database; financial tracking
and reporting; safety retrofits and program compliance system-wide.
A. Project Status as of June 2019
Project Awarded to KCI-CG Tri-Venture (“KCI/CG”) on August 10, 2016. Contract Amount
$26,108,286.00 (Professional Services - $5,841,986.00 Construction - $20,266,300.00) per
year for five (5) years.
Schedule Related
Notice to Proceed was issued for February 22, 2017.
The Contract expires February 20, 2022 with the option of two (2) one-year extensions.
Scope Changes and Change Orders – no change orders have been executed to date, however,
KCI/CG has requested the approval of several new items that were not included in the
Page 6 of 15
original Contract. Conduit Division is currently negotiating pricing of these items with
KCI/CG. At the completion of discussion, Conduit Division will generate the necessary
paperwork for Administration’s approval.
To date, multiple professional and construction services tasks have been completed.
Professional services generally consist of manhole and tracing inspections, design of
manholes, asset management support services, to mention a few.
Construction services generally consist of clearing obstructions in conduits,
repairing/rehabilitating electric manholes. Tasks issued include construction of supplemental
ducts for various BGE 4kV upgrades, construction of a parallel duct bank system along the
North Avenue corridor, from Bentalou St to Milton Avenue, construction of conduit
improvements along Greenmount Avenue from 29th St to East 43rd St.
Below is a summary of the various tasks executed under this Contract within the past year.
Task Scope Status
Camden St Inspections Cable tracing inspections Completed
North Charles at Upnor Road Inspections Cable tracing inspections Completed
BGE Request Manhole Repair Inspections Cable tracing inspections Completed
Eutaw St, Howard St, and Hopkins Plaza/Park
Ave Inspections Cable tracing inspections On-going
Port Covington Inspections Cable tracing inspections Completed
Stockholm St and Warner St Inspections Cable tracing inspections Completed
Edmondson Avenue Bridge Inspections Cable tracing inspections On-going
Madison St Pedestrian Bridge Inspections Cable tracing inspections On-going
Lovegrove Alley Inspections Cable tracing inspections On-going
E Mount Royal Ave and St Paul St Design of MH Completed
220 N Liberty Road Design of MH Completed
Lombard St and Hopkins Plaza Design of MH Completed
231 E Redwood St Design of MH Completed
Professional Services
Page 7 of 15
Logistics
Within this Contract, an allowance has been made for unanticipated reactive maintenance
work. Reactive maintenance work consists of activities generated as a result of service
requests received from the Conduit Maintenance Yard. These service requests typically
consist of manhole frame and cover replacements, duct obstruction clearing, split ducting,
etc. On the other hand, this Contract has also developed a proactive maintenance approach
that focuses on identifying and attacking problem corridors before they result in service
requests by the Conduit lessees.
Conducting proactive maintenance work requires developing criteria to rank and prioritize
projects. The prioritization has been developed in a manner that optimizes existing and
future Conduit Division resources. Capital drivers included in the ranking system include,
but are not limited to: the condition of the asset, criticality of the damage to the asset, asset
location in proximity to other projects/repairs, sociopolitical factors, estimated repair cost
and availability of resources to repair the asset.
Conduit Program logistics for strategic planning and prioritization to rehabilitate segments of
the system is determined by a multitude of factors. DOT’s program inspection, records
research, and asset management allows for determination of the following factors:
Duct Obstruction/Duct Availability
Alternative Duct Route
Benefit to planned Duct Lease Work in the area
Impacts of Cable Owners Service Outage
Duct Material, Age, and Service life
Adjacent Utility Impacts on Conduit
Opportunity for Economic Development/Sociopolitical Priority
Other planned/ongoing projects
Structural Assessment
External influences
Task Scope Status
MH at E. Mount Royal Ave and St. Paul St MH Reconstruction Completed
MH at Whitelock-Newington Alley MH Reconstruction Completed
MH at E Baltimore St and N Eden St MH Reconstruction Completed
MH at North Ave and Bentalou St MH Reconstruction Completed
MH at N Charles St and W Fayette Ave MH Reconstruction Completed
MH at 220 N Liberty Street MH Reconstruction On-going
MH at 231 E Redwood St MH Reconstruction On-going
North Avenue Parallel Ductbank Corridor Improvements On-going
Greenmount Ave Corridor Improvements On-going
Park Heights Split Ducts Corridor Improvements Completed
Various BGE 4 kV Upgrades Supplemental Ductbanks Completed
Construction Services
Page 8 of 15
A ranking system has been established which assigns points for the aforementioned criteria.
This process will inform our Capital Planning strategy to prioritize many of the forecasted capital
projects.
B. Minority and Women Owned Business Participation
The Project is not federally funded and as such, the City’s MBE/WBE standards apply, not
the State Disadvantaged Business Enterprise standards. KCI-CG is fully committed to
meeting the established 27% MBE and 10% WBE goal for professional services and 27%
MBE and 7% goal for construction. The breakouts below reflect MBE/WBE participation
from Contract award through the end of FY19:
PARTICIPATION CHART CONTINUES ON FOLLOWING PAGE
Page 9 of 15
In Contract Year 2, significant progress was made in handing off completed Professional
services related tasks to the Construction arm of the Contract. Significant progress has also
been made in identifying various corridors within the City requiring manhole/cable tracing
Consultant
Proposed Fee,
Professional
Services for
Contract FY 19
Percentage of
Professional
Services
Contract
Invoiced Thru
FY 19 (Invoice 1
to 25)
Percentage of
Professional
Services Contract
(Invoiced to Date)
AB Consultants, Inc. $ 140,095.68 2% $ 160,811.12 1%
Baker Engineering $ 186,340.02 3% $ 961,300.87 8%
Constellation Design $ 80,191.15 1% $ 5,968.48 0%
CST Engineering, Inc. $ 288,261.05 5% $ 930,875.26 8%
iCivil, Inc. $ 70,047.79 1% $ 100,349.31 1%
Infrastructure Technologies, LLC $ 70,047.79 1% $ 27,468.77 0%
Itenology Corporation $ 200,000.00 3% $ 98,783.44 1%
Ross Technical Services, Inc. $ 224,152.92 4% $ 436,204.30 4%
SAMMS Engineering $ 560,382.31 10% $ 1,156,298.52 10%
Sabra Wang $ 272,121.26 5% $ 225,839.48 2%
Sue Ann's Office Supply $ 303,994.50 5% $ - 0%
Total Professional Services M/WBE $ 2,395,634.47 41% $ 4,103,899.55 35%
Consultant
Proposed Fee,
Construction
Services for
Contract FY 19
Percentage of
Construction
Services
Contract
Invoiced Thru
FY 19 (Invoice 1
to 25)
Percentage of
Construction
Services Contract
(Invoiced to Date)
Couser Supply $ 1,367,975.25 6.75% $ 374,987.95 1.00%
Cuddy and Associates, LLC $ 1,215,978.00 6.00% $ 4,809,785.57 18.00%
Machado Concrete Co., Inc. $ 810,652.00 4.00% $ 901,164.35 3.00%
Priceless Industries, Inc. $ 202,663.00 1.00% $ - 0.00%
R.E. Harrington Plumbing & Heating $ 1,621,304.00 8.00% $ - 0.00%
Baker Engineering Services, Inc. $ 303,994.50 1.50% $ 343,521.36 1.00%
Sunrise Safety Services, Inc. $ 202,663.00 1.00% $ 217,253.21 1.00%
Paniagua Ent., Inc. $ 709,320.50 3.50% $ 245,416.00 1.00%
Priority Construction Corp. $ 425,592.30 2.10% $ 302,523.92 1.00%
Bryant Concrete Construction $ 283,728.20 1.40% $ 173,725.80 1.00%
WSI, Inc. * $(1,418,641.00) 0.00% $ - 0.00%
Total Construction Services M/WBE 5,725,229.75$ 28.25% 7,368,378.16$ 27.92%
Professional Services
Construction Services
* WSI - $$ reallocated to Paniagua Ent., Inc., Priority Construction Corp., and Bryant Concrete
Page 10 of 15
inspections. Finally, in the past year, due to emphasis placed on addressing overdue
Customer Service Requests (CSRs), KCI/CG has assisted in reducing such backlogs to close
to zero.
C. Implementation and Policy Challenges with Recommendation
The Project is in Year 2 post procurement and as such, DOT does not yet have specific or
detailed recommendations to make regarding implementation or policy challenges. DOT is
compiling a data set of such matters which will be reviewed internally to arrive at detailed
recommendations for the DBEC’s consideration and inclusion in later DBEC reports.
III. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BACK RIVER HEADWORKS PROJECT SC 918H
The Department of Public Works (“DPW”), Back River Headworks Improvements Project
(“Headworks Project”) primarily entails construction of new headworks facilities, consisting of an
influent pumping station, a fine screen facility, and a grit removal facility, and wet weather storage
facilities. The City’s Wet Weather Program determined that the construction of the Headworks
Project is the single, most cost-effective solution to elimination of the City’s sanitary sewer
overflows and comply with the Wet Weather Consent Decree.
The Headworks Project is being delivered under the Construction Manager-at-Risk (CMAR)
delivery method and is the City’s first CMAR project. The CMAR delivery method is essentially a
hybrid of the Design Build method in that there is a distinct design phase followed by construction.
One of the key distinctions between CMAR and DB is that there are two separate contracts; one for
design, the other for construction. One procurement is used to advertise both phases and only one
firm is selected by the City. Following the design phase, the winning bidder and the City engage in
negotiations to agree on a Guaranteed Maximum Price (“GMP”). If the parties agree on GMP then
the successful firm contracts with the City for the construction phase. If GMP cannot be agreed,
then the City would be free to re-advertise the construction portion of the work.
The Headworks Project was originally advertised as a traditional design-bid-build project
with a 100% design having been completed prior to advertising for bids. Two bids were received,
the lowest of which was $90,000,000.00 over the budget for the project. DPW then approached the
DBEC about the possibility of structuring the Headworks Project using a modified CMAR method.1
DPW and the DBEC concluded that a modified CMAR delivery method had the best potential to
reduce construction costs. The DBEC concluded that given the similarity between this CMAR
project and traditional design build projects that the Headworks project should comply, to the
greatest extent possible, with the Design Build Resolution of the Board of Estimates (“BOE”) and be
overseen by the DBEC. The BOE agreed and accepted the DBEC’s recommendation to use the
CMAR delivery method on January 27, 2016.
1 Modified by virtue of the fact that a 100% design existed. The design phase for the Headworks Projects, unlike
traditional CMAR projects consists mainly of value engineering and to modify the 100% design to reduce costs.
Page 11 of 15
A. Project Status as of August 9, 2018
Background Pre-Construction:
Project was advertised on January 29, 2016 after the BOE approved the request for Proposals
using the CMAR method.
Four proposals were received on March 2, 2016
All proposals were found to be responsive and were evaluated
The evaluation process followed the procedures as established in the RFP which included review
based on the following criteria
Qualifications and approach (65%)
Financial capacity and proposed fees (15%)
Interview (20%)
Interviews were conducted on March 15, 2016
All scoring was reviewed and finalized by the evaluation panelists on March 15, 2016
March 25, 2016 – Selection of preferred CMAR firm, a joint venture between Clark Construction
and Ulliman Schutte, Inc. (“Clark/US”)
March 29, 2016 – Presentation to DBEC which approved the selection of Clark/US.
March 30, 2016 – DPW notified Clark/US of DPW’s intent to recommend award by the BOE to
Clark/US, subject to reaching agreement on all terms and conditions and completion of all
administrative procedures
May 4, 2016 – The BOE Approved award to Clark/US.
May 25, 2016 – CMAR firm submitted signed contract documents for processing by DPW.
July 28, 2017 Notice to Proceed for Pre-Construction was issued.
GMP Estimates were received:
November 2016.
January 2017.
GMP package bids were received:
March 2017.
April 2017.
GMP Negotiations progressed from April through May 2017.
GMP Package and Pricing were submitted to the BOE for processing in May 2017
GMP cost of $429,776,789.
BOE Approval of the GMP Package and Contract for the Headworks Construction was approved
on June 28, 2017.
Construction Progress to Date:
Construction Phase Milestones:
June 29, 2017 – Construction NTP
December 30, 2020 – Technical Compliance Milestone.
October 31, 2021 – Substantial Completion.
October 31, 2021 – City issue Conditional Acceptance.
Page 12 of 15
Approximately 58,000 yards of concrete have been placed, which is 75% complete for the
overall project concrete. The process mechanical installation is progressing in conjunction with
the project concrete.
Influent Pump Station – 100% of concrete complete
Fine Screen Facility – 100% of concrete complete
Grit Facility – 90% of concrete complete
Steel Structures Percent Complete.
Influent Pump Station – 98% of steel complete
Fine Screen Facility – 85% of concrete complete
Grit Facility – 20% of concrete complete
Facilities Hydrostatic testing is ongoing.
Influent Pump Station: 3 out of 8 large pumps have been installed.
All course screens (4) and fine screens (6) have been installed.
Support of Excavation installation is ongoing at Grit Effluent Conduits.
Started Overflow Conduit installation.
Completed the first half of the Influent Junction Chamber construction.
Completed the internal lining of Influent Conduit IC-1.
Shotcrete and cable wrap is ongoing at Equalization Tank No. 1 and cap and slot infill ongoing at
Tank No.2.
Mass backfilling is ongoing.
Site ductbank installation has commenced at the administration building and main substation.
Mechanical equipment is being delivered to the site for installation.
Schedule Progress and proposed logic revision are currently under review.
Weekly issues, Quality Control/Quality Assurance, schedule, partnering, risk, start-up,
Maintenance of Plant Operations, and Initial/ Preparatory meetings are held regularly with all
involved parties.
Overall the Project is trending to meet its Technical and Completion Milestones
B. Minority and Women Owned Business Participation
The Pre-Construction phase of the project was funded by the City and Baltimore County
therefore City MBE/WBE Goals of 10% and 3% respectively apply during the pre-construction
process.
Pre-Construction Fee $3,490,000
Contractual Participation Requirements: MBE $349,000 10%
WBE $104,700 3%
Page 13 of 15
Pre-Construction Phase MBE/WBE participation (completed 4/30/17):
SUBCONTRACTOR Amount Reported Participation Reported
Shah Associates $ 183,008 5.24%
Roane’s $71,444 2.05%
SP Arch $34,848 1.0%
Native Sons $60,000 1.72%
Horton $20,800 0.6%
C. L. McCoy $7,000 0.20%
CMC Repro & Assoc. $9,310 0.27%
MBE Totals $386,410 11.07%
SUBCONTRACTOR Amount Reported Participation Reported
Stella May $46,812 1.34%
Carroll $48,722 1.40%
Keep U Clean Jan Svc $4,100 0.12%
WBE Totals $99,634 2.85%
Construction Phase MBE/WBE Participation:
The Construction phase of the Headworks Project is being funded by the state’s revolving fund
therefore the state’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise standards apply and not the City’s
MBE/WBE standards. The Construction phase of the project has the MBE and WBE State Goals of
18% and 16% respectively.
Clark/US’s estimates for the MBE/WBE participation are 12.82% and 5.80% respectively at this
time. The level of efforts expended on contacting regional and local DBE businesses has been
documented and will continue to be recorded in accordance with MDE guidelines for reporting
purposes.
The estimated percentages translate into the following dollar amounts to be spent with the
MBE/WBE subcontractors, based on the Contract amount of $429,776,789:
MBE 12.82% $55,092,484.33
WBE 5.45% $23,426,947.00
Page 14 of 15
At this time, Clark/US has invoiced for $235,163,197.62, which is approximately 55% of the
contract amount. The following MBE/WBE participation has been reported:
SUBCONTRACTOR MBE CONTRACT Participation Reported
MBE Companies Amount
% of
total
contract
Amount % of invoiced
amount
A&S Refuse LLC $551,000 0.13% $43,959.51 8%
Capital Development Design, Inc. $1,870,402 0.44% $1,202,155.79 64%
EMC2, Inc. $75,200 0.02% $293,610.98 390%
Horton $12,500,000 2.91% $2,668,925.51 21%
Innovo Construction LLC $1,990,000 0.46% $124,913.00 6%
JD Belfield $60,000 0.01% - -
Keep U Clean Janitorial Svc. $121,816 0.03% $45,297 37%
LCCI $330,000 0.08% $5,950.00 2%
NSL/Freestate $16,636,200 3.87% $5,182,903.36 31%
Weathespoon & Williams $592,190.00 0.14% - -
Allan Myers - lower tier: Mohawk
Bridge & Iron, Doughboy Hauling $4,333,333 1.01% $2,308,799.88 53%
Baseline $388,000 0.09% $562,713 145%
Cagley & Associates $18,300 0.00% $10,125.00 55%
Ruff Nex $1,698,106 0.40% $1,172,068.53 69%
Bulldog Construction $173,417 0.04% $1,185,998.26 684%
Ulliman Schutte - lower tier:
Ideal, GE Frisco, TBD
$13,754,520.00 3.20% - -
MBE Totals $55,092,484 12.82%
$14,807,419.82
26.88%
SUBCONTRACTOR WBE CONTRACT Participation Reported
WBE Companies Amount
% of
contract
amount
Amount % of invoiced
amount
Baltimore Waterproofing $232,200 - -
Regional Contracting Services LLC $2,853,580 $728,421.97 26%
Stella May Contracting $4,030,627 $4,030,627 100%
TMI Striping $12,279 $12,279 100%
Regional Drywall & Acoustic Panel $75,325 - -
Page 15 of 15
Rowen Concrete $2,166,667 $558,525.60 26%
DN Tanks - lower tier: Jernigan's,
Acorn Supply & Distributing $350,919 $45,067.22 13%
Eisenhart Steel $1,479,110 $322,207 22%
Ulliman Schutte - lower tier: J&S
Valves, Robnet, Acorn Supply &
Distributing, Roane's Rigging &
Transfer
$12,226,240 $1,770,048.86 14%
WBE Totals $23,426,947.00 5.45% $7,467,176.65 32%
C. Implementation and Policy Challenges with Recommendation
From the first two years of construction, DPW has the following recommendations for
DBEC’s consideration:
Engage and award the project to the CMAR prior to 30% design documents to
maximize their input
Place monetary provisions to enforce timely baseline schedule development
This contract used the Army Corps of Engineers specification regarding Quality
Assurance/Quality Controls. The DBEC should consider modifying this specification
so that it is more applicable to the Construction Industry
Include more details on definitions of the different funds' categories i.e., Owner
Allowances, Constructions Contingency... and the intended use of the funds to
eliminate any disagreements over which category covers what work.