ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

38
WM-OFMP Numrii faturave te leshuara ne raportme konsumatorete regjistruar(%) ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES Presented by: vera muhaxhiri

description

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES. Presented by: vera muhaxhiri. CONTENT. Introduction Absolute performance of water sector Relative performance of water sector Relative individual performance Relative comparative performance Conclusion Steps forward. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

Page 1: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING

OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

Presented by: vera muhaxhiri

Page 2: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

CONTENT Introduction Absolute performance of water

sector Relative performance of water

sector Relative individual performance Relative comparative performance Conclusion Steps forward

Page 3: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Water is essential, indeed: without it, there will be no existence…and as such it shall be used carefully.

The best for this is that water should be treated almost as all other businesses.

Water treatment and distribution are businesses which are faced with high costs.

Page 4: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

INTRODUCTION- Performance of water companies were evaluated by

taking into consideration key performance indicators- ! Performance indicators for 2007 were estimated by

reliable data- Absolute performance ensures achieved level- Relative individual performance justifies development

trends within the company- Relative comparative performance provides activity

results from the best to the worst, as well - It determines position of each company in relation

with sector average- (Non) development trends necessarily requires

explanations- Relevant stakeholders has contributed in trends

development

Page 5: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Absolute performance

how sector stands in 2007?

Page 6: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

KEY FACTS OF PERFORMANCE IN 2007 (I)

According to the evaluations, coverage with water services is 72%, and with wastewater services is 50%.

58% of water produced is not billed. 78,348,252m3 water were subject to losses and abuse in average from overall 217l water produced, only 91l

are billed €7,834,825 are expenses on behalf of non revenue

water the water sector would benefit an amount of €595,230

if NRW would have been decreased for only 8% = with grants provided by government!

Page 7: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

KEY FACTS OF PERFORMANCE IN 2007 (II)

Billing percentage has remained the same to 92%

Metered consumption has dropped to 81% due to reduction in proportion of customers with meters to 2%.

Operating costs per m3 of water produced has increased to €0.10

Average tariff is €0.35, where the difference of €0.25 is supposed to cover inevitable amount of water losses; necessary capital costs, risk of non-collection; and minimal reserve fund

Page 8: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

KEY FACTS OF PERFORMANCE IN 2007 (III)

As operating costs per 1 billing point are €5.14,incomes are €7.94

Revenue collection is increased to 61% Operating cost has been covered by cash

(WCR=1.03) Debtors requirements has reached to

€63,888,776; and obligations toward creditors are €11,301,052

Page 9: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

KEY FACTS OF PERFORMANCE IN 2007 (IV)

Staff performed more efficiently although indicator of 7.35 is still high.

Water quality is 2% In average, water supply is …..(?) Average customer complaints are….(?) In general, companies has been very

responsible toward reporting to WWRO

Page 10: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Relative performance

were sector development trends progressive or regressive

in 2007 compared to 2006 ?

Page 11: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007 / 2006 (I)

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

59% 58% ♫

Billing percentage 92% 92% -Proportion of customers with meters

77% 75%

Metered consumption %

83% 81%

Collection rate % 57% 61% ♫

Page 12: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007 / 2006 (II)

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/regWorking coverage rate 1.03 1.03 -

Working rate 1.72 1.63 Staff efficiency (‘000 customers)

7.57 7.35 ♫

Average tariffs per m3 0.34 0.35 ♫

Page 13: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007 / 2006 (III)

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/regComplaints per '000 customers

0.62 / -

Failure of water quality tests %

3% 2% ♫

Average water disconnections per customer/d

2h / -

Reporting delays 12 d 7 d ♫

Page 14: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Relative individual performance

what are development trends within a company in

2007 compared to 2006?

Page 15: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Prishtina, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

54% 51% ♫

Billing percentage 94% 89% Prop. of customers with water meters

82% 69%

Collection rate % 59% 62% ♫Working coverage rate

1.07 1.08 ♫

Staff efficiency 6.77 6.36 ♫

Page 16: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Hidroregjioni Jugor, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

46% 39% ♫

Billing percentage 92% 91% Prop. of customers with water meters

83% 86% ♫

Collection rate % 58% 65% ♫

Working coverage rate

0.91 1.01 ♫

Staff efficiency 5.99 5.93 ♫

Page 17: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Hidrodrini, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

75% 77%

Billing percentage 92% 92% -Prop. of customers with water meters

84% 87% ♫

Collection rate % 49% 53% ♫

Working coverage rate

0.98 0.98 -

Staff efficiency 6.76 6.48 ♫

Page 18: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Ujesjellesi Regjional, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

47% 48%

Billing percentage 92% 92% ♫

Prop. i kons. me ujemates

41% 45% ♫

Collection rate % 45% 50% ♫

Working coverage rate

1.13 0.95

Staff efficiency 11.48

11.03

Page 19: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Radoniqi, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

67% 62% ♫

Billing percentage 100% 100%

-

Prop. of customers with water meters

92% 94% ♫

Collection rate % 66% 70% ♫

Working coverage rate

1.03 1.10 ♫

Staff efficiency 8.78 8.66 ♫

Page 20: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Bifurkacioni, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

61% 54% ♫

Billing percentage 75% 84% ♫

Prop. of customers with water meters

49% 58% ♫

Collection rate % 50% 57% ♫

Working coverage rate

0.98 1.05 ♫

Staff efficiency 7.42 8.19

Page 21: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

PERFORMANCE DEVELOPMENTS 2007/2006

RWC Hidromorava, SH.A.

Indicator 2006 2007 prog/reg

Non-revenue water %

57% 46% ♫

Billing percentage 91% 97% ♫

Prop. of customers with water meters

78% 80% ♫

Collection rate % 65% 71% ♫

Working coverage rate

0.91 0.91 -

Staff efficiency 8.89 9.10

Page 22: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Relative comparative performance

who is the best performing company?!

Page 23: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Non-revenue water %

Page 24: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Billing percentage

Numri i faturave te leshuara ne raport me konsumatoret e regjistruar (%)

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Bifurkacioni,(Ferizaj)

Prishtina,(Prishtine)

HidroregjioniJugor, (Prizren)

Mesatarja esektorit

UjesjellesiRegjional,(Mitrovice)

Hidrodrini, (Peje)

Hidromorava,(Gjilan)

Radoniqi,(Gjakove)

2006 2007

Page 25: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Metered consumption %

Konsumimi i matur ne raport me konsumimin total (%)

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Bifurkacioni,(Ferizaj)

UjesjellesiRegjional,(Mitrovice)

Prishtina,(Prishtine)

Mesatarja esektorit

Hidromorava,(Gjilan)

Hidrodrini,(Peje)

HidroregjioniJugor, (Prizren)

Radoniqi,(Gjakove)

2006 2007

Page 26: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Staff efficiency %

Page 27: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Customer complaints

Page 28: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Working rate

Page 29: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Working coverage rate

Page 30: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Operating cost per m3 of water produced

Page 31: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Collection rate %

Page 32: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Water quality

Perqindja e testeve te deshtuara te ujit

0% 5% 10%

HidroregjioniJugor, (Prizren)

Bifurkacioni,(Ferizaj)

Hidrodrini,(Peje)

Hidromorava,(Gjilan)

Mesatarja esektorit

Prishtina,(Prishtine)

UjesjellesiRegjional,(Mitrovice)

Radoniqi,(Gjakove)

2006 2007

Page 33: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Water supply

Page 34: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Water service coverage

Page 35: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

Wastewater service coverage

Page 36: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

CONCLUSION- In 2007 compared to 2006, water sector has

performed much better in relation to key performance indicators

- All companies has shown progress in 2007 compared to 2006 in relative individual performance

this may be a result of- Serious engagement of companies’ management

staff- Establishment of Boards of Directors- Contribution given by Donors and Consultants- WWRO role

Page 37: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

STEPS FORWARD

- Preparation of Performance Report for 2007

- Publication of the Performance Report

- Regional benchmarking of water companies

Page 38: ANNUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING  OF SEVEN REGIONAL WATER COMPANIES

WM-OFMP

Nu

mri

i fa

tura

ve

te

lesh

uar

a n

e r

apo

rt m

e

kon

sum

ato

ret

e r

eg

jistr

uar

(%

)

0%

25

%5

0%

75

%1

00

%

Bif

urka

cion

i,(F

eriz

aj)

Pris

htin

a,

(Pris

htin

e)

Hid

rore

gjio

niJu

gor,

(Pr

izre

n)

Mes

atar

ja e

sekt

orit

Hid

rodr

ini,

(Pe

je)

Uje

sjel

lesi

Re

gjio

nal,

(Mitr

ovic

e)

Hid

rom

orav

a,(G

jilan

)

Rad

oniq

i,(G

jako

ve)

20

06

20

07

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!