ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL...
Transcript of ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL...
ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY2010-11
FACT SHEET
Uttarakhand
Government of India 2/A, Mansingh Road, New Delhi-110 011
Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, IndiaMinistry of Home Affairs,
Uttarakhand
ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY2010-11
FACT SHEET
Vital Statistics DivisionOffice of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India
New DelhiWebsite : www.censusindia.gov.in
UttarakhandA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Index
Page No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Introduction
Sample Particulars
Wealth Index
Household Characteristics
Sex Ratio
Effective Literacy Rate
Marriage
Schooling Status
Work Status
Disability
Injury
Acute Illness
Chronic Illness
Personal Habits
Fertility
Abortion
Family Planning Practices
Unmet Need for Family Planning
Ante Natal Care
Delivery Care
Post Natal Care
Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY)
Immunization, Vitamin A & Iron Supplement and Birth Weight
Childhood Diseases
Breastfeeding and Supplementation
Birth Registration
Awareness
Mortality
Confidence Interval (95%) for some important Indicators
Housing Characteristics
Annexure
i-xvii
1-4
5
6
7-8
9
10-11
12
13
14-15
16-18
19-23
24-34
35-37
38-43
44-45
46-48
49
50-53
54-56
57-58
59
60-63
64-65
66-69
70
71-72
73-79
80-81
82-85
86-106
i
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Introduction
Genesis
Objective
Coverage
Decentralized district-based health planning is essential in India because of the
large inter-district variations. In the absence of vital data at the district level, the State
level estimates are being used for formulating district level plans as well as setting the
milestones thereof. In the process, the hotspots (districts requiring special attention)
very often get masked by the State average. This statistical fallacy compounds the
problems of the districts acutely, more so in the health sector. At present, none of the
Surveys provides estimates of core vital indicators on fertility and mortality at district
level. The District Level Household Survey conducted with periodicity of five years mainly
focuses on indicators pertaining to maternal health and child welfare programmes. There
has, therefore, been a surge in demand from various quarters, in recent years, to
generate timely and reliable statistics at the district level for informed decision making in
the health sector.
2. The Annual Health Survey (AHS) was conceived during a meeting of the National
Commission of Population held in 2005 under the Chairmanship of the Prime Minister
wherein it was decided that “there should be an Annual Health Survey of all districts
which could be published / monitored and compared against benchmarks”. The objective
was to monitor the performance and outcome of various health interventions of the
Government including those under National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) at closer
intervals through these benchmark indicators. The AHS has been made an integral part
of the NRHM, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. The responsibility of the project has
been entrusted to the Office of the Registrar General, India on behalf of the Ministry of
Health & Family Welfare in view its expertise in handling the Sample Registration
System, one of the largest demographic surveys in the world.
3. Realizing the need for preparing a comprehensive district health profile on key
parameters based on a community set up, the AHS has been designed to yield
benchmarks of core vital and health indicators at the district level; prevalence of
disabilities, injuries, acute and chronic illness and access to health care for identified
morbidities; and access to maternal, child health and family planning services. By virtue
of being a panel survey, it has the unique ability to map the rate of change in these
indicators on a yearly basis. AHS would, thus, enable better capturing of the health
seeking behaviour of the public as compared to other periodic cross-sectional surveys,
and also help needed corrections in the strategies.
4. The sample size at the district level has been derived taking Infant Mortality Rate as
the decisive indicator and host of other practical issues related to execution of the
survey. Keeping in view the mammoth size of the sample, it was a conscious decision of
the Government to initially confine the survey to the 284 districts (as per 2001 Census)
of the 8 Empowered Action Group States (Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh,
Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha and Rajasthan) and Assam for a
three year period starting from 2010-11. These 9 high focus States with relatively high
fertility and mortality account for about 48 percent of the total population in the country.
A representative sample of 20,694 statistically selected Primary Sample Units (PSUs -
Census Enumeration Blocks in case of urban areas and villages or a segment thereof in
ii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
case of larger villages in rural areas) based on 2001 Census has been drawn from these
AHS States which would cover about 18 million population and 3.6 million households
each year. However, during the Base-line Survey, a total of 20.1 million population and
4.14 million households have actually been covered. Despite being restricted to 9 States,
the AHS is the largest demographic survey in the world and covers two and a half times
that of the Sample Registration System.
5. The project is being implemented as a hybrid model wherein the actual field work
has been outsourced to seven selected Survey Agencies on the pattern of National Family
Health Survey (NFHS) and District Level Household Survey (DLHS). The co-ordination,
supervision and monitoring of the fieldwork in the States are being carried out by
dedicated staff posted at various levels in the respective Directorate of Census
Operations (DCOs). The responsibility for overall co-ordination, supervision and
monitoring across the nine AHS States rests with the AHS Division of ORGI. For smooth
and effective execution of the survey, the AHS States have been divided into 18 mutually
exclusive and exhaustive zones, each having a group of contiguous districts with more or
less equal workload.
6. The outline of the survey such as approach, periodicity, coverage, sampling
strategy, sample size, permissible levels of relative standard errors, and levels of
aggregation, was finalized after a series of deliberations with the representatives from
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Central
Statistics Office (CSO), Ministry of Woman & Child Development, Indian Council of
Medical Research, Planning Commission, International Institute for Population Sciences
and other subject experts. Based on the recommendations, various technical details
including preparation of sample design, derivation of sample size etc. were worked out
and vetted by the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) constituted for the purpose.
7. The Sample design adopted for Annual Health Survey is a uni-stage stratified
simple random sample without replacement except in case of larger villages in rural
areas ( population more than or equal to 2000 as per 2001 Census), wherein a two
stage stratified sampling has been applied. The sample units are Census Enumeration
Blocks (CEBs) in urban areas and villages in rural areas. In rural areas, the villages
have been divided into two strata. Stratum I comprises villages with population less than
2000 and Stratum II contains villages with population 2000 or more. Smaller villages
with population less than 200 were excluded from the sampling frame in such a manner
that the total population of villages so excluded did not exceed 2 per cent of the total
population of the district. In case of Stratum I, the entire village is the sample unit. In
case of Stratum II, the village has been divided into mutually exclusive (non-overlapping)
and geographically contiguous units comprising group of EBs called segments of more or
less equal size and population not exceeding 2000 in any case. One segment from the
frame of segments thus prepared was selected in a random manner to represent the
selected village at the second stage of sampling.
8. The number of sample villages in each district was allocated between the two strata
proportionally to their size (population). The villages within each size stratum were
further ordered by the female literacy rate based on the Census 2001 data, and three
Fieldwork Strategy
Technical Consultation
Sample Design
iii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
disjoint and equal size substrata were established. The sample villages within each
substratum were selected by simple random sampling without replacement. Similarly, in
urban areas, the Census Enumeration Blocks within a district were ordered by the
female literacy rate based on the Census 2001 data, and three disjoint and equal size
substrata were established. The sample Census Enumeration Blocks within each
substratum were selected by simple random sampling without replacement. Thus, female
literacy which has a direct bearing on the fertility behaviour was used for implicit
stratification. Further, the process of selection ensured equal representation across
three sub-strata both in rural as well as in urban areas of a district besides rendering
the sample design as self-weighting.
9. Generating robust estimates of Infant Mortality Rate at the district level has become
an utmost necessity as reduction in Infant Mortality constitutes one of the key targets in
the Reproductive & Child Health Programme (RCH) under the umbrella of NRHM. This
would also facilitate effective tracking of the Millennium Development Goal 4 on Child
Mortality. The Infant Mortality Rate has therefore been taken as the decisive indicator for
estimation of sample size at the district level. The permissible level of error has been
taken as 10 percentage relative standard error (prse) at the district level. The sample size
so worked out would yield relatively better estimates of Crude Birth Rate / Crude Death
Rate and may also enable generation of rarer indicators like MMR (for a group of
districts) with good precision. In the absence of district level estimates from any other
reliable source, the district level derived estimates of IMR based on SRS pooled data have
been used for estimation of sample size for each district.
10. One of the essential prerequisites for the commencement of the survey was to
uniquely identify the sample units on ground. This was done in all the sample units
across the nine AHS States by the regular staff of ORGI. The work involved firming up of
the boundary of the selected villages / Enumeration Blocks; resorting to segmentation in
case of villages exceeding the population 2000, random selection of segment thereof and
drawing of appropriate notional maps of the sample units to serve as the base map for
the survey work.
11. The Baseline Survey in all the nine AHS States was carried out during July 2010 to
March 2011 and four Schedules, in all, were administered. These are: (i) House-listing
Schedule, (ii) Household Schedule, (iii) Woman Schedule and (iv) Mortality Schedule. In
the House-listing Schedule, besides the mapping and listing of all the houses and
households in a sample unit, some key particulars relating to the housing characteristics
(type and ownership), basic amenities available to the household and assets possessed
by them were collected. In the Household Schedule, all Usual Residents as on
01.01.2010 were listed and for each listed member, information on background
characteristics like Name, Sex, Relationship to Head, Date of Birth, Age, Religion, Social
Group, Marital Status, Date at first Marriage, Education and Occupation/Activity Status
was captured. Besides, information in respect of Disability, Morbidity (Injuries, Acute
Illness, and Chronic Illness) and Personal Habits (like Chewing, Smoking and
Consumption of Alcohol) was also collected wherever applicable. Woman Schedule
comprised two sections. Section-I was administered to all Ever Married Women (EMW)
aged 15-49 years and information relating to the outcome of pregnancy(s) (live birth/still
Sample Size
Sample Identification Work
Survey Tools
iv
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
birth/abortion); birth history; type of medical attention at delivery; details of maternal
health care(ante-natal/natal/post-natal); immunization of children; breast feeding
practices including supplements; occurrence of child diseases (Pneumonia, Diarrhoea
and fever); registration of births, etc. taken place during the reference period i.e.
01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 was collected. Section II focused on information on pregnancy;
use, sources and practices of family planning methods; details relating to future use of
contraceptives and unmet need; awareness about RTI/STI, HIV/AIDS, administration of
HAF/ORT/ORS during diarrhoea and danger signs of ARI/Pneumonia; and these details
were collected from all Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years.
12. Through the Mortality Schedule, details relating to death occurred to usual
residents of sample household during 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 were captured and it
included information on name & sex of deceased, date of death, age at death, registration
of death and source of medical attention received before death. For infant deaths, a
question on symptoms leading to death was also probed. In case of deaths associated
with pregnancy, information on a variety of questions on factors leading/contributing to
death, symptoms leading to death, time between onset of complications and death, etc.
was asked to yield data on various determinants of maternal mortality. These schedules
were finalized after a series of deliberations in the TAG and thereafter piloting in the field
situation. The fieldwork in sample units was carried out by teams of field enumerators
which had at least one female in each team. This was done to ensure that besides
canvassing of woman schedule, questions on morbidity for female members in household
schedule and questions relating to infant deaths as well as deaths associated with
pregnancy in the mortality schedule were also probed and recorded only by the female
enumerator.
13. Since information on morbidity, disability and few specific details in case of infant
and maternal deaths etc. were collected at the district level in such a large survey setup
for the first time, adequate emphasis was given to training. An exhaustive training
manual for the field staff was prepared with inputs from various stakeholders and
subject experts. A three day ‘Training of Trainers’ programme was organized at New Delhi
prior to commencement of State/Zone level training sessions wherein experts imparted
training on concepts, definitions and how best to collect data on different parameters. A
pool of medical doctors was arranged with the help of National Institute of Health &
Family Welfare (NIHFW) who imparted training to the field staff on disability and
morbidity during State/Zone level training programmes. A standardized Video Training
Module was specially developed for the purpose. Officers from ORGI and DCOs were
deputed to observe the training programmes conducted at State level by Survey Agencies.
14. In addition to the multilayer supervision mechanism adopted by the Survey
Agencies, regular inspections were carried out by the officers/officials of respective DCOs
and those from ORGI headquarters to ensure the data quality. The inspections were a
judicious mix of concurrent as well as post survey audit. Over and above, a component of
Third Party Audit was included to verify and authenticate the surveyed data through an
independent mechanism. The Third Party Audit work was carried out in 20 randomly
selected AHS units in each of the districts covering every fourth household thereof by
following a standard protocol prescribed by ORGI. Truncated versions of Household,
Women and Mortality Schedules were filled in afresh by the field staff of the Third Party
Training
Supervision and Third Party Audit
v
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Audit Agencies. The findings in respect of key indicators were matched and re-survey
was undertaken by the Survey Agencies in units where the variation was outside the
permissible limit. The third party audit also helped in netting of missed vital events,
particularly rarer ones like infant and maternal deaths.
15. In view of the large volume of data collected under AHS and significant time
required for validation and processing, dissemination of AHS results is done in two
phases. The first set of data was released in August 2011 in the form of State-wise
bulletins, which contained the district level data on crude birth rate, crude death rate,
natural growth rate, infant mortality rate, neo-natal and post neo-natal mortality rates,
under 5 mortality rate, sex ratio at birth, sex ratio (0-4 years) and overall sex ratio. In
addition, the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), Maternal Mortality Rate and life time risk
were released for a group of districts. In order to facilitate direct intervention, the
maternal mortality indicators were combined and released for a group of districts on the
basis of existing administrative divisions in the respective AHS States.
16. Under the present phase of dissemination, data on host of other important
parameters covered in AHS under Household and Woman Schedules are being released
in the form of State and District Level Factsheets. Though the sample size has been
calculated for the district as a whole, the rural and urban estimates at the district level
have also been published as byproduct. Users are advised to keep the above fact into
consideration while using the rural / urban estimates of a district. In order to ward off
unusual sampling fluctuations, the urban estimates have not been published in respect
of some indicators for the districts where the number of urban sample units was less
than six. To begin with, number of PSUs, Households, Population, Ever Married Women,
Currently Married Women, Children aged 12-23 months (as on date of survey) covered in
the sample of each district and the State along with their rural-urban breakup have been
given to provide the users requisite insight on the metadata. The indicators contained in
the AHS Bulletin have also been reproduced in these Factsheets so that the users may
have access to complete set of indicators at one place. However, they may refer to the
AHS Bulletin for details on metadata.
17. A few relevant indicators based on House-listing Schedule, which would help in
assessing the economic profile of the households such as, structure of the house where
the household is residing, i.e. Pucca/Kachcha; Ownership status of the house, i.e.
Owned/Rented; Improved source of drinking water; Treatment of water by the
households to make it safer for drinking; Access to toilet facility; Access to electricity;
Main Source of lighting; Main source of fuel used for cooking; Availability of kitchen; and
Possession of Computer/Telephone/Mobile have also been tabulated. In the absence of
income and expenditure measures of economic status, household wealth Index has been
constructed at State level for each of the nine study States using the assets possessed
and the facilities availed by the households as mentioned above to determine a
household’s relative economic status and also to assess the differential impact with
respect to health outcomes or health service utilization thereof. The technique of
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been used to determine variable weightings.
Similar approach was also followed in NFHS and DLHS Household Wealth Index.
Dissemination of Results
Wealth Index
vi
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
List of Variables selected for the development of HH Wealth Index
Assets Coded Categories
Type of Structure of the House Pucca House=1 Otherwise=0
Main Source of drinking water Piped water into dwelling/yard/plot, Public
tap/stand pipe, Hand pump, Tube well or bore
well , Protected dug well = 1 Otherwise=0
Type of Toilet Facility mainly Used Flush/Pour Flush Latrine – connected : to piped
sewer line /septic tank/ pit latrine/somewhere
else, Pit Latrine (Without flush/pour flush):
Ventilated improved pit, Pit latrine with slab = 1
Otherwise=0
Household having Electricity Yes=1, No= 0
Main Source of lighting Electricity, Solar=1, Otherwise=0
Main Source of Fuel used for Cooking LPG/PNG, Electricity, Biogas= 1, Otherwise=0
Household having no dwelling room exclusively in possession = 0, 1 dwelling room exclusively in possession = 1, 2 dwelling rooms exclusively inpossession = 2, 3 dwelling rooms exclusively in
Number of Dwelling rooms exclusively possession = 3, 4 dwelling rooms exclusively in in the possession of household possession = 4, 5 dwelling rooms exclusively in
possession = 5, 6 dwelling rooms exclusively in
possession = 6, 7 dwelling rooms exclusively in
possession = 7, 8 dwelling rooms exclusively in
possession = 8, 9 or more dwelling rooms
exclusively in possession=9
Availability of Kitchen Cooking inside or Outside House - Has Kitchen=1,
Otherwise=0
Possession of Radio/Transistor Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Television Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Computer/Laptop Computer/Laptop with or without internet
connection = 1, No =0
Possession of Telephone/Mobile Phone Telephone, Mobile Phone or both = 1, No=0
Possession of Washing Machine Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Refrigerator Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Sewing Machine Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Bicycle Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Two wheeler (Scooter/Motorcycle/Moped) Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Car/Jeep/Van Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Tractor Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Water Pump/Tube well Yes=1, No= 0
Possession of Cart (Driven by animal/ Cart-Driven by animal/machine/other=1, Doesn’tmachine/other) have =0
Land Possessed (in hectares) No land= 0, Less than 0.02 hectare = 1, 0.02 to
less than 1.00 hectare = 49, 1.00 to less than 4.00
hectares = 250, 4.00 to less than 10.00 hectares
=700, 10.00 hectares or more=1000
18. The list of variables used for the development of wealth index along with their
coding structure is given below:
vii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Considering these variables, principal component analysis technique was applied and
each of the above household assets/ facilities was assigned a weight or a factor loading.
The Asset Scores have then been computed for each single household by using the
following formula:
Subsequently, the Asset Scores of all the variables were added at the household level to
get the Total Asset Score for each of the households. Thereafter the households were
ranked according to their individual Household Asset Score (HHAS) and then divided into
five quintiles with the same number of households in each. This provided the cut off
points or the ranges for each quintile. The highest (20%) and the lowest (20%) quintiles
have been published for each of the districts in a State to highlight the extreme disparity
in the household’s relative economic well being. The value of the indicators
corresponding to these quintiles is outside the purview of this factsheet and would be
presented in State level reports.
19. The information on marital status as on 01.01.2010 was probed in respect of all
household members (Usual Residents) irrespective of their age. For those who were
married, the date of first marriage was recorded. Using this, age at first marriage, which
has a direct impact on child bearing as women marrying early have on an average a
longer period of exposure to pregnancy and a greater number of lifetime births, was
obtained. Using the age data, the mean age at marriage for males and females has been
worked out and included in the Factsheet. The mean age at marriage is based on the
marriages to the members of the household (Usual Residents as on 1.1.2010) taken place
during 2007-09. The proportion of marriages among males and females taking place
below the legal age, i.e., 21 and 18 years respectively, has also been tabulated. Such
proportions are also based on the marriages to the members of the household (Usual
Residents as on 1.1.2010) taken place during 2007-09. Besides, the percentage of
Currently Married Women aged 20-24 years marrying before legal age (18 years) and
percentage of Currently Married Men aged 25-29 years marrying before legal age (21
years) have been worked out and presented.
20. The data on any type of disability as on date of survey was collected in respect of all
the usual residents. The type of disability included `mental’, `visual’, `hearing’, `speech’,
`loco-motor’ and `multiple’. The prevalence of any type of disability per 1,00,000
population by gender and residence at the district and State levels has been presented in
the factsheet. Since it is difficult to capture the type of injury and its severity from lay
reporting, an attempt has been made to assess the severity of injury from the type and
duration of hospitalization required. This would also provide an assessment of the
workload on hospitals / doctors on account of injury. Accordingly, the type of treatment
meted to the injury during last one year of the date of survey has been collected. The
categories by type of treatment included `treated in intensive care unit for any time-1,
treated as in-patient with stay more than two weeks-2, treated as in-patient with stay
one to two weeks-3, treated as in-patient with stay less than one week-4, treated as out-
patient-5, treated by traditional healers-6, and treated at home-7’. Based on these
Marriage
Disability and Injury
[Value of Asset Variable - Mean of Asset Variable]
Standard Deviation of Asset VariableHH Asset Score (AS) = x Weight of component I
viii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
categories, the number of persons injured by type of treatment received per 1,00,000
population, have been categorized into severe(by including categories 1 & 2), major (by
including categories 3 & 4) and minor (by including categories 5 & 6) groups. Those
treated at home have been excluded from the above categorization and thus from the
analysis also.
21. On the morbidity front, if any member (usual resident) of the household suffered
from any ‘acute illness’ during last fifteen days prior to the date of survey, the type of
illness has been ascertained. Based on this data, persons suffering from acute illness per
1,00,000 population has been presented for a few select diseases like diarrhoea /
dysentery; acute respiratory infection & all types of fever and also for any type of acute
illness. Besides, the source from where the treatment for the acute illness was taken has
also been included. Accordingly, two important indicators, viz., percentage of persons
suffering from acute illness and taking treatment from any source and percentage of
persons suffering from acute illness and taking treatment from Government source have
been presented. The latter gives the share of Government source across all types of
sources availed for taking treatment. It may be noted that the entire fieldwork was
carried out over a period of six to seven months and in the process, districts were
covered at different points of time (i.e., months / seasons). The seasonality effect may be
taken note of while interpreting the results.
22. The data in respect of chronic illness has been collected based on the symptoms
pertaining to a particular illness persisting for more than one month and also in respect
of illnesses where it was diagnosed. For both the cases, the reference period was last one
year preceding the date of survey. For ascertaining information on symptoms, a list of
symptoms associated with various types of diseases was provided along with a separate
category for asymptomatic (i.e., having no symptoms). The asymptomatic included those
who were not suffering from any illness as well as those who were suffering but had no
symptoms. Using this data, percentage of persons having any kind of symptoms of
chronic illness along with their source of treatment has been presented. As regards
chronic illnesses diagnosed, this was included to measure the extent to which facilities
for diagnosis and treatment of some major chronic illnesses set up by centre/State/local
Government / private agencies have been utilized. A list of common chronic diseases and
those pertaining to major health intervention programmes was provided. Based on this
data, percentage of persons diagnosed for a few important diseases such as diabetes,
hypertension, tuberculosis, asthma / chronic respiratory disease and arthritis per
1,00,000 population has been presented besides those diagnosed for any type of chronic
illness. Using the data collected on source of diagnosis, status with regard to getting
regular treatment and source of treatment, percentage of persons having diagnosed for
any kind of chronic illness and getting regular treatment as well as those getting regular
treatment from Government source has been worked out and included in the Factsheet.
Since the data on morbidity has been elicited as reported by the respondents, it may
suffer on account of accuracy. Nevertheless, the availability of such a rich data set at the
district level would fill in the much awaited void and pave the way for evidence-based
health planning and appropriate interventions.
Acute Illness
Chronic Illness
ix
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Personal Habits
Fertility
23. During the base-line survey, information on personal habits such as chewing
practices, smoking and consumption of alcohol has been collected for all the usual
residents of age 15 years and above. Under chewing habits, the information has been
separately collected for chewing with and without tobacco. Based on the data, the
percentage of population by habit of chewing with and without tobacco, percentage of
population by habit of smoking and percentage of population by habit of drinking
alcohol, for the usual residents of age 15 years and above, have been presented. Both for
smoking and consuming alcohol, the proportion is based on usual as well as occasional
smokers / drinkers. The usual smoker is the one who smokes at least once every day
and the usual drinker, who drinks at least once every week. The data on disability,
morbidity as well as personal habits have been given by residence and sex to capture the
differentials. The enumerators were specifically instructed to collect information
pertaining to morbidity as well as personal habits from the concerned individuals in
privacy and with due sensitivity in order to elicit proper response to the extent possible.
24. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR), which is an age-period fertility rate for a synthetic
cohort of women, measures the average number of births a group of women would have
by the time they reach 50 years of age if they were to give birth at the current age-
specific fertility rates. The TFR is expressed as the average number of births per woman.
Under AHS, TFR has been calculated by dividing three years average of all births
reported during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09 by all the women in respective age
group. The seven five-yearly age-specific fertility rates for all women in the age groups
from 15-19 to 45-49 have been added and thereafter multiplied by 5 to yield the TFR.
Due to lack of adequate number of births, the TFR by residence could not be worked out
and hence is not being published.
25. The distribution of births by birth order is another way to understand the dynamics
on spacing of children and level of fertility. In this regard, two key indicators namely,
`percentage of women aged 20-24 reporting birth of order 2 & above’ and `percentage of
women reporting birth of order 3 & above’ based on last two live births taken place to
Ever Married Women aged 15-49 years during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09, have
been presented. ‘Percentage of Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years with two
living children wanting no more children’ is one of the most crucial indicators on desire
to limit child bearing. While deriving this indicator, sterilized women or their husbands
have not been taken into account whereas women who were currently pregnant have
been included.
26. Teen-age pregnancy and motherhood is an important subject in the settings where
the marriage of girls takes place at very young ages. This is not only important from the
fertility perspective but also its consequent implication on the health of the mother and
child. Accordingly, `percentage of women aged 15-19 who were already mothers or
pregnant at the time of survey’ has been tabulated and it depicts the percentage of
women who have begun child bearing among all ever married women aged 15-19 years.
The ever married sample denominator for the age group 15-19 years has not been
adjusted by the all women factors for the same age group. This factor should be taken
into consideration while interpreting the results.
x
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Median age at first live birth
Birth interval
Mean number of children ever born and surviving
Abortion
27. Median age at first live birth of women aged 15-49 years has been presented to
reflect the age at which 50 percent of the women have given their first live birth. This
indicator covers women of all marital status and ever married sample denominator has
been adjusted by the all women factors in this age group. Ever Married Women not yet
having first live birth and Never Married Women have been included as a separate
category for computation. Median has been calculated from cumulated single year of age
percent distributions of age at first birth. Median is linearly interpolated by the age
values by which 50 percent or more of the women had a first birth. In order to gauge the
same for older women of the same cohort, median age at first live birth for women aged
25-49 years has also been calculated and presented. These two indicators in conjunction
would help in comparing the age with regard to entry into parenthood between the two
cohorts.
28. The information on birth interval, which is defined as the length of time between
two successive live births, has been collected in respect of last two live births which took
place during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09 for birth order 2 & above. Short birth
intervals are likely to have adverse bearing on the mother’s health as also on the chances
of survival of the neonates and infants. In the Indian context, the birth interval of 36
months may be taken as the bare minimum from the perspective of reducing neonatal
and infant mortality and also for achieving the requisite nutritional outcomes. The
information on percentage of live births taking place after an interval of 36 months has
been calculated and presented to provide insight into the pace of child bearing.
29. The number of children ever born and surviving has been collected for all Ever
Married Women aged 15-49 years. The survival status has been assessed as on 1.1.2010
(the reference point for the population). The number of children ever born to women
provides an estimate of cohort fertility against the period measures of fertility such as the
CBR and the TFR. In order to facilitate comparison of completed cohort fertility with the
current fertility, the mean number of ever born children to women aged 45-49 years has
been calculated and presented. The gap between the two would demonstrate the decline
in fertility levels in the recent past.
30. Abortion as an option was probed for all the pregnancies which resulted into any
kind of outcome i.e. live birth, still birth, spontaneous and induced abortion during the
reference period i.e. 2007-2009. This was followed by a series of questions such as when
the abortion had taken place (month & year), month of pregnancy when the abortion had
occurred, whether any ANC was received, whether ultrasound was performed before the
abortion, the place of abortion and who performed the abortion. Based on these data,
various indicators such as percentage of pregnancy(s) to women aged 15-49 years
resulting in abortion, percentage of women who received any ANC before abortion,
percentage of women who went for ultrasound before abortion, average month of
pregnancy at the time of abortion, percentage of abortions performed by skilled health
personnel (doctor / nurse / ANM / LHV / trained dai), and abortions which took place
in institutions have been tabulated and presented.
xii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Family Planning Practices
Current usage of Family Planning Methods
Unmet Need for Family Planning
31. The information on awareness as well as the usage in respect of Family Planning
Practices was probed from Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years. There were a few
women whose marital status as on 1.1.2010 (reference date) was Currently Married but
on date of survey, their marital status was widow / divorcee / separated. In such cases,
questions on only awareness were probed from them.
32. Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years, who were currently menstruating or
who were in lactating status or secondary amenorrhoea as on date of survey, were asked
whether they or their husbands are currently using any method(s) of family planning. In
other words, those CMW who were currently pregnant or in menopause status or who
have undergone hysterectomy or never menstruated were excluded from the sample. The
family planning methods included both modern as well as traditional methods. Modern
methods included Tubectomy, Vasectomy, Copper-T/IUD, Pills (Daily), Pills (Weekly),
Emergency Contraceptive Pill, Condom/Nirodh, etc., while the traditional ones were
Contraceptive Herbs, Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal, Lactational Amenorrhoea
Method, etc. Accordingly, percentage of CMW reporting use of various types of family
planning methods (most used method) has been tabulated. In addition, percentage of
CMW using any method (Contraceptive Prevalence Rate), any modern method and any
traditional method has also been tabulated. Levels of use of contraceptives provide the
most obvious and widely accepted criterion for assessing the success of FP programme.
33. The unmet need for Family Planning is a crucial indicator for assessing the future
demand for Family Planning services / supplies. Currently Married Women who are not
using any method of contraception but who do not want any more children are defined
as having an unmet need for limiting and those who are not using contraception but
want to wait for two years or more before having another child are defined as having an
unmet need for spacing. The sum total of unmet need for limiting and spacing is the
unmet need for Family Planning. In order to ensure comparability with DHS Estimates,
similar set of questions were probed from CMW aged 15-49 years under AHS also.
34. For working out the estimates on unmet need, the unmet need for spacing has been
calculated as the “proportion of pregnant CMW whose pregnancy was mistimed; CMW in
lactational amenorrhoea who are not using any family planning method and whose last
birth was mistimed, or whose last birth was unwanted but now they say they want more
children; fecund CMW who are neither currently pregnant nor in amenorrhoea, and who
are not using any family planning method and say that they want to wait for two or more
years for the next birth, including those who say that they are unsure whether they
want another child, or want another child but are unsure when to have the birth”.
35. The unmet need for limiting has been worked out as the “proportion of pregnant
CMW whose pregnancy was unwanted; CMW in lactational amenorrhoea who are not
using any family planning method, whose last child was unwanted and who do not want
any more children; and fecund CMW who are neither pregnant nor in amenorrhoea who
are not using any method of family planning and who want no more children”. Using the
met demand for contraception (current contraceptive users) and the unmet need for
contraception, the total demand for family planning as well as the percentage demand
xii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Ante-natal Care
36. Ante-natal care constitutes one of the key elements towards initiatives to promote
safe motherhood. A series of questions to capture various aspects of ante-natal care such
as, number of ante-natal check-ups received, months of pregnancy at the time of first
ANC, main source of ANC, type of tests performed during ANC, number of Tetanus
Toxoid (TT) injections received and number of days of consumption of Iron & Folic Acid
(IFA) tablets/syrup, were asked from the EMW aged 15-49 years in respect of their last
two outcomes of pregnancies which have resulted into live births / still births during the
reference period, i.e., 2007-09. However, appropriate indicators based on the above
aspects have been tabulated in respect of responses recorded for last live / still births.
37. The indicators included in the Factsheets are percentage of mothers who received
any ANC, percentage of mothers who had ANC in first trimester, percentage of mothers
who received 3 or more ANC, percentage of mothers who received at least one TT
injection, percentage of mothers who consumed IFA for 100 days or more and percentage
of mothers who had full ante-natal check-up. The full ante-natal check-up comprises at
least three visits for ANC, at least one TT injection received and IFA consumption for 100
days or more. In addition, percentage of mothers who received ANC from Government
source, percentage of mothers whose blood pressure & blood (for Hb) were taken and
percentage of mothers who underwent ultrasound have been calculated and presented.
Besides, percentage of Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered
for ANC has also been presented.
satisfied can be assessed. The classification for the need for family planning is illustrated
as under:
Classification of the need for family planning
Total need for family planning
For limiting:Pregnant women whose pregnancy was unwanted, amenorrhoeic women whose last birth was unwanted, and women who are neither pregnant nor amenorrhoeic and who want no more children but are not using a family planning method
For spacing:Pregnant women whose pregnancy was mistimed, amenorrhoeic women whose last birth was mistimed, and women who are neither pregnant nor amenorrhoeic who say they want to wait two or more years for the next birth, are unsure whether they want another child, or want another child but are unsure when to have it and are not using a family planning method
For spacing:Women who want another child or are undecided and are us ing a f am i l y planning method
For limiting:Women who want no more children and are using a family planning method
Met need(current use)
Unmetneed
xiii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Delivery Care
Post-natal Care
Financial assistance under Janani Suraksha Yojana
38. Under Delivery Care, the details about place of delivery, source of transport
provided / availed for reaching the institution, length of stay in the institution after
delivery, type of delivery (normal / caesarean / assisted) and the personnel conducting
delivery in case of domiciliary births were inquired from the EMW aged 15-49 years for
their last two pregnancy outcomes resulting into live births/still births during the
reference period, i.e. 2007-09. As in the case of ante-natal care, indicators based on
these parameters have been tabulated in respect of responses for last live/still births.
Percentage of deliveries taken place in institutions and their distribution into
Government and Private institutions; percentage of deliveries taken place at home;
percentage of home deliveries conducted by skilled health personnel; and percentage of
Safe deliveries are the key indicators presented in the Factsheet. Safe delivery comprises
institutional deliveries and home deliveries conducted by doctor/ nurse / ANM / LHV
and it does not include those attended by trained dai. However, trained dai is included
under skilled health personnel. If the respondent has mentioned more than one person
attending delivery, only the most qualified person is taken into consideration.
39. As regards the extent of stay in institutions after delivery which is very crucial and
has a direct bearing on the new born care as also on the health of the mother, the
percentage of less than 24 hours stay in the institution after delivery has been worked
out and presented. Besides, percentage of Caesarean deliveries out of total deliveries
taken place in Government and Private Institutions respectively has also been presented.
40. Getting a Post partum / Post-natal check-up soon after the birth of baby or within
48 hours is crucial for the health of both the mother and the child. Accordingly, three
indicators, viz., percentage of mothers who received Post-natal check-up within 48 hours
of delivery, percentage of mothers who received Post-natal check-up within one week of
delivery and percentage of mothers who did not receive any Post-natal check-up have
been calculated and presented. In case of institutional delivery where the woman had
stayed there for at least 48 hours, it was presumed that the post-natal care was given
within 48 hours. These indicators are based on the last outcome of pregnancy which
resulted into live / still birth during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09.
41. Along with the first post-natal check-up of mother, check-up of the new borns is
essential. It was therefore probed from the mothers, whose last outcome of pregnancy
resulted into live birth during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09, when was the new born
checked up. Based on this, the percentage of new born who received check up within 24
hours of birth has been worked out and presented. In case of institutional delivery if the
baby remained there for at least 24 hours, it was presumed that the first check-up was
done within 24 hours.
42. The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) is one of the most important programmes under
the overall umbrella of NRHM aimed at reducing Maternal Mortality Ratio and Neo-natal
Mortality Rate by promoting institutional deliveries. Under the Scheme, cash incentives
are provided to mothers and they are facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists
(ASHAs) to deliver their babies in a health facility. There are also provisions for cost
reimbursement for transport and incentives to ASHAs for encouraging mothers to opt for
institutional delivery. The scheme is fully sponsored by the Central Government and is
xiv
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
implemented in all States and Union Territories, with special focus on low-performing
States. There is also a provision for roping in the private sector by giving accreditation to
willing private hospitals/nursing homes for providing delivery services. The Scheme has
been implemented in all the 9 AHS States since 2005.
43. In order to gauge the spread and effectiveness of the JSY, Ever Married Women
aged 15-49 years were probed whether they had availed the maternity financial
assistance for safe motherhood under the scheme in respect of their last two outcomes of
delivery resulting in live / still births during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09. The
percentage of mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery, percentage of
mothers who availed financial assistance for institutional delivery and percentage of
mothers who availed financial assistance for Government institutional delivery under
JSY, all in respect of the last outcome of delivery resulting in live birth / still birth, have
been calculated and presented. Since the scope of JSY has been extended to domiciliary
births also, these three sets of indicators would present a holistic picture.
44. The information on childhood immunization, i.e., vaccination coverage, has been
collected for all living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births
during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]. Information on six vaccine preventable diseases
namely, tuberculosis, diphtheria, whooping cough (Pertussis), tetanus, polio and
measles, has been collected with reference to the status as on date of survey. Universal
immunization of children against these six diseases is vital for reducing infant and child
mortality. Whenever the mother had the vaccination card (Immunization / MCH) and if
the card was available at the time of interview, the responses were recorded based on
entries in the card. Otherwise, the responses as reported by the mother were noted
down. For those living children who did not receive any vaccination, the main reason
thereof has also been noted.
45. In conformity with the International and Govt. of India guidelines which specify that
children should be fully vaccinated by the time they complete their first year of life, the
12-23 months age group has been chosen for analysis. The percentage of children having
Immunization Card, percentage of children aged 12-23 months who have received BCG,
percentage of children who have received 3 doses of polio vaccine, percentage of children
who have received polio dose at birth, percentage of children who have received three
doses of DPT vaccine and percentage of children who have received measles vaccine, all
for the age group 12-23 months, have been calculated and presented. Besides the
percentage of children aged 12-23 months who have been fully immunized, the
percentage of children aged 12-23 months who did not receive any vaccination have also
been tabulated in order to portray the complete picture of immunization. According to
the WHO guidelines, children are considered fully immunized when they have received
vaccination against tuberculosis, three doses of DPT, three doses of the poliomyelitis and
one dose of measles.
46. Proper and sufficient intake of Vitamin-A and Iron supplements is essential to
thwart childhood morbidity and mortality. Vitamin-A is an essential micro nutrient for
the immune system and plays an important role in maintaining the epithelial tissues in
the body. Severe Vitamin-A deficiency (VAD) can cause eye damage. VAD has also the
potential to increase the severity of measles and diarrhoeal diseases in children and slow
recovery from illness. Since the human liver can store an adequate amount of the
Immunization
Administration of Vitamin-A and Iron & Folic Acid supplements
xv
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
vitamin for 4-6 months, Vitamin-A dosing every six months is one of the usual methods
for ensuring that children at risk are protected from developing VAD. The National
Programme on Prevention of Blindness mandates that children of age 9 months to 5
years should be administered oral doses of Vitamin-A every six months. In order to
assess the situation, information on children aged 6-35 months who have received at
least one dose of Vitamin-A during the last six months has been collected and presented.
47. Anaemia, which is characterised by a low level of haemoglobin in the blood, is a
great concern in young children because it can result in impaired cognitive performance,
behavioural and motor coordination, language development and scholastic achievement.
It also enhances the risk of morbidity from other infectious diseases. One of the most
vulnerable groups to anaemia is children aged 6-23 months. It was probed from the
mothers of all living children older than 6 months whether IFA tablet / syrup was
administered to the children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births
during reference period, i.e., 2007-09] in the last 3 months. IFA tablet/syrup as
supplements is given to child beyond six months to prevent anaemia. Based on this, the
percentage of children aged 6-35 months who have received IFA tablets / syrup during
last three months has been calculated and presented.
48. Birth weight is an important indicator to measure the vulnerability of a new born to
the risk of childhood illness and chances of survival. The information on birth weight
assists in monitoring programmes to reduce neo-natal and infant mortality through a
reduction in low birth weight infants. The information on birth weight has been collected
in respect of all living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births
during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]. Based on this data, the percentage of children
whose birth weight was taken and percentage of children whose birth weight was less
than 2.5 Kg. have been worked out and presented.
49. Treatment practices and contact with health services among children with the 3
most important childhood illnesses namely, Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI), Fever and
Diarrhoea, help in the assessment of National Programmes aimed at reducing the
mortality impact of these illnesses. The information on children suffering from Acute
Respiratory Infection, Fever and Diarrhoea in respect of all the living children [last two
outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]
during fifteen days preceding the date of survey has been collected. This has been done
to minimise the recall lapse. Besides the prevalence, the information on treatment of ARI
with antibiotics, treatment of fever and the treatment of diarrhoea with Home Available
Fluids (HAF) / fluids prepared from ORS packet has been collected. The treatment of
diarrhoeal diseases with Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) aids in the assessment of
programmes that recommends such treatment. Based on these data, the percentage of
children suffering from Diarrhoea and received HAF / ORS / ORT, percentage of children
suffering from ARI and sought treatment, and percentage of children suffering from fever
and sought treatment have been calculated and presented.
50. Early breastfeeding practices determine the successful establishment and duration
of breastfeeding. It is recommended that children be put to the breast immediately or
within one hour of birth. There is growing evidence of the benefits to mother and child of
Birth weight
Childhood diseases
Child feeding practices
xvi
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
early initiation of breastfeeding preferably in the first hour of the birth. Early initiation of
breastfeeding contributes to reducing neo-natal mortality. It ensures early skin to skin
contact which is important in preventing hypothermia and establishing the bond
between the mother and her child. Early initiation of breastfeeding also reduces the
mother's risk of post partum haemorrhage, one of the leading causes of maternal
mortality. Although breastfeeding is nearly universal in India, very few children are put
to breastfeed immediately after birth. In order to have an assessment with regard to the
time of initiation of breastfeeding, the mothers of all living children [last two outcomes of
pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09] were asked
when did they first breastfeed their baby. Based on this, the percentage of children
breastfed within one hour of birth has been calculated and presented.
51. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of the child's life is an essential
component of the optimal infant and young child feeding practices. The Government of
India recommends that children should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months
of life (i.e., the child should be given only breast milk and nothing else, not even water).
In order to assess the situation on ground, the mothers of all living children [last two
outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]
were asked how many days/months did they exclusively breastfeed their baby. Based on
the responses, percentage of children aged 6-35 months exclusively breastfed for at least
six months has been worked out and presented.
52. The introduction of complementary feeding at six months of age, solid and semi-
solid food and the diverse food combinations fed to children also constitute part of the
optimal feeding practices. The purpose of complementary feeding is to complement the
breast milk and sustain the growth and development of the child. WHO recommends
introduction of solid or semi-solid foods to infants around the age of 6 months because
by that age, breast milk by itself is no longer sufficient to maintain the child's optimal
growth. Information on supplementation was obtained by asking mothers of all living
children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference
period, i.e., 2007-09] at what age did they start feeding the baby food other than breast
milk. The type of food included water, animal milk / formula milk, semi-solid mashed
food, solid (adult) food and vegetables/fruits. Based on these, the percentage of children
who received foods other than breast milk such as water, animal/formula milk, semi-
solid mashed food, solid (adult) food and vegetables/fruits during first six months has
been worked out and presented. Besides, the average month by which children received
these foods have also been worked out and presented.
53. India, being a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989
which recognizes birth registration as one of the first rights of child, is committed to
achieve universalization of birth registration. In India, registration of birth is compulsory
under the Registration of Births and Deaths (RBD) Act, 1969. The Act mandates that
every birth should be registered and a birth certificate provided free of charge to the
informant. Despite significant efforts to improve the Civil Registration System, especially
during the past decade, the overall level of registration of births still falls short by about
25 percent. The registration system in the country functions at different levels of
efficiency across States/UTs. In order to assess the functioning of the Civil Registration
System in the community, information on whether the birth of the baby was registered
Complementary feeding
Birth Registration
xvii
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
with the civil authority and if so, the birth certificate was received or not in respect of all
living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference
period, i.e., 2007-09] has been collected. Based on this, the percentage of children whose
births were registered and the percentage of children whose births were registered & who
also received the Birth Certificates have been arrived at and presented.
54. Under the RBD Act, the institutions where birth takes place is to register the birth
and issue the birth certificate in case they have been declared as the registration units or
to report the event to the local Registrar of Births & Deaths. Of late, majority of the
Government institutions have been declared as registration units. Since a review of the
system across different States/UTs has revealed that due to lack of a proper and
complete reporting system, the institutional births which have already been registered
are not being reflected in the final figures compiled and therefore in order to net all such
cases, it was presumed that the birth would have been registered. However, even in these
cases it was probed whether the birth certificate has been received.
55. This Factsheet pertains to the State of Uttarakhand. The field work for the AHS has
been carried out by M/s. Academy of Management Studies, Lucknow and M/s. EPOS
Health (India) Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon in the allotted zones. The third party audit work in the
State has been done by M/s. TALEEM Research Foundation, Ahmedabad.
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
1
UttarakhandA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
SAMPLE PARTICULARS
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Sample Units Households Population
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Ever Married Women(aged 15-49 years)
Currently Married Women(aged 15-49 years)
Children 12-23 months
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 2501 1962 539 367183 292975 74208 1605561 1280191 325370
Almora 192 173 19 26704 24512 2192 115112 106586 8526
Bageshwar 162 156 6 26569 25707 862 110925 107436 3489
Chamoli 276 236 40 36404 30470 5934 152336 130390 21946
Champawat 42 34 8 5996 5078 918 27823 23475 4348
Dehradun 367 133 234 57093 26131 30962 269201 130475 138726
Haridwar 50 25 25 10163 6478 3685 56828 37547 19281
Nainital 110 59 51 20298 12640 7658 94635 59224 35411
Pauri Garhwal 386 337 49 46093 41377 4716 192088 171778 20310
Pithoragarh 161 136 25 24893 20115 4778 100986 82902 18084
Rudraprayag 225 222 3 32378 32218 160 134713 134068 645
Tehri Garhwal 351 317 34 46867 41791 5076 191953 170848 21105
Udham Singh Nagar 81 45 36 17151 11839 5312 86693 60948 25745
Uttarkashi 98 89 9 16574 14619 1955 72268 64514 7754
Uttarakhand 315432 252852 62580 298921 239397 59524 21971 17922 4049
Almora 22215 20547 1668 20867 19306 1561 1565 1485 80
Bageshwar 22131 21442 689 20930 20287 643 1237 1205 32
Chamoli 29726 25282 4444 28310 24119 4191 2308 2004 304
Champawat 5359 4547 812 5045 4278 767 416 361 55
Dehradun 50717 24287 26430 48486 23300 25186 3862 2111 1751
Haridwar 9826 6213 3613 9486 6018 3468 961 678 283
Nainital 17392 11027 6365 16475 10456 6019 1227 775 452
Pauri Garhwal 39587 35423 4164 37308 33361 3947 2288 2082 206
Pithoragarh 20906 17050 3856 19653 16006 3647 1274 1101 173
Rudraprayag 27569 27456 113 26072 25965 107 1826 1821 5
Tehri Garhwal 41284 36872 4412 38845 34594 4251 2795 2533 262
Udham Singh Nagar 14826 10304 4522 14177 9853 4324 1230 871 359
Uttarkashi 13894 12402 1492 13267 11854 1413 982 895 87
2
UttarakhandA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Sample Units
Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Units
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Almora
Bage
shwar
Chamoli
Champa
wat
Dehradu
n
Haridwar
Nainital
Pauri G
arhw
al
Pithorag
arh
Rudrapray
ag
Tehri G
arhw
al
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Uttarkas
hi
Rural Urban
Rural
78%
Urban
22%
3
UttarakhandA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Sample Households
Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Households
Rural
80%
Urban
20%
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
Almor
a
Bages
hwar
Chamoli
Champa
wat
Dehra
dun
Haridw
ar
Nainita
l
Pauri Gar
hwal
Pithor
agar
h
Rudra
pray
ag
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttarkas
hi
UrbanRural
4
UttarakhandA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Sample Population
Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Population
Rural
80%
Urban
20%
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
Almor
a
Bages
hwar
Chamoli
Champa
wat
Dehra
dun
Haridw
ar
Nainita
l
Pauri Gar
hwal
Pithor
agar
h
Rudra
pray
ag
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttarkas
hi
UrbanRural
5
UttarakhandA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
WEALTH INDEX
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Lowest (20%) Highest (20%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 20.0 24.2 3.5 20.1 12.2 51.0
Almora 23.8 25.9 0.8 8.7 5.7 42.2
Bageshwar 28.9 29.8 3.4 7.2 6.3 35.4
Chamoli 19.0 22.1 3.2 7.8 4.1 27.2
Champawat 32.7 36.1 14.2 16.9 14.8 28.6
Dehradun 5.5 7.9 3.4 52.8 38.8 64.5
Haridwar 14.8 21.8 2.5 31.4 15.4 59.6
Nainital 10.4 14.0 4.4 40.8 35.8 49.1
Pauri Garhwal 22.3 24.6 1.5 18.7 15.5 47.2
Pithoragarh 30.5 37.3 2.0 10.3 5.1 32.1
Rudraprayag 20.7 20.8 0.6 5.1 5.0 28.8
Tehri Garhwal 25.6 28.3 3.2 10.3 6.3 43.2
Udham Singh Nagar 11.8 14.7 5.3 26.0 20.3 38.6
Uttarkashi 31.3 34.9 4.7 11.1 7.7 36.5
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
SC ST ALL
Average Household Size
Uttarakhand 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.6 4.6 4.6
Almora 4.7 4.8 4.2 4.1 3.8 4.5 4.3 4.3 3.9
Bageshwar 4.5 4.5 4.4 3.7 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.2 4.0
Chamoli 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.3 3.7
Champawat 4.9 4.8 5.1 3.2 1.6 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.7
Dehradun 5.2 5.5 5.0 6.3 6.7 4.5 4.7 5.1 4.5
Haridwar 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.6 5.8 5.2
Nainital 4.9 5.0 4.6 5.4 4.8 5.6 4.7 4.8 4.6
Pauri Garhwal 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3
Pithoragarh 4.6 4.6 4.3 3.6 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.1 3.8
Rudraprayag 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.3 0.0 4.2 4.2 4.0
Tehri Garhwal 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.1 4.1 4.2
Udham Singh Nagar 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.9 5.0 5.1 4.8
Uttarkashi 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.0
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Population below age 15 years (%)
Dependency RatioCurrently Married Illiterate
Women aged 15-49 years (%)
Uttarakhand 31.8 33.2 28.4 69.8 75.5 57.1 28.2 32.1 18.6
Almora 30.8 31.4 23.9 75.9 78.1 50.8 14.3 15.2 2.4
Bageshwar 31.5 31.7 28.3 75.5 76.6 55.7 17.9 18.7 3.0
Chamoli 32.1 32.4 30.9 70.7 73.2 59.4 16.5 18.9 5.4
Champawat 35.1 35.3 33.8 80.2 82.8 68.1 29.4 28.5 33.6
Dehradun 27.6 30.6 25.5 59.5 66.2 55.0 22.6 29.7 17.6
Haridwar 34.6 37.9 28.7 73.3 82.0 59.5 46.6 59.8 24.8
Nainital 29.4 29.7 29.0 60.1 62.9 56.2 14.3 15.6 12.4
Pauri Garhwal 31.1 31.6 28.7 74.9 78.4 57.1 21.3 22.4 15.0
Pithoragarh 31.7 31.4 33.0 73.6 75.6 65.1 16.7 19.4 5.1
Rudraprayag 33.0 33.0 30.5 78.7 79.0 54.7 19.2 19.2 18.0
Tehri Garhwal 35.1 35.8 30.8 83.8 88.5 58.6 41.1 45.2 15.9
Udham Singh Nagar 32.2 33.5 30.0 64.5 69.5 56.5 36.7 43.3 25.4
Uttarkashi 33.9 34.5 29.8 73.5 76.1 57.3 42.4 46.1 16.9
6
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand 866 877 833 877 888 846 992 1026 913
Almora 874 879 802 896 899 843 1131 1144 968
Bageshwar 823 831 667 880 885 776 1089 1099 925
Chamoli 857 856 864 879 900 781 1045 1077 903
Champawat 880 853 1017 888 877 943 1017 1045 891
Dehradun 836 876 800 865 880 852 944 953 937
Haridwar 870 870 868 847 842 862 881 868 904
Nainital 918 908 932 882 872 896 910 924 890
Pauri Garhwal 885 890 854 912 920 861 1134 1162 989
Pithoragarh 764 781 668 817 844 699 1067 1084 991
Rudraprayag 861 863 500 894 897 586 1194 1200 720
Tehri Garhwal 890 895 843 922 929 867 1220 1273 929
Udham Singh Nagar 867 914 787 877 912 817 904 918 880
Uttarkashi 868 882 741 921 933 818 996 1012 891
SEX RATIO
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0-4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)
7
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Haridw
ar
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Nainita
l
Dehra
dun
Uttara
khan
d
Uttarka
shi
Champa
wat
Chamoli
Pithor
agar
h
Bages
hwar
Almor
a
Pauri G
arhw
al
Rudra
pray
ag
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0- 4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)
Uttarakhand: Sex Ratio
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Total Rural Urban
Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0- 4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)
Uttarakhand: Sex Ratio
8
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
EFFECTIVE LITERACY RATE
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Person Male Female
Uttarakhand 81.3 78.7 87.6 89.8 88.7 92.2 72.9 69.1 82.6
Almora 85.3 84.4 97.2 95.8 95.5 99.1 76.3 75.0 95.2
Bageshwar 84.1 83.5 95.2 94.8 94.6 98.2 74.6 73.8 92.0
Chamoli 87.0 85.3 94.8 96.6 96.1 98.7 78.0 75.6 90.4
Champawat 81.3 81.5 80.2 92.5 93.7 87.2 70.5 70.2 72.5
Dehradun 84.6 79.7 88.0 89.8 86.4 92.1 79.2 72.7 83.8
Haridwar 74.4 68.7 84.2 81.9 77.7 89.3 65.8 58.3 78.5
Nainital 89.7 88.6 91.2 94.9 95.3 94.3 84.0 81.3 87.8
Pauri Garhwal 81.3 80.1 88.5 91.6 91.3 93.5 72.6 70.8 83.6
Pithoragarh 85.4 83.4 94.5 95.4 94.8 98.2 76.3 73.2 91.0
Rudraprayag 83.7 83.6 90.6 96.2 96.2 95.8 73.6 73.6 83.3
Tehri Garhwal 73.2 70.6 89.0 87.8 86.3 95.0 62.0 59.1 82.6
Udham Singh Nagar 78.7 75.2 84.6 86.2 83.7 90.5 70.4 66.1 78.0
Uttarkashi 77.5 75.8 88.9 90.0 89.2 95.2 65.1 62.9 81.8
9
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
MARRIAGE
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Marriages among Females below legal age (18 years) (%) #
Marriages among Males below legal age (21 years) (%) #
Currently Married Women aged 20-24 years married before legal age (18 years) (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mean age at Marriage#
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Currently Married Men aged 25-29 Yearsmarried before legal age ( 21 years) Male Female
Uttarakhand 3.0 3.7 1.3 5.4 6.7 3.1 25.2 26.6 20.1
Almora 2.0 2.2 0.0 2.9 3.3 0.0 19.0 19.1 17.7
Bageshwar 5.2 5.4 1.8 5.2 5.5 3.0 32.0 32.0 31.6
Chamoli 2.1 2.3 1.0 3.8 4.5 1.2 21.2 21.5 19.1
Champawat 8.1 7.6 10.5 5.0 3.1 11.9 37.2 35.5 47.6
Dehradun 1.1 1.8 0.6 2.9 3.8 2.3 16.8 18.6 14.9
Haridwar 2.4 3.5 1.0 8.0 10.8 4.1 24.1 27.5 14.6
Nainital 1.4 1.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.1 21.6 22.7 19.6
Pauri Garhwal 1.9 2.1 0.9 3.1 3.4 1.8 21.4 21.8 18.0
Pithoragarh 9.2 10.4 3.3 7.2 8.3 2.5 42.8 43.5 38.2
Rudraprayag 2.5 2.6 - 3.2 3.2 - 21.7 21.7 -
Tehri Garhwal 4.1 4.5 1.1 6.6 7.7 3.5 23.6 23.9 20.2
Udham Singh Nagar 3.1 3.8 2.0 7.8 10.0 4.6 28.7 31.1 23.9
Uttarkashi 6.0 6.3 3.3 10.4 11.0 5.1 29.9 29.8 31.6
Uttarakhand 22.6 25.5 15.7 25.8 25.3 26.8 22.0 21.4 23.2
Almora 16.2 16.9 7.7 26.8 26.4 29.6 21.7 21.4 24.6
Bageshwar 26.8 27.5 13.6 25.9 25.7 28.1 21.1 21.0 23.3
Chamoli 21.1 23.0 12.3 26.0 25.5 27.8 21.8 21.6 23.0
Champawat 24.8 24.2 28.6 25.6 25.6 25.4 20.5 20.4 21.1
Dehradun 15.8 17.4 14.5 26.8 26.2 27.3 23.3 22.7 23.7
Haridwar 27.7 33.0 16.1 24.8 23.7 26.5 22.2 21.1 23.7
Nainital 15.4 17.7 12.1 27.3 27.2 27.5 22.8 22.4 23.4
Pauri Garhwal 17.5 18.4 13.2 27.3 27.2 27.9 22.3 22.1 23.4
Pithoragarh 29.0 30.9 19.1 25.7 25.3 27.1 20.6 20.3 21.9
Rudraprayag 22.0 22.0 - 25.9 25.9 - 21.5 21.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 24.0 25.3 18.9 25.7 25.3 27.0 21.4 21.2 23.3
Udham Singh Nagar 23.3 26.4 17.8 24.9 24.3 25.7 21.5 21.1 22.0
Uttarkashi 32.5 33.7 17.5 24.5 24.2 26.9 21.3 21.1 23.3
# Based on marriages taken place during 2007-2009.
# Based on marriages taken place during 2007-2009.
10
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Mea
n a
ge
at M
arri
age
(bas
ed o
n m
arri
ages
tak
en p
lace
du
rin
g 2
007-
2009
)
051015202530 Champa
watPith
oraga
rh
Bages
hwar
Uttarka
shi Te
hri G
arhwal
Rudrap
rayag Udh
am S
ingh N
agar
Almora
Chamoli
Uttarak
hand
Haridw
arPau
ri Garh
wal
Nainita
l
Dehrad
un
Mal
eFe
mal
e
11
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
SCHOOLING STATUS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children currently attending school (Age 6-17 years) (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children attended before / Drop out (Age 6-17 years) (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 92.6 93.0 91.7 93.4 94.2 91.5 91.7 91.7 91.9
Almora 97.3 97.2 98.8 98.1 98.1 98.6 96.5 96.4 99.1
Bageshwar 97.3 97.3 97.4 98.5 98.5 96.8 96.1 96.0 98.1
Chamoli 98.1 97.9 99.0 98.7 98.6 99.2 97.4 97.1 98.9
Champawat 95.0 96.6 87.0 95.6 97.2 88.0 94.3 95.8 85.7
Dehradun 93.1 92.9 93.3 92.9 93.2 92.6 93.4 92.6 94.0
Haridwar 84.5 82.8 88.3 86.7 85.8 88.6 81.8 79.2 88.0
Nainital 93.5 95.5 90.5 93.6 96.7 89.3 93.3 94.2 91.8
Pauri Garhwal 96.1 96.4 94.2 96.8 97.3 93.8 95.4 95.5 94.7
Pithoragarh 97.2 96.7 99.2 98.0 97.6 99.2 96.3 95.7 99.2
Rudraprayag 98.0 98.1 - 98.7 98.7 - 97.3 97.3 -
Tehri Garhwal 96.6 96.4 98.0 97.8 97.8 97.6 95.3 94.9 98.5
Udham Singh Nagar 88.3 88.0 88.9 89.2 89.2 89.2 87.4 86.8 88.6
Uttarkashi 97.6 97.4 98.8 98.1 98.1 98.7 97.0 96.7 98.9
Uttarakhand 6.2 5.9 7.2 5.6 4.9 7.4 6.9 6.9 6.8
Almora 2.5 2.6 0.9 1.8 1.8 1.1 3.2 3.3 0.7
Bageshwar 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.4 1.4 3.0 3.7 3.8 1.9
Chamoli 1.8 2.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.7 2.5 2.7 1.1
Champawat 4.5 3.2 11.1 4.1 2.7 10.5 5.1 3.8 11.9
Dehradun 5.7 6.0 5.4 6.0 5.9 6.1 5.3 6.1 4.6
Haridwar 12.5 13.7 9.9 10.7 11.2 9.6 14.7 16.6 10.2
Nainital 6.0 3.9 9.0 5.9 2.9 10.2 6.1 5.1 7.6
Pauri Garhwal 3.5 3.2 5.5 2.9 2.4 6.0 4.2 4.1 5.0
Pithoragarh 2.7 3.1 0.8 1.9 2.2 0.8 3.5 4.1 0.7
Rudraprayag 1.9 1.8 - 1.2 1.2 - 2.6 2.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 3.1 3.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.3 4.2 4.6 1.3
Udham Singh Nagar 9.5 9.6 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.8 10.0 9.4
Uttarkashi 1.9 2.1 0.7 1.5 1.6 0.9 2.4 2.6 0.5
12
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
WORK STATUS
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children aged 5-14 years engaged in work (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Work Participation Rate (15 years and above)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 2.2 2.0 2.8 2.6 2.3 3.3 1.7 1.6 2.2
Almora 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5
Bageshwar 0.7 0.7 1.5 0.8 0.7 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.6
Chamoli 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7
Champawat 0.4 0.1 1.8 0.6 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.7
Dehradun 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.4 3.3 3.6 2.2 2.2 2.2
Haridwar 5.5 5.1 6.2 6.0 5.6 6.8 4.9 4.6 5.5
Nainital 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.3 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2
Pauri Garhwal 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.5
Pithoragarh 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.8
Rudraprayag 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 2.0 2.1 1.5 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.1
Udham Singh Nagar 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.9 3.0 2.7 1.1 0.9 1.5
Uttarkashi 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.2 0.5
Uttarakhand 37.2 35.2 41.8 67.0 65.3 70.5 8.7 7.6 11.4
Almora 32.1 31.5 38.9 59.6 59.2 63.4 9.9 9.5 14.9
Bageshwar 30.0 29.3 42.2 59.1 58.5 69.4 5.3 4.9 14.7
Chamoli 31.7 30.0 39.8 61.9 60.3 68.8 4.8 4.0 9.4
Champawat 33.5 32.2 39.5 61.4 59.4 70.1 8.2 8.4 7.1
Dehradun 40.6 39.6 41.4 69.0 69.1 69.0 11.4 9.3 12.8
Haridwar 43.0 42.7 43.3 74.0 74.7 72.9 8.4 6.6 11.3
Nainital 39.5 37.7 42.2 68.3 66.1 71.3 8.5 7.4 10.0
Pauri Garhwal 30.2 28.8 38.5 57.8 56.1 66.4 8.3 7.7 12.2
Pithoragarh 31.3 31.1 32.5 60.6 61.1 58.7 6.4 5.7 9.9
Rudraprayag 26.6 26.4 - 57.5 57.2 - 3.9 3.9 -
Tehri Garhwal 29.3 27.5 39.5 60.3 58.5 68.2 7.6 7.3 10.3
Udham Singh Nagar 43.3 42.9 43.9 73.3 73.1 73.6 10.2 10.0 10.6
Uttarkashi 37.2 36.8 39.8 65.3 65.4 64.5 10.5 10.1 13.5
13
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
DISABILITY
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Prevalence of any type of Disability (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand: Prevalence of any type of Disability (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand 1331 1470 991 1554 1730 1147 1107 1217 820
Almora 1317 1342 997 1499 1554 832 1157 1156 1167
Bageshwar 1174 1172 1204 1376 1369 1489 989 993 895
Chamoli 1429 1498 1098 1552 1653 1110 1311 1354 1085
Champawat 1494 1559 1173 1774 1819 1566 1218 1309 732
Dehradun 949 1275 716 1153 1544 875 733 992 546
Haridwar 1549 1668 1333 1863 2000 1609 1192 1286 1027
Nainital 1221 1334 1059 1359 1481 1187 1070 1175 916
Pauri Garhwal 1141 1246 537 1437 1581 675 881 958 396
Pithoragarh 1227 1379 536 1323 1521 463 1138 1248 611
Rudraprayag 1495 1496 - 1684 1692 - 1337 1332 -
Tehri Garhwal 1218 1304 673 1489 1608 859 997 1068 472
Udham Singh Nagar 1567 1802 1161 1786 2095 1264 1324 1482 1045
Uttarkashi 1566 1673 812 1762 1889 925 1369 1459 686
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
14
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Pre
vale
nce
of
any
typ
e o
f D
isab
ility
(P
er 1
00,0
00 P
op
ula
tio
n)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
DehradunPauri G
arhwal
Bageshwar
Tehri G
arhwal
Nainital
Pithoragarh
Almora
Uttarakh
and
Chamoli
ChampawatRudrapraya
g
Haridwar
Uttarka
shi
Udham Singh Nagar
15
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
16
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Major
INJURY
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Severe
Uttarakhand 261 285 204 346 377 274 176 195 126
Almora 123 124 117 159 162 116 92 90 119
Bageshwar 119 112 258 134 123 331 106 103 179
Chamoli 343 315 478 396 355 572 293 278 375
Champawat 274 302 138 378 403 261 173 205 0
Dehradun 220 297 165 273 399 183 164 189 146
Haridwar 285 360 150 410 515 217 143 181 76
Nainital 236 225 251 312 294 337 153 151 156
Pauri Garhwal 222 229 182 271 282 215 179 184 149
Pithoragarh 263 288 149 345 387 165 186 198 133
Rudraprayag 378 381 - 438 440 - 329 331 -
Tehri Garhwal 315 328 232 390 407 302 254 267 157
Udham Singh Nagar 301 329 252 442 465 402 146 182 83
Uttarkashi 382 396 284 452 469 341 311 323 220
Uttarakhand 300 311 272 394 403 373 205 221 163
Almora 126 133 35 163 172 46 94 99 24
Bageshwar 108 107 115 134 132 165 84 85 60
Chamoli 295 281 365 352 333 433 241 232 288
Champawat 346 379 184 417 461 217 277 301 146
Dehradun 266 370 192 361 513 254 165 221 125
Haridwar 444 477 384 628 679 533 235 245 219
Nainital 227 212 249 295 265 337 152 154 150
Pauri Garhwal 205 215 153 224 227 206 189 204 99
Pithoragarh 225 247 122 302 331 176 152 170 67
Rudraprayag 333 337 - 379 384 - 296 298 -
Tehri Garhwal 416 407 474 494 471 612 354 358 325
Udham Singh Nagar 330 332 326 444 434 460 204 222 174
Uttarkashi 385 405 245 442 457 341 328 354 137
INJURY
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Minor
Uttarakhand: Number of Injured Persons (Per 100,000 Population)
by type of Treatment received
Uttarakhand 1234 1247 1202 1636 1649 1607 829 856 758
Almora 246 251 188 276 282 208 220 224 167
Bageshwar 350 367 29 369 386 55 333 349 0
Chamoli 817 576 1973 880 619 2029 756 536 1911
Champawat 1622 1680 1334 1783 1850 1479 1464 1519 1171
Dehradun 1514 1803 1307 2056 2483 1753 939 1089 830
Haridwar 2629 2897 2142 3698 4053 3041 1416 1567 1147
Nainital 494 432 582 593 547 658 385 309 497
Pauri Garhwal 1366 1429 1000 1598 1637 1390 1162 1252 604
Pithoragarh 672 715 476 762 800 595 588 636 355
Rudraprayag 708 715 - 797 807 - 633 638 -
Tehri Garhwal 1715 1821 1042 2095 2231 1371 1406 1503 689
Udham Singh Nagar 865 893 816 1197 1248 1110 497 506 481
Uttarkashi 859 902 555 1048 1111 633 669 696 467
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Severe Major Minor
Person
Male
Female
17
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Utt
arak
han
d:
Nu
mb
er o
f In
jure
d P
erso
ns
by
typ
e o
f Tr
eatm
ent
rece
ived
(P
er 1
00,0
00 P
op
ula
tio
n)
0
100
200
300
400
500 Bagesh
war
Almora
DehradunPauri G
arhwal
Nainital
Uttarakh
and
Pithoragarh
Champawat
Haridwar
Udham Singh NagarTe
hri Garhwal
ChamoliRudrapraya
g
Uttarka
shi
Se
vere
M
ajo
r
18
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
ACUTE ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Diarrhoea/Dysentery
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)
Uttarakhand 675 767 447 646 742 424 703 791 473
Almora 448 446 469 501 496 555 401 402 381
Bageshwar 385 401 86 367 382 110 402 418 60
Chamoli 1824 1569 3048 1708 1493 2653 1936 1640 3487
Champawat 1280 1390 736 1218 1342 652 1340 1436 830
Dehradun 351 401 314 338 388 303 364 415 327
Haridwar 535 687 259 530 678 257 541 698 262
Nainital 453 407 517 408 321 529 501 500 503
Pauri Garhwal 320 317 340 327 321 362 314 313 317
Pithoragarh 955 1055 498 914 1025 430 994 1084 566
Rudraprayag 1083 1091 - 1046 1057 - 1114 1120 -
Tehri Garhwal 367 356 431 364 355 411 369 357 453
Udham Singh Nagar 855 1141 361 809 1089 336 906 1198 390
Uttarkashi 1612 1681 1122 1430 1517 852 1795 1844 1427
Uttarakhand 1983 2004 1930 1861 1906 1759 2105 2100 2118
Almora 239 233 328 268 258 393 214 210 262
Bageshwar 250 257 115 196 201 110 300 309 119
Chamoli 2115 1195 6530 1487 773 4621 2717 1587 8645
Champawat 116 139 0 137 167 0 95 112 0
Dehradun 3004 2904 3075 2796 2719 2851 3224 3098 3314
Haridwar 4392 5741 1945 4209 5451 1915 4599 6074 1978
Nainital 728 243 1418 659 224 1267 803 264 1586
Pauri Garhwal 1745 1748 1728 1671 1688 1586 1809 1799 1873
Pithoragarh 73 77 55 67 75 33 78 79 78
Rudraprayag 2910 2940 - 2531 2565 - 3226 3252 -
Tehri Garhwal 5067 5093 4904 4933 4997 4597 5175 5167 5235
Udham Singh Nagar 419 431 396 395 412 365 445 452 431
Uttarkashi 919 911 980 846 867 706 993 954 1290
19
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
ACUTE ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Fever (All Types)
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Any type of Acute Illness
Uttarakhand 5225 5366 4877 5004 5199 4552 5447 5529 5234
Almora 776 772 833 651 638 809 886 888 858
Bageshwar 1076 1113 373 865 901 221 1271 1305 537
Chamoli 2354 2318 2529 1770 1660 2254 2913 2928 2834
Champawat 2881 3191 1357 2439 2735 1087 3316 3626 1659
Dehradun 1990 3050 1229 1785 2727 1115 2206 3388 1351
Haridwar 18379 21041 13552 17985 20682 13002 18826 21453 14161
Nainital 2603 1561 4086 2296 1381 3576 2939 1755 4657
Pauri Garhwal 1641 1696 1329 1447 1480 1272 1812 1880 1387
Pithoragarh 2212 2265 1969 1861 1858 1872 2541 2641 2066
Rudraprayag 4338 4378 - 2743 2772 - 5673 5715 -
Tehri Garhwal 2769 2994 1355 2175 2377 1106 3252 3473 1624
Udham Singh Nagar 4603 4584 4638 4203 4213 4186 5046 4986 5151
Uttarkashi 3539 3549 3469 2490 2525 2263 4592 4561 4830
Uttarakhand 8448 8736 7742 8029 8403 7163 8870 9060 8375
Almora 1694 1680 1877 1636 1604 2033 1745 1747 1715
Bageshwar 1955 2024 631 1622 1685 496 2261 2332 776
Chamoli 7681 6471 13483 6066 5049 10533 9226 7791 16752
Champawat 4868 5351 2484 4321 4829 2001 5406 5851 3026
Dehradun 5758 6924 4921 5295 6358 4539 6249 7519 5330
Haridwar 24241 28424 16654 23666 27814 16004 24893 29127 17373
Nainital 3982 2384 6258 3586 2118 5640 4416 2671 6950
Pauri Garhwal 4154 4189 3949 3844 3864 3739 4425 4467 4161
Pithoragarh 3579 3708 2992 3096 3183 2720 4032 4193 3265
Rudraprayag 9505 9594 - 7224 7308 - 11413 11497 -
Tehri Garhwal 8493 8747 6899 7762 8035 6315 9088 9300 7527
Udham Singh Nagar 6343 6667 5784 5801 6177 5164 6942 7200 6487
Uttarkashi 7487 7566 6925 5999 6144 5036 8981 8971 905620
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: (Per 100,000 Population)
Persons suffering from Fever (All Types)
Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from any type of Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Diarrhoea/Dysentery (Per 100,000 Population)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
21
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Diarrhoea/Dysentery Acute Respiratory Infection
(ARI)
Fever (All Types)
Total
Rural
Urban
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
Almor
a
Bages
hwar
Pauri Gar
hwal
Dehra
dun
Pithor
agar
h
Chamoli
Nainita
l
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Champa
wat
Uttarkas
hi
Rudra
pray
ag
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttara
khan
d
Haridw
ar
Fever (All Types)Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)Diarrhoea/Dysentery
22
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
ACUTE ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness and taking treatment from Any Source (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Persons suffering from Acute Illness and taking treatment from Government Source (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 96.4 96.1 97.5 96.7 96.3 97.6 96.3 95.8 97.4
Almora 73.6 73.2 79.4 69.6 69.0 75.0 77.0 76.4 84.7
Bageshwar 79.3 79.3 81.8 79.1 79.1 77.8 79.5 79.4 84.6
Chamoli 93.3 92.2 95.8 93.0 91.4 96.3 93.6 92.7 95.8
Champawat 90.1 89.4 97.2 91.3 90.7 97.8 89.5 88.7 96.8
Dehradun 96.5 96.3 96.6 96.1 96.0 96.2 96.8 96.6 97.0
Haridwar 98.6 98.6 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.8 98.6 98.6 98.6
Nainital 97.2 95.8 97.9 97.6 96.0 98.4 96.8 95.6 97.5
Pauri Garhwal 91.9 91.5 94.1 92.2 92.0 93.2 91.6 91.1 95.0
Pithoragarh 91.9 91.3 95.2 91.8 91.3 94.3 91.9 91.3 95.9
Rudraprayag 94.5 94.5 - 94.9 94.9 - 94.3 94.3 -
Tehri Garhwal 94.0 94.3 91.8 94.5 94.9 91.2 93.8 93.9 92.4
Udham Singh Nagar 98.2 98.4 97.9 98.6 98.4 98.9 98.0 98.5 97.2
Uttarkashi 95.3 95.2 96.3 94.7 94.7 94.7 95.7 95.5 97.3
Uttarakhand 12.7 13.7 10.3 11.7 12.3 10.1 13.7 14.9 10.4
Almora 47.7 47.9 44.9 46.5 46.7 45.5 48.5 48.8 44.3
Bageshwar 58.5 58.1 83.3 60.9 60.7 71.4 56.9 56.3 90.9
Chamoli 25.9 29.9 17.2 28.4 32.7 19.8 24.4 28.2 15.4
Champawat 28.3 29.6 15.2 28.5 29.3 20.0 28.1 29.9 11.7
Dehradun 9.2 10.6 7.7 8.9 10.4 7.5 9.4 10.9 8.0
Haridwar 4.2 4.8 2.4 4.3 4.9 2.3 4.2 4.7 2.5
Nainital 38.7 39.8 38.2 38.8 39.4 38.5 38.6 40.1 37.8
Pauri Garhwal 21.7 22.5 17.0 21.6 22.5 16.6 21.8 22.5 17.3
Pithoragarh 43.9 45.3 36.3 43.7 45.3 35.6 44.1 45.3 36.9
Rudraprayag 40.6 40.7 - 37.4 37.4 - 42.4 42.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 11.8 12.3 7.7 11.1 11.6 7.3 12.3 12.7 8.1
Udham Singh Nagar 7.7 7.6 8.0 7.5 7.0 8.6 7.9 8.2 7.5
Uttarkashi 29.0 30.3 19.0 29.6 30.9 18.4 28.6 29.9 19.3
23
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
CHRONIC ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having any kind of Symptoms of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having any kind of Symptoms of Chronic Illness and sought Medical Care (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 9656 9530 9967 7826 7604 8340 11499 11403 11749
Almora 6199 6082 7753 5090 5019 5961 7177 7009 9600
Bageshwar 10014 10142 7538 7222 7346 5019 12574 12684 10263
Chamoli 8932 8619 10435 5960 5987 5843 11776 11061 15522
Champawat 13526 14515 8648 10238 11128 6177 16758 17756 11420
Dehradun 11941 11125 12527 10254 9305 10929 13730 13035 14233
Haridwar 10967 11059 10798 9517 9645 9280 12612 12687 12478
Nainital 6537 5197 8447 5378 4224 6992 7808 6247 10075
Pauri Garhwal 10741 10797 10419 8828 8797 8995 12421 12511 11860
Pithoragarh 14191 14570 12464 10269 10649 8612 17868 18187 16348
Rudraprayag 8064 8132 - 5890 5949 - 9884 9950 -
Tehri Garhwal 14716 15195 11699 11819 12203 9779 17070 17519 13766
Udham Singh Nagar 6043 5823 6425 5179 4928 5603 6999 6796 7358
Uttarkashi 7560 7474 8164 5518 5506 5596 9609 9418 11059
Uttarakhand 88.4 86.2 93.5 90.4 88.2 94.9 87.0 84.9 92.3
Almora 83.2 82.9 87.0 86.8 86.4 90.7 81.0 80.7 84.6
Bageshwar 83.9 83.5 95.1 85.2 84.8 95.6 83.2 82.8 94.8
Chamoli 71.0 74.9 55.7 77.5 79.3 69.3 67.9 72.7 50.1
Champawat 83.9 83.5 87.0 85.4 85.1 87.3 83.0 82.6 86.8
Dehradun 94.3 89.4 97.5 95.0 90.3 97.9 93.8 88.8 97.1
Haridwar 90.8 90.3 91.8 91.4 91.2 91.8 90.3 89.5 91.9
Nainital 90.6 89.3 91.8 92.6 91.0 94.0 89.2 88.0 90.2
Pauri Garhwal 90.8 90.1 94.8 92.1 91.6 94.7 89.9 89.2 94.8
Pithoragarh 85.7 83.6 97.0 85.6 83.4 97.6 85.8 83.7 96.7
Rudraprayag 71.1 71.0 - 75.8 75.7 - 68.7 68.7 -
Tehri Garhwal 87.4 86.2 96.7 89.6 88.3 98.1 86.1 85.1 95.6
Udham Singh Nagar 93.9 91.7 97.2 94.1 91.9 97.4 93.6 91.5 97.1
Uttarkashi 79.0 81.0 66.7 85.1 85.5 82.6 75.5 78.3 57.6
24
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Hypertension
CHRONIC ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Diabetes
Uttarakhand 669 356 1436 732 393 1517 606 321 1348
Almora 182 150 610 237 205 624 134 102 596
Bageshwar 157 139 516 188 171 496 129 109 537
Chamoli 268 126 952 313 156 1006 225 98 893
Champawat 415 364 667 495 460 652 337 272 683
Dehradun 1628 934 2125 1706 984 2219 1545 882 2025
Haridwar 532 127 1265 561 121 1372 499 134 1147
Nainital 937 544 1497 1016 589 1614 850 496 1365
Pauri Garhwal 792 705 1290 899 793 1458 697 630 1120
Pithoragarh 307 208 758 369 252 881 248 168 633
Rudraprayag 136 134 - 151 146 - 123 124 -
Tehri Garhwal 542 378 1568 695 492 1773 417 290 1348
Udham Singh Nagar 675 470 1029 673 466 1023 678 475 1037
Uttarkashi 206 121 812 223 109 973 190 132 631
Uttarakhand 1005 664 1843 798 520 1442 1214 804 2283
Almora 583 466 2135 558 456 1802 605 475 2477
Bageshwar 429 409 831 382 369 607 473 444 1074
Chamoli 528 368 1294 500 362 1110 554 374 1498
Champawat 917 902 989 786 796 739 1045 1003 1269
Dehradun 2228 1297 2897 1861 951 2508 2618 1659 3313
Haridwar 875 508 1540 535 269 1027 1261 784 2109
Nainital 1372 893 2053 996 703 1406 1783 1098 2778
Pauri Garhwal 1216 1110 1827 1011 932 1429 1396 1262 2229
Pithoragarh 1214 940 2466 1068 815 2170 1351 1054 2765
Rudraprayag 405 410 - 381 386 - 426 429 -
Tehri Garhwal 1060 833 2488 935 740 1974 1162 906 3040
Udham Singh Nagar 408 309 579 278 192 424 552 437 755
Uttarkashi 441 385 838 347 304 633 536 466 1070
25
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Diabetes (Per 100,000 Population)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Rudrapray
ag
Bage
shwar
Almora
Uttarkas
hi
Chamoli
Pithorag
arh
Champa
wat
Haridw
ar
Tehri G
arhw
al
Uttarakh
and
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Pauri G
arhw
al
Nainita
l
Dehradu
n
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Diabetes (Per 100,000 Population)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
26
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Hypertension (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Hypertension (Per 100,000 Population)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Rudrap
raya
g
Udha
m Singh
Nag
ar
Bage
shwa
r
Uttarkas
hi
Cham
oli
Almora
Harid
war
Cham
pawa
t
Uttarakh
and
Tehri G
arhw
al
Pithorag
arh
Pauri G
arhw
al
Nainita
l
Dehrad
un
27
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
28
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
CHRONIC ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Tuberculosis (TB)
Uttarakhand 189 189 187 219 223 210 158 156 163
Almora 92 96 47 103 108 46 83 85 48
Bageshwar 86 86 86 103 100 165 71 74 0
Chamoli 68 71 55 81 86 61 55 56 48
Champawat 126 124 138 116 131 43 137 117 244
Dehradun 159 168 153 177 174 180 140 161 124
Haridwar 370 405 306 418 479 306 316 321 306
Nainital 124 89 172 141 81 225 105 98 114
Pauri Garhwal 117 120 98 157 163 127 82 84 69
Pithoragarh 121 132 72 132 145 77 112 121 67
Rudraprayag 78 79 - 81 82 - 75 75 -
Tehri Garhwal 174 182 123 210 222 146 145 151 98
Udham Singh Nagar 272 302 221 312 350 248 228 249 191
Uttarkashi 147 159 64 161 171 97 133 147 27
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Asthma / Chronic Respiratory Disease
Uttarakhand 550 614 393 631 730 404 469 502 382
Almora 492 510 258 613 642 254 386 395 262
Bageshwar 1144 1168 688 1354 1402 496 952 955 895
Chamoli 489 518 351 543 586 355 438 455 346
Champawat 1304 1466 506 1353 1545 478 1256 1390 537
Dehradun 470 476 466 507 511 504 432 439 426
Haridwar 346 385 275 437 530 267 243 219 284
Nainital 378 344 426 425 399 460 327 283 389
Pauri Garhwal 450 467 350 606 646 392 313 314 307
Pithoragarh 1526 1668 874 1595 1787 760 1461 1560 988
Rudraprayag 430 434 - 558 565 - 322 324 -
Tehri Garhwal 819 877 455 1183 1311 503 524 541 403
Udham Singh Nagar 385 419 326 386 425 321 383 412 332
Uttarkashi 374 401 181 483 515 268 264 288 82
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Tuberculosis (TB) (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Tuberculosis (TB) (Per 100,000 Population)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Chamoli
Rudrapray
ag
Bage
shwar
Almora
Pauri G
arhw
al
Pithorag
arh
Nainital
Champa
wat
Uttarkas
hi
Dehradu
n
Tehri G
arhw
al
Uttarakh
and
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Haridwar
29
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Asthma/Chronic Respiratory Disease (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Asthma/Chronic Respiratory Disease (Per 100,000 Population)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Haridw
ar
Uttark
ashi
Nainita
l
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Rudra
pray
ag
Pauri
Garhw
al
Dehra
dun
Cham
oli
Almor
a
Uttara
khan
d
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Bages
hwar
Cham
pawat
Pithor
agar
h
30
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
31
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
CHRONIC ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Arthritis
Uttarakhand 1358 1509 988 731 834 493 1989 2165 1531
Almora 1512 1504 1619 809 803 878 2132 2114 2382
Bageshwar 3922 4001 2379 2184 2248 1048 5515 5596 3819
Chamoli 1737 1909 916 1016 1156 399 2427 2606 1489
Champawat 3464 3821 1702 2050 2337 739 4854 5242 2782
Dehradun 971 958 980 476 535 434 1496 1402 1564
Haridwar 648 625 690 487 521 425 832 746 983
Nainital 1041 1104 952 484 532 417 1652 1721 1550
Pauri Garhwal 952 993 719 478 517 274 1369 1401 1169
Pithoragarh 4878 5073 3987 2380 2507 1828 7219 7441 6164
Rudraprayag 2175 2191 - 1134 1145 - 3046 3062 -
Tehri Garhwal 997 1030 787 569 599 411 1344 1365 1191
Udham Singh Nagar 676 617 777 392 343 475 990 917 1120
Uttarkashi 769 772 748 483 486 462 1057 1055 1070
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Any kind of Chronic Illness
Uttarakhand 8005 7579 9049 6752 6274 7861 9266 8850 10351
Almora 5497 5339 7589 4595 4484 5938 6293 6085 9290
Bageshwar 8601 8665 7366 6302 6380 4909 10709 10742 10024
Chamoli 5448 5281 6252 4230 4059 4985 6614 6415 7655
Champawat 11466 12238 7659 8808 9538 5481 14078 14822 10102
Dehradun 10371 9077 11301 9074 7695 10056 11747 10527 12631
Haridwar 9074 8806 9559 8183 7861 8777 10085 9895 10424
Nainital 6348 4779 8582 5295 3896 7254 7501 5733 10069
Pauri Garhwal 8289 8236 8597 7184 7102 7615 9259 9206 9591
Pithoragarh 12321 12354 12171 8870 8959 8480 15557 15486 15893
Rudraprayag 6314 6364 - 4854 4900 - 7536 7584 -
Tehri Garhwal 9394 9220 10486 8320 8174 9093 10266 10032 11985
Udham Singh Nagar 5734 5543 6063 4899 4673 5281 6658 6491 6951
Uttarkashi 6116 6134 5984 4955 4920 5182 7282 7334 6888
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Arthritis (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Arthritis (Per 100,000 Population)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Har
idwar
Udh
am Singh
Nag
ar
Uttar
kash
i
Paur
i Gar
hwal
Deh
radu
n
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Nainital
Uttarak
hand
Almor
a
Cham
oli
Rudr
apraya
g
Cham
pawat
Bage
shwar
Pith
orag
arh
32
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
Chamoli
Almora
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Uttarkas
hi
Rudrapray
ag
Nainital
Uttarakh
and
Pauri G
arhw
al
Bage
shwar
Haridwar
Tehri G
arhw
al
Dehradu
n
Champa
wat
Pithorag
arh
33
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
CHRONIC ILLNESS
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness and getting Regular Treatment (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness and getting Regular Treatment from Government Source (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 60.7 54.3 73.6 63.6 57.1 75.5 58.5 52.4 72.0
Almora 47.3 47.7 43.0 50.9 51.9 42.0 44.9 45.1 43.6
Bageshwar 42.5 41.9 56.0 44.8 44.3 56.2 41.2 40.5 56.0
Chamoli 47.3 41.4 70.9 52.1 45.7 74.8 44.3 38.9 68.1
Champawat 48.4 47.4 56.5 53.6 52.6 61.1 45.2 44.2 53.6
Dehradun 73.6 65.1 78.5 75.1 66.4 79.8 72.3 64.0 77.3
Haridwar 57.4 45.6 77.0 59.2 47.0 79.3 55.7 44.3 74.9
Nainital 67.2 67.1 67.4 68.1 68.4 67.9 66.6 66.1 66.9
Pauri Garhwal 67.2 65.8 74.7 70.1 68.7 77.0 65.1 63.8 72.8
Pithoragarh 46.2 45.4 49.7 50.1 49.1 54.3 44.1 43.4 47.2
Rudraprayag 44.4 44.4 - 48.2 48.2 - 42.3 42.3 -
Tehri Garhwal 65.0 62.6 77.9 69.1 67.0 79.3 62.2 59.9 76.8
Udham Singh Nagar 68.8 63.9 76.5 69.8 65.3 76.6 67.9 62.8 76.4
Uttarkashi 58.2 58.2 58.2 59.6 59.8 58.7 57.2 57.2 57.8
Uttarakhand 26.4 29.2 21.0 25.5 28.4 20.5 27.0 29.7 21.5
Almora 50.4 50.5 49.2 51.9 52.5 46.7 49.4 49.3 50.8
Bageshwar 56.3 55.4 78.3 55.9 54.9 79.3 56.5 55.6 77.8
Chamoli 56.1 59.1 44.9 56.5 60.8 41.8 55.9 58.0 47.2
Champawat 22.9 24.0 14.8 23.0 24.3 12.8 22.9 23.8 15.9
Dehradun 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 14.6 15.3 15.1 15.4 14.9
Haridwar 9.5 8.2 11.4 10.1 8.5 12.4 8.8 7.8 10.4
Nainital 48.5 52.2 45.6 47.5 52.1 44.2 49.3 52.4 46.8
Pauri Garhwal 21.8 21.4 24.0 22.9 22.5 24.6 21.0 20.6 23.4
Pithoragarh 41.5 43.6 32.5 43.5 45.6 34.0 40.5 42.5 31.6
Rudraprayag 52.4 52.4 - 54.6 54.7 - 51.2 51.2 -
Tehri Garhwal 15.1 15.4 13.6 14.8 14.9 14.5 15.4 15.8 13.0
Udham Singh Nagar 20.1 23.1 15.7 19.7 23.2 14.8 20.4 23.0 16.5
Uttarkashi 39.5 40.6 32.1 37.7 39.6 27.6 40.6 41.3 36.0
34
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
PERSONAL HABITS (15 YEARS AND ABOVE )
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Population by habit of Chewing with Tobacco (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Population by habit of Chewing without Tobacco (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 8.8 9.4 7.3 15.7 17.4 12.3 2.1 2.2 2.0
Almora 9.4 9.7 5.5 19.2 20.1 10.6 1.5 1.5 0.5
Bageshwar 14.3 14.6 9.8 25.8 26.3 18.8 4.6 4.8 0.8
Chamoli 10.9 11.6 7.9 21.8 23.4 15.2 1.2 1.4 0.2
Champawat 11.3 11.7 9.3 22.4 23.9 15.7 1.2 1.0 2.5
Dehradun 7.8 9.2 6.9 13.5 16.0 11.9 1.9 2.3 1.6
Haridwar 6.8 7.5 5.8 9.6 10.2 8.8 3.7 4.5 2.6
Nainital 8.8 9.8 7.3 15.8 18.4 12.2 1.1 0.6 1.8
Pauri Garhwal 5.0 4.9 5.3 10.3 10.3 10.0 0.7 0.7 1.0
Pithoragarh 14.8 16.2 8.7 28.2 30.7 16.9 3.5 3.9 1.6
Rudraprayag 7.4 7.3 - 16.6 16.5 - 0.5 0.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 4.3 3.9 6.9 9.8 9.0 13.2 0.5 0.5 0.5
Udham Singh Nagar 10.9 11.8 9.5 17.8 19.4 15.1 3.4 3.4 3.3
Uttarkashi 8.4 8.6 7.2 16.2 16.6 13.8 1.0 1.1 0.2
Uttarakhand 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.7
Almora 1.1 1.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.9
Bageshwar 2.4 2.4 1.4 4.2 4.3 2.5 0.8 0.8 0.4
Chamoli 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1
Champawat 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.7 2.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5
Dehradun 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4
Haridwar 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.9
Nainital 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.6 0.6 0.3 1.1
Pauri Garhwal 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2
Pithoragarh 1.3 1.4 1.1 2.4 2.4 2.1 0.5 0.5 0.3
Rudraprayag 0.8 0.8 - 1.5 1.5 - 0.2 0.2 -
Tehri Garhwal 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1
Udham Singh Nagar 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.0
Uttarkashi 1.1 1.2 0.3 2.0 2.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2
35
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
PERSONAL HABITS (15 YEARS AND ABOVE )
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Population by habit of Smoking (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Population by habit of Drinking Alcohol (%)
Person Male Female
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 13.8 16.0 8.7 24.8 28.9 16.1 3.2 4.1 1.0
Almora 14.7 15.3 7.5 29.3 30.7 14.7 3.0 3.1 0.5
Bageshwar 20.2 20.6 11.8 34.3 35.0 22.5 8.2 8.5 1.1
Chamoli 19.8 20.7 15.4 37.0 38.8 29.4 4.4 5.2 0.7
Champawat 13.1 14.2 7.7 24.2 26.5 14.1 3.1 3.5 1.0
Dehradun 10.2 13.2 8.3 17.8 21.7 15.2 2.4 4.5 1.1
Haridwar 15.6 19.6 9.2 25.4 30.9 16.4 4.7 6.8 1.5
Nainital 10.1 11.6 7.9 18.7 21.6 14.8 0.8 1.0 0.4
Pauri Garhwal 15.8 16.9 9.9 30.0 32.1 19.5 4.6 5.2 0.7
Pithoragarh 15.7 17.7 6.8 29.1 32.5 13.1 4.4 5.1 1.4
Rudraprayag 18.4 18.4 - 40.7 40.9 - 1.9 1.9 -
Tehri Garhwal 16.1 16.8 12.0 34.6 37.2 23.1 3.2 3.5 0.6
Udham Singh Nagar 9.6 10.8 7.8 17.1 18.9 14.1 1.5 1.9 0.8
Uttarkashi 17.8 18.5 12.9 32.3 33.5 24.4 4.0 4.5 0.7
Uttarakhand 11.6 12.9 8.5 23.0 26.2 16.2 0.7 0.8 0.4
Almora 11.9 12.1 9.3 25.8 26.5 18.4 0.7 0.7 0.4
Bageshwar 17.3 17.5 12.8 36.8 37.5 25.1 0.8 0.8 0.3
Chamoli 20.0 20.2 19.2 41.7 42.8 37.0 0.7 0.8 0.5
Champawat 14.2 15.2 9.2 29.3 32.0 17.5 0.6 0.6 0.4
Dehradun 11.3 12.2 10.7 21.3 22.7 20.4 1.0 1.5 0.7
Haridwar 6.8 7.5 5.7 12.4 13.5 10.6 0.5 0.6 0.4
Nainital 9.4 11.8 6.0 17.8 22.5 11.4 0.4 0.5 0.1
Pauri Garhwal 14.2 14.8 11.0 31.1 32.9 22.3 0.8 0.8 0.4
Pithoragarh 15.9 17.1 10.0 33.3 36.1 20.7 1.1 1.2 0.8
Rudraprayag 17.9 17.9 - 41.6 41.7 - 0.5 0.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 14.0 14.1 13.6 33.0 34.4 26.5 0.8 0.8 0.3
Udham Singh Nagar 7.9 9.1 5.8 14.7 17.1 10.9 0.3 0.4 0.2
Uttarkashi 16.1 15.8 18.1 31.9 31.5 34.7 1.0 1.0 0.4
36
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Chewing with Tobacco Chewing without Tobacco
Person FemaleMale
Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Chewing with/without Tobacco (%)
Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Smoking (%)
Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Drinking Alcohol (%)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Person Male Female
Total
Rural
Urban
37
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand 36.5 37.2 33.6 31.4 33.4 25.7
Almora 29.7 30.2 16.0 25.3 26.1 9.9
Bageshwar 36.3 36.2 38.2 26.0 26.5 13.8
Chamoli 38.2 38.2 38.2 26.4 27.7 19.6
Champawat 41.5 41.3 42.7 34.1 33.4 37.7
Dehradun 32.4 35.3 28.8 24.2 28.9 19.9
Haridwar 40.6 43.7 27.9 43.8 49.3 29.7
Nainital 37.3 36.9 37.9 29.2 28.8 29.7
Pauri Garhwal 28.0 28.0 28.5 29.7 30.3 25.5
Pithoragarh 40.4 39.9 44.4 21.3 22.2 16.1
Rudraprayag 37.7 37.3 - 26.2 26.2 -
Tehri Garhwal 34.5 34.3 36.9 32.5 33.3 25.6
Udham Singh Nagar 36.7 37.2 35.7 32.9 35.4 28.1
Uttarkashi 40.6 40.3 44.1 26.5 26.6 25.4
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate Total Fertility Rate
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
FERTILITY
Uttarakhand 18.6 19.3 16.7 12.0 12.4 11.0 2.3 2.4 2.0
Almora 16.3 16.7 12.1 10.3 10.4 7.8 2.0 - -
Bageshwar 14.7 14.7 13.0 7.4 7.5 6.0 1.8 - -
Chamoli 17.7 17.9 16.7 12.4 12.2 13.5 2.0 - -
Champawat 17.3 17.1 18.2 11.9 11.6 13.4 2.2 - -
Dehradun 17.9 20.7 15.9 11.0 13.3 9.3 2.2 - -
Haridwar 22.7 25.3 18.1 14.8 17.0 10.9 3.1 - -
Nainital 16.8 16.6 17.1 11.3 10.6 12.2 2.1 - -
Pauri Garhwal 19.9 20.5 16.4 11.5 11.7 10.5 2.4 - -
Pithoragarh 14.7 15.4 11.8 8.8 8.8 8.7 1.7 - -
Rudraprayag 16.4 16.5 - 10.4 10.5 - 1.8 - -
Tehri Garhwal 22.4 23.1 17.8 13.1 13.4 10.9 2.6 - -
Udham Singh Nagar 18.6 19.1 17.9 13.3 13.4 13.1 2.4 - -
Uttarkashi 16.1 16.6 12.5 11.5 11.8 8.7 1.9 - -
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Women aged 20-24 reporting birth of order 2 & above (%)
Women reporting birth of order 3 & above (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
38
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Crude Birth Rate and Natural Growth Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
Total Rural Urban
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate
Uttarakhand: Crude Birth Rate and Natural Growth Rate
0
5
10
15
20
25
Bages
hwar
Pithor
agar
h
Uttarka
shi
Almor
a
Rudra
pray
ag
Nainita
l
Champa
wat
Chamoli
Dehra
dun
Uttara
khan
d
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Pauri G
arhw
al
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Haridw
ar
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate
39
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Total Fertility Rate
Uttarakhand: Total Fertility Rate
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Total Rural Urban
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Pithorag
arh
Bage
shwar
Rudrapray
ag
Uttarkas
hi
Chamoli
Almora
Nainital
Champa
wat
Dehradu
n
Uttarakh
and
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Pauri G
arhw
al
Tehri G
arhw
al
Haridwar
40
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Women with two children wanting no more children (%)
Women aged 15-19 years who were already mothers or pregnant at the time of survey (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 78.4 73.6 85.2 41.4 41.0 43.5
Almora 50.0 48.6 64.4 32.6 32.5 37.5
Bageshwar 51.6 51.1 59.8 38.8 38.7 50.0
Chamoli 38.9 33.7 57.2 44.8 42.7 60.5
Champawat 53.5 50.7 63.7 42.4 44.9 26.7
Dehradun 88.5 84.9 90.3 41.5 42.3 40.5
Haridwar 74.2 65.0 82.0 37.1 37.0 37.5
Nainital 65.9 64.8 67.1 46.0 49.0 37.1
Pauri Garhwal 85.4 84.5 88.8 37.2 36.1 52.2
Pithoragarh 53.9 50.1 66.5 48.3 47.8 53.6
Rudraprayag 47.5 47.1 - 35.1 35.1 -
Tehri Garhwal 73.6 68.3 89.8 33.7 33.3 43.5
Udham Singh Nagar 62.3 60.1 65.6 50.1 50.7 48.4
Uttarkashi 70.4 66.2 87.2 42.3 42.3 40.0
FERTILITY
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Median age at first live birth of Women aged 15-49 years
Median age at first live birth of Women aged 25-49 years
Live Births taking place after an interval of 36 months (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 22.2 21.8 23.3 21.7 21.2 22.8 37.9 36.2 42.8
Almora 22.0 21.9 24.1 21.4 21.3 23.6 44.4 43.9 56.5
Bageshwar 21.5 21.4 22.4 21.0 21.0 21.9 51.5 50.8 66.7
Chamoli 22.1 22.0 22.6 21.6 21.4 22.3 37.1 36.1 42.7
Champawat 20.8 20.7 21.4 20.4 20.2 21.1 44.3 46.5 34.5
Dehradun 23.6 22.9 24.1 23.1 22.4 23.6 39.8 33.4 46.4
Haridwar 21.9 21.2 23.2 21.3 20.7 22.6 32.2 28.6 43.1
Nainital 23.0 22.6 23.7 22.5 22.1 23.1 38.4 34.0 44.3
Pauri Garhwal 22.3 22.2 23.3 21.9 21.8 22.9 45.7 46.0 43.8
Pithoragarh 20.9 20.8 21.8 20.7 20.5 21.5 46.2 44.1 58.4
Rudraprayag 21.9 21.9 - 21.4 21.4 - 42.9 42.9 -
Tehri Garhwal 21.8 21.7 22.7 21.4 21.3 22.3 41.6 41.2 44.8
Udham Singh Nagar 22.1 21.8 22.7 21.4 21.1 22.0 31.2 29.7 34.2
Uttarkashi 21.8 21.6 23.1 21.3 21.1 22.6 35.2 33.5 49.7
41
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
42
UttarakhandA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Women aged 15-19 years who were already mothers or pregnant at the time of survey (%)
Uttarakhand: Median age of Women at first live birth
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Champa
wat
Pithor
agar
h
Bages
hwar
Uttarkas
hi
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Rudra
pray
ag
Haridw
ar
Almor
a
Chamoli
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttara
khan
d
Pauri Gar
hwal
Nainita
l
Dehra
dun
Age 15-49 years Age 25-49 years
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Almor
a
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Rudra
pray
ag
Haridw
ar
Pauri Gar
hwal
Bages
hwar
Uttara
khan
d
Dehra
dun
Uttarkas
hi
Champa
wat
Chamoli
Nainita
l
Pithor
agar
h
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
43
UttarakhandA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
FERTILITY
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mean number of children ever born to Women aged 15-49 years
Mean number of children surviving to Women aged 15-49 years
Mean number of children ever born to Women aged 45-49 years
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.9 4.1 3.5
Almora 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.0 3.6 3.6 2.7
Bageshwar 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.4 2.8
Chamoli 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.3
Champawat 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.9 3.9 4.0
Dehradun 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.2 3.4 3.8 3.2
Haridwar 3.2 3.6 2.6 2.9 3.1 2.4 5.0 5.8 4.0
Nainital 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.6 3.7
Pauri Garhwal 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 3.9 4.0 3.5
Pithoragarh 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 3.3 3.3 2.9
Rudraprayag 2.5 2.5 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.6 3.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 2.9 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 4.4 4.5 3.5
Udham Singh Nagar 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 4.1 4.3 3.9
Uttarkashi 2.8 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 4.1 4.2 3.4
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Pregnancy to Women aged 15-49 years resulting in abortion (%)
Women who received any ANC before abortion (%)
Women who went for Ultrasound before abortion (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
ABORTION
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Average Month of pregnancy at the time of abortion
Abortion performed by skilled health personnel (%)
Abortion taking place in Institution (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 4.5 3.9 6.2 52.4 43.1 68.7 31.6 23.7 45.3
Almora 1.0 1.0 0.3 40.8 39.8 100.0 23.6 22.3 100.0
Bageshwar 1.5 1.5 0.0 26.8 26.8 0.0 18.3 18.3 0.0
Chamoli 1.4 1.4 1.5 38.9 35.3 56.3 21.7 21.0 25.0
Champawat 1.4 1.3 1.8 59.7 55.5 75.0 34.1 29.7 50.0
Dehradun 7.9 7.0 8.7 58.7 48.5 66.1 37.2 31.1 41.6
Haridwar 8.7 8.3 9.5 51.2 41.8 72.2 29.2 20.6 48.5
Nainital 3.3 2.0 5.1 80.6 79.0 81.4 47.4 38.5 52.3
Pauri Garhwal 4.5 4.0 8.2 36.7 36.2 38.5 23.6 24.3 21.5
Pithoragarh 1.2 1.4 0.2 39.0 37.8 100.0 20.5 20.9 0.0
Rudraprayag 1.2 1.2 - 29.2 29.2 - 24.1 24.1 -
Tehri Garhwal 5.3 5.0 7.9 35.0 32.6 46.7 21.3 17.8 38.7
Udham Singh Nagar 1.6 1.3 2.2 63.9 54.0 75.0 47.1 38.2 57.1
Uttarkashi 2.9 2.9 2.8 45.1 46.0 37.5 18.8 18.0 25.0
Uttarakhand 2.8 2.9 2.5 57.4 53.1 64.8 54.3 50.1 61.7
Almora 3.7 3.7 3.0 31.3 30.0 100.0 27.5 26.2 100.0
Bageshwar 3.6 3.6 0.0 38.0 38.0 - 33.8 33.8 -
Chamoli 4.2 4.2 4.2 32.1 29.8 43.8 30.2 28.7 37.5
Champawat 4.7 4.6 5.3 56.9 51.9 75.0 51.1 44.5 75.0
Dehradun 2.5 2.6 2.5 63.0 60.8 64.7 61.3 59.8 62.3
Haridwar 2.5 2.6 2.3 60.5 56.7 69.1 58.2 53.8 68.0
Nainital 3.2 3.7 3.0 63.6 67.1 61.6 53.1 58.7 50.0
Pauri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.5 49.1 46.6 56.9 47.4 46.3 50.8
Pithoragarh 4.1 4.1 3.0 40.6 39.5 100.0 29.0 27.7 100.0
Rudraprayag 3.7 3.7 - 51.8 51.8 - 50.5 50.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.4 50.1 51.7 42.7 47.0 49.0 37.3
Udham Singh Nagar 3.3 3.4 3.0 52.1 38.2 67.9 47.5 32.6 64.3
Uttarkashi 3.4 3.5 2.4 40.0 37.4 62.5 37.0 34.1 62.5
44
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Pregnancy to Women aged 15-49 years resulting in abortion (%)
Uttarakhand: Abortion where ultrasound was performed/Abortion performed by skilled health personnel (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Almor
a
Chamoli
Bages
hwar
Uttarkas
hi
Pithor
agar
h
Pauri Gar
hwal
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Rudra
pray
ag
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Champa
wat
Uttara
khan
d
Haridw
ar
Dehra
dun
Nainita
l
Ultrasound before abortion Performed by skilled health personnel
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Almor
a
Rudra
pray
ag
Pithor
agar
h
Cham
pawat
Cham
oli
Bages
hwar
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttark
ashi
Nainita
l
Uttara
khan
d
Pauri
Garhw
al
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Dehra
dun
Haridw
ar
45
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES (CMW AGED 15-49 YEARS)
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Current Usage
Any Method (%) Any Modern Method (%) Female Sterilization (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Current Usage
Male Sterilization (%) Copper-T/IUD (%) Pills (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 62.7 61.4 66.0 55.4 55.5 55.0 32.5 37.3 20.6
Almora 59.7 59.8 59.2 58.7 58.8 57.3 45.0 45.7 35.5
Bageshwar 61.3 60.9 69.0 58.2 57.7 67.4 38.6 38.8 34.7
Chamoli 66.5 66.1 68.3 65.9 65.6 67.4 57.8 59.8 48.4
Champawat 65.5 65.1 67.6 61.3 61.3 61.4 43.5 46.8 26.7
Dehradun 67.1 66.4 67.6 53.7 54.7 53.0 22.5 27.9 18.7
Haridwar 53.7 48.3 62.7 41.9 36.6 50.8 12.9 13.7 11.7
Nainital 66.2 68.8 62.3 61.8 65.7 56.0 29.2 35.9 19.2
Pauri Garhwal 64.6 63.7 69.3 52.7 52.3 54.8 36.2 38.4 23.5
Pithoragarh 64.9 65.7 61.3 62.9 63.5 60.3 48.5 50.9 38.5
Rudraprayag 59.4 59.3 - 58.5 58.4 - 53.7 53.8 -
Tehri Garhwal 60.2 58.9 67.9 50.9 50.1 55.5 41.3 43.0 30.4
Udham Singh Nagar 66.4 64.3 70.1 58.2 58.9 57.1 24.5 27.7 19.0
Uttarkashi 62.6 62.3 64.3 58.7 58.7 58.4 45.1 46.4 35.6
Uttarakhand 1.5 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.6 4.1 3.8 4.9
Almora 3.5 3.6 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 2.4 2.3 4.6
Bageshwar 6.8 7.0 2.2 0.5 0.4 2.0 3.3 2.5 18.9
Chamoli 2.1 2.4 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.6 2.9
Champawat 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.1 4.6 3.9 7.9
Dehradun 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.9 1.5 2.2 4.8 5.5 4.3
Haridwar 0.3 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.0 1.3 5.5 5.9 4.8
Nainital 2.8 4.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.5 7.2 7.7 6.4
Pauri Garhwal 1.2 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.0 2.8 3.0 2.6 5.2
Pithoragarh 1.2 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.7 2.6 2.4 3.5
Rudraprayag 1.0 1.0 - 0.2 0.2 - 0.7 0.7 -
Tehri Garhwal 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 1.5 2.3 1.9 5.0
Udham Singh Nagar 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.8 1.5 5.2 5.5 4.9
Uttarkashi 3.7 3.9 2.4 0.7 0.6 1.4 3.2 3.1 3.8
46
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES (CMW AGED 15-49 YEARS)
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Current Usage
Condom/Nirodh (%) Emergency Contraceptive Pills (%) Any Traditional Method (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Current Usage
Periodic Abstinence (%) Withdrawal (%) LAM (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 15.9 11.5 26.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 7.4 5.9 11.0
Almora 7.2 6.7 14.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.1 1.0 1.9
Bageshwar 8.7 8.7 8.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 3.1 3.2 1.6
Chamoli 4.4 2.3 14.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9
Champawat 12.5 9.9 25.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.1 3.7 6.2
Dehradun 22.9 18.1 26.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 13.4 11.7 14.5
Haridwar 21.5 15.2 31.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 11.8 11.7 12.0
Nainital 21.1 16.8 27.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.4 3.1 6.2
Pauri Garhwal 10.7 8.7 22.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 11.9 11.4 14.5
Pithoragarh 10.0 8.4 17.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.0 2.2 0.9
Rudraprayag 2.7 2.6 - 0.1 0.1 - 0.9 0.9 -
Tehri Garhwal 5.9 4.1 17.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 9.3 8.8 12.4
Udham Singh Nagar 27.0 24.5 31.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 8.2 5.4 13.0
Uttarkashi 5.6 4.3 14.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 3.9 3.6 5.9
Uttarakhand 4.3 3.4 6.7 1.7 1.3 2.7 1.2 1.1 1.3
Almora 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.0
Bageshwar 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 0.0
Chamoli 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3
Champawat 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.1 1.7 4.5 1.9 2.0 1.5
Dehradun 10.0 8.6 10.9 2.2 1.8 2.4 1.0 1.1 0.9
Haridwar 7.1 6.7 7.6 2.4 2.1 2.9 2.0 2.5 1.1
Nainital 0.4 0.2 0.6 2.9 2.3 3.9 0.9 0.6 1.4
Pauri Garhwal 9.0 8.8 10.5 1.5 1.4 2.0 1.2 1.1 1.5
Pithoragarh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.3
Rudraprayag 0.1 0.1 - 0.4 0.4 - 0.4 0.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 6.8 6.4 9.3 1.0 0.8 2.0 1.4 1.5 0.9
Udham Singh Nagar 4.2 2.7 6.9 2.1 1.5 3.2 1.6 1.0 2.5
Uttarkashi 2.5 2.4 2.7 0.6 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.7
47
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
48
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Cu
rren
t U
sag
e o
f F
amily
Pla
nn
ing
Pra
ctic
es (
CM
W a
ged
15-
49 y
ears
) (%
)
Udham Singh N
agar
0102030405060708090100
Haridwar
Rudraprayag
Almora
Tehri G
arhwal
Bageshwar
Uttarka
shi
Uttarakh
andPauri G
arhwal
Pithoragarh
Champawat
Nainital
Chamoli
Dehradun
Any
Met
hod
Any
Mod
ern
Met
hod
Any
Trad
ition
al M
etho
d Fe
mal
e St
eriliz
atio
n
UNMET NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Unmet need for Spacing (%)
Unmet need for Limiting (%)
Total Unmet need (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 12.0 13.1 9.4 11.2 11.6 10.1 23.2 24.7 19.5
Almora 12.2 12.4 9.5 13.5 12.9 20.3 25.7 25.4 29.8
Bageshwar 13.2 13.4 9.7 14.4 14.7 9.9 27.7 28.1 19.6
Chamoli 12.9 13.6 9.8 7.9 7.3 10.4 20.7 20.9 20.2
Champawat 13.1 13.8 9.2 10.3 10.4 9.6 23.3 24.2 18.9
Dehradun 7.9 9.0 7.1 8.9 9.4 8.6 16.8 18.4 15.7
Haridwar 14.7 17.6 9.9 14.5 16.8 10.6 29.2 34.4 20.5
Nainital 12.1 12.9 10.9 10.5 8.9 12.8 22.5 21.8 23.7
Pauri Garhwal 8.6 8.8 7.2 11.0 11.6 7.6 19.6 20.4 14.9
Pithoragarh 12.8 13.5 9.8 12.2 10.6 19.3 25.1 24.1 29.1
Rudraprayag 13.3 13.3 - 13.4 13.3 - 26.6 26.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 10.5 11.2 6.1 10.9 11.0 10.1 21.4 22.2 16.2
Udham Singh Nagar 13.9 14.9 12.1 9.1 10.3 7.0 23.0 25.2 19.1
Uttarkashi 12.1 12.6 8.1 10.3 9.9 13.1 22.3 22.5 21.2
49
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
ANTE NATAL CARE
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered for ANC (%)
Mothers who received any Antenatal Check-up (%)
Mothers who had Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 68.5 65.2 79.2 84.4 81.2 93.3 59.5 53.5 76.2
Almora 66.7 65.9 80.4 85.8 85.1 97.0 42.0 40.3 71.6
Bageshwar 62.1 61.4 79.2 81.9 81.2 98.4 51.6 50.6 73.6
Chamoli 70.0 67.0 86.5 80.2 77.1 96.0 45.5 41.1 67.9
Champawat 59.6 61.0 52.4 86.3 85.4 90.6 56.4 53.6 70.7
Dehradun 81.7 77.6 85.7 94.2 92.6 95.7 77.3 72.7 81.5
Haridwar 69.5 65.8 80.9 85.1 82.1 92.2 64.6 60.0 75.9
Nainital 73.2 65.9 84.6 88.6 84.8 93.9 67.7 61.7 76.2
Pauri Garhwal 75.8 75.3 79.4 88.1 86.8 96.6 58.4 55.7 76.6
Pithoragarh 63.2 60.4 84.5 82.6 79.9 98.6 49.7 45.6 74.1
Rudraprayag 54.8 54.5 - 66.4 66.2 - 41.9 41.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 64.9 63.0 86.7 72.6 69.7 96.1 48.2 44.7 76.1
Udham Singh Nagar 64.4 62.0 69.5 82.6 79.2 88.9 62.5 57.2 72.5
Uttarkashi 67.4 66.5 77.8 80.1 78.3 94.2 48.9 46.2 70.3
Uttarakhand: Antenatal Care (%)
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rudrap
raya
g
Tehri G
arhw
al
Uttarkas
hi
Cham
oli
Bage
shwa
r
Udha
m Singh
Nag
ar
Pithorag
arh
Uttarakh
and
Harid
war
Almora
Cham
pawa
t
Pauri G
arhw
al
Nainita
l
Dehrad
un
Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered for ANC Mothers who received any Antenatal Check-up Mothers who had Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester
50
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mothers who had Full Antenatal Check-up (%)
Mothers who received ANC from Govt. Source (%)
Mothers whose Blood Pressure (BP) taken (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
ANTE NATAL CARE
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mothers who received 3 or more Antenatal Care (%)
Mothers who received at least one Tetanus Toxoid (TT) injection (%)
Mothers who consumed IFA for 100 days or more (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 52.3 44.2 74.8 83.6 80.4 92.5 14.9 12.6 21.4
Almora 40.2 37.8 84.1 85.6 85.0 97.0 23.2 22.1 42.4
Bageshwar 47.2 45.2 92.0 81.6 80.9 98.4 17.4 17.1 23.2
Chamoli 44.3 39.3 69.9 79.9 76.8 95.6 7.0 5.5 14.6
Champawat 50.3 46.5 69.6 86.3 85.4 90.6 14.1 15.0 9.9
Dehradun 74.8 68.2 80.6 93.1 91.3 94.8 24.5 20.9 27.7
Haridwar 54.7 46.2 75.4 83.2 80.2 90.4 8.2 4.6 16.7
Nainital 61.7 52.7 74.4 88.3 84.6 93.5 21.1 20.5 22.0
Pauri Garhwal 47.4 43.8 71.4 87.3 86.0 95.7 13.4 13.0 15.8
Pithoragarh 50.7 45.6 81.2 82.4 79.7 98.3 16.6 15.8 20.8
Rudraprayag 39.9 39.6 - 66.4 66.2 - 5.4 5.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 34.0 29.2 72.1 71.3 68.4 95.0 10.1 10.2 9.5
Udham Singh Nagar 51.4 42.6 67.8 82.3 78.8 88.8 15.0 11.6 21.3
Uttarkashi 37.2 33.2 68.7 78.7 76.9 93.4 9.1 7.7 19.7
Uttarakhand 11.1 8.3 19.0 69.7 75.1 56.6 55.7 48.2 76.5
Almora 13.7 12.3 39.1 81.2 80.9 86.3 61.8 60.3 89.7
Bageshwar 8.2 7.6 22.4 81.3 80.5 95.9 53.2 51.4 92.0
Chamoli 4.8 3.4 11.8 81.6 79.4 90.1 45.4 40.3 70.8
Champawat 8.3 8.5 7.3 82.6 82.4 83.8 57.5 56.9 60.7
Dehradun 22.7 18.6 26.5 58.8 67.5 51.4 77.2 68.0 85.3
Haridwar 7.0 3.5 15.4 40.3 45.7 28.8 41.9 31.8 66.2
Nainital 17.0 15.9 18.6 75.5 74.6 76.7 74.6 68.7 82.8
Pauri Garhwal 9.6 8.8 14.4 80.7 81.5 75.6 51.7 48.5 73.1
Pithoragarh 12.1 11.2 17.1 86.0 84.2 94.7 47.6 41.7 82.9
Rudraprayag 3.7 3.8 - 76.8 76.6 - 34.3 34.1 -
Tehri Garhwal 5.8 5.5 7.8 74.2 76.2 62.5 36.8 31.4 79.5
Udham Singh Nagar 9.9 6.1 16.8 52.4 53.8 50.0 62.4 57.4 71.6
Uttarkashi 6.4 5.0 18.1 89.6 90.7 82.4 47.2 43.6 76.4
51
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
ANTE NATAL CARE
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mothers whose Blood taken for Hb (%)
Mothers who underwent Ultrasound (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 47.0 38.9 69.4 43.9 35.3 68.0
Almora 46.8 44.8 81.9 43.4 41.0 84.9
Bageshwar 38.8 37.0 79.2 31.4 29.5 73.6
Chamoli 30.4 24.7 59.0 21.9 16.9 47.1
Champawat 33.0 30.8 44.0 26.9 25.5 34.0
Dehradun 71.1 62.2 79.0 70.0 61.6 77.4
Haridwar 34.1 23.9 58.7 40.6 29.8 66.7
Nainital 72.8 65.8 82.7 67.9 59.9 79.2
Pauri Garhwal 46.3 43.8 63.5 38.7 35.8 58.3
Pithoragarh 37.3 31.5 71.7 34.4 28.8 67.8
Rudraprayag 25.0 24.8 - 22.9 22.7 -
Tehri Garhwal 32.0 26.9 73.0 28.1 22.7 71.5
Udham Singh Nagar 52.6 47.9 61.2 44.8 38.6 56.3
Uttarkashi 38.8 34.2 75.7 25.3 21.7 53.7
Uttarakhand: Mothers who received Full Antenatal Check-up (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rudra
pray
ag
Cham
oli
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Uttark
ashi
Haridw
ar
Bages
hwar
Cham
pawat
Pauri
Garhw
al
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttara
khan
d
Pithor
agar
h
Almor
a
Nainita
l
Dehra
dun
3 or more Antenatal care At least one Tetanus Toxoid (TT) injecction IFA for 100 days or more Full Antenatal Check-up
52
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Mo
ther
s w
ho
rec
eive
d t
ests
du
rin
g A
nte
Nat
al C
hec
k-u
p (
%)
0102030405060708090
Chamoli
Rudra
pray
ag
Uttarka
shi
Champa
watTe
hri G
arhw
al
Bages
hwar
Pithor
agar
hPau
ri Gar
hwal
Haridw
ar
Almor
a
Uttara
khan
dUdh
am S
ingh N
agar
Nainita
l
Dehra
dun
Blo
od T
est f
or H
bU
ltras
ound
Blo
od P
ress
ure
(BP
)
53
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
DELIVERY CARE
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Institutional Delivery (%)Delivery at
Government Institution (%)Delivery at
Private Institution (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand: Institutional Delivery (%)
Uttarakhand 50.5 43.2 71.1 29.9 28.7 33.1 20.3 14.3 37.1
Almora 39.8 37.5 80.8 35.3 33.5 67.9 4.4 4.0 12.5
Bageshwar 33.9 32.4 68.0 30.5 29.2 60.0 3.4 3.2 8.0
Chamoli 34.7 29.0 63.8 32.2 27.5 55.6 2.5 1.4 8.1
Champawat 59.7 58.8 64.4 51.5 52.4 47.1 8.2 6.4 17.3
Dehradun 70.2 61.1 78.4 35.0 35.1 34.9 34.1 25.6 41.7
Haridwar 48.7 38.8 72.4 13.1 12.4 14.6 35.3 26.3 56.8
Nainital 57.7 51.1 66.9 40.0 36.8 44.5 17.6 14.2 22.4
Pauri Garhwal 52.8 49.6 74.9 38.5 36.6 51.3 13.8 12.5 23.1
Pithoragarh 49.4 43.7 83.2 46.8 41.4 79.0 2.5 2.2 4.2
Rudraprayag 35.3 35.0 - 31.7 31.5 - 3.5 3.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 38.7 33.5 80.0 26.1 23.9 44.1 11.9 9.3 33.0
Udham Singh Nagar 51.5 46.5 60.8 23.0 22.9 23.1 28.5 23.5 37.7
Uttarkashi 50.5 47.3 75.7 43.2 42.1 51.7 6.6 4.8 20.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Harid
war
Udha
m Singh
Nag
ar
Tehri G
arhw
al
Uttarakh
and
Bage
shwa
r
Rudrap
raya
g
Cham
oli
Dehrad
un
Almora
Pauri G
arhw
al
Nainita
l
Uttarkas
hi
Pithorag
arh
Cham
pawa
t
Government Private
54
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
DELIVERY CARE
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Delivery at Home (%)Delivery at home conducted by
skilled health personnel (%)Safe Delivery (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand: Safe Delivery (%)
Uttarakhand 49.0 56.4 28.4 32.0 28.4 52.1 56.9 49.4 77.6
Almora 60.0 62.3 19.2 35.0 34.4 67.3 60.8 58.9 93.7
Bageshwar 65.8 67.4 32.0 16.9 15.9 62.5 45.0 43.1 88.0
Chamoli 65.2 70.9 36.2 34.9 34.0 43.1 57.4 53.1 79.4
Champawat 39.9 40.8 35.6 20.0 16.9 38.2 67.7 65.6 78.0
Dehradun 29.4 38.3 21.4 39.7 35.9 45.7 75.8 67.8 82.8
Haridwar 50.4 60.5 26.1 32.0 29.8 43.9 52.8 42.9 76.6
Nainital 42.0 48.5 32.8 51.9 43.0 70.5 79.5 72.0 90.0
Pauri Garhwal 46.6 49.8 24.3 18.3 16.7 39.6 58.2 54.9 80.6
Pithoragarh 50.4 56.1 16.4 23.1 22.4 38.1 61.0 56.2 89.5
Rudraprayag 64.6 64.8 - 16.2 16.2 - 45.7 45.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 60.7 65.9 19.6 13.3 12.2 42.7 43.1 37.7 85.9
Udham Singh Nagar 48.4 53.4 39.0 44.7 40.3 55.9 73.1 68.0 82.6
Uttarkashi 48.9 52.1 23.9 28.0 27.2 40.3 52.9 49.5 79.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Tehri G
arhw
al
Bage
shwar
Rudrapray
ag
Haridwar
Uttarkas
hi
Uttarakh
and
Chamoli
Pauri G
arhw
al
Almora
Pithorag
arh
Champa
wat
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Dehradu
n
Nainital
55
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
DELIVERY CARE
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Government Institutions (%)
Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Private Institutions (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand: Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Government/Private Institutions (%)
Uttarakhand 10.1 8.1 15.1 30.4 28.4 32.5
Almora 8.8 7.1 23.9 38.7 34.6 61.8
Bageshwar 5.7 5.3 9.3 36.5 34.9 50.0
Chamoli 7.0 6.4 8.4 29.3 34.4 25.0
Champawat 3.6 3.5 4.4 37.5 39.7 33.3
Dehradun 19.1 16.1 21.7 31.3 30.5 31.8
Haridwar 8.8 5.8 15.0 27.8 26.0 29.8
Nainital 13.4 10.5 16.7 47.2 43.8 50.3
Pauri Garhwal 9.5 8.5 14.3 28.7 26.6 36.6
Pithoragarh 6.5 5.7 9.2 33.1 30.9 40.0
Rudraprayag 10.4 10.3 - 25.4 25.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 8.9 7.9 13.4 21.2 21.0 21.6
Udham Singh Nagar 7.7 7.9 7.5 28.2 26.6 30.1
Uttarkashi 5.9 5.4 9.0 34.6 28.1 46.3
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Tehri G
arhw
al
Rudrapray
ag
Haridwar
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Pauri G
arhw
al
Chamoli
Uttarakh
and
Dehradu
n
Pithorag
arh
Uttarkas
hi
Bage
shwar
Champa
wat
Almora
Nainital
Government Private
56
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
POST NATAL CARE
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Less than 24 hrs. stay in institution after delivery (%)
Mothers who received Post-natal Check-up within 48 hrs. of delivery (%)
Mothers who received Post-natal Check-up within 1 week of delivery (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mothers who did not receive any Post-natal check-up (%)
New borns who were checked up within 24 hrs. of birth (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 40.5 41.7 38.5 59.1 51.0 81.5 61.4 53.7 83.0
Almora 36.3 34.8 48.4 50.2 48.3 84.9 54.3 52.4 87.5
Bageshwar 40.0 38.3 57.1 39.0 37.5 72.8 41.3 39.8 75.2
Chamoli 43.7 44.3 42.5 35.5 29.1 68.0 38.5 32.1 70.9
Champawat 79.8 81.1 73.8 60.1 58.1 70.2 63.5 61.6 73.3
Dehradun 48.3 50.0 47.1 79.3 70.9 86.7 81.0 73.7 87.5
Haridwar 34.7 35.2 34.0 61.8 53.7 81.3 63.0 55.4 81.3
Nainital 30.0 28.5 31.7 64.3 59.1 71.7 67.0 62.1 74.0
Pauri Garhwal 45.3 47.1 36.9 59.6 55.2 89.8 61.7 57.3 91.7
Pithoragarh 42.9 44.1 39.1 54.1 48.7 86.3 55.7 50.2 88.3
Rudraprayag 36.5 36.5 - 34.1 33.8 - 37.7 37.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 48.2 48.6 46.6 42.5 36.6 89.7 45.2 39.5 90.7
Udham Singh Nagar 32.6 36.0 27.7 65.7 56.9 82.0 69.2 60.8 84.6
Uttarkashi 45.8 44.8 50.5 52.9 49.8 77.2 52.9 49.8 77.2
Uttarakhand 35.8 42.9 16.1 59.3 51.4 81.3
Almora 42.4 44.2 10.3 50.1 48.3 83.7
Bageshwar 53.7 55.1 24.0 39.2 37.6 72.8
Chamoli 47.1 52.2 21.4 35.0 28.8 66.5
Champawat 32.8 34.3 25.1 63.8 62.1 72.8
Dehradun 18.2 25.3 12.0 79.5 71.4 86.8
Haridwar 36.5 44.1 18.3 61.3 53.2 80.4
Nainital 29.9 34.2 23.7 63.0 57.1 71.5
Pauri Garhwal 33.0 36.6 8.0 59.4 55.1 88.5
Pithoragarh 39.3 44.4 9.5 53.6 48.0 86.6
Rudraprayag 53.4 53.6 - 36.1 35.8 -
Tehri Garhwal 51.2 56.8 7.1 43.0 37.2 89.9
Udham Singh Nagar 30.5 38.8 15.2 67.8 60.1 82.1
Uttarkashi 47.1 50.2 22.8 52.1 49.0 77.0
57
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Utt
arak
han
d:
Mo
ther
s b
y st
atu
s o
f re
ceip
t o
f P
ost
-nat
al C
hec
k-u
p (
%)
0102030405060708090100 Rudrapraya
g
Chamoli
Bageshwar
Tehri G
arhwal
Almora
Uttarka
shi
Pithoragarh
Uttarakh
andPauri G
arhwal
Champawat
Haridwar
Nainital
Udham Singh Nagar
Dehradun
Did
not r
eceiv
eCh
eck-
up w
ithin
48 h
rs.
58
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
JANANI SURAKSHA YOJANA (JSY)
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery under JSY (%)
Mothers who availed financial assistance for institutional delivery under JSY (%)
Mothers who availed financial assistance for Government Institutional delivery under JSY (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 26.9 26.7 27.3 51.4 61.5 36.4 81.1 83.3 76.0
Almora 29.9 29.0 45.4 72.8 74.8 56.4 81.1 82.7 66.8
Bageshwar 26.5 25.7 44.8 75.6 76.5 65.9 83.2 84.0 74.7
Chamoli 27.3 24.3 42.4 78.0 83.1 66.3 83.4 86.7 75.3
Champawat 50.0 51.6 41.9 80.4 83.9 64.2 93.2 94.1 87.8
Dehradun 28.6 30.7 26.7 40.0 47.8 34.4 76.6 79.4 74.1
Haridwar 10.9 10.8 11.0 21.7 26.6 15.4 78.2 79.8 75.0
Nainital 29.6 29.5 29.6 51.0 57.3 44.2 73.0 79.0 66.0
Pauri Garhwal 32.5 30.9 44.0 61.1 61.6 58.7 82.3 81.8 84.9
Pithoragarh 39.6 36.8 56.1 79.4 83.3 67.4 83.1 87.0 70.8
Rudraprayag 27.4 27.1 - 76.8 76.4 - 84.5 84.3 -
Tehri Garhwal 21.3 19.4 36.4 54.3 56.3 47.2 78.0 77.1 81.8
Udham Singh Nagar 20.1 19.5 21.1 38.5 41.4 34.4 84.7 82.6 88.6
Uttarkashi 41.5 40.7 47.9 80.5 83.5 64.9 92.1 92.4 90.3
Uttarakhand: Mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery under JSY (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Haridwar
Udham
Singh
Nag
ar
Tehri G
arhw
al
Bage
shwar
Uttarakh
and
Chamoli
Rudrapray
ag
Dehradu
n
Nainital
Almora
Pauri G
arhw
al
Pithorag
arh
Uttarkas
hi
Champa
wat
Any delivery Institutional delivery Government Institutional delivery
59
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
IMMUNIZATION, VITAMIN A & IRON SUPPLEMENT AND BIRTH WEIGHT
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children aged 12-23 months having Immunization Card (%)
Children aged 12-23 months who have received BCG (%)
Children aged 12-23 months who havereceived 3 doses of Polio vaccine (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children aged 12-23 months who have received 3 doses of DPT vaccine (%)
Children aged 12-23 months who have received Measles vaccine (%)
Children aged 12-23 months Fully Immunized (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 87.2 85.8 91.2 91.9 91.1 94.1 83.2 81.9 86.9
Almora 96.2 96.1 98.8 95.8 95.7 97.5 90.0 89.8 93.8
Bageshwar 87.2 86.6 100.0 93.2 93.0 96.9 90.0 89.6 100.0
Chamoli 93.7 93.7 93.8 95.5 95.3 97.0 87.7 87.2 90.1
Champawat 92.8 93.1 90.9 94.4 94.1 96.4 92.9 93.5 89.1
Dehradun 91.8 89.8 93.7 95.2 93.8 96.4 89.1 86.0 92.1
Haridwar 68.8 62.0 83.7 81.5 78.8 87.6 64.4 59.0 76.3
Nainital 94.6 96.0 92.7 95.6 96.3 94.7 90.5 92.0 88.3
Pauri Garhwal 89.9 91.0 82.5 94.6 95.0 92.2 83.2 83.7 79.6
Pithoragarh 92.8 91.9 98.3 97.0 96.5 100.0 92.7 92.0 97.1
Rudraprayag 92.8 92.7 - 95.6 95.5 - 80.6 80.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 85.2 83.9 95.0 88.5 87.2 98.1 81.2 79.9 91.2
Udham Singh Nagar 92.9 92.6 93.3 95.2 95.0 95.5 90.1 90.1 90.0
Uttarkashi 83.2 81.8 95.4 89.3 88.6 95.4 75.9 76.8 67.8
Uttarakhand 83.0 81.6 86.7 82.6 81.7 85.0 75.4 73.8 79.9
Almora 89.4 89.4 88.8 90.6 90.3 97.5 77.6 77.3 83.8
Bageshwar 89.8 89.4 100.0 87.2 86.9 93.8 78.8 78.3 90.6
Chamoli 86.8 86.4 89.1 88.5 88.1 90.5 80.9 80.1 84.9
Champawat 92.9 93.5 89.1 88.2 89.6 80.0 86.4 87.8 78.2
Dehradun 87.7 84.7 90.5 89.0 85.8 91.9 83.7 79.3 87.7
Haridwar 65.4 59.5 78.4 65.0 59.6 77.0 55.3 49.3 68.6
Nainital 90.5 92.0 88.3 89.1 90.0 87.8 85.5 86.5 84.1
Pauri Garhwal 82.1 82.7 78.6 87.6 87.5 88.8 76.9 76.9 76.7
Pithoragarh 92.7 92.0 97.1 91.4 90.4 97.7 87.5 86.2 96.0
Rudraprayag 80.6 80.5 - 86.6 86.6 - 73.5 73.4 -
Tehri Garhwal 79.8 78.5 89.7 82.0 80.7 91.2 75.6 74.1 86.6
Udham Singh Nagar 90.1 90.1 90.0 82.9 85.3 78.6 80.2 81.6 77.7
Uttarkashi 75.9 77.2 64.4 81.9 81.4 86.2 67.7 68.6 59.8
60
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
61
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Utt
arak
han
d:
Ch
ildre
n a
ged
12-
23 m
on
ths
hav
ing
Imm
un
izat
ion
Car
d v
s. F
ully
Imm
un
ized
(%
)
0102030405060708090100
Haridw
ar
Uttarka
shi
Rudra
pray
ag
Uttara
khan
dTe
hri G
arhw
alPau
ri Gar
hwal
Almor
a
Bages
hwar Udh
am S
ingh N
agar
Chamoli
Dehra
dun
Nainita
l
Champa
wat
Pithor
agar
h
Hav
ing
Imm
uniz
atio
n C
ard
Chi
ldre
n F
ully
Imm
uniz
ed
IMMUNIZATION, VITAMIN A & IRON SUPPLEMENT AND BIRTH WEIGHT
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children who have received Polio dose at birth (%)
Children who did not receive any vaccination (%)
Children (aged 6-35 months) who received at least one Vitamin A dose during last six months (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children (aged 6-35 months) who received IFA tablets/syrup during last 3 months (%)
Children whose birth weight was taken (%)
Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 75.8 72.7 84.2 5.8 6.1 5.0 55.0 54.1 57.2
Almora 72.0 70.8 95.0 1.4 1.4 1.3 51.2 51.0 55.7
Bageshwar 51.9 50.2 93.8 2.5 2.6 0.0 37.2 36.8 45.4
Chamoli 50.6 46.8 70.4 2.6 2.6 2.3 50.5 48.3 62.5
Champawat 49.8 51.1 41.8 2.8 2.6 3.6 29.3 30.4 24.2
Dehradun 88.2 85.5 90.6 4.0 4.7 3.3 62.1 61.0 63.1
Haridwar 75.8 72.1 84.1 14.2 15.8 10.6 48.0 46.1 52.4
Nainital 83.3 82.8 84.1 2.4 1.6 3.8 65.3 66.4 63.7
Pauri Garhwal 91.6 92.1 88.3 3.8 3.8 3.9 69.9 71.8 57.7
Pithoragarh 68.0 64.6 89.6 1.6 1.9 0.0 43.0 41.8 50.4
Rudraprayag 62.6 62.5 - 2.8 2.8 - 61.8 61.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 76.1 73.4 96.2 8.0 8.8 1.9 65.0 63.7 74.9
Udham Singh Nagar 74.6 73.5 76.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 53.8 54.6 52.2
Uttarkashi 86.3 85.2 96.6 8.0 8.6 3.4 63.7 65.2 51.5
Uttarakhand 14.3 14.7 13.4 41.0 33.8 61.2 24.1 25.5 21.8
Almora 28.7 27.8 46.1 33.5 31.1 77.0 26.8 27.9 18.9
Bageshwar 8.2 7.6 19.6 27.1 25.6 60.8 31.4 32.0 26.6
Chamoli 26.1 27.9 16.3 26.8 22.1 50.4 17.1 17.1 16.9
Champawat 9.3 10.1 5.5 29.9 30.1 29.0 35.4 32.9 47.7
Dehradun 10.0 11.0 9.1 59.2 49.9 67.7 23.7 25.0 22.9
Haridwar 8.6 7.9 10.3 31.9 21.8 57.1 31.6 39.2 25.1
Nainital 20.9 20.9 20.8 56.6 52.0 63.1 24.3 24.0 24.6
Pauri Garhwal 7.4 7.8 5.1 44.7 42.1 62.6 20.7 20.0 24.0
Pithoragarh 9.2 10.1 4.0 43.9 38.5 76.1 26.8 27.6 24.5
Rudraprayag 23.3 23.1 - 26.8 26.5 - 14.1 14.3 -
Tehri Garhwal 6.9 6.6 9.0 29.6 24.4 70.4 24.1 25.5 20.2
Udham Singh Nagar 16.6 16.8 16.0 46.1 40.9 55.7 17.7 20.0 14.7
Uttarkashi 16.5 16.1 20.1 37.9 35.1 61.2 29.5 29.6 29.3
62
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)
Uttarakhand: Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Rudra
pray
ag
Chamoli
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Pauri Gar
hwal
Dehra
dun
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Uttara
khan
d
Nainita
l
Almor
a
Pithor
agar
h
Uttarkas
hi
Bages
hwar
Haridw
ar
Champa
wat
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Total Rural Urban
63
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
CHILDHOOD DISEASES
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children suffering from Diarrhoea (%)
Children suffering from Diarrhoea who received HAF/ORS/ORT (%)
Children suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection who sought treatment (%)
Children suffering from Fever (%)
Children suffering from Fever who sought treatment (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 9.6 10.6 6.8 83.3 83.1 84.1 7.3 7.3 7.5
Almora 5.3 5.2 5.9 87.1 86.3 100.0 3.1 3.0 4.5
Bageshwar 1.9 2.0 0.8 83.7 85.2 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.8
Chamoli 9.6 9.7 9.3 84.4 82.2 95.8 6.7 4.9 16.2
Champawat 8.3 8.6 6.8 83.4 83.0 85.7 1.6 1.5 2.4
Dehradun 7.1 8.5 5.9 79.3 73.2 87.3 8.3 9.3 7.5
Haridwar 13.0 15.4 7.3 79.2 78.8 81.0 12.4 13.1 10.6
Nainital 8.4 9.6 6.7 92.3 92.3 92.3 5.8 5.1 6.8
Pauri Garhwal 6.8 6.7 7.1 79.5 78.2 88.0 5.7 5.5 7.1
Pithoragarh 4.8 5.3 2.1 91.7 92.2 84.6 1.0 1.1 0.5
Rudraprayag 8.3 8.3 - 85.5 85.5 - 6.1 6.1 -
Tehri Garhwal 5.3 5.5 3.6 79.7 78.9 90.0 6.2 6.1 6.9
Udham Singh Nagar 13.5 16.5 7.9 85.2 87.6 76.0 8.8 10.6 5.5
Uttarkashi 21.7 22.6 13.9 84.8 84.9 84.2 7.5 7.7 5.9
Uttarakhand 95.1 94.3 97.2 20.2 20.4 19.7 91.5 90.9 93.5
Almora 84.5 83.3 100.0 6.1 5.9 10.1 82.2 81.9 86.2
Bageshwar 87.2 86.8 100.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 79.0 78.0 100.0
Chamoli 91.1 88.0 95.8 11.9 11.0 16.6 87.5 87.6 87.1
Champawat 89.2 85.6 100.0 10.5 11.1 7.7 81.6 82.6 75.0
Dehradun 96.9 96.2 97.6 15.7 18.9 12.7 89.5 90.4 88.4
Haridwar 99.0 98.7 100.0 41.9 43.6 37.6 93.8 93.0 96.0
Nainital 92.5 93.5 91.4 14.3 14.5 14.1 92.4 93.1 91.3
Pauri Garhwal 91.5 91.0 94.0 12.7 12.4 14.8 87.0 86.1 92.3
Pithoragarh 88.1 87.3 100.0 6.1 6.3 5.2 87.9 87.5 90.6
Rudraprayag 95.4 95.4 - 10.9 10.9 - 87.9 87.8 -
Tehri Garhwal 87.6 87.6 87.7 14.2 14.1 15.3 82.3 80.6 94.5
Udham Singh Nagar 94.8 93.7 98.5 23.8 26.1 19.6 95.3 95.3 95.4
Uttarkashi 93.4 93.3 93.8 31.2 32.2 23.1 87.4 87.0 92.1
64
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Ch
ildh
oo
d D
isea
ses
(%)
0510152025303540
Bages
hwar
Almora
Pithora
garh
Champa
watRud
rapray
ag
Chamoli
Pauri G
arhwal
Tehri
Garh
wal
Nainita
l
Dehrad
un
Uttarak
hand Udh
am S
ingh N
agar
Uttarka
shi
Haridw
ar
Dia
rrhoe
aAc
ute
Res
pira
tory
Infe
ctio
nFe
ver
65
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
BREASTFEEDING AND SUPPLEMENTATION
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Children breastfed within one hour of birth (%)
Children aged 6-35 months exclusively breastfed for at least six months (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand: Children breastfed within one hour of birth (%)
Uttarakhand 63.2 66.0 55.2 38.2 39.2 35.0
Almora 79.2 79.7 70.0 37.7 37.5 41.6
Bageshwar 62.6 62.8 59.8 26.8 27.3 15.8
Chamoli 82.9 83.3 80.8 55.4 55.2 56.6
Champawat 61.4 58.8 74.9 52.6 51.1 61.1
Dehradun 51.9 54.8 49.3 46.2 47.3 45.1
Haridwar 39.6 38.8 41.4 33.5 35.8 27.8
Nainital 68.9 76.3 58.1 33.4 35.8 29.5
Pauri Garhwal 77.4 79.2 65.8 30.3 31.2 24.0
Pithoragarh 76.9 79.3 62.1 44.9 45.1 43.1
Rudraprayag 89.9 89.9 - 44.5 44.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 74.5 76.8 56.1 33.3 32.9 36.4
Udham Singh Nagar 58.9 56.9 62.8 34.5 39.0 26.3
Uttarkashi 80.7 81.8 71.6 38.1 35.9 56.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Haridw
ar
Dehra
dun
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Champa
wat
Bages
hwar
Uttara
khan
d
Nainita
l
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Pithor
agar
h
Pauri G
arhw
al
Almor
a
Uttarka
shi
Chamoli
Rudra
pray
ag
66
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Utt
arak
han
d:
Ch
ildre
n (
aged
6-3
5 m
on
ths)
exc
lusi
vely
bre
astf
ed f
or
at le
ast
six
mo
nth
s (%
)
0102030405060
Bages
hwar
Pauri G
arhwal
Tehri
Garh
wal
Nainita
l
Haridw
ar Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Almora
Uttarka
shi
Uttarak
hand
Rudrap
rayag
Pithora
garh
Dehrad
un
Champa
wat
Chamoli
67
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
CHILDREN WHO RECEIVED FOODS OTHER THAN BREAST MILK DURING FIRST 6 MONTHS
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Water (%) Animal/Formula Milk (%) Semi-Solid mashed food (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Solid (Adult) Food (%) Vegetables/Fruits (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 53.6 52.1 58.0 59.2 56.7 65.9 13.5 13.0 14.8
Almora 60.2 60.4 57.0 50.0 50.2 46.2 13.1 13.3 9.9
Bageshwar 71.0 71.2 64.9 68.6 67.8 83.5 10.4 10.1 16.5
Chamoli 43.9 44.2 42.3 46.4 47.0 43.3 21.3 22.1 17.1
Champawat 47.5 49.4 37.7 50.7 51.7 45.5 7.5 7.9 5.4
Dehradun 44.4 41.9 46.7 65.2 60.0 70.0 20.3 18.9 21.6
Haridwar 39.0 32.8 53.2 57.6 54.8 64.1 9.3 7.9 12.4
Nainital 59.5 58.2 61.3 52.6 50.0 56.3 16.6 18.8 13.3
Pauri Garhwal 58.4 57.4 64.8 68.1 66.8 76.7 26.6 26.1 29.6
Pithoragarh 54.5 54.0 57.7 52.2 51.6 56.0 2.8 2.8 2.5
Rudraprayag 55.7 55.7 - 54.9 55.0 - 7.1 7.2 -
Tehri Garhwal 51.1 50.7 53.8 61.4 60.5 68.9 18.1 17.5 22.7
Udham Singh Nagar 71.3 68.3 77.1 68.0 63.9 75.8 10.1 9.6 11.1
Uttarkashi 41.7 42.4 35.8 54.5 55.6 45.9 10.7 11.3 6.6
Uttarakhand 8.0 7.9 8.4 9.0 8.8 9.6
Almora 6.3 6.4 4.9 6.8 6.8 5.8
Bageshwar 3.0 2.9 5.2 7.4 7.3 9.3
Chamoli 13.8 14.4 11.0 14.6 15.3 10.7
Champawat 1.0 0.8 1.8 6.1 6.9 1.8
Dehradun 14.3 13.8 14.7 16.8 15.0 18.3
Haridwar 5.6 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.4 7.0
Nainital 9.5 11.4 6.6 9.8 12.3 6.1
Pauri Garhwal 20.5 20.9 17.8 23.2 23.0 24.3
Pithoragarh 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.4 2.1 4.2
Rudraprayag 3.1 3.1 - 2.9 2.9 -
Tehri Garhwal 11.7 11.6 12.1 13.2 12.4 18.8
Udham Singh Nagar 4.8 4.4 5.4 4.1 4.0 4.1
Uttarkashi 7.7 8.4 2.2 7.8 8.5 2.6
68
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Water Animal/Formula Milk Semi-Solid mashed food
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
AVERAGE MONTH BY WHICH CHILDREN RECEIVED FOODS OTHER THAN BREAST MILK
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Solid (Adult) Food Vegetables/Fruits
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 3.6 3.8 3.1 3.9 4.1 3.4 6.3 6.4 6.1
Almora 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.3 6.3 6.3 6.2
Bageshwar 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.1 4.2 2.9 6.3 6.3 6.0
Chamoli 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.2 5.3 4.8 6.1 6.1 6.0
Champawat 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.2 6.5 6.5 6.7
Dehradun 3.3 3.6 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.1 5.5 5.7 5.3
Haridwar 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 7.0 7.3 6.5
Nainital 4.2 4.4 3.8 5.0 5.3 4.5 6.1 6.0 6.3
Pauri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.3 3.4 3.5 2.8 5.1 5.1 4.9
Pithoragarh 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.8 6.8 6.8 7.0
Rudraprayag 4.2 4.2 - 4.6 4.6 - 6.5 6.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.4 5.9 5.9 5.4
Udham Singh Nagar 2.6 2.8 2.3 3.1 3.4 2.6 6.6 6.6 6.5
Uttarkashi 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.6 6.7 6.7 6.8
Uttarakhand 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.4 7.4 7.5
Almora 6.9 6.9 6.6 7.0 7.0 6.6
Bageshwar 8.5 8.5 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.4
Chamoli 7.1 7.1 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.4
Champawat 9.2 9.2 9.3 6.8 6.7 7.6
Dehradun 8.0 8.4 7.8 7.1 7.5 6.8
Haridwar 9.1 9.1 8.9 8.6 8.7 8.4
Nainital 6.7 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.9
Pauri Garhwal 7.8 7.6 8.6 6.1 6.2 5.8
Pithoragarh 9.2 9.1 9.6 6.8 6.9 6.4
Rudraprayag 7.6 7.6 - 7.5 7.5 -
Tehri Garhwal 9.0 9.1 7.8 7.8 7.9 6.8
Udham Singh Nagar 8.2 8.0 8.4 8.1 7.9 8.4
Uttarkashi 7.8 7.7 8.5 7.8 7.7 8.1
69
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
BIRTH REGISTRATION
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Birth Registered (%) Children whose birth was registered and received Birth Certificate (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Uttarakhand 66.7 63.8 74.7 37.7 31.0 56.7
Almora 66.0 64.8 88.5 46.8 44.9 82.6
Bageshwar 66.8 65.7 90.0 35.1 33.1 76.9
Chamoli 84.2 84.0 85.0 59.5 59.0 62.0
Champawat 53.2 55.4 42.0 27.1 28.3 21.3
Dehradun 82.8 77.9 87.4 54.5 41.0 66.8
Haridwar 73.1 67.9 85.8 27.2 14.5 58.5
Nainital 58.1 57.9 58.4 42.3 35.8 51.7
Pauri Garhwal 78.7 76.9 90.8 36.5 33.5 56.7
Pithoragarh 77.6 75.3 91.6 46.8 42.9 70.1
Rudraprayag 72.9 72.8 - 35.2 34.8 -
Tehri Garhwal 62.6 59.3 88.5 20.4 16.7 49.9
Udham Singh Nagar 40.9 34.5 52.8 34.2 27.8 46.0
Uttarkashi 71.3 69.5 86.1 26.3 24.3 43.6
Uttarakhand: Birth Registration (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Cham
pawat
Nainita
l
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Almor
a
Uttara
khan
d
Bages
hwar
Uttark
ashi
Rudra
pray
ag
Haridw
ar
Pithor
agar
h
Pauri
Garhw
al
Dehra
dun
Cham
oli
Received Birth CertificateBirth Registered
70
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
AWARENESS ON RTI/STI, HAF/ORS/ORT AND ARI/PNEUMONIAHIV/AIDS,
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Women who are aware of HIV/AIDS (%)
Women who are aware of RTI/STI (%)
Women who are aware of HAF/ORS/ORT (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
State / District
Total Rural Urban
Women who are aware of danger signs of ARI/Pneumonia (%)
1 2 3 4
Uttarakhand 94.8 94.0 96.8
Almora 89.8 89.3 96.7
Bageshwar 93.4 93.1 98.9
Chamoli 93.2 93.3 92.7
Champawat 97.4 97.1 98.9
Dehradun 96.6 95.0 97.8
Haridwar 96.9 96.5 97.6
Nainital 91.6 91.7 91.3
Pauri Garhwal 95.8 95.4 97.8
Pithoragarh 97.1 96.9 98.2
Rudraprayag 88.6 88.6 -
Tehri Garhwal 94.8 94.2 98.4
Udham Singh Nagar 98.3 98.4 98.2
Uttarkashi 86.8 85.8 93.6
Uttarakhand 87.2 84.3 94.3 74.1 72.4 78.2 97.5 96.9 98.9
Almora 85.8 84.9 96.8 55.2 53.6 76.5 97.0 96.9 98.5
Bageshwar 84.4 83.8 97.0 60.1 58.6 87.9 98.2 98.1 99.4
Chamoli 87.7 86.4 93.7 66.1 63.9 76.5 97.0 96.7 98.4
Champawat 92.3 91.1 98.5 93.8 96.2 81.8 98.7 98.5 99.6
Dehradun 93.5 89.5 96.3 91.1 88.7 92.7 98.4 97.6 99.0
Haridwar 80.0 75.1 88.0 91.5 90.9 92.4 96.8 95.8 98.4
Nainital 89.9 85.5 96.4 65.1 63.2 67.9 97.7 97.2 98.5
Pauri Garhwal 90.5 89.3 97.0 92.6 91.8 97.5 97.7 97.4 99.8
Pithoragarh 91.4 89.6 99.0 93.6 92.5 98.4 99.5 99.4 99.8
Rudraprayag 82.6 82.4 - 49.2 48.9 - 95.7 95.7 -
Tehri Garhwal 84.5 82.4 98.1 87.6 86.3 95.5 96.7 96.2 99.6
Udham Singh Nagar 88.9 86.0 93.8 40.4 43.0 35.9 99.0 99.0 99.1
Uttarkashi 78.5 76.2 94.9 72.6 69.9 91.6 91.1 90.2 97.2
71
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of HIV/AIDS (%)
Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of RTI/STI (%)
Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of HAF/ORS/ORT (%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Total Rural Urban
0
20
40
60
80
100
Total Rural Urban
0
20
40
60
80
100
Total Rural Urban
72
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
MORTALITY
State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female
Crude Death Rate (CDR)
Total Rural Urban
Person Male Female
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 6.6 7.9 5.4 7.0 8.5 5.5 5.7 6.5 4.9
State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female
Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
Total Rural Urban
Person Male Female
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 6.6 7.9 5.4 7.0 8.5 5.5 5.7 6.5 4.9
Almora 6.1 8.1 4.3 6.2 8.3 4.3 4.3 5.2 3.3
Bageshwar 7.2 9.3 5.3 7.3 9.3 5.4 7.0 9.1 4.8
Chamoli 5.3 6.6 4.0 5.7 7.2 4.3 3.2 4.0 2.3
Champawat 5.4 7.1 3.7 5.5 7.4 3.6 4.8 5.5 4.0
Dehradun 6.9 7.8 5.9 7.4 8.7 6.1 6.5 7.2 5.8
Haridwar 7.9 8.6 7.1 8.3 8.9 7.7 7.1 8.0 6.1
Nainital 5.5 6.4 4.6 6.0 7.0 4.9 4.9 5.5 4.2
Pauri Garhwal 8.4 10.4 6.6 8.8 11.0 6.9 6.0 7.0 4.9
Pithoragarh 6.0 7.7 4.4 6.6 8.5 4.9 3.1 4.1 2.0
Rudraprayag 6.0 8.2 4.1 6.0 8.2 4.2 - - -
Tehri Garhwal 9.3 11.9 7.2 9.7 12.7 7.3 6.9 7.4 6.3
Udham Singh Nagar 5.4 6.2 4.4 5.7 6.6 4.6 4.8 5.5 4.0
Uttarkashi 4.6 5.5 3.7 4.7 5.7 3.8 3.8 4.7 2.8
Uttarakhand 43 42 44 46 46 47 33 32 33
Almora 20 20 20 20 19 21 - - -
Bageshwar 31 31 31 32 33 32 - - -
Chamoli 27 27 26 30 31 29 - - -
Champawat 37 39 34 31 35 26 - - -
Dehradun 37 36 37 45 46 44 29 28 30
Haridwar 72 68 75 81 75 89 47 52 41
Nainital 31 33 29 27 30 23 37 37 36
Pauri Garhwal 43 42 43 44 44 45 32 32 32
Pithoragarh 20 18 24 23 21 27 - - -
Rudraprayag 19 19 19 19 20 19 - - -
Tehri Garhwal 61 61 61 64 65 62 40 29 53
Udham Singh Nagar 37 37 37 44 47 41 25 20 31
Uttarkashi 38 38 38 41 41 40 - - -
73
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Crude Death Rate (CDR)
Person
Male
Female
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Total Rural Urban
Uttarakhand: Crude Death Rate (CDR)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Uttarkas
hi
Chamoli
Champa
wat
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Nainita
l
Pithorag
arh
Rudrapray
ag
Almora
Uttarakh
and
Dehradu
n
Bage
shwar
Haridw
ar
Pauri G
arhw
al
Tehri G
arhw
al
Male Female
74
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Total Rural Urban
Person
Male
Female
Uttarakhand: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Rudra
pray
ag
Almor
a
Pithor
agar
h
Chamoli
Bages
hwar
Nainita
l
Champa
wat
Dehra
dun
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Uttarka
shi
Uttara
khan
d
Pauri G
arhw
al
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Haridw
ar
Male Female
75
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
76
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand 30 32 23 13 14 10
Almora 13 14 - 6 6 -
Bageshwar 19 20 - 12 12 -
Chamoli 18 20 - 9 10 -
Champawat 25 23 - 11 7 -
Dehradun 25 32 19 11 13 10
Haridwar 50 57 32 22 24 15
Nainital 21 18 25 10 9 12
Pauri Garhwal 29 30 23 13 14 9
Pithoragarh 12 14 - 8 9 -
Rudraprayag 11 11 - 9 9 -
Tehri Garhwal 43 45 29 18 19 11
Udham Singh Nagar 28 32 20 9 12 5
Uttarkashi 23 25 - 15 16 -
MORTALITY
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Neo-natal Mortality Rate Post Neo-natal Mortality Rate
2 3 4 5 6 71
State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female
Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR)
Total Rural Urban
Person Male Female
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Uttarakhand 53 53 54 58 58 59 39 39 40
Almora 25 26 25 26 25 26 - - -
Bageshwar 39 39 38 40 41 39 - - -
Chamoli 30 31 30 34 35 33 - - -
Champawat 44 44 43 34 37 31 - - -
Dehradun 45 45 45 57 58 56 35 34 36
Haridwar 94 89 99 111 103 121 54 58 49
Nainital 38 40 36 36 39 33 41 41 40
Pauri Garhwal 51 50 52 53 52 54 36 34 39
Pithoragarh 24 22 26 27 25 29 - - -
Rudraprayag 26 28 25 26 28 25 - - -
Tehri Garhwal 76 76 76 79 81 78 48 39 59
Udham Singh Nagar 44 45 43 49 51 47 35 34 36
Uttarkashi 47 45 48 50 49 51 - - -
Utt
arak
han
d:
Infa
nt
Mo
rtal
ity
Rat
e (I
MR
) w
ith
it's
co
mp
on
ent
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Rudra
pray
ag
Almor
a Pithor
agar
hCha
moli
Bages
hwar
Nainita
l Dehra
dun Cha
mpa
wat
Udham
Sing
h Nag
arUtta
rkas
hi Pauri
Garhw
al Uttara
khan
d Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Haridw
ar
Neo
-nat
al M
orta
lity
Rat
eP
ost N
eo-n
atal
Mor
talit
y R
ate
77
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand: Under five Mortality Rate (U5MR)
Person
Male
Female
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Total Rural Urban
Uttarakhand: Under five Mortality Rate (U5MR)
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pithor
agar
h
Almor
a
Rudra
pray
ag
Chamoli
Nainita
l
Bages
hwar
Champa
wat
Udham
Sing
h Nag
ar
Dehra
dun
Uttarka
shi
Pauri G
arhw
al
Uttara
khan
d
Tehr
i Gar
hwal
Haridw
ar
Male Female
78
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / Commissionrait
SampleFemale
Population
21
MORTALITYMaternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), Maternal Mortality Rate and Life Time Risk
SampleLive
Births
MaternalDeaths MMR
95% Confidence Interval MaternalMortality
Rate
Life TimeRisk
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
Uttarakhand 435843 86881 163 188 159 216 12 0.44%
GARHWAL HQ 294328 61177 116 190 155 224 13 0.46%(Uttarkashi, Chamoli,Rudraprayag, TehriGarhwal, Dehradun,Pauri Garhwal,Haridwar)
KUMAON HQ 141515 25704 47 183 131 235 11 0.39%(Pithoragarh,Bageshwar, Almora,Champawat, Nainital,Udham Singh Nagar)
DISTRIBUTION OF MATERNAL AND NON-MATERNAL DEATHS BY BROAD AGE GROUP
Age Group LowerLimit
NonMaternalDeaths
SampleFemaleDeaths
95% Confidence Interval
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
MaternalDeaths
ProportionUpperLimit
95% Confidence Interval
LowerLimit
UpperLimitProportion
15-19 240 2 1 0 3 238 12 10 13
20-24 332 56 34 27 42 276 13 12 15
25-29 310 55 34 26 41 255 12 11 14
30-34 266 21 13 8 18 245 12 10 13
35-39 319 16 10 5 14 303 15 13 16
40-44 323 11 7 3 11 312 15 14 17
45-49 438 2 1 0 3 436 21 19 23
Total 2228 163 100 2065 100
Uttarakhand: Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) at Commissionrait level
176
178
180
182
184
186
188
190
192
194
196
Kumaon HQ Uttarakhand Garhwal HQ
79
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
Uttarakhand 18.2 19.0 18.8 19.9 16.1 17.3 6.5 6.8 6.8 7.2 5.5 6.0
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (95%) FOR SOME IMPORTANT INDICATORS
State / DistrictLowerLimit
Crude Birth Rate
Total
21
Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Crude Death Rate
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Almora 15.5 17.1 15.8 17.5 9.4 14.8 5.7 6.4 5.8 6.6 3.6 5.0
Bageshwar 14.1 15.2 14.1 15.3 10.6 15.4 6.8 7.6 6.9 7.6 4.0 10.0
Chamoli 17.3 18.5 15.4 18.1 17.2 18.2 5.4 6.0 2.6 3.8 5.0 5.6
Champawat 15.6 19.0 15.8 18.4 11.0 25.3 4.6 6.1 4.7 6.3 2.8 6.8
Dehradun 17.4 18.4 19.9 21.6 15.1 16.6 6.7 7.1 7.1 7.8 6.2 6.8
Haridwar 20.7 24.7 22.4 28.2 16.5 19.6 7.2 8.6 7.3 9.3 6.3 8.0
Nainital 16.0 17.7 15.5 17.8 15.8 18.4 5.1 6.0 5.4 6.6 4.2 5.5
Pauri Garhwal 19.4 20.4 19.9 21.1 15.0 17.9 8.1 8.7 8.4 9.2 5.4 6.5
Pithoragarh 14.2 15.3 14.8 16.0 10.8 12.7 5.6 6.3 6.2 7.0 2.5 3.7
Rudraprayag 16.0 16.9 16.0 16.9 - - 5.7 6.2 5.7 6.3 - -
Tehri Garhwal 21.8 23.0 22.5 23.8 16.4 19.1 9.0 9.6 9.3 10.0 5.8 7.9
Udham Singh Nagar 17.6 19.6 17.8 20.3 16.1 19.6 5.0 5.8 5.2 6.2 4.2 5.5
Uttarkashi 15.1 17.0 15.6 17.6 11.3 13.8 4.2 5.0 4.3 5.2 2.7 4.9
State / DistrictLowerLimit
Total
21
Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
LowerLimit
UpperLimit
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Infant Mortality Rate U5MR
Uttarakhand 40 46 43 50 27 38 52 55 57 60 36 42
Almora 15 24 15 25 - - 21 29 21 30 - -
Bageshwar 25 37 26 38 - - 33 44 34 46 - -
Chamoli 26 34 5 19 - - 27 34 30 38 - -
Champawat 22 51 18 43 - - 33 54 24 45 - -
Dehradun 33 40 40 50 24 33 42 48 52 62 30 39
Haridwar 61 82 68 95 29 64 84 103 100 123 40 68
Nainital 23 39 17 37 24 49 32 44 29 43 31 50
Pauri Garhwal 39 47 40 49 24 40 47 55 49 57 25 48
Pithoragarh 16 25 18 29 - - 19 28 22 32 - -
Rudraprayag 16 22 17 22 - - 22 30 23 30 - -
Tehri Garhwal 56 66 58 69 29 52 71 80 74 84 36 60
Udham Singh Nagar 30 44 35 54 15 35 38 50 42 57 25 44
Uttarkashi 29 47 31 50 - - 40 54 42 58 - -
80
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 71
LowerLimit
LowerLimit
LowerLimit
Sex Ratio at Birth
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (95%) FOR SOME IMPORTANT INDICATORS
UpperLimit
UpperLimit
UpperLimit
Uttarakhand 854 877 864 890 807 860
Almora 830 921 833 927 639 1002
Bageshwar 778 871 785 880 465 933
Chamoli 820 895 816 897 767 972
Champawat 792 977 760 956 786 1318
Dehradun 809 864 838 916 762 841
Haridwar 815 927 807 938 766 982
Nainital 867 973 843 977 849 1023
Pauri Garhwal 854 918 857 924 755 965
Pithoragarh 719 810 732 832 569 782
Rudraprayag 820 903 822 906 - -
Tehri Garhwal 860 920 864 928 750 947
Udham Singh Nagar 819 918 854 977 705 876
Uttarkashi 811 928 822 946 584 933
81
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households living in a Pucca House (%) Households living in a Kachcha House (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Structure of House
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households living in Owned House (%) Households living in Rented House (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
Ownership of House
Uttarakhand 80.3 76.0 90.8 7.8 9.4 4.0
Almora 84.6 84.1 90.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
Bageshwar 56.5 54.6 92.3 13.9 14.6 1.2
Chamoli 88.5 87.3 93.6 4.5 5.4 0.8
Champawat 59.3 59.8 57.2 28.5 26.2 40.1
Dehradun 90.9 85.1 94.5 6.0 9.4 3.8
Haridwar 90.5 86.6 96.9 6.3 9.1 1.7
Nainital 86.2 84.1 89.1 4.3 5.9 2.2
Pauri Garhwal 80.4 77.7 96.3 3.0 3.3 1.5
Pithoragarh 58.5 51.6 87.2 20.3 23.0 9.1
Rudraprayag 82.7 82.5 100.0 3.4 3.4 0.0
Tehri Garhwal 76.6 73.5 96.3 4.5 5.1 0.9
Udham Singh Nagar 76.6 73.8 81.2 10.7 13.4 6.2
Uttarkashi 68.1 63.8 95.0 16.8 19.0 3.1
Uttarakhand 84.8 90.8 70.4 12.3 6.7 26.0
Almora 87.9 91.0 50.7 10.5 7.7 43.2
Bageshwar 88.9 90.8 53.5 10.6 8.7 46.3
Chamoli 83.5 91.9 48.8 15.2 7.5 47.1
Champawat 89.6 95.3 60.5 6.4 2.8 24.6
Dehradun 80.0 89.5 73.9 17.4 8.2 23.3
Haridwar 88.3 91.5 83.2 6.9 2.3 14.4
Nainital 77.9 85.7 67.2 17.5 9.6 28.4
Pauri Garhwal 86.2 90.2 62.4 12.0 8.1 35.1
Pithoragarh 82.6 91.2 47.0 15.8 7.2 51.6
Rudraprayag 92.4 93.1 26.9 6.7 6.0 70.0
Tehri Garhwal 87.9 92.9 56.2 10.5 5.7 41.5
Udham Singh Nagar 84.8 91.2 74.6 11.2 5.4 20.5
Uttarkashi 83.4 87.9 54.9 14.4 10.2 41.3
82
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households having Improved Source of Drinking Water (%) Households treating water to make it Safer for Drinking (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Source of Drinking Water
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households having Access to Toilet Facility (%) Households Sharing Toilet Facility (%) Households having Access to Electricity (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Access to Toilet Facility Availability of Electricity
Uttarakhand 89.6 85.8 98.6 15.7 9.1 31.6
Almora 74.7 73.0 94.7 18.0 14.0 66.7
Bageshwar 81.3 80.5 97.7 10.5 8.4 50.3
Chamoli 90.9 89.5 96.8 15.1 9.0 40.1
Champawat 82.1 80.4 90.6 4.7 3.3 11.8
Dehradun 99.2 98.0 99.9 29.8 17.2 37.8
Haridwar 99.7 99.7 99.8 7.2 0.5 18.1
Nainital 87.4 80.7 96.6 31.5 20.7 46.4
Pauri Garhwal 85.0 82.9 97.6 13.6 8.3 45.2
Pithoragarh 77.5 74.1 91.5 26.4 17.9 62.0
Rudraprayag 85.5 85.4 95.0 9.6 9.5 25.0
Tehri Garhwal 79.7 76.5 99.8 9.6 5.8 33.6
Udham Singh Nagar 99.9 99.9 99.9 4.5 2.2 8.1
Uttarkashi 84.0 81.6 99.3 11.8 6.3 46.6
Uttarakhand 67.7 56.4 95.4 14.2 11.0 21.9 92.5 90.2 98.2
Almora 61.1 57.9 98.9 9.2 8.6 16.8 84.4 83.1 99.2
Bageshwar 62.4 60.6 95.9 9.0 8.4 20.6 87.5 86.9 99.0
Chamoli 59.5 52.0 90.4 7.9 6.3 14.3 87.7 84.9 99.1
Champawat 46.3 43.0 63.3 8.6 9.0 6.3 80.7 78.1 94.3
Dehradun 89.8 79.8 96.2 20.7 15.9 23.8 97.5 98.2 97.0
Haridwar 65.4 46.2 96.8 18.1 13.1 26.3 96.6 94.9 99.2
Nainital 84.2 74.6 97.3 15.9 12.9 20.2 94.6 91.9 98.3
Pauri Garhwal 60.0 53.6 98.1 10.4 8.6 21.3 91.7 90.6 98.4
Pithoragarh 60.0 51.2 96.8 8.9 8.1 12.4 86.5 83.5 99.3
Rudraprayag 55.0 54.5 98.8 8.0 7.9 16.9 95.2 95.1 99.4
Tehri Garhwal 60.3 54.7 95.9 15.7 13.7 28.9 93.0 92.4 96.5
Udham Singh Nagar 70.9 57.0 93.4 16.3 13.4 21.0 96.3 94.6 99.1
Uttarkashi 48.0 40.3 96.4 11.6 11.0 15.4 87.6 86.1 97.2
83
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households using Electricity (%) Households using Kerosene (%) Households having Separate Kitchen (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Main Source of Lighting Availability of Kitchen
State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households using Firewood/Crop residues/Cow Dung Cake (%) Households using Kerosene (%) Households using LPG/PNG (%)
Total Rural Urban
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101
Main Source of Fuel Used for Cooking
Uttarakhand 89.1 85.9 97.0 8.9 11.7 2.1 71.6 67.9 80.6
Almora 83.4 82.1 98.7 15.5 16.7 0.8 75.6 74.5 88.2
Bageshwar 87.1 86.5 98.7 11.1 11.7 1.0 73.5 72.5 92.5
Chamoli 87.2 84.5 98.2 7.0 8.5 1.0 79.6 79.2 81.4
Champawat 80.5 77.9 93.8 18.1 20.5 5.9 88.2 85.9 99.7
Dehradun 96.0 96.3 95.8 3.0 2.8 3.1 81.4 79.7 82.4
Haridwar 88.4 83.0 97.4 10.9 16.2 2.1 55.0 41.6 77.0
Nainital 94.3 91.6 98.0 4.9 7.2 1.7 77.5 76.9 78.3
Pauri Garhwal 87.8 86.3 96.6 9.8 11.2 1.7 70.5 68.1 85.2
Pithoragarh 85.7 82.5 98.9 9.3 11.4 0.7 65.5 60.6 86.4
Rudraprayag 89.0 88.9 99.4 10.2 10.3 0.6 90.2 90.3 81.9
Tehri Garhwal 84.7 83.3 94.2 11.4 12.6 3.6 65.1 61.9 85.4
Udham Singh Nagar 95.4 93.7 98.0 4.1 6.0 1.1 65.6 59.5 75.5
Uttarkashi 74.6 71.5 94.2 20.0 22.8 2.9 80.1 78.1 92.9
Uttarakhand 57.0 73.3 17.3 1.4 0.7 3.0 40.8 25.0 79.0
Almora 73.6 79.7 2.0 1.1 1.0 2.3 24.9 19.0 95.3
Bageshwar 74.6 78.0 10.3 1.2 1.1 4.5 23.9 20.6 85.0
Chamoli 69.8 82.3 17.8 1.1 0.8 2.4 28.7 16.5 79.4
Champawat 69.0 73.6 46.2 0.3 0.C3 0.1 30.1 25.4 53.7
Dehradun 24.7 45.6 11.4 2.9 1.7 3.6 71.8 51.8 84.4
Haridwar 63.4 90.1 19.7 0.8 0.2 1.9 35.3 9.3 78.0
Nainital 42.1 60.8 16.4 2.4 0.8 4.6 53.6 35.7 78.3
Pauri Garhwal 56.4 63.6 13.4 0.8 0.6 2.0 41.6 34.4 84.2
Pithoragarh 60.3 74.0 3.3 1.1 0.8 2.5 38.3 25.0 94.0
Rudraprayag 81.2 82.0 1.9 0.4 0.4 8.8 18.2 17.5 85.6
Tehri Garhwal 61.0 68.9 10.3 1.3 0.4 7.2 36.4 29.2 81.8
Udham Singh Nagar 59.4 77.3 30.3 0.8 0.3 1.8 38.4 20.7 67.1
Uttarkashi 63.4 71.8 10.2 2.0 1.6 4.1 33.7 25.9 82.5
84
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
State / District
Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban
Households having Computer/laptop with or without Internet Connectivity (%) Households having Telephone/Mobile (%)
2 3 4 5 6 71
HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS
Possession of Computer/Telephone/Mobile
Uttarakhand 9.4 5.5 19.1 81.2 76.1 93.5
Almora 5.1 3.7 22.3 80.9 79.6 96.9
Bageshwar 4.3 3.9 11.1 74.0 73.1 91.0
Chamoli 6.0 3.4 16.9 81.4 78.0 95.8
Champawat 3.1 2.4 6.6 65.7 63.3 78.1
Dehradun 20.6 11.5 26.4 92.2 86.8 95.5
Haridwar 10.3 5.0 19.1 83.9 76.6 95.8
Nainital 13.5 11.2 16.5 85.0 80.9 90.7
Pauri Garhwal 7.7 5.8 19.0 76.1 72.5 97.7
Pithoragarh 6.8 2.7 24.0 67.8 61.8 92.9
Rudraprayag 3.9 3.8 13.8 81.5 81.3 99.4
Tehri Garhwal 6.3 4.3 18.6 80.1 77.4 97.1
Udham Singh Nagar 7.4 5.4 10.5 83.2 79.5 89.2
Uttarkashi 6.8 5.2 17.3 69.6 65.8 94.1
85
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
86
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
ANNEXURE
87
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
88
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
89
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
90
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
91
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
92
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
93
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
94
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
95
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
96
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
97
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
98
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
99
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
100
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
101
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
102
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
103
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
104
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
105
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual H
ealth
Survey 2
01
0-1
1
106
UTTARAKHANDA
nn
ual
He
alth
Su
rvey
20
10
-11
Uttarakhand: Coverage along the continuum of care
91.5
83.3
95.1
75.4
55.0
82.6
83.0
59.2
38.2
63.2
59.1
56.9
43.9
11.1
59.5
84.4
62.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Care sought for Fever
Care sought for Diarrhoea
Care sought for ARI
Fully Immunized
Received at least one Vitamin A dose
Received Measles vaccine
Received 3 doses of DPT vaccine
Animal/Formula Milk
Exclusively breastfed for at least six months
Children breastfed within one hour of birth
Check-up within 48 hrs.
Safe Delivery
Ultrasound
Full Antenatal Check-up
Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester
Received any Antenatal Check-up
Family Planning (Any Method)
Pregnancy
Birth
Infancy
Childhood
Pre pregnancy
P
A
K
IS
TA
N
BHUTAN
BANGLADESH
ARABIAN SEA
N
E
PA
L
BAY OF
BENGAL
AN
DA
MA
NA
ND
NI
CO
BA
RI
SL
AN
DS
ANDAMAN SEA
(I
ND
IA
)
LA
KS
HA
DW
EE
P
(I
ND
IA
)
MYANMAR
BOUNDARY, INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY, STATE/U.T.
New More I.(INDIA)
P - PUDUCHERRY
AFGHANISTAN! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
JHARKHAND
Coco Is.(MYANMAR)
Narcondam I.(INDIA)
Barren I.(INDIA)
INDIRA POINT
SRILANKA
P
P
PThe administrative headquarters of Chandigarh,Haryana and Punjab are at Chandigarh.
80
120
16
20
24
0
28
0
320
360
0
0
720 76 0
800
840
880
920
East of Greenwich
36
0
32
0
28
0
24
0
20
0
16
0
12
0
8
0
800
840
880
920
960
680
720
760
LA
KS
HA
DW
EE
PS
EA
INDIAN OCEAN
KILOMETRES
100 0 100 200 300 400
UTTARAKHAND
C
H
IN
AT
IB
E T
RAJASTHAN
ODISHA
MAHARASHTRA
MADHYA PRADESH
KARNATAKA
GUJARAT
BIHAR
ANDHRA PRADESH
UTTAR PRADESH
ASSAM
TAMIL NADU
CHHATTISGARH
JAMMU AND KASHMIR
PUNJAB
WESTBENGAL
KERALA
HARYANA
ARUNACHAL PRADESH
HIMACHALPRADESH
MANIPUR
MIZORAM
MEGHALAYA
NAGALAND
TRIPURA
SIKKIM
GOA
NCT OF DELHI
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI
DAMAN & DIU
PUDUCHERRY
CHANDIGARH
C Government of India Copyright, 2011The responsibility for the correctness of internal details rests with the publisher.
The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line.
The external boundaries and coastlines of India agree with the Record/MasterCopy certified by Survey of India.
The state boundaries between Uttarakhand & Uttar Pradesh, Bihar & Jharkhand and Chattisgarh & Madhya Pradesh have not been verified by the Governments concerned.
The administrative headquarters of Chandigarh, Haryana and Punjab are at Chandigarh.
The interstate boundaries amongst Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya shown on the map are as interpreted from the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act. 1971," but have yet to be verified.
AHS STATES IN INDIA
POSITION OF UTTARAKHAND
Pri
nte
d b
y :
Sara
sw
ati
Off
set
Pri
nte
rs P
vt.
Ltd
., N
ew
Delh
i
Email : [email protected]: www.censusindia.gov.in
Enquiries should be directed to:Vital Statistics DivisionOffice of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, IndiaMinistry of Home AffairsGovernment of India