Announcements – 9/21/12
-
Upload
brody-shields -
Category
Documents
-
view
31 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Announcements – 9/21/12
Prayer Remote Desktop check Exam starts a week from tomorrow
a. Avoid Oct 1 and Oct 3 if possible Results of doodle.com voting:
a. Exam review will be Wed 5-6:30, room to be announced
Announcements – 9/21/12
PearlsBeforeSwine
From warmup
Extra time on?a. Example of a near-perfect Carnot engine;
especially if a video of one exists (sped up, of course), or if we could see a demo of a Carnot engine in class.
Other comments?a. I really don't get irreversibility. Can't you
adiabatically compress and then immediately decompress a gas? If it's insulated well enough, don't you get nearly all the energy back?
Worked Problem from last time
Game plan: a.Find unknown state variablesb.Find Q for each legc.Find |Wnet|
d.Then e = |Wnet|/Qh
1, 320K2
3, 320 KP
V
202000 Pa
303000 Pa
V2=?T2=?
0.001 m3
Qc
Qh Qh
Demos Stirling engine Thermoelectric engine
Review: Second Law
a. Kelvin-Plankb. new: “Clausius statement”
Refrigerators (or air conditioners)
COPrefrigerator: How good is your refrigerator?
fridgeheat, Qc
work
exhaust, Qh
From warmup
Why would you want to use a heat pump (instead of an electric heater) to heat your house when 100% of the energy in an electric heater can be converted directly to heat? Isn't that more efficient? Explain.
a. No, because a heat pump is usually around 400% effective. That is, you get 4 times more energy (in the form of heat) out than you put in (in the form of work). Because it pulls energy from the air surrounding it, instead of just relying on the work that you put into it.
Heat Pumps
COPheat pump: How good is your heat pump?
heatpump
heat, Qc
work
“exhaust”, Qh
“Reversible” vs. “Irreversible”
“In order for a process to be [totally*] reversible, we must return the gas to its original state without changing the surroundings.”
Warmup: Give an example of a process that would be considered reversible if not for that qualifier
a. Yesterday at the physics social we froze things in liquid nitrogen. When a balloon went in, it compressed greatly. Then, when it was taken out, its volume expanded back to its original state.
*Other terminology: internally reversible vs totally reversible.
“Reversible” vs. “Irreversible”
a. (My answer) Pretty much any line that you can draw on a PV diagram would be reversible if not for that condition. Consider a constant volume change, a vertical line on a PV diagram. If the surroundings are hot, the gas will move up the line towards higher temperature. By making the surroundings cold, the gas will move down the exact same line, reversing its path.
P
V
state A; TA = 300K
state B; TB = 650K
Warmup: Give an example of a process that would be considered reversible if not for that qualifier
From warmup The Carnot engine is completely impractical…
Why then do we bother? What is important about this engine?
a. It is important as a standard to measure the efficiency of other, more practical engines, and also as a measure of what is possible for humankind to achieve.
Why doesn't the Carnot engine have perfect efficiency?
a. Because no engine can have 100% efficiency
b. Because that would require a cold reservoir at 0K, which is impossible.
Carnot Cycle All heat added/subtracted
reversibly a. During constant
temperature processesb. Drawback: isothermal =
slow, typically
HW 11-5 – 11-7: find efficiency for a specific Carnot cycle
Optional HW: eC derived for a general Carnot cycle
max" " 1 cC
h
Te e
T
“C” for “Carnot”
Carnot Theorem
Second Law, Kelvin-Plank statementa. You can’t fully convert heat to workb. You can’t have an efficiency of 100%
Carnot Theorem: a. You can’t even have that!
max 1 cC
h
Te e
T
Th = max temp of cycleTc = min temp of cycle
Carnot Theorem: How to remember
Engine: emax = ?
Refrigerator: COPr,max = ?
Heat pump: COPhp,max = ?
Carnot Theorem: Proof Part 1 of proof: The Kelvin-Plank statement of the
Second Law is equivalent to the Clausius statement.
Clausius: Heat energy does not spontaneously flow from cold to hot.
Kelvin-Plank: You can’t fully convert all heat to work.
What if you could make heat go from coldhot?
What if you could make a perfect engine? Then use it to power a refrigerator.
engineheat
work
exhaust
Then do this:
Carnot Theorem: Proof
Part 2 of proof: A totally reversible engine can be run backwards as a refrigerator.(Obvious? It’s really: “Only a totally reversible…”)
Why not this?P
V
Bottom line: you could build a system to do that, but it couldn’t be built from an engine/heat reservoirs that look like this:
P
V
Carnot Theorem: Proof Part 3 of proof: Suppose you had an engine
with e > emax. Then build a Carnot engine using the same reservoirs, running in reverse (as a fridge). Use the fridge’s heat output to power the engine:
Which work is bigger? Can you see the problem?
fridgeQc
work
Qh engine
work
exhaust(at Tc)
Multi-Stage Carnot Engine? Build a new cycle using only isotherms and
adiabats. Result?
“Regeneration” Any engineers in the crowd? The other way that you can transfer heat
without changing entropy: internal heat transfer The Brayton cycle: Used by most non-steam
power plants
Image from Wikipedia
Isothermal contour
Brayton cycle, cont. What does temperature look like at each point? Use “T-S” diagram. “S” = entropy, we’ll talk much
more about on Monday For now, just know that adiabatic = constant S. Focus on y-axis
Look here!
Brayton cycle with regeneration Add another compressor & another turbine to
increase the range over which regeneration can be done
With an infinite number of compressors/turbines, you get the Carnot efficiency! (even with const. pressure sections)
Image from http://web.me.unr.edu/me372/Spring2001/The%20Brayton%20Cycle%20with%20Regeneration.pdf(who apparently got it from a textbook, but I’m not sure which one)