7/28/2019 Annex 2 28-Revised

1/3

ANNEX 2-28

EIARC Report for the

Project Title:

Project Location :Barangay/s Municipality/City Province Region

Proponent Name:

Date & Venue ofLast EIARC Meeting

:

I. Brief Project Description

Project Type :

Product Type :

Project Location :Barangay/s Municipality/City Province Region

Project Area :

Production Rate :

Project Life :

Total Production or

total resourceestimate for projectlife

Production Method/Technology

:

Project Manpower :

Project Cost :

Project Waste Types :

II. Summary matrix of significant project impacts and mitigation enhancementmeasures

The following matrices and sections in the EIA Report and AdditionalInformation Responses provide a summarized overview of the extent of projectimpacts and measures to address the projects potential consequences:

EIA Report AI Response

Impacts Mitigation Plan State section in the report State nature of response

SDP Framework

IEC Framework

Etc

186

ANNEX 2-28PRO-FORMA EIA REVIEW COMMITTEE (EIARC) REPORT

7/28/2019 Annex 2 28-Revised

2/3

ANNEX 2-28

III. Summary of key issues or concerns plus the proponents response to theissue(s) raised and EIARCs evaluation of the responses

EIARC s Key Concerns ProponentsResponse

EIARCEvaluation ofResponse*

Ex. 1) On the Project Description

a) Presentation of estimated or range of volume and rate ofgeneration of overburden based on available FS data

Ex. Presented inAI response.

Acceptable.

Ex. 2) On Hydrology, Water Quality

b) Lack of baseline data on heavy metals in groundwater considered important due to high background of Pb and Crin river water quality. Include in EMoP as baseline/pre-operational monitoring.

Ex. RevisedEMoP submitted.

Acceptable.

Ex 3) On Socio-economics

c) No mention in the EMP of training and preparation of localresidents to be qualified for hiring; No commitment toformulate a hiring scheme which will raise chances newly-trained locals to be hired, as well as how to provide equalopportunities for IPs ; no mention of training for womenwhich should be sensitive to the limitations of nature ofwork opportunities appropriate for women in the mine site(e.g. training program for women may include livelihoodother than on skills for working in the mine)

Ex. RevisedEMP portionsubmitted.

Acceptable.

IV. A review summary based on the technical and substantive review criteria

1. Summary of the major substantive concerns of the EIARC which were addressed in the AIresponses of the Proponent

2. Summary of substantive concerns which were recommended to be post-ECC

3. Summary of substantive concerns falling outside the mandate of DENR-EMB, and thus, werereferred to other agencies/entities with mandates on such issues

V. Report on compliance with Public Participation requirements

1. Statement on public participation during IEC activities

2. Statement on public participation during Site Scoping

3. Statement on public participation during Public Hearing or Public Consultation

4. Meetings or interventions by Proponent with project stakeholders , particularly with sectors whohave opposing views about the project

5. Proponents commitments to pursue public involvement in the project monitoring

6. Other proofs of public participation

187

7/28/2019 Annex 2 28-Revised

3/3

ANNEX 2-28

VI. Over-all findings and recommendations of the review or evaluation

Example of over-all recommendation to issue ECC:

A. Example of statement on positive determination on the review: The EIARC recommends theissuance of an ECC, subject to the recommendations listed in Section VII below.

B. Example of additional recommendation: Moreover, the EIA Review Committee also recommendsthat once an ECC is decided upon and is eventually issued, the EMB EIA Division briefs theproponent not only of the regulatory or must conditionalities of the ECC but to also impressupon the Proponent the advantages and soundness of the EIARC recommendations arising outof the review process.

VII. List of EIARC Recommendations

I. Recommendations to the Regulatory Conditions of EMB

II. Recommendations for Consideration by Proponent

III. Recommendations to Specific Government Agency/ies or LGUs withMandate on the Project

Prepared by: ________________________ Date: ______________

Chair, EIARC

NOTE: The Chair signs the EIARC Report within five (5) days after the final review meeting. DraftEIARC Recommendations are signed off by all EIARC members. If an EIARC member dissents, he orshe must submit a memorandum to the DENR-EMB Director through the EIARC Chairman his or her

reasons for dissenting.

188