Anna Dorothea Wagner, PD & MER Department of...
Transcript of Anna Dorothea Wagner, PD & MER Department of...
Neo- and adjuvant treatment for gastric and GE junction cancer: The role of radiotherapy
Anna Dorothea Wagner, PD & MER Department of Oncology University of Lausanne
Overview
1. Background: 2. Rationale: Why to irradiate? 3. Methods: How to irradiate? 4. Timing: When to irradiate? 5. Patient selection: Whom to irradiate?
1. Backgroud:
To be considered when discussing (neo-) adjuvant radiotherapy : a) Results of surgery alone b) Localisation: gastric vs GE-junction c) Histological subtype: intestinal versus
diffuse
1. Background: Results for surgery alone – the Dutch gastric cancer study as example
Songun, Lancet Oncol 2010
5-year survival rate in both arms > 40% for surgery alone in
Recruitment between 1998 - 1993
Overview
1.Background: Heterogeneity of GC 2. Rationale: Why to irradiate? 3. Methods: How to irradiate? 4. Timing: When to irradiate? 5. Patient selection: Whom to irradiate? 6. Perspectives
2. Rationale: Why to irradiate?Retrospective analysis, n=60 EBRT (external beam irradiation) or IOERT (EBRT+intraoperative IRRADIATION) 39.8-57.6 Gy (median 48.6), with 5-FU (92%)
Henning et al, I J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics 2000
70% loco-regional control rates (defined as lack of progression based
on radiographic evaluation, clinical exam, or local symptoms)
2. Rationale: Intergroup 0116
Patient characteristics: ▪ N= 559 patients randomized between 1991-1998 ▪ R0 resected cancer of stomach or GEJ ▪ T1-2: 31% N1-3: 85% ▪ T3: 61% ▪ T4: 7% type of lymphadenectomy: D1: 36% D2: 10% D0: 54%
Macdonald et al, NEJM 2001
2. Rationale: Intergroup 0116
Treatment: Chemotherapy: 5-FU 425mg/m2, LV 20mg/m2, d1-5q 4 weeks, one cycle before RT: day 1- 25: 1.8 Gy/d day 1-5 every week (45 Gy in total), with chemotherapy on days 1-5 and 23-25 followed by 2 monthly cycles of chemotherapy
Macdonald et al, NEJM 2001
2. Rationale: Intergroup 0116
Smalley et al., J Clin Oncol 2012
Updated analysis HR for OS: 1.32 (95% CI 1.10-1.60)
p=.0046
But: 17% stopped treatment
due to toxicity 1% treatment related
deaths Second malignancies:
7.4% vs 3.5%
Overview
1.Background: Heterogeneity of GC 2. Rationale: Why to irradiate? 3. Methods: How to irradiate? 4. Timing: When to irradiate? 5. Patient selection: Who to irradiate? 6. Perspectives
3. Methods: How to irradiate?
From: Lee et al., Cancer Res and Treatment, 2014
Example for 2D-RT (AP/PA)
OBSOLETE IN 2015
3. Methods: How to irradiate?
Recommended radiation dose and schedule: 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/day on day 1-5 for 5 weeks Linear accelerator with 3D-CRT or IMRT capability with energy of 4-18 mv
3. Methods: How to irradiate
Gross tumor volume (GTV): macroscopically visible tumor Clinical target volume (CTV): includes GTV + safety margin for microscopic invasion of about 1 cm. Planning target volume (PTV): takes into account the precision of the patient’s position, as well as the motility of the organ
3. Methods: How to irradiate
- One volume should be used throughout RT - endoscopy, EUS and CT should be used prior to induction chemotherapy and assign the tumor to one of the following six locations: tumors of the GEJ (type I-III) or proximal/middle/distal third of the stomach - No boost recommended
3. Methods: How to irradiate
- Advanced treatment planing techniques allow
calculation of 3D DVH for any organ at risk - Tolerance doses for critical organs are well
known (TD 5/5= dose which causes 5% grade III/IV toxicity after 5 years)
3. Methods: How to irradiate?
▪ Type I: More than 1 cm above GEJ
▪ Type II: True carcinomas of the cardia
▪ Type III: Tumor center more than 2,
but not more than 5 cm below the GEJ
From: Matzinger et al., 2009
3. Methods: How to irradiate?
Less than 5% of the patients have tumor cells more than 3 cm from the macroscopic edge of the primary lesion
Bozzetti, Eur J Surg Oncol 1992; Matzinger, 2009
Overview
1.Background: Heterogeneity of GC 2. Rationale: Why to irradiate? 3. Methods: How to irradiate? 4. Timing: When to irradiate? 5. Patient selection: Who to irradiate? 6. Perspectives
4. When to irradiate?
▪ not delayed by surgical complications ▪ patient in better general condition ▪ smaller treatment volumes ▪ intact vascularization and oxygenization ▪ no anatomical deviations ▪ tumor downsizing may facilitate surgery
Advantages of NEOadjuvant RT:
4. When to irradiate?
▪Precise pathological staging is available ▪No risk of disease progression during
neoadjuvant treatment
Advantages of adjuvant RT:
4. When to irradiate?Neoadjuvant studies
▪ In GASTRIC cancer, studies on neoadjuvant chemoradiation are limited to single-arm phase II studies, which demonstrate high clinical and pathological response rates
(eg Ajani, 2005)
▪ In GEJ cancer, one randomized phase III trial comparing chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone has been published (Stahl, 2009)
4. When to irradiate?Neoadjuvant chemoradiation
N= 41 two 28 days cycles of 5-CDDP, 5-FU, paclitaxel, followed by 45 Gy+paclitaxel+5-FU
Ajani 2005
▪N= 119, phase III
Stahl, JCO 2009
R
PLF regimen (weekly 5-FU 2mg/m2, LV 500mg/m2 + biweekly CDDP 50mg/m2 q 6 weeks for 2.5 cycles
2 cycles PLF as above, followed by chemoradiation (CDDP 50mg/m2
d1+8 plus etoposide 80mg/m2 d 3+5)+ 30 Gy
ARTIST-trial
2000 - 2005
4."POET"– trial: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in GEJ-cancer
1 treatment-related death with chemotherapy alone
Stahl, J Clin Oncol 2009
Overall survival 27.7 vs 47.4 % at 3 years (n.s.)
4. "POET"– trial: neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in GEJ-cancer
Path. CR 15.6 vs 2 %
Surgery aloneChemoradiation
« POET »- trial: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in GEJ-cancer
▪Underpowered trial, patient numbers were too small ▪Chemotherapy does not correspond
to current standards ▪Radiation dose (30 Gy) lower than
usually used
▪N= 458, phase III
Lee, JCO online2011
R
6 cycles of XP (capecitabine 2000mg/m2 d1-14+ CDDP 60 mg/m2 q d 21 Treatment completed as planned: 75.4 %
2 cycles of XP, followed by 45 Gy XRT with capecitabine 1.650 mg/m2 for 5 weeks and 2 cycles FP Treatment completed as planned 81.7 %
4. « ARTIST »-trial: adjuvant chemoradiation
2004 - 2008
« ARTIST » : safety
XP▪ Dose modifications: 52% ▪ 1 treatment related death ▪ Major grade III/IV
toxicities: nausea 12%, neutropenia 41%
XP+RT▪ Dose modifications: 35% ▪ 1 treatment related death (non-neutropenic
pneumonia) ▪ Major grade III/IV
toxicities: nausea 12%, neutropenia 49%
Conclusion : adjuvant chemoradiotherapy feasible and well tolerated
4. « ARTIST »-trial: adjuvant chemoradiation
Lee, JCO online2011
« ARTIST »
Primary endpoint : DFS at 3 years: 78.2 vs 74.2% for XP/RT vs XP, p= 0.862
Subgroup with pos. lymph nodes (n= 396): 77.5 vs.72.3 % ; p=0.356
4. « ARTIST »-trial: adjuvant chemoradiation
Lee, JCO online2011
Disease free survival
Overall survival
4. « ARTIST »-trial: adjuvant chemoradiation- long term follow up
Park, J Clin Oncol 2015
subgroup analyses at long-term
follow-up: no benefit for
diffuse-type carcinoma and patients with
negative lymph nodes
4. « ARTIST »-trial: adjuvant chemoradiation- long term follow up
Overview
1.Background: Heterogeneity of GC 2. Rationale: Why to irradiate? 3. Methods: How to irradiate? 4. Timing: When to irradiate? 5. Patient selection: Whom to irradiate? 6. Perspectives
5. Patient selection
According to subgroup analyses of Intergroup 0116 and ARTIST-trials, patients with diffuse-type
gastric cancers do not benefit
from adjuvant chemoradiation
Currently ongoing trials: TOPGEAR
Two parts: Part I: phase II component (n=120) - Toxicity - Surgical morbidity - Path. response
Part II: phase III (n=752) - Overall survival ongoing
Conclusions of phase II-part (ECCO 2015) - Preoperative CRT is safe and feasible - Does not increase surgical morbidity - Chemo dose reductions in 40% in CRT
arm versus 48% in CT arm - 98% of patients completed full
radiotherapy dose - Comprehensive QA program ensures high
quality trial conduct
Currently ongoing trials: TOPGEAR
Lleong, ECCO 2015
Currently ongoing trials: CRITICS
R
ECCx3
S U R G E R Y
ECCx3
ECCx3S U R G E R Y
INT -0116 regimen (« Macdonald »)
Currently ongoing trials: ARTIST-2
R
S U R G E R Y
Adjuvant SOX (6 months)
Adjuvant S-1 (12 months)
S1-RT SOX SOX
N=900 D-2-resected GC pN2-3
Conclusions
- The role of chemoradiation in the curative treatment of GC is controversial
- Modern RT has acceptable toxicities - After D2-resected GC, chemoradiation has no
benefit in the overall patient population (« ARTIST »)
- Current studies investigate the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemoradiation in comparison to perioperative chemotherapy