Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Anne Siebenbrock & Herbert Scheithauer Unit of Developmental Science and...
-
Upload
aleesha-gallagher -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Anne Siebenbrock & Herbert Scheithauer Unit of Developmental Science and...
Anja Schultze-Krumbholz, Anne Siebenbrock & Herbert ScheithauerUnit of Developmental Science and Applied Developmental PsychologyDepartment of Educational Science and Psychology
DAPHNE III –Discussion and Decisions
Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
2DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Greece‘s points for discussion
- Broader categories of CB?- Both for victims and self-reported acts- Severity, type?
- Validity of self-reported acts?- Item „attack in online game“- Refusing facebook invitations = cyberbullying?
3DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Discussion of Greek Presentation
- intention? Perceived as joke, form of communication where no one feels insulted- How much do players know about their counterparts and do they then realise that
they might insult the counterpart when they make a sexist joke assuming the other is also a male?
- No indirect indices to assess emotional impact … suggestion Greece: follow-up focus groups
- Where does cyberbullying end?- Comparing victim and bully perspective of most important incidents? Might be
different
4DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Discussion of German presentation
- cut-off scores for bullying/cyberbullying scales
5DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Spanish presentation
- Exclude subscale „support for cultural pluralism“ due to low consistencies across countries?
- Suggestion: not involved/once or twice not involved, 2-3 times occasional, once a week/several times a week frequent
- Use three different criteria: e.g. compute scale score like American researchers- Take online games out of instrument or leave it in?
6DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Polish presentation
- Help seeking- Online behavior, experiences with being criticised online for actions (e.g. by
moderators)
7DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
UK presentation
DAPHNE II- Most cyberbullying by SNS- Decrease in traditional bullying/victimisation due to anti-bullying work in UK?- No change in cyberbullying/victimisation no focus on anti-cyberbullying
interventions
DAPHNE III- Not collected yet problems with EU
8DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Italian presentation
DAPHNE II- How can the decrease be explained? sample composition?- Comparisons among countries? Which data are comparable?- Publications?
DAPHNE III- Code different cyberbullying items differently? E.g. photos/videos? Weight single
items differently? When cyberbullying affects something that can be permanent?
Scales- 10 subscale structure not confirmed- Problems with „cultural pluralism“
9DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Data coding
Scoring of SES:- Compute separately for parents- Do descriptives of this
School climate:- Run CFA on original subscales- Italy has used all original scales and will reduce to the common 6 scales- Scales should be recoded to 0-4 or 0-3, respectively
Media use- Discussion about scale level- Code the same in all countries so that data is comparable
10DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Data coding
Bullying/Cyberbullying scoring:- Discussion: median vs. mean vs. sum score- Suggestion: use LCA (decisions based on statistics)
Categorisation approach:- 1. victim: 3 or 4 in any of the victim items and less than 2 in bully items- 2. bully: 3 or 4 in any of the bully items and less than 2 in victim items- 3. bully/victim: 3 or 4 in any of the victim items AND 3 or 4 in any of the bully items- Rosario will send the syntax, everyone will do it for own data set
Latent Class analysis approach:- Whole European data set- Compare to categorisation approach- Responsible person: Anja
11DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Data analyses
- Latent Class Analyses: Anja (GER)- Validation Bullying/Cyberbullying: Rosario (ESP)- Validation of School Climate: Vassilis (GRE)- Prevalence comparison and socio-economic factors: Jacek (POL)- Combination of school climate and bullying/cyberbullying: Antonella/Annalisa (IT)
12DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Publication decisions- Teams who make the work can include 3 names, the other partners two authors- Suggestion to have ONE name for the whole group, e.g. „Cyberbullying Research Group“
but problems for internal (universities) evaluations and dissertations- National data and national parts of core questionnaire can be published by national groups
any time
- Which journals to choose?- International journals with impact factor
- Citation of bullying/cyberbullying instrument (European Cyberbullying Questionnaire – ECQ): - Instrument specifically developed for this study- Publish technical report on the internet with the name „European Cyberbullying
Collaborative Research Group“ and cite this report as a source of the instrument; electronic citation
- Put questionnaire on the internet
13DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Deadlines
Send data set with core data to Antonella Italy will form a complete common data set across all countries- Italy will create new variable for country- Antonella will send example file by end of June- Send national data set by July 15, 2011
- First draft of manuscript by end-October, 2011
14DAPHNE III Meeting in Thessaloniki, June 20-21, 2011
Miscellaneous
- Use Drop Box for saving the data of the group
- International book on intervention approaches (DAPHNE III outcome) with national guidelines and data- But use English/international publisher and not national publisher- Suggestion: E-Book in english and national language- Italy will prepare a national AND international book- Book proposal: Italy
- No spending of budget after March 31, 2012- if DAPHNE money is needed for publication, contract needs to be made
BEFORE March 31, 2012 !!!