An!integrative!study!of!the!effects!of!exposure!to ...UNIVERSIDADE!DE!VIGO! FACULTAD!DE!CIENCIAS!...
Transcript of An!integrative!study!of!the!effects!of!exposure!to ...UNIVERSIDADE!DE!VIGO! FACULTAD!DE!CIENCIAS!...
!
!
!
UNIVERSIDADE!DE!VIGO!
FACULTAD!DE!CIENCIAS!
DEPARTAMENTO!DE!QUÍMICA!FÍSICA!
!
!
!
!
An!integrative!study!of!the!effects!of!exposure!to!
arsenic!in!Corbicula*fluminea!(Müller,!1744)!
!
by!
!
Hugo!Miguel!Baptista!Carreira!dos!Santos!
!
!
!
!
!
Ourense!2012!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Copyright*
!
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
!
!
!
UNIVERSIDADE!DE!VIGO!
FACULTAD!DE!CIENCIAS!
DEPARTAMENTO!DE!QUÍMICA!FÍSICA!
D.!JOSÉ!LUIS!CAPELO!MARTÍNEZ,!INVESTIGADOR!IPP!DEL!DEPARTAMENTO!DE!QUÍMICA!
FISICA,! FACULTAD! DE! CIENCIAS,! CAMPUS! DE! OURENSE,! UNIVERSIDAD! DE! VIGO,! Y! D.!
MÁRIO!EMANUEL!CAMPOS!DE! SOUSA!DINIZ,! INVESTIGADOR!AUXILIAR!DE! LA! SECCIÓN!
DE! BIOQÍMICA! Y! BIOFÍSICA,! DEPARTAMENTO! DE! QUÍMICA,! FACULTAD! DE! CIENCIAS! Y!
TECNOLOGÍA,!UNIVERSIDADE!NOVA!DE!LISBOA!(PORTUGAL),!
INFORMAN:!
Que!el! trabajo!descrito!en! la!presente!memória!con!el! título:! “An!Integrative!study!of! the!
effects! of! exposure! to! arsenic! in! Corbicula* fluminea! (Müller,! 1744)”,! presentado! por! el!
Licenciado!en!Química!Aplicada,!Master!en!Biocorganica,!Master!en!Ciencia!y!Tecnologia!de!
los!Alimentos!y!Doctor! en!Bioquímica,!D.!Hugo!Miguel!Baptista!Carreira!dos!Santos!para!
optar!al!grado!de!Doctor!ha!sido!realizado!bajo!nuestra!dirección!en!el!Departamento!de!
Química!Física!de!la!Universidad!de!Vigo,!Campus!de!Ourense.!
Y,!para!que!así!conste,!firman!la!presente!en!Ourense!a!miércoles!17!de!octubre!de!2012.!
!
!
Mário*Emanuel*Campus*de*Sousa*Diniz,*Ph.D*
! José*Luis*Capelo*Martínez,*Ph.D*
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! vii!
Acknowledgements!
Giving&thanks&because&of&the&successful&ending&of&a&hard&work&is&indeed&something&nice&to&be&
done.&And&this&is&because&with&my&doctoral&thesis&finally&completed,&I&can&see&the&way&I&have&
done&to&get&this&moment.&It&has&been,&it&is&and&I&hope&it&will&be&a&never&ending&way&to&wisdom.&
I&would&like&to&thanks&to&my&supervisors&Prof.&Mário&Diniz&and&Prof.&José&Luis&Capelo&for&their&
help&guidance&through&this&work.&
To&the&University&of&Vigo&for&giving&me&the&possibility&for&work&on&their&facilities.&&
To&the&New&University&of&Lisbon&and&in&particular&to&the&Chemistry&Department&of&the&Faculty&
of&Science&and&Technology,&for&giving&me&the&possibility&to&use&its&facilities.&
To&Dr.&Pedro&Costa,&Prof.&Isabel&Peres&and&Prof.&Maria&Elena&Costa&por&the&advise&during&the&
development&of&the&in&vivo&assays.&
To&my&parents,&Leonor&and&Armindo,&and&to&my&brother&Ruben,&for&being&like&they&are&and&for&
their&constant&support&and&help.&Without&their&constant&presence&and&perseverance&in&pushing&
me&to&give&my&best.&
To&all&my&laboratory&colleagues,&especially,&to&Gonçalo,&Marco&and&Ricardo&for&their&support.&
To& Elisabete,& more& than& a& colleague& a& real& friend,& for& her& always& useful& help,& advice& and&
support.&
To&all&the&people&that&in&a&way&or&another&have&contribute&to&this&work&and&that&I&had&might&
forgotten&of&named&here.&
Finally,&a&special&thanks&to&all&that&truly&friends&that&are&always&with&me…&
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ix!
Table!of!Contents!
Acknowledgements.............................................................................................................................vii.
Table.of.Contents..................................................................................................................................ix.
Resumen.................................................................................................................................................13.
Introducción..........................................................................................................................................15.
2.! Los!marcadores!biológicos!de!respuesta!–!Metalotioneinas!(MTs)!...................................!17!
3.! Cuantificación!de!metalotioneínas!por!polarografía!DPPHSDME!........................................!19!
4.! Espectrometría!de!absorción!atómica!de!Cámara!de!Grafito!...............................................!22!
5.! Histología!e!histoquímica!.....................................................................................................................!24!
6.! References!...................................................................................................................................................!25!
Objectivos...............................................................................................................................................29.
Chapter.I..Toxicological.effects.of.arsenic.exposure.in.Corbicula*fluminea.....................31.
I.1.! Abstract!......................................................................................................................................................!31!
I.2.! Materials!and!Methods!........................................................................................................................!32!
I.2.1.! Experimental!Procedure!............................................................................................................!32!
I.2.2.! Histology!and!Histochemistry!..................................................................................................!32!
I.2.3.! Detection!of!Metallothionein!....................................................................................................!33!
I.2.4.! Metallothionein!Determination!...............................................................................................!33!
Table!of!Contents&
!x!
I.2.5.! Arsenic!Determination!.................................................................................................................!34!
I.2.6.! Statistical!Analysis!.........................................................................................................................!35!
I.3.! Results!.........................................................................................................................................................!36!
I.4.! Discussion!..................................................................................................................................................!39!
I.5.! References!.................................................................................................................................................!42!
Chapter. II.. Effects. of. exposure. to. As. in. Corbicula* fluminea:. Evaluation. of. the.
histological,.histochemical.and.biochemical.responses.........................................................49.
II.1.! Abstract!.....................................................................................................................................................!49!
II.2.! Materials!and!Methods!.......................................................................................................................!50!
II.2.1.! Experimental!Procedure!............................................................................................................!50!
II.2.2.! Histology!and!Histochemistry!.................................................................................................!51!
II.2.3.! Quantification!of!Metallothioneins!.......................................................................................!51!
II.2.4.! Arsenic!Determination!...............................................................................................................!52!
II.2.5.! Statistical!Analysis!........................................................................................................................!53!
II.3.! Results!.......................................................................................................................................................!53!
II.4.! Discussion!................................................................................................................................................!56!
II.5.! References!................................................................................................................................................!58!
Chapter.III..Toxicokinetics.of.trivalent.Arsenic.in.Corbicula*fluminea..............................65.
III.1.! Abstract!....................................................................................................................................................!65!
Table!of!Contents&
! xi!
III.2.! Materials!and!Methods!.....................................................................................................................!66!
III.2.1.! Experimental!Procedure!.........................................................................................................!66!
III.2.2.! Arsenic!Determination!.............................................................................................................!67!
III.2.3.! Uptake!and!Elimination!Kinetics!and!Bioaccumulation!Factors!............................!67!
III.2.4.! Maetallothionein!Determination!.........................................................................................!69!
III.2.5.! Histochemistry!............................................................................................................................!70!
II.2.5.! Statistical!Analysis!.......................................................................................................................!70!
III.3.! Results!.....................................................................................................................................................!70!
III.3.1.! Arsenic!Concentration!in!Water!...........................................................................................!70!
III.3.2.! Arsenic!Bioacumulation!and!Elimination!........................................................................!71!
III.3.3.! Biodynamic!Accumulation!Model!and!Bioconcentration!Factors!.........................!72!
III.3.4.! Metallothionein!Induction!......................................................................................................!73!
III.3.5.! Histochemistry!............................................................................................................................!74!
III.4.! Discussion!..............................................................................................................................................!76!
II.5.! References!...............................................................................................................................................!81!
Chapter.IV..Conclusions.....................................................................................................................87.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 13!
!Resumen!
Los! bivalvos! han! sido! reconocidos! como! organismos! centinelas! de! ecosistemas!
acuáticos! porque! dan! información! precisa! y! global! sobre! el! impacto! ambiental! y! la!
biodisponibilidad!de!compuestos!químicos.!Corbicula&fluminea!(Muller!1744),&C.&Fluminea,&
es!un!bivalvo!de!agua!dulce!del! sureste!de!Asia!que! se!ha!dispersado!progresivamente!a!
nivel!mundial,!colonizando!varios!países!fuera!de!su!biota!original,!incluyendo!los!Estados!
Unidos!de!Norteamérica!y,!más!recientemente,!algunos!de!Europa.!Presenta!una!dinámica!
invasiva! al! colonizar! ríos,! canales! y! lagos,! donde! vive! semienterrado! en! las! capas!
superficiales! del! sedimento! y! se! alimenta! de! fitoplancton,! siendo! también! capaz! de!
recolectar! material! orgánico! del! sedimento,! lo! cual! contribuye! a! que! C.& fluminea! sea! un!
serio!candidato!para!ser!utilizado!como!molusco!centinela!de!agua!dulce!en!programas!de!
monitorización!ambiental! (Vidal! et! al.! 2002).!Desde!un!punto!de!vista! ecotoxicológico,!C.&
fluminea& es! un! modelo! muy! interesante! ya! que! vive! enterrado! en! los! sedimentos!
superficiales,! filtrando! grandes! volúmenes! de! agua! (cerca! de! 10! L! almeja–1! día–1),! y!
consecuentemente,!puede!bioacumular!grandes!cantidades!de!metales.!!
El! arsénico! (As)! es! un! elemento! que! se! encuentra! presente! en! elevadas!
concentraciones!en!distintas! regiones!geográficas!del!mundo,! contaminando! los! recursos!
hídricos! y,! por! tanto,! representa! un! riesgo! potencial! para! la! salud! humana! y! la! fauna!
silvestre.!En!algunas!regiones!de!Asia,!como!Bangladesh,!el!envenenamiento!crónico!por!As!
constituye! un! serio! problema! de! salud! pública! asociado! con! varios! tipos! de! patologías,!
como!por!ejemplo!el!cáncer.!Además,!las!actividades!antropogénicas!y!descargas!puntuales!
de!contaminantes,!como!las!ocurridas!sobre!la!plataforma!continental!del!Atlántico!NE!por!
el!transporte!del!petróleo!y!sus!derivados,!han!vertido!grandes!cantidades!de!metales!(e.g.,!
Cd,!Cu,!Pb,!Mo,!Ni)!y!metaloides!(As)!al!ambiente.!En!algunos!estudios!se!han!encontrado!
niveles!elevados!de!As!en!(i)!bivalvos!marinos!tales!como!los!ostrones!y!los!mejillones;!(ii)!
Resumen&
!14!
en!los!poliquetos!marinos;!(iii)!en!los!cangrejos!y!(iv)!en!los!peces.!Aunque!este!metaloide!
ha! sido! sujeto! de!muchos! estudios! toxicológicos,! aún! existen! incógnitas! en! cuanto! a! sus!
efectos!en!organismos!vivos,!especialmente!en!los!que!viven!en!ecosistemas!de!agua!dulce.!
La! resistencia! de! los! bivalvos! a! la! toxicidad! causada! por! los! metales! es! atribuida!
normalmente! a! la! acción! de! mecanismos! de! destoxificación.! Así,! una! respuesta! celular!
específica! del! organismos! bivalovos! a! un! ambiente! contaminado! por! metales! es! la!
producción!de!metalotioneínas!(MTs).!Esta!hipótesis!aún!está!en!discusión,!ya!que!existen!
otros!contaminantes!que!pueden!inducir!la!producción!de!MTs!(e.g.,!especies!reactivas!del!
oxígeno,! estrés! físico,! o! una! infección).! No! obstante,! la! producción! de! MTs! causada! por!
otros!agentes!generalmente!es!menor!que! la!causada!por! los!metales! (Kagi!1993),!por! lo!
que!se!ha!propuesto!el!uso!de!las!MTs!como!un!biomarcador!potencial!en!la!monitorización!
ambiental!de!organismos!acuáticos!expuestos!a!metales.!La!producción!de!MTs!fue!descrita!
por! primera! vez! por! Margoshes! y! Vallee! (1957)! en! la! corteza! renal! de! equinos;! desde!
entonces!ésta!ha!sido!identificada!en!otros!organismos!como!peces,!moluscos!y!crustáceos,!
con! las!siguientes!propiedades!comunes:!bajo!peso!molecular,!alto!contenido!de!residuos!
de!cisteína,!ausencia!de!aminoácidos!aromáticos,!y!estabilidad!térmica!y!ácida.!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 15!
Introducción!
La!contaminación!de!los!ecosistemas!acuáticos!por!arsénico!(As)!es!actualmente!un!
tema!de!creciente!interés!para!el!medio!ambiente,!que!afecta!no!sólo!a!la!salud!de!millones!
de!personas!y!otros!organismos!vivos,!sino!también!a!la!sostenibilidad!global.!El!arsénico!
se!encuentra!ampliamente!distribuido!en!diferentes!áreas!geográficas,!como!resultado!de!
procesos! naturales! y! antropogénicos! de! actividad! geoquímica! y! aplicaciones! industriales!
(por!ejemplo,!en!la!fabricación!de!vidrio,!pinturas,!pesticidas,!minería,!y!conservantes!de!la!
madera).!En! cuanto! a! la! contaminación!ambiental! y! los! riesgos!para! la! salud!pública,! los!
casos!más!graves!de!contaminación!por!arsénico!se!registraron!en:!
I. América!del!Sur,!el!caso!de!Chile!y!Argentina;!
II. Europa!del!Este!en!países!como!Hungría!y!Croacia;!
III. Continente!asiático,!en!China,!India!y!Bangladesh!(Cavar!et!al.!2005)!
Del!mismo!modo,! en! Portugal! hay! algunas! regiones! (Alpiarça,! Valbom,!Vila! Flor! y!
Ponte!de!Sor)!donde!los!valores!de!arsénico!en!el!agua!potable!superan!los!niveles!exigidos!
por!la!ley,!poniendo!a!sus!poblaciones!en!riesgo!(Garcia!2006).!
Los!niveles!de!contaminación!asociados!con!el!arsénico!son!particularmente!altos!en!
Banglades! (figura! 1).! De! hecho,! este! país! se! enfrenta! actualmente! a! una! amenaza! grave!
para! la! salud! pública! de! 85! millones! de! personas! expuestas! al! consumo! diario! de! agua!
contaminada!con!arsénico!(Hossain!2006).!
Introducción&
!16!
!
Figura. 1.! Áreas! contaminadas! por! arsénico! en! Bangladesh.! Presencia! de! arsénico! y!
población! contaminada! (rojo)! .! Presencia! de! Arsénico! (rosa),! Arsénico! no! encontrado!
(azul).!
En!muchas!zonas,!se!observa!un!aumento!significativo!en!el!número!de!patologías!
asociadas! con! la! intoxicación! por! arsénico.! La! exposición! de! largo! plazo! a! este! elemento!
causa!la!aparición!de!enfermedades!cardiovasculares,!hipertensión,!trastornos!del!sistema!
nervioso!central!y!periférico,!alteraciones!del!sistema!reproductivo,!!y!cáncer!del!pulmón!y!
de!piel!(Mouthon!1981).!!
Es!ampliamente!conocida!la!capacidad!de!los!moluscos!bivalvos!para!acumular!altas!
concentraciones!de!metales! en! sus! tejidos.!Debido!a! esta! capacidad,! estos!organismos! se!
puede!utilizar!como!bioHindicadores!de!contaminación!en!el!medio!ambiente!acuático.!
1.. Corbicula*fluminea.Müller,.1744!
La! Corbicula& fluminea! es! una! almeja! de! agua! dulce! originaria! de! Asia! y! que!
progresivamente! ha! colonizado! los! EE.UU.! y! más! recientemente! Europa.! Este! bivalvo!
encontrado!en!el!continente!europeo!en!1980,!fue!observado!por!primera!vez!en!Francia!en!
el!río!Dordogne!y!em!Portugal!en!el! .!En!la!actualidad,! la!Corbicula&fluminea!se!distribuye!
ampliamente!por!los!países!europeos,!presentando!una!invasivos!canales!dinámicos!de!ríos!
y!lagos.!
Introducción&
! 17!
!
Figura. 2.! Corbicula& fluminea& (http://acuatico.foroslatin.com/t61HlaHalmejaHdeHrioH
corbiculaHfluminea)&&
Este! bivalvo! vive! enterrado! en! las! capas! superficiales! del! sedimento! y! realiza!
intercambios!con!la!columna!de!agua!a!través!de!las!corrientes!generadas!por!movimientos!
ciliares! en! la! superficie! de! las! branquias,! los! palpos! labiales! y! el! manto.! Los! sifones!
inhalantes! y! exhalantes! controlan! el! flujo! de! agua! en! la! cavidad! interna! del! manto!
(Mouthon!2001).!
Los! moluscos! bivalvos,! en! general,! tienen! alto! potencial! de! bioacumulación! de!
metales!pesados!y!metaloides!tales!como!el!As.!Desde!el!punto!de!vista!ecoHtoxicológico,!la!
transferencia! del! metaloide! para! el! organismo! acuático! surge! como! resultado! de! una!
compleja! serie! de! interacciones!medioambientales! que! afectan! a! la! biodisponibilidad!del!
arsénico.! Por! otra! parte,! las! vías! de! entrada,! sean! por! ingestión! de! alimentos! o!
directamente!a!través!del!agua!!condicionan!la!distribución!del!elemento!en!los!diferentes!
órganos!del!organismo!(Baudrimont!et!al.!1997).!
2.. Los.marcadores.biológicos.de.respuesta.–.Metalotioneinas.(MTs).
El! término! biomarcador! se! utiliza! comúnmente! de! modo! general! para! incluir!
diversas! medidas! que! reflejen! la! interacción! entre! los! sistemas! biológicos! y! un! riesgo!
potencial,! que!puede! ser!de!origen!químico,! físico!o!biológico.!Los!biomarcadores! se!han!
Introducción&
!18!
utilizado!en!numerosos!estudios!y!programas!de!vigilancia!del!medio!ambiente!marino.!Sin!
embargo,! el! ecosistema! acuático! a! menudo! ha! quedado! relegado! a! un! segundo! plano!
cuando! se! trata! de! estudios! relacionados! con! la! contaminación! del! medio! acuático! por!
metales! pesados! y! otros! elementos! o! compuestos,! y! por! lo! tanto! surge! la! necesidad! de!
aplicar! el! mismo! tipo! de! enfoque! a! los! ecosistemas! de! agua! dulce.! El! análisis! de!
biomarcadores! en! muestras! de! origen! biológico! permite! obtener! indicaciones! sobre! el!
estado!del!ecosistema!en!que!el!organismo!estudiado!vive.!(Viarengo!et!al.!1997).!
!
Figura.3.!Estructura!de!la!metalotioneina.!La!unión!de!los!átomos!de!metal!a!residuos!de!
cisteína.!(http://faculty.virginia.edu/metals/cases/prescott1.html).!
Las! metalotioneínas,! MTs,! son! proteínas! de! bajo! peso! molecular! (6H7kDa)!
(Baudrimont! et! al.! 2003),! con! alto! contenido! de! residuos! de! cisteína! (figura! 3),!
aproximadamente!33%!de!61! aminoácidos,! que!no!presentan! aminoácidos! aromáticos,! y!
que!tienen!una!elevada!tolerancia!a!condiciones!ácidas!u!elevadas!temperaturas.!Presentan,!
además,! una! absorción! característica! a! 254! nm! (Mason! and! Jenkins! 1992).! En! términos!
funcionales,!los!estudios!realizados!sobre!MTs!indican!un!papel!importante!de!las!mismas!
en!el!metabolismo!y!biodisponibilidad!de!metales!esenciales!tales!como!Cu!y!Zn,!mientras!
que!también!participan!en!el!proceso!de!destoxificación!de!metales!pesados!tales!como!Cd,!
Hg,!Ag!etc.! (Baudrimont!et!al.!2003).!Así,! la!utilización!de!MTs!es!particularmente!útil!en!
estudios!relacionados!con!la!contaminación!del!medio!acuático,!y!por!lo!tanto!se!reconocen!
como!posibles!biomarcadores!de!exposición!a!metales!pesados.!
Introducción&
! 19!
3.. Cuantificación.de.metalotioneínas.por.polarografía.DPPXSDME.
La! voltametría! ha! sido! ampliamente! utilizada! por! químicos,! físicos! y! biólogos.! en!
diferentes! estudios! sobre! los! procesos! de! oxidación! y! reducción! de!metales! en! distintos!
medios,!en!procesos!de!adsorción!y!en! los!mecanismos!de!transferencia!de!electrones!de!
superficies! de! electrodos! químicamente! modificados! (Skoog! et! al.! 1992).! Esta! técnica!
comprende!un!grupo!de!procedimientos!basados!en!el!comportamiento!electroquímico!del!
potencial! de! flujo! de! un! electrodo! polarizable! utilizando! un! electrolito! de! soporte.!
Teóricamente! cualquier! especie! química! puede! ser! analizada,! siempre! que! sufra! una!
oxidación! o! reducción! en! el! intervalo! de! potencial! aplicada! por! los! electrodos! (Riordan!
1991).! La! reacción! de! oxidaciónHreducción! que! tiene! lugar! en! el! electrodo! se! controla!
mediante!la!aplicación!de!un!potencial!en!el!electrodo!de!trabajo.!La!reacción!de!oxidaciónH
reducción!que!ocurre!en!el!electrodo!es!controlada!por!la!aplicación!de!un!potencial!sobre!
el! electrodo! de! trabajo,! potencial! este! que! varia! en! el! tiempo.! Se! registra! una! relación!
corriente/voltaje! correspondiente! a! los! procesos! de! reducción! que! se! producen! en! el!
electrodo! y! en! la! muestra.! Las! técnicas! electroquímicas,! y! en! particular! los! métodos!
voltamétricos,! constituyen! uno! de! los! métodos! más! directos! para! el! estudio! de! la!
especiación!de!metales! traza! (10H8! a!10H11!mol.LH1),!una!vez!que!no! requieren,! como!paso!
inicial,!extracción!o!preHconcentración!de!las!muestras!(Mota!and!Santos!1995).!
La! identificación! electroquímica! de! metalotioneinas! por! polarografía! de! pulso!
diferencial!(DPP)!es!una!técnica!analítica!que!se!aprovecha!de!la!alto!contenido!de!residuos!
de! cisteína! presentes! en! las,! MTs.! Es! una! técnica! muy! rápida! y! reproducible,! que! es!
utilizada!a!menudo!en!los!estudios!!MTs!en!tejidos!animales,!muestras!ambientales,!etc.!El!
uso!de!la!polarografía!para!la!cuantificación!de!las!proteínas!que!contienen!HSH!fue!descrita!
por!primera!vez!en!1931!por!Brdicka.!Más!tarde,!el!método!fue!modificado!por!Palecek!y!
Pechan,! a! través! del! uso! de! la! polarografía! de! pulso! diferencial! (DPP)! y! que! luego! fue!
adaptada!para!el!análisis!específico!de!metalotioneínas!(Riordan!1991).!
Introducción&
!20!
La!polarografía!de!pulso!diferencial!(DPP)!es!una!técnica!de!voltamétrica!en!el!que!
se!utiliza!un!electrodo!de!gota!de!mercurio!y!donde!la!diferencia!entre!dos!mediciones!de!
corriente! tomadas! en! dos! períodos! de! tiempo! se! realiza! repetidamente! en! una! gota! de!
mercurio! continuamente! renovada! mientras! el! instrumento! explora! una! cierta! gama! de!
valores!de!potencial!de!trabajo.!En!este!método,!el!electrodo!se!polariza!con!una!secuencia!
de!pulsos!cuadrados!y!uniformes!que!se!superponen!en!una!rampa!de!potencial!lineal!!que!
aumenta!lentamente!durante!el!barrido.!La!corriente!se!mide!en!la!segunda!parte!del!pulso!
cuando! la! capacidad! de! corriente! está! disminuyendo! rápidamente.! El! fundamento! del!
método!de!Brdicka!(DPP)!para!proteínas!es!la!generación!de!ondas!dobles!catalíticas!de!las!
proteínas!que!contienen!SS/SH!en!un!electrolito!de!soporte! tampón!y!cloruro!de!amonio!
hexaminocobalto!(III)!(Riordan!1991).!Así,! la!determinación!de!proteínas!que!contienen!H
SH!(incluyendo!metalotioneínas)!tiene!como!base!la!relación!lineal!entre!la!segunda!de!dos!
ondas!H!que!se!siguen!a!la!onda!de!reducción!de!cobalto!y!concentración!de!proteína.!Estas!
ondas!se!denominan!"A"!y!"B"!(figura!4.)!y!se!atribuyen!a!la!reducción!tiólica!con!hidrogeno!
catalizada!por!Co!(III).!!
!
Figura. 4.! Polarogramas! de! Pulso! Diferencial.! 50,! 100,! 150! μL! de! citosol! de! Ruditapes&
decussatus&utilizando!el!electrolito!de!Brdicka,!obtenidos!con!un!electrodo!de!gota!estática!!
de! mercurio.! El! cobalto! (Co),! "A"! y! "B"! se! refieren! a! la! reducción! de! Co! y! proteína,!
respectivamente!(Bebianno!and!Langston!1989).!
Introducción&
! 21!
La!onda!"A"!(H1,35!V!vs!Ag/AgCl)!no!se!puede!determinar!con!precisión,!ya!que!está!
influenciada! por! la! onda! de! reducción! catalítica! del! cobalto,! mientras! que! la! onda! “B”!
presenta!una!mejor!resolución!(!H1,4!V!vs!Ag/AgCl).!Es!de!destacar!que!el!ion!complejo!de!
Co(III)! con!moléculas! de! proteína! juega!un!papel! decisivo! en! el! efecto! generador! de! dos!
ondas!polarograficas!(Bebianno!and!Langston!1989).!
La! altura! de! la! onda! es! una! función! del! número! de! grupos! tiol! adsorbido! a! la!
superficie!del!electrodo!y!es!controlada!por! la!velocidad!de!recombinación!de! los!grupos!
sulfhídricos! ionizados! y! los! protones! (figura! 5).! Las! reacciones! electroquímicas! se!
producen! independientemente! de! si! las! cadenas! laterales! que! contienen! azufre! son! los!
tioles,!los!disulfuros,!o!de!si!forman!complejos!con!los!metales.!
!
Figura. 5.! Polarograma! de! la! línea! de! base! de! electrolito! de! referencia! y! la! onda! B!
resultante! de! 55! pmol! de! MTHI! purificada! de! trucha! arcoHiris.! La! cantidad! de! MT! se!
determinó!mediante!la!medición!de!la!altura!(h)!(Riordan!1991).!
La!técnica!de!DPPHSMDE!aplicada!a! la!determinación!de!MT! ! tiene! la!capacidad!de!
detectar!concentraciones!del!orden!de!pico!moles.!Este!método!es!específico!para!las!TMs.!
Para!ello!primero!se!eliminan!las!proteínas!contaminantes,!a!través!de!su!desnaturalización!
térmica.! Este! enfoque! electroquímico! ha! sido! utilizado! en! la! cuantificación! de! MTs! en!
muchos!estudios!de!inducción!de!metalotioneina!como!resultado!de!la!exposición!a!metales!
y!metaloides.!
Introducción&
!22!
4.. Espectrometría.de.absorción.atómica.de.Cámara.de.Grafito.
La! espectrometría! de! absorción! atómica! (AAS)! es! una! técnica! analítica! bien!
desarrollada!y!lo!suficientemente!robusta!como!para!ser!implementado!en!los!laboratorios!
de! análisis! químicos! a! gran! escala.! Esta! técnica! se! utiliza! para! fines! cualitativos! y!
cuantitativos,!permitiendo!la!determinación!y!cuantificación!de!más!de!70!elementos!y!se!
puede!aplicar!en!diferentes!áreas!tales!como:!análisis!clínicos,!ambientales,!farmacéuticos!y!
en!la!industria.!
El!principio!fundamental!de!la!espectrometría!de!absorción!atómica!es!la!absorción!
de!radiación!electromagmética!en! la!región!del! !ultravioleta!o!visible!por!átomos!neutros!
en!estado!gaseoso.!Para!un!átomo!en!el!estado!fundamental,! los!electrones!de!valencia!se!
encuentran! en! un! estado! E0! de! menor! energía.! Estos! pueden! absorber! energía! sobre! la!
forma!de!fotones!de!energía!hν,!siendo!promovidos!para!un!estado!de!mayor!energía!(E1),!
(figura!6).!
!
Figura.6.!Proceso!de!absorción!de!energía.!
La! diferencia! de! energía! entre! E0! y! E1! corresponde! a! la! absorción! de! un! fotón! de!
energía! igual!a!hν.!Cada!una!de!estas! transiciones!es! característica!para!cada!elemento!y!
por!lo!tanto!requiere!una!fuente!de!energía!que!emita!en!una!longitud!de!onda!discreta!y!
monocromática! ! característica! del! elemento! que! se! va! a! determinar! (Gonçalves! 2001,!
Harris! 2003).! La! formación! de! átomos! libres! en! AAS! es! esencial,! esto! se! obtiene! por!
Introducción&
! 23!
atomización! de! la! muestra.! La! energía! aplicada! durante! la! atomización! de! una! muestra!
determinará! la!población!de!átomos! libres!capaces!de!absorber!energía!de! la! lámpara!de!
cátodo!hueco.!La!energía!necesaria!para!la!atomización!depende!del!elemento!a!analizar!y!
la!matriz!en!la!que!se!encuentra.!
En! la!espectrometría!de!absorción!atómica,!el!analito!puede!ser!atomizado!en!una!
llama,! en! un! horno! calentado! eléctricamente! o! en! un! plasma.! En! la! espectrometría! de!
absorción!atómica!de!horno!de!grafito,!una!pequeña!cantidad!de!muestra,!que!puede!variar!
de! 1! a! 100! μL! se! inyecta! en! el! interior! de! un! tubo! de! grafito.! En! este! caso! la! muestra!
atomizada! permanece! en! el! camino! óptico! durante! varios! segundos,! obteniendoHse! una!
mayor!sensibilidad!(Harris!2003).!
La! espectrometría! de! absorción! atómica! con! cámara! de! grafito! se! basa! en! la!
absorción! de! energía! por! átomos! neutros! en! el! estado! gaseoso,! generados! a! partir! de! la!
deposición! de! una! pequeña! cantidad! de! muestra! en! un! tubo! de! grafito,! que! se! calienta!
mediante! la! aplicación! de! temperatura! elevada! (Harris! 2003).! El! uso! de! la! cámara! de!
grafito! para! el! análisis! de! metales! requiere! un! operador! con! mayor! experiencia!
comparativamente!con!las!técnicas!de!la!llama.!Dependiendo!de!la!naturaleza!de!la!matriz!
en!la!que!se!encuentra!el!analito,!y!el!tipo!de!elemento!que!se!va!a!determinar,!es!necesario!
optimizar! un! conjunto! de! pasos! sin! las! cuales! no! se! obtienen! buenos! resultados.!
Típicamente,!el!horno!de!grafito!se!calienta!en!tres!o!más!etapas:!el!secado,!la!calcinación!y!
la!atomización!(figura!7).!
Después! de! la! atomización,! el! horno! de! grafito! se! calienta,! típicamente! a! 2400ºC!
para! eliminar! cualquier! residuo! restante.! Durante! cada! paso! el! horno! se! purga! con! una!
corriente!de!Ar!o!N2,!excepto!durante!la!atomización,!para!eliminar!el!material!volátil.!Este!
material,! que! no! es! el! analito! es! una! causa! potencial! de! interferencia.! Para! evitar! la!
volatilización!del!analito!de! interés!durante! la!etapa!de!calcinación,! la!muestra!se!mezcla!
con!un!modificador!de!matriz.!Idealmente,!la!matriz!se!descompone!y!se!vaporiza!durante!
Introducción&
!24!
la!etapa!de!calcinación..!El!modificador!de!matriz!puede!actuar!tanto!en!la!matriz!como!el!
analito,! ya! sea! mediante! el! aumento! de! la! volatilidad! de! la! matriz! o! disminución! de! la!
volatilidad!del!analito.!
!
!
Figura.7.!Perfil!de!la!temperatura!en!la!cámara!de!grafito!(Harris!2003).!
5.. Histología.e.histoquímica.
La!histología!(del!griego!histo,!tejido!+!logos,!estudio)!trata!del!estudio!de!los!tejidos!
y!cómo!se!organizan!para!formar!órganos.!Podemos!distinguir!cuatro!tipos!de!tejido:!tejido!
epitelial,!tejido!conectivo,!tejido!muscular!y!tejido!nervioso!(Junqueira!and!Carneiro!2003).!
Los! tejidos! están! formadas! por! dos! componentes! principales,! las! células! y!matriz!
extracelular,! que! formalmente! se! consideran! como! dos! entidades! separadas.! La! matriz!
extracelular! se! compone! de! diferentes! tipos! de! moléculas! altamente! organizadas! en!
estructuras! complejas,! tales! como! las! fibras! de! colágeno.! La!matriz! extracelular! confiere!
soporte! mecánico! a! la! célula! requerido! para! transportar! nutrientes,! metabolitos! y!
productos!de!desecho.!
Cada! uno! de! los! diversos! tejidos! está! compuesto! de! varios! tipos! de! células! y!
generalmente! por! asociaciones! específicas! de! células! y! matriz! extracelular.! Estas!
asociaciones!características! facilitan! la! identificación!de! los! tejidos!por!medio!de!técnicas!
Introducción&
! 25!
histológicas!e!histoquímicas.!
La! aplicación! de! técnicas! histológicas! para! el! análisis! microscópico! tiene!
aplicabilidad! en! campos! tan! variados! como! la! biología! celular,! biología! del! desarrollo,! la!
neurobiología,! la! microbiología! y! patología! experimental,! entre! otros! (Taatjes! and! Roth!
2005).! Los! avances! en! la! química,! la! fisiología,! patología! e! inmunología! así! como! la!
interacción!de!estas!áreas!de!conocimiento!son!esenciales!para!una!mejor!comprensión!de!
la!biología!del!tejido.!
La! preparación! ideal! de! los! tejidos! para! el! análisis! histológico,! debe! preservar! el!
tejido!de!modo!que!mantenga!la!misma!estructura!y!composición!molecular!encontrado!en!
el! organismo! intacto.! Sin!embargo,! el! tratamiento!aplicado!al! tejido,! a!menudo! introduce!
distorsiones! artificiales! y! provoca! la! pérdida! de! algunos! componentes! presentes! en! el!
tejido!original.!
6.. References.
Bebianno! MJ,! Langston! WJ! (1993)! Turnover! rate! of! metallothionein! and! cadmium! in!
Mytilus!edulis.!Biometals&6:239–244.!
Ćavar!S,!Klapec!T.!Jurišić!R.!Valek!M!(2005)!Science&of&the&Total&Environ.&339:277–282.!
Garcia!R!(2006)!In!Jornal!Público,!12.01.2006–07h49,!PúblicoHPT!onHline!
Hossain!!MF!(2006)&Agriculture,&Ecosys.&and&Environ.&113:1–16!
Smith!AH.!Lingas!EO.!Rahman!M!(2000)!B&World&Health&Organ.&78:1093–1103!!
Regoli!F.!Orlando!M!(1994)!Mar.&Pollut.&Bull.&28:592–&600.&&
Mouthon! J! (1981)! Sur! la! presence! en! France! et! au! Portugal! de! Corbicula& (Bivalvia,!
Corbiculidae)!originaire!d’Asie.!Basteria&45:109–116.!
Introducción&
!26!
http://cars.er.usgs.gov/posters/Nonindigenous/Nonind_Species_Introduced/nonind_speci
es_introduced.html!
J.!Mouthon,!Hydrobiol.452!(2001)!109–119!.!
M.!Baudrimont,!J.!Metivaud,!R.!Maury–!Brachet,!F.!Ribeyer,!A.!Boudu,!Emviron.!Toxicol.!and!
Chem.!16!(1997)!2096–2105!
A.!Viarengo,!E.!Ponzano,!F.!Dondero,!R.!A.!Fabbri,!!Mar&Environ&Res&44!(1997)!69–84.!
M.!Baudrimont,!S.!Andres,!G.!Durrieu,!A.!Boudou,!Aquatic&Toxicology&63!(2003)!89–102!!
A.Z.!Mason,!K.!D.!Jenkins,!Metal!detoxification!in!aquatic!organisms.!In!A.!Tessier!and!D.R.!
Turner,!eds.,!Metal&Speciation&and&Bioavailibity&in&Aquatic&Systems.&John!Wiley!&!Sons,!New!
York,!NY,!USA,!(1992)!pp.!479–608.!
Skoog,!A.D.,!West,!D.M.,!Holler,!F.J.!Voltammetry,!in!Fundamentals!of!Analytical!Chemistry.!
Ed.!6th,!Saunders&College&Publishing,!USA,!(1992)!471!–!507.!
Mota,!A.M.!and!Santos,!M.M.C!Trace!Metal!Speciation!of!Labile!Chemical!Species!in!Natural!
Waters:! Electrochemical! Methods,! in! Metal! Speciation! and! Bioavailability! in! Aquatic!
Systems.!Ed.!Tessier,!A.!and!Turner,!D.R.,!Publ.!Jonh&Wiley&and&Sons,!Ltd.!(1995).!
J.! F.! Riordan,! B.! L.! Vallee,! Methods! in! Enzimology,! Metallobiochemistry& Part& B,&
Metallothioneins&and&Related&Molecules,!Academic!Press!,!INC,!1991!
Bebianno,!M.J.!&!Langston!W.J.!Portugaliae&Electroch.&Acta,!vol.!7,!(1989).!59H64.!
Quím.!Nova,!Vol.!26,!No.!2,!249H252,!2003!
http://www.chemsoc.org/pdf/LearnNet/rsc/AA_txt.pdf!
M.L.S.S! Gonçalves,! Métodos& instrumentais& para& anàlises& de& soluções,! Gulbenkian,! Lisboa,!
2001.!
Introducción&
! 27!
D.C.Harris,!Quantitative&Chemical&Analysis,!!6!th!Ed.!Freeman,!2003.!
L.C.!Jinqueira,!J.Carneiro,!Basic!Histology,!10th!Ed.!(2003)!McGrawHHill!Companies!!
D.!J.!Taatjes,!J.Roth,!Histochem&Cell&Biol!Review,!124!(2005)!547–574!
F.!Regoli,!E.!Orlando,!Mar.!Pollut.!Bull.!28!(1994)!592–!600.!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 29!
Objectivos!
Los!objetivos!de!la!presente!tesis!doctoral!son:!
I. Estudiar!la!respuesta!de!C.&Fluminea!cuando!es!expuesta!a!elevadas!concetraciones!
de!As!durante!!períodos!de!tiempo!prolongado,!de!hasta!4!semanas.!Para!!la!realización!
de! este! estdio! se! determinará! la! concentración! de! As! en! los! tejidos! blandos! de! C.&
Fluminea;&
II. Estudiar!la!distribución!de!As!en!los!tejidos!blandos!y!en!la!fracción!citosólica!de!C.&
Fluminea;&
III. Estudiar!la!producción!de!metalotioneias!como!respuesta!a!la!exposición!a!elevadas!
concetraciones!de!As;!
IV. Estudiar! la!correlación!entre! la!concentración!de!metalotioneias!y!de!As!en!tejidos!
blandos!y!en!la!fracción!citosólica!de!C.&Fluminea;!
V. Estudiar!si!C.&Fluminea!puede!utilizarse!como!bioindicador!de!contaminación!por!As.!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 31!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!arsenic!
exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea!
I.1.. Abstract.
Contamination!of!aquatic!environments!by!arsenic!is!a!serious!worldwide!problem.!
The! main! objective! of! this! work! was! to! evaluate! the! response! of! a! freshwater! clam!
(Corbicula& fluminea)! to! arsenic! (As! III)! exposure! and! infer! its! potential! as! a! biological!
indicator! of! contamination.!Metallothioneins! (MTs)!were! used! as! indicators! of!metalloid!
toxicity!in!combination!with!a!histological!and!histochemical!evaluation.!After!a!period!of!
acclimatization! in! the! laboratory,! 50!C.&fluminea! (0.4! g! ±! 0.1)!were! exposed! to! different!
nominal! concentrations! of! arsenic! (100,! 300,! 500,! and! 1000! μg.LH1)! for! 7! days.! The!
concentration! of! total! As! III! in! the! water! and! in! the! tissues! of! the! organisms! was!
determined! by! atomic! absorption! spectrometry,! and! MTs! were! quantified! through!
differential! pulse! polarography.! Results! suggest! that! the! organisms! exposed! to! the!
concentrations! of! 300! and!1000!μg!As! LH1!accumulated! the! highest! levels! of! As! III! in! the!
tissues! (17! ±! 9! and! 15! ±! 3! μg.LH1! distilled! water,! respectively),! which! was! confirmed!
through! histochemical! analysis.! An! apparent! induction! of!MTs!was! also! observed! in! the!
organisms! exposed! to! As! III,! suggesting! that! C.& fluminea! possesses! some! capacity! for!
arsenic!regulation.!The!results!suggest!that!the!induction!of!MTs!may!be!of!high!interest!as!
a!biomarker!for!arsenic!contamination!in!aquatic!environments,!and!confirms!the!potential!
of!C.&fluminea!as!a!biological!indicator.!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!32!
I.2.. Materials.and.Methods.
I.2.1. Experimental.Procedure.
The! freshwater!bivalves,!Corbicula&fluminea!Müller,!1744,!were!collected!manually!
from!Rio!Minho’s!hydroHgraphic!basin!(Portugal)!and!maintained!in!a!laboratorial!system!
of!tanks!subjected!to!a!continuous!flow!of!filtered!and!aerated!tap!water.!After!a!period!of!
acclimatization,!50!bivalves!(soft!body!mass!=!0.4!±!0.1!g;!shell!length!=!1.5!±!0.5!cm)!were!
distributed! randomly! into! 10! polyvinyl! tanks! (2! L)! and! exposed! to! different! nominal!
concentrations!of!As!(100,!300,!500,!and!1000!μg.LH1).!The!static!assay!was!carried!out!in!
duplicate,!at!(20!±!1)!ºC,!with!continuous!aeration!and!a!constant!photoperiod!(12:00!light).!
Tap!water!was!used!as!a!control!after!the!removal!of!chlorine.!Temperature!and!pH!were!
monitored!daily.!At!the!beginning!and!end!of!the!assay,!samples!of!water!were!collected!for!
the! determination! of! the! total! As! concentration.! Organisms! were! fed! daily! with! finely!
triturated!fish!food!(Dibaq,!Segovia,!Spain).!Bivalves!were!sampled!after!7!days,!and!whole!
soft!tissues!from!the!replicates!of!each!treatment!were!quickly!excised,!dried!on!absorbent!
paper,!and!weighed!(fresh!weight).!The!length!of!the!shell!was!also!recorded.!Subsamples!
from! the! soft! tissues! (gills,! foot,!mantle,! and!digestive! gland)!were! taken! for! histological!
and!histochemical! evaluation.!The! remaining! tissue! samples!were!preserved!at! H80ºC! for!
the!subsequent!analysis!of!metals!and!MTs.!
I.2.2. Histology.and.Histochemistry.
Subsamples!of!C.&fluminea!tissues!were!fixed!in!a!solution!of!BouinHHollande!for!48!h,!
and!treated!in!accordance!with!the!procedures!used!in!histology!as!described!by!Martoja!
and!Martoja! (1967).! After! immersion! in! paraffin,! sections! of! 5–7! μm!were! stained!with!
hematoxyline! and!eosin! (H!&!E).!The! staining!procedure!adopted! for! the!detection!of!As!
granules!in!the!tissues!(Castel’s!method,!1936)!was!carried!out!according!to!Lillie!(1965).!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 33!
The! effects! on! the! tissues! were! assessed! through! histological! and! histochemical!
observation!using!an!optical!microscope!(LeicaHATC!2000,!Wetzal,!Germany).!
I.2.3. Detection.of.Metallothionein.
MTs! were! visualized! by! sodium! dodecyl! sulphate! polyacrylamide! gel!
electrophoresis!(SDSHPAGE).!Gels!(0.75!mm!thick)!were!comprised!of!a!15%!acrylamide!in!
a! 0.25!M!TrisHHCl! buffer! (pH!8.8)! running! gel! and!5%!acrylamide! in! a! 0.125!M!TrisHHCl!
buffer!(pH!6.8)!stacking!gel,!and!were!stained!with!Coomassie!Blue!RH250.!Samples!were!
previously!heated!at!1008C!for!2!min!in!SDS!sample!buffer!containing!bHmercaptoethanol!
([99%)! from! Merk! (Darmstadt,! Germany).! BroadHRange! protein! standard! (BioHRad,!
Hercules,!CA,!USA)!was!used!as!molecular!weight!standard!for!electrophoresis,!containing:!
aprotinin! (6.50! kDa),! lysozyme! (14.4! kDa),! trypsin! inibitor! (21.50! kDa),! carbonic!
anhydrase!(31.00!kDa),!ovalbumin!(45.00!kDa),!serum!albumin!(66.20!kDa),!phosporylase!
b! (97.40! kDa),! bHglactosidase! (116.25! kDa),! myosin! (200.00! kDa).! MT!molecular! weight!
was!determined!using!the!software!Quantitity!One!(BioHRad,!Hercules,!CA,!USA).!
I.2.4. Metallothionein.Determination..
Tissue!samples!were!homogenized!individually!in!three!volumes!of!0.02!M!of!TrisH
HCl!(pH!8.6)!in!an!ice!bath!using!a!rotor!(HeidolphHRZR!2100,!Heidolph!Elektro!GmbH!&!Co.,!
KG,!Kelheim,!Germany).! Subsamples!were! taken! for!wet:dry!weight! ratio! determinations!
and!metal!analysis.!An!aliquot!of!the!homogenate!(3!mL)!was!centrifuged!at!30,000!x!g!for!
1!h!at!4ºC.!The!supernatant!(cytosol)!was!separated!from!the!pellet,!heatHtreated!at!80ºC!
for!10!min!to!precipitate!the!high!molecular!weight!proteins,!and!subsequently!centrifuged!
at! 30,000! x! g! for! 1! h! at! 4ºC.! Supernatant! (cytosol)! was! stored! at! H80ºC,! for! subsequent!
measurements.!A!differential!pulse!polarographic!assay!for!thiolic!HSH)!compounds,!based!
on! the!Brdicka! reaction,!was!used! to!determine!MTs! in!heatHtreated! cytosol,!using!a!Met!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!34!
rohm!693!VA!Processor!and!a!694!VA!Stand!(Metrohm,!Herisau,!Switzerland),!with!a!static!
mercury!drop!electrode!according! to! the! techniques!described!by!Thompson!and!Cosson!
(1984)!and!Olafson!and!Olsson!(1991).!The!threeHelectrode!system!consisted!of!a!beveled!
capilary! mercury! electrode,! a! platinum! counter! electrode,! and! an! Ag/AgCl! reference!
electrode.! The! Brdicka! supporting! electrolyte! was! prepared! according! to! the!method! of!
Palecek! and! Pechan! (1971),! and! contained! 1! M! NH4Cl,! 1! M! NH4OH,! and! 2! mM!
(CoCNH3)6)Cl3.!The!electrolyte!was!prepared!weekly!and!stored!at!4ºC!as!recommended!by!
Thompson! and! Cosson! (1984).! Triton! XH100! (SIGMA,! St.! Louis,! MO,! USA)!was! used! at! a!
concentration! of! 2.5! x! 10H2%! (v/v)! to! suppress! secondary! maxima! and! minima,! and! to!
eliminate! baseline! noise.! Supporting! electrolyte! (20!mL)!was! dispensed!directly! into! the!
polarographic!cell,!together!with!250!μL!of!Triton!XH100!and!aliquots!of!standard!solution!
and! sample.! The! cell! was! purged! with! purified! nitrogen! for! 120! s! before! analysis!
(Thompson! and! Cosson,! 1984).! In! the! absence! of! a! standard! for! molluscan! MT,!
determination!of!MTs!in!the!cytosol!of!C.&fluminea!tissues!was!performed!using!rabbit!liver!
MT,!MTHI,!and!II!standard!(SIGMA,!St.!Louis,!MO,!USA).!The!working!standard!solution!was!
10! mg.LH1,! prepared! in! deionized! water.! MT! concentrations! were! determined! using! the!
standard!additions!method!according!to!Bebianno!and!Langston!(1989).!Aliquots!(25–150!
μL)!of! the!heatHtreated! cytosol!were! taken! for!quantification!of! the!heatHstable!MT!using!
differential! pulse! polarography.! MT! concentrations! were! determined! as! milligram! per!
gram!homogenate!dry!weight.!
I.2.5. Arsenic.Determination..
I.2.5.1. Tissue*
Metalloid!analysis!(AsIII)!was!carried!out!on!homogenate!dried!samples!(forced!air!
oven! at! 60ºC! for! 5! days),! and! digested! with! concentrated! nitric! acid! (5! mL! of! HNO3!
Suprapur,!Merck,!Darmstadt,!Germany)!in!a!pressurized!medium!(teflon!cells)!for!24!h!at!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 35!
room!temperature,!which!was!followed!by!heating!at!100ºC!for!4!h,!and!an!additional!hour!
after! adding!1!mL!H2O2! (Bryan! et! al.,! 1985).!Digested! samples!were!diluted! in! 25!mL!of!
ultrapure! water! (MilliQ! plus)! and! total! As! concentrations! were! measured! by! electroH
thermal! atomic! absorption! spectrometry! (ETHAAS)! with! Zeeman! correction! and! matrix!
modifier! (Pd(NO3)2.2H2O,! Fluka,! Buchs,! Switzerland),! using! a! graphite! tube! atomizer!
(M6Solaar!AAS,!Thermo!Electron!Corporation,!Waltham,!MA,!USA).!The! limit!of!detection!
and!quantification!were!calculated!with!the!criteria!of!3σ!and!10!σ,!and!were!3.1!and!9.3!
μg.LH1,!respectively.!Analysis!of!the!DOLT!3!NRCHCNRC!(National!Research!Council,!Canada)!
reference! material! and! blanks! were! used! to! validate! the! analytical! procedure! analysis,!
where! the! same! analytical! procedure!was! implemented! as! for! the! samples.! The! As! (III)!
measured!(9.4!±!0.3!mg.kgH1;!N!=!2)!showed!good!agreement!with!the!certified!values!(10.2!
±!0.5!mg.kgH1).!The!AsIII!concentration!was!determined!using!a!standard!calibration!curve.!
Standard!solutions!were!prepared! from!a!commercial! inorganic!AsIII! standard! for!Atomic!
absorption!(N!206962,!1!g.LH1,!Aldrich,!Milwaukee,!WI,!USA).!Concentrations!are!expressed!
on!a!dryHtissue!weight!basis!(μg.gH1).!
I.2.5.2. Water*
Two!replicates!were!performed!per!experimental! condition,! and!were!collected!at!
the!beginning!and!at! the!end!of! the!assay,!using!polyethylene!bottles!acidified!with!nitric!
acid! (10! μL.mLH1! of! HNO3! SupraPur,! Merck,! Darmstadt,! Germany)! and! stored! at! 4ºC.!
Samples! containing! As! were! directly! determined! by! ETHAAS! without! filtration,! after!
dilution!with!ultrapure!water.!Blanks!were!analyzed!in!triplicate!using!the!same!procedure.!
I.2.6. Statistical.Analysis..
The! nonparametric! MannHWhitney! U! test! was! used! to! determine! differences!
between! the! treated!samples!and! the!control! samples.!Statistical!analysis!was!performed!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!36!
with!a!significance!level!of!5%,!using!the!software!Statistica!5.0!(Statsoft,!1995,!Tulsa,!OK,!
USA).!
I.3.. Results.
No!mortality!of!C.&fluminea!was!observed!during!the!experiment.!Measurements!of!
As!in!water!samples!collected!from!the!different!exposure!treatments!of!the!experimental!
assays! are! shown! in! table! I.1.! At! the! beginning! of! each! experiment,! the! average!
concentration!was!measured! to!be!very! close! to! the!nominal! concentration,!but! the!final!
concentrations!decreased!about!4–19%!depending!on!the!As!concentration!added.!
Table.I.1.!Total!As!concentration!(average!±!s.d.!μg.LH1)!
! Control* 100* 300* 500* 1000*
Ci! 1.1±0.6! 108±5! 295±4! 521±8! 993±6!
Cf! 1.4±0.9! 88±6! 276±5! 469±11! 953±4!
Ci:!initial!concentration;!Cf:!final!concentration;!(n=3,!each!replicate)!
The! results! obtained! for! arsenic! stored! in! exposed! wholeHbody! C.& fluminea! are!
presented! in! figure! I.1.! The! highest! level! of! this! metalloid! [29.75! μg.LH1! distilled! water!
(d.w.)]!was!found!in!tissues!of!the!organisms!exposed!to!300!μg!As!LH1!and!the!lowest!level!
was!measured! in!the!control!group!(3.81!μg.LH1!d.w.).!Statistical!analysis!revealed!that!As!
concentrations! determined! in! organisms! exposed! to! 1000! μg! As! LH1! in! water! were!
significantly!different!from!controls!(p!<!0.05).!
!
!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 37!
!
Figure. I.1.! Total! As! in!whole! soft! tissues! (average! ±! s.d.! μg.LH1! dry!weight);! Significant!
differences!(★!p!<!0.05).!
Electrophoresis!results!of!the!MTs!SDSHPAGE!obtained!from!C.&fluminea!exposed!to!
AsIII!are!shown!in!figure!2.!C.&fluminea!MTs!seemed!to!contain!two!distinct!bands,!18.22!kDa!
and!16.41!kDa,!corresponding!to!MT!forms!I!and!II,!respectively.!In!addition,!lowHmolecular!
weight! contaminants! are! also! visible! in! the! cytosolic! fraction! of! the! exposed! organisms.!
MTs! were! quantified! in! the! tissues! of! C.& fluminea! that! were! exposed! to! different! As!
concentrations,!as!shown!in!figure!I.3.!
!
Figure. I.2.!SDSHPAGE!of!MTs!like!proteins!from!C.fluminea.!Lane!1:!MTs!from!C.&fluminea!
(band!A!and!B);!Lane!2!and!3:!MTs!standard!from!rabbit!liver.!The!main!band!is!identified!
as!both!isoforms!(MT!I!and!II);!Lane!4:!BroadHrange!protein!standard.!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!38!
The!average!MT!concentrations!ranged!from!8.38!mg.gH1!d.w.!in!the!control!group!to!
14.42!mg.gH1!d.w.!quantified!in!organisms!exposed!to!300!μg!!As!LH1.!However,!the!highest!
concentration!of!MT!(28.96!mg.gH1!d.w.)!was!measured!in!organisms!exposed!to!1000!μg!As!
LH1.! An! apparent! induction! of! MT! synthesis! was! observed! along! the! different! exposure!
treatments!(figure!I.3).!Statistical!differences!were!found!between!controls!and!organisms!
exposed!to!300!μg!As!LH1!(p&<!0.05).!
!
Figure. I.3.! Total! As! in!whole! soft! tissues! (average! ±! s.d.! μg.LH1! dry!weight);! Significant!
differences!(★!p!<!0.05)!
The!results!of! the!histochemical!evaluation!showed!the!presence!of!As!granules! in!
the! tissues! of! C.& fluminea,! particularly! in! the! cells! of! the! digestive! gland! (figure! I.4).!
However,! it!was!not!possible!to!establish!a!quantitative!correlation!between!the!granules!
and!the!different!concentrations!of!As!used!in!the!assay.!The!histological!evaluation!shows!
degeneration!of!the!digestive!gland!cells!(figure!I.4!B),!with!the!apparent!loss!of!integrity!of!
the!tissues!in!some!of!the!exposed!organisms!to!500!and!1000!μg!As!LH1.!Regarding!other!
tissues!(foot,!gills,!and!mantle),!the!histological!observation!revealed!few!or!nonexistent!As!
granules.!
!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 39!
!
Figure.I.4.!(A)!Digestive!gland!cells!of!a!control!organism!and!(B)!histochemical!detection!
of! As! granules! within! digestive! gland! cells! of! an! exposed! organism! to! 1000! μg.LH1! As.!
Arrowheads:!As!granules.!
I.4.. Discussion.
The!main!aim!of! the!experiments!was! to! investigate! the! responses!of!MTs!and!As!
(III)! bioaccumulation! in! C.& fluminea! via! the! waterHcolumn! and! their! potential! use! as!
biomarker!of!As!exposure! in!ecotoxicology!studies.!The! total!As! levels!determined! in! the!
tissues!of! the!control!organisms!are! in!agreement!with! those! found!by! Jonhs!and!Luoma!
(1990)! for!Corbicula& sp.! and! other! freshwater! bivalve! species.! The! bioaccumulation! data!
(figure.! III.1)! suggest! an! increasing! trend! according! to! the! increasing! metalloid!
concentrations! tested,! after! 7!days! of! exposure.!However,! the! levels! of!As!determined! in!
exposed! organisms! showed! some! variability.! Such! variability! commonly! occurs! within!
similar!species,!as!well!as! the!regulation!processes!of!some!metals!(Luoma!and!Rainbow,!
2005).!According!to!Sebesvari!et!al.!(2005),!there!is!an!immediate!and!significant!capacity!
for!C.&fluminea!to!regulate!As.!Therefore,!the!variability!found!can!be!partially!attributed!to!
active!metal!regulation!and!also!to!the!short!period!of!exposure.!Furthermore,!variability!
on!tissue!metal!concentrations!can!also!be!dependent!on!environmental!conditions!and!the!
physiological! status! of! molluscs! (Roesijadi,! 1994).! In! addition,! studies! carried! out! by!
ValetteHSilver!et! al.! (1999)! reported!elevated! levels!of!As! in!oysters! (Crassostrea&sp.)!and!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!40!
mussels! (Mytilus&sp.)! from!southcoasts!of! the!USA,!but!no! link!was! found!between!the!As!
bioaccumulated! by! the! bivalves! and! the! water! column.! MTs! have! been! used! to! assess!
biological!availability!of!heavy!metals,!providing!a!more!sensitive!evaluation!tan!the!direct!
measure! of! metals! in! the! tissues! (Bebianno! and! Langston,! 1993).! The! increase! in! MT!
concentrations!has!usually!been!associated!with!elevations!in!tissue!metal!conH!centration!
(Olsson! and! Haux,! 1986),! suggesting! a! correspondence! between! bioaccumulated! metals!
and! MT! induction! (Roesijadi,! 1994).! Detection! of! MTs! in! invertebrate! tissues! by!
electrophoresis!is!a!common!procedure!to!assess!the!presence!of!this!protein!in!cytosolic!
fractions! (Duquesne! et! al.,! 1995).! SDSHPAGE! electrophoresis! showed! proteins! of! similar!
molecular!weight!to!rabbit!MTs!and!two!main!isoforms!seem!to!coexist!(figure!III.2).!Thus,!
SDSHPAGE!results!support!the!detection!of!MTHlike!proteins!in!C.&fluminea!and!show!protein!
fractions! of! 18.22! and! 16.41! kDa! (approximate! molecular! weight),! consistent! with! the!
typical! size! of! dimeric! MTs! (10–20! kDa)! found! in!many! aquatic! invertebrate! organisms!
(Engel,! 1999;! Demuynck! et! al.,! 2006).! Additionally,! the! polarographic! response! in! the!
cytosolic! fractions! indicates! the! presence! of! containing! HSH! groups! in! MTHlike! proteins!
(Bebianno!et!al.,!1992),!confirming!the!electrophoresis!data.!The!MTs!induction!in!exposed!
organisms! showed! statistical! differences! between! the! control! group! and! organisms!
exposed!to!300!μg!As!LH1!(p!<!0.05),!but!we!could!not!find!significant!statistical!differences!
between! any!other! experiment!with! the! control! organisms.!Nevertheless,! results! suggest!
that! there! is! a! tendency! of! MTs! to! increase,! at! least! until! 300! μg! As! LH1,! which! can! be!
indicative! of! active! As! detoxification! mechanisms.! On! the! basis! of! histological! data,! the!
capacity! to! regulate! As! might! be! affected.! Some! authors! reported! MTs! induction! in! C.&
fluminea! after! exposure! to! Cd,! (Doherty! et! al.,! 1988;! Inza! et! al.,! 1997;!Baudrimont! et! al.,!
1997)! and! Marie! et! al.! (2006),! transplanted! two! freshwater! bivalves,! C.& fluminea! and!
Dreissena&polymorpha,!along!a!gradient!of!polymetallic!pollution!and!found!that,!in!spite!of!
stronger! metal! accumulation! factors! in! D.& polymorpha,! C.& fluminea! showed! a! higher!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 41!
sensitivity!in!MT!response!along!the!pollution!gradient,!most!likely!due!to!more!efficient!Cd!
and! Zn! detoxification! mechanisms! being! activated! in! C.& fluminea.! Thus,! under! higher!
contamiH!nation!pressures,!C.&fluminea!developed!a!more!efficient!adaptative!response!than!
did!D.&polymorpha!with!respect!to!Cd!and!Zn!accumulation.!Nevertheless,! the!tendency!of!
MTs! to! increase! after! metal! exposure! is! not! systematically! observed,! especially! when!
exposure!conditions!are!too!severe!and!MTs’!metal!sequestration!capacity!is!overwhelmed!
(Baudrimont! et! al.,! 2003).! In! a! few! organisms,! the! histological! evaluation! showed!
degeneration! of! the! cells! of! the! digestive! gland! (figure! III.4! B),!with! an! apparent! loss! of!
tissue! integrity! in! organisms! exposed! to! 500! and! 1000! μg.LH1! of! As.! These! organisms!
exhibited!lower!levels!of!MTs!in!comparison!with!organisms!from!the!same!treatment!that!
revealed! a! normal! digestive! gland! cell! condition.! This! suggests! that! the! homeostatic!
capacity,! and! consequently! the! regulation! and!neutralization! of!As,! can!be!diminished! in!
organisms! where! cells! are! severely! affected! by! exposure! to! high! concentrations! of! As.!
According!to!Cajaraville!et!al.!(1995),!the!digestive!cells!are!involved!in!MT!induction!and!
intracellular! digestion! via! a! lysosomal! system.! This! is! important! for!metal! sequestration!
and!detoxification,!but!excessive!amounts!of!metals!overload!the!storage!capacity!of!these!
organelles!and!cause!alterations!of!the!lysosomal!membrane!stability.!Thus,!MT!induction!
and!metal! detoxification!may! be! affected.! The! intracellular! storage! and! sequestration! of!
metals! by! vesicleH! bound! granules! and! cytosolic! proteins! have! been! shown! to! play! an!
important!role!in!controlling!both!the!kinetics!of!bioaccumulation!and!the!manifestation!of!
toxic! effects! via! the! reduction! of! the! metal’s! accessibility! to! functional! binding! sites!
(Roesijadi! and!Robinson,! 1994).! It! is! possible! that! an! analogous!process!may!occur!with!
respect! to! arsenic! and! this! mollusc! species.! The! histochemical! results! show! some! As!
granules! within! tissues,! particularly! in! the! digestive! gland! cells,! demonstrating! As!
bioaccumulation!and!supporting!the!hypothesis!that!C.&fluminea!digestive!gland!cells!play!a!
major!role!in!As!detoxification!mechanisms.!The!evaluation!performed!in!the!gills,!mantle,!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!42!
and! foot! revealed! an! absence! of! (or! few)! granules,! suggesting! that! they! are! less! able! to!
bioaccumulate! As,! and! may! be! less! involved! in! detoxification! processes.! The! results!
obtained!in!this!study!suggest!that!C.&fluminea!have!a!high!potential!to!be!used!as!indicative!
organisms! for! As! contamination.! Further! exposure! studies,! using! organisms! of! different!
sizes,!as!well!as!longer!exposure!periods!is!highly!recommended.!Other!biomarkers!should!
also! be! analyzed! (e.g.! lipid! peroxidation,! gluthationeHSHtransferase,! genotoxicicity)! to!
complement!the!available!information!on!toxicological!effects!of!As!in!these!molluscs.!
I.5.. References.
Banerjee! K,! Helwick! RP,! Gupta! S! (1999)! A! treatment! process! for! removal! of! mixed!
inorganic!and!organic!arsenic!species!from!groundwater.!Environ&Prog&18:280–284.!
Basack!SB,!Oneto!ML,!Fuchs!JS,!Wood!EJ,!Kesten!EM!(1998)!Esterases!of!Corbicula&fluminea!
as! biomarkers! of! exposure! to! organophosphorus! pesticides.!Bull&Environ&Contam&Toxicol&
61:569–576.!
Baudrimont!M,!Metivaud!J,!MauryHBrachet!R,!Ribeyre!F,!Boudu!A!(1997).Bioaccumulation!
and! metallothionein! response! in! the! asiatic! clam! Corbicula& fluminea! after! experimental!
exposure!to!cadmium!and!inorganic!mercury.!Environ&Toxicol&Chem&16:2096–2105.!
Baudrimont!M,!Andres!S,!Durrieu!G,!Boudou!A!(2003)!The!key!role!of!metallothioneins!in!
the!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea!during!the!depuration!phase,!after!in!situ!exposure!to!Cd!and!
Zn.!Aquat&Toxicol&63:89–102.!
Bebianno! MJ,! Langston! WJ! (1989)! Quantification! of! Metallothioneins! in! marine!
invertebrates!using!different!pulse!polarography.!Port&Electrochim&Acta&7:59–64.!
Bebianno!MJ,!Langston!WJ!(1991)!Metallothionein!induction!in!Mytilus!edulis!exposed!to!
cadmium.!Mar&Biol&108:91–96.!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 43!
Bebianno! MJ,! Langston! WJ! (1993)! Turnover! rate! of! metallothionein! and! cadmium! in!
Mytilus!edulis.!Biometals&6:239–244.!
Bebianno!MJ,!Langston!WJ,!Simkiss!K!(1992)!Metallothionein!induction!in!Littorina!littorea!
(mollusca:!prosobranchia)!on!exposure!to!cadmium.!J&Mar&Biol&Ass&UK&72:329–342.!
Bilos!C,!Colombo!JC,!Presa!MJR!(1998)!Trace!metals!in!suspended!particles,!sediments!and!
Asiatic!clams!(Corbicula&fluminea)!of!the!Rio!de!la!Plata!Estuary,!Argentina.!Environ&Pollut&
99:1–11.!
Bissen!M,!Frimmel!FH!(2003)!Arsenic—A!Review.!II.!Oxidation!of!arsenic!and!its!removal!
in!water!treatment.!Acta&hydroch&hydrob&31:97–107.!
Britton! JC,! Morton! B! (1982)! A! dissection! guide,! field! and! laboratory! manual! for! the!
introduced!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea.!Malacol&Rev&3:1–82.!
Bryan!GW,!Langston!WJ,!Hummerstone!LG,!Burt!GR!(1985)!A!Guide!to!the!assessment!of!
heavyHmetal! contamination! in! estuaries! using! biological! indicators.! Mar& Biol& Ass& UK&
(Occasional&Publication)&4:74.!
Cajaraville!MP,!Robledo!Y,!Etxeberria!M,!Marigomez!I!(1995)!Cellular!biomarkers!as!useful!
tools! in! the! biological! monitoring! of! environmental! pollution:! Molluscan! digestive!
lysossomes.!In:!Cajaraville!MP,!editor.!Cell&Biology&in&Environmental&Toxicology.&University&of&
the&Basque&Country&Press&Service,&Bilbo,&Spain.&pp&89–134.!
Carpene!E!(1993)!Metallothionein!in!marine!molluscs.!In:!Dallinger!R,!editor.!Ecotoxicology&
of&Metals&in&Invertebrates.&FL&USA:&CRC,&Boca&Rato.&pp&55–72.!
Croteau!MN,! Luoma! SN,! Stewart!AR! (2005)! Trophic! transfer! of!metals! along! freshwater!
food! webs:! Evidence! of! cadmium! biomagnification! in! nature.! Limnol& Oceanogr& 50:1511–
1519.!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!44!
Demuynck! S,! Grumiaux! F,! Mottier! V,! Schikorski! D,! Lemiere! S,! Lepretre! A! (2006)!
Metallothionein! response! following! cadmium! exposure! in! the! oligochaete! Eisenia& fetida.!
Comp&Biochem&Physiol&C&144:34–46.!
Doherty!FG,!Failla!ML,!Cherry!DS!(1988)!MetallothioneinHlike!heavy!metal!binding!protein!
levels! in!Asiatic!clams!are!dependent!on!the!duration!and!mode!of!exposure!to!cadmium.!
Water&Res&22:927–932.!
Domouhtsidou!GP,!Dailianis!S,!Kaloyianni!M,!Dimitriadis!VK!(2004)!Lysosomal!membrane!
stability! and! metallothionein! content! in! Mytilus& galloprovincialis! (L.),! as! biomarkers:!
Combination!with!trace!metal!concentrations.!Mar&Pollut&Bull&48:572–586.!
Duquesne! S,! Flowers! AE,! Coil! JC! (1995)! Preliminary! evidence! for! a!metallothioneinHlike!
heavy!metalHbinding!protein!in!the!tropical!marine!bivalve!Tridacna!crocea.!Comp&Biochem&
Physiol&C&112:69–78.&
Engel!DW!(1999)!Accumulation!and!cytosolic!partitioning!of!metals!in!the!American!oyster!
Crassostrea!virginica.!Mar&Environ&Res&47:89–102.!
Fournier! E,! Adam! C,! Massabuau! JC,! GarnierHLaplace! J! (2005)! Bioaccumulation! of!
waterborne!selenium!in! the!Asiatic!clam!Corbicula&fluminea:! Influence!of! feedingHinduced!
ventilatory!activity!and!selenium!species.!Aquat&Toxicol&72:251–260.!
Hassan! MM,! Atkins! PJ,! Dunn! CE! (2005)! Social! implications! of! arsenic! poisoning! in!
Bangladesh.!Soc&Sci&Med&6:2201–2211.!
Inza! B,! Ribeyre! F,! MauryHBrachet! R,! Boudou! A! (1997). Tissue! distribution! of! inorganic!
mercury,!methylmercury!and!cadmium!in! the!asiatic!clam!(Corbiculafluminea)! in!relation!
to!the!contamination!levels!of!the!water!column!and!sediment.!Chemosphere&35:2817–2836.!
IRAR!(2005)!Instituto!Regulador!das!Aguas!e!dos!Resıduos:!Relatorio!Anual!do!Sector!das!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 45!
Aguas! e! Resıduos! em!Portugal! (RASARP! –! 2004),! Vol.! 4,! Controlo! da!Qualidade! da! Agua!
para!Consumo!Humano.238!p.!
Jonhs! C,! Luoma! SN! (1990)! Arsenic! in! benthic! bivalves! of! San! Francisco! bay! and! the!
Sacramento/San!Joaquin!River.!Sci&Total&Environ&97/98:673–684.!
Kojima!Y!(1991)!Definitions!and!nomenclature!of!metallothioneins.!In:!Abelson!JN,!Simon!
MI,!editors.!Methods&in&Enzymology.&San&Diego&CA,&USA:&Academic.&pp&8–10.&
Labrot! F,! Ribera! D,! SaintHDenis! M,! Narbonne! JF! (1996)! In! vitro! and! in! vivo! studies! of!
potential! biomarkers! of! lead! and! uranium! contamination:! Lipid! peroxidation,! acetylH
cholinesterase,! catalase! and! glutathione! peroxidase! activities! in! three! nonHmammalian!
species.!Biomarkers&1:23–30.!
Liao! CM,! Chen! BC,! Singh! S,! Lin! MC,! Liu! CW,! Han! BC! (2003)! Acute! toxicity! and!
bioaccumulation!of!arsenic!in!tilapia!(Oreochromis!mossambicus)!from!a!Blackfoot!Disease!
area!in!Taiwan.!Environ&Toxicol&18:252–259.!
Lillie!RD!(1965)!Histopathologic!Technic!and!Practical!Histohemistry.!New!York:!McGraw!
Hill.445!p.!
Luoma!S,!Rainbow!P!(2005)!Why!is!metal!bioaccumulation!so!variable?!Biodynamics!as!a!
unifying!concept.!Environ&Sci&Technol&39:1921–1931.!
Marie! V,! Baudrimont! M,! Boudou! A! (2006)! Cadmium! and! zinc! bioaccumulation! and!
metallothionein! response! in! two! freshwater! bivalves! (Corbicula& fluminea! and! Dreissena&
polymorpha)!transplanted!along!a!polymetallic!gradient.!Chemosphere&65:609–617.!
Martoja!R,!Martoja!M!(1967)!Initiation!aux!tecniques!de!l’histologie!animal.!Paris:!Masson!
and.!Cie.345!p.!
Mouthon! J! (1981)! Sur! la! presence! en! France! et! au! Portugal! de! Corbicula! (Bivalvia,&
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
!46!
Corbiculidae)!originaire!d’Asie.!Basteria&45:109–116.!
Mouthon!J!(2001).Life!cycle!and!population!dynamics!of!the!Asian!clam!Corbicula&fluminea!
(Bivalvia:!Corbiculidae)!in!the!Saone!River!at!Lyon!(France).!Hydrobiol&452:109–119.!
Ngu! TT,! Stillman! MJ! (2006)! Arsenic! binding! to! human! metallothionein.! J& Am& Chem& Soc&
128:12473–12483.!
Olafson! RW,! Olsson! PE! (1991)! Electrochemical! detection! of! metallothionein.! Methods&
Enzymol&205:205–213.!
Oliver!LM,!Fisher!WS!(1999)!Appraisal!of!prospective!bivalve!immunomarkers.!Biomarkers&
4:510–530.!
Olsson! PE,! Haux! C! (1986)! Increased! hepatic! metallothionein! content! correlates! to!
cadmium!accumulation!in!environmentally!exposed!perch!(Perca&fluviatilis).!Aquat&Toxicol&
9:231–242.!
Palecek! E,! Pechan! Z! (1971)! Estimation! of! nanogram! quantities! of! proteins! by! pulse!
polarographic!techniques.!Anal&Biochem&42:59–71.&
Roesijadi!G!(1994)!Behavior!of!metallothioneinHbound!metals!in!a!natural!population!of!an!
Estuarine!mollusc.!Mar&Environ&Res&38:147–168.!
Roesijadi! G! (1999)! The! basis! for! increased! metallothionein! in! a! natural! population! of!
Crassostrea!virginica.!Biomarkers&4:467–472.!
Roesijadi! G,! Robinson! WE! (1994)! Metal! regulation! in! aquatic! animals:! Mechanisms! of!
uptake,!accumulation,!and!release.!In:!Malins!DC,!Ostrander!GK,!editors.!Aquatic&Toxicology:&
Moleck&ular,&Biochemical,&and&Cellular&Perspectives.&FL&USA:&CRC&Boca&Raton.&pp&387–420.!
Sebesvari! Z,! Ettwigb! F,! Emonsc! H! (2005)! Biomonitoring! of! tin! and! arsenic! in! different!
Chapter!I.!Toxicological!effects!of!As!exposure!in!Corbicula&fluminea&
! 47!
compartments! of! a! limnic! ecosystem! with! emphasis! on! Corbicula& fluminea! and!
Dikerogammarus!villosus.!J&Environ&Monit&7:203–207.!
Thompson! JAJ,! Cosson! RP! (1984). An! Improved! electrochemical! method! for! the!
quantification!of!metallothioneins!in!marine!organisms.!Mar&Environ&Res&11:137–152.!
ValetteHSilver!NJ,!Riedel!GF,!Crecelius!EA,!Windom!H,!Smith!RG,!Dolvin!SS!(1999)!Elevated!
arsenic!concentrations! in!bivalves! from!the!southeast! coasts!of! the!USA.!Mar&Environ&Res&
48:311–333.!
Viarengo!A!(1989)!Heavy!metals! in!marine! invertebrates:!Mechanisms!of! regulation!and!
toxicity!at!the!cellular!level.!Aquat&Sci&1:295–317.!
Viarengo!A,!Ponzano!E,!Dondero!F,!Fabbri!RA!(1997)!A!simple!spectrophotometric!method!
for!metallothionein!evaluation!in!marine!organisms:!An!application!to!Mediterranean!and!
Antarctic!molluscs.!Mar&Environ&Res&44:69–84.!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 49!
Chapter!II.!Effects!of!exposure!to!As!in!Corbicula&
fluminea:!Evaluation!of!the!histological,!
histochemical!and!biochemical!responses!
II.1.. Abstract.
Arsenic!(As)!is!a!common!element!in!aquatic!environments!and!it!is!originated!from!
both!anthropogenic!and!natural!processes.!It!is!a!toxic!metalloid,!especially!in!the!trivalent!
form! (arsenite),! to! humans! and! wildlife,! and! consequently! its! contamination! of! aquatic!
environments! (especially! groundwater! and! drinking! water)! is! a! serious! public! health!
problem!in!several!regions!around!the!globe,!particularly!in!Asia,!since!it!is!known!to!cause!
cancer!and!other!types!of!pathologies.!The!main!goal!of!the!present!study!was!to!assess!the!
toxicological! effects,! bioaccumulation! and! ability! to! regulate! As! in! Corbicula& fluminea!
(Müller!1744),!exposed!to!different!concentrations!of!As! in!the!water.!One!hundred!fresh!
water!bivalves!(1.6!±!0.3!g)!from!the!Minho!River!(Portugal)!were!randomly!distributed!in!
ten!20L!tanks!and!exposed!to!different!nominal!concentrations!of!As!(100,!300,!500,!and!
1000!μg.L–1)! for!28!days.!A!tank!with!tap!water! free!of!chlorine!was!used!as!control.!The!
assay! was! performed! in! duplicate,! at! a! constant! temperature! of! 20! ±! 1ºC.! The! results!
showed! a! significant! increase! (p! <! 0.01)! of! As! in! the! total! concentration! and! cytosolic!
fraction! after! 28! days! of! exposure! in! all! treatments.! A! significant! increase! (p! <! 0.01)! in!
metallothionein! concentration! was! also! detected! in! bivalves! exposed! to! the! different!
concentrations!of!As,! in!comparison!with!the!controls.!The!histological!and!histochemical!
evaluation! provided! clear! evidence! that! As! accumulated! in! tissues,! especially! in! the!
digestive!gland,!and!caused!tissue!alterations!in!50%!of!the!organisms.!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!50!
II.2.. Materials.and.Methods.
II.2.1.. Experimental.Procedure.
The! biological! material! used! to! carry! out! the! experiments! was! the! freshHwater!
mollusc!C.&fluminea.!Animals!were!collected! from!the!Minho!River! (northern!Portugal)! in!
December!2005!and!then!maintained!under!laboratory!conditions!in!a!system!of!tanks!with!
recirculated,!filtered,!and!continuously!aerated!tap!water,!at!a!constant!temperature!of!20!±!
1ºC.!After!a!twoHweek!period!of!acclimatization,!100!individuals!(soft!body!mass!=!1.6!±!0.3!
g;! shell! length!=!1.9!±!0.2!cm)!were!randomly!distributed! in! ten!20L!polyvinyl! tanks!and!
exposed! to! different! nominal! concentrations! of! trivalent! As! (0,! 100,! 300,! 500,! and! 1000!
μg.L–1)!added!to!the!water!in!each!tank!at!the!beginning!of!the!experiment.!A!solution!was!
prepared!from!standard!inorganic!trivalent!As!purchased!from!Aldrich!(St.!Louis,!MO,!USA),!
to!which!distilled!water!was!added!to!obtain!a!final!concentration!of!100!mg.L–1.!Aliquots!of!
this!solution!were!added! to! test! tanks!according! to! the!nominal!concentrations! intended.!
The! assay! was! static! and! carried! out! over! 28! days,! in! duplicate,! at! 20! ±! 1ºC,! using!
dechlorinated!tap!water,!with!continuous!aeration!and!constant!photoperiod!(12!h!light;!12!
h! dark).! Two! tanks! with! tap! water! (chlorine! free)! were! used! as! control.! Some!
physicochemical! parameters! were!monitored! daily:! temperature! and! pH! using! an! Orion!
potentiometer!(model!290,!Orion!Research!Inc.,!USA),!and!electrical!conductivity!using!an!
Orion!conductivityHsalinity!meter!(model!140,!Orion!Research!Inc.,!Germany).!The!bivalves!
were!fed!minced!fish!pellets!daily!(Dibaq,!Spain).!Organisms!were!sampled!after!28!days!of!
exposure,!and!soft! tissues!were!removed!using!a!scalpel! to!cut! the!adductor!muscles!and!
force!open!the!valves.!Fresh!soft!tissues!were!weighed!(fresh!weight)!and!dried!in!a!forced!
air!oven!at!60ºC!for!five!days!(dry!weight),!and!then!stored!at!–80ºC!for!further!analysis.!
The!length!of!the!shell!was!also!recorded.!Samples!of!water!from!each!tank!were!taken!at!
the!beginning!and!end!of!the!assay!for!the!determination!of!the!total!As!concentration.!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 51!
II.2.2..Histology.and.Histochemistry.
Subsamples! of! C.& fluminea! ! soft! tissues! were! taken! and! fixed! in! BouinHHollande’s!
solution!for!48!h.!The!samples!were!processed!using!the!standard!histological!procedures!
described! by!Martoja! and!Martoja! (1967).! After! paraffin! inclusion,! sections! 5–7! μm! thin!
were!stained!with!haematoxylin!and!eosin,!and!mounted!for!microscope!observation.!The!
histochemistry!was!performed!according!to!Castel’s!method!as!described!by!Lillie!(1965)!
to! reveal! As! granules! in! the! tissues.! The! effects! on! the! tissues! were! assessed! through!
histological!and!histochemical!observation,!using!an!optical!microscope!(LeicaHATC!2000,!
Wetzlar,!Germany).!
II.2.3.. Quantification.of.Metallothioneins.
The! procedures! adopted! to! determine!MTs!were! previously! described! by!Olafson!
(1981),!and!Thompson!and!Cosson!(1984).!Briefly,!MTs!were!extracted!by!homogenizing!
the! soft! tissues! from!C.& fluminea! in! TrisHHCl! (0.02!M,! pH! =! 8.6)! in! a! volume! ratio! of! 1:4!
(tissue:buffer),! in! an! iceHbath,! using! a! rotor! equipped! with! a! TFE! pestle! (HeidolphHRZR!
2100,!Heidolph!Elektro!GmbH!&!Co.!KG,!Kelheim,!Germany).!Subsamples!were!then!taken!
for!wet:dry!weight!ratio!determinations!and!metal!analysis.!The!remaining!homogenate!(3!
mL)!of!each!sample!was!centrifuged!(30,000!×!g!at!4ºC)!for!1!h.!The!cytosol!(supernatant)!
was!separated!from!the!pellet,!placed!in!a!80ºC!water!bath!for!10!min!to!denaturate!high!
molecular!weight!and!nonHheat!stable!proteins,! followed!by!centrifugation!(30,000!×!g!at!
4ºC)!for!1!h.!The!cytosolic!fractions!obtained!were!stored!at!–80ºC!for!MT!determination.!
The! quantification! of! MTs! in! the! heatHtreated! cytosolic! fraction! was! carried! out! by!
differential! pulse! polarography! for! thiolic! (–SH)! compounds,! using! the! Brdička! reaction.!
The! determination! was! carried! out! using! a! Metrohm! 694! stand! and! 693! processor!
(Metrohm!Ltd.,!Herisau,! Switzerland),!with! a! static!mercury!drop!electrode,! according! to!
the!methods!described!by!Thompson!and!Cosson!(1984)!and!Olafson!and!Olsson!(1991).!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!52!
The!threeHelectrode!system!consisted!of!a!bevelled!capillary!mercury!electrode,!a!platinum!
counter!electrode,!and!an!Ag/AgCl!reference!electrode.!The!Brdička!supporting!electrolyte!
was!prepared!weekly!according!to!the!method!proposed!by!Palecek!and!Pechan!(1971)!and!
Thompson! and! Cosson! (1984),! and! contained! 1! M! NH4Cl,! 1! M! NH4OH,! and! 2! mM!
[Co(NH3)6]Cl3,! being! stored! at! 4ºC.! Triton! xH100! (Sigma,! St.! Louis,! MO,! USA)! at! an!
appropriate!concentration!of!2.5!×!10–2!%!(v/v)!was!used!to!suppress!secondary!maxima!
and! minima! and! eliminate! baseline! noise! (Bebianno! and! Langston! 1989).! Given! the!
absence!of!a!molluscan!MT,!a!rabbit!liver!MT!(forms!I!and!II,!Sigma,!St!Louis,!MO,!USA)!was!
used! as! a! standard,! prepared! to! a! working! standard! solution! of! 10! mg.L–1! in! deionized!
water.! The! measurements! were! performed! by! adding! 20! mL! of! supporting! electrolyte!
directly! into! the!polarographic!cell,! together!with!250!μL!of!Triton!XH100!and!aliquots!of!
standard!solution!of!rabbit!MT!(250!μL)!and!sample!(25–150!μL).!The!cell!was!purged!with!
purified! nitrogen! for! 120! sec! before! analysis! (Thompson! and! Cosson! 1984).! The! MT!
concentrations! were! determined! using! the! standard! additions! method! according! to!
Bebianno!and!Langston!(1989),!and!the!results!are!expressed!as!mg.g–1!dry!weight!whole!
body!homogenate.!
II.2.4.. Arsenic.Determination..
Soft! tissue! samples! were! dried! at! 60ºC! for! five! days,! followed! by! digestion! with!
concentrated! nitric! acid! (5! mL! of! HNO3! –! Suprapur,! Merck,! Darmstadt,! Germany)! in!
pressurized!Teflon!cells!over!24!h!at!room!temperature.!The!samples!were!then!heated!at!
100ºC! for! 4! h,! before! adding! 1!mL!H2O2! (Bryan! et! al.! 1985).! After!waiting! 1! h,! digested!
samples!were!diluted!in!25!mL!of!ultrapure!water!(MilliHQ!plus).!Water!samples!(n!=!3!per!
each!experimental!condition)!were!collected! in!polyethylene!bottles!at! the!beginning!and!
the! end! of! the! assay! and! acidified! with! 10! μL.mL–1! HNO3! (Suprapur,! Merck,! Darmstadt,!
Germany).!Samples!were!stored!at!4ºC.!Arsenic!was!determined!by!electrothermal!atomic!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 53!
absorption! spectrometry! (GFAAS)! with! Zeeman! correction! and! matrix! modifier!
(Pd(NO3)2.2H2O,! Fluka),! using! a! graphite! tuve! atomizer! (AAS,! Thermoptec! M6Solaar),!
without! filtration,! after! dilution!with! ultrapure!water.! Standard! solutions!were! prepared!
from!a!commercial!inorganic!As!standard!for!atomic!absorption!(N!206962,!1!g.L–1,!Aldrich,!
USA).!The!total!As!concentration!was!determined!using!a!standard!calibration!curve.!The!
detection!and!quantification!limits!were!3.1!and!9.3!μg.L–1,!calculated!according!to!the!3σ!
and! 10σ! criteria,! respectively.! Quantification! of! total! As! in! digested! tissue! samples! was!
achieved! by! electrothermal! atomic! absorption! using! the! same! procedure! aforesaid.! The!
reference! material! DOLT! 3! (NRCCNRC,! Canada)! and! blanks! were! analyzed! in! order! to!
validate! the!analytical!procedure!analysis,!using! the!same!analytical!procedure!as! for! the!
samples.!The!total!As!measured!from!the!digested!samples!of!reference!material!(9.4!±!0.3!
mg! kg–1;! n! =! 2)! showed! good! agreement! with! the! certified! values! (10.2! ±! 0.5! mg.kgH1).!
Concentrations!are!expressed!on!a!dry!tissue!weight!basis!(μg.g–1).!
II.2.5.. Statistical.Analysis..
Statistical!analysis!was!performed!using!the!nonparametric!MannHWhitney!U!test!to!
determine! differences! between! treatment! and! control! samples.! Correlations! were!
performed!using!the!nonparamatric!Spearman!rankHorder!correlation!coefficient!(R).!The!
Statistica!5.0!software!(StatSoft!Inc.,!USA,!1995)!was!used!in!all!statistics!using!a!0.01!level!
of!significance.!
II.3.. Results.
Throughout!the!28Hday!experimental!period!no!mortality!was!registered!regardless!
of!treatment.!The!physicochemical!parameters!were!stable!and!showed!good!values!during!
theexperiments:!temperature,!20!±!2ºC;!pH,!7.0!±!0.2;!and!conductivity,!545!±!10!μS.cm–1.!
The!measurements! of! total! As! in! water! samples! at! the! beginning! and! at! the! end! of! the!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!54!
experiment!are!shown!in!table!II.1.!
Table.II.1.!Total!As!concentrations!(average!±!s.d.!μg.LH1)!measured!in!water!samples!
at!the!beginning!and!end!of!the!experiment.!
! Control* 100* 300* 500* 1000*
Ci! <3!μg.LH1! 98±6! 297±5! 495±8! 993±5!
Cf! <3!μg.LH1! 94±3! 289±3! 475±5! 971±4!
Ci:! initial! concentration;! Cf:! final! concentration;! (n=3,! each! replicate).! Limit! of!
detection:!3.1!μg.LH1!
The! results! obtained! for! total! As! accumulated! in! soft! tissues! from!C.& fluminea! are!
shown!in!figure!II.1.!The!highest!average!level!(145!±!26!μg.g–1!d.w.)!was!determined!in!soft!
tissues!from!organisms!exposed!to!1000!μg!As!L–1.!The!lowest!average!level!(0.7!±!0.1!μg.g–
1!d.w.)!was!measured!in!the!cytosolic!fraction!of!the!control!group.!
!
Figure. II.1.! Concentration! of! metallothioneins! (average! ±! s.d.! μg.LH1! dry! weight),! and!
concentration!od!As!in!the!soft!tissue!and!in!the!citosolic!fraction!(average!±!s.d.!μg.LH1!dry!
weight):!Significant!differences!from!controls!(★!p&<!0.05).!
!
!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 55!
The! statistical! analysis! of! the! results! showed! that! total! As! concentrations!
determined!in!exposed!organisms!were!significantly!different!(p!<!0.01)!from!those!of!the!
controls! in! all! treatments! and! in! whole! tissues,! as! well! as! the! cytosolic! fraction.! The!
quantified!levels!of!MTs!for!the!different!exposure!concentrations!are!also!shown!in!figure!
1.! The! average! MT! concentrations! per! test! ranged! from! 6.8! ±! 1.2! mg.g–1! (d.w.),! in! the!
control! group,! to! 19.1! ±! 3.7! mg.g–1! (d.w.),! in! organisms! exposed! to! 100! μg! As! L–1.! The!
statistical!analyses!showed!that!MTHlike!protein! induction!was!significantly!different!(p!<!
0.01)!from!controls!in!all!treatments.!Statistics!showed!a!significant!correlation!(R!=!0.6,!p!<!
0.01)! between! cytosolic! As! and!MTHlike! proteins;! however,! only! a!marginally! significant!
correlation! (R!=!0.3,!p! =!0.09)!was! found!between!whole! tissue!As!and!MTHlike!proteins.!
Nonetheless,!a!better!significant!correlation!(R!=!0.7,!p!<!0.01)!was!observed!between!As!in!
tissues!and!cytosolic!As.!The!percentages!of! total!As!determined! in! the! cytosolic! fraction!
ranged!from!5.5%!in!controls!to!17.3%!in!organisms!exposed!to!100!μg!As!L–1!relative!to!As!
in!soft!tissues!(figure!II.2.).!
!
Figure.II.2.!Distribution!of!As!in!soft!tissues!and!in!the!heatHtreated!cytosolic!fraction.!
The!histochemical!evaluation!results!support!the!bioaccumulation!results,!revealing!
that! As! granules! are! present! in! the! tissues! of! C.& fluminea! exposed! to! the! different! As!
!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!56!
concentrations,! mainly! in! the! cells! of! the! digestive! gland! (figure! II.3).! The! histological!
observations!also!showed!that!organisms,!especially!those!exposed!to!1000!μg!As!L–1,!have!
degeneration!of!the!cells!from!the!digestive!gland.!
!
Figure. II.. 3.! (A)! Digestive! gland! cells! of! a! control! organism! and! (B)! histochemical!
detection!of!As!granules!within!digestive!gland!cell!of!an!organism!exposed!to!1000!μg.LH1.!
Arrowheads:!As!granules!
II.4.. Discussion.
The! total! As! concentrations! found! in! the! tissues! of! the! control! organisms! are! in!
agreement! with! the! levels! reported! by! other! authors! for! the! same! species! (Johns! and!
Luoma! 1990),! as! well! as! for! other! bivalve! species! such! as! oysters,! clams,! and! mussels!
(Suñer! et! al.! 1999,! ValetteHSilver! et! al.! 1999,! Argese! et! al.! 2005,! Orescanin! et! al.! 2006,!
Santos! et! al.! 2007).! The! results! of! total! As! accumulated! in! whole! soft! tissues! showed! a!
significant! increase! (P! <! 0.01)! after! 28! days! of! exposure! according! to! the! different!
treatments.!Similarly,!total!As!levels!found!in!the!cytosolic!fractions!registered!a!significant!
increase!(p!<!0.01)!and!showed!a!good!correlation!with!As!in!whole!soft!tissues!(R!=!0.7,!p!<!
0.01).!The!levels!of!total!As!found!in!the!water!samples!showed!a!decrease!at!the!end!of!the!
experimental! period! for! all! tested! concentrations.! This! difference! can! be! due! to! As!
bioaccumulation!and!eventually! to!As!adsorption!on!the!tank!walls.!The!MTHlike!proteins!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 57!
have!been!used!as!biomarkers!of!exposure!to!high!levels!of!metals,!where!an!induction!is!
usually! associated! with! elevations! in! tissue! metal! concentration,! suggesting! a!
correspondence!between!bioaccumulated!metals!and!MTHlike!protein!induction!(Bebianno!
and!Langston!1993,!Roesijadi!1994).!The!detection!and! identification!of!MTHlike!proteins!
from!C.& fluminea! tissues! is! a! common! procedure! and! has! been! done! in! previous! studies!
(Baudrimont! et! al.! 1997,!Marie! et! al.! 2006,! Diniz! et! al.! 2007),! showing! protein! fractions!
consistent! with! the! typical! size! of! dimeric! MTs! (10–20! kDa)! found! in! many! aquatic!
invertebrate!organisms.! In!addition,! the!same!authors!showed!that! this!bivalve!species! is!
able! to! induce!MTHlike! proteins!when! exposed! to! high!metal! concentrations.! Our! results!
show!a!significant!increase!in!MTHlike!proteins!for!all!tests!when!compared!to!controls!but!
no! significant! differences! were! found! between! treatments,! which! may! suggest! that! the!
capacity!to!sequester!the!metalloid! is!diminished!as!the!result!of!an!excess!of! total!As,!as!
also! suggested! by! Baudrimont! et! al.! (2003).! The! increase! in! total! As! concentrations!
observed! in! whole! soft! tissues! was! accompanied! by! a! significant! induction! of! MTHlike!
proteins!in!comparison!to!the!controls;!however,!the!best!correlation!was!found!between!
the! cytosolic! fraction! As! and! MTHlike! proteins! (R! =! 0.6,! p! <! 0.01),! indicating! a! close!
relationship!between!the!metalloid!present!in!the!cytosol!and!MT!induction.!These!results!
suggest! that,! most! probably,! other! detoxification! mechanisms! are! involved! in! the!
neutralization! of! the! toxic! effects! of! As,! by! reducing! the! intracellular! metal! availability.!
Some! of! those!mechanisms!may! be! related! to! intracellular! storage! and! sequestration! of!
metals! by! vesicleHbound! granules! and! other! nonHMT! cytosolic! proteins! (Roesijadi! and!
Robinson!1994,!Baudrimont!et!al.!1999,!Cecílio!et!al.!2006).!Sebesvari!et!al.!(2005)!showed!
that!this!species!is!capable!of!actively!regulating!As,!while!Marie!et!al.!(2006)!reported!that!
C.&fluminea!has!more!efficient!detoxification!mechanisms!than!another!freshHwater!bivalve,!
Dreissena!polymorpha,! even!under! exposure! to!higher! concentrations! of!metals! (namely!
Cd! and! Zn),! probably! due! to! a! more! efficient! adaptive! response.! Moreover,! the! low!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!58!
percentages!of! total!As! found! in! the! cytosol! supports! this!hypothesis,! suggesting! that! for!
the! concentrations! tested,!C.& fluminea! is! capable! of! regulating! the! excess! of!metalloid,! at!
least!to!some!extent,!using!different!detoxification!mechanisms!that!may!also!act!together!
for! this! purpose.! In! addition,! it!must! be! noted! that! biotic! parameters! such! as! body! size!
and/or! weight,! phenotypic! differences,! sex,! physiological! conditions,! and! reproductive!
state!may! influence!metal! bioaccumulation! (MartínHDíaz! et! al.! 2006).!The!histochemistry!
revealed!the!presence!of!As!granules!accumulated!in!the!bivalve!soft!tissues,!mostly!in!cells!
from! the! digestive! gland,! supporting! the! higher! levels! of! total! As! determined! in! tissues!
according! to! the! different! exposure! concentrations.! These! results! emphasize! the!
hypothesis!of!the!participation!of!other!detoxifying!mechanisms!other!than!As!chelating!by!
MTs.! The! present! study! shows! that!C.& fluminea! bioaccumulates!As! according! to! different!
concentrations!of!this!metalloid!in!water.!The!induction!of!MTHlike!proteins!can!be!inferred!
as!a!detoxifying!response!to!contamination!pressure;!however,!the!total!As!concentrations!
found! in! the! cytosolic! fractions! were!much! lower! than! the! total! As! found! in! whole! soft!
tissues,!supporting!the!hypothesis!that!other!detoxifying!mechanisms,!besides!MTs,!play!an!
important!role!in!detoxification,!since!MTs!are!cytosolic!proteins.!This!study!also!reinforces!
the!suitability!of!using!C.&fluminea! !as!a!potential!biological!indicator!of!As!contamination,!
but! highlights! the! need! to! develop! more! studies! using,! for! example,! other! types! of!
biomarkers!(e.g.,!reactive!oxygen!species,!glutathioneHSHtransferase,! lipid!peroxidation)!to!
complement!the!As!ecotoxicologic!traits!found!to!this!date!in!this!bivalve.!
II.5.. References.
Argese!E,!Bettiol!C,!Rigo!C,!Bertini!S,!Colomban!S,!Ghetti!PF!(2005)!Distribution!of!arsenic!
compounds!in!Mytilus&galloprovincialis!of!the!Venice!lagoon!(Italy).&Sci.&Total&Environ.&348:&
267–277.!
Baudrimont!M,!Metivaud!J,!MauryHBrachet!R,!Ribeyre!F,!Boudu!A!(1997)!Bioaccumulation!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 59!
and! metallothionein! response! in! the! Asiatic! clam! Corbicula& fluminea! after! experimental!
exposure!to!cadmium!and!inorganic!mercury.!Environ.&Toxicol.&Chem.&16:&2096–2105.!
Baudrimont! M,! Andres! S,! Metivaud! J,! Lapaquellerie! Y,! Ribeyre! F,! Maillet! N,! Latouche! C,!
Boudou!A!(1999)!Field!transplantation!of!the!freshwater!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea!along!
a!polymetallic!contamination!gradient!(River!Lot,!France).! II.!Metallothionein!response!to!
metal!exposure.!Environ.&Toxicol.&Chem.&18:&2472–2477.!
Baudrimont!M,!Andres!S,!Durrieu!G,!Boudou!A!(2003)!The!key!role!of!metallothioneins!in!
the!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea!during!the!depuration!phase,!after!in!situ!exposure!to!Cd!and!
Zn.!Aquat.!Toxicol.&63:&89–102.!
Bebianno! MJ,! Langston! WJ! (1989)! Quantification! of! metallothioneins! in! marine!
invertebrates!using!differential!pulse!polarography.!Portugal.&Electrochim.&Acta&7:&511–524.!
Bebianno! MJ,! Langston! WJ! (1993). Turnover! rate! of! metallothionein! and! cadmium! in!
Mytilus!edulis.!Biometals&6:&239–244.!
Bebianno! MJ,! Geret! F,! Hoarau! P,! Serafim! MA,! Coelho! MR,! GnassiaHBarelli! M,! Romeo! M.!
(2004)!Biomarkers!in!Ruditapes!decussatus:!A!potential!bioindicator!species.!Biomarkers&
9:&305–330.!
Besada!V,!González!JJ,!Schultze!F!(2006)!Mercury,!cadmium,!lead,!arsenic,!copper!and!zinc!
concentrations! in!albacore,!yellowfintuna!and!bigeye! tuna! from!the!Atlantic!Ocean.&Cienc.&
Mar.&32:&439–445.!
Bilos!C,!Colombo!JC,!Presa!MJR!(1998).Trace!metals!in!suspended!particles,!sediments!and!
Asiatic!clams!(Corbicula&fluminea)!of!the!Rio!de!La!Plata!Estuary,!Argentina.!Environ.&Pollut.&
99:&1–11.!
Bryan!GW,!Langston!WJ,!Hummerstone!LG,!Burt!GR!(1985)!A!guide!to! the!assessment!of!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!60!
heavyHmetal! contamination! in! estuaries!using!biological! indicators.!Occas.&Publ.&Mar.&Biol.&
Assoc.&UK&4:&1–74.!
Carpéne!E!(1993)!Metallothionein!in!marine!molluscs.!In:!Dallinger!R!(ed.),!Ecotoxicology&
of&Metals&in&Invertebrates.!CRC,!Boca!Raton,!pp.!55–72.!
Cecílio!P,!Raimundo!J,!Canário!J,!Vale!C,!Sequeira!M!(2006)!Relationships!between!total!and!
organic! mercury! concentrations! in! tissues! and! length! of! common! dolphins! (Delphinus!
delphis)!from!the!Portuguese!coast.!Cienc.&Mar.&32:&379–387.!
Couillard!Y,!Campbell!PGC,!Tessier!A!(1993)!Response!of!metallothionein!concentrations!in!
a! freshwater!bivalve! (Anodonta&grandis)! along!an!environmental! cadmium!gradient.!Mol.!
Mar.!Biol.!Biotechnol.!2:!299–313.!
Diniz!MS,!Hugo!Santos!M,!Costa!PM,!Peres! I,!Costa!MH,!Capelo! JL!(2007)!Metallothionein!
responses! in! the! Asiatic! clam! (Corbicula& fluminea)! after! exposure! to! trivalent! arsenic.!
Biomarkers&12:&589–598.!
Domouhtsidou!GP,!Dailianis!S,!Kaloyianni!M,!Dimitriadis!VK!(2004)!Lysosomal!membrane!
stability! and! metallothionein! content! in! Mytilus! galloprovincialis! (L.),! as! biomarkers:!
Combination!with!trace!metal!concentrations.!Mar.&Pollut.&Bull.&48:&572–586.!
Fernández!N,!Cesar!A,!González!M,!DelValls!TA!(2006)!Level!of!contamination!in!sediments!
affected!by!the!Prestige!oil!spill!and!impact!on!the!embryo!development!of!the!sea!urchin.!
Cienc.&Mar.&32:&421–427.!
IRAR!(2005)!Instituto!Regulador!das!Águas!e!dos!Resíduos:!Relatório!Anual!do!Sector!das!
Águas!e!Resíduos!em!Portugal!(RASARPH2004).!Vol.!4.!Controlo!da!Qualidade!da!Água!para!
Consumo!Humano.!238!pp.!
Johns! C,! Luoma! SN! (1990)! Arsenic! in! benthic! bivalves! of! San! Francisco! Bay! and! the!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 61!
Sacramento/San!Joaquin!River.!Sci.&Tot.&Environ.&97:&673–684.!
Kagi!JHR!(1993)!Evolution,!structure!and!chemical!activity!of!class!I!metallothioneins:!An!
overview.!In:!Suzuki!KT,!Imura!N,!Kimura!M!(eds.),!Metallothionein!III.!Birkhauser&Verlag,&
Switzerland,&pp.&29–55.!
Lillie!RD!(1965)!Histopathologic!Technic!and!Practical!Histochemistry.!McGraw!Hill,!New!
York,!445!pp.!
Marie! V,! Baudrimont! M,! Boudou! A! (2006)! Cadmium! and! zinc! bioaccumulation! and!
metallothionein! response! in! two! freshwater! bivalves! (Corbicula& fluminea! and! Dreissena!
polymorpha)!transplanted!along!a!polymetallic!gradient.!Chemosphere&65:&609–617.!
Margoshes!M,!Valee!BL!(1957)!A!cadmium!protein!from!equine!idney!cortex.!J.&Am.&Chem.&
Soc.&79:&4813–4814.!
MartínHDíaz!ML,!Riba!I,!CasadoHMartínez!MC,!DelValls!A!(2006)!Bioavailability!of!metals!in!
sediments!from!Spanish!estuaries!using!Carcinus!maenas.!Cienc.&Mar.&32:&412–420.!
Martoja! R,!Martoja!M! (1967)! Initiation! aux! Tecniques! de! l’Histologie! Animal.!Masson! et!
Cie.,!Paris,!345!pp.!
!
Mason! RP,! Laporte! JM,! Andres! S! (2000)! Factors! controlling! the! bioaccumulation! of!
mercury,!methylmercury,!arsenic,!selenium,!and!cadmium!by!freshwater!invertebrates!and!
fish.!Arch.&Environ.&Contam.&Toxicol.&38:&283–297.!
Mouthon! J! (1981)! Sur! la! presence! en! France! et! au! Portugal! de! Corbicula! (Bivalvia,!
Corbiculidae)!originaire!d’Asie.!Basteria&45:&109–116.!
Mouthon!J!(2001)!Life!cycle!and!population!dynamics!of!the!Asian!clam!Corbicula&fluminea!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!62!
(Bivalvia:!Corbiculidae)!in!the!Saone!River!at!Lyon!(France).!Hydrobiologia&452:&109–119.!
Mouthon! J! (2003)! Longitudinal! and! temporal! variations! of! density! and! size! structure! of!
Corbicula& fluminea! (Bivalvia)! populations! in! the! Saône! and! Rhône! rivers! (France).! Ann.&
Limnol.&–&Int.&J.&Lim.&39:15–25.!
Olafson! RW! (1981)! Differential! pulse! polarographic! determination! of! murine!
metallothionein!induction!kinetics.!J.&Biol.&Chem.&256:&1263–1268.!
Olafson! RW,! Olsson! PE! (1991)! Electrochemical! detection! of! metallothionein.! Meth.&
Enzymol.&205:&205–213.!
Oliver!LM,!Fisher!WS!(1999)!Appraisal!of!prospective!bivalve!immunomarkers.!Biomarkers&
4:&510–530.!
Orescanin! V,! Lovrencic! I,! Mikelic! L,! Barisic! D,! Matasin! Z,! Lulic! S,! Pezelj! D! (2006).
Biomonitoring! of! heavy!metals! and! arsenic! on! the! east! coast! of! the!middle! Adriatic! Sea!
using!Mytilus!galloprovincialis.!Nucl.&Instr.&Meth.&Phys.&Res.&B&245:&495–500.!
Palecek! E,! Pechan! Z! (1971)! Estimation! of! nanogram! quantities! of! proteins! by! pulse!
polarographic!techniques.!Anal.&Biochem.&42:&59–71.!
Prego! R,! CobeloHGarcía! A,! MarmolejoHRodríguez! J,! SantosHEcheandía! J! (2006)! Trace!
elements! in! the! Prestige! fuelHoil! spill:! Levels! and! influence! on! Laxe! Ria! sediments! (NW!
Iberian!Peninsula).!Cienc.&Mar.&32:&179–186.!
Roesijadi!G!(1994)!Behavior!of!metallothioneinHbound!metals!in!a!natural!population!of!an!
estuarine!mollusc.!Mar.&Environ.&Res.&38:&147–168.!
Roesijadi! G! (1999)! The! basis! for! increased! metallothionein! in! a! natural! population! of!
Crassostrea!virginica.!Biomarkers&4:&467–472.!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
! 63!
Roesijadi! G,! Robinson! WE! (1994)! Metal! regulation! in! aquatic! animals:! Mechanisms! of!
uptake,!accumulation,!and!release.!In:!Malins!DC,!Ostrander!GK!(eds.),!Aquatic&Toxicology:&
Molecular,&Biochemical,&and&Cellular&Perspectives.&CRC,&Boca&Raton,&pp.&387–420.!
RomeroHIsart! N,! Vasák! M! (2002)! Advances! in! the! structure! and! chemistry! of!
metallothioneins.!J.&Inorg.&Biochem.&88:&388–396.!!
Santos!HM,!Diniz!M,!Costa!PM,!Peres!I,!Costa!MH,!Alves!S,!Capelo!JL!(2007).Toxicological!
effects! and! bioaccumulation! in! the! freshwater! clam! (Corbicula& fluminea)! following!
exposure!to!trivalent!arsenic.!Environ.&Toxicol.&22:&502–509.!
Sebesvari! Z,! Ettwigb! F,! Emonsc! H! (2005)! Biomonitoring! of! tin! and! arsenic! in! different!
compartments! of! a! limnic! ecosystem! with! emphasis! on! Corbicula& fluminea! and!
Dikerogammarus!villosus.!J.&Environ.&Monit.&7:&203–207.!
Stillman!MJ!(1995)!Metallothioneins.!Coord.&Chem.&Rev.&144:&461–511.!
Suñer!MA,!Devesa!V,!Muñoz!O,!López!F,!Montoro!R,!Arias!AM,!Blasco! J!(1999)!Total!and!
inorganic! arsenic! in! the! fauna! of! the! Guadalquivir! estuary:! Environmental! and! human!
health!implications.!Sci.&Tot.&Environ.&242:&261–270.!
Thompson! JAJ,! Cosson! RP! (1984)! An! improved! electrochemical! method! for! the!
quantification!of!metallothioneins!in!marine!organisms.!Mar.&Environ.&Res.&11:&137–152.!
ValetteHSilver!NJ,!Riedel!GF,!Crecelius!EA,!Windom!H,!Smith!RG,!Dolvin!SS!(1999)!Elevated!
arsenic!concentrations!in!bivalves!from!the!southeast!coasts!of!the!USA.!Mar.&Environ.&Res.&
48:&311–333.!
Vahter!M!(2002).Mechanisms!of!arsenic!biotransformation.!Toxicology&181:&211–217.!
Vidal!ML,!Bassères!A,!Narbonne!JF!(2002).Seasonal!variations!of!pollution!biomarkers!in!
two!populations!of!Corbicula&fluminea!(Müller).!Comp.&Biochem.&Physiol.&C&13:&133–151.!
Chapter!II.!Histological!histochemical!and!biochemical!responses&
!64!
Waring! J,! Maher! W! (2005)! Arsenic! bioaccumulation! and! species! in! marine! Polychaeta.!
Appl.&Organomet.&Chem.&19:&917–929.&
WHO,!World!Health!Organization!(2001)!Arsenic!and!arsenic!compounds.!Environ.!Health!
Crit.!224.!Monograph,&coord.&Dr.&J&Ng,&Geneva,&pp.&61–167.!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! 65!
Chapter!III.!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!Arsenic!in!
Corbicula&fluminea!
III.1.. Abstract.
Arsenite! (AsIII)! uptake! and! elimination! kinetics! were! studied! in! a! freshwater!
bivalve,!Corbicula&fluminea,!exposed!to!several!nominal!concentrations!of!AsIII!(0,!100,!300,!
500,!and!1000!μg.LH1)!in!a!static!28Hday!assay,!folH!lowed!by!a!depuration!stage!of!14!days.!
At! the! end! of! each! sampling! time! (days! 0,! 7,! 28,! and! 42)! wholeHbody! portions! were!
surveyed! for! total! As! concentrations! and,! compliH! mentarily,! surveyed! for! wholeHbody!
metallothionein!(MT)!induction!to!assess!its!role!as!a!defense!mechanism!against!exposure!
to! AsIII.! Histochemical! evaluation! of! the! digestive! gland! was! performed! to! verify! As!
deposition! and! eliminaH! tion! in! the! tissue.! Results! show! a! significant! increase! in!wholeH
body!total!As!after!28!days!of!exposure!for!all!treatments,!followed!by!a!decrease!at!the!end!
of! the! depuration! phase.! Biodynamic! kinetic!models! for!As! uptake! and! elimination!were!
obtained! from!bioaccumulation!data!during! the!exposure!phase,! for!all!As! treatments,!by!
estimating! uptake! and! elimination! rate! constants.! Bioconcentration! factors! (BCFs)! were!
estimated! by! the! ratio! of! these! constants.! Results! revealed! that! exposure! to! higher!
concentrations! of! AsIII! causes! a! decrease! in! BCFs,! suggesting! that! C.! fluminea! triggers!
effective!regulatory!mechanisms!when!exposed!to!higher!concentrations!of!the!metalloid.!
Significant! induction! of! MT! was! detected! during! the! exposure! phase,! followed! by! a!
decrease! in! MT! concentration! to! control! levels! after! depuration! for! all! treatments.! No!
significant! differences! in! MT! concentrations! were! observed! between! treatments.! This!
finding! may! confirm! the! role! of! MT! as! part! of! the! As! regulation! process,! but! its!
independence!relative!to!concentrations!of!AsIII!in!water!suggests!that!MT!induction!is!not!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!66!
dose! dependent.! The! histochemical! evaluation! provided! clear! evidence! that! As! was!
effectively! accumulated! in! the! digestive! gland! during! exposure! and! eliminated! during!
depuration.!The!present!work!demonstrated! that!C.!fluminea! is! capable!of! regulating!As,!
even!at!exposures!as!high!as!1000!lg!LH1!of!waterborne!AsIII.!
III.2.. Materials.and.Methods.
III.2.1..Experimental.Procedure.
The! freshwater! bivalves,! Corbicula& fluminea,! collected! from! the! river! Minho’s!
hydrographic!basin!(northwestern!Portugal)!were!acclimated!in!a!closed!continuousHflow!
system!with!filtered!and!aerated! tap!water.!Animals!were! fed!daily!with!a! suspension!of!
minced!fish!pellets!(DibaQ,!Segovia,!Spain).!The!assay!was!carried!out!in!static!mode!and!in!
duplicate,!at!20!±!1°C!and!pH!7.06!±!0.07,!with!a!12:12Hh!light:dark!photoperiod.!Bivalves!
(soft!body!mass,!1.6!±!0.3!g;!shell!length,!2.0!±!0.3!cm)!were!randomly!distributed!by!20LH
capacity!polyvinyl!tanks!(15!individuals!per!replica),!with!constant!aeration,!and!exposed!
to! different! nominal! concentrations! of! AsIII:! 0! (control),! 100,! 300,! 500,! and! 1000! μg.LH1.!
AsIII! stock! solutions!were! prepared! from! standard! inorganic! trivalent! arsenic! (Sigma,! St.!
Louis,!MO,!USA).!The!control!test!was!performed!with!clean,!dechlorinated,!tap!water.!The!
assay!was!divided!into!exposure!and!depuration!phases.!The!exposure!phase!lasted!for!28!
days,!with! three!sampling! times,!at!days!0! (T0),!7! (T7),! and!28! (T28).!After!T28!animals!
were! allowed! to!deH! purate! in! clean!water! for! a! further!14!days! (depuration!phase),! the!
assay! was! terminated! at! day! 42! (T42).! At! T0! 10! animals! from! acclimation! tanks! were!
sacrificed!for!analysis,!and!at!subsequent!sampling!times!five!individuals!per!replica!were!
processed!for!wholeHbody!As!and!MT!concentrations!and!histochemical!evaluation.!At!each!
sampling!time!water!samples!were!collected!to!determine!the!real!As!concentrations.!
!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 67!
III.2.2..Arsenic.Determination.
Total!As!in!tissue!was!determined!in!homogenized!whole!soft!body!samples,!dried,!
and!digested! in!pressurized!TFE!cells!with!HNO3!and!H2O2!(Bryan!et!al.!1985).!Total!As!
concentrations! were! measured! by! electrothermal! atomic! absorption! spectrometry! (ETH
AAS),!with! Zeeman! correction! and! a!matrix!modifier! (Pd[NO3]2.2H2O! from! Fluka,! Buchs,!
Switzerland),! using! a! graphite! tube! atomizer! (M6Solaar! AAS;! Thermo! Electron! Corp.,!
Waltham,! MA,! USA).! Analysis! of! DOLT! 3! reference! material! (National! Research! Council,!
Ottawa,!Canada)!and!blanks!followed!the!same!analytical!procedure!used!for!the!samples!
to!validate!the!procedure!and!the!measured!values!were!found!within!the!certified!range.!
The! calibration! curve! was! obtained! from! standard! inorganic! As! for! atomic! absorption!
spectrometry!(N206962!standard;!Aldrich,!Milwaukee,!WI,!USA).!Concentrations!are!given!
as! micrograms! total! As! per! gram! tissue! dry! weight! (d.w.).! Total! As! in! water! was!
determined! using! the! same! procedure,! from! water! samples! acidified! with! 1! μg.mLH
1Suprapur!grade!65%!HNO3!(Merck,!Darmstadt,!Germany).!
III.2.3..Uptake.and.Elimination.Kinetics.and.Bioaccumulation.Factors.
FirstHorder! twoHcompartment! kinetic! models! were! obtained! to! estimate! the! As!
uptake!and!elimination!(excretion)!rate!constants!k! .!According!to!the!biodynamic!models!
detailed! by! De! Kock! and! Kramer! (1994! )! and! Luoma! and! Rainbow! (2005! ),! the!
bioaccumulation!of!a!contaminant!results!from!the!balance!between!uptake!from!water!and!
elimination! from! tissues,! which! depends! on! the! concentration! of! the! bioavailable!
contaminant!in!the!surrounding!medium.!!
CAs =k1CAs(water )
k2(1− e−k2t )+CAs(init.)e
−k2t! Equation!III.1!
Arsenic! bioaccumulation! may! therefore! be! given! by! the! model! where! CAs. is! the!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!68!
concentration!of!total!As!in!tissue!at!time!t,!k1!!is!the!uptake!constant,!k2!!is!the!elimination!
constant,! CAs(init.). is! the! baseline! As! concentration! in! tissue! (i.e.,! at! the! beginning! of! the!
exposure! period),! and! CAs(water)& is! the! As! concentration! in! the! water,! assuming! that! it!
remains! constant! and! no! decay! parameter! is! necessary! in! the! model.! Since! tissue! As!
concentrations!are!given!as!micrograms!per!gram!tissue!d.w.,!water!As!as!micrograms!per!
liter,! and! time! as! days,! k1! ! is! given! as!micrograms! As! per! gram! tissue! d.w.! per! day! per!
microgram!As!per!liter!water,!which,!simplified,!becomes!liters!per!gram!per!day!(L.gX1.dayX
1).! The! constant!k2! is! expressed! as! daysX1! ,! since! the! elimination! rate! over! time!may! be!
obtained! by! multiplying! this! constant! by! the! As! concentration! in! tissue! (Luoma! and!
Rainbow! 2005).! The! constants! k1! ! and! k2! are! thus! random! coefficients! related! to! the!
removal! of! the! element! from! the! water,! as! is! its! incorporated! in! the! tissues! and! its!
elimination! from! the! organism,! respectively.! Under! steadyHstate! conditions,! the!
bioconcentration!factor!(BCF)!can!be!estimated!as!the!ratio!of!k.constants!(e.g.,!Bailer!et!al.!
2000):!
BCF = k1k2
! Equation!III.2!
Bioconcentration! factors!are! thus!given!as! liters!per!gram!(L.gX1! ).!Standard!errors!
(SE)!for!BCFs!were!estimated!as!described!by!Bailer!et!al.!(2000!),!according!to!the!formula!
SE(BCF) ≈ σ12
k22 −
2k1σ1,2k23 +
k12σ 2
2
k24 ! Equation!III.3!
where! r2! ! is! the! variance! of! each! k! ! estimation! and! r1,2!is! the! covariance! between!
both!estimations!since!they!were!obtained!by!the!same!model.!Estimation!was!done!using!
bioaccumulation!data! from!the!exposure!phase.!Since!wáter!As!concentrations!were!kept!
constant!during!the!exposure!phase!in!each!experimental!treatment,!four!different!models!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 69!
(corresponding!to!the!nominal!exposures!to!100,!300,!500,!and!100!μg.LX1!)!were!obtained.!
Rate!constants!k1!!and!k2!!were!estimated!by!iterative!least!squares.!Model!goodness!of!fit!
was!assessed!by!the!r2!statistic.!
III.2.4..Maetallothionein.Determination.
MT! was! determined! by! quantification! of! thiolic! (–SH)! groups! in! heatHtreated!
cytosols!from!wholeHbody!samples!according!to!the!Brdicˇka!reaction,!as!described!by!Diniz!
et!al.!(2007).!WholeHbody!tissue!samples!were!homogenized!in!the!cold!(4!ºC),! in!3!ml!of!
0.02!M!TrisHHCl!buffer!(pH!8.6)!and!centrifuged!at!30,000!g!!for!1!h!at!4!ºC.!The!supernatant!
(cytosol)! was! then! separated! from! the! pellet,! heatHtreated! at! 80! ºC! for! 10! min,! and!
subsequently!centrifuged!at!30,000!g!for!1!h!at!4!ºC!to!precipitate!residual!high!molecular!
weight! and! nonHheatHstable! proteins.! Quantification! of! MT! equivalents! in! heatHtreated!
cytosols!was!performed!by!means!of!differentialHpulse!polarography!with!a!static!mercury!
drop! electrode! (DPPHSMDE)! using! a! 693! VA! processor! and! a! 694! VA! stand! (Metrohm,!
Herisau,! Switzerland).! The! threeHelectrode! system! consisted! of! a! mercury! capillary!
working!electrode,!a!platinum!auxiliary!electrode,!and!an!Ag/AgCl!reference!electrode.!The!
Brdicka!supporting!electrolyte!was!prepared!according!to!Palecek!and!Pechan!(1971!)!and!
contained!1!M!NH4Cl,! 1!M!NH4OH,! and!2!mM!(CoCNH3)6Cl3! (hexaminecobalt! III! chloride;!
Sigma).!Triton!XH100!(Sigma),!2.5!9!10H2!%!(v/v),!was!added!to!the!electrolyte!prior!to!use!
to!suppress!baseline!noise.!The!quantification!procedure!by!DPPSMDE!was!adapted! from!
Thompson! and! Cosson! (1984).! MT! concentrations! were! determined! using! the! standard!
addition!method.!In!the!absence!of!a!standard!mollusk!MT,!determination!of!C.&fluminea!MT!
was!performed!using!a!rabbit! liver!MT!(forms!I!and!II)!standard!(Sigma),!as!validated!by!
Diniz!et!al.!(2007).!Results!are!expressed!as!milligrams!MT!per!gram!tissue!d.w.!
!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!70!
III.2.5..Histochemistry..
Fresh!samples!of!wholeHbody!C.&fluminea!!were!placed!in!Castel’s!fixative,!containing!
10%!(v/v)!formaldehyde!and!2.5%!(m/v)!copper!sulfate,!for!5!days.!After!washing!for!24!h!
with! distilled! water,! samples! were! embedded! in! paraffin! for! histological! sectioning! as!
described!by!Martoja!and!Martoja!(1967).!After!inclusion!in!paraffin,!5H7!μm!sections!were!
counterstained!with!Nuclear!Fast!Red!(Sigma).!Castel’s!method!for!arsenic!histochemistry!
was! employed! as! described! by! Lillie! (1965! ).! Histochemical! evaluation! was! performed!
using!a!DMLB!optical!microscope!(Leica!Microsystems,!Wetzal,!Germany).!
II.2.5.. Statistical.Analysis..
The!nonparametric!statistics!Mann–Whitney!U!and!Kruskall–Wallis!H!were!used!to!
identify! differences! between! exposure! and! control! treatments! and! within! groups,!
respectively,! after! failure! to! demonstrate! homogeneity! of! variances! by! Levene’s! test.!
Correlation!analysis!was!obtained!with!Spearman!rankHorder!correlations!R!!or!Kendall’s!s!!
statistics.! Inference!on!BCF!estimates!was!obtained!with! the!zHtest.!The!significance! level!
was! set! at! 5%.! Statistical! analysis! and!model! parameter! estimation!were!done!using! the!
Statistica!6.0!software!(StatSoft!Inc.,!Tulsa,!OK,!USA),!after!Sheskin!(2000!).!
III.3.. Results.
III.3.1..Arsenic.Concentration.in.Water.
Arsenic!Concentrations! in!water!during! the!experimental!period!no!mortality!was!
observed!in!any!treatment.!Total!As!concentrations!determined!in!water!samples!collected!
from!the!different!treatments!were!found!to!be!very!close!to!the!nominal!concentrations!of!
AsIII!exposure!(table!III.!1).!No!significant!differences!were!detected!between!the!beginning!
and! the! end!of! the! experimental! period! (Mann–Whitney!U,! p>0.05),!which! confirms! that!
CAs(water)!(Equation!III.1)!can!be!regarded!as!constant.!!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 71!
Table. III.1.! Average! ±! standard! deviation! values! of! effective! total! As! concentration!
(μg.LH1)!measured!in!water!samples!at!the!exposed!assay.!
! Control* 100* 300* 500* 1000*
T0! <3!μg.LH1! 96±2! 306±5! 540±8! 1010±3!
T28! <3!μg.LH1! 92±3! 299±3! 530±5! 991±4!
Limit!of!detection:!3.1!μg.LH1!
III.3.2..Arsenic.Bioacumulation.and.Elimination.
The!data!obtained!from!clam!tissue!samples!collected!at!T7!and!T28!!regarding!the!
different!exposures!to!AsIII!!(100,!300,!500,!and!1000!μg!As!LX1!)!are!shown!in!figure!III.1!,!
which!also!reports!total!As!concentrations!for!depurated!organisms.!!
!
Figure. III.1.! Average! total! As! accumulation! in! exposed! organisms.! Error! bars! represent!
standard! deviation.! Significant! differences! (★)! from! control! organisms! and! (†)! from! the!
other!exposed!groups,!respectively!(MannHWhitney!U,!p&<!0.05).!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!72!
Total!As! concentration! in! control! clams!was!10.8!±!6.4! μg!As! gH1! d.w.! and!did!not!
vary! significantly! along! the! experiment! time! (p& >! 0.05).! The! levels! of! As! in! organisms!
sampled!at!T0!!(11.7!±!4.4!μg!As!gX1!d.w.)!were!not!significantly!different!from!controls!(p&>!
0.05).! During! the! exposure! phase,! a! very! significant! increase! in! accumulated! As! was!
observed!for!all!treatments!at!T28!(p!<!0.05)!but!not!at!T7!.!At!the!end!of!the!exposure!term!
a!strong!correlation!between!As!in!water!and!As!in!mollusks’!whole!soft!body!(Spearman!R!
=! 0.75,! p! <! 0.05)! was! observed.! After! 14! days! of! depuration! a! significant! decrease! was!
observed! (p! <! 0.05)! in! the! contents! of! total! As! in! the!whole! soft! tissues! of! the! clams! in!
comparison!with! levels!measured!at!T28,! for!all! treatments.!The!decrease! in!wholeHbody!
total!As!ranged!between!79%!and!91%.!
III.3.3..Biodynamic.Accumulation.Model.and.Bioconcentration.Factors.
Bioaccumulation! data! from! the! exposure! phase! were! successfully! fitted! to!model!
(equation! III.1),! yielding! four! different! models! that! explain! 95.5%–98.4%! of! the! total!
variance!(figure!III.2).!
!
Figure.III.2.!Estimated!models!for!all!AsIII!treatments!during!the!exposure!phase!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 73!
Estimated! k! constants! and! respective! BCFs! are! presented! in! table! III.2.! The! BCF!
estimated!for!the!100!μg.LX1!exposure!was!found!to!be!significantly!higher!than!the!other!
treatments!(p!<.0.01).!Although!no!other!significant!differences!were!found!between!BCFs,!
these!were!found!to!be!negatively!correlated!with!As!exposures!(Kendall’s!τ!=.X.1,!p!<!0.05),!
decreasing!with!increasing!exposures!to!waterborne!AsIII.!
Table.III.2.!Results!of!the!kinetics!study!of!the!exposure!phase!
Treatment!
(μg!AsIII!.LH1)!
k1*
(L!gH1!dayH1)*
K2*
(L!gH1!dayH1)*
BCF.±.SE.
(L!gH1)*
100! H0.019! H0.176! 0.110±0.018!
300! H0.003! H0.119! 0.024±0.015!
500! H0.004! H0.173! 0.021±0.004!
1000! H0.002! H0.162! 0.010±0.004!
Note:!BCF!bioconcentration!factor;!k1*uptake!constant;!k2*elimination!constant;!SE!standard!
error!
III.3.4..Metallothionein.Induction.
The!MT!induction!in!exposed!organisms!was!found!to!be!significantly!different!from!
controls!only!at!T28!(figure!III.3).!Induction!was!higher!in!organisms!exposed!to!100!μg.LX1.!
The!concentrations!of!MTs!in!the!organisms!used!as!controls!(7.8!±!0.8!mg.gH1!d.w.)!did!not!
vary! significantly! during! the! experimental! period! (Kruskall–Wallis! H,! p! >! 0.05).! The!
increase! in! MT! concentrations! ranged! approximately! between! twoH! and! threefold,!
corresponding! to! induction! rates! ranging! between! 0.52! and! 0.79! mg! MT! gH1! dayH1,!
respectively,! from!T0!to!T28.!After!the!depuration!phase,!a!decrease!was!observed!in!MT!
concentrations!in!all!exposed!groups,!reaching!levels!similar!to!those!of!controls!(p!<!0.05).!
A!moderate! but! significant! correlation! (Spearman!R! =! 0.5,!p&<!0.05)!was! found! between!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!74!
bioaccumulated!As!and!MT!concentrations!after!28!days!of!exposure!but!not!at!any!other!
sampling!points.!
!
Figure. III.3.! Average! woleHbody! MT! concentration! in! tested! organisms.! Error! bars!
represent! standard!deviation.! Significant!differences! (★)! from!control! organisms! and! (†)!
from!the!other!exposed!groups,!respectively!(MannHWhitney!U,!p&<!0.05).!
III.3.5..Histochemistry.
The!histochemical!analysis!revealed!the!presence!of!As!granules!in!the!tissues!of!C.&
fluminea,! particularly! in! the! cells! of! the! digestive! gland! (figure! III.! 4)! from! organisms!
exposed! to! higher! concentrations! (500! and! 1000! μg! As! LX1).! Histochemical! analysis! of!
depurated!individuals!depicts!a!distinctive!loss!of!accumulated!As,!shown!by!the!reduction!
to!total!or!nearHtotal!absence!of!copper!arsenite!granules,!which!is!in!accordance!with!the!
reduction!of!tissue!As!to!control!levels!measured!by!AAS!(figure!III.!5).!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 75!
!
Figure. III.4.!Histochemical!analysis!of!exposed!individuals!showing!an!increase!in!copper!
arsenite!granules!(arrows)!after!28!days!of!exposure.!a.Digestive!grand!tubules!of!a!control!
individual;!b!digestive!gland!tubules!of!a!clam!exposed!to!500!μg.!As!LH1.!
.
Figure.III.5..Histochemical!analysis!of!digestive!glands!of!depurated!individuals!showing!a!
decrease!in!copper!arsenite!granules!(arrows)!in!digestive!gland!tubules!of!clams!exposed!
to!100!μg.!As!LH1.!a!After!28!days!of! exposure,! exhibiting! clusters!of! granules;!b! after!14!
days!of!depuration!..
!
!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!76!
III.4.. Discussion.
The!present!work!demonstrated!that!C.&fluminea! is!capable!of!bioaccumulating!and!
eliminating!As!as!a!result!of!exposure! to!high! levels!of!arsenite! in!water,!which! indicates!
that! the! species! is! capable! of! regulating! the! metalloid! even! following! contamination! by!
what! is! recognized! as! the! element’s! most! toxic! form.! According! to! Baudrimont! et! al.!
(1997a)!C.&fluminea! is!capable!of!accumulating!high! levels!of!waterborne!elements!and! is!
an! interesting!model!organism! for! toxicological! studies! in! freshwater!ecosystems!since! it!
lives!buried!in!the!upper!layer!of!sediments!and!filters!large!quantities!of!water!(10!L!clamH
1!dayH1).!Nevertheless,!only! limited! information! is!yet!available!regarding! the!exposure!of!
this! freshwater! bivalve! to! As,! although! Sebesvari! et! al.! (2005)! have! demonstrated! that!
Corbicula&sp.! is!capable!of!accumulating!As!and!stated!that! the!asiatic!clam!is!suitable! for!
monitoring!environmental!heavy!metals!and!metalloids.!A!field!study!carried!out!by!Jonhs!
and! Luoma! (1990),! who! collected! Corbicula& sp.! from! the! San! Francisco! Bay! and! the!
Sacramento/San! Joaquin! river! delta! (USA),! showed! that!mean! As! concentrations! ranged!
from!5.4!to!11.5!μg.gX1g!whole!tissue!d.w.!at!all!stations!(with!small!temporal!fluctuations!
being!detected),!generally!being!consistent!with!concentrations! found! in!uncontaminated!
systems.!The!control!organisms!in!the!present!work!show!concentrations!within!the!same!
range.! The! results! show,! however,! that! As! bioaccumulation! is! linked! to! As! in! water,!
contradicting!previous! findings!when!bivalves!were!employed! to!monitor!waterborne!As!
(e.g.,! ValetteHSilver! et! al.! 1999;! Orescanin! et! al.! 2006).! Most! of! these! field! studies! with!
bivalves! failed! or!were! unable! to! relate! As! concentrations! in!water!with! the!metalloid’s!
levels! in! typical! contaminant! storage! compartments! such! as! sediments.! It! is! likely! that!
waterborne! As! represents! a! much! more! bioavailable! form! of! the! metalloid,! especially!
concerning!filterHfeeding!animals!such!as!bivalves,!hence!the!exponentialHtype!curve!of!the!
bioaccumulation! models! estimated! in! the! present! work.! Bioaccumulation! of! toxic!
substances!by!aquatic!organisms!is!a!complex!phenomenon!that!results!from!the!relation!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 77!
between!uptake!and!elimination!rates!and!therefore!from!the!intrinsic!biological!variables!
from!which! they! derive.! From! the! uptake! constants! low!BCFs! (<1)!were! obtained.! Since!
accumulation!depends!on!uptake!constant!x!As!concentration!in!water!(1),!low!BCFs!do!not!
necessarily!mean!that!the!organisms!are!not!bioaccumulating!but!that!the!proportion!of!the!
metalloid!actually!being!removed!from!the!water!and!incorporated!into!the!tissues!is!low,!
at!least!at!the!tested!concentrations!of!AsIII.!It!is!noteworthy!that!the!tested!concentrations!
are!realistic! in!terms!of! freshwater!highly!contaminated!with!this!metalloid!(reviewed!by!
Mandal! and! Suzuki! 2002).! The! results! show! that! As! concentrations! in! soft! tissues!
decreased!in!all!treatments!during!the!depuration!phase.!Furthermore,!the!BCF!estimates,!
which! were! found! to! decrease! with! increasing! exposures! to! As,! may! indicate! that! the!
organisms! underwent! a! regulation! process! by!modulating! the! uptake:elimination! ratios.!
Even! empirically,! it! can!be! observed! that! exposure! to! 1000!μg.LX1,! for! instance,! does!not!
correspond!to!a!10Hfold!increase!in!bioacumulated!As!relative!to!100!μg.LX1,!at!any!sampling!
time.!According!to!our!results,!this!can!mean!that!the!animals!were!responding!to!exposure!
especially!by!restricting!uptake,!since!the!estimated!elimination!constants!failed!to!show!a!
clear! trend!with! increasing!exposure!concentrations.!On! the!other!hand,! the!results! from!
the!depuration!phase!(confirmed!by!histochemistry)!indicate!that!these!bivalves!have!good!
mechanisms! to! eliminate! the! metalloid! at! the! tested! concentrations! of! exposure.! These!
results!confirm!the!strong!metabolic!capacity!of!the!species!regarding!As!detoxification,!as!
already! suggested! by! Sebesvari! et! al.! (2005).! The! phenomenon! of! decreasing! BCFs!with!
increasing! metal! exposures! has! also! been! observed! for! other! elements! (essential! and!
nonessential)! and! described! as! a! factor! that! may! compromise! the! employment! of! this!
guideline!as!a!biomonitoring!tool!of!aquatic!biota!(McGeer!et!al.!2003).!Still,!much!research!
is!lacking!regarding!the!actual!biological!factors!that!are!responsible!for!this.!Nevertheless,!
even! if! BCFs! alone! are! not! capable! of! providing! a! direct! measure! of! environmental!
contamination,!our!work!showed!that!BCFs,!when!associated!with!uptake!and!elimination!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!78!
kinetics,! may! provide! solid! insight! into! the! species’! sensitivity! and! regulatory! capacity!
toward! contamination.! The! release! of! contaminants! from! cells! depends! on! the! different!
turnover!times!of! the!various!biochemical!compartments!to!which!the!pollutant! is!bound!
(reviewed! by! Ravera! 2001):! the! pollutant! fraction! bound! to! substances! with! a! short!
turnover!time!is!the!one!initially!released!(such!as!phosphorous!in!membranes),!and!only!
subsequently! are! the! fractions! bound! to! compounds! with! a! longer! turnover! time! (like!
metals! precipitated! in! granules).! Regarding! As,! these! compounds!may! consist! of! several!
detoxifying! mechanisms! that! are! activated! to! neutralize! the! toxic! effects! and! rapidly!
eliminate! the!metalloid! from! tissues! (e.g.,! formation!of!metal! thiolates!by!MTs!and!other!
chelating! processes! like! As! methylation! [Aposhian! 1997]).! The! kinetic! differences! in! As!
elimination! in! organisms! exposed! to! different! concentrations! of! contaminants! can! be!
attributed!to!differences!in!uptake!and!depuration!rates!(Luoma!and!Rainbow!2005).!Our!
results! show! that!C.& fluminea! can! efficiently! regulate! As! by!modulating! bioconcentration!
factors!according!to!exposure!concentrations,!possibly!by!enabling!a!series!of!responses!of!
which! MT! induction! and! intracellular! storage! of! arsenic! granules! may! be! important!
components.!The!kinetics!analysis!performed!in!this!work!was!effectively!based!on!a!twoH
compartment! (water/! organism)! partitioning! model! which! is! a! simplified! equation! that!
reflects! the!overall!processes!within! the!organism.! It! is!not!possible!at! this! stage! to! infer!
whether! uptake! is! reduced! by! specific! responses! to! exposure! or! if! physiological! effects,!
such!as!a!decrease! in! filtration!rates,!are! involved,!or!how!elimination! is!modulated.!The!
low! mortality! and! relative! constancy! of! elimination! during! uptake! (and! the! effective!
depuration! that! followed)! should! indicate,! however,! that! exposure! to!waterborne!As! did!
not! considerably! impair! the! animal’s! metabolism,! suggesting! that! direct! responses! to!
exposure!have!occurred.!The!BCFs,!on!the!other!hand,!reflect!the!combination!of!all!effects!
and! responses! that! affect! uptake! and! elimination,! a! clear! negative! correlation! with!
increasing! exposures! having! been! observed.! Even! though! some! inconsistencies! and!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 79!
divergences!remain!in!the!scientific!community!regarding!the!physiological!role!of!MTs!and!
their!use!as!biomarkers!in!environmental!monitoring!programs!(Amiard!et!al.!2006),! it! is!
generally! accepted! that! these!proteins! play! a! role! in! the!homeostasis! of! essential!metals!
(e.g.,! Cu! and! Zn),! as! they! can! act! as! essential!metal! stores! ready! to! fulfill! enzymatic! and!
other!metabolic!demands!(Viarengo!and!Nott!1993;!Roesijadi!1996).!It!is!also!believed!that!
the!binding!of!MTs!to!metals!has!a!detoxifying!effect,!due!to!their!ability!to!sequester!these!
elements! and! consequently! decrease! their! bioavailability! to! other! cellular! ligands!
(Baudrimont!et!al.!1999;!Ravera!2001).!It!is!noteworthy!that,!at!least!concerning!mollusks,!
there! are! several! agents! that! are! also! able! to! induce! MT! biosynthesis! such! as! physical!
stress,! tumor! necrosis! factor,! and! reactive! oxygen! species! (Baudrimont! et! al.! 1997a;!
Viarengo!et!al.!1999).!The!present!study!reveals!that!a!significant!MT!induction!over!time!of!
exposure! occurs,! followed! by! a! decrease! to! baseline! levels! when! the! organisms! are! no!
longer!subjected!to!waterborne!As.!These!results!clearly!indicate!that!C.&fluminea!MTs!play!
a!significant!role!in!As!contamination,!confirming!the!results!of!previous!studies!(Santos!et!
al.!2007;!Diniz!et!al.!2007).!The!induction!of!these!proteins!was,!however,!higher!in!clams!
exposed!to! lower!concentrations!of!AsIII! in!water!(100!and!300!lg!LH1),!showing!that!MT!
overexpression! in!this!species! following!exposure!to!As! is!unlikely!to!be!dose!dependent,!
which!may!result!from!other!detoxification!mechanisms!that!may!have!a!more!prominent!
role!in!As!detoxification,!a!subject!already!debated!by!other!authors!(e.g.,!Apeti!et!al.!2005).!
Although!many!field!and!laboratory!studies!were!performed!with!C.&fluminea,!only!a!limited!
number! of! studies! have! been! devoted! to!MT! induction! in! this! species! and,! in! particular,!
regarding!AsIII!exposure!(Baudrimont!et!al.!1997b;!Santos!et!al.!2007;!Diniz!et!al.!2007).!In!
fact,! studies! focusing! on!MT! induction! in! freshwater! bivalves! following! As! exposure! are!
scarce.! In! accordance!with! the! present! findings,! Baudrimont! et! al.! (2003)! observed! that!
fieldHcontaminated& C.& fluminea&MT! concentrations! rapidly! decreased! by! 37%! following!
transfer! to! unpolluted! conditions.! According! to! Viarengo! et! al.! (1987)! the! elimination! of!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!80!
metals! by! bivalves! seems! to! be! mediated! by! an! active! mechanism! involving! their!
accumulation! in! lysossomes! (with! the! subsequent! excretion! of! the! metalHrich! residual!
bodies).! Since! our! results! show! that! C.& fluminea! is! able! to! regulate! this! metalloid! by!
accumulating! and! eliminating! the! excess! of! As! in! tissues,! it! is! thus! possible! that! MT!
induction! may! partially! function! as! part! of! a! primary! defense! mechanism! in! favor! of!
bioaccumulation! and! other! biochemical! mechanisms.! The! presence! of! intracellular! As!
deposits,! as! detected! by! the! histochemical! evaluation,! may,! in! fact,! be! another! primary!
defense! mechanism! against! contamination,! since! precipitated! forms! of! the! metalloid!
should! not! be! made! easily! available! to! affect! cellular! functions.! Arsenic! concretions,!
observed!to!form!large!clusters!in!tissues!of!the!digestive!gland!in!the!individuals!exposed!
to!higher!concentrations,!appear!to!be!linked!to!the!metalloid’s!uptake!and!elimination!and!
might!explain!the!good!potential!of!this!species!to!bioaccumulate!As;!in!addition,!it!may!be!
an! important! factor! regarding! its! tolerance! to! contamination.!From! the!present! results! it!
can!be! inferred!that!C.&fluminea!may!be!suitable!as!a!monitoring!organism!of!exposure!to!
AsIII!in!water,!being!able!to!accumulate!and!effectively!eliminate!the!metalloid!even!when!
exposed! to! relatively! high! concentrations.! The! present!work! also! shows! that!C.& fluminea!
may!have!a!good!resistance!to!this!metalloid,!mostly!by!being!able!to!modulate!uptake!and!
elimination!relative!to!exposure!concentrations,!from!which!result!low!BCFs.!Some!caution!
may!thus!be!required!when!interpreting!As!kinetics!data!on!this!species.!Finally,!although!it!
has! been! demonstrated! that! MT! induction! occurs! as! a! result! of! exposure! to! AsIII,! the!
unclear! relationship! between!MTs! and! exposure! concentrations!may! signify! that! caution!
should!be!implied!when!considering!it!as!a!standHalone!biomarker!of!exposure!to!arsenite!
in!C.&fluminea.!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 81!
II.5.. References.
Amiard!JC,!AmiardHTriquet!C,!Barka!S,!Pellerin! J,!Rainbow!PS.!(2006)!Metallothioneins! in!
aquatic!invertebrates:!their!role!in!metal!detoxification!and!their!use!as!biomarkers.&Aquat&
Toxicol&76:160–202&
Apeti! DA,! Johnson! E,! Robinson! L.! (2005)! A! model! for! bioaccumulation! of! metals! in!
Crassostrea!virginica!from!Apalachicola!Bay,!Florida.!Am&J&Environ&Sci&1:239–248!
Florida.! Am! J! Environ! Sci! 1:239–248! Aposhian! HV! (1997)! Enzymatic! methylation! of!
arsenic!species!and!other!new!approaches!to!arsenic!toxicity.!Annu&Rev&Pharmacol&Toxicol&
37:397–419.!!
Aposhian!HV,! Aposhian!MM! (2006)! Arsenic! toxicology:! five! questions.!Chem&Res&Toxicol&
19:1–15.!
Bailer! AJ,! Walker! SE,! Venis! K! (2000)! Estimating! and! testing! bioconcentration! factors.!
Environ&Toxicol&Chem&19:2338–2340.!
Baudrimont!M,!Metivaud!J,!MauryHBrachet!R,!Ribeyre!F,!Boudu!A!(1997a)!Bioaccumulation!
and! metallothionein! response! in! the! asiatic! clam! Corbicula& fluminea! after! experimental!
exposure!to!cadmium!and!inorganic!mercury.!Environ&Toxicol&Chem&16:2096–2105.!!
Baudrimont! M,! LemaireHGony! S,! Ribeyre! F,! Metivaud! J,! Boudou! A! (1997b)! Seasonal!
variations!of!metallothionein!concentrations!in!the!Asiatic!clam!(Corbicula&fluminea).!Comp&
Biochem&Physiol&118C:361–367!
Baudrimont! M,! Andres! S,! Metivaud! J,! Lapaquellerie! Y,! Ribeyre! F,! Maillet! N,! Latouche! C,!
Boudou!A!(1999)!Field!transplantation!of!the!freshwater!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea!along!
a!polymetallic! contamination!gradient! (river!Lot,!France):! II.!Metallothionein!response! to!
metal!exposure.!Environ&Toxicol&Chem&18:2472–2477.!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!82!
Baudrimont!M,!Andres!S,!Durrieu!G,!Boudou!A!(2003).The!key!role!of!metallothioneins!in!
the!bivalve!Corbicula&fluminea!during!the!depuration!phase,!after!in!situ!exposure!to!Cd!and!
Zn.!Aquat&Toxicol&63:89–102.&!
Bissen!M,!Frimmel!FH!(2003a)!Arsenic—a!review.!Part!I.!Occurrence,!toxicity,!speciation,!
mobility!in!the!aqueous!environment.!Acta&Hydrochim&Hydrobiol&31:9–18.!!
Bissen! M,! Frimmel! FH! (2003b)! Arsenic—a! review.! Part! II.! Oxidation! of! arsenic! and! its!
removal!in!water!treatment.!Acta&Hydrochim&Hydrobiol&3:97–107.!!
Bryan!GW,!Langston!WJ,!Hummerstone!LG,!Burt!GR!(1985)!A!Guide!to!the!assessment!of!
heavyHmetal!contamination!in!estuaries!using!biological!indicators.!Mar&Biol&Assoc&UK,!
Occasional! Publication!No.! 4! Cervantes!C,! Ji! G,! Ramirez! JL,! Silver! S! (1994)! Resistance! to!
arsenic!compounds!in!microorganisms.!FEMS&Microbiol&Rev&15:355–&367.!
Couillard!Y,!Campbell!PGC,!Tessier!A!(1993)!Response!of!metallothionein!concentrations!in!
a! freshwater!bivalve! (Anodonta! grandis)! along! an! environmental! cadmium!gradient.!Mol&
Mar&Biol&Biotechnol&2:299–313!
De!Kock!WC,!Kramer!KJM!(1994)!Active!biomonitoring!(ABM)!by!translocation!of!bivalve!
molluscs.! In:!Kramer!KJM!(ed)!Biomonitoring!of! coastal!waters!and!estuaries.!CRC!Press,!
Boca!Raton,!FL,!pp!51–84!
Diniz! M,! Santos! HM,! Costa! PM,! Peres! I,! Costa! MH,! Capelo! JL! (2007)! Metallothionein!
responses! in! the! Asiatic! clam! (Corbicula& fluminea)! after! exposure! to! trivalent! arsenic.!
Biomarkers&12:589–598.!!
Duker! AA,! Carranza! EJM,! Hale! M! (2005)! Arsenic! geochemistry! and! health.! Environ& Int&
31:631–641.&!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 83!
Feng!Z,!Xia!Y,!Tian!D,!Wu!K,!Schmitt!M,!Kwok!RK!(2001)!DNA!damage!in!buccal!epithelial!
cells!from!individuals!chronically!exposed!to!arsenic!via!drinking!water!in!Inner!Mongolia,!
China.!Anticancer&Res&21:51–58!
Fraysse! B,! Baudin! JP,! GarnierHLaplace! J,! Adam!C,! Boudou!A! (2002)! Effects! of! Cd! and! Zn!
waterborne! exposure! on! the! uptake! and! depuration! of! 57Co,! 110mAg! and! 134Cs! by! the!
Asiatic! clam! (Corbicula& fluminea)! and! the! zebra! mussel! (Dreissena& polymorpha)—whole!
organism!study.!Environ&Poll&118:297–306.&!
Hindmarsh!JT!(2000)!Arsenic,!its!clinical!and!environmental!significance.!J&Trace&Elem&Exp&
Med&13:165–172.&!
Hossain! F,! Sivakumar! B! (2006)! Spatial! pattern! of! arsenic! contamination! in! shallow!
tubewells!of!Bangladesh:!regional!geology!and!nonHlinear!dynamics!stochastic.!Environ&Res&
Risk&Assess&20:66–76.&!
Inza! B,! Ribeyre! F,! MauryHBrachet! R,! Boudou! A! (1997)! Tissue! distribution! of! inorganic!
mercury,!methylmercury!and!cadmium!in!the!asiatic!clam!(Corbicula&fluminea)!in!relation!
to!the!contamination!levels!of!the!water!column!and!sediment.!Chemosphere&35:2817–2836.&
1!
Jiang!G,! Gong! Z,! Li! XHF,! Cullen!WR,! Le! XC! (2003)! Interaction! of! trivalent! arsenicals!with!
metallothionein.!Chem&Res&Toxicol&16:873–880.!!
Jonhs! C,! Luoma! SN! (1990)! Arsenic! in! benthic! bivalves! of! San! Francisco! Bay! and! the!
Sacramento/San!Joaquin!River.!Sci&Tot&Environ&97(98):673–684.!
Kaise! T,! Horiguchi! Y,! Fukui! S,! Shiomi! K,! Chino! M,! Kikuchi! T! (1992)! Acute! toxicity! and!
metabolism!of!arsenocholine!in!mice.!Appl&Organomet&Chem&6:369–373.!!
Liao!CM,!Ling!MP!(2003)!Assessment!of!human!health!risks!for!arsenic!bioaccumulation!in!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!84!
tilapia!(Oreochromis&mossambicus)!and!largeHscaleHmullet!(Liza¯olepis)!from!blackfoot!
disease!area!in!Taiwan.!Arch&Environ&Contam&Toxicol&45:264–272.&!
Lillie!RD! (1965)!Histopathologic! technic! and!practical!histochemistry.!McGrawHHill,!New!
York!
Luoma!S,!Rainbow!P!(2005)!Why!is!metal!bioaccumulation!so!variable?!Biodynamics!as!a!
unifying!concept.!Environ&Sci&Technol&39:1921–1931.!!
Mandal! BK,! Suzuki! KT! (2002)! Arsenic! around! the!world:! a! review.!Talanta&58:201–235.!
Martoja!R,!Martoja!M!(1967).Initiation!aux!tecniques!de!l’histologie!animal.!Masson,!Paris!
McGeer!JC,!Brix!KB,!Skeaff!JM,!DeForest!DK,!Brigham!SI,!Adams!WJ,!Green!A!(2003)!Inverse!
relationship! between! bioconcentration! factor! and! exposure! concentration! for! metals:!
implications! for!hazard!assessment!of!metals! in! the!aquatic!environment.!Environ&Toxicol&
Chem&22:1017–1037.!!
Mouthon! J! (1981)! Sur! la! presence! en! France! et! au! Portugal! de! Corbicula! (Bivalvia,!
Corbiculidae)!originaire!d’Asie.!Basteria&45:109–116!
Ngu! TT,! Stillman! MJ! (2006)! Arsenic! binding! to! human! metallothionein.! J& Am& Chem& Soc&
128:12473–12483.&!
Orescanin! V,! Lovrencic! I,! Mikelic! L,! Barisic! D,! Matasin! Z,! Lulic! S,! Pezelj! D! (2006)!
Biomonitoring! of! heavy!metals! and! arsenic! on! the! east! coast! of! the!Middle! Adriatic! Sea!
using!Mytilus!galloprovincialis.&Nuc&Instr&Meth&Phys&Res&B&245:495–500.&!
Palecek! E,! Pechan! Z! (1971)! Estimation! of! nanogram! quantities! of! proteins! by! pulse!
polarographic!techniques.!Anal&Biochem&42:59–71.!!
Ravera! O! (2001)! Monitoring! of! the! aquatic! environment! by! species! accumulator! of!
pollutants:!a!review.!J&Limnol&60S1:63–78!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
! 85!
Roesijadi!G! (1996)!Metallothionein! and! its! role! in! toxic!metal! regulation.!Comp&Biochem&
Physiol&113C:117–123&
RomeroHIsart! N,! Vasak! M! (2002). Advances! in! the! structure! and! chemistry! of!
metallothioneins.&J&Inorg&Biochem&88:388–396.!
Santos!HM,!Diniz!M,!Costa!PM,!Peres!I,!Costa!MH,!Alves!S,!Capelo!JL!(2007)!Toxicological!
effects! and! bioaccumulation! in! the! freshwater! clam! (Corbicula& fluminea)! following!
exposure!to!trivalent!arsenic.!Environ&Toxicol&22:502–509.!!
Sebesvari! Z,! Ettwig! F,! Emons! H! (2005)! Biomonitoring! of! tin! and! arsenic! in! different!
compartments! of! a! limnic! ecosystem! with! emphasis! on! Corbicula& fluminea! and!
Dikerogammarus!villosus.!J&Environ&Monit&7:203–207.!!
Sheskin!FJ!(2000)!Handbook!of!parametric!and!nonparametric!statistical!procedures,!2nd!
edn.!Chapman!&!Hall,!Boca!Raton,!FL!
Thompson! JAJ,! Cosson! RP! (1984)! An! improved! electrochemical! method! for! the!
quantification!of!metallothioneins!in!marine!organisms.!Mar&Environ&Res&11:137–152.!!
Toyama! M,! Yamashita! M,! Hirayama! N,! Murooka! Y! (2002)! Interactions! of! arsenic! with!
human!metallothioneinH2.!J&Biochem&Tokyo&132:217–221!
ValetteHSilver!NJ,!Riedel!GF,!Crecelius!EA,!Windom!H,!Smith!RG,!Dolvin!SS!(1999).Elevated!
arsenic!concentrations! in!bivalves! from!the!southeast! coasts!of! the!USA.!Mar&Environ&Res&
48:311–&333.!!
Viarengo! A,! Nott! JA! (1993)! Mechanisms! of! heavy! metal! catión! homeostasis! in! marine!
invertebrates.!Comp&Biochem&Phys&104C:355–372.!
Viarengo! A,! Moore! MN,! Mancinelli! G,! Mazzucotelli! A,! Pipe! RK,! Farrar! SV! (1987)!
Metallothioneins!and!lysosomes!in!metal!toxicity!and!accumulation!in!marine!mussels:!the!
effect!of!cadmium!in!the!presence!and!absence!of!phenanthrene.!Mar&Biol&94:251–257.!!
Chapter!III.!!Toxicokinetics!of!trivalent!As!in!C.&fluminea!
!86!
Viarengo!A,!Burlando!B,!Dondero!F,!Marro!A,!Fabbri!R!(1999)!Metallothionein!as!a!tool!in!
biomonitoring!programmes.!Biomarkers&4:455–466.!!
.
!
! 87!
Chapter!IV.!Conclusions!
Results! obtained! for! the! organisms! exposed! during! 7! days! to! different!
concentrations!of!As!suggest!that!the!organisms!exposed!to!the!concentrations!of!300!and!
1000!μg!As!LH1!accumulated!the!highest!levels!of!AsIII!in!the!tissues!(17!±.9!and!15!±.3!μg.gX1!
distilled!water,!respectively),!which!was!confirmed!through!histochemical!analysis.!
Fort! he! 7! days! exposure! an! apparent! induction! of! MTs!was! also! observed! in! the!
organisms!exposed!to!AsIII,!suggesting!that!C.&fluminea!possesses!some!capacity!for!arsenic!
regulation.!!
Results! obtained! for! the! organisms! exposed! during! 28! days! to! different!
concentrations!of!As!shows!a!significant!increase!(p!<!0.01)!of!As!in!the!total!concentration!
and!cytosolic!fraction!after!28!days!of!exposure!in!all!treatments.!A!significant!increase!(p!<!
0.01)! in! metallothionein! concentration! was! also! detected! in! bivalves! exposed! to! the!
different! concentrations! of! As,! in! comparison! with! the! controls.! The! histological! and!
histochemical!evaluation!provided!clear!evidence!that!As!accumulated!in!tissues,!especially!
in!the!digestive!gland,!and!caused!tissue!alterations!in!50%!of!the!organisms.!
Results!show!a!significant!increase!in!wholeHbody!total!As!after!28!days!of!exposure!
for!all!treatments,!followed!by!a!decrease!at!the!end!of!the!depuration!phase.!Biodynamic!
kinetic!models! for! As! uptake! and! elimination!were! obtained! from! bioaccumulation! data!
during!the!exposure!phase,!for!all!As!treatments,!by!estimating!uptake!and!elimination!rate!
constants.!Bioconcentration!factors!(BCFs)!were!estimated!by!the!ratio!of!these!constants.!
Results!revealed!that!exposure!to!higher!concentrations!of!AsIII!!causes!a!decrease!in!BCFs,!
suggesting! that! C.& fluminea! triggers! effective! regulatory! mechanisms! when! exposed! to!
higher!concentrations!of!the!metalloid.!
Significant!induction!of!MT!was!detected!during!the!exposure!phase,!followed!by!a!
decrease! in! MT! concentration! to! control! levels! after! depuration! for! all! treatments.! No!
significant! differences! in! MT! concentrations! were! observed! between! treatments.! This!
finding! may! confirm! the! role! of! MT! as! part! of! the! As! regulation! process,! but! its!
Independence!relative!to!concentrations!of!AsIII!in!water!suggests!that!MT!induction!is!not!
dose! dependent.! The! histochemical! evaluation! provided! clear! evidence! that! As! was!
Chapter!IV.!Conclusions!
!88!
effectively! accumulated! in! the! digestive! gland! during! exposure! and! eliminated! during!
depuration.! The! present!work! demonstrated! that!C.& fluminea& is! capable! of! regulating!As,!
even!at!exposures!as!high!as!1000!μg.LX1!of!waterborne!AsIII!.!
The!results!suggest!that!the!induction!of!MTs!may!be!of!high!interest!as!a!biomarker!
for! arsenic! contamination! in! aquatic! environments,! and! confirms! the! potential! of! C.&
fluminea!as!a!biological!indicator.