Animal Experiments and Patents Shahnaz Irani Linda Govenlock 11 April 2007.
-
Upload
suzan-mcbride -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Animal Experiments and Patents Shahnaz Irani Linda Govenlock 11 April 2007.
Animal Experiments and Patents
Shahnaz Irani
Linda Govenlock
11 April 2007
Patents: Basic Facts• A standard patent gives the patentee the right to
exclude others from exploiting the patented invention including conducting animal experiments
• A patent application is published 18 months after filing
• A standard patent has a maximum 20 year term• A patent is fundamentally concerned with new and
inventive subject matter
Need for experimental data
• To be granted, a patent application must describe the invention fully. This means there must be sufficient description/examples of the invention
• For vet/pharma patent applications, the patent specification must generally include results of animal experiments demonstrating drug efficacy/safety/utility
Duplication of data?
• Patents covering new drug compounds, formulations or indications would generally have original data which was not previously the subject of experimentation
• Patents can contain comparative experimental data. This could be simply a reference to data published elsewhere. This is not necessarily a duplication of pre-existing experiments.
Delay in publication of data
• A patent applicant must not publicly disclose their invention-including experimental data-before filing their patent application
• This delay may result in duplication of experimentation where more than one research group is working on the same invention. This is inevitable
• Non published data
Data Exclusivity
• S25A TGA provides that all clinical data provided to obtain regulatory approval of a drug is not available to anyone for 5 years from registration of the drug on the ARTG
• This includes all Phase l-lll experimental data• Phase ll and lll data is rarely included in a patent
application• Obstructs original/parallel research
Research Exemption
• Recommendation that an experimental use exemption be introduced into AU
• Such experimental use includes-determining how an invention works, seeking an improvement of the invention
• Duplication of experimental data will avoid patent infringement.
Conclusion
• Duplication of experimentation may be patent infringement
• Patent applications are published documents • Patents per se do not exacerbate needless
duplication of animal experiments
Thank you
• ANY QUESTIONS?