Anesthesie 2011 Article 5
Transcript of Anesthesie 2011 Article 5
-
7/29/2019 Anesthesie 2011 Article 5
1/3
Pain Management via Locoregional (Epidural) Approach Beyond Sodium Channel
Blockers
Lyon Yonghoon Lee, DVM, PhD, DACVA
College of Veterinary Medicine, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA
Several features of local anesthesia render it particularly useful in veterinary practice. Although
many surgical procedures can be carried out satisfactorily under local anesthesia alone, sedation or
general anesthesia may become necessary depending on the species, temperament and health of the
animal, and on the magnitude of the procedure. Preemptive local anesthesia in animals undergoing
general anesthesia will reduce the amount of general anesthetic, thus minimizing the cardiopulmonary
depression that may accompany and also leading to quicker recovery. It may also provide a useful pain
relief even beyond the full recovery from general anesthesia. Local anesthesia can be largelysubdivided into surface (or topical) anesthesia, infiltration anesthesia, intrasynovial anesthesia, and
epidural anesthesia in accordance with specific nerve or anatomic sites of its application.
Local anesthesia has been most commonly carried out utilizing sodium channel blockers such as
lidocaine and bupivacaine. However, more recently, other classes of analgesics including opioids, alpha
2 agonists, NMDA antagonists, and NSAIDs are increasingly being utilized particularly for epidural
anesthesia for cranial laparotomies or hindlimb orthopedic procedures in small animals. These
non-conventional local analgesics proved to provide equally effective or superior analgesia, and
extended duration with reduced unwanted side effects either in itself or in combination with sodium
channel blocker. The current presentation will focus on various analgesics advocated to be useful in
epidural anesthesia in small animals.
ANATOMYAND TECHNIQUESOF EPIDURAL ANESTHESIAIN DOGSAND CATS
The epidural injection site in dogs and cats is located at the lumbosacral junction between the seventh
lumbar (L-7) and the first sacral vertebra (S-1). In dogs the spinal cord terminates at around 6/7th
lumbar vertebrae. Anterior epidural anesthesia may therefore be safely and easily induced at the
lumbosacral junction. The spinal cord is supported, protected, and stabilized by vertebral column,
ligaments and meninges. The epidural space is located immediately below the ligamentum flavum
separating the dura mater from the vertebral periosteum, the lining of the spinal canal. To locate the
site, identify the iliac prominences on either side, and take an imaginary line between them crossing
the dorsal spinous process of the last lumbar segment. The site for the needle insertion is immediately
caudal to this, in the midline. Restrain laterally or in sternal recumbency (personal preference). To
perform epidural anesthesia, the injection must be made only into the epidural space, between the
ligamentum flavum and dura mater. Epidural injection should be differentiated from spinal (or
intrathecal) injection, in which the anesthetic is injected into the subarachnoid space, between the
arachnoid membrane and the pia mater (this is also where the myelogram is performed in the disc
problem dogs). Anesthetic agents injected into the subarachnoid space (spinal injection) produce true
spinal anesthesia because of the lack of protection provided by the dura mater and arachnoid
meninges. Consequently, the volume of the anesthetic solution must be reduced by one third.
Hypotension can be a major complication. This procedure should not be carried out unless there is an
intravenous line in place so fluids or anti-hypotensives can be given promptly. The epidural space is
identified by advancing the needle from an area of high resistance (ligamentum flavum) to an area of
low resistance (epidural space). This is usually accomplished using the "hanging drop" or the "lack of
resistance" technique during injection. Dangers of spinal and epidural block include hypotension,
hindlimb motor paralysis, infection, and irritation.
PHARMACOLOGICAL CHOICES
Sodium Channel Blockers (SCB)
Sodium channel blockers interfere nerve conduction by inhibiting influx of sodium ions through
ion-selective sodium channels in nerve membrane leading to impairment of the generation of action
potential. This in turn provides blockade both for sensory input and motor activity of the innervated
area resulting in local anesthesia.
PROCEEDINGSOF THE WORLD SMALL ANIMAL
VETERINARY ASSOCIATION
JEJU, KOREA
14-17 OCTOBER, 2011
13
-
7/29/2019 Anesthesie 2011 Article 5
2/3
Lidocaine and bupivacaine are the two most commonly employed in veterinary medicine belonging to
this class of drug. Lidocaine possesses reasonably rapid onset of action, with good spreading
properties, providing about one to two hour duration of epidural analgesia. Bupivacaine has a
prolonged duration of action; up to eight hours. It is therefore preferred over lidocaine for epidural
anesthesia particularly in prolonged surgery and for benefit of postoperative analgesia.
Several precautions must be taken into account in the use of SCB. Accidental intravenous injection of
this drug is the most common cause of adverse reaction associated with local anesthe tic
administration. In severe cases it can cause cardiac arrest. When the plasma concentration of SCB is
excessive, sufficient cardiac sodium channels become blocked so that conduction and automaticity
become adversely depressed. One should always draw back on syringe to check not in vein before
injecting SCB local anesthetic. As a very rough guide, the toxic dose of lidocaine would be 8 mg/kg
(much lower in the cat, 2mg/kg) and 4 mg/kg of bupivacaine. (NB, in very small animals such as
domestic cats, small dogs, goat kids, birds and small mammals this amount can be easily exceeded
using solutions of standard concentration, so dilute it carefully and use with caution).
For epidural use, much lower dose is prescribed; a dose of 12 mg/kg of lidocaine or 0.51 mg/kg of
bupivacaine. Undesirable signs of overdose are initial sedation, followed with increasing dosage by
twitching, convulsions, coma and death. A common acceptable side effect is hindlimb paralysis for
short period after recovery. Many clinical research and observation report that analgesics of different
classes such as opioids, SCB, and alpha 2 agonists provide extended duration of epidural analgesia,
with significantly improved motor function than in animals treated only with sodium channel blockers.Additionally, combination of these agents with SCB prolongs the analgesia that is achieved with each
class of drug alone.
Opioids
The most popular pharmacological choice except SCB in epidural anesthesia is opioids in veterinary
use. The drugs bind to opioid receptors in the CNS which usually have inhibitory effects on neurons
resulting in spinal analgesia. Examples of most commonly used drugs in this class for epidural
anesthesia are morphine and hydromorphone. Major advantages are opioids outlast analgesia either
alone or in combination with SCB, and keep the patient ambulatory due to sparing motor effect.
Since realizing opioid's potential as effective analgesic via epidural route in 80's, these have gained a
wider acceptance in epidural anesthesia both in human and veterinary medicine, and indeed the author
would prefer opioids over SCB in epidural anesthesia in small animals. However, Troncy reported ifmorphine (0.2 mg/kg) is combined with bupivacaine (1 mg/kg) epidurally, it results in superior and
prolonged analgesia than morphine (0.2 mg/kg) alone in dogs. As previously mentioned, synergistic
effect for opioids and SCB is well established meriting multimodal approach in performing epidural
anesthesia.
Alpha 2 Agonists
Alpha 2 agonists's mechanism of action is mainly through its agonist activity at presynaptic alpha-2
adrenergic receptors that results in decrease in release of norepinephrine from adrenergic nerve
terminals in CNS and periphery. This causes sedation, decreased sympathetic activity, analgesia, and
hypotension. Main clinical uses are to decrease anxiety, provide chemical restraint with relatively
dependable sedation, potentiate effects of other drugs and provide analgesia. The duration of action
via systemic administration is dose dependent, and typically lasts 10 to 30 minutes of sedation and
restraint for xylazine and 60 to 90 minutes for medetomidine. One good advantage of this class of
drugs is its ability to enable pharmacological reversal with alpha-2 adrenergic antagonists:
atipamezole, yohimbine, and tolazoline.
Although alpha 2 agonists such as xylazine and detomidine has been favored for epidural analgesia
in large animals including horses because of less ataxia and extended duration of effect than lidocaine,
similar consideration is of less concern in small animals. It has been demonstrated that epidurally
administered xylazine (0.25 mg/kg) provides analgesia in dogs greater than four hours.1
It is
suggested that combination of alpha 2 agonists with lidocaine or bupivacaine will provide synergistic
effect with superior and longer lasting analgesia than when a sodium channel blocker is used alone.
NMDA Antagonists
The examples of NMDA (n-methyl-d-aspartate) antagonist in veterinary use a re ketamine andtiletamine. The mechanism of action is through its NMDA (n-methyl-d-aspartate) - glutamate
antagonistic effect which inhibits neurotransmission, and causes a variety of pharmacological effects
including analgesia. Since tiletamine is only available as combined agent with zolazepam, it is ketamine
that would be more practical for epidural administration. Results on ketamine's use for epidural
14
-
7/29/2019 Anesthesie 2011 Article 5
3/3
anesthesia are conflicting. Rao et alreported 0.4 mg/kg of ketamine epidurally provided 90 minutes of
analgesia, while 2 mg/kg of epidural ketamine was of little use in treating experimentally induced
synovitis in dogs. Currently, better alternatives are available in providing epidural analgesia in small
animals.
SUMMARY
Epidural anesthesia has become a more common practice in small animals in recent years. It could
provide additional intraoperative analgesia to reduce inhalant requirement during general anesthesia,
thereby minimizing the cardiopulmonary depression that may accompany and also leading to quicker
recovery. It may also provide a useful pain relief even beyond the full recovery from general
anesthesia. Drugs of choice for epidural anesthesia have expanded beyond traditional sodium channel
blockers that include opioids, alpha 2 agonists, and NMDA antagonists. It is suggested utilization of
these agents in epidural anesthesia in multimodal approach offers several advantages such as reduced
adverse side effects, prolonged duration and superior analgesia. Further studies are warranted to
provide more information regarding epidural use of different classes of analgesics in combination,
particularly in dosages and duration of effect.
References
1. Rector E, Kramer S, Kietzmann M, Hart S, Nolte I. Evaluation of the antinociceptive effect of systemic and
epidurally applied xylazine in general anesthesia with isoflurane in dogs and the effect of atipamezole injection on
postoperative analgesia. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr1998;111(1112):43851.
2. Kona-Boun JJ, Cuvelliez S, Troncy E. Evaluation of epidural administration of morphine or morphine and
bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after premedication with an opioid analgesic and orthopedic surgery indogs.J Am Vet Med Assoc2006;229:11031112.
3. Hamilton SM, Johnston SA, Broadstone RV. Evaluation of analgesia provided by the administration of epidural
ketamine in dogs with a chemically induced synovitis. Vet Anaesth Analg 2005;32:3039.
4. Rao KNM, Rao KV, Makkera S, Naidu KS. Ketamine as epidural anaesthetic in dogs. Indian Vet J1999;76:6162.
15