ANDERSON PARK MASTERPLAN & PLAN Of MANAgEMENT … · Anderson PLAN ANA GEMENT 2 COMMUNITY ORKSHO...

6:30pm Mon 4th and Wed 6th December 2017

A N D E R S O N PA R K M A S T E R P L A N & P L A N O f M A N A g E M E N T

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS

2Anderson Park - MASTERPLAN AND PLAN of MANAgEMENT

community WoRKSHoPS – December 2017

AgENDA

6.30 - 6.40 pm Welcome

6.40 - 6.55 Introduction

6.55 - 7.25 Confirm values and objectives for Anderson park

7.25 - 7.50 Summary studies of some key issues

7.50 - 8.20 Identification of potential options for key issues

8.20 - 8.30 Thank you and close



Plan of Management process



Plan of Management process

Develop a Basis for Management



Basis for Management

VALUESImportant qualities to be protected

Legacy for future generations

Heritage Environment Visual & character Access Recreation Community




Heritage Environment Visual & character Access Recreation Community Legacy for future generations

OUTCOMESManagement objectives for the

values (important qualities)

----

----

----

----

----

----

----





Heritage

ManagementDecisions needing

to be made

Environment Visual & character Access Recreation Community

Responding to site issues

Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??

Implementing Council strategy

& policy





Heritage


to be made



Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??


& policy





Heritage


to be made



Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??


& policy

COMMUNITY LAND CATEGORISATION





Heritage


to be made



Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??


& policy






Heritage


to be made



Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??


& policy


Detailed assessment / investigation of issues and proposals





Heritage


to be made



Managing use


ParkMaintenance



----

----

----

----

----

----

----

Park improvements

Other ??

PRIORITISED ACTION PLAN


& policy


Detailed assessment / investigation of issues and proposals




Balmain east foreshoresPlan of Management

Page 75

Objectives & Performance targets Strategies to achieve objectives andperformance targets

Priority Performance Monitoring / Evaluation

Foreshore access between Illoura Reserve and Peacock Point

4.9 Foreshore access over intertidal zone- disabled suitable boardwalk- low impact structure with permeable deck- subject to environmental, heritage, and visual

assessment

Short term Additional park experience adds to character and amenity of park

Minimise visual & construction impact

Provide at grade access to viewing deck upper landing

4.10 Ramp access to viewing deck - provide timber access ramp from existing

sandstone to deck

Short term Improved equity of use

Peacock PointImproved access to main stairway to park

Refer 4.8

5. FACILITIES / AMENITIESCoordinated low key but effective regulatory signage

5.1 Improved signage - more visible / easy to read- to select locations at entry points etc- iintegrated with other landscape elements

where possible

Short term Effective signage without visual clutter

Lookes Avenue ReserveLow key provision of facilities caters for recreational use

5.2 Facilities integrated to coordinated design for reserve

- entry signage- access path from Lookes Ave- interpretive elements - past marine uses- some limited park seating and incidental

seating through terrace walls etc

Short term Increased use of Lookes Ave Reserve

Thornton ParkUpgrade aged park elements 5.3 Upgrade foreshore balustrade

- Heritage input- Replace with new balustrade - possibly timber

and steel - undertake design assessment

Short term Low visual impact

Illoura ReserveImproved foreshore seating areas 5.4 Provide upgraded seating amenity in foreshore

zones - at junction to 2-8 Weston St- along foreshore gravel area

Short term Improved use and amenity

Upgrade aged park elements 5.5 Remove timber pole entry clusters and make good - consider contemporary entry treatment in conjunction with original designer

- Edward Street north- Edward Street south

Short term Improved visual appearance

Example POM Action Plan



Heritage

Aboriginal European

OUTCOMES

“Our objectives for the future”

1. Recognise indigenous cultural heritage of area and harbour foreshores

2. Assist community to understand indigenous cultural heritage

1. Recognise historic dedication of park for community recreation and the fact that the park has been used over many years for mutiple activities

2. Assist community to understand historic cultural heritage

VALUES

“Important qualities”



Environment

OUTCOMES

Our objectives

1. Appropriate opportunities for fauna and bird habitat within park are provided

2. The habitat quality of the foreshore edge is maintained and enhanced where possible

1. Water quality of stormwater runoff entering the harbour is improved

2. Harvested stormwater and roof water contribute to park maintenance

Fauna Water quality

1. Park tree plantings are conserved and protected

2. Future tree senescence is effectively planned for and addressed

Flora

VALUES




OUTCOMES


1. Views and vistas across park to water are conserved

2. Views to harbour are enhanced where possible

3. Anderson Park is a clean and safe space

4. Visual impact of amenities building is reduced

VALUES


Visual & landscape character



Access

Pedestrian / cycle Waterfront

OUTCOMES


1. Improved ease and safety of pedestrian access into park

2. Effective access within park to cater for all park users

3. Effective access through park is available when sports field in use

4. Universal access to park is provided

5. Cycle visitation is encouraged

6. Anderson Park is connected to the broader walking trail system

1. Sustainable low impact public access to waterfront is provided

VALUES




Recreation

OUTCOMES

Our objectives

1. Role of park for a sustainable level of organised sports use is conserved

2. Impacts of organised sports use on grass surface are reduced

3. Parking is managed to equitably and fairly serve park users and local residents and enable safe access to the park

1. Natural qualities of park including trees, grass and foreshore are conserved and enhanced where possible

2. Opportunities for children and adults to experience nature and have “nature based” play experiences are provided

Organised sports Experiencing nature

1. Role of park for informal and casual community use is conserved and enhanced

2. Role of park as a community “village green” and gathering place is conserved

Informal recreation

VALUES




Community

OUTCOMES

Our objectives

1. Recreational use is managed having regard for the amenity of the local neighbourhood

1. Facilities provide for comfortable community use

2. Amenities are usable for both organised sports users and informal park users

3. Facilities and amenities are appropriately and effectively maintained

4. Facilities should support and not detract from the character of the park

Neighbourhood Amenity

Facilities

1. The park provides a “Village Green” role adjoining the harbour for the neighbourhood

2. The park provides a harbourside green respite for North Sydney CBD workers

3. The park has a broad base of use for both informal and organised activities

4. These uses are managed to sustainably co-exist

Community focus

VALUES




OUTCOMES


1. The park is conserved as a community village green open space

2. The park continues to serve a range of uses including both informal and organised recreation

3. Park visual qualities and character are conserved

4. Park facilities are effectively maintained and updated when required

VALUES





SuMMARy STuDiES Of SOME KEy iSSuES

a. Organised sports in North Sydney & Parkuseandgrasscondition

b. Field layout

c. Pedestrian movement & TrafficandParking

d. Tree Management

e. Heritage

f. Waterfront

g. Environment

h. Amenities



•150ha of open space

•125ha of informal use parkland / bushland (83%)

•25ha of sports grounds (17%)

Source: North Sydney Recreation Needs Strategy 2015

OPEN SPAcE

1/06/15

RECREATION NEEDS STUDY 24

Map 3. Play spaces

Map 4. Water based recreation facilities



•council has 13 playingfields

•8 are located in foreshore parks

1/06/15

RECREATION NEEDS STUDY 23

Map 1: Sportsgrounds

Map 2. Outdoor sports court and greens

Source: North Sydney Recreation Needs Strategy 2015

ORgANiSED SPORTS



REcREATiON bAcKgROuND• RecreationNeedsStudy2005,(NSC)

• NorthSydneySyntheticFieldFeasibilityStudyFinalReport,(NSC)

• SportsgroundPlanofManagement,(NSC)

• Regional Sportsgrounds infrastructure Management Strategy2011,NorthernSydneyRegionalOrganisationof councils (NSROc)

• North Sydney council Delivery Program – 2013/14–2016/17,(NSC)

• SyntheticSurfacesBusinessCaseStudy,(NSC)

• NorthSydneyRecreationNeedsStudy,(NSC)

• NSROc Regional Sportsground Strategy Review (DRAfT)

2008

2005

2011

2011

2013

2014

2015

2017 (NSc) North Sydney council



ORgANiSED SPORTS

•Withlimitedopportunitiestoprovideadditionalfields-Council’srecreationstrategieslooktooptimisetheuseofexistingfields

•Council’sapproachalsoreliesonahighdegreeofflexibilityandmulti-use

•But,thishastotakeintoaccountthecapacity of the reserve and the adjoining areastosustainthatadditionaluse

•At a regional level NSROc is looking to increase capacity across the region as a wholewhereopportunitiesareavailable-primarily in Hornsby

NSROC � Regional Sportsground Strategy Review Draft Report � Version 1 � 20/10/17 Page 5

This area is expected to grow by almost 200,000 by 2036 to a total of 1,083,000. Major age structure increases are expected in the babies to pre-schoolers group (11%), 5 to 19 year olds (20%) and 85 years plus (85%). Since the Plan for Growing Sydney was developed, the Greater Sydney Commission has since prepared six district plans to facilitate its implementation. Within the North District Plan it is noted that proposed actions could influence how different levels of government plan for the District, and how public and private investment decisions are made – directly influencing growth and change. In particular, for local government, the draft District Plan states that it will:

Figure 2 – North District

Source: Draft NSROC Regional Sportsground Strategy Review 2017



ORgANiSED SPORTS

•NorthSydneysportsclubsrelyheavilyonfacilitiesinadjoiningLGA’stosupplementthelocalshortfall

•From2011-2036regionalpopulationprojectedtogrowby200,000to752,600(+36%)

Source: Draft NSROC Regional Sportsground Strategy Review 2017

NSROC � Regional Sportsground Strategy Review Draft Report � Version 1 � 20/10/17 Page 23

The region has relatively limited available flat land due to topography and established urban development. Several playing fields are single grounds with playgrounds, shared paths and recreation facilities on the boundary lines. The average playing area at each sportsground is just over one hectare (1.04Ha) with around 27% having a playing area smaller than a ‘standard field’ (circa 7,000m2). Sportsgrounds in the region commonly contain bushland or native vegetation, spectacular physical features such as sand stone rock formations, and views of water. These characteristics provide a high level of amenity as well as an opportunity to screen sports lights and noise from adjacent residents. At the same time, these bushland and physical features provide challenges for sportsground design and maintenance activities, and provision of support facilities. In some cases, topography has been used effectively to enhance a sportsground, for example providing a natural amphitheatre for spectators. In other cases, bushland compromises field size, traffic management and expansion opportunities. The region has high rainfall compared to the rest of Sydney. This impacts on drainage and the ability of grounds to withstand winter use and potentially assists turf growth in other seasons. It is common practice in the region to returf goalmouths at the end of every winter season.

3.1.2 Inventory Breakdown and Benchmarking

It is difficult gain reliable data to benchmark the provision of sportsgrounds due to different data collection methods and levels of accuracy for recording sportsground areas. Often, figures are quoted that incorporate expanses of bushland, recreation parks and other associated spaces that are not directly related to the provision of sport. To gain a more appropriate comparison, the area of available/useable ‘playing space’15 needs to be compared. This level of data is not typically reported by most Councils, however, OPG recently conducted a similar study for Northern Beaches Council which is available for comparative purposes. Table 3 shows the comparison between NSROC and the Northern Beaches LGA. Table 3: Benchmark Supply Comparison

Area Population Playing Space (Ha) Population/ Hectare

Hectare/ 1000 Population

NSROC 592,550 239.3 2,476 0.40 Northern Beaches 263,700 116.5 2,264 0.44

This indicates a similar, but overall lower level of provision in the NSROC area compared to the Northern Beaches LGA on hectare to population basis. Table 4 presents a breakdown of population and playing space of the NSROC area by LGA. Table 4: Breakdown of Supply by LGA

Area Population % of

NSROC Pop.

Playing Area Count

Playing Space (Ha)

% of NSROC Playing Space

Average Site Area

(Ha) Pop/Ha Ha/1000

Pop

Hornsby 149,650 25% 44 59.5 25% 1.35 2,516 0.40 Hunters Hill 14,500 2% 10 6.5 3% 0.65 2,238 0.45 Ku-ring-gai 123,500 21% 63 63.6 27% 1.01 1,943 0.51 Lane Cove 37,350 6% 7 9.3 4% 1.33 4,016 0.25 North Sydney 72,150 12% 13 10.1 4% 0.77 7,179 0.14 Ryde 119,950 20% 73 61.9 26% 0.85 1,936 0.52 Willoughby 75,450 13% 19 28.5 12% 1.50 2,651 0.38 Total 592,550 100% 229 239.3 100% 1.04 2,476 0.40

The following observations can be made from the data above:

• Overall provision of playing space -

o Hornsby, Ku-ring-gai and Ryde LGAs supply the majority playing space, with

15 This relates to useable sports surfaces (e.g. competition/training areas) and immediate surrounds. The analysis in this report focuses predominately on this figure.



SPORTS fiELD uSAgE AT ANDERSON PARK

Typicalbookingsdistributionoveranaverageweek:

Mornings 7-8am

Lunchtimes/afternoons 1pm-4:45pm

Evenings 5pm-9pm

Weekends -Saturday 7:30amto5pm

-Sunday Nobookings

7-8am(occasional9till2:30pmbookings)

1pm-4:45pm

5pm-7pm(upto9pmfromFebruary)

7:30am to 5pm

No bookings




•Generalsportsturftargetusage-maximum25hrs/week

•NorthSydney’scap-maximum32hrs/week




Anderson park 2009 - 2014 2017 Difference

Average hours of Winter use 31.125 hrs 29.24 hrs -1.8 hrs

Average hours of Summer use 10 hrs 15.69 hrs +5.69 hrs

•Preferredsportsturftargetusage-maximum25hrs/week

•NorthSydneycap-maximum32hrs/week



SPORTS fiELD uSAgE AT ANDERSON PARKUsertypeandbookingsbasedon2017information:

Percentages based on bookings over 2 typical weeks during in winter and summer

North Sydney boys High School

Loreto Kirribili

StAloysiusCollege-SeniorSchool

StAloysiusCollege-JuniorSchool

Sportworx

North Sydney united football club

Northern Suburbs football

Winter

Clubs, 59%organisations,corporate

Schools 41%

Summer

Clubs, 37%organisations,corporate

Schools 63%



gRASS cONDTiON

•Amount of use

•Overshadowing

•Drainage

• Irrigation

•Wet weather management

•Recovery capacity



1. Reduce usage hours

2. Reduce School booking use

3. increase resilience of grass surface

• improvedirrigation

• improvedsoilconditions

• improved drainage

• review wet weather and turf recovery management

Other ?

FIELDUSE&PLAYINGFIELDCONDITION-SOME POSSibLE OPTiONS



SPORTS fiELD

•Long corridor of open space

•further contained by the enclosing fig avenues



SPORTS fiELD

• important long views to water

• informal access to edges of the green



SPORTS fiELD

•Juniorsizefieldcanonlybeaccommodated

•Existingfieldmarkings=100x48m

•FIFA/FootballNSW-SeniorComp recommends=105x68m+3mrunoff minimumwidth=64m

JULY 2017

DATE CLIENT PROJECT DRAWINGSCALE

ISSUE

1

N

TITLE

Anderson Parkplan of management

DescriptionRev Drawn Chked

1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

Sports use plan 3501.SA01

DIMENSIONS OF LINE MARKING OF EXISTING FIELD

Line markings - 100 x 48mCricket (Junior) - 25m radius

DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED FIELD SHOWN IN 2015 DA

Outer perimeter - 102 x 52mField edge - 96 x 48m

48

100

R 25

R 25

3.64

5248

102

96

2.39

3.64

5.24

Cricket Playing field size shown - 25m radius(measured from centre of pitch to boundary)

5-8 years 25m (min) 30m(recommended)Under 10 30m (min) 40m(recommended)

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

Sports use plan 3501.SA01

DIMENSIONS OF LINE MARKING OF EXISTING FIELD

Line markings - 100 x 48mCricket (Junior) - 25m radius

DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED FIELD SHOWN IN 2015 DA

Outer perimeter - 102 x 52mField edge - 96 x 48m

48

100

R 25

R 25

3.64

5248

102

96

2.39

3.64

5.24

Cricket Playing field size shown - 25m radius(measured from centre of pitch to boundary)

5-8 years 25m (min) 30m(recommended)Under 10 30m (min) 40m(recommended)



1. Recogniselimitationsofexistingfield:

-poororientation

-undersizedforseniorcompetition

Limitsitsscopeforcompetitionuse

2. Investigatelowkeypedestrianaccessclearoffieldviewing/runoffareastoenableaccesspastduringgametimes–someoptions:

-northsidelinkingtoamenitiesblock

-southsideunderFigs

Other ?

SPORTSFIELD-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS



N O R T H S Y D N E YLGA N e u t r a l B a y

250m

3 min

500m

6 min

Clarke Road

Kurraba Road

High Street

Raw

linso

n Ro

ad

Ben Boyd Road

PEDESTRiAN cONTEXT



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

ACCESS - Pedestrian Routes 3501.SA01

ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son StreetKurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

fOOTPATHS



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw


Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


LEGEND

Study area

Commuter route

Recreational (harbour & local heritage walks)

Park entries:

At grade access

Stepped access

General Public Footpath links

Ramp access

Bus Stops

Exising Warranted Crossing

Refuge / Non Formal Crossing

Service Vehicular Entry to Park

Crossing at traffic lights

ENTRiES



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw


Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

cROSSiNgS

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


LEGEND

Study area

Commuter route

Recreational (harbour & local heritage walks)

Park entries:

At grade access

Stepped access

General Public Footpath links

Ramp access

Bus Stops

Exising Warranted Crossing

Refuge / Non Formal Crossing

Service Vehicular Entry to Park

Crossing at traffic lights



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw


Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

cOMMuTER MOvEMENTS



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

ACCESS - Pedestrian Access 3501.SA01

ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

HARbOuR / HERiTAgE WALKS

Source: North Sydney Circle Walk segment 6 Historic Plaques Walk 3



35

40

40

20

25

30

35

40

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

10

15

5

15

10

5

25

20

15

10

30

5

25

2015

10 5

30

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

5

TP

IT

ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw


Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

LANDFORM & ACCESSS 3501.SA01

LEGEND

Study area

Steep Embankment

Direction of fall/grade

Drainage Channel

Level ground

+ 8.43

+ 5.54

+ 6.67

+ 3.31

+ 2.522.60+

+ 2.56

+ 5.00

+ 11.58

STEPS - 14 risers2430mm level difference

STEPS - 15 risers2710mm level difference

RAMP (GRADE 1:7 APPROX)

STEPS2230mm level difference

RAMP (GRADE 1:7 APPROX)

8.06+ 7.85+

ELEVATED RAMP TO AMENITIES BUILDING

AT GRADE ACCESS

AT GRADE ACCESS

AT GRADE ACCESS

AT GRADE ACCESS

STEPS790MM LEVEL DIFFERENCE

3.21 +

2.42 +

+ 5.80+ 3.09

SEA WALL

uNivERSAL AccESS



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

LAcK Of PEDESTRiAN cROSSiNgS AT iNTERSEcTiON PEDESTRiAN

REfugE SAfETy

iSSuES

PEDESTRiAN RAMP gRADiENT

LAcK Of ADDiTiONAL ROAD cROSSiNgS



JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

LAcK Of PEDESTRiAN cROSSiNgS AT iNTERSEcTiON PEDESTRiAN

REfugE SAfETy

iSSuES

PEDESTRiAN RAMP gRADiENT

LAcK Of ADDiTiONAL ROAD cROSSiNgS

LiMiTED cHANNEL bRiDgES iNTO PARK

cONSTRAiNED AccESS ALONg PARK ON gAME DAyS



Demand and supply

An analysis of the parking demand at the park has been conducted for the Saturdaymorningpeak.Itreliedonthefollowingassumptions:

• Afullsizedfieldhas20playersperteam(includingreservesandcoaching/adminstaff).

• Theprivatevehicledrivingrateisequalto95%.

• Playerscarpoolat1.2playerspercar.

Subsequently,• Parkingdemandforonefullsizedmatchcouldbeapproximatedto32vehicles.• withoverlapbetweenagamefinishingandthenextgameabouttobegin,

parkingdemandmayincreasetouptodoublethisrequirement(64spaces)duringpeaktimes.

TRAffic AND PARKiNg



iNvENTORy

26 spaces

64 spaces

13 spaces

2 spaces

•105 spaces to adjoining streets



RESTRicTiONS

•norestrictionsonweekends



Improve existing Refuge crossing1. improvements to pedestrian refuge along Kurraba

Road:

• couldbetterconnecttheParktothenorth-east.

• Currentlyrequirespedestrianstowalkthroughangled parking and wait to cross Kurraba Road within chevronline-marking,withnokerbrampsprovidedto allow access.

• Pedestrians may feel unsafe when crossing Kurraba Roadinthislocation

• could be improved by:

-provisionofkerbrampsonthesouth-westernkerbside

-provisionofapedestrianpathonapproachtothecar park side of

-potentialwideningofthecrossingpoint

TRAFFC-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS



TRAFFIC-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

Provide new pedestrian access2.Investigatepotentialforpedestrianfacilities

to link Warringa Park to Anderson Park

Other ?



PARKING-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

Parking / drop off3.ConversionofasectionofClarkRoadintoa“NoParking”zoneonSaturdaysandweekdays3pmto9pmtoprovideforsetdownanddropoff.

Located near bridge crossing into park

4.Reviewofgamestartingtimestopotentiallyalleviate“crossover”parkingdemand between games

Other ?

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

POSSibLE DROP Off ZONE ON SATuRDAyS



ACCESS-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17


ANDERSON PARK

Kurraba R

oad

Clark R

oad

Raw

son Street

Kurraba Road

Ben B

oyd R

oad

Hold

sw

ort

h S

treet

WarringaPark

Pedestrian access into / within park5.Investigateadditionalaccesspoints/

bridges across canal

6.Investigatepossiblepedestrianpath/walking surface to one side of park

7.Investigatepotentialtoprovidecompliantgradient to Kurraba Rd Ramps

Other ?



TREE MANAgEMENT



TREE MANAgEMENT

• CompactionunderFigs

• Erosion and root damage

• Poorconditionsforgrass

• good shade and amenity under figs



TREEMANAGEMENT-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

1. MulchedzoneunderFigsto: -protectrootzone -reducecompaction -retainmoisture -buildsoilquality

2. Potentiallowimpact(egboardwalk)accessunderFigswithselectedsittingrestpoints

-providesforaccessadjoiningfieldwhengames are on

-universalaccess -sittingandrestpointsinshade -potentialforintegrationofinterpretation

3. Other ?



HERiTAgE

• Aboriginal cultural heritage

• European / historic



HERiTAgE

• Localaviationhistoryandconnections

• KingsfordSmith&Nancy-BirdWalton



HERiTAgE



HERITAGE-SOME POSSibLE OPTiONS

1. Upgradeexistingmemorials

2. Provideadditionalinterpretationwithinpark:

-environment -Aboriginalculture& harbour

3. Communityeventcelebratingaviationhistory-community ‘picnicinpark’day

4. Other ?



WATER fRONT



WATER fRONT

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

LAND OWNERSHIP 3501.SA01

Lot 7362DP 1168049

Lot 7031

DP 93641

Lot 3

DP913708

Lot 2DP913708

Lot 1DP913708

STO

RM

WA

TE

R

CH

AN

NE

L

Lot 5DP69187

Lot 3DP68287

Lot 3

DP333590

Lot 4DP913708

LEGEND

Crown Land

Land Parcel Boundaries

Future Acquisition / Ownership Transfer (as per 1989 LEP)

Under Private Ownership

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

LAND OWNERSHIP 3501.SA01

Lot 7362DP 1168049

Lot 7031

DP 93641

Lot 3

DP913708

Lot 2DP913708

Lot 1DP913708

STO

RM

WA

TE

R

CH

AN

NE

L

Lot 5DP69187

Lot 3DP68287

Lot 3

DP333590

Lot 4DP913708

LEGEND

Crown Land

Land Parcel Boundaries

Future Acquisition / Ownership Transfer (as per 1989 LEP)

Under Private Ownership

• Public foreshore access

• fishing

• SeaWallcondition

• views to harbour

• Landidentifiedforaquisition



WATERFRONT-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

1. Investigatepossiblepublicsteps (ownership issue ?)

2. Periodic reviews of seawall condition



ENviRONMENT

• Water Quality in channel

• Tidal rubbish

• Parkmaintenance(fertiliser)

• bird habitat

• Marine habitat at seawall



ENVIRONMENT-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

1. Investigatepotentialwaterqualitymeasuresincanal:

-grosspollutanttrapsupstream

-possiblelinearwetland-watertreatment 2. Potentialwaterharvestingforirrigation

3. Reviewgrassfertilisertypeandfrequency

4. improve habitat performance of sea wall -habitatniches -overhangingtrees

Other ?



AMENiTiES

• Questionsaroundpublicaccessibility and use

• Visualscale,appearance,impact



AMENITIES-SOMEPOSSIBLEOPTIONS

1. Consideroptionsforhowbuildingmightbetterintegratewithpark:

-frontagetreeplanting -softenbrickwallfacade -softenappearanceofconcretebleacher seat (eg darker / earth colour) -Other? 2. Reviewtoiletlockingregime-tobeopen

for day to day public use

3. Potentialroofwaterharvestingforirrigation/toiletflush

Other ?



THANK yOu AND cLOSE



N

Prospect Hill

JULY 2017


ISSUE

1

N

TITLE



1 Preliminary EP AH

Date

20/10/17

CONTEXT PLAN 3501.SA01

McMAHONS

POINT NORTH

250m

500m

6 min

3 min

500m

6 min

1 km

12 min

1 k

m

12 m

in

1 km

12 min

N O R T H S Y D N E YLGA

N e u t r a l B a y

K i r r i b i l l i

N o r t h S y d n e y

C r e m o r n e

C r e m o r n eP o i n t

W a v e r t o n

K u r r a b aP o i n t

M O S M AN LGA

250m

500m

6 min

3 min

500m

6 min

1 km

12 min

1 km

12 min

ST LEONARDSPARK

FORSYTHPARK

ANDERSONPARK

WARINGAPARK

ILBERYRESERVE

REIDRESERVE

KURRABAPOINT

RESERVE

CREMORNERESERVE

MILSONPARK

HARNETTPARK

KESTERTONPARK

BRADFIELDPARK

CLARKPARK

LAVENDERBAY

PARKLANDS

SAWMILLERSRESERVE

BLUESPOINT

RESERVE

WAVERTONPARK

BALLS HEADRESERVE

BRENNANPARK

CARRADAHPARK

RAWSON STWILDLIFE

CORRIDOR

LEGEND

Study area

Major road

Rail

Park (incl playground & foreshore reserve)

Sportsfields incl golf greens

Bushland

Public Open SpaceSTuDy AREA

ANDERSON PARK MASTERPLAN & PLAN Of MANAgEMENT … · Anderson PLAN ANA GEMENT 2 COMMUNITY ORKSHO...

Documents

Transcript of ANDERSON PARK MASTERPLAN & PLAN Of MANAgEMENT … · Anderson PLAN ANA GEMENT 2 COMMUNITY ORKSHO...