Analytic Number Theory - GitHub Pages · 2019. 10. 7. · What is analytic number theory? It’s...
Transcript of Analytic Number Theory - GitHub Pages · 2019. 10. 7. · What is analytic number theory? It’s...
Analytic Number Theory
March 12 2019
1
CONTENTS 2
Contents
0 Introduction 3
1 Elementary techniques 4
11 Arithmetic functions 4
12 Summation 6
13 Dinsar function 8
14 Estimates for the Primes 10
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of the PNT 16
2 Sieve Methods 20
21 Setup 20
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve 22
23 Combinatorial Sieve 25
3 The Riemann ζ Function 30
31 Dirichlet series 30
32 Prime Number Theorem 35
33 Zero-free region 38
34 Error terms 43
35 Functional equation 46
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions 50
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions 50
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem 53
43 Zero-free region 54
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions 60
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem 62
CONTENTS 3
5 Example Class 1 67
51 Question 2 67
52 Question 3 68
53 Question 5 69
54 Question 1 70
0 INTRODUCTION 4
0 Introduction
mdashLecture 1mdash
Lecturer Thomas Bloom (tb634camacuk wwwthomasbloomorganthtml)
Printed notes will be updated but 1-2 weeks behind
Example classes weeks 357 tuesdays 330-5pm prop-in sessions weeks 2468Rooms to be confirmed later
What is analytic number theory Itrsquos the study of numbers (regular integersdiscrete) using analysis (realcomplex continuous) and some other quantitativequestions
For example for the famous function π(x) the number of primes no greaterthan x we know π(x) sim x
log x
Throughout this course by numbers wersquoll mean natural numbers excluding 0
We can also ask how many twin primes there are ie how many p such thatp p + 2 are both prime This is not known yet (not even the finiteness) butfrom 2014 Zhang Maynard Polymath showed that there are infinitely manyprimes at most 246 apart which is not that far from 2 The current guess isthat the number is around x
(log x)2
Another question we may ask how many primes are there equiv a (mod q) (a q) =1 We know by Dirichletrsquos theorem that there are infinitely manyA natural guess of the count is 1
φ(q)x
log x where φ(x) is the Euler Totient function
This is known to hold for small q
In this course wersquoll talk about(1) Elementary techniques (real analysis)(2) Sieve methods(3) Riemann zeta functionprime number theory (complex analysis)(4) Primes in arithmetic progressions
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 5
1 Elementary techniques
Review of asymptotic notationbull f(x) = O(g(x)) if there is c gt 0 st |f(x)| le c|g(x)| for all large enough xbull f ≪ g is the same thing as f = O(g) This also defines what f ≫ g means inthe natural way
bull f sim g if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 1 (ie f = (1 + o(1))g)
bull f = o(g) if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 0
11 Arithmetic functions
Arithmetic functions are just functions f N rarr C in other words relabellingnatural numbers with some complex numbersAn important operation for multiplicative number theory (fg = f(n)g(n)) ismultiplicative convolution
f lowast g(n) =983131
ab=n
f(a)g(b)
Examples 1(n) equiv 1foralln (caution 1 is not the identity function and 1 lowast f ∕= f)Mobius function
micro(n) =
983069(minus1)k if n = p1pk0 if n is divisible by a square
Liouville function λ(n) = (minus1)k if n = p1pk (primes not necessarily distinct)Divisor function τ(n) = number of d st d|n =
983123ab=n 1 = 1 lowast 1 This is
sometimes also known as d(n)
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if f(nm) = f(n)f(m) when (nm) = 1In particular a multiplicative function is determined by its values on primepowers
Fact If f g are multiplicative then so is f lowast gAll the function wersquove seen so far (microλ τ 1) are multiplicative
Non-example log n is definitely not multiplicative
Fact (Mobius inversion)1 lowast f = g lArrrArr micro lowast g = f That is
983131
a|n
f(d) = g(n)foralln lArrrArr983131
d|n
g(d)micro(nd) = f(n)foralln
eg983131
d|n
micro(d) =
9830691 n = 10 else
= 1 lowast micro
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
CONTENTS 2
Contents
0 Introduction 3
1 Elementary techniques 4
11 Arithmetic functions 4
12 Summation 6
13 Dinsar function 8
14 Estimates for the Primes 10
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of the PNT 16
2 Sieve Methods 20
21 Setup 20
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve 22
23 Combinatorial Sieve 25
3 The Riemann ζ Function 30
31 Dirichlet series 30
32 Prime Number Theorem 35
33 Zero-free region 38
34 Error terms 43
35 Functional equation 46
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions 50
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions 50
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem 53
43 Zero-free region 54
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions 60
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem 62
CONTENTS 3
5 Example Class 1 67
51 Question 2 67
52 Question 3 68
53 Question 5 69
54 Question 1 70
0 INTRODUCTION 4
0 Introduction
mdashLecture 1mdash
Lecturer Thomas Bloom (tb634camacuk wwwthomasbloomorganthtml)
Printed notes will be updated but 1-2 weeks behind
Example classes weeks 357 tuesdays 330-5pm prop-in sessions weeks 2468Rooms to be confirmed later
What is analytic number theory Itrsquos the study of numbers (regular integersdiscrete) using analysis (realcomplex continuous) and some other quantitativequestions
For example for the famous function π(x) the number of primes no greaterthan x we know π(x) sim x
log x
Throughout this course by numbers wersquoll mean natural numbers excluding 0
We can also ask how many twin primes there are ie how many p such thatp p + 2 are both prime This is not known yet (not even the finiteness) butfrom 2014 Zhang Maynard Polymath showed that there are infinitely manyprimes at most 246 apart which is not that far from 2 The current guess isthat the number is around x
(log x)2
Another question we may ask how many primes are there equiv a (mod q) (a q) =1 We know by Dirichletrsquos theorem that there are infinitely manyA natural guess of the count is 1
φ(q)x
log x where φ(x) is the Euler Totient function
This is known to hold for small q
In this course wersquoll talk about(1) Elementary techniques (real analysis)(2) Sieve methods(3) Riemann zeta functionprime number theory (complex analysis)(4) Primes in arithmetic progressions
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 5
1 Elementary techniques
Review of asymptotic notationbull f(x) = O(g(x)) if there is c gt 0 st |f(x)| le c|g(x)| for all large enough xbull f ≪ g is the same thing as f = O(g) This also defines what f ≫ g means inthe natural way
bull f sim g if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 1 (ie f = (1 + o(1))g)
bull f = o(g) if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 0
11 Arithmetic functions
Arithmetic functions are just functions f N rarr C in other words relabellingnatural numbers with some complex numbersAn important operation for multiplicative number theory (fg = f(n)g(n)) ismultiplicative convolution
f lowast g(n) =983131
ab=n
f(a)g(b)
Examples 1(n) equiv 1foralln (caution 1 is not the identity function and 1 lowast f ∕= f)Mobius function
micro(n) =
983069(minus1)k if n = p1pk0 if n is divisible by a square
Liouville function λ(n) = (minus1)k if n = p1pk (primes not necessarily distinct)Divisor function τ(n) = number of d st d|n =
983123ab=n 1 = 1 lowast 1 This is
sometimes also known as d(n)
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if f(nm) = f(n)f(m) when (nm) = 1In particular a multiplicative function is determined by its values on primepowers
Fact If f g are multiplicative then so is f lowast gAll the function wersquove seen so far (microλ τ 1) are multiplicative
Non-example log n is definitely not multiplicative
Fact (Mobius inversion)1 lowast f = g lArrrArr micro lowast g = f That is
983131
a|n
f(d) = g(n)foralln lArrrArr983131
d|n
g(d)micro(nd) = f(n)foralln
eg983131
d|n
micro(d) =
9830691 n = 10 else
= 1 lowast micro
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
CONTENTS 3
5 Example Class 1 67
51 Question 2 67
52 Question 3 68
53 Question 5 69
54 Question 1 70
0 INTRODUCTION 4
0 Introduction
mdashLecture 1mdash
Lecturer Thomas Bloom (tb634camacuk wwwthomasbloomorganthtml)
Printed notes will be updated but 1-2 weeks behind
Example classes weeks 357 tuesdays 330-5pm prop-in sessions weeks 2468Rooms to be confirmed later
What is analytic number theory Itrsquos the study of numbers (regular integersdiscrete) using analysis (realcomplex continuous) and some other quantitativequestions
For example for the famous function π(x) the number of primes no greaterthan x we know π(x) sim x
log x
Throughout this course by numbers wersquoll mean natural numbers excluding 0
We can also ask how many twin primes there are ie how many p such thatp p + 2 are both prime This is not known yet (not even the finiteness) butfrom 2014 Zhang Maynard Polymath showed that there are infinitely manyprimes at most 246 apart which is not that far from 2 The current guess isthat the number is around x
(log x)2
Another question we may ask how many primes are there equiv a (mod q) (a q) =1 We know by Dirichletrsquos theorem that there are infinitely manyA natural guess of the count is 1
φ(q)x
log x where φ(x) is the Euler Totient function
This is known to hold for small q
In this course wersquoll talk about(1) Elementary techniques (real analysis)(2) Sieve methods(3) Riemann zeta functionprime number theory (complex analysis)(4) Primes in arithmetic progressions
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 5
1 Elementary techniques
Review of asymptotic notationbull f(x) = O(g(x)) if there is c gt 0 st |f(x)| le c|g(x)| for all large enough xbull f ≪ g is the same thing as f = O(g) This also defines what f ≫ g means inthe natural way
bull f sim g if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 1 (ie f = (1 + o(1))g)
bull f = o(g) if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 0
11 Arithmetic functions
Arithmetic functions are just functions f N rarr C in other words relabellingnatural numbers with some complex numbersAn important operation for multiplicative number theory (fg = f(n)g(n)) ismultiplicative convolution
f lowast g(n) =983131
ab=n
f(a)g(b)
Examples 1(n) equiv 1foralln (caution 1 is not the identity function and 1 lowast f ∕= f)Mobius function
micro(n) =
983069(minus1)k if n = p1pk0 if n is divisible by a square
Liouville function λ(n) = (minus1)k if n = p1pk (primes not necessarily distinct)Divisor function τ(n) = number of d st d|n =
983123ab=n 1 = 1 lowast 1 This is
sometimes also known as d(n)
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if f(nm) = f(n)f(m) when (nm) = 1In particular a multiplicative function is determined by its values on primepowers
Fact If f g are multiplicative then so is f lowast gAll the function wersquove seen so far (microλ τ 1) are multiplicative
Non-example log n is definitely not multiplicative
Fact (Mobius inversion)1 lowast f = g lArrrArr micro lowast g = f That is
983131
a|n
f(d) = g(n)foralln lArrrArr983131
d|n
g(d)micro(nd) = f(n)foralln
eg983131
d|n
micro(d) =
9830691 n = 10 else
= 1 lowast micro
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
0 INTRODUCTION 4
0 Introduction
mdashLecture 1mdash
Lecturer Thomas Bloom (tb634camacuk wwwthomasbloomorganthtml)
Printed notes will be updated but 1-2 weeks behind
Example classes weeks 357 tuesdays 330-5pm prop-in sessions weeks 2468Rooms to be confirmed later
What is analytic number theory Itrsquos the study of numbers (regular integersdiscrete) using analysis (realcomplex continuous) and some other quantitativequestions
For example for the famous function π(x) the number of primes no greaterthan x we know π(x) sim x
log x
Throughout this course by numbers wersquoll mean natural numbers excluding 0
We can also ask how many twin primes there are ie how many p such thatp p + 2 are both prime This is not known yet (not even the finiteness) butfrom 2014 Zhang Maynard Polymath showed that there are infinitely manyprimes at most 246 apart which is not that far from 2 The current guess isthat the number is around x
(log x)2
Another question we may ask how many primes are there equiv a (mod q) (a q) =1 We know by Dirichletrsquos theorem that there are infinitely manyA natural guess of the count is 1
φ(q)x
log x where φ(x) is the Euler Totient function
This is known to hold for small q
In this course wersquoll talk about(1) Elementary techniques (real analysis)(2) Sieve methods(3) Riemann zeta functionprime number theory (complex analysis)(4) Primes in arithmetic progressions
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 5
1 Elementary techniques
Review of asymptotic notationbull f(x) = O(g(x)) if there is c gt 0 st |f(x)| le c|g(x)| for all large enough xbull f ≪ g is the same thing as f = O(g) This also defines what f ≫ g means inthe natural way
bull f sim g if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 1 (ie f = (1 + o(1))g)
bull f = o(g) if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 0
11 Arithmetic functions
Arithmetic functions are just functions f N rarr C in other words relabellingnatural numbers with some complex numbersAn important operation for multiplicative number theory (fg = f(n)g(n)) ismultiplicative convolution
f lowast g(n) =983131
ab=n
f(a)g(b)
Examples 1(n) equiv 1foralln (caution 1 is not the identity function and 1 lowast f ∕= f)Mobius function
micro(n) =
983069(minus1)k if n = p1pk0 if n is divisible by a square
Liouville function λ(n) = (minus1)k if n = p1pk (primes not necessarily distinct)Divisor function τ(n) = number of d st d|n =
983123ab=n 1 = 1 lowast 1 This is
sometimes also known as d(n)
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if f(nm) = f(n)f(m) when (nm) = 1In particular a multiplicative function is determined by its values on primepowers
Fact If f g are multiplicative then so is f lowast gAll the function wersquove seen so far (microλ τ 1) are multiplicative
Non-example log n is definitely not multiplicative
Fact (Mobius inversion)1 lowast f = g lArrrArr micro lowast g = f That is
983131
a|n
f(d) = g(n)foralln lArrrArr983131
d|n
g(d)micro(nd) = f(n)foralln
eg983131
d|n
micro(d) =
9830691 n = 10 else
= 1 lowast micro
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 5
1 Elementary techniques
Review of asymptotic notationbull f(x) = O(g(x)) if there is c gt 0 st |f(x)| le c|g(x)| for all large enough xbull f ≪ g is the same thing as f = O(g) This also defines what f ≫ g means inthe natural way
bull f sim g if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 1 (ie f = (1 + o(1))g)
bull f = o(g) if limxrarrinfinf(x)g(x) = 0
11 Arithmetic functions
Arithmetic functions are just functions f N rarr C in other words relabellingnatural numbers with some complex numbersAn important operation for multiplicative number theory (fg = f(n)g(n)) ismultiplicative convolution
f lowast g(n) =983131
ab=n
f(a)g(b)
Examples 1(n) equiv 1foralln (caution 1 is not the identity function and 1 lowast f ∕= f)Mobius function
micro(n) =
983069(minus1)k if n = p1pk0 if n is divisible by a square
Liouville function λ(n) = (minus1)k if n = p1pk (primes not necessarily distinct)Divisor function τ(n) = number of d st d|n =
983123ab=n 1 = 1 lowast 1 This is
sometimes also known as d(n)
An arithmetic function is multiplicative if f(nm) = f(n)f(m) when (nm) = 1In particular a multiplicative function is determined by its values on primepowers
Fact If f g are multiplicative then so is f lowast gAll the function wersquove seen so far (microλ τ 1) are multiplicative
Non-example log n is definitely not multiplicative
Fact (Mobius inversion)1 lowast f = g lArrrArr micro lowast g = f That is
983131
a|n
f(d) = g(n)foralln lArrrArr983131
d|n
g(d)micro(nd) = f(n)foralln
eg983131
d|n
micro(d) =
9830691 n = 10 else
= 1 lowast micro
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 6
is multiplicative itrsquos enough to check identity for primes powersIf n = pk then d|n = 1 p pk So LHS=1 minus 1 + 0 + 0 + = 0 unlessk = 0 when LHS = micro(1) = 1
Our goal is to study primes The first guess might be to work with
1p(n) =
9830691 n prime0 else
(eg π(x) =983123
1lenlex 1p(n)) Instead we work with von Mangoldt funcion
and(n) =983069
log p n is a prime power0 else
(eg in a few lectures wersquoll look at ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex and(n))
Lemma (1)1 lowast and = log and by Mobius inversion micro lowast log = andNote that itrsquos easy to realize that and is not multiplicative else log will be
Proof 1 lowast and(n) =983123
d|n and(d) So if n = pk11 pkr
r then above
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
and(pji )
=
r983131
i=1
ki983131
j=1
log(pi)
=
r983131
i=1
ki log(pi)
= log n
Note that the above tells us
and(n) =983131
d|n
micro(d) log(nd)
= log n983131
d|n
micro(d)minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
by the famous fact that983123
d|n micro(d) = 0 unless n = 1 but when n = 1 log n = 0Now we can try to evaluate
minus983131
1lenlex
and(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
micro(d) log d
= minus983131
dlex
micro(d) log d(983131
1lenlexd|n
1) (reverse order of summation)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 7
But 983131
1lenlexd|n
1 = lfloorxdrfloor = xd+O(1)
So we know the original sum is equal to
minusx983131
dlex
micro(d)log d
d+O(
983131
dlex
micro(d) log d)
mdashLecutre 2mdash
Lecturerrsquos favourite book Multiplicative Number Theory
Room for example classes MR14 (Tues 330-5pm week 357)
12 Summation
Given an arithmetic function f we can ask for estimates of983123
1lenlex f(n)We say that f has average order g if
9831231lenlex f(n) sim xg(x) (in some sense the
average size of f is g)
For example if f equiv 1 then983123
1lenlex f(n) = lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1) sim x So the averageorder of 1 is 1 (makes a lot of sense)A slightly less trivial example is the identity function f(n) = n we have983123
1lenlex n sim x2
2 so the average order of n is n2
Lemma (1 Partial summation)If (an) is a sequence of complex numbers and f is st f prime is continuous Then983123
1lenlex anf(n) = A(x)f(x)minus983125 x
1A(t)f prime(t)dt where A(x) =
9831231lenlex an
We can see that this is a discrete version of integration by parts
Proof Suppose x = N is an integer Note that an = A(n)minusA(nminus 1) So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) =983131
1lenleN
f(n)(A(n)minusA(nminus 1))
= A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)(f(n+ 1)minus f(n)) using A(0) = 0
Now f(n+ 1)minus f(n) =983125 n+1
nf prime(t)dt So
983131
1lenleN
anf(n) = A(N)f(N)minusNminus1983131
n=1
A(n)
983133 n+1
n
f prime(t)dt
= A(N)f(N)minus983133 N
1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 8
To be complete we should also consider the case where x is not an integer Butif N = lfloorxrfloor
A(x)f(x) = A(N)f(x)
= A(N)
983061f(N) +
983133 x
N
f prime(t)dt
983062
Lemma (2)
983131
1lenlex
1
n= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where γ is some constant
Proof Apply partial summation with f(x) = 1x and an equiv 1 so A(x) = lfloorxrfloor
Then writing lfloortrfloor = tminus t
983131
1lenlex
1
n=
lfloorxrfloorx
+
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloort2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+
983133 x
1
1
tdtminus
983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= 1 +O
9830611
x
983062+ log xminus
983133 infin
1
tt2
dt+
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt
= γ +O
9830611
x
983062+ log x+O
9830611
x
983062
= log x+ γ +O
9830611
x
983062
where at the penultimate step we bound the error term by
983133 infin
x
tt2
dt le983133 infin
x
1
t2dt
le 1
x
and we actually know γ = 1minus983125infin1
tt2 dt
This γ is called Eulerrsquos constant (Euler-Mascheroni)We know very little about this constant we only know γ = 0577 and wedonrsquot even know if γ is irrational
Lemma (3)
983131
1lenlex
log n = x log xminus x+O(log x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 9
Proof Use partial summation again with f(x) = log x and an = 1 so A(x) =lfloorxrfloor
983131
1lenlex
log n = lfloorxrfloor log xminus983133 x
1
lfloortrfloortdt
= x log x+O(log x)minus983133 x
1
1dt+O(
983133 x
1
1
tdt)
= x log xminus x+O(log x)
13 Dinsar function
Recall that τ(n) = 1 lowast 1(n) =983123
d|n 1
Theorem (4)
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
So average order of τ is log x
Proof Note that we wonrsquot apply partial summation here PS allows to get983123anf(n) from knowledge of
983123an but τ(n) here is not differentiable so PS is
not going to apply
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
d|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
983131
1lenlexd|n
1
=983131
1ledlex
lfloorxdrfloor
=983131
1ledlex
x
d+O(x)
= x983131
1ledlex
1
d+O(x)
= x log x+ γx+O(x)
where we applied lemma 2 at the last step This is all correct but the errorterm is larger than what we wanted However we have indeed prove that theaverage order of τ(x) is log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 10
To reduce error term we use (Dirichletrsquos) hyperbola trick
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
1lenlex
983131
ab=n
1
=983131
ablex
1
=983131
alex
983131
ble xa
1
Note that now wersquore just counting number of integer points below the hyperbolaxy = n (relabelling variables)When summing over ab le x we can sum over a b le x12 separately thensubtract the repetition off Then
983131
1lenlex
τ(n) =983131
alex12
983131
ble xa
1 +983131
blex12
983131
ale xb
1minus983131
ablex12
1
= 2983131
alex12
lfloorxarfloor minus lfloorx12rfloor2
= 2983131
alex12
x
a+O(x12)minus x+O(x12)
by noting that lfloorx12rfloor2 = (x12 +O(1))2 Now the above equals
= 2x log x12 + 2γxminus x+O(x12)
= x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
Improving this O(x12) error term is a famous and hard problem We shouldprobably get O(x14+ε) but this is open The best known result is O(x03149)
Note that this does not mean that τ(n) ≪ log n The average order is smalldoesnrsquot say about the individual values being small
Wersquoll state the theorem wersquore proving and prove it in the next lecture
Theorem (5)
τ(n) le nO( 1log log n )
In particular τ(n) ≪ε nε forallε gt 0
mdashLecture 3mdash
Proof τ is multiplicative so itrsquos enough to calculate at prime powersNow τ(pk) = k + 1 So if n = pk1
1 pkrr thjen τ(n) =
983124ri=1(ki + 1)
Let ε be chosen later and consider τ(n)nε =
983124ri=1
ki+1
pkiε
i
Note as p rarr infin k+1pkε rarr 0
In particular if p ge 21ε then k+1pkε le k+1
2kle 1 What about for small p We
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 11
canrsquot do better than p ge 2 but thatrsquos enoughIn this case k+1
pkε le k+12kε le 1
ε (as x + 12 le 2x =rArr εk + ε le 2kεforallx ge 0) for
ε le 12So
τ(n)
nεle
r983132
i=1ilt21ε
ki + 1
pkiεle (1ε)21ε
Now choose optimal ε(trick) if you want to choose x to minimise f(x) + g(x) choose x st f(x) =g(x)
So here τ(n) le nεεminus21ε = exp(ε log n+ 21ε log 1ε)Choose ε st log n asymp 21ε ie ε = 1
log logn So
τ(n) le n1 log logn(log log n)2log log n
= n1 log logne(logn)log 2 log log logn
le nO( 1log log n )
14 Estimates for the Primes
Recall π(x) is the number of primesle x =983123
1lenlex 1p(n) and ψ(x) =983123
1lenlex Λ(n)The prime number theorem states that π(x) sim x
log x or equivalently ψ(x) sim x
(justified later)It was 1850 before the correct magnitude of π(x) was proved Chebyshev showedthat π(x) ≍ x log x where f ≍ g means g ≪ f ≪ g
Theorem (6 Chebyshev)ψ(x) ≍ xWersquoll show below that (log 2)x le ψ(x) le (log 4)x (remember that the defaultbase for log is e so log 2 lt 1 while log 4 gt 1)
Proof First wersquoll prove the lower bound Recall 1 lowastΛ = log ie983123
ab=n Λ(a) =log n The (genuine) trick is to find a sum Σ st ε le 1() Wersquoll use the identitylfloorxrfloor le 2lfloorx
2 rfloor + 1forallx ge 0 Why Say x2 = n + θ θ isin [0 1) Then lfloorx
2 rfloor = n andx = 2n+ 2θ and so lfloorxrfloor = 2n or at most 2n+ 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 12
So
ψ(x) ge983131
nlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloor minus 2lfloor x
2nrfloor)
=983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mlexn
1minus 2983131
nlex
Λ(n)983131
mle x2n
1
=983131
nmlex
Λ(n)minus 2983131
nmlex2
Λ(n) write d = nm
=983131
dlex
1 lowast Λ(d)minus 2983131
dlex2
1 lowast Λ(d)
=983131
dlex
log dminus 2983131
dlex2
log d
= x log xminus x+O(log x)minus 2(x
2log
x
2minus x
2+O(log x))
= (log 2)x+O(log x) ≫ x
For the upper bound note that lfloorxrfloor = 2lfloorx2rfloor+ 1 for x isin (1 2) so983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n) =983131
x2ltnltx
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor) le983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)(lfloorxnrfloorminus2lfloorx2nrfloor)
so ψ(x)minus ψ(x2) le (log 2)x+O(log x)So ψ(x) = (ψ(x)minusψ(x2))+(ψ(x2)minusψ(x4))+ le log 2(x+x2+x4+ ) =(2 log 2)x (note only log x error terms at most)
Lemma (7)
983131
plexp primes
log p
p= log x+O(1)
Proof Recall that log = 1 lowast Λ So983131
nlex
log n =983131
ablex
Λ(a)
=983131
alex
Λ(a)983131
blexa
1
=983131
alex
Λ(a)lfloorxarfloor
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(ψ(x))
= x983131
alex
Λ(a)
a+O(x)
But983123
nlex log n = x log xminus x+O(log x) So
983131
nlex
Λ(n)
n= log xminus 1 +O(
log x
x) +O(1) + log x+O(1)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 13
It remains to note that
983131
plex
infin983131
n=2
log p
pn=
983131
plex
log p
infin983131
k=2
1
pk
=983131
plex
log p
p2 minus p
leinfin983131
p=2
1
p32= O(1)
So983123
nlexΛ(n)n =
983123plex
log pp +O(1)
mdashLecture 4mdash
Drop-in Tuesday 4pm-5pm
Lemma (8)
π(x) = ψ(x)log x +O( x
(log x)2 )
In particular π(x) ≍ xlog x and prime number theorem π(x) sim x
log x is equivalent
to ψ(x) sim xSo from now on wersquoll call this the prime number theorem instead
Proof The idea is to use partial summation
θ(x) =983131
plex
log p = π(x) log xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
tdt
but this doesnrsquot work immediately since ψ(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) =983123
pklex log pHowever we have
ψ(x)minus θ(x) =
infin983131
k=2
983131
pklex
log p
=
infin983131
k=2
θ(x1k)
leinfin983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
=
log x983131
k=2
ψ(x1k)
as the larger terms are all zero Then the above
≪log x983131
k=2
x1k
≪ x12 log x
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 14
(Obviously we could do better but thatrsquos less important) Now ψ(x) = π(x) log x+
O(x12 log x)minus983125 x
1π(t)t dt Note that we have π(t) ≪ t
log t so we can bound theabove by
ψ(x) = π(x) log x+O(x12 log x) +O(
983133 x
1
1
log tdt)
= π(x) log x+O(x
log x)
(For π(t) ≪ tlog t note that from π(t) le t ψ(x) = π(x) log x + O(x12 log x) +
O(x) So π(x) log x = O(x))
Lemma (9)983123plex
1p = log log x+ b+O( 1
log x ) where b is some constant
Proof We use partial summation Let A(x) =983123
plexlog pp = log x + R(x) (so
R(x) ≪ 1 (by lemma 7)) Then
983131
2leplex
1
p=
A(x)
log xminus983133 x
2
A(t)
t(log t)2dt
= 1 +O(1
log x) +
983133 x
2
1
t log tdt+
983133 x
2
R(t)
t(log t)2dt
Note983125infin2
R(t)t(log t)2 dt exists say = c Then
983131
2leplex
1
p= 1 + c+O(
1
log x) + log log xminus log log 2 +O(
983133 infin
x
1
t(log t)2dt)
= log log x+ b+O(1
log x)
Theorem (10 Chebyshev)If π(x) sim c x
log x then c = 1Note that this is weaker than PNT itself this only says that if that relationexists then we must have c = 1(Also if π(x) sim x
log xminusA(x) then A sim 1)
Proof Use partial summation on983123
plex1p
983131
plex
1
p=
π(x)
xminus983133 x
1
π(t)
t2dt
If π(x) = (c+ o(1)) xlog x then
=c
log x+ o(
1
log x) + (c+ o(1))
983133 x
1
1
t log tdt
= O(1
log x) + (c+ o(1)) log log x
But983123
plex1p = (1 + o(1)) log x Hence c = 1
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 15
Lemma (11)983124plex(1minus 1
p )minus1 = c log x+O(1) where c is some constant
Proof
log(983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1) = minus
983131
plex
(1minus 1
p)
=983131
plex
983131
k
1
kpk
=983131
plex
1
p+
983131
kge2
983131
plex
1
kpk
= log log x+ cprime +O(1
log x)
where we used the expansion log(1minus t) = minus983123
ktk
k Now note that ex = 1 +O(x) for |x| le 1 So
983132
plex
(1minus 1
p)minus1 = c log xeO( 1
log x )
= c log x(1 +O(1
log x))
= c log x+O(1)
It turns out that c = eγ asymp 178 where γ is the Euler constant that wersquove seenpreviously
So why is PNT hard given that wersquove proved so many results From proba-bilistic heuristic we have the rsquoprobabilityrsquo that p|n is 1
p What is the probability that n is prime then n is prime iff n has no primedivisors le n12 Our guess is that the events rsquodivisible by prsquo are independentso the probability that n is prime should be something like
983124plen12(1 minus 1
p ) asymp1
c logn12 = 2c
1logn So
π(x) =983131
nlex
1n prime asymp2
c
983131
nlex
1
log nasymp 2
c
x
log xasymp 2eminusγ x
log x
if the above guesses are correct but from theorem 10 we know that the constantshould be 1 instead of 2eminusγ asymp 1122What have gone wrong It turns out that the error terms accumulated are toooverwhelming that theyrsquove actually contributed to the main term So PNT isnot something like we find the main term and prove that the error terms arenegligible
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 16
Recall that 1 lowast Λ = log so micro lowast log = Λ So
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a) log b
=983131
alex
micro(a)(983131
ble xa
log b)
Recall that
983131
mlex
logm = x log xminus x+O(log x)
983131
mlex
τ(m) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(x12)
so their main terms agreeSo
ψ(x) =983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
τ(b) + 2γx
a+O
983061x12
a12
983062983092
983108
=983131
ablex
micro(a)τ(b)
=983131
abclex
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
aclexb
micro(a)
=983131
blex
983131
dlexb
micro lowast 1(d)
= lfloorxrfloor = x+O(1)
since we know the last term is 0 unless d is 1
The error term
minus2γ983131
alex
micro(a)x
a= O(x
983131
alex
micro(a)
a)
so we need to show that983123
alexmicro(a)a = o(1) However this is still the same as
PNT so we havenrsquot gained anything
mdashLecture 5mdash
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 17
15 Selbergrsquos identity and an elementary proof of thePNT
Recall that PNT isψ(x) =
983131
nlex
Λ(n) = x+ o(x)
Let (Selbergrsquos function)
Λ2(n) = micro lowast (log2)(n) =983131
ab=n
micro(a)(log b)2
(Recall Λ = micro lowast log)
The idea is to prove a rsquoPNT for Λ2rsquo with elementary methods
Lemma (12)(1) Λ2(n) = Λ(n) log n+ Λ lowast Λ(n)(2) 0 le Λ2(n) le (log n)2(3) If Λ2(n) ∕= 0 then n has at most 2 distinct prime factors
Proof For (1) we use Mobius inverison so it is enough to show that
983131
d|n
(Λ(d) log d+ Λ lowast Λ(d)) = (log n)2
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
ab|n
Λ(a)Λ(b) as 1 lowast Λ = log
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
a|n
Λ(a)
983091
983107983131
b|na
Λ(b))
983092
983108
983167 983166983165 983168=log(n
d )
=983131
d|n
Λ(d) log d+983131
d|n
Λ(d) log(n
d)
= log n983131
d|n
Λ(d) = (log n)2
For (2) Λ2(n) ge 0 since both terms on RHS in (1) arege 0 and since983123
d|n Λ2(d) =
(log n)2 Λ2(n) le (log n)2For (3) note that if n is divisible by 3 distinct primes then Λ(n) = 0 andΛ lowast Λ(n) =
983123ab=n Λ(a)Λ(b) = 0 since at least one of a or b has ge 2 distinct
prime divisors
Theorem (13 Selberg)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2x log x+O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 18
Proof
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) =983131
nlex
micro lowast (log)2(n)
=983131
ablex
micro(a)(log b)2
=983131
alex
micro(a)
983091
983107983131
ble xa
(log b)2
983092
983108
By PS
983131
mlex
(logm)2 = x(log x)2 minus 2x log x+ 2x+O((log x)2)
By PS (let A(t) =983123
nlet τ(n) = t log t+ ct+O(t12))
983131
mlex
τ(m)
m=
A(x)
x+
983133 x
1
A(t)
t2dt
= log x+ c+O(xminus12) +
983133 x
1
log t
tdt+ c
983133 x
1
1
tdt+O(
983133 x
1
1
t32dt)
=(log x)2
2+ c1 log x+ c2 +O(xminus12)
So
x(log x)2
2=
983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ cprime1
983131
mlex
τ(m) + cprime2x+O(x12)
So983131
nlex
(logm)2 = 2983131
mlex
τ(m)x
m+ c3
983131
mlex
τ(m) + c4x+O(x12)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+ c5
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b) + c6983131
alex
micro(a)x
a+O(
983131
alex
x12
a12)
First note that x12983123
alex1
a12 = O(x) (by PS or just comparing with theintegral Secondly
x983131
alex
micro(a)
a=
983131
alex
micro(a)lfloorxarfloor+O(x)
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
1 +O(x)
=983131
dlex
micro lowast 1(d) +O(x)
= O(x)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 19
since the sum is either 1 (when d = 1) or 0 (otherwise)Thirdly1
983131
alex
micro(a)983131
blex
τ(b) =983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
983131
cd=b
1
=983131
alex
micro(a)983131
cdle xa
1
=983131
acdlex
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
acle xd
micro(a)
=983131
dlex
983131
ele xd
micro lowast 1(e)
=983131
dlex
1 = O(x)
So
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2983131
alex
micro(a)983131
ble xa
τ(b)x
ab+O(x)
= 2x983131
dlex
1
dmicro lowast τ(d) +O(x)
Recall that τ = 1 lowast 1 so micro lowast τ = micro lowast 1 lowast 1 = 1 So the above
= 2x983131
dlex
1
d+O(x)
= 2x log x+O(x)
(Non-examinable from now but lecturer still recommends us to think about it)A 14-point plan to prove PNT from Selbergrsquos identity
Let r(x) = ψ(x)x minus 1 so PNT is equivalent to limxrarrinfin |r(x)| = 0
1) Selbergrsquos identity =rArr
r(x) log x = minus983131
nlex
Λ(n)
nr(
x
n) +O(1)
2) Considering 1) with x replaced xm summing over m show
|r(x)|(log x)2 le983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)|+O(log x)
1Jaspal noticed that this can be obtained much more easily by micro lowast τ = 1 from Mobiusinversion
1 ELEMENTARY TECHNIQUES 20
3)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n) = 2
983133 lfloorxrfloor
1
log tdt+O(x)
4-6) (Letrsquos skip some of the steps)
983131
nlex
Λ2(n)
n|r(x
n)| = 2
983133 x
1
|r(xt)|t log t
dt+O(log x)
7) Let V (u) = r(eu) Show that
u2|V (u)| le 2
983133 u
0
983133 v
0
|V (t)|dtdv +O(u)
8) Show
lim sup |r(x)| le lim sup1
u
983133 u
0
|V (t)|dt = β
9-14) () If α gt 0 then can show from 7) that β lt α contradiction so α = 0and PNT
2 SIEVE METHODS 21
2 Sieve Methods
mdashLecture 6mdash
Hand in by Monday if you want some questions (q2 and q3) to be marked
Everyone knows how Sieve of Eratosthenes works (some demonstration by lec-turer) Our interest is in using the sieve to count things If we apply Sieve ofEratosthenes to the interval [1 20] then we get an equality between two waysof counting how many numbers are left
π(20) + 1minus π(radic20) = 20minus lfloor202rfloor minus lfloor203rfloor+ lfloor206rfloor
where both sides evaluate to 7
21 Setup
Wersquoll have the followingbull Finite set A sub N (the set to be sifted)bull Set of primes p (the set of primes we sift out by) usually all primesbull Sifting limit z (sift all primes in P less than z)bull sifting function
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(n983124
pisinPpltz p)=1
Let983124
pisinPpltz p = P (z) Our goal is to estimate S(AP z)
bull For d let
Ad = n isin A d|n
bull We write |Ad| = f(d)d X+Rd (most textbooks use ω in place of f here our use
here is to avoid confusion) where f is multiplicative (f(mn) = f(m)f(n)forall(mn) =1) and 0 le f(d)foralldbull Note that |A| = f(1)
1 X +R1 = X +R1bull Rd is an rsquoerrorrsquo termbull We choose f so that f(p) = 0 if p ∕isin P by convention (so in that caseRp = |Ap|)bull Let Wp(z) =
983124pltzpisinP (1minus
f(p)p )
Example 1) Take A = (x x + y] cap N P the set of all primes So |Ad| =lfloorx+y
d rfloor minus lfloorxd rfloor =
yd +O(1)
Here f(d) equiv 1 and Rd = O(1)So S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge z|eg if z asymp (x+ y)12 then
S(AP z) = π(x+ y)minus π(x) +O((x+ y)12)
2 SIEVE METHODS 22
2) A = 1 le n le y n equiv a (mod q) Ad = 1 le m le xd dm equiv a (mod q)
This congruence only has solutions if (d q)|a So|Ad| = (dq)
dq y +O((d q)) if (d q)|a and = O((d q)) otherwise
So here X = yq and f(d) = d(d q) if (d q)|a and 0 otherwise
3) How about twin primes ie p p+ 2 both primes We haveA = n(n+ 2) 1 le n le x (so if p|n(n+ 2) lArrrArr n equiv 0minus2 (mod p))P is all primes except 2|Ap| = 2x
p + O(1) (so f(p) = 2) So f(d) = 2ω(d) for f to be completely
multiplicative where ω(d) denote the number of primes divisors of dS(AP x12) = |1 le p le x p p+ 2 both prime+O(x12) Denote the mainterm as π2(x) then as mentioned in the first lecture we expect π2(x) asymp x
(log x)2
We will prove the upper bound using sieves
Theorem (1 Sieve of Eratosthenes Legendre)S(AP z) = XWp(z) +O(
983123d|p(z) Rd)
Proof
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(np(z))=1
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|(np(z))
micro(d)
=983131
nisinA
983131
d|nd|p(z)
micro(d)
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)983131
nisinA
1d|n
=983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)|Ad|
= X983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|p(z)
micro(d)Rd
= X983132
pisinPpltz
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062+O(
983131
d|p(z)
|Rd|)
Corollary π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog log y
Proof In example 1 f equiv 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 and X = y So
Wp(z) =983132
plez
9830611minus 1
p
983062≪ (log z)minus1
and983131
d|p(z)
|Rd| ≪983131
d|p(z)
1 le 2z
So π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ ylog z + 2z ≪ y
log log y if we choose z = log y
2 SIEVE METHODS 23
mdashLecture 7mdash
For the previous corollary take A = x lt n ltle x + y p = all primesz = log y Then y
log log y ≫ S(AP z) = |x lt n le x+ y p|n =rArr p ge log y geπ(x+ y)minus π(x) +O(log y)
22 Selbergrsquos Sieve
Sieve of E-L S(AP z) le XW +O(983123
d|P (z) |Rd|)The problem is that we have to consider 2z many divisors of P (z) so we get 2z
many error terms which forces us to only take z = log y
bull We can do a different sieve and only consider those divisors of P (t) which aresmall say le DThe key part of E-L was 1(nP (z)) = 1 =
983123d|(nP (z)) micro(d)
For an upper bound itrsquos enough to use any function F st
F (n) ge983069
1 n = 10 else
Selbergrsquos observation was that if (λi) is any sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 thenF (n) = (
983123d|n λd)
2 works F (1) = (983123
d|1 λd)2 = λ2
1 = 1
Assumption 0 lt f(p) lt p if p isin P (remember that |Ap| = f(p)p X +Rp)
This lets us define a new multiplicative() function g st
g(p) =
9830611minus f(p)
p
983062minus1
minus 1 =f(p)
pminus f(p)
Theorem (3 Selbergrsquos Sieve)
foralltS(AP z) le X
G(t z)+
983131
d|P (z)dltt2
3ω(d)|Rd|
where G(t z) =983123
d|P (z)dltt g(d)
Recall W =983124
pisinPplez(1minusf(p)p ) so expected size of S(AP z) is XW
Note thas as t rarr infin
G(t z) =983131
d|P (z)
g(d)
=983132
pltz
(1 + g(p))
=983132
pltz
(1minus f(p)
p)minus1
asymp 1
W
2 SIEVE METHODS 24
Corollary (4)forallx y
π(x+ y)minus π(x) ≪ y
log y
Proof As before A = x lt n le x+ y f(p) equiv 1 Rd = O(1) X = yNow apply Selbergrsquos sieve instead Main term
G(z z) =983131
d|P (z)dltz
983132
p|d
(pminus 1)minus1
=983131
d=p1prltz
983132 infin983131
kge1
1
pki
ge983131
dltz
1
d
≫ log z
But on the other hand the second last line also equals
=983131
i
infin983131
kge1p1prltz
1
pk11 pkr
r
=983131
n square free part of n ltz
1
n
(g(p) = 1pminus1 = 1
ϕ(p) so g(d) = 1ϕ(d) ) So our main term is ≪ y
log z
Note that 3ω(d) le τ3(d) ≪ε dε so error term is ≪ε tε983123
dltt2 1 ≪ t2+ε =z2+ε(t = z) So
S(AP z) ≪ y
log z+ z2+ε ≪ y
log y
(choose z = y13)
Proof (of Selbergrsquos Sieve)Let (λi) be a sequence of reals with λ1 = 1 to be chosen later Then
S(AP z) =983131
nisinA
1(nP (z))=1
le983131
nisinA
(983131
d|(nP (z))
λd)2
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe
983131
nisinA
1d|ne|n
=983131
de|P (z)
λdλe|A[de]|
= X983131
de|P (z)
λdλef([d e])
[d e]+
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
2 SIEVE METHODS 25
Wersquoll choose λd st |λd| le 1 and λd = 0 if d ge t Then983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
de|P (z)
λdλeR[de]
983055983055983055983055983055983055le
983131
delttde|P (z)
|R[de]|
le983131
n|P (z)nltt2
|Rn|983131
de
1[de]=n
and since983123
de 1[de]=n = 3ω(n) (think of n = p1pr where d = p1pk ande = pj pr for k ge j so basically for each pi we have 3 choices itrsquos in d in eor in both) (n square-free)
Let V =983123
de|P (z) λdλef([de])[de] Write [d e] = abc where d = ab e = bc and
(a b) = (b c) = (a c) = 1 (this is possible because n is square-free)
mdashLecture 8 missingmdash
mdashLecture 9mdash
Example class today 330-5pm mr14
To finish the proof that π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 we need to show G(z z) ≫ (log z)2
where G(z z) =983123
d|P (z)dltz g(d) and g(2) = 0 and g(p) = 2pminus2
First note that g(p) ge 2pminus1 So if d is odd and square free then g(d) ge 2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(note that the numerator is equal to τ(d) for square-free integers)Now write
G(z z) =983131
dltzd odd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
≫983131
dltzd square free
2ω(d)
ϕ(d)
(the even terms added in are only at most twice of the original sum so it doesnrsquotchange the order) Now the above
=983131
dltzdsquare freed=p1pr
2ω(d)r983132
i=1
(1pi + 1p2i + )
=983131
dltzd=em2e square free
2ω(d)d
ge983131
dltz
2ω(d)
d
by partial summation itrsquos enough to show that983123
dltz 2ω(d) ≫ z log z because
then above ≫ (log z)2 as required (check)
Recall that to show983123
dltz τ(d) ≫ z log z we used that τ = 1 lowast 1 So similarly
we want to write 2ω(n) =983123
d|n micro(d)f(nd) where f is multiplicative
Letrsquos do some calculation for n = 1 we need micro(1)f(1) = 1 so f(1) = 1 For
2 SIEVE METHODS 26
n = p a prime 2 = f(p)minus f(1) = f(p)minus 1 so f(p) = 3For n = p2 a prime 2 = f(p2)minus f(p) so f(p2) = 5
Ok this probably doesnrsquot work Letrsquos try something more general say write itas
983123d|n f(d)g(nd) where f is multiplicative Then
bull n = 1 f(1) = g(1) = 1bull n = p f(p) + g(p) = 2bull n = p2 g(p2) + f(p2) + f(p)g(p) = 2
Say letrsquos try f = τ So g(p) = 0 g(p2) = minus1 g(pk) = 0 forallk ge 3
So therefore
g(n) =
9830690 n not a squaremicro(d) n = d2
and 2ω(n) =983123
d|n τ(d)g(nd)
So (remember983123
blex τ(b) = x log x+ (2γ minus 1)x+O(radicx))
983131
dltz
2ω(d) =983131
altz
g(a)983131
bleza
τ(b)
=983131
altz
g(a)za log(za) + c983131
altz
g(a)za+O(z12983131
altz
1a12)
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
=983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log z minus 2983131
dltz12
micro(d)zd2 log d
983167 983166983165 983168≪z
983123dltz12
log dd2≪z
+O(z)
Note983123
dltz12micro(d)d2 = c+O(
983123dgtz12 1d2) = c+O(1z12) So
983131
dltz
2ω(d) = cz log z +O(z) ≫ z log z
It remains to show that c gt 0 Either(1) Note LHS canrsquot be O(z)(2) calculate the first couple of terms in the series(3) Note that c = 6π2(= 1
ζ(2) ) gt 0
23 Combinatorial Sieve
Selberg is just an upper bound sieve (where we considered
(983131
d|n
λd)2 ge
9830691 n = 10 else
with λi = 1) Now consider some inclusion-exclusion principle
S(AP z) = |A|minus983131
p
|Ap|+983131
pq
|Apq|minus
The idea of combinatorial sieve is to truncate the sieve process
2 SIEVE METHODS 27
Lemma (Buchstab Formula)S(AP z) = |A|minus
983123p|P (z) S(Ap P p)
Proof First notice that |A| = S(AP z) +983123
p|P (z) S(Ap P p) the first term
is the number of n isin A st p|n p isin P =rArr p ge z by definition (denote this setby S1) the summand of second term is the number of n isin A st n = mp andq|n q isin P =rArr q gt p (denote this set by Sp for each p)Now note that every element n isin A is either in S1 or has some prime divisorsfrom P (z) If p is the least such prime divisor then n isin Sp So this is a partitionof A
Similarly we could prove
W (z) = 1minus983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
pW (p)
as W (z) =983124
p|P (z)(1minusf(p)p )
Corollary For any r ge 1
S(AP z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
where l(d) is the least prime divisor of d
Proof Induction on r r = 1 is just Buchstab formula For the inductive stepuse
S(Ad P l(d)) = |Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Adp P p)
and
(minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
(|Ad|minus983131
pisinPpltl(d)
S(Apd P p))
=983131
d|p(z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r+1983131
e|P (z)ω(e)=r+1
S(Ae P l(e))
In particular note that if r is even then
S(AP z) ge983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|
Similarly if r is odd we get a similar bound in the le direction
Theorem (Brunrsquos Pure Sieve)For r ge 6 log 1
W (z) then
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(2minusrX +983131
d|P (z)dlezr
|Rd|)
2 SIEVE METHODS 28
(Compare this to Eratostehenrsquos sieve
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O(983131
d|P (z)
|Rd|)
)
mdashLecture 10mdash
Proof Recall that from the iterating Buchstab Formula we have that for anyr ge 1
S(AP x) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)|Ad|+ (minus1)r983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
S(Ad P l(d))
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)Rd + (minus1)r983131
by trivial bound 0 le S(Ad P l(d)) le |Ad| = X f(d)d +Rd So above
S(AP z) = X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+O(
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|)
By Buchstab again applied to W (z) we have
W (z) =983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
micro(d)f(d)
d+ (minus1)r
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
micro(d)f(d)
dW (l(d))
So
S(AP z) = XW (z) +O
983091
983107983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ltr
|Rd|+983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
|Ad|+X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d
983092
983108
where we just use a crude bound that W (l(d)) lt 1Error term
= X983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d+
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)ler
|Rd|
le983131
d|P (z)dlezprime
|Rd|
because d|P (z) =983124
pisinPpltz P It remains to show that
983131
d|P (z)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d≪ 2minusr
2 SIEVE METHODS 29
Note that
983131
d|P (x)ω(d)=r
f(d)
d=
983131
p1prpisinPpiltz
f(p1)f(pr)
p1prle
(983123
p|P (z)f(p)p )r
r
and we use rprime ge rr
er to then get
le (e983123
p|P (z)f(p)p
r)r (dagger)
Now
983131
p|P (z)
f(p)
ple
983131
p|P (z)
minus log(1minus f(p)
p) = minus logW (z)
So if r ge 2e| logW (z)| then (dagger) is at most
(e| logW (z)|
r)r le 2minusr
and wersquore done (2e lt 6)
Note that we could easily improve this by being more careful at the constantsbut those are less important we just want to have the purest form of the com-binatorial sieve
Recall Selbergrsquos Sieve shows π2(x) ≪ x(log x)2 and now combinatorial sieve gives
both upper and lower bound so we might think it would give a lower bound forπ2(x) However in the twin prime sieve setting recall that W (z) ≍ 1
(log z)2 so
in Brunrsquos sieve we need to take r ≫ 2 log log zIf r = C log log z for C large enough then 2minusrX ≪ X
(log z)100 (safe enough) the
main term is ≫ x(log z)2 |Rd| ≪ 2ω(d) = do(1) so
983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪ 2r+o(1) = z2 log log z + o(1)
For this to be o( x(log z)2 ) we need to choose z asymp exp((log x)14) We seem to
have success but in the end when we try to relate S(AP z) and π2(x) we haveLHS is 1 le n le x p|n(n + 2) then p ≫ ()z = exp((log x)14) (p ≫ x12)but when we try to get a lower bound it is impossible to remove the extra stuffwe have here
Corollary For any z le exp(o(( log xlog log x )
12))
|1 le n le x p|n =rArr p ge z| sim eminusγ x
log z
Remark 1) In particular z = (log x)A is allowed for any A but z = xc forany c gt 0 is not allowed2) In particular we canrsquot count primes like this (z = x12) Recall heuristic frombefore says if this asymptotic were correct for primes then π(x) sim 2eminusr x
log x
(contradicts PNT 2eminusγ = 112)
2 SIEVE METHODS 30
Proof Again use A = 1 le n le x so f(d) = 1 and |Rd| ≪ 1 ThenW (z) =
983124pltz(1minus 1
p ) sim eminusγ log z So
S(AP z) = |1 le n le x p|n =rArr p gt z|
= eminusγ x
log z+ o(
x
log z) +O(2minusrx+
983131
d|P (z)dlt2r
|Rd|)
If r ge 6| logW (z)| so r ge 100 log log z is certainly fine we have in that caes
2minusrx le (log z)minus(log 2)100x = o(x
log z)
and choosing r = lceil100 log log zrceil983131
d|P (z)dle2r
|Rd| ≪983131
dlezr
1 ≪ zr le 2500(log z) log log z
(this course is very forgiving on constants) It remains to note that if log z =
o(( log xlog log x )) =
(log x)(log log x)F (x) then
log z log log z = o(log x
log log xmiddot log log x)
= o(log x)
So 2500(log log z) log z le x110 = o( xlog z ) if x is large enough
mdashLecture 11mdash
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 31
3 The Riemann ζ Function
Lecture notes is again up to date again
Letrsquos start with some gentle introduction
In this chapter and as a tradition in this area write s = σ + it for a complexnumber s (instead of z)
If n isin N ns = elogn by definition which is entire Itrsquos also equal to nσ middot eit logn
The Riemann ζ function is defined for σ gt 1
ζ(s) =
infin983131
n=1
1
ns
31 Dirichlet series
For any arithmetic f N rarr C we have a Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
We have to be careful here because there are certainly choices of f that makeLf (s) not converge anywhere (eg f = n)
Lemma (1)For any f there is an abscissa of convergence σc st(1) σ lt σc =rArr Lf (s) diverges(2) σ gt σc =rArr Lf (s) converges uniformly in some neighbourhood of s Inparticular Lf (s) is holomorphic at s
Proof It is enough to show if Lf (s) converges at s0 and σ gt σ0 then therersquosa neighbourhood of s on which Lf converges uniformly (then we could takeσc = infσ Lf (s) converges) Note that itrsquos entirely possible that σc = infin orσc = 0Let R(u) =
983123ngtu f(n)n
minuss0 By partial summation
983131
MltnleN
f(n)nminuss = R(M)Ms0minuss minusR(N)Ns0minuss + (s0 minus s)
983133 N
M
R(u)us0 minus sminus 1du
If |R(u)| le ε for all u ge M then
983055983055983055983055983055983055
983131
MlenleN
f(n)nminuss
983055983055983055983055983055983055le 2ε+ ε|s0 minus s|
983133 n
M
uσ0minusσminus1du
le (2 +|s0 minus s||σ0 minus σ| )ε
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 32
Note that there is a neighbourhood of s in which |sminusσ0|M|σminusσ0| ≪ 1 So
983123 f(n)n3
converges uniformly here
Lemma (2 see Part IB complex analysis for the general case)
If983123 f(n)
ns =983123 g(n)
ns for all s in some half-plane σ gt σ0 isin R then f(n) = g(n)foralln
Proof Itrsquos enough to consider983123 f(n)
ns equiv 0forallσ gt σ0
Suppose existnf(n) ∕= 0 Let N be the least such f(N) ∕= 0 Since983123
ngeNf(n)nσ = 0
f(N) = minusNσ983131
ngeN
f(n)
nσ
So |f(n)| ≪ nσ and so the series983123
ngtNf(n)
nσ+1+ε is absolutely convergent
So since f(n)nσ rarr 0 as σ rarr infin RHS also rarr 0 So f(N) = 0
Lemma (3)If Lf (s) and Lg(s) are absolutely convergent at s then
Lflowastg(s) =
infin983131
n=1
f lowast g(n)ns
is also absolutely convergent at s and is equal to Lf (s)Lg(s)
Proof
983075 infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983076983075 infin983131
m=1
g(m)
ms
983076=
infin983131
nm=1
f(n)g(m)
(nm)s
=
infin983131
k=1
1
ks
983091
983107983131
nmnm=k
f(n)g(m)
983092
983108
(why is the last one abs convergent)
Lemma (4 Euler product)If f is multiplicative and Lf (s) is absolutely convergent at s then we have avery nice alternative form of the Dirichlet series
Lf (s) =983132
p
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
f(p2)
p2s+
983062
Proof The informal proof is to just multiply out RHS and by fundamentaltheorem of arithmetic we know every term in the product appears exactly oncein LHS But obviously we have to care about the issue of convergence hereLet y be arbitrary consider the truncated product
983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062=
983131
np|n =rArr plty
f(n)
ns
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 33
So use the usual technique in analysis of bounding errors983055983055983055983055983055983132
plty
9830611 +
f(p)
ps+
983062minus
infin983131
n=1
f(n)
ns
983055983055983055983055983055 le983131
np|n =rArr plty
|f(n)|nσ
le983131
nexistp|n(pgey)
|f(n)|nσ
rarr 0
as y rarr infin
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123infin
n=11ns defines a holomorphic function and converges
absolutely for σ gt 1 Note that it definitely canrsquot converge for σ = 1 as weget the harmonic series when s = 1 So in this case we get a function thatabsolutely converges whenever it converges2
Note that ζ prime(s) =983123
1ns )
prime = minus983123 logn
ns Since 1 is completely multiplicative
1 +1
ps+
1
p2s+ = (1minus pminuss)minus1
So
ζ(s) =983132
p
9830611
1minus pminuss
983062
So
1
ζ(s)=
983132
p
(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
n
micro(n)
ns
log ζ(s) = minus983131
p
log(1minus 1
ps)
=983131
p
983131
k
1
kpks
=983131 Λ(n)
log n
1
ns
Finally if we take the derivative wersquoll get
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)= minus
983131 Λ(n)
ns
We have some interesting results from this point for example consider
ζ prime(s)
ζ(s)times ζ(s) = ζ prime(s)
2Never ever use this Dirichlet series when s is not in that half plane ndash else wersquoll discoverthat the sum of all natural numbers is minus 1
12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 34
which corresponds to Λ lowast 1 = log
Similarly we have Mobius inversion if f lowast 1 = g then Lf times ζ = Lg so Lf =1ζ times Lg ie f = micro lowast g
mdashLecture 12mdash
2nd es in online as well as typed solution to the first one
Before we start the lecture I want to properly answer a question last time Lasttime we had
1
ζ(s)=
infin983131
n=1
micro(n)
ns
remember in chapter one we mentioned that PNT is equivalent to proving that983123 micro(n)n = 0 So it might be tempting to use the above and claim that LHS rarr 0
as s rarr 1 therefore RHS rarr 0 The reason that this doesnrsquot work is that itrsquos notobvious that RHS converges at all we only know that if RHS converges thenit converges to 0 But the hard part is to show that RHS does converge
For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983123
n1ns
Lemma For σ gt 1
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
Proof by partial summation
983131
1lenlex
1
ns=
lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
lfloortrfloorts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+ s
983133 x
1
1
tsdtminus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
=lfloorxrfloorxs
+s
sminus 1
983045tminuss+1
983046x1minus s
983133 x
1
tts+1
dt
Limit as x rarr infin
= 0 +s
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
The integral converges absolutely for σ gt 0 so this gives
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+ F (s)
where F (s) is holomorphic in σ gt 0We define
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 35
(for σ gt 0) Note that ζ(s) is meromorphic in σ gt 0 with only a simple poleat s = 1
Corollary For 0 lt σ lt 1
1
σ minus 1lt ζ(σ) lt
σ
σ minus 1
In particular ζ(σ) lt 0 for 0 lt σ lt 1 (in particular not zero)
Proof
ζ(σ) = 1 +1
σ minus 1minus σ
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt
Now
0 lt
983133 infin
1
ttσ+1
dt lt1
σ
so done
Corollary For 0 lt δ le σ le 2 |t| le 1 ζ(s) = 1sminus1 +Oδ(1) uniformly
Proof
ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1= 1minus s
983133 infin
1
tts+1
dt
= O(1) +O
983061983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt
983062
= O(1) +Oδ(1)
Lemma ζ(s) ∕= 0 for σ gt 1
Proof For σ gt 1 ζ(s) =983124
p(1minus 1ps )
minus1 and the infinite product converges and
no factors are zero (so)(lecturer has some careful definition of convergence of infinite product by takinglogarithm and converting it to an infinite sum first then take exponent so theresult canrsquot be zero ndash check)
It then becomes interesting if ζ(s) has any zeroes in σ gt 0 We have a famousconjecture
Conjecture If ζ(s) = 0 and σ gt 0 then σ = 12
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 36
32 Prime Number Theorem
Let α(s) =983123 an
ns Partial summation lets us write α(s) in terms of A(x) =983123nlex an
If σ gt max(0σc)(complex part of σ) then α(s) = s983125infin1
A(t)ts+1 dt (this is called
the Mellin transform)
What about the converse Note that if α(s) = ζprime(s)ζ(s) then an = Λ(n) so A(x) =983123
nlex Λ(n) = ψ(x)
Converse ndash Perranrsquos formula
A(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinα(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt max(0σc)
Note that
ψ(x) =1
2πi
983133 σ+iinfin
σminusiinfinminusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds
for σ gt 1 We could try a contour to the left going past the line σ = 1and weknow therersquos a pole at s = 1 with residue x so by residue theorem (see partIB Complex Method) it gives our main term for PNT (recall PNT is ψ(x) =x + o(x)) but the problem is that there might be other poles which wouldbe especially bad if they are on the line σ = 1 as that cancels our main termThatrsquos why we say PNT is equivalent to no zeros of ζ(s) on σ = 1
Lemma ((Pre)-Perranrsquos Formula)If σ gt 0 y ∕= 1 then
1
2πi
983133 σ+iT
σminusiT
ys
sds =
9830691 y gt 10 y lt 1
+O
983061yσ
T | log y|
983062
mdashLecture 13mdash
Proof Use the contour c (see diagram) for y gt 1Since yss has a single pole at s = 0Z with residue 1 so by the residue theorem1
2πi
983125cyssds = 1
Now we bound983133
P1
ys
sds =
983133 σ
minusinfin
yu+iT
u+ iTdu ≪ 1
T
983133 σ
minusinfinyudu =
yσ
T log y
Similarly983125P2
≪ yσ
T log y sot983125c=
983125 σ+iT
σminusiT+O( yσ
T log y )For y lt 1 use the same argument with the contour being the rectangle goingright There are no poles inside this region so the main term is 0 and the errorterm can be bounded similarly
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 37
Theorem (Perranrsquos formula)Suppose α(s) =
983123 an
ns is absolutely convergent for all σ gt σaIf σ0 gt max(0σa) and x is not an integer then
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O(
2σ0x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an||xminus n| +
xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
|an|nσ0
)
Proof Since σ0 gt 0 we can write
1nltx =1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
(xn)s
sds+O(
(xn)σ0
T | log(xn)| )
Now
983131
nltx
an =1
2πi
983131
n
anns
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
sds+O(
xσ0
T
983131
n
|an|nσ0 | log( xn )|
)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
xs
s
983131
n
anns
ds+O()
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
α(s)xs
sds+O()
For the error term(1) Contribution from n le x
2 or n ge 2x where | log( xn )| ≫ 1 is ≪ xσ0
T
983123n
|an|nσ0
(2) Contribution from x
2 lt n lt 2x we write
| log(xn)| = | log(1 + nminus x
x)|
and | log(1 + δ)| ≍ |δ| uniformly for minus 12 le δ le 1 So
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|nσ0 | log(xn)| ≪
xσ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|xnσ0 |xminus n|
≪ 2σ0
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
|an|x|xminus n|
Wersquoll now prove a strong form of the PNT assuming the following results whichwersquoll prove in the future
(1) existc gt 0 st if σ gt 1 minus clog(|t|+4) and |t| ge 7
8 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 and ζprime
ζ (s) ≪log(|t|+ 4) (the +4 is just to make sure the denominator is not negative)(2) ζ(s) ∕= 0 for 8
9 le σ le 1 and |t| le 78
(3) ζprime
ζ (s) = minus1sminus1 + O(1) for 1 minus c
log(|t|+4) lt σ le 2 and |t| le 78 Letrsquos draw a
picture of what wersquore assuming here (diagram)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 38
Theorem (PNT)There exists c gt 0 st
ψ(x) = x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
In particular ψ(x) sim x
Proof Assume that x = N + 12 for some N (for convenience) By Perranrsquos
formula for any 1 lt σ0 le 2
ψ(x) =983131
nlex
Λ(n)
=1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
minusζ prime
ζ(s)
xs
sds+O(
x
T
983131
x2ltn2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n|983167 983166983165 983168
=R1
+xσ0
T
983131 Λ(n)
nσ0983167 983166983165 983168=R2
)
In the error term
R1 ≪ log xx
T
983131
x2ltnle2x
1
|xminus n|
≪ log xx
T
983131
1lemle4x
1
m
≪ x
T(log x)2
and using point 3)
R2 ≪ xσ0
T
1
|σ0 minus 1|
≪ x
Tlog x
if σ0 = 1 + 1log x
Let c be the contour (see diagram) where we used σ1 = 1minus clog T lt 1 Then
1
2πi
983133
c
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds = x
by residue theorem (1) and (2) (ensuring that there are no other poles)Now we need to bound the error terms
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ log T
983133 σ1
σ0
xu
Tdu
≪ log T
Txσ1(σ1 minus σ0)
≪ x
T
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 39
For the left part
983133 σ1+iT
σ1minusiT
minusζ prime(s)
ζ(s)
xs
sds ≪ (log T )|
983133 σ1plusmni
σ1plusmniT
xu
udu|+ (
983133 σ1+i
σ1minusi
xσ11
|σ1 minus 1| )
≪ xσ1 log T +xσ1
1minus σ1
≪ xσ1(log T )
So
ψ(x) = x+O(x
T(log x)2 + x1minus c
log T (log T ))
= x+O(x
exp(cradiclog x)
)
if we choose T = exp(cradiclog x)
(some insight on why we choose this bound we want xT asymp x1minus c
log T ie log T asymplog xlog T Therefore log T asymp
radiclog x)
mdashLecture 14mdash
33 Zero-free region
Firstly near s = 1 things are easy because of the pole
Theorem If σ gt 1+t2
2 then ζ(s) ∕= 0 (a region enclosed by a parabola openedto the right see diagram) In particular ζ(s) ∕= 0 if 8
9 le σ le 1 |t| le 78
Also ζ(s) = 1sminus1 + O(1) and minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 + O(1) uniformly in 89 le σ le 2
and |t| le 78
Proof Recall that ζ(s) = ssminus1 + s
983125infin1
uus+1 du so
|ζ(s)minus s
sminus 1| le |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du
le |s|σ
so if σ gt |sminus 1| ζ(s) ∕= 0 ie if σ lt 1+t2
2 and in particular 1+(78)2
2 lt 89Also
|ζ(s)minus 1
sminus 1| le 1 + |s|
983133 infin
1
1
uσ+1du = O(1)
So same holds for minus ζprime
ζ
The main reason we could obtain the above is that the pole at 1 is convenientit dominates everything around it so thatrsquos the only thing we care
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 40
For |t| large we need a different idea How do we show that there arenrsquot zeroson σ = 1Suppose there is a zero of order m at 1 + it Then (by expanding it at 1 + it)
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) sim m
δ
So
983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ+itsim minus1
δ
But
|LHS| le983131 Λ(n)
n1+δ= minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)
983131 1
δ
So
983131
p
log p
p1+δeit log p sim minus
983131 log p
p1+δ
So
cos(t log p) asymp minus1
for almost all primes p So pit asymp minus1 for almost every prime so p2it asymp 1 Sothere must be a pole at 1 + 2it contradiction
Letrsquos now forget about number theory and look at some purely complex analyt-ical results
Lemma (Borel-Caratheodery Lemma)Suppose f is holomorphic on |z| le R and f(0) = 0If realf(z) le M for all |z| le R for any r lt R
sup|z|ler
(|f(z)| |f prime(z)|) ≪rR M
Proof Let g(z) = f(z)z(2Mminusf(z)) This is holomorphic in |z| le R (note that 2M minus
f(z) ∕= 0 and the zero at z = 0 is cancelled by our assumption f(z) = 0)If |z| = R then |2M minus f(z)| ge |f(z) and so
|g(z)| le |f(z)|R|f(z)| le
1
R
So for all |z| le rMR by maximum modulus
|g(z)| = |f(z)||z||2M minus f(z)| le
1
R
So
R|f(z)| le r|2M minus f(z)| le 2Mr + r|f(z)|
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 41
so
|f(z)| le 2Mr
Rminus r≪ M
This proves the claim for f For f prime(z) we use Cauchyrsquos formula
f prime(z) =1
πi
983133
|w|=rprime
f(w)
(z minus w)2dw (r lt rprime lt R)
So f prime(z) ≪ M as well
Lemma If f is holomorphic on a domain including |z| le 1 |f(z)| le M in thisdisc and f(0) ∕= 0 If 0 lt r lt R lt 1 then for |z| le r
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+Ork(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk ranges over all zeros of f in |z| le R
Proof Suppose that f(0) = 1 (WLOG) Say first there are no zeros considerh(z) = log f(z) Now realh(z) = log |f(z)| le logM so by Borel-Caratheoderylemma
|hprime(z)| = |fprime
f(z)| ≪ logM
so doneIn general we define an auxiliary function g with no zeros
g(z) = f(z)
K983132
k=1
R2 minus zzk(z minus zk)R
The kth factor has a pole at z = zk and on |z| = R has modulus 1So on |z| le R |g(z)| le M in particular
|g(0)| =K983132
k=1
R
|zk|le M (lowast)
Now let h(z) = log g(z)g(0) which is well-defined now We know realh(z) = log |g(z)|minus
log |g(0)| le logM for |z| le R By B-C lemma
|hprime(z)| =
983055983055983055983055983055f prime
f(z)minus
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zk+
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk
983055983055983055983055983055
So
f prime
f(z) =
K983131
k=1
1
z minus zkminus
K983131
k=1
1
z minusR2zk+O(logM)
and if |z| le r
|z minusR2zk| ge|R2||zk|
minus |z| ge Rminus r ≫ 1
and K ≪ logM (coming from ())
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 42
Corollary If |t| ge 78 and 56 le σ le 2 then
ζ prime
ζ(s) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log |t|)
where the sum of ρ is over all zeros in |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
mdashLecture 15mdash
Example Class today at 330-5pm in MR14
(a diagram drawn for the corollary last time)
Theorem There is c gt 0 st ζ(s) ∕= 0 if σ ge 1minus clog t
Proof Assume ζ(ρ) = 0 ρ = σ+ it Let δ gt 0 be chosen later Use the previouscorollary
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) =
1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)3
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) = real 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+ real
983131
ρprime ∕=ρ
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log t)
=1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t) +
Since realρprime le 1 real 11+δ+itminusρprime gt 0 So
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it) gt
1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
Similarly we know
realζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it) gt O(log t)
Also
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ) =
minus1
δ+O(1)
The next step is basically magic (thatrsquos why it took so many years for thiszero-free region to be proven)
real983061minus3
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus 4
ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + it)minus ζ prime
ζ(1 + δ + 2it)
983062
lt3
δ+O(1)minus 4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
So intuitively if we make σ rarr 1 and δ rarr 0 the above is negative Howeverabove is also equal to a dirichlet series
= real9830753983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+ 4
983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+it+983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ+2it
983076
=983131
n
Λ(n)
n1+δ(3 + 4 cos(t log n) + cos(2t log n))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 43
Note that 3 + 4 cos θ + cos(2θ) = 2(1 + cos θ)2 ge 0 So each term in the abovesum is non-negativeNow we only need to properly choose δ so that the above is really negative (toobtain a contradiction) we need
3
δgt
4
1 + δ minus σ+O(log t)
so choose δ = c log t for large enough c so
4
1 + δ minus σlt
10
8=rArr σ ge 1minus c
log t
The best known to date is σ ge 1minus c(log log t)13
(log t)23 but itrsquos still going to 0 as t rarr infin
Lemma If σ gt 1minus c2 log t and |t| ge 7
8 then
ζ prime
ζ(s)| ≪ log t
Proof Let s1 = 1 + 1log t + it = σ1 + it Here
983055983055983055983055ζ prime
ζ(s1)
983055983055983055983055 ≪infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ1≪ 1
σ1 minus 1≪ log t
We have
ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log t)
therefore if we take real part everywhere then
real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
Now if s = σ + it where σ gt 1minus c2 log t (where c is the same as in the zero-free
region theorem above) then
ζ prime
ζ(s)minus ζ prime
ζ(s1) =
983131
ρ
(1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ) +O(log t)
Note that wersquore implicitly using the zero-free region because otherwise s mightbe one of the ρ so our sum wonrsquot make senseAlso |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1 minus ρ| so
9830559830559830559830551
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
|s1 minus ρ|2 log t ≪ real 1
s1 minus ρ(as real(1
z) =
realz|z|2 )
so983131
ρ
| 1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ| ≪ real
983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ≪ log t
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 44
This concludes our components of proof of PNT
Assuming RH we can show (using the same contour idea but we now have amuch larger zero-free region)
ψ(x) = x+O(x12(log x)2)
This will be an exercise in sheet 3
Using partial summation we can deduce that
π(x) = Li(x) +Oε(x12 + ε)
where Li(x) is the logarithmic integral function
Li(x) =
983133 x
2
1
log tdt
=x
log x+O(
x
(log x)2)
so
π(x) =x
log x+ E(x)
then E(x) ≫ x(log x)2
34 Error terms
In this section wersquoll show that rsquooftenrsquo
|ψ(x)minus x| ≫ x12
Actually we will show that
ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
ie
lim supxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) ge c gt 0
and
lim infxrarrinfin
(ψ(x)minus x
x12) le minusc lt 0
mdashLecture 16mdash
Letrsquos remind you that our goal is to show that ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x12)
For contradiction suppose that ψ(x) minus x le cx12 for all large x So cx12 minusψ(x) + x ge 0 ndash take Mellin transform of this
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 45
Lemma (Landau)Let A(x) be integrable and bounded on any finite interval and A(x) ge 0 for allx ge X Let
σc = infσ
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminusσdx lt infin
Then if
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
A(x)xminussdx
then F is analytic for reals gt σc but not at s = σc
Proof Divide integral into [1 X] and (Xinfin) correspondingly partition of F =F1+F2 F1 is entire (itrsquos a finite integral of an integrable function) If reals gt σcthe integral converges absolutely so F2 is analytic for reals gt σcBy contradiction suppose F2 is analytic at s = σcWrite F2 as a Taylor series around σc + 1
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
ck(sminus σc minus 1)k
where
ck =F
(k)2 (σc + 1)
k=
1
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(minus log x)kxminusσcminus1
This power series has a radius of convergence which must be 1 + δ for someδ gt 0Evaluate the series at δ = σc minus δ
2
F2(s) =
infin983131
k=0
(1minus σc minus s)k
k
983133 infin
x
A(x)(log x)kxminus1minusσcdx
At s = σc minus δ2 we can interchange integral and summation so
F2(σc minusδ
2) =
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminus1minusσc exp((1 + σc minus s) log x)dx
=
983133 infin
x
A(x)xminussdx
so983125infinx
converges at σc minus δ2 contradicting the definition of σc
Theorem (Landau)If σ0 is the supremum of the real parts of ρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then(1) For any σ lt σ0 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ)(2) If there is a zero ρ with σ = σ0 then ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
σ0)
Corollary Assuming therersquos a zero with σ = 12 ψ(x)minus x = Ωplusmn(x
12)
Corollary RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 46
Proof Let c gt 0 be chosen later and suppose that ψ(x)minusx le cxσ for all x ge X(for contradiction) Consider (σ le σ0)
F (s) =
983133 infin
1
(cxσ minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1dx
Recall by partial summation that
ζ prime
ζ(s) = minuss
983133 infin
1
ψ(x)xminussminus1dx
and983133 infin
1
xminussdx =1
sminus 1
both for reals gt 1 So F (s) = csminusσ + ζprime(s)
sζ(s) +1
sminus1 (reals gt 1)
This has a pole at s = σ it doesnrsquot have a pole at s = 1 because the contributionfrom the second and last term cancel each other out and is analytic for reals gt σSo by Landaursquos lemma in fact this integral converges for all s with reals gt σThis proves (1) because if σ lt σ0 then there is a zero of ζ with σ lt realρ le σ0and at ρ F has a singularity (ρ ∕isin R)Suppose there is ρ = σ0 + it0 Repeat the above argument with σ = σ0 butconsider instead
G(s) = F (s) +eiθF (s+ it0) + eminusiθF (sminus it0)
2
where θ isin R is chosen later G(s) is still analytic for reals gt σ and has a poleat s = σ0 From F (s) we have residue c from F (s + it0) we have residue m
ρ
where M is the order of ρ from F (sminus it0) we have residue mρ
So G(s) has a pole at s = σ) with residue
c+eiθm
2ρ+
eminusiθm
2ρ= cminus m
|ρ|where we choose θ st
eiθ
ρ= minus 1
|ρ|Now if we choose c lt m
|ρ| then this residue is negative
So as s rarr σ0 from the right along R G(s) rarr minusinfinBut for reals gt σ0
real(s) =983133 infin
1
(cxσ0 minus ψ(x) + x)xminussminus1
983091
9831099831099831071 +eiθxminusit0
2+
eiθxit0
2983167 983166983165 983168=1+cos(θminust0 log x)ge0
983092
983110983110983108 dx
So
G(s) = G1(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 x1 entire
+ G2(s)983167 983166983165 983168983125 infinx
(ge0)sisinRrealsgtσ0
cannot go to minusinfin ContradictionThis proves ψ(x)minus x = Ω+(x
σ) Ωminus is the same (multiply by minus1)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 47
35 Functional equation
mdashLecture 17mdash
The lecture on next Tuesday and Thursday will be given by Jack Throne instead
Recall that for σ gt 0 ζ(s) = 1 + 1sminus1 minus s
983125infin1
tts+1 dt
Wersquoll try to extend it to other parts of the complex plane
Let f(t) = 12 minus t Then
ζ(s) =1
sminus 1+
1
2+ s
983133 infin
1
f(t)
ts+1dt
But this integral now converges when σ gt minus1 let
F (x) =
983133 x
0
f(t)dt
So we know using integration by part
983133 Y
X
f(t)
ts+1dt =
983063F (t)
ts+1
983064Y
X
+ (s+ 1)
983133 Y
X
F (t)
ts+2dt
And note that F (t) is bounded (consider what f(t) looks like) Therefore983125infin1
f(t)ts+1 dt converges when σ gt minus1
We can now start calculating values of ζ for example
ζ(0) = minus1
2
= 1 + 1 + 1 +
We can surely continue doing integration by part in this way to define ζ forσ gt minus2 σ gt minus3 etc but therersquos a better way
Note that for minus1 lt σ lt 0
s
983133 1
0
f(t)
ts+1=
s
2
983133 1
0
1
ts+1dtminus s
983133 1
0
1
tsdt =
1
2+
1
sminus 1
so for minus1 lt σ lt 0 we actually know
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
f(t)
ts+1dt
as a nice single integral
By Fourier analysis (you can take this for granted if you havenrsquot learnt anythingon that see part IB Methods) as f is periodic f(t) has a Fourier series
f(t) =
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπ
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 48
which converges for all t ∕isin Z So where minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s
983133 infin
0
1
ts+1
infin983131
n=1
sin(2nπt)
nπdt
= s
infin983131
n=1
1
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin(2nπt)
ts+1dt (assume we can swap
983133and
983131for now)
= s
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ
983133 infin
0
sin y
ys+1dy where y = 2nπt
The integral is now independent from n so we can deal with it separatelyHere the series
infin983131
n=1
(2nπ)s
nπ= 2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)
and983133 infin
0
sin(y)
ys+1dy =
1
2i
983061983133 infin
0
eiy
ys+1dy minus
983133 infin
0
eminusiy
ys+1dy
983062
apply substitution u = iy and u = minusiy separately in the two integrals
= minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss)
where
Γ(s) =
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
is the gamma function which converges for σ gt 0Letrsquos study the gamma function for a while use integration by part
Γ(s+ 1) =
983133 infin
0
tseminustdt
=983045minustseminust
983046infin0
+ s
983133 infin
0
tsminus1eminustdt
= sΓ(s)
In particular since Γ(1) =983125infin0
eminustdt = 1 we know Γ(n) = (nminus 1) for n isin Z
So we see that gamma function is a very natural analytic extension to factorial
Also note that Γ(s+ 1) = sΓ(s) allows us to extend Γ(s) to the complex planewith poles at s = 0minus1minus2
For the zeta function this means for minus1 lt σ lt 0
ζ(s) = s2sπsminus1ζ(1minus s)(minus sin(sπ
2)Γ(minuss))
= 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
RHS is defined for all σ lt 0 so we just define ζ(s) by above for σ lt 0 Thisgives an analytic continuation of ζ(s) to C
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 49
Theorem (Functional equation)For all s isin C
ζ(s) = 2sπsminus1 sin(πs
2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
Note that we know therersquos pole at s = 1 How does that fit into this equationWe can try to evaluate ζ(1) by the above formula
ζ(1) = 2times 1times 1times Γ(0)times ζ(0)
but apparently Γ has a pole at 0 so we havenrsquot broken anything
Are there any other poles We have
ζ(s) = (entire) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)983167 983166983165 983168entire for σlt0
So ζ(s) has no pole for σ lt 0 This means that ζ(s) is analytic everywhere inC except for a simple pole at s = 1
We can also try to evaluate things like
ζ(2) = 4times π times 0times Γ(minus1)ζ(minus1)
We know ζ(2) = π2
6 while Γ has a pole at minus1 but that is cancelled by the 0 inRHSWe can try the other way
ζ(minus1) =1
2times 1
π2times 1times Γ(2)ζ(2)
=minus1
2π2times π2
6
= minus 1
12
= 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +
So if you really want to assign a value to this series like a physicists then thisis the value (but donrsquot do it)
What about zeros of ζ
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot sin(πs2)Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
if σ lt 0 ζ(1minus s) ∕= 0 and Γ(1minus s) ∕= 0 So the only possibility is that sin(πs2 )vanishes and we know it does at s = minus2n for n isin N So in σ lt 0 ζ(s) haszeros exactly at minus2minus4minus6
In σ ge 1 ζ(s) has no zeros So we also know by the functional equation that ithas no zeros at σ = 0
So except for the trivial zeros ζ(s) only has zeros in 0 lt σ lt 1
If 0 lt σ lt 1 apply the functional equation
0 = ζ(s) = ( ∕= 0) middot Γ(1minus s)ζ(1minus s)
3 THE RIEMANN ζ FUNCTION 50
But Γ never vanishes in that region So the zeros of ζ are symmetric about thepoint s = 1 But also ζ(s) = macrζ(s) so we get four zeros if σ ∕= 1
2 ie wild zeroshave to come in fours In contrast if therersquos a zero on σ = 1
2 then there areonly one counterpart (reflection against the real axis) So this is probably whyRiemann orignally proposed his hypothesis
Theorem RH is equivalent to ψ(x) = x+O(x12+o(1))
Proof =rArr is just by contour integrationFor lArr σ0 = suprealρ ζ(ρ) = 0 then ψ(x) = x+ Ωplusmn(x
σ)forallσ lt σ0So if RH fails there must be 0 lt σ lt 1 st σ ∕= 1
2 Therefore by our previous
symmetry property σ0 gt 12 So ψ(x) = x + Ωplusmn(x
σprime) where 1
2 lt σprime lt σcontradiction
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 51
4 Primes in arithmetic progressions
mdashLecture 18mdash
As you probably know Thomas Bloom is away for a week so Irsquoll be lecturingthis course for today and Thursday Irsquoll be starting a new chapter today onprimes in arithmetic progressions where in the end wersquoll prove the Dirichlettheorem (every arithmetic progression contains infinitely many primes) whichyou probably already know
41 Dirichlet characters and L-functions
Fix q isin N ADirichlet character of modulus q is a homomorphism χ (ZqZ)lowast rarrClowast We know (ZqZ)lowast is a finite abelian group of order φ(q) so the set of Dirich-let characters modulus q form a finite abelian group of the same order by theobvious definition of multiplication
We can also think of the Dirichlet character χ as defining a function χ Z rarr Cgiven by the formula
χ(a) =
983069χ(a mod q) (a q) = 10 (a q) gt 1
Note this χ is periodic with period q and is also totally multiplicativeIf χ is the trivial homomorphism on (ZqZ)lowast we call it the principal (Dirichlet)character of modulus q usually denoted as χ0
Wersquoll first justify why this function is called a character in fact it is just a onedimensional character of the group (ZqZ)lowast (see part II Representation Theory)
Lemma (1) Let χ be a Dirichlet character of modulus q Then
983131
aisin(ZqZ)lowastχ(a) =
983131
1lealeq
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) χ = χ0
0 χ ∕= χ0
(2) Let a isin (ZqZ)lowast Then983131
χ
χ(a) =
983069φ(q) a equiv 1 (mod q)0 a ∕equiv 1 (mod q)
Proof We treat (2) If a equiv 1 (mod q) then χ(a) = 1 for all χ So983123
χ χ(a) =983123χ 1 = φ(q)
If a ∕equiv 1 (mod q) then there exists ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast such that ψ(a) ∕= 1 Themap χ rarr χψ is a permutation of the set of Dirichlet characters mod q hence
983131
χ
χ(a) =983131
χ
(χψ)(a) = ψ(a)983131
χ
χ(a)
ψ(a) ∕= 1 so we must have983123
χ χ(a) = 0
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 52
Let 1xequiva (mod q) Z rarr C be defined by
1(x) =
9830691 x equiv a (mod q)0 else
where a isin Z (a q) = 1Then the above lemma (2) says4
1xequiva (mod q)(x) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(x)
It follows that
983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1 =983131
plex
1xequiva (mod q)(p)
=1
φ(q)
983131
plex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(p)
Estimating this is closely related to estimating for example
1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)Λ(n) =983131
χ
χ(a)minus1
φ(q)
983131
nlex
χ(n)Λ(n)
So the strategy to prove Dirichletrsquos theorem is to consider the contribution ofeach character χ separately
Wersquoll do this using the Dirichlet L-functions
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
This series converges absolutely in the region σ gt 1 (as χ(n) must be some rootsof unity) and therefore defines an analytic function there
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 then983123
nge1 χ(n)nminuss converges in σ gt 0
Proof Use partial summation with the obvious choice an = χ(n) A(x) =983123nlex χ(n) f(t) = tminuss
983131
nlex
χ(n)nminuss = A(x)xminuss minus983133 x
t=1
A(t)f prime(t)dt
Now lemma says983123
1lenleq χ(n) = 0 as χ ∕= χ0 Hence A(n) is periodic and
|A(x)| le φ(q) for all x So |A(x)xminuss| le φ(q)xminusσ and the integral is absolutelyconvergent
4The summand in RHS is χ(xa) as χ is a homomorphism then compare with the lemmaabove
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 53
Consequence L(sχ) is analytic in the same region σ gt 0 and in particulardoes not have a pole at s = 1Since χ(n) is multiplicative we have an Euler product identity
L(sχ) =983132
p
(1minus χ(p)pminuss)minus1
which is valid in the region σ gt 1Consequence 1 when χ = χ0 L(sχ0) = ζ(s)
983124p|q(1 minus pminuss) Hence L(sχ0)
has a meromorphic continuation to all s isin C and a simple pole at s = 1Consequence 2 In the region σ gt 1 and for any χ we have a formula for thelogarithmic derivative of L(sχ) in the same way as for ζ(s)
This gives an identity
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
mdashLecture 19mdash
Last time we fixed q isin N and introduced the Dirichlet L function for anyDirichlet character χ (ZqZ)lowast rarr Clowast
L(sχ) =983131
nge1
χ(n)nminuss
where we abuse the notation to extend χ to a function N rarr CWe observed that this was absolutely convergent for σ gt 1 We also observedthat when χ ∕= χ0 (the trivial character) L(sχ) is convergent in σ gt 0We also had a formula for the log derivative
logL(sχ) =983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk
hence
Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)=
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)k(minus log p)pminusks
= minus983131
nge1
χ(n)Λ(n)nminuss
which is valid in σ gt 1
Fix a isin N (a q) = 1 We combine this with the identity valid for any naturalnumber n
1nequiva (mod q)(n) =1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1χ(n)
We get
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss = minus 1
φ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
which is valid in σ gt 1
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 54
42 Dirichletrsquos theorem
Theorem Let a isin N (a q) = 1 There are infinitely many primes p st
p equiv a (mod q)
How are we going to prove it We have L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minus pminuss) so as we
saw last time L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 Hence
983131
nge1
1nequiva (mod q)(n)Λ(n)nminuss =
1
φ(q)
1
sminus 1+O(1) +
983131
χ ∕=χ0
χ(a)minus1Lprime(sχ)
L(sχ)
Letrsquos assume that we understand that the last term is bounded Then RHS(and so LHS) is divergent at s = 1 But if there are finitely many primes p equiv a(mod q) LHS would be bounded as s rarr 1 So to show Dirichletrsquos theorem itrsquos
enough to show that forallχ ∕= χ0Lprime(sχ)L(sχ) is bounded or analytic at s = 1 since we
know itrsquos meromorphic
This is equivalent to showing that if χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Theorem If χ ∕= χ0 then L(1χ) ∕= 0
Proof
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp(983131
χ
logL(sχ))
= exp(983131
χ
983131
p
983131
kge1
χ(p)kpminusksk)
= exp(983131
χ
983131
nge1
χ(n)nminussΛ(n)
log n)
= exp
983091
983107983131
nge1
983077nminussΛ(n)
log n
983131
χ
χ(n)
983078983092
983108
We know by a previous lemma that
χ(n) =
9830690 (q n) gt 1 or (q n) = 1 n ∕equiv 1 (mod q)φ(q) n equiv 1 (mod q)
Hence
983132
χ
L(sχ) = exp
983091
983107983131
nge1nequiv1 (mod q)
nminussΛ(n)
log nφ(q)
983092
983108
valid in σ gt 1 The exponent is a non-negative real number for s gt 1 real
So for s isin (1infin)983124
χ L(sχ) isin [1infin)
Note that L(sχ0) has a simple pole at s = 1 If there are at least two dinstinctcharacters ψψprime of modulus q such that L(1ψ) = L(1ψprime) = 0 then
983124χ L(sχ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 55
would be analytic in a neighbourhood of s = 1 and vanish at s = 1 but this isimpossible so therersquos at most one character ψ st L(1ψ) = 0Note for any χ L(1 χ) = L(1χ) So if L(1χ) = 0 then L(1 χ) = 0Hence if L(1χ) = 0 then χ = χ In other words (as |χ must have modulus 1)χ takes values in plusmn1 (we call such characters quadratic as then χ2 = 1)Suppose for contradiction that there exists a non-principal but quadratic char-acter ψ (ZqZ)lowast rarr plusmn1 st L(1ψ) = 0We consider the product L(sψ)ζ(s) This function is analytic in σ gt 0In σ gt 1 we have the expression
L(sψ)ζ(s) = (983131
nge1
ψ(n)nminuss)(983131
nge1
nminuss) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminuss
where r(n) =983123
d|n ψ(d) First of all r is multiplicative also r(n) ge 0 we needto only prove it for prime powers
r(pk) = ψ(1) + ψ(p) + + ψ(pk) =
983099983103
983101
k + 1 ψ(p) = 11 ψ(p) = 0 or ψ(p) = minus1 k is even0 ψ(p) = minus1 k is odd
We also know r(n2) ge 1 by the same argument
We now use Landaursquos lemma
Lemma Let f(s) =983123
nge1 annminuss where an are non-negative real numbers
Suppose given σ0 st f(s) is convergent therefore absolutely convergent inσ gt σ0 Suppose as well that f(s) admits an analytic continuation to the disc|sminus σ0| lt ε Then f(s) is convergent in the region σ gt σ0 minus ε
Let f(s) = L(ψ s)ζ(s) =983123
nge1 r(n)nminuss valid in σ gt 1 Then we can use
Landaursquos lemma together with the fact that f(s) is analytic in σ gt 0 to concludethat f(s) is convergent in σ gt 0But this canrsquot be true
f(12) =983131
nge1
r(n)nminus12 ge983131
nge1
r(n2)n ge983131
nge1
1n = infin
This is impossible So L(1ψ) ∕= 0
43 Zero-free region
mdashLecture 20 missed but lecturer wasnrsquot able to make it anywaymdash
mdashSo still Lecture 20mdash
Example class today at 330pm MR14
Wersquove proved that there are infinitely many primes equiv apmodq where (a q) = 1(Dirichletrsquos theorem) We did this using
minusLprime
L(sχ) =
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)χ(n)
ns
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 56
Wersquod like to prove some sort of PNT for such primes To do this wersquoll usePerranrsquos formula in a similar fashion that we did to ζ function
We need information about the zeros of L(sχ) We saw last week that L(1χ) ∕=0
Similarities to zero-free region for ζ(s) but important difference ζ(s) has apole at s = 1 but L(sχ) has no poles for σ gt 0 if χ ∕= χ0 For zeta we had
ζ(s) = 1 +1
sminus 1minus s
983133 tts+1
dt
so we can show ζ(σ) ∕= 0 when 0 lt ζ lt 1 But this is a problem for L-function
Let τ = |t|+ 4 (basically for us to always be able to write log τ)
Recall the following lemma
Lemma If f(z) is analytic on a region containing |z| le 1 and f(0) ∕= 0 and|f(z)| le M (bounded) for |z| le 1 Then for 0 lt r lt R lt 1 for |z| le r we have
f prime
f(z) =
983131 1
z minus zk+O(log
M
|f(0)| )
where zk is the zeros of f inside the disk |zk| le R
We can use this to get a nice formula for L-function
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and 56 le σ le 2 then
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over ρ all the zeros with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This basically follows from the previous lemma by setting f(z) = L(z +32 + itχ) R = 56 r = 23 Note that
|f(0)| = |L(32 + itχ)|
=983132
p
|1minus χ(p)
p32+it|
ge983132
p
(1minus 1
p32)minus1 ≫ 1
By partial summation if F (t) =983123
1lenlet χ(n) for σ gt 0
L(sχ) = s
983133 infin
1
F (t)
ts+1dt
so
|L(sχ)| ≪ |s|q983133 infin
1
1
tσ+1dt ≪ qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 57
Theorem Let χ be a character There is an absolute constant c gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0
if σ gt 1minus clog(qτ)
It would be very nice if we could prove this but unfortunately we couldnrsquotdo that for general characters We can only prove this for χ a non-quadraticcharacter (χ(n) isin R foralln and χ ∕= χ0)
Proof If χ = χ0 since L(sχ0) = ζ(s)983124
p|q(1minuspminuss) in this region σ gt 0 zeros
of L(sχ0) are the same as ζ(s) so done (in fact we proved a better result forζ)Let ρ = σ + it st L(ρχ) = 0 The idea is to compare (δ rarr 0+)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)
Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)
Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)
Use the same trick as in ζ function consider
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δreal(3 + 4χ(n)nminusit + χ(n)2nminus2it)
and wersquoll again use the fact that forallθ 3+4 cos θ+cos(2θ) ge 0 ie real(3+4eiθ+ei2θ)
By the lemma
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) =
1
δ+O(log q)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) ≪ log(qτ)
(since χ2 ∕= χ0 by assumption that itrsquos not a quadratic character so therersquos nopole at 1) Now we can combine this and get
3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus τ+O(log τ) ge 0
contradiction if we choose δ asymp cprime
log qτ and σ ge 1minus clog qτ
Theorem If χ is a quadratic character existc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
So we have a zero-free region provided that wersquore not on the real line
But we cannot rule out a zero ρ of L(sχ) with ρ isin R close to 1 (this is stillopen) We had a weaker result
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 58
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is an absolute constant c gt 0st L(sχ) has at most one zero ρ isin (0 1) st ρ ge 1minus c
log q
These zeros are called the exceptional zeros if they exist (but hopefully theydonrsquot)
To prove the above two theorems first we need a lemma for L(sχ0)
Lemma If 56 le σ le 2 then
minusLprime
L(sχ0) =
1
sminus 1minus983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
over zeros ρ with |ρminus (32 + it)| le 56
Proof This essentially follows from the same formula for ζ function
minusζ prime
ζ(s) = minus
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log τ) +
1
sminus 1
since(a) for σ gt 0 zeros of ζ are zeros of L(sχ0) (so wersquore summing up the sameset of ρ)(b) by the Euler product
Lprime
L(sχ0) =
χprime
χ(s) +
983131
p|q
log p
ps minus 1≪ ω(q) ≪ log q
There are only 3 minutes left so Irsquoll just quickly sketch a proof and do themproperly next timeFirst theorem for t large same as previous proof (χ2 = χ0 but no pole)For t small 0 lt |t| ≪ 1
log qτ instead of comparing χ0 χ χ2 we compare ρ and
ρSecond theorem we can no longer do either of the above but we allowed onezero so if there are more than one then wersquoll compare two such real zeros (wersquollexplain what we mean by compare exactly on the next lecture)
mdashLecture 21mdash
Now wersquore going to prove properly the two theorems above quadratic characterswe stated before
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character Then there is an absolute constantc gt 0 st
L(sχ) ∕= 0 if σ gt 1minus c
log qτand t ∕= 0
Proof As before let ρ = σ + it be a zero of L(sχ) Let δ gt 0 which wersquore
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 59
going to choose later By above lemma 1 (on page 56)
minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) = minus
983131
ρprime
1
1 + δ + itminus ρprime+O(log qτ)
=rArr minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minus 1
1 + δ + itminus ρ+O(log qτ) = minus 1
1 + δ minus σ+O(log qτ)
and
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
the problem now is that χ0 is the principal character so wersquore in the case oflemma 2 (on page 58) instead First suppose τ ge C(1minus σ)
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2) = minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ0)
le real 1
δ + 2it+O(log qτ)
le δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
As before
real(minus3Lprime
L(1 + δχ0)minus 4
Lprime
L(1 + δ + itλ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δ + 2itχ2)) ge 0
But on the other hand it also
le 3
δminus 4
1 + δ minus σ+
δ
δ2 + 4t2+O(log qτ)
If σ = 1 we get a contradiction as δ rarr 0 (we assumed t ∕= 0) Otherwise if wechoose δ = c(1minus σ) then the above gives
0 le 3
c(1minus σ)minus 4
(c+ 1)(1minus σ)+
cprime
1minus σ+O(log qτ)
We can choose c C hence cprime st the above le minus cprimeprime
1minusσ + O(log qτ) and so σ le1minus cprimeprimeprime
log qτ For small τ we need a different argument In particular wersquore not going to usethis mysterious 3 minus 4 + argument In fact therersquos a simpler argument that
will work since L(ρχ) = 0 also L(ρχ) = 0 (L(sχ) = s983125infin1
9831231lenlet χ(n)
ts+1 dt) Itfollows that
minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ) le minusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρminusreal 1
1 + δ minus ρ+O(log qτ)
(assuming that |t| le c(1minus σ) in particular |t| le cprime for some small constant)RHS is
minus2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 60
As before
minusLprime
L(1 + δχ0) le
1
δ+O(log qτ)
Now
(minusrealLprime
L(1 + δχ0)minusrealLprime
L(1 + δ + itχ))
=
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
n1+δ(1 + real(χ(n)nit
983167 983166983165 983168|z|=1
)) ge 0
so
1
δminus 2(1 + δ minus σ)
(1 + δ minus σ)2 + t2+O(log qτ) ge 0
Now wersquore in good shape if we choose δ = c(1 minus σ) then LHS is le minus cprime
(1minusσ) +
O(log qτ) So σ le 1minus cprimeprime
log qτ
Theorem Let χ be a quadratic character There is c gt 0 st there is at mostone real zero ρ isin (0 1) of L(sχ) st
ρ ge 1minus c
log q
Proof Suppose ρ0 lt ρ1 le 1 are zeros of L(sχ) Then for σ isin (0 1) by thesame argument
minusrealLprime
L(σχ) le minusreal 1
σ minus ρ0minusreal 1
σ minus ρ1+O(log q)
for σ ge 1minus 11000000 say
So
1
σ minus 1minus 2
σ minus ρ0+O(log q) ge (minusrealLprime
L(σχ0)minusrealLprime
L(σχ)) ge 0
Hence ρ0 le 1minus clog q
Now we have the zero-free region for L function with about the same strengthas for ζ function so we can prove an analogue of PNT (which wersquoll do in nextlecture) Wersquoll first introduce a lemma
Lemma If χ ∕= χ0 and σ ge 1minus clog qτ (for some absolute c gt 0 then if either
χ has no exceptional zero or χ has exceptional zero at β but |s minus β| ge 1log q
then
Lprime
L(sχ) ≪ log qτ
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 61
Proof If σ gt 1 note
|Lprime
L(sχ)| le
infin983131
n=1(nq)=1
Λ(n)
nσ≪ 1
σ minus 1
In particular if s = σ+ it and s1 = 1+ 1log qτ + it |L
prime
L (sχ)| ≪ log qτ By lemma1
Lprime
L(sχ) =
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρ+O(log qτ)
for all zeros ρ |sminus ρ| ≍ |s1ρ| So
|Lprime
L(sχ)minus Lprime
L(s1χ)| ≪ |
983131
ρ
1
sminus ρminus 1
s1 minus ρ|+O(log qτ)
≪ real983131
ρ
1
s1 minus ρ+O(log qτ) ≪ log qτ
44 Prime Number Theorem for Arithmetic Progressions
Recall that
983131
1lenlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)983131
1lenlex
Λ(n)χ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Theorem If q le exp(O(radiclog x)) then (1)
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
(2) If χ ∕= χ0 χ has no exceptional zero then ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
(3) If x ∕= x0 and we have an exceptional zero at β then ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β +
O(x exp(minuscradiclog x))
Wersquoll prove this on Saturday
mdashLecture 22mdash
addition to section 43
Theorem If χ1χ2 are distinct quadratic characters modulo q then L(sχ1)L(sχ2)has at most one real zero β 1minus c
log q lt β lt 1 (sometimes called the exceptional
character of q)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 62
Proof Say βi is a real zero of L(sχi) (i = 1 2) WLOG suppose 56 le β1 leβ2 lt 1 (if they are less than 56 then wersquore good anyway Fix δ gt 0 we havethe following(1) minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχi) le minus 11=δminusβi
+O(log q) (i = 1 2)
(2) minusrealLprime
L (1+δχ1χ2) le O(log q) (the product is not principal because χ1 ∕= χ2
(3) minus ζprime
ζ (1+ δ) le 1δ +O(1) (minus ζprime
ζ (s) =1
sminus1 +O(1)) (we could also just stick with
minusrealLprime
L (1 + δχ0))
Therefore consider the following Dirichlet series with non-negative coefficients
minusζ prime
ζ(1 + δ)minus Lprime
L(1 + δχ1)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ2)minus
Lprime
L(1 + δχ1χ2) le
1
δminus 2
1 + δ minus β1+O(log q)
so choose δ = c(1minus β1) and therefore β1 le 1minus clog q
Back to section 44 where we stated a theorem last time
Let ψ(xχ) =983123
nlex Λ(n)χ(n)
Theorem Let q le exp(O(radiclog x)) Then
ψ(xχ0) = x+O(x exp(minusc983155log x))
If χ ∕= χ0 we get a cancellation ψ(xχ) = O(x exp(minuscradiclog x)) unless χ has an
exceptional zeroIf χ has an exceptional zero at β then in fact we get another main term
ψ(xχ) = minusxβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Recall that
1nequiva (mod q) =1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)χ(n)
we get an expression
ψ(x q a) =983131
nlexnequiva (mod q)
Λ(n)
=1
ϕ(q)
983131
χ
χ(a)ψ(xχ)
Corollary If (a q) = 1 then (q le exp(O(radiclog x)))
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x)) (no exceptional zero)
If q has an exceptional zero at β and χ1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)minus χ1(a)
ϕ(q)
xβ
β+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 63
Proof (of theorem)By Perranrsquos formula (σ0 gt 1 T ge 1)
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133 σ0+iT
σ0minusiT
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983107 x
T
983131
x2ltnlt2x
Λ(n)
|xminus n| +xσ0
T
infin983131
n=1
Λ(n)
nσ0
983092
983108
By the same argument as for ζ(s) error term is ≪ x(log x)2
T (σ0 = 1 + 1log x )
Take C to be a rectangular contour with corners at σ0 plusmn iTσ1 plusmn iT we get(integrand omitted)
ψ(xχ) =1
2πi
983133
C
+O(
983133
σ1plusmniT
+
983133 σ1+iT
σ0+iT
+
983133 σ1minusiT
σ0minusiT
+x(log x)2
T)
Error terms we bound in the same way as for ζ(s) so in total
ψ(xχ) = minus 1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds+O
983091
983109983109983107x(log x)2
T+ xσ1
983167 983166983165 983168≪exp(minusc
radiclog x)T=exp(O(
radiclog x))
983092
983110983110983108
and we choose σ1 = 1minus clog qT so xσ1 ≪ x exp(minusc
radiclog x) if q ≪ T asymp exp(O(
radiclog x))
How about the main term If χ = χ0 take σ1 as above so no zeros of L(sχ0)
so Lprime
L has just a simple pole at s = 1 so 12πi
983125C= x
If χ ∕= χ0 therersquos no exceptional zero no zeros of L(sχ) with σ ge σ1 so no
poles of Lprime
L (sχ) so983125C= 0
If χ has an exceptional zero at β then inside C Lprime
L has a pole at β So Lprime
L (sχ)xs
s
has residue xβ
β at this pole so
1
2πi
983133
C
Lprime
L(sχ)
xs
sds =
xβ
β
45 Siegel-Walfisz Theorem
Theorem (1 S-W)forallA gt 0 if q le (log x)A and (a q) = 1 then
ψ(x q a) =x
ϕ(q)+OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Some people might call this the PNT for AP because this has not many if andthen restrictions (comparing to what wersquove proved in the previous section) andit has the right main term and error term
This follows from
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 64
Theorem (2)If q le (log x)A and x is large enough (depending on A) then
ψ(xχ) = OA(exp(minusc983155log x))
forallχ ∕= χ0
This in turn follows from the following theorem
Theorem (3)forallε gt 0 existC(ε) st if χ is a quadratic character modulo q and β is a real zerothen
β lt 1minus cεqminusε
Proof Omitted5
The constant Cε here is ineffective the proof gives no way to calculate Cε butjust the existence of it (unlike most of the other proofs in this course where ifyou really want to calculate the constant you can follow the proof and calculateeach step)
Proof that theorem 3 =rArr theorem 2 if there exists an exceptional zero then
ψ(xχ) = O(xβ
β+ x exp(minusc
983155log x))
= xO(exp(minusCεqε log x) + exp(minusC
983155log x))
since q le (log x)A this is O(expminusC primeε
radiclog x)) choosing ε = 1
3A say
mdashLecture 23mdash
Drop-in session today at 4-5pm Therersquoll be one more drop-in session and onemore example class next term probably in week 1 The final sheet will probablybe online today The lecture notes will probably be updated by the end of theweek
Recall that wersquove stated the Siegel-Walfisz theorem last lecture and nearlyproved it Wersquoll first state a corollary
Corollary
π(x q a) = primes p le x p equiv a (mod q)
=li(x)
ϕ(q)+O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
where li(x) =983125 x
21
log tdt if (a q) = 1 and if q le (log x)A (unconditionally) or if
q le exp(O(radiclog x)) (if q has no exceptional zero)
(we could achieve q le x12minuso(1) assuming GRH ndash ie the zeros of Dirichlet Lfunction also has real parts 12)
5Itrsquos originally intended to be included but it uses no tool that wersquove not seen and youcan just sit down and read it if you want
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 65
Proof Let F (x) =983123
plexpequiva (mod q) log p = ψ(x q a) +O(x12) and so
π(x q a) =983131
plexpequiva (mod q)
1
=F (x)
log x+
983133 x
2
F (t)
t(log t)2dt
=1
ϕ(q)(
x
log x+
983133 x
2
1
(log t)2dt) +O(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
Note that this is a trick that wersquove used many times in the course altering theweight in a weighted sum by doing partial summation
The final things I want to talk about in this course are two applications ofSiegel-Walfisz theorem(1) For fixed (a q) = 1 how large is the smallest prime equiv a (mod q) We callthis prime paq
Corollary forallε gt 0 paq ≪ε exp(qε)
Proof Let x lt paq Then ψ(x q a) = 0 (therersquore no primes at all for counting)So somehow the error term has to cancel out the main term So if q le (log x)Athen
x
ϕ(q)= OA(x exp(minusc
983155log x))
so
exp(c983155log x) = OA(q)
so log x le (log q)2 + OA(1) But this contradicts our previous assumption thatq le (log x)A ie for any A if q is large enough q le (log paq)
A
Similarly
Corollary If q has no exceptional zero then paq le qO(log q) Proof is the same
We have a reasonable conjecture
Conjecture
paq le q1+o(1)
If we assume GRH we can prove paq le q2+o(1) So even GRH doesnrsquot get uswhat we think is true
Theorem (Linnik)There exists a constant L st paq ≪ qLThe point that this is an unconditional result it doesnrsquot matter if RH fails orif q has any exceptional zeros
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 66
Theorem (Walfisz)For any n write r(n) as the number of ways as n as a prime and a square-freenumber Then r(n) sim cnli(n) where
cn = (983132
p|n
(1 +1
p2 minus pminus 1))(
983132
p
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)))
The first product obviously depends on n The second product evaluates toaround 03739Letrsquos finish off by just proving this
Proof Note that the indication function of being square-free
1minusfree(m) =983131
d2|m
micro(d)
which is easily checked since both sides are multiplicative so itrsquos enough tocheck for prime powers So
r(n) =983131
pltn
1minusfree(nminus p)
=983131
pltn
983131
d2|(nminusp)
micro(d)
=983131
dltradicn
micro(d)983131
pltnp=n (mod d2)
1
But this is exactly a prime counting sum So use what wersquove proved before theabove is equal to
983131
dltradicn
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n)
Now there are several casesif (n d) gt 1 then π(n minus 1 d2 n) = O(1) So in total this contributes O(n12)to r(n)
if (n d) = 1 and d le (log n)A π(nminus1 d2 n) = li(n)ϕ(d2) +O(n exp(minusc
radiclog n)) So
983131
dlt(logn)A
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) = li(n)983131
dlt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
ϕ(d2)+O(n exp(minusc
983155log n))
Now note that ϕ(d2) = dϕ(d) So
983131
(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)=
983132
p∤n
(1minus 1
p(pminus 1)) = cn
Since
983131
dgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)
dϕ(d)le
983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d32
≪ 1
(log n)A2= o(1)
4 PRIMES IN ARITHMETIC PROGRESSIONS 67
as n rarr infinFor d gt (log n)A use π(x q a) ≪ 1 + x
q because there are at most that manyintegers there So
983131
n12gtdgt(logn)A(dn)=1
micro(d)π(nminus 1 d2 n) ≪983131
(logn)Altdltn12
(1 +n
d2)
≪ n12 + n983131
dgt(logn)A
1
d2≪ n
(log n)A
That is
r(n) = cnli(n) +O(n12 +li(n)
(log n)A2+
n
(log n)A+ n exp(minusc
983155log n))
= (1 + o(1))cnli(n)
because li(n) = (1 + o(1) nlogn )
Thatrsquos the end of the official course On Thursday wersquoll still have anotherlecture where wersquoll introduce some aspect of analytic number theory that wedidnrsquot talk about
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 68
5 Example Class 1
Wersquoll go through questions 235146 (in that order)
51 Question 2
(a)
983131
nlex
ω(n) =983131
nlex
983131
p|n
1
=983131
plex
983131
p|nlex
1
=983131
plex
lfloorxprfloor
= x log log x+O(x)
using983123
plex1p = log log x + O(1) and [x] = x + O(1) and number of p le x is
O(x)
Try to avoid writing things likeO(1)983123
plex 1 Sample replacement of it983123
plex O(1) =O(
983123plex 1)
(b) In general whenever you seem a sum like this the first instinct should be toexpand it So we have
983131
nlex
|ω(n)minus log log x|2 ≪ x log log x
=983131
nlex
ω(n)2 minus 2 log log x983131
nlex
ω(n) + lfloorxrfloor(log log x)2
So itrsquos enough to show that
983131
nlex
ω(n)2 le x(log log x)2 +O(x log log x)
We write LHS as
983131
pqlex
983131
nlex
1p|n1q|n =983131
p=q
lfloorxprfloor+983131
p ∕=q
lfloor x
pqrfloor
=983131
pq
lfloor x
pqrfloor+O(x log log x)
le x983131
pq
1
pq+O()
le x(983131
p
1
p)2 +O()
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 69
(c) Itrsquos enough to show that983123
nlex | log log xminus log log n|2 ≪ x log log x by notingthat the sum is actually a metric We could certainly expand it but itrsquos morework than what we need The reason we are expanding above is because wehave a mixture of something arithmetic and something analytic so we canrsquot doanything to it without expanding the square
Note that if x12 le n le x then | log log x minus log log n| = O(1) So the originalsum
=983131
nlex12
983167 983166983165 983168O(x12(log log x)2
+983131
x12lenlex983167 983166983165 983168O(x)
Now let r(x) be the number of n le x st |ω(n) minus log log n| gt (log log x)34Then r(x)(log log x)32 ≪ x log log x so r(x) ≪ x
(log log x)12= o(x) ()
For rsquoalmost allrsquo n τ(n) ge 2ω(n) and le 2Ω(n) where Ω(n) counts all primedivisors rather than just the distinct ones
52 Question 3
(a) Following lecture we want something like
983131
nlex
1
n= γ + log xminus x
x+
983133 infin
x
ttdt
= 1minus x+
log xminus983133 x
1
tt2
dt
= γ + log xminus xx
+1
2x+O(
1
x2)
So itrsquos enough to show that983055983055983055983055983133 infin
x
tt2
dtminus983133 infin
x
12
t2dt
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
x2
Note that for t isin [n n+ 1)9830559830559830559830551
t2minus 1
n2
983055983055983055983055 ≪1
n3
So983133 n+1
n
tt2
dt =1
n2
983133 n+1
n
tdt+O(1
n3)
=1
2n2+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
1
t2dt+O(
1
n3)
=1
2
983133 n+1
n
(1
t2+O(1t3))dt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 70
So983133 infin
x
tt2
dt =1
2
983133 infin
x
1
t2dt+O(
1
x2)
(b) (1) Using part (a) we get
∆(x) = x12 minus 2983131
alex12
xa+O(1)
(2)983133 x
0
∆(t)dt ≪ x
We get 23x
32 from the first term after integration so we want the second termto have a main tern that cancels this out
53 Question 5
(a)
γ = minus983133 infin
0
eminust log tdt
= limNrarrinfin
(
N983131
n=1
1
nminus logN)
We write
1
n=
983133
I
fn(t)dt =
983133 1
0
tnminus1dt
Now
N983131
n=1
1
n=
983133 1
0
(1 + t+ + tNminus1)dt
=
983133 1
0
1minus tN
1minus tdt
=
983133 N
1
1minus (1minus vN )N
vdv
So
γ = limnrarrinfin
(minus983133 N
1
(1minus vN)N
vdv)
= minus983133 infin
1
eminusv
vdv +
983133 1
0
1minus eminust
tdt
=
983133 infin
1
eminust log tdt+
983133 1
0
eminust log tdt
5 EXAMPLE CLASS 1 71
(c) forallδ gt 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ minus c+ γ = δ
983133 infin
2
E(t)
t1+δdtminus δ
983133 2
1
log log t+ c
t1+δdt
as δ rarr 0
983131
p
1
p1+δ+ log δ rarr cminus γ
We have E(t) ≪ 1log t and δ
983125infin2
1(log t)t1+δ dt ≪ δ12
(e) Note that this will show
983132
plex
(1minus 1p) sim eγ log x
Let
F (δ) =983131
p
(log(1minus 1
p1+δ) +
1
p1+δ)
converges uniformly So F (0) = limδrarr0 F (δ)Now
983131
p
log(1minus 1
p1+δ= log ζ(1 + δ) rarr minus log δ
as δ rarr 0 (we havenrsquot done zeta function but letrsquos use it anyway) (log ζ(1+ δ)+log δ) rarr 0 as δ rarr 0)
54 Question 1
We want to use induction and hyperbola method as wellNote that τn = 1 lowast τnminus1 Write
983131
nlex
τk(n) =983131
ablex
τkminus1(b)
=983131
alex1k
983131
blexa
τkminus1(b) +983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b)lfloorxbrfloor minus (983131
blex1minus1k
τkminus1(b))lfloorx1krfloor
=
Unfortunately we have no time for more but feel free to ask now or later
typed solution is online)