Analysis of Successes, Failures, and Characteristics of an Established Campus Sustainability...

24

Transcript of Analysis of Successes, Failures, and Characteristics of an Established Campus Sustainability...

Bike Share

Green Apple Move Out

Two Birds, One Stone

Community Agriculture Club

Igoe Renewable Energy Project

NYU Green Lease

NATIONAL COMPARISON: GRANTS FUNDED

SIUC

Penn

NYU

Prince

ton

UCB-TGIF MIT

GMC

UCIrvine

UCB-CACSW

WC

UHManoa

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

26

18 18

15

11

7 6 64 4

1

26

18

53

3033

20

30

6

3134

1

Numberof GrantsFunded

Average Number of Grants Funded Per Year

Total Grants Funded

Num

ber o

f Gra

nts

NATIONAL COMPARISON: INTEREST

NYU SIUC

UCB-TGIF

Penn

UCIrvine

GMC

UHManoa

WW

C0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

5447

33

2114

7 5 5

163

47

100

2114

35

5

43

Quantity of Proposals Submitted

Average Number of Proposals Submitted YearlyTotal Number of Proposals Submitted

Prop

osal

s Sub

mitt

ed

WW

CGMC

NYU SIUC

UCB-TGIF

UHManoa

UCIrvine

Penn

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.00%

3.50%

4.00%

4.50%

5.00%

4.30% 4.27%

0.26% 0.21% 0.17% 0.10% 0.05% 0.05%

Percent of Elgible Campus Members who Submitted Applications

Num

ber o

f Pro

posa

ls S

ubm

itted

/ E

lgib

ale

Popu

latio

n Po

ol

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GRANT BUDGET SIZE

$0-$1,500 $1,501-$5,000 $5,001-$999 $10,000+0

5

10

15

20

25

Green Grants by Original Budget

OverallLast Cycle

Original Budget of Grant

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: RECIPIENT TYPE

Undergrad-uate

Staff Faculty Graduate0

5

10

15

20

25

Grant Recipients by Project Leader Type

OverallLast Cycle

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GRANT TYPE

Operations

Enga

gemen

t

Operations &

Enga

gemen

t

Researc

h

Researc

h & En

gage

ment

Operations, R

esearc

h & En

gage

ment

02468

1012141618

Green Grants by Project Type

OverallLast Cycle

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: COMPLETION RATE

Completed

Completed, awaiti

ng docu

mentation

Defunct

In Progre

ss0

5

10

15

20

25

Completion Rate

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: REASONS FOR FAILURE

Top three reasons projects become defunct:1)Personnel leave NYU2)Project leader abandoned

project3)Project leader decided to pursue

project outside of Green Grant Support

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: PI TYPE VS. SUCCESS

Undergraduates Graduate Students Faculty Staff0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Completed Project Leader Type by Success Rate

SuccessfulIncompleteDefunct

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

Successful: 73% 71% 71% 50% Defunct: 27% 29% 29% 50%

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: GROUP TYPE VS. SUCCESS

Collaboration Solo0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Completed Project Group Type by Success Rate

SuccessfulIncompleteDefunct

Num

ber

of P

roje

cts

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: BUDGET SIZE VS. SUCCESS

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: BUDGET SIZE VS. SUCCESS

NYU GREEN GRANTS: EXTENSIONS

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: STAFFING

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Green Grants Assistant Position: Contribu-tion to Completion Rate

DefunctCurrent Anticipated Completion RateAnticipated Completion Rate before Position

Proj

ect C

ompl

etion

Rat

e

INTERNAL ANALYSIS: STAFFINGGreen Grants Assistant: Ratio of Time Spent on Major Tasks

Payments34%

Planning &Execution

28%

Outreach &Communications

21%

Institutionalization17%

NYU GREEN GRANTS: MOVING FORWARD

NYU GREEN GRANTS

Thank you!

[email protected]

NATIONAL COMPARISON: SELECTIVITY

UHManoaNYU

UCB-TGIF

UCIrvine

SIUC

WW

CGMC

Penn0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Percentage of Proposals Funded

FundedRejected

Perc

enta

ge o

f Sub

mitt

ed P

ropo

sals

WW

CNYU

Prince

tonNAU

UCB-TGIFSIU

CMIT

UHManoaPenn

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%100%

40% 40%

33%28%

20%17% 16%

11%

Percent of Selection Committee Members who are Experts

Perc

ent o

f mem

bers

who

ar e

xper

ts